Understanding an Integrative Review vs Systematic Review
Where to start
Literature Reviews / Systematic Reviews
How to choose the right systematic literature review?
Expository Essay: Different types of review articles
COMMENTS
Rapid reviews: the pros and cons of an accelerated review process
A rapid review is a 'a form of knowledge synthesis that accelerates the process of conducting a traditional systematic review through streamlining or omitting various methods to produce evidence for stakeholders in a resource-efficient manner'. 12 There is not a single-validated methodology in conducting rapid reviews. 13 Therefore, variation in methodological quality of rapid reviews can ...
What are 'rapid reviews' and why do we need them?
A rapid review is a form of knowledge synthesis that accelerates the process of conducting a traditional systematic review through streamlining or omitting specific methods to produce evidence for stakeholders in a resource-efficient manner. The timeframe of the review depends on resource availability, the quantity and quality of the literature ...
Rapid Reviews: the easier and speedier way to evaluate papers, but with
It can be difficult to access all the literature if it is restricted or in a different language, exposing it to publication bias. The review should include details of these concessions and challenges to give context to any of the claims made. The writing process. The process of performing a rapid review is laid out below: THE LITERATURE SEARCH
Systematic, scoping, and rapid reviews: An overview
The Right Review tool might help guide your choice of an evidence synthesis method. You can get a sense of the wide array of review types on our Literature Reviews for Graduate Students guide. Below, you'll find a brief comparison of three common types of evidence synthesis: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and rapid reviews.
The Difference Between a Rapid Review vs Systematic Review
A rapid review is the synthesis of evidence designed to provide more timely data for speedy decision-making. Compared to a systematic review, a rapid review takes a much shorter time to complete. Although the approaches used in rapid reviews vary greatly, they usually take less than five weeks. With rapid reviews, there are short deadlines ...
Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance
This article provides updated guidance on methods for conducting rapid reviews of effectiveness, targeted at Cochrane and other stakeholders interested in the methodology of rapid reviews. The guidance, developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group, builds upon previous interim guidance, and incorporates changes based on an evaluation of its application, a scope of the literature on ...
Rapid Review
A typology of literature reviews. "A rapid review is a form of knowledge synthesis that accelerates the process of conducting a traditional systematic review through streamlining or omitting specific methods to produce evidence for stakeholders in a resource-efficient manner." (Garritty et. al, 2020)
Full article: Rapid literature review: definition and methodology
The grey literature was identified using Google Scholar with keywords including 'targeted review methodology' OR 'focused review methodology' OR 'rapid review methodology'. Only publications in English were included, and the date of publication was restricted to year 2016 onward in order to identify the most up-to-date literature.
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance
1.1. Context for rapid reviews. In health care, systematic reviews (SRs) are highly valued evidence syntheses that inform decisions. However, the methodological rigor and process that makes SR evidence trustworthy often take one to 2 years to complete [, , , ] and limit their utility to meet the time-sensitive needs of stakeholders.For example, given the onset of coronavirus, decision makers ...
A scoping review of rapid review methods
Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews.
Common Review Types
Definition: Rapid reviews are a form of evidence synthesis that may provide more timely information for decision making compared with standard systematic reviews. When to use: When you want to evaluate new or emerging research topics using some systematic review methods at a faster pace. Limitations: It is not as rigorous or as thorough as a systematic review and therefore may be more likely ...
Rapid literature review: definition and methodology
Abstract. Introduction: A rapid literature review (RLR) is an alternative to systematic literature review (SLR) that can speed up the analysis of newly published data. The objective was to identify and summarize available information regarding different approaches to defining RLR and the methodology applied to the conduct of such reviews.
PDF How to do a rapid scoping review
Scoping reviews are a type or evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept or issues, often irrespective of source (ie. primary research, reviews, non-empirical evidence) within or across particular contexts. Munn et al 2022.
Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews
Tricco and colleagues [] conducted an international survey of rapid review producers, using a modified Delphi ranking to solicit opinions about the feasibility, timeliness, comprehensiveness, and risk of bias of six different rapid review approaches.Ranked best in terms of both risk of bias and feasibility was "approach 1," which included published literature only, based on a search of one ...
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search
This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and ...
Introduction to Rapid Reviews
Introduction to Rapid Reviews. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of rapid reviews increased and became a popular method of conducting a rigorous literature review, using systematic review methodology in a shorter time frame. This type of review helps synthesize the available evidence in a narrative descriptive format and can be done at a ...
What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research
This fact has not been acknowledged in previous syntheses of the rapid review literature. It is also possible for rapid reviews to achieve high AMSTAR scores if conducted and reported well. Therefore, it can be easily argued that a high quality rapid review is likely to provide an answer closer to the 'truth' than a systematic review of low ...
Types of reviews
There are various approaches for simplifying the review components, such as by reducing the number of databases, assigning a single reviewer in each step while another reviewer verifies the results, excluding or limiting the use of grey literature, or by narrowing the scope of the review. In general, a rapid review takes about four months or less.
Systematic Review Service: What Type of Review is Right for You?
Rapid reviews aim to be rigorous in their methodology but set limits on the process in order to shorten the timeframe of review completion (Grant & Booth, 2009). Several stages of the review process may be limited, including the scope of the question, the comprehensiveness of the search strategy, or the quality appraisal.
A scoping review of rapid review methods
Background Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews. We aimed to examine articles, books, and reports that evaluated ...
Reviews: From Systematic to Narrative: Review By Type
The literature review examines published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. Review articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. ... Rapid Review. Scoping review. Systematic Search ...
What are the different types of review?
Literature, or narrative, reviews provide an overview of what is known about a particular topic. They evaluate the material, rather than simply restating it, but the methods used to do this are not usually prespecified and they are not described in detail in the review. The search might be comprehensive but it does not aim to be exhaustive.
Rapid Review vs. Systematic Review: What are the differences?
Rapid reviews are considered more susceptible to bias compared to systematic reviews, although the extent of bias is unknown. Despite gaining interest from decision makers and program managers, rapid reviews receive criticism, especially from stakeholders in academia. This type of review is often viewed as a "quick and dirty" method, and ...
A Systematic Literature Review to Examine the Role of Additive
PRISMA framework (Agnusdei et al., 2022) is used to perform a systematic literature review (SLR). The SLRs follow concise approach to identify the scattering and synthesize apprehension on a specific concern [3, 5].The relevant articles were collected from the Scopus database using a set of keywords as 'additive manufacturing' and 'sustainable development' or 'circular economy' or ...
A rapid realist review of literature examining Co‐production in mental
This rapid realist review develops a theory about how and why co-production methods in youth mental health services work, for whom and in which circumstances. Methods. Relevant evidence was synthesised to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) that can inform policy and practice.
Cost-effectiveness and health economics for ureteral and kidney stone
A systematic review of the literature was performed, retrieving 83 English-written full-text studies for inclusion. Papers were labelled according to the respective area of interest: 'costs of different procedures: SWL, URS, PCNL', 'costs of endourological devices and new technologies: reusable and disposable scopes, lasers, other devices ...
Southwest Rapid Rewards® Plus Credit Card Review: High ...
The Rapid Rewards Plus card is a solid choice for frequent Southwest flyers who want to earn Rapid Rewards points without paying high fees. With a $69 annual fee, it offers a generous sign-up bonus of 50,000 points after spending $1,000 in the first three months.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
A rapid review is a 'a form of knowledge synthesis that accelerates the process of conducting a traditional systematic review through streamlining or omitting various methods to produce evidence for stakeholders in a resource-efficient manner'. 12 There is not a single-validated methodology in conducting rapid reviews. 13 Therefore, variation in methodological quality of rapid reviews can ...
A rapid review is a form of knowledge synthesis that accelerates the process of conducting a traditional systematic review through streamlining or omitting specific methods to produce evidence for stakeholders in a resource-efficient manner. The timeframe of the review depends on resource availability, the quantity and quality of the literature ...
It can be difficult to access all the literature if it is restricted or in a different language, exposing it to publication bias. The review should include details of these concessions and challenges to give context to any of the claims made. The writing process. The process of performing a rapid review is laid out below: THE LITERATURE SEARCH
The Right Review tool might help guide your choice of an evidence synthesis method. You can get a sense of the wide array of review types on our Literature Reviews for Graduate Students guide. Below, you'll find a brief comparison of three common types of evidence synthesis: systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and rapid reviews.
A rapid review is the synthesis of evidence designed to provide more timely data for speedy decision-making. Compared to a systematic review, a rapid review takes a much shorter time to complete. Although the approaches used in rapid reviews vary greatly, they usually take less than five weeks. With rapid reviews, there are short deadlines ...
This article provides updated guidance on methods for conducting rapid reviews of effectiveness, targeted at Cochrane and other stakeholders interested in the methodology of rapid reviews. The guidance, developed by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group, builds upon previous interim guidance, and incorporates changes based on an evaluation of its application, a scope of the literature on ...
A typology of literature reviews. "A rapid review is a form of knowledge synthesis that accelerates the process of conducting a traditional systematic review through streamlining or omitting specific methods to produce evidence for stakeholders in a resource-efficient manner." (Garritty et. al, 2020)
The grey literature was identified using Google Scholar with keywords including 'targeted review methodology' OR 'focused review methodology' OR 'rapid review methodology'. Only publications in English were included, and the date of publication was restricted to year 2016 onward in order to identify the most up-to-date literature.
1.1. Context for rapid reviews. In health care, systematic reviews (SRs) are highly valued evidence syntheses that inform decisions. However, the methodological rigor and process that makes SR evidence trustworthy often take one to 2 years to complete [, , , ] and limit their utility to meet the time-sensitive needs of stakeholders.For example, given the onset of coronavirus, decision makers ...
Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews.
Definition: Rapid reviews are a form of evidence synthesis that may provide more timely information for decision making compared with standard systematic reviews. When to use: When you want to evaluate new or emerging research topics using some systematic review methods at a faster pace. Limitations: It is not as rigorous or as thorough as a systematic review and therefore may be more likely ...
Abstract. Introduction: A rapid literature review (RLR) is an alternative to systematic literature review (SLR) that can speed up the analysis of newly published data. The objective was to identify and summarize available information regarding different approaches to defining RLR and the methodology applied to the conduct of such reviews.
Scoping reviews are a type or evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept or issues, often irrespective of source (ie. primary research, reviews, non-empirical evidence) within or across particular contexts. Munn et al 2022.
Tricco and colleagues [] conducted an international survey of rapid review producers, using a modified Delphi ranking to solicit opinions about the feasibility, timeliness, comprehensiveness, and risk of bias of six different rapid review approaches.Ranked best in terms of both risk of bias and feasibility was "approach 1," which included published literature only, based on a search of one ...
This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and ...
Introduction to Rapid Reviews. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of rapid reviews increased and became a popular method of conducting a rigorous literature review, using systematic review methodology in a shorter time frame. This type of review helps synthesize the available evidence in a narrative descriptive format and can be done at a ...
This fact has not been acknowledged in previous syntheses of the rapid review literature. It is also possible for rapid reviews to achieve high AMSTAR scores if conducted and reported well. Therefore, it can be easily argued that a high quality rapid review is likely to provide an answer closer to the 'truth' than a systematic review of low ...
There are various approaches for simplifying the review components, such as by reducing the number of databases, assigning a single reviewer in each step while another reviewer verifies the results, excluding or limiting the use of grey literature, or by narrowing the scope of the review. In general, a rapid review takes about four months or less.
Rapid reviews aim to be rigorous in their methodology but set limits on the process in order to shorten the timeframe of review completion (Grant & Booth, 2009). Several stages of the review process may be limited, including the scope of the question, the comprehensiveness of the search strategy, or the quality appraisal.
Background Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews. We aimed to examine articles, books, and reports that evaluated ...
The literature review examines published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. Review articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. ... Rapid Review. Scoping review. Systematic Search ...
Literature, or narrative, reviews provide an overview of what is known about a particular topic. They evaluate the material, rather than simply restating it, but the methods used to do this are not usually prespecified and they are not described in detail in the review. The search might be comprehensive but it does not aim to be exhaustive.
Rapid reviews are considered more susceptible to bias compared to systematic reviews, although the extent of bias is unknown. Despite gaining interest from decision makers and program managers, rapid reviews receive criticism, especially from stakeholders in academia. This type of review is often viewed as a "quick and dirty" method, and ...
PRISMA framework (Agnusdei et al., 2022) is used to perform a systematic literature review (SLR). The SLRs follow concise approach to identify the scattering and synthesize apprehension on a specific concern [3, 5].The relevant articles were collected from the Scopus database using a set of keywords as 'additive manufacturing' and 'sustainable development' or 'circular economy' or ...
This rapid realist review develops a theory about how and why co-production methods in youth mental health services work, for whom and in which circumstances. Methods. Relevant evidence was synthesised to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) that can inform policy and practice.
A systematic review of the literature was performed, retrieving 83 English-written full-text studies for inclusion. Papers were labelled according to the respective area of interest: 'costs of different procedures: SWL, URS, PCNL', 'costs of endourological devices and new technologies: reusable and disposable scopes, lasers, other devices ...
The Rapid Rewards Plus card is a solid choice for frequent Southwest flyers who want to earn Rapid Rewards points without paying high fees. With a $69 annual fee, it offers a generous sign-up bonus of 50,000 points after spending $1,000 in the first three months.