critical thinking in nursing students

ANA Nursing Resources Hub

Search Resources Hub

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Tips to Develop the Skill

4 min read • February, 09 2024

Critical thinking in nursing helps caregivers make decisions that lead to optimal patient care. In school, educators and clinical instructors introduced you to critical-thinking examples in nursing. These educators encouraged using learning tools for assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation.

Nurturing these invaluable skills continues once you begin practicing. Critical thinking is essential to providing quality patient care and should continue to grow throughout your nursing career until it becomes second nature. 

What Is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

Critical thinking in nursing involves identifying a problem, determining the best solution, and implementing an effective method to resolve the issue using clinical decision-making skills.

Reflection comes next. Carefully consider whether your actions led to the right solution or if there may have been a better course of action.

Remember, there's no one-size-fits-all treatment method — you must determine what's best for each patient.

How Is Critical Thinking Important for Nurses? 

As a patient's primary contact, a nurse is typically the first to notice changes in their status. One example of critical thinking in nursing is interpreting these changes with an open mind. Make impartial decisions based on evidence rather than opinions. By applying critical-thinking skills to anticipate and understand your patients' needs, you can positively impact their quality of care and outcomes.

Elements of Critical Thinking in Nursing

To assess situations and make informed decisions, nurses must integrate these specific elements into their practice:

• Clinical judgment. Prioritize a patient's care needs and make adjustments as changes occur. Gather the necessary information and determine what nursing intervention is needed. Keep in mind that there may be multiple options. Use your critical-thinking skills to interpret and understand the importance of test results and the patient’s clinical presentation, including their vital signs. Then prioritize interventions and anticipate potential complications. 
• Patient safety. Recognize deviations from the norm and take action to prevent harm to the patient. Suppose you don't think a change in a patient's medication is appropriate for their treatment. Before giving the medication, question the physician's rationale for the modification to avoid a potential error. 
• Communication and collaboration. Ask relevant questions and actively listen to others while avoiding judgment. Promoting a collaborative environment may lead to improved patient outcomes and interdisciplinary communication. 
• Problem-solving skills. Practicing your problem-solving skills can improve your critical-thinking skills. Analyze the problem, consider alternate solutions, and implement the most appropriate one. Besides assessing patient conditions, you can apply these skills to other challenges, such as staffing issues . 

How to Develop and Apply Critical-Thinking Skills in Nursing

Critical-thinking skills develop as you gain experience and advance in your career. The ability to predict and respond to nursing challenges increases as you expand your knowledge and encounter real-life patient care scenarios outside of what you learned from a textbook. 

Here are five ways to nurture your critical-thinking skills:

• Be a lifelong learner. Continuous learning through educational courses and professional development lets you stay current with evidence-based practice . That knowledge helps you make informed decisions in stressful moments.  
• Practice reflection. Allow time each day to reflect on successes and areas for improvement. This self-awareness can help identify your strengths, weaknesses, and personal biases to guide your decision-making.
• Open your mind. Don't assume you're right. Ask for opinions and consider the viewpoints of other nurses, mentors , and interdisciplinary team members.
• Use critical-thinking tools. Structure your thinking by incorporating nursing process steps or a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) to organize information, evaluate options, and identify underlying issues.
• Be curious. Challenge assumptions by asking questions to ensure current care methods are valid, relevant, and supported by evidence-based practice .

Critical thinking in nursing is invaluable for safe, effective, patient-centered care. You can successfully navigate challenges in the ever-changing health care environment by continually developing and applying these skills.

Images sourced from Getty Images

Related Resources

Item(s) added to cart

The Value of Critical Thinking in Nursing

• How Nurses Use Critical Thinking
• How to Improve Critical Thinking
• Common Mistakes

Some experts describe a person’s ability to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize ambiguity as evidence of critical thinking. Others identify specific skills that demonstrate critical thinking, such as the ability to identify problems and biases, infer and draw conclusions, and determine the relevance of information to a situation.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN, has been a critical care nurse for 10 years in neurological trauma nursing and cardiovascular and surgical intensive care. He defines critical thinking as “necessary for problem-solving and decision-making by healthcare providers. It is a process where people use a logical process to gather information and take purposeful action based on their evaluation.”

“This cognitive process is vital for excellent patient outcomes because it requires that nurses make clinical decisions utilizing a variety of different lenses, such as fairness, ethics, and evidence-based practice,” he says.

How Do Nurses Use Critical Thinking?

Successful nurses think beyond their assigned tasks to deliver excellent care for their patients. For example, a nurse might be tasked with changing a wound dressing, delivering medications, and monitoring vital signs during a shift. However, it requires critical thinking skills to understand how a difference in the wound may affect blood pressure and temperature and when those changes may require immediate medical intervention.

Nurses care for many patients during their shifts. Strong critical thinking skills are crucial when juggling various tasks so patient safety and care are not compromised.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN, is a nurse educator with a clinical background in surgical-trauma adult critical care, where critical thinking and action were essential to the safety of her patients. She talks about examples of critical thinking in a healthcare environment, saying:

“Nurses must also critically think to determine which patient to see first, which medications to pass first, and the order in which to organize their day caring for patients. Patient conditions and environments are continually in flux, therefore nurses must constantly be evaluating and re-evaluating information they gather (assess) to keep their patients safe.”

The COVID-19 pandemic created hospital care situations where critical thinking was essential. It was expected of the nurses on the general floor and in intensive care units. Crystal Slaughter is an advanced practice nurse in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a nurse educator. She observed critical thinking throughout the pandemic as she watched intensive care nurses test the boundaries of previously held beliefs and master providing excellent care while preserving resources.

“Nurses are at the patient’s bedside and are often the first ones to detect issues. Then, the nurse needs to gather the appropriate subjective and objective data from the patient in order to frame a concise problem statement or question for the physician or advanced practice provider,” she explains.

Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills

We asked our experts for the top five strategies nurses can use to purposefully improve their critical thinking skills.

Case-Based Approach

Slaughter is a fan of the case-based approach to learning critical thinking skills.

In much the same way a detective would approach a mystery, she mentors her students to ask questions about the situation that help determine the information they have and the information they need. “What is going on? What information am I missing? Can I get that information? What does that information mean for the patient? How quickly do I need to act?”

Consider forming a group and working with a mentor who can guide you through case studies. This provides you with a learner-centered environment in which you can analyze data to reach conclusions and develop communication, analytical, and collaborative skills with your colleagues.

Practice Self-Reflection

Rhoads is an advocate for self-reflection. “Nurses should reflect upon what went well or did not go well in their workday and identify areas of improvement or situations in which they should have reached out for help.” Self-reflection is a form of personal analysis to observe and evaluate situations and how you responded.

This gives you the opportunity to discover mistakes you may have made and to establish new behavior patterns that may help you make better decisions. You likely already do this. For example, after a disagreement or contentious meeting, you may go over the conversation in your head and think about ways you could have responded.

It’s important to go through the decisions you made during your day and determine if you should have gotten more information before acting or if you could have asked better questions.

During self-reflection, you may try thinking about the problem in reverse. This may not give you an immediate answer, but can help you see the situation with fresh eyes and a new perspective. How would the outcome of the day be different if you planned the dressing change in reverse with the assumption you would find a wound infection? How does this information change your plan for the next dressing change?

Develop a Questioning Mind

McGowan has learned that “critical thinking is a self-driven process. It isn’t something that can simply be taught. Rather, it is something that you practice and cultivate with experience. To develop critical thinking skills, you have to be curious and inquisitive.”

To gain critical thinking skills, you must undergo a purposeful process of learning strategies and using them consistently so they become a habit. One of those strategies is developing a questioning mind. Meaningful questions lead to useful answers and are at the core of critical thinking .

However, learning to ask insightful questions is a skill you must develop. Faced with staff and nursing shortages , declining patient conditions, and a rising number of tasks to be completed, it may be difficult to do more than finish the task in front of you. Yet, questions drive active learning and train your brain to see the world differently and take nothing for granted.

It is easier to practice questioning in a non-stressful, quiet environment until it becomes a habit. Then, in the moment when your patient’s care depends on your ability to ask the right questions, you can be ready to rise to the occasion.

Practice Self-Awareness in the Moment

Critical thinking in nursing requires self-awareness and being present in the moment. During a hectic shift, it is easy to lose focus as you struggle to finish every task needed for your patients. Passing medication, changing dressings, and hanging intravenous lines all while trying to assess your patient’s mental and emotional status can affect your focus and how you manage stress as a nurse .

Staying present helps you to be proactive in your thinking and anticipate what might happen, such as bringing extra lubricant for a catheterization or extra gloves for a dressing change.

By staying present, you are also better able to practice active listening. This raises your assessment skills and gives you more information as a basis for your interventions and decisions.

Use a Process

As you are developing critical thinking skills, it can be helpful to use a process. For example:

• Ask questions.
• Gather information.
• Implement a strategy.
• Evaluate the results.
• Consider another point of view.

These are the fundamental steps of the nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, implement, evaluate). The last step will help you overcome one of the common problems of critical thinking in nursing — personal bias.

Common Critical Thinking Pitfalls in Nursing

Your brain uses a set of processes to make inferences about what’s happening around you. In some cases, your unreliable biases can lead you down the wrong path. McGowan places personal biases at the top of his list of common pitfalls to critical thinking in nursing.

“We all form biases based on our own experiences. However, nurses have to learn to separate their own biases from each patient encounter to avoid making false assumptions that may interfere with their care,” he says. Successful critical thinkers accept they have personal biases and learn to look out for them. Awareness of your biases is the first step to understanding if your personal bias is contributing to the wrong decision.

New nurses may be overwhelmed by the transition from academics to clinical practice, leading to a task-oriented mindset and a common new nurse mistake ; this conflicts with critical thinking skills.

“Consider a patient whose blood pressure is low but who also needs to take a blood pressure medication at a scheduled time. A task-oriented nurse may provide the medication without regard for the patient’s blood pressure because medication administration is a task that must be completed,” Slaughter says. “A nurse employing critical thinking skills would address the low blood pressure, review the patient’s blood pressure history and trends, and potentially call the physician to discuss whether medication should be withheld.”

Fear and pride may also stand in the way of developing critical thinking skills. Your belief system and worldview provide comfort and guidance, but this can impede your judgment when you are faced with an individual whose belief system or cultural practices are not the same as yours. Fear or pride may prevent you from pursuing a line of questioning that would benefit the patient. Nurses with strong critical thinking skills exhibit:

• Learn from their mistakes and the mistakes of other nurses
• Look forward to integrating changes that improve patient care
• Treat each patient interaction as a part of a whole
• Evaluate new events based on past knowledge and adjust decision-making as needed
• Solve problems with their colleagues
• Are self-confident
• Acknowledge biases and seek to ensure these do not impact patient care

An Essential Skill for All Nurses

Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.

By using the strategies in this guide during your daily life and in your nursing role, you can intentionally improve your critical thinking abilities and be rewarded with better patient outcomes and potential career advancement.

Frequently Asked Questions About Critical Thinking in Nursing

How are critical thinking skills utilized in nursing practice.

Nursing practice utilizes critical thinking skills to provide the best care for patients. Often, the patient’s cause of pain or health issue is not immediately clear. Nursing professionals need to use their knowledge to determine what might be causing distress, collect vital information, and make quick decisions on how best to handle the situation.

How does nursing school develop critical thinking skills?

Nursing school gives students the knowledge professional nurses use to make important healthcare decisions for their patients. Students learn about diseases, anatomy, and physiology, and how to improve the patient’s overall well-being. Learners also participate in supervised clinical experiences, where they practice using their critical thinking skills to make decisions in professional settings.

Do only nurse managers use critical thinking?

Nurse managers certainly use critical thinking skills in their daily duties. But when working in a health setting, anyone giving care to patients uses their critical thinking skills. Everyone — including licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced nurse practitioners —needs to flex their critical thinking skills to make potentially life-saving decisions.

Meet Our Contributors

Crystal Slaughter, DNP, APRN, ACNS-BC, CNE

Crystal Slaughter is a core faculty member in Walden University’s RN-to-BSN program. She has worked as an advanced practice registered nurse with an intensivist/pulmonary service to provide care to hospitalized ICU patients and in inpatient palliative care. Slaughter’s clinical interests lie in nursing education and evidence-based practice initiatives to promote improving patient care.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN

Jenna Liphart Rhoads is a nurse educator and freelance author and editor. She earned a BSN from Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing and an MS in nursing education from Northern Illinois University. Rhoads earned a Ph.D. in education with a concentration in nursing education from Capella University where she researched the moderation effects of emotional intelligence on the relationship of stress and GPA in military veteran nursing students. Her clinical background includes surgical-trauma adult critical care, interventional radiology procedures, and conscious sedation in adult and pediatric populations.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN

Nicholas McGowan is a critical care nurse with 10 years of experience in cardiovascular, surgical intensive care, and neurological trauma nursing. McGowan also has a background in education, leadership, and public speaking. He is an online learner who builds on his foundation of critical care nursing, which he uses directly at the bedside where he still practices. In addition, McGowan hosts an online course at Critical Care Academy where he helps nurses achieve critical care (CCRN) certification.

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (With Examples, Importance, & How to Improve)

Successful nursing requires learning several skills used to communicate with patients, families, and healthcare teams. One of the most essential skills nurses must develop is the ability to demonstrate critical thinking. If you are a nurse, perhaps you have asked if there is a way to know how to improve critical thinking in nursing? As you read this article, you will learn what critical thinking in nursing is and why it is important. You will also find 18 simple tips to improve critical thinking in nursing and sample scenarios about how to apply critical thinking in your nursing career.

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

4 reasons why critical thinking is so important in nursing, 1. critical thinking skills will help you anticipate and understand changes in your patient’s condition., 2. with strong critical thinking skills, you can make decisions about patient care that is most favorable for the patient and intended outcomes., 3. strong critical thinking skills in nursing can contribute to innovative improvements and professional development., 4. critical thinking skills in nursing contribute to rational decision-making, which improves patient outcomes., what are the 8 important attributes of excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. the ability to interpret information:, 2. independent thought:, 3. impartiality:, 4. intuition:, 5. problem solving:, 6. flexibility:, 7. perseverance:, 8. integrity:, examples of poor critical thinking vs excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. scenario: patient/caregiver interactions, poor critical thinking:, excellent critical thinking:, 2. scenario: improving patient care quality, 3. scenario: interdisciplinary collaboration, 4. scenario: precepting nursing students and other nurses, how to improve critical thinking in nursing, 1. demonstrate open-mindedness., 2. practice self-awareness., 3. avoid judgment., 4. eliminate personal biases., 5. do not be afraid to ask questions., 6. find an experienced mentor., 7. join professional nursing organizations., 8. establish a routine of self-reflection., 9. utilize the chain of command., 10. determine the significance of data and decide if it is sufficient for decision-making., 11. volunteer for leadership positions or opportunities., 12. use previous facts and experiences to help develop stronger critical thinking skills in nursing., 13. establish priorities., 14. trust your knowledge and be confident in your abilities., 15. be curious about everything., 16. practice fair-mindedness., 17. learn the value of intellectual humility., 18. never stop learning., 4 consequences of poor critical thinking in nursing, 1. the most significant risk associated with poor critical thinking in nursing is inadequate patient care., 2. failure to recognize changes in patient status:, 3. lack of effective critical thinking in nursing can impact the cost of healthcare., 4. lack of critical thinking skills in nursing can cause a breakdown in communication within the interdisciplinary team., useful resources to improve critical thinking in nursing, youtube videos, my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. will lack of critical thinking impact my nursing career, 2. usually, how long does it take for a nurse to improve their critical thinking skills, 3. do all types of nurses require excellent critical thinking skills, 4. how can i assess my critical thinking skills in nursing.

• Ask relevant questions • Justify opinions • Address and evaluate multiple points of view • Explain assumptions and reasons related to your choice of patient care options

5. Can I Be a Nurse If I Cannot Think Critically?

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.7(2); 2020 Mar

Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities

Christian makafui boso.

1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town South Africa

2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast Ghana

Anita S. van der Merwe

Janet gross.

3 Peace Corps Liberia, Mother Patern College of Health Sciences, Stella Maris Polytechnic, Monrovia Liberia

Critical thinking (CT) is vital for nursing practice. Nursing schools should provide learning experiences that enable nursing students to acquire CT skills. Yet, these authors are not aware of any study that has directly observed instructional activities related to CT skills acquisition in the classroom environment. The aim of this study was to explore instructional activities in the classroom environment in relation to acquisition of CT skills of students.

Qualitative non‐participant observation.

Using a purposive sampling, 10 classroom teaching sessions were observed and mediating factors of CT skills acquisition of students noted. Data were analysed thematically. Data were collected from October–December 2017. 

Three key themes of instructional activities relating to acquisition of CT skills of students emerged, namely educators’ behaviour, students’ characteristics and university‐wide factors/administrative support. Class sizes ranged from 34–162 students with an average of 95.

1. INTRODUCTION

The ever‐changing and complex healthcare environment requires that nurses acquire critical thinking (CT) skills to meet the complex challenges of the environment (Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ). Nurses should be able to select and use data for effective clinical judgements to promote good health outcomes (Nelson, 2017 ; Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ). Consequently, nursing schools must offer learning experiences that assist students to think critically about complex issues instead of just merely becoming receptacles for information (Toofany, 2008 ; Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ). It is the duty of nurse educators to help students to acquire CT skills (Nelson, 2017 ; Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ).

Attempts have been made to conceptualize CT to guide the facilitation of CT skills of students. Worth noting are Dwyer, Hogan, and Stewart ( 2014 ) and Duron, Limbach, and Waugh’s ( 2006 ) frameworks, which could be relevant in the classroom setting. Focusing on learning outcomes, Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) posited that long‐term memory and comprehension are foundational processes for CT application. The framework incorporates both reflective judgement and self‐regulatory functions of metacognition as a requirement for CT. Self‐regulation refers to an individual's ability, willingness and the perceived need to think critically when solving specific problems. Therefore, factors that influence the interrelationship between short‐term and long‐term memory (the bedrock of CT), comprehension, reflective judgement and self‐regulation functions of metacognition will influence CT skills of the students. On the other, Duron et al.’s model focused on practical instructional activities needed to guide students in acquiring CT skills. The five‐step framework requires that educators: (a) determine learning objectives; (b) teach through questioning; (c) practice before assessing; (d) review, refine and improve; and (e) provide feedback and assessment of learning.

Nursing literature is replete with studies demonstrating that adopting appropriate teaching methods/strategies, such as active learning, improves the CT scores of students. Examples of such approaches include problem‐based learning (Jones, 2008 ; Jun, Lee, Park, Chang, & Kim, 2013 ), concept mapping (Wheeler & Collins, 2003 ) and simulation (Sullivan‐Mann, Perron, & Fellner, 2009 ). Furthermore, based on a systematic review, Chan ( 2013 ) suggested three strategies to facilitate CT skills of nursing students, which include appropriate questioning strategy, reflective writing on learning experiences and discussion of case study.

The classroom environment provides a vital opportunity for educators to create the necessary milieu to encourage students to develop their CT skills. It is therefore required that negative factors to the development of CT are minimized or removed and those factors that enhance the development of CT skills are accentuated. However, these factors that influence CT have received less attention in nursing education (Raymond, Profetto‐McGrath, Myrick, & Strean, 2018 ). Furthermore, no direct observations have been made to identify specific factors influencing CT in the classroom setting.

Studies such as those of Mangena and Chabeli ( 2005 ) and Shell ( 2001 ) assessed factors that inhibit CT acquisition of nursing students. Mangena and Chabeli's study focused on educators and students’ perspectives. They found that educators’ lack of knowledge of CT teaching methods and evaluation, negative attitudes of educators, student selection and educational background, socialization, culture and language inhibited the development of CT skills of students. Shell also found negative student factors, demand to cover content and time constraints both on class time and on educators’ development that hindered CT skills development of students.

Raymond and Profetto‐McGrath ( 2005 ) also identified internal and external factors of educators that had an impact on their CT. These factors included physical and mental well‐being, the view of leadership on CT and collegial relationships that existed in the educators’ environment. Similarly, Raymond et al. ( 2018 ) identified personal (elements/conditions originating from the educator), interpersonal (elements originating from the student–educator relationship) and broader environmental factors (conditions evident in the larger physical setting or political milieu) that influenced educators’ CT and influenced their abilities to role model CT skills.

The above authors focused on factors influencing CT from different perspectives. Shell ( 2001 ) and Mangena and Chabeli ( 2005 ) focused on barriers to student development of CT. Also, Shell examined educators’ perspectives. Mangena and Chabeli examined both educators’ and students’ views. Raymond and Profetto‐McGrath ( 2005 ) and Raymond et al. ( 2018 ) specifically focused on nurse educators' CT skills. None of the above studies directly observed classroom teaching though similar factors were identified.

2. BACKGROUND

The “greatest healthcare resource is the healthcare personnel, of which nurses are a primary component” (Talley, 2006 , p. 50). However, limited resources in nursing schools especially in developing countries where this study was undertaken (Talley, 2006 ) impede the experiences required for the students to develop CT skills. For example, studies have identified lack of qualified educators (Bell, Rominski, Bam, Donkor, & Lori, 2013 ; Salifu, Gross, Salifu, & Ninnoni, 2018 ) as well as infrastructural and logistical constraints (Talley, 2006 ), large class sizes and absenteeism (Wilmot, Kumfo, Danso‐Mensah, & Antwi‐Danso, 2013 ) as some of the challenges affecting nursing education. These challenges have led to the dominance of inappropriate teaching approaches (Boso & Gross, 2015 ; Wilmot et al., 2013 ).

Similarly, studies regarding CT have reported the negative influence of sociocultural norms such as the seniority tradition (Chan, 2013 ; Jenkins, 2011 ; Kawashima, 2003 ; Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ). In such cultures, students are not encouraged to speak out openly (Chan, 2013 ). For example, an individual is not expected to disagree nor question an authority figure in public. In the context of this study, the seniority tradition could have been manifested in the classroom where the faculty is regarded as an authority whose ideas may be seen as sacrosanct by students. These authors argue that it is necessary to identify the factors through direct observation that might hinder or enhance the facilitation of CT of students in the classroom setting. Notwithstanding, the authors of this paper had not found any publication in the nursing literature where direct observation for CT teaching methods/strategies had been carried out in the classroom setting. Therefore, this study explored factors that might influence students’ ability to memorize and comprehend content towards CT skills acquisition. Also, educators’ instructional activities that either enhanced or inhibited students’ CT facilitation in the classroom context were explored.

3. THE AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to explore instructional activities towards the development of CT skills of students in a classroom environment. This study was part of a larger research project aimed at developing a CT‐based curriculum framework of students.

4. RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative non‐participant observation design was used. This design was to allow for the observation of first‐hand (Patton, 2015 ) and unusual aspects (Creswell & Creswell, 2018 ) real‐time classroom practices whilst being present. Also, qualitative observation has been noted as a primary means of understanding the experiences of users (Reddacliff, 2017 ).

5.1. Setting

The study was conducted in classroom settings of an undergraduate nursing programme in a public university in Ghana. As a school in a developing country, there are constraints such as logistical inadequacies and lack of adequate qualified faculty, which could inhibit meaningful learning experience towards CT skills development of students existed. The classes are scheduled based on the demands of the various departments of the university. The university runs several programmes, and each programme is allocated with venues as demanded.

5.2. Sampling

Through a purposive method ten (10) teaching sessions from class levels 200 to 400 were observed from October to December 2017. Educators who had lectures within the period were approached face‐to‐face. Ten out of 16 educators agreed to participate. They provided informed consent. The 10 sessions provided rich data to be able to deduce current practices of instruction as occurring in the classroom environment. The main selection criterion was a full teaching session (1–3 hr) of B.Sc. nursing undergraduate programme taught by an educator in the selected nursing school.

5.3. Data collection and instrumentation

Data were collected between October and December 2017. The observations were from five level 200, three level 300 and two level 400 classes; six medical–surgical, one maternal health, one biomedical and two nursing fundamental/theoretical courses were taught. Two individuals—first author and an assistant, consistent with Winter and Munn‐Giddings’ ( 2001 ) recommendation for observation, observed the teaching sessions. A six‐item semi‐structured observation guide/protocol using Billing and Halstead's ( 2005 ) six steps of designing learning experiences for developing CT skills was employed for data collection. Billing and Halstead's six steps of designing experiences for developing CT skills were consistent with identifying factors that enhance or inhibit memory, comprehension, reflective judgement and instruction identical to Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) and Duron et al.’s ( 2006 ) frameworks. The protocol was pre‐tested in a classroom at an analogous nursing school. Though the sixth step of Billing and Halstead's ( 2005 ) six steps of designing learning experiences for developing CT skills proposes both summative and formative assessments, in the context of this observation, only formative assessment methods used by the educators could be observed.

Billing and Halstead's six steps of designing experiences for developing CT skills are as follows. Step 1 involved determining the learning outcome for the specific class. These learning objectives should be explicitly clear to students and fit for purpose. Step 2 involved creating an anticipatory set. The educator's strategies that generate students’ interest in content, encourage their participation and create collegial environment for students were observed. Step 3 consisted of selecting teaching and learning strategies. Observation focused on identifying active learning methods of teaching against passive teaching methods. Also, whether the educator or students dominated the class was explored. Whether the nurse educator combined different teaching methods/strategies were explored. Step 4 considered implementation issues. Class size, involvement of students, classroom arrangement, use of teaching aids and materials and instructional media were observed. Step 5 involved the observation of how the learning experience was closed. This included how the educator summarized the lesson and related lessons to next class period. Step 6 involved how students’ learning experiences were evaluated. The educator's strategies for the assessment and evaluation of student learning experience during class period were observed.

The observers positioned themselves at the back of the classrooms throughout each period of teaching. Participants did not appear distracted or uncomfortable during the periods of observation. Thoughts and feeling of the observers relative to observed situations were captured as field notes. In order not to distract and cause discomfort to participants, the observers took minimal notes and expanded them immediately after the observations. Transcripts from the observations were compared and agreed on by the two observers. Differences were resolved through discussion. Also, the educators whose teaching sessions were observed were asked to provide feedback and revision made based on educators' comment(s). This was to minimize observers’ bias.

5.4. Data analysis

Bryman's ( 2010 ) four stages of qualitative analysis as described by Gibbs ( 2010 ) were used to analyse the data. The first author and an assistant described each observation. Later, the first author read the transcript at least four times to enable a meaningful content analysis. Data were coded, and themes and sub‐themes were derived. Subsequently, the second and third authors who are the supervisors of this research project cross‐checked the themes and sub‐themes with the observational transcripts for validation.

5.5. Ethical consideration

This study was approved as one part of a doctoral project by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ref. no S17/05/106) and the university where the study was done. Permission was also sought from the dean of the selected school. The first author visited the students at their various classrooms to explain the nature and purpose of the study to them. Likewise, the nurse educators were provided with information on the purpose and nature of the study. They were provided individually with informed consent forms for signing before data were collected. They were assured of their rights to opt out at any stage of the study. Confidentiality and anonymity were also assured. Individual participants were not identified with the data (during data collection, analysis and reporting).

Three overall themes were deduced from the classroom observation data, namely educators’ behaviour, students’ behaviour and university‐wide factors/administrative support. These themes related to the Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) and Duron et al.’s ( 2006 ) frameworks of CT development. To reiterate, these factors could either enhance or inhibit memory (foundation of CT development), comprehension, reflective judgement and self‐regulatory functions of metacognition as a requirement for CT.

6.1. Theme I: Educators’ classroom behaviour

Educators’ behaviour includes actions and inactions of the educators that might either enhance or inhibit students’ positive learning experiences towards the acquisition of CT skills. Four sub‐themes under this theme were identified namely beginning and ending on time; creating a conducive and participatory environment; and teaching methods and styles and managing the class.

6.1.1. Subtheme A: Beginning and ending on time

Only one (observation 6) started on time. The lecturer was in the class before scheduled time waiting for students. However, nine of the classes started late. The lateness ranged from 10 min (observations 2 and 7) to 44 min (observation 3). In one case (observation 5), the lecturer was on time but students were not available because they were moving immediately from another lecture. In other words, the ending time from the other lecture overlapped with the starting time of the new lecture. In another case (observation 8), the lecturer was engaged in an analogous official duty and therefore reported late.

6.1.2. Subtheme B: Creating a conducive and participatory environment

Some attitudes demonstrated by the educators appeared to have encouraged collegiality. For example, one lecturer's statement, "no answer is wrong, it could only be a right answer to a different question" (observation 2) caused students to participate in the teaching/learning process, which is consistent with CT teaching strategies. Also, some lecturers demonstrated a good sense of humour that was appreciated by students. For example, in observation 3, the lecturer asked a question and after the question, jokingly said, "my question to those in spectacles", which generated laughter from the students. The same lecturer appeared receptive to students’ views—allowed students to disagree with his views and even thanked students for asking questions. These strategies also demonstrated modelling of open‐mindedness (an attribute of CT) on part of the educators.

Active participation in the teaching and learning process is required to facilitate CT skills of students. However, some actions taken by some lecturers appeared to have resulted in students not fully participating in the learning process. For example, students appeared tense or nervous after the lecturer made the statements that "they [students] must respect and not make offensive statements; some of you are still adolescents. You must respect, I have always told you" (observation 8). This statement was in reaction to a comment from a student that the lecturer found to be offensive.

6.1.3. Subtheme C: Teaching methods and styles

The most frequent teaching method used was student presentation. In one case (observation 6), students were given case studies from which they were requested to draw a plan of care. However, students themselves used lectures whilst presenting. General discussions followed students' presentations led by the lecturer. The presentation encouraged students to share their views freely. However, during student presentations, several students appeared disinterested and were passive in the process. Some presenters just read from the power point slides verbatim. In cases where lecturers taught, they often used the lecture method interspersed with periods of questions and answers (observations 2, 3, 4 and 8).

In one lecture (observation 3), the lecturer related lessons to real life situations (stories from the clinical settings) that appeared to have sustained the interest of the students. The lecturer also frequently moved up and down the aisles during the class session. These actions appeared to have caused students to be more attentive (which enhances memory) throughout the session.

6.1.4. Subtheme D: Managing the class

Management of the class appeared to be challenging to some lecturers. For example, in observation 10, the lecturer did not act even when students were engaged in distractive behaviours. Most students generally appeared interested in the lesson. However, several students appeared indifferent with what was happening, and some conversed throughout the session (observation 10).

6.2. Theme II Students' characteristics

Students’ characteristics refer to actions and inactions of the students during observations that might either enhance or inhibit students’ positive learning experiences towards the acquisition of CT skills. Two sub‐themes under this theme were identified, namely distractive student behaviour and punctuality.

6.2.1. Subtheme A: Distractive student behaviour

Attention/perception processing is needed to enhance short‐term memory, which leads to long‐term memory (Dwyer et al., 2014 ). In all classes observed, several students were engaged in distractive behaviours that might hinder memory, namely fidgeting with phones, beeping/ringing phones, petty chatting and whispering—especially those sitting at the back roll of the class. However, what appeared to be the source of most distractive behaviour—the mobile phone—was useful in helping students in some of the presentations. Students sitting in front appeared more attentive. Movement of lecturers up and down the aisles appeared to limit distractive behaviours.

6.2.2. Subtheme B: Punctuality

Students arrived to lectures late. For example, during observation 2, approximately 70 students were late, with some more than 1 hr late. Also, another class session began with 62 students and ended with 117 (about 55 students late). In another instance, at a pre‐scheduled time, only 29 students were present. One student came after about 1 hr 21 min (observation 5), whilst some students left before the classes concluded.

6.3. Theme III: University‐wide factors/administrative support

University‐wide factors/administrative support relate to administrative factors in the university or school that might either enhance or inhibit students’ positive learning experiences towards the acquisition of CT skills. Three sub‐themes under this theme were identified: class size; scheduling of classes; and classroom layout and equipment.

6.3.1. Subtheme A: Class size

Class sizes observed for the 10 sessions ranged from 34–162 with an average of 95 students. Most classes (7) were above 90 students.

6.3.2. Subtheme B: Scheduling of classes

Some students who were to have a lecture immediately after the session were packed at the entrance to the lecture hall whilst engaging in conversation apparently causing distraction (observation 4). Also, some lectures started immediately after a lecture had ended with no time to move from one lecture hall to another.

6.3.3. Subtheme C: Classroom layout and equipment

Classrooms’ arrangements/layouts are rectangular with desks and chair bolted down. Most ceiling mounted projectors in classrooms were dysfunctional forcing lecturers to use movable projectors which were placed too close to screens. This made power point font sizes small. Some screens were torn and dirty making projected content unclear (observation 3). Also, some public address systems were dysfunctional, and therefore, some students could not hear the lecturers. For example, during a lecture (observation 4) on three different occasions, students drew the attention of the lecturer to the fact that they could not hear him. At a point, rain stopped the lecture because students could not hear the lecturer.

7. DISCUSSION

Based on the observation of classroom environment in relation to instructional activities, several factors need to be considered to provide students with the desired learning experiences to the development of their CT skills. Educators’ positive behaviour which served as factors towards the enhancement of CT skills of students identified in this study is worth noting. These factors including educators’ good sense of humour and open‐mindedness appeared to inspire students to engage in the teaching–learning process were encouraging. The learning and learning process were also made entertaining. This finding is consistent with Ulloth's ( 2002 ) study which found humour to be useful in holding students’ attention, relieving anxiety, establishing rapport and making learning fun. Froneman, Du Plessis, and Koen's ( 2016 ) study on student–educator relationship identified similar characteristics needed for meaningful learning experiences of students. Similarly, other studies (Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ; Raymond & Profetto‐McGrath, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ) buttress the need for nurse educators to create a conducive environment for students to develop CT skills.

Another finding worth highlighting in this study was negative educators’ factors such as being unfriendly in correcting students, using inappropriate teaching methods and poor class management skills. Similar factors were identified among educators in South Africa (Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ) and Canada (Raymond & Profetto‐McGrath, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ). Mangena and Chabeli ( 2005 ) found that educators’ lack of knowledge, inappropriate teaching and assessment methods and educators’ negative attitude as barriers to the facilitation of CT skills of students.

A further noteworthy finding is the inappropriate implementation of CT teaching methods by educators. Notably, the incongruous implementation of students’ presentation and discussion methods need to be highlighted. This finding is similar to Boso and Gross' ( 2015 ) study among nurse educators in Ghana and inappropriate teaching and assessment methods identified in Mangena and Chabeli’s ( 2005 ) study.

Students’ lateness to lectures (lack of punctuality) identified in this study is worth highlighting. This finding indicates loss of valuable time which may be needed to engage with the content which may hinder the development of students’ CT skills. Also, students’ lateness to lectures appears to correspond with educators’ own late start to lectures. This appears to agree with Jack, Hamshire and Chambers' ( 2017 ) findings which highlight the influence of educator's behaviour on students. This is similar to Cruess, Cruess, and Steinert ( 2008 ) and Billings and Halstead's ( 2005 ) assertions about role modelling.

Another important finding of this study was students’ distractive behaviour. Some students engaging in distractive behaviours are not unexpected, but the degree and extent of these distractive behaviours were unanticipated. Shell ( 2001 ) identified students’ behaviour as the highest barrier to the development of CT skills of students. Also, this finding may be indicative of nurse educators’ apparent lack of appropriate classroom management skills required for meaningful learning experience of students. For example, as seen in this study, educator's movements up and down the aisles aided in the minimization of distractive behaviours of students.

The use of mobile phone during class time as an example of distractive behaviours is worth highlighting. These students may have been engaged on social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter during class sessions underscoring the penetration of social media into every facet of the students’ lives. The risk of the use of technology or social media has been noted (Ferguson, 2013 ). Inappropriate use of social media by students found in this study may highlight the absence of social media guidelines for students and educators. Peck ( 2014 ) suggests a purposeful use of social media to improve learning. Schools of higher learning have used social media to improve connectedness, increase access to academic libraries, create virtual classrooms and create student learning experiences to achieve desired academic outcomes (Peck, 2014 ). Evidence supports increased knowledge and flexibility of learning when technology is introduced into the classroom such as blended‐learning (Strickland, Gray, & Hill, 2012 ) and flipped‐classroom (Missildine, Fountain, Summers, & Gosselin, 2013 ) approaches. A purposeful use of social media should reflect the availability of social media guidelines/policy, which will likely minimize the risk or abuse of social media use.

Large class sizes were observed in this study. Pressure to increase student intake appears to overwhelm the school's capacity in terms of space and the number of qualified nurse educators at post (Bell et al., 2013 ; Hornsby, Osman, & Matos‐Ala, 2013 ). This is similar to Raymond and Profetto‐McGrath, ( 2005 ) and Raymond et al.’s ( 2018 ) studies that highlight environmental factors that influence facilitation of CT in a school. The large class sizes appear to influence teaching methods/strategies (Hornsby et al., 2013 ) that could be adopted by educators as identified in Gibbs, Lucas, and Spouse's ( 1997 ) study.

Another finding of this study was scheduling of classes. Classes were sometimes beginning immediately after another for the same students. This was partly accounting for late arrival of students to the next class. The late arrival of students to class may reduce their contact hours and may influence the introduction of the appropriate learning methods/strategies. Given that found time as a factor in CT development of students, reduced contact hours could inhibit the facilitation of CT of the students.

Issues relating to classroom features were observed in this study. These findings primarily relate to logistical and design issues. Logistical issues included dysfunctional ceiling mounted projectors, torn/dirty screens and inadequate public address systems. These logistical constraints may impede meaningful learning experience and consequently hinder the development of CT skills acquisition of students. This finding is consistent with other reports on challenges in the Ghanaian nursing educational system (Bell et al., 2013 ; Talley, 2006 ; Wilmot et al.,  2013 ). The traditional rectangular classroom physical layouts with desks and chairs bolted down is inconsistent with CT skills tenets which require that physical features of classrooms involve small or large circle arrangements to allow for students to make eye contact with each other and the educator to facilitate open dialogue (Billings & Halstead, 2005 ).

8. LIMITATIONS

Given that this was a direct non‐participatory observational study, some observations might have been missed by the researchers (Creswell & Poth, 2018 ; Patton, 2015 ), especially when an attempt to minimize interruption of the teaching process, the observers of this observational study positioned themselves at the back of the classroom throughout each session. Also, there could have been observer bias. As noted by Creswell and Poth, there could have been impression management and potential deception on the part of the participants, especially the educators which might have influenced the data obtained. Several observations (10) were purposefully conducted to minimize this potential Hawthorne effect. In addition, some accounts might have been misinterpreted. However, this was minimized to some extent by reviewing the accounts with participants involved in the study.

9. RECOMMENDATION

Based on this study, further studies are recommended. The exploration of the experiences of nursing students and educators of instructional practices towards the development of CT skills in Ghana is highly recommended. Both quantitative and qualitative studies on how social media or technology in general could be used to facilitate meaningful learning are recommended.

This study also has implications for nurse educators and nursing school authorities who need to create a conducive environment for students for CT skills of students. Nurse educators should examine their own instructional methods/strategies with the view to adopting appropriate CT methods. In this regard, educators should aim at making learning fun and enjoyable. Educators should see themselves as role models to students regarding the demonstration of CT skills. School authorities should institute continuous faculty development programmes to help educators update their teaching skills regarding CT skills of students. School managers should provide the needed logistics needed for meaningful learning and commensurate to learning space, available faculty and other resources.

10. CONCLUSIONS

This study sought to observe instructional practices that influence the acquisition of CT skills of students in a classroom environment. The findings suggest that the educators’ teaching strategies have influence on learning atmosphere for CT skills facilitation of students. Also, several inhibiting and enhancing factors relating to students, university‐wide/administrative support were identified. It is therefore important that inhibiting factors are minimized or removed and enhancing factors are maintained or accentuated to help students engage in meaningful and purposeful learning experience with the view of developing their CT skills. Particularly, the role of the educators must be stressed to ensure that a conducive and participatory environment is created for student learning.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We do not have any conflict of interest to report.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

CMB, ASVDM and JG: Conceptualization and designing of the study. CMB: Data collection, analysing and drafting of the manuscript. ASVDM and JG: Study supervision and made critical revisions on the paper. All the authors made substantial contributions to the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to acknowledge Victor Angbah for assisting in data collection. We also express our gratitude to the study participants.

Boso CM, van der Merwe AS, Gross J. Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities . Nursing Open . 2020; 7 :581–588. 10.1002/nop2.426 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• Bell, S. A. , Rominski, S. , Bam, V. , Donkor, E. , & Lori, J. (2013). Analysis of nursing education in Ghana: Priorities for scaling‐up the nursing workforce . Nursing and Health Sciences , 15 ( 2 ), 244–249. 10.1111/nhs.12026 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billings, D. M. , & Halstead, J. A. (2005). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty , 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
• Boso, C. M. , & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nurse educators’ perceptions of critical thinking in developing countries: Ghana as a case study . Advances in Medical Education and Practice , 6 , 555–560. 10.2147/AMEP.S88942 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chan, Z. C. Y. (2013). A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education . Nurse Education Today , 33 ( 3 ), 236–240. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Creswell, J. W. , & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
• Creswell, J. W. , & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cruess, S. R. , Cruess, R. L. , & Steinert, Y. (2008). Teaching rounds: Role modelling - Making the most of a powerful teaching strategy . Bmj , 336 ( 7646 ), 718–721. 10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Duron, R. , Limbach, B. , & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline . Interrnational Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 17 ( 2 ), 160–166. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dwyer, C. P. , Hogan, M. J. , & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century . Thinking Skills and Creativity , 12 , 43–52. 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ferguson, C. (2013). It’s time for the nursing profession to leverage social media . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 69 , 745–747. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1725032933?accountxml:id=10382%255Cnhttp://link.library.curtin.edu.au/openurl??url_ver=Z39.88-2004%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal%26genre=article%26sxml:id=ProQ:ProQ:healthcompleteshell%26atitle=Adapting+a+Social+Media+Strateg . 10.1111/jan.12036 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Froneman, K. D. , Plessis, E. , & Koen, M. P. (2016). Effective educator‐student relationships in nursing education to strengthen nursing students’ resilience . Curationis , 39 ( 1 ), 1–9. 10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1595 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibbs, G. , Lucas, L. , & Spouse, J. (1997). The effects of class size and form of assessment on nursing students’ performance, approaches to study and course perceptions . Nurse Education Today , 17 ( 4 ), 311–318. 10.1016/S0260-6917(97)80062-7 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibbs, R. G. (2010). Coding part 1: Alan Bryman’s 4 stages of qualitative analysis [Web Video] . p. 20613008. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X7VuQxPfpk%26feature=list_other%26playnext=1%26list=SP14E49EDF20613008 [ Google Scholar ]
• Hornsby, D. J. , Osman, R. , & Matos‐Ala, J. D. . (2013). Large‐class pedagogy: Interdisciplinary perspectives for quality higher education (1st ed.). Stellenbosch, South Africa: SUN MeDIA MeTRO; Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%26lr=%26xml:id=KpT3AwAAQBAJ%26pgis=1%255Cnhttp://www.africansunmedia.co.za/Portals/0/files/extracts/LargeClassPedagogyextract.pdf%255Cnhttp://www.sajs.co.za/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Boughey_BookReview.pdf%255Cnwww.africansun [ Google Scholar ]
• Jack, K. , Hamshire, C. , & Chambers, A. (2017). The influence of role models in undergraduate nurse education . Journal of Clinical Nursing , 26 ( 23–24 ), 4707–4715. 10.1111/jocn.13822 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jenkins, S. D. (2011). Cross-cultural perspectives on critical thinking . Journal of Nursing Education , 50 ( 5 ), 268–274. 10.3928/01484834-20110228-02. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones, M. (2008). An evaluation of problem-based learning in an Associate Degree Program . Nursing Education Perspectives , 29 ( 5 ), 278–284. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jun, W. H. , Lee, E. J. , Park, H. J. , Chang, A. K. , & Kim, M. J. (2013). Use of the 5E Learning Cycle Model combined with problem-based learning for a fundamentals of nursing course . Journal of Nursing Education , 52 ( 12 ), 681–689. 10.3928/01484834-20131121-03. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kawashima, A. (2003). Critical thinking integration into nursing education and practice in Japan: Views on its reception from foreign-trained Japanese nursing educators . Contemporary Nurse , 15 ( 3 ), 199–209. 10.5172/conu.15.3.199 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mangena, A. , & Chabeli, M. M. (2005). Strategies to overcome obstacles in the facilitation of critical thinking in nursing education . Nurse Education Today , 25 ( 4 ), 291–298. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.012 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Missildine, K. , Fountain, R. , Summers, L. , & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction . Journal of Nursing Education , 52 ( 10 ), 597–599. 10.3928/01484834-20130919-03 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nelson, A. E. (2017). Methods faculty use to facilitate nursing students’ critical thinking . Teaching and Learning in Nursing , 12 ( 1 ), 62–66. 10.1016/j.teln.2016.09.007 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
• Peck, J. L. (2014). Social media in nursing education: Responsible integration for meaningful use . Journal of Nursing Education , 53 ( 3 ), 164–169. 10.3928/01484834-20140219-03 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raymond, C. L. , & Profetto‐McGrath, J. (2005). Nurse educators’ critical thinking: Reflection and measurement . Nurse Education in Practice , 5 , 209–217. 10.1016/j.nepr.2004.10.004 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raymond, C. , Profetto‐McGrath, J. , Myrick, F. , & Strean, W. B. (2018). Balancing the seen and unseen: Nurse educator as role model for critical thinking . Nurse Education in Practice , 31 ( January ), 41–47. 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.010 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Reddacliff, A. (2017). If Margaret Mead was a librarian: Observation and visitor experience at libraries in Rrussia and the Baltic states . Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association , 66 ( 1 ), 17–27. 10.1080/00049670.2017.1283739 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salifu, D. A. , Gross, J. , Salifu, M. A. , & Ninnoni, J. P. K. (2018). Experiences and perceptions of the theory‐practice gap in nursing in a resource‐constrained setting: A qualitative description study . Nursing Open , 6 , 72–83. 10.1002/nop2.188 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shell, R. (2001). Perceived barriers to teaching for critical thinking by nursing faculty . Nursing and Health Care Perspectives , 22 ( 6 ), 286–291. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/nlnjournal/ [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Strickland, K. , Gray, C. , & Hill, G. (2012). The use of podcasts to enhance research‐teaching linkages in undergraduate nursing students . Nurse Education in Practice , 12 ( 4 ), 210–214. 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.01.006 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sullivan-Mann, J. , Perron, C. A. , & Fellner, A. N. (2009). The effects of simulation on nursing students’ critical thinking scores: A quantitative study . Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews , 9 ( 2 ), 111–116. 10.1053/j.nainr.2009.03.006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Talley, B. (2006). Nurses and nursing education in Ghana: Creating collaborative opportunities . International Nursing Review , 53 ( 1 ), 47–51. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00431.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Toofany, S. (2008). Critical thinking among nurses: Concept mapping can help both newly registered staff and nursing students develop the critical thinking skills they lack . Nursing Management (Harrow) , 14 , 28–31. 10.7748/nm2008.02.14.9.28.c6344 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ulloth, J. K. (2002). The benefits of humor in nursing education . The Journal of Nursing Education , 41 ( 11 ), 476–481. 10.3928/0148-4834-20021101-06 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Von Colln‐Appling, C. , & Giuliano, D. (2017). A concept analysis of critical thinking: A guide for nurse educators . Nurse Education Today , 49 , 106–109. 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wheeler, L. A. , & Collins, S. K. R. (2003). The influence of concept Mapping on critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students . Journal of Professional Nursing , 19 ( 6 ), 339–346. 10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00134-0 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilmot, E. M. , Kumfo, J. , Danso-Mensah, D. , & Antwi-Danso, S. (2013). An Investigation into the factors that contribute to nurse/midwife trainees’ poor performance in the final licencing examination in Ghana . Nursing and Midwifery Council: Accra. [ Google Scholar ]
• Winter, R. , & Munn-Giddings, C. (2001). A handbook for PAR in health and social care . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group Quantitative Psychology (2017-SGR-269), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 2 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group on Gender, Identity and Diversity (2017-SGR-1091), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 3 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 4 Multidisciplinary Nursing Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
• PMID: 33029860
• DOI: 10.1111/nup.12332

Critical thinking is a complex, dynamic process formed by attitudes and strategic skills, with the aim of achieving a specific goal or objective. The attitudes, including the critical thinking attitudes, constitute an important part of the idea of good care, of the good professional. It could be said that they become a virtue of the nursing profession. In this context, the ethics of virtue is a theoretical framework that becomes essential for analyse the critical thinking concept in nursing care and nursing science. Because the ethics of virtue consider how cultivating virtues are necessary to understand and justify the decisions and guide the actions. Based on selective analysis of the descriptive and empirical literature that addresses conceptual review of critical thinking, we conducted an analysis of this topic in the settings of clinical practice, training and research from the virtue ethical framework. Following JBI critical appraisal checklist for text and opinion papers, we argue the need for critical thinking as an essential element for true excellence in care and that it should be encouraged among professionals. The importance of developing critical thinking skills in education is well substantiated; however, greater efforts are required to implement educational strategies directed at developing critical thinking in students and professionals undergoing training, along with measures that demonstrate their success. Lastly, we show that critical thinking constitutes a fundamental component in the research process, and can improve research competencies in nursing. We conclude that future research and actions must go further in the search for new evidence and open new horizons, to ensure a positive effect on clinical practice, patient health, student education and the growth of nursing science.

Keywords: critical thinking; critical thinking attitudes; nurse education; nursing care; nursing research.

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. MacKinnon K, Marcellus L, Rivers J, Gordon C, Ryan M, Butcher D. MacKinnon K, et al. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
• Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Eddy K, Jordan Z, Stephenson M. Eddy K, et al. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314 Review.
• Strategies to overcome obstacles in the facilitation of critical thinking in nursing education. Mangena A, Chabeli MM. Mangena A, et al. Nurse Educ Today. 2005 May;25(4):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.012. Epub 2005 Apr 12. Nurse Educ Today. 2005. PMID: 15896414
• Ethics in nursing education: learning to reflect on care practices. Vanlaere L, Gastmans C. Vanlaere L, et al. Nurs Ethics. 2007 Nov;14(6):758-66. doi: 10.1177/0969733007082116. Nurs Ethics. 2007. PMID: 17901186 Review.
• Teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking in bachelor nursing students: a scoping review protocol. Westerdahl F, Carlson E, Wennick A, Borglin G. Westerdahl F, et al. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e033214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32014875 Free PMC article. Review.
• Higher Vocational Nursing Students' Clinical Core Competence in China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Wang S, Huang S, Yan L. Wang S, et al. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Mar 1;10:23779608241233147. doi: 10.1177/23779608241233147. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38435341 Free PMC article.
• Effect of the case-based learning method combined with virtual reality simulation technology on midwifery laboratory courses: A quasi-experimental study. Zhao L, Dai X, Chen S. Zhao L, et al. Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Dec 16;11(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.009. eCollection 2024 Jan. Int J Nurs Sci. 2023. PMID: 38352279 Free PMC article.
• Translation, validation and psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Nurses Professional Competence Scale Short form. Duka B, Stievano A, Caruso R, Prendi E, Ejupi V, Spada F, De Maria M, Rocco G, Notarnicola I. Duka B, et al. Acta Biomed. 2023 Aug 3;94(4):e2023197. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i4.13575. Acta Biomed. 2023. PMID: 37539614 Free PMC article.
• A study of the effects of blended learning on university students' critical thinking: A systematic review. Haftador AM, Tehranineshat B, Keshtkaran Z, Mohebbi Z. Haftador AM, et al. J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Mar 31;12:95. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_665_22. eCollection 2023. J Educ Health Promot. 2023. PMID: 37288404 Free PMC article. Review.
• Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Influences on Critical Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making Skills among Registered Nurses: A Study Protocol. Zainal NH, Musa KI, Rasudin NS, Mamat Z. Zainal NH, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;11(8):1169. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081169. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37108003 Free PMC article.
• Alfaro-Lefevre, R. (2019). Critical thinking, clinical reasoning and clinical judgment. A practical approach, 7th ed. Elsevier.
• Armstrong, A. (2006). Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy, 7(3), 110-124.
• Armstrong, A. (2007). Nursing ethics. A virtue-based approach. Palgrave Macmillian.
• Banks-Wallace, J., Despins, L., Adams-Leander, S., McBroom, L., & Tandy, L. (2008). Re/Affirming and re/conceptualizing disciplinary knowledge as the foundations for doctoral education. Advances in Nursing Sciencies, 31(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ANS.0000311530.81188.88
• Banning, M. (2008). Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: Concepts and research studies. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(3), 177-183.
• Search in MeSH

Grants and funding

• PREI-19-007-B/School of Nursing. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. University of Barcelona

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• Subscribe to journal Subscribe
• Get new issue alerts Get alerts

Secondary Logo

Journal logo.

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

An introduction to critical thinking

Johanson, Linda EdD, MS, RN

Linda S. Johanson is an associate professor of nursing at Appalachian State University in Boone, N.C.

The author has disclosed no financial relationships related to this article.

After a brief interaction with a nursing student, this nurse educator saw the wisdom of using critical thinking when teaching critical thinking.

IN NURSING SCHOOL, I learned about two types of thinking: There is the regular kind, and then there is critical thinking. Although it sounds like it means thinking about important things, critical thinking really means using reflective, systematic thought processes while weighing alternatives and finding a creative solution. For example, if a patient requests something for pain, the nurse will assess the pain, consider options for resolution, and individualize the intervention. This will often lead to a creative solution. When I became a nursing instructor, encouraging critical thinking at any plausible juncture for my students became one of my priorities.

Critical thinking comes easily to some students, but it can be a challenge for others. This is where a student I'll call Tiffany comes in. Her story, from one of my first years as a senior-level clinical instructor in the ICU, taught me an important lesson about educating aspiring nurses on critical thinking skills.

The problem

It was a Friday, my only office day for the week. The phone rang, and the coordinator for the first-level students was in a panic. Their instructor had called in sick, and a group of brand-new nursing students was assembled on the gerontology unit awaiting direction. My office was in a building adjacent to the hospital, and I was asked to run over there, quickly give assignments, and get the students started. I was unfamiliar with this level of student, but the coordinator assured me that I could handle it. The students would just be changing bed linens and providing bed baths.

I grabbed my lab coat and headed over to the unit. I quickly took inventory of the patient census and assigned each student to a patient. They set off with their arms full of linens and ambition.

Feeling satisfied that I had intervened effectively, I stationed myself at the central desk where I could be found if anyone needed me. About 15 minutes later, Tiffany hurried toward the nursing station with a panicked look on her face.

“I need help with my patient,” she said. “It's an emergency!” I quickly walked her back toward her assigned patient's room. As we walked, I encouraged her to explain the emergency. Thoughts of a cardiac arrest, patient fall, seizure, or violent behavior emerged from my critical care mindset. However, Tiffany relayed none of those potential emergencies in her explanation. Instead she informed me, “My patient said he needs to use the urinal!”

I stopped and looked at her incredulously. “That is the emergency?”

When her eyes began to fill with tears, compassion overwhelmed me. Of course that would be an emergency to this brand-new student. She had been told to give a bath and make the bed. Something outside of that assignment had come up.

I told her that she could let the patient use the urinal if he needed it before his bath. Confident that she could now conduct the new task on her assignment list, I gave her a word of encouragement and went back to the nursing station. All was quiet for about 10 minutes until Tiffany returned in another state of panic. Her patient was now too weak to hold on to the urinal. This time, I was a bit calmer in response.

Thinking it through

After explaining to the student what it meant to be a critical thinker and the value and characteristics thereof, I asked her to try to reason out an answer to her problem. She suggested she could hold the urinal for him.

“Yes! Outstanding!” I exclaimed. “That is how you use critical thinking!” After encouraging her to just be professional about it and act confidently, off she went to apply her new solution.

A lesson learned

This experience helped me to see the need to use critical thinking when teaching critical thinking. After all, one of the hallmark characteristics of critical thinking is to avoid making assumptions. As an instructor, I now develop assignments that require students to be creative, encourage problem-solving skills with individualized case studies and simulations, and challenge students with Socratic questioning and open-ended examinations instead of using a strict multiple-choice format. By taking this approach, instructors can begin to build those critical thinking skills that are so essential to professional practice.

• + Favorites
• View in Gallery

Readers Of this Article Also Read

Transitioning from staff nurse to nurse educator, eight traits make great nursing instructors, nclex practice questions, joys of teaching nursing, rn education: a matter of degrees.