jordan peterson critical thinking writing

• The Big Think Interview
• Your Brain on Money
• Explore the Library
• The Universe. A History.
• The Progress Issue
• A Brief History Of Quantum Mechanics
• 6 Flaws In Our Understanding Of The Universe
• Michio Kaku
• Neil deGrasse Tyson
• Michelle Thaller
• Steven Pinker
• Ray Kurzweil
• Cornel West
• Helen Fisher
• Smart Skills
• High Culture
• The Present
• Hard Science
• Special Issues
• Starts With A Bang
• Everyday Philosophy
• The Learning Curve
• The Long Game
• Perception Box
• Strange Maps
• Free Newsletters
• Memberships

Jordan Peterson’s 10-step process for stronger writing

Clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson poses during a photo shoot in Sydney, New South Wales. (Photo by Hollie Adams / Newspix / Getty Images)

• The best way to improve your thinking is to learn how to write, says Jordan Peterson.
• His 10-step process for writing an essay is time consuming, but the benefits are worth it.
• From the granular to the macro, every facet of writing a solid essay is covered in his template.

Becoming a better writer is a means for becoming a better thinker, says Canadian professor Jordan Peterson . Arranging your thoughts on a page in a coherent fashion organizes your thinking process so you can better understand it, which translates into efficiently communicating your ideas to others. Just as Marie Kondo inspires fans to declutter their homes in order to transform their emotional and mental life, Jordan Peterson’s 10-step essay writing template is a way of empowering you to achieve mental clarity.

1. Introduction

The introductory step qualifies the importance of essay writing. Peterson summarizes:

“The primary reason to write an essay is so that the writer can formulate and organize an informed, coherent and sophisticated set of ideas about something important.”

Actions based on thinking through consequences are more productive and less painful than those based on ignorance. Peterson believes in no better means for living an effective life than writing, which forces you to confront inconsistencies, paradoxes, and novel ideas. By rejecting substandard notions uncovered by your essays, you can choose to take action on those that matter most. Organizing your thoughts verbally, he concludes, allows you to think abstractly, granting access to higher-order cognitive processes.

2. Levels of Resolution

First, select a word; then craft a sentence; finally, sequence sentences inside of a paragraph. Peterson suggests that each paragraph consist of at least 10 sentences or 100 words. Over time such numbers are arbitrary. In literature, José Saramago’s sentences run thousands of words while Philip Roth’s later novels include numerous single-sentence paragraphs. Learn form before mastering it, Peterson writes. Strict adherence to structure is helpful.

“Rules are there for a reason. You are only allowed to break them if you are a master. If you’re not a master, don’t confuse your ignorance with creativity or style. Writing that follows the rules is easier for readers, because they know roughly what to expect. So rules are conventions.”

The final two levels of resolution are arranging the paragraphs in a logical progression (with each paragraph presenting a single idea) and understanding the essay as a whole. Creative people sometimes miss the mark by failing to organize their thoughts in a clear manner. Successful essays generally achieve these five levels, from the granular to the macro. Brevity and beauty can be achieved using this guideline, reminiscent of V.S. Naipaul’s rules for writing .

www.youtube.com

Jordan Peterson on how to improve your writing

3. the topic and the reading list.

Choosing a topic occurs in one of two ways: you’re assigned it (remember, this guide is for Peterson’s students) or you can list 10 topics that you’re interested in exploring and choose one. The next step is to pick your reading list for researching the topic. Peterson suggests five to 10 books per thousand words of essay. He eschews highlighting books; instead, take notes. There is evidence that writing down (and not typing) information is the best way to remember information.

4. The Outline

Peterson calls this step “the most difficult part of writing an essay.” Also, “it’s not optional.” This step is why I love the word-processing program Scrivener — my outline lives on the left side as I work on longer articles and books. Any outline could shift and transform as you research and write the essay, so being able to constantly reference the skeleton you create is the surest path to success.

5. Paragraphs

One of the hardest pieces of advice to convey to new writers is to just write . Writer’s block doesn’t exist when you’re disciplined. Malcolm Gladwell discusses this point on Tim Ferriss’s podcast. Gladwell spent a decade in the Washington Post newsroom; reporters don’t have the luxury of writer’s block. The first draft is effectively thinking on the page. Success occurs during the editing process, which is why Peterson recommends not worrying about the quality of your work during the paragraph process. Just get the words onto the page. Peterson continues,

“Production (the first major step) and editing (the second) are different functions, and should be treated that way. This is because each interferes with the other. The purpose of production is to produce. The function of editing is to reduce and arrange.”

6. Editing and Arranging of Sentences Within Paragraphs

Once the first draft is complete, Peterson forces you to confront yourself by asking that you rewrite every sentence in a different manner. Then compare the two drafts by reading them aloud. Hearing yourself speak your own words not only causes you to listen to the music of your words, it also helps you understand what is being communicated to the reader. This step also helps you eliminate redundancies and master conciseness.

Jordan Peterson on the Power of Writing

7. re-ordering the paragraphs.

By this stage you’re examining the fluidity of the content in service of the essay as a whole. Just as you examined each individual sentence, now you look at their service to the meaning of each paragraph. From there, you investigate how the jigsaw pieces fit together to construct the puzzle.

8. Generating a New Outline

Many writers believe they’re done once the second draft is tight. Peterson disagrees. After you’ve read through the latter draft, he recommends writing yet another outline. Importantly, do not look back at the essay while doing so. This Jedi mind trick on yourself has utility; you’re making yourself remember what’s most important about the argument you’ve constructed. This will help you eliminate repetitive or unnecessary arguments as well as strengthen the most pertinent points.

“If you force yourself to reconstruct your argument from memory, you will likely improve it. Generally, when you remember something, you simplify it, while retaining most of what is important. Thus, your memory can serve as a filter, removing what is useless and preserving and organizing what is vital. What you are doing now is distilling what you have written to its essence.”

After a few days, if you “really want to take it to the next level,” return to your latest draft to investigate every sentence, every paragraph, and the outline. The space of days will separate what you think you wrote from what you actually wrote. In a more toned-down version of this, I write a draft of every article, edit it at least twice, yet never publish until the next morning. That way I have allowed a night of sleep to pass before blasting it into cyberspace. My favorite time to do this is between 5–7 a.m., after the cats are fed and the caffeine is circulating.

10. References and Bibliography

Peterson saves citations for last. Of course, you’ve been saving your sources as you collect information — another great feature in Scrivener. Citing sources also offers one last opportunity to read the quality of the work and ensure that you’ve properly captured the information you’ve collected. With that, your essay is complete.

Stay in touch with Derek on Twitter and Facebook .

Jordan B. Peterson “If You Can Think and Speak and Write, You Are Absolutely Deadly.”

In this episode, Jordan Peterson highlights the importance of critical thinking, effective public speaking skills, and eloquent writing, for these are necessary skills for a thriving career and continuous opportunities.

Jordan shares his valuable insight that nowadays, battles are won with the precision of words and sharpness of wit. According to Jordan, if you can think, speak, and write well, nothing and no one can get in your way.

Knowledge is power. However, knowledge isn’t power unless applied. It’s not enough that you know something. It’s how you effectively apply and use what you learned that makes a huge difference in your life, career, and building your network. Expand your mind, sharpen your wit, and study yourself. Remember, you are your greatest investment.

Source: Jordan Peterson – The Best Way To Learn Critical Thinking

Enjoy today’s quote. Leave a comment below and let us know what you think!

This is a great post

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Privacy Overview

We’re fighting to restore access to 500,000+ books in court this week. Join us!

Send me an email reminder

By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone.

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

10 Step Guide To Clearer Thinking Through Essay Writing - Jordan B. Peterson

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

6 Favorites

DOWNLOAD OPTIONS

In collections.

Uploaded by Unknown on June 26, 2022

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

• Sign in / Join
• Portuguese (Brazil)
• Portuguese (Portugal)

Jordan Peterson's Advice for practicing and developing better critical-thinking habits

Talk pro and con.

Join LibraryThing to post.

This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.

1 proximity1 Edited: May 11, 2018, 3:27 am

"Rules are there for a reason. You are only allowed to break them if you are a master. If you’re not a master, don’t confuse your ignorance with creativity or style. Writing that follows the rules is easier for readers, because they know roughly what to expect. So rules are conventions. Like all conventions, they are sometimes sub-optimal. But not very often. So, to begin with, use the conventions. For example, aim to make your paragraphs about 10 sentences or 100 words long."

"The fifth level of resolution is the essay, as a whole. Every element of an essay can be correct, each word, sentence, and paragraph – even the paragraph order – and the essay can still fail, because it is just not interesting or important. It is very hard for competent but uninspired writers to understand this kind of failure, because a critic cannot merely point it out. There is no answer to their question, “exactly where did I make a mistake?” Such an essay is just not good. An essay without originality or creativity might fall into this category. Sometimes a creative person, who is not technically proficient as a writer, can make the opposite mistake: their word choice is poor, their sentences badly constructed and poorly organized within their paragraphs, their paragraphs in no intelligible relationship to one another – and yet the essay as a whole can succeed, because there are valuable thoughts trapped within it, wishing desperately to find expression."

2 JGL53 Edited: May 10, 2018, 9:16 pm

3 proximity1 edited: may 12, 2018, 3:14 am, 4 jgl53 edited: may 11, 2018, 12:17 pm.

Group: Pro and Con

449 members

174,845 messages

This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.

Touchstones

No touchstones

Sign Up Today

Hire highly skilled candidates and increase your company's worth absolutely free!

Without Login

What you'll get.

• Free job posting
• Expedite Hiring Process
• Unlimited postings
• Recruit top talent
• Interview Scheduler
• Application Integration
• Candidate Screening
• Questionnaires
• Compare Candidates
• Drop Resume
• Career Advice

Top Categories

• Sub Category:
• Jordan Peterson
• critical thinking

original source: https://youtu.be/nsZ8XqHPjI4?t=2h17m35s Psychology Professor Dr. Jordan B. Peterson says that the best way to teach people critical thinking is to teach them to write. Dr. Peterson's new book is available for pre-order: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: http://amzn.to/2yvJf9L If you want to support Dr. Peterson, here is his Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jordanbpeterson Check out Jordan Peterson's Self Authoring Program, a powerful tool to sort yourself out: http://bit.ly/selfAuth (Official affiliate link for Bite-sized Philosophy)

You Might Be Interested In

Related Videos

Get the Reddit app

Welcome to the discourse! This forum is dedicated to the work associated with Dr. Jordan Peterson: a public intellectual, clinical psychologist, and professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Toronto.

If you want to practice critical thinking by writing, this might be helpful.

https://writingtherapy.io/ is an online journal platform with an emphasis on the therapeutic benefits of journaling. Inspired by Dr. J ordan Peterson and Dr. James Pennebaker. Check https://writingtherapy.io/videos as well for Dr. James Pennebaker's work.

By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .

Enter the 6-digit code from your authenticator app

You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.

Enter a 6-digit backup code

Create your username and password.

Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.

Reset your password

Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password

Check your inbox

An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account

Choose a Reddit account to continue

Jordan Peterson on Writing: 26 Quick Points [Explained!]:

I summarize my quick answer about Jordan Peterson on writing. 

Writing opens up critical thinking. Active towards better arguments. The writing process improves with practice. It gives a new door to think. 

The internal conversation is another form of thinking. You divide yourself into various parts and discuss with arguments. Write about your thoughts. Writing is a way of thinking. The great literature is truthful. 

Find a reason to write with proper sentence orientation. Dive for your worse problem. Walk readers through your process. You can argue with complexity. Self-authorizing Program assists you to think better. 

Table of Contents

Jordan Peterson views about his work:

Jordan never says he’s right. He shares his take on the literature. It’s an informed observer approach. 

It’s a model way to show a single way. That’s not crucial to exact like Jordan Peterson. Understanding his work is enough.

Teach people to write:

 It is hard to teach people to write. It’s intensive. 

Writing is thinking: 

Jordan wants students to tell Why they should write something. It’s not about grades. It directs towards thinking. 

Thinking makes you effective in the world. You can win battles better. It’s the most powerful weapon you require. Read about  Slavoj Zizek Ideology .

Writing makes effective:

You can’t argue with them. They divide things into pieces. Lay down your arguments better. You get money, opportunity and influence. 

Articulate is a weapon:

Articulating yourself is the most dangerous thing. You learn using weapons. People are in the educational system to make them weaker. 

It makes competition down. 

Be an articulate creature. Dedicate work to articulate and clear maximum. It’s practical. It’s your way to move upward. 

Formulate thinking:

Jordan answers the advice question of a university student. Learn to write. It formalizes thinking. 

The best way towards critical thinking is to make them write.

Find writing agenda:

You require a problem for writing. Specifying the topic is a difficult thing. Diagnosis of the problem is a crucial step. Truthful writing requires Problems that you face. 

Write about things you find crucial. Discover your belief in the truth. It builds foundations. 

Boil your arguments:

Pick the arguments. Boil them out. 

Turn the chapter into a few Arguments. Then write the chapter again with more arguments. Sometimes, easies have intuitive ideas but poor writing. 

Write through your thinking contest:

Jordan doesn’t suggest taking notes in lectures. You can’t listen to lectures same time. Take notes afterwards to remember. 

Read the book and never highlight things. Close the book. 

Write about your thoughts about the book. 

You join things that already exist in your mind. Relate and remind things. Reform the sentence to remind it.

Words selection straight:

Pick the right world. Go straight to the point. Try to choose the words perfectly. 

Get your words together. It’s the core of humanity. 

Jordan Peterson shares his experience about writing his first book, Maps of meaning. He writes 50times every sentence for it. 

Jordan competes for words for best. Horn your words. Effective writers require all authority. 

Successful People articulates:

The highest successful people are good at articulating things. They strategize, negotiate and entice people vision forward. 

Jordan Peterson’s knowledge pattern:

Jordan Peterson finds a single Problem in his every lecture. He goes deep as far as possible. Jordan gathers knowledge in an idea’s manner. He explores solutions, not giving preconstructed ones. 

Jordan builds rhythm with his knowledge. 

Memory palace:

Jordan Peterson uses the memory palace technique. 

He builds theory at first. He applies his knowledge to Theory. 

His theory grows over time. He forgets a lot he read. 

Genre complexity associated with movies:

The less complex genre appears like real life. More complex genres abstract out from fundamental lessons. 

When you read a novel, words trigger your imagination. You build representations. 

Representation impacts your behaviour. 

Movies have a short time. Movies can’t put long ideas into action. 

Ideas propagate with evolution.

It can apply multiple dimensions. It generates more problems. 

You require a mega-solution. 

Writing is serious:

Take writing seriously. Write focused and aim manner. 

Collect your thinking through focus. 

Jordan Makes sentences workable as he can’t better anymore. He writes and leaves work for weeks. He thinks out of his current situational thinking. 

“Maps of meaning” Writing:

Jordan Peterson wrote for 3hours every day for 15Years about Maps of meaning. He treats his book writing as the highest priority. Jordan Peterson separates himself from others. 

He thinks about his worse Problem deep and resolves it. 

Jordan Peterson worse problem through writing:

Jordan Peterson thinks worse problem for Maps of meaning book. 

It’s a relationship between individual and cruel totalitarian.

It’s a worse thing people do under worse circumstances. He finds associate reasoning. 

The right technology to write:

Jordan suggests using 2 Screens at a time. A comfortable chair, keyboard and mouse is enough. Develop a workplace. 

The writing habits grow over time. 

Do High-Quality essay writing:

Students offer their professors what they want. Students choose specific languages for professors. Fewer professors punish to produce high quality easy for an agreement based. Jordan doesn’t appreciate it. 

Develop True voice:

Students are in university find their true voice. Deviating yourself from it makes you corrupt. Formulating your arguments give you a permanent part of a character. It becomes your view to see the world. That guides your action. 

Information free sources:

A lot of 20th-century books are free completely. The copyrights expire. A lot of great information is available on youtube. Jordan Peterson has a plan to start humanity university online. 

Self-authoring program benefits:

Jordan Peterson already has a self-authoring program. It assists people to write about themselves. 

People can write an autobiography and analyse personal faults. They develop a plan. 

Jordan’s self-authoring program helps young men to perform better. You’re Experimenting with technology to help people write. 

Great literature reveals:

Great literature doesn’t provide a good side of humanity. It’s relieving. Being alive means being in trouble. 

The walkthrough writing process:

You should have a question to write a book. It’s one you don’t know the answer to. You study and write to fight against problems. 

You walk the reader through your thinking process. He can track at least your work. 

Some people start thinking about malevolence in existence. They start revenging against Existence. It becomes revenge against God for the crime of being. You move towards emotion’s bottom. 

Jordan Peterson’s book choice:

Genesis has individual-based stories. The book shares flaws and difficulties of life. 

It shares horrible experiences and brutal truths. Jordan Peterson prefers Dostoyevsky over Leo Tolstoy. 

Dostoyevsky delves into people’s souls. Dostoyevsky shares individual experiences. 

Jordan Peterson on the argument:

The argument is to resolve the problem. It’s not about winning. 

You may be wrong. It should matter to you. Jordan Peterson on Reading and Writing boosts your argument ability. Your ideas evolution happens.

The opponent may tell you the reason. 

Jordan suggests checking your thinking map. Jordan Peterson becomes clear about his knowledge due to encountering conflicting situations. 

You don’t want to discuss a contagious issue. Teach people to divide arguments and formulate a response. 

Argumentive space:

Argument practising enhances people’s argumentive space conceptualization. 

These problems do not go away. Those are complex solutions. 

Accept complex issues:

There is a lot of already discussion on a complex topic. You develop a biases-based approach at first. Realize the localization of your viewpoint. 

Most people arguments are shallow. Those are perceptional biases. 

Educated know the entire range of opinions. 

References:

• Peterson about writing:
• Jordan Peterson writing podcast episode:
• Jordan Peterson writing announcements:
• Peterson about stronger Writing:
• Peterson’s easy writing guide:
• Jordan Peterson’s university profile:

Shamaz abraham

Related posts, best entrepreneur books for beginners: 9 recommendations, what do real estate insurance lawyers do, what do car insurance lawyers do, leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jordan Peterson’s Free Speech Battle

Friends Read Free

Since 2016, when Jordan Peterson criticized amendments to Canada’s Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code to include “gender identity and expression” as prohibited grounds for discrimination, he has been in the public eye. He argued that mandating the use preferred pronouns was a form of compelled speech and identity politics run amok.

Peterson’s latest ordeal of having to undergo mandatory training by his regulatory college in order to keep his psychologist’s licence after the country’s highest court refused to hear his appeal, marking another pivotal moment for the free-speech advocate, has once again brought him into the national spotlight.

The college seized upon complaints from individuals around the world—none of whom were Peterson’s patients—to demand that he undergo remedial training on how to conduct himself on social media.

This case transcends Peterson and sets a precedent for all professionals subject to regulatory bodies.

Professionals now face the reality that they must self-censor to avoid punitive actions by their professional overseers. Peterson’s case could impact all Canadian professionals, not just psychologists, by forcing them into ideological compliance or facing professional ruin. It demands serious reflection from all professionals. If you are regulated by a body that determines your livelihood, you have no choice but to recognize the danger and speak out against these encroachments on free speech before it’s too late—for you and for the country.

Peterson revealed that many professionals have reached out to him, emphasizing the importance of this case. But this issue goes beyond just regulatory bodies.

Our key institutions need to be free of ideology. Yet we have witnessed them becoming oriented in the same direction as the prevailing philosophical changes incubated at universities. Justices increasingly rely on law clerks—top law graduates—for research in writing their decisions. These clerks are frequently recommended by professors, some of whom were once court clerks themselves. This close-knit relationship with law schools makes the court system vulnerable to being swayed by the latest academic trends.

Moreover, the courts have increasingly been amenable to the idea that “experts” should be allowed to do their jobs with limited interference. Bureaucratic decisions become sacrosanct because the courts are reluctant to second-guess the “experts.” If charter rights are violated by these decisions, this can be excused if bureaucrats consider “charter values,” a judge-made doctrine requiring decision-makers to consider the “essence” of the charter when making decisions. In Peterson’s case, it is not his freedom of expression that is at stake as much as the “charter values” of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

But the deference to bureaucrats leaves Canadians—including Peterson—without true freedom of expression regarding which ideologies predominate in society.

We are all at a loss in this new reality. There are too few “Petersons” with the means and courage to fight this societal Goliath. We lose the benefit of professional discourse on issues that matter.

We need the free speech of professionals so that we may benefit from their collective wisdom.

Peterson has thrown down the gauntlet. He is not willing to back down. He will go through the mandatory re-education process but has no intention of giving the regulatory college an easy ride, and will be keeping up his challenge.

This is a battle for the very soul of free speech in Canada. It is time to build resilience for what lies ahead.

Pro-Life Group’s Case Raises Critical Questions About the Limits of Free Speech in the Digital Age

Online Harms Act Would Kill Dialogue and Free Speech, Not Encourage It

Politicization of Supreme Court of Canada Started Long Before ‘Woman’ Dustup

The Day the Rule of Law in Canada Failed, and the Day It Almost Did