pros and cons of graffiti essay

EducationalWave

Pros and Cons of Graffiti

Graffiti offers therapeutic benefits , aiding in stress relief and self-expression . It fosters creativity and can transform public spaces into cultural hubs, enhancing community bonds. However, unauthorized graffiti is illegal, leading to legal repercussions and high cleanup costs. It may also negatively impact property values and deter economic investments. Public perception of graffiti varies, with some viewing it as vandalism and others as urban beautification. The complexities of graffiti's role in society warrant a closer look into both its positive and negative facets.

Table of Contents

• Graffiti offers a therapeutic outlet for self-expression, aiding in coping with stress and anxiety.
• Unauthorized graffiti is illegal and can result in legal consequences and financial penalties for removal.
• Graffiti can decrease property values and deter economic development and business investments.
• Graffiti fosters community building and cultural enrichment in public spaces.
• Society often views graffiti as vandalism, which can tarnish artists' reputations and hinder its appreciation.

Therapeutic Benefits

Engaging in graffiti offers therapeutic benefits by providing a creative outlet for self-expression , which can greatly enhance mental health. For many graffiti artists, the act of creating art on various surfaces triggers a release of dopamine , a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and reward. This physiological response can notably boost mood and provide a profound sense of accomplishment .

Moreover, graffiti serves as an effective form of therapy, aiding individuals in coping with stress , anxiety , and depression. The immersive nature of graffiti creation promotes mindfulness and relaxation, offering a temporary escape from the pressures of daily life. This mindful engagement allows artists to focus on the present moment, reducing rumination and promoting mental well-being.

Beyond individual benefits, the practice of graffiti can also build a sense of community among artists. Shared spaces and collaborative projects foster social connections and support networks, providing a platform for mutual encouragement and camaraderie. These social interactions can further enhance mental health by reducing feelings of isolation and loneliness.

Creative Expression

Graffiti serves as a powerful medium for artistic freedom and cultural commentary , allowing artists to transform urban landscapes with bold, imaginative works. Through tagging, murals, and stencils, creators convey personal messages and social critiques that resonate with a wide audience.

This form of expression not only enhances visual diversity but also amplifies the voices of marginalized communities in public spaces.

Artistic Freedom

In the world of urban art, graffiti stands as a powerful medium for artists to exercise their creative freedom and express their unique visions. This form of artistic expression allows individuals to mark territory, not in a literal sense, but through vibrant, often provocative visuals that claim space in the urban landscape. Graffiti artists leverage this freedom to challenge societal norms and explore unconventional forms of art, transforming ordinary spaces into vibrant and thought-provoking works.

Cultural Commentary

Cultural commentary through graffiti serves as a powerful demonstration for artists to address social, political , and personal issues, enabling marginalized voices to resonate within the public sphere. This form of creative expression is particularly prevalent in urban environments, where the walls serve as canvases for visual storytelling . Graffiti artists leverage their medium to challenge societal norms , provoke thought, and convey powerful messages that might otherwise be overlooked.

The significance of graffiti as a platform for social issues cannot be overstated. Whether tackling themes of racial injustice, economic disparity, or political corruption, graffiti often brings attention to perspectives that mainstream discourse may neglect. This democratization of expression allows individuals from underrepresented communities to participate in cultural dialogues , making their voices heard and seen in ways that traditional media might not permit.

Moreover, the immediacy and accessibility of graffiti enable it to serve as a proof for conversations and potential change. By embedding their work in public spaces, artists invite passersby to engage with the content directly, fostering a communal reflection on pressing issues. Graffiti stands as a demonstration to the power of art in driving social awareness and inspiring collective action .

Community Building

By fostering connections among artists, street art can serve as a powerful tool for community building and urban transformation. Graffiti enables artists to connect and share their passion, creating a supportive environment where creativity and collaboration flourish. This sense of community can be instrumental in driving urban art scenes and transforming public spaces into vibrant cultural hubs.

Building friendships through graffiti contributes to meaningful connections, enhancing the quality of urban life. Artists inspire and challenge each other, pushing creative boundaries. Reclaiming public areas from commercial dominance empowers residents, allowing them to infuse public spaces with local identity and cultural expression. Consequently, graffiti serves not only as an artistic endeavor but as a medium for social cohesion and community empowerment. By transforming urban landscapes, graffiti fosters a sense of belonging and collective ownership among community members, making it a significant aspect of urban development and cultural vibrancy.

Legal Issues

Graffiti, while often celebrated as a form of artistic expression, faces notable legal challenges that artists must navigate. One of the primary issues is its illegal status when created without permission on public spaces . Artists caught engaging in unauthorized graffiti can face arrest, with repeat offenses potentially leading to jail or prison time. The consequences are particularly severe when the graffiti is done on critical infrastructure such as trains, where penalties can escalate to lengthy prison sentences.

The legal ramifications extend beyond criminal charges. Illegal graffiti can result in hefty financial penalties for the offenders. Additionally, property owners often bear the cost of removing graffiti, which can be substantial. This not only affects individual property values but can also lead to broader economic repercussions . Neighborhoods plagued with illegal graffiti may suffer from a negative perception , which can deter investment and impede economic development.

Graffiti laws vary significantly by location. Some areas impose stricter penalties and have more rigorous enforcement measures aimed at curbing unauthorized art in public spaces. These varying legal landscapes mean that graffiti artists must be acutely aware of local regulations to avoid severe legal consequences.

Public Perception

Public perception of graffiti is deeply polarized, with some individuals celebrating it as a vibrant form of artistic expression while others condemn it as an act of vandalism . One of the primary reasons why people support graffiti is its role as a powerful medium for self-expression , particularly for marginalized groups . These individuals often use graffiti to challenge societal norms and voice their discontent with the status quo, fostering a sense of community and solidarity among like-minded individuals.

Conversely, the reasons why people view graffiti negatively are mostly tied to its unauthorized nature. Unauthorized graffiti is frequently associated with legal consequences, which can tarnish the reputation and freedom of the artists involved. Society's tendency to view graffiti as a serious offense often leads to negative stereotypes and stigmatization of those who practice it. This perception can result in a lack of acceptance and appreciation for the artistic value that graffiti may offer.

Different perspectives on graffiti greatly influence community reactions. While some neighborhoods embrace it as a form of urban beautification , others perceive it as a blight on public spaces, thereby shaping the overall acceptance and legitimacy of graffiti within various societal contexts.

Economic Impact

While public perception of graffiti varies widely, its economic impact is unequivocally significant. The presence of graffiti can have both direct and indirect financial consequences for communities and businesses.

• Decrease in Property Values : Unregulated graffiti often leads to a decline in property values in affected neighborhoods. Potential buyers may perceive these areas as less desirable, which can result in lower real estate prices.
• Cost of Removal : The financial burden of removing illegal graffiti falls heavily on property owners and local governments. This process can be expensive, consuming resources that could otherwise be allocated to community development.
• Deterrent to Economic Development : Areas with high levels of graffiti are frequently seen as unattractive for business investments. The negative perception of graffiti as vandalism can drive away potential investors and hinder economic growth.
• Impact on Public Transportation and Infrastructure : Graffiti on public transportation systems and infrastructure can lead to significant financial losses. Cleanup efforts and necessary repairs not only incur costs but can also disrupt services, further impacting economic stability.

Moreover, business owners in graffiti-prevalent areas often experience reduced foot traffic and sales, challenging their economic viability. By understanding these economic impacts, communities can better strategize their approach to managing graffiti.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the pros of graffiti?.

Graffiti provides a therapeutic and creative outlet for self-expression, enhancing mental health. It fosters community among artists, challenges corporate control of public spaces, and injects cultural expression into urban environments, transforming them into vibrant art displays.

What Are the Negatives of Graffiti?

The negatives of graffiti include property damage, legal repercussions, and financial burdens on municipalities for cleanup. Additionally, it can lead to negative perceptions of neighborhoods, deter economic development, and pose health risks due to exposure to toxic materials.

Why Should Graffiti Be Illegal?

Graffiti should be illegal due to its legal implications, including property damage, decreased property values, and significant taxpayer expenses for cleanup. Additionally, it poses safety hazards and can negatively impact transportation services, tourism, and economic development.

What Are Good Arguments for Graffiti?

Graffiti serves as a significant medium for cultural expression, enabling marginalized voices to be heard, beautifying urban landscapes, and fostering community engagement. It also ignites important social and political discussions, enriching the cultural fabric of communities.

Graffiti presents a multifaceted issue encompassing therapeutic benefits , creative expression, and community building . It can serve as an outlet for artistic talent and social commentary , yet often faces criticism for defacing property and incurring cleanup costs.

While graffiti has its positive aspects, it also raises concerns related to legal issues, public perception, and economic impact . Balancing its contributions to cultural enrichment with the need for regulation remains a complex challenge that necessitates thoughtful consideration from policymakers and communities alike.

Related Posts:

• 40 Pros and Cons of Urbanization
• 20 Pros and Cons of Being a Landlord
• 20 Pros and Cons of Generac Generators

Related posts:

• Pros and Cons of Urban Sprawl

Educational Wave Team

The New York Times

Advertisement

The Opinion Pages

Graffiti is a public good, even as it challenges the law.

Lu Olivero is the director of Aerosol Carioca and the author of the forthcoming "Cidade Grafitada: A Journey Inside Rioʼs Graffiti Culture."

Updated July 11, 2014, 6:15 PM

Vandalism is expression and that is what makes it art. Graffiti, a vandalism sub-genre, is differentiated by its aesthetics, or its message.

However, graffiti straddles the line between pure art and pure vandalism. Though graffiti represents a challenge to the law — and sometimes serves as social commentary about the subjectivity of laws — it can simultaneously serve a public good through its nuanced social commentary and its artistry.

The arbitrary nature of how graffiti is removed or preserved highlights an interesting dissonance: the social-political oligarchy rejects the artist, and the conditions that create the art, unless the art is somehow accepted on the establishment’s terms. Enter Banksy: a British street artist, and self-described vandal, who has become a celebrated figure in the world of elite art.

Banksy’s work has unintentionally reignited the “art or vandalism” debate: though the British government has been vigilant in removing his trademark stencil art, labeling it “vandalism,” his original works and knockoffs have skyrocketed in price over the last decade. His work is often highly satirical of establishment rules and politics. Why is it that Banksy’s work is gobbled up by the same people he is critical of — yet his contemporaries are looked at as “criminals"? Why are they judged so differently?

Thirty years ago hip-hop music was labeled “noise,” and graffiti will follow the same trajectory. Perceptions about street art have already drastically changed.

For example, in Brazil, during late 1990s, it was common for graffiti artists to be harassed or shot at by the police. Today, many of the same officers support graffiti initiatives for city beautification, and as a crime deterrent. They understand that graffiti can be a career opportunity for youth in low-income neighborhoods. The growth of graffiti in Brazil, and its role in challenging the status quo, demonstrates the power of art, and its ability to create dialogue.

In the city of Rio de Janeiro, many leading street artists have put graffiti to good use for social development, founding art schools in low-income neighborhoods and partnering with the police to paint murals in run-down areas. They host large events and festivals, which bring in tourists.

It has had such an effect that this year the mayor of Rio announced the legalization of graffiti on city property that is not historical.

The truth is that despite the acceptance of graffiti, it needs the law so that it can function outside of it. This is where innovation is born, and this is what pushes the art to evolve. Had graffiti artists in Brazil painted inside the lines of the law, many internationally acclaimed artists would never have existed.

Some people may not like the message, or how it is manifested, but that doesn’t mean the message – and the medium – don’t have value.

Join Opinion on Facebook and follow updates on twitter.com/roomfordebate .

Topics: Law , art

It's Young, Cool, Creative – Let It Happen

Legal Venues Celebrate the Art Form

When does graffiti become art, it’s always vandalism.

It’s Young, Cool, Creative – Let It Happen

Value in the message and the medium, related discussions.

Recent Discussions

Conservation, exposition, Restauration d’Objets d’Art

Home Issues HS Vandalism and Art The duality of Graffiti: is it va...

The duality of Graffiti: is it vandalism or art?

Introduction.

1 Graffiti is found in many societies with different cultural contexts and has become a witness and an ethnographic source of information on urban art development (Waclawek, 2011). Modes of expression are mainly related to visibility, notoriety, choice of venue, transgression, and are often a mean to react and protest while remaining anonymous, by illegally introducing messages in the public space. Contemporary graffiti is also described by its controversial issues between social, style and aesthetic forms along with vandalism aspects. Facing a worldwide plethoric production, the assumption that Graffiti is a positive urban art form raises some paradoxical questions regarding ephemerality and “visual pollution” with a growing art market demand. However, it is often seen as illicit production and vandalism asset. For instance, removing graffiti or restricting the practice of graffiti from the public space has been a controversial issue for artists and authorities. A question therefore arises: how can the aesthetic and pictorial aspects of these acts of creation be considered as acts of vandalism? ( Bengsten, 2016).

Fig. 1 Vandalism

Vandalism by Goon and Chick, 1985

© Henry Chalfant and James Prigoff

Fig. 2 Vandalism?

Keith Haring, New York, 1983

© Laura Levine/Corbis

The problem of temporality

2 Similarly, the notion of temporality, by dissociating conservation and transmission must be considered. The growing interest leads to different perceptions probably with greater attention to the act of "heritage" at the expense of the act of protest. The patrimonialization of graffiti and, to a large extent, of Street Art is an essential point, because graffiti writers or street art practitioners often see institutions as "looters" who, come to preserve cultural acts that other public institutions have condemned (Omodeo, 2016).

3 Heritage is primarily a process which, in principle, prevents any destruction or voluntary surrender of an artwork, which are a corollary of creation and its limitation of copyright in time. For most “writers”, Graffiti is not an act thought out on the basis of a future conservation. The issue is visibility and notoriety, by the number, size and/or the choice of venue. Regarding paint materials, so many spray paint brands are available to the general public in hardware stores. Graffiti writers would not necessarely comply with this rule as their preferences for brands are more related to habits, opportunities and word of mouth, along with, plastic qualities and not for resistance properties.

Alterations

4 If Graffiti question the artistic approach of the artist and the context of their creation, it also poses those of alteration mechanisms, sometimes irreversible, these colors, which are significant from the point of view of heritage conservation. This encourage today to have a different perspective than that of the material history of the work with the creative process, the components used and the effects of environment parameters and ultimately, of time (Colombini, 2017).

5 The traditional methods of conservation are questioned; which must intervene and what modifications in relation to the original one can be accepted? (Beerkens, 2005). Is it essential to invite the artist to take part in the heritage process? One must look at the field of Muralism, mainly in the USA, to find more innovative and frequent restoration procedures. Indeed, the restoration of murals, often monumental paintings, is a civic and collective act within the "neighborhood". The actors of the restoration/renovation are both volunteer civilians trained and supervised by experienced conservators, artists and more generally, of persons engaged in neighborhood committees (Shank, 2004). This is not without rewards and sometimes reveals abuses that go beyond the artistic acts.

Fig. 3 Conservation

Community mural conservation

© 2014 Mural Conservancy of Los Angeles

Fig. 4 A public Art project, 1985

6 The practice of graffiti and its legislation ambiguities are at stake. Graffiti and Street Art have their own definitions and interpretations, but they have something in common with illegal acts when it comes to the artistic act carried out on surfaces without the given permission by a property owner, whether public or private. We are now witnessing a radicalization of practices both from two points of view: legality and vandalism. The character of these acts explains why some artists (not only from the graffiti scene) have seen their career highlighted with arrests, penalties and sometimes trials, while their works are copyrightable (Moyne, 2016).

7 T he question of authenticity of paint arises when, aesthetic and style expertise, may not be sufficient to ascertain whether the juridical designation of Street Art as “Art” versus graffiti as vandalism. This is even truer for legal graffiti, mainly because of the variability of quality of the known and the good quality of spray paints, supposedly meant to last, as opposed to, the use of cheap brands of spray paint as illegal graffiti (Marsh, 2007).

Duality of the phenomenon

8 This paper relates to the duality of the modern graffiti phenomenon, as to whether it is a vandalism act or a cultural production. It focusses on a comparison study, mainly through artist interviews, between the evolving graffiti practices in Western major cities where illegality is often reclaimed by artists, and the fast emergence of graffiti in China, where this artistic expression is not only watched through its illegal and vandalism forms, but also for its aesthetic perceptions, though practices happen in restricted areas for expressing social, anti-official and political actions (Valjakka, 2011). Graffiti are buffed, almost straight away, by city cleaners the so called “buffers”, who are in the streets to remove all sorts of inscriptions from plumbers to whatever girl ads. If they cannot scrap it out, they paint over and that is why graffiti never lasts. At the same time, the relationship with authorities has improved very much over the last few years. It is more and more common to negotiate with the police by explaining what graffiti writers are doing, colours and mode of expression for everybody, in order to, embellish the streets rather than litter or vandalize them. From a civilization where calligraphy has been the core of the artistic production, the writing on a wall has different meanings than in a Euro-American context (gangs and political + social protests). Confronting these two almost opposite approaches, it allows a better understanding of this artistic form, as to whether it is considered vandalism or art. This controversial interrogation can be illustrated by the artist Bando’s quote “Graffiti is not vandalism, but a very beautiful crime”.

List of illustrations

Electronic reference

Alain Colombini , “ The duality of Graffiti: is it vandalism or art? ” ,  CeROArt [Online], HS | 2018, Online since 09 December 2018 , connection on 06 September 2024 . URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/5745; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ceroart.5745

About the author

Alain colombini.

Contemporary art scientist. Centre Interdisciplinaire de Conservation et de Restauration du Patrimoine (CICRP), Marseille – France

By this author

• Les matériaux en polyuréthanne dans les œuvres d’art : des fortunes diverses. Cas de la sculpture « Foot Soldier » de Kenji Yanobe [Full text] Published in CeROArt , 2 | 2008

The text only may be used under licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 . All other elements (illustrations, imported files) are “All rights reserved”, unless otherwise stated.

The journal

• Presentation
• Information for authors
• Scientific Committee and editorial board

Full text issues

• HS | 2021 Imiter le textile en polychromie à la fin du Moyen Âge. Le brocart appliqué
• 12 | 2020 Flux 2020-2021
• 11 | 2019 Flux 2019
• HS | 2018 Four Study Days in Contemporary Conservation
• HS | 2017 Education and Research in Conservation-Restoration
• HS | Juin 2015 Tribute to Roger Marijnissen
• 10 | 2015 La restauration, carrefour d’interrelations
• HS | 2014 Teaching Conservation-Restoration
• 9 | 2014 The conservator-restorer’s knowledge and recognition
• HS | 2013 Conservation: Cultures and Connections
• HS | 2013 De l’art et de la nature
• HS | 2013 Le faux, l’authentique et le restaurateur
• 8 | 2012 Politiques de conservation-restauration
• HS | 2012 La restauration des œuvres d’art en Europe entre 1789 et 1815 : pratiques, transferts, enjeux
• 7 | 2011 Science et conscience
• 6 | 2011 Réinventer les méthodologies
• 5 | 2010 La restauration en scène et en coulisse
• 4 | 2009 Les dilemmes de la restauration
• 3 | 2009 L’erreur, la faute, le faux
• 2 | 2008 Regards contemporains sur la restauration
• 1 | 2007 Objets d’art, œuvres d’art

EGG Special Issues

• EGG 6 | 2017 First publications from young graduates in conservation
• EGG 5 | 2016 First publications from young graduates in conservation
• EGG 4 | 2014 First publications from young graduates in conservation
• EGG 3 | 2013 First publications from young graduates in conservation
• EGG 2 | 2012 First publications from young graduates in conservation
• EGG 1 | 2010 First publications from young graduates in conservation
• Call for papers

Information

• Mentions légales et Crédits
• Publishing policies

Newsletters

• OpenEdition Newsletter

In collaboration with

Electronic ISSN 1784-5092

Read detailed presentation  

Site map  – Syndication

Privacy Policy  – About Cookies  – Report a problem

OpenEdition Journals member  – Published with Lodel  – Administration only

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search

Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art? Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Since the appearance of graffiti, people have been disputing if it is vandalism or art. Many graffiti features compel the public to form negative opinions about it and question its creative nature. The first questionable characteristic is the history of graffiti, and associated with the street gang culture of New York in the 70s (Novak, 2017). The second trait is a specific way of execution, which involves intervention in the urban environment. Finally, graffiti’s unconventional and unusual nature differentiates it from traditional and widely-accepted art forms (Boyd, 2010). However, graffiti has been around for a long time as a creative expression that shakes the social fabric with its aesthetics and message. Therefore, graffiti meets all the parameters of art, despite its unconventional peculiarities.

People often think that graffiti is not art because there are many mediocre, incoherent, unskillful examples. Everyone has access to self-expression through graffiti; potential artists only need to get paint and a little courage (Boyd, 2010). Thus, some people point to worthy original graffiti and say that this is art, while others, looking at mediocre drawings, call it vandalism. Both parties are entitled to their opinion, as damaging private property is indeed vandalism. However, belittling graffiti as an art style on the basis that someone with no talent can draw low-quality graffiti is wrong. It is similar to calling painting or sculpture “not art” because many people, having taken paints or clay in their hands, will not be able to create anything worthy of a museum exhibition.

People consider prehistoric rock art to be art without a doubt about the presence of a creative element. Seeing the rock art in the Spanish cave of Altamira, Pablo Picasso exclaimed: “After Altamira, everything is decadence!” (Davies, 2018). Thus, society and the art community are ready to recognize the high artistic value of drawings made in a non-traditional way on canvas and with paints. Graffiti, in this sense, is no different from rock art. These are images made on the walls of the housing in an act of creative personal self-expression. The best examples are admired; the worst, as in the past, are forgotten and erased.

Finally, graffiti is art because it is an emotional expression of human creative skills and abilities to comprehend the existing reality. Graffiti has a long history and is characterized by its conceptuality and the ability to break into urban space and challenge the ordinary. Art always claims originality and produces the effect of emotional shock. In history, graffiti has often become a visual image of the world’s pain, challenging problems, and inconvenient truths. There are many examples of legendary graffiti, such as “Fraternal Kiss” – the painting on the Berlin Wall, depicting a kiss between communist leaders Leonid Brezhnev and Erich Honecker (Novak, 2017). This satirical image conveyed the laughter and horror of ordinary people, whose fates were decided by fanatical old people. It is difficult to disagree with the fact that such paintings are art in their impact and creativity.

Summing up the above, it can be argued that graffiti is art if it combines the skill of the artist and their emotional message aimed at reflecting reality. The history of graffiti has many examples of paintings that shook society and made people pay attention to the acute problems of humanity. This type of art differs from others only in the means, techniques, and used space of the urban environment, which becomes part of the project.

Boyd, A. (2010). In defense of graffiti . Alex Boyd: BoydBlog. Web.

Davies, S. (2018). Can Westerners understand the art of other cultures and what might they learn by doing so? Journal of World Philosophies 3 , 93-122. Web.

Novak, D. (2017). Historical dissemination of graffiti art. SAUC – Street Art and Urban Creativity , 3 (1), 29-42. Web.

• Eduardo Kobra's Graffiti as a Form of Art
• Andy Warhol’s Iconic Artwork “32 Campbell’s Soup Cans”
• Aspects of Graffiti as Art Therapy
• Vandalism and Its Perception in American Society
• Graffiti Culture: Is It a Form of Artistic Expression or Criminal Activity?
• Graphic Memoirs and Forney's Marbles
• Element and Principles of Design: Critical Analysis
• Pectoral and Necklace of Sithathoryunet
• "Adoration of the Magi" Analysis
• The Healing Wings Project After COVID-19
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, June 19). Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art? https://ivypanda.com/essays/is-graffiti-vandalism-or-art/

"Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art?" IvyPanda , 19 June 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/is-graffiti-vandalism-or-art/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art'. 19 June.

IvyPanda . 2023. "Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art?" June 19, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/is-graffiti-vandalism-or-art/.

1. IvyPanda . "Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art?" June 19, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/is-graffiti-vandalism-or-art/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Is Graffiti Vandalism or Art?" June 19, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/is-graffiti-vandalism-or-art/.

Vandalism or art? Graffiti straddles both worlds

By Jean Reichenbach | March 1991 issue

• UW Magazine Facebook
• Jump To Comments

K ilroy was here ... and there ... and everywhere. Anyone old enough to have experienced the American landscape between 1942 and 1956 remembers that Kilroy left his name on rocks, bridges, buildings and—during World War II and the Korean War—even on walls behind enemy lines.

Kilroy may be history but today, in America’s inner cities, there are still graffiti scrawls “behind enemy lines.” Some gang graffiti serves as a billboard announcing to streetwise cognoscenti that “I sell drugs here” or “I shoot people who don’t belong here” or a warning that “You are passing into enemy territory.”

Other gang-related scrawls are simply expressions of a basic adolescent urge to establish groups and set goals. A list of names or nicknames (called “tags” in graffiti culture), for example, may simply mean “We hang out together,” says a UW expert in graffiti.

Whether it’s Kilroy’s name or a gang member’s “tag,” the writers are exercising one of graffiti’s most important functions: providing people with little access to other means of public expression the opportunity to be heard, explains Rick Olguin. An American ethnic studies professor, Olguin became interested in the subject as a graduate student at Stanford University and is now writing a book about graffiti.

A 1976 photo shows both Anglo and Hispanic anti-war graffiti.

Actually, G.I.s and gang members are relative latecomers to this ancient medium of communication, protest and occasionally genuine art. The catacombs under the city of Rome, for example, bear names and symbols left by persecuted first century Christians.

Olguin describes visiting a ruin in Greece where one of the now-scattered building blocks bears a mark scratched into it by a stonemason 3,000 years ago. “At that moment something really clicked about this universal urge to write graffiti, or for people to write their initials in fresh cement or carve their name in a tree or a  desk,” he recalls. “Fundamentally, graffiti is almost the universal way in which people express a fairly universal drive to be remembered.” And because it represents a universal human desire, Olguin deplores society’s tendency to “trivialize ” modern graffiti by “collapsing all of it into gang behavior.”

Olguin’s views notwithstanding, Sue Honaker, Seattle’s anti-graffiti coordinator, doesn’t hesitate to label as “graffiti vandals” the people who decorate walls that don’t belong to them.

Honaker can’t estimate how much graffiti removal costs the city of Seattle each year. But, she points out, the Seattle Public Library one year spent half its annual maintenance staff hours removing graffiti and Metro spent “well over $500,000” in one year cleaning graffiti from buses.

New York City spends $52 million annually in the battle against graffiti on its more than 6,000 subway cars, according to U.S. News and World Report . Last year, Time reported that annual U.S. costs run “into the billions.” Jay Beswick, founder of the National Graffiti Information Network, said in the same report that Los Angeles spends $28 million annually dealing with graffiti and Southern California cities together incur costs of $100 million.

“ It's not a question of art. It could be the Mona Lisa, but if it's on the side of your house, your rights are violated. ”

Sue Honaker, Seattle's anti-graffiti coordinator

“Basically, graffiti is any scrawl, writing, picture or marking on someone else’s property without their consent,” says Honaker, a 1984 UW alumna. “I don’t think there’s a person alive who has a problem with art,” she adds. “It’s not a question of art. It could be the Mona Lisa, but if it’s on the side of your house, your rights are violated.”

Olguin agrees that graffiti that encourages criminal behavior should be obliterated. But, he adds, society often fails to recognize that graffiti can also be art and a serious expression of cultural roots. “Not quite as complex as Navajo blanket weaving, but it has that kind of characteristic.”

Among Puerto Rican youth in New York City, for example, a master graffiti painter will draw out the mural and a group of apprentices, many of whom aspire to master status themselves, complete the project under his direction, says Olguin. “They’re seriously involved in learning a cultural aesthetic form of representation. It’s not just pure vandalism. … It’s art school just like Rubens.”

Olguin also ties graffiti to what he calls the “aesthetic of no empty space ” found in many cultures around the world. The walls of whole villages in remote parts of West Africa are painted in mural fashion, he says, and traces of these traditional motifs can be identified in African-American graffiti. “If these (African village) people occupied these offices,” he notes with a gesture toward the pristine perimeter of his Padelford office, “none of these walls would be white.”

Graffiti style makes its way into the mainstream in the lettering of this Chicano preschool sign.

The same aesthetic of filling empty space is also characteristic of pre-Columbian cultures. Walls in the ancient city of Teotehuacan, which 1,200 years ago had a population of 100,000, were entirely covered in floral murals, Olguin observes. Pre-Columbian designs, such as the feathered serpent or the step-pyramid shape, can be found today in graffiti in Mexican-American sections of cities such as Los Angeles and Albuquerque.

Olguin also ties the psychological mechanisms behind graffiti to the practice of ritual scarification (including the up-to-date “ritual scar” of pierced earlobes). He also likens it to tattoos (which he calls “personal permanent graffiti”), and even the current craze for message-bearing T-shirts, which are “thoroughly painless and another place you see all kinds of graffiti.” All of those practices, he says, reflect a deep human need to control our surrounding space.

Honaker, whose view is less academic, divides the graffiti she sees into several categories, including bubble gum (“John Loves Mary”), religious (“Jesus Saves” or “Allah Saves”), political, cartoon, gang and satanic which, she adds, is sometimes accompanied by evidence of animal mutilations such as a beheaded cat.

Each type of graffiti tends to have its own symbols. Satanist and white supremacist graffiti may be accompanied by the names of heavy metal rock ·bands such as Black Sabbath, Guns and Roses, Metallica and URU, Olguin notes. The pentagram, a five pointed star within a circle, is also a satanist symbol.

Disembodied heads are another common graffiti motif, Olguin notes, of which Kilroy, with his head and hands showing above a horizontal line, is a prime example. Chicano youth currently favor a front-view face with a goatee and perhaps a mustache, sunglasses and a fedora. Sculptors have been making disembodied heads for centuries whenever they create busts, Olguin points out. “It’s sort of canonical.”

One mysterious symbol that has cropped up in Seattle recently is a “weird squiggle,” in Olguin’s words, that at first glance suggests an Asian language. But experts at the Jackson School of International Studies have not been able to identify it. Sometimes, upon close inspection, the images resemble Roman letters elaborated almost to the point of being illegible, much like some of the illuminated manuscripts of the Middle Ages, notes Olguin, who remains mystified about what the messages signify or who is writing them.

A 1990 mural in Albuquerque, New Mexico, painted to discourage drug use, employs street graffiti styles.

Contemporary writers of political graffiti have adopted 19th century anarchist symbols such as a black flag or the letter A inside of a circle, Olguin notes, although he doubts they understand classic anarchist philosophy. “To them, anarchy means ‘There are no rules,’ which is different from ‘There is no government,’ which is what anarchy is about.”

As is often the case in popular culture, California can be a trendsetter in graffiti. Corporate symbols, such as the familiar bell of the telephone company, the logo of the Los Angeles Raiders, or oil company logos are popular territorial markers for Los Angeles gangs, says Honaker. “El Norte” and “El Sur” are gang designations seen throughout Northern and Southern California respectively. Such designations, including the gang names Bloods and Crips, tend to make their way north. One of Olguin’s friends has seen the word “Surrenos” in a neighborhood in West Seattle, the mark of a group of kids from a neighborhood in southern Orange County.

In contrast to some cities, Honaker notes, only about two percent of Seattle’s graffiti is the work of true gang members. Olguin agrees that the percentage is small. Most gang-type work is “copy cat,” in Honaker’s words, but she declines to make public the clues that allow her to tell the difference.

If gang graffiti is an expression of “I belong,” hate graffiti is a statement of separation, Olguin says. “You get a real statement of identity, not through connection to a space but through definition of an out­group: ‘I am not gay’ … ‘I am not black’ … ‘I am not woman.”‘

The campus has seen a recent “flurry of really ugly racist stuff,” says Anne Guthrie, administrative manager in the UW’s facility management office. Guthrie ties the wave to a resurgence of racism both here and on American campuses in general. Official policy calls for the prompt removal of all graffiti, says Guthrie, but special efforts are made to remove racist and sexist scrawls within 24 hours.

A mid-1970s mural in San Diego that promotes the United Farmworkers has not been defaced by graffiti in more than 10 years.

Political graffiti is also popular on campus, and is usually aimed at political and military hot spots from El Salvador to the Middle East. Favorite locations seem to be the west wall of campus facing 15th Avenue N.E., the back wall of Kincaid Hall near the Burke Gillman Trail and “Red Square” near the Odegaard Undergraduate Library, Guthrie says. The stairwells from the Central Plaza Garage are another popular target.

To Guthrie’s knowledge, no tally is kept of how much money and staff time is spent removing campus graffiti. But, she points out, in an era of limited budgets, every dollar or hour devoted to graffiti removal is that much less available for other, badly needed, purposes.

Removal techniques and costs vary according to the surface and the kind of paint used. Concrete can be painted over, cleaned with high pressure water hoses or sprayed over with what Honaker calls a “slurry” that, in effect, applies a thin layer of new concrete.

Brick and marble surfaces are especially expensive to clean, Honaker notes, and often require the use of chemicals which pose an environmental threat when they make their way through storm drains into rivers or other bodies of water.

Like Olguin, Honaker spends considerable time on the street getting to know the youth who engage in the graffiti. She tries to “stay away from the punitive” and works hard to maintain good relationships with known graffiti vandals who keep her up to date on “what’s new on the street,” she says.

Her experience leads her to believe that graffiti vandalism is an essentially anonymous behavior which permits individuals to, in her words, “rile without risk.” Youngsters who have failed to attract approval through academic, social or athletic achievement can, through graffiti, command a moment in the sun, she notes. Take, for example, the New York City youth who slipped into a zoo at night and spray-painted graffiti on the back side of an elephant. “He had a good story to tell at school the next day,” Honaker notes.

Most youthful vandals are from the lower economic levels, Honaker says, but the activity also attracts affluent children who “put up graffiti or run with a tag team” as a way to add a sense of risk to otherwise orderly, safe lives. A “tag team,” she explains, often consists of an artist, a lookout, and someone adept at stealing paint—which can be a major undertaking and is often a point of honor in itself. “A good piece can take as many as 500 spray cans,” she adds.

Whenever possible Honaker tries to persuade the best of the painters to design and paint murals on walls offered for that purpose by Seattle business people. The city already boasts dozens of such productions.

“There’s a lot of really good talent out there,” she notes. “Good people who are misdirected.”

Olguin urges that we work harder to re-channel not just the art but also the energy of the youths who participate in it. These youngsters, with their graffiti and gang behavior, are exploring the limits of society’s rules, he notes. “It seems to me that (exploring these limits) is what entrepreneurial societies are all about, what aesthetically creative and dynamic societies are all about.”

At top: A 1990 photo of a retaining wall on Rainier Avenue South in Seattle that is covered with hundreds of “tags.”

Jean Reichenbach is associate editor of Col­umns.

Be boundless

Connect with us:.

© 2024 University of Washington | Seattle, WA

Graffiti Art: Why Graffiti Is Art And Not Vandalism

Although graffiti is generally considered to be a contemporary artform, it actually originated thousands of years ago. The earliest examples are things like cave paintings and inscriptions on ancient buildings in Egypt, Greece and the Roman Empire, with the word ‘graffiti’ itself stemming from the Italian word graffiato, meaning ‘scratched’. Yet as the art form has evolved, so have the connotations surrounding it, and at present, turning walls into canvases remains nothing more than vandalism according to US law.

Editorial Team , Oct 3, 2023

The debate over whether graffiti constitutes art or vandalism is incredibly complex, and depends on many factors, such as the location of a particular piece, and the quality and message of the design. There is no clear answer, and it’s easy to see both sides of the debate — after all, not everyone would be happy to have their property painted without their consent. On the flip side, it could also be argued that graffiti is an artist’s right to freedom of expression, and a way to ensure their work can be appreciated by those beyond the artistic elite.

However, we champion plenty of graffiti artists here at ArtLife, and even though there will always be exceptions, we stand firm that graffiti is deserving of its status as art for the following reasons:

Graffiti Takes Technical Skill

A great deal of talent is required to create brilliant artwork, and graffiti is no exception. In fact, there are plenty of street artists whose work clearly displays an immense level of technical ability. Take Retna, for example, who has gone beyond painting walls to cover entire buildings with his distinct calligraphic style, such as the 21-story Cuauhtemoc building in Mexico City. This unbelievably complex achievement required a great deal of strategic planning and real imagination to pull off, as well as a clear understanding of color and composition. This may not be true of all graffiti creations — many critics would argue that you don’t need talent to paint a scruffy tag. However, art is subjective, and there will always be ‘good’ and ‘bad’ artists within every movement. Those like Retna prove that, as in any art form, graffiti can be exceptional when created by someone with impressive skill.

It Exemplifies Freedom Of Expression

Art ceases to be art without freedom of expression, and perhaps graffiti exercises this right more than any other medium. Taking creativity to the streets means that the artists don’t need to worry about gallery curators, critics or potential buyers, and can therefore be completely unrestrained, and even anonymous if they so choose. Status doesn’t matter, and the lack of limitations allow graffiti artists to break conventions and push boundaries to create even more exciting — and arguably more authentic — works of art.

Political And Social Themes Are Powerfully Represented

Many of the most renowned artworks make a powerful comment on the social and political issues of their time, and graffiti can make a huge impact in this respect. Just look at Banksy, who has become world-famous for his humorous and subversive commentaries like Love is in the Air, first painted on Jerusalem’s West Bank barrier in 2003 as a statement in favor of Palestinian rights. Similarly, Keith Haring was able to bring mass attention to the crack epidemic through his Crack is Wack mural, as well as homosexuality and the AIDS crisis. Plenty of aficionados would argue that it’s art’s duty to shed light on such topics, and given that these themes relate to ordinary people, perhaps it’s unsurprising that the most iconic examples were created on the streets the target audience live on.

Impressive Works Bring Drab Spaces To Life

As well as having meaning, art is also valued for its beauty, and there’s no denying how beautiful some graffiti can look, which is why street art tours are now so popular all over the world. Even though graffiti is generally free to access, more and more people are willing to pay to see some of the most magnificent works in the city of choice. Bold colours, shapes and patterns are key features of this art form, and when artists let their imaginations run wild, their creations instantly transform drab spaces into places people are excited to be. Seeing as art is used to decorate the walls of our homes, couldn’t it be argued that graffiti does the same to the walls outside?

Huge Sales Demonstrate Its Artistic Value

Anyone arguing that graffiti isn’t art may struggle to explain why people have paid so much for it in recent years. For example, Untitled by Jean-Michel Basquiat sold for a huge $110.5 million in 2017, the most expensive American painting ever to sell at auction at the time, while Banksy’s Girl with Balloon sold for $1.37 million. Other expensive pieces include Retna’s Untitled ($38,000) and Charlie Chaplin by Mr. Brainwash ($100,000). Not everyone would agree that an artwork’s value is determined by its price tag, however the fact that graffiti can sell for such high sums proves the respect and prestige it has generated within the art community, and it would therefore be entirely reductive to claim all graffiti is mere vandalism.

• Graffiti, its Significance and Drawbacks Words: 2003
• Street Art Graffiti as a Culture Words: 1110
• Graffiti as a Monumental Form of Art Words: 607
• Criminal Law – Is Graffiti a Crime or Not? Words: 1362
• Graffiti Evaluation and Labeling Theory Words: 557
• Graffiti: Whether It Is a Good or Bad Side of Society Words: 856
• Graffiti as a Cultural Phenomenon Words: 573
• Anthropology: Melbourne Graffiti Culture Comparing to New York Words: 2327
• Street Art, Graffiti, and Instagram Words: 608
• Art and Community Participation and Interaction Words: 1442
• The Power of Art in Society Words: 2488
• The Question of Ownership of Art Words: 1984
• What is Art? Finding a Definition Words: 1194
• Public Art and Communities’ Needs Words: 759
• The Representational Aspect of Art Words: 662
• The History and Concepts of Art Nouveau Words: 1106
• Art’ and Money Relations Words: 657
• The World of Art: Categories and Types Words: 1147
• The Role of Art in the World and Culture Words: 1472
• Arts Organizations Management Words: 2236
• Art: Dictionary, Societal, Personal Definitions Words: 1276
• Arts Education and Its Benefits in Schools Words: 729
• Cataloging Street Art: Main Features, Kinds, Shapes, and Sizes Words: 1757
• History of Ecology Topic in Art Words: 1655
• Interpreting Art: Term Definition Words: 2143

Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?

Introduction – what is graffiti.

Graffiti is a word used to describe any writing or images that have been painted, sketched, marked, scrawled or scratched in any form on any type of property. It can be a design, figure, inscription or even a mark or word that has been written or drawn on either privately held or government owned properties. While graffiti refers to an entire scribbling or drawing, graffito describes a single scribble. Graffiti can be any form of public marking which appears as a distinguishing symbol and most of the time it comes out as a rude decoration having the form of simply written words, elaborate and complicated wall paintings or etchings on walls and rocks.

Graffiti can also be described as an unauthorized drawing or inscription on any surface situated in a public area. Apart from this graffiti also includes hideous scribbles which we often find scrawled and painted on the fences of a house, in subways, bridges, along the sides of houses and other buildings and even on trains, buses and cars. Although some look like elaborate paintings most of them are garbage which appears to have been done by small children.

Graffiti vandalism has a number of forms. The most harmful and destructive of all are the gang graffiti and tags. The former are generally used by gang members to outline their turf or threat opposite gangs. These often lead to acts of violence. Tags represent the writer’s signature and can also be complicated street art. Conventional graffiti is often hurtful and malicious and generally the act of impulsive or isolated youths. Ideological graffiti is hateful graffiti which expresses ethnic, racial or religious messages through slurs and can cause a lot of tension among the people. Sometimes the graffitists also use acid etching where they use paints mixed with acids and additional chemicals which can rankle the surface making the etchings permanent. (Wilson, 52-66)

Graffiti – Art or Vandalism

Graffiti cannot be considered as a form of art since its basic difference from art is consent or permission. Although a number of people consider graffiti to be one of the numerous art forms, most of the times graffiti is considered as unwanted and unpleasant damage to both public and government properties. In modern times almost all of the countries in the world consider the defacing of public or government owned property with any type of graffiti without taking the owner’s permission or authorization to be an act of vandalism.

Had graffiti been created without destroying someone’s belongings then even it would have appeared artistic, due to their bright use of colors, and not as an act of vandalism. Graffiti scribblers often claim that in order to improve the look of the walls and fences of one’s property they make colorful paintings on them. But this is highly questionable since they almost never take the permission of the owner of the property before making their art, turning the entire thing into vandalism. They do not have the right to destroy or change the look of one’s property without taking their permission or authority. (Smollar, 47-58)

All throughout history people have considered graffiti to be an act of vandalism since it incorporates an illegal use of public and government property. Such an act is not only mutilation of property and an ugly thing but is also very expensive to remove. Although graffiti artists use their talents to share and express their feelings, until and unless graffiti is done on an area designated for it and by somebody authorized to do so, graffiti in any form will remain to be an act of vandalism and not art.

Graffiti done without proper authority cannot be considered as art since immature vandals simply use graffiti as a means to seek infamy. Graffiti is noting more than an irresponsible and dangerous form of art promoting gang activities and truancy. Thus, we can see that there is nothing artistic about graffiti vandalism. (Austin, 450-451)

The Problem of Graffiti

The problem both the government and the people of the world face due to graffiti is not at all a new one as it has existed for centuries, and sometimes it is even dated back to the Roman Empire and Ancient Greece. Some people even consider graffiti as an act of terrorism which is in its larval stage. The main problem with graffiti is that it is fundamentally unauthorized and is created by destroying someone’s possessions.

Today graffiti vandals use markers and spray paints as their most common medium for creating graffiti which makes it a much bigger problem. Painting over the graffiti is a costly affair which the owners of the property vandalized have to bear. Graffiti makers tend to remain unknown and thus, never even make an offer to pay for the repairs for vandalizing someone’s property which at times could even be thousands of dollars.

Sometimes due to graffiti a property’s value gets lowered by a huge rate due to some inane scribbling across the wall or fence of the property. Not only do these graffiti vandals scribble on the fences and walls of the property they sometimes even destroy them by breaking a window, door or fence just for the mere sake of art. They slash the seats of the cars, buses and trains for which the government has to pay. (Ley, 491-505)

Recent History

In the last few decades the problem of graffiti has become far reaching and has spread from the largest of cities to small localities. Graffiti should not be viewed as an isolated problem since it leads to other public disorders, like loitering, littering and even public urination, and crimes, since most of the time the graffiti scribblers unable to pay for the markers and paints shoplift the required materials. Since graffiti is considered to be a public disorder it is sometimes even perceived as a means of lowered quality of living in certain communities.

As graffiti is almost always associated with crimes, it tremendously increases the fear of various criminal activities among the families of a community. Sometimes graffiti vandals even arouse questions in the hearts of the citizens by making them feel that the government authorities are incapable of protecting them from graffiti scribblers, thus making them further insecure.

Graffiti vandals have no concern for public or government property near public areas and deface anything they can lay their hand on including blank walls, trees, alley gates, monuments, statues, utility boxes, schools, furniture in parks and streets, buses and bus shelters, pavements, railway areas, utility poles, telephone boxes, street lights, traffic signs and signals, inside and outside of trains, vending machines, vacant buildings, freeway, subways, bridges, billboards, parking garages, sheds and road signs.

In a nutshell, graffiti is present almost in any area that is open to the view of the general public. Since graffiti vandals even mess with street signs and traffic signals that help the drivers navigate through busy towns, graffiti poses a threat to the safety of those drivers. Sometimes due to depreciation in land value or excessive nuisance created by these graffiti vandals, families and businesses alike have to avoid certain areas and may even have to move out of it completely. People facing graffiti vandalism and living in areas with graffiti have to face reduced business activities since common people generally associate criminal activities with graffiti and are thus, afraid to set up businesses in those areas. (D’Angelo, 102-109)

Cost of cleaning

Prevention and cleaning up of graffiti is associated with high costs. The government and the public have to bear heavy costs in order to protect themselves from the graffiti vandals. Currently, it had been estimated that almost $22 billion is spent in the US each year for cleaning up and preventing various acts of graffiti. It was also found that England almost has to spend £26 million every year to remove graffiti which is present in almost 90% of the places in the nation.

It becomes the headache of the local authorities to clean up the graffiti and fix whatever has been destroyed as soon as possible. Councils and government officials have to maintain quick responsive units who can rapidly and effectively clean out graffiti and fix damages the instant such an act is reported. Government authorities and councils even have to take up a combination of protective, preventive and removal strategies to fight back graffiti vandalism, making the whole process extremely costly. But since protecting or deterring property will not completely eliminate graffiti, it is better to remove graffiti as soon as it is reported. (Ley, 491-505)

Negatives of Graffiti

Graffiti not only causes danger to the citizens of a neighborhood but it also creates a huge mess which government officials have to clean up by paying from the city funds. Since the government has to bear the cost for cleaning up graffiti, it has a direct impact on the budget of a city too. Government officials have to use a significant amount from the available city budget for fixing damages to public buildings, streets and other properties. A huge amount of money also goes in the eradication and prevention of graffiti vandalism since this requires special equipment, materials and trained labors, making the entire matter highly expensive and time consuming.

Graffiti also adversely affects the taxpayers who have to pay extra for fixing damages to public properties, circuitously, during their yearly property taxes. Sometimes businesses pass on the cost for cleaning graffiti off their property on to their customers, who have to make larger payments for their goods purchased, for no fault of theirs. (Rafferty, 77-84)

Further, graffiti also causes losses in revenues related to reductions in retail sales and the transit systems. Thus, the money that needs to be spent for cleaning up and preventing graffiti can also be used for improving an area and may also have other valuable uses. Since graffiti contributes to a reduction in retails sales, businesses plagued by graffiti is least likely to be sponsored by others. Also the general public will be afraid and will feel unsafe when entering a retail store scrawled all over with graffiti. Graffiti vandalism is not always simply limited to spray painting and destruction of property since the graffiti vandals often commit severe crimes like rape and robbery. Given that they are not caught or reported most of the times, graffiti vandals think that they can do anything and get away with it. (Austin, 450-451)

Graffiti is frequently associated with gangs, although graffiti vandals are not limited only to these gangs. It creates an environment of blight and intensifies the fear of gang related activities and violence in the heart of the general public. It has been seen that gangs often use graffiti as a signal for marking their own territory and graffiti also functions as a tag or indicator for the various activities of a gang. In those areas, where graffiti is extremely common, tag and gang graffiti is extremely widespread and also causes a lot of trouble.

Gangs commonly make tags using acid spray paints or markers on apartments and buildings and they serve as a motto or statement or an insult. Such graffiti also include symbols and slogans that are exclusive for a particular gang and may also be made as a challenge or threat for a rival gang. Not only are graffiti made to disrespect other gangs but sometimes racist graffiti is also scribbled on walls which creates a lot of racist tension among the people of certain communities.

Such activities shock the residents who are indirectly forced to move out of the areas for the safety of their families. Graffiti scribblers who are also members of a gang or part of its crew sometimes get involved in fighting, and every now and then a number of them end up dead due to these gang wars. The messages relayed through graffiti are taken very seriously by gang members and the threats are almost always acted upon. (Smollar, 47-58)

Another problem with graffiti is that although sometimes a single act of graffiti may not be a serious offence, graffiti itself has a cumulative outcome which makes it even more serious. Its original emergence in a particular neighborhood almost always attracts even more graffiti vandals. At certain areas graffiti tend to occur over and over. Graffiti offenders are inclined to attack those areas that are painted over to clean the graffiti. Such areas act as a magnet attracting graffiti offenders to commit re-vandalism repeatedly.

Some graffitists commit acts of vandalism since they are extremely stubborn and do so in order to fight an emotional and psychological battle with the city council and government officials. They deliberately commit graffiti vandalisms in order to establish their authority and claim over a specific area. Graffiti offenders do so with the intention to defy the government authorities. (Wilson, 52-66)

Sometimes graffiti is extremely repulsive and thus, gets people, especially teenagers into extremely bad habits. They stop caring about other people or the government and develop a tendency to scribble anywhere they find a blank space. They stop respecting people and their property and the kids even start to make graffiti on the desks and tables of their schools. Graffiti vandals have no concern for the people around them and thus, increase the pessimistic attitude of the neighborhoods around them.

Not only does graffiti lead to crimes but the scribblers also harbor disruptive anti-social feelings and behavior inside them. Sometimes teenagers and kids place graffiti on other people’s property without their authority or consent as a mischievous act, not realizing that they are committing a crime which is equivalent to vandalism and punishable by law. These juvenile scribblers are accountable for almost all of the graffiti we find on the buildings and streets and they do not even realize that their graffiti sometimes even becomes offensive and racist in nature. (Rafferty, 77-84)

Juvenile crime

City officials are also concerned about the fact that when juveniles take part in graffiti vandalism it may be their initial offence leading them into much more harmful and sometimes even sophisticated crimes. Not only does graffiti create a gateway for these juveniles into a world of crime, it can sometimes also be associated with truancy due to which the juveniles may remain uneducated their whole lives.

Deprived of a proper education these young minds get involved with alcoholism and drug abuse, thus leading to even severe problems. Adolescents and juveniles become astray sending a message to all that graffiti give rise to various criminal activities. In those communities where people gather in groups at street corners during late hours, it is easier for the drug peddlers to promote their products among the juveniles without being interrupted either by the authorities or residents. (Smollar, 47-58)

Graffiti as a Social menace

Graffiti is a huge problem since it contaminates the environment of a locality. It is undeniably a plague for our modern cities since it leads to visual pollution. City officials and councils have to spend huge sums in order to clean the ever present graffiti on the walls and fences. But even an expensive cleaning strategy is not but a useless and ineffective way to deal with these graffiti vandals since they almost always find a way to reproduce graffiti.

Graffiti vandalism is an extremely complex and multifaceted public disorder which does not have any easy solution. Not only is the cleaning of graffiti an expensive affair, it is also an extremely difficult one since it involves a lot of hard work. Sometimes graffiti damages certain surfaces to such an extent that they remain permanently impaired as the graffiti vandals change the entire nature of the surfaces they paint on, thus changing the nature and environment of the whole neighborhood. If an act of graffiti vandalism is left unchecked, then it may even lead to urban decay by causing further decline in property value and increasing fear in communities.

Most of the times when graffiti is cleaned or painted over a part of the damage always remains. For example, the paint does not match entirely or sometimes the area becomes darker than before, making the cover up completely visible. Graffiti has a significant impact on the overall appearance of a neighborhood and almost always lowers the quality of life of the entire community. When these graffiti scribblers destroy train terminal and subways they immediately create a harmful first impression on others, of that city, all over the country.

Graffiti simply does not give rise to maintenance issues but it gives rise to a complicated social problem, one that makes people feel extremely unsafe in their own neighborhoods. Communities become unlivable due to reduction in the beauty and pride of their neighborhood. Graffiti completely destroys the design and scenic beauty of the entire community and the hate messages conveyed through graffiti hurts the people of the community.

Sometimes graffiti becomes so offensive that it disturbs the local residents making it a concern for the entire community. The residents not only feel unsafe themselves but also fear for their children who have to grow up in such a disturbing and troublesome locality. Though graffiti may appear to be a radical form of art, to the people whose belongings have been disfigured by graffiti it is nothing more than an unwanted form of vandalism, which is not only distressing but also extremely difficult to remove. (Rafferty, 77-84)

Consequences of Graffiti

Since defacing of public or government property without the owners authority is considered to be vandalism, offenders are even punishable by the law of many countries. Graffiti is like a crime since its creators steal the rights of the owners of the property to have their possessions look well and clean. Police authorities all over the world refer to graffiti vandalism as criminal damage. Graffiti vandals should be made to face strict penalties which should not only include jail time but also large fines, so that they do not repeat their actions again. The offenders not only have to pay huge penalties but can even be prosecuted for their crimes.

The graffiti vandals should not only have to pay fines for destroying properties but should also be made to clean the graffiti themselves, as a punishment. Juvenile scribblers have to carry out community services as a punishment for their crime. Graffiti vandals who have committed serious crimes, like rape or murder can even be imprisoned for life. Not only do these graffiti vandals damage other people and government properties, they also risk their own lives in making the graffiti. They often display their stupidity by gambling with their lives while trying to create graffiti on trains and bridges. It has often been seen that these graffiti scribblers suffer from dreadful injuries and some even end up dead. (D’Angelo, 102-109)

Some countries do not view graffiti as a major problem since they may not have encountered widespread incidences of graffiti vandalism, which may have been focused on only a few relatively hot spot areas. But the areas facing the problem of graffiti vandalism realize its intensity. Since graffiti is a highly visible form of vandalism, it greatly affects the people living in that area since it completely changes their existing perception of the entire neighborhood.

Graffiti scribblers carefully choose those locations frequented by passersby so that they can be affected by the drawings and scribbling even more. Graffiti becomes a form of vandalism due to the medium the graffitists use to display their art which is almost anything other than a piece of canvas. Graffiti vandals somewhat force the viewers to view their work, even if they do not want to do so.

They have no consideration as to where they place their work or that it may become a problem for the general public or that the medium which they are using either belongs to the government or to an individual. All these add up to people’s perception which views graffiti as vandalism leading to urban decay and crime and causing depreciation of business and property value and in the growth of industries.

Works Cited

Austin, J. “Wallbangin’: Graffiti and Gangs in L.A.” American Ethnologist 29.2 (2004): 450-451.

D’Angelo, Frank J. “Fools’ Names and Fools’ Faces are Always Seen in Public Places: A Study of Graffiti.” Journal of Popular Culture 10.1 (2006): 102-109.

Ley, D. “Urban Graffiti as Territorial Markers.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 64.4 (2001): 491-505.

Rafferty, P. Discourse on Difference: Street Art/ Graffiti Youth.” Visual Anthropology Review 7.2 (2005): 77-84.

Smollar, J. “Homeless Youth in the United States: Description and Developmental Issues.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 39.5 (2006): 47-58.

Wilson, J. “Racist and Political Extremist Graffiti in Australian Prisons, 1970s to 1990s.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 47.1 (2008): 52-66.

Cite this paper

• Chicago (N-B)
• Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2021, October 29). Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism? https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/

"Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" StudyCorgi , 29 Oct. 2021, studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

StudyCorgi . (2021) 'Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism'. 29 October.

1. StudyCorgi . "Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" October 29, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" October 29, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

StudyCorgi . 2021. "Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?" October 29, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/.

This paper, “Graffiti: Is It Art or Vandalism?”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: October 29, 2021 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Home — Essay Samples — Arts & Culture — Graffiti — Essay On Graffiti Is Vandalism

Essay on Graffiti is Vandalism

• Categories: Graffiti Vandalism

About this sample

Words: 758 |

Published: Mar 14, 2024

Words: 758 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof. Kifaru

Verified writer

• Expert in: Arts & Culture Law, Crime & Punishment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

8 pages / 3521 words

2 pages / 1128 words

1 pages / 250 words

1 pages / 507 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Graffiti

Banksy. (2019). Banksy . Available at: 2021).

You have no doubt seen graffiti painted on buildings, bridges, and walls. Many people dismiss it as vandalism, but others consider it a legitimate form of art. In this essay, I will discuss the cultural and social significance [...]

Graffiti has long been a subject of contention, often occupying a gray area between vandalism and art. Historically, it has been viewed as an act of defiance, a rebellious expression carried out under the veil of anonymity. [...]

Contemporary art is the art of today, produced in the 21st century. It differs from the modern art, which is art of a style marked by a significant departure from traditional styles and values. Contemporary came after the modern [...]

Graffiti: a form of artistic expression or a destructive act of vandalism? This age-old debate has sparked controversy and divided opinions for decades. From the vibrant murals adorning city walls to the crude tags scribbled on [...]

When you think of graffiti what’s the first thing that comes to mind? Vandalism or street art? Most would say vandalism, but what makes the distinction between the two? The intention of the piece. There’s a difference between [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Graffiti – vandalism or acceptable street art?

Does graffiti symbolise a neighbourhood in decline, or should it be seen as valuable art? Join Labs panellists in the great graffiti debate

Graffiti ‒ an act of vandalism and a sign of a neighbourhood in decline?

Some would agree, but increasingly, this view is being challenged by the growing prominence of ‘street artists’ who create graffiti that many people would consider to be valuable works art.

Just last week, a collection of works by British graffiti artist Banksy sold for more than £400,000 at an auction in London, and graffiti stencils by the Russian street artist ‘Pavel 183’ have also sold for hundreds of thousands of pounds.

On the other hand, the usual perception of graffiti as a 'problem' persists: English Heritage reported recently that around 70,000 listed buildings are estimated to have been damaged in 2011 ‒ from, they cited, a combination of graffiti, urination and metal theft.

What are your views on graffiti? We asked Labs participants to have their say on the issue

Responses tended to represent one of two general opinions: panellists either felt that graffiti was largely an act of vandalism regardless of its type, or felt that in some situations, it can be acceptable and even seen as art. The responses we received made it clear that it is the content, style and message of the graffiti that matters.

Many people also suggested setting up designated areas to keep graffiti under control, while a few participants proposed new penalties for graffiti that is unmistakeably anti-social.

What do you think about graffiti? Join the debate by using Disqus below

Here's what our poll participants had to say...

1. All graffiti is vandalism

Argument 1: it makes an area look run-down.

“Graffiti makes an area look run-down and uncared for, somewhere where you would not like to shop or live ” Anon

“Even when done well, which is very rarely, it looks awful. It makes an area look run-down; if these people are so keen on doing it they should do so on their own homes ” Rosie S, Staffordshire

“It makes some areas look like war zones and the authorities should be more keen to remove it” Peter F, Surrey

Argument 2 - It is illegal

“ Painting on someone else's/public property is illegal . Graffiti is an expression by individuals who lack a sense of personal ownership” Anon

“It is done illegally. People think they can just do what they like and get away with it ” Julia F, Bicester

“No one has the right to deface public or private property ” Bob E, Shropshire

“Disfigures the object(s) on which it is placed. It is criminal damage ” Anon

Argument 3 - Others have to clean it up

“It invariably costs people, private companies and local authorities money to remove ” Wayne, Hertfordshire

“I have suffered from tagging on my property . There is very little art to it that I can see and it is expensive to clear up ” Anon

“It's mostly ugly and unsightly and damages someone’s property - plus the tax payer has to pay to clean it up ” Anon

“Costs taxpayers money to clear and gives a bad image to places. Usually the person causing the graffiti is not a tax payer so they contribute nothing! ” Aidan, Cornwall

2. Some graffiti is acceptable

Argument 1 - it can be artistic and improve the look of the area.

“Very occasionally, graffiti can be a mini work of art which brightens up an otherwise boring wall ” Anon

“Graffiti that is art, like well-drawn pictures that enhance a buildings plain wall is acceptable. If it is used to disguise an ugly piece of architecture or an eyesore is certainly going to enhance the area ” Mikki T, Scotland

“An artist that has made use of a run-down building to create their art is in fact using his/her environment to its full potential. It is giving the building of neglect a new purpose ” Anon

“ Sometimes graffiti is used to paint murals in connection with youth club work etc. and helps cover untidy areas. This can brighten up the village or town” Anon

Argument 2 - It can be good, dependent on context

“Graffiti artists are talented so I enjoy looking at their work when it's in a place where people can appreciate it and it looks good rather than someone just spraying the bus stop as they go by” Anon

“ It needs the right context and surroundings to earn respect in its own right, and not be seen as vandalism” Anon

“I think there needs to be a distinction between street art and graffiti or tagging . Street art can enliven drab areas of housing or the urban environment” Anon

“ 'Good' graffiti is art and can be enjoyed publicly. ‘Bad' graffiti is a picture of a phallus or a simple scribble, swear words or a pointless and usually misspelled note” Adam L, Lancashire

Argument 3 - It can carry an important message

“I can tolerate graffiti that has a sense of humour or irony and expresses a comment about society ” Anon

“I think it can be an important form or artistic expression, often for socially excluded groups . I also think it can give young people a voice” Anon

“ S ome graffiti can be very powerful , and a worthwhile means of self-expression” Anon

“I think it is a way for people to make their feelings clear - often people who feel that society is not listening to their vocal complaints” Mrs S, Northamptonshire

Follow and discuss: @YouGovLabs on Twitter

What do Green voters believe?

28% of Britons say the outcome of general elections has little to no impact on them personally

John Humphrys: What’s the real price of your package holiday?

John humphrys - back to beer and sandwiches at number 10, two thirds of britons say social media companies should be held responsible for posts inciting riots.

John Humphrys: Lock ‘em up? Or set ‘em free?

The public reaction to the 2024 riots.

John Humphrys - The Green Belt: to build or not to build?

Wales overwhelmingly rejects the 20mph speed limit.

Spray-painted subway cars, tagged bridges, mural-covered walls – graffiti pops up boldly throughout our cities. And it turns out: it’s nothing new. Graffiti has been around for thousands of years. And across that span of time, it’s raised the same questions we debate now: Is it art? Is it vandalism? Kelly Wall describes the history of graffiti.

Content produced by : TED Ed

• Other artists
• Contemporary art

• THE FOUNDATION
• Our partners
• LEGAL POLICIES

Follow Art Explora on social networks

Follow Art Explora news

2021 Art Explora

" * " indicates required fields

Inscrivez-vous pour profiter de tous les contenus proposés et enregistrer votre progression. It’s easy and free of charge!

• Skip to main content
• Skip to main navigation
• Awards & Honors
• News by topic
• News archives
• E-Newsletter
• Tuesday Newsday
• UCSC Magazine
• Administrative Messages

Home / 2021 / September / The writing on the wall: exploring the cultural value of graffiti and street art

The writing on the wall: exploring the cultural value of graffiti and street art

Doctoral candidate’s research interprets graffiti’s deeper meaning among Latinx and Black urban subcultures in Los Angeles

September 14, 2021

By Allison Arteaga Soergel

Ismael Illescas grew up admiring the graffiti around his neighborhood in Los Angeles. He had migrated to the city with his mother and brother from Ecuador in the 1990s as part of a large Latin American diaspora. In his urban environment, he found himself surrounded by beautiful, cryptic messages. They were written on walls and scrawled daringly across billboards. Little by little, he began to understand the meanings behind some of these messages. And, eventually, he started writing back. 

Illescas became a graffiti writer himself, for a time. He has since given it up, but he never lost his initial sense of curiosity and admiration. In fact, now, as a doctoral candidate in Latin American and Latino Studies, his dissertation research has taken him back to Los Angeles, where he gathered insights from current and former graffiti writers about how their work connects with concepts of art, identity, culture, and space. 

For those who create it, graffiti is an expression of identity and an outlet for creativity, social connection, and achievement, according to Illescas’s research. Some of the most popular graffiti yards in Los Angeles are abandoned spaces in communities of color that neither the economy nor the city has been willing to invest in, he says. But graffiti allows Black and Latino young men to transform these areas into spaces of congregation and empowerment. 

“In a city where these youth are marginalised, ostracized, and invisibilized, graffiti is a way for them to become visible,” Illescas said. “They feel that the system is against them, and upward social mobility is limited for them, so putting their names up around the city is a way for them to achieve respect from their peers and assert their dignity, and that doesn’t come easily from other places and institutions in society.”

Graffiti also offers what Illescas calls an “illicit cartography,” meaning that it can be read like a cultural map of the city. Graffiti styles in East Los Angeles, for example, reflect Mexican-American artistic influence that began with Pachuco counterculture in the 1940s. Rich graffiti writing traditions emerged, including “placas,” or tags that list a writer’s stylized signature, and “barrio calligraphy,” which blends rolling scripts with Old English lettering. In the 1980s, those traditions then incorporated colorful, whimsical East Coast influences.

“The result is that Los Angeles has a really unique graffiti style,” Illescas said. “Although outsiders might not necessarily notice it, you can easily see the Mexican-American artistic influence in the aesthetics, and that has become associated with Latinx urban identities.”

Graffiti is a multiracial and multi-ethnic subculture, and Illescas says his research aims to recognize the specific contributions of Black and Latinx communities. He’s also critically examining the subculture’s hypermasculinity and how that may limit its transformative potential.  And he’s particularly interested in shedding light on how race may affect public perceptions of graffiti.

Depending on the context, graffiti can either be publicly admired as “street art”—and valued up to millions of dollars—or it can be criminalized at levels ranging up to felony charges and years of jail time. In Los Angeles, a city which many researchers consider to be highly racially segregated, Black and Latinx communities, like South Central Los Angeles and East Los Angeles, are the places where graffiti is most likely to be severely criminalized and lumped together with gang activity, Illescas says.

Meanwhile, Illescas says street art is more likely to be recognized as such within arts districts, where officially sanctioned “beautification” projects use public art to attract more business and new residents, which can contribute to gentrification issues. And some of the most famous street artists are actually white men, like Banksy or Shepard Fairey, who have each attained international recognition for the artistic value of their illegal works. 

“This is where systemic racism occurs,” Illescas said. “You have some people who are more prone to being criminalized and severely punished for a very similar act, and that punishment falls mainly on young Black and Latino men.”

For these reasons, Illescas has found that many graffiti writers of color have mixed feelings about the growing public appreciation for street art. 

“On the one hand, it’s a capitalistic appropriation of transgressive graffiti into commercialized street art,” Illescas said. “But it also ties into the efforts of graffiti writers who have been pushing for years to decriminalize their art and demonstrate its artistic and social value and the types of knowledge that it brings with it.”

Street art has, in fact, already brought opportunities for some veteran Black and Latino graffiti writers, who told Illescas they had recently been commissioned for their art or had found jobs as tour guides in arts districts. But each of these artists got their start creating illegal graffiti tags. Illescas believes that decriminalization will ultimately require transforming public appreciation of street art into a deeper understanding of the expressive value of other forms of graffiti. And he hopes his research might aid in that process.  

“The graffiti that we see up in the streets may seem like an insignificant tag or scribble to some people, but there’s a lot of meaning behind it,” he said. “There needs to be a recognition that graffiti is actually a visual representation of someone’s identity, and it’s also potentially their starting point to a very meaningful artistic career.” 

University News

• University News Home
• Monthly Newsletter

Other News & Events

• Campus Calendars

• UCSC Chancellor
• Press Releases
• Contacts for Reporters
• Send us an email
• Report an accessibility barrier
• Land Acknowledgment
• Accreditation

Last modified: September 16, 2021 185.194.105.172

• A favor o en Contra
• Art & Culture
• The Pros and Cons of Graffiti: Evaluating the Artistic Rebellion

Graffiti has long been a controversial form of artistic expression. Originating in the streets as a form of rebellion, it has evolved into a recognized art form with its own unique style and culture. However, graffiti continues to divide opinions, with some praising its creativity and ability to transform urban spaces, while others condemn it as vandalism and destruction of public property.

In this article, we will delve into the pros and cons of graffiti, exploring the different perspectives surrounding this form of art. We will examine the positive aspects, such as its ability to bring marginalized voices to the forefront, add vibrancy to otherwise dull urban environments , and foster a sense of community. On the other hand, we will also discuss the negative consequences, including the cost of removal and damage to private property, as well as the potential for graffiti to perpetuate illegal activities and contribute to urban decay. By exploring both sides of the argument, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and implications of graffiti as an art form.

Is graffiti a form of artistic expression or vandalism?

The positive impact of graffiti on urban spaces and communities., the negative consequences of graffiti on public property and perception., exploring alternative approaches to graffiti: legal walls and street art festivals., frequently asked questions.

There is a longstanding debate surrounding graffiti and whether it should be considered a form of artistic expression or simply vandalism. Supporters of graffiti argue that it is a powerful way for marginalized communities to express themselves and bring attention to social and political issues. They view it as a form of rebellion against the mainstream art world and a way to reclaim public spaces .

On the other hand, opponents of graffiti argue that it is illegal and destructive, causing property damage and contributing to a sense of disorder and decay in urban areas. They believe that graffiti detracts from the beauty and cleanliness of cities, and that it should be eradicated and discouraged. They argue that graffiti artists should find legal avenues to express themselves, such as street art festivals or commissioned murals.

One of the main arguments in favor of graffiti is its potential as a catalyst for social change . Graffiti can draw attention to important social and political issues that are often overlooked or ignored. It allows individuals to express their thoughts and opinions in a public space, sparking conversations and raising awareness. Graffiti has been used to protest against government corruption , police brutality , and other forms of social injustice .

Additionally, graffiti can be seen as a way for marginalized communities to reclaim public spaces and make their voices heard. In areas where there is a lack of access to traditional art platforms, graffiti can provide a means for individuals to express themselves and share their stories. It can empower communities and give them a sense of ownership over their surroundings.

However, opponents argue that graffiti is a form of vandalism that defaces public and private property. It can be costly to remove and repair the damage caused by graffiti, and it can create a sense of disorder and neglect in neighborhoods. Some argue that graffiti contributes to a culture of lawlessness and can attract other forms of criminal activity.

Despite the controversy surrounding graffiti, it is undeniable that it has had a significant impact on the art world. Many graffiti artists have gained recognition and acclaim for their work, blurring the lines between street art and traditional art forms. Museums and galleries have started to exhibit graffiti pieces, recognizing their artistic value and cultural significance.

In conclusion, the debate over graffiti continues, with arguments on both sides of the spectrum. While graffiti can be seen as a form of artistic expression and a way for marginalized communities to have a voice, it is also viewed as vandalism and a threat to public and private property. The discussion surrounding graffiti raises important questions about the boundaries of art and the role it plays in society.

Graffiti, often seen as an act of rebellion and vandalism, has also garnered attention for its positive contributions to urban spaces and communities. While it is important to acknowledge the illegality of graffiti in many places, it is equally important to recognize the artistic value and social impact that it can have.

One of the main benefits of graffiti is its ability to transform otherwise mundane and neglected spaces into vibrant works of art. Graffiti artists often use their skills to beautify abandoned buildings, walls, and public spaces . By adding color, intricate designs, and meaningful messages, graffiti can breathe new life into urban environments , making them more visually appealing and engaging for residents and visitors alike.

Moreover, graffiti has the potential to foster a sense of community and pride among residents. When graffiti is created with the consent and support of the local community, it can serve as a powerful tool for self-expression and cultural representation . Graffiti murals depicting local history, social issues, and diverse identities can create a sense of belonging and solidarity among community members. It allows individuals to see themselves and their experiences reflected in public spaces, promoting inclusivity and cultural dialogue .

Additionally, graffiti can act as a platform for social and political activism . Many graffiti artists use their work to raise awareness about important social issues, such as inequality, discrimination, and environmental concerns. By utilizing public spaces as their canvas, these artists have the ability to reach a wide audience and spark conversations that may otherwise go unnoticed. Graffiti can serve as a powerful form of protest and a means for marginalized communities to have their voices heard .

It is important to note that the positive impact of graffiti is contingent on certain conditions. When graffiti is created without permission or in inappropriate locations, it can become a nuisance and detract from the overall appeal of urban spaces. Additionally, graffiti that promotes hate speech or offensive content should never be condoned or celebrated. It is crucial to distinguish between artful graffiti that adds value to communities and destructive vandalism that only serves to harm.

In conclusion, while graffiti may be a controversial topic, it is essential to recognize the positive impact it can have on urban spaces and communities. When created with care, consent, and a sense of purpose, graffiti has the ability to transform dull environments into vibrant works of art , foster community pride and inclusivity , and serve as a powerful tool for social and political activism .

While graffiti has its supporters, there are also many valid arguments against it. One of the main concerns is the damage it causes to public property. Graffiti often involves unauthorized markings on buildings, walls, and other surfaces, resulting in defacement and destruction of public spaces. This can lead to increased costs for communities, as they have to allocate resources to clean up and repair the damage caused by graffiti.

Furthermore, graffiti can contribute to a negative perception of neighborhoods and communities. When graffiti covers buildings and public spaces, it can create a sense of disorder and neglect. This can deter potential investors, businesses, and tourists from visiting or investing in the area. The presence of graffiti can also make residents feel unsafe and contribute to a decline in quality of life.

In addition, graffiti often involves trespassing and vandalism, which are illegal activities. Those who engage in graffiti may face legal consequences, including fines and even imprisonment. This not only disrupts the lives of those involved in graffiti, but also puts a strain on law enforcement resources.

Moreover, graffiti can be seen as a form of visual pollution. When graffiti covers public spaces, it can overshadow or even erase the original architectural and artistic elements of a place. This can be particularly damaging in historical or cultural areas, where graffiti can destroy or devalue significant landmarks and works of art.

Lastly, graffiti can perpetuate a culture of rebellion and disregard for authority. By promoting the defacement of public property, graffiti sends a message that it is acceptable to break the rules and ignore the consequences. This can have a negative impact on society as a whole, as it undermines the importance of respecting communal spaces and the rights of others.

While graffiti has long been associated with vandalism and illegal activities, there are alternative approaches that aim to transform it into a legitimate art form. One such approach is the establishment of legal walls , designated areas where graffiti artists can freely express their creativity without fear of legal repercussions. These walls provide a space for artists to showcase their skills and create vibrant, visually appealing murals.

Additionally, street art festivals have gained popularity as a way to celebrate graffiti as an art form. These events bring together graffiti artists from around the world to create large-scale murals and installations in public spaces. Street art festivals not only beautify communities but also foster a sense of community engagement and pride.

By embracing these alternative approaches, cities can harness the creative energy of graffiti artists and transform their urban landscapes into vibrant and visually stimulating environments. Legal walls and street art festivals provide an outlet for artistic expression and encourage dialogue between artists and the public.

However, there are also arguments against these alternative approaches. Some argue that by providing legal spaces for graffiti, it normalizes an illegal activity and sends mixed messages to society. They believe that graffiti should be strictly regulated and those who engage in it should face legal consequences.

Another concern is that allowing graffiti in certain areas may lead to an increase in vandalism and defacement of private property. Critics argue that legal walls may not be enough to contain graffiti artists, and they may take their art to unauthorized locations, causing damage to public and private spaces.

Furthermore, there is a debate about the artistic value of graffiti. While some view it as a form of creative expression and a way to reclaim public spaces, others see it as nothing more than vandalism and a blight on the urban landscape.

In conclusion, the establishment of legal walls and the organization of street art festivals offer alternative approaches to graffiti that aim to transform it into a recognized art form. These initiatives provide opportunities for artists to showcase their skills and create visually appealing murals. However, there are valid concerns about the normalization of an illegal activity and the potential increase in vandalism. The debate about the artistic value of graffiti continues, and it is up to society to determine how to approach and regulate this form of artistic rebellion.

What is graffiti? Graffiti is a form of art that involves writing or drawing on public walls or surfaces using spray paint or markers.

Is graffiti illegal? In many countries, graffiti without permission is considered illegal, as it is often seen as vandalism. However, there are some cities and communities that embrace graffiti as a form of artistic expression.

What are the pros of graffiti? Graffiti can be a powerful form of self-expression, allowing artists to convey messages and create visual impact in public spaces. It can also revitalize neighborhoods and contribute to cultural diversity.

What are the cons of graffiti? Graffiti can damage property, contribute to a sense of urban decay, and create a negative perception of an area. It can also be seen as a form of illegal activity and may lead to fines or legal consequences for the artists involved.

Si leer artículos parecidos a The Pros and Cons of Graffiti: Evaluating the Artistic Rebellion puedes ver la categoría Art & Culture .

Zeus' Stance: Was He for or Against Odysseus?

Pros and Cons of Nietzsche: Exploring the Controversial Legacy

Nietzsche's Stance on Realism: Unraveling the Philosopher's Views

The Enduring Discipline: Exploring the Pros and Cons of Philosophy

Debating Empiricism: Examining Arguments for and Against the Theory

Pros and Cons of Tarot: Unveiling the Mysteries of Divination

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Zeus' Stance: Was He for or Against Odysseus?

• Argumentative
• Ecocriticism
• Informative
• Explicatory
• Illustrative
• Problem Solution
• Interpretive
• Music Analysis
• All Essay Examples
• Entertainment
• Law, Crime & Punishment
• Artificial Intelligence
• Environment
• Geography & Travel
• Government & Politics
• Nursing & Health
• Information Science and Technology
• All Essay Topics

The Pros And Cons Of Graffiti

Graffiti, often seen as a form of urban art or vandalism depending on one's perspective, evokes both admiration and disdain in society. Like any form of expression, graffiti carries with it a set of pros and cons that shape public opinion and policy decisions.

One of the most evident pros of graffiti is its ability to beautify otherwise mundane urban landscapes. In neglected or forgotten areas, graffiti can breathe life into concrete walls, transforming them into vibrant murals that captivate passersby. These colorful displays of creativity often serve as a form of public art, enriching the cultural fabric of a community and providing a voice for marginalized groups. Additionally, graffiti can spark conversations about social issues, challenging viewers to reconsider their perspectives and engage in dialogue about topics such as politics, identity, and the environment.

However, alongside its artistic merits, graffiti also presents several cons, particularly in terms of property damage and legality. Many property owners view graffiti as a nuisance and a form of vandalism that detracts from the value of their buildings. The unauthorized nature of graffiti often leads to conflicts between artists and authorities, resulting in fines, legal repercussions, and the erasure of their work. Moreover, graffiti can contribute to a sense of urban decay, perpetuating stereotypes about crime and neglect in certain neighborhoods. This negative perception can hinder economic development and deter potential investors from revitalizing blighted areas.

Despite these challenges, some argue that graffiti has the potential to foster a sense of community and empowerment among artists. By reclaiming public spaces and challenging traditional notions of art ownership, graffiti allows individuals to express themselves freely and connect with like-minded individuals. In this sense, graffiti serves as a form of grassroots activism, challenging authority and subverting mainstream cultural norms.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding graffiti is multifaceted, encompassing issues of artistic expression, property rights, and social responsibility. While graffiti has the power to beautify urban environments and spark meaningful conversations, it also raises concerns about vandalism and legality. Finding a balance between artistic freedom and civic responsibility is essential in navigating the complex landscape of graffiti culture. Ultimately, whether one views graffiti as a blight on society or a beacon of creativity depends on individual perspective and the broader societal context in which it exists.

Related Essays

• Pros And Cons Of Graffiti Art
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Pros And Cons
• Pros And Cons Of C. P. Sports Lifting Traps
• Pros And Cons Of Abolish Death Penalty
• Microchip Pros And Cons

Boy Scouts Pros And Cons

The Boy Scouts of America has been a longstanding organization that has helped shape the lives of countless young boys over the years. With its focus on leadership, outdoor skills, and community service, the Boy Scouts offer a unique opportunity for boys to learn and grow in a supportive environment. However, like any organization, the Boy Scouts also have their pros and cons. One of the biggest pros of being a Boy Scout is the emphasis on leadership development. Through various activities such as camping trips, community service projects, and merit badge programs, boys are given the opportunity to take on leadership roles and learn valuable skills that will benefit them throughout their lives. This focus on leadership helps boys build confidence, communication skills, and the ability to work well with others. Another pro of the Boy Scouts is the emphasis on outdoor skills. Boys are taught how to navigate the wilderness, build a fire, tie knots, and other essential outdoor skills. These skills not only help boys become more self-sufficient and confident in the outdoors, but they also foster a love and appreciation for nature. In a world where many children spend more time indoors on screens, the Boy Scouts provide a valuable opportunity for boys to connect with the natural world. However, there are also some cons to consider when it comes to the Boy Scouts. One of the main criticisms of the organization is its history of excluding certain groups, such as girls and LGBTQ individuals. While the Boy Scouts have made efforts to become more inclusive in recent years, there are still some who feel that the organization has not gone far enough in addressing these issues. This lack of inclusivity can be a barrier for some boys who may not feel welcome or accepted in the Boy Scouts. In conclusion, the Boy Scouts of America offer many benefits to young boys, including leadership development, outdoor skills, and a sense of community. However, there are also some drawbacks to consider, such as the organization's history of exclusion. Ultimately, the decision to join the Boy Scouts should be based on the individual boy's interests and values, as well as the values of the local troop. With the right support and guidance, the Boy Scouts can be a positive and enriching experience for many young boys....

• Existentialism and Modern Life
• Celebrations & Rituals

Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase

The Louisiana Purchase stands as one of the most monumental events in American history, marking a significant expansion of the young nation's territory. This historic acquisition occurred in 1803 when the United States, under the leadership of President Thomas Jefferson, purchased approximately 828,000 square miles of land from France for $15 million. While the Louisiana Purchase brought numerous benefits to the United States, it also presented several challenges and drawbacks. One of the foremost advantages of the Louisiana Purchase was the vast expanse of land it added to the United States. This acquisition effectively doubled the size of the nation overnight, providing ample room for westward expansion and the opportunity for increased economic growth. The newly acquired territory encompassed fertile land, rich natural resources, and valuable waterways, laying the foundation for future agricultural and commercial development. Additionally, the acquisition of key port cities such as New Orleans facilitated trade and navigation along the Mississippi River, bolstering the country's economic prospects. Furthermore, the Louisiana Purchase solidified American control over the Mississippi River, a vital waterway for trade and transportation. By gaining control of this strategic river, the United States could more effectively navigate goods to market and maintain access to important trade routes. This enhanced access to the Mississippi River not only facilitated domestic trade but also strengthened the country's position in international commerce, contributing to its emergence as a global economic power. However, despite its many benefits, the Louisiana Purchase also posed significant challenges and drawbacks for the United States. One notable concern was the issue of governance and administration over the newly acquired territory. The vast size of the Louisiana Territory presented logistical difficulties in terms of establishing effective governance, maintaining law and order, and integrating the diverse population living within its borders. Additionally, the acquisition of such a large territory raised questions about the expansion of slavery and the balance of power between free and slave states, ultimately fueling tensions that would culminate in the Civil War. In conclusion, the Louisiana Purchase brought about both opportunities and challenges for the United States. While it provided vast new lands for expansion, facilitated economic growth, and secured strategic control over vital waterways, it also presented governance and political challenges, as well as intensified debates over issues such as slavery and national identity. Despite these complexities, the Louisiana Purchase remains a pivotal moment in American history, shaping the nation's trajectory and laying the groundwork for its future development and expansion....

• History of the United States
• Global Economy
• Environment Problems

The Pros And Cons Of Jigsaw

Jigsaw puzzles have been a beloved pastime for centuries, captivating people of all ages with their ability to challenge and entertain. However, like any activity, they come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. One of the most prominent benefits of jigsaw puzzles is their ability to improve cognitive skills. Assembling a puzzle requires critical thinking, problem-solving, and spatial awareness, which can help enhance memory and mental agility. Moreover, the process of searching for and fitting together pieces stimulates the brain, promoting neuroplasticity and potentially reducing the risk of cognitive decline in older individuals. Another advantage of jigsaw puzzles is their therapeutic value. Many people find solace in the focused concentration required to complete a puzzle, which can help alleviate stress and anxiety. Additionally, the sense of accomplishment that comes from finishing a puzzle can boost self-esteem and confidence, making it a rewarding activity for individuals seeking relaxation and emotional well-being. On the flip side, one of the drawbacks of jigsaw puzzles is their time-consuming nature. Depending on the size and complexity of the puzzle, it can take hours, days, or even weeks to complete. This prolonged commitment may not be feasible for individuals with busy schedules or limited free time, making it a less accessible leisure activity for some. Furthermore, jigsaw puzzles can be frustrating, especially when faced with a particularly challenging section or missing pieces. The inability to progress can lead to feelings of disappointment and disillusionment, detracting from the enjoyment of the experience. Additionally, storing and organizing puzzles can be cumbersome, requiring ample space and careful handling to prevent damage or loss. In conclusion, jigsaw puzzles offer a variety of benefits, including cognitive stimulation and emotional relaxation. However, they also pose challenges such as time consumption and frustration. Ultimately, whether the pros outweigh the cons depends on individual preferences and priorities....

• Christianity
• Positive Psychology and Well-being

Gmo Pros And Cons Essay

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of contentious debate in recent years, sparking discussions about their safety, ethical implications, and impact on the environment and human health. Proponents argue that GMOs hold the key to addressing global food security challenges, increasing crop yields, and reducing the need for harmful pesticides. However, opponents raise concerns about the potential long-term health risks associated with GMO consumption, the loss of biodiversity, and the corporate control of the food supply. One of the primary arguments in favor of GMOs is their potential to alleviate hunger and malnutrition worldwide. By engineering crops for traits such as resistance to pests, diseases, and harsh environmental conditions, GMOs offer the promise of higher yields and more resilient food sources. In regions where food scarcity is a pressing issue, such innovations could significantly improve agricultural productivity and ensure a more stable food supply for vulnerable populations. Furthermore, proponents assert that GMOs have the potential to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture by decreasing the reliance on chemical pesticides and herbicides. By incorporating traits that confer resistance to pests or tolerance to specific herbicides, genetically modified crops can help farmers minimize the use of conventional agricultural chemicals, thereby reducing pollution and mitigating harm to non-target species. On the other hand, critics of GMOs raise valid concerns regarding their safety for human consumption and their potential to harm ecosystems. While regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EPA maintain that GMOs on the market are safe for consumption and the environment, skeptics argue that long-term effects have not been adequately studied. Additionally, the concentration of GMO seed patents in the hands of a few multinational corporations raises concerns about corporate control over the food system and the loss of biodiversity. In conclusion, the debate surrounding GMOs is multifaceted, with valid arguments presented on both sides. While proponents highlight the potential of GMOs to address pressing global challenges such as food insecurity and environmental degradation, opponents emphasize the need for caution and thorough scientific evaluation to ensure the safety of these technologies. Moving forward, it is essential to continue research into the long-term effects of GMOs while implementing robust regulatory frameworks to mitigate risks and maximize benefits for society and the environment....

• Sustainable Economic Practices
• Climate & Weather

Pros And Cons Of Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden remains one of the most polarizing figures in recent history due to his actions as a whistleblower. On one hand, Snowden is hailed as a hero for his courage in exposing the extensive surveillance programs conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA). His revelations sparked crucial debates about privacy rights and government transparency. However, on the other hand, Snowden is criticized for his methods, which some argue endangered national security and violated the oath of secrecy he took as a government contractor. This essay will delve into the pros and cons of Edward Snowden's actions, examining both the positive and negative impacts of his whistleblowing. One of the most significant pros of Edward Snowden's actions is the spotlight he shone on the NSA's mass surveillance programs. Through his leaks to journalists in 2013, Snowden revealed the extent to which the NSA was collecting and analyzing data on millions of people, both within the United States and around the world. This disclosure sparked a global conversation about the balance between national security and individual privacy. As a result, there have been legislative and policy changes aimed at increasing transparency and oversight of government surveillance activities. Snowden's actions also prompted advancements in encryption technology and greater awareness among the public about the importance of protecting personal data from government intrusion. However, Snowden's whistleblowing also has its cons, particularly concerning national security. Critics argue that by leaking classified information, Snowden compromised intelligence-gathering methods and endangered the lives of intelligence operatives and military personnel. The information he disclosed could potentially aid adversaries in evading detection and thwarting counterterrorism efforts. Additionally, Snowden's decision to flee to Russia, where he was granted asylum, raised suspicions about his motives and allegiances. Some view his actions as traitorous, as he violated his duty to protect classified information and instead chose to disclose it to foreign governments and the public. In conclusion, the case of Edward Snowden presents a complex ethical dilemma with both pros and cons. While his whistleblowing brought much-needed attention to government surveillance practices and sparked important debates about civil liberties, it also raised concerns about the potential risks to national security. Whether Snowden is ultimately viewed as a hero or a traitor depends largely on one's perspective and values regarding transparency, privacy, and the role of government in safeguarding its citizens. Nevertheless, his actions have undoubtedly left a lasting impact on the discourse surrounding surveillance and privacy rights in the digital age....

• Cybersecurity and National Security
• Privacy & Security
• Terrorism & Political Violence

Pros And Cons Of Gastric Bypass Surgery

Gastric bypass surgery, a type of weight-loss surgery, has gained popularity as a solution for individuals struggling with obesity and related health issues. Like any medical procedure, it comes with both advantages and disadvantages that individuals should carefully consider before making a decision. One of the significant advantages of gastric bypass surgery is its effectiveness in achieving significant weight loss. By reducing the size of the stomach and rerouting the digestive system, gastric bypass surgery can help patients lose a substantial amount of weight, leading to improvements in overall health and a reduced risk of obesity-related conditions such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea. For many individuals who have struggled with obesity for years, gastric bypass surgery offers a chance for meaningful and long-lasting weight loss. Furthermore, gastric bypass surgery can lead to improvements in quality of life for many patients. Beyond the physical benefits of weight loss, individuals often experience increased mobility, reduced joint pain, and improved self-esteem and confidence. The ability to engage in activities that were once challenging or impossible due to excess weight can have a profound impact on an individual's overall well-being and mental health. However, gastric bypass surgery also has its drawbacks and potential risks that should not be overlooked. One of the main concerns is the risk of complications both during and after surgery. Like any surgical procedure, gastric bypass surgery carries risks such as infection, blood clots, and adverse reactions to anesthesia. Additionally, some patients may experience complications specific to gastric bypass surgery, such as dumping syndrome, nutritional deficiencies, and gallstones. Another consideration is the lifestyle changes required after gastric bypass surgery. Patients must adhere to strict dietary guidelines, including consuming smaller portion sizes and avoiding certain foods that can cause discomfort or complications. Moreover, patients need to commit to long-term lifestyle changes, including regular exercise and ongoing medical monitoring, to maintain weight loss and prevent complications. In conclusion, gastric bypass surgery offers significant benefits for individuals struggling with obesity, including effective weight loss and improvements in overall health and quality of life. However, it is essential for patients to weigh these potential benefits against the risks and lifestyle changes associated with the procedure. Ultimately, the decision to undergo gastric bypass surgery should be made in consultation with healthcare professionals and based on a thorough understanding of the pros and cons....

• Health Care
• Public Health Issues
• Global Health Challenges
• Nutrition & Dieting

The Pros And Cons Of The Battle Of Gettysburg

Battles throughout history have been pivotal moments that shape the course of nations and societies. They are often the culmination of tensions, conflicts, and ambitions. While battles bring about significant changes, they come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. One of the foremost pros of engaging in battle is the potential for decisive outcomes. Battles offer a platform for conflicting parties to resolve their differences, establish dominance, or defend their principles. For instance, the Battle of Gettysburg during the American Civil War marked a turning point as the Union forces emerged victorious, halting the Confederate advance into Northern territory and boosting Union morale. Thus, battles serve as catalysts for significant historical shifts. Additionally, battles can foster a sense of unity and camaraderie among those involved. Soldiers often develop strong bonds with their comrades as they face adversity together on the battlefield. These bonds transcend individual differences and can forge lifelong friendships. The shared experiences of hardship and triumph create a profound sense of solidarity among soldiers, contributing to a cohesive fighting force. On the flip side, battles exact a heavy toll in terms of human lives and suffering. War casualties, both military and civilian, are an inevitable consequence of armed conflict. The Battle of Stalingrad during World War II, for example, resulted in staggering casualties on both the German and Soviet sides, with estimates reaching over two million deaths. Such loss of life leaves a lasting scar on societies and reminds us of the human cost of war. Furthermore, battles often lead to widespread destruction and devastation. The physical landscape bears the brunt of military engagement, with cities, towns, and infrastructure becoming casualties of war. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II illustrates the catastrophic impact of battles on civilian populations, causing immense loss of life and long-term environmental damage. In conclusion, battles have played a significant role in shaping the course of history, with both positive and negative consequences. While they offer opportunities for decisive outcomes and foster unity among participants, battles also exact a heavy toll in terms of human suffering and destruction. Understanding the pros and cons of engaging in battle is crucial for evaluating the costs and benefits of armed conflict in the pursuit of various objectives....

Pros And Cons Of Street Smarts

Street smarts, also known as practical knowledge or common sense, are skills and abilities that are gained outside of a traditional classroom setting. While street smarts can be incredibly valuable in navigating real-world situations, they also come with their own set of pros and cons. One of the main advantages of having street smarts is the ability to adapt to new and unfamiliar situations quickly. Individuals with street smarts are often able to think on their feet and make decisions based on their instincts and past experiences. This can be especially useful in situations where traditional knowledge or rules may not apply, such as in emergencies or unexpected circumstances. Another benefit of street smarts is the ability to read people and situations accurately. Those with street smarts are often adept at picking up on subtle cues and body language, allowing them to assess a situation and respond accordingly. This can be particularly useful in social settings or when dealing with potentially dangerous individuals. On the other hand, one of the drawbacks of relying solely on street smarts is the potential for making impulsive or risky decisions. While street smarts can be valuable in certain situations, they may not always be based on sound reasoning or logic. This can lead to errors in judgment or missed opportunities for learning and growth. Additionally, individuals who rely heavily on street smarts may struggle in more structured or academic environments. While practical knowledge is important, it is also essential to have a solid foundation of theoretical knowledge to fully understand complex concepts and make informed decisions. Without this balance, individuals may find themselves limited in their ability to progress in certain fields or industries. In conclusion, street smarts can be a valuable asset in navigating the complexities of the real world. However, it is important to recognize the limitations of practical knowledge and strive for a balance of both street smarts and book smarts. By combining these two types of intelligence, individuals can maximize their potential for success in a variety of situations and environments....

• Social Issues

Can't find the essay examples you need?

Use the search box below to find your desired essay examples.