literature review table matrix

• Walden University
• Faculty Portal

Common Assignments: Literature Review Matrix

Literature review matrix.

As you read and evaluate your literature there are several different ways to organize your research. Courtesy of Dr. Gary Burkholder in the School of Psychology, these sample matrices are one option to help organize your articles. These documents allow you to compile details about your sources, such as the foundational theories, methodologies, and conclusions; begin to note similarities among the authors; and retrieve citation information for easy insertion within a document.

You can review the sample matrixes to see a completed form or download the blank matrix for your own use.

• Literature Review Matrix 1 This PDF file provides a sample literature review matrix.
• Literature Review Matrix 2 This PDF file provides a sample literature review matrix.
• Literature Review Matrix Template (Word)
• Literature Review Matrix Template (Excel)

Related Resources

Didn't find what you need? Email us at [email protected] .

• Previous Page: Commentary Versus Opinion
• Next Page: Professional Development Plans (PDPs)
• Office of Student Disability Services

Walden Resources

Departments.

• Academic Residencies
• Academic Skills
• Career Planning and Development
• Customer Care Team
• Field Experience
• Military Services
• Student Success Advising
• Writing Skills

Centers and Offices

• Center for Social Change
• Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
• Office of Degree Acceleration
• Office of Research and Doctoral Services
• Office of Student Affairs

Student Resources

• Doctoral Writing Assessment
• Form & Style Review
• Quick Answers
• ScholarWorks
• SKIL Courses and Workshops
• Walden Bookstore
• Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
• Student Safety/Title IX
• Legal & Consumer Information
• Website Terms and Conditions
• Cookie Policy
• Accessibility
• Accreditation
• State Authorization
• Net Price Calculator
• Contact Walden

Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.

Literature Review Basics

• What is a Literature Review?
• Synthesizing Research
• Using Research & Synthesis Tables
• Additional Resources

About the Research and Synthesis Tables

Research Tables and Synthesis Tables are useful tools for organizing and analyzing your research as you assemble your literature review. They represent two different parts of the review process: assembling relevant information and synthesizing it. Use a Research table to compile the main info you need about the items you find in your research -- it's a great thing to have on hand as you take notes on what you read! Then, once you've assembled your research, use the Synthesis table to start charting the similarities/differences and major themes among your collected items.

We've included an Excel file with templates for you to use below; the examples pictured on this page are snapshots from that file.

• Research and Synthesis Table Templates This Excel workbook includes simple templates for creating research tables and synthesis tables. Feel free to download and use!

Using the Research Table

This is an example of a  research table,  in which you provide a basic description of the most important features of the studies, articles, and other items you discover in your research. The table identifies each item according to its author/date of publication, its purpose or thesis, what type of work it is (systematic review, clinical trial, etc.), the level of evidence it represents (which tells you a lot about its impact on the field of study), and its major findings. Your job, when you assemble this information, is to develop a snapshot of what the research shows about the topic of your research question and assess its value (both for the purpose of your work and for general knowledge in the field).

Think of your work on the research table as the foundational step for your analysis of the literature, in which you assemble the information you'll be analyzing and lay the groundwork for thinking about what it means and how it can be used.

Using the Synthesis Table

This is an example of a  synthesis table  or  synthesis matrix , in which you organize and analyze your research by listing each source and indicating whether a given finding or result occurred in a particular study or article ( each row lists an individual source, and each finding has its own column, in which X = yes, blank = no). You can also add or alter the columns to look for shared study populations, sort by level of evidence or source type, etc. The key here is to use the table to provide a simple representation of what the research has found (or not found, as the case may be). Think of a synthesis table as a tool for making comparisons, identifying trends, and locating gaps in the literature.

How do I know which findings to use, or how many to include?  Your research question tells you which findings are of interest in your research, so work from your research question to decide what needs to go in each Finding header, and how many findings are necessary. The number is up to you; again, you can alter this table by adding or deleting columns to match what you're actually looking for in your analysis. You should also, of course, be guided by what's actually present in the material your research turns up!

• << Previous: Synthesizing Research
• Next: Additional Resources >>
• Last Updated: Sep 26, 2023 12:06 PM
• URL: https://usi.libguides.com/literature-review-basics

• Reserve a study room
• Library Account
• Undergraduate Students
• Graduate Students
• Faculty & Staff

How to Conduct a Literature Review (Health Sciences and Beyond)

• What is a Literature Review?
• Developing a Research Question
• Selection Criteria
• Database Search
• Documenting Your Search

Review Matrix

• Reference Management

Using a spreadsheet or table to organize the key elements (e.g. subjects, methodologies, results) of articles/books you plan to use in your literature review can be helpful. This is called a review matrix.

When you create a review matrix, the first few columns should include (1) the authors, title, journal, (2) publication year, and (3) purpose of the paper. The remaining columns should identify important aspects of each study such as methodology and findings.

Click on the image below to view a sample review matrix.

You can also download this template as a Microsoft Excel file .

The information on this page is from the book below. The 5th edition is available online through VCU Libraries.

• << Previous: Documenting Your Search
• Next: Reference Management >>
• Last Updated: Mar 15, 2024 12:22 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.vcu.edu/health-sciences-lit-review

Matrix Method for Literature Review

• Introduction
• Organize Your Sources
• Choose Your Remaining Column Topics
• More Information
• Sample Matrix and Templates
• Related Library Guides
• Getting Help

The Review Matrix   

Using a review matrix enables you to quickly compare and contrast articles in order to determine the scope of research across time. A review matrix can help you more easily spot differences and similarities between journal articles about a given research topic. Review matrices are especially helpful for health sciences literature reviews covering the complete scope of a research topic over time.

This guide focuses on the review matrix step in the literature review process. For more information on searching databases, see the Health Sciences Literature Searching Guide.

• Next: Organize Your Sources >>
• Last Updated: Feb 20, 2024 10:26 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.duq.edu/matrix

• Books, Articles, & More
• Curriculum Library
• Archives & Special Collections
• Scholars Crossing
• Research Guides
• Student Support
• Faculty Support
• Interlibrary Loan

AMA Writing Guide: Literature Matrix

• AMA Style Formatting
• In-text Citations
• Journal Articles
• Books and Ebooks
• WHO Reports
• Misc. Citations
• Structured Abstract- IMRAD
• Primary & Secondary Sources
• Literature Matrix

What is a literature matrix?

As defined by Judith Garrard in her handbook entitled  Health Sciences Literature Reviews Made Easy: The Matrix Method , a “Review of the literature consists of reading, analyzing, and writing a synthesis of scholarly materials about a specific topic. When reviewing scientific literature, the focus is on the hypotheses, the scientific methods, the strengths and weaknesses of the study, the results, and the authors’ interpretations and conclusions.” When reading materials for a literature review, you should critically evaluate the study’s major aims and results. 

The purpose of completing a literature matrix is to help you identify important aspects of the study. Literature matrixes contain a variety of headings, but frequent headings include: author surname and date, theoretical/ conceptual framework, research question(s)/ hypothesis, methodology, analysis & results, conclusions, implications for future research, and implications for practice. You can add additional columns as needed, and you might consider adding a “notes column” to proactively have important quotations and your thoughts already collected.  As you read journal articles, have your literature matrix ready. It is best to fill in the matrix directly after reading a work, rather than returning to the matrix later.  

Literature Matrix Files

You should use a literature matrix that best helps you to organize your reading and research. Excel workbooks can help to organize your research. Sample basic and complex literature matrixes are provided below: 

• Literature Matrix Basic BLANK
• Literature Matrix Basic SAMPLE
• Literature Matrix Complex BLANK

Synthesize vs. Summarize

When writing your literature review, you will not simply summarize the materials that you found related to your topic. A summary is a recap of the information provided in research articles. Summaries provide basic information about the study, but the details provided in a summary are not enumerative or systematic. 

Synthesizing goes beyond summarizing to explore specific aspects of the research study. When synthesizing the literature, rely on your completed literature matrix to inform your writing. Do you see any tends across publications? Was one type of methodology used repeatedly, why or why not? Did separate teams of researchers come to the same conclusion, differing conclusions, or is the literature inconclusive? Synthesizing requires that you look at the current state of the research overall. 

When preparing to write a synthesis, you will read the literature available, tease apart individual findings and supporting evidence across different articles, and then reorganize this information in a way that presents your understanding of the current state of research in this field.  

• << Previous: Primary & Secondary Sources
• Last Updated: Apr 3, 2024 9:18 AM
• URL: https://libguides.liberty.edu/ama

Module 4: Strategic Reading

Organize your Readings with a Literature Review Matrix

The next step after reading and evaluating your sources is to organize them in a way that will help you start the writing process.

Review Matrix

One way to organize your literature is with a review matrix. The review matrix is a chart that sorts and categorizes the different arguments presented per topic or issue. Using a matrix enables you to quickly compare and contrast your sources in order to determine the scope of research across time. This will allow you  to spot similarities and differences between sources. It is particularly useful in the synthesis and analysis stages of a review (See Module 1 Conducting a Literature Review with the SALSA Framework ).

Example of a Review Matrix

My research question:

How can we use machine learning to analyze social media data related to HIV?

Writing a Literature Review Modified from The WI+RE Team,  UCLA. Creative Commons CC-BY-NA-SA

Create a Review Matrix

Start with a charting tool you are most familiar with (for example MS Word, MS Excel, Google Sheets, Numbers etc).

• Organize your sources from oldest to most recent. This way you can see how the research on your topic has changed over time.
• First Column: citation (i.e., author, title, source, publication year)
• Second Column: purpose or summary (1-2 sentences)
• methodology
• intervention

Key Takeaways

Here are some examples of different review matrices and templates:

• Evidence Synthesis Matrix Template, Jane Schmidt, Toronto Metropolitan University (Google Sheets)
• The Matrix Method for Literature Reviews, Brandeis University, Writing Resources.
• Literature Review Synthesis Matrix , Concordia University (MS Word)
• Write a Literature Review: Synthesize . Johns Hopkins University, Sheridan Libraries

Advanced Research Skills: Conducting Literature and Systematic Reviews (2nd Edition) Copyright © 2021 by Kelly Dermody; Cecile Farnum; Daniel Jakubek; Jo-Anne Petropoulos; Jane Schmidt; and Reece Steinberg is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

The Sheridan Libraries

• Write a Literature Review
• Sheridan Libraries
• Find This link opens in a new window
• Evaluate This link opens in a new window

What Will You Do Differently?

Please help your librarians by filling out this two-minute survey of today's class session..

Professor, this one's for you .

Introduction

Literature reviews take time. here is some general information to know before you start.  .

•  VIDEO -- This video is a great overview of the entire process.  (2020; North Carolina State University Libraries) --The transcript is included --This is for everyone; ignore the mention of "graduate students" --9.5 minutes, and every second is important  
• OVERVIEW -- Read this page from Purdue's OWL. It's not long, and gives some tips to fill in what you just learned from the video.  
• NOT A RESEARCH ARTICLE -- A literature review follows a different style, format, and structure from a research article.  

Steps to Completing a Literature Review

• Next: Find >>
• Last Updated: Sep 26, 2023 10:25 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.jhu.edu/lit-review

• Jacksonville University
• Swisher Library
• Brooks Rehabilitation College of Healthcare Sciences

Matrix Method for Literature Review

Introduction.

Using a review matrix enables you to quickly compare and contrast articles in order to determine the scope of research across time. A review matrix can help you more easily spot differences and similarities between journal articles about a given research topic. Review matrices are especially helpful for health sciences literature reviews covering the complete scope of a research topic over time.

Organizing your Sources

Once you complete your research, organize your source by date in order to make it easier to see changes in research over time.

Every review matrix should have the same first three column headings: (1) authors, title, and journal; (2) publication year; (3) purpose.

It may be difficult to determine purpose from just a cursory review of the article. In some cases, it may be necessary to first read the paper fully to identify its purpose.

Choose your Remaining Column Topics

Next, carefully read all your articles. Note any important issues you identify. The following broad categories provide some suggestions for determining your own subject headings:

• Methodological - Methodology is often an important question. For example, if you are looking at tests of an Ebola vaccine beyond human subjects, it will be important to note what type of animal the test was carried out on, i.e. macaques or mice.
• Content-specific - Consider noting what was actually studied. For example, when looking at the effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of illnesses, it would be important to note what illness was being studied.
• Geographical - It may be important to note where the research was completed. For example, if you want to compare the effects of the AIDS epidemic in different countries, you would use country as a column heading.

There are many ways to choose your column headings, and these are just a few suggestions. As you create your own matrix, choose column headings that support your research question and goals.

• Do not include column headings that are explicit in your research question. For example, if you are looking at drug use in adolescents, do not include a column heading for age of study participants. If the answer will be the same for every study, it's generally a bad choice for a column heading.
• Do not try to fully complete a review matrix before reading the articles. Reading the articles is an important way to discern the nuances between studies. 

Sample Review Matrix and Templates

• Review Matrix Example: Ebola Vaccine Clinical Studies This document includes a review matrix of two Ebola vaccine clinical reviews done on humans published by the National Institute of Health.
• Review Matrix Word Template A review matrix template in Microsoft Word.
• Review Matrix Excel Template A review matrix template for Microsoft Excel

More Information

Information found in this guide was adapted from the following book. 

Guide Credit

Information on this guide has been borrowed with permission from David Nolfi at Duquesne University . 

• Research Guides
• Vanderbilt University Libraries
• Peabody Library

Literature Reviews

Literature review table.

• Steps to Success: The Literature Review Process
• Literature Reviews Webinar Recording
• Writing Like an Academic
• Publishing in Academic Journals
• Managing Citations This link opens in a new window
• Literature Review Table Template Peabody Librarians have created a sample literature review table to use to organize your research. Feel free to download this file and use or adapt as needed.
• << Previous: Literature Reviews Webinar Recording
• Next: Writing Like an Academic >>
• Last Updated: Feb 29, 2024 4:20 PM
• URL: https://researchguides.library.vanderbilt.edu/peabody/litreviews

Log in using your username and password

• Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
• Latest content
• Current issue
• Write for Us
• BMJ Journals More You are viewing from: Google Indexer

You are here

• Volume 24, Issue 2
• Five tips for developing useful literature summary tables for writing review articles
• Article Text
• Article info
• Citation Tools
• Rapid Responses
• Article metrics

• http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-5319 Ahtisham Younas 1 , 2 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-8130 Parveen Ali 3 , 4
• 1 Memorial University of Newfoundland , St John's , Newfoundland , Canada
• 2 Swat College of Nursing , Pakistan
• 3 School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Sheffield , Sheffield , South Yorkshire , UK
• 4 Sheffield University Interpersonal Violence Research Group , Sheffield University , Sheffield , UK
• Correspondence to Ahtisham Younas, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL A1C 5C4, Canada; ay6133{at}mun.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2021-103417

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Literature reviews offer a critical synthesis of empirical and theoretical literature to assess the strength of evidence, develop guidelines for practice and policymaking, and identify areas for future research. 1 It is often essential and usually the first task in any research endeavour, particularly in masters or doctoral level education. For effective data extraction and rigorous synthesis in reviews, the use of literature summary tables is of utmost importance. A literature summary table provides a synopsis of an included article. It succinctly presents its purpose, methods, findings and other relevant information pertinent to the review. The aim of developing these literature summary tables is to provide the reader with the information at one glance. Since there are multiple types of reviews (eg, systematic, integrative, scoping, critical and mixed methods) with distinct purposes and techniques, 2 there could be various approaches for developing literature summary tables making it a complex task specialty for the novice researchers or reviewers. Here, we offer five tips for authors of the review articles, relevant to all types of reviews, for creating useful and relevant literature summary tables. We also provide examples from our published reviews to illustrate how useful literature summary tables can be developed and what sort of information should be provided.

Tip 1: provide detailed information about frameworks and methods

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Tabular literature summaries from a scoping review. Source: Rasheed et al . 3

The provision of information about conceptual and theoretical frameworks and methods is useful for several reasons. First, in quantitative (reviews synthesising the results of quantitative studies) and mixed reviews (reviews synthesising the results of both qualitative and quantitative studies to address a mixed review question), it allows the readers to assess the congruence of the core findings and methods with the adapted framework and tested assumptions. In qualitative reviews (reviews synthesising results of qualitative studies), this information is beneficial for readers to recognise the underlying philosophical and paradigmatic stance of the authors of the included articles. For example, imagine the authors of an article, included in a review, used phenomenological inquiry for their research. In that case, the review authors and the readers of the review need to know what kind of (transcendental or hermeneutic) philosophical stance guided the inquiry. Review authors should, therefore, include the philosophical stance in their literature summary for the particular article. Second, information about frameworks and methods enables review authors and readers to judge the quality of the research, which allows for discerning the strengths and limitations of the article. For example, if authors of an included article intended to develop a new scale and test its psychometric properties. To achieve this aim, they used a convenience sample of 150 participants and performed exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the same sample. Such an approach would indicate a flawed methodology because EFA and CFA should not be conducted on the same sample. The review authors must include this information in their summary table. Omitting this information from a summary could lead to the inclusion of a flawed article in the review, thereby jeopardising the review’s rigour.

Tip 2: include strengths and limitations for each article

Critical appraisal of individual articles included in a review is crucial for increasing the rigour of the review. Despite using various templates for critical appraisal, authors often do not provide detailed information about each reviewed article’s strengths and limitations. Merely noting the quality score based on standardised critical appraisal templates is not adequate because the readers should be able to identify the reasons for assigning a weak or moderate rating. Many recent critical appraisal checklists (eg, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) discourage review authors from assigning a quality score and recommend noting the main strengths and limitations of included studies. It is also vital that methodological and conceptual limitations and strengths of the articles included in the review are provided because not all review articles include empirical research papers. Rather some review synthesises the theoretical aspects of articles. Providing information about conceptual limitations is also important for readers to judge the quality of foundations of the research. For example, if you included a mixed-methods study in the review, reporting the methodological and conceptual limitations about ‘integration’ is critical for evaluating the study’s strength. Suppose the authors only collected qualitative and quantitative data and did not state the intent and timing of integration. In that case, the strength of the study is weak. Integration only occurred at the levels of data collection. However, integration may not have occurred at the analysis, interpretation and reporting levels.

Tip 3: write conceptual contribution of each reviewed article

While reading and evaluating review papers, we have observed that many review authors only provide core results of the article included in a review and do not explain the conceptual contribution offered by the included article. We refer to conceptual contribution as a description of how the article’s key results contribute towards the development of potential codes, themes or subthemes, or emerging patterns that are reported as the review findings. For example, the authors of a review article noted that one of the research articles included in their review demonstrated the usefulness of case studies and reflective logs as strategies for fostering compassion in nursing students. The conceptual contribution of this research article could be that experiential learning is one way to teach compassion to nursing students, as supported by case studies and reflective logs. This conceptual contribution of the article should be mentioned in the literature summary table. Delineating each reviewed article’s conceptual contribution is particularly beneficial in qualitative reviews, mixed-methods reviews, and critical reviews that often focus on developing models and describing or explaining various phenomena. Figure 2 offers an example of a literature summary table. 4

Tabular literature summaries from a critical review. Source: Younas and Maddigan. 4

Tip 4: compose potential themes from each article during summary writing

While developing literature summary tables, many authors use themes or subthemes reported in the given articles as the key results of their own review. Such an approach prevents the review authors from understanding the article’s conceptual contribution, developing rigorous synthesis and drawing reasonable interpretations of results from an individual article. Ultimately, it affects the generation of novel review findings. For example, one of the articles about women’s healthcare-seeking behaviours in developing countries reported a theme ‘social-cultural determinants of health as precursors of delays’. Instead of using this theme as one of the review findings, the reviewers should read and interpret beyond the given description in an article, compare and contrast themes, findings from one article with findings and themes from another article to find similarities and differences and to understand and explain bigger picture for their readers. Therefore, while developing literature summary tables, think twice before using the predeveloped themes. Including your themes in the summary tables (see figure 1 ) demonstrates to the readers that a robust method of data extraction and synthesis has been followed.

Tip 5: create your personalised template for literature summaries

Often templates are available for data extraction and development of literature summary tables. The available templates may be in the form of a table, chart or a structured framework that extracts some essential information about every article. The commonly used information may include authors, purpose, methods, key results and quality scores. While extracting all relevant information is important, such templates should be tailored to meet the needs of the individuals’ review. For example, for a review about the effectiveness of healthcare interventions, a literature summary table must include information about the intervention, its type, content timing, duration, setting, effectiveness, negative consequences, and receivers and implementers’ experiences of its usage. Similarly, literature summary tables for articles included in a meta-synthesis must include information about the participants’ characteristics, research context and conceptual contribution of each reviewed article so as to help the reader make an informed decision about the usefulness or lack of usefulness of the individual article in the review and the whole review.

In conclusion, narrative or systematic reviews are almost always conducted as a part of any educational project (thesis or dissertation) or academic or clinical research. Literature reviews are the foundation of research on a given topic. Robust and high-quality reviews play an instrumental role in guiding research, practice and policymaking. However, the quality of reviews is also contingent on rigorous data extraction and synthesis, which require developing literature summaries. We have outlined five tips that could enhance the quality of the data extraction and synthesis process by developing useful literature summaries.

• Aromataris E ,
• Rasheed SP ,

Twitter @Ahtisham04, @parveenazamali

Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests None declared.

Patient consent for publication Not required.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Nursing and Allied Health: Building a Summary Table or Synthesis Matrix

• Nursing Library Services
• Library Support for Nursing Accreditation
• Academic Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Standards for Science
• ACRL Guidelines for Distance Learning
• AACN Resources: Information Literacy
• The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
• Accreditation Commision for Education
• ACEN Learning Resources | Definitions & Standards
• Tutoring: College of Nursing & Allied Health Students
• Technology and Collaboration
• Affordable Learning Louisiana
• NIH Virtual Reality Funding
• Assistive Technology Resources
• Web Accessibility Initiative WC3
• Healthcare Links for Persons With Disabilities
• Accessibility
• Accessibility Tools: Videos
• Braile Institute: Blind and Low Vision Web Accessibility
• Braile Institute: Assistive Technology for the Visually Impaired This link opens in a new window
• Mental Health Resources for Students & Faculty
• Student Activities & Organizations
• Anatomage Video Training
• APA Reference Worksheet With Examples This link opens in a new window
• APA Style and Grammar Guidelines, 7.0
• What's New in APA Guide, 7.0 This link opens in a new window
• APA Instructional Aids for Professors/Instructors
• APA Handouts & Guides This link opens in a new window
• Sample Papers for Students and Instructors
• Academic Writer Tutorial: Basics This link opens in a new window
• APA Styling Your Paper
• When to cite or not cite a database
• Video: A Step-By-Step Guide for APA Style Student Papers
• Video: Citing Works in Text Using APA 7.0 This link opens in a new window
• Video: Creating References Using APA Guide, 7.0 This link opens in a new window
• Journal Article Reporting Standards
• Digital Information Literacy
• Tips Sheet: Copyright Essentials for Higher Education This link opens in a new window
• Citing National Patient Safety Goals (Joint Commission)
• Citing Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in APA format
• Best Nursing Apps
• Writing an Abstract for Your PILT or Special Project
• PILT Poster Presentation Archive
• Academic Success
• Healthcare Career Salaries
• Industry Statistics: Healthcare
• Nursing Organizations
• Radiology Organizations
• Controlled Medical Vocabularies
• COVID-19 Current Vaccines (Medscape)
• COVID-19 Current and Candidate Vaccine Landscape and Tracker (WHO)
• COVID-19: Clinical Care (Open Access) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Clinician Care Guidance (CDC.gov) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Coronavirus (NEJM) This link opens in a new window
• COVID -19 Contract Tracing & Patient Privacy (Cornell) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Coronavirus Dashboard (Johns Hopkins Epidemiology)
• COVID-19: Coronavirus Guidelines (Up-To-Date) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Critical Care Evidence (Cochrane) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Diagnosis & Treatment (JAMA) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Free Video Access (Jove) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: General Guidance (NSULA)
• COVID-19: Healthcare Hub (Elsevier) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19 Healthcare Infection Prevention Control (CDC)
• COVID-19: Keeping Up With A Moving Target (Johns Hopkins Nursing Videos)
• COVID-19: LitCovid Daily Update (NLM)
• COVID-19: Literature Links (Massachusetts General Hospital (Epidemiology))
• COVID-19: Louisiana Department of Health
• COVID-19: Novel Coronavirus Information Center (Elsevier) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19 Nursing Resources (Medscape)
• COVID-19: Open Access Resources (EBSCO)
• COVID-19: Red Book - Recent Pediatric Updates (AAP)
• COVID-19: Resource Center (ECRI Trust) This link opens in a new window
• COVID-19: Twitter Feed (Johns Hopkins)
• COVID-19: Updates (NSULA)
• COVID-19: Washing Your Hands Thoroughly (NHS)
• COVID-19: Well-Being Initiative (ANF)
• COVID-19: Worldwide Map from (Medscape Nursing)
• Properly Putting On Your Facemask & Getting a Good Seal (Dr. Scheiner) This link opens in a new window
• Washing Your Hands the NHS way! (NHS-UK)
• Creating Personal Accounts
• Creating a CINAHL MyFolder Account
• Creating a PubMed | MyNCBI Personal Account
• Creating a ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Premium | MyResearch Folder
• Creating an OVID MyWorkspace Personal Account
• Mobile APPS | CINAHL for Apple and Android Mobile Devices
• My Circulation Login
• Interlibrary Loan Personal Account
• Data Visualization Products
• International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders | DSM-5-TR
• [C1] Infections | Infectious Diseases
• [C04] Neoplasms
• [C05] Musculoskeletal Diseases
• [C06] Digestive System Diseases
• [C07] Stomatognathic Diseases
• [C08] Respiratory Tract Diseases
• [C09] Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
• [C10] Nervous System Diseases
• [C11] Eye Diseases
• [C12] Urogenital Diseases
• [C14] Cardiovascular Diseases
• [C15] Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
• [C16] Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
• [C17] Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
• [C18] Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
• [C19] Endocrine System Diseases
• [C20] Immune System Diseases
• [C21] Disorders of Environmental Origin
• [C22] Animal Diseases [Zoonotic diseases]
• [C23] Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
• [C24] Occupational Diseases
• [C25] Chemically-Induced Disorders
• [C26] Wounds and Injuries
• WHO Drug Information [Relative to Diseases]
• NDDK Patient Education Tool Kit
• Clinical Tools & Patient Education
• NDDK Resources on Medline Plus
• NDDK Open Research
• Dietary Guidelines for Americans
• Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
• Move Your Way Community Resources
• National Youth Sports Strategy
• President’s Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition
• White House Conference on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health
• Equitable Long-Term Recovery and Resilience
• National Health Observances
• Finding Clinical Trials
• NIH News in Health
• Dosage Calculations & Pharmacology
• PICO - EBM Video This link opens in a new window
• PICO Slides
• Fillable CONSAH Pico Form
• Evidence Based Practice for Nursing
• Evidence-Based Nursing: -Step 2
• Evidence Appraisal - Step 3
• Evidence Application - Step 4
• Outcome Evaluation - Step 5
• Evidence Translation - Step 6
• Google Advanced Search for EBM
• Nursing Research Methods
• Faculty Book Request
• Proctor Request Form
• Peer Reviewed Literature: Assessment Goals
• EBSCO eBooks Anesthesia
• Full Text Finder
• EBSCO e-Books Nursing 2021
• EBSCO eBooks Radiology Science & Allied Health
• EBSCO eBooks: Writing About Nursing and Allied Health
• Alzheimers and Dementia
• Statistics on Aging
• CDC Bibliography: Alzheimers & Aging This link opens in a new window
• Health Conditions
• Health Behaviors
• Populations
• Settings and Systems
• Social Determinants of Health
• ILL Interlibrary Loan
• Gestational Diabetes and Fast Foods (MeSH)
• Mobile Resources
• Full Text eBooks Categories
• Nursing Theory
• Psychiatric Nursing Journals
• Display, sort and; navigate
• Similar articles
• Cite, save and share
• Citations in PubMed
• All About PubMed Filters
• PubMed Quick Tours and Tutorials
• Evidence Based Practice Tutorial (PubMed) This link opens in a new window
• Developing a Clinical Question This link opens in a new window
• Using PubMed to Find Relevant Articles This link opens in a new window
• Next Steps This link opens in a new window
• Scenario (practice) This link opens in a new window
• Radiology Books and e-Books
• History of Radiology & Radiography
• Radiology: Anatomage This link opens in a new window
• Radiology Anatomy Atlas Viewer
• Advanced Radiographic Research
• Diagnostic Imaging Selected Articles
• Faculty and Administrative Resources
• Radiology Tech and MRI Salaries (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
• Radiology Technician Demand by State
• Review Tools for Graduate Students
• Training & Videos
• Register for an Online Meeting
• Joining an Online Meeting
• Training Videos & Search Examples
• Training Survey
• Sources for Health Statistics
• Ebola and Infectious Diseases
• Nursing Sites

Building a Summary Table or Synthesis Matrix

Quick Links | Nursing & Allied Health

• Library Home
• Campus Computer Labs
• Circulation Policies
• Catalog Search (books/ebooks)
• Contact Your Librarian For Research Assistance             (link sends email)
• Database Directory >> Nursing & Allied Health
• Faculty Materials Request Form
• Holidays & University Closures
• Interlibrary Loan Request Form
• Journals Full Text Finder
• LibGuides (Online Help)
• Review My Paper**
• Shreveport Proctor Request Form
• Shreveport Main Phone:  (318) 677-3007
• Shreveport Librarian Phone:  (318) 677-3013
• Student Help Desk :  Phone: (318) 357-6696  [email protected]
• The 20-20-20 Rule
• Training Videos

** Submit your research paper for grammar review

   GOOGLE MAP  |  LINKED

• Simplifying Synthesis | Download the Article PDF Copy
• Writing a Literature Review and Using a Synthesis Matrix

What a Summary Table or Synthesis Matrix looks like

Use the "Literature Review Matrix Template" as a guideline to help you sort through your thoughts, note important points and think through the similarities and differences: 

You are organizing the review by ideas and not by sources .  The literature review is not just a summary of the already published works.  Your synthesis should show how various articles are linked. 

A summary table is also called a synthesis matrix.  The table helps you organize and compare information for your systematic review, scholarly report, dissertation or thesis

Synthesis Matrix.

A summary table is also called a synthesis matrix . A summary table helps you record the main points of each source and document how sources relate to each other. After summarizing and evaluating your sources, arrange them in a matrix to help you see how they relate to each other, and apply to each of your themes or variables.

Faculty who typically guide students find it challenging to help students learn how to synthesize material (Blondy, Blakesless, Scheffer, Rubenfeld, Cronin, & Luster-Turner, 2016; Kearney, 2015) .  Writers  can easily summarize material but seem to struggle to adequately synthesize knowledge about their topic and express that in their writing. So, whether you are writing a student papers, dissertations, or scholarly report it is necessary to learn a few tips and tricks to organize your ideas.

Building a summary table and developing solid synthesis skills is important for nurses, nurse practitioners, and allied health researchers.  Quality evidence-based practice initiatives and nursing care and medicine are based on understanding and evaluating the resources and research available, identifying gaps, and building a strong foundation for future work.

Good synthesis is about putting the data gathered, references read, and literature analyzed together in a new way that shows connections and relationships. ( Shellenbarger, 2016 ). The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines synthesis as something that is made by combining different things or the composition or combination of parts or elements so as to form a whole (Synthesis, n.d.).  

In other words, building a summary table or synthesis matrix  involves taking information from a variety of sources, evaluating that information and forming new ideas or insights in an original way.  This can be a new and potentially challenging experience for students and researchers who are used to just repeating what is already in the literature.

Visit Our Libraries

   Interlibrary Loan    |    Shreveport Education Center Library   |    Eugene P. Watson Memorial Library    |     NSU Leesville Library 

Cammie G. Henry Research Center    |   Prince Music Media Library

• << Previous: Best Nursing Apps
• Next: Writing an Abstract for Your PILT or Special Project >>
• Last Updated: Mar 19, 2024 1:14 PM
• URL: https://libguides.nsula.edu/nursingandalliedhealth

University of Tasmania, Australia

Literature reviews.

• What is a literature review?
• How to develop a researchable question
• How to find the literature
• Taking notes
• How to bring it all together: examples, templates, links, guides

Preview the text to check for relevance. 

• the abstract
• introduction
• look at any charts, tables, graphs, diagrams

Check the number of times the article has been cited by others. The more times cited, the more important it might be. 

Read more deeply and let this guide the development of your question.

You may find that the more you read, your question changes or you discover a bigger topic or subtopics. 

Do not waste your time using a highlighter. Annotate the page and take notes. 

There are no shortcuts in this part of the process. 

For more information on managing your reading, go to the Study Toolkit in MyLO and check out the Academic Reading  and Writing module. 

Taking Notes

Use a synthesis matrix for note taking. This table c an be as simple or as complicated as you need

Advantages of using a synthesis matrix:

• allows you to  sort the ideas and thoughts while analysing and synthesising the research.
• helps make planning the structure and paragraph order easier 
• allows for paraphrasing and summarising before actually writing
• provides a clearer view of the relationship between different sources
• aids in identifying themes and patterns in the findings and conclusions.
• gives a glance view of each area under scrutiny

  The organisation/headings will change depending on the focus of your review. 

Using a spreadsheet will also help organise your reading and matrix. 

You will find some examples of a synthesis matrix to download at the bottom of this page. 

Example 1. 

C. Hartigan University of Tasmania

Example 2: Organised by themes.

from:  The Thesis Whisperer:Using a matrix to organise your notes

Example 3: Literature Review preparation.

Watch this short clip for some more ideas.  ( N.B. Ignore the APA referencing in this clip)

• Synthesis matrix
• Literature Review Prep: Synthesis matrix: Johns Hopkins University
• << Previous: How to find the literature
• Next: How to bring it all together: examples, templates, links, guides >>
• Last Updated: Apr 10, 2024 11:56 AM
• URL: https://utas.libguides.com/literaturereviews

What’s Included: Literature Review Template

This template is structure is based on the tried and trusted best-practice format for formal academic research projects such as dissertations and theses. The literature review template includes the following sections:

• Before you start – essential groundwork to ensure you’re ready
• The introduction section
• The core/body section
• The conclusion /summary
• Extra free resources

Each section is explained in plain, straightforward language , followed by an overview of the key elements that you need to cover. We’ve also included practical examples and links to more free videos and guides to help you understand exactly what’s required in each section.

The cleanly-formatted Google Doc can be downloaded as a fully editable MS Word Document (DOCX format), so you can use it as-is or convert it to LaTeX.

PS – if you’d like a high-level template for the entire thesis, you can we’ve got that too .

FAQs: Literature Review Template

What format is the template (doc, pdf, ppt, etc.).

The literature review chapter template is provided as a Google Doc. You can download it in MS Word format or make a copy to your Google Drive. You’re also welcome to convert it to whatever format works best for you, such as LaTeX or PDF.

What types of literature reviews can this template be used for?

The template follows the standard format for academic literature reviews, which means it will be suitable for the vast majority of academic research projects (especially those within the sciences), whether they are qualitative or quantitative in terms of design.

Keep in mind that the exact requirements for the literature review chapter will vary between universities and degree programs. These are typically minor, but it’s always a good idea to double-check your university’s requirements before you finalize your structure.

Is this template for an undergrad, Master or PhD-level thesis?

This template can be used for a literature review at any level of study. Doctoral-level projects typically require the literature review to be more extensive/comprehensive, but the structure will typically remain the same.

Can I modify the template to suit my topic/area?

Absolutely. While the template provides a general structure, you should adapt it to fit the specific requirements and focus of your literature review.

What structural style does this literature review template use?

The template assumes a thematic structure (as opposed to a chronological or methodological structure), as this is the most common approach. However, this is only one dimension of the template, so it will still be useful if you are adopting a different structure.

Does this template include the Excel literature catalog?

No, that is a separate template, which you can download for free here . This template is for the write-up of the actual literature review chapter, whereas the catalog is for use during the literature sourcing and sorting phase.

How long should the literature review chapter be?

This depends on your university’s specific requirements, so it’s best to check with them. As a general ballpark, literature reviews for Masters-level projects are usually 2,000 – 3,000 words in length, while Doctoral-level projects can reach multiples of this.

Can I include literature that contradicts my hypothesis?

Yes, it’s important to acknowledge and discuss literature that presents different viewpoints or contradicts your hypothesis. So, don’t shy away from existing research that takes an opposing view to yours.

How do I avoid plagiarism in my literature review?

Always cite your sources correctly and paraphrase ideas in your own words while maintaining the original meaning. You can always check our plagiarism score before submitting your work to help ease your mind. 

Do you have an example of a populated template?

We provide a walkthrough of the template and review an example of a high-quality literature research chapter here .

Can I share this literature review template with my friends/colleagues?

Yes, you’re welcome to share this template in its original format (no editing allowed). If you want to post about it on your blog or social media, all we ask is that you reference this page as your source.

Do you have templates for the other dissertation/thesis chapters?

Yes, we do. You can find our full collection of templates here .

Can Grad Coach help me with my literature review?

Yes, you’re welcome to get in touch with us to discuss our private coaching services , where we can help you work through the literature review chapter (and any other chapters).

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

Geochemical Peculiarities of the Atlantic Pleistocene Sediments

• Published: 09 May 2024
• Volume 59 , pages 247–267, ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• M. A. Levitan 1 ,
• T. A. Antonova 1 ,
• L. G. Domaratskaya 1 &
• A. V. Koltsova 1  

10 Accesses

Explore all metrics

In the geochemical review based on records from cruises of the International Deep Marine Drilling Project (DSDP, ODP, and IODP phases) and other literature data on the main types of Pleistocene sediments in the Atlantic, tables of average arithmetic chemical composition, mean weighted chemical composition, accumulation rates, and mass accumulation rates of chemical components are presented. These tables can be used for the comparative analysis with sediments of the same or other stratons in different oceanic basins, as well as with paleoceanic sediments on the continents. The terrigenous matrix dominates within the lithogenic matter. Using methods of mathematical statistics, we revealed the main geochemical associations and major factors determining the chemical composition of studied sediments. Masses of oxides of petrogenic elements and several trace elements have been calculated for Pleistocene sediments. Average chemical composition of Pleistocene sediments is proposed for the Atlantic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Distribution of Chemical Elements in Sediments

Chemical Composition of Pleistocene Sediments in the Indian Ocean

Holocene deposits of the southeastern coast of the gorlo strait (white sea): new data of diatom and radiocarbon analyses.

Bezrukov, P.L. and Lisitsyn, A.P., Classification of sediments in modern marine basins, Tr. IO AN SSSR , 1960, vol. 32, pp. 3–14.

Google Scholar  

Chamley, H., Debrabant, P., Foulon, J., et al., Mineralogy and geochemistry of Cretaceous and Cenozoic Atlantic sediments off the Iberian Peninsula (site 398, DSDP Leg 47B), Init. Repts. DSDP, 47B , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1979. pp. 429–449.

Cronan, D.S., Geochemical investigations on sediments from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: Leg 37, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Init. Repts. DSDP, 37 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1977, pp. 631–632.

Cunningham, R. and Kroopnick, P.M., Inorganic and isotopic geochemistry of sediments from sites 549 to 551, northeastern North Atlantic, Init. Repts. DSDP, 80 , Washington, DC: (U.S. Govt. Printing Office), 1985, pp. 1073–1079.

Dean, W.E. and Parduhn, N.L., Inorganic geochemistry of sediments and rocks recovered from the southern Angola Basin and adjacent Walvis Ridge, sites 530 and 532, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 75, Init. Repts. DSDP, 75 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1984, pp. 923–958.

Debrabant, P., Chamley, H., Foulon, J., and Maillot, H., Mineralogy and geochemistry of Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic sediments from north Biscay Bay and Rockall Plateau (Eastern North Atlantic), DSDP Leg 48, Init. Repts. DSDP, 48 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.), 1979, pp. 703–725.

Debrabant, P., Foulon, J., and Maillot, H., Mathematical treatment of geochemical data, Deep Sea Drilling Project sites 415 and 416, Init. Repts. DSDP, 50 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1980, pp. 695–703.

Donnelly, T.W., Chemistry of sediments of the Western Atlantic: site 417 compared with sites 9, 105, 386, and 387, Init. Repts. DSDP, 51, 52, and 53 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1980, pp. 1515–1523.

Donnelly, T.W. and Nalli, G., Mineralogy and chemistry of Caribbean sediments, Leg 15, Init. Repts. DSDP , 15, Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1973, pp. 929–961.

Dubinin, A.V. and Rimskaya-Korsakova, M.N., Geochemistry of rare earth elements in bottom sediments of the Brazil Basin, Atlantic Ocean, Lithol. Miner. Resour , 2011, no. 1, pp. 1–16.

Dubinin, A.V. and Rozanov, A.G., Geochemistry of rare earth elements and thorium in sediments and ferromanganese nodules of the Atlantic Ocean, Lithol. Miner. Resour ., 2001, no. 3, pp. 268–279.

Dubinin, A.V., Sval’nov, V.N., Berezhnaya, E.D., et al., Geochemistry of trace and minor elements in sediments and manganese micronodules from the Angola Basin, Lithol. Miner. Resour. , 2013, no. 3, pp. 175–197.

Emelyanov, E.M., Geochemistry of sediments in the Western Central Atlantic, DSDP, Leg 39, Init. Repts. DSDP , 39, Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1977, pp. 477–492.

Emelyanov, E.M., Sedimentogenez v basseine Atlanticheskogo okeana (Sedimentogenesis in the Atlantic Ocean Basin), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.

Emelyanov, E.M. and Romankevich, E.A., Geokhimiya Atlanticheskogo okeana. Organicheskoe veshchestvo i fosfor (Geochemistry of the Atlantic Ocean: Organic Matter and Phosphorus), Moscow: Nauka, 1979.

Emelyanov, E.M., Lisitsyn, A.P., and Il’in, A.V., Tipy donnykh osadkov Atlanticheskogo okeana. Rezul’taty issledovanii po MGP. Okeanologicheskie issledovaniya (Bottom Sediment Types in the Atlantic Ocean: Results of the IHP Oceanic Studies), Kaliningrad, 1975.

Emelyanov, E.M., Blazchishin, A.I., Kharin, G.S., et al., Mineral and chemical composition of sediments of the Vøring Plateau, DSDP Leg 38, Init. Repts. DSDP, 38 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1978, pp. 31–44.

Emelyanov, E.M., Trimonis, E.S., and Kharin, G.S., Paleookeanologiya Atlanticheskogo okeana (Paleoceanography of the Atlantic Ocean), Leningrad: Nedra, 1989.

Gordeev, V.V., Geokhimiya sistemy reka-more (Geochemistry of the River–Sea System), Moscow: IP Matushkina, 2012.

Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., and Smith, A.G., A Geological Time Scale 2004 , Cambridge: Cambr. Univ. Press, 2004.

Book   Google Scholar  

Hetzel, A., Brumsack, H.-J., Schnetger, B., and Böttcher, M.E., Inorganic geochemical characterization of lithologic units recovered during ODP Leg 207 (Demerara Rise), Proc. ODP, Sci. Res. , 207, College Station, 2006, pp. 1–37. https://habr.com/ru/post/339798.

Jarvis, I., Moreton, J., and Gerard, M., Chemostratigraphy of Madeira abyssal plain Miocene-Pliocene turbidites, site 950, Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 157 , College Station, 1998, pp. 535–558.

Lacasse, C., Paterne, M., Werner, R., et al., Geochemistry and origin of Pliocene and Pleistocene ash layers from the Iceland Plateau, site 907, Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 151 , College Station, 1996, pp. 309–331.

Lackschewitz, K.S., Wallrabe-Adams, H.-J., and Garbe-Schönberg, D., Geochemistry of surface sediments from the mid-oceanic Kobeinsey Ridge, north of Iceland, Mar. Geol. , 1994, vol. 121, pp. 105–119.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Latimer, J.C. and Filippelli, G.M., Data report: sediment geochemistry at site 1089, Leg 177 Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 177 , College Station, 2001, pp. 1–14.

Levitan, M.A., Pleistotsenovye otlozheniya Mirovogo okeana (Pleistocene Sediments in the World Ocean), Moscow: RAN, 2021.

Levitan, M.A., Antonova, T.A., Domaratskaya, L.G., Kol’tsova, A.V., and Syromyatnikov, K.V., Chemical Composition of Pleistocene sediments in the Indian Ocean, Lithol. Miner. Resour , 2023, no. 5, pp. 387–406.

Levitan, M.A. and Ditrikh, P.G., Facies variability of bottom sediments north of Elephant Island, in Biologicheskie i geologicheskie issledovaniya dna v Yuzhnoi Atlantike (Biological and Geological Studies of Bottom in the Southern Atlantic), Vinogradov, N.G, Ed., 1990, pp. 185–192.

Levitan, M.A., Ditrikh, P.G., and Gorbunova Z.N., Bottom sediments along the trans-oceanic profile (Southern Atlantic), in Biologicheskie i geologicheskie issledovaniya dna v Yuzhnoi Atlantike (Biological and Geological Studies of Bottom in the Southern Atlantic), Vinogradov, N.G, Eds., 1990a, pp. 172–184.

Levitan, M.A., Ditrikh, P.G., Rudakova, A.N., and Vershinin, A.V., Facies variability of the surface sediment layer at the continental margin of Namibia, in Biologicheskie i geologicheskie issledovaniya dna v Yuzhnoi Atlantike (Biological and Geological Studies of Bottom in the Southern Atlantic), Vinogradov, N.G, Eds., 1990b, pp. 193–206.

Levitan, M.A., Roshchina, I.A., and Tolmacheva, A.V., Geochemical features of sediments on the continental slope of the Weddell Sea and their paleoceanographic interpretation, Lithol. Miner. Resour ., 2008, no. 2, pp. 111–124.

Lisitsyn, A.P., Protsessy okeanskoi sedimentatsii. Litologiya i geokhimiya (Processes of the Oceanic Sedimentation: Lithology and Geochemistry), Moscow: Nauka, 1978.

Lisitsyn, A.P., Emelyanov, E.M., and El’tsina, G.N., Geokhimiya osadkov Atlanticheskogo okeana. Karbonaty i kremnezem. Rezul’taty issledovanii po MGP (Geochemistry of the Atlantic Sediments. Carbonates and Silica. Results of the IHP Studies), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.

Lu, H., Matsumoto, R., and Watanabe, Y., Data report: major element geochemistry of the sediments from site 997, Blake Ridge, Western Atlantic, Proc. ODP, Sci. Res. 164 , College Station, 2000, pp. 147–182.

Malone, M., Data report: geochemistry and mineralogy of periplatform carbonate sediments: sites 1006, 1008, and 1009, Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 166 , College Station, 2000, pp. 145–152.

McCoy, F.W., Swint, T.R., and Piper, D.Z., Types of Bottom sediments, in Mezhdunarodnyi geologo-geofizicheskii atlas Tikhogo okeana (International Geological–Geophysical Atlas of the Pacific Ocean), Udintsev, G.B., Ed., Moscow: St. Petersburg, 2003, pp. 114–115.

Matsumoto, R., Mineralogy and geochemistry of carbonate diagenesis of the Pliocene and Pleistocene hemipelagic mud on the Blake Outer Ridge, site 533, Leg 76, Init. Repts. DSDP 76 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1983, pp. 411–427.

Migdisov, A.A., Girin, Yu.P., Galimov, E.M., et al., Major and minor elements and sulfur isotopes of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic sediments at sites 415 and 416, Leg 50, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Init. Repts. DSDP, 50 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1980, pp. 675–689.

Murdmaa, I.O., Fatsii okeanov (Facies of Oceans), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.

Murdmaa, I.O., Gordeev, V.V., Emelyanov, E.M., and Bazilevskaya, E.S., Inorganic geochemistry of the Leg 44 sediments, Init. Repts. DSDP, 44 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1978, pp. 575–582.

Murdmaa, I.O., Gordeev, V.V., Emelyanov, E.M., and Bazilevskaya, E.S., Inorganic geochemistry of Leg 43 sediments, Init. Repts. DSDP, 43 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1979, pp. 675–694.

Murray, M.A., Muratli, J.M., Hartwell, A.M., et al., Data report: dissolved minor element compositions, sediment major and minor element concentrations, and reactive iron and manganese data from the Lesser Antilles volcanic arc region, IODP Expedition 340 Sites U1394, U1395, U1396, U1399, and U1400, Proc. IODP, 340 , Tokyo: Integr. Ocean Drill. Progr. Manag. Int. Inc., 2016, pp. 1–27.

Pickering, K.T. and Stow, D.A.V., Inorganic major, minor and trace element geochemistry and clay mineralogy of sediments from the Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 96, Gulf of Mexico, Init. Repts. DSDP, 96 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1986, pp. 733–745.

Rodehorst, U., Schmincke, H.-U., and Sumita, M., Geochemistry and petrology of Pleistocene ash layers erupted at Las Cañaras Edifice (Tenerife), Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 157 , College Station, 1998, pp. 315–328.

Ronov, A.B., History of sedimentation and oscillatory movements in the European part of the Soviet Union (based on the 3D method), in Tr. Geofiz. Inst. AN SSSR , 1949, vol. 3.

Ronov, A.B., Khain, V.E., and Balukhovskii, A.N., Atlas litologo-paleogeograficheskikh kart Mira. Mezozoi i kainozoi kontinentov i okeanov . (Atlas of Lithological–Paleogeographic Maps of the World: Mesozoic and Cenozoic of Continents and Oceans), Leningrad: Mingeo SSSR, 1989.

Ronov, A.B., Yaroshevskii, A.A., and Migdisov, A.A., Khimicheskoe stroenie zemnoi kory i geokhimicheskii balans glavnykh elementov (Chemical Composition of the Earth’s Crust and Geochemical Balance of the Major Elements), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.

Rudnick, R.L. and Gao, S., Composition of continental crust, in Treatise of Geochemistry , Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003, pp. 1–64.

Saito, S., Major and trace element geochemistry of sediments from east Greenland continental rise: an implication for sediment provenance and source area weathering, Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 152 , College Station, 1998, pp. 19–28.

Schmidt, C., Hensen, C., Hubscher, C., et al., Geochemical characterization of deep-sea sediments on the Azores Plateau – From diagenesis to hydrothermal activity, Mar. Geol ., 2020, vol. 429, pp. 106–191.

Article   Google Scholar  

Sexton, P.F. and Barker, S., Onset of “Pacific-style” deep-sea sedimentary carbonate cycles at the mid-Pleistocene transition, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett ., 2012, vol. 321–322, pp. 81–94.

Skornyakova, N.S. and Murdmaa, I.O., Lithofacies types of deep-sea pelagic (red) clays in the Pacific, Litol. Polezn. Iskop., 1968, no. 6, pp. 17–37.

Tarney, J. and Donnellan, N.C.B., Minor element geochemistry of sediments at site 328, Falkland Outer Basin and site 329, Falkland Plateau, Leg 36, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Init. Repts. DSDP, 36 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1977, pp. 929–939.

Taylor, S.R. and McLennan, S.M., The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution , Oxford: Blackwell 1985. Translated under the title Kontinental’naya kora, ee sostav i evolyutsiya , Moscow: Mir, 1988.

Timofeev, P.P., Varentsov, I.M., Rateev, M.A., and Rengarten, N.V., Lithology, mineralogy, and geochemistry of upper Cenozoic sediments at 23° N near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, drilled on Leg 45, Init. Repts. DSDP, 45 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1979, pp. 323–347.

Trimonis, E.S., Terrigennaya sedimentatsiya v Atlanticheskom okeane (Terrigenous Sedimentation in the Atlantic Ocean), Moscow: Nauka, 1995.

Varentsov, I.M., The geochemistry of heavy metals in upper Cenozoic sediments near the crest of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, latitude 23° N, drilled on DSDP Leg 45, Init. Repts. DSDP, 45 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1979, pp. 349–377.

Varentsov, I.M., Ludwig, W.J., Krasheninnikov, V.A., et al., Geochemical history of post-Middle Jurassic sedimentation in the Southwestern Atlantic, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 71: Ba, Sr, and major components, Init. Repts. DSDP, 71 , Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1983, pp. 423–442.

Wallrabe-Adams, H.-U. and Lackschewitz, K.S., Chemical composition, distribution, and origin of silic volcanic ash layers in the Greenland–Iceland–Norwegian Sea: explosive volcanism from 10 to 300 ka as recorded in deep-sea sediments, Mar. Geol ., 2003, vol. 193, pp. 273–293.

Wang, Y.-C., Gieskes, J.M., and Musoke, L., Bulk chemical analysis of sediments, Hole 671B, Proc. ODP, Sci. Res., 110 , College Station, 1990, pp. 179–188.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to K.V. Syromyatnikov who provided the results of mathematical statistics and drew the figures.

This work was accomplished in accordance with the State Task of the Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia

M. A. Levitan, T. A. Antonova, L. G. Domaratskaya & A. V. Koltsova

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Levitan .

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by D. Sakya

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Levitan, M.A., Antonova, T.A., Domaratskaya, L.G. et al. Geochemical Peculiarities of the Atlantic Pleistocene Sediments. Lithol Miner Resour 59 , 247–267 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S002449022470055X

Download citation

Received : 05 May 2023

Revised : 20 November 2023

Accepted : 28 December 2023

Published : 09 May 2024

Issue Date : June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1134/S002449022470055X

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Atlantic Ocean
• Pleistocene
• bottom sediments
• geochemistry
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research