Working in a western university begins with a PhD program, which is an essential first step towards a career in academia.
Rector of Moscow’s New Economic School (NES) Ruben Enikolopov, Professor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Anna Mikusheva, as well as recent NES graduate Artemii Korolkov, who has enrolled in an economics PhD program at the University of Pennsylvania, and joint NES-HSE bachelor program graduate Anna Shchetkina, who has entered into quantitative marketing PhD program at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, all share their thoughts on how best to prepare to apply, how to choose a program and university, how research work is carried out in a foreign university and how to build a career after graduation.
What is the value of an international PhD program?
Ruben Enikolopov How do standard PhD programs work? During the first two years in any top international program, you’ll learn from some of the world’s leading academics who are pushing forward the boundaries of scientific knowledge. You will only start conducting your own research work after two solid years of studying and exams. For the remaining three-four years, under the guidance of these academics, you will put forward your own ideas that test the limits of what we know. You can only get a feel for these limits in a foreign PhD program. An additional, but not always obvious, benefit of these programs is that you will be able to network with people, your classmates could become your co-authors or advisors. You will build social capital.
Anna Mikusheva Attending an international university gives you tremendous social experience. You will enjoy being surrounded by amazing, intelligent and talented people who are passionate about making the world a better place. I did not really experience this diversity in Russia while I studied at Moscow State University, even though I have great respect and love for this place. At Moscow State we were all pretty similar, because we had roughly the same life experience. America, on the other hand, is a melting pot, and this is especially evident in its universities. People with different opinions and backgrounds from different countries go there to study. For the first couple of years I was left speechless by the broad spectrum of their ideas. Everyone was so unlike one another that it was impossible to predict who would say what. This life experience is one of the things that made me think of staying in academia just because it was nice to be in this environment.
Anna Shchetkina During my bachelor’s, my goal was simple: I needed to pick my courses, do my homework, pass my exams and get good grades. After five years of studying for a PhD, after which I hope to become a professor, I’ll have to write papers that will advance the knowledge of the whole world. No one teaches you this during your bachelor’s degree. A PhD program will give me this unique opportunity, to have people share their experience and tell me what I need to do to create something genuinely new instead of simply regurgitating someone else’s work.
Artemii Korolkov My main hope regarding a PhD abroad is to conduct my own independent research. While studying at a bachelor's or a master’s program it’s quite difficult to work on the same thing for a long time without getting distracted by other things. A PhD gives you this opportunity and that’s why most people do a doctorate.
Ruben Enikolopov I would like to warn graduates that starting independent research activities does not happen so quickly and painlessly. For the first two years, students, of course, are already beginning to put forward new ideas, but still devote more time to their studies. PhD students even have something called “third year depression,” where courses come to an end and they have to come up with new ideas on their own and that’s very difficult. It passes for most people when they stick to something and eventually break down this wall.
Anna Mikusheva I agree with Ruben, I think he is talking about patience and grit. We always want to get results quickly. While working in academia, I was surprised to learn how much time it takes to produce anything worthy. If you set yourself a goal and achieve it on the first try, it probably means the problem was too easy and there’s no point in writing a paper about it. If you solve the problem on the fourth attempt, for example, then it’s more promising but still potentially not too interesting. You can work for months, sometimes years on genuinely interesting questions, but when you find the solution, it will be a thing of beauty. Like many, I also became depressed in my third year, it’s a really difficult time in any PhD program. It stems partially from the fact that we expect to be successful very quickly. You need to understand that scientific research takes a long time and time also defines how deeply you can delve into something.
How to prepare to apply for an international PhD program
Artemii Korolkov There are technical requirements, you need to prove your knowledge of English by taking an internationally recognized test, for most programs you also need a sufficient GRE General scores in math. However, recommendation letters from your professors are the most important thing. You need to communicate and work with your recommenders for quite a long time to get them. I would recommend that you start off by arranging to get these recommendations, and only then sitting your exams, writing cover letters and selecting a university.
Anna Shchetkina Yes, getting recommendation letters really does take a long time. It took three years for me to get mine, I worked with my professor as a research and teaching assistant. However, the thing that surprised me the most in the application process, was how much time I spent having interviews with universities. I had finished submitting all my paperwork by December, and I had interviews with foreign universities from January until March, all of which I had to prepare for. Once the school has taken a decision and sends you an offer letter, there are going to be even more conversations, because now you get to know your professors and discuss your interests and projects with them. This final stage of the enrollment process is crucial for your further study at that university.
Ruben Enikolopov Getting the recommendation letters is the key element of the application process. Your professors take into account all the aspects of the students’ work, including their skills as research assistants. But the most important thing is how students carry out their own research. Thesis papers are still in progress in the autumn or beginning of winter when recommendation letters are usually written. However, students are already preparing to write them, and professors usually describe how well this is going in the recommendation letter. In these letters, it’s not enough simply to say that a student is very intelligent, asks good questions and gets decent grades. There need to be specific examples, for instance, “she is embarking upon her research work, look at this great idea she has and the superb way she is developing it.” Students should start working on their degree thesis as soon as possible to give their professors something to write about.
Now for a bit of cynical advice: at least one letter should be from a professor whose published work is well-respected enough to make his recommendation stand out to those who read it. If your letters are written by professors who do not publish at the international level or young academics who are yet to establish themselves, it could reduce your chances of getting in.
Anna Mikusheva University admission officers want to know who can and will conduct research and you need to prove you fit this criterion. This can be reflected in your CV, recommendation or cover letters. You need to outline your track record. Students normally describe their projects, present published articles and speeches for conferences. It is very important to describe your experience as a professor’s research assistant, if any. Many students have internships at government agencies involved in economic policy. If you have the opportunity during your internship to demonstrate your depth of thought and ability to focus on a single important issue, you should definitely bring this to the university’s attention. When choosing who should write you recommendation letters, think about what this person can add to what you’ve already put in your application. By the way, your recommendation letter doesn’t always have to be written by your professor. If you have conducted policy research in the Central Bank, for example, it would look better if your adviser there gave you a reference than a professor you only took one course with. Predoctoral fellowships are also becoming more popular, these are research positions people take up before their PhD in order to gain research experience and good references.
How to choose a program and university
Anna Mikusheva If we’re talking about economics programs, it’s important to note that there is a hierarchy of schools. You should have a decent understanding of which universities are ranked best and how they got there. When applying, you’ll normally take this into consideration and know where you want to go.
How do PhD programs differ from one another? First of all, by their students. As Ruben has already said, you’ll be studying, co-authoring articles and communicating with these people your entire professional life. Most universities publish information on their websites about what their graduates do. If you really want a career in academia, you should aim at a highly ranked university, because these are where future academics are born.
The second difference - how many areas of economics are researched at the university, or how diverse the expertise of its professors is. Most of the top schools cover almost all branches of Economics well. This is very important because more than half of students change their specialization within Economics during their PhD. This is what I did, when after just a year and a half of studying I switched my focus from Micro Theory to Econometrics. If a PhD program gives you the opportunity to change your course, then it’ll be pretty seamless. However, universities further down the rankings might not have active research faculty in some fields of Economics. It’s more difficult to study what you want if your choice is limited.
Ruben Enikolopov If you choose to go to a university outside the top-10, you really need to understand how the specifics of that institution could affect your studies. It’s very useful to talk to professors who know the nuances of different universities, because you can’t always find this out from the information they publish on their websites. For example, it could turn out that the renowned academic you’d like to study under no longer works with students.
In recent years, some PhD programs in European universities have become much stronger. They may not reach the level of top-10 American universities, but they’re already very competitive.
Anna Shchetkina In marketing, there is also a specific list of top-10 universities you need to go to in order to get a good job in the future. I applied to all these universities, without giving much thought to where exactly I wanted to go. It was only when I received offer letters and was having interviews with universities, that my research supervisor who knows the ins and outs of these institutions really helped by giving me an idea of which schools taught which areas. For example, all branches of economics are represented more or less equally in leading universities, but the situation with marketing is a bit different. A top university could have a marketing program, but you may only be able to specialize in one area. So not every university will cover the specific field you want to study.
Artemy Korolkov People normally apply to quite a few universities. Anna applied to 10, I applied to 13. This is the average; some even send applications to 20 universities or more. When you get your offer letters and it’s time to make a choice, you can always contact students and professors in these programs. This is what I did and they always replied quickly and gave detailed answers to all my questions.
Which skills are necessary to study on an international PhD program
Ruben Enikolopov First of all, you should have a desire to do research. You can always change your mind and work in the private sector after your PhD program, but you need to have this strong motivation at the start. Secondly, to do science, you must be stubborn and, to a certain extent, mentally resilient. Nothing works out the first time you try it. When you become a professor, things only get worse, because you will send articles to scientific journals and they will constantly be rejected. You will always be getting knocked back and this is both painful and unpleasant. You need to learn to pick yourself up and keep moving forward, and this is impossible if you don’t enjoy what you do. In economics, the research cycle takes years from the initial ideas until the final paper is published. The only thing that can keep you going all that time is enjoying the process. Towards the end of your PhD course, you’ll learn how to keep trying new ideas, reject the boring ones and push ahead with the ones you like. You’ll also learn how to communicate well with people and get feedback on your work to improve it. You’ll learn how to present your work in a way that’s interesting to others. This is the social aspect of science you’ll be instilled with during your PhD program.
Anna Mikusheva I completely agree with Ruben, determination and a positive attitude are very important. You will be constantly reminded of this. I would also like to say that you don’t need a university degree in economics to enroll in an economics PhD program. We’re always getting students who never studied economics before their PhD, instead having a background in mathematics, computer science or physics. If you’re not an economist, it’s very important to have a solid foundation in mathematics, and an interest in economics. Be ready, a PhD program will change your attitude to life and your understanding of the world. I would say that, in general, economists are quite cynical and rational people. Maybe it’s because we understand the idea of stimuli too literally and strongly believe in the idea of the market. During the PhD program, we start thinking differently, there’s even a saying “to think like an economist.” It’s hard to describe, you just need to experience it. Even if you enter the program as a mathematician, you’ll come out as an economist.
How PhD research work is organized
Anna Mikusheva During the first years of study, students master the foundational courses that help them understand what economics is and where its frontiers lie. Then they normally start working as research assistants, helping their professors conduct research. These tasks can vary, for example, I used to check the proofs in my professors’ academic articles. I also tried to rewrite some of them more succinctly. This is how you learn to do research. It is learning by doing. Even students with a decent knowledge of mathematics write poor (hard to read and understand) proofs in econometrics when they do it for the first time. But you’ll make a huge leap forward when you write your first papers under the supervision of a professor. Some students co-author a paper with their advisers. It is very beneficial to go together through the process of writing and publishing a paper. I had this great experience and had my first paper published when I was a student. Your research supervisor keeps you sane when you get your first critical reviews, tells you how to reply to them and how to communicate with the editor. Adviser’s support is crucial in pushing you to keep working on your topic knowing that your work has been criticized. On a PhD program you’re taught grit and persistence, then you will keep learning it yourself as you go on.
Ruben Enikolopov I agree, the most useful thing a PhD course can give you is the experience of writing a paper with your advisor, as well as observing how they do research and work on an academic paper if you’re a research assistant. When students read papers that have been published, they look perfect. It seems like the author just woke up, had some coffee, came up with an ingenious idea, quickly jotted it down and voila! In fact, it’s a very long and laborious process. Frequently, you’ll start off with one idea and try to develop it, then in the process it can change or you can get completely different results to what you were expecting.
I was lucky. I wrote my first papers jointly with my research supervisor from NES and I gained invaluable experience thanks to her. If you’re a research assistant, you can ask your professor for advice on how to go about writing a paper. If you plan on continuing your work in academia, you will have to write your main piece of research, your job market paper. It’s what you need to “sell” yourself when applying for a professor’s job. You can take note of how senior students write them. Learning through doing is especially important here. You can’t write your paper using bullet points: first do this, then do that. The ability to write a research paper is something that can’t be taught, you can only learn this through experience and by example. The more cases you see, the better. There are many seminars in PhD programs where students and graduates discuss their raw ideas. Watching how these works evolve is also a very useful experience that can teach you a lot.
The career benefits of doing a PhD
Anna Mikusheva Our graduates have three paths into employment. Some of them lead to academia. They either do a post-doctorate or embark on a tenure track: they become assistant professor, associate professor and then get tenure (a permanent contract with a university) and become full professors. This is the standard academic career path.
The second direction involves working in various government agencies, such as the Central Bank, Federal Reserve, International Monetary Fund, Justice Department etc., all of which are in need of economists. There you will be able to carry out the research that underlies policy decisions.
The third type of career is working in the private sector. People normally choose investment banking or consulting. There are also more and more opportunities cropping up at tech companies like Amazon and Uber. They need economists to assess supply and demand, as well as explain how best to distribute resources.
Ruben Enikolopov Yes, in recent years powerful research centres have emerged in tech companies. People who work for the likes of Amazon and Microsoft basically become academics. Yes, they deal with issues these companies are interested in, but at the same time, they publish papers and can go back to university afterwards. Although it's normally a one-way path going from academia to the private sector, you can’t really go back. The difference between working at a university and a big tech research centre is that in the former you will teach while conducting your research. In tech companies, you will take part in applied projects, but you’ll spend a large portion of your time carrying out academic research. We can call this the fourth, niche career path. This is only possible in the top tech companies, but research departments could continue to spring up in private companies.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help .
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $ 2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Navigating the american dream: a guide for international brands.
Valter Klug, founder of Samba Rock, an ad & e-comm agency. 25 years of experience working with global brands. Let's connect on LinkedIn .
The vast landscape of the American market has always shimmered with potential and beckoned emerging brands to experience its rich diversity and opportunities. Yet, like any frontier, its complexity demands more than just ambition; it requires collective strength, strategic vision and an understanding of its intricate tapestry.
My marketing agency helps international brands expand their presence in the U.S., so I've seen firsthand that America is not just a single market. It's a world within itself—a conglomerate of multifaceted consumers with varied tastes, cultures and demands. Successful entry means understanding this diversity and translating it into strategies that resonate. This helps ensure your brand's message doesn't just speak but also sings to your target audience.
1. market research.
This is the compass that can help your brand identify current consumer trends, competitive niches and untapped opportunities. International brands should prioritize understanding consumer demographics and psychographics to tap into specific audience needs and buying habits. I recommend analyzing the competitive landscape for potential market niches, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements to avoid legal pitfalls and familiarizing yourself with prevalent pricing strategies and key distribution channels as well. In my experience, staying attuned to emerging industry trends better positions brands for successful U.S. market integration.
Mold your brand's voice to ensure it respects and resonates with the intricate cultural tones of the U.S. To do this, you can first monitor popular American media, ranging from TV shows and movies to podcasts and books, to gain insights into linguistic nuances, humor, values and topical issues that resonate with Americans. Second, consider localizing content through collaborations with U.S.-based content creators or influencers who naturally understand and embody these cultural subtleties. A strategy my team often recommends to clients is to conduct focus groups or surveys with diverse American audiences.
Diversity breeds innovation. A congregation of varied brand perspectives can lead to revolutionary solutions. Consider forming think tanks where you can come together with other international brands for the cross-pollination of ideas. By sharing challenges, solutions and insights specific to your individual experiences, you can uncover unique strategies that one brand alone might overlook. Joint ventures or collaborative campaigns can also amplify your collective reach and impact, thus offering a unified front that leverages the strength of diversity.
Establishing bonds with your customers that transcend mere transactions is a conduit to understanding the pulse of the market. Social media channels, especially Instagram, X (formerly known as Twitter) and Facebook provide avenues for real-time interactions. Your brand can host Q&A sessions, live demonstrations or virtual meetups on social media, for instance. Furthermore, consider implementing feedback loops, such as surveys or focus group discussions, to gather authentic opinions and insights.
Emerging brands often face numerous challenges, including regulatory compliance and intense competition. Building resilience and fostering innovation are essential in navigating these challenges.
Leveraging technological advancements could be a good place to start. I encourage international brands to consider investing in technology-driven solutions to help streamline operations. For example, you might find it helpful to use a cloud-based management system that allows real-time monitoring and swift decision-making across different time zones.
Optimizing operations, maintaining agility and developing a collective framework (i.e., a strategic alliance with similar or complementary brands) also enables brands to adapt to changing market scenarios and overcome obstacles efficiently. For example, an international fashion brand might collaborate with a local e-commerce platform and a logistics company. This could help ensure swift online sales and efficient distribution while sharing promotional expenses and market insights.
I believe forming strategic partnerships and alliances can amplify a brand’s reach and impact. Network with industry experts, influencers and other brands to open doors to collaborative opportunities, shared knowledge and mutual growth. Leveraging the power of collaboration can build your brand equity and expand your market presence.
The allure of the American market is undeniable, but the path is strewn with intricacies. However, I believe that when brands keep a few best practices in mind and unite to pool resources and wisdom, they don't just navigate the challenges—they redefine success. This approach is more than a strategy; it's a transformative shift where brands, small or large, journey together toward mutual milestones. And in this unity, the American dream isn't just a distant horizon but a tangible reality that's achievable and waiting to be seized.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
+7 (495) 818-96-58
Will your product be in demand in Russia? Who are your competitors in Russia and what strategies do they use? How to persuade Russians to choose your product? The answer will prompt market research.
Marketing research will reduce the risks of entering the Russian market and help develop a clear strategy. The study will:
Determine the market capacity. Which regions and cities should I bet on? Is it generally beneficial to go to Russia? The research will give the right answer.
Assess the viability of ideas. Rigid competition, cultural differences, and insufficient demand for your product are just a few factors which can disrupt your plans. Research will relieve you of similar surprises and, inadvance, will allow you to estimate how much really to embody plansin life.
Keep ahead of competitors. You will find out who your competitors in Russia are (in both local and foreign companies), which products and services they offer, which strategies are developed, and which competitive advantages are strong. You will be able to collect the best practices and use them to your advantage.
Understand the "mysterious Russian soul". You will learn the specifics of buying behavior in Russia: which stereotypes and prejudices Russians have. You will understand how to attract the attention of customers and convince them to choose your product.
Identify effective channels. The study will tell you which sales channels are in Russia and which are effective for you. Which kind of communication will be effective, and what is doomed to failure.
Producers, working in B2B markets
Distributors, working in B2C markets
Companies which bring innovative products to to the market
A business owner or CEO
Executive or commercial director
Marketer or director of marketing
The RMAA Group is a marketing agency which helps foreign companies enter the Russian market. We specialize exclusively in marketing strategies and their implementation for international brands and businesses in Russia.
We have been working since 2008
During this time, the agency has gained wide experience in working with international brands, and has created unique expertise in bringing new brands to the Russian market.
More than 30 projects were implemented
Each time these projects solved non-standard and diverse tasks, helping our clients to conquer Russian markets.
We use an integrated approach
when companies are brought to the Russian market. We carry out research, develop marketing and business strategies, identify UTS, create positioning and deal with the promotion of the company in Russia.
Communicate directly , without intermediaries
Our Russian team is fluent in English, so communication is comfortable and without any loss of information.
How do we work?
To find the answers to your questions , we will thoroughly investigate the topic: we conduct interviews, analyze the activities of competitors, and examine the experience of customers.
In addition to open sources, we have a broad base of contacts throughout Russia. Thanks to this, we quickly collect private data in a short time.
We specify in the contract all the topics that will be disclosed in the study, and the timing of the interim reports.
We regularly communicate , answer your questions and correct your further actions based on your interests.
You will receive a full study for detailed study and work , as well as a shortened version, convenient for presentation to company management, investors or the board of directors.
We care about privacy and to prevent the leakage of your data, we sign a non-disclosure agreement.
Why commission a new study, if you can buy one that has already been done?
We are "honed" for the needs of each particular client and investigate the situation for specific products in Russia.
Each product is unique, for the development of the strategy we find answers to narrow, pointed questions, which, by definition, are not found in the purchased sample study.
Very well, and what to do with this research?
After completing the research , we help develop a strategy for promoting your product to the Russian market and implement it.
Conducting research
Decision making about entering Russia
Developing a strategy
Successful entry to the market
Get consultation
Case study: How to help a manufacturing company enter new regions of Russia?
About the company: Manufacturer of equipment. The name of the company is not disclosed in accordance with the agreement.
Task: The regional manufacturer planned federal expansion. To build a holistic marketing strategy, he ordered a comprehensive study from us that involved dealers, retail customers and service centers.
How did the study go?
We conducted in-depth interviews with customers and developed a questionnaire to confirm the reliability of the results on a large sample of buyers.
Reproduced the buyer's methods, collected feedback, understood the strengths to make emphasis in communication and how to improve products.
We talked with the dealers to understand how they make decisions about the choice of the supplier, what arguments they are convincing and what disadvantages they see.
They collected feedback about the company, understood which criteria are important in choosing a supplier and which points of growth the company has. Found a way to simplify logistics.
We interviewed the service center owners to find out how they decide to cooperate.
Determined the criteria which draw attention to the supplier pay attention. Discovered a method to reduce the cost of the process of ordering spare parts.
Case study: How to help an IT company develop a service that is in demand in Russia and the US?
About the company: IT-company. The name of the company is not disclosed in accordance with the agreement.
Task: IT-company develops a service-marketplace, which will test in Russia, and in the future plans to launch around the world. To create a marketing strategy and use the achievements of Western competitors, the company ordered from us a comprehensive study that captured customers and performers, which comprises the marketplace, and competitors in Russia and the United States.
We conducted in-depth interviews with customers to understand how they cope with the search for performers, what problems they are experiencing and how they relate to the marketplace.
We understood how to build communications to evoke confidence in the service and what functionality to put in it.
We talked to the performers to understand the difficulties they face when searching for customers, whether they use marketplaces and what does not suit them in existing services.
We determined which disadvantages exist for current marketplaces, what functionality is needed for the executors and what the UTS should be.
We analyzed the largest competitors in Russia and the US, talked with experts in the industry and collected data through competitive intelligence.
We determined what difficulties the competitors face and what solutions they find. We collected advanced solutions.
Russian-Speaking Influencer Marketing Overview
White Paper:
Further insights and trends in the Influencer Industry within Russia and the CIS
HOW TO SELL TO RUSSIAN LARGE COMPANIES?
Learn how to conquer this billion-dollar marketplace
Russian Digital Market Overview
Strategic Insights into Russian Digital Marketing Landscape
How Does the Media Buying Market in Russia Work?
Navigating the Media Buying System in Russia
Do you want to know more about our other services?
B2B Marketing Solutions
Media Buying Solutions
Full Integrated Digital Marketing
RMAA has offices in two Russian cities: Moscow and Vladivostok.
RMAA Moscow
121099, Russia
Moscow, Vozdvizhenka st.,
building 10
Vladivostok
RMAA Vladivostok
690091, Russia
Vladivostok, Aleutskaya, 17
+74958189658
Want to get our offer?
Your name:*
Phone Number:
Company's website:
Your question or comment:
Thank you for your request! We will contact you as soon as possible.
Questions? Let's talk
PROUD MEMBER OF
We use cookies to improve your personal online experience.
Currency Exchange International, Corp. ( TSE:CXI - Get Free Report ) passed below its 50 day moving average during trading on Friday . The stock has a 50 day moving average of C$26.26 and traded as low as C$25.60. Currency Exchange International shares last traded at C$25.60, with a volume of 1,100 shares.
The firm's 50 day moving average price is C$26.23 and its 200-day moving average price is C$25.46. The stock has a market cap of C$165.12 million, a P/E ratio of 13.26 and a beta of 0.80. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 8.70, a current ratio of 2.45 and a quick ratio of 1.62.
Currency Exchange International ( TSE:CXI - Get Free Report ) last issued its earnings results on Wednesday, June 12th. The company reported C$0.39 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter. The firm had revenue of C$27.26 million for the quarter. Currency Exchange International had a net margin of 11.37% and a return on equity of 12.44%. As a group, equities research analysts forecast that Currency Exchange International, Corp. will post 2.7739583 earnings per share for the current year.
Featured stories.
Before you consider Currency Exchange International, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Currency Exchange International wasn't on the list.
While Currency Exchange International currently has a "hold" rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Click the link below and we'll send you MarketBeat's list of seven best retirement stocks and why they should be in your portfolio.
Investing tools.
Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat's full suite of research tools.
Best-in-class portfolio monitoring.
We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here . By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service .
New to Zacks? Get started here.
Don't Know Your Password?
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK . If you do not, click Cancel.
Image: Bigstock
Making its debut on 10/04/2022, smart beta exchange traded fund VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF ( SMOT Quick Quote SMOT - Free Report ) provides investors broad exposure to the Style Box - All Cap Blend category of the market.
The ETF industry has traditionally been dominated by products based on market capitalization weighted indexes that are designed to represent the market or a particular segment of the market.
Market cap weighted indexes work great for investors who believe in market efficiency. They provide a low-cost, convenient and transparent way of replicating market returns.
But, there are some investors who would rather invest in smart beta funds; these funds track non-cap weighted strategies, and are a strong option for those who prefer choosing great stocks in order to beat the market.
Non-cap weighted indexes try to choose stocks that have a better chance of risk-return performance, which is based on specific fundamental characteristics, or a mix of other such characteristics.
Methodologies like equal-weighting, one of the simplest options out there, fundamental weighting, and volatility/momentum based weighting are all choices offered to investors in this space, but not all of them can deliver superior returns.
The fund is managed by Van Eck. SMOT has been able to amass assets over $338.56 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs in the Style Box - All Cap Blend. Before fees and expenses, SMOT seeks to match the performance of the MORNINGSTAR US SML-MID CAP MOAT FOCUS ID.
The Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index tracks the overall performance of small and mid-cap companies with sustainable competitive advantages and attractive valuations.
Expense ratios are an important factor in the return of an ETF and in the long-term, cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins, other things remaining the same.
With on par with most peer products in the space, this ETF has annual operating expenses of 0.49%.
SMOT's 12-month trailing dividend yield is 0.65%.
It is important to delve into an ETF's holdings before investing despite the many upsides to these kinds of funds like diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk. And, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation in the Consumer Discretionary sector - about 22% of the portfolio. Industrials and Information Technology round out the top three.
Looking at individual holdings, Dupont De Nemours Inc ( DD Quick Quote DD - Free Report ) accounts for about 1.45% of total assets, followed by Discover Financial Services ( DFS Quick Quote DFS - Free Report ) and Nisource Inc ( NI Quick Quote NI - Free Report ) .
Its top 10 holdings account for approximately 14.08% of SMOT's total assets under management.
The ETF has added about 0.63% so far this year and is up about 6.85% in the last one year (as of 08/13/2024). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $25.84 and $34.11.
SMOT has a beta of 1.27 and standard deviation of 18.22% for the trailing three-year period. With about 114 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Style Box - All Cap Blend segment of the market. However, there are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider.
IShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF ( ITOT Quick Quote ITOT - Free Report ) tracks S&P Total Market Index and the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF ( VTI Quick Quote VTI - Free Report ) tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. IShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF has $56.87 billion in assets, Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF has $403.33 billion. ITOT has an expense ratio of 0.03% and VTI charges 0.03%.
Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Style Box - All Cap Blend.
To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center .
Normally $25 each - click below to receive one report free:.
NiSource, Inc (NI) - free report >>
Discover Financial Services (DFS) - free report >>
DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (DD) - free report >>
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) - free report >>
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) - free report >>
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) - free report >>
This file is used for Yahoo remarketing pixel add
13k Accesses
9 Citations
2 Altmetric
Explore all metrics
Classic business literature asserts the central role of marketing as foundational to the existence of organizations, and further notes that marketing must permeate all areas of a business enterprise. Leveraging this premise, we examine marketing scholars’ contributions to the international business (IB) literature – specifically notable works in exporting and market entry. Despite the overarching role of marketing in business, our systematic examination of published works in JIBS identified only 11 marketing contributions among the top 100 most frequently cited publications. More recent Web of Science data for the most cited contributions since 2015 demonstrate a decline in the number of international marketing (IM) and IB-related contributions by marketing scholars. Our goal in this editorial is to re-emphasize marketing’s critical importance and centrality in IB research, especially with reference to its dominant role in such areas as exporting and market entry decisions, customer acquisition, and relationship management. This special issue is intended to highlight IM and to motivate more contributions by IM scholars, as well as to call for greater integration of marketing thought in IB research.
La littérature classique en management affirme le rôle central du marketing comme fondement de l'existence des organisations, et souligne en outre que le marketing doit imprégner tous les domaines d'une entreprise. Nous appuyant sur cette prémisse, nous examinons les contributions des chercheurs en marketing à la littérature du commerce international (IB – International Business ), plus spécifiquement, les travaux importants portés sur l’exportation et l’entrée sur les marchés. Malgré le rôle fondamental du marketing dans les affaires, notre examen systématique des travaux publiés dans la revue JIBS n'a identifié que 11 contributions liées au marketing parmi les 100 publications les plus fréquemment citées. Les données plus récentes sur le Web of Science liées aux contributions les plus citées depuis 2015 montrent une baisse du nombre de contributions relatives au marketing international (IM – International Marketing ) et au IB par les chercheurs en marketing. Dans cet éditorial, notre objectif est de souligner à nouveau l’importance critique et la centralité du marketing dans la recherche en IB, notamment par rapport à son rôle dominant dans les domaines tels que les décisions d’exportation et d’entrée sur les marchés, l’acquisition de clients et la gestion des relations. Ce numéro spécial a pour but de mettre en valeur le IM, de stimuler davantage de contributions de la part des chercheurs en IM, ainsi que d'appeler à une plus grande intégration de la pensée marketing dans la recherche en IB.
La literatura empresarial clásica reivindica el papel del marketing como primordial a la existencia de las organizaciones y además nota que el marketing debe permear todas las áreas de una empresa. Apalancándonos en esta premisa, examinamos las contribuciones de los académicos de marketing a la literatura de negocios internacionales – específicamente los trabajos más destacados sobre la exportación y la entrada del mercado. A pesar del papel global del marketing en los negocios, nuestro examen sistemático de los trabajos publicados en JIBS identificamos sólo 11 contribuciones de marketing entre las 100 publicaciones más citadas. Los datos más recientes de Web of Science de las contribuciones más citadas desde el 2015 demuestran una disminución en el numero de contribuciones relacionadas con marketing y negocios internacionales por parte de los estudiosos de marketing. Nuestra meta con este editorial es hacer hincapié a importancia fundamental del marketing y su centralidad en la investigación de negocios internacionales, especialmente con referencia a su papel dominante en áreas como la exportación y las decisiones de entrada al mercado, la adquisición de clientes y la gestión de relaciones. Esta edición especial busca resaltar el marketing internacional y motivar más contribuciones de académicos de marketing internacional, y también hacer un llamado a una mayor integración del pensamiento de marketing en la investigación de negocios internacionales.
A literatura clássica de negócios afirma o papel central do marketing como fundamental para a existência de organizações e, além disso, observa que o marketing deve permear todas as áreas de uma empresa. Aproveitando essa premissa, examinamos contribuições dos acadêmicos de marketing para a literatura de negócios internacionais (IB), especificamente trabalhos notáveis em exportação e entrada no mercado. Apesar do papel abrangente do marketing nos negócios, nosso exame sistemático de trabalhos publicados no JIBS identificou apenas 11 contribuições de marketing entre as 100 publicações mais citadas. Dados mais recentes da Web of Science para as contribuições mais citadas desde 2015 demonstram um declínio no número de contribuições de marketing internacional (IM) e relacionadas a IB por acadêmicos de marketing. Nosso objetivo neste editorial é reenfatizar a importância crítica e centralidade do marketing na pesquisa em IB, especialmente com referência ao seu papel dominante em áreas como exportação e decisões de entrada no mercado, aquisição de clientes e gerenciamento de relacionamento. Esta edição especial tem como objetivo destacar o IM e motivar mais contribuições de acadêmicos de IM, bem como pedir uma maior integração do pensamento de marketing na pesquisa de IB.
经典的商业文献断言市场营销对组织存在有着基础的中心的作用, 并进一步指出, 市场营销必须渗透到商业企业的所有领域。 利用这一前提, 我们研究了市场营销学者对国际商务 (IB) 文献的贡献, 特别是在出口和市场准入方面的著名作品。 尽管市场营销在商业中起着举足轻重的作用, 我们对JIBS发表的作品的系统检查发现, 在最常被引用的前100篇文章中只有11篇是市场营销的贡献。最新的Web of Science数据 (自2015年以来被引用最多的数据) 表明, 市场营销学者对国际市场营销 (IM) 和与IB相关的贡献数量有所下降。 我们这篇社论的目标是重新强调市场营销在IB研究中的至关重要性和中心地位, 尤其是参考市场营销在出口和进入市场决策、客户获取以及关系管理等领域的主导作用。 本期专刊旨在突出IM和激发IM学者做出更多的贡献, 并呼吁将市场营销思想与IB研究有更大的整合。
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Marketing is the raison d’etre and the force that drives organizations. Among the many axioms advanced by Peter Drucker, the father of modern management, are that the purpose of a business is “to create customers”, and that an organization has only two functions: one role relates to marketing (i.e., innovation) and the other is marketing (Drucker, 1954 , p. 37; Trout, 2006 ; Webster, 2009 ). Drucker further observed that only innovation and marketing produce results (i.e., revenue streams); the rest are costs (Cohen, 2013 ). Product innovation is a key marketing strategy component and an important means of creating and keeping customers, and, hence, a central element of a successful competitive strategy. This marketing-based view is also shared by other management thought leaders. Ted Levitt ( 2006 , p. 129), for example, notes that “the entire corporation must be viewed as a customer-creating and customer-satisfying organism.”
The “marketing-based” position held by seasoned management opinion leaders underscores the “overarching” role and centrality of marketing as a philosophy that should drive virtually all organizations. In fact, McKenna ( 1991 ) takes this notion even further by claiming “…successful companies are becoming market driven, adapting their products to fit their customers’ strategies” (p. 66). Adopting market orientation and becoming a market-driven organization, in turn, require marketing to “permeate” all aspects of organizational decision-making, inclusive of international business activities, before a product is produced or externally sourced. Parenthetically, since marketing represents the interface of all businesses with their customers, it should be expected to play a central role in published academic works in business, including international business (IB) – the focus of attention in this editorial.
Many studies have examined research themes covered in IB journals. One such effort surveyed academic publications in the six leading IB-related journals, and identified and classified 112 articles with at least 20 citations each for the 1996–2006 period (Griffith, Cavusgil, & Xu, 2008 ). Collectively, with over 22% of the most-cited publications, marketing was identified as having the largest number of publications. 1 In keeping with business thought leaders’ position on the purpose of an enterprise, one would expect a higher proportion of (1) internationally oriented marketing topics and/or (2) published works on other topics, such as IB, that actively include marketing in some meaningful way. Surprisingly, much of the published research in IB excludes marketing considerations. As an example, in examining foreign market entry and expansion modes [e.g., foreign direct investment (FDI)], the ultimate goal – beyond the theoretical lens in use, efficiencies, drivers, order of market entry, and resultant models and theories – is to gain or create new customers and/or better serve current customers in markets worldwide. Such an approach constitutes a marketing-centric view of FDI.
The IB literature has demonstrated that firms engaging in FDI invest more in research and development (R&D) and innovation (e.g., Anand & Kogut, 1997 ); however, the IB literature is not explicit about why firms invest in innovation in the first place. 2 A marketing-centric view (e.g., Ellis, 2000 ; Knight & Cavusgil, 2004 ; Leonidou & Katsikeas, 1996 ) does not imply a necessity to include marketing in every (e.g., market entry) project. Rather, it consists of a researcher mindset that conceives of and fine-tunes research projects in light of the ultimate purpose of an organization (per Drucker, Levitt, and McKenna) when marketing is not an explicit aspect of the study. The business worldview from within the marketing discipline is that marketing permeates the entire organization (including innovation). IB scholars recognize the integrated nature of marketing across various firm activities in specific sectors (e.g., in the services industry per Rugman & Verbeke, 2008 , p. 409), however, creating and serving customers necessitate the broadening of this perspective across all industries, as predicated in marketing. Stated differently, framing marketing as a single value chain function, or adopting a strictly downstream view of it inhibits richer and more meaningful customer-centric, as well as increasingly more realistic conceptualizations of critical activities and decisions in IB (cf. Takeuchi & Porter, 1986 ). Among other downsides, the narrow conceptualization of marketing functions as downstream activities in the value chain undermines marketing’s true role and influence in shaping strategy formulation. Global strategy decisions envisioned and designed by the C-suite inherently involve a very significant level of marketing content, without which a sound global strategy is not possible.
Concurrently, Buckley ( 2002a ) voices concern that international marketing (IM) has neglected the proximal issue of globalization in studies of IM strategy. This concern is in line with the broader criticism that IM has also largely abandoned strategy issues (Kotabe, 2001 ). Indeed, the marketing discipline can be criticized for failing to fully embrace the influences of international and global dimensions across the many critical strategy pillars inherently thought of as marketing’s intellectual domain. An examination of research priorities published by the influential Marketing Science Institute (MSI) demonstrates the discipline’s relative inactive posture in IM/IB. In all, the 2020–2022 MSI Research Priorities report includes four internationally oriented topics among 126 research questions listed. 3 It is thus not too surprising that IM scholars have paid only scant attention to research opportunities at the intersection of IM strategy and globalization, which, in turn, has limited our understanding of the crucial role that marketing plays in establishing, developing, and sustaining effective business operations across markets worldwide. In parallel, we assert that investigations of globalization should also include marketing strategy considerations.
To develop a better understanding of the contributions of marketing scholarship to the IB literature and, more specifically, to the Journal of International Business Studies ( JIBS ), we examined all highly cited articles published in JIBS since the journal’s inception. We rank-ordered all articles by their total citation frequencies using the Web of Science (WOS) database. We identified 11 marketing articles on topics generally considered to belong to the marketing domain among the top 100 most-cited JIBS publications (Table 1 ). 4 We further observed that scholars with marketing ties have also made highly cited general IB contributions to the literature. Overall, it is evident that marketing scholars have made significant contributions in JIBS to the extant IM and IB knowledge. However, it is also apparent that the most highly cited IM publications in JIBS were published in the 1982–2002 period. This pattern raises a question about the relative impact of IM, as measured by WOS citation frequencies, in JIBS published works. We thus examined the most-cited JIBS publications since 2015 (Table 2 ). The data indicate that, in contrast to pre-2015, fewer marketing studies have been among the top 100 most-cited articles published in JIBS as of late. In addition, fewer contributions on broader IB topics are by authors with close marketing ties.
Despite the centrality and importance of marketing in business, the influence of IM scholars and IM publications in the broader IB discipline via the field’s leading journal has been on the decline. The marketing theme of this special issue of JIBS builds on business and management thought leaders’ (e.g., Drucker, Levitt) view regarding the purpose of a business enterprise; that is, we start with the premise of the critical importance of marketing to all facets of business and leverage broad-based agreement about the declining role of marketing in IB research as well as broader IB contributions by marketing scholars in JIBS . Our overarching objective in this issue is to motivate relevant and rigorous research that advances IM and, in turn, IB thought on an ongoing basis, beyond the confines of this special issue. If one subscribes to Drucker’s vision about the purpose of a business, then IM should be better integrated into and represented within IB publications, notably within JIBS , the leading and most highly cited journal in IB. To this end, our goals in this essay are to (1) highlight the role of IM within IB, (2) detail the many critical roles of marketing in today’s business enterprise, and (3) introduce the marketing contributions in this special issue.
Beyond Drucker’s view of the purpose of a business, IB at its core is inherently intertwined with marketing. For centuries, individuals and firms have sought to expand sales through exporting, which constitutes the most common foreign market entry and international expansion mode; for many firms, therefore, export marketing has defined IB. Indeed, all exporting is strictly rooted in marketing (see, for example, Anderson & Gatignon, 1986 ). 5 This view is implied in the broader perspective of export development, which emphasizes internal and external triggers to exporting (cf. Cavusgil & Nevin, 1980 ; Wiedersheim-Paul, Welch, & Olson, 1978 ), both of which are export marketing centered. Some scholars view all international market entry forms as essentially marketing driven (e.g., Douglas & Craig, 1989 ). Indeed, many early contributors to foreign market entry and the export development process are closely associated with the marketing discipline (e.g., Bilkey & Tesar, 1977 ; Cavusgil, 1980 ; Czinkota, & Johnston, 1981 ; Katsikeas, 1996 ; Samiee & Walters, 1991 ). Over time, some firms continue to reap the benefits of increased sales and profits via export marketing, whereas others, recognizing the broader and longer-term potential of global markets, have sought to establish different forms of engagement in markets abroad. For example, international leasing and licensing (i.e., limited-term rental contract of an asset) as means of foreign market entry or expansion constitute marketing activities, but they are often viewed as activities related to, for example, market expansion and operational strategy (e.g., Contractor, 1985 ; Ricks & Samiee, 1974 ). It may be that the role and critical importance of IM is widely recognized by IB scholars. However, making marketing’s presence more explicit in IB research can result in framing issues such that corresponding research findings will yield greater marketplace and marketing relevance, in line with Drucker’s and Levitt’s views on the purpose of business. In short, regardless of entry mode or a firm’s structural configuration, market expansion and increased sales via (in)direct marketing internationally is central to IB. Such a view highlights the centrality and critical role of IM activities, while emphasizing the significance of IM contributions to the broader IB field.
Interest in and focus on scholarly research in IM began to intensify during the 1980s, and empirical investigations of IM problems and challenges facing firms have received heightened research attention for decades. Initial scholarly research in IM was limited, though there is noteworthy work on export market entry triggers as well as motivations and explanations for internationalization decisions (Ford & Leonidou, 2013 ). Since this early research, IM scholars have amassed a growing, multifaceted, and well-developed body of knowledge. Despite these advances, however, the growing importance and relevance of IM remains underappreciated and understudied (Day, 1996 ). As an unfortunate outcome of this, IM topics in the top IB journals are sparse (cf. Griffith et al., 2008 ), and a current survey of several leading marketing and IB journals reveals a relative paucity of scholarly work on IM issues. 6 Given IM’s centrality to all enterprises, the primary purpose of this special issue is to reinforce IM’s broad-based importance, with a particular focus on IM in the broader IB context.
A recent survey of the IM literature published in the top six IB/IM journals during the 1995–2015 period identified 1,722 published works (Leonidou, Katsikeas, Samiee, & Aykol, 2017 ). The knowledge structure on which this body of scholarly work indicates that many of the developments in IM thought are driven by 14 key knowledge nodes identified in Samiee and Chabowski ( 2012 ). 7 It is evident from the results of the investigation by Samiee and Chabowski ( 2012 ) that, in terms of knowledge base, IM has much in common with IB. A relatively high proportion (approximately 40%) of key sources used in IM research are also commonly cited in IB research, including Hofstede ( 1980 , 1991 , 2001 ), Porter ( 1980 , 1985 , 1990 ), Williamson ( 1975 , 1985 ), Buckley and Casson ( 1976 ), Bartlett and Ghoshal ( 1989 ), Nelson and Winter ( 1982 ), Penrose ( 1959 ), and Pfeffer and Salancik ( 1978 ). Of the 26 most influential works in IM, serving as foundational knowledge for the 2004–2008 period, the majority (18) were published in outlets not specifically designated as marketing-related (Samiee & Chabowski, 2012 ), thus demonstrating IM’s shared knowledge and close relationship to IB. Key IM knowledge nodes serving as the foundation of IM scholarship during this period appear in Table 3 .
IM research has evolved across numerous themes, with some areas receiving disproportionate scholarly attention over time (Leonidou et al., 2017 ). Foreign market entry and export marketing are among the oldest topics of interest for IM researchers, and these remain relevant and important. Collectively, origin-related research topics likely constitute the most popular IM theme among IM researchers and potentially the most researched area, with hundreds of publications (e.g., Kotabe, 2001 ; Papadopoulos, el Banna, Murphy, & Rojas-Méndez, 2011 ; Samiee & Chabowski, 2021 ). 8 Origin-related research – or more specifically, the country-of-origin line of research within IM – can be traced back broadly to Dichter ( 1962 ) and, more specifically, to Schooler ( 1965 ). Although the concept was applied strictly to customer product choice, it can and has been applied to other facets of IB (e.g., liability of foreignness). Beyond marketing, explicit recognition of business problems associated with nonlocal origins of firms began to emerge in the IB literature in the 1970s. For example, Buckley and Casson ( 1976 ) refer to the political problems of “foreignness,” and Boddewyn and Hansen ( 1977 , p. 550) note that “American companies were faced with handicaps due to their foreignness.” Although IB challenges related to nonlocal origins of products and firms seem intuitive, international marketers’ close proximity to markets and customers afforded them the opportunity to recognize the issue much earlier than appears to have been the case in the broader IB discipline. We highlight this issue to point to how IM and IB can and should leverage each other for a more comprehensive analysis and rapid advancement of the field.
Much of the intellectual capital in IM works has been devoted to various aspects of buyer behavior (Kotabe, 2001 ; Leonidou et al., 2017 ). This trend is not surprising given that, in general, a large majority of MSI research priorities ( 2020 ) are focused on customer-related issues (including three of the four internationally oriented themes out of the 126 research questions posed). Among international themes, one research question pertains to gaining global perspectives on prioritizing customer value at all touchpoints during the omnichannel customer experience; another theme seeks to understand whether customer behavior is the same or different in emerging markets; and a third issue addresses ways in which firms might integrate consumer-focused strategies globally. A sharp focus on the buyer and, more specifically, the consumer and his/her behavior highlights an ongoing emphasis on behavioral issues within marketing at the expense of advancing other equally salient issues in need of development. As a result, some important IM research areas are not receiving sufficient scholarly attention. To this end, 25 years ago, Day ( 1996 , p. 15) noted that “studies of cross-cultural differences in buyer behavior or the effect of country of origin do not suffice when the big issues needing answers are about global competitive interactions, global new product development and launch practices, sharing of market insights across borders, or the coordination and integration of multicountry operations.” An overemphasis on the buyer behavior aspects of IM, frequently via experiments, has indeed curbed scholarly efforts to advance IM and the exploration of “big issues”: for example, the short- and long-term effects of radical shifts in the external environment and competitive structures on various aspects of marketing strategy, notably, global supply chain management, innovation, and global product development activities, among others. In general, innovation can be related to and affect any facet of an enterprise’s operations (e.g., processes). The key innovation concern within marketing has centered on product breakthroughs and service delivery, as well as how firms can adapt to a changing landscape often marked by disruptive technological developments. Nevertheless, studies of global innovation or R&D can benefit from cross-fertilization, with significant advances in this area within marketing.
Despite the decades-long practice of international outsourcing by firms, few IM researchers have explored this critical area (e.g., Kotabe & Murray, 1990 ; Swamidass & Kotabe, 1993 ). As a result, scant research is available within this important area to shed light on IM practices [e.g., innovate vs. import (buy) new products; make vs. buy] that can facilitate enhanced IM performance. To this end, a fourth research priority identified by MSI ( 2020 ) is the global supply chain impact of the pandemic (p. 11). Sourcing considerations, such as exporting and importing, are by nature customer-centric and marketing-based. Nevertheless, much of the research in the area is conducted within other disciplines (Buckley, Doh, & Benischke, 2017 ). The importance of a focus on the bigger picture, including the organization, human capital, capabilities, innovation, and metrics, has been stressed in marketing (Moorman & Day, 2016 ). Behavioral components should continue to play important roles in advancing marketing (and IM); however, these topics need to be examined within the context of organizational priorities and not strictly limited to consumer-based studies.
Given the commonality of direct and indirect international involvement across firms and industries, a host of new and exciting challenges related to customers, suppliers, and relationship management are raised. Today’s global marketplace is characterized by disruptive external forces, intense competition from a multitude of foreign and indigenous companies, and heterogeneous customer behavior shaped by differences across a range of host-market conditions, notably culture. Technological advances create marketplace opportunities and novel business models and segments (e.g., social media, collaborative consumption/shared economy, product cocreation), while undermining long-established global brands, product/service markets, and business patterns and processes on a global scale. For example, local and international ride-hailing services such as Ola and Uber competing with long established global car rental firms; collaboratively developed HD DVD losing the industry-wide format war to the technologically more advanced Blu-ray by Sony shortly after its debut which, in turn, lost popularity as the market shifted to streaming services; photorefractive keratectomy developed in the U.S. essentially undermined the Russian-born radial keratectomy; and MP3/FLAC and streaming services largely replaced tangible music CDs developed through an R&D joint venture between Philips and Sony. Concurrently, new technologies are promoting new forms of interaction for businesses and customers that transcend national boundaries (e.g., social media; short message service-SMS; online reviews; using proprietary consumer data via artificial intelligence activated voice recognition to drive host-market demand, as is the case with Amazon’s Alexa or Google Assistant). Concurrently, innovative breakthroughs and rapid dissemination of information have given rise to intellectual property theft on a global scale, undermining marketing strategies, global brands, and distribution network relationships and their management, while requiring all firms to canvass markets globally to identify potential abuses and to assert control over their intellectual property. 9
Although the Internet and information technology (IT) continue to have a significant influence on customers and businesses (e.g., exporters, importers, concept-testing, global marketing strategy planning), a citations-based review of the IM literature revealed that IT-related topics did not constitute a knowledge base in IM (Samiee & Chabowski, 2012 ). This finding was corroborated by Leonidou et al. ( 2017 ), who noted that less 4% of IM-related academic articles reviewed included various facets of Internet connectivity. In addition, a literature review of 29 academic journals addressing the Internet’s impact on relational approaches to foreign market entry identified only 94 published articles, constituting approximately 3% of all the articles reviewed (Watson, Weaven, Perkins, Sardana, & Palmatier, 2018 ). IT has transformed how firms enter and manage markets globally to varying degrees in ways that are often not self-evident. In addition, IT's ubiquity and intangible nature make its detection and true impact on IM difficult, thus leading to a growing knowledge gap. The paucity of IT-motivated IM research uncovered by these reviews demonstrate the need to incorporate various facets of IT in more IM projects, including initial online export/import information gathering, marketing research, market entry and development, and export customer acquisition by both manufacturers and channel intermediaries. Furthermore, a research focus on cross-border e-commerce, especially as a means of internationalizing the scope of smaller firms’ marketing, is underdeveloped. It is surprising that, while origin-related buyer behavior topics remain popular, almost no effort has been made to explore how origin affects choice in online and, in particular, international e-commerce contexts (e.g., Ulgado, 2002 ). Buckley ( 2002a ) rightfully identified e-commerce as a frontier in IM research nearly two decades ago. Firms allocate significant amounts of financial resources to adopt promising technologies to improve their marketing performance, yet little research has been devoted to assessing the performance impact of digital tools (e.g., customer relationship management software) in terms of establishing new cross-border relationships or maintaining existing ones. Although IM has generally ignored such impactful areas of research as the influence of the Internet in global marketing, the IB literature, and more specifically international management, has also been shortsighted with respect to its limited pursuit of pertinent Internet-related research topics (e.g., international human resource management, global strategy development, management of global collaborative ventures and partnerships) (Chabowski & Samiee, 2020 ).
Social media influence both the demand and the supply side of exchange. On the supply side, firms are engaging people by allowing them to participate in cocreation and product development processes. Enterprises are increasingly engaging the public in idea generation via social media (e.g., Dell IdeaStorm, LEGO World Builder), new product development, and start-up capital (e.g., Quirky, Kickstarter). The degree to which firms engage social media audiences internationally (including both global and local social media sites) for one or more aspects of cocreation, and the influence of such activity on multinational corporations’ competitiveness across markets, remain unexplored. Examining the extent to which customers from around the world participate in knowledge development processes and help firms improve their existing products and/or create innovative ones also remains a fertile research area (Bayus, 2013 ; Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004 ).
Equally important research issues on the demand side also warrant research attention. For example, customers located in distant parts of the world use social media, but the impact of such engagement, and the positive or negative ripple effect it creates in or across social networks with respect to local and global brands, has received insufficient research attention (McAlexander, Schouten, & Koenig, 2002 ). Furthermore, the extent to which various customer segments rely on and ways in which they use social media across markets remain unexplored. This knowledge void, in turn, impacts the development of effective international cocreation strategies on the supply side. Relatedly, the global ubiquity of the Internet and social networks has made these media a major target for cybercriminals. Regular revelations of firm and customer data breaches are bound to have a consequential impact, not only on firm image and the customer engagement process, scope, and depth but also on demands for greater privacy and protection by customers and governments. Thus, IM research should explore the impact of, for example, cross-national privacy regulations on the efficacy of relationship development and management as well as online marketing processes.
Globalization has transformed the way business relationships are formed, managed, and evaluated, and customer engagement is likely to play a prominent role in business-to-business contexts. Business relationships are complex, interpersonal, and interdependent, and relationship marketing efforts can make a difference in promoting common goals and facilitating joint activities that create value for both partners; value that each company could not achieve outside the relationship or with other partners (Palmatier, 2008 ). In an international context, companies need to manage their cross-border relationships more skillfully to address geographic separation, cultural distance, administrative (e.g., currencies, legal jurisdictions) and economic (Katsikeas, Samiee, & Theodosiou, 2006 ; Leonidou, Samiee, Aykol, & Talias, 2014 ; Samiee, Chabowski, & Hult, 2015 ) differences between local and foreign markets, and increased levels of risk and uncertainty inherent in international operations (Johanson & Vahlne, 2009 ; Katsikeas, Skarmeas, & Bello, 2009 ). How does the international environment affect the activities, strategies, structures, and decision-making processes of companies with respect to their business relationships? How can companies manage their overseas business relationships as value-bearing assets? Are cross-border business relationships part of a value-creating network that delivers superior value to the end customer? What is the role of international relationship building and management in overcoming the liability of foreignness? Likewise, the roles of overseas business partners (e.g., distributors, suppliers) in knowledge development, innovation, and goal achievement are relevant and important areas that require research attention.
The fit between IM strategy and international relationships also deserves ongoing research attention. How can companies ensure that their different suppliers and partners abroad are well-aligned with their IM strategy? Strategy standardization offers significant economies of scale in value-adding activities (e.g., R&D, production, marketing), facilitates the development of a consistent corporate/brand image across countries, enhances coordination and control of international operations, and reduces operational and managerial complexity, whereas adaptation is based on the premise that variations between countries necessitate adjustment of the marketing strategy to the idiosyncrasies of each local market. The contingency approach suggests that the appropriateness of the selected IM strategy – typically positioned between the two standardization–adaptation extremes – should be evaluated based on its alignment, or fit, with dominant factors in the international environment, as fit facilitates enhanced performance outcomes (Katsikeas et al., 2006 ). Despite long-standing traditions in these areas, sensemaking in some overarching topics is needed. For example, the pursuit of a market orientation strategy demands sensitivity to local market conditions and IM strategy adaptation. Given the importance of market orientation for many firms, there is a need to better understand how market orientation influences IM strategy. On the one hand, market and customer orientation demand more localized or adapted IM strategies. On the other hand, a high degree of IM strategy standardization seemingly impedes a high degree of market orientation. How do firms reconcile their IM strategy and market orientation efforts? Moreover, how do customer relationships in particular and business relationships in general interact with the perennial issue of adaptation or standardization of IM strategy? Do overseas business relationships help the company determine which specific strategic elements are feasible or desirable to standardize or adapt? If so, under what conditions, and to what degree? To what extent is cocreation possible and appropriate under each IM strategy scenario?
In addition, the assessment of performance in international market operations is an issue that requires particular attention in the IM literature. The relevance and importance of IM resources, strategies, and actions is reflected in the extent to which these favorably influence firm performance outcomes achieved via international market operations and, in turn, contribute to organizational performance. However, there are a large number and wide diversity of IM performance measures employed in the literature, which makes the development of a coherent cumulative body of knowledge in the field particularly challenging (Katsikeas, Morgan, Leonidou, & Hult, 2016 ). Scant attention has been given in IM as to how performance should be conceptualized and operationalized, and studies commonly do not provide a definition or any justification for the assessment of performance that is adopted and for the specific measures used in the context of foreign market operations (Katsikeas, Leonidou, & Morgan, 2000 ; Leonidou, Katsikeas, & Samiee, 2002 ). Given that performance is inherently a multidimensional construct, it is essential that IM researchers be selective in choosing specific performance dimensions, and justify their choice on the basis of some theory-based logic, conceptual framing, and/or for pragmatic reasons. Performance assessment in international market operations should be in line with the theoretical perspective(s) adopted in the study. For example, empirical research grounded in the resource-based view and/or the dynamic capabilities perspective, which underpins much of the strategy-related and competitive advantage work in IM, requires a competitor-centered assessment of performance outcomes; that is, individual performance aspects and items need to be assessed in relation to competition in the foreign market targeted by the firm’s IM strategy (see Katsikeas et al., 2016 ).
The call for papers for this special issue has been received with much enthusiasm, as demonstrated by the large number of submissions covering a wide range of IM topics. Accordingly, manuscripts accepted for inclusion in this issue represent the diversity of submissions, with each making a unique contribution to the IM body of knowledge. The first article focuses on the sharing economy (SE), which is a timely and important issue that influences business operations across industries worldwide. Kozlenkova, Lee, Xiang, and Palmatier’s meta-analytic effort examines the effects of value-based (i.e., utilitarian, social, hedonic, and sustainability value) and governance-based (i.e., trust) factors on SE participation and investigates their relative effectiveness under different global contingencies (i.e., economic/competitive, cultural, societal, technological, regulatory, and demographic factors). Based on 55 empirical articles, with 60 independent samples from 15 countries, representing 123 correlations across 26,377 customers during the 2009–2019 period, the findings suggest that hedonic value exerts the largest effect on SE participation, followed by trust and utilitarian value, while social value and sustainability have the smallest effects. The analysis reveals a complex pattern of global contingency effects that firms should consider when advancing their entry strategies, formulating governance mechanisms, and evaluating promising markets. Kozlenkova et al. integrate their key insights into three tenets, reflecting the most important and surprising findings. These tenets are grounded in the vitally important roles of inequality, the hierarchy of needs, and governance mechanisms that can serve as a platform for establishing an emerging perspective of global SE participation.
Marketing metrics represent another critically important topic that has received little research attention in IM or IB. Sound managerial decisions and marketing strategy are based on quantitative measures, including outcomes (Moorman & Day, 2016 ). In their contribution to this special issue, Mintz, Currim, Steenkamp, and de Jong focus on metric use in marketing decisions across 16 countries, using a cultural perspective. The authors leverage a rich dataset containing more than 4,300 marketing decisions in more than 1,600 firms across 16 countries. Respondents chose from 24 general metrics pertinent to marketing (12) and financial (12) decisions, plus 6 metrics specific to each of 10 marketing mix decisions. The findings indicate that, for all markets combined, an average of 9 metrics are used per marketing decision. With nearly 12 metrics per decision, South Korean managers use the highest number of metrics, while Japanese managers use the fewest, with approximately 4 metrics per marketing decision. China and India, each with approximately 11 metrics, are close to Korea and are heavy users of marketing metrics, whereas France and the United States, with nearly 6 and 7, respectively, are moderate users of metrics in decision-making. Importantly, satisfaction, awareness, and return on investment are the three most commonly used metrics across markets. In addition, the study finds that metric use is affected by both firm and country culture.
Business-to-business (B2B) electronic platforms (e-platforms) play a critical role in helping exporting firms reach, serve, and penetrate foreign markets. However, the IB literature is unclear about how and under what conditions firms can use B2B e-platforms to boost their export performance outcomes. Drawing on signaling theory, Jean, Kim, Zhou, and Cavusgil propose and empirically test a model that investigates how exporters’ e-platform use affects export sales performance by boosting foreign market contact (i.e., quotations from foreign buyers) and how the institutional environment and export growth strategies influence the e-platform use–foreign market contact link. Using survey and archival lagged data on a sample of 205 exporters that subscribe to Alibaba.com, the authors reveal that e-platform use enhances foreign buyer contact and, in turn, export sales performance. The findings also suggest that the positive impact of e-platform use among exporters is further boosted when they come from regions that have less-developed market intermediaries or under conditions of high institutional distance between the home and host countries. The study also demonstrates that the effect of e-platform use on a foreign buyer contact becomes weaker under conditions of high export market diversification or high product diversification.
Platform-based mobile payments have experienced significant growth worldwide in recent years, partly because they offer unique value for both customers and companies over other digital payment methods. Kumar, Nim, and Agarwal note, however, that patterns of such payment adoption grow differently across countries, with some emerging countries (e.g., China) outperforming developed ones. The authors propose a conceptual model of mobile payment adoption, and develop hypotheses using explanations from the literature on network effects and institutional theory. Based on data collected across 30 countries (17 developed and 13 emerging), the study confirms the existence of network effects and differential influences of perceived value, inertia, and cultural factors on the mobile payment adoption of innovators and imitators. The presence of significant heterogeneity both within and between countries regarding the adoption of mobile payments, which offers additional evidence of leapfrogging by emerging markets with regard to mass mobile payment use, has important implications for theory development and marketing management practice in IB.
Global brands and perceived brand globalness (PBG) research have received much scholarly attention in the IM literature (Aaker & Joachimsthaler, 1999 ; Batra, Ramaswamy, Alden, Steenkamp, & Ramachander, 2000 ; Steenkamp et al., 2003 ). Contributing to this growing literature, Mandler, Bartsch, and Han tap the potential aversion to globalization among consumers and examine sentiments with respect to branding as the basis for corporate decisions regarding the appropriateness of global branding. The authors leverage signaling theory to conduct two studies that (1) assess brand credibility on the basis of consumer PBG and perceived brand localness (PBL) across two countries (Germany and South Korea), and (2) examine the role of three moderators (perceived country of origin, category social signaling value, and category cultural grounding). The findings demonstrate that both PBG and PBL are positively associated with brand credibility across markets; a split-sample test offers a contrast between globalized and globalizing markets, and demonstrates a relationship between brand credibility and PBL in Germany but not in South Korea, where brand credibility is associated with PBG. The study reports the impact of brand origin on brand credibility and demonstrates that effect of PBL on brand credibility does not vary with the brand’s origin in Germany, but the effect is stronger for domestic brands than for foreign brands in South Korea. The contrast between consumer perceptions in globalized and globalizing markets offers fruitful theoretical and managerial implications, while raising a series of consumer and IM strategy questions that have the potential to expand the boundaries of IM knowledge.
Origin-related research and animosity with reference to consumer perceptions, preferences, and choice have played major roles in the marketing literature (Klein, Ettenson, & Morris, 1998 ; Lu, Heslop, Thomas, & Kwan, 2016 ; Samiee, 1994 ; Verlegh & Steenkamp, 1999 ). In line with this stream of IM research, Westjohn, Magnusson, Peng, and Jung contrast animosity’s effect on product judgement versus willingness to buy. The first part of their contribution consists of a meta-analysis of 43 post–Klein et al. ( 1998 ) published works focusing on animosity, involving 18 nations, to address the inconsistencies reported in the literature. The authors follow this with an examination of the contextual role of culture on animosity effects using six experiments in the United States and China. They leverage three Hofstede dimensions (i.e., collectivism, long-term orientation, and power distance), measured at the individual level. The results indicate that collectivism and long-term orientation lessen the negative effects of animosity and support the position that animosity’s effect on willingness to buy is stronger than it is on product judgments. The findings offer useful insights for managers regarding, among others, consumers’ attitudes toward brands. Although the findings indicate that product judgements are not affected by animosity, the results indicate that product sales could be affected. In addition to demonstrating cross-cultural differences, the authors find that cultural values influence consumers’ willingness to buy.
The establishment, development, and management of cross-border interorganizational exchange relationships has received considerable research attention in the IB literature (e.g., Bello & Gilliland, 1997 ; Robson, Katsikeas, Schlegelmilch, & Pramböck, 2019 ; Skarmeas, Katsikeas, & Schlegelmilch, 2002 ). The starting point for Obadia and Robson’s study is the inconsistent findings in the literature regarding the effects of cooperation on performance in exporter–importer relationships. The authors argue that the relationship of cooperation with performance in IB associations has an inverted U shape; at high levels, the performance impact of cooperation weakens greatly and becomes negative. They also find that the importer’s specific investments mediate the link between cooperation and performance, which advances the idea that relational phenomena affect exporter performance only if they foster an importer’s productive behaviors. The study also points to the role of interdependence in moderating the inverted U-shaped relationship between cooperation and the importer’s specific investments. The findings reveal that a limited increase of interdependence enhances the impact of low to moderate levels of cooperation on the importer’s specific investments.
Overall, criticisms of IM scholarship (e.g., Buckley, 2002a ; Douglas & Craig, 1992 ; Kotabe, 2001 ) are generally well placed and to the point. Marketing and IM are pivotal to a firm’s existence and should play overarching roles in charting firms’ management and strategy. Yet IM has largely abandoned the “big picture” by focusing on microresearch and behavioral questions, notably, country-of-origin, and cross-cultural consumer behavior topics (Day, 1996 ; Kotabe, 2001 ; Leonidou et al., 2017 ).
Much work remains for IM scholars to advance the field by placing greater emphasis and effort on strategy-related topics and exploring macro-areas of business: for example, by bridging IM strategy with regard to market entry modes and globalization and addressing issues related to disruptive external change to global supply chains and e-commerce, among others. Indeed, Buckley’s ( 2002b ) position regarding the past successes of IB scholarship in exploring international market entry (the “big picture”) may seem premature if one agrees that marketing, a central concern of which is the customer and the idiosyncrasies associated with the demand-side, is largely absent from much of this success. The relative absence of “marketing” in much of the market entry literature is a call for IB and IM scholars to leverage this critical aspect of firms’ internationalization decisions. This view is consistent with Drucker’s position that “Concern and responsibility for marketing must therefore permeate all areas of the enterprise” (Drucker, 1954 , pp. 38–39). Additionally, the fact that IB and IM are close in their fundamentals, and that the IM knowledge structure significantly taps into management scholarship (Buckley, 2002a ; Samiee & Chabowski, 2012 ), further validates marketing’s relevance and centrality in the broader international business thought. Consequently, the perceived proximity of these disciplines appears to be greater than one might expect. A major strength of IB has been its ability to embrace and integrate other business disciplines from which crucial research questions emerge (Peng, 2004 ). A more marketing- and customer-centric view of IB research is also in line with this position.
There appears to be ample research opportunity to adopt a marketing mindset in IB research and to explicitly introduce marketing considerations to achieve a marketing-based view of IB activities, most notably the macro-issues, including market entry mode choice, international expansion patterns, cross-border buyer–seller relationships, and strategic alliances. Although this special issue is primarily intended to inspire and broadly direct researchers’ focus on developing IM projects that fill key knowledge gaps in IM thought, in keeping with Drucker’s and Levitt’s positions regarding the marketing purpose of all enterprises, we very much hope that this work offers pathways for general IB scholars to embrace, leverage, and contribute to IM knowledge.
The proportion of marketing articles reported by Griffith et al. ( 2008 ) is likely inflated, as two of the six journals surveyed are dedicated entirely to international marketing topics.
This issue maybe exacerbated by the use of varying terminologies across disciplines; however, despite marketing’s centrality in business, “marketing” and “consumer” or “customer” are rare terms in much IB research (cf. Anand & Kogut, 1997 ; Hejazi, Tang, & Wang, 2020 ).
MSI is a non-profit organization led by academic researchers, in collaborations with industry, aiming to address marketing issues faced by firms. Although we do not observe an ongoing internationally related research momentum in its current list of priorities, MSI has periodically addressed selective IM-related topics.
We also calculated citation per year to account for the timing of the published works; however, as Tables 1 and 2 show, among the highly cited works, the most-cited set and the order of articles remain largely the same.
This includes intracorporate export transactions involving parts and semifinished products. International firms frequently require subsidiaries to effectively compete in quality, price, and service with other suppliers, effectively marketing themselves as the premier supplier to the internal customer. Even if intrafirm export sales were guaranteed, as is the case in some firms, the final assembled product must still compete with other firms in every respect. In other words, the marketing function of intracorporate export transactions is merely pushed to the firm assembling and selling the final product.
Several journals, led by Journal of International Marketing and International Marketing Review , are dedicated to publishing scholarly IM research.
This is based on the spatial configuration generated by multidimensional scaling for works published in 34 scholarly journals (2,709 articles) in the 2004–2008 period. Other analyses (factor analysis and clustering) produced slightly fewer knowledge groups.
Estimates of the number of publications in this IM domain vary. For example, Samiee and Chabowski ( 2021 ) identify more than 482 country-of-origin publications listed in the Web of Science database, whereas Lu et al. ( 2016 ) estimate that the number of country-of-origin-related publications exceed 600.
The International Chamber of Commerce estimates the global economic value of counterfeiting to reach US$2.3 trillion by 2022. https://iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/global-impacts-counterfeiting-piracy-reach-us4-2-trillion-2022/ .
Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. 1999. The lure of global branding. Harvard Business Review, 77: 137–146.
Google Scholar
Anand, J., & Kogut, B. 1997. Technological capabilities of countries, firm rivalry and direct investment in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3): 445–466.
Article Google Scholar
Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3): 1–26.
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. 1990. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 42–58.
Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Sahay, A. 1996. Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5): 1005–1032.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution . Harvard Business School.
Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Ramachander, S. 2000. Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2): 83–95.
Bayus, B. L. 2013. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Science, 59(1): 226–244.
Bello, D. C., & Gilliland, D. I. 1997. The effects of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance. Journal of Marketing, 61(1): 22–38.
Bilkey, W. J., & Nes, E. 1982. Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1): 89–100.
Bilkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. 1977. The export behavior of smaller-sized Wisconsin firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 93–98.
Boddewyn, J. J., & Hansen, D. M. 1977. American marketing in the European Common Market, 1963–1973. European Journal of Marketing, 11(7): 548–563.
Bonaccorsi, A. 1992. On the relationship between firm size and export intensity. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 605–635.
Buckley, P. 2002a. International business versus international marketing. International Marketing Review, 19(1): 16–20.
Buckley, P. J. 2002b. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365–373.
Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise . New York: Holmes & Meier.
Book Google Scholar
Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. 2017. Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9): 1045–1064.
Cavusgil, S. T. 1980. On the internationalization process of firms. European Research, 8(November): 273–281.
Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. 2015. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 3–16.
Cavusgil, S. T., & Nevin, J. R. 1980. A conceptualization of the initial involvement in international marketing. Theoretical developments in marketing (pp. 68–71). Chichago: American Marketing Association.
Chabowski, B. R., & Samiee, S. 2020. The Internet and the international management literature: Its development and intellectual foundation. Journal of International Management. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100741 .
Child, J., & Tse, D. K. 2001. China’s transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 5–21.
Cohen, W. A. 2013. Drucker on marketing: Lessons from the world’s most influential business thinker . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.
Contractor, F. J. 1985. Licensing in international strategy: A guide for planning and negotiations . Quorom Books.
Coviello, N. E. 2006. The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5): 713–731.
Coviello, N. 2015. Re-thinking research on born globals. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 17–26.
Czinkota, M. R., & Johnston, W. J. 1981. Segmenting US firms for export development. Journal of Business Research, 9(4): 353–365.
Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 37–52.
Day, G. S. 1996. Using the past as a guide to the future: Reflections on the history of the Journal of Marketing . Journal of Marketing, 60(January): 14–16.
Dichter, E. 1962. The world customer. Harvard Business Review, 40(4): 113–122.
Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. 1989. Evolution of global marketing strategy: Scale, scope, and synergy. Columbia Journal of World Business, 24(3): 47–59.
Douglas, S. P., & Craig, C. S. 1992. Advances in international marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9(4): 291–318.
Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. 2006. Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5): 578–602.
Drucker, P. F. 1954. The practice of management . New York: Harper & Brothers.
Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. 2000. The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the US, Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 259–285.
Ellis, P. 2000. Social ties and foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3): 443–469.
Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. D. 1997. Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 337–360.
Erramilli, M. K. 1991. The experience factor in foreign market entry behavior of service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3): 479–501.
Ford, D., & Leonidou, L. C. 2013. Research developments in international marketing. In S. J. Paliwoda (Ed.), New perspectives on international marketing : 3–32. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2): 1–19.
Griffith, D. A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Xu, S. 2008. Emerging themes in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7): 1220–1235.
Han, C. M., & Terpstra, V. 1988. Country-of-origin effects for uni-national and bi-national products. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2): 235–255.
Harmeling, C. M., Magnusson, P., & Singh, N. 2015. Beyond anger: A deeper look at consumer animosity. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(6): 676–693.
Hejazi, W., Tang, J., & Wang, W. 2020. Selection, learning, and productivity at the firm level: Evidence from Canadian outward FDI. Journal of International Business Studies. . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00343-9 .
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values . Thousand Oak: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind . New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations . Thousand Oak: Sage.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3): 53–70.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 25–34.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1411–1431.
Jones, M. V., & Coviello, N. E. 2005. Internationalisation: Conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 284–303.
Katsikeas, C. S. 1996. Ongoing export motivation: Differences between regular and sporadic exporters. International Marketing Review, 13(2): 4–19.
Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, L. C., & Morgan, N. A. 2000. Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4): 493–511.
Katsikeas, C. S., Morgan, N. A., Leonidou, L. C., & Hult, G. T. M. 2016. Assessing performance outcomes in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(March): 1–20.
Katsikeas, C. S., Samiee, S., & Theodosiou, M. 2006. Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization. Strategic Management Journal, 27(9): 867–890.
Katsikeas, C. S., Skarmeas, D., & Bello, D. 2009. Building successful trust-based international exchange relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 132–155.
Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. 1998. The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1): 89–100.
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2004. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 124–141.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411–432.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2): 1–18.
Kotabe, M. 2001. Contemporary research trends in international marketing: The 1990s. In A. M. Rugman, & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international business : 457–502. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter Google Scholar
Kotabe, M., & Murray, J. Y. 1990. Linking product and process innovations and modes of international sourcing in global competition: A case of foreign multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(3): 383–408.
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., & Aulakh, P. S. 2002. Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1): 79–97.
Leonidou, L. C., & Katsikeas, C. S. 1996. The export development process: An integrative review of empirical models. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 517–551.
Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. 2002. Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 53(1): 51–67.
Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., Samiee, S., & Aykol, B. 2017. International marketing research: A state-of-the-art review and the way forward. In L. C. Leonidou, C. S. Katsikeas, S. Samiee, & B. Aykol (Eds.), Advances in global marketing: A research anthology : 3–33. Cham: Springer.
Leonidou, L., Samiee, S., Aykol, B., & Talias, M. 2014. Antecedents and outcomes of exporter-importer relationship quality: Synthesis, meta-analysis, and directions. Journal of International Marketing, 22(2): 21–46.
Levitt, T. 2006. What business are you in? Classic advice from Theodore Levitt. Harvard Business Review, 84(10): 126–137.
Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. 1999. Guanxi versus the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2): 231–247.
Lu, I. R. R., Heslop, L. A., Thomas, D. R., & Kwan, E. 2016. An examination of the status and evolution of country image research. International Marketing Review, 33(6): 825–850.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.
McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. 2002. Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1): 38–54.
McKenna, R. 1991. Marketing is everything. Harvard Business Review, 69(1): 65–79.
Moorman, C., & Day, G. S. 2016. Organizing for marketing excellence. Journal of Marketing, 80(6): 6–35.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 20–38.
MSI 2020. Marketing Science Institute research priorities: 2020–2022 . Marketing Science Institute.
Mullen, M. R. 1995. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 573–596.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. 1990. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 20–35.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Palmatier, R. W. 2008. Interfirm relational drivers of customer value. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 76–89.
Papadopoulos, N., el Banna, A., Murphy, S. A., & Rojas-Méndez, J. I. 2011. Place brands and brand-place associations: The role of ‘place’ in international marketing. In S. C. Jain, & D. A. Griffith (Eds.), Handbook of research in international marketing : 88–113. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Peng, M. W. 2004. Identifying the big question in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 99–108.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm . New York: Wiley.
Peterson, R. A., & Jolibert, A. J. 1995. A meta-analysis of country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 883–900.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective . New York: Harper & Row.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors . New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance . New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. E. 1990. Competitive advantage of nations . New York: Free Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. 2004. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Ricks, D. A., & Samiee, S. 1974. Leasing: It may be right abroad even when it is not at home. Journal of International Business Studies, 5(2): 87–90.
Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Pramböck, B. 2019. Alliance capabilities, interpartner attributes, and performance outcomes in international strategic alliances. Journal of World Business, 54(2): 137–152.
Roth, M. S., & Romeo, J. B. 1992. Matching product category and country image perceptions: A framework for managing country-of-origin effects. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3): 477–497.
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2008. A new perspective on the regional and global strategies of multinational services firms. Management International Review, 48(4): 397–411.
Samiee, S. 1994. Customer evaluation of products in a global market. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(3): 579–604.
Samiee, S., & Chabowski, B. R. 2012. Knowledge structure in international marketing: A multi-method bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2): 364–386.
Samiee, S. & Chabowski, B. R. 2021. Knowledge structure in product- and brand origin–related research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00767-7 .
Samiee, S., Chabowski, B. R., & Hult, G. T. M. 2015. International relationship marketing: Intellectual foundations and avenues for further research. Journal of International Marketing, 23(4): 1–21.
Samiee, S., & Walters, P. G. P. 1991. Segmenting corporate exporting activities: Sporadic versus regular exporters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(2): 93–104.
Schooler, R. D. 1965. Product bias in the Central American Common Market. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3): 394–397.
Sharma, P. 2015. Consumer ethnocentrism: Reconceptualization and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3): 381–389.
Skarmeas, D., Katsikeas, C. S., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. 2002. Drivers of commitment and its impact on performance in cross-cultural buyer–seller relationships: The importer’s perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4): 757–783.
Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., Batra, R., & Alden, D. L. 2003. How perceived brand globalness creates brand value. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1): 53–65.
Swamidass, P. M., & Kotabe, M. 1993. Component sourcing strategies of multinationals: An empirical study of European and Japanese multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(1): 81–99.
Takeuchi, H., & Porter, M. E. 1986. Three roles of international marketing in global strategies. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries : 111–146. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533.
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 270–283.
Trout, J. 2006. Peter Drucker on marketing. Forbes , July 3. Retrieved August 22, 2020, from https://www.forbes.com/2006/06/30/jack-trout-on-marketing-cx_jt_0703drucker.html#1ef6ac0a555c
Ulgado, F. M. 2002. Country-of-origin effects on e-commerce. Journal of American Academy of Business, 2(1): 250–253.
Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. 1999. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5): 521–546.
Watson, G. F., IV., Weaven, S., Perkins, H., Sardana, D., & Palmatier, R. W. 2018. International market entry strategies: Relational, digital, and hybrid approaches. Journal of International Marketing, 26(1): 30–60.
Webster, F. E., Jr. 2009. Marketing IS management: The wisdom of Peter Drucker. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1): 20–27.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.
Wiedersheim-Paul, F., Welch, L., & Olson, H. 1978. Pre-export activity: The first steps in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 9(1): 47–58.
Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization . New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, and relational contracting . New York: Free Press.
Xie, Z., & Li, J. 2018. Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2): 222–245.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Collins College of Business, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
Saeed Samiee
Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Constantine S. Katsikeas
Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
G. Tomas M. Hult
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Saeed Samiee .
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Accepted by Alain Verbeke, Editor-in-Chief, 29 March 2021. This article has been with the authors for one revision and was single-blind reviewed.
Reprints and permissions
Samiee, S., Katsikeas, C.S. & Hult, G.T.M. The overarching role of international marketing: Relevance and centrality in research and practice. J Int Bus Stud 52 , 1429–1444 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00433-2
Download citation
Received : 13 December 2020
Revised : 19 March 2021
Accepted : 29 March 2021
Published : 18 May 2021
Issue Date : October 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00433-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Advertisement
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience.
A group of scientists led by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission has analyzed the impact of deploying more vertical PV systems in the European energy markets and has identified potential advantages that may be offered by this scenario. These include lower electricity prices, lower system costs, and an increasing power exchange between neighboring countries.
Effects of Integrating vertical bifacial PV on electricity mix in various EU countries
Image: Joint Research Centre, nature communication, Common License CC BY 4.0
An international research team has investigated the impact of deploying bifacial vertical agrivoltaics on a large-scale disruptive scenario in the European energy market and has found that east-west oriented vertical PV panels could play a significant role in achieving a more balanced and more integrated continental power system by 2040.
The scientists found, in particular, that the perspective of a larger penetration of vertical PV systems, mainly of commercial and industrial size, may lead to several major improvements such as increasing solar power shares and value, reducing base-load electricity prices, and enhancing energy exchange between neighboring countries.
The group explained that east-west oriented vertical PV extends the generation time of a solar array to dawn and sunset, which are periods when it is more valuable to the consumers. “Such setup typically produces 30% in the 3 midday hours in contrast to the south facing PV that produce nearly 70% of its output in the midday,” it emphasized. “Favouring vertical bifacial systems reduces peak PV production, and ensures a production profile that covers a larger number of hours, which helps solar-based production maintain higher market value.”
The analysis was based on the European Power Market Model (EPMM), which is a multi-market sectoral equilibrium model that simulates the European electricity wholesale markets and analyses the impact of policies on the European markets. It covers the 27 countries adhering to the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (Entso-E).
The modeling considered minimized electricity demand costs, start-up and shut-down costs, production costs, and renewable energy curtailment. It covered both conventional and renewable generation and, as well as energy storage. “The primary model objective is to satisfy the electricity consumption needs at the lowest system cost, considering the characteristics of available power plants and cross-border transmission capacities in the European power system,” the group stated.
In the five proposed sensitivity scenarios analyzed by modeling, solar PV is expected to reach a capacity ranging from 649 GW to 1,178 GW from around 240 GW currently. In the base case, however, no investments in vertical bifacial PV were assumed, while in the best-case scenario vertical PV is expected to reach a remarkable 50% share.
“The model output clearly shows an increase in solar generation by 2% and 3.6% in 2030 and 2040, respectively,” the researchers explained. “This increase exceeds 5.3% in the high PV scenario, clearly showing the potential of the vertical system. Notably, a substantial increase in the electricity injected into the grid is evident with higher vertical PV utilization, primarily replacing gas and nuclear generation.”
The analysis also showed more vertical PV may lead to substantially lower power prices, due in part to lower system costs, reduced curtailment and the replacement of expensive conventional power generation assets.
“Over the longer term, the European power system becomes more sustainable both economically and environmentally,” the scientists concluded. “The future system is characterized by lower CO 2 emissions, and reduced reliance on imported fossil fuels, and it will be more sustainable in economic terms as well, characterized by reducing total system cost and decreasing wholesale electricity prices.”
Their findings are available in the study “ Impacts of large-scale deployment of vertical bifacial photovoltaics on European electricity market dynamics ,” which was recently published in nature communications . The research group included academics from Hungary's Regional Centre for Energy Policy Research, the University of California – Berkeley , the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission, Greek consultancy Elpedison SA, and software provider European Dynamics Luxembourg SA.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com .
More articles from Emiliano Bellini
Kaust reveals details of 33.7%-efficient perovskite-silicon tandem solar cell, related content.
Please be mindful of our community standards .
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy .
By subscribing to our newsletter you’ll be eligible for a 10% discount on magazine subscriptions!
This website uses cookies to anonymously count visitor numbers. View our privacy policy. ×
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
COMMENTS
Online - not entirely global. Culture, history, consumption patterns, economics, language and infrastructure aren't the only variations that need to be taken into account for an international research project. Technology has a potentially huge impact on the types of research you can conduct and how well it works.
International market research is a key piece of successful export planning. It is important to critically review and assess demand for your product, as well as factors related to a given export destination. The information will maximize your company's efforts while keeping the export plan cost and time-efficient. Our resources can help you ...
Then create a research plan including your research methods. Choose the right research tools (like Attest's market analysis software) for that, and then start conducting the research. Analyze all the data and pin it together. Finally, present the data and take action based on your new insights. 2.
In the end, remember that these steps are just a high-level overview of international market research. Each market research project is unique, so you'll need to tailor your approach to fit the particular needs of your company. Keep in mind that the process of conducting comprehensive market research is an essential and unavoidable task if you ...
Mark as interesting. International market research studies markets and consumers across different countries and cultures. It provides insights into global trends, preferences, and behaviors, aiding businesses in tailoring strategies for diverse geographical audiences.
Conducting Market Research. International market research is a key piece of successful export planning. It is important to critically review and assess if the potential export destination is suitable for your product or service. You need to determine if there is a market, if your product is competitive after determining the landed cost, and ...
International Marketing Research in the 21st Century Introduction Businesses preparing to compete in the 21st century are increasingly confronted with the task of crafting strategies that anticipate and respond to the rapid pace of change in global markets. As a result, their information needs are changing and becoming ever more complex and ...
2. Conduct a Country Analysis: Dive deep into the specifics of your target countries. Evaluate economic stability, cultural nuances, legal frameworks, and political landscapes. A thorough country ...
The primary task of market research is the identification, evaluation and comparison of potential foreign markets (for market selection, see the explanations in chapter "International Market Selection"). At the beginning of the selection process, regions are excluded from further analysis if they do not meet certain conditions such as ...
eBook ISBN 978-3-031-54650-1 Published: 08 July 2024. Edition Number 1. Number of Pages XLIX, 611. Number of Illustrations 18 b/w illustrations, 26 illustrations in colour. Topics Marketing, Market Research/Competitive Intelligence, Online Marketing/Social Media, Consumer Behavior, Branding.
In order to capture comprehensively and in a structured way the particular challenges of international research projects in marketing, we break the typical research process into five steps, as depicted in Fig. 1: finding a conceptual framework (Phase 1), defining the research unit and identifying the unit's drivers (Phase 2), conducting the data collection in multiple nations (Phase 3 ...
An international market research report is an in-depth exploration of a new market, collecting as much information as possible and sharing it within the company. ... Writing a strong international market research report is a demanding and complex task, and for best results, you should work with experienced professionals. Working with a veteran ...
January 18, 2023. Export market research and analysis are crucial for businesses seeking to expand their presence in international markets. By identifying target markets, understanding market dynamics, analyzing market demand and trends, evaluating competition, formulating market entry strategies, and assessing risks, businesses can make ...
There are three basic data collection approaches in international marketing research: (1) secondary data, (2) survey data, and (3) experimental data. Secondary data were collected for other purposes than helping to solve the current problem. Primary data are collected expressly to help solve the problem at hand.
5. Mitigate risk. Entering any new market is a risky venture, and that risk increases when you expand abroad. According to research by the Harvard Business Review, companies operating abroad faced far lower Return on Assets compared to those in domestic markets. Many of these companies do not survive the attempt.
3.6 Language Differences. The major objectives of International Marketing Research are: To carry out country screening and selection. To evaluate a country's market potential. To identify problems that would not require a country's listing for further consideration. To identify aspects of country's environment that needs further study.
International marketing research requires a deep understanding of diverse cultures, as consumer behavior, preferences, and market dynamics can vary significantly across countries. ... avoiding gathering irrelevant information, and analysing and interpreting data. Thus, defining the research problem may be the pivotal task in the entire study ...
Özsomer Ayşegül, Simonin Bernard L. (2004), "Marketing Program Standardization: A Cross-Country Exploration," International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (4), 397-419. Crossref Google Scholar
Then they normally start working as research assistants, helping their professors conduct research. These tasks can vary, for example, I used to check the proofs in my professors' academic articles.
Strategic Expansion Essentials 1. Market Research. This is the compass that can help your brand identify current consumer trends, competitive niches and untapped opportunities.
Moscow is still placed very low by the Corporation of London research team in the Global Financial Centers' Index. Therefore the Russian authorities put forward the task to develop the Russian financial center of international standing which should be based in Moscow and probably later partially in St. Petersburg.
leading marketing journals like Journal of Marketing (e.g., Petersen et al. 2015) and in journals that are dedicated to international marketing topics, such as Journal of International Marketing and International Marketing Review. While growing in number, multi-country marketing studies are often criticized for how they address
Marketing Research for International Brands in the Russian market. Will your product be in demand in Russia? Who are your competitors in Russia and what strategies do they use? ... Task: The regional manufacturer planned federal expansion. To build a holistic marketing strategy, he ordered a comprehensive study from us that involved dealers ...
Examine Global Payments' (GPN) international revenue patterns and their implications on Wall Street's forecasts and the prospective trajectory of the stock.
International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM - Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, July 24th. The technology company reported $2.43 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $2.16 by $0.27. International Business Machines had a return on equity of 40.59% and a net margin of 13 ...
The firm had revenue of C$27.26 million for the quarter. Currency Exchange International had a net margin of 11.37% and a return on equity of 12.44%. As a group, equities research analysts forecast that Currency Exchange International, Corp. will post 2.7739583 earnings per share for the current year. Currency Exchange International Company Profile
IShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF has $56.87 billion in assets, Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF has $403.33 billion. ITOT has an expense ratio of 0.03% and VTI charges 0.03%.
Fitch Ratings-Hong Kong/Shanghai-15 August 2024: Fitch Ratings has affirmed Haiyan State-owned Assets Management Co., Ltd.'s (HYSA) Long-Term Foreign- a
Marketing is the raison d'etre and the force that drives organizations. Among the many axioms advanced by Peter Drucker, the father of modern management, are that the purpose of a business is "to create customers", and that an organization has only two functions: one role relates to marketing (i.e., innovation) and the other is marketing (Drucker, 1954, p. 37; Trout, 2006; Webster, 2009).
An international research team has investigated the impact of deploying bifacial vertical agrivoltaics on a large-scale disruptive scenario in the European energy market and has found that east ...