Asia Pacific Guide to Lending and Taking Security

Hong kong sar, select a topic.

  • Related Publications
  • 1. Are there any classes of unsecured and unsubordinated creditor whose claims against a debtor would rank equally with or above those of the debtor’s secured creditors?
  • 2. May security given by a company rank in a specified order so as to secure liabilities owed to different creditors of the company in that order and, if that is not possible, is it viable for parties to enter into a contractual arrangement for the purposes of moderating this order?
  • 3. Does this jurisdiction recognise the concept of floating security or similar equivalent (i.e., security over a changing pool of assets that the company giving the security is free to buy, sell and generally deal with)?
  • 4. If so, are there any practical reasons why floating security is difficult to take, maintain or enforce?
  • 5. May security be granted to a trustee to be held on trust for the lenders from time to time, in such a way that a change of lenders does not require new security to be taken?
  • 6. If not, are there any techniques that can be used to achieve substantially the same effect (e.g., parallel debt structures)?
  • 7. If an agent holds security for the lenders rather than a trustee, is it necessary to take new security on a change of lenders? If no, why not? If yes, are there ways to structure the transaction to avoid such a requirement?
  • 8. Under the laws of this jurisdiction, is there any class of asset over which it is difficult or impossible to grant effective and perfected security, or in relation to which any security granted will be of limited effect?
  • 9. Under the laws of this jurisdiction, are there any restrictions on offshore lenders taking security over any class of asset?
  • 10. Must a company receive a corporate benefit in return for giving a guarantee or security? In particular, are there restrictions on the grant of upstream and cross-stream guarantees and security? If yes, briefly what is the effect of these laws?
  • 11. What type of security interests does your jurisdiction recognise, e.g., pledge, charge, mortgage, hypothecation? In relation to each type of security interest, please state the formalities required to create and perfect that security.
  • 12. Are there any registration, translation or notarization requirements in relation to security, guarantees, subordination or intercreditor documents?
  • 13. Are there any stamp, documentary, registration, notarization or other taxes, duties or fees chargeable in respect of security, guarantees, subordination or intercreditor documents? If yes, what are the amounts and when are they payable?

Secured creditors generally stand outside the order of priority of payments because they are entitled to be paid from the proceeds of their security. The exception is a creditor secured by a floating charge (discussed in the answer to question 3 of this section). Creditors secured by a floating charge rank below preferential creditors (e.g., employees and the government).

Yes, it is possible to contractually provide for a specified order of priority among different creditors. This is usually effected by the creditors and the debtor entering into a subordination agreement or an intercreditor deed.

Yes. A floating charge allows the chargor to continue to deal with the charged assets in its ordinary course of business until the charge “crystallizes” into a fixed charge over the assets in existence at the point of crystallization, usually on a specified crystallization event.

There are certain issues that a security holder needs to be aware of when taking a floating charge as security. On the insolvency of the chargor, the security granted by a floating charge ranks behind all fixed charges and behind the rights of certain preferential creditors (see the answer to question 1 of this section). On a winding-up of the chargor, a floating charge that was created within 12 months, or, in the case of a charge that was created in favor of a person connected to the chargor, within two years, of the commencement of the winding-up is invalid except to the extent of new consideration from the chargee, if any, unless it is shown that the chargor was solvent immediately after the creation of the floating charge.

However, contractual protections can be included in security documents to control and to mitigate against these types of risks, including the ability to automatically crystallize a floating charge into a fixed charge immediately on the occurrence of certain events (e.g., where insolvency proceedings against the chargor have commenced or where the lender considers that the assets subject to the floating charge may be in danger of being seized or otherwise be in jeopardy). On crystallization, a floating charge becomes a fixed charge and ranks as a fixed charge. This means that it would rank behind an earlier fixed charge but it would have priority over subsequent fixed charges and floating charges.

Not applicable. 

In Hong Kong secured lending transactions, the security agent usually acts as a trustee for the lenders, although the security agent may not necessarily be given the title of "trustee." If the security agent acts as an agent and not as a trustee, it would be necessary to consider the terms of the security agent's appointment and the agency provisions in the transaction documents to determine whether new security would be required on a change of lenders. Therefore, the simplest and most practical approach is for the security agent to always act as a trustee in relation to the security.

Security may be conferred over most assets that are likely to be of interest to lenders as security for a financing transaction. However, lenders should note the following:

  • Future assets (i.e., those not in existence at the time of entering into the security document) may only be made the subject of equitable security, such as a charge, and not legal security, such as a legal mortgage. In practice, the distinction is unlikely to be significant.
  • For a charge to be fixed (rather than floating), it is advisable for  a lender to ensure that it exercises actual control over the charged assets so that the chargor is not permitted to freely deal with the assets as though they were not subject to the fixed charge. Otherwise, the security may be recharacterized as a floating charge. In practice, it is often difficult to take a fixed charge over inventory or trade receivables if they are trading assets of the chargor because the taking of a fixed charge is likely to be strongly resisted by a chargor.
  • Where security is taken over contractual rights, the underlying contract giving rise to the assigned rights must be examined to ensure that those contractual rights can be made the subject of security. Prohibitions on the assignment of those rights will invalidate any purported security over them. In addition, rights under contracts that are "personal" to the contracting parties (e.g., an employment contract) are not assignable.
  • In some cases, the involvement of a third party may be required before effective security can be granted. For example, it may be necessary to obtain a waiver or consent to the creation of the security from a contract counterparty.
  • In the case of land in Hong Kong, it is necessary to consider the land grant conditions to determine whether the grant of security over land is permitted or subject to any restrictions. The land grant conditions may prohibit the creation of security over the land (even where security is granted to finance the land acquisition cost) or may otherwise limit the persons to whom security may be granted.  In addition, the land grant conditions in respect of certain Hong Kong real property may contain restrictions on alienation that require, for example, specific consents to be obtained from the Hong Kong government or a government-linked entity prior to security being created in favor of a lender. In those cases, the consent may limit the maximum amount that may be secured by the relevant security.
  • In the case of shares in a Hong Kong company, it is necessary to consider whether the articles of association of the company impose any restrictions on the grant of security over, or on the transfer of, those shares. The effectiveness of the security or a lender's rights to enforce that security may be compromised if the restrictions in relation to the transfer contained in the articles of association are not first altered or disapplied, or if any required consents are not obtained.
  • As a matter of public policy, generally, it is not possible to assign (by way of security) a bare right to sue or litigate.

Directors of a Hong Kong company have a common law duty to act in the best interests of the company and to exercise powers and to take actions that benefit the company commercially. The Companies Registry of Hong Kong (" Companies Registry ") has issued nonstatutory guidelines that outline general principles for directors in the performance of their functions that embody the requirement for directors to act in the best interests of the company.

When considering whether a company should provide a guarantee or security, the directors must therefore consider whether any commercial benefit will accrue to the company from the provision of that guarantee or security.

Generally, Hong Kong law does not recognize the concept of a group benefit. When a parent company gives a guarantee or grants security in respect of a subsidiary's obligations, the commercial benefit to the parent can be clearly established. However, when a subsidiary company gives a guarantee or grants security in respect of its parent's obligations or the obligations of another subsidiary of its parent (i.e., a "sister" company), it is often more difficult to establish what the commercial benefit is to the subsidiary.

Whether a company derives a commercial benefit from providing a guarantee or security is a factual matter for consideration in each particular case however, practical steps can be taken to reduce the risk of commercial benefit arguments being successfully raised by the most likely objectors (the company's shareholders and creditors). Assuming a guarantee or security is proposed to be granted by a solvent company, two key steps are obtaining the unanimous approval of the company's shareholders to the giving of the guarantee or the granting of the security and obtaining a statement from the company's directors that the company will not be unable to pay its debts as a result of the giving of the guarantee or the granting of the security. This will also protect the guarantee or security from being subsequently challenged as unenforceable on the basis that, for example, the directors used the powers conferred on them for an improper purpose or for a purpose not authorized by the company's articles of association (i.e., not in the best interests of the company), provided that the lender/chargee does not have actual knowledge of that impropriety.

Lastly, there are general presumptions in law that allow parties to presume that the transactions undertaken by a Hong Kong company are not ultra vires acts.

Types of security interests

The types of security interests typically used in financing transactions in Hong Kong include:

  • For shares, a legal or equitable mortgage or an equitable charge.
  • For real property, a legal charge.
  • For other immovable assets: a fixed charge over specific assets.
  • For movable assets: a chattel mortgage, a floating charge, or a pledge  - note that under Hong Kong law, a "pledge" is a "possessory security" and can only be created over movable assets, but not over immovable assets or intangible assets.
  • For bank accounts, book debts and contractual rights (such as rights to insurance and rights to trade receivables), an equitable or legal assignment, or a charge.
  • Generally, a floating charge over all or certain classes of assets.

Formalities

Security over specified assets of a company incorporated in Hong Kong or a company registered under the CO as a "non-Hong Kong company" must be registered with the Companies Registry within one month of the creation of the relevant security. Otherwise, the security will not be enforceable against any liquidator or creditor of the security provider.

In addition, in the case of a legal charge over real property or any other security document affecting land, the security interest must also be registered within one month of its creation with the Land Registry of Hong Kong (" Land Registry ") to preserve its priority.

The registration of certain assets with other registries may also be necessary or advisable. See the answer to question 12 of this section for the registration requirements.

To perfect an assignment of debts and contractual rights, written notice of the assignment must be provided to the debtor or counterparty. For some classes of an asset (e.g., shares and other securities), it is common for lenders or security agents to hold in their possession and control any documents of title (e.g., title deeds), blank transfer forms and other ancillary documents (e.g., signed but undated resignation letters of the directors) to assist with the enforcement of the security and prevent unauthorized dealings by the chargor.

Security interests over real property must generally be made by way of deed and it is common for security over other kinds of assets to be made by deed.

If a document creates registrable security, it must be filed with the Companies Registry within one month of the date of its execution (and together with a certified translation, if the security document is not in Chinese or English). This registration requirement only applies to security created by companies incorporated in Hong Kong and any foreign company that is registered as a non-Hong Kong company (as referred to in the answer to question 11 of this section).

Where a foreign company (not a non-Hong Kong company) enters into a security document and the secured property is situated in Hong Kong, and the company subsequently becomes registered as a non-Hong Kong company under the CO, the registration of the security with the Companies Registry is required within one month of the date of the foreign company's registration as a non-Hong Kong company.

As mentioned in the answer to question 11 of this section, a legal charge over real property or any other security document affecting land must also be registered within one month of its creation with the Land Registry (and if the security document is not in Chinese or English, together with a Chinese or English translation to enable the Land Registry to determine whether the relevant registration requirements have been complied with).

Apart from the registration requirements referred to above, there may be different registration requirements in respect of certain types of assets (e.g., vessels and intellectual property) and in relation to different types of security providers (e.g., individuals).

There are no notarization requirements in relation to security, guarantee, subordination or intercreditor documents.

A registration fee of HKD 340 must be paid to the Companies Registry on the submission for the registration of each security document.

A registration fee of HKD 450 must be paid to the Land Registry on the submission for the registration of each security document (or HKD 230 if the amount or value of the consideration or value of the property or interest affected is less than HKD 750,000).

Other than the registration requirements and fees set out above and in the answer to question 12 of this section, no stamp duty or similar taxes or charges are payable in respect of security documents. However, in respect of a mortgage of shares in a Hong Kong company, nominal stamp duty of HKD 5 is payable on the execution of an instrument of transfer signed "in blank" (which lenders normally require). The execution enables the shares to be registered in the name of the lender (or its nominee) by converting an equitable share mortgage into a legal share mortgage. Stamp duty at a rate of 0.26% of the value of shares being transferred will be payable on the enforcement of the security. After the execution of an agreement for the transfer of shares, the parties should submit the relevant documents for stamping, if that agreement is executed in Hong Kong, within two days of signing; if it is executed outside Hong Kong, within 30 days of signing.

  • Practical Law

Contract Formation and Enforcement in Hong Kong: Overview

Get full access to this document with a free trial.

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

  • General Contract and Boilerplate

Hong Kong Law Contract Guide

Our team in Hong Kong recently developed a Hong Kong Law Contract Guide. The guide discusses relevant legal principles that inform the most common contractual clauses in Hong Kong. The guide offers practical points to consider in drafting a contract, and sample clauses that may be a useful reference when preparing or reviewing a contract. The guide also addresses Hong Kong principles related to implied terms, privity of contract, and resolution of disputes. As activity into Hong Kong grows, we hope this resource helps to facilitate the agreement process.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Latest Posts

  • Indonesia relaxes local content rules to energise green energy investment
  • What’s next for the UK's Online Safety Act and can it solve the misinformation problem?
  • Standalone information exchange is a serious competition law infringement, says the European Court
  • Texas Court Bars Nationwide Enforcement of FTC Rule Banning Non-Compete Agreements
  • FDA Issues “Phase II” Draft Guidance on Voluntary Sodium Reduction Targets

See more »

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

Refine your interests »

Written by:

Hogan Lovells

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Published In:

Hogan lovells on:.

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Custom Email Digest

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Conventus Law

Conventus Law

More results...

legal assignment hong kong

Hong Kong – Assignment, Novation Or Sub-Participation Of Loans.

April 28, 2022 by Balaram Adhikari

TRANSFERABILITY OF LOANS

The legal analysis regarding the transferability of loans can be complex.  The loan agreement should be examined with a view to identifying any restrictions on transferability of the loan between lenders, such as prior consent of the debtor and, in some cases, whether such consent may be withheld.  Other general restrictions may apply given that most banks have internal confidentiality rules and data protection requirements, the latter of which may also be subject to governmental regulations.  Certain jurisdictions may restrict the transfer of loans relating to specific types of receivables – mortgage or consumer loans being prime examples.  It is imperative to conduct proper due diligence on the documentation and underlying assets in order to be satisfied with the transferability of the relevant loans.  This may be complicated further if there are multiple projects, facility lines or debtors.  It is indeed common to see a partial transfer of loans to an incoming lender or groups of lenders.

METHODS OF TRANSFER

The transfer of loans may be carried out in different ways and often involves assignment, novation or sub-participation.

A typical assignment amounts to the transfer of the rights of the lender (assignor) under the loan documentation to another lender (assignee), whereby the assignee takes on the assignor’s rights, such as the right to receive payment of principal and interest on the loan.  The assignor is still required to perform any obligations under the loan documentation.  Therefore, there is no need to terminate the loan documentation and, unless the loan documentation stipulates otherwise, there is no need to obtain the debtor’s consent, but notice of the assignment must be served on the debtor.  However, many debtors are in fact involved in the negotiation stage, where the parties would also take the opportunity to vary the terms of the facility and security arrangement.

Novation of a loan requires that the debtor, the existing lender (transferor) and the incoming lender (transferee) enter into new documentation which provides that the rights and obligations of the transferor will be novated to the transferee.  The transferee replaces the transferor in the loan facility and the transferor is completely discharged from all of its rights and obligations.  This method of transfer does require the prior consent of the relevant debtor.

Sub-participation is often used where a lender, whilst wishing to share the risks of certain loans, nonetheless prefers to maintain the status quo.  There is no change to the loan documentation – the lender simply sells all or part of the loan portfolio to another lender or lenders.  From the debtor’s perspective, nothing has changed and, in principle, there is no need to obtain the debtor’s consent or serve notice on the debtor.  This method of transfer is sometimes preferred if the existing lender is keen to maintain a business relationship with the debtor, or where seeking consent from the debtor or notifying the debtor of any transfer is not feasible or desirable.  In any case, there would be no change to the balance sheet treatment of the existing lender.

OFFSHORE SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS

The transfer of a loan in a cross-border transaction often involves an offshore security package.  A potential purchaser will need to conduct due diligence on the risks relating to such security.  From a legal perspective, the security documents require close scrutiny to confirm their legality, validity and enforceability, including the nature and status of the assets involved.  Apart from transferability generally, the documents would reveal whether any consent is required.  A lender should seek full analysis on the risks relating to enforcement of security, which may well be complicated by the involvement of various jurisdictions for potential enforcement actions.

A key aspect to the enforcement consideration is whether a particular jurisdiction requires that any particular steps be taken to perfect a security interest relating to the loan portfolio (if the concept of perfection applies at all) and, if so, whether any applicable filing or registration has been made to perfect the security interest and, more importantly, whether there exists any prior or subsequent competing security interest over all or part of the same assets.  For example, security interests may be registered in public records of the security provider maintained by the companies registry in Bermuda or the British Virgin Islands for the purpose of obtaining priority over competing interests under the applicable law.  The internal register of charges of the security provider registered in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda or the British Virgin Islands should also be examined as part of the due diligence process.  Particular care should be taken where the relevant assets require additional filings under the laws of the relevant jurisdictions, notable examples of such assets being real property, vessels and aircraft.  Suites of documents held in escrow pending a potential default under the loan documentation should also be checked as they would be used by the lender or security agent to facilitate enforcement of security when the debtor defaults on the loan.

DUE DILIGENCE AND BEYOND

Legal due diligence on the loan documentation and security package is an integral part of the assessment undertaken by a lender of the risks of purchasing certain loan portfolios, regardless of whether the transfer is to be made by way of an assignment, novation or sub-participation.  Whilst the choice of method of transfer is often a commercial decision, enforceability of security interests over underlying assets is the primary consideration in reviewing sufficiency of the security package in any proposed loan transfer.

legal assignment hong kong

For further information, please contact:

Fiona Chan , Partner, Appleby

[email protected]

Register for your monthly Asia legal updates from Conventus Law

Error: Contact form not found.

legal assignment hong kong

Let Legal Operations Work Its Magic.

legal assignment hong kong

Perspectives: Transforming In-House Legal Teams In Asia.

legal assignment hong kong

The Hong Kong Court Of Final Appeal Considers Principles Of Quistclose Trust.

Conventus Law

CONVENTUS LAW

CONVENTUS DOCS CONVENTUS PEOPLE

3/f, Chinachem Tower 34-37 Connaught Road Central, Central, Hong Kong

[email protected]

   
   

Learn more about our comprehensive legal services.

  • Banking and Finance
  • Capital Markets
  • China Trade and Investment
  • Competition
  • Construction
  • Corporate and M&A
  • Corporate Services
  • Data Protection and Privacy
  • Employment and Pensions
  • Intellectual Property
  • Investment Funds
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution
  • Private Clients
  • Real Estate

Advising our clients on different opportunities and challenges of the industry.

  • Construction and Infrastructure
  • Consumer Goods and Retail
  • Energy and Resources
  • Financial Institutions
  • Funds and Investment Management
  • Hospitality and Leisure
  • Life Sciences and Healthcare
  • Private Equity and Investment
  • Private Wealth
  • Technology, Media and Telecom
  • Transportation and Logistics

Developing a unique culture, which blends traditional client care with modern technology and working practices since 1851.

  • Our Heritage
  • International Approach
  • Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG)
  • Corporate Responsibility

Stay up to date on the latest news and legal insights.

  • News & Insights
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Firm Announcements
  • Transaction and Case Highlights
  • Legal Updates
  • Video Series
  • Podcast Series

Priority of Floating Charges

1. A floating charge is a type of security which may be created over a class of moveable assets (such as current assets, trading stock or cash on hand), and are commonly sought by banks and other credit-providers as security for money which has been lent to a borrower. Under a floating charge, the borrower (or chargor) may continue to deal with its assets subject to the charge in the ordinary course of business until the charge crystallises and the creditor takes steps to enforce it. However, a creditor holding a floating charge over some or all of a borrower’s assets may find such security challenged by other secured creditors in the event of the borrower’s insolvency, giving rise to questions of priorities between them.

2. Under Hong Kong law, priorities between competing interests over the same property of an insolvent company are determined in accordance with a complex set of priority rules. These priority rules vary depending on the type of property involved, as well as the type(s) of security which have been granted in respect of such property.

3. In this note, we provide an overview of the general Hong Kong law priority position of a bank (“ Bank “) which holds a floating charge (“ Floating Charge “) over all of a Hong Kong company’s assets, where the company (“ Borrower “) has also granted to a third party creditor (“ Other Creditor “) a later:

  • legal assignment of receivables owed to the Borrower by its customers (i.e. receivables assigned in accordance with s9 of the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 23) (“ LARCO “)
  • pledge of (i) bills of lading, and (ii) warehouse receipts, in respect of goods (located in Hong Kong) owned by the Borrower, in each case where the Other Creditor is in possession of them; and
  • fixed charge over cash margin held in an account in Hong Kong with the Other Creditor (which is a bank);

and the Borrower subsequently becomes insolvent.

I. Floating charge v. subsequent legal assignment of receivables  

(a) General position

4. Where the Borrower has granted the Floating Charge over all of its assets (including receivables owed to it by its customers) to the Bank, and has also subsequently legally assigned the same receivables to the Other Creditor, a question of priority between the competing interests of the Bank and the Other Creditor with respect to such receivables may arise.

5. Under Hong Kong law, the general rule governing priority between assignments or charges over the same debts or receivables is the rule laid down in the English case of Dearle v Hall (1828) 3 Russ 1 (“ Dearle v Hall “) : that is the assignee/chargee whose notice to the debtor is the first in time has priority, provided that at the time of the assignment/creation of the charge, he did not have notice of any earlier assignment/charge to any other assignee/chargee and he was acting in good faith and gave good value in return for his charge/assignment.

6. However, where receivables subject to a floating charge are disposed of by way of a legal assignment, in the absence of any restrictions in the terms of the floating charge against doing so, the rule in Dearle v Hall does not apply to determine priorities. Rather, the general position appears to be that, as the chargor under the floating charge is permitted to deal with its assets subject to the charge in the ordinary course of business until crystallisation (which would include selling or assigning receivables), the legal assignee of such receivables would take free of the prior floating charge. The rule in Dearle v Hall would not apply since the floating chargee will be taken to have impliedly authorised the chargor to effect the legal assignment. Accordingly, in the absence of any restrictions under the terms of the Floating Charge, the Borrower (as chargor) would prima facie have been permitted to sell/assign the charged receivables to the Other Creditor, provided no crystallisation event had occurred, so that the Other Creditor’s interest in the receivables would have priority over that of the Bank’s. This would be the position even where the Other Creditor had notice (whether actual or constructive – see para. 12, below) of the existence of the Bank’s prior Floating Charge as its interest would be taken to have been created with the implied authorisation of the Bank.

7. However, in practice, floating charges in Hong Kong almost always contain restrictive covenants prohibiting chargors from assigning or otherwise encumbering charged assets with interests ranking in priority to, or pari passu with, the charge (“ negative pledge clause “). Additionally, floating charges commonly contain clauses stipulating that the charge will automatically crystallise upon the happening of certain events which may not require the intervention of the chargee (“ automatic crystallisation clause “). The effect which such clauses may have on the Bank’s priority position is discussed as follows.

(b) Negative pledge

8. If the Bank’s Floating Charge contains a negative pledge clause, such clause would generally not affect the Other Creditor except where the Other Creditor had actual notice (see paras. 12-15, below) of the clause at the time it took its legal assignment. If, at that time, the Other Creditor did have actual notice of such a clause, the Bank’s interest in the receivables would likely gain priority. The Other Creditor could also be liable to the Bank for procuring the Borrower’s breach of the clause, and the courts could restrain it from enforcing its rights so as to cause a breach of a prior agreement of which it had knowledge.

(c) Automatic crystallisation

9. A typical automatic crystallisation clause in a floating charge instrument will provide that if the chargor acts in breach of a negative pledge clause and creates, or attempts to create, a subsequent interest without the consent of the prior floating chargee, the floating charge will automatically crystallise, and rank ahead of any subsequent interest. If the Bank’s Floating Charge contains such an automatic crystallisation clause, it is possible that the Floating Charge will have crystallised before the Other Creditor’s legal assignment of receivables was effected, as any attempt to create a prior ranking interest would cause the Floating Charge to crystallise.

10. Where the Other Creditor’s legal assignment is effected after crystallisation of the Bank’s Floating Charge, it would seem that the Bank’s interest in the receivables would take priority being first in time, as from crystallisation, it will no longer be taken to have impliedly authorised the Borrower to dispose of the receivables to the Other Creditor. Thus, as between a crystallised floating charge (which takes effect as an equitable fixed charge) and a subsequent equitable assignment of receivables (i.e. a legal assignment which has not yet been perfected by notice to the contract counterparty, notice being one of the requirements for a legal assignment under s9 LARCO ), the rule in Dearle v Hall can still apply.

11. Accordingly, priority between the Bank’s and the Other Creditor’s interests in the receivables would be determined according to the order in which notice is given to the customers (i.e. the contract counterparties). If the Other Creditor perfects its legal assignment by giving notice of its assignment to the customers first in time, and does not have notice of the crystallisation of the Bank’s Floating Charge, the Other Creditor would take priority under the rule in Dearle v Hall . However, if it is the Bank that gives notice of crystallisation of its Floating Charge first in time, the position would be reversed and the Bank would take priority instead (note that the holder of a floating charge can only give notice of its charge to contract counterparties upon crystallisation, as only at that time does the charge attach/fasten to the assets subject to the charge).

(d) Does registration of a charge confer notice of a negative pledge clause or automatic crystallisation clause?

12. Under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) , certain types of charges (including floating charges) created by Hong Kong companies and non-Hong Kong companies with a place of business in Hong Kong must be registered with the Companies Registry within 5 weeks of creation. Registration of a charge will generally constitute at least constructive notice of the existence of that charge to any subsequent chargee/assignee. Constructive notice means that in the absence of actual notice (i.e. personal knowledge), a subsequent chargee/assignee will generally be taken to have constructive notice of an earlier registered interest.

13. A common practice has arisen in Hong Kong whereby negative pledge and automatic crystallisation clauses in charge documents are included in the particulars which are submitted to the Companies Registry upon registration. The existence of such registered negative pledge and automatic crystallisation clauses may therefore be revealed by way of a company search conducted by any member of the public.

14. Previously, it was unclear as to whether the doctrine of constructive notice by registration extended to notice of all particulars (including negative pledge and automatic crystallisation clauses) which had been registered with the Companies Registry. That area of the law has now been clarified in the Hong Kong case of ABN Amro Bank NV v Chiyu Banking Corp Ltd & Ors [2000] HKC 3 381 (“ ABN Amro “) in which it was held that registration of a negative pledge or automatic crystallisation clause does not confer constructive notice of such clause on a subsequent assignee/chargee. In that case, the court held that the doctrine of constructive notice by registration only operates in a narrow sense – it means constructive notice is only of (i) the existence of the prior interest; and (ii) the particulars of the prior interest statutorily required to be registered. Inclusion of particulars of a negative pledge or automatic crystallisation clause which is contained in a charge document is not a statutory requirement. Accordingly, the practical effect of the decision in ABN Amro is that, for a subsequent chargee/assignee to have notice of any negative pledge or automatic crystallisation clause contained in a prior floating charge document, it must have had actual notice of it (constructive notice of registered particulars of the prior floating charge will not be sufficient).

15. However, with the commencement of the new Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) (“ new CO “) on 3 March 2014, certified copies of the charge instruments, together with a statement of the particulars, of registrable charges, must be registered with the Companies Registry and made available for public inspection ( Part 8 of the new CO ). As the doctrine of constructive notice means constructive notice of (i) the existence of a prior interest; and (ii) the particulars of the prior interest which are statutorily required to be registered, for charges which are registered in accordance with the new CO , subsequent chargees/assignees will likely be deemed to have constructive notice of all of the terms of the relevant charge instruments, including any negative pledge and/or automatic crystallisation clauses (since the entire charge instruments will be statutorily required to be registered).

II. Floating charge v. pledge of bills of lading and warehouse receipts

(a) Bills of lading

16. Under Hong Kong law, a bill of lading is a document of title to the underlying goods it represents at common law. Thus, assuming that the Borrower’s pledge of bills of lading to the Other Creditor has the effect of transferring constructive possession of the underlying goods they represent to the Other Creditor (and provided such goods are situated in Hong Kong), it seems likely that such pledge of bills of lading would be recognised in Hong Kong as a pledge of the goods themselves.

17. In the absence of any restriction in the terms of the Floating Charge against creation of subsequent pledges, as between the Bank’s prior Floating Charge over the Borrower’s assets (including goods owned by the Borrower) and the Other Creditor’s pledge of bills of lading (representing pledged goods), the Borrower (as pledgor) would have been impliedly authorised by the Bank to pledge the bills of lading to the Other Creditor prior to crystallisation of the Floating Charge as this would be in the ordinary course of its business (see para. 6, above). Alternatively, it may be argued that the time of crystallisation is not relevant, as a pledge (a legal interest) will always take priority to a floating charge (an equitable interest) provided that the pledgee did not have notice of crystallisation of the floating charge (see para. 18, below). Accordingly, the Other Creditor’s interest with respect to the bills of lading and underlying goods (as pledgee) would take priority ahead of the Bank’s interest (as floating chargee), as long as it retained possession of the pledged bills of lading (possession being an essential element of a pledge under Hong Kong law).

18. However, if the Bank’s Floating Charge contains a negative pledge clause, the Other Creditor may lose priority where it had actual notice of such clause (see paras. 8, 12-15, above). If the Floating Charge had crystallised before the creation of the Other Creditor’s pledge (e.g. by the joint operation of a negative pledge clause and automatic crystallisation clause), it is likely that the Other Creditor would retain priority with respect to the pledged bills of lading (provided that it did not have actual notice of the negative pledge and automatic crystallisation clauses). This is because a floating charge takes effect as a fixed charge as at the time of crystallisation (an equitable interest), and as between an equitable charge and a subsequent pledge (a legal interest), the general rule is that the subsequent pledgee’s interest will take priority as a legal purchaser for value, provided that he did not have notice of the crystallisation of the prior equitable charge.

(b) Warehouse receipts

19. For Hong Kong law purposes, warehouse receipts are not documents of title to the underlying goods they represent at common law. Accordingly, under Hong Kong law, a pledge of a warehouse receipt by itself is not sufficient to create a pledge of the underlying goods it represents as there is no delivery of possession of the goods (unlike a bill of lading). However, a valid pledge of the underlying goods to a warehouse receipt may still be created by other methods, such as by way of “attornment”. Creation of a pledge by way of “attornment” was described in Official Assignee of Madras v Mercantile Bank of India [1935] AC 53 (“ Madras “) , where was held that “ If…the goods [are] in the custody of a third person, who held for the bailor…the pledge could be effected by a change of the possession of the third party, that is by an order to him from the pledgor to hold for the pledgee, the change being perfected by the third party attorning to the pledgee, that is acknowledging that he thereupon held for him; there was thus a change of possession and a constructive delivery “.

20. If the Other Creditor has a valid pledge of goods under pledged warehouse receipts, its priority position as against the Bank would likely be the same as that under pledged bills of lading (see paras. 16-18, above)

(c) What is the position where the Other Creditor does not have a perfected pledge of underlying goods?

21. If the Other Creditor for any reason does not have a perfected pledge of the underlying goods under pledged bills of lading or warehouse receipts (e.g. where the bill of lading is not negotiable, or a third party bailee is found not to have properly “attorned” the goods to the Other Creditor), it may nevertheless still have a pledge of the paper bills of lading or warehouse receipts. In that situation, the Other Creditor would generally be able to retain the bills of lading or warehouse receipts, but would not be able to use them to dispose of the goods for value (since it would not be able to pass constructive possession of the goods to a purchaser). However, if the Other Creditor is named as consignee on the bills of lading or warehouse receipts it would be entitled to call for delivery of the goods. Upon taking delivery of the goods, the Other Creditor’s pledge of such goods would then likely be perfected (as it will have taken actual delivery), and its priority would likely be determined as above (see paras. 16-18, above).

III. Floating charge v. fixed charge over cash margin

22. As the Bank’s Floating Charge covers all of the Borrower’s assets, the Bank would also have a floating charge over all of the Borrower’s cash. However, where the Borrower grants a later fixed charge over cash which has been deposited with another banking institution such as the Other Creditor, particular issues with respect to priority may arise.

(a) Where cash subject to a fixed charge

23. In the absence of any restriction under the terms of the Floating Charge prohibiting the Borrower from granting subsequent interests, as between the Bank’s Floating Charge over the Borrower’s cash (including cash deposited with the Other Creditor), and the Other Creditor’s fixed charge over such cash, prima facie , the Borrower would have been impliedly authorised to grant the subsequent fixed charge to the Other Creditor, as this would have been in the ordinary course of its business (see para. 6, above). Accordingly, the Other Creditor’s fixed charge would have priority ahead of the Bank’s Floating Charge in the event of the Borrower’s insolvency.

24. If the Floating Charge instrument contains a negative pledge clause, as with the scenarios mentioned above, the Other Creditor may lose priority where it had actual notice of such clause (see paras. 8, 12-15, above).

25. However, if the Floating Charge had crystallised before the creation of the Other Creditor’s fixed charge (e.g. by the joint operation of a negative pledge clause and automatic crystallisation clause), the Other Creditor’s fixed charge should still take priority (provided that it did not have actual notice of the negative pledge clause). Although the general position is that the rule in Dearle v Hall will apply to determine priority between the Bank and Other Creditor (see para. 10, above), since the Borrower’s cash is held in accounts with the Other Creditor, there is no need for the Other Creditor to give notice to itself (as the account debtor) and such notice will generally be presumed. Accordingly, provided that the Other Creditor did not have notice of crystallisation of the Bank’s Floating Charge at the time it took its fixed charge over the Borrower’s cash, the Other Creditor will have priority under the rule in Dearle v Hall . (b) Where not subject to any security

26. As regards the Borrower’s cash which is held in an account with the Other Creditor, but with respect to which the Other Creditor has not taken any security over, the relationship between the Borrower and the Other Creditor (as banker) would be that of an ordinary creditor and debtor. However, where such cash is “collateral” for any amounts which may become owing to the Other Creditor (“ cash margin “), upon the Borrower’s insolvency, the Other Creditor would normally be able to assert a claim over such cash margin pursuant to the mandatory insolvency set-off rules under s35 of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap. 6) (“ BO “) to set-off the cash margin against debts owed to it by the Borrower.

27. Under s35 BO , insolvency set-off is available where:

  • there have been credits, debts and other dealings between a company in liquidation and a creditor which permit a financial balance to be struck;
  • the credits, debts and other dealings must have been mutual, meaning they must be between the same persons and in the same right;
  • the claim must be provable in liquidation; and
  • the creditor did not, at the time of giving credit to the insolvent company, have notice that the winding up had commenced.

28. However, as the Borrower has granted the Floating Charge to the Bank, upon crystallisation, the Floating Charge would operate to transfer the beneficial ownership in the cash margin to the Bank. This means that crystallisation will likely destroy the mutuality of claims required for a set-off to take place between the Other Creditor and the Borrower under para. 27 b., above, and the Bank will take priority free of the Other Creditor’s set-off right under s35 BO .

IV Conclusion

29. The above analysis illustrates some likely priority outcomes where creditors have taken competing security interests over the same property of a borrower. In particular, the analysis demonstrates the importance of including negative pledge and automatic crystallisation clauses in floating charge instruments.

30. The effect of the new CO remains to be seen. However, based on the existing legal principles under Hong Kong law, it appears likely that banks and other creditors seeking to take security over a borrower’s assets will be deemed to have constructive notice of all the terms of any existing security taken over such assets (where such security is registered pursuant to, and in accordance with the new CO ). Banks and creditors should therefore conduct thorough searches and review the terms of any pre-existing registered charges carefully so that they will not be caught unaware by any terms which they would be deemed to have notice of.

Related Services and Sectors:

Filter news & insights.

  • China Trade & Investment
  • Securities and Futures Commission

Search News & Insights

Subscribe to Publications

Sign up for our regular updates covering the latest legal developments, regulations and case law.

Media Contact

For media enquiries please contact us at [email protected] .

Tel: +852 2825 9211

Popular Insights

Solicitors’ hourly rates for party and party taxations to increase, new corporate governance requirements for hk listed companies/listing applicants will come into effect in january 2022, closing the operations of a solvent company in hong kong.

  • Insolvency and Restructuring
  • Notarial Services
  • Senior Partner
  • Senior Associate
  • Business Support Careers
  • Experienced Hires
  • Students & Graduates
  • Management Structure
  • Our Achievements

News & Insights

  • News and Announcement

Terms of Use & Disclaimer

Remote Access Contact Us

This content is currently available only in English. We are constantly working on providing more bilingual content. Thank you for your patience.

此內容目前僅提供英文版本。我們一直致力於提供更多雙語內容,感謝您的耐心等待。

此内容目前仅提供英文版本。我们一直致力于提供更多双语内容,感谢您的耐心等待。

  • Legal Services

Privacy Overview

CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Portfolio Builder

Select the legal services that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Title Type CV Email

Click here to share this shortlist. (It will expire after 30 days.)

Need more information about the above People and Legal Services? Talk to one of our clerks: +852 2825 9211

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.

  • Create an Account

Ho & Hall's Hong Kong Contract Law - Sixth Edition

Author: Professor Stephen Hall

Ho & Hall's Hong Kong Contract Law Sixth edition comprehensively updates the law of contract as it applies in Hong Kong and revises and clarifies statements of the law in a number of areas. It incorporates significant developments in all areas including, most notably, implied terms, offer and acceptance, contractual intention, interpretation of terms, implied terms, misrepresentation, rectification, economic duress, severance of restrictive covenants, third party rights, negotiating damages, penalties, and promissory estoppel.

Publication Date: July 2022

Publisher: LexisNexis

Product Format Details Qty
Book (Soft cover) In Stock ISBN: 9789888799862

Ho & Hall's Hong Kong Contract Law authored by Stephen Hall, is a comprehensive work which expertly identifies the unique local characteristics of Hong Kong contact law. The text balances theoretical and policy discussion with practical considerations, including clear illustrative examples of the law at work. The late Professor Betty M Ho was the author of this work’s influential first and second editions (titled Hong Kong Contract Law). The sixth edition continues to build on Professor Ho’s legacy.

1 Introduction

2 Agreement

3 Consideration

4 Intention

5 Form of Contract

6 Contents of a Contract

7 Misrepresentation

9 Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionability

10 Incapacity

11 Illegality

12 Joint Obligations and Joint Rights

14 Assignment

15 Performance

16 Discharge and Variation by agreement

17 Discharge by frustration

18 Discharge by breach

19 Remedies For Breach Of Contract

20 Limitation of actions

21 Estoppel

22 Unjust enrichment

23 Conflict of laws

Featured Authors

Professor stephen hall.

Stephen Hall is Professor of Law at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, where he is an award-winning teacher and researcher. He previously taught at the Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, where he was the Director of the European Law Centre. Before turning to academic life, he spent nine years with the Australian Attorney-General's Department, where he advised government ministers and officials. He holds a doctorate in European Union Law from the University of Oxford.

Assignment of claims: Are there any constraints to assigning claims or seeking cost guarantees?

June 18, 2019 > > Litigation & Dispute Resolution

IR Global | View firm profile

The following article discusses session three in the IR Global Virtual Series on 'Litigation Funding: Handling commercial and financial disputes

Germany – FW The assignment of claims to a third party for the purpose of their recovery is allowed without further ado, if the assignee bears the full financial risk of recovering the claims and acts for his own account (e.g. factoring).

If an assignee collects debts for the account of the assignor and if the debt collection is conducted as a stand-alone business, this is considered a collection service (Inkassodienstleistung) under the Legal Services Act (Rechtsdienstleistungsgesetz).

Pursuant to the latter, persons who provide such collection services (collection service providers) have to seek the permission of competent authorities and have to be registered with the Legal Services Register (Rechtsdienstleistungsregister). The assignment of claims to a collection service provider which is not registered is null and void; the unauthorised collection service provider lacks the capacity to sue.

With regard to certain types of litigation, e.g. consumer actions, the assignment of claims (to registered collection service providers) is common. In general, such assignments appear reasonable to pool small claims in order to benefit from synergy effects and to create a certain ‘balance of power’ vis-à-vis more financially powerful counter-parties. With regard to bigger claims, however, litigation funding will usually be the better, or even only, option to get financial support from third parties.

Spain – DJ The situation is similar in Spain, because the Spanish civil courts were inspired by the Napoleonic French Code. A lot of opportunistic funds arrived in Spain following the economic crisis, to buy bad credits and assets from banks. This has led to a lot of assignments of claims and the courts have established that they are valid and enforceable.

France – MCC Contractual assignment of claims is valid under French law with a condition and a limit. As a condition, the claim has to be fundamentally legitimate and conform to the public order. The debtor’s consent is not required unless the right was provided to be non-assignable.

Unless the debtor has already agreed to it, the assignment may be set up against him only if it was previously served to him by a Bailiff, or he has acknowledged it. The debtor may set up against the assignee defences inherent to the debt itself, such as nullity, the defence of non-performance, termination or the right to set off related debts.

He may also set up defences which arose from the relations with the assignor before the assignment became enforceable against him, such as the grant of a deferral, the release of a debt, or the set-off of debts which are not related. The assignor and the assignee are jointly and severally liable for any additional costs arising from the assignment which the debtor did not have to advance. Subject to any contractual term to the contrary, the burden of these costs lies on the assignee.

As a limit, if the claim subject to assignment is litigious, the debtor may obtain a release from the assignee by reimbursing him the actual price paid for the assignment, plus costs and reasonable expenses, plus interest calculated from the date on which the assignee paid the price of the assignment made to him. The claim then disappears.

Because of this rule called ‘retrait litigieux’, assignees have to be very careful and research what happened before the assignment.

US – ES There is no prohibition in the US against assigning a claim, or part of a claim, to a third party, but, of course, any third party taking an assignment of all or part of the claim is subject to all potential offsets and defences that exist against the primary holder of the claim.

Assigning claims is done fairly often, mostly in the intellectual property patent world. Patent trolls are big in the US, buying up patent claims and aggressively litigating and pursuing those claims.

Sweden – DE Almost any claim can be assigned in Sweden, the main rule is that the original claimant must have initiated a lawful claim, then it can be assigned. Claims based on unlawful contracts (Pactum Turpe) can neither be enforced by the first holder of the claim, nor its successor. Apart from that, there are no restrictions of any kind, or any constraints to assigned claims.

As far as cost guarantees are concerned, we have the same situation as any other European country in that EU citizens or companies founded in another country within the EU cannot be forced to provide a guarantee for legal costs in litigation proceedings in Sweden.

The same applies for claimants in a country that has entered into an international agreement with Sweden, such as The Hague Convention.

Austria – KO If you are representing a client from outside the EU, the opponent may ask the court to order a cost deposit covering all the procedural costs of the defendant.

US – ES Is there a limit on that?

Austria – KO No, if you have a multi million-dollar dispute, your client pays the court fees of 1.2 per cent, plus also the estimated court-related fees including legal fees for the defendant. The policy is clear – if someone is suing us from somewhere in the world and we, as a defendant in Austria, end up winning the case, we might not be able to enforce our cost award against this claimant. As a result, there is an interest of security deposit which has to be paid upon request by a claimant outside the EU.

US – ES Do you find that a successful application by a defendant to require a large security deposit will often end a case?

Austria – KO Yes, it’s one of the best strategies to fend off a claimant or to make them reduce the claim, and a common strategy for the defendant’s lawyer to ask for a huge security deposit. It’s at the discretion of the judge, but overall you will have to deposit a huge amount of money to get the case going. There is discussion going on about legislation to reduce that, but there are two interests to be weighed against each other.

It’s another argument for why third-party funding can be crucial to get cases going.

As to assignments, one single action containing several claims is permitted if the claims get assigned to another legal entity; such legal entity acts as the sole claimant if the claims rely on the same or similar legal and factual basis. The concept has been approved by the Supreme Court.

Hong Kong – NG An order for security for costs in litigation offers protection to a party from the risk of their opponent not being able to pay the party’s litigation costs if ordered to do so.

Applications for security for costs are a common feature of civil litigation before the first-instance courts in Hong Kong. Sometimes liability for security for costs and the amount can be agreed between the parties. As for the form of the security for costs, the most common method to give security is to make a payment into court. Other methods included an undertaking to pay, a bond, a bank guarantee or a charge.

Despite their abolition in some other common law jurisdictions, the crimes and torts of maintenance and champerty are still part of Hong Kong law. Third party funding is considered to infringe the doctrines of champerty and maintenance, so it is not generally permitted for litigation in the Hong Kong courts (except for specific cases).

Litigation funding is allowed in some insolvency cases, because debtors often siphon away assets when insolvent, yet liquidators or trustees in bankruptcy often find themselves without sufficient funds to recover assets or pursue other legitimate claims in the name of the debtor.

In light of this, the Hong Kong law has accepted litigation funding arrangements as a legitimate practice in liquidation proceedings. Such arrangements may include the sale and assignment by a liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy, of an action commenced in the bankruptcy, to a purchaser for value.

As far as arbitration is concerned, the Arbitration Ordinance or AO (Cap. 609) has recently been amended, such that the common law tort and offence of champerty and maintenance no longer apply to third party funding of arbitration and mediation.

Under the AO, a Code of Practice sets out the standards with which third party funders are ordinarily expected to comply in connection with arbitration funding. It states the requirements for funding agreements, the minimum amount of capital a third-party funder is required to have, the procedure for addressing conflicts of interest and whether third party funders will be liable to funded parties for adverse costs.

Contributors

Klaus Oblin (KO) Oblin Melichar – Austria www.irglobal.com/advisor/dr-klaus-oblin

Marie-Christine Cimadevilla (MCC) Cimadevilla Avocats – France www.irglobal.com/advisor/marie-christine-cimadevilla

Daniel Jimenez (DJ) SLJ Abogados – Spain www.irglobal.com/advisor/daniel-jimenez

Erwin Shustak (ES) Shustak Reynolds & Partners – US – California www.irglobal.com/advisor/erwin-shustak

Nick Gall (NG) Gall Solicitors – Hong Kong www.irglobal.com/advisor/nick-gall

Dan Engström (DE) Advokatfirman Nova AB – Sweden www.irglobal.com/advisor/dan-engstrom

Florian Wettner (FW) METIS Rechtsanwälte – Germany www.irglobal.com/advisor/florian-wettner

More from IR Global

The Government restricts bans on assignment

United Kingdom |  Publication |  November 2018

Legislation now in force preventing parties from prohibiting the assignment of receivables under certain contracts.

At the moment, a contract can prohibit or restrict the parties’ ability to assign or transfer rights created under the contract. The extent of the restriction is a matter of interpretation of the clause concerned. If one of the parties to the contract attempts to assign the benefit of the contract in breach of the restriction, the purported assignment is ineffective.

One of the key assets of any business is its receivables, and restrictions on assignment can prevent the parties from factoring receivables or otherwise raising finance on them. The Government has decided that it should be easier for businesses to raise finance on their receivables. Accordingly the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 allows regulations to be made to invalidate restrictions on the assignment of receivables in particular types of contract. The regulations have now been made. They are contained in The Business Contract Terms (Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018. Draft regulations published in July, have been approved by both Houses of Parliament and are now in force.

What types of contracts do the Regulations apply to?

The Regulations apply to contracts for the supply of goods, services or intangible assets under which the supplier is entitled to be paid money. But there are a number of important exclusions from their application, including the following:

  • They only apply to contracts entered into on or after 31 December 2018.
  • They only apply where the person who supplies the goods, services or intangible assets concerned, and is therefore entitled to the receivable, is a small or medium-sized enterprise which is not a special purpose vehicle. Whether or not an entity qualifies in any particular case requires a detailed examination of the precise wording of the
  • Regulations. Counter-intuitively, the test is not applied at the time the contract is entered into, but at the time the assignment takes place.
  • There is a specific exemption for contracts “for, or entered into in connection with, prescribed financial services”: These are widely defined to include “any service of a financial nature”.
  • There are specific exclusions for particular types of contract, including certain commodities, project finance, energy, land, share purchase and business purchase contracts and operating leases.
  • As a general rule, it would seem that the Regulations only apply to contracts governed by English law or the law of Northern Ireland, but they prevent the parties from choosing a foreign law if it can be established that the purpose of doing so was to evade the Regulations.
  • The Regulations do not apply if none of the parties to the contract has entered into it in the course of carrying on a business in the United Kingdom.

What is the effect of the Regulations?

The Regulations provide that “a term in a contract has no effect to the extent that it prohibits or imposes a condition, or other restriction , on the assignment of a receivable arising under that contract or any other contract between the same parties.”

A receivable is the right to be paid any amount under a contract for the supply of goods, services, or intangible assets. The Regulations do not prevent the parties from restricting the assignment of other contract rights.

More difficult is to establish what is meant by assignment. Receivables are transferred in various ways in practice. Sometimes the transfer is outright (for instance by way of sale); and sometimes it is by way of security (for instance to secure a loan). The transfer may be effected by a statutory assignment, an equitable assignment, a charge or a trust. “Assignment” is not defined in the Regulations, and so there is some doubt as to which of these transactions are covered.

Although charges are not expressly referred to, they might be covered by the expression “assignment” if it is given a broad interpretation. But because of the uncertainty, the best course is to take an assignment by way of security over a receivable where there is, or might be, a restriction. That way, it is clear that the Regulations do apply.

Non-assignment clauses come in a variety of forms. They will be covered by the Regulations if they prohibit or impose a condition , or other restriction on the assignment of a receivable. The Regulations expressly invalidate terms which prevent the assignee from determining the validity or value of the receivable or their ability to enforce it. Whether or not the Regulations apply in any particular case will require an analysis of the precise terms of the restriction.

The Regulations will be of particular importance to businesses involved in the financing of receivables. And they will also be of concern to buyers because they will override their contractual protections.

Richard Calnan

  • Financial institutions

Practice area:

  • Banking and finance

Recent publications

Publication

On 31 October 2023, the Screening of Third Country Transactions Act 2023 (the “Act”), which establishes a new foreign direct investment ("FDI") screening regime in Ireland, was enacted.

Global | August 21, 2024

EU Commission Expands Foreign Subsidies Guidance

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation, or FSR, is intended to prevent or remedy distortions of the EU internal market caused by “foreign” – meaning non-EU – subsidies benefitting companies active in the EU.

Global | August 19, 2024

Financial stock market numbers

Chance prediction or superforecasters: Reflections on the regulation of the securitisation “market”

The conventional wisdom is that ‘securitisation caused the great financial crisis’ (GFC). A further piece of conventional wisdom is that this was due to the misalignment of incentives between securitisation originators and securitisation investors . This conventional wisdom in turn drove much of the regulation of securitisation we now have.

Global | August 16, 2024

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .

© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023

  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (Français)
  • United States
  • Deutschland (Deutsch)
  • Germany (English)
  • The Netherlands
  • Türkiye
  • United Kingdom
  • South Africa
  • Hong Kong SAR
  • Marshall Islands
  • Nordic region
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • YouTube Channel
  • (1) Introduction
  • (3) Formal Agreement for Sale and Purchase
  • (2) Provisional Agreement for Sale and Purchase
  • (4) Redemption
  • (5) Assignment
  • (6) Mortgage
  • (7) Stamp Duty
  • (8) Land Registration
  • (9) Completion
  • (11) Sub-sale and Sub-purchase
  • (12) Conveyancing Practice and Procedure
Monograph : Conveyancing
 

An assignment is a document through which title to a property is legally assigned by the vendor to the purchaser. An assignment has to be in the form of a deed and is prepared by the purchaser's solicitors for the approval of the vendor's solicitors. The date of execution of an assignment is the same as the date of completion for the sale and purchase of the property.

LICENCE LIST

Ascertain if the person concerned is currently licensed and the details of the licence

LICENSEE CORNER

Useful quick links for Licensees

CANDIDATE CORNER

Useful information before becoming an estate agent

CONSUMER EDUCATION WEBSITE

Useful information and advice for consumers

  • More Blog Popular
  • Who's Who Legal
  • Instruct Counsel
  • My newsfeed
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Follow Please login to follow content.

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

At a glance: M&A structures and regulation in Hong Kong

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP logo

Structure and process, legal regulation and consents

How are acquisitions and disposals of privately owned companies, businesses or assets structured in your jurisdiction? What might a typical transaction process involve and how long does it usually take?

Typically, a contract, referred to as a sale and purchase agreement, is executed between the relevant parties to acquire or dispose of privately owned companies, businesses or assets. Privately owned companies can also be acquired by a contractual offer followed by a minority squeeze-out, or by a scheme of arrangement proposed by the company to be acquired, provided that the offer or the scheme is made in accordance with Part 13 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap 622)(CO).

The process of acquiring a company, business or assets will often depend on the complexity of the issues and the number of parties involved, as well as whether the transaction involves a bilateral negotiation or a controlled auction process with multiple potential buyers.

An auction process in which interest from several buyers is solicited will typically involve:

  • drafting an information memorandum as the basis of marketing the company, business or assets, completion of vendor due diligence, and drafting of a sale and purchase agreement and other transaction documentation (approximately six to eight weeks);
  • ‘round one’ expressions of interest from potential buyers who will then be permitted to undertake due diligence (approximately four weeks);
  • ‘round two’ offers by potential buyers with markups of the transaction documentation (approximately four weeks); and
  • negotiation of transaction documentation with one or more buyers until definitive terms are agreed with one party (up to two weeks).

The larger and more international the target company, business or assets, the longer each phase of a process can take. Up to three months will often elapse between distribution of an information memorandum and execution of definitive transaction documents. A bilateral transaction can take longer to complete owing to the lack of competitive tension in the process.

Which laws regulate private acquisitions and disposals in your jurisdiction? Must the acquisition of shares in a company, a business or assets be governed by local law?

The CO sets out the regulatory framework for Hong Kong-incorporated companies. There is a range of statutes and regulations dealing with the transfer of employees, title to property, third-party rights, data protection, pensions and competition that are relevant to private acquisitions and disposals in Hong Kong.

Although most sales of Hong Kong incorporated companies will be governed by the laws of Hong Kong, there is no requirement to be so, and accordingly it is possible for acquisitions to be governed by the law of an overseas jurisdiction. Further, legal formalities applicable to the transfer of shares and assets and liabilities that are subject to local law will also have to be complied with. In Hong Kong, there have been cases for transactions to be governed by the laws of China. These transactions usually involve assets that are based in China but are owned by a Hong Kong natural person or Hong Kong incorporated entity or transaction parties that are both in China.

What legal title to shares in a company, a business or assets does a buyer acquire? Is this legal title prescribed by law or can the level of assurance be negotiated by a buyer? Does legal title to shares in a company, a business or assets transfer automatically by operation of law? Is there a difference between legal and beneficial title?

The content and implications of title to shares and related assurances are not expressly prescribed by Hong Kong law and can generally be negotiated by the parties.

Legal title to shares in a company incorporated under the CO transfers upon the company’s register of members being updated to reflect the buyer as the registered holder of the shares following receipt by the company of an instrument of transfer duly executed by the parties. The transfer of title to assets subject to Hong Kong law may require notifications to be given, consents from third parties to be obtained and registrations to be made.

Legal and beneficial titles are distinct interests in property. A person registered as holding the legal title to a share in a company incorporated under the CO may be a nominee with a different party having the right to receive the economic benefits of the share. Accordingly, the beneficial interest can be transferred without having to update the register of members of the company. Interests in other assets, such as real estate, can be held in the same way.

Specifically in relation to the acquisition or disposal of shares in a company, where there are multiple sellers, must everyone agree to sell for the buyer to acquire all shares? If not, how can minority sellers that refuse to sell be squeezed out or dragged along by a buyer?

Typically a buyer will prefer all sellers to sign the transaction documentation and agree to be bound by the same.

Minority shareholders may, however, be required to sell their shares pursuant to drag-along provisions contained in a company’s articles of association or in a shareholders’ agreement requiring the transfer of title to their shares if specified conditions are satisfied.

Under the CO, if (1) a purchaser makes an offer to acquire all the shares not held by it in a Hong Kong incorporated company, (2) the offer is made on the same terms as those provided in Part 13 of the CO (takeover offer) and (3) the purchaser has, by virtue of acceptances of the offer (through signing of transaction documentation or otherwise), acquired at least 90 per cent in number of the shares of any class to which the offer relates, the purchaser may invoke the procedures set out in the CO to compulsorily acquire the remaining shares.

If the target company is a ‘public company’ under the Hong Kong Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Takeovers Code), the Takeovers Code would also apply to the process of compulsory acquisition, regardless of whether the target company is incorporated in Hong Kong or elsewhere. The primary factor in determining whether a company is considered a public company is the number of shareholders in Hong Kong. Accordingly, an unlisted company with a significant number of Hong Kong shareholders is likely to be a public company to which the Takeovers Code applies.

Pursuant to the Takeovers Code, in addition to complying with the relevant laws of the jurisdiction of incorporation of the target company, the offeror (purchaser) must have acquired 90 per cent of the disinterested shares (ie, shares other than those owned by the purchaser or persons acting in concert with it) during the four-month period after posting the initial offer document before it can exercise its right to compulsorily acquire the remaining shares not already acquired by it. This is a more stringent threshold than the one set out in the CO.

If the takeover offer is structured as a scheme of arrangement to acquire all shares of a Hong Kong incorporated company, the CO requires the holding of a High Court of Hong Kong-sanctioned shareholders’ meeting in which:

  • the approval by shareholders of the target representing at least 75 per cent of voting rights of the shareholders present and voting in person or by proxy at the meeting; and
  • the votes cast against the arrangement at the meeting do not exceed 10 per cent of the total voting rights attached to all ‘disinterested shares’ in the target company (where the target company is also a public company to which the Takeovers Code applies, the number of votes cast against the resolution to approve the scheme at such meeting must not be more than 10 per cent of the votes attaching to all disinterested shares). While the definitions of ‘disinterested shares’ under the CO and the Takeovers Code are largely similar, they are however not identical. Accordingly, care needs to be taken to determine if the 10 per cent threshold is satisfied under both the CO and the Takeovers Code).

In addition to the shareholders’ approval, the scheme must also be sanctioned by the High Court of Hong Kong.

Specifically in relation to the acquisition or disposal of a business, are there any assets or liabilities that cannot be excluded from the transaction by agreement between the parties? Are there any consents commonly required to be obtained or notifications to be made in order to effect the transfer of assets or liabilities in a business transfer?

As a matter of Hong Kong contract law, a buyer can generally choose which assets or liabilities it wishes to acquire in a transaction that is structured as a business or asset sale.

The transfer of assets or liabilities may require customary third-party consents: for example, a landlord’s consent to the assignment of a lease, or a counterparty’s consent to the assignment or novation of a contract.

Are there any legal, regulatory or governmental restrictions on the transfer of shares in a company, a business or assets in your jurisdiction? Do transactions in particular industries require consent from specific regulators or a governmental body? Are transactions commonly subject to any public or national interest considerations?

There are no legal, regulatory or governmental restrictions on transfers of shares in a Hong Kong incorporated company unless the target business belongs to the banking, insurance, securities and futures, provident fund or telecommunications or broadcasting sectors. In particular, the telecommunications sector is also subject to the ‘Merger Rule’ under the Competition Ordinance. Details of relevant requirements are set out below.

Persons who intend on becoming a ‘shareholder controller’ in banks, restricted licence banks or deposit-taking companies (collectively, authorised institutions) must serve a notice to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority of such intention and obtain its prior approval. A shareholder controller is any person (together with his or her associates) who is entitled, directly or indirectly, to control 10 per cent or more of the voting power at a general meeting of an authorised institution. Only upon receiving a notice of consent from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority or the passing of three months after having given notice (without receiving a notice of objection) may that person become a shareholder controller.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority will take into account a wide range of factors to determine the ‘fitness and properness’ of a potential shareholder controller.

Becoming a shareholder controller of an authorised issuer in Hong Kong requires completing an application process to ensure that the Hong Kong Insurance Authority (HKIA) has no objection for someone to become the proposed shareholder controller of such insurance company. Shareholder controller refers to any person who alone or with an associate is entitled to exercise 15 per cent or more of the voting power at any general meeting of the insurance company. If the HKIA then notifies the proposed controller that there is no objection, or three months pass without any such notice, the proposed controller may become a controller. The HKIA has the power to object to an application to become a shareholder controller if the person is not fit and proper to hold that position.

Similarly, the HKIA’s prior consent must be obtained before a person may become a shareholder controller of a Hong Kong holding company of an insurance group if the company is designated by the HKIA (by notice published in the government gazette) as a ‘designated insurance holding company’ under the Insurance Ordinance.

To become a substantial shareholder of a licensed corporation, the proposed shareholder must gain prior approval from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). The relevant regulated activities are listed in Schedule 5 of the Ordinance and include, among other things, dealing in or advising on securities, advising on corporate finance and asset management. Prior approval from the SFC is also required for changes to registered provident fund schemes, including changes of the trustee or change of control.

A ‘substantial shareholder’ includes a person who controls either 10 per cent of the voting power (at the relevant company’s general meetings) of a licensed corporation or 35 per cent of the voting power of a company that in turn controls 10 per cent of the voting power of the licensed corporation.

The SFC will refuse to approve an applicant to become a substantial shareholder unless it is satisfied that the licensed corporation will remain ‘fit and proper’ to be licensed if the application is approved.

To become a substantial shareholder of an approved trustee, the proposed shareholder must gain prior written consent from the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority.

No ‘disqualified person’ shall ‘exercise control’ of a corporation that is a sound broadcasting licensee under the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106) without the approval of the Chief Executive in Council. Disqualified persons include, among others, licensees, persons who are domestic pay or free television programme service licensees (or an associate of such licensee) or persons who exercise control of a corporation that is a licensee. Any person who is a beneficial owner of more than 15 per cent or holds an office in that company can exercise control.

Additionally, to own (directly or indirectly) more than 49 per cent of voting shares in a licensee, a person must satisfy the requisite residency requirements. For individuals, they must ordinarily be resident in Hong Kong and have been resident for a continuous period of not less than seven years. If it is a company that acquires the shares, it must ordinarily be resident in Hong Kong with an absolute majority of persons taking an active part in the management of the corporation meeting the residency requirements and the management of the company must be bona fide exercised in Hong Kong.

The Merger Rule under the Competition Ordinance prohibits anticompetitive mergers and acquisitions, and is currently limited to mergers relating to carrier licenses issued under the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106). If the transaction is deemed anticompetitive, the Competition Commission has the power to stop the merger process or unwind the merger if already completed.

Similar to the relevant provisions of the Telecommunications Ordinance (Cap 106), without the requisite approval, a person is not permitted to exercise control (being the beneficial owner of more than 15 per cent) of a domestic free or pay television programme service licensee if it is a disqualified person, which includes, among others, a licensee in the same or different category of licence or a person who exercises control in such licensee.

A television programme service licensee and any person exercising control of it must be ‘fit and proper’, which can be determined using several factors, including the person’s business record and criminal record in respect of offences involving bribery, false accounting, corruption or dishonesty (section 21(4) of the Broadcasting Ordinance).

Are any other third-party consents commonly required?

For purchases of shares from an existing shareholder, the consent of the other shareholders may be required to waive pre-emptive rights, tag-along rights or other restrictions on transfer that are usually specified either under the articles of association of the target company or the relevant shareholders’ agreements.

Similarly, for any acquisition or disposal of assets, the transaction parties must scrutinise the provisions under the articles of association and shareholders’ agreement, if any, to see if there are any restrictions on the transfer or prior shareholders’ approval for the transfer, or both. The parties will also need to follow the proper procedures for transferring certain rights, permits, licences and consents that may be necessary for the smooth transition and the continuous operation of the business in Hong Kong or, if needed, for obtaining new permits or licences, or both, when there is an acquisition of a business or assets.

Consents from third parties may also be required under previous agreements of the target company with its landlords, creditors, debenture holders, mortgagees or other contracting parties that may be affected as a result of a transfer of assets or upon a change in control of the target company.

If a transaction involves a transfer of personal data (which is defined under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO) (Cap 486) as any data relating directly or indirectly to a living individual from which it is practicable for the identity of the individual to be directly or indirectly ascertained and in a form in which access to or processing of the data is practicable) to a place outside Hong Kong, the transaction parties should be mindful of the guidance on cross-border data transfers issued by the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data of Hong Kong, as well as the relevant data protection principles (DPPs) and requirements under the PDPO, including DPP 3, which requires the consent of the data subject to be obtained if his or her personal data is to be used for a purpose other than that for which the data was originally collected or a directly related purpose. 

Must regulatory filings be made or registration (or other official) fees paid to acquire shares in a company, a business or assets in your jurisdiction?

For transfer of shares in relation to a Hong Kong incorporated company, it is not required to deliver any specified form to the Hong Kong Companies Registry for reporting the transfer when it takes place. However, if such transfer takes place before the lodgement of the company’s annual return with the Hong Kong Companies Registry, the transfer should be reported in the annual return after the transfer has taken place. Any change subsequent to the filing of the annual return should be reported in the next annual return. For a private company, the annual return should be filed within 42 days of the anniversary of the date of incorporation every year. Each annual return should be accompanied by an annual registration fee (as part of the government’s relief measures, the registration fees for annual returns delivered to the Companies Registry on time and within the concession period from 1 October 2020 to 30 September 2022 have been waived for two years).

For transactions involving a subscription of new shares of a Hong Kong incorporated company, a form relating to return of allotment must be filed with the Hong Kong Companies Registry within one month after the allotment. Details, such as the total number of allotted shares, a description of the shares allotted and a statement of capital that shows the company’s latest share capital structure, must be included. There is no filing fee involved in the submission of such return.

A deed or other written instruments such as an assignment or a mortgage are required to be executed upon the sale of an immovable property in Hong Kong. Such document will be registered at the Hong Kong Land Registry. There is no time restriction within which the registration must be made under law; however, late registration may possibly result in a loss of registration priority. If an instrument has been registered within one month after the date of its execution, it may retain its priority back to the execution date, otherwise the priority will be counted only from the date of registration. A registration fee, which varies in accordance with the nature of the instrument or the amount of consideration paid or the value of the property, will be charged.

Other fees are also payable when seeking regulatory approval to become a controlling or substantial shareholder of companies in certain industry sectors .

Filed under

  • Corporate Finance/M&A
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

Popular articles from this firm

Snapshot: the regulatory framework for financial services compliance in hong kong *, private m&a in hong kong *, hk profit announcements: to warn or not to warn *, q&a: due diligence for private m&a transactions in hong kong *, in brief: financial services compliance programmes in hong kong *.

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Determining whether to file a National Security and Investment Act 2021 notification (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: Drafting a staff handbook (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to transfer personal data lawfully outside the European Economic Area (EU)

Related research hubs

legal assignment hong kong

Lorenz Logo en

Newsletter No. 149 (EN)

Securing and assigning claims in hong kong.

  • Last updated:
  • 31 January, 2023

I. Introduction

Security in the form of a charge over certain assets, such as receivables or “book debt” for instance, is of signifi­cant importance for international trade and loan transactions. In order for a creditor to minimize the risk of default by the debtor and obtain assurance that only secured rather than unsecured debts are held, the creditor must take several steps to reserve a preferential rank over other creditors.

This newsletter will discuss the assign­ment of receivables, in German called “Zession”, and what is required for a registration in Hong Kong to reserve a preferential rank in case of insolvency of the debtor. First, the relevant terms will be defined and then described in further detail in context of Hong Kong legisla­tion. The final part of the newsletter will explain what is required to register a blanket assignment of receivables in Hong Kong.

II. Definitions

1.       Assignment of receivables

Assignments of receivables are regulated in Germany in § 398 of the Civil Law Code ( B ürgerliche G esetz b uch, BGB ). The assignment of receivables is a common security for loans. The legal re­lationship usually consists of a party granting security, the grantor (e.g. per­son or entity taking a loan) who assigns receivables (e.g. receivables for goods supplied) to a secured party (e.g. entity or person giving a loan). The assignment of receivables makes the se­cured party the creditor of the receiva­bles.

2.      Types of assignment of receivables

Assignments generally can be distin­guished into single assignment (“Einzel­zession”), overall assignment (“Mantel­zession”) and blanket assignment (“Globalzession”). The blanket assign­ment is also sometimes re­ferred to as global assignment. The blanket assign­ment is differentiated from the single as­signment and overall assign­ment insofar, as the blanket assign­ment assigns all cur­rent and future receivables in favour of the secured person or entity. In contrast, a single assign­ment only assigns a specif­ic receivable while an overall assignment usually assigns only receivables that ex­isted at a certain point in time. Some­times, overall assignments are accompa­nied with an arrangement that all future receivables will be assigned through ad­ditional overall assignments. However, since such arrangement is very similar to the blanket assignment, usually in such circumstances the parties agree to pro­ceed with a blanket assignment.

3.      Absolute and undisclosed assign­ments

Independent of whether current or fu­ture receivables are assigned, or whether one specific receivable or a group of re­ceivables are assigned, the assign­ment can be either absolute or undisclosed. With an undisclosed assign­ment the se­cured party decides not to disclose the assign­ment to the third-party debtor, who continues to settle the receivables by payment to the grantor. With an absolute assignment, the assign­ment is disclosed to the third-party debtor and the debtor is only able to set­tle the receivables with discharging ef­fect by payment to the secured party, not the grantor.

In Hong Kong, no requirement exists that for an absolute assignment the third-party debtor has to only settle the receivables with discharging effect by payment to the secured party. It is how­ever common, if the secured party is a bank, that a special account is opened, which is used by the third-party debtor to settle the receivables. The money held in these accounts can only be accessed or transferred with the permission of the secured party (usually the bank).

III. Assignment of receivables in Hong Kong

Assignments of receivables such as the blanket assignment are generally possi­ble and are regulated under the broader term “charges”. In Hong Kong and many other common law jurisdictions a distinction is made between “fixed” and “floating” charges.

A fixed charge is a charge over assets which are specified (e.g. a machine or a specific receivable). With the effect of the assignment that the grantor (“char­gor”) is no longer free to deal with those assets. In contrast, a floating charge is an assignment of a type or group of assets (e.g. inventory, goods in a warehouse, undefined number of receivables, or the general under­taking or property of the company) which are not specifically identifiable and the chargor is able to continue to use the assets (processing and selling goods, collect receivables, etc.) while the secured person (“chargee”) retains certain rights in case of insolvency.

Charges are generally available to sole-traders as security instrument in business transactions while in practice “floating charges“ are primarily only granted by companies. The C ompanies O rdinance Chap. 622 ( CO ) does not define fixed and floating charges and so its definition is based on case law in alignment with common law principles. Assignments of receivables have generally been catego­rised as fixed charges. However, the conditions of what constitutes a fixed charge have changed significantly after the decisions in Agnew v IRC [2001] UKPC 28 and National Westminster Bank Ltd v Spectrum Plus Ltd [2004] 3 WLR 503.

A blanket assignment has the character­istic that the underlying assets, the re­ceiv­ables, constantly change (old receiv­ables are settled, and new ones are add­ed). Therefore, it is generally accept­ed that the blanket assignment is not treat­ed like a fixed charge, but as a float­ing charge. The classification is not up to the involved parties, but is determined by the relevant judge on a case by case basis (common law).

In case the grantor would like to classify the blanket assignment as a fixed charge, it would be necessary to open a bank ac­count, which is used for all settlement payments of the relevant receivables, and the grantor is unable to access or transfer any amounts from this account without the prior permission of the se­cured party. Since such arrangement is rather unpractical, it can be noted that the blanket assignment will most likely be characterised as a floating charge. With a floating charge, the secured party has only access to the charged receiva­bles, when they “concretise”. A floating charge will concretises if:

  • the company winds-up;
  • commences insolvency proceedings;
  • ceases its business;
  • any agreed terms of the charge.

The disadvantage of a floating charge is that the secured party is ranked after creditors that are in the possession of a fixed charge.

IV. Registration

To ensure that a party providing a loan becomes a secured creditor in compari­son to an unsecured creditor, it is neces­sary that the charge is valid and regis­tered. If an assignment of receiv­ables is not registered, it is invalid towards the liquidator and other creditors of the company. The registration of charges is regulated in Section 333 ff of the CO.

1.       Registration

Section 334 of the CO includes a list of charges that must be registered (inde­pendent whether they are considered fixed or floating charges). Among the listed charges are receivables.

2.      Registration period

Section 335 of the CO requires that a charge is registered within a month af­ter its creation.

3.      Registry keeping

Pursuant to Section 352 of the CO, a company must keep a registry at its reg­istered office. In case that the registry is not kept at the registered office, the Registrar of Companies must be in­formed. The registry must be kept in Hong Kong.

4.      Registration by the company or its creditors

In theory it is the duty of the company to register the charge. However, it is common that the registration is done by the creditor.

A blanket assignment of receivables is possible in Hong Kong and must be registered at the Companies Registry as charge. A registration is also possible (recommended) by the creditor. A blan­ket assignment of receivables is most likely categorised as a floating charge, which has the disadvantage that in case of insolvency, the secured party’s set­tlement of claims will be ranked after the creditors of fixed charges.

We hope that we have been able to assist you with this information. If you have any further questions, please contact us:

Lorenz & Partners Co., Ltd.

27th Floor, Bangkok City Tower, 179, S Sathorn Rd,

Thung Maha Mek, Sathon, Bangkok 10120

Email:  [email protected] www.lorenz-partners.com +66 (0) 2 287 1882

Lorenz Logo en

  • Publications
  • Legal Notice

logo wtsglobal

  • Tax Accounting
  • Business Consulting
  • Our Publications
  • Our Newsletters, Brochures and Case Studies as PDF
  • Our Newsletters, Brochures and Case Studies as HTML
  • Thailand Legal Updates
  • Our Publication in Legal and Tax Magazines

Legal assistant part time Jobs

Perform a job search.

  • Kwun Tong Kwun Tong District
  • Tsim Sha Tsui Yau Tsim Mong District
  • Central Central and Western District
  • Mong Kok Yau Tsim Mong District
  • Sheung Wan Central and Western District
  • Admiralty Central and Western District

Related searches

legal assignment hong kong

Legal Assistant (Part Time)

This is a Part time job

  • Work 2 to 3 days per week (Weekdays)
  • Provide admin support to Legal Department
  • Gain valuable experience in HUGO BOSS

legal assignment hong kong

legal & Com Sec Administrative Assistant (Part-time)

  • Young & Energetics work environment
  • Outdoor filings and sending documents

legal assignment hong kong

PARALEGAL / LEGAL ASSISTANT / SECRETARY

This is a Full time job

legal assignment hong kong

Part-time Officer (Legal)

  • Stable working environment; 16 hrs working
  • Welcome undergraduates
  • Clerical support to team

legal assignment hong kong

Managerial Position(CPA preferred)管理岗位(CPA優先)

legal assignment hong kong

Junior Legal Secretary (Part-time)

Part-time/full time legal secretary/ legal clerk.

legal assignment hong kong

Litigation Clerk/Legal Secretary (Part Time/Flexible Working)

This is a Contract/Temp job

Litigation Paralegal - Immediate Availability Preferred

Receive new jobs for this search by email, select a job.

1209/2A Help St, Chatswood NSW 2067

Great Assignment Helper

  • Assignment Expert
  • Homework Help
  • Do My Assignment
  • Assignment Writing Services
  • Help With My Assignment
  • Pay Someone to Do My Assignment
  • Pay Someone to Do My Homework
  • Assignment Helper
  • TAKE MY ONLINE EXAM
  • Take My Online Class for Me
  • Math Homework Help Online
  • IT Assignment Help

Computer Science Assignment Help

  • Network Assignment Help
  • Algorithm assignment help
  • Android App Assignment Help
  • Animation assignment help
  • Apache Spark Assignment Help
  • Economics Assignment Help
  • Macroeconomics Assignment Help
  • microeconomics assignment help
  • Public Economics Assignment Help
  • Finance Assignment Help
  • Managerial Accounting Assignment Help
  • Capital Budgeting Assignment Help
  • Activity-Based Accounting Assignment Help

Accounting Assignment Help

  • Cost Accounting Assignment Help
  • Taxation Assignment Help
  • Tax Accounting Assignment Help
  • Corporate Finance Assignment Help
  • Financial Management Assignment Help
  • Psychology Assignment Help
  • Social Science Assignment Help
  • English Assignment Help
  • Humanities Assignment Help
  • Archeology Assignment Help
  • Geography Assignment Help
  • History Assignment Help
  • Philosophy Assignment Help
  • Sociology Assignment Help
  • TAFE Assignment Help

Law Assignment Help

  • BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT HELP
  • Tort Law Assignment Help
  • Taxation Law Assignment Help
  • Criminology Assignment Help
  • Law and Ethics Assignment Help
  • Nursing Assignment Help
  • Management Assignment help
  • Operations Management Assignment Help
  • MBA Assignment Help
  • Project Management Assignment Help
  • Marketing Management Assignment Help
  • MATHEMATICS ASSIGMENT HELP
  • algebra assignment help
  • Calculus Assignment Help
  • excel assignment help
  • Geometry Assignment Help
  • statistics assignment help
  • SPSS Assignment Help
  • Engineering Assignment Help
  • Civil Engineering Assignment Help
  • Chemical Engineering Assignment Help
  • Electrical Engineering Assignment Help
  • Electronics Engineering Assignment Help
  • Mechanical Engineering assignment help
  • Physics Assignment Help
  • Biology Assignment Help
  • Chemistry Assignment Help
  • dissertation help
  • Research Paper Help
  • Thesis Help
  • PHP Assignment Help
  • Database Assignment Help
  • Java Programming Help
  • Matlab Assignment Help
  • Programming Assignment Help
  • UML Diagram Assignment Help
  • Web Designing and Web Development assignment help
  • Data Mining Assignment Help
  • MYOB assignment help
  • SAS Assignment Help
  • data structure assignment help
  • medical science assignment help
  • Pharmacy Assignment Help
  • Veterinary Medicine Assignment Help
  • Plagiarism Checker
  • Grammar Checker
  • GPA Calculator
  • Words Counter
  • How it works
  • REVIEWS   4.88/5

Get Help Instantly

Raise Your Grades with Great Assignment Helper

Best Assignment Help Services In Hong Kong

At GreatAssignmentHelper.com, We undertake your Success with academic assignments 24*7 through expert professional writers and mentors who guide you through your challenging assignments and help you secure desired grades without bothering.

Place your order from Our App and Get 25% Extra Discount

legal assignment hong kong

300K+ Students Of

uni1

How Great Assignment Helper Works

Our writers deliver most of the essays ahead of schedule. It takes 4 simple steps to buy your custom paper

...

Submit Order Details

Submit details of the order to enable our experts to deliver desirable results (Subject, no. of pages, referencing format, deadline & upload necessary files).

...

Get Best Rate for your order

Open the Chatbox and share your order id with our GAH Helper who will understand your instructions and provide your with the best rates and payment link to you.

...

Make payment securely

Once you receive the payment link, proceed to the secure payment gateway provided by PayPal and make the payment. Now sit back & relax.

...

Track & Download your assignment

You can track your order status by simply providing your order id over chat or over WhatsApp 24x7. Once your assignment is completed, it is shared with you over email, WhatsApp & also uploaded on your dashboard & you can download the same per your convenience.

Hong Kong Assignment Help: Elevate Your Academic Journey

Looking for reliable and instant assignment help in Hong Kong ? Look no further than Great Assignment Helper! Our team of PhD experts is dedicated to providing top-notch assignment help to students across the country. Whether you need assistance with case studies, management assignment help, essays, or any other type of reliable assignment help, our online assignment helpers are here to assist you 24/7 with our live chat support.

Great Assignment Helper offers reliable and affordable assignment writing services in Hong Kong with a quick turnaround time.

At Great Assignment Helper, we offer affordable prices and hassle-free services that cater to your specific needs. With quick turnaround times and a commitment to quality, our goal is always to help you achieve top grades with ease. So why wait? Get started today and experience the difference that expert Hong Kong Assignment Help can make!

Expert Assignment Writing Services

Our expert assignment writing services in Hong Kong provide top-quality assignments that guarantee you the best grades. Our team consists of qualified and experienced assignment writers who are experts in their respective fields. We offer customized and plagiarism-free assignments tailored to meet your specific needs, ensuring that you get exactly what you need to succeed.

At greatassignmenthelper.com, we believe in providing only the best services for our clients. That's why we conduct thorough research and analysis before delivering each case study or assignment help request. With our 24/7 availability, quick turnaround time, and affordable prices, getting top grades has never been easier!

Home Page Side

Unveiling the Distinctive Features of Our Assignment Help Services in Hong Kong

Subject Expertise Our assignment help services in Hong Kong are backed by a team of subject experts possessing extensive knowledge and expertise in various disciplines. Whether it's engineering, business, humanities, or sciences, our tutors are well-versed in the subject matter, ensuring accurate and comprehensive assistance for your assignments.

Affordable Prices and Hassle-free Services

At Great Assignment Helper, we understand that students require affordable and hassle-free assignment writing services. Our team of expert writers provides pocket-friendly rates with no hidden charges, ensuring transparency and trust between us and our clients. Additionally, ordering from us is easy with secure payment options available for your convenience.

We prioritize customer satisfaction at all times. Hence, we provide limitless revisions until you're satisfied with the end result. Whether it’s a case study or any other academic task, our experts are here to provide you with high-quality work that will help you achieve top grades effortlessly.

  • Pocket-friendly Rates with No Hidden Charges
  • Easy Ordering Process With Secure Payment Options
  • Unlimited Revisions Until Satisfaction

24/7 Availability and Quick Turnaround

Our assignment writing experts are available round-the-clock to assist you with any queries you may have. We understand the importance of meeting deadlines, which is why we offer fast delivery of assignments within set timelines. In case of urgent requirements, our emergency assignment help service ensures that you get the assistance you need without any delay.

At Great Assignment Helper, we provide hassle-free and affordable assignment writing services for students in Hong Kong. Our team of experienced writers can assist with various types of assignments including case studies and essays. Count on us as your dependable online assignment helper in Hong Kong, where top grades are effortlessly attainable thanks to our 24/7 accessibility and swift turnaround. Plagiarism-Free Work In our Hong Kong assignment help services, we emphasize originality, guaranteeing plagiarism-free content. Our dedicated team of experts conducts extensive research to deliver authentic assignments. Rigorous quality checks and plagiarism detection tools guarantee that the work delivered to you is 100% original, ensuring academic integrity and excellence.

Unlocking Academic Success: Online Assignment Help Services

home page Left Image

Looking for online assignment help in Hong Kong? Our expert assignment helpers are here to provide hassle-free and affordable services to students looking to achieve top grades. We cover a wide range of subjects, including but not limited to finance, marketing, and law.

Our professional and experienced writers ensure that every assignment is customized according to the specific requirements of the student and is completely plagiarism-free. With our online assignment helper service in Hong Kong, you can be assured of timely delivery without compromising on quality. Contact us today for all your academic writing needs!

Explore Our Extensive Range of Subject-based Assignment Help Services in Hong Kong

Our Hong Kong assignment help covers a wide range of subjects from STEM to Social Sciences and Humanities. Our team of experts provides top-quality custom assignments that are plagiarism-free, enabling you to score high grades with ease.

Seeking accounting assignment help in Hong Kong ? Look no further! Our dedicated team of experts specializes in providing comprehensive assistance for accounting assignments. From financial accounting to managerial accounting, auditing to tax accounting, we cover it all. Our experts have a deep understanding of accounting principles, concepts, and frameworks, ensuring accurate and high-quality solutions for your assignments. Let us help you excel in your accounting studies and achieve the grades you desire.

Need assistance with your Computer Science assignments? Look no further! Our Computer Science assignment help services in Hong Kong  provide comprehensive support for students tackling coding, algorithms, database management, software engineering, and more. Our team of experts, well-versed in the field, will guide you in understanding complex concepts, solving problems, and delivering high-quality assignments. Excel in your Computer Science studies with our reliable assistance and unlock your potential for success.

Seeking expert guidance for your law assignments? Look no further! Our dedicated law assignment help services in Hong Kong are tailored to provide comprehensive support to students pursuing legal studies. From analyzing complex cases to crafting persuasive arguments, our team of experienced experts possesses in-depth knowledge of legal principles and practices. With their guidance, you can submit well-researched, meticulously structured, and compelling law assignments. Excel in your academic journey with our trusted law assignment help today!

Leading Universities in Hong Kong

The University of Hong Kong , established in 1911, is a leading university in Hong Kong known for its research excellence and international reputation. It offers undergraduate and postgraduate programs in various fields such as business, sciences, engineering, law and medicine. With state-of-the-art facilities and A globally sourced student population, the University of Hong Kong provides an enriching academic experience.

Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) , founded in 1963, is another top-tier university renowned for its research prowess across key disciplines like science & technology, social science & humanities as well as business management. Apart from academic excellence with distinguished faculty members and strong industry connections through partnerships with multinational corporations to startups alike; CUHK stands out for nurturing innovation among students through initiatives such as entrepreneurship training programs or dedicated centres fostering creativity beyond classroom learning opportunities alone.

University of Hong Kong

The University of Hong Kong is a leading institution of higher education in East Asia, with a long tradition of academic excellence and innovation. It offers a wide range of undergraduate and graduate programs across various disciplines, providing students with opportunities for interdisciplinary learning and research. Some notable features include:

  • A diverse student body from around the world
  • Extensive research facilities and partnerships
  • State-of-the-art teaching methods and technologies

Programs and courses offered by the university cover fields such as business, law, engineering, medicine, social sciences, humanities and arts.

Notable alumni who have graduated from the University of Hong Kong include Nobel laureates in physics Chen-Ning Yang (1954)and Tsung-Dao Lee (1946), actress Maggie Cheung Man-yuk (1982), politician Anson Chan Fang On-sang (1967), businessman Michael Kadoorie(1973). Their achievements serve as testimony to the quality education provided by this prestigious institution.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) is a leading institution in Asia with a strong reputation for academic excellence. The university is known for its distinctive features such as bilingual education, multicultural environment and emphasis on research-based learning. CUHK offers a wide range of programmes across different disciplines including business, engineering, social sciences and humanities. Students can choose from undergraduate, postgraduate and doctoral programmes depending on their interests and career goals.

Apart from academic pursuits, CUHK also provides students with an enriching campus life experience. The university has state-of-the-art facilities including modern classrooms, libraries, sports centres and student housing to ensure that students have access to all the resources they need to excel academically and personally. Additionally, there are numerous extracurricular activities such as clubs, societies and cultural events which contribute towards creating a vibrant community on campus where students can build lifelong friendships while pursuing their passions outside the classroom.

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

HKUST is a world-renowned institution that offers top-rated academic programs and research opportunities. As one of the leading universities in Hong Kong, HKUST prides itself on its unique Global Business Programs that are designed to prepare graduates for successful careers in the global marketplace. These programs give students hands-on experience with international companies, practical skills, and critical thinking abilities necessary to succeed in today's rapidly changing business environment.

International students have access to various scholarships at HKUST that can help them finance their studies while pursuing their academic goals. Whether you are an undergraduate or graduate student, there are many scholarship options available based on merit and financial need. With these resources at your disposal, you can focus on pursuing your education without worrying about the financial burden.

Empowering Your Academic Journey with a Reliable Assignment Helper

Looking for hassle-free and affordable assignment writing services? Our online assignment helper can provide you with expert guidance and support to help you achieve top grades with ease. With personalized attention and assistance, our team ensures that your assignments are completed on time while maintaining the highest quality standards.

Our Hong Kong assignment help covers a wide range of subjects and is designed to meet the specific needs of students across different academic levels. Whether you need help with research papers, essays or any other type of written assignments, our experienced writers have got you covered. Trust us for timely delivery and quality assurance – get in touch today!

Expert Guidance and Support

Our team of experienced professionals possess in-depth subject knowledge and are available 24/7 to provide you with expert guidance and support. We understand the importance of meeting deadlines and delivering top-quality work, which is why we offer personalized attention and assistance throughout the process. Whether you need help with research, writing or editing, our online assignment helper service can help you achieve your academic goals hassle-free and at an affordable price.

Personalized Attention and Assistance

Our personalized attention and assistance ensures that you receive customized assignment solutions, one-on-one communication with experts, and feedback and revision support for your assignments.

With our team of experienced professionals, we provide tailored solutions to meet your specific needs. Our one-on-one communication enables you to discuss any doubts or concerns with our experts directly. We also offer feedback and revision support throughout the process to ensure that you receive top grades with ease.

Our personalized attention includes:

  • Customized assignment solutions
  • One-on-one communication with experts
  • Feedback and revision support

At Great Assignment Helper, we strive to make the assignment writing process hassle-free while providing affordable services for students looking for Hong Kong assignment help online.

Timely Delivery and Quality Assurance

We understand the importance of meeting deadlines, and therefore, we strictly adhere to them. You can rely on us for timely delivery of your assignments. In addition to this, our experts guarantee 100% plagiarism-free work that is thoroughly checked by editors before submission. We take pride in delivering high-quality assignments that meet the academic standards and exceed your expectations.

Our quality assurance process includes a thorough check by our experienced editors before submitting any assignment to you. This ensures that all assignments are free from errors, typos or other inconsistencies that may affect their quality or credibility. With our Hong Kong Assignment Help services, you can confidently submit your assignments knowing they have been written according to all relevant guidelines and are of top-notch quality!

Reviews By Our Success & Top Students

Lita Beals

Great Assignment Helper have undoubtedly the best academic support system for students aspiring for a 360 degree excellence. The subject experts at Great Assignment Helper have patiently guided me through the challenges of in depth research and assimilation of concepts for all of my Finance Homework Help.

Antony Dunn

Antony Dunn

Subject specialists at Great Assignment Helper have helped me with my various academic Assignment Helps over the past two years. With their assistance only I have been able to impress my examiners enough to score grades of excellence consistently. Their support methodology has been totally hassle free and soft on a student’s pocket.

Latest News & Blogs

Image

12 Aug, 2024

40 trending free statistics project ideas 2024.

Lorem ipsum dolor am consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor labore et dolore.

Image

Brian Nelson

Image

08 Aug, 2024

100 best ethical dilemma essay topics.

Image

02 Aug, 2024

How do you know who is a r1 research institution.

Jennifer Lawrence

whatsapp-image

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

  • You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
  • You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
  • You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
  • A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

We've detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Why did this happen?

Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our Terms of Service and Cookie Policy .

For inquiries related to this message please contact our support team and provide the reference ID below.

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Generative AI
  • Business Operations
  • IT Leadership
  • Application Security
  • Business Continuity
  • Cloud Security
  • Critical Infrastructure
  • Identity and Access Management
  • Network Security
  • Physical Security
  • Risk Management
  • Security Infrastructure
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Software Development
  • Enterprise Buyer’s Guides
  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Newsletters
  • Foundry Careers
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Member Preferences
  • About AdChoices
  • E-commerce Links
  • Your California Privacy Rights

Our Network

  • Computerworld
  • Network World

Tech giants warn proposed Hong Kong cyber rules could undermine digital economy

The regulation would allow authorities to install their programs in the computer systems of infrastructure providers including google and amazon..

lawyer looking over laws and regulations

Hong Kong’s proposed cybersecurity regulations have sparked controversy, with US tech giants and business groups warning the legislation could grant the government unprecedented access to computer systems and stifle investment in the city’s digital economy.

The Asia Internet Coalition (AIC), representing tech giants such as Amazon, Google, and Meta, has been vocal in its criticism, arguing that the regulations, intended to safeguard critical infrastructure, could overreach and jeopardize the integrity of service providers.

These concerns have been echoed by the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) and the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (HKGCC), both of which have submitted formal objections during the public consultation phase.

A key issue raised by the AIC is the proposed power for authorities to connect their equipment to private company systems and install software — actions that could compromise the operational security of these firms. In a letter dated August 1 , AmCham expressed fears that such measures would “significantly impact” the operations of critical infrastructure operators (CIOs) and could chill tech investments in Hong Kong.

“Such unprecedented power directly intervenes in, and could have a significant impact on, a CIO’s operation and could harm the users of the services,” the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) wrote in a letter, referring to critical infrastructure operators.

AmCham also warned the legislation could have a “chilling effect” on tech investment in Hong Kong. The firm has suggested removing the “power to install programs in CCS [critical computer systems]” by the authorities.

“Removing the power to connect equipment to or install program in CCS as this is likely to have a chilling effect on technology investment and Hong Kong digital economy, which will undermine trust in service providers who operate in Hong Kong,” Dr. Eden Wood, president of AmCham wrote in the letter.

The HKGCC has raised similar concerns asking the authorities to reconsider the proposed legislation and not to “impose unduly burdensome or disproportionate compliance costs” to businesses given the current economic climate.

“Given the business impact of the proposed law, we suggest that considerations be given to the introduction of balanced and proportionate legislation, which is principle and risk-based, technology-neutral, and aligned with internationally recognized standards, so as to promote stakeholder trust and support the city’s innovation and technology advancements,” Patrick Yeung, CEO at HKGCC wrote in a letter dated 12 August.

“It is important that businesses in Hong Kong, and those that may wish to establish operations here, have sufficient comfort,” the letter read.

“The tighter control and scrutiny from the government could have a significant implication on enterprises and will make CIOs rethink their IT strategy on how to sandbox company and users’ private data while maintaining openness to the watchdog’s monitoring for a controlled cybersecurity approach,” said Neil Shah, VP for research and partner at Counterpoint Research.

“The implications are on how to comply with the regulations while maintaining data sovereignty for their customers and employees which could go against the value and agreements of many international companies. While some might look to challenge, some might try to find a workaround and some might even could exit the market,” added Shah.

A query seeking comments from Google and Meta remains unanswered.

What raises the concern?

In June, the Hong Kong government proposed a new cybersecurity legislation, named the Critical Infrastructure (Computer System) Bill, which was thrown open for public discussion on July 2.

The proposed legislation was designed to regulate large organizations that provide critical services, requiring them to secure their essential computer systems. However, it does not cover personal data and business information stored within these systems.

Though the tech giants and associations such as AIC, AmCham, and HKGCC have acknowledged the criticality of a robust cybersecurity law, the bone of contention pertains to some “strict guidelines.”

The primary concern is related to the “Investigation Powers” of the Commission office. It proposes that in the case of security incidents against a CCS, the authorities hold the power to “connect equipment to or install programs in the CCS” which means authorities can install their programs in the computer systems of private companies like Google, Amazon or any other infrastructure providers.

The second important concern is the magnitude of the penalty and reporting structure. The proposed legislation includes mandatory breach reporting within two hours and fines of up to $641,800 (HK$5 million).

The clash comes amid Hong Kong’s heightened scrutiny over internet freedom. The region recently flexed its muscle over online content by forcing Google to block pro-democracy protest songs on YouTube, raising concerns about potential future content removal demands.

Related content

Australian data regulator backs off clearview ai, musk’s x under scrutiny in europe for data privacy practices, the cost of a data breach continues to escalate, from our editors straight to your inbox, show me more, how mfa gets hacked — and strategies to prevent it.

Image

3 key strategies for mitigating non-human identity risks

Image

CrowdStrike denies merger talks with Action1

Image

CSO Executive Sessions: Guardians of the Games - How to keep the Olympics and other major events cyber safe

Image

CSO Executive Session India with Dr Susil Kumar Meher, Head Health IT, AIIMS (New Delhi)

Image

CSO Executive Session India with Charanjit Bhatia, Head of Cybersecurity, COE, Bata Brands

Image

Cybersecurity Insights for Tech Leaders: Addressing Dynamic Threats and AI Risks with Resilience

Image

legal assignment hong kong

Hong Kong Crypto Exchanges Face Challenges to Get Full Licenses

By Kiuyan Wong

Kiuyan Wong

Hong Kong’s push for a digital-asset hub faces growing pains amid uncertainty over whether 11 crypto exchanges will all achieve full licenses after earlier receiving initial approvals.

The city’s Securities and Futures Commission found unsatisfactory practices at some of the “deemed-to-be-licensed” platforms during on-site inspections carried out since they won the designation in June, people familiar with the situation said, asking not to be identified because the information is private.

Some of the crypto firms are overly reliant on a handful of executives to oversee the custody of client assets, while others aren’t properly guarding against cybercrime risks, the people ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn about bloomberg law.

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.

IMAGES

  1. Lawyers in Hong Kong

    legal assignment hong kong

  2. HKU Legal Scholarship Blog: New Volume of Hong Kong Journal of Law and

    legal assignment hong kong

  3. Assignment Q1

    legal assignment hong kong

  4. Contract Law in Hong Kong

    legal assignment hong kong

  5. hong kong high court

    legal assignment hong kong

  6. introduction of legal system (assignment)

    legal assignment hong kong

COMMENTS

  1. PDF A guide to Hong Kong Security and Receivership

    A legal assignment can relate only to past debts. In an equitable assignment, the debtors are not given notice of the assignment and the assignee has no right to ... Banking Practice and Guidance of the Law Society of Hong Kong are complied with in relation to personal guarantors so as to reduce the risk of challenge later, for example, for ...

  2. PDF Securing and Assigning Claims in Hong Kong

    Assignments of receivables such as the blanket assignment are generally possi-ble and are regulated under the broader term "charges". In Hong Kong and many other common law jurisdictions a distinction is made between "fixed" and "floating" charges. fixed charge is a charge over assets which are specified (e.g. a machine or a ...

  3. Assignment of Contract Rights

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Understand what an assignment is and how it is made. Recognize the effect of the assignment. Know when assignments are not allowed. Understand the concept of assignor's warranties. The Concept of a Contract Assignment. Method of Assignment. Effect of Assignment.

  4. Back to Basics

    In this alert, we outline the law in Hong Kong on execution of documents by a company. Insight, Back to Basics - Execution of Documents under Hong Kong Law. 03 August 2022 ... For example, an agreement for sale and purchase, an assignment, a charge or a receipt on discharge of a charge, in each case, in respect of immovable property in Hong ...

  5. PDF Contract Law in Hong Kong

    of very few textbooks focused on Hong Kong contract law at the undergraduate or graduate level. Much has changed in the Hong Kong legal arena since 2007. Many of those changes directly affect contract law; others do so more tangentially. Hong Kong's first post-1997 Chief Justice, Andrew Li, who did so much to maintain Hong Kong's

  6. If taking security

    Generally, Hong Kong law does not recognize the concept of a group benefit. When a parent company gives a guarantee or grants security in respect of a subsidiary's obligations, the commercial benefit to the parent can be clearly established. ... an equitable or legal assignment, or a charge. Generally, a floating charge over all or certain ...

  7. Assignment, Delegation, and Commonly Used Contracts Clauses

    Restrictions on assignment or delegation are not the only common elements that can be found in contracts. For example, you have probably encountered exculpatory clauses. An exculpatory clause is an express limitation on potential or actual liability arising under the subject matter of the contract. In short, exculpatory clauses are often ...

  8. Contract Formation and Enforcement in Hong Kong: Overview

    by Paul Starr, Felicity Ng, and Sian Knight, King & Wood Mallesons. A Q&A guide to general contract formation and enforcement in Hong Kong. The Q&A gives a high-level overview of key concepts of contract law, including contract formation with general information on authority and capacity, formal legal requirements, preliminary agreements and ...

  9. Factoring and Set off Rights

    Law on factoring and its effect on set off rights. Under Hong Kong law, the assignment of debts is governed by both statute and common law principles. Section 9 of the Law Amendment and Reform (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap. 23) (the Ordinance) provides that:-. " Any absolute assignment, by writing under the hand of the assignor (not ...

  10. Hong Kong Law Contract Guide

    Hong Kong Law Contract Guide Contents Introduction Formation of contract Terms, representations, and warranties Best endeavours/ reasonable endeavours Limitation and exclusion of liability clauses ...

  11. Hong Kong

    Hong Kong - Assignment, Novation Or Sub-Participation Of Loans. April 28, 2022 by Balaram Adhikari. The legal analysis regarding the transferability of loans can be complex. The loan agreement should be examined with a view to identifying any restrictions on transferability of the loan between lenders, such as prior consent of the debtor and ...

  12. Cap. 159 Legal Practitioners Ordinance

    Cap. 159 Legal Practitioners Ordinance. Timeline. Match case. Enable word stemming. Search: e.g. "Apple is good" means to find documents having the exact phrase "Apple is good". e.g. Apple AND Lemon means to find documents having both words. e.g. Apple OR Lemon means to find documents having either words.

  13. Priority of Floating Charges

    Under Hong Kong law, the general rule governing priority between assignments or charges over the same debts or receivables is the rule laid down in the English case of Dearle v Hall (1828) 3 Russ 1 ("Dearle v Hall"): that is the assignee/chargee whose notice to the debtor is the first in time has priority, provided that at the time of the ...

  14. Ho & Hall's Hong Kong Contract Law

    HK$ 2,400.00. In Stock ISBN: 9789888799862. Qty: minus. plus. Add to Cart. Product description. Ho & Hall's Hong Kong Contract Law authored by Stephen Hall, is a comprehensive work which expertly identifies the unique local characteristics of Hong Kong contact law. The text balances theoretical and policy discussion with practical ...

  15. Assignment of claims: Are there any constraints to ...

    In light of this, the Hong Kong law has accepted litigation funding arrangements as a legitimate practice in liquidation proceedings. Such arrangements may include the sale and assignment by a liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy, of an action commenced in the bankruptcy, to a purchaser for value. As far as arbitration is concerned, the Arbitration

  16. The Government restricts bans on assignment

    Publication. China releases revised rules to ease investment through the QFII regime. On 26 July 2024, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) jointly released revised rules in respect of the investments into China's financial market through the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor and Renminbi Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor ...

  17. Q&A: conducting litigation in Hong Kong

    In Hong Kong, the major courts and tribunals that deal with civil proceedings are: Small Claims Tribunal - to hear and decide low value monetary claims involving HK$75,000 or less. The main ...

  18. (5) Assignment

    An assignment is a document through which title to a property is legally assigned by the vendor to the purchaser. An assignment has to be in the form of a deed and is prepared by the purchaser's solicitors for the approval of the vendor's solicitors. The date of execution of an assignment is the same as the date of completion for the sale and ...

  19. PDF Assignments of registered trade marks and applications

    the relevant law of the place where the firm is established. In the case of a sole proprietorship established in the Hong Kong SAR, an application is usually filed and registered in the name of the sole proprietor trading in the name of the firm (e.g. Chan Siu-ling trading as Chan & Co.).

  20. At a glance: M&A structures and regulation in Hong Kong

    The CO sets out the regulatory framework for Hong Kong-incorporated companies. There is a range of statutes and regulations dealing with the transfer of employees, title to property, third-party ...

  21. Securing and Assigning Claims in Hong Kong

    The final part of the newsletter will explain what is required to register a blanket assignment of receivables in Hong Kong. II. Definitions . 1. Assignment of receivables. Assignments of receivables are regulated in Germany in § 398 of the Civil Law Code (Bürgerliche Gesetzbuch, BGB). The assignment of receivables is a common security for loans.

  22. PDF Hong Kong Commercial Law

    The Hong Kong Commercial Law Notes are formatted into a step-by-step guide, which you can use as a checklist in your exams to ensure that every element of the exam question is answered. You may find the Table of Contents to be a quick and useful overview of the law to be applied. You should also answer the exam question using the ILAC method ...

  23. Legal Assistant Part Time Jobs in Hong Kong

    Find your ideal job at Jobsdb with 101 Legal Assistant Part Time jobs found in Hong Kong. View all our Legal Assistant Part Time vacancies now with new jobs added daily!

  24. Legal System

    Studying Legal System LLAW1008 at The University of Hong Kong? On Studocu you will find 101 lecture notes, 38 summaries, 29 practice materials and much more for. Skip to main content. University; ... Legal system assignment. 6 pages 2015/2016 0% (1) 2015/2016 0% (1) Save. Other. Date Rating. year. Ratings. SOUL-Assignment Cover n Question CLS ...

  25. Assignment Help Expert

    Our dedicated law assignment help services in Hong Kong are tailored to provide comprehensive support to students pursuing legal studies. From analyzing complex cases to crafting persuasive arguments, our team of experienced experts possesses in-depth knowledge of legal principles and practices. With their guidance, you can submit well ...

  26. Law and Society Assignment Comments 2023 (pdf)

    1 Law and Society 2023-24 Department of Law The University of Hong Kong General Comments on Assignment Performance Assignment Question: Although Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau and Marx lived a long time ago, their thoughts are still helpful to us today when we think about and analyze current issues in Hong Kong Discuss the above with reference to the thoughts of at least two of the four thinkers (In ...

  27. US Firms Warn Against 'Unprecedented' Hong Kong Cyber Rules (1)

    US firms have warned that proposed cyber regulations could grant the Hong Kong government unusual access to their computer systems, highlighting the latest challenge to Western tech giants in the city.

  28. US Firms Warn Against 'Unprecedented' Hong Kong Cyber Rules

    US firms have warned that parts of a proposed cyber law could grant the Hong Kong government unusual access to their computer systems, highlighting the latest challenge to Western tech giants in ...

  29. Tech giants warn proposed Hong Kong cyber rules could undermine digital

    In June, the Hong Kong government proposed a new cybersecurity legislation, named the Critical Infrastructure (Computer System) Bill, which was thrown open for public discussion on July 2 ...

  30. Hong Kong Crypto Exchanges Face Challenges to Get Full Licenses

    Hong Kong's push for a digital-asset hub faces growing pains amid uncertainty over whether 11 crypto exchanges will all achieve full licenses after earlier receiving initial approvals. The city's Securities and Futures Commission found unsatisfactory practices at some of the "deemed-to-be ...