The University of Pennsylvania is an internationally renowned research institution that attracts the best students from the United States and around the globe. The Graduate Program is designed for students who wish to earn a Ph.D. in Chemistry while undertaking cutting edge research. The program provides students with the necessary theoretical background and hands-on training to become independent and highly successful scientists. Graduate students achieve mastery of advanced chemistry topics through courses in different subdisciplines. Broad exposure to current research also occurs via four weekly departmental seminar programs and many interdisciplinary, university-wide lecture series.
Currently, faculty, students, and postdoctoral associates in Chemistry work in the fields of bioinorganic chemistry, bioorganic chemistry, chemical biology, biophysical chemistry, bioinformatics, materials science, laser chemistry, health related chemistry, structural and dynamical studies of biological systems, X-ray scattering/diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, applications of computing and computer graphics, as well as investigations of chemical communication and hormone-receptor interactions. Many research groups combine different techniques to explore frontier areas, such as nanomaterials applied to biology, photoactive biomolecules, and single-molecule imaging. Novel synthetic procedures are under constant development for targets ranging from super-emissive nanoparticles to highly specialized drug molecules and giant dendrimers, which are being explored, for example, as drug-delivery systems. The Research Facilities in the Department of Chemistry provide a strong technology base to enable the highest level of innovation. Graduate students are a driving, integral force at Penn Chemistry.
By Joel Shulman
How does your chemistry Ph.D. program compare to others in terms of department size and student demographics? Requirements for the degree? Graduate student progression and support? Developing skills that go beyond knowledge of chemistry? Answers to these questions and many others can be gleaned from the Survey of Ph.D. Programs in Chemistry recently reported by the ACS Committee on Professional Training (CPT) . Highlights of the survey are given here.
View the full report
The primary objective of the CPT is to facilitate the maintenance and improvement of the quality of chemical education at the postsecondary level. Not only does the Committee develop and administer the guidelines that define high-quality undergraduate education, but it also produces resources such as the ACS Directory of Graduate Education and publishes data on undergraduate and graduate education. Approximately every ten years, CPT fields a survey of Ph.D. programs. The latest survey solicited data from all 196 Ph.D. programs in chemistry and received usable information (base year, 2007) from 139 of these programs.
The 139 reporting Ph.D. programs are divided for purposes of comparison into three groups of approximately equal size according to the total number of graduate students in the program: 44 small (defined as 0 to 40 total graduate students), 46 medium (41 to 105 graduate students), and 49 large programs (106+ graduate students). The number of students in Ph.D. programs ranges from 0 to 394 (see Figure 1) with a total of 13,280 students. Eighteen departments have more than 200 students, accounting for more than one-third (4,460) of the total graduate students in chemistry. The 30 largest programs account for almost 50% of graduate students. The average program size is 96 students (and 23 faculty), while the median program size is 67 students.
Of the doctoral students in responding programs, 27.4% are women, 5.2% are underrepresented minorities, and 42.3% are international students (Table 1). Small programs tend to have a higher percentage of underrepresented minority students (averaging 7.8%), while large programs have a higher percentage of women (28.5%) and a lower percentage of international students (37.3%).
All Schools | Small Programs (0-40 students) | Medium Programs (41-105 students) | Large Programs (106+ students) | |
Avg. # of faculty | 23 | 15 | 20 | 33 |
Avg. # of students | 96 | 25 | 70 | 183 |
% International | 42.3% | 53.0% | 52.6% | 37.3% |
% African American | 2.4% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 2.3% |
% Hispanic | 2.5% | 4.2% | 1.8% | 2.5% |
% Native American | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
% Women | 27.4% | 21.6% | 26.1% | 28.5% |
Of course, a doctoral dissertation is required by all Ph.D. programs. Most (71%) graduate programs require entering graduate students to take placement exams, although this requirement tends to be less prevalent as program size increases. The average program requires a minimum of 20 credits (semester hours, corrected for programs on the quarter system) of coursework, a number that does not vary significantly by program size. In addition to course work and dissertation, 96% of programs require at least one of the following: cumulative examinations (58%), an oral preliminary exam (54%), a comprehensive oral exam (50%), and/or a comprehensive written exam (31%). All four of these exams are required by 7% of programs; 17% of programs require three; 43% of programs require two; and 28% require only one. Large programs require cumulative exams less often and oral exams more often than small or medium programs. Only four programs (3%) require students to pass a language exam for the Ph.D.
All Programs | Small Programs (0-40 students) | Medium Programs (41-105 students) | Large Programs (106+ students) | |
Entering graduate students take placement exams | 71% | 79% | 70% | 65% |
Minimum number of credits of formal course work | 20 cr | 22 cr | 20 cr | 19 cr |
Require cumulative examination | 58% | 58% | 73% | 45% |
Require an oral preliminary examination | 54% | 37% | 53% | 69% |
Require a comprehensive written examination | 50% | 44% | 47% | 59% |
Require a comprehensive written examination | 31% | 37% | 27% | 31% |
Require a foreign language examination | 3% | 2% | 4% | 2% |
Require creation and defense of original proposal | 74% | 72% | 70% | 80% |
The mean time to the Ph.D. is 5.1 years, a number that varies neither by program size nor by public vs. private institution (data not shown). Most programs place a limit on the amount of time allowed to achieve a Ph.D. (average of 7.8 years) as well as on the number of years of departmental support allowed a student (average of 5.9 years). More than 80% of students choose a research advisor within six months of entering graduate school. A significant number of programs either require or permit laboratory rotations before a final advisor is selected.
Monetary support for Ph.D. students comes from teaching assistantships more often than from research assistantships at small and medium programs, while the reverse is true in large programs. There is wide variation in TA stipends, depending on both program size and geographic location. Most programs have a range of stipends, which on average run from $18,000 to about $20,000 per year. Teaching assistants at larger programs are more likely to teach discussion (recitation) sections than those in small or medium programs.
All Programs | Small Programs (0-40 students) | Medium Programs (41-105 students) | Large Programs (106+ students) | |
Mean time to Ph.D. degree | 5.1 years | 5.0 years | 5.2 years | 5.1 years |
Limit time allowed to achieve Ph.D. (if so, how long?) | 73% (7.8 years) | 78% (7.8 years) | 69% (8.1 years) | 73% (7.4 years) |
Limit number of years of support? (If so, how long?) | 60% (5.9 years) | 70% (5.5 years) | 56%(6.1 years) | 55% (6.2 years) |
What percentage of students select a research advisor within: Two months? Six months? Twelve months? | 20% 81% 98% | 23% 76% 97% | 17% 80% 100% | 21% 87% 100% |
Lab rotations are either allowed or required before selecting a final research advisor | 46% | 43% | 40% | 53% |
Percentage of students supported by: Teaching assistantships Research assistantships | 54% 40% | 62% 28% | 55% 40% | 45% 51% |
TA stipend Ave low Ave high | $18,000 $19,900 | $16,000 $18,500 | $18,200 $20,400 | $19,500 $20,700 |
Percentage of TAs teaching discussion sections | 45% | 32% | 41% | 60% |
In addition to chemistry knowledge and laboratory skills, it is important that all Ph.D. chemists develop skills in areas such as critical thinking, oral and written communication, and teamwork. Toward this end, 74% of all programs require students to create and defend an original research proposal (Table 2). All but six programs require students to make presentations (exclusive of the thesis defense) to audiences other than their research group; the average number of required presentations is 2.4, with little variation by program size. When asked whether any graduate students receive student-skills training outside of formal course work, 67% responded that at least some students receive specific training in communications; 59% in ethics/scientific integrity; 43% in grant writing; 37% in mentoring; 37% in intellectual property/patents; and 18% in business/economics. Students in large programs are more likely to receive some training in these skill areas than are students in other programs.
The data from this CPT survey provide a snapshot of graduate student demographics, requirements for the degree, and progression and support in chemistry Ph.D. programs. Survey results highlight similarities and differences among small, medium, and large programs across the country.
Dr. Joel I. Shulman retired as The Procter & Gamble Company's Manager of Doctoral Recruiting and University Relations in 2001 and is now an adjunct professor of chemistry at the University of Cincinnati. He serves the ACS as a consultant for the Office of Graduate Education and the Department of Career Management and Development and as a member of the Committee on Professional Training.
Accept & Close The ACS takes your privacy seriously as it relates to cookies. We use cookies to remember users, better understand ways to serve them, improve our value proposition, and optimize their experience. Learn more about managing your cookies at Cookies Policy .
1155 Sixteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA | service@acs.org | 1-800-333-9511 (US and Canada) | 614-447-3776 (outside North America)
Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society
Johns Hopkins University was the first American institution to emphasize graduate education and to establish a PhD program in chemistry. Founding Chair Ira Remsen initiated a tradition of excellence in research and education that has continued until this day. The Hopkins graduate program is designed for students who desire a PhD in chemistry while advancing scientific knowledge for humankind.
The graduate program provides students with the background and technical expertise required to be leaders in their field and to pursue independent research.
Graduate students’ advancement is marked by entrance exams, coursework, teaching, seminars, oral examinations, and an individual research project that culminates in a thesis dissertation. The thesis research project represents an opportunity for graduate students to make a mark on the world. Working in conjunction with a faculty member or team, individually tailored thesis projects enable students to think independently about cutting-edge research areas that are of critical importance. Thesis research is the most important step toward becoming a PhD scientist, and our program provides an outstanding base with a proven track record of success.
Graduate students make up the heart of the Chemistry Department, and the department strives to support students’ individual needs. Each student is carefully advised and classes are traditionally quite small. Multidisciplinary research and course offerings that increase scientific breadth and innovation are hallmarks of the program. In addition to academic and technical development, our department also offers several outlets for professional and social development.
For more information, contact the Director of Graduate Studies. Dr. Art Bragg Office: Remsen 221 410-516-5616 [email protected]
Prospective students, application process, application faqs, for admitted students, current students, phd program requirements, thesis preparation, for first year students, student organizations, chemistry student seminars, quality of life.
Interdisciplinary programs.
1-25 of 1,390 results
#1 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
Blue checkmark.
PASADENA, CA ,
133 Niche users give it an average review of 4 stars.
Featured Review: Other says I like the campus most , students activities , diverse programs of alumni and dorms and libraries . overall experiences are very good . .
Read 133 reviews.
Overall Niche Grade : A+ ,
Acceptance Rate : 3% ,
Net Price : $20,755 ,
SAT Range : 1530-1580 ,
#2 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
CAMBRIDGE, MA ,
666 Niche users give it an average review of 4.2 stars.
Featured Review: Other says My experience has greatly exceeded my already-high expectations. My professors have always been available and the opportunity to apply my studies and skills to research projects was great. My... .
Read 666 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 4% ,
Net Price : $20,232 ,
#3 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
861 Niche users give it an average review of 4.2 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says Attending Harvard College has been an inspiring, challenging, and eye-opening experience. As a future dental school applicant, I’ve taken full advantage of the numerous opportunities to engage with... .
Read 861 reviews.
Net Price : $19,491 ,
SAT Range : 1490-1580 ,
Saint John's University - Minnesota
Kennesaw State University
Norco College
#4 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
NEW HAVEN, CT ,
1063 Niche users give it an average review of 4 stars.
Featured Review: Senior says Aside from the obvious (great academics and professors), there are just so many great resources and opportunities available at Yale. Unfortunately, you don't get any guidance or help accessing them,... .
Read 1063 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 5% ,
Net Price : $18,647 ,
SAT Range : 1500-1580 ,
#5 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
LA JOLLA, CA ,
4048 Niche users give it an average review of 3.6 stars.
Featured Review: Freshman says The University of California San Diego is honestly the perfect place, I knew I wanted to be here since I was a sophomore in high school. The campus itself is beautiful, and if you want to explore out... .
Read 4048 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 24% ,
Net Price : $16,111 ,
#6 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
ATLANTA, GA ,
1632 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says While Emory does not a traditional college experience by many means, it is definitely a great place to go with lots of wonderful resources. There are ample opportunities, especially for students... .
Read 1632 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 11% ,
Net Price : $26,680 ,
SAT Range : 1430-1550 ,
#7 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
PRINCETON, NJ ,
476 Niche users give it an average review of 4 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says Princeton University is certainly an academically rigorous college. It attracts students who hold themselves to high standards which, due to grade deflation, adds to the stress of most students. The... .
Read 476 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 6% ,
Net Price : $18,698 ,
#8 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
CHICAGO, IL ,
1307 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Alum says I enjoyed my time at Hyde Park! I thought that the school challenged me strongly and prepared me well for post-college life. The curriculum was thoughtful and the range of classes to take outside of... .
Read 1307 reviews.
Net Price : $36,991 ,
#9 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
PITTSBURGH, PA ,
1490 Niche users give it an average review of 3.7 stars.
Featured Review: Freshman says Starting as a freshman at Carnegie Mellon has been a whirlwind experience. Moving from the bustling, sunny streets of Dubai to the colder, more laid-back vibe of Pittsburgh was a big adjustment. I... .
Read 1490 reviews.
Net Price : $33,499 ,
SAT Range : 1490-1570 ,
#10 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
CHAPEL HILL, NC ,
2699 Niche users give it an average review of 3.9 stars.
Featured Review: Alum says I had a wonderful experience during my undergrad at UNC Chapel Hill! The campus is beautiful, there are always people hanging out on the quads, and there are many traditions that continue every year.... .
Read 2699 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 17% ,
Net Price : $10,614 ,
SAT Range : 1350-1530 ,
#11 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
STANFORD, CA ,
1296 Niche users give it an average review of 4.1 stars.
Featured Review: Alum says I'm an alum, parent of an alum, & worked in a significant position at Stanford. I loved meeting brilliant people from around the world. As a result, I learned a tremendous amount in academic & social interactions. Stanford provided opportunities to meet world leaders, policy... Due to the qtr system, I took a ton of classes so I double majored. My daughter was Phi Beta Kappa as she also took classes in different disciplines. I walked on to athletic teams & by my last year was playing with a US team. That had a significant impact on my life. Campus is amazing! 8000 acres with the farm, gardens, museums, hiking, etc. .
Read 1296 reviews.
Net Price : $18,279 ,
#12 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
HOUSTON, TX ,
1130 Niche users give it an average review of 4.1 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says Rice University is a great school for all-rounders—people who have more than one passion in life and want to explore all these passions together. They emphasize this even in the more intensive... .
Read 1130 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 9% ,
Net Price : $19,902 ,
#13 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
DURHAM, NC ,
1214 Niche users give it an average review of 3.9 stars.
Featured Review: Alum says Duke is a great community! While classes were difficult, challenged us to think critically, and were competitive by nature, I believe Duke students worked hard to help each other learn and succeed.... .
Read 1214 reviews.
Net Price : $23,694 ,
#14 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
BERKELEY, CA ,
4539 Niche users give it an average review of 3.7 stars.
Featured Review: Junior says As a minority student at UC Berkeley, my experience has been both challenging and rewarding. Initially, I found aspects of campus life exclusive, making it hard to find my place. However, I've grown... .
Read 4539 reviews.
Net Price : $19,257 ,
SAT Range : 1310-1530 ,
#15 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
LOS ANGELES, CA ,
5648 Niche users give it an average review of 4 stars.
Featured Review: Senior says Hosting over 1,200 clubs and student organizations, UCLA has something for everyone. This is a school where it is easy to find the connections to experience new things, as well as get involved on... .
Read 5648 reviews.
Net Price : $16,999 ,
#16 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
BALTIMORE, MD ,
1419 Niche users give it an average review of 3.7 stars.
Featured Review: Freshman says Absolutely fantastic experience. Better than all of the Ivy League schools combined. Professors are superb, students are excellent. Happiest place on Earth - like another Disney World, but better! .
Read 1419 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 7% ,
Net Price : $24,034 ,
SAT Range : 1520-1570 ,
#17 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA ,
2444 Niche users give it an average review of 3.9 stars.
Featured Review: Junior says As a student at the University of Virginia, my experience was shaped by a mix of academic rigor and vibrant student life. UVA's beautiful grounds and strong community create an environment that's... However, UVA has areas needing improvement, particularly in diversity and inclusion. While progress has been made, more efforts are needed to ensure all students feel welcome, regardless of race or... .
Read 2444 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 19% ,
Net Price : $19,469 ,
SAT Range : 1400-1540 ,
#18 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
NASHVILLE, TN ,
1361 Niche users give it an average review of 4 stars.
Featured Review: Senior says I have overall had a great experience with Vanderbilt University, and I am truly sad that it is my last year coming up in the fall. I think that community is something that Vanderbilt does well, as... .
Read 1361 reviews.
Net Price : $25,606 ,
#19 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
IRVINE, CA ,
4324 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says As an incoming second-year undergraduate, I found myself getting comfortable with much ease and little time. The university is renowned for its diverse student body. Coming from a diverse city, I... .
Read 4324 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 21% ,
Net Price : $14,033 ,
SAT Range : 1230-1430 ,
#20 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
CHAMPAIGN, IL ,
5059 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says Upon arrival to UIUC, I immediately felt the sense that I was welcomed and appreciated for being there. The professors are spectacular! My organic chemistry professor contributed to the COVID test,... .
Read 5059 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 45% ,
Net Price : $14,544 ,
SAT Range : 1320-1510 ,
#21 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
EVANSTON, IL ,
1501 Niche users give it an average review of 3.7 stars.
Featured Review: Alum says The 90s were a different time. While NU is a larger, private school, I really had a small school, community feel. Lived in the Residential College system (CRC & Willard) was great for getting to... .
Read 1501 reviews.
Net Price : $22,095 ,
#22 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
NEW YORK, NY ,
1386 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Other says The resources available at Columbia are unparalleled. The Butler Library, with its vast collection of historical documents and rare manuscripts, became my second home. I spent countless hours there,... Living in New York City has been an adventure in itself. The city’s cultural diversity and endless opportunities for exploration have made my time at Columbia even more exciting. From visiting... .
Read 1386 reviews.
Net Price : $22,058 ,
#23 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
PROVIDENCE, RI ,
1088 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says I love Brown so much and can hardly imagine going to a different school! However, I'd love to see more support regarding challenges students from various backgrounds may face specifically transitions... .
Read 1088 reviews.
Net Price : $26,723 ,
#24 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
ITHACA, NY ,
2100 Niche users give it an average review of 3.8 stars.
Featured Review: Sophomore says Coming from a somewhat big city, I wasn't sure what to expect from a small college town like Ithaca. But after a short year at Cornell, I absolutely love it. Although there isn't a whole lot to do,... Aside from Ithaca, I also think Cornell is the perfect size for a school. It's big so it's pretty busy and there's always parties and social gatherings, and you don't have to see your opps that... .
Read 2100 reviews.
Net Price : $26,060 ,
SAT Range : 1470-1570 ,
#25 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America .
WILLIAMSTOWN, MA ,
318 Niche users give it an average review of 3.9 stars.
Featured Review: Alum says I really enjoyed my time at Williams College! It is what you make of it - if you reach out and get involved in things you are 100% going to meet really cool, passionate, and extremely smart people... I was part of an athletics team and it really made my time enjoyable there. It was tough to balance everything sometimes but it prepared me for after college life really well. I will say that the... .
Read 318 reviews.
Acceptance Rate : 8% ,
Net Price : $20,965 ,
SAT Range : 1480-1570 ,
University of Montana
Missouri University of Science and Technology
The College of New Jersey
Showing results 1 through 25 of 1,390
Updated: February 29, 2024
Below is a list of best universities in the United States ranked based on their research performance in Chemistry. A graph of 441M citations received by 10.9M academic papers made by 1,407 universities in the United States was used to calculate publications' ratings, which then were adjusted for release dates and added to final scores.
We don't distinguish between undergraduate and graduate programs nor do we adjust for current majors offered. You can find information about granted degrees on a university page but always double-check with the university website.
For Chemistry
The best cities to study Chemistry in the United States based on the number of universities and their ranks are Cambridge , Stanford , Ann Arbor , and Baltimore .
Engage in outstanding research in every area of chemistry.
Join an enthusiastic department with an international reputation and world-class research facilities, including newly renovated research laboratories containing a wide range of highly specialized, state-of-the-art instrumentation.
Advanced training in chemistry can lead to a supervisory position in a lab or research facility, or employment in many other fields.
You'll need to meet the Faculty of Graduate Studies minimum requirements as well as any program-specific admissions requirements before you can apply.
At Dalhousie, we want our students to focus on their studies, rather than worry about their personal finances. We offer competitive tuition rates and funding programs to support graduate students in almost all of our degree programs.
Thesis : Pursue independent and original research guided by a supervisor to develop and defend your thesis.
5 years or longer
Delivery format:.
All graduate programs at Dalhousie are collaboratively delivered by a home Faculty and the Faculty of Graduate Studies .
GRADUATE COORDINATOR
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 902-494-3323
While every effort is made to ensure accuracy on this page, in the event of a discrepancy, Dalhousie's Academic Calendars are the official reference.
Experience University of Idaho with a virtual tour. Explore now
Helping to ensure U of I is a safe and engaging place for students to learn and be successful. Read about Title IX.
Review the events calendar.
The largest Vandal Family reunion of the year. Check dates.
U of I's web-based retention and advising tool provides an efficient way to guide and support students on their road to graduation. Login to SlateConnect.
Department of Chemistry
Physical Address: Renfrew Hall 116
Mailing Address: 875 Perimeter Dr, MS 2343 Moscow, ID 83844-2343
Phone: 208-885-6552
Fax: 208-885-6173
Email: [email protected]
Web: Department of Chemistry
To the Potential Graduate Student,
I would like to take this opportunity to introduce you to the Department of Chemistry at the University of Idaho. We are a mid-sized chemistry department with 16 faculty members, between 25 and 40 graduate students, and over a dozen postdoctoral scientists. The ratio of graduate students to faculty is small enough that each student receives individual attention, but there are still enough students, postdoctoral fellows, and visiting scientists in each lab to allow for lively discussions.
Renfrew Hall, where the Department of Chemistry is located, is a four-story building with 95,000 square feet of floor space. The building is air-conditioned and well equipped with modern facilities for chemical research. Graduate students have access to major instruments including 300 and 500 MHz NMR spectrometers, a high resolution GC/MS, and a single crystal X-ray diffractometer. The department also has several nanosecond lasers, a dozen Fourier transform infrared spectrometers, three Raman spectrometers, a photon correlation spectrometer, two atomic absorption spectrometers, various chromatographs (SFC, GC, and HPLC), and facilities for neutron activation analysis. We have world-renowned research laboratories in fluorine chemistry and supercritical fluids.
Our department offers research programs in many branches of chemistry, including biological applications of nano-technology, catalyst design, development of Instrumental methods, drug synthesis, environmental chemistry, explosives synthesis and detection, fluorine chemistry, nucleic acid therapeutics and diagnostics, and theoretical organic chemistry. Our department also has strong interactions with two national laboratories, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Washington, and the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Our graduate students often have the opportunity to perform experiments in collaboration with scientists at these national laboratories.
We have high expectations for our graduate students in research, but we do not expect our students to spend all their time in one research laboratory. We encourage our graduate students to participate in chemical demonstrations and lectures given regularly at local schools and in area communities. We take teaching seriously, and all our incoming graduate students participate in a short course that covers many of the less-obvious skills required of university-level teachers.
Our strength lies in our surroundings as well as in our department. Moscow, our hometown, is located in the heart of the rolling Palouse hills, described in the National Geographic Magazine article, “A Paradise Called the Palouse”. Washington State University is only 8 miles away, adding to the intellectual and cultural opportunities in the region. To the east are the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, and to the west is the Columbia River Basin. We are just a few hours' drive from some of Idaho’s renowned wilderness areas.
If you would like to attend a university that has high standards and is small enough for you to get to know students and faculty in other research groups, the University of Idaho is a great choice. Our students have the opportunity to interact with talented members of the faculty every day. I invite you to learn about the scientific endeavors underway in this department in the rest of this web site and, when you are choosing a graduate school, to consider the advantages of the University of Idaho.
Ray von Wandruszka, Chair Department of Chemistry
Doctoral degrees.
The University of Idaho awards the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in recognition of high achievement in scholarly and research activity. The degree of Doctor of Education is granted for high scholarly attainment and in recognition of the completion of academic preparation for professional practice. See the "Ph.D. and Ed.D. Procedures" tab for more details. The Doctor of Athletic Training is offered through the College of Education and the Department of Movement Sciences (see the "DAT Procedures" tab for more details).
The major professor and program offering a particular doctoral program indicate the general philosophy of the degree program, the objectives of courses and seminars, the research specialties available, and requirements unique to the department. Admission to the doctoral program is granted only to those who have a recognized potential for completing the degree.
Credit requirements.
For the Ph.D. and Ed.D., a minimum of 78 credits beyond the bachelor's degree is required.; At least 52 credits must be at the 500 level or above and at least 33 of the 78 credits must be in courses other than 600 (Doctoral Research and Dissertation). A maximum of 45 research credits in 600 (Doctoral Research and Dissertation) including 6 credits of 599 (Non-thesis Research) or 500 (Master's Research and Thesis) may be in the 45 research credits used toward the degree. For the D.A.T., a minimum of 66 credits is required and follows a prescribed set of courses set by the program.
Courses numbered below 300 may not be used to fulfill the requirements for a doctoral degree; courses numbered 300-399 may be used only in supporting areas and are not to be used to make up deficiencies. Individual programs may require additional course work. Applicants having a doctoral degree may obtain a second doctoral degree subject to the approval of the Graduate Council. The Graduate Council will establish the requirements for the second degree.
For the Ph.D. and Ed.D. degrees, a student must complete at least 39 of the 78 required credits at the University of Idaho (U of I) while matriculated in the College of Graduate Studies. Credits can be transferred to U of I with the consent of the student's major professor, the committee (if required by the program), the program's administrator, and the dean of the College of Graduate Studies. Credits can be transferred only if the institution from which the credits are being transferred has a graduate program in the course's discipline. All credits used toward graduate degrees must be from regionally accredited American institutions or from non-US institutions recognized by the appropriate authorities in their respective countries. Transfer credits are subject to all other College of Graduate Studies rules and regulations. Correspondence study courses may be applied to the degree only with the prior written approval of the College of Graduate Studies. Courses used toward an undergraduate degree, professional development courses, and courses on a professional development transcript are not available to be used toward a doctoral degree.
Of the credits submitted to satisfy the requirements for a Ph.D. or Ed.D. degree, a maximum of 30 may be more than eight years old when the degree is conferred, provided the student's committee and program administrator determine that the student has kept current in the subjects concerned. Graduation must occur no later than five years after the date on which the candidate passed their preliminary or general examination. These time limitations can be extended only on recommendation of the committee and approval by the Graduate Council.
Regulations are outlined in Section 4920 of the Faculty-Staff Handbook.
A period of professional practice is required for the Doctor of Education degree; the period involved is determined by the student's supervisory committee. While the Ed.D. is a College of Education degree, you should consult with the departments in the College of Education to learn of specific emphasis requirements.
Appointment of major professor and committee.
Refer to " Appointment of Major Professor and Committee for All Degree Seeking Graduate Students " in the preceding General Graduate Regulations section. In addition, a doctoral supervisory committee consists of at least four people: the major professor as chair and at least one additional UI faculty member from the program, the balance of the committee may be made up of faculty members from a minor or supporting area, and faculty members from a discipline outside the major. If the committee has a co-chair, the minimum number of committee members is five.
The qualifying examination is a program option and serves to assess the background of the student in both the major and supporting fields and to provide partially the basis for preparation of the student's study program. A particular program may or may not require a master's degree as a prerequisite for the qualifying evaluation. As soon as the program's qualifications are met, a supervisory committee is appointed.
Refer to " Preparation and Submission of Study Plan " in the preceding General Graduate Regulations section.
The preliminary examination should be scheduled only after the student has completed the majority of the courses on their study plan. The student is required to be registered during the semester the preliminary examination is taken. The student's committee certifies to the College of Graduate Studies the results of the preliminary examination and if passed, the student is advanced to candidacy. Graduation must occur no later than five years after the date on which the candidate passed their examination. If the preliminary examination is failed, it may be repeated only once; the repeat examination must be taken within a period of not less than three months or more than one year following the first attempt. If a student fails the preliminary examination a second time, or the program does not allow the student to repeat the examination after the first failure or the student does not retake the examination within one year, the student is automatically moved to unclassified enrollment status and is no longer in the degree program.
When the student approaches the end of their course work, has completed the professional experience requirement, and has outlined the dissertation subject in detail, the supervisory committee approves the holding of the general examination. The student is required to be registered during the semester the general examination is taken. The examination is both written and oral and is intended to assess progress toward degree objectives. The student's committee certifies to the College of Graduate Studies the results of the general examination and if passed, the student is advanced to candidacy. Graduation must occur no later than five years after the date on which the candidate passed their examination. If the general examination is failed, it may be repeated only once; the repeat examination must be taken within a period of not less than three months or more than one year following the first attempt. If a student fails the general examination a second time, or the program does not allow the student to repeat the examination after the first failure or the student does not retake the examination within one year, the student is automatically moved to unclassified status and is no longer in the degree program.
See the General Graduate Regulations section regarding application for advanced degree, registration requirements, final defense and dissertation requirements.
The culminating clinical project.
Students enrolled in the Doctor of Athletic Training (D.A.T.) will engage in research projects during the curricular phase of the program. These project(s) will lead to at least two publication ready manuscripts, and all students must meet professional authorship requirements (regardless of order). See the Department of Movement Sciences and Doctor of Athletic Training webpages for more information.
All D.A.T. project team committees will have at least four committee members: two members of the athletic training faculty (all with graduate faculty status), the student's attending clinician (who is the student's on-site mentor during the student's residency), and an expert in the student's chosen area of clinical research. The athletic training faculty members will always chair the CCP, provide research guidance, and serve as the experts in the development of advanced practice in Athletic Training. A situation may arise in which one or both of the members of the committee that are outside of the AT program faculty may have a degree less than that of which the student is seeking; however, the intent of the third and fourth D.A.T. committee membership is to provide outside validation of the student's progress toward advanced practice and clinical utility of action research studies.
These dissertation hours may be used in instances when the CCP has not been successfully completed and the curricular phase of program has been completed.
Send Page to Printer
Print this page.
Download Page (PDF)
The PDF will include all information unique to this page.
Students seeking admission to the Immunology Graduate Program apply to the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences. Students begin their studies in July.
The Immunology program is committed to diversity and encourages applications from individuals with diverse backgrounds and experiences that will enrich the mix of students on our campus. These include individuals determined by NIH as being under-represented in biomedical sciences, including individuals with disabilities. GSBS offers a full range of services to support its students.
The application is completed online on the GSBS Application Portal .
Information about application deadlines and the application process can be found in the Admissions section of this website.
For Immunology Program specific information and questions, please email Steve Bunnell , Immunology Admissions Director.
GSBS students typically receive financial aid that includes full tuition remission, a student stipend and HMO-based health insurance.
Prospective applicants are required to have completed a minimum of one year of college-level biology, at least one year of college-level mathematics, and general and organic chemistry. Although not required, successful completion of courses in biochemistry, cell biology and genetics are assets for graduate biomedical study. Most of our current students majored in a biological science during their undergraduate years.
The GRE is not required and, if scores are submitted, they will not be considered in the Admissions process.
Typical highly competitive applicants have GPAs of at least 3.4 (based on a 4.0 system) and have engaged in significant laboratory research during or following their undergraduate education.
Prospective applicants are evaluated based on prior grades, three letters of recommendation, and responses to the short essays that are part of the application. Prior research experience is strongly valued but is not required.
The essay prompts for our program are:
Following review of submitted applications, competitive candidates are invited to visit Tufts and meet with students and faculty.
EXPLORE our brands
Best Credit Cards
Best Personal Loans
Home Equity
Student Loans
Student Loan Refinance
Certificate of Deposits
Explore Options
Best Insurance Companies
Best Investments
Getting Started
Filing Taxes
Women's Clothing
Men's Clothing
Women's Shoes
Men's Shoes
Accessories
Living Room Accessories
Heaters, fans, and air purifiers
Kitchen products
Product reviews
Office Accessories
Home Office
Guides and How-To's
Home and garden
Pet Accessories
Memorial Day
Black Friday
Home Audio Gear
Headphones & Earbuds
Laptops & Laptop Accessories
Tablets & Tablet Accessories
Wifi & Computer Accessories
Glasses & Headsets
Smart Watches
Electric Bikes & Scooters
Smart Devices
Travel Gear
Gift guides
For loved ones
Special occassions
Coffee Makers & Espresso Machines
Online Coffee Shops & Subscriptions
Coffee Accessories & How Tos
Wine & Champagne Glasses
Wine Accessories
Gifts for Wine Lovers
Non-fiction
Board Games
Graduate student loans can help pay for a master's, doctoral or professional degree but tend to have higher interest rates than undergraduate loans
Contributor, Buy Side from WSJ
Becca Stanek is a contributor to Buy Side from WSJ and has worked as an editor and writer in the personal finance space since 2017. She previously served as the managing editor at LendingTree and an editor at SmartAsset. Prior to that, she was a staff writer at The Week. She’s currently freelancing for publications including SoFi, Forbes, and The Week while she earns her MFA in creative writing.
Kelly Larsen has written and edited content that spans many personal finance topics, including buying a home, saving for retirement, and paying off student loans. She first started learning about the world of finance through her work at Finance101.com. In 2020, Kelly helped launch Paven, a financial well-being app.
Updated September 9, 2024, 12:06 PM EDT
Graduate school is a big undertaking, both academically and financially. According to the College Board , graduate students borrowed an average of $17,490 in federal student loans in the 2022-23 year. The best graduate student loans make it feasible to cover the cost of continuing your education while minimizing the amount you have to repay later.
Federal graduate student loans are a good option but may not offer as much funding as you need. If you are looking for additional funds to help bridge the gap to obtaining your advanced degree, private student loans can help. Here's a look at the best graduate student loans, as well as an overview of graduate student loan interest rates and the application process.
Best graduate student loans, ascent: best for no-cosigner loans.
Best No-Cosigner Loans
Buy Side rating
on Credible’s website
Min. Credit Score
Does not disclose
Variable APR
Loan Amount
$2,001* to $400,000
5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 20
Pros and cons
No application or origination fees
Autopay discounts of 0.25 to 1.00 percentage points
1% cash back reward at graduation
Extended grace periods of 9 to 36 months
Higher interest rates than some competitors
International students can’t release their cosigner
More details
Ascent offers several unique borrowing options that you don’t typically see with private lenders. In addition to traditional student loans for undergraduate, graduate, and medical programs, college juniors and seniors may qualify for its Outcomes-Based Loan — which doesn’t require established credit or a cosigner. Instead, Ascent reviews alternate factors such as your school, major, and GPA to determine your eligibility.
Ascent also offers a wide range of loan terms and repayment plans to choose from. You may even qualify for its Progressive Repayment plan, which allows you to start with small payments that gradually increase over time. Borrowers who use a cosigner can release them after as few as 12 payments, though international students don’t qualify for this option.
Interest rates
Fixed or variable
Minimum credit score
Minimum income
5, 7, 10, 12, 15, or 20 years
Loan amounts
$2,001 minimum up to your school’s annual cost of attendance; lifetime limits of $200,000 for undergrads and $400,000 for graduates
Cosigner release
Eligibility
Must be a U.S. citizen or DACA student enrolled at least half time at an eligible institution. International students with a qualified cosigner may also qualify. Applicants who can’t meet financial, credit, or other requirements may qualify with a cosigner.
Best for flexible repayment
$1,000 up to cost of attendance
5, 7, 10, 15
Accepts applicants with credit scores under 700
Flexible student loan repayment terms
Can borrow up to school-certified cost of attendance
Access to a dedicated Student Loan Advisor to assist with the application process
No discounts available
No cosigner release option
Associate degree students and holders are not eligible for loans or refinancing
Education Loan Finance (ELFI) is a division of Tennessee-based SouthEast Bank owned by Education Loan Finance, Inc., a non-profit whose mandate is to provide access to higher education. ELFI launched in 2015 and offers undergraduate, graduate, and parent private student loans as well as student loan refinancing.
ELFI student loans and refinance loans are available to residents in all U.S. states including Puerto Rico. Borrowers can benefit from no application, origination, or prepayment fees. ELFI also offers flexible repayment terms and competitive rates, however there’s no cosigner release option and the lender doesn’t offer any discounts.
5, 7, 10, or 15 years
$1,000 - Cost of attendance
A cosigner may not be taken off a loan, but the borrower can apply for a new loan without their cosigner.
All 50 states as well as Washington DC and Puerto Rico.
Best for Extended Grace Periods
College Ave
$1,000 up to 100% of the school-certified cost of attendance
5, 8, 10, 15 (20 for health professionals)
Autopay discount of 0.25 percentage points
Multiyear approval available
Graduate, MBA, law, dental, and medical school loans have grace periods between 9 and 36 months
Parent borrowers must make at least interest-only payments while student is in school
Must complete half your repayment term before you’re eligible for cosigner release
College Ave offers a wide range of in-school loans for nearly every type of degree. There are a number of loan repayment options, and borrowers can choose a unique eight-year repayment term. Plus, graduate, dental, and medical students receive extended grace periods.
You may get easy funding for multiple years — 90% of undergraduates are approved for additional student loans when they apply with a cosigner. However, it can be difficult to remove a cosigner for your loan later on, as you must complete at least half of your repayment term before becoming eligible. That’s significantly longer than some lenders, which may only require one to two years of payments before releasing a cosigner.
5, 8, 10, or 15 years for most borrowers (law, dental, medical, and other health profession students have up to 20 years)
$1,000 minimum up to your school’s annual cost of attendance; lifetime limits depend on your degree and credit profile
Available after more than half of the scheduled repayment period has elapsed and other requirements are met
Must be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident at an eligible institution. International students with a Social Security number and a qualified cosigner may also qualify. Applicants who can’t meet financial, credit, or other requirements may qualify with a cosigner.
The lenders in this list are all Credible partners. We evaluated them based on interest rates and origination fees, loan amounts, loan terms, discounts, whether cosigners are accepted and more. Our team of experts gathered information from each lender's website, customer service department, directly from our partners and via email support. We verified all the data points to make sure they were accurate and up to date.
Graduate student loans are funds intended to help cover the costs of a master's, doctoral or professional degree. This may include tuition and other related costs for medical school, law school, a Ph.D., an MBA or other master's program.
Loans for graduate school generally function in much the same way as loans for undergraduate study, where you must repay the funds borrowed, plus interest. However, there are some key differences. For one, there are no federal graduate student loans that are subsidized, which means that interest will start to accrue right away. Further, grad school loans tend to have higher interest rates and borrowing limits than undergrad loans.
Broadly speaking, there are two types of student loans available to graduate students: federal graduate student loans and private graduate student loans.
Whether private or federal, graduate student loans are generally unsubsidized, meaning that interest begins to accrue on the loan as soon as it is disbursed. Undergraduates, on the other hand, may be able to access subsidized loans . This means they are not charged interest while enrolled in school or during their grace period or other periods of deferment.
Graduate students have two options when it comes to federal student loans:
Another option for grad students is private graduate student loans. These are accessible through private lenders. With private student loans , credit is a determining factor in application approval, as well as the interest rates and loan terms you receive. Generally, federal loans should be exhausted first, since they offer more favorable rates. However, those with excellent credit may be able to qualify for a lower rate with private grad student loans.
Still, federal loans tend to offer more borrower protections and benefits than private loans do, such as generous deferment and forbearance options and the possibility of student loan forgiveness . More repayment plans, such as income-driven repayment , are also available.
But unlike some federal loans, private lenders generally have higher loan limits and will offer funding up to the full cost of attendance, minus any other financial aid received.
Student loan interest rates for graduate students will vary, depending on the type of loan and whether it is federal or private. All federal graduate student loans have a fixed interest rate, which means the rate will remain the same throughout the life of the loan. Loans from private lenders may have fixed or variable interest rates, where the rate may change over time based on the market.
Federal graduate student loans have the same interest rate, regardless of a borrower's credit history. For Direct Unsubsidized Loans, it is 8.08% for loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2024, and before July 1, 2025, while the rate for grad PLUS loans is 9.08% for the same period. Meanwhile, interest rates for private graduate student loans will vary, depending on an applicant's credit and other factors. Lower-interest graduate student loans are generally offered to those with excellent credit.
As for graduate student loan fees, most federal loans have a loan origination fee. For Direct Unsubsidized Loans taken out after Oct. 1, 2020, and before Oct. 1, 2024, that fee is 1.057% of the loan amount. For Direct PLUS Loans, a loan fee of 4.228% applies for loans taken out within that same time frame.
For private graduate student loans, the fees a lender charges and the amount of those fees will vary.
The graduate student loan application process will vary, depending on whether you're applying for federal or private graduate loans.
To apply, you will need to fill out the FAFSA , or Free Application for Federal Student Aid. The first step in doing so is to create a StudentAid.gov account. From there, you'll need to gather documents and information necessary to complete the FAFSA, including your Social Security number, tax returns, current balances of cash, savings and checking accounts and the net worth of any investments or businesses.
You will then complete the FAFSA as directed, providing the requested information. This will include listing the schools you want to receive your information. Once submitted, you will find out from each school you are accepted to how much federal aid you are eligible to receive.
You'll apply for private graduate student loans directly through your chosen lender. Before applying, take the time to research different lenders and compare graduate student loans. Consider prequalifying, as this can give you a sense of your odds of approval and what rates you may receive before submitting to a hard credit check as part of the formal application process.
Once you've narrowed it down, move forward by filling out an application, which will involve a pull of your credit history. You will then find out if you're approved. From there, you will finalize any necessary paperwork for loan disbursement.
How you manage your graduate student loans can make a big difference in the financial impact they have in the long run. Here are some tips for grad students to keep in mind:
The best loan for graduate school is generally whichever loan offers you the lowest interest rate and most competitive repayment options and borrower protections. Typically, this will be federal graduate student loans.
Yes, you can get student loans for graduate school. You can take out either federal graduate student loans or private graduate student loans.
Generally speaking, federal loans are better than private loans, as they have fixed interest rates and offer more borrower protections and benefits. However, if you have stellar credit, you may be able to qualify for a lower interest rate with a private lender.
Private graduate student loan credit score requirements vary by lender, though generally you need a good credit score (a FICO score of 670 or higher). While Direct PLUS Loans do specify that you cannot have an adverse credit history (such as delinquent debts, a prior discharge of a debt in bankruptcy or instances of foreclosure or repossession), no specific credit score is required.
To get the best interest rate on a graduate student loan, you will generally want to consider federal loans first, since they tend to have more favorable interest rates. Otherwise, getting the best interest rate largely comes down to having an excellent credit score.
Shopping for quality products made easy
Sign up for our Buy Side from WSJ Newsletter
News release.
Published September 8, 2024
BUFFALO, N.Y. – As Banned Books Week (Sept. 22-28) approaches, the urgency of defending the freedom to read has never been more apparent. Across the nation, communities are grappling with the rising trend of book bans and challenges, which have profound implications for students, educators and families. Africa Hands , assistant professor of information science at the University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education and former public library worker, shares her insights on why Banned Books Week is critical and what it means for the future of education and community values.
For over four decades, Banned Books Week has served as a focal point for discussing the freedom to read and the dangers of censorship. “It’s really important that Banned Books Week continues because it provides a time when these conversations can happen,” Hands said.
She emphasizes that with the increasing diversity of voices in literature, these discussions are more vital than ever: “We see books being written that really showcase people’s lives, and as we see that, we also see these books being challenged or banned.”
Book bans don’t just limit access to diverse perspectives—they can have profound implications for students who see themselves in these stories. “It’s a form of erasure,” Hands explained. “For students, seeing themselves in a story could be life-giving. We can’t just exclude people who are in our communities and wipe them away by saying, ‘We’re not going to read about them.’”
Hands offers actionable advice for those looking to support libraries and advocate for inclusive collections:
Though Buffalo has not seen significant issues with book banning, Hands cautions against complacency. “It can happen in any community. Sometimes, it’s one parent with a lot of time who files multiple reports. We live in vibrant communities, and you can’t assume it won’t happen here.” She advises that communities and libraries be prepared with updated policies and a readiness to advocate for the freedom to read.
Hands brings a wealth of experience to this issue. Before joining the faculty at UB, she spent years working in public libraries, where she saw firsthand the tension between what children want to read and what their parents deem appropriate.
“I have that very on-the-ground experience, helping people choose books and seeing the difference between what kids want to read and what their parents want them to read,” Hands shared.
Her background in public libraries has shaped her understanding of the crucial role that diverse books play in reflecting and affirming the lives of all readers.
Africa Hands, assistant professor of information science at the University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education. Photo by Meredith Forrest Kulwicki.
Danielle LeGare
Director of Content
University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education
Phone: 716-645-1310
Email: [email protected]
An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Nsf 24-588: nsf epscor graduate fellowship program (egfp), program solicitation, document information, document history.
|
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitting organization's local time):
October 02, 2024
June 02, 2025
June 01, 2026
The NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (EGFP) is a new three-year pilot program that responds directly to input from recent studies and legislation, including the Envisioning the Future of NSF EPSCoR report and the CHIPS and Science Act (Public Law 117-167) . The EGFP is intended to advance graduate talent recruitment, development, and retention at graduate institutions in the eligible EPSCoR states and territories , hereafter referred to as EPSCoR jurisdictions. Through the EGFP's investments, NSF intends to help build additional capacity for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research and in turn promote innovation and economic growth in EPSCoR jurisdictions and across the Nation.
EGFP is designed to enhance the STEM research capacity and competitiveness of EPSCoR jurisdictions by providing funding to graduate degree-awarding institutions that will allow them to recruit NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellows. Awardee institutions will select fellowship recipients, the NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellows, from the pool of exceptional talent who received Honorable Mention from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) no more than three years prior to the proposal due date. NSF will provide the mechanism for awardee institutions to connect with GRFP Honorable Mention recipients through the NSF Education and Training Application (ETAP) system .
Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitted in accordance with the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) that is in effect for the relevant due date to which the proposal is being submitted. The NSF PAPPG is regularly revised and it is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that the proposal meets the requirements specified in this solicitation and the applicable version of the PAPPG. Submitting a proposal prior to a specified deadline does not negate this requirement.
General information.
Program Title:
NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (EGFP)
The NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (EGFP) provides an opportunity for applicants who received the distinction of GRFP Honorable Mention no more than three years before the proposal due date to be named NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellows and obtain financial support for their graduate education at an institution in an EPSCoR jurisdiction. EGFP aims to enhance the capacity and competitiveness of EPSCoR jurisdictions by providing funding to graduate degree-awarding institutions to support NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellows as they pursue graduate degrees in the disciplines specified by the NSF Directorates and Office that are participating in the EGFP funding program. Fellows may pursue degrees in field that differ from the field or sub-field of study that the GRFP Honorable Mention recipients previously listed in their GRFP application. EGFP awards will be made to institutions in EPSCoR jurisdictions. Awards will provide three years of stipend and associated cost-of-education allowance for each NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellow. Stipends must be budgeted at the level of $37,000 per year per Fellow and cost-of-education allowances must be budgeted at the level of $16,000 per year per Fellow. A total of three years of support must be budgeted per Fellow. Each Fellow must be given up to five years to utilize the support. Awardees will administer the awards such that the Fellows receive the full stipend amount and the institution retains the full cost-of-education allowance during the three years that each Fellow receives support. All submissions must request support for a minimum of three Fellows.
NSF recognizes the unique lived experiences of individuals from communities that are underrepresented and/or under-served in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and the barriers to inclusion and access to STEM education and careers. NSF highly encourages the leadership, partnership, and contributions in all NSF opportunities of individuals who are members of such communities supported by NSF. This includes leading and designing STEM research and education proposals for funding; serving as peer reviewers, advisory committee members, and/or committee of visitor members; and serving as NSF leadership, program, and/or administrative staff. NSF also highly encourages demographically diverse institutions of higher education (IHEs) to lead, partner, and contribute to NSF opportunities on behalf of their research and education communities. NSF expects that all individuals, including those who are members of groups that are underrepresented and/or under-served in STEM, are treated equitably and inclusively in the Foundation's proposal and award process.
NSF encourages IHEs that enroll, educate, graduate, and employ individuals who are members of groups underrepresented and/or under-served in STEM education programs and careers to lead, partner, and contribute to NSF opportunities, including leading and designing STEM research and education proposals for funding. Such IHEs include, but may not be limited to, community colleges and two-year institutions, mission-based institutions such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs), women's colleges, and institutions that primarily serve persons with disabilities, as well as institutions defined by enrollment such as Predominantly Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs), Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs), and Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs).
"Broadening participation in STEM" is the comprehensive phrase used by NSF to refer to the Foundation's goal of increasing the representation and diversity of individuals, organizations, and geographic regions that contribute to STEM teaching, research, and innovation. To broaden participation in STEM, it is necessary to address issues of equity, inclusion, and access in STEM education, training, and careers. Whereas all NSF programs might support broadening participation components, some programs primarily focus on supporting broadening participation research and projects. Examples can be found on the NSF Broadening Participation in STEM website.
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.
Anticipated Type of Award: Continuing Grant
Estimated Number of Awards: 5 to 35
Anticipated Funding Amount: $17,000,000
Proposals must request at least the amount of funding required to support three Fellows over three years ($477,000 total). It is anticipated that no proposals will request support for more than 20 Fellows over three years ($3,180,000 total). It is also anticipated that the average award size will allow five Fellows to be supported for three years ($795,000 total).
Number of awards and award sizes are subject to the availability of funds and quality of proposals submitted.
Who May Submit Proposals:
Proposals may only be submitted by the following: Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) that are accredited, have a campus located in an eligible EPSCoR jurisdiction at the time of proposal submission, and offer at least one master's and/or doctoral degree in a STEM discipline aligned with the topical focus area(s) described in this solicitation.
Who May Serve as PI:
As of the submission deadline, PIs, co-PIs, or other Senior/Key personnel must hold primary, full-time, paid, and continuing appointments at an institution that is eligible to submit in response to this solicitation (see above), with exceptions granted for family or medical leave, as determined by the submitting institution. Individuals holding term-limited appointments are not eligible.
Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: 1
Each submitting organization is limited to one proposal per annual competition. Potential PIs are advised to contact their institutional office of research (or equivalent) regarding processes used to select proposals for submission. Institutions interested in supporting Fellows in multiple topical focus areas must submit a single proposal that addresses all topical areas of interest.
Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or co-PI: 1
An individual must not participate as PI, Co-PI, or Senior/Key Personnel on more than one proposal submitted for the same deadline.
A. proposal preparation instructions.
C. due dates, proposal review information criteria.
Merit Review Criteria:
National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review criteria apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Award Conditions:
Standard NSF award conditions apply.
Reporting Requirements:
Standard NSF reporting requirements apply.
In 1950, Congress established NSF, five years after Vannevar Bush sent a report titled Science – the Endless Frontier to President Harry S. Truman outlining a plan to create a new agency that would contribute to the development of the Nation's scientific talent ( https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/EndlessFrontier_w.pdf ). Bush's report created a blueprint for U.S. scientific research. He made the point that" There are talented individuals in every segment of the population ". Bush further wrote that " ... it is recommended that provision be made for... graduate fellowships... ". These words are reminders that investments in transformative science and people with high potential are key for keeping the U.S. strong and competitive.
The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) acted on Bush's report and became NSF's first program. Since its inception, GRFP has received applications each year from exceptionally talented individuals who have the potential to make strong positive contributions to the U.S. STEM enterprise. Only a small subset of applicants are offered an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship every year. An additional elite group of applicants receive the distinction of being named an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Honorable Mention in recognition of their outstanding achievements and potential for future contributions in STEM. GRFP Awardees and Honorable Mentions together represent some of the nation's most promising STEM talent. Unfortunately, due to funding limitations, NSF has been unable to provide GRFP Honorable Mentions with financial support for graduate school.
The EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (EGFP) aims to enhance the STEM capacity and competitiveness of EPSCoR jurisdictions by providing graduate degree-granting institutions with funding that can be used to provide fellowships to students who received a GRFP Honorable Mention. The EGFP program specifically seeks to empower IHEs from EPSCoR jurisdictions to attract and retain extremely high-quality graduate students.
This program is an opportunity for GRFP applicants who received the distinction of GRFP Honorable Mention to obtain financial support for their graduate education in STEM disciplines, including the discipline of STEM education research, at an institution in an EPSCoR jurisdiction. Eligible students must have received a GRFP Honorable Mention no more than three years prior to the deadline date for submission of proposals to the EGFP. Students who receive support through this program are known as NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellows, and are referred to as Fellows for the remainder of this solicitation.
EGFP awards are made to institutions to support graduate students in specific fields of study. Institutions that receive funding through this program will be eligible to recruit and support meritorious GRFP Honorable Mentions to attend their institutions and pursue a graduate degree. Support from the EGFP program is only available for those fields specified by the NSF Directorates and Office participating in the EGFP. Students must be recruited for and pursue degrees in the field(s) addressed in each EGFP proposal.
As authorized in the CHIPS and Science Act (Sections 10325, 10387, 10383, and 10393), the EGFP program will help NSF to increase its investments in EPSCoR jurisdictions, while growing STEM talent and providing an opportunity to support the development of a ready workforce in critical and emerging technologies. EGFP investments in the future STEM workforce are intended to build capacity for STEM research in EPSCoR jurisdictions, which in turn is intended to promote innovation and economic growth in EPSCoR jurisdictions and across the Nation.
STEM Topics and Areas Eligible for Consideration
The following NSF Directorates and Office are participating in this solicitation:
Each participating Directorate and Office has identified specific topics or areas that align with their unique goals and the programs they support. These topics or areas may differ from the field or sub-field the Honorable Mention recipients previously listed in their GRFP applications.
The topics and area that will be considered for funding by each of the participating Directorates and Office are described below.
Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) : BIO will consider proposals that engage Fellows with research on any topic normally supported by the Directorate for Biological Sciences with an emphasis on proposals that combine biology and artificial intelligence, that advance the bioeconomy, and/or create solutions for a resilient planet. More information about BIO is available on the NSF.gov website. https://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=BIO .
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) : CISE will consider proposals that engage Fellows with research on any topic normally supported by the Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering. More information about CISE is available on the NSF.gov website. https://new.nsf.gov/cise .
Directorate for Engineering (ENG) : ENG will consider proposals that engage Fellows with research on any topic normally supported by the Directorate for Engineering. More information about ENG is available on the NSF.gov website. https://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=ENG .
Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) : GEO will consider proposals that engage Fellows with research on any topic normally supported by the Directorate for Geosciences. More information about GEO is available on the NSF.gov website. https://new.nsf.gov/about/directorates-offices#geo .
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) : MPS will consider proposals that engage Fellows with research on any topic normally supported by the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences. More information about MPS is available on the NSF.gov website. https://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=MPS .
Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE) : SBE will consider proposals that engage Fellows in any field or fields of study supported by the Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. More information about SBE is available on the NSF.gov website. https://new.nsf.gov/sbe .
Directorate for STEM Education (EDU) : EDU will consider proposals that provide support for graduate students pursuing a master's or doctoral degree in STEM education. This includes degrees offered within STEM disciplines that involve discipline-based education research. More information about EDU is available on the NSF.gov website. https://new.nsf.gov/edu .
Directorate for Technology, Innovation and Partnerships (TIP) : TIP will consider proposals that engage Fellows in graduate curricula designed in collaboration with non-academic employers to address skills gaps in the ten key technology areas that are described in Sec. 10387 of the CHIPS and Science Act and correspondingly the focus of the Directorate. NSF recognizes that each of these key technology areas spans multiple fields of study and expects graduate program offerings to demonstrate such multi-disciplinary training. Graduate programs eligible for support must incorporate experiential learning and problem-solving components beyond traditional research activities typically expected of graduate programs in STEM fields. Industry- and policy-based experiential learning opportunities are strongly preferred. Proposals considered for funding by TIP must indicate how specific non-academic employers have been engaged in the development or modification of relevant graduate curricula. More information about TIP is available on the NSF.gov website. https://new.nsf.gov/tip/latest .
Office of Integrative Activities (OIA) : The Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) in OIA will consider proposals that provide support for graduate students pursuing a master's or doctoral degree in a STEM discipline aligned with an EPSCoR Research Infrastructure Improvement (RII) award within the jurisdiction. These submissions should focus on leveraging existing NSF EPSCoR RII investments to improve research, education, broadening participation, and economic development in the jurisdiction. Proposals should identify graduate student experiences that synergize with the currently funded RII project(s) in ways that engage in academic, government, and private sector partners, as appropriate. Currently funded RII projects may be found on NSF's website at this link , by exploring the websites of EPSCoR jurisdictions , or by contacting an NSF EPSCoR RII Program Director .
Institutional Responsibilities
Proposing institutions must be prepared to provide NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellows with a high-quality graduate experience in the discipline(s) in which each Fellow will pursue a graduate degree. Institutions must provide clear evidence of an existing graduate program in the discipline(s) relevant to the proposal. Only proposals focusing on one or more of the topics or areas described above will be considered for funding. Other proposals will be returned without review. See the Full Proposal Preparation Instructions section for more information about the expected contents of a proposal.
Institutions receiving awards through this solicitation will be required to use the NSF Education and Training Application (ETAP) system to recruit prospective Fellows. Institutions may recruit potential Fellows from the pool of highly qualified individuals who received Honorable Mention recognition from the NSF GRFP no more than three years prior to the proposal submission deadline.
NSF conducts ongoing program monitoring and evaluation to determine how effective its programs are at achieving their goals. Proposing institutions must present a plan for ensuring that all project participants, including employees of the proposing institution, as well as supported Fellows, will comply with NSF's requests for information related to program-level evaluation, including requests to participate in surveys, interviews, and other methods for collecting evaluation data. Prospective Fellows offered funding through this program must be informed of and agree to this obligation prior to receiving support.
Proposing institutions should note that for this solicitation, a graduate student Mentoring Plan, prepared in accordance with the guidance contained in the PAPPG, must be included in the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal. In submission of each annual and final annual project report, the PI or co-PI is certifying that every graduate student receiving substantial support through this program had an Individual Development Plan (IDP) during the reporting period. NSF defines "substantial support" as support provided to an individual that is equal to one person month or more during the annual reporting period for the NSF award. Other requirements in the PAPPG that apply to all NSF research proposals and awards apply to EGFP proposals and awards.
Fellow Responsibilities
Prospective Fellows will connect with institutions offering fellowships via the NSF Education and Training Application (ETAP) system. In addition to completing an ETAP application, Fellows will also be required to submit any additional documentation required by the institution(s) offering fellowships to be considered for support. Prospective Fellows must have received the distinction of Honorable Mention from the NSF GRFP program no more than three years prior to the deadline date for the institution's proposal to the EGFP program. Fellows can apply to graduate programs that differ from those listed as field or sub-field in their previous GRFP application. To be eligible for ongoing support, fellowship recipients must be enrolled full-time in an eligible master's or doctoral degree-granting program and make ongoing satisfactory progress toward completion of their graduate degree. Fellows must remain enrolled in a degree program in the same discipline as when they were admitted by institution. Full-time enrollment must be certified by the awardee institution's registrar (or equivalent). Fellowships are granted by the institution and not portable to another institution. If a Fellow transfers to another institution, the Fellow will forfeit continued access to the fellowship.
$17,000,000 available annually. Number of awards is approximate and subject to the availability of funds and quality of the proposals submitted.
Additional Eligibility Info:
A proposing institution must provide clear evidence of an existing graduate program in the discipline(s) relevant to the proposal. All proposals must include a Letter of Collaboration from the submitting institution's Graduate School Dean, or from a person with similar responsibility and authority for the graduate programs that are relevant to the proposal.
Full Proposal Preparation Instructions : Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Research.gov or Grants.gov.
See PAPPG Chapter II.D.2 for guidance on the required sections of a full research proposal submitted to NSF. Please note that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from the PAPPG instructions.
The following instructions are specific to proposals submitted to the EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program and supplement the NSF PAPPG.
The following information is in addition to the guidance provided by the NSF PAPPG, which applies to all proposals submitted to NSF.
Cover Sheet: For planning purposes, use March 15 of the upcoming year as the award start date.
Project Summary: (1-page limit): The first sentence of the Project Summary should clearly identify the NSF Directorate(s) or Office that provides funding for research in the disciplinary area and topic that are the focus of the proposal and the number of graduate students for whom Fellowships will be provided. In the case that the proposal focuses on areas that are associated with more than one NSF Directorate or Office, the number of graduate students should be disaggregated by Directorate or Office. The remainder of the Project Summary should describe the proposed project. See the NSF PAPPG for additional instructions. The summary should be written in a manner that will be informative to STEM professionals working in related fields and understandable to a scientifically literate lay reader.
Project Description: The Project Description may not exceed 15 pages, including tables and illustrations.
Each proposal should provide an overview of the educational ecosystem represented by the proposing institution. This may include topics such as size, setting, areas of emphasis, number of undergraduate and graduate degree programs, collaborations with other educational institutions, connections to businesses and industry, or other topics that the proposal authors feel are relevant.
Each proposal must explicitly identify the STEM or STEM education research area(s) for which Fellows are sought, and the number of students for whom Fellowships will be provided (disaggregated by research area as appropriate).
For each relevant discipline, the proposal must provide credible evidence that the institution has the capacity to serve the number of students for whom support is requested. In addition, the institution must demonstrate in the proposal that they have the capability to provide students with a high-quality graduate experience. This means that, at a minimum, the graduate program(s) for which students are sought:
Most of the project description portion of the proposal should focus on providing a complete description of the characteristics of the graduate program that selected Fellows will experience, from matriculation through graduation. Alignment of the graduate program with one or more of those specified by the Directorates/Office collaborating to issue this solicitation must be clearly articulated. Discussion of the topics shown as bullet points in the preceding paragraph must be included. Additionally, each proposal should describe compelling characteristics of the relevant graduate degree program that can be highlighted as evidence of quality. Each proposal should also summarize what constitutes "satisfactory progress" toward completion of a STEM or STEM education research graduate degree in the relevant discipline(s) and describe how students are guided to make continuous satisfactory progress throughout their graduate program. The process by which students who are not making satisfactory progress are notified, given opportunities to improve, and, if no improvement occurs, are dismissed from the program(s) should be addressed.
Additional information may also be included as deemed appropriate in judging the overall potential of the institution to provide Fellows with a high-quality graduate experience. For example, proposals may include information about services and other resources offered to graduate students by relevant departments and/or colleges (or equivalent) and the institution. Proposal authors are encouraged to review the information in Section VI of this Solicitation (NSF Proposal Processing and Review Criteria), including the additional solicitation-specific review criteria.
The proposal must include a commitment to collaborate with NSF to prepare and disseminate institutional graduate admission resources via the NSF Education and Training Application (ETAP) system. A description of the process by which prospective Fellows' information submitted via ETAP will be reviewed, the additional application materials that will be requested from the prospective Fellows, and the process for making final decisions regarding which applicants will be offered fellowships, must be included. Proposing institutions are strongly encouraged to make the application process as simple and straightforward as possible for prospective Fellows because these individuals have already been pre-screened and received an Honorable Mention as a result of the NSF GRFP application and review process.
Other Supplementary Documents: All proposals must include the following two items, which must be uploaded into the Other Supplementary Documents section of the proposal:
Cost Sharing:
Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.
Other Budgetary Limitations:
Awards will support up to three years of stipends and associated cost-of-education allowances for Fellows. Stipends should be budgeted at the level of $37,000 per student per year and cost-of-education allowances should be budgeted at the level of $16,000 per student per fellowship year. The cost-of-education allowance provides payment in lieu of tuition and mandatory fees to the institution. A total of three years of support must be budgeted per student. Each student must be given up to five years to utilize the support. Both stipends and cost-of-education allowances must be listed as Participant Support Costs in the NSF proposal budget.
During the years in which students are receiving fellowship support, the institution is required to exempt Fellows from paying tuition and fees normally charged to students of similar academic standing, unless such charges are optional or are refundable (i.e., the institution is responsible for tuition and required fees in excess of the cost-of-education allowance). Acceptance of fellowship funds by the awardee institution indicates acceptance of and adherence to these and other terms and conditions as specified in this solicitation and the PAPPG. The cost-of-education allowance is provided to institutions in lieu of tuition and mandatory fees and it can be used for any purpose that the institution would normally use the revenue it collects via tuition and fees.
Each proposal should develop a three-year budget for the project in which all the funds requested are evenly distributed across the three project years. If the project is on track, the funding requested will be provided to each awardee institution as continuing grant increments during the three project years. The institution can use all the funding for Fellows during those years, or, if one or more Fellows chooses to defer their fellowship, the institution may request one or more no-cost extensions, as necessary, to allow each Fellow up to five years to utilize their three years of fellowship funding. All Fellows' requests for deferral must be approved by the institution. Awardee institutions' requests for no-cost extensions must be documented and approved as described in the PAPPG.
To reiterate, each Fellow will receive up to three years of support and that support may be utilized at any time during a five-year period. A Fellow's cost-of-education allowance, which is to be used at the discretion of the institution, can only be charged to the award during the same year that the Fellow receives a stipend.
Fellows receiving fellowship support must have full access to all resources and other benefits available at the institution to other graduate students supported at the "full-time" support level (normally 20 hours per week average expected commitment) as research or teaching assistants. Once a Fellow matriculates at an institution in a discipline supported by the institution's EGFP award, the Fellow cannot change their field of study to pursue a degree for which the institution has not received EGFP support.
If, for any reason, a supported Fellow leaves an institution, the institution should contact the cognizant NSF program officer. The potential next steps are: (1) the awardee institution recruits a new Fellow; or (2) NSF reduces the value of any upcoming continuing grant increments to reflect the reduction in number of Fellows supported by the institution and/or arranges for the return of some portion of the funds previously provided to the institution by NSF. If the institution receives permission from NSF to recruit a new Fellow and does not have sufficient funds remaining to provide a full three years of support to the incoming Fellow, they may request a supplement to their award. The availability of supplements is dependent upon the availability of funds at NSF. No commitments of NSF-provided funding should be made to incoming replacement Fellows beyond what the host institution is able to provide with the funds remaining in the project budget (including awarded supplements) at the time the commitment is being made. New Fellows must have received Honorable Mention from the NSF GRFP no more than three years prior to the date of submission of the institution's EGFP proposal. New Fellows must connect with the institution via NSF's ETAP system.
Support for no fewer than three Fellows can be requested in any proposal. This requirement does not apply to supplement requests.
For Proposals Submitted Via Research.gov:
To prepare and submit a proposal via Research.gov, see detailed technical instructions available at: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html . For Research.gov user support, call the Research.gov Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 or e-mail [email protected] . The Research.gov Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the Research.gov system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.
For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:
Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov is available on the Grants.gov Applicant Resources webpage: https://www.grants.gov/applicants . In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide (see link in Section V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: [email protected] . The Grants.gov Contact Center answers general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation. Submitting the Proposal: Once all documents have been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must then sign and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred to Research.gov for further processing. The NSF Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov informational page provides submission guidance to applicants and links to helpful resources including the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide , Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov how-to guide , and Grants.gov Submitted Proposals Frequently Asked Questions . Grants.gov proposals must pass all NSF pre-check and post-check validations in order to be accepted by Research.gov at NSF. When submitting via Grants.gov, NSF strongly recommends applicants initiate proposal submission at least five business days in advance of a deadline to allow adequate time to address NSF compliance errors and resubmissions by 5:00 p.m. submitting organization's local time on the deadline. Please note that some errors cannot be corrected in Grants.gov. Once a proposal passes pre-checks but fails any post-check, an applicant can only correct and submit the in-progress proposal in Research.gov.
Proposers that submitted via Research.gov may use Research.gov to verify the status of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has been received and validated by NSF, the Authorized Organizational Representative may check the status of an application on Grants.gov. After proposers have received an e-mail notification from NSF, Research.gov should be used to check the status of an application.
Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program for acknowledgement and, if they meet NSF requirements, for review. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal. In addition, Program Officers may obtain comments from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. Senior NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. A flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal and award process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.
A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/ .
Proposers should also be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in Leading the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Talent Development and the Delivery of Benefits from Research - NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 - 2026 . These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.
One of the strategic objectives in support of NSF's mission is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions must recruit, train, and prepare a diverse STEM workforce to advance the frontiers of science and participate in the U.S. technology-based economy. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation's most creative scientists and engineers. NSF also supports development of a strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning.
NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.
The National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all areas of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes every effort to conduct a fair, competitive, transparent merit review process for the selection of projects.
1. Merit Review Principles
These principles are to be given due diligence by PIs and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Given that NSF is the primary federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:
With respect to the third principle, even if assessment of Broader Impacts outcomes for particular projects is done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable for carrying out the activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual projects should include clearly stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the PI intends to do, and a plan in place to document the outputs of those activities.
These three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit review criteria, as well as a context within which the users of the criteria can better understand their intent.
2. Merit Review Criteria
All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board approved merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
The two merit review criteria are listed below. Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i). contains additional information for use by proposers in development of the Project Description section of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i), prior to the review of a proposal.
When evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:
The following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:
Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to achievement of societally relevant outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and other underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education.
Proposers are reminded that reviewers will also be asked to review the Data Management and Sharing Plan and the Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.
Additional Solicitation Specific Review Criteria
In addition to the standard NSF Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Criteria, reviewers will be required to carefully consider the extent to which the following aspects are addressed in proposals:
Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.
Reviewers will be asked to evaluate proposals using two National Science Board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will generally be completed and submitted by each reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF strives to be able to tell proposers whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. Large or particularly complex proposals or proposals from new recipients may require additional review and processing time. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.
After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements or the Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support for review of business, financial, and policy implications. After an administrative review has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers perform the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.
Once an award or declination decision has been made, Principal Investigators are provided feedback about their proposals. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.
A. notification of the award.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms and Conditions* and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF . Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] .
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .
Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Build America, Buy America
As expressed in Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers (86 FR 7475), it is the policy of the executive branch to use terms and conditions of Federal financial assistance awards to maximize, consistent with law, the use of goods, products, and materials produced in, and services offered in, the United States.
Consistent with the requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act (Pub. L. 117-58, Division G, Title IX, Subtitle A, November 15, 2021), no funding made available through this funding opportunity may be obligated for infrastructure projects under an award unless all iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States. For additional information, visit NSF's Build America, Buy America webpage.
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 days prior to the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require submission of more frequent project reports). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final annual project report, and a project outcomes report for the general public.
Failure to provide the required annual or final annual project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for all identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.
PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and final annual project reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report also must be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.
More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .
Please note that the program contact information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
For questions related to the use of NSF systems contact:
For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:
The NSF website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences . Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time new publications are issued that match their identified interests. "NSF Update" also is available on NSF's website .
Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at https://www.grants.gov .
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering."
NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic research.
NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported projects. See the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide Chapter II.F.7 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
The National Science Foundation Information Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111.
COMMENTS
Best Graduate Chemistry Programs
The Best Universities for PhDs in Chemistry in the USA ...
La Jolla, CA. 49 Annual Graduates. $74,063 Median Starting Salary. UCSD is a very large public university located in the large city of La Jolla. Chemistry doctor's degree recipients from University of California - San Diego receive an earnings boost of about $3,546 above the average income of chemistry graduates.
Chemical Materials Scientist ($130,008) Professor of Chemistry ($94,914) Development Chemist ($59,802) Director of Research ($107,150) The tuition for a PhD in chemistry can range from $10,000 to $70,000 based on various factors, with public schools being much more affordable than private schools.
QS World University Rankings for Chemistry 2024
Princeton, NJ ·. Graduate School. ·. 3 reviews. Master's Student: The best part of the Princeton University mechanical engineering graduate degree is the excellent faculty that teach the courses. They are incredibly knowledgeable and also very willing to help students in office hours or in sponsorship of projects.
Best Global Universities for Chemistry in the United States
PhD Program - Stanford Chemistry
Chemistry, PhD < Johns Hopkins University. Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences. 2024-25 Edition. Home ›. Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences ›. Full-time, On-campus Undergraduate and Graduate Programs (Homewood) ›. Departments, Program Requirements, and Courses ›. Chemistry ›.
Chemistry PhD Program. The University of Pennsylvania is an internationally renowned research institution that attracts the best students from the United States and around the globe. The Graduate Program is designed for students who wish to earn a Ph.D. in Chemistry while undertaking cutting edge research. The program provides students with the ...
2024 Best Graduate Science Schools
Survey of Ph.D. Programs in Chemistry
Chemistry in United States: 2024 PhD's Guide
The Hopkins graduate program is designed for students who desire a PhD in chemistry while advancing scientific knowledge for humankind. The graduate program provides students with the background and technical expertise required to be leaders in their field and to pursue independent research. Graduate students' advancement is marked by ...
Our PhD program equips graduate students with the skills necessary to succeed as independent researchers. A PhD from MIT means that I have been surrounded by the most influential people during my most formative years in training. There is never a shortage of creativity or motivation to do my best. - Kenny Chen, Graduate Student in the ...
2024 Best Colleges for Chemistry in America
99. University of South Carolina - Columbia. 100. University of Texas Medical Branch. The best cities to study Chemistry in the United States based on the number of universities and their ranks are Cambridge, Stanford, Ann Arbor, and Baltimore.
Dal's Chemistry (PhD) program provides research opportunities in analytical, environmental, inorganic, materials, organic, physical and theoretical chemistry ... Dalhousie is one of Canada's top 15 research-intensive universities. ... We offer competitive tuition rates and funding programs to support graduate students in almost all of our ...
Minimum qualifications needed for application to the Chemistry Graduate Program: GPA > 3.0/4.0 (US scale) You may use the WES iGPA Calculator or the Scholaro GPA Calculator if your school is on a different scale.; GRE scores are required (for those with an international education only).We look for a score > 50 th percentile on the quantitative section of the GRE.
Renfrew Hall, where the Department of Chemistry is located, is a four-story building with 95,000 square feet of floor space. The building is air-conditioned and well equipped with modern facilities for chemical research. Graduate students have access to major instruments including 300 and 500 MHz NMR spectrometers, a high resolution GC/MS, and ...
Procedures for Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Education Degrees Appointment of Major Professor and Committee. Refer to "Appointment of Major Professor and Committee for All Degree Seeking Graduate Students" in the preceding General Graduate Regulations section.In addition, a doctoral supervisory committee consists of at least four people: the major professor as chair and at least one ...
Most graduate chemistry schools are closer to 50%. Which is probably higher than the worst med schools in the country. Biophysics to analytical or inorganic is quite the jump. If you want to get into biophysics then you want to find a single-molecule spectroscopy lab with magnetic or optical tweezers and afm.
Best Global Universities for Chemistry - Education
Basic Science PhD Programs MD/PhD - MSTP Basic Science MS Programs Clinical & Translational Science Programs Non-Degree Options Tufts IRACDA ... Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tufts University Suite 501 136 Harrison Avenue Boston, MA 02111. 617-636-6767 [email protected]
Contact. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tufts University Suite 501 136 Harrison Avenue Boston, MA 02111. 617-636-6767 [email protected]
Graduate school is a big undertaking, both academically and financially. According to the College Board, graduate students borrowed an average of $17,490 in federal student loans in the 2022-23 ...
As Banned Books Week (Sept. 22-28) approaches, the urgency of defending the freedom to read has never been more apparent. Across the nation, communities are grappling with the rising trend of book bans and challenges, which have profound implications for students, educators and families. Africa Hands, assistant professor of information science at the University at Buffalo Graduate School of ...
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP)
University of Idaho - Profile, Rankings and Data
Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitting organization's local time): October 02, 2024. June 02, 2025. June 01, 2026. Important Information And Revision Notes. The NSF EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program (EGFP) is a new three-year pilot program that responds directly to input from recent studies and legislation, including the Envisioning the Future of NSF EPSCoR report and the CHIPS ...