literature review waterfall model

The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development

Conference paper
Cite this conference paper

Kai Petersen 10 , 11 ,
Claes Wohlin 10 &
Dejan Baca 10 , 11

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 32))

Included in the following conference series:

International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement

4744 Accesses

61 Citations

3 Altmetric

Waterfall development is still a widely used way of working in software development companies. Many problems have been reported related to the model. Commonly accepted problems are for example to cope with change and that defects all too often are detected too late in the software development process. However, many of the problems mentioned in literature are based on beliefs and experiences, and not on empirical evidence. To address this research gap, we compare the problems in literature with the results of a case study at Ericsson AB in Sweden, investigating issues in the waterfall model. The case study aims at validating or contradicting the beliefs of what the problems are in waterfall development through empirical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Available as PDF
Read on any device
Instant download
Own it forever
Compact, lightweight edition
Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Royce, W.: Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. In: Proc. IEEE WESCOM. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1970)

Google Scholar

Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 7th edn. Pearson Eductation Ltd., London (2004)

MATH Google Scholar

Raccoon, L.B.S.: Fifty years of progress in software engineering. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 22(1), 88–104 (1997)

Article Google Scholar

Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)

McBreen, P.: Software craftsmanship: the new imperative. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

Pfleeger, S.L., Atlee, J.M.: Software engineering: theory and practice, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)

Jarzombek, J.: The 5th annual jaws s3 proceedings (1999)

Thomas, M.: It projects sink or swim. British Computer Society Review 2001 (2001)

Johnson, J.: Keynote speech: Build only the features you need. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP 2002) (2002)

Jones, C.: Patterns of Software Systems: Failure and Success. International Thomson Computer Press (1995)

Sametinger, J.: Software engineering with reusable components: with 26 tables. Springer, Berlin (1997)

Book MATH Google Scholar

Anderson, D.J.: Agile Management for Software Engineering: Applying the Theory of Constraints for Business Results (The Coad Series). Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

Cohen, D., Larson, G., Ware, B.: Improving software investments through requirements validation. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop (SEW 2001), Washington, DC, USA, p. 106. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

Boehm, B.: Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer 35(1), 64–69 (2002)

Karlström, D., Runeson, P.: Combining agile methods with stage-gate project management. IEEE Software 22(3), 43–49 (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Blekinge Institute of Technology, Box 520, SE-37225, Ronneby, Sweden

Kai Petersen, Claes Wohlin & Dejan Baca

Ericsson AB, Box 518, SE-37123, Karlskrona, Sweden

Kai Petersen & Dejan Baca

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Fraunhofer IIESE, Fraunhoferplatz 1, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany

Frank Bomarius

Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, P.O.Box 3000, 90014, Finland

Markku Oivo

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 3, 02150, Espoo, Finland

Päivi Jaring

Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 68, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

Pekka Abrahamsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Petersen, K., Wohlin, C., Baca, D. (2009). The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development. In: Bomarius, F., Oivo, M., Jaring, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 32. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02152-7_29

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02152-7_29

Publisher Name : Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Print ISBN : 978-3-642-02151-0

Online ISBN : 978-3-642-02152-7

eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Innovation With Pixels

CMS Website Development

Ui/ux design, social media marketing, mobile app development, ecommerce store, seo optimization, sales funnel pages, graphic designing, content writing, website maintenance, domain & hosting.

Case Studies

></center></p><h2>The Waterfall Model: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Definition, Process, and Applications</h2><p>The Waterfall Model is a traditional software development methodology that follows a linear, sequential approach. It is widely known for its structured process, clear documentation, and ease of understanding.</p><p>In this article, we’ll explore the definition, steps, and examples of the Waterfall Model, talk its advantages and disadvantages, and examine it to the Agile method.</p><p>Table of Contents</p><h2>Waterfall Model Definition</h2><p>It splits a project into distinct, non-overlapping phases through a linear, sequential approach to software development. There is not any manner to head again and alternate some thing that turned into achieved in a previous segment; everyone needs to be finished earlier than shifting directly to the next.</p><p>This model emphasizes thorough planning, documentation, and a rigid structure, making it ideal for simple, well-defined projects.</p><h2>Waterfall Model Steps</h2><p>It consists of the following steps:</p><ul><li>Requirements Gathering: In this phase, the project team gathers and documents the client’s requirements, forming the basis for the entire project.</li><li>System Design: The group creates a detailed layout of the system, such as hardware and software program specifications, facts float diagrams, and database schemas.</li><li>Implementation : To construct the system in accordance with the concept, the development team writes the necessary code.</li><li>Testing : Thorough testing is performed on the system to find and fix any flaws or problems.</li><li>Deployment : Once the system is tested and approved, it is deployed for use by the end users.</li><li>Maintenance : The group keeps aid and preserves the device after deployment to make sure it continues running as it must.</li></ul><h2>Waterfall Model Example</h2><p>A company wants to develop a new inventory management system. The Waterfall Model would be applied as follows:</p><ul><li>Requirements Gathering: The project team meets with the company to understand its needs and gathers information on the desired features and functionalities.</li><li>System Design: The team designs the system, including the user interface, database structures, and data flow diagrams.</li><li>Implementation : The developers write code to build the system according to the design specifications.</li><li>Testing : To make sure it satisfies the standards and operates properly, the system is put through rigorous testing.</li><li>Deployment : The deployment and availability of the inventory management system to the business.</li><li>Maintenance : The development team offers continuing assistance and upkeep, including updates and bug fixes.</li></ul><h2>Waterfall Model vs. Agile</h2><p>While Agile is more suitable for projects with changing or evolving requirements, the Waterfall Model is best suited for projects with clearly defined requirements. Agile encourages flexibility, collaboration, and continuous improvement, while the Waterfall Model follows a rigid, linear process.</p><h2>When to Use the Waterfall Model</h2><p>It is most effective for projects with:</p><ul><li>Clearly defined requirements that are unlikely to change.</li><li>Limited need for client involvement during the development process.</li><li>A focus on thorough documentation.</li><li>A well-understood technology stack.</li></ul><h2>Advantages of the Waterfall Model</h2><ul><li>Easy to understand and follow.</li><li>Emphasis on documentation.</li><li>Clear milestones and deadlines.</li><li>Suitable for projects with well-defined requirements.</li></ul><h2>Disadvantages of the Waterfall Model</h2><ul><li>Inflexible and unable to accommodate changes easily.</li><li>Late discovery of defects or issues.</li><li>Limited client involvement during development.</li><li>Not suitable for complex, evolving projects.</li></ul><h2>Waterfall Model Diagram</h2><p>A Waterfall Model diagram visually represents the sequential steps and the flow of the project from one phase to another. The diagram typically takes the form of a Gantt chart or a flowchart, with arrows indicating the progression from one stage to the next. This visual representation helps the project team and stakeholders understand the project’s structure, milestones, and progress.</p><h2>Tips for Successfully Implementing the Waterfall Model</h2><p>To maximize the success of a Waterfall Model project, consider the following tips:</p><ul><li>Thoroughly define and document requirements: Spend ample time in the Requirements Gathering phase to ensure that all client needs and expectations are clearly outlined and documented.</li><li>Encourage effective communication: Regular communication between team members and stakeholders is crucial for ensuring that everyone is on the same page throughout the project’s duration.</li><li>Monitor progress: Keep music of the venture’s progress and milestones, taking into consideration timely identity and resolution of any problems that may rise up.</li><li>Allocate resources appropriately: Ensure that adequate resources, including time, budget, and personnel, are allocated to each project phase.</li><li>Conduct thorough testing: Rigorous testing is essential for identifying and resolving defects before deployment, reducing the risk of costly post-deployment issues.</li></ul><h2>Adapting the Waterfall Model for Modern Projects</h2><p>While the traditional Waterfall Model may not be well-suited for complex, dynamic projects, some adaptations can make it more applicable in today’s rapidly changing software development landscape:</p><ul><li>Incorporate feedback loops: Introducing feedback loops between phases can allow for some degree of iteration and flexibility within the linear structure, making it easier to address issues and incorporate changes.</li><li>Combine with Agile principles : Some organizations have adopted a hybrid approach, combining the structured process of the Waterfall Model with the flexibility and adaptability of Agile methodologies.</li><li>Focus on risk management: Proactively identifying and addressing potential risks throughout the project lifecycle can help mitigate the impact of unforeseen changes and challenges.</li></ul><h2>The Role of the Project Manager in the Waterfall Model</h2><p>The success of a Waterfall Model project relies heavily on the role of the project manager. The project manager is in charge of making sure that the project is carried out effectively while keeping to the planned structure and timeframe. Some key responsibilities of the project manager within the Waterfall Model include:</p><ul><li>Defining project scope: The project manager works closely with the client to identify and document the project requirements and scope, setting the foundation for the entire project.</li><li>Creating a project plan: The project manager develops a complete project plan, outlining the responsibilities, milestones, and time limits for every phase.</li><li>Allocating resources: The project manager is responsible for assigning resources, such as personnel, budget, and time, to each project phase and ensuring their effective utilization.</li><li>Coordinating communication: The mission supervisor acts as the critical factor of communication between the mission group, stakeholders, and the consumer, making sure that everybody is informed and aligned in the course of the project.</li><li>Monitoring progress and performance: The project manager continually tracks the project’s progress against the plan, addressing any issues or deviations that may arise.</li><li>Ensuring quality: The project manager is responsible for maintaining high-quality standards throughout the project, including thorough testing and review processes.</li></ul><h2>The Waterfall Model in Other Industries</h2><p>Although the Waterfall Model is primarily associated with software development, its principles and structure can be applied to other industries and projects as well. For example, the Waterfall Model can be used in:</p><ul><li>Construction and engineering: These businesses frequently require a linear, sequential strategy for projects, with each phase building on the one before.</li><li>Manufacturing : The Waterfall Model can be applied to product development and production processes, where a step-by-step approach is necessary for efficient and accurate execution.</li><li>Event planning: Large-scale events often involve a series of sequential steps, from concept development to logistics planning and execution, making the Waterfall Model an appropriate choice.</li><li>Marketing campaigns: The Waterfall Model can be used to plan and execute marketing campaigns, ensuring that each stage of the campaign is completed before moving on to the next.</li></ul><p>By understanding the underlying principles and structure of the Waterfall Model, it can be adapted and applied to various industries and projects beyond software development.</p><p>The Waterfall Model remains a popular software development methodology due to its structured, linear approach and clear documentation. Understanding its method, strengths, and obstacles is vital for figuring out whether or not it’s miles the proper preference to your task.</p><p>By adopting the Waterfall Model to modern project requirements and applying best practices, you can increase the likelihood of successful project outcomes and deliver high-quality software solutions.</p><p><center><a href=

Waterative Model: an Integration of the Waterfall and Iterative Software Development Paradigms

2019, Database Systems Journal

Software development paradigms help a software developer to select appropriate strategies to develop software projects. They include various methods, procedures, and tools to describe and define the software development life cycle (SDLC). The waterfall and iterative models are two useful development paradigms, which have been used by various software developers in the last decades. This paper proposes a new software development methodology, called waterative model, which applies an integration of the waterfall and iterative development paradigms. In this model, the iterative model is embedded into the waterfall model to use the advantages of both models as an integrated one. It, in the most cases, is appropriate for large software products that need a long-term period of time for the development process. Experimental results demonstrate that the customer satisfaction score could be high by using the proposed model in various software projects.

Related Papers

IJCST Eighth Sense Research Group

The development lifecycle of software comprises of five major stages namely Feasibility study, Requirement Elicitation, Designing, Coding and Testing. A software process model is the basic framework which gives a workflow from one stage to the next. This workflow is a guideline for successful planning, organization and final execution of the software project. Generally we have many different techniques and methods used to software development life cycle. Project and most real word models are customized adaptations of the generic models while each is designed for a specific purpose or reason, most have similar goals and share many common tasks. This paper will explore the similarities and difference among these various software development life cycle models.

International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology IJSRST , Madhup Kumar

A software life cycle is the series of identifiable stages that a software product undergoes during its life time. An s/w life cycle model is a descriptive and diagrammatic representation of s/w life cycle. A life cycle model map the different activities performed on a s/w product from its inspection to retirement. Business organization follow steps-Business process, manufacturing industries-manufacturing process same as for s/w development use s/w process model. The first life cycle of any s/w product is generally feasibility study, RAS, Design, Coding, Testing and Maintenance. A (software/system) life cycle model is a description of the sequence of activities carried out in an SE project, and the relative order of these activities.

vinoraj vino

Christopher Valentine

IJEETE Journals , Nancy Bindal

Software development process is concerned with production of software. Software cycles a process used by a systems analyst to develop an information system, including software productivity, cost, and overall quality

Rahul Verma

Sumant Aditya

Saru Dhir , saru d

A major challenge in any engineering endeavour is taking a poorly organised, uncertain, inconsistent, incomplete, and over generalized requirements specification and turning it into a well-structured design. In order to manage quality and to save cost and time, many companies are shifting from traditional software development lifecycle models to the agile environment. This paper aims to describe the impact and comparison of various traditional methodologies and new methodology. This paper explores the reasons for which software industries shifted from Traditional RE to Agile RE. This research has performed comparative studies of different software development methodologies, when and where they can be used. This paper also gives introduction to agile software development methodology and how to apply them.

IJCT-International Journal of Computer Techniques

International Journal of Computer Techniques IJCT

Wireless sensor network (WSN) is primarily designed for real-time collection and analysis of data in hostile environments. One of the major challenges of WSN is security. Network security is the most vital component in information security, because it is responsible for securing all information passed through the networks. The security of WSN poses challenges because of the criticality of the data sensed by a node and in turn the node meets severe constraints, such as minimal power, computational, and communicational capabilities. An identification of a suitable cryptographic algorithm for WSN is an important challenge due to the computational time, computation capability, and storage resources of the sensor nodes. Many symmetric algorithms have been implemented for sensor networks. In earlier studies, it is found that asymmetric algorithms, such as ELGAMAL and RSA, have not been implemented due to high-power constraint and for memory constraints. In this paper, it can be implemented for wireless sensor in an efficient manner using optimized computation. In this paper, the performance of the RSA cryptography algorithm is compared with the ELGAMAL algorithm by evaluating the cluster-based wireless network topology environment. The simulation results of both RSA and ELGAMAL show the comparative study using the NS2 simulation tool. The result shows that the RSA algorithm consumes a less computational time, data transmitting, and has a good storage capacity than the ELGAMAL. Keywords— Asymmetric cryptography, ELGAMAL, RSA, security, wireless sensor network (WSN).

RELATED PAPERS

Mahdi H . Miraz , Maaruf Ali

muhammad jafar

Ravimohan Rajmohan

RASHIDATUL FARHAN

Albert Acquah

Favour Egberike

Arnold Ndukuyu

Rupesh Khadka

karim karime

RUAS-SASTech Journal

Prof. N D Gangadhar

brahmam tulabandula

Dr. K. K. Baseer

Funke Olagunju

darothi sarkar

Calvin Tran

Gaurav Gupta

PETER HYELAMZHA

Introduction

Introduction to Software Engineering - Software Engineering
What is the Need of Software Engineering?
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Classification of Software - Software Engineering
Software Characteristics - Software Engineering
Software Quality - Software Engineering
ISO/IEC 9126 in Software Engineering
Boehm's Software Quality Model
McCall's Quality Model
Software Crisis - Software Engineering
Difference between Software Engineering process and Conventional Engineering Process
People Metrics and Process Metrics in Software Engineering
Halstead’s Software Metrics - Software Engineering
Cyclomatic Complexity
Functional Point (FP) Analysis - Software Engineering
Lines of Code (LOC) in Software Engineering

Software Development Models

Waterfall Model - Software Engineering
Iterative Waterfall Model - Software Engineering
What is Spiral Model in Software Engineering?
Prototyping Model - Software Engineering
Incremental Process Model - Software Engineering
Rapid application development model (RAD) - Software Engineering
Coupling and Cohesion - Software Engineering
RAD Model vs Traditional SDLC - Software Engineering

Agile Software Development

Agile Software Development - Software Engineering
Agile Development Models - Software Engineering
Agile Methodology Advantages and Disadvantages
Agile SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle)
Difference between Traditional and Agile Software Development
Comparison between Agile model and other models in Software Engineering

Software Requirements Specification

Software Requirement Specification (SRS) Format
Parts of a SRS document - Software Engineering
Software Engineering | Classification of Software Requirements
How to write a good SRS for your Project
Software Engineering | Quality Characteristics of a good SRS
Difference between SRS and FRS

Software Project Management(SPM)

Software Project Management (SPM) - Software Engineering
Project size Estimation Techniques - Software Engineering
System configuration management - Software Engineering
COCOMO Model - Software Engineering
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) - Software Engineering
Integrating Risk Management in SDLC | Set 1
Integrating Risk Management in SDLC | Set 2
Integrating Risk Management in SDLC | Set 3
Software Engineering | Software Project Management Complexities
Quasi renewal processes - Software Engineering
Reliability Growth Models - Software Engineering
Jelinski Moranda software reliability model - Software Engineering
Software Engineering | Schick-Wolverton software reliability model
Goel-Okumoto Model - Software Engineering
Mills' Error Seeding Model - Software Engineering
Basic Fault Tolerant Software Techniques
Software Maintenance - Software Engineering

Software Testing and Debugging

What is Software Testing?
Types of Software Testing
Principles of software testing - Software Testing
Software Engineering | Testing Guidelines
Black Box Testing - Software Engineering
White box Testing - Software Engineering
Unit Testing - Software Testing
Acceptance Testing - Software Testing
Alpha Testing - Software Testing
Beta Testing - Software Testing
Regression Testing - Software Engineering
Integration Testing - Software Engineering
What is Debugging in Software Engineering?

Software Verification and Validation

Verification and Validation in Software Engineering
Role of Verification and Validation (V&V) in SDLC
Requirements Validation Techniques - Software Engineering
Differences between Verification and Validation

Software Engineering Interview Questions

Top Software Engineering Interview Questions and Answers [2024]
Software Engineering

Software Engineering Quiz

SDLC MCQ Questions and Answers
Software Development Models MCQ Questions and Answers
Risk Management in Software Engineering - MCQ Questions
Software Quality Assurance Quiz

Iterative Waterfall Model – Software Engineering

In a practical software development project, the classical waterfall model is hard to use. So, the iterative waterfall model can be thought of as incorporating the necessary changes to the classical waterfall model to make it usable in practical software development projects. It is almost the same as the classical waterfall model, except some changes are made to increase the efficiency of the software development .

Table of Content

What is the Iterative Waterfall Model?

Process of iterative waterfall model, when to use iterative waterfall model, application of iterative waterfall model, why is iterative waterfall model used, advantages of iterative waterfall model, drawbacks of iterative waterfall model.

The Iterative Waterfall Model is a software development approach that combines the sequential steps of the traditional Waterfall Model with the flexibility of iterative design. It allows for improvements and changes to be made at each stage of the development process, instead of waiting until the end of the project. The iterative waterfall model provides feedback paths from every phase to its preceding phases, which is the main difference from the classical waterfall model.

When errors are detected at some later phase, these feedback paths allow for correcting errors committed by programmers during some phase.
The feedback paths allow the phase to be reworked in which errors are committed and these changes are reflected in the later phases.
But, there is no feedback path to the stage – feasibility study, because once a project has been taken, does not give up the project easily.
It is good to detect errors in the same phase in which they are committed.
It reduces the effort and time required to correct the errors.
A real-life example could be building a new website for a small business.

Iterative Waterfall Model

1. Requirements Gathering

This is the first stage where the business owners and developers meet to discuss the goals and requirements of the website.

In this stage, the developers create a preliminary design of the website based on the requirements gathered in stage 1.

3. Implementation

In this stage, the developers begin to build the website based on the design created in stage 2.

Once the website has been built, it is tested to ensure that it meets the requirements and functions properly.

5. Deployment

The website is then deployed and made live to the public.

6. Review and Improvement

After the website has been live for a while, the business owners and developers review its performance and make any necessary improvements.

This process is repeated until the website meets the needs and goals of the business. Each iteration builds upon the previous one, allowing for continuous improvement and iteration until the final product is complete.

The prerequisite of being well-defined and comprehended.
The development team is gaining knowledge about new technologies.
Certain characteristics and objectives carry a significant chance of failure in the future.
The essential needs are established, but as time passes, the finer points may become relevant.
Programmers have a learning curve to climb when they utilize new technology.
The resources needed to complete a large project are constrained, hence on a smaller scale, the automation is more temporary.
Very high risk as the project’s objective may occasionally alter.

The main reason behind using iterative waterfall model is feedback path. In the classical waterfall model, there are no feedback paths, so there is no mechanism for error correction. But in the iterative waterfall model feedback path from one phase to its preceding phase allows correcting the errors that are committed and these changes are reflected in the later phases.

Phase Containment of Errors: The principle of detecting errors as close to their points of commitment as possible is known as Phase containment of errors.
Collaboration: Throughout each stage of the process, there is collaboration between the business owners and developers. This ensures that the website meets the needs of the business and that any issues or concerns are addressed in a timely manner.
Flexibility: The iterative waterfall model allows for flexibility in the development process. If changes or new requirements arise, they can be incorporated into the next iteration of the website.
Testing and feedback: The testing stage of the process is important for identifying any issues or bugs that need to be addressed before the website is deployed. Additionally, feedback from users or customers can be gathered and used to improve the website in subsequent iterations.
Scalability: The iterative waterfall model is scalable, meaning it can be used for projects of various sizes and complexities. For example, a larger business may require more iterations or more complex requirements, but the same process can still be followed.
Maintenance: Once the website is live, ongoing maintenance is necessary to ensure it continues to meet the needs of the business and its users. The iterative waterfall model can be used for maintenance and improvement cycles, allowing the website to evolve and stay up-to-date.
Easy to Manage: The iterative waterfall model is easy to manage as each phase is well-defined and has a clear set of deliverables. This makes it easier to track progress, identify issues, and manage resources.
Faster Time to Market: The iterative approach allows for faster time to market as small and incremental improvements are made over time, rather than waiting for a complete product to be developed.
Predictable Outcomes: The phased approach of the iterative waterfall model allows for more predictable outcomes and greater control over the development process, ensuring that the project stays on track and within budget.
Improved Customer Satisfaction: The iterative approach allows for customer involvement and feedback throughout the development process, resulting in a final product that better meets the needs and expectations of the customer.
Quality Assurance: The iterative approach promotes quality assurance by providing opportunities for testing and feedback throughout the development process. This results in a higher-quality end product.
Risk Reduction: The iterative approach allows for early identification and mitigation of risks, reducing the likelihood of costly errors later in the development process.
Well-organized: In this model, less time is consumed on documenting and the team can spend more time on development and designing.
Cost-Effective: It is highly cost-effective to change the plan or requirements in the model. Moreover, it is best suited for agile organizations.
Simple: Iterative waterfall model is very simple to understand and use. That’s why it is one of the most widely used software development models .
Feedback Path: In the classical waterfall model, there are no feedback paths, so there is no mechanism for error correction. But in the iterative waterfall model feedback path from one phase to its preceding phase allows correcting the errors that are committed and these changes are reflected in the later phases.
Difficult to incorporate change requests: The major drawback of the iterative waterfall model is that all the requirements must be clearly stated before starting the development phase. Customers may change requirements after some time but the iterative waterfall model does not leave any scope to incorporate change requests that are made after the development phase starts.
Incremental delivery not supported: In the iterative waterfall model, the full software is completely developed and tested before delivery to the customer. There is no scope for any intermediate delivery. So, customers have to wait a long for getting the software.
Overlapping of phases not supported: Iterative waterfall model assumes that one phase can start after completion of the previous phase, But in real projects, phases may overlap to reduce the effort and time needed to complete the project.
Risk handling not supported: Projects may suffer from various types of risks. But, the Iterative waterfall model has no mechanism for risk handling.
Limited customer interactions: Customer interaction occurs at the start of the project at the time of requirement gathering and at project completion at the time of software delivery. These fewer interactions with the customers may lead to many problems as the finally developed software may differ from the customers’ actual requirements.

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads, improve your coding skills with practice.

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

IMAGES

What is the Waterfall Model?
Waterfall Model or Traditional Model in 2021
Waterfall Model Example In Real Life
What is waterfall iterative model.
What Is The Waterfall Model? Waterfall Model In A Nutshell
Waterfall Model & Waterfall Methodology

VIDEO

Classical Waterfall Model || Software Engineering
Review WATERFALL
Explain Waterfall Model in Software Engineering Tutorials
#Waterfall model hairstyle #👈
Review vlog Ep- 94 || Hill track review || Waterfall || Stream in hill || Mayaboti Pori
Waterfall Design

COMMENTS

Software Engineering Methodologies: A Review of the Waterfall Model and
A review of literature reveals that waterfall model uses linear approach and is only suitable for sequential or procedural design. In waterfall, errors can only be detected at the end of the whole ...
Waterfall Model
Waterfall model. The Waterfall Model is a linear application development model that uses rigid phases: When one phase ends, the next begins. Steps occur in sequence, and, if unmodified, the model does not allow developers to go back to previous steps (hence "waterfall": Once water falls down, it cannot go back up). Exam Warning.
Software Engineering Methodologies: A Review of the Waterfall Model and
A review of literature reveals that waterfall model uses linear approach and is only suitable for sequential or procedural design. In waterfall, errors can only be detected at the end of the whole process and it may be difficult going back to repeat the entire process because the processes are sequential.
PDF Simulating the Software Development Lifecycle: The Waterfall Model
2. Background. In this section, we provide an overview of the relevant literature introducing the innovation of software development processes and the idea of a lifecycle. We then present the waterfall model, which is perceived as the first software development lifecycle, as well as our motivation for its study. 2.1.
Waterfall Model
The Waterfall Model is a software development life cycle model that was originally defined by Royce around 1970. This model has the advantage of dividing the life cycle into phases that are easily understood by management. The phases follow: Requirements (the needs of the customer are collected). Specification (a formal document containing the ...
The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development
Waterfall development is still a widely used way of working in software development companies. Many problems have been reported related to the model. Commonly accepted problems are for example to cope with change and that defects all too often are detected too late in the software development process. However, many of the problems mentioned in ...
PDF The Waterfall Model in Large-Scale Development
Literature identiﬁes a number of problems related to the waterfall model. An overview of the problems identiﬁed in literature is shown in Table 1. In addi-tion to the identiﬁed articles we considered books discussing advantages and disadvantages of the waterfall model. The waterfall model is connected to high costs and eﬀorts [2][5 ...
Software Engineering Methodologies: A Review of the Waterfall Model and
The waterfall model with agile-scrum methodologies are compared to realize software quality assurance with special focus on mobile applications to answer the question, which process model and practices are available for android software development along with focus on quality assurance. Expand
PDF Simulating the Software Development Lifecycle: The Waterfall Model
The Waterfall Model Antonios Saravanos 1, *, Mathew X. Curinga 2 ... in their review of crisis and risks in engineering project management describe the existence of a software crisis. Middleton and Sutton [18] share that "people who have labored to produce software in chaotic develop- ... ilarly appears in the literature to be used at times ...
Best Practices in Systems Development Lifecycle: An Analyses ...
Topics covered include an introduction to the Systems Development Lifecycle and the Waterfall Model including advantages and disadvantages. It also discusses the six stages of SDLC 1) Requirements Gathering and Analysis, 2) Systems Development, 3) Systems Implementation and Coding, 4) Testing, 5) Deployment, 6) Systems Operations and Maintenance.
Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting
Section 2 documents the literature-review process, provides an overview of the state-of-research, and points out the research gap to be closed. ... [30]. 4. Findings of the empirical survey First, the differences between classical waterfall-model versus agile methods were discussed with the interview partners, who rated the six domains with ...
The Waterfall Model: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Definition, Process
When to Use the Waterfall Model. It is most effective for projects with: Clearly defined requirements that are unlikely to change. Limited need for client involvement during the development process. A focus on thorough documentation. A well-understood technology stack. Advantages of the Waterfall Model. Easy to understand and follow.
The Waterfall Model and the Agile Methodologies
The V-model, also known as the Verification and Validation model, is a sequential development process that mirrors the shape of a V. It is similar to the waterfall model in that each stage must be ...
The Waterfall Model: Advantages, disadvantages, and when you should use
The Waterfall Model is a linear or sequential approach to project management and works based on fixed dates, requirements, and outcomes. Teams do not require consistent communication and, unless specific integrations are required, can be self-contained. Team members can also work independently and are often required to provide status reports ...
Simulating the Software Development Lifecycle: The Waterfall Model
The Waterfall Model ... Alves et al. [12] in their review of crisis and risks in engineering project management describe the existence of a software crisis. Middleton and SuZon [13] share that "people who have labored to produce software in chaotic de- ... In this section, we provide an overview of the relevant literature introducing the in-
Waterative Model: an Integration of the Waterfall and Iterative
An overall view of the SDLC framework 3 A literature review on software development paradigms Waterfall model [8, 9] is the simplest development model from among a list of available software development paradigms. All steps of the SDLC framework are conducted one after another through a linear manner.
(PDF) How relevant are waterfall project management methodologies in
Through a desk-top literature review, this paper proposes the use of a project management model to properly conceptualize the location of Missio Dei as a main project that includes other network ...
Iterative Waterfall Model
The iterative waterfall model provides feedback paths from every phase to its preceding phases, which is the main difference from the classical waterfall model. When errors are detected at some later phase, these feedback paths allow for correcting errors committed by programmers during some phase. The feedback paths allow the phase to be ...
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
For this reason, the waterfall model is recursive because each phase can be repeated endlessly until it is perfected. Figure 1 illustrates the various phases of the SDLC model waterfall. ... Literature review 3.1. System information Understanding information systems can be seen in terms of physical and function. From a physical point of
(PDF) Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for
Procedural models for project management can be differentiated into plan-driven methods which follow a classical waterfall process and agile methods which follow an iterative, test-driven approach.
PDF Software Engineering Methodologies: A Review of the Waterfall Model and
oriented approach. A review of literature reveals that waterfall model uses linear approach and is only suitable for sequential or procedural design. In waterfall, errors can only be detected at the end of the whole process and it may be difficult going back to repeat the entire process because the processes are sequential.
Simulating the Software Development Lifecycle: The Waterfall Model
This study employs a simulation-based approach, adapting the waterfall model, to provide estimates for software project and individual phase completion times. Additionally, it pinpoints potential efficiency issues stemming from suboptimal resource levels. We implement our software development lifecycle simulation using SimPy, a Python discrete-event simulation framework. Our model is executed ...
Literature Review on Waterfall Model
Literature Review on Waterfall Model - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. literature review on waterfall model
Unravelling the three lines model in cybersecurity: a systematic
After the seminal publication by the Institute of Internal Auditors in 2013, academics and practitioners have either referenced this model as the primary governance framework for risk management or analysed it in depth in various areas. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review on the topic.