scientific research projects

Biodiversity
Cities & society
Land & water
All research news
All research topics
Learning experiences
Programs & partnerships
All school news
All school news topics
In the media
For journalists

Meet students who spent their summer pursuing sustainability research

Through programs offered by the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, undergraduate students from Stanford and institutions across the U.S. worked on projects that tackled pressing environmental challenges and advanced fundamental knowledge about our planet. Here’s an inside look at their experiences.

A large group of students smiling outside a Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability building

This year, more than 70 undergraduate students engaged in summer research to develop new skills and deepen their understanding of Earth, climate, and society. Through five programs part of the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability , undergraduates explored sustainability-related issues in disciplines ranging from energy and civil engineering to oceans and social sciences.

The five programs include Mentoring Undergraduates in Interdisciplinary Research (MUIR), organized by the Woods Institute for the Environment ; Summer Undergraduate Program on Energy Research (SUPER), organized by the Precourt Institute for Energy ; Sustainability, Engineering and Science - Undergraduate Research (SESUR); Hopkins Internships - Summer Undergraduate Research Funds (HI-SURF); and Sustainability Undergraduate Research in Geoscience and Engineering Program (SURGE).

The SURGE program is funded by the National Science Foundation and welcomes students from other U.S. institutions, especially those from underrepresented backgrounds doing research for the first time. The other programs receive funding from the Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education (VPUE).

Across all the programs, undergraduates contributed directly to research projects under the guidance of Stanford scholars. They also participated in shared group activities such as research seminars and graduate school workshops.

The large cohort allowed participants to learn from each other in addition to a variety of mentors. Building this community of support, in contrast with the sometimes isolating nature of individual research, was one of the main goals of bringing the five programs together last year.

Whether pursuing a scientific interest, trying out new tools, or discerning a potential career path, students used this summer to grow both academically and personally. Many hope to expand on the work they started, while others are moving forward with newfound clarity on their discipline. As they wrapped up their projects, three undergraduates shared insights about their research, personal growth, and how they made the most of the experience.

Evelyn Pung, ’27, SESUR participant

For Evelyn Pung, the motivation to research the link between environmental quality and human health was a personal one.

She grew up 10 minutes away from the ocean in Long Beach, California, but she rarely took trips to the beach. “The pollution at our beaches had gotten so bad, my parents didn’t want me to go, out of health concerns,” she said.

This summer through the SESUR program, Pung got involved in a project in the lab of civil and environmental engineering Professor Nick Ouellette . With her mentor, PhD student Sophie Bodek , she studied the movement of tiny plastic particles in bodies of water. Understanding how these pollutants travel through water in different environments can inform efforts to limit their spread.

Pung said that the freedom to actively control the experiment, combined with supportive mentorship from Bodek, made the research especially fulfilling.

“This whole experience has been a gratifying learning opportunity,” she said.

Trent La Sage, ’25, SURGE participant

Trent La Sage, an undergraduate student at the University of Florida, conducted research that brings together physics, Earth science, and materials science.

His project tackled a common problem in materials science: Insights about certain materials are not easily accessible to researchers. While findings about materials at ambient conditions can be uploaded to a public database for other scientists to reference, no such platform exists for materials at extreme conditions.

To address this, La Sage and other scholars worked on a program that uses computer vision and large language models like Chat GPT to pull data from published research papers, which can then be applied to work on future computational models.

The opportunity to collaborate on a large team was a highlight for La Sage, who appreciated the variety of viewpoints. He brought his own distinct perspectives to the group – both in discipline, as the only physics and astrophysics major, and in experience, having started his undergraduate education after several years in the workforce.

“It was very helpful to have people from other backgrounds. And we’ve been able to get a lot of things done that I wouldn’t have been able to get done myself,” he said.

Juan Martín Cevallos López, ’26, HI-SURF participant

After recurring moments of awe and discovery in his oceans-related classes at Stanford, Juan Martín Cevallos López, who prefers to be referenced by his first and middle name, discovered a passion for ocean science. He knew he wanted to get involved in research at the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability’s Hopkins Marine Station in Pacific Grove and applied to the HI-SURF program.

Juan Martín contributed to three different projects – studying the impacts of ocean acidification on a particular species of seaweed, the development of bat star larvae in various temperatures, and the role of crustose coralline, a key component of coral reefs, in temperate environments such as Monterey Bay.

Throughout his research, Juan Martín was thrilled to be able to combine his knowledge of oceanography with other scholars’ expertise in marine biology and ecology, and he is eager to continue studying the ocean.

“I’m excited to see where it takes me, because it can literally take you anywhere,” he said.

Explore More

Researchers discover a surprising way to jump-start battery performance

Charging lithium-ion batteries at high currents just before they leave the factory is 30 times faster and increases battery lifespans by 50%, according to a study at the SLAC-Stanford Battery Center.

Energy storage

Sustainability Accelerator welcomes first cohort of entrepreneurial fellows

The Sustainability Accelerator’s new postdoctoral fellowship program kicks off fall quarter with four entrepreneurial fellows who will pursue individual research on greenhouse gas removal.

Bringing environmental law to life

PhD student Eeshan Chaturvedi is driven to create meaningful change worldwide. He’s advancing sustainability through both his legal research and global leadership.

Graduate students

Current Projects

Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering Building

The Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering Building project is managed by the Department of Campus Planning & Facilities Management at Case Western Reserve University. Learn more about the project below.

Construction manager: Nicholas Christie
Project start: November 2023
Projected completion: Fall 2026
Total project cost: $300 million

Scope of Project

Per Case Western Reserve University’s 2019 Strategic Plan, the university seeks to achieve $600 million in annual research funding over the next decade. A new, five-story, 189,000-square-foot research building is proposed on the current site of Yost Hall, consistent with the 2015 Campus Master Plan. The building will include wet labs, dry labs—including shared core lab and technology platforms.

View the Live Webcam

Exterior Quad Elevation

Exterior Quad Oblique

Exterior MLK Elevation

Exterior Gateway

Interior Winter Garden Toward MLK

Interior Cafe Toward Stair

Interior Living Room Oblique

Yost Hall Demolition FAQs

What is happening at Yost Hall?

As previously detailed in the daily, Yost Hall will become a construction site on Wednesday, Nov. 1. In the ensuing months, crews will complete the work necessary to remove the structure so that construction on the university’s new Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building (ISEB) can begin.

How will this work affect people in Yost Hall?

All of those who worked in Yost—including in the Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics—have been relocated.

How will this work affect university parking along Martin Luther King Jr. Drive?

Lot 1B is now closed and will not re-open; that area is part of the ISEB project. All of those who used to park in the lot have been notified and offered alternative options. Some individuals who now park in Lot 1A may have to relocate temporarily to the Veale Garage; those individuals will be notified as soon as additional information becomes available.

How will this project affect pedestrians in that area of the Case Quad?

Campus Planning and Facilities Management (CPFM) will collaborate with the project contractor to provide adequate signage indicating where individuals can and cannot walk.

Will people still be able to access Tomlinson Hall—in particular the ground floor dining options?

Yes, Tomlinson offices and food services will continue to operate during the project.

Will the work affect labs in Wickenden Hall?

The CPFM team is working with lab managers in Wickenden to provide alternative access options for deliveries.

Will any trees be removed during this project?

Some trees will need to be removed to make space for the new building, a process that will begin in early November. The university is committed to planting a new tree on campus for each tree that is taken down.

When will the actual demolition of Yost Hall begin?

Demolition is scheduled to commence in late March/early April of 2024. In the meantime, contractors will be preparing the building and site for the removal of the building.

When will further updates be available?

Updates will be provided in the daily and on the CPFM website.

Ohio State nav bar

The Ohio State University

BuckeyeLink
Find People
Search Ohio State
Becoming a Principal Investigator
Find Funding
Research Administration Tools
Student Involvement
Knowledge Enterprise Resources
Research Commons
Report Emergency or Animal Concerns
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
Animal Care and Use Policies and Guidelines
Animal Study Team Requirements
Per Diem Rates and Fees
Lab Animal Handling and Technique Training
Laboratory Animal Medicine Training
Animal Facilities and Access
Animal Transfer
Animal Ordering or Imports
Surgery and Technical Services
Quality Assurance Assessment Program
Accreditation
Recombinant DNA, Biohazard and Animal Incident Reporting
Human Gene Transfer
Institutional Biosafety Committee
IBC Registration Process
Biosafety Study Team Requirements
Biosafety Protocols and Amendments
Biosafety Policies and Guidelines
Report Human Subjects Concerns
Institutional Review Board
IRB Member Rosters and Meeting Dates
IRB Submission Types
Human Research Study Team Requirements
Human Subject Research Policies and Guidance
IRB Time to Approval
Informed Consent, Assent and Parental Permission
HIPAA and Human Subjects Research
Exempt Research
Event Reporting
Collaborative and Multi-Site Research
Research vs. Quality Assurance/Improvement
Quality Improvement Program
Information for Research Participants
Community-Engaged Research
Clinical Trials Registration
Information for IRB Members
Responsible Conduct of Research
Disclosure Process
Tips for Disclosing
What Not to Disclose
Common Disclosure Scenarios
Policies and Documents
Foreign Talent Programs
Conflict Approval Committee
Controlled Substances
Dual Use Research
University Activities
Export Control Regulations
International Research Engagements
Export Control Training
Export Control Terms and Definitions
LabArchives - Electronic Lab Notebook
Research Diving
Avoiding Plagiarism
Research Security Governance Board
Roles and Responsibilities
Proposal Development and Submission Guidelines
Types of Sponsors
Grants, Gifts and Contracts
Working with Business and Industry Sponsors
Working with Federal Agencies
Other Support/Current and Pending Support
Clinical Trials
Uniform Guidance
Institutional Information
Direct Cost Categories
Employment Benefits (Fringe) Rates
Subcontracts for Budget Preparation
Participant Support Costs
Facilities and Administrative Costs
Central Cost Share Request
Submission Checklist
Sponsored Program Officers
Bayh-Dole Certification
Award Acceptance and Initiation
Award Management Roles and Responsibilities
Award Terms and Conditions
Cost Sharing Requirements
Cost Transfers
Personnel Appointments
Payments to Research Subjects
Absence or Transfer of Principal Investigator
Patents and Copyrights
Travel on Sponsored Projects
Ordering in Workday
Procurement Policies and Procedures
Purchasing Basics
Bid Opportunities
Consultant Agreement Procedures
Subcontracting on Sponsored Awards
Procurement and Receipt of Radioactive Material
Equipment and Property
Software License Agreements
Special Purchasing Needs
Physical Facilities
International Purchasing
Award Closeout
Corporate Partnerships at Ohio State
Invention Disclosure and Assessment
Licensing Your Technology
Forming a Startup Company
Peter Mohler
Cynthia Carnes
Animal Care and Use Program
Research Compliance
Responsible Research Practices
Secure Research
Sponsored Programs
Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center
Campus Chemical Instrument Center
Campus Microscopy and Imaging Facility
Center for Emergent Materials
Center of Microbiome Science
Center for RNA Biology
Center for Quantum Information Science and Engineering
Chronic Brain Injury Program
Foods for Health
Gene Therapy Institute
Global Water Institute
Infectious Diseases Institute
Institute for Materials Research
Institute for Optical Science
Translational Data Analytics Institute
Facts and Figures
150 Years of Excellence
Awards and Honors
Associate Deans for Research
Submit an Event
Research and Innovation Showcase 2022
Research and Innovation Showcase 2021
Research and Innovation Showcase 2020
Research and Innovation Showcase 2019

Clinical and Translational Science Institute Pilot Grant Information & Ideation Registration

Periodically, the CTSI releases Requests for Applications (RFAs) for pilot research projects, as well as offering training and career development grants. An ideation session will be held to learn more. The session will include a short 30-minute presentation on Translational Science and question and answer followed by a one hour and 30-minute ideation workshop.

Prospective applicants are encouraged to attend the virtual ideation workshop. This workshop is designed to elevate the strength and quality of proposals through early peer review and panel feedback. This workshop is a fantastic opportunity for applicants to present their initial ideas in a professional and friendly forum. Research shows that ideas that have gone through several iteration processes are stronger and have better potential of securing funding.

A billionaire hopes to change our understanding of sea life and save the oceans with a research vessel straight out of 'Star Trek'

OceanXplorer, a 285-foot research vessel , contains cutting-edge tools for ocean science.
Billionaire Ray Dalio bought the former oil ship and helped transform it into a world-leading research vessel.
Ray Dalio's son wants the ship to inspire ocean conservation through advanced research and documentaries.

The OceanXplorer is both science and spectacle.

The 285-foot research vessel gives ocean scientists access to virtual reality, submersibles , a helicopter, and onboard laboratories, all in a setting designed to evoke a Marvel movie.

"It has basically every tool a researcher could dream of for exploring the deep," Eric Stackpole, a remotely operated vehicle expert, told Business Insider.

Stackpole is part of a team that traveled on the ship from a volcanic archipelago in the North Atlantic to just south of the North Pole for National Geographic's new show "OceanXplorers."

See what it was like to follow polar bears from the sky and study sharks from the seafloor.

OceanX converted a former oil vessel into a research ship.

Billionaire Ray Dalio bought the boat in 2016 . It was an oil ship at the time and he and his son Mark Dalio spent the next four years transforming it into a one-of-a-kind research vessel capable of real-time scientific analysis. Experts from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution consulted to ensure scientists would have everything they needed on board.

For example, it might take a typical research vehicle several years to get DNA sequencing results back and then return to the same location equipped with that data.

With OceanXplorer's onboard lab, researchers can collect samples, process the data in real-time, and then make informed decisions based on what they find.

"We feel like it's a lot more efficient," said Mark Dalio, co-CEO of OceanX, the company that owns OceanXplorer.

It's helping scientists solve some of the sea's greatest mysteries.

The vessel's pair of three-seater submersibles can descend over 3,000 feet and stay on the seafloor for 12 hours.

As a passenger in one, biologist Nigel Hussey witnessed something he'd never seen before, a Greenland shark feeding in its own habitat.

The sharks can live for over 400 years, the longest of any vertebrate, but they spend much of their time in deep, difficult-to-access waters of the Arctic.

"To actually witness and see an animal that you've committed a huge amount of time, blood, sweat, and tears to studying, it's indescribable how fabulous it is," Hussey said in National Geographic's show.

Seeing the cautious way the shark approached food could indicate one reason the species lives so long , Hussey said. Some researchers want to learn more about these animals in the hopes of lengthening human lifespans.

It was built for many kinds of science.

On board, scientists can use the four labs to analyze samples, sequence DNA, and study specimens. Meanwhile, ROVs explore the deep ; sonar maps the seafloor ; and a sampling tool measures the water's temperature, pressure, and salinity.

"I think the most unique kind of throughline is the cross-disciplinary nature of the ship," Mark Dalio said. Meaning researchers who study sharks, whales, squid, and polar bears can all make use of the vessel .

OceanX not only helps scientists reach locations from the subtropical Bahamas to freezing Svalbard, it brings along filmmakers and photographers to document the work as it's taking place.

The National Geographic show highlights the work of researchers who used the ship's helicopters to study polar bears ' disappearing habitats and another group who dove deep in submersibles to study sperm whales' prey.

"Ultimately, our goal is to help raise awareness of what this majority of our planet is like," Stackpole said. "If you don't understand it, you can't affect it."

Some of the technology feels like living in the future.

OceanX partnered with Microsoft to create a "holographic laboratory" on the ship. The cutting-edge technology makes complex data easy to visualize.

Scientists wearing HoloLens headsets can view a simulated ocean floor. It can help turn numbers in a graph into a representation of an underwater environment, incorporating data from sperm whale location tags, sonar readings, and temperature and salinity information.

"We were able to stand around this table and in three dimensions, manipulate a map of what the bottom looks like," Stackpole said of an ocean-floor visualization. "It felt like living in the future."

There are some bonuses to being on a billionaire's boat.

The vessel was built for scientists, but it still has some amenities you might not typically find on a research ship.

"There was a drawer that was just filled with ice cream you could get whenever you want," Stackpole said. "That felt like an indulgence for an open ocean expedition."

It's not quite like going on a luxury cruise , though. There's room for about 72 people on board, but passengers have to share rooms with bunk beds.

The ship is supposed to look like something out of 'Star Trek.'

Mark Dalio worked as a National Geographic filmmaker in the past and always wanted the OceanXplorer to be used for scientific storytelling.

Director James Cameron and his team — who have experience designing the filmmaker's former research vessel — offered advice about creating spaces that were both functional and futuristic. Specifically, Cameron suggested they take inspiration from a " Star Trek " spacecraft.

"If you're going to do all that work, make it look and feel like something like the 'Starship Enterprise' of the oceans," Dalio said. "Make it inspirational and aspirational for the next generation of scientists and students and educators."

Art director Page Buckner, who worked on "Iron Man 2," "Jurassic World," and other movies, also helped make the ship camera-ready.

"Everything can be ready to go from a filmmaking standpoint" when scientists are seeing something new or exciting, Dalio said. "It allows us to be a lot more in the moment during that and really capture that in a way that is very authentic."

In fact, most of the ship was designed with documentaries in mind.

The next big project is a focus on fish.

Mark Dalio plans to keep the ship in Southeast Asian waters for the next five years. The Phillippines is a hot spot for a variety of marine life.

One goal is to learn more about the region's biodiversity to help find ways to protect vulnerable species.

Techniques like whole genome sequencing will give scientists a clearer picture of what fish are present and what animals are eating them.

Other research will focus on gathering data to document climate change, studying coral reefs , and finding potential areas for preservation that could be used for carbon credits.

All this feeds into OceanX's overarching goal, which is to foster the next generation of ocean scientists. "We need a next generation of ocean scientists and ocean storytellers," Dalio said.

Main content

Education During Coronavirus

A Smithsonian magazine special report

Science | June 15, 2020

Seventy-Five Scientific Research Projects You Can Contribute to Online

From astrophysicists to entomologists, many researchers need the help of citizen scientists to sift through immense data collections

Rachael Lallensack

Former Assistant Editor, Science and Innovation

If you find yourself tired of streaming services, reading the news or video-chatting with friends, maybe you should consider becoming a citizen scientist. Though it’s true that many field research projects are paused , hundreds of scientists need your help sifting through wildlife camera footage and images of galaxies far, far away, or reading through diaries and field notes from the past.

Plenty of these tools are free and easy enough for children to use. You can look around for projects yourself on Smithsonian Institution’s citizen science volunteer page , National Geographic ’s list of projects and CitizenScience.gov ’s catalog of options. Zooniverse is a platform for online-exclusive projects , and Scistarter allows you to restrict your search with parameters, including projects you can do “on a walk,” “at night” or “on a lunch break.”

To save you some time, Smithsonian magazine has compiled a collection of dozens of projects you can take part in from home.

American Wildlife

If being home has given you more time to look at wildlife in your own backyard, whether you live in the city or the country, consider expanding your view, by helping scientists identify creatures photographed by camera traps. Improved battery life, motion sensors, high-resolution and small lenses have made camera traps indispensable tools for conservation.These cameras capture thousands of images that provide researchers with more data about ecosystems than ever before.

Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute’s eMammal platform , for example, asks users to identify animals for conservation projects around the country. Currently, eMammal is being used by the Woodland Park Zoo ’s Seattle Urban Carnivore Project, which studies how coyotes, foxes, raccoons, bobcats and other animals coexist with people, and the Washington Wolverine Project, an effort to monitor wolverines in the face of climate change. Identify urban wildlife for the Chicago Wildlife Watch , or contribute to wilderness projects documenting North American biodiversity with The Wilds' Wildlife Watch in Ohio , Cedar Creek: Eyes on the Wild in Minnesota , Michigan ZoomIN , Western Montana Wildlife and Snapshot Wisconsin .

"Spend your time at home virtually exploring the Minnesota backwoods,” writes the lead researcher of the Cedar Creek: Eyes on the Wild project. “Help us understand deer dynamics, possum populations, bear behavior, and keep your eyes peeled for elusive wolves!"

A baby elephant stands between the legs of an adult elephant.

If being cooped up at home has you daydreaming about traveling, Snapshot Safari has six active animal identification projects. Try eyeing lions, leopards, cheetahs, wild dogs, elephants, giraffes, baobab trees and over 400 bird species from camera trap photos taken in South African nature reserves, including De Hoop Nature Reserve and Madikwe Game Reserve .

With South Sudan DiversityCam , researchers are using camera traps to study biodiversity in the dense tropical forests of southwestern South Sudan. Part of the Serenegeti Lion Project, Snapshot Serengeti needs the help of citizen scientists to classify millions of camera trap images of species traveling with the wildebeest migration.

Classify all kinds of monkeys with Chimp&See . Count, identify and track giraffes in northern Kenya . Watering holes host all kinds of wildlife, but that makes the locales hotspots for parasite transmission; Parasite Safari needs volunteers to help figure out which animals come in contact with each other and during what time of year.

Mount Taranaki in New Zealand is a volcanic peak rich in native vegetation, but native wildlife, like the North Island brown kiwi, whio/blue duck and seabirds, are now rare—driven out by introduced predators like wild goats, weasels, stoats, possums and rats. Estimate predator species compared to native wildlife with Taranaki Mounga by spotting species on camera trap images.

The Zoological Society of London’s (ZSL) Instant Wild app has a dozen projects showcasing live images and videos of wildlife around the world. Look for bears, wolves and lynx in Croatia ; wildcats in Costa Rica’s Osa Peninsula ; otters in Hampshire, England ; and both black and white rhinos in the Lewa-Borana landscape in Kenya.

An image featuring marine life from Invader ID.

Under the Sea

Researchers use a variety of technologies to learn about marine life and inform conservation efforts. Take, for example, Beluga Bits , a research project focused on determining the sex, age and pod size of beluga whales visiting the Churchill River in northern Manitoba, Canada. With a bit of training, volunteers can learn how to differentiate between a calf, a subadult (grey) or an adult (white)—and even identify individuals using scars or unique pigmentation—in underwater videos and images. Beluga Bits uses a “ beluga boat ,” which travels around the Churchill River estuary with a camera underneath it, to capture the footage and collect GPS data about the whales’ locations.

Many of these online projects are visual, but Manatee Chat needs citizen scientists who can train their ear to decipher manatee vocalizations. Researchers are hoping to learn what calls the marine mammals make and when—with enough practice you might even be able to recognize the distinct calls of individual animals.

Several groups are using drone footage to monitor seal populations. Seals spend most of their time in the water, but come ashore to breed. One group, Seal Watch , is analyzing time-lapse photography and drone images of seals in the British territory of South Georgia in the South Atlantic. A team in Antarctica captured images of Weddell seals every ten minutes while the seals were on land in spring to have their pups. The Weddell Seal Count project aims to find out what threats—like fishing and climate change—the seals face by monitoring changes in their population size. Likewise, the Año Nuevo Island - Animal Count asks volunteers to count elephant seals, sea lions, cormorants and more species on a remote research island off the coast of California.

With Floating Forests , you’ll sift through 40 years of satellite images of the ocean surface identifying kelp forests, which are foundational for marine ecosystems, providing shelter for shrimp, fish and sea urchins. A project based in southwest England, Seagrass Explorer , is investigating the decline of seagrass beds. Researchers are using baited cameras to spot commercial fish in these habitats as well as looking out for algae to study the health of these threatened ecosystems. Search for large sponges, starfish and cold-water corals on the deep seafloor in Sweden’s first marine park with the Koster seafloor observatory project.

The Smithsonian Environmental Research Center needs your help spotting invasive species with Invader ID . Train your eye to spot groups of organisms, known as fouling communities, that live under docks and ship hulls, in an effort to clean up marine ecosystems.

If art history is more your speed, two Dutch art museums need volunteers to start “ fishing in the past ” by analyzing a collection of paintings dating from 1500 to 1700. Each painting features at least one fish, and an interdisciplinary research team of biologists and art historians wants you to identify the species of fish to make a clearer picture of the “role of ichthyology in the past.”

Pictured is a Zerene eurydice specimen, or California dogface butterfly, caught in 1951.

Interesting Insects

Notes from Nature is a digitization effort to make the vast resources in museums’ archives of plants and insects more accessible. Similarly, page through the University of California Berkeley’s butterfly collection on CalBug to help researchers classify these beautiful critters. The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology has already digitized about 300,000 records, but their collection exceeds 4 million bugs. You can hop in now and transcribe their grasshopper archives from the last century . Parasitic arthropods, like mosquitos and ticks, are known disease vectors; to better locate these critters, the Terrestrial Parasite Tracker project is working with 22 collections and institutions to digitize over 1.2 million specimens—and they’re 95 percent done . If you can tolerate mosquito buzzing for a prolonged period of time, the HumBug project needs volunteers to train its algorithm and develop real-time mosquito detection using acoustic monitoring devices. It’s for the greater good!

Pelicans coming in for landing on PELIcam.

For the Birders

Birdwatching is one of the most common forms of citizen science . Seeing birds in the wilderness is certainly awe-inspiring, but you can birdwatch from your backyard or while walking down the sidewalk in big cities, too. With Cornell University’s eBird app , you can contribute to bird science at any time, anywhere. (Just be sure to remain a safe distance from wildlife—and other humans, while we social distance ). If you have safe access to outdoor space—a backyard, perhaps—Cornell also has a NestWatch program for people to report observations of bird nests. Smithsonian’s Migratory Bird Center has a similar Neighborhood Nest Watch program as well.

Birdwatching is easy enough to do from any window, if you’re sheltering at home, but in case you lack a clear view, consider these online-only projects. Nest Quest currently has a robin database that needs volunteer transcribers to digitize their nest record cards.

You can also pitch in on a variety of efforts to categorize wildlife camera images of burrowing owls , pelicans , penguins (new data coming soon!), and sea birds . Watch nest cam footage of the northern bald ibis or greylag geese on NestCams to help researchers learn about breeding behavior.

Or record the coloration of gorgeous feathers across bird species for researchers at London’s Natural History Museum with Project Plumage .

A pressed Wister's coralroot below a letter and sketch of the flower found in Oct. 1937

Pretty Plants

If you’re out on a walk wondering what kind of plants are around you, consider downloading Leafsnap , an electronic field guide app developed by Columbia University, the University of Maryland and the Smithsonian Institution. The app has several functions. First, it can be used to identify plants with its visual recognition software. Secondly, scientists can learn about the “ the ebb and flow of flora ” from geotagged images taken by app users.

What is older than the dinosaurs, survived three mass extinctions and still has a living relative today? Ginko trees! Researchers at Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History are studying ginko trees and fossils to understand millions of years of plant evolution and climate change with the Fossil Atmospheres project . Using Zooniverse, volunteers will be trained to identify and count stomata, which are holes on a leaf’s surface where carbon dioxide passes through. By counting these holes, or quantifying the stomatal index, scientists can learn how the plants adapted to changing levels of carbon dioxide. These results will inform a field experiment conducted on living trees in which a scientist is adjusting the level of carbon dioxide for different groups.

Help digitize and categorize millions of botanical specimens from natural history museums, research institutions and herbaria across the country with the Notes from Nature Project . Did you know North America is home to a variety of beautiful orchid species? Lend botanists a handby typing handwritten labels on pressed specimens or recording their geographic and historic origins for the New York Botanical Garden’s archives. Likewise, the Southeastern U.S. Biodiversity project needs assistance labeling pressed poppies, sedums, valerians, violets and more. Groups in California , Arkansas , Florida , Texas and Oklahoma all invite citizen scientists to partake in similar tasks.

A group of Harvard computers and astronomers.

Historic Women in Astronomy

Become a transcriber for Project PHaEDRA and help researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics preserve the work of Harvard’s women “computers” who revolutionized astronomy in the 20th century. These women contributed more than 130 years of work documenting the night sky, cataloging stars, interpreting stellar spectra, counting galaxies, and measuring distances in space, according to the project description .

More than 2,500 notebooks need transcription on Project PhaEDRA - Star Notes . You could start with Annie Jump Cannon , for example. In 1901, Cannon designed a stellar classification system that astronomers still use today. Cecilia Payne discovered that stars are made primarily of hydrogen and helium and can be categorized by temperature. Two notebooks from Henrietta Swan Leavitt are currently in need of transcription. Leavitt, who was deaf, discovered the link between period and luminosity in Cepheid variables, or pulsating stars, which “led directly to the discovery that the Universe is expanding,” according to her bio on Star Notes .

Volunteers are also needed to transcribe some of these women computers’ notebooks that contain references to photographic glass plates . These plates were used to study space from the 1880s to the 1990s. For example, in 1890, Williamina Flemming discovered the Horsehead Nebula on one of these plates . With Star Notes, you can help bridge the gap between “modern scientific literature and 100 years of astronomical observations,” according to the project description . Star Notes also features the work of Cannon, Leavitt and Dorrit Hoffleit , who authored the fifth edition of the Bright Star Catalog, which features 9,110 of the brightest stars in the sky.

A microscopic image of white blood cells

Microscopic Musings

Electron microscopes have super-high resolution and magnification powers—and now, many can process images automatically, allowing teams to collect an immense amount of data. Francis Crick Institute’s Etch A Cell - Powerhouse Hunt project trains volunteers to spot and trace each cell’s mitochondria, a process called manual segmentation. Manual segmentation is a major bottleneck to completing biological research because using computer systems to complete the work is still fraught with errors and, without enough volunteers, doing this work takes a really long time.

For the Monkey Health Explorer project, researchers studying the social behavior of rhesus monkeys on the tiny island Cayo Santiago off the southeastern coast of Puerto Rico need volunteers to analyze the monkeys’ blood samples. Doing so will help the team understand which monkeys are sick and which are healthy, and how the animals’ health influences behavioral changes.

Using the Zooniverse’s app on a phone or tablet, you can become a “ Science Scribbler ” and assist researchers studying how Huntington disease may change a cell’s organelles. The team at the United Kingdom's national synchrotron , which is essentially a giant microscope that harnesses the power of electrons, has taken highly detailed X-ray images of the cells of Huntington’s patients and needs help identifying organelles, in an effort to see how the disease changes their structure.

Oxford University’s Comprehensive Resistance Prediction for Tuberculosis: an International Consortium—or CRyPTIC Project , for short, is seeking the aid of citizen scientists to study over 20,000 TB infection samples from around the world. CRyPTIC’s citizen science platform is called Bash the Bug . On the platform, volunteers will be trained to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotics on a given sample. Each evaluation will be checked by a scientist for accuracy and then used to train a computer program, which may one day make this process much faster and less labor intensive.

12 images from the platform showcasing different galactic formations

Out of This World

If you’re interested in contributing to astronomy research from the comfort and safety of your sidewalk or backyard, check out Globe at Night . The project monitors light pollution by asking users to try spotting constellations in the night sky at designated times of the year . (For example, Northern Hemisphere dwellers should look for the Bootes and Hercules constellations from June 13 through June 22 and record the visibility in Globe at Night’s app or desktop report page .)

For the amateur astrophysicists out there, the opportunities to contribute to science are vast. NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) mission is asking for volunteers to search for new objects at the edges of our solar system with the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project .

Galaxy Zoo on Zooniverse and its mobile app has operated online citizen science projects for the past decade. According to the project description, there are roughly one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe. Surprisingly, identifying different types of galaxies by their shape is rather easy. “If you're quick, you may even be the first person to see the galaxies you're asked to classify,” the team writes.

With Radio Galaxy Zoo: LOFAR , volunteers can help identify supermassive blackholes and star-forming galaxies. Galaxy Zoo: Clump Scout asks users to look for young, “clumpy” looking galaxies, which help astronomers understand galaxy evolution.

If current events on Earth have you looking to Mars, perhaps you’d be interested in checking out Planet Four and Planet Four: Terrains —both of which task users with searching and categorizing landscape formations on Mars’ southern hemisphere. You’ll scroll through images of the Martian surface looking for terrain types informally called “spiders,” “baby spiders,” “channel networks” and “swiss cheese.”

Gravitational waves are telltale ripples in spacetime, but they are notoriously difficult to measure. With Gravity Spy , citizen scientists sift through data from Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, or LIGO , detectors. When lasers beamed down 2.5-mile-long “arms” at these facilities in Livingston, Louisiana and Hanford, Washington are interrupted, a gravitational wave is detected. But the detectors are sensitive to “glitches” that, in models, look similar to the astrophysical signals scientists are looking for. Gravity Spy teaches citizen scientists how to identify fakes so researchers can get a better view of the real deal. This work will, in turn, train computer algorithms to do the same.

Similarly, the project Supernova Hunters needs volunteers to clear out the “bogus detections of supernovae,” allowing researchers to track the progression of actual supernovae. In Hubble Space Telescope images, you can search for asteroid tails with Hubble Asteroid Hunter . And with Planet Hunters TESS , which teaches users to identify planetary formations, you just “might be the first person to discover a planet around a nearby star in the Milky Way,” according to the project description.

Help astronomers refine prediction models for solar storms, which kick up dust that impacts spacecraft orbiting the sun, with Solar Stormwatch II. Thanks to the first iteration of the project, astronomers were able to publish seven papers with their findings.

With Mapping Historic Skies , identify constellations on gorgeous celestial maps of the sky covering a span of 600 years from the Adler Planetarium collection in Chicago. Similarly, help fill in the gaps of historic astronomy with Astronomy Rewind , a project that aims to “make a holistic map of images of the sky.”

Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Rachael Lallensack | READ MORE

Rachael Lallensack is the former assistant web editor for science and innovation at Smithsonian .

Create your free Science Near Me account to find local science festivals, events, talks and more!

Science Bob

Experiments
Science Fair Ideas
Science Q&A
Research Help
Experiment Blog

Okay, this is the hardest part of the whole project…picking your topic. But here are some ideas to get you started. Even if you don’t like any, they may inspire you to come up with one of your own. Remember, check all project ideas with your teacher and parents, and don’t do any project that would hurt or scare people or animals. Good luck!

Does music affect on animal behavior?
Does the color of food or drinks affect whether or not we like them?
Where are the most germs in your school? ( CLICK for more info. )
Does music have an affect on plant growth?
Which kind of food do dogs (or any animal) prefer best?
Which paper towel brand is the strongest?
What is the best way to keep an ice cube from melting?
What level of salt works best to hatch brine shrimp?
Can the food we eat affect our heart rate?
How effective are child-proof containers and locks.
Can background noise levels affect how well we concentrate?
Does acid rain affect the growth of aquatic plants?
What is the best way to keep cut flowers fresh the longest?
Does the color of light used on plants affect how well they grow?
What plant fertilizer works best?
Does the color of a room affect human behavior?
Do athletic students have better lung capacity?
What brand of battery lasts the longest?
Does the type of potting soil used in planting affect how fast the plant grows?
What type of food allow mold to grow the fastest?
Does having worms in soil help plants grow faster?
Can plants grow in pots if they are sideways or upside down?
Does the color of hair affect how much static electricity it can carry? (test with balloons)
How much weight can the surface tension of water hold?
Can some people really read someone else’s thoughts?
Which soda decays fallen out teeth the most?
What light brightness makes plants grow the best?
Does the color of birdseed affect how much birds will eat it?
Do natural or chemical fertilizers work best?
Can mice learn? (you can pick any animal)
Can people tell artificial smells from real ones?
What brands of bubble gum produce the biggest bubbles?
Does age affect human reaction times?
What is the effect of salt on the boiling temperature of water?
Does shoe design really affect an athlete’s jumping height?
What type of grass seed grows the fastest?
Can animals see in the dark better than humans?

Didn’t see one you like? Don’t worry…look over them again and see if they give you an idea for your own project that will work for you. Remember, find something that interests you, and have fun with it.

To download and print this list of ideas CLICK HERE .

The scientific method
science fair resources
a little helpful advice

ADS (these ads support our free website)

Share this page.

Our teams leverage research developments across domains to build tools and technology that impact billions of people. Sharing our learnings and tools to fuel progress in the field is core to our approach.

person pointing at map on phone screen and fighter jet

Our resources are available to everyone

We regularly share datasets, tools and services with the broader scientific community to be used, shared, and built on.

Sorry, it looks like you have JavaScript disabled. Learn how to enable it.

110+ Best Science Investigatory Project Topics: Dive into Science

Post author By admin
September 29, 2023

Explore a wide range of science investigatory project topics to engage in innovative research and make significant contributions to the field.

Get ready to dive headfirst into the thrilling world of Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topics! Imagine a journey where you become a scientist, an explorer of the unknown, and a solver of real-world puzzles.

This is what SIP offers – a chance to channel your inner curiosity and creativity into the fascinating realm of science.

From unlocking the secrets of life in biology to experimenting with the wonders of chemistry, from unraveling the mysteries of the universe in physics to addressing vital environmental issues – SIP topics are your keys to a world of exploration.

In this adventure, we’ll guide you through an array of captivating SIP ideas. These topics aren’t just assignments; they’re opportunities to uncover new knowledge, make a difference, and have a blast along the way.

So, gear up for an exciting journey, as we unveil the science topics that could spark your imagination and fuel your passion for discovery. Let’s begin!

Table of Contents

What is a Science Investigatory Project?

Imagine stepping into the shoes of a scientist – asking questions, running experiments, and discovering the secrets of the world around you. That’s exactly what a Science Investigatory Project, or SIP, is all about.

At its core, a SIP is a thrilling journey of scientific exploration. It’s a project that challenges you to pick a problem, make educated guesses (that’s your hypothesis), roll up your sleeves for experiments, collect data, and connect the dots to find answers.

Here’s how it works

Step 1: the mystery.

You start with a question – something that piques your curiosity. It could be anything from “Why do plants grow towards the light?” to “What makes the sky blue?” Your SIP is your ticket to unravel these mysteries.

Step 2: The Guess

Next comes your hypothesis – a fancy word for your best guess at the answer. It’s like saying, “I think this is what’s happening, and here’s why.”

Step 3: The Detective Work

Now, it’s time for the fun part – experimenting! You set up tests, tweak variables, and observe closely. Whether you’re mixing chemicals, observing insects, or measuring temperature, you’re the scientist in charge.

Step 4: Clues and Evidence

As you experiment, you collect clues in the form of data – numbers, measurements, observations. It’s like gathering puzzle pieces.

Step 5: The “Aha!” Moment

When you analyze your data, patterns start to emerge. You connect those puzzle pieces until you have a clear picture. Does your data support your guess (hypothesis), or do you need to rethink things?

Step 6: Sharing Your Discovery

Scientists don’t keep their findings to themselves. They share them with the world. Your SIP report or presentation is your chance to do just that. You explain what you did, what you found, and why it matters.

So, why do SIPs matter? They’re not just school projects. They’re your chance to think like a scientist, ask questions like a detective, and discover like an explorer. They’re where you become the expert, the innovator, the problem-solver.

From the mysteries of biology to the wonders of chemistry and the enigmas of physics, SIPs open doors to countless adventures in science. So, what question will you ask? What mystery will you solve? Your SIP journey awaits – embrace it, and you might just uncover something amazing.

Choosing the Right SIP Topic

Choosing the right Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topic is like selecting a path for your scientific adventure. It’s a critical decision, and here’s how to make it count:

Follow Your Passion

Your SIP topic should resonate with your interests. Pick something you’re genuinely curious about. When you’re passionate, the research becomes a thrilling quest, not a chore.

Real-World Relevance

Consider how your topic connects to the real world. Can your research shed light on a problem or offer solutions? SIPs are a chance to make a tangible impact.

Feasibility

Be realistic about the resources at your disposal. Choose a topic that you can explore within your time frame and access to equipment. Avoid overly ambitious projects that might overwhelm you.

Originality Matters

While it’s okay to explore well-trodden paths, strive for a unique angle. What can you add to the existing knowledge? Innovative ideas often lead to exciting discoveries.

Mentor Guidance

If you’re feeling uncertain, don’t hesitate to seek guidance from teachers or mentors. They can help you refine your ideas and offer valuable insights.

Remember, your SIP topic is the compass for your scientific journey. It should excite your curiosity, have real-world significance, and be feasible within your means. So, choose wisely, and let your scientific adventure begin!

Environmental Science

Analyzing the Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Air Quality
Investigating the Impact of Microplastics on Marine Life
Studying the Relationship Between Temperature and Ocean Acidification
Exploring the Effects of Deforestation on Local Ecosystems
Investigating the Factors Contributing to Soil Erosion in a Watershed
Analyzing the Impact of Noise Pollution on Wildlife Behavior
Studying the Relationship Between Temperature and Ice Melt Rates
Investigating the Effect of Urbanization on Local Bird Populations
Exploring the Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health in Urban Areas
Analyzing the Biodiversity of Insects in Urban vs. Rural Environments

Social Sciences

Analyzing the Impact of Social Media Use on Teenagers’ Mental Health
Investigating the Factors Influencing Online Shopping Behavior
Studying the Effects of Different Teaching Methods on Student Engagement
Analyzing the Impact of Parenting Styles on Children’s Academic Performance
Investigating the Relationship Between Music Preferences and Stress Levels
Exploring the Factors Contributing to Workplace Stress and Burnout
Studying the Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Access to Healthcare
Analyzing the Factors Influencing Voting Behavior in Local Elections
Investigating the Impact of Advertising on Consumer Purchasing Decisions
Exploring the Effects of Cultural Diversity on Team Performance in the Workplace

These SIP topics offer a wide range of research opportunities for students in biology, chemistry, physics, and environmental science. Students can choose topics that align with their interests and contribute to their understanding of the natural world.

Conducting Your SIP

So, you’ve picked an exciting Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topic and you’re all set to dive into the world of scientific exploration. But how do you go from a brilliant idea to conducting your own experiments? Let’s break it down into easy steps:

Step 1: Dive into Research

Before you start mixing chemicals or setting up experiments, it’s time for some detective work. Dive into research! What’s already out there about your topic? Books, articles, websites – explore them all. This background study gives you the superpower of knowledge before you even start.

Step 2: Hypothesize Away!

With all that newfound wisdom, formulate a hypothesis. Don your scientist’s hat and make an educated guess about what you think will happen during your experiments. It’s like making a bet with science itself!

Step 3: Time for Action

Now comes the fun part. Design your experiments. What materials do you need? What steps should you follow? Imagine you’re a mad scientist with a plan! Then, go ahead and conduct your experiments. Be precise, follow your plan, and observe like Sherlock.

Step 4: Collect That Data

During your experiments, be a data ninja. Record everything. Measurements, observations, weird surprises – they’re all clues! The more detailed your notes, the better.

Step 5: Decode Your Findings

Time to put on your detective’s hat again. What do your data and observations tell you? Look for patterns, anomalies, and secrets your experiments are revealing. This is where the real magic happens.

Step 6: The Big Reveal

Now, reveal the grand finale – your conclusions! Did your experiments support your hypothesis, or did they throw you a curveball? Discuss what your findings mean and why they matter. It’s like solving the mystery in a thrilling novel.

Step 7: Your SIP Report

Finally, put it all together in your SIP report. Think of it as your scientific storybook. Share your journey with the world. Start with the introduction, add in your methodology, sprinkle your results and discussions, and wrap it up with a conclusion that leaves your readers in awe.

Remember, this isn’t just about science; it’s about your adventure in discovering the unknown. Have fun, be curious, and let your inner scientist shine!

What is a good topic for an investigatory project?

A good topic for an investigatory project depends on your interests and the resources available to you. Here are some broad categories and potential topics to consider:

The Impact of Different Fertilizers on Plant Growth
Investigating the Effect of Air Pollution on Local Plant Life
Analyzing the Quality of Drinking Water from Various Sources
Studying the Growth of Microorganisms in Different Water Types
Creating Biodegradable Plastics from Natural Materials
Investigating the Chemical Composition of Household Cleaning Products
Analyzing the Effects of Different Cooking Oils on Food Nutrition
Testing the pH Levels of Various Household Substances
Studying the Behavior of Ants in Response to Different Food Types
Investigating the Impact of Light Exposure on Seed Germination
Analyzing the Effects of Different Music Types on Plant Growth
Designing and Testing a Simple Wind Turbine
Investigating the Relationship Between Temperature and Electrical Conductivity in Materials
Studying the Behavior of Different Types of Pendulums
Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Solar Panels
Analyzing the Impact of Social Media Use on Teenagers’ Sleep Patterns
Investigating the Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior in Online Shopping
Studying the Effects of Different Teaching Methods on Student Learning
Analyzing the Relationship Between Music Preferences and Mood

Computer Science and Technology

Developing a Smartphone App for Personal Productivity
Investigating the Factors Affecting Wi-Fi Signal Strength in Different Locations
Analyzing the Impact of Screen Time on Productivity and Well-being
Studying the Efficiency of Different Coding Languages in Software Development

When choosing a topic, consider your interests, available resources, and the potential impact of your project. It’s essential to select a topic that excites you and allows you to conduct meaningful research.

Additionally, check with your school or instructor for any specific guidelines or requirements for your investigatory project.

What should I do in a science investigatory project?

So, you’re all set to embark on a thrilling adventure known as a Science Investigatory Project (SIP). But where do you start, and what should you be doing? Here’s your guide to diving headfirst into the world of scientific exploration:

Choose a Topic That Sparks Your Interest

Begin by picking a topic that genuinely excites you. It should be something you’re curious about, like “Why do plants grow towards the light?” or “How does pollution affect local water quality?”

Unleash Your Inner Detective with Background Research

Dive into the world of books, articles, and online resources. Learn everything you can about your chosen topic. It’s like gathering clues to solve a mystery.

Craft Your Hypothesis – Your Educated Guess

Formulate a hypothesis. Think of it as your scientific prediction. What do you think will happen when you investigate your question? Make an educated guess and write it down.

Plan Your Scientific Experiments

Now, let’s get hands-on! Plan your experiments. What materials will you need? What steps will you follow? Imagine you’re a mad scientist with a plan to uncover the secrets of the universe!

Collect Data – Be a Data Ninja

During your experiments, be a data ninja! Record everything meticulously. Measurements, observations, quirky surprises – they’re all part of your data treasure trove.

Decode Your Findings – Be a Scientific Sleuth

Time to decode the clues! Analyze your data like a scientific sleuth. Look for patterns, unexpected twists, and, most importantly, what your experiments are trying to tell you.

Share Your Scientific Tale: The SIP Report

It’s time to tell your scientific tale. Create your SIP report – your storybook of science. Start with the introduction, add in your experiments, sprinkle with results, and wrap it up with a conclusion that leaves your readers in awe.

Share Your Discoveries with the World

If you can, share your SIP findings. Present your work to your classmates, at science fairs, or anywhere you can. Share your excitement about science with the world!

Remember, SIP isn’t just about following steps; it’s about your adventure in discovering the mysteries of the universe. So, stay curious, have fun, and let your inner scientist shine!

What are the best topics for investigatory project chemistry class 12?

Hey there, future chemists! It’s time to explore the fascinating world of Chemistry with some class 12 investigatory project ideas that will not only challenge your scientific skills but also pique your curiosity:

Water Wizardry

Dive into the world of H2O and analyze water samples from different sources – tap water, well water, and that bottled stuff. Let’s uncover the secrets of your hydration!

Biodiesel Bonanza

Ever wondered if you could turn cooking oil into fuel? Investigate the synthesis of biodiesel from everyday vegetable oils, and let’s see if we can power the future with French fries!

Vitamin C Showdown

Put on your lab coat and determine the vitamin C content in various fruit juices. Is your morning OJ really packed with vitamin C? Let’s find out!

Race Against Time – The Iodine Clock

Get ready to race time itself! Study the kinetics of the iodine clock reaction and see how factors like concentration and temperature affect this chemistry marvel.

Shampoo Chemistry

Let’s turn your shower into a science lab! Test the pH levels of different shampoos – are they gentle or are they acidic? Your hair deserves the best!

Heavy Metal Detectives

Investigate soils for heavy metals. Are there hidden dangers lurking beneath our feet? Let’s discover the truth and protect the environment.

Metal Makeover

Ever dreamed of turning ordinary objects into shimmering treasures? Electroplate items like coins or jewelry with various metals and unveil their magical transformations!

The Dye Chronicles

Explore the vibrant world of food dyes used in your favorite treats. What’s really behind those bright colors? Let’s uncover the secrets of our rainbow foods!

Solubility Sleuths

Unravel the mysteries of solubility! How does temperature impact the solubility of common salts? Let’s dissolve some science questions.

Perfume Alchemy

Dive into the world of fragrances! Analyze the chemical components in different perfumes and discover the magic behind your favorite scents.

Remember, the best project is one that not only challenges you but also stirs your scientific curiosity. Choose a topic that excites you, and let your chemistry adventure begin!

What are good science experiment ideas?

Light Dance with Plants: Imagine plants swaying to the rhythm of light! Explore how different types of light affect plant growth – from disco-like colorful LEDs to the soothing glow of natural sunlight.
Kitchen Warriors: Don your lab coat and investigate everyday kitchen items like garlic, honey, and vinegar as germ-fighting superheroes. Who knew your kitchen could be a battleground for bacteria?
Animal Extravaganza: Dive into the world of critters! Observe and report on the curious behaviors of your chosen animal buddies. It’s like being a wildlife detective in your own backyard.
Fizz, Pop, and Bang: Get ready for some explosive fun! Experiment with classic chemical reactions that sizzle and explode, like the volcanic eruption of baking soda and vinegar.
Titration Showdown: Become a master of precision with acid-base titration. Unlock the secrets of unknown solutions, like a chemistry detective solving mysteries.
Crystal Kingdom: Step into the magical world of crystals. Grow your own dazzling crystals and reveal how factors like temperature and concentration influence their growth.
Swingin’ Pendulums: Swing into action with pendulums! Investigate how factors like pendulum length and mass affect the way they sway. It’s like dancing with physics.
Machine Marvels: Enter the world of simple machines. Uncover the mechanical magic behind levers, pulleys, and inclined planes as you lift heavy objects with ease.
Electromagnet Madness: Get electrified! Build your own electromagnet and experiment with coils and currents to see how they shape magnetic fields.
Water Adventure: Dive into water quality testing. Collect samples from different sources and become a water detective, searching for clues about pollution and health.
Air Expedition: Take to the skies with your own air quality station. Discover what’s floating in the air around you, from tiny particles to invisible gases.
Climate Crusaders: Join the battle against climate change. Investigate how shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns impact your local ecosystem.

Earth Science

Rock Detectives: Grab your magnifying glass and investigate rocks and fossils in your area. It’s like traveling through time to uncover Earth’s ancient secrets.
Weather Watchers: Become a meteorologist with your own weather station. Predict the weather and marvel at how the atmosphere behaves around you.
Volcano Eruption Spectacle: Get ready for volcanic eruptions without the lava! Create a stunning volcano model and watch it come to life with your own eruptions.
Starry Nights: Explore the cosmos with a telescope and discover celestial wonders, from the rings of Saturn to the galaxies far, far away.
Moon Phases Odyssey: Join the lunar calendar club! Track the Moon’s different faces over weeks and become an expert on lunar phases.
Solar Eclipse Spectacle: Witness the sky’s ultimate blockbuster – a solar eclipse! Safely observe this cosmic dance with eclipse glasses and telescopes.

These science experiments are not just about learning; they’re about unleashing your inner scientist and having a blast along the way! So, pick your favorite, put on your lab coat, and let the science adventures begin!

In wrapping up our exploration of Science Investigatory Project (SIP) topics, it’s clear that we’ve uncovered a treasure trove of possibilities. These topics are more than just words on a page; they’re gateways to adventure, inquiry, and understanding.

We’ve ventured into diverse realms of science, from the secrets of plant life to the hidden chemistry of everyday items. We’ve danced with the laws of physics, delved into environmental enigmas, and probed the complexities of human behavior. These topics aren’t just ideas; they’re invitations to explore the wonders of our world.

So, as you consider your own SIP journey, let your curiosity be your compass. Pick a topic that truly intrigues you, one that keeps you awake at night with questions. Embrace the process – the experiments, the surprises, and the “Aha!” moments.

Remember, it’s not just about reaching a conclusion; it’s about the exhilarating path you take to get there. SIPs are your chance to be a scientist, an explorer, and a storyteller all at once. So, go ahead, choose your topic, embark on your adventure, and share your discoveries with the world. Science is waiting for your curiosity to light the way!

Frequently Asked Questions

1. how long does it typically take to complete a science investigatory project, the duration of an sip varies, but it generally spans a few months to a year, depending on the complexity of the topic and available resources., 2. can i work on an sip alone, or is it better to collaborate with classmates, you can choose to work on an sip individually or in a group. both approaches have their advantages, so it depends on your preference and the project’s requirements., 3. are there any age restrictions for participating in sips, sips are typically undertaken by students in middle school and high school, but there are no strict age restrictions. anyone with a passion for scientific inquiry can engage in an sip., 4. how can i find a mentor or advisor for my sip, you can seek guidance from science teachers, professors, or professionals in your chosen field. they can provide valuable insights and support throughout your sip journey., 5. where can i showcase my sip findings, you can present your sip findings at science fairs, school exhibitions, or even submit them to relevant scientific journals or conferences for broader recognition..

australia (2)
duolingo (13)
Education (284)
General (78)
How To (18)
IELTS (127)
Latest Updates (162)
Malta Visa (6)
Permanent residency (1)
Programming (31)
Scholarship (1)
Sponsored (4)
Study Abroad (187)
Technology (12)
work permit (8)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Find a Research Project

You can search for a research project by looking for a keyword in the title, approach, objective, or all of those fields. You can also search by project number.

As well, you can explore research projects by subject of investigation .

You can browse international research projects by country .

Or you can browse research project annual reports .

Investigative Research Projects for Students in Science: The State of the Field and a Research Agenda

Open access
Published: 16 March 2023
Volume 23 , pages 80–95, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Michael J. Reiss ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1207-4229 1 ,
Richard Sheldrake ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-6478 1 &
Wilton Lodge ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9219-8880 1

3738 Accesses

4 Citations

6 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

One of the ways in which students can be taught science is by doing science, the intention being to help students understand the nature, processes, and methods of science. Investigative research projects may be used in an attempt to reflect some aspects of science more authentically than other teaching and learning approaches, such as confirmatory practical activities and teacher demonstrations. In this article, we are interested in the affordances of investigative research projects where students, either individually or collaboratively, undertake original research. We provide a critical rather than a systematic review of the field. We begin by examining the literature on the aims of science education, and how science is taught in schools, before specifically turning to investigative research projects. We examine how such projects are typically undertaken before reviewing their aims and, in more detail, the consequences for students of undertaking such projects. We conclude that we need social science research studies that make explicit the possible benefits of investigative research projects in science. Such studies should have adequate control groups that look at the long-term consequences of such projects not only by collecting delayed data from participants, but by following them longitudinally to see whether such projects make any difference to participants’ subsequent education and career destinations. We also conclude that there is too often a tendency for investigative research projects for students in science to ignore the reasons why scientists work in particular areas and to assume that once a written report of the research has been authored, the work is done. We therefore, while being positive about the potential for investigative research projects, make specific recommendations as to how greater authenticity might result from students undertaking such projects.

L’une des façons d’enseigner les sciences aux étudiants est de leur faire faire des activités scientifiques, l’objectif étant de les aider à comprendre la nature, les processus et les méthodes de la science. On peut avoir recours à des projets de recherche et d’enquête afin de refléter plus fidèlement certains éléments relevant de la science qu’en utilisant d’autres approches d’enseignement et d’apprentissage, telles que les activités pratiques de confirmation et les démonstrations faites par l’enseignant. Dans cet article, nous nous intéressons aux possibilités offertes par les projets de recherche dans lesquels les étudiants, individuellement ou en collaboration, entreprennent des recherches novatrices. Nous proposons un examen critique du domaine plutôt que d’y porter un regard systématique. Nous commençons par examiner la documentation portant sur les objectifs de l’enseignement des sciences et la manière dont les sciences sont enseignées dans les écoles, avant de nous intéresser plus particulièrement aux projets de recherche et d’enquête. Nous analysons la manière dont ces projets sont généralement menés avant d’examiner leurs buts et d’évaluer de façon plus approfondie quelles sont les conséquences pour les élèves de réaliser de tels projets. Nous constatons que nous avons besoin d’études de recherche en sciences sociales qui rendent explicites les avantages potentiels des projets de recherche et d’enquête scientifiques. Ces études devraient comporter des groupes de contrôle adéquats qui examinent les conséquences à long terme de ces projets, non seulement en recueillant des données différées auprès des participants, mais aussi en suivant ceux-ci de manière longitudinale de façon à voir si ces projets font une quelconque différence dans l’éducation subséquente et les destinations professionnelles ultérieures des participants. Nous concluons également que les projets de recherche et d’enquête des étudiants en sciences ont trop souvent tendance à ignorer les raisons pour lesquelles les scientifiques travaillent dans des domaines particuliers et à supposer qu’une fois que le rapport de recherche a été rédigé, le travail est terminé. Par conséquent, tout en demeurant optimistes quant au potentiel que représentent les projets de recherche et d’enquête, nous formulons des recommandations particulières en ce qui a trait à la manière dont une plus grande authenticité pourrait résulter de la réalisation de tels projets par les étudiants.

Investigative School Research Projects in Biology: Effects on Students

Moving Research into the Classroom: Synergy in Collaboration

Reintroducing “the” Scientific Method to Introduce Scientific Inquiry in Schools?

Explore related subjects.

Artificial Intelligence

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

Many young people are interested in science but do not necessarily see themselves as able to become scientists (Archer & DeWitt, 2017 ; Archer et al., 2015 ). Others may not want to become scientists even though they may see themselves as succeeding in science (Gokpinar & Reiss, 2016 ). At the same time, in many countries, governments and industry want more young people to continue with science, primarily in the hope that they will go into science or science-related careers (including engineering and technology), but also because of the benefits to society that are presumed to flow from having a scientifically literate population. Making science more inclusive and accessible to everyone may need endeavours and support from across education, employers, and society (Royal Society, 2014 ; Institute of Physics, 2020 ).

However, getting more people to continue with science, once it is no longer compulsory, is only one purpose of school science (Mansfield & Reiss, 2020 ). Much of school science is focused on getting students to understand core content of science—things like the particulate theory of matter, and the causes of disease in humans and other organisms. Another strand in school science is on getting students to understand something of the practices of science, particularly through undertaking practical work. A further, recently emerging, position is that science education should help students to use their knowledge and critical understanding of the content and practices of science to strive for social and environmental justice (Sjöström & Eilks, 2018 ).

In this article, we are interested in the affordances of investigative research projects—discussed in more detail below but essentially pieces of work undertaken by students either individually or collaboratively in which they undertake original research. We provide a critical rather than a systematic review of the field and suggest how future research might be undertaken to explore in more detail the possible contribution of such projects. We begin by examining the literature on the aims of science education, and how science is taught in schools, before specifically turning to investigative research projects. We examine how such projects are typically undertaken before reviewing their aims and, in more detail, the consequences for students of undertaking such projects. We make recommendations as to how investigative research projects might more fruitfully be undertaken and conclude by proposing a research agenda.

Aims of Science Education

School science education typically aims to prepare some students to become scientists, while concurrently educating all students in science and about science (Claussen & Osborne, 2013 ; Hofstein & Lunetta, 2004 ; Osborne & Dillon, 2008 ). For example, in England, especially for older students, the current science National Curriculum for 5–16-year-olds is framed as providing a platform for future studies and careers in science for some students, and providing knowledge and skills so that all students can understand and engage with the natural world within their everyday lives (Department for Education, 2014 ). Accordingly, science education within the National Curriculum in England broadly aims to develop students’ scientific knowledge and conceptual understanding; develop students’ understanding of the nature, processes, and methods of science (aspects of ‘working scientifically’, including experimental, analytical, and other related skills); and ensure that students understand the relevance, uses, and implications of science within everyday life (Department for Education, 2014 ). Comparable aims are typically found in other countries (Coll & Taylor, 2012 ; Hollins & Reiss, 2016 ).

Science education often involves practical work, which is generally intended to help students gain conceptual understanding, practical and wider skills, and understanding of how science and scientists work (Abrahams & Reiss, 2017 ; Cukurova et al., 2015 ; Hodson, 1993 ; Millar, 1998 ). Essentially, the thinking behind much practical work is that students would learn about science by doing science. Practical work has often been orientated towards confirming and illustrating scientific knowledge, although it is increasingly orientated around reflecting the processes of investigation and inquiry used within the field of science, and providing understanding of the nature of science (Abrahams & Reiss, 2017 ; Hofstein & Lunetta, 2004 ).

In many countries, especially those with the resources to have school laboratories, practical work in science is undertaken at secondary level relatively frequently, although this is less the case with older students (Hamlyn et al., 2020 , 2017 ). Practical work is more frequent in schools within more advantaged regions (Hamlyn et al., 2020 ) and many students report that they would have preferred to do more practical work (Cerini et al., 2003 ; Hamlyn et al., 2020 ).

The impact of practical work remains less clear (Cukurova et al., 2015 ; Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ). Society broadly expects that students in any one country will experience practical work to similar extents, so it is unfeasible, for more than a handful of lessons (e.g. Shana & Abulibdeh, 2020 ), to apply experimental designs where some students undertake practical work while others do not. One study, where students were assigned to one of four different groups, concluded that while conventional practical work led to more student learning than did either watching videos or reading textbooks, it was no more effective than when students watched a teacher demonstration (Moore et al., 2020 ).

The study by Moore et al. ( 2020 ) illustrates an important point, namely, that students can acquire conceptual knowledge and theoretical understanding by ways other than engagement in practical work. Indeed, there are some countries where less practical work is undertaken than in others, yet students score well, on average, on international measures of attainment. Some, but relatively few, studies have focused on whether the extent of practical work, and/or whether practical work undertaken in particular ways, associates with any educational or other outcomes. There are some indications that more frequent practical work associates with benefits (Cukurova et al., 2015 ). For example, students in higher-performing secondary schools have reported that they undertake more frequent practical work than pupils in lower-performing schools, although this does not reflect the impact of practical work alone (Hamlyn et al., 2017 ). In a more recent study, Oliver et al. ( 2021a , b ), in their analysis of the science scores in the six Anglophone countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA) that participated in PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) 2015, found that “Of particular note is that the highest level of student achievement is associated with doing practical work in some lessons (rather than all or most) and this patterning is consistent across all six countries” (p. 35).

Students often appreciate and enjoy practical work in science (Hamlyn et al., 2020 ; National Foundation for Educational Research, 2011 ). Nevertheless, students do not necessarily understand the purposes of practical work, some feel that practical work may not necessarily be the best way to understand some aspects of science, and some highlight that practical work does not necessarily give them what they need for examinations (Abrahams & Reiss, 2012 ; Sharpe & Abrahams, 2020 ). Teachers have also spoken about the challenges of devising and delivering practical work, and often value practical work for being motivational for students rather than for helping them to understand science concepts (Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ; National Foundation for Educational Research, 2011 ).

Teaching Approaches

Educational research has examined how teaching and learning could best be undertaken. Many teaching and learning approaches have been found to associate with students’ learning outcomes, such as their achievement (Bennett et al., 2007 ; Furtak et al., 2012 ; Hattie et al., 2020 ; Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ) and interest (e.g. Chachashvili-Bolotin et al., 2016 ; Swarat et al., 2012 ), both in science and more generally. However, considering different teaching and learning approaches is complicated by terminology (where the definitions of terms can vary and/or terms can be applied in various ways) and wider aspects of generalisation (where it can be difficult to determine trends across studies undertaken in diverse ways across diverse contexts).

Inquiry-based approaches to teaching and learning generally involve students having more initiative to direct and undertake activities to develop their understanding (although not necessarily without guidance and support from teachers), such as working scientifically to devise and undertake investigations. However, it is important to emphasise that inquiry-based approaches do not necessitate practical work. Indeed, there are many subjects where no practical work takes place and yet students can undertake inquiries. In science, examples of non-practical-based inquiries that could fruitfully be undertaken collaboratively or individually and using the internet and/or libraries include the sort of research that students might undertake to investigate a socio-scientific issue. An example of such research includes what the effects of reintroducing an extinct or endangered species might be on an ecosystem, such as the reintroduction of the Eurasian beaver ( Castor fiber ) into the UK, or the barn owl ( Tyto alba ) into Canada. Inquiry-based learning in school science has often been found to associate with greater achievement (Furtak et al., 2012 ; Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ), though too much time spent on inquiry can result in reduced achievement (Oliver et al., 2021a ).

Allied to inquiry-based approaches is project-based learning. Here, students take initiative, manifest autonomy, and exercise responsibility for addressing an issue (often attempting to solve a problem) that usually results in an end product (such as a report or model), with teachers as facilitators and guides. The project occurs over a relatively long duration of time (Helle et al., 2006 ), to allow time for planning, revising, undertaking, and writing up the study. Project-based learning tends to associate positively with achievement (Chen & Yang, 2019 ).

Context-based approaches to teaching and learning use specific contexts and applications as starting points for the development of scientific ideas, rather than more traditional approaches that typically cover scientific ideas before moving on to consider their applications and contexts (Bennett et al., 2007 ). Context-based approaches have been found to be broadly equivalent to other teaching and learning approaches in developing students’ understanding, with some evidence for helping foster positive attitudes to science to a greater extent than traditional approaches (Bennett et al., 2007 ). Specifically relating learning to students’ experiences or context (referred to as ‘enhanced context strategies’) often associates positively with achievement (Schroeder et al., 2007 ). The literature on context-based approaches overlaps with that on the use of socio-scientific issues in science education, where students develop their scientific knowledge and understanding by considering complicated issues where science plays a role but on its own is not sufficient to produce solutions (e.g. Dawson, 2015 ; Zeidler & Sadler, 2008 ). To date, the literature on context-based approaches and/or socio-scientific issues has remained distinct from that on investigative research projects but, as we will argue below, there might be benefit in considering their intersection.

Various other teaching and learning approaches have been found to be beneficial in science, including collaborative work, computer-based work, and the provision of extra-curricular activities (Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ). Similarly, but specifically focusing on chemistry, various teaching and learning practices have been found to associate positively with academic outcomes, including (most strongly) collaborative learning and problem-based learning (Rahman & Lewis, 2019 ).

Most attention has focused on achievement-related outcomes. Nevertheless, inquiry-based learning, context-based learning, computer-based learning, collaborative learning, and extra-curricular activities have often also been found to associate positively with students’ interests and aspirations towards science (Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ). While many teaching and learning approaches associate with benefits, it remains difficult definitively to establish whether any particular approach is optimal and/or whether particular approaches are better than others. Teaching and learning time are limited, so applying a particular approach may mean not applying another approach.

Investigative Research Projects

Science education has often (implicitly or explicitly) been orientated around students learning science by doing science, intending to help students understand the nature, processes, and methods of science. An early critique of pedagogical approaches that saw students as scientists was provided by Driver ( 1983 ) who, while not dismissing the value of the approach, cautioned against over-enthusiastic adoption on the grounds that, unsurprisingly, school students, compared to actual scientists, manifest a range of misconceptions about how scientific research is undertaken. Contemporary recommendations for practical work include schools delivering frequent and varied practical activities (in at least half of all science lessons), and students also having the opportunity to undertake open-ended and extended investigative projects (Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ).

Investigative research projects may be intended to reflect some aspects of science more accurately or authentically than other teaching and learning approaches, such as confirmatory practical activities and teacher demonstrations. Nevertheless, authenticity in science and science education can be approached and/or defined in various ways (Braund & Reiss, 2006 ), and the issue raises wider questions such as whether only (adult) scientists can authentically experience science, and who determines what science is and what authentic experiences of science are (Kapon et al., 2018 ; Martin et al., 1990 ).

Although too tight a definition can be unhelpful, investigative research projects in science typically involve students determining a research question (where the outcome is unknown) and approaches to answer it, undertaking the investigation, analysing the data, and reporting the findings. The project may be undertaken alone or in groups, with support from teachers and/or others such as scientists and researchers (Bennett et al., 2018 ; Gatsby Charitable Foundation, 2017 ). Students may have varying degrees of autonomy—but then that is true of scientists too.

Independent research projects in science for students have often been framed around providing students with authentic experiences of scientific research and with the potential for wider benefits around scientific knowledge and skills, attitudes, and motivations around science, and ultimately helping science to become more inclusive and accessible to everyone (Bennett et al., 2018 ; Milner-Bolotin, 2012 ). Considered in review across numerous studies, independent research projects for secondary school students (aged 11–19) have often (but not necessarily always) resulted in benefits, including the following:

Acquisition of science-related knowledge (Burgin et al., 2012 ; Charney et al., 2007 ; Dijkstra & Goedhart, 2011 ; Houseal et al., 2014 ; Sousa-Silva et al., 2018 ; Ward et al., 2016 );

Enhancement of knowledge and/or skills around aspects of research and working scientifically (Bulte et al., 2006 ; Charney et al., 2007 ; Ebenezer et al., 2011 ; Etkina et al., 2003 ; Hsu & Espinoza, 2018 ; Ward et al., 2016 );

Greater confidence in undertaking various aspects of science, including applying knowledge and skills (Abraham, 2002 ; Carsten Conner et al., 2021 ; Hsu & Espinoza, 2018 ; Stake & Mares, 2001 , 2005 );

Aspirations towards science-related studies and/or careers (Abraham, 2002 ; Stake & Mares, 2001 ), although students in other studies have reported unchanged and already high aspirations towards science-related studies and/or careers (Burgin et al., 2015 , 2012 );

Subsequently entering science-related careers (Roberts & Wassersug, 2009 );

Development of science and/or research identities and/or identification as a scientist or researcher (Carsten Conner et al., 2021 ; Deemer et al., 2021 );

Feelings and experiences of real science and doing science (Barab & Hay, 2001 ; Burgin et al., 2015 ; Chapman & Feldman, 2017 );

Wider awareness and/or understanding of science, scientists, and/or positive attitudes towards science (Abraham, 2002 ; Houseal et al., 2014 ; Stake & Mares, 2005 );

Benefits akin to induction into scientific or research communities of practice (Carsten Conner et al., 2018 );

Development of wider personal, studying, and/or social skills, including working with others and independent work (Abraham, 2002 ; Moote, 2019 ; Moote et al., 2013 ; Sousa-Silva et al., 2018 ).

Positive experiences of projects and programmes are often conveyed by students (Dijkstra & Goedhart, 2011 ; Rushton et al., 2019 ; Williams et al., 2018 ). For example, students have reported appreciating the greater freedom and independence to discover things, and that they felt they were undertaking real experiments with a purpose, and a greater sense of meaning (Bulte et al., 2006 ).

Nevertheless, it remains difficult to determine the extent of generalisation from diverse research studies undertaken in various ways and across various contexts: benefits have been observed across studies involving different foci (determining what was measured and/or reported), projects for students, and contexts and countries. Essentially, each individual research study did not cover and/or evidence the whole range of benefits. Many benefits have been self-reported, and only some studies have considered changes over time (Moote, 2019 ; Moote et al., 2013 ).

Investigative science research projects for students are delivered in various ways. For example, some projects are undertaken through formal programmes that provide introductions and induction, learning modules, equipment, and the opportunity to present findings (Ward et al., 2016 ). Some programmes put a particular emphasis on the presentation and dissemination of findings (Bell et al., 2003 ; Ebenezer et al., 2011 ; Stake & Mares, 2005 ). Some projects are undertaken through schools (Ebenezer et al., 2011 ; Ward et al., 2016 ); others entail students working at universities, sometimes undertaking and/or assisting with existing projects (Bell et al., 2003 ; Burgin et al., 2015 , 2012 ; Charney et al., 2007 ; Stake & Mares, 2001 , 2005 ) or in competitions (e.g. Liao et al., 2017 ). While many projects are undertaken in laboratory settings, some are undertaken outdoors, in the field (Carsten Conner et al., 2018 ; Houseal et al., 2014 ; Young et al., 2020 ).

Primary School

While much of the school literature on investigative research projects in science concentrates on secondary or university students, some such projects are undertaken with students in primary school. These projects are often perceived as enjoyable and considered to benefit scientific skills and knowledge and/or confidence in doing science (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ; Liljeström et al., 2013 ; Maiorca et al., 2021 ; Tyler-Wood et al., 2012 ). Such projects often help students feel that they are scientists and doing science (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ; Reveles et al., 2004 ).

For example, one programme for primary school students in Australia intended students to develop and apply skills in thinking and working scientifically with support by scientist mentors over 10 weeks. It involved the students identifying areas of interest and testable questions within a wider scientific theme, collaboratively investigating their area of interest through collecting and analysing data, and then presenting their findings. Data on the programme’s outcomes were obtained through interviews with students and by studying the reports that they wrote (Forbes & Skamp, 2016 , 2019 ). Participating students said that they appreciated the autonomy and practical aspects, and enjoyed the experiences. The students showed developments in thinking scientifically and around the nature of science, where science often became seen as something that could be interesting, enjoyable, student-led, collaborative, creative, challenging, and a way to understand how things work within the world (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ). The experiences of thinking and working scientifically, and aspects such as collaborative working and learning from each other, were broadly considered to help develop students’ scientific identities and include them within a scientific community of practice. Some students felt that they were doing authentic (‘real’) science, in contrast to some of their earlier or other experiences of science at school, which had not involved an emphasis on working scientifically and/or specific activities within working scientifically, such as collecting and analysing data (Forbes & Skamp, 2019 ).

CREST Awards

CREST Awards are intended to give young people (aged 5–19) in the UK the opportunity to explore real STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) projects, providing the experience of ‘being a scientist’ (British Science Association, 2018 ). The scheme has been running since the 1980s and some 30,000 Awards are given each year. They exist at three levels (Bronze, Silver, and Gold), reflecting the necessary time commitment and level of independence and originality expected. The Awards are presented as offering the potential for participants to experience the process of engaging in a project, and developing investigation, problem-solving, and communication skills. They are also presented as something that can contribute to further awards (such as Duke of Edinburgh Awards) and/or competition entries (such as The Big Bang Competition). CREST Gold Awards can be used to enhance applications to university and employment. At Gold level, arranging for a STEM professional in a field related to the student’s work to act as a mentor is recommended, though not formally required. CREST Awards are assessed by teachers and/or assessors from industry or academia, depending on the Award level.

Classes of secondary school students in Scotland undertaking CREST Awards projects appeared to show some benefits around motivational and studying strategies, but less clearly than would be ideal (Moote, 2019 ; Moote et al, 2013 ). Students undertaking CREST Silver Awards between 2010 and 2013 gained better qualifications at age 16 and were more likely to study science subjects for 16–19-year-olds than other comparable students (matched on prior attainment and certain personal characteristics), although the students may have differed on unmeasured aspects, such as attitudes and motivations towards science and studying (Stock Jones et al., 2016 ). A subsequent randomised controlled trial found that year 9 students (aged 13–14) undertaking CREST Silver Awards and other comparable students ultimately showed similar science test scores, attitudes towards school work, confidence in undertaking various aspects of life (not covering school work), attitudes towards science careers (inaccurately referred to as self-efficacy), and aspirations towards science careers (Husain et al., 2019 ). Nevertheless, teachers and students perceived benefits, including students acquiring transferable skills such as time management, problem-solving, and team working, and that science topics were made more interesting and relevant for students (Husain et al., 2019 ). Overall, it remains difficult to form any definitive conclusions about impacts, given the diverse scope of CREST Awards but limited research. For example, whether and/or how CREST Awards projects are independent of or integrated with curricula areas may determine the extent of (curricula-based) knowledge gains.

Nuffield Research Placements

Nuffield Research Placements involve students in the UK undertaking STEM research placements during the summer between years 12 and 13, and presenting their findings at a celebration event (Nuffield Foundation, 2020 ). The scheme has been running since 1996 and a little over 1000 students participate each year. The programme is variously framed as an opportunity for students to undertake real research and develop scientific and other skills, and an initiative to enhance access/inclusion and assist the progression of students into STEM studies at university (Cilauro & Paull, 2019 ; Nuffield Foundation, 2020 ).

The application process is competitive, and requires a personal statement where students explain their interest in completing the placement. Students need to be studying at least one STEM subject in year 12, be in full-time education at a state school (i.e. not a private school that requires fees), and have reached a certain academic level at year 11. The scheme historically aimed to support and prioritise students from disadvantaged backgrounds, and is now only available for students from disadvantaged backgrounds based on family income, living or having lived in care, and/or being the first person in their immediate family who will study in higher education (Nuffield Foundation, 2020 ).

There have been indications that students who undertake Nuffield Research Placements are, on average, more likely to enrol on STEM subjects at top (Russell Group) UK universities and complete a higher number of STEM qualifications for 16–19-year-olds than other students (Cilauro & Paull, 2019 ). Nevertheless, it remains difficult to isolate independent impacts of the placements, given that (for example) students commence their 16–19 education prior to the placements.

Following their Nuffield Research Placements, students have reported increased understanding of what STEM researchers do in their daily work and unchanging (already high) enjoyment of STEM and interest in STEM job opportunities (Bowes et al., 2017 ; Cilauro & Paull, 2019 ). Wider benefits have been attributed to the placement, including skills in writing reports, working independently, confidence in their own abilities in general, and team working (Bowes et al., 2017 ). Students also often report that they feel they have contributed to an authentic research study in an area of STEM in which they are interested (Bowes et al., 2021 ).

Institute for Research in Schools Projects

The Institute for Research in Schools (IRIS) started in 2016 and has about 1000 or more participating students in the UK annually. It facilitates students to undertake a range of investigative research projects from a varied portfolio of options. For example, these projects have included CERN@School (Whyntie, 2016 ; Whyntie et al., 2015 , 2016 ), where students have been found to have positive experiences, developing research and data analysis skills, and developing wider skills such as collaboration and communication (Hatfield et al., 2019 ; Parker et al., 2019 ). Teachers who have facilitated projects for their students (Rushton & Reiss, 2019 ) report that the experiences produced personal and wider benefits around:

Appreciating the freedom to teach and engage in the research projects;

Connecting or reconnecting with science and research, including interest and enthusiasm (in science as well as teaching it) and with a role as a scientist, including being able to share past experiences or work as a scientist with students;

Collaborating with students and scientists, researchers, and others in different and/or new ways via doing research (including facilitating students and providing support);

Professional and skills development (refreshing/revitalising teaching and interest), including recognition by colleagues/others (strengthening recognition as a teacher/scientist, as having skills, as someone who provides opportunities/support for students).

The teachers felt that their students developed a range of specific and transferable benefits, including around research, communication, teamwork, planning, leadership, interest and enthusiasm, confidence, and awareness of the realities of science and science careers. Some benefits could follow and/or be enhanced by the topics that the students were studying, such as interest and enthusiasm linking with personal and wider/real-life relevance, for example, for topics like biodiversity (Rushton & Reiss, 2019 ).

Students in England who completed IRIS projects and presented their findings at conferences reported that the experiences were beneficial through developing skills (including communication, confidence, and managing anxiety); gaining awareness, knowledge, and understanding of the processes of research and careers in research; collaboration and sharing with students and teachers; developing networks and contacts; and doing something that may benefit their university applications (Rushton et al., 2019 ). Presenting and disseminating findings at conferences were considered to be inspirational and validating (including experiencing the impressive scientific and historical context of the conference venue), although also challenging, given limited time, competing demands, anxiety and nervousness, and uncertainty about how to engage with others and undertake networking (Rushton et al., 2019 ).

Although our principal interest is in investigative research projects in science at school, it is worth briefly surveying the literature on such projects at university level. This is because while such projects are rare at school level, normally resulting from special initiatives, there is a long tradition in a number of countries of investigative research projects in science being undertaken at university level, alongside other types of practical work.

Unsurprisingly, university science students typically report having little to no prior experience with authentic research, although they may have had laboratory or fieldwork experience on their pre-university courses (Cartrette & Melroe-Lehrman, 2012 ; John & Creighton, 2011 ). University students still perceive non-investigative-based laboratory work as meaningful experiences of scientific laboratory work, even if these might be less authentic experiences of (some aspects of) scientific research (Goodwin et al., 2021 ; Rowland et al., 2016 ).

Research experiences for university science students are often framed around providing students with authentic experiences of scientific research, with more explicit foci towards developing research skills and practices, developing conceptual understanding, conveying the nature of science, and fostering science identities (Linn et al., 2015 ). Considered in review across numerous studies, research experiences for university science students have often (but not necessarily always) resulted in benefits, including to research skills and practices and confidence in applying them, enhanced understanding of the reality of scientific research and careers, and higher likelihood of persisting or progressing within science education and/or careers (Linn et al., 2015 ).

For example, in one study, university students of science in England reported having no experience of ‘real’ research before undertaking a summer research placement programme (John & Creighton, 2011 ). After the programme, the majority of students agreed that they had discovered that they liked research and that they had gained an understanding of the everyday realities of research. Most of the students reported that their placement confirmed or increased their intentions towards postgraduate study and research careers (John & Creighton, 2011 ).

Implications and Future Directions

Investigative research projects in science have the potential for various benefits, given the findings from wider research into inquiry-based learning (Furtak et al., 2012 ; Savelsbergh et al., 2016 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ), context-based learning (Bennett et al., 2007 ; Schroeder et al., 2007 ), and project-based learning (Chen & Yang, 2019 ). However, the potential for benefits involves broad generalisations, where inquiry-based learning (for example) covers a diverse range of approaches that may or may not be similar to those encountered within investigative research projects. Furthermore, we do not see investigative research projects as a universal panacea. It is, for example, unrealistic to expect that students can simultaneously learn scientific knowledge, learn about scientific practice, and engage skillfully and appropriately in aspects of scientific practice. Indeed, careful scaffolding from teachers is likely to be required for any, let alone all, of these benefits to result.

We are conscious that enabling students to undertake investigative research projects in science places particular burdens on teachers. Anecdotal evidence suggests that if teachers themselves have had a university education in which they undertook one or more such projects themselves (e.g. because they undertook a research masters or doctorate in science), they are more likely both to be enthused about the benefits of this way of working and to be able to help their students undertake research. It would be good to have this hypothesis investigated rigorously and, more importantly, to have data on effective professional development for teachers to help their students undertake investigative research projects in science. It is known that school teachers of science can benefit from undertaking small-scale research projects as professional development (e.g. Bevins et al., 2011 ; Koomen et al., 2014 ), but such studies do not seem rigorously to have followed individual teachers through into their subsequent day-to-day work with their students to determine the long-term consequences for the students.

Benefits accruing from investigative research projects are likely to be enhanced if there is an alignment between the form of the assessment and the intended outcomes of the investigative research project (cf. Molefe, 2011 ). The first author recalls how advanced level biology projects (for 16–18-year-olds) were assessed in England by one of the Examination Boards back in the 1980s. At the end of the course, each student who had submitted such a project had a 15-min viva with an external examiner. The mark scheme rewarded not only the sorts of things that any advanced level biology mark scheme would credit (use of literature, appropriate research design, care in data collection, thorough analysis, etc.) but originality too. There was therefore an emphasis on novel research. Indeed, occasionally students published sole- or co-authored accounts of their work in biology or biology education journals.

We mentioned above Driver’s ( 1983 ) caution about the extent to which it is realistic to envisage high school students undertaking investigative research projects that have more than superficial resemblance to those undertaken by actual scientists. Nevertheless, as the above review indicates, there is a strong strand within school science education of advocating the benefits of students designing and undertaking open-ended research projects (cf. Albone et al., 1995 ). Roth ( 1995 ) argued that for school science to be authentic, students need to:

(1) learn in contexts constituted in part by ill-defined problems; (2) experience uncertainties and ambiguities and the social nature of scientific work and knowledge; (3) learning is predicated on, and driven by, their current knowledge state; (4) experience themselves as parts of communities of inquiry in which knowledge, practices, resources and discourse are shared; (5) in these communities, members can draw on the expertise of more knowledgeable others whether they are peers, advisors or teachers. (p. 1)

Investigative research projects in science allow learners to learn about science by doing science, and therefore might help foster science identities. Science identities can involve someone recognising themselves and also being recognised by others as being a science person, and also with having various experiences, knowledge, and skills that are valued and recognised within the wider fields of science.

However, the evidence base, as indicated above and in the systematic review of practical independent research projects in high school science undertaken by Bennett et al. ( 2018 ), is still not robust. We need research studies that make explicit the putative benefits of investigative research projects in science, that have adequate control groups, and that look at the long-term consequences of such projects not only by collecting delayed data from participants (whether by surveys or interviews) but by following them longitudinally to see whether such projects make any difference to their subsequent education and career destinations. We also know very little about the significance of students’ home circumstances for their enthusiasm and capacity to undertake investigative research projects in science, though it seems likely that students with high science capital (DeWitt et al., 2016 ) are more likely to receive familial support in undertaking such projects (cf. Lissitsa & Chachashvili‐Bolotin, 2019 ).

We also need studies that consider more carefully what it is to engage in scientific practices. It is notable that the existing literature on investigative research projects for students in science makes no use of the literature on ethnographic studies of scientists at work—neither the foundational texts (e.g. Latour & Woolgar, 1979 ; Knorr-Cetina, 1983 ) nor more recent studies (e.g. Silvast et al., 2020 ). Too often there is a tendency for investigative research projects for students in science to ignore the reasons why scientists work in particular areas and to assume that once a written report of the research has been authored, the work is done. There can also be a somewhat simplistic belief that the sine qua non of an investigative research project is experimental science. Keen as we are on experimental science, there is more to being a scientist than undertaking experiments. For example, computer simulations (Winsberg, 2019 ) and other approaches that take advantage of advances in digital technologies are of increasing importance to the work of many scientists. It would be good to see such approaches reflected in more school student investigative projects (cf. Staacks et al., 2018 ).

More generally, greater authenticity would be likely to result if the following three issues were explicitly considered with students:

How should the particular focus of the research be identified? Students should be helped to realise that virtually all scientific research requires substantial funding. It may not be enough, therefore, for students to identify the focus for their work on the grounds of personal interest alone if they wish to understand how science is undertaken in reality. Here, such activities as participating in well-designed citizen science projects that still enable student autonomy (e.g. Curtis, 2018 ) can help.

Students should be encouraged, once their written report has been completed, to present it at a conference (as happens, for instance, with many IRIS projects) and to write it up for publication. Writing for publication is more feasible now that publication can be via blogs or on the internet, compared to the days when the only possible outlets were hard-copy journals or monographs.

What change in the world does the research wish to effect? Much student research in science seems implicitly to presume that science is neutral. The reality—back to funding again—is that most scientific research is undertaken with specific ends in mind (for instance, the development of medical treatments, the location of valuable mineral ores, the manufacture of new products for which desire can also be manufactured). It is not, of course, that we are calling for students unquestioningly to adopt the same values as those of professional scientists. Rather, we would encourage students to be enabled to reflect on such ends and values.

Abraham, L. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House, 75 (5), 229–232.

Article Google Scholar

Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. (2012). Practical work: its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49 (8), 1035–1055.

Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds) (2017). Enhancing learning with effective practical science 11-16 . London: Bloomsbury.

Google Scholar

Albone, E., Collins, N., & Hill, T. (Eds) (1995). Scientific research in schools: a compendium of practical experience. Bristol: Clifton Scientific Trust.

Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: a conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52 (7), 922–948.

Archer, L., & DeWitt, J. (2017). Understanding young people’s science aspirations: How students form ideas about ‘becoming a scientist’. Abingdon: Routledge.

Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (1), 70–102.

Bell, R., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (5), 487–509.

Bennett, J., Dunlop, L., Knox, K., Reiss, M. J., & Torrance Jenkins, R. (2018). Practical independent research projects in science: a synthesis and evaluation of the evidence of impact on high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 40 (14), 1755–1773.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: a synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91 (3), 347–370.

Bevins, S., Jordan, J., & Perry, E. (2011). Reflecting on professional development. Educational Action Research, 19 (3), 399–411.

Bowes, L., Birkin, G., & Tazzyman, S. (2017). Nuffield research placements evaluation: final report on waves 1 to 3 of the longitudinal survey of 2016 applicants. Leicester: CFE Research.

Bowes, L., Tazzyman, S., Stutz, A., & Birkin, G. (2021). Evaluation of Nuffield future researchers. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: the contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education , 28 , 1373–1388.

British Science Association. (2018). CREST Awards: getting started guide, primary. London: British Science Association.

Bulte, A., Westbroek, H., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (9), 1063–1086.

Burgin, S., McConnell, W., & Flowers, A. (2015). ‘I actually contributed to their research’: the influence of an abbreviated summer apprenticeship program in science and engineering for diverse high-school learners. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (3), 411–445.

Burgin, S., Sadler, T., & Koroly, M. J. (2012). High school student participation in scientific research apprenticeships: variation in and relationships among student experiences and outcomes. Research in Science Education, 42 , 439–467.

Carsten Conner, L., Oxtoby, L., & Perin, S. (2021). Power and positionality shape identity work during a science research apprenticeship for girls. International Journal of Science Education , 1–14.

Carsten Conner, L., Perin, S., & Pettit, E. (2018). Tacit knowledge and girls’ notions about a field science community of practice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8 (2), 164–177.

Cartrette, D., & Melroe-Lehrman, B. (2012). Describing changes in undergraduate students’ preconceptions of research activities. Research in Science Education, 42 , 1073–1100.

Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2003). Student review of the science curriculum: major findings . London: Planet Science.

Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., Milner-Bolotin, M., & Lissitsa, S. (2016). Examination of factors predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education , 38 (3), 366–390.

Chapman, A., & Feldman, A. (2017). Cultivation of science identity through authentic science in an urban high school classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12 , 469–491.

Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (2), 195–213.

Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26 , 71–81.

Cilauro, F., & Paull, G. (2019). Evaluation of Nuffield research placements: interim report. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Claussen, S., & Osborne, J. (2013). Bourdieu’s notion of cultural capital and its implications for the science curriculum. Science Education, 97 (1), 58–79.

Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2012). An international perspective on science curriculum development and implementation. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 771–782). Springer, Dordrecht.

Chapter Google Scholar

Cukurova, M., Hanley, P., & Lewis, A. (2015). Rapid evidence review of good practical science. London: Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

Curtis, V. (2018). Online citizen science and the widening of academia: distributed engagement with research and knowledge production . Cham: Palgrave.

Dawson, V. (2015). Western Australian high school students’ understandings about the socioscientific issue of climate change. International Journal of Science Education , 37 (7), 1024–1043.

Deemer, E., Ogas, J., Barr, A., Bowdon, R., Hall, M., Paula, S., … Lim, S. (2021). Scientific research identity development need not wait until college: examining the motivational impact of a pre-college authentic research experience. Research in Science Education , 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09994-6

Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: framework document. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4 . Accessed 1 July 1 2017.

DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Mau, A. (2016). Dimensions of science capital: exploring its potential for understanding students’ science participation. International Journal of Science Education, 38 , 2431–2449.

Dijkstra, E., & Goedhart, M. (2011). Evaluation of authentic science projects on climate change in secondary schools: a focus on gender differences. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29 (2), 131–146.

Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (1), 94–116.

Etkina, E., Matilsky, T., & Lawrence, M. (2003). Pushing to the edge: Rutgers Astrophysics Institute motivates talented high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (10), 958–985.

Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2016). Secondary science teachers’ and students’ involvement in a primary school community of science practice: how it changed their practices and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 46 , 91–112.

Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2019). ‘You actually feel like you’re actually doing some science’: primary students’ perspectives of their involvement in the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education, 49 , 465–498.

Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82 (3), 300–329.

Gatsby Charitable Foundation. (2017). Good practical science. London: Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

Gokpinar, T., & Reiss, M. (2016). The role of outside-school factors in science education: a two-stage theoretical model linking Bourdieu and Sen, with a case study. International Journal of Science Education , 38 , 1278–1303.

Goodwin, E., Anokhin, V., Gray, M., Zajic, D., Podrabsky, J., & Shortlidge, E. (2021). Is this science? Students’ experiences of failure make a research-based course feel authentic. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20 (1), 1–15.

Hamlyn, B., Hanson, T., Malam, S., Man, C., Smith, K., & Williams, L. (2020). Young people’s views on science education: science education tracker 2019: wave 2. London: Wellcome Trust.

Hamlyn, R., Matthews, P., & Shanahan, M. (2017). Young people’s views on science education: science education tracker research report February 2017. London: Wellcome Trust.

Hatfield, P., Furnell, W., Shenoy, A., Fox, E., Parker, B., Thomas, L., & Rushton, E. (2019). IRIS opens pupils’ eyes to real space research. Astronomy & Geophysics, 60 (1), 1.22–1.24.

Hattie, J., Bustamante, V., Almarode, J. T., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2020). Great teaching by design: from intention to implementation in the visible learning classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education – theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51 , 287–314.

Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22 (1), 85–142.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88 (1), 28–54.

Hollins, M. & Reiss, M. J. (2016) A review of the school science curricula in eleven high achieving jurisdictions. The Curriculum Journal , 27 , 80-94.

Houseal, A., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student-teacher-scientist partnership on students’ and teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51 (1), 84–115.

Hsu, P.-L., & Espinoza, P. (2018). Cultivating constructivist science internships for high school students through a community of practice with cogenerative dialogues. Learning Environments Research, 21 , 267–283.

Husain, F., Wishart, R., Attygalle, K., Averill, P., Ilic, N., & Mayer, M. (2019). CREST Silver evaluation report. London: Education Endowment Foundation.

Institute of Physics. (2020). Limit Less: Support young people to change the world. London: Institute of Physics.

John, J., & Creighton, J. (2011). Researcher development: the impact of undergraduate research opportunity programmes on students in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (7), 781–797.

Kapon, S., Laherto, A., & Levrini, O. (2018). Disciplinary authenticity and personal relevance in school science. Science Education, 102 (5), 1077–1106.

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1983). New developments in science studies: the ethnographic challenge. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 8 (2), 153–177.

Koomen, M. H., Blair, R., Young-Isebrand, E., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2014). Science professional development with teachers: nurturing the scientist within. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education , 18 (6).

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts . Beverly Hills: Sage.

Liao, T., McKenna, J., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (2017). Four decades of High School Physics Olympics Competitions at the University of British Columbia. Physics in Canada , 73 (3), 127–129.

Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2013). Making learning whole: an instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8 , 51–86.

Linn, M., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities. Science, 347 (6222), 1261757.

Lissitsa, S., & Chachashvili‐Bolotin, S. (2019). Enrolment in mathematics and physics at the advanced level in secondary school among two generations of highly skilled immigrants. International Migration , 57 (5), 216–234.

Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Bush, S., Delaney, A., Mohr-Schroeder, M., & Soledad, S. Y. (2021). Informal learning environments and impact on interest in STEM careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19 , 45–64.

Mansfield J., & Reiss M. J. (2020). The place of values in the aims of school science education. In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, A. Fitzgerald, & A. Jones (Eds), Values in science education (pp. 191–209), Cham: Springer.

Martin, B., Kass, H., & Brouwer, W. (1990). Authentic science: a diversity of meanings. Science Education, 74 (5), 541–554.

Millar, R. (1998). Rhetoric and reality: what practical work in science is really for. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science. Which way now? (pp. 16–31). London: Routledge.

Milner-Bolotin, M. (2012). Increasing interactivity and authenticity of chemistry instruction through data acquisition systems and other technologies. Journal of Chemical Education , 89 (4), 477–481.

Molefe, M. L. (2011). A study of life sciences projects in science talent quest competitions in the Western Cape, South Africa, with special reference to scientific skills and knowledge . Unpublished PhD thesis.

Moore, A. M., Fairhurst, P., Correia, C. F., Harrison, C., & Bennett, J. M. (2020). Science practical work in a COVID-19 world: are teacher demonstrations, videos and textbooks effective replacements for hands-on practical activities? School Science Review , 102 (378), 7–12.

Moote, J. (2019). Investigating the longer-term impact of the CREST inquiry-based learning programme on student self-regulated processes and related motivations: views of students and teachers. Research in Science Education, 49 (1), 265–294.

Moote, J., Williams, J., & Sproule, J. (2013). When students take control: investigating the impact of the CREST inquiry-based learning program on self-regulated processes and related motivations in young science students. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12 (2), 178–196.

National Foundation for Educational Research. (2011). Exploring young people’s views on science education. London: Wellcome Trust.

Nuffield Foundation. (2020). Nuffield research placements: guide for student applicants. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Oliver, M. C., Jerrim, J., & Adkins, M. J. (2021a). PISA: Engagement Attainment and interest in Science (PEAS) – Final Report. Available at https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/lsri/documents/peas-report.pdf .

Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021b). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: a comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education , 51 , 595–616.

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.

Parker, B., Thomas, L., Rushton, E., & Hatfield, P. (2019). Transforming education with the Timepix detector – Ten years of CERN@school. Radiation Measurements, 127 (106090), 1–7.

Rahman, M. T., & Lewis, S. (2019). Evaluating the evidence base for evidence‐based instructional practices in chemistry through meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21610

Reveles, J., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 1111–1144.

Roberts, L., & Wassersug, R. (2009). Does doing scientific research in high school correlate with students staying in science? A half-century retrospective study. Research in Science Education, 39 , 251–256.

Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Rowland, S., Pedwell, R., Lawrie, G., Lovie-Toon, J., & Hung, Y. (2016). Do we need to design course-based undergraduate research experiences for authenticity? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15 (4), 1–16.

Royal Society. (2014). Vision for science and mathematics education. London: The Royal Society.

Rushton, E., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). From science teacher to ‘teacher scientist’: exploring the experiences of research-active science teachers in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 41 (11), 1541–1561.

Rushton, E., Charters, L., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). The experiences of active participation in academic conferences for high school science students. Research in Science & Technological Education , 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1657395

Savelsbergh, E., Prins, G., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B., Draijer, J., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: a meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19 , 158–172.

Schroeder, C., Scott, T., Tolson, H., Huang, T.-Y., & Lee, Y.-H. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (10), 1436–1460.

Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science practical work and its impact on high students’ academic achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education , 10 (2), 199–215.

Sharpe, R., & Abrahams, I. (2020). Secondary school students’ attitudes to practical work in biology, chemistry and physics in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38 (1), 84–104.

Silvast, A., Laes, E., Abram, S., & Bombaerts, G. (2020). What do energy modellers know? An ethnography of epistemic values and knowledge models. Energy Research & Social Science , 66 , 101495.

Sjöström, J. & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung . In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65–88). Cham: Springer.

Sousa-Silva, C., McKemmish, L., Chubb, K., Gorman, M., Baker, J., Barton, E., … Tennyson, J. (2018). Original Research by Young Twinkle Students (ORBYTS): when can students start performing original research? Physics Education, 53 (1), 1–12.

Staacks, S., Hütz, S., Heinke, H., & Stampfer, C. (2018). Advanced tools for smartphone-based experiments: phyphox. Physics Education , 53 (4), 045009.

Stake, J., & Mares, K. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (10), 1065–1088.

Stake, J., & Mares, K. (2005). Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: the splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (4), 359–375.

Stock Jones, R., Annable, T., Billingham, Z., & MacDonald, C. (2016). Quantifying CREST: what impact does the Silver CREST Award have on science scores and STEM subject selection? London: British Science Association.

Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 49 (4), 515–537.

Tyler-Wood, T., Ellison, A., Lim, O., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2012). Bringing up girls in science (BUGS): the effectiveness of an afterschool environmental science program for increasing female students’ interest in science careers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 , 46–55.

Ward, T., Delaloye, N., Adams, E. R., Ware, D., Vanek, D., Knuth, R., … Holian, A. (2016). Air toxics under the big sky: examining the effectiveness of authentic scientific research on high school students’ science skills and interest. International Journal of Science Education, 38 (6), 905–921.

Whyntie, T. (2016). CERN@School: forming nationwide collaborations for physics research in schools. Nuclear Physics News, 26 (1), 16–19.

Whyntie, T., Bithray, H., Cook, J., Coupe, A., Eddy, D., Fickling, R., … Shearer, N. (2015). CERN@school: demonstrating physics with the Timepix detector. Contemporary Physics, 56 (4), 451–467.

Whyntie, T., Cook, J., Coupe, A., Fickling, R., Parker, B., & Shearer, N. (2016). CERN@school: bringing CERN into the classroom. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, 273-275 , 1265–1270.

Williams, D., Brule, H., Kelley, S., & Skinner, E. (2018). Science in the learning gardens (SciLG): a study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5 (8), 1–14.

Winsberg, E. (2019). Computer simulations in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/simulations-science/ .

Young, J., Carsten Conner, L., & Pettit, E. (2020). ‘You really see it’: environmental identity shifts through interacting with a climate change-impacted glacier landscape. International Journal of Science Education, 42 (18), 3049–3070.

Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and ethical issues in science education: a prelude to action. Science & Education , 17 , 799–803.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to The Institute of Research in Schools for funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK

Michael J. Reiss, Richard Sheldrake & Wilton Lodge

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Reiss .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Reiss, M.J., Sheldrake, R. & Lodge, W. Investigative Research Projects for Students in Science: The State of the Field and a Research Agenda. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 23 , 80–95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00263-4

Download citation

Accepted : 01 February 2023

Published : 16 March 2023

Issue Date : March 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00263-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Science investigative research projects
Student autonomy
Student engagement
Authenticity
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Researchers gathered on rocks on the edge of a creek.

Innovation Anywhere, Opportunity Everywhere

Get the latest news on topics you choose, right in your inbox..

What's new

NSF invites K-12 students to compete for Game Maker Awards

3D neural network, stroke, neurorestoration, intelligence, self-correction, Brain organoids, Stretchable electronics, Artificial intelligence, Machine learning

NSF invests $14M in bioengineered systems and ethical biocomputing research

abstract image of a robot hand holding the earth globe in its hand

NSF invests $20M to advance artificial intelligence technologies for the geosciences   

A collage of five images, each showing people working in different high tech labs.

Quantum science and engineering expands across the nation with $39M from NSF

Our priorities.

Promote discovery in science & engineering

America's economic and national security depend on our ability to invest heavily in the technologies of today while making the discoveries that are the foundation for the technologies of tomorrow.

NSF by the numbers

NSF’s Fiscal Year 2023 enacted budget

Percent of budget supporting research, education and related activities

Organizations supported by NSF across every state and U.S. territory

Researchers, entrepreneurs, students and teachers supported by NSF

Suggestions or feedback?

MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Machine learning
Sustainability
Black holes
Classes and programs

Departments

Aeronautics and Astronautics
Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Architecture
Political Science
Mechanical Engineering

Centers, Labs, & Programs

Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL)
Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
Lincoln Laboratory
School of Architecture + Planning
School of Engineering
School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
Sloan School of Management
School of Science
MIT Schwarzman College of Computing

MIT’s top research stories of 2021

Press contact :, media download.

*Terms of Use:

Images for download on the MIT News office website are made available to non-commercial entities, press and the general public under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license . You may not alter the images provided, other than to crop them to size. A credit line must be used when reproducing images; if one is not provided below, credit the images to "MIT."

Previous image Next image

Despite the pandemic’s disruptions, MIT’s research community still found a way to generate a number of impressive research breakthroughs in 2021. In the spirit of reflection that comes with every new orbit around the sun, below we count down 10 of the most-viewed research stories on MIT News from the past year.

We’ve also rounded up the year’s top MIT community-related stories .

10. Giving cancer treatment a recharge . In October, researchers discovered a way to jump-start the immune system to attack tumors. The method combines chemotherapy and immunotherapy to spur immune cells into action. The researchers hope it could allow immunotherapy to be used against more types of cancer.

9. Generating 3D holograms in real-time . Computer scientists developed a deep-learning-based system that allows computers to create holograms almost instantly. The system could be used to create holograms for virtual reality, 3D printing, medical imaging, and more — and it’s efficient enough to run on a smartphone.

8. Creating inhalable vaccines . Scientists at the Koch Institute developed a method for delivering vaccines directly to the lungs through inhalation. The new strategy induced a strong immune response in the lungs of mice and could offer a quicker response to viruses that infect hosts through mucosal surfaces.

7. Assessing Covid-19 transmission risk . Two MIT professors proposed a new approach to estimating the risks of exposure to Covid-19 in different indoor settings. The guidelines suggest a limit for exposure based on factors such as the size of the space, the number of people, the kinds of activity, whether masks are worn, and ventilation and filtration rates.

6. Teaching machine learning models to adapt . Researchers in CSAIL developed a new type of neural network that can change its underlying equations to continuously adapt to new data. The advance could improve models’ decision-making based on data that changes over time, such as in medical diagnosis and autonomous driving.

5. Programming fibers . In June, a team created the first fabric fiber with digital capabilities. The fibers can sense, store, analyze, and infer data and activity after being sewn into a shirt. The researchers say the fibers could be used to monitor physical performance, to detect diseases, and for a variety of medical purposes.

4. Examining the limitations of data visualizations . A collaboration between anthropologists and computer scientists found that coronavirus skeptics have used sophisticated data visualizations to argue against public health orthodoxy like wearing a mask. The researchers concluded that data visualizations aren’t sufficient to convey the urgency of the Covid-19 pandemic because even the clearest graphs can be interpreted through a variety of belief systems.

3. Developing a Covid-detecting face mask . Engineers at MIT and Harvard University designed a prototype face mask that can diagnose the person wearing the mask with Covid-19 in about 90 minutes. The masks are embedded with tiny, disposable sensors that can be fitted into other face masks and could also be adapted to detect other viruses.

2. Confirming Hawking’s black hole theorem . Using observations of gravitational waves, physicists from MIT and elsewhere confirmed a major theorem created by Stephen Hawking in 1971. The theorem states that the area of a black hole’s event horizon — the boundary beyond which nothing can ever escape — will never shrink.

1. Advancing toward fusion energy . In September, researchers at MIT and the MIT spinout Commonwealth Fusion Systems ramped up a high-temperature superconducting electromagnet to a field strength of 20 tesla, the most powerful magnetic field of its kind ever created on Earth. The demonstration was three years in the making and is believed to resolve one of greatest remaining points of uncertainty in the quest to build the world’s first fusion power plant that produces more energy than it consumes.

Share this news article on:

MIT community in 2021: A year in review

collage of images from top research stories

MIT community in 2020: A year in review

MIT's most popular research stories of 2019 spanned schools and disciplines.

More MIT News

David Trumper stands in front of a chalkboard, holding up a small cylindrical electric motor in each hand

For developing designers, there’s magic in 2.737 (Mechatronics)

Read full story →

Five square slices show glimpse of LLMs, and the final one is green with a thumbs up.

Study: Transparency is often lacking in datasets used to train large language models

Charalampos Sampalis wears a headset while looking at the camera

How MIT’s online resources provide a “highly motivating, even transformative experience”

A small model shows a wooden man in a sparse room, with dramatic lighting from the windows.

Students learn theater design through the power of play

Illustration of 5 spheres with purple and brown swirls. Below that, a white koala with insets showing just its head. Each koala has one purple point on either the forehead, ears, and nose.

A framework for solving parabolic partial differential equations

Feyisayo Eweje wears lab coat and gloves while sitting in a lab.

Funding at NSF

The U.S. National Science Foundation offers hundreds of funding opportunities — including grants, cooperative agreements and fellowships — that support research and education across science and engineering.

Learn how to apply for NSF funding by visiting the links below.

Finding the right funding opportunity

Learn about NSF's funding priorities and how to find a funding opportunity that's right for you.

Preparing your proposal

Learn about the pieces that make up a proposal and how to prepare a proposal for NSF.

Submitting your proposal

Learn how to submit a proposal to NSF using one of our online systems.

How we make funding decisions

Learn about NSF's merit review process, which ensures the proposals NSF receives are reviewed in a fair, competitive, transparent and in-depth manner.

NSF 101 answers common questions asked by those interested in applying for NSF funding.

Research approaches we encourage

Learn about interdisciplinary research, convergence research and transdisciplinary research.

Newest funding opportunities

Nsf 75th anniversary: nsf stem day, neurobiology in changing ecosystems (nice), advancing informal stem learning (aisl), advancing plant transformation.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

Knowledge Base
Starting the research process
How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

Published on October 12, 2022 by Shona McCombes and Tegan George. Revised on November 21, 2023.

A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s important, and how you will conduct your research.

The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most proposals will contain at least these elements:

Introduction

Literature review.

Research design

Reference list

While the sections may vary, the overall objective is always the same. A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research plan, helping you get organized and feel confident in the path forward you choose to take.

Research proposal purpose, research proposal examples, research design and methods, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research proposals.

Academics often have to write research proposals to get funding for their projects. As a student, you might have to write a research proposal as part of a grad school application , or prior to starting your thesis or dissertation .

In addition to helping you figure out what your research can look like, a proposal can also serve to demonstrate why your project is worth pursuing to a funder, educational institution, or supervisor.

Research proposal aims
	Show your reader why your project is interesting, original, and important.
	Demonstrate your comfort and familiarity with your field. Show that you understand the current state of research on your topic.
	Make a case for your . Demonstrate that you have carefully thought about the data, tools, and procedures necessary to conduct your research.
	Confirm that your project is feasible within the timeline of your program or funding deadline.

Research proposal length

The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.

One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.

Download our research proposal template

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.

Example research proposal #1: “A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management”
Example research proposal #2: “Medical Students as Mediators of Change in Tobacco Use”

Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:

The proposed title of your project
Your supervisor’s name
Your institution and department

The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.

Your introduction should:

Introduce your topic
Give necessary background and context
Outline your problem statement and research questions

To guide your introduction , include information about:

Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
How much is already known about the topic
What is missing from this current knowledge
What new insights your research will contribute
Why you believe this research is worth doing

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

Academic style
Vague sentences
Style consistency

See an example

As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.

In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:

Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesize prior scholarship

Following the literature review, restate your main objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.

Building a research proposal methodology
	? or ? , , or research design?
	, )? ?
	, , , )?
	?

To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.

For example, your results might have implications for:

Improving best practices
Informing policymaking decisions
Strengthening a theory or model
Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
Creating a basis for future research

Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .

Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.

Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.

Download our research schedule template

Example research schedule
Research phase	Objectives	Deadline
1. Background research and literature review		20th January
2. Research design planning	and data analysis methods	13th February
3. Data collection and preparation	with selected participants and code interviews	24th March
4. Data analysis	of interview transcripts	22nd April
5. Writing		17th June
6. Revision	final work	28th July

If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.

Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:

Cost : exactly how much money do you need?
Justification : why is this cost necessary to complete the research?
Source : how did you calculate the amount?

To determine your budget, think about:

Travel costs : do you need to go somewhere to collect your data? How will you get there, and how much time will you need? What will you do there (e.g., interviews, archival research)?
Materials : do you need access to any tools or technologies?
Help : do you need to hire any research assistants for the project? What will they do, and how much will you pay them?

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Methodology

Sampling methods
Simple random sampling
Stratified sampling
Cluster sampling
Likert scales
Reproducibility

Statistics

Null hypothesis
Statistical power
Probability distribution
Effect size
Poisson distribution

Research bias

Optimism bias
Cognitive bias
Implicit bias
Hawthorne effect
Anchoring bias
Explicit bias

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.

A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.

A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.

All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

IMAGES

Eight keys to choosing and researching an award-winning science fair
Eight keys to choosing and researching an award-winning science fair
Research for science fair project. 20 AMAZING Science Fair Project
Ideas For A Science Experiment
Introduction to Scientific Research Projects
Make a Science Fair Project about Scientific Method

VIDEO

10 science project ideas/ science fair projects/best science fair projects
PQWT Home Leaks Detector
The source of the leak has been identified. #detector #waterleak #leaks
List of Science Projects || Science Day Projects || Science Day Project Ideas 2023
China research vessel Shy Yan 6 / Colombo port Sri Lanka / 실험 6silheom 6 / 선박seonbag / Oceans
Science Fair Projects New Ideas 2023

COMMENTS

Science Fair Project Ideas, Answers, & Tools
Free Topic Selection Wizard, science fair project ideas, step by step how to do a science fair project, Ask an Expert discussion board, and science fair tips for success.
Meet students who spent their summer pursuing sustainability research
Across all the programs, undergraduates contributed directly to research projects under the guidance of Stanford scholars. They also participated in shared group activities such as research seminars and graduate school workshops. ... Earth science, and materials science. His project tackled a common problem in materials science: Insights about ...
NSF invests $14M in bioengineered systems and ethical biocomputing research
The U.S. National Science Foundation has invested $14 million in seven interdisciplinary research projects through the Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI): Biocomputing through EnGINeering Organoid Intelligence program.
Opinion: The Rat Race for Research Funding Delays Scientific Progress
This year to date, the National Science Foundation has already awarded funding to more than 500 projects with abstracts mentioning "climate change," on subjects such as salamander color ...
Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering Building
The Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building project, ... A new, five-story, 189,000-square-foot research building is proposed on the current site of Yost Hall, consistent with the 2015 Campus Master Plan. The building will include wet labs, dry labs—including shared core lab and technology platforms.
Clinical and Translational Science Institute Pilot Grant Information
Periodically, the CTSI releases Requests for Applications (RFAs) for pilot research projects, as well as offering training and career development grants. An ideation session will be held to learn more. The session will include a short 30-minute presentation on Translational Science and question and answer followed by a one hour and 30-minute ideation workshop.Prospective applicants are ...
Billionaire-Bought OceanXplorer Is a High-Tech Ocean Research Vessel
OceanXplorer, a 285-foot research vessel, contains cutting-edge tools for ocean science. Billionaire Ray Dalio bought the former oil ship and helped transform it into a world-leading research ...
Seventy-Five Scientific Research Projects You Can Contribute to Online
Learn about wildlife, galaxies, plants and more by contributing to citizen science projects from home. Smithsonian magazine lists dozens of free and easy ways to help researchers sift through data, identify species and transcribe notes.
SciStarter
SciStarter is the place to find, join, and contribute to science through providing people access to more than 2700 searchable formal and informal research projects and events. But more than just a project directory, SciStarter also offers a coordinated place to record contributions and access the tools and instruments needed to participate in ...
Science Projects
Browse Science Projects. Over 1,200 free science projects for K-12. Browse by subject, grade level, or try our Topic Selection Wizard to find your winning science project. With science projects in 32 different areas of science from astronomy to zoology, we've got something for everyone! Let us help you find a science project that fits your ...
10 Research Question Examples to Guide your Research Project
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not focused or researchable. The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically feasible. For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries.
What is a research project?
Learn what a research project is, how to choose a research approach, and how to write a research question, aim, objective, and paper. Find answers to common questions about research methods, styles, and formats.
List of Science Fair Project Ideas
Aerodynamics & Hydrodynamics. The 'Ultimate' Science Fair Project: Frisbee Aerodynamics. Aerodynamics & Hydrodynamics. The Paper Plate Hovercraft. Aerodynamics & Hydrodynamics. The Science of Launching an Airplane by Catapult. Aerodynamics & Hydrodynamics. The Swimming Secrets of Duck Feet. Aerodynamics & Hydrodynamics.
List of Science Fair Ideas and Experiments You Can Do
Okay, this is the hardest part of the whole project…picking your topic. But here are some ideas to get you started. Even if you don't like any, they may inspire you to come up with one of your own. Remember, check all project ideas with your teacher and parents, and don't do any project that would hurt or scare people or animals. Good luck!
Projects
Projects. Our teams leverage research developments across domains to build tools and technology that impact billions of people. Sharing our learnings and tools to fuel progress in the field is core to our approach. Languages. How Google is expanding support for thousands of the world's languages. Learn More.
Science Projects (Search: projects)
Browse Science Projects. Over 1,200 free science projects for K-12. Browse by subject, grade level, or try our Topic Selection Wizard to find your winning science project. With science projects in 32 different areas of science from astronomy to zoology, we've got something for everyone! Let us help you find a science project that fits your ...
Zooniverse
A vibrant community. Zooniverse gives people of all ages and backgrounds the chance to participate in real research with over 50 active online citizen science projects. Work with millions of registered users around the world to contribute to research projects led by hundreds of researchers. Sign in or register to get started.
A Beginner's Guide to Starting the Research Process
Step 4: Create a research design. The research design is a practical framework for answering your research questions. It involves making decisions about the type of data you need, the methods you'll use to collect and analyze it, and the location and timescale of your research. There are often many possible paths you can take to answering ...
100 Science Topics for Research Papers
Research Sources. Science: As a premier publication in the field, Science publishes peer-reviewed research and expert-curated information. Nature: Publishes peer-reviewed articles on biology, environment, health, and physical sciences. Nature is an authoritative source for current information. If articles are difficult to read, you can search ...
110+ Best Science Investigatory Project Topics: Dive into Science
Whether you're mixing chemicals, observing insects, or measuring temperature, you're the scientist in charge. Step 4: Clues and Evidence. As you experiment, you collect clues in the form of data - numbers, measurements, observations. It's like gathering puzzle pieces. Step 5: The "Aha!".
Research Projects : USDA ARS
You can search for a research project by looking for a keyword in the title, approach, objective, or all of those fields. You can also search by project number. As well, you can explore research projects by subject of investigation. You can browse international research projects by country. Or you can browse research project annual reports.
Investigative Research Projects for Students in Science: The State of
One of the ways in which students can be taught science is by doing science, the intention being to help students understand the nature, processes, and methods of science. Investigative research projects may be used in an attempt to reflect some aspects of science more authentically than other teaching and learning approaches, such as confirmatory practical activities and teacher ...
How to Pick a Science Research Topic & Idea: FULL GUIDE
My full guide on how to come up with a science research topic and idea. Are you trying to find your STEM research passion? In this video, I will walk you thr...
NSF
NSF's mission is to advance the progress of science, a mission accomplished by funding proposals for research and education made by scientists, engineers, ... Explore our database of funded projects to learn what we're doing across the U.S. Get the latest news on topics you choose, right in your inbox. ...
MIT's top research stories of 2021
The year's popular research stories include a promising new approach to cancer immunotherapy, the confirmation of a 50-year-old theorem, and a major fusion breakthrough. In 2021, MIT researchers made advances toward fusion energy, confirmed Stephen Hawking's black hole theorem, developed a Covid-detecting face mask, and created a ...
Physics Science Projects
Science Fair Project Idea. Engineering Design Process. In this engineering challenge, you will build a car powered by nothing but a rubber band. The farther the car goes, and the fewer materials you use to build it, the higher your score. Enter your score in the 2024 Science Buddies Engineering Challenge for a chance to win prizes!
Funding at NSF
The U.S. National Science Foundation offers hundreds of funding opportunities — including grants, cooperative agreements and fellowships — that support research and education across science and engineering. Learn how to apply for NSF funding by visiting the links below.
What Is a Research Design
A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question. Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative, descriptive, longitudinal, experimental, or correlational. What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.
How to Write a Research Proposal
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement, before your research objectives. Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you'll address the overarching aim.
Planning and Managing Scientific Research: A guide for the ...
Download. XML. Although there are many books on project management, few address the issues associated with scientific research. This work is based on extensive scientific rese...