These cookies are essential to enable the services to provide the requested feature, such as remembering you have logged in.
Confirm My Selections
Monetary policy lives in the shadow of us federal debt..
Today’s inflation is transitory, our central bankers assure us. It will go away on its own. But what if it does not? Central banks will have “the tools” to deal with inflation, they tell us. But just what are those tools? Do central banks have the will to use them, and will governments allow them to do so?
Should inflation continue to surge, central banks’ main tool is to raise interest rates sharply, and keep them high for several years, even if that causes a painful recession, as it did in the early 1980s in the United States, United Kingdom, and much of Europe. How much pain, and how deep of a dip, does it take to stop inflation and to keep inflation in check? The well-respected Taylor rule (named after my Hoover Institution colleague John B. Taylor) recommends that interest rates rise one-and-a-half times as much as inflation. So if inflation rises from 2 percent to 5 percent, interest rates should rise by 4.5 percentage points. Add a baseline of 2 percent for the inflation target and 1 percent for the long-run real rate of interest, and the rule recommends a central-bank rate of 7.5 percent. If inflation accelerates further before central banks act, reining it in could require the 15 percent interest rates of the early 1980s.
Would central banks do that? If they did, would high interest rates control inflation in today’s economy? There are many reasons for worry.
Monetary policy lives in the shadow of debt. US federal debt held by the public was about 25 percent of GDP in 1980, when Federal Reserve chair Paul Volcker started raising rates to tame inflation. Now, it is 100 percent of GDP and rising quickly, with no end in sight. When the Fed raises interest rates 1 percentage point, it raises the interest costs on debt by 1 percentage point, and, at 100 percent debt to GDP, 1 percent of GDP is about $227 billion. A 7.5 percent interest rate therefore creates interest costs of 7.5 percent of GDP, or $1.7 trillion.
Where will those trillions of dollars come from? Congress could drastically cut spending or find ways to increase tax revenues. Alternatively, the US Treasury could try to borrow additional trillions. But for that option to work, bond buyers must be convinced that a future Congress will cut spending or raise tax revenues by the same trillions of dollars, plus interest. Even if investors seem confident at the moment, we cannot assume that they will remain so indefinitely, especially if additional borrowing serves only to pay higher interest on existing debt. Even for the United States, there is a point at which bond investors see the end coming and demand even higher interest rates as a risk premium, thereby raising debt costs even more, in a spiral that leads to a debt crisis or to a sharp and uncontrollable surge of inflation. If the US government could borrow arbitrary amounts and never worry about repayment, it could send its citizens checks forever and nobody would have to work or pay taxes again. Alas, we do not live in that fanciful world.
In sum, for higher interest rates to reduce inflation, they must be accompanied by credible and persistent fiscal tightening, now or later. If the fiscal tightening does not come, higher interest rates will eventually fail to contain inflation.
This is a perfectly standard proposition, though it is often overlooked when discussing the US and Europe. It is embodied in the models used by the US Fed and other central banks. It was standard International Monetary Fund advice for decades.
Successful inflation and currency stabilization almost always includes monetary and fiscal reform, and usually microeconomic reform. The role of fiscal and microeconomic reform is to generate sustainably higher tax revenues by boosting economic growth and broadening the tax base, rather than with sharply higher and growth-reducing marginal tax rates. Many attempts at monetary stabilization have fallen apart because the fiscal or microeconomic reforms failed. Latin American economic history is full of such episodes.
The government can borrow as long as people believe that the fiscal reckoning will come in the future. But when people lose that faith, things can unravel quickly and unpredictably.
Even the US experience in the 1980s conforms to this pattern. The high interest rates of the early ’80s raised interest costs on the US national debt, contributing to most of the “Reagan deficits,” which seemed large at the time. Even after inflation declined, interest rates remained high, arguably because markets were worried that inflation would come surging back.
So why did the US inflation-stabilization effort succeed in the 1980s, after failing twice before in the ’70s, and countless times in other countries? In addition to the Fed remaining steadfast and the Reagan administration supporting it through two bruising recessions, the US undertook a series of important tax- and microeconomic-policy changes, most notably the 1982 and 1986 tax reforms, which sharply lowered marginal rates, as well as market-oriented regulatory reforms starting with the Carter-era deregulation of trucking, air transport, and finance.
The US experienced a two-decade economic boom. A larger GDP boosted tax revenues, enabling debt repayment despite high real-interest rates. By the late 1990s, strange as it sounds now, economists were actually worrying about how financial markets would work once all US Treasury debt had been paid off. The boom was arguably a result of these monetary, fiscal, and microeconomic reforms, though we do not need to argue the cause and effect of this history. Even if the economic boom that produced fiscal surpluses was coincidental with tax and regulatory reform, the fact remains that the US government successfully paid off its debt, including debt incurred from the high interest costs of the early 1980s. Had it not done so, inflation would have returned.
But would that kind of successful stabilization happen now, with the US national debt four times larger and still rising, and with interest costs for a given level of interest rates four times larger than the contentious Reagan deficits? Would Congress really abandon its ambitious spending plans, or raise tax revenues by trillions, all to pay a windfall of interest payments to largely wealthy and foreign bondholders?
Arguably, it would not. If interest costs on the debt were to spiral upward, Congress would likely demand a reversal of the high interest-rate policy. The last time the US debt-to-GDP ratio was 100 percent, at the end of World War II, the Fed was explicitly instructed to hold down interest costs on US debt, until inflation erupted in the 1950s.
The unraveling can be slow or fast. It takes time for higher interest rates to raise interest costs, as debt is rolled over. The government can borrow as long as people believe that the fiscal reckoning will come in the future. But when people lose that faith, things can unravel quickly and unpredictably.
Fiscal-policy constraints are only the beginning of the Fed’s difficulties. Will the Fed act promptly, before inflation gets out of control? Or will it continue to treat every increase of inflation as “transitory,” to be blamed on whichever price is going up most that month, as it did in the early 1970s?
It is never easy for the Fed to cause a recession, and to stick with its policy through the pain. Nor is it easy for an administration to support the central bank through that kind of long fight. But tolerating a lasting rise in unemployment—concentrated as usual among the disadvantaged—seems especially difficult in today’s political climate, with the Fed loudly pursuing solutions to inequality and inequity in its interpretation of its mandate to pursue “maximum employment.”
Moreover, the ensuing recession would likely be more severe. Inflation can be stabilized with little recession if people really believe the policy will be seen through. But if they think it is a fleeting attempt that may be reversed, the associated downturn will be worse.
One might think this debate can be postponed until we see if inflation really is transitory or not. But the issue matters now. Fighting inflation is much easier if inflation expectations do not rise. Our central banks insist that inflation expectations are “anchored.” But by what mechanism? Well, by the faith that those same central banks would, if necessary, reapply the harsh Volcker medicine of the 1980s to contain inflation. How long will that faith last? When does the anchor become a sail?
Two percentage points is the insurance premium for eliminating the chance of a debt crisis for 30 years, and for making sure the Fed can fight inflation if it needs to do so. I am not alone in thinking that this seems like inexpensive insurance.
A military or foreign-policy analogy is helpful. Fighting inflation is like deterring an enemy. If you just say you have “the tools,” that’s not very scary. If you tell the enemy what the tools are, show that they all are in shiny working order, and demonstrate that you have the will to use them no matter the pain inflicted on yourself, deterrence is much more likely.
Yet the Fed has been remarkably silent on just what the “tools” are, and just how ready it is to deploy them, no matter how painful doing so may be. There has been no parading of matériel. The Fed continues to follow the opposite strategy: a determined effort to stimulate the economy and to raise inflation and inflation expectations by promising no-matter-what stimulus. The Fed is still trying to deter deflation and says it will let inflation run above target for a while in an attempt to reduce unemployment, as it did in the 1970s.
It has also precommitted not to raise interest rates for a fixed period of time, rather than for as long as requisite economic conditions remain, which has the same counterproductive result as announcing military withdrawals on specific dates. Like much of the US government, the Fed is consumed with race, inequality, and climate change, and thus is distracted from deterring its traditional enemies.
An amazing opportunity to avoid this conundrum beckons, but it won’t beckon forever. The US government is like a homeowner who steps outside, smells smoke, and is greeted by a salesman offering fire insurance. So far, the government has declined the offer because it doesn’t want to pay the premium. There is still time to reconsider that choice.
Higher interest rates raise interest costs only because the US has financed its debts largely by rolling over short-term debt, rather than by issuing long-term bonds. The Fed has compounded this problem by buying up large quantities of long-term debt and issuing overnight debt—reserves—in return.
The US government is like any homeowner in this regard. It can choose the adjustable-rate mortgage, which offers a low initial rate but will lead to sharply higher payments if interest rates rise. Or it can choose the 30-year (or longer) fixed-rate mortgage, which requires a larger initial rate but offers 30 years of protection against interest-rate increases.
Who is right about inflation.
The US Fed and consumers have very different expectations about the future.
Economists gauge the likelihood of the US economy “overheating.”
Right now, the one-year Treasury rate is 0.07 percent, the 10-year rate is 1.3 percent, and the 30-year rate is 1.9 percent. Each one-year bond saves the US government about 2 percentage points of interest cost as long as rates stay where they are. But 2 percent is still negative in real terms. Two percentage points is the insurance premium for eliminating the chance of a debt crisis for 30 years, and for making sure the Fed can fight inflation if it needs to do so. I am not alone in thinking that this seems like inexpensive insurance. Even former US secretary of the treasury Lawrence H. Summers has changed his previous view to argue that the US should move swiftly to long-term debt.
But it’s a limited-time opportunity. Countries that start to encounter debt problems generally face higher long-term interest rates, which forces them to borrow in the short run and expose themselves to the attendant dangers. When the house down the street is on fire, the insurance salesman disappears, or charges an exorbitant rate.
Will the current inflation surge turn out to be transitory, or will it continue? The answer depends on our central banks and our governments. If people believe that fiscal and monetary authorities are ready to do what it takes to contain breakout inflation, inflation will remain subdued.
Doing what it takes means joint monetary and fiscal stabilization, with growth-oriented microeconomic reforms. It means sticking to those policies through the inevitable political and economic pain. And it means postponing or abandoning grand plans that depend on the exact opposite policies.
If people and markets lose faith that governments will respond to inflation with such policies in the future, inflation will erupt now. And in the shadow of debt and slow economic growth, central banks cannot control inflation on their own.
John H. Cochrane is a senior fellow of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and was previously a professor of finance at Chicago Booth. This essay first appeared on Project Syndicate and his blog, The Grumpy Economist .
Inflation affects behavior decades after prices have stabilized.
Hyperinflation in 1920s Germany set off ripples that persist a century later.
Research highlights the need for cross-border cooperation among securities regulators.
The Capitalisn’t podcast explores why the “Twitter Files” have received so little attention.
Your Privacy We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice , which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.
Kennedy School experts in public finance and economic policy weigh in on the causes and responses to the highest American consumer price jump in three decades.
Inflation in the United States has jumped to the highest level in 30 years, reaching 6.2% in October as measured by the Consumer Price Index. The COVID-19 pandemic has fueled consumer demand for goods and services at a time when supply lines are constrained and many industries have been affected by staff shortages. The inflation surge has generated intense political debate on the causes and the appropriate response.
We asked several economists and public finance experts at Harvard Kennedy School—all of whom have held senior federal government economics roles—to offer brief perspectives on how they view the underlying issues and the key policy choices facing the Biden administration and Congress.
On the revenue side, income and sales tax receipts will largely keep pace with inflation, so moderate inflation is unlikely to have a major impact. However, if inflation leads to sharply higher interest rates that lead to a stock market sell-off, then states that are highly dependent on capital gains taxes (such as California and New Jersey) may suffer. Another area of vulnerability could be property taxes, especially states where increases in assessed values or in property taxes are capped, as with California’s Prop. 13. These prevent rising house prices feeding through into state revenues, and are also the major revenue source for local governments.
On the expense side, the biggest risk is rising wages, which consume the largest share of state budgets. We could see public sector unions pushing for a return of “CPI-plus” language in new labor agreements. This would automatically bake in the cost of higher inflation to local expenditures. In addition, high inflation could significantly weaken state pension plans, many of which assume that future wage increases will be only 2%. Most of the current generation of local pension managers have little experience with inflation. They need to begin adjusting their portfolios now to prevent erosion of their asset bases.
Linda Bilmes is the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Lecturer in Public Policy and previously served as Assistant Secretary of Commerce.
What is not clear is how quickly these issues will resolve. The size and persistence of demand/supply imbalances has repeatedly surprised us, in part because virus caseloads have stayed unexpectedly high. We have only a limited understanding of why so many would-be workers are staying out of the labor force, making it hard to predict how many will return and how quickly. We are not sure how much inflation expectations have risen (a critical determinant of whether higher inflation sticks) because of measurement difficulties.
This uncertainty makes it difficult for monetary policymakers to know when they need to begin raising rates to avoid letting inflation stay at undesirably high levels. Given that they may need to revise their views quickly based on incoming data, it is especially important that they communicate the high degree of uncertainty. Surprising financial markets with an abrupt unexpected change in policy could lead to a rapid decline in asset prices that causes a significant setback in the economic recovery.
Karen Dynan is a professor of the practice of economics and former chief economist of the U.S. Treasury.
Let’s start with two don'ts.
Jeffrey Frankel is the James W. Harpel Professor of Capital Formation and Growth and was a member of the Council of Economic Advisors from 1983-1984 and 1996-1999.
Economists like to explain everything with demand and supply, and the concepts work well here. Demand is likely to remain high, fueled by households with healthy balance sheets, continued fiscal support, and very low interest rates. No one knows how long it will take supply to recover, or even whether it will fully recover, but it could be at least a year. The combination of strong demand and weak supply will likely keep inflation uncomfortably high.
President Biden can do a little about inflation by helping with port capacity and other supply-chain measures. Even better would be dropping President Trump’s tariffs on China. But these steps would only be small. The main agency charged with controlling inflation is the Federal Reserve. They are right to continue to be focused on the millions of people without jobs but should recalibrate towards incorporating more concern for inflation into their policy stance, including setting a default of more rate increases in 2022, something it can call off if inflation and/or employment is well below what we are currently expecting.
Jason Furman is the Aetna Professor of the Practice of Economic Policy and previously was chair of the Council of Economic Advisors under President Obama.
Simultaneously, the Administration should signal that a concern about inflation will inform its policies generally. Measures already taken to reduce port bottlenecks may have limited effect but are a clear positive step. Buying inexpensively should take priority over buying American. Tariff reduction is the most important supply-side policy the administration could undertake to combat inflation. Raising fossil fuel supplies, such as the recent deployment of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, is crucial. And financial regulators need to step up and be attentive to the pockets of speculative excess that are increasingly evident in financial markets.
Excessive inflation and a sense that it was not being controlled helped elect Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, and risks bringing Donald Trump back to power. While an overheating economy is a relatively good problem to have compared to a pandemic or a financial crisis, it will metastasize and threaten prosperity and public trust unless clearly acknowledged and addressed.
Lawrence H. Summers is Charles W. Eliot University Professor , Weil Director of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, and president emeritus of Harvard University. His government positions included Secretary of the Treasury in the Clinton Administration and Director of the National Economic Council under President Obama. Portions of this essay were excerpted from a Washington Post column .
Banner image by AP Photo/Noah Berger; inline image by Xinhua via Getty Images; faculty portraits by Martha Stewart
Helping homeowners during the covid-19 pandemic: lessons from the great recession, democratizing the federal regulatory process: a blueprint to strengthen equity, dignity, and civic engagement through executive branch action, economic inequality and insecurity: policies for an inclusive economy.
Get smart & reliable public policy insights right in your inbox.
January 16, 2022 Inflation hit a 40-year high last month, leaping 7 percent from the year prior. As households grapple with greater price hikes for groceries and other essentials, companies are contending with booming consumer demand and persistent supply-chain backlogs, keeping prices elevated. But how can companies determine that short-term price increases are fair? And how should they prepare to deal with the long-term consequences of inflationary markets? Explore these recent insights to get up to speed, and dive deeper on key topics, including:
How to deal with price increases in this inflationary market
The CEO: Architect of the new operations agenda
The coronavirus effect on global economic sentiment
CEO Excellence
Unlocking cash from your balance sheet
Winning the race with inflation: The pricing opportunity for industrial companies
Responding to inflation and volatility: Time for procurement to lead
Ten steps retailers can take to shock-proof their supply chains
Pandemic price spikes: What is a CFO’s next move?
What’s going on with shipping rates?
Defying cost volatility: A strategic pricing response
Getting real about mitigating price inflation
How changes in interest rates affect inflation, problems with using interest rates to control inflation, interest rates as a monetary policy tool, are the inflation rate and interest rate linked, what are the current inflation and interest rates, which is worse, inflation or deflation, the bottom line, what is the relationship between inflation and interest rates.
Yarilet Perez is an experienced multimedia journalist and fact-checker with a Master of Science in Journalism. She has worked in multiple cities covering breaking news, politics, education, and more. Her expertise is in personal finance and investing, and real estate.
Inflation and interest rates tend to move in the same direction, because interest rates are the primary tool used by the U.S. central bank to manage inflation.
The Federal Reserve Act directs the Fed to promote maximum employment and stable prices. Since 2012 the Federal Reserve has targeted an annual inflation rate of 2% as consistent with the stable prices portion of its dual mandate.
The Fed targets a positive rate of inflation, defined as a sustained rise in the overall price level for goods and services, because a sustained decline in prices, known as “deflation,” can be even more harmful to the economy. The positive levels of inflation and interest rates also provide the central bank with the flexibility to lower rates in response to an economic slowdown.
In August 2020 the Federal Reserve adopted average inflation targeting . This framework committed Fed policymakers to hold inflation above 2% for a time to compensate for stretches when the inflation rate fell short of that target.
The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure is the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index. Unlike the Consumer Price Index (CPI) , which is based on a survey of consumer purchases, the PCE Price Index tracks consumer spending and prices through the business receipts used to calculate the gross domestic product (GDP) .
One of the figures provided by the PCE Price Index is known as the core PCE Price Index. This excludes food and energy prices that are typically more volatile and tend to be less reflective of the overall price trend as a result.
When the Federal Reserve responds to elevated inflation risks by raising its benchmark federal funds rate , it effectively increases the level of risk-free reserves in the financial system, limiting the money supply available for purchases of riskier assets. Conversely, when a central bank reduces its target interest rate, it effectively increases the money supply available to purchase risk assets.
By increasing borrowing costs, rising interest rates discourage consumer and business spending , especially on commonly financed big-ticket items such as housing and capital equipment. Rising interest rates also tend to weigh on asset prices, reversing the wealth effect for individuals and making banks more cautious in lending decisions.
Finally, rising interest rates signal the likelihood that the central bank will continue to tighten monetary policy , further tamping down inflation expectations.
As the chart above shows, policymakers often respond to changes in economic outlook with a lag, and their policy changes, in turn, take time to affect inflation trends.
Because of these lags, policymakers have to try to anticipate future inflation trends when deciding on rate levels in the present. Yet the Fed’s adherence to its inflation target can only be gauged with backward-looking inflation statistics. These can range widely amid economic shocks that can sometimes prove transitory and other times less so.
The target federal funds rate announced by the Federal Reserve on May 3, 2023.
"In short, if making monetary policy is like driving a car, then the car is one that has an unreliable speedometer, a foggy windshield, and a tendency to respond unpredictably and with a delay to the accelerator or the brake," former Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke said in 2004 while still a Fed governor.
Central banks trying to anticipate inflation trends risk making a policy error by needlessly stoking inflation with rates that are too low or stifling growth by raising them. In the case of the Federal Reserve, it must pursue its stable prices objective while also trying to maximize employment.
The Federal Reserve uses the federal funds rate as its primary monetary policy tool. The federal funds rate, targeted as a range since 2008, is the overnight rate at which banks lend to each other over the very short term.
Traditionally, the Federal Reserve used open market operations—purchases and sales of securities—to adjust the supply of banking system reserves and hold the federal funds rate on target. Demand for reserves was the result of banking reserve requirements imposed to ensure the soundness of banks.
In the years following the 2008 global financial crisis, the focus of bank regulation shifted to capital buffer requirements and stress tests to ensure long-term solvency. In 2019 the Fed unveiled a policy of targeting the federal funds rate with two other rates it sets outright.
The interest on reserve balances (IORB) rate is what the Fed pays banks for overnight deposits in their Fed accounts. It sets an effective floor under the federal funds rate. Overnight reverse purchase agreements are a supplementary tool that pays a somewhat lower interest rate to non-bank money market participants for overnight deposits.
In 2020 the Federal Reserve eliminated reserve requirements for banks and other depository institutions. That policy is still in force as of 2024.
Yes. The Federal Reserve attempts to control inflation by raising interest rates. Therefore, if the former rises, so does the latter in response.
The inflation rate at the end of January 2024 was 3.1%. The interest rate as of May 3, 2023, was in the range of 5% to 5.25%.
Deflation is worse than inflation, because it can cause a downward economic spiral that leads first to a recession and then possibly to a depression.
Interest rates and inflation tend to move in the same direction but with lags, because policymakers require data to estimate future inflation trends, and the interest rates they set take time to fully affect the economy. Higher rates may be needed to bring rising inflation under control, while slowing economic growth often lowers the inflation rate and may prompt rate cuts. The Fed targets a range of the federal funds rate, in part, by setting the rate it pays on banking reserve balances.
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. " Why Does the Fed Care about Inflation? "
Federal Reserve Board. " Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement, 2022 ."
Federal Reserve Board. " Monetary Policy: What Are Its Goals? How Does It Work? "
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. " Inflation, Disinflation and Deflation: What Do They All Mean? "
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. " The Fed’s Inflation Target: Why 2 Percent? "
Federal Reserve Board. " 2020 Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy ."
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. " PCE and CPI Inflation: What’s the Difference? "
U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis. " Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, Excluding Food and Energy ."
International Monetary Fund. " Monetary Policy: Stabilizing Prices and Output ."
Federal Reserve Board. " Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement, 2023 ."
Federal Reserve Board. " Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke ."
Federal Reserve Board. " Policy Tools: Open Market Operations ."
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. " The Federal Funds Rate ."
Federal Reserve Board. " Statement Regarding Monetary Policy Implementation and Balance Sheet Normalization ."
Federal Reserve Board. " Liberty Street Economics: The Federal Reserve’s Two Key Rates: Similar but Not the Same? "
Federal Reserve Board. " Federal Reserve Actions to Support the Flow of Credit to Households and Businesses ."
National Archives, Federal Register. " Reserve Requirements of Depository Institutions ."
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. " Consumer Price Index ."
Essay on Inflation!
Inflation and unemployment are the two most talked-about words in the contemporary society. These two are the big problems that plague all the economies. Almost everyone is sure that he knows what inflation exactly is, but it remains a source of great deal of confusion because it is difficult to define it unambiguously.
Inflation is often defined in terms of its supposed causes. Inflation exists when money supply exceeds available goods and services. Or inflation is attributed to budget deficit financing. A deficit budget may be financed by additional money creation. But the situation of monetary expansion or budget deficit may not cause price level to rise. Hence the difficulty of defining ‘inflation’ .
Inflation may be defined as ‘a sustained upward trend in the general level of prices’ and not the price of only one or two goods. G. Ackley defined inflation as ‘a persistent and appreciable rise in the general level or average of prices’ . In other words, inflation is a state of rising price level, but not rise in the price level. It is not high prices but rising prices that constitute inflation.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
It is an increase in the overall price level. A small rise in prices or a sudden rise in prices is not inflation since these may reflect the short term workings of the market. It is to be pointed out here that inflation is a state of disequilibrium when there occurs a sustained rise in price level.
It is inflation if the prices of most goods go up. However, it is difficult to detect whether there is an upward trend in prices and whether this trend is sustained. That is why inflation is difficult to define in an unambiguous sense.
Let’s measure inflation rate. Suppose, in December 2007, the consumer price index was 193.6 and, in December 2008 it was 223.8. Thus the inflation rate during the last one year was 223.8 – 193.6/193.6 × 100 = 15.6%.
As inflation is a state of rising prices, deflation may be defined as a state of falling prices but not fall in prices. Deflation is, thus, the opposite of inflation, i.e., rise in the value or purchasing power of money. Disinflation is a slowing down of the rate of inflation.
As the nature of inflation is not uniform in an economy for all the time, it is wise to distinguish between different types of inflation. Such analysis is useful to study the distributional and other effects of inflation as well as to recommend anti-inflationary policies.
Inflation may be caused by a variety of factors. Its intensity or pace may be different at different times. It may also be classified in accordance with the reactions of the government toward inflation.
Thus, one may observe different types of inflation in the contemporary society:
i. Currency Inflation:
This type of inflation is caused by the printing of currency notes.
ii. Credit Inflation:
Being profit-making institutions, commercial banks sanction more loans and advances to the public than what the economy needs. Such credit expansion leads to a rise in price level.
iii. Deficit-Induced Inflation:
The budget of the government reflects a deficit when expenditure exceeds revenue. To meet this gap, the government may ask the central bank to print additional money. Since pumping of additional money is required to meet the budget deficit, any price rise may be called deficit-induced inflation.
iv. Demand-Pull Inflation:
An increase in aggregate demand over the available output leads to a rise in the price level. Such inflation is called demand-pull inflation (henceforth DPI). But why does aggregate demand rise? Classical economists attribute this rise in aggregate demand to money supply.
If the supply of money in an economy exceeds the available goods and services, DPI appears. It has been described by Coulborn as a situation of “too much money chasing too few goods” .
Note that, in this region, price level begins to rise. Ultimately, the economy reaches full employment situation, i.e., Range 3, where output does not rise but price level is pulled upward. This is demand-pull inflation. The essence of this type of inflation is “too much spending chasing too few goods.”
v. Cost-Push Inflation:
Inflation in an economy may arise from the overall increase in the cost of production. This type of inflation is known as cost-push inflation (henceforth CPI). Cost of production may rise due to increase in the price of raw materials, wages, etc. Often trade unions are blamed for wage rise since wage rate is not market-determined. Higher wage means higher cost of production.
Prices of commodities are thereby increased. A wage-price spiral comes into operation. But, at the same time, firms are to be blamed also for the price rise since they simply raise prices to expand their profit margins. Thus we have two important variants of CPI: wage-push inflation and profit-push inflation. Anyway, CPI stems from the leftward shift of the aggregate supply curve.
i. Creeping or Mild Inflation:
If the speed of upward thrust in prices is very low then we have creeping inflation. What speed of annual price rise is a creeping one has not been stated by the economists? To some, a creeping or mild inflation is one when annual price rise varies between 2 p.c. and 3 p.c.
If a rate of price rise is kept at this level, it is considered to be helpful for economic development. Others argue that if annual price rise goes slightly beyond 3 p.c. mark, still then it is considered to be of no danger.
ii. Walking Inflation:
If the rate of annual price increase lies between 3 p.c. and 4 p.c., then we have a situation of walking inflation. When mild inflation is allowed to fan out, walking inflation appears. These two types of inflation may be described as ‘moderate inflation’.
Often, one-digit inflation rate is called ‘moderate inflation’ which is not only predictable, but also keep people’s faith on the monetary system of the country’. People’s confidence get lost once moderately maintained rate of inflation goes out of control and the economy is then caught with the galloping inflation.
iii. Galloping and Hyperinflation:
Walking inflation may be converted into running inflation. Running inflation is dangerous. If it is not controlled, it may ultimately be converted to galloping or hyperinflation. It is an extreme form of inflation when an economy gets shattered. “Inflation in the double or triple digit range of 20, 100 or 200 per cent a year is labelled galloping inflation”.
iv. Government’s Reaction to Inflation:
Inflationary situation may be open or suppressed. Because of ant-inflationary policies pursued by the government, inflation may not be an embarrassing one. For instance, an increase in income leads to an increase in consumption spending which pulls the price level up.
If the consumption spending is countered by the government via price control and rationing device, the inflationary situation may be called a suppressed one. Once the government curbs are lifted, the suppressed inflation becomes open inflation. Open inflation may then result in hyperinflation.
Inflation is mainly caused by excess demand/or decline in aggregate supply or output. Former leads to a rightward shift of aggregate demand curve while the latter causes aggregate supply curve to shift leftward. Former is called demand-pull inflation (DPI) and the latter is called cost- push inflation (CPI).
Before describing the factors that lead to a rise in aggregate demand and a decline in aggregate supply, we like to explain “demand-pull” and “cost- push” theories of inflation.
There are two theoretical approaches to DPI —one is the classical and the other is the Keynesian.
According to classical economists or monetarists, inflation is caused by the increase in money supply which leads to a rightward shift in negative sloping aggregate demand curve.
Given a situation of full employment, classicists maintained that a change in money supply brings about an equi-proportionate change in price level. That is why monetrarists argue that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.
Keynesians do not find any link between money supply and price level causing an upward shift in aggregate demand. According to Keynesians, aggregate demand may rise due to a rise in consumer demand or investment demand or government expenditure or net exports or the combination of these four.
Given full employment, such increase in aggregate demand leads to an upward pressure in prices. Such a situation is called DPI. This can be explained graphically.
Just like the price of a commodity, the level of prices is determined by the interaction of aggregate demand and aggregate supply. In Fig. 11.3, aggregate demand curve is negative sloping while aggregate supply curve before the full employment stage is positive sloping and becomes vertical after the full employment stage. AD 1 is the initial aggregate demand curve that intersects the aggregate supply curve AS at point E 1 .
The price level thus determined is OP 1 . As aggregate demand curve shifts to AD 2 , price level rises to OP 2 . Thus, an increase in aggregate demand at the full employment stage leads to an increase in price level only, rather than the level of output. However, how much price level will rise following an increase in aggregate demand depends on the slope of the AS curve.
DPI originates in the monetary sector. Monetarists’ argument that “only money matters” is based on the assumption that at or near full employment, excessive money supply will increase aggregate demand and will thus cause inflation.
An increase in nominal money supply shifts aggregate demand curve rightward. This enables people to hold excess cash balances. Spending of excess cash balances by them causes price level to rise. Price level will continue to rise until aggregate demand equals aggregate supply.
Keynesians argue that inflation originates in the non-monetary sector or the real sector. Aggregate demand may rise if there is an increase in consumption expenditure following a tax cut. There may be an autonomous increase in business investment or government expenditure. Governmental expenditure is inflationary if the needed money is procured by the government by printing additional money.
In brief, an increase in aggregate demand i.e., increase in (C + I + G + X – M) causes price level to rise. However, aggregate demand may rise following an increase in money supply generated by the printing of additional money (classical argument) which drives prices upward. Thus, money plays a vital role. That is why Milton Friedman believes that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.
There are other reasons that may push aggregate demand and, hence, price level upwards. For instance, growth of population stimulates aggregate demand. Higher export earnings increase the purchasing power of the exporting countries.
Additional purchasing power means additional aggregate demand. Purchasing power and, hence, aggregate demand, may also go up if government repays public debt. Again, there is a tendency on the part of the holders of black money to spend on conspicuous consumption goods. Such tendency fuels inflationary fire. Thus, DPI is caused by a variety of factors.
In addition to aggregate demand, aggregate supply also generates inflationary process. As inflation is caused by a leftward shift of the aggregate supply, we call it CPI. CPI is usually associated with the non-monetary factors. CPI arises due to the increase in cost of production. Cost of production may rise due to a rise in the cost of raw materials or increase in wages.
Such increases in costs are passed on to consumers by firms by raising the prices of the products. Rising wages lead to rising costs. Rising costs lead to rising prices. And rising prices, again, prompt trade unions to demand higher wages. Thus, an inflationary wage-price spiral starts.
This causes aggregate supply curve to shift leftward. This can be demonstrated graphically (Fig. 11.4) where AS 1 is the initial aggregate supply curve. Below the full employment stage this AS curve is positive sloping and at full employment stage it becomes perfectly inelastic. Intersection point (E 1 ) of AD 1 and AS 1 curves determines the price level.
Now, there is a leftward shift of aggregate supply curve to AS 2 . With no change in aggregate demand, this causes price level to rise to OP 2 and output to fall to OY 2 .
With the reduction in output, employment in the economy declines or unemployment rises. Further shift in the AS curve to AS 2 results in higher price level (OP 3 ) and a lower volume of aggregate output (OY 3 ). Thus, CPI may arise even below the full employment (Y f ) stage.
It is the cost factors that pull the prices upward. One of the important causes of price rise is the rise in price of raw materials. For instance, by an administrative order the government may hike the price of petrol or diesel or freight rate. Firms buy these inputs now at a higher price. This leads to an upward pressure on cost of production.
Not only this, CPI is often imported from outside the economy. Increase in the price of petrol by OPEC compels the government to increase the price of petrol and diesel. These two important raw materials are needed by every sector, especially the transport sector. As a result, transport costs go up resulting in higher general price level.
Again, CPI may be induced by wage-push inflation or profit-push inflation. Trade unions demand higher money wages as a compensation against inflationary price rise. If increase in money wages exceeds labour productivity, aggregate supply will shift upward and leftward. Firms often exercise power by pushing up prices independently of consumer demand to expand their profit margins.
Fiscal policy changes, such as an increase in tax rates leads to an upward pressure in cost of production. For instance, an overall increase in excise tax of mass consumption goods is definitely inflationary. That is why government is then accused of causing inflation.
Finally, production setbacks may result in decreases in output. Natural disaster, exhaustion of natural resources, work stoppages, electric power cuts, etc., may cause aggregate output to decline.
In the midst of this output reduction, artificial scarcity of any goods by traders and hoarders just simply ignite the situation.
Inefficiency, corruption, mismanagement of the economy may also be the other reasons. Thus, inflation is caused by the interplay of various factors. A particular factor cannot be held responsible for inflationary price rise.
People’s desires are inconsistent. When they act as buyers they want prices of goods and services to remain stable but as sellers they expect the prices of goods and services should go up. Such a happy outcome may arise for some individuals; “but, when this happens, others will be getting the worst of both worlds.” Since inflation reduces purchasing power it is bad.
The old people are in the habit of recalling the days when the price of say, meat per kilogram cost just 10 rupees. Today it is Rs. 250 per kilogram. This is true for all other commodities. When they enjoyed a better living standard. Imagine today, how worse we are! But meanwhile, wages and salaries of people have risen to a great height, compared to the ‘good old days’. This goes unusually untold.
When price level goes up, there is both a gainer and a loser. To evaluate the consequence of inflation, one must identify the nature of inflation which may be anticipated and unanticipated. If inflation is anticipated, people can adjust with the new situation and costs of inflation to the society will be smaller.
In reality, people cannot predict accurately future events or people often make mistakes in predicting the course of inflation. In other words, inflation may be unanticipated when people fail to adjust completely. This creates various problems.
One can study the effects of unanticipated inflation under two broad headings:
(i) Effect on distribution of income and wealth
(ii) Effect on economic growth.
During inflation, usually people experience rise in incomes. But some people gain during inflation at the expense of others. Some individuals gain because their money incomes rise more rapidly than the prices and some lose because prices rise more rapidly than their incomes during inflation. Thus, it redistributes income and wealth.
Though no conclusive evidence can be cited, it can be asserted that following categories of people are affected by inflation differently:
i. Creditors and Debtors:
Borrowers gain and lenders lose during inflation because debts are fixed in rupee terms. When debts are repaid their real value declines by the price level increase and, hence, creditors lose. An individual may be interested in buying a house by taking a loan of Rs. 7 lakh from an institution for 7 years.
The borrower now welcomes inflation since he will have to pay less in real terms than when it was borrowed. Lender, in the process, loses since the rate of interest payable remains unaltered as per agreement. Because of inflation, the borrower is given ‘dear’ rupees, but pays back ‘cheap’ rupees.
However, if in an inflation-ridden economy creditors chronically loose, it is wise not to advance loans or to shut down business. Never does it happen. Rather, the loan- giving institution makes adequate safeguard against the erosion of real value.
ii. Bond and Debenture-Holders:
In an economy, there are some people who live on interest income—they suffer most.
Bondholders earn fixed interest income:
These people suffer a reduction in real income when prices rise. In other words, the value of one’s savings decline if the interest rate falls short of inflation rate. Similarly, beneficiaries from life insurance programmes are also hit badly by inflation since real value of savings deteriorate.
iii. Investors:
People who put their money in shares during inflation are expected to gain since the possibility of earning business profit brightens. Higher profit induces owners of firms to distribute profit among investors or shareholders.
iv. Salaried People and Wage-Earners:
Anyone earning a fixed income is damaged by inflation. Sometimes, unionized worker succeeds in raising wage rates of white-collar workers as a compensation against price rise. But wage rate changes with a long time lag. In other words, wage rate increases always lag behind price increases.
Naturally, inflation results in a reduction in real purchasing power of fixed income earners. On the other hand, people earning flexible incomes may gain during inflation. The nominal incomes of such people outstrip the general price rise. As a result, real incomes of this income group increase.
v. Profit-Earners, Speculators and Black Marketeers:
It is argued that profit-earners gain from inflation. Profit tends to rise during inflation. Seeing inflation, businessmen raise the prices of their products. This results in a bigger profit. Profit margin, however, may not be high when the rate of inflation climbs to a high level.
However, speculators dealing in business in essential commodities usually stand to gain by inflation. Black marketeers are also benefited by inflation.
Thus, there occurs a redistribution of income and wealth. It is said that rich becomes richer and poor becomes poorer during inflation. However, no such hard and fast generalizations can be made. It is clear that someone wins and someone loses from inflation.
These effects of inflation may persist if inflation is unanticipated. However, the redistributive burdens of inflation on income and wealth are most likely to be minimal if inflation is anticipated by the people.
With anticipated inflation, people can build up their strategies to cope with inflation. If the annual rate of inflation in an economy is anticipated correctly people will try to protect them against losses resulting from inflation.
Workers will demand 10 p.c. wage increase if inflation is expected to rise by 10 p.c. Similarly, a percentage of inflation premium will be demanded by creditors from debtors. Business firms will also fix prices of their products in accordance with the anticipated price rise. Now if the entire society “learns to live with inflation” , the redistributive effect of inflation will be minimal.
However, it is difficult to anticipate properly every episode of inflation. Further, even if it is anticipated it cannot be perfect. In addition, adjustment with the new expected inflationary conditions may not be possible for all categories of people. Thus, adverse redistributive effects are likely to occur.
Finally, anticipated inflation may also be costly to the society. If people’s expectation regarding future price rise become stronger they will hold less liquid money. Mere holding of cash balances during inflation is unwise since its real value declines. That is why people use their money balances in buying real estate, gold, jewellery, etc.
Such investment is referred to as unproductive investment. Thus, during inflation of anticipated variety, there occurs a diversion of resources from priority to non-priority or unproductive sectors.
Inflation may or may not result in higher output. Below the full employment stage, inflation has a favourable effect on production. In general, profit is a rising function of the price level. An inflationary situation gives an incentive to businessmen to raise prices of their products so as to earn higher doses of profit.
Rising price and rising profit encourage firms to make larger investments. As a result, the multiplier effect of investment will come into operation resulting in higher national output. However, such a favourable effect of inflation will be temporary if wages and production costs rise very rapidly.
Further, inflationary situation may be associated with the fall in output, particularly if inflation is of the cost-push variety. Thus, there is no strict relationship between prices and output. An increase in aggregate demand will increase both prices and output, but a supply shock will raise prices and lower output.
Inflation may also lower down further production levels. It is commonly assumed that if inflationary tendencies nurtured by experienced inflation persist in future, people will now save less and consume more. Rising saving propensities will result in lower further outputs.
One may also argue that inflation creates an air of uncertainty in the minds of business community, particularly when the rate of inflation fluctuates. In the midst of rising inflationary trend, firms cannot accurately estimate their costs and revenues. Under the circumstance, business firms may be deterred in investing. This will adversely affect the growth performance of the economy.
However, slight dose of inflation is necessary for economic growth. Mild inflation has an encouraging effect on national output. But it is difficult to make the price rise of a creeping variety. High rate of inflation acts as a disincentive to long run economic growth. The way the hyperinflation affects economic growth is summed up here.
We know that hyperinflation discourages savings. A fall in savings means a lower rate of capital formation. A low rate of capital formation hinders economic growth. Further, during excessive price rise, there occurs an increase in unproductive investment in real estate, gold, jewellery, etc.
Above all, speculative businesses flourish during inflation resulting in artificial scarcities and, hence, further rise in prices. Again, following hyperinflation, export earnings decline resulting in a wide imbalance in the balance of payments account.
Often, galloping inflation results in a ‘flight’ of capital to foreign countries since people lose confidence and faith over the monetary arrangements of the country, thereby resulting in a scarcity of resources. Finally, real value of tax revenue also declines under the impact of hyperinflation. Government then experiences a shortfall in investible resources.
Thus, economists and policy makers are unanimous regarding the dangers of high price rise. But the consequence of hyperinflation is disastrous. In the past, some of the world economies (e.g., Germany after the First World War (1914-1918), Latin American countries in the 1980s) had been greatly ravaged by hyperinflation.
The German Inflation of 1920s was also Catastrophic:
During 1922, the German price level went up 5,470 per cent, in 1923, the situation worsened; the German price level rose 1,300,000,000 times. By October of 1923, the postage of the lightest letter sent from Germany to the United States was 200,000 marks.
Butter cost 1.5 million marks per pound, meat 2 million marks, a loaf of bread 200,000 marks, and an egg 60,000 marks Prices increased so rapidly that waiters changed the prices on the menu several times during the course of a lunch!! Sometimes, customers had to pay double the price listed on the menu when they observed it first!!!
During October 2008, Zimbabwe, under the President-ship of Robert G. Mugabe, experienced 231,000,000 p.c. (2.31 million p.c.) as against 1.2 million p.c. price rise in September 2008—a record after 1923. It is an unbelievable rate. In May 2008, the cost of price of a toilet paper itself and not the costs of the roll of the toilet paper came to 417 Zimbabwean dollars.
Anyway, people are harassed ultimately by the high rate of inflation. That is why it is said that ‘inflation is our public enemy number one’. Rising inflation rate is a sign of failure on the part of the government.
Related Articles:
Reference Library
Collections
Study notes, videos, interactive activities and more!
Economics news, insights and enrichment
Currated collections of free resources
Browse resources by topic
Resource Selections
Currated lists of resources
Study Notes
Last updated 23 Jan 2023
In 2018, the average rate of consumer price inflation in the world economy was 3.8% (according to the IMF’s World Economic Outlook). In South Africa, inflation was 5.3%, Argentina 31%, Turkey 16% and Ethiopia 9%. In these countries, the annual rate of inflation was significantly higher than the world averaged and in countries such as the UK and the USA where inflation is around 2 percent.
Evaluate the economies policies that might be used to help reduce the rate of inflation in high inflation countries (25)
Inflation is a sustained increase in a country’s general price level measured by the annual percentage rate of change of consumer prices. There are two main causes of accelerating inflation. Firstly, demand-pull inflation comes from a situation of excess aggregate demand relative to a country’s productive capacity. When the output gap is positive, short-run aggregate supply becomes inelastic and therefore an outward shift of aggregate demand can lead to a sharp rise in prices as producers look to increase their profits. Secondly, cost-push inflation happens when there is a rise in production costs leading to an inward shift of the SRAS curve. This could happen for example when unit wage costs have increased (i.e. wages are rising faster than productivity) or when imported goods and services become more expensive in the wake of a depreciation of a country’s exchange rate.
Policies to reduce the rate of inflation are likely to be most effective when they address the main causes and these policies can focus either on short-term causes or longer-term factors.
Monetary Policy
In a situation of high inflation, monetary policy can have a key role to play. The standard response of a central bank would be to raise official interest rates. This is an example of a contractionary or deflationary policy. Higher interest rates reduce aggregate demand, leading to a slower rate of economic growth and (eventually) lower demand-pull inflation. For example, higher interest rates might makes mortgages on property more expensive to service which has the effect of dampening down the rate of growth of house prices via a fall in housing demand.
A period of higher relative interest rates also causes an appreciation of the exchange rate which has the effect of reducing the price of imports and making exports more expensive. In 2018 for example, faced with a sharply-depreciating currency, Turkey’s central bank increased the main policy interest rate to help stem a rapid outflow of hot money from their financial system. In South Africa, the central bank has been raising interest rates gradually to a high of 6.75 percent as part of their inflation control strategy
Higher interest rates squeeze aggregate demand and can help reduce the size of a positive output gap. As part of monetary policy, the central bank might also Introduce a lower inflation target: Many countries have an inflation target (e.g. UK CPI inflation target of 2%). One argument in support of this is that if consumer and businesses believe the inflation target is credible, then it will help to lower inflation expectations. And if inflation expectations are reduced, it becomes easier to control inflation because fewer people will be asking for hefty wage increases.
Trade policies
In some countries, retail prices are kept artificially high because of the effects of import tariffs and import quotas. One policy option for a government might involve gradually lower import tariffs, perhaps as part of a wider trade agreement with other countries. A smaller tariff could have the effect of reducing import prices leading to an outward shift of short run aggregate supply. The costs of imported raw materials, component parts and finished consumer goods fall leading to a deflationary effect on the general price level. This might be shown in an analysis diagram by an outward shift of short run aggregate supply.
A potential downside of this approach is that domestic firms would then face tougher price competition from overseas suppliers and there might be a contraction in home-based production, employment and investment. The government would also be giving up some tax revenues from import tariffs which for a number of emerging/developing countries can be a significant source of tax income. Reducing trade frictions can be an effective policy to bring down the rate of inflation although domestic businesses would need to increase their efficiency to be able to compete with cheaper goods and services from overseas.
Supply-side policies
Supply-side policies are measures designed to increase the competitiveness and efficiency of the economy, putting downward pressure on long-term costs and therefore helping to control inflation. These policies might include government tax relief for business investment and also state funding to fast-forward major infrastructure projects in sectors such as transport, energy and power supply, telecoms and health care. Ultimately, if supply-side policies provide successful, then more new firms will enter markets (increasing industry supply and driving down prices) and labour productivity will increase helping to control the unit costs of businesses so that fewer of them are under pressure to raise prices. Effective supply-side policies lead to an outward shift of the long-run aggregate supply curve and help provide the conditions for a period of non-inflationary growth. However, they are unlikely to have much effect on the rate of inflation in the short term. In this sense, monetary policy has a more important role to play in controlling price increases.
Monetary policy in some countries is also accompanied by a policy of wage controls or wage freezes. Trying to control wages could, in theory, help to reduce inflationary pressures. In the UK, the UK government has in recent years operated with a public sector pay policy that has limited annual pay rises for several million workers to just 1 percent a year - this has meant that nominal wages have failed to keep pace with inflation leading to a steep fall in real wages and also relative pay compared to many private sector jobs.
Final evaluation
Overall, monetary policy has the main job of keeping inflationary pressures in check during the economic cycle whereas supply-side policies have an important role to play in keeping costs and prices down over the longer-term. It is important to note that there are limits to the effectiveness of policy when it comes to lowering the rate of inflation. The annual rate of price increases in most countries is susceptible to external shocks such as volatility in global commodity prices, unexpected movements in the exchange rate and the changing global economic cycle. Policy can influence prices but not necessarily determine them in the direct way that economics textbooks might imply.
Exchange rates - macroeconomic effects of currency fluctuations.
6th April 2015
14th December 2015
15th March 2016
4th December 2016
4th August 2017
2.5.3 economic booms (edexcel a-level economics teaching powerpoint).
Teaching PowerPoints
Boston House, 214 High Street, Boston Spa, West Yorkshire, LS23 6AD Tel: 01937 848885
© 2002-2024 Tutor2u Limited. Company Reg no: 04489574. VAT reg no 816865400.
Home — Essay Samples — Economics — Inflation — Measures to Control Inflation
About this sample
Words: 634 |
Published: Jan 15, 2019
Words: 634 | Page: 1 | 4 min read
Inflation essay outline, inflation essay example, introduction.
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Prof. Kifaru
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
2 pages / 705 words
3 pages / 1271 words
2 pages / 992 words
1 pages / 573 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
This essay explores the provisions and impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act, analyzing its effects on inflation rates, economic growth, distributional outcomes, and sector-specific implications. It outlines how the act [...]
In recent times, the discussion surrounding inflation and its impact on the economy has gained significant traction. One proposed solution to address rising inflation levels is the implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act. [...]
Theories of inflation in economics encompass a diverse range of perspectives that seek to explain the complex phenomenon of sustained increases in the general price level of goods and services. Inflation is a critical economic [...]
Fuel prices are a topic of perennial concern and discussion, as they have far-reaching implications for individuals, businesses, and economies worldwide. This essay delves into the complex subject of fuel prices, examining the [...]
The occurrence of grade inflation is affecting the quality of education throughout the system. A lot of students, at every level of education, are promoted to higher grades even though they are unqualified for that grade. Grade [...]
Measuring inflation is a difficult problem for government statisticians. To do this, many items representing the economy are gathered in what is called "market basket". The cost of this basket will be compared over time. As a [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
If you’ve noticed that you’re paying more than before for the same amount of groceries, you’re not the only one.
If you’ve noticed that you’re paying more than before for the same amount of groceries, you’re not the only one. Inflation is easing , but grocery prices are still high — up 21%, on average, since inflation started to surge more than three years ago.
FILE - People buy groceries at a Walmart Superstore in Secaucus, New Jersey, July 11, 2024. (AP Photo/Eduardo Munoz Alvarez)
Eduardo Munoz Alvarez / AP
Unlike some other items, you can't just stop buying groceries when they get pricey. There's nothing you can do about inflation, but you can find ways to save on groceries so they don't heavily affect your wallet or your eating habits. These include using coupons, budgeting and buying in bulk.
Here's are some expert recommendations for saving on groceries:
Kiersten Torok started using coupons back when she was in high school, after her parents lost their jobs during the 2008 recession. She began relying on them even more in 2020, when she lost her own job during the pandemic. Now she's using her social media platform to help others learn how to save.
"When times like these come up, coupons are a necessity for so many Americans," said Torok, known on Instagram and TikTok as Torok Coupon Hunter .
Many might think that using coupons means cutting them out of a magazine. While you can certainly still do that, there are now easier ways to get the discounts. Many stores, like Walmart and Target, have coupons available on their apps.
“All you have to do is scan an item in a store, the coupons pop up on your app and then they automatically apply in the register," Torok said. "It’s become much more streamlined."
One of Torok’s coupon golden rules is: Never pay big for toothpaste — there's always a combination of coupons and offers available. For anyone who wants to try couponing, Torok recommends that you first start using them at your favorite store and never buy things you don’t need, even if there's a big discount.
Apps like Flipp , which lets you browse for coupons from all major grocery stores, and Ibotta , an app that gives you cashback for using coupons, can make your journey with couponing easier.
Making a budget is a key to keeping grocery spending under control, and the first step is to track how much you're already spending. Start by reviewing how much you have spent on the last few times you've gone grocery shopping, recommended David Brindley, deputy editor for AARP Bulletin .
If you don’t keep receipts from past grocery runs, try looking at your bank account statement and adding up the grocery charges. Once you know how much you spend on groceries, set a goal, for example, staying within a specific budget or reducing your spending.
You need a plan, but before you make one, ensure you know what you currently have in your fridge and your pantry. Sarah Schweisthal, personal finance expert and social media manager at budgeting app YNAB , recommends taking everything out and making an inventory so you don't buy duplicates of things you already have on hand.
Brindley also recommends planning to cook multiple meals with similar ingredients, which saves money and also cuts down on food waste.
Once you’ve tracked your spending and inventoried what you already have, the next step is to make a plan. Write down the items you’re looking to buy and your estimated cost, making sure you stay on budget. Meal planning for the week or month can be a good way to stay on top of your spending, Schweisthal said.
Going up and down the aisles can sometimes make you crave things that you haven’t planned for, like a snack or a new dish. If you foresee that it’ll be hard for you to stick to your list, include some flexibility in your plan, such as allotting a specific amount to buy snacks or a random item you see at the checkout line.
“I think having flexibility in a plan actually helps you stick to it more,” Schweisthal said.
Making a plan can be as simple as writing down a list on paper or in your phone's notes app. Or, you can use apps that specifically help you with meal planning such as AnyList or Mealime .
If you tend to wander off your grocery list because every time you go to the store you buy things you don’t need, shopping online and picking up curbside is a good workaround.
“I 100% recommend sitting down Sunday morning and just looking at the stores and comparing the items you need for the week, especially with things you can get for curbside pickup,” Torok said.
If you buy your groceries from multiple stores because each has better prices on some items, ordering ahead of time can also save time.
If you are in charge of buying groceries for your entire family, it can be beneficial to include them in your grocery budgeting routine. For Torok, this has meant teaching her children how to scan coupons while they shop.
Since buying in bulk can be very cost-effective. Brindley also recommends that you team up with a friend or a family member to buy specific items in bulk and share the discount.
Lastly, you can save money by using food-sharing apps such as Olio, which connects people around their community to share extra grocery items, and Too Good to Go, where you can buy surplus food at a discount.
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Streaming Now
You might be using an unsupported or outdated browser. To get the best possible experience please use the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Microsoft Edge to view this website. |
Updated: Feb 7, 2023, 9:22am
Until recently, inflation was a far-off memory for most Americans. But that faded, distant memory has roared back to life over the past two years, imposing higher costs and painful choices on consumers.
After spending more than two decades below 3%, the consumer price index (CPI)—a key measure of U.S. inflation—nearly tripled from 2020 to 2021, rising from 1.4% to 7.0%. Inflation fell a bit, to 6.5%, in 2022.
The U.S. hasn’t seen price gains like this since the era of hyperinflation in the 1970s and early 1980s. Monthly inflation data peaked at an annualized rate of 9.1% in June 2022, and it’s cooled off somewhat since then.
“The high inflation we’re experiencing today is likely brought on by a combination of factors including a strong post-Covid recovery, lingering supply chain issues, the war in Ukraine and its effects on energy and food prices, Fed rate hikes and gains in wages after years of low growth,” says Matt Fleming, a wealth advisor executive at Vanguard Personal Advisor Services.
Meanwhile, stimulus checks and the suspension of student loan payments during the pandemic gave Americans an unexpected opportunity to save money, says Michelle Griffith, wealth advisor for U.S. Consumer Wealth Management at Citi.
“But after social distancing and the shelter-in-place mandate came to an end, spending started up again, and inflation reared its head,” says Griffith.
While Fleming says inflation has peaked in most markets and should keep trending lower, he believes it will take much longer to dispel the pressures that created higher prices in the first place—things like historically low unemployment and higher wage growth.
Inflation occurs when changes throughout the economy drive prices broadly higher, reducing consumer purchasing power. This means that each dollar you earn buys fewer goods and services.
The root cause of these broad-based price increases are imbalances in supply and demand. There are three primary reasons demand may outpace supply: supply shocks, increased money supply and consumer expectations.
During the Covid-19 crisis, consumers were kept at home by shelter-in-place orders and thus less inclined to spend money on discretionary activities, but spent more money on buying goods.
The world experienced severe supply shocks during the pandemic, making it hard for supply to keep up with demand. Luckily, spending for much of the pandemic was reduced as people were forced to stay home, giving Americans an unexpected opportunity to save.
According to Griffith, when consumers start saving up cash, it can eventually lead to enthusiastic spending sprees, which can drive higher prices and more inflation. And that’s exactly what happened when stay-at-home orders were dropped and people could resume social activities.
Another cause of excess demand that leads to rising prices are inflation expectations . If workers expect inflation to rise, they may demand higher wages to compensate, which may prompt businesses to raise prices in turn, thus creating a “wage-price” spiral.
Inflation and cost of living are interconnected concepts, but they are not synonyms. Inflation describes a gradual increase in prices, while the cost of living is a snapshot of how much a person needs to spend at any given moment in time.
“When inflation rises, so do the costs of goods and services, which, in turn, erodes purchasing power,” Fleming says. “This is particularly troublesome for those with lower fixed incomes, as inflation can rob their ability to afford necessities like food, housing, medications and transportation.”
To compensate for inflation’s erosion of purchasing power, retirement benefits providers may offer cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).
Inflation can impact the price of everything you need for daily living, from food to housing to what it costs to fill your tank so you can drive to work or put clothes on your back.
Item | 12-month percentage change |
---|---|
For example, here’s how the prices of common household items increased in December 2022 from the same period one year ago:
Inflation can have a similar effect on the housing market as it does your cost of living. Shelter accounts for nearly one-third of the inputs for CPI inflation and 40% of core CPI that excludes food and energy, so even small increases in rents and home prices can impact inflation.
“The housing market has been impacted by inflationary pressures on multiple levels including higher material and labor costs combined with rising interest rates and mortgage expenses, which have weighed on affordability,” says Sid Vaidya, chief investment strategist for U.S. Wealth at TD Wealth.
Rising rates have priced some buyers out of the market, but he says there’s still reason for hope.
“While inflation continues to linger at elevated levels across most advanced economies, recent data has provided some initial signs of relief from improving supply chain conditions and softening raw input prices,” Vaidya says.
No one can predict with certainty how high inflation will rise or when it will end. The one thing most experts agree on is that planning ahead is crucial.
Having an emergency fund can give you the cushion and confidence to keep your longer-term savings fully invested, which is crucial to keeping pace with inflation.
“Stay focused on your goals and enjoy the long-term benefits of a diversified portfolio,” Fleming says. “Transition periods can be painful in the moment, but instead of focusing on recent losses, focus on the gains you’ve likely seen in your portfolio over the past decade.”
Coryanne Hicks is an investing reporter, finance writer and ghostwriter whose work appears in Forbes Advisor, U.S. News & World Report, Kiplinger, Business Insider publications. Hicks has ghostwritten white papers and financial guidebooks for dozens of industry professionals. Her U.S. News video series on how to start investing at any age won an honorable mention at the 2019 Folio: Eddie & Ozzie awards for best Consumer How-To video. She was also a 2019 SABEW Goldschmidt fellow for business journalists. Previously, Hicks was a fully-licensed financial professional at Fidelity Investments.
by Pakiology | Jul 20, 2024 | Essay | 0 comments
Inflation is a persistent rise in the general price level of goods and services in an economy over a period of time. It has a profound impact on the purchasing power of individuals and affects the overall economy of a country. In Pakistan, inflation has been a persistent problem, and all segments of society have felt its effects. The inflation rate in Pakistan has reached double-digit levels, causing severe economic difficulties for the average person. In this article, we will discuss the causes of inflation in Pakistan and offer practical solutions to control inflation and stabilize the economy.
Page Contents
Mitigating the effects of inflation through monetary policy, tackling inflation through fiscal policy, enhancing agricultural productivity to control inflation, empowering the private sector to foster economic growth, conclusion:.
Inflation in Pakistan is a complex issue that has several root causes. Some of the major causes of inflation in Pakistan include:
Monetary policy is the primary tool used by the central bank to control inflation in Pakistan. The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) can use several monetary policy tools to reduce inflation, including:
Fiscal policy refers to the government’s approach to managing its revenue and expenditure. To control inflation in Pakistan, the government can implement several fiscal policy measures, including:
Reducing government spending Increasing taxes and duties Implementing price controls Encouraging investment and economic growth
Agriculture is a crucial sector in Pakistan, and its growth and productivity are essential for controlling inflation. The government can implement several measures to increase agricultural productivity, including:
The private sector is the driving force behind economic growth and development. To control inflation in Pakistan, the government can implement several measures to empower the private sector, including:
Inflation reduces the purchasing power of individuals, leading to a decline in consumer demand and economic growth. It also contributes to rising costs of production, reducing the competitiveness of domestic goods and services in the international market.
Monetary policy is the primary tool used by the central bank to control inflation in Pakistan. The State Bank of Pakistan can use various monetary policy tools, including increasing interest rates, reducing the money supply, and regulating credit and lending, to control inflation.
To control inflation in Pakistan, the government can implement several fiscal policy measures, including reducing government spending, increasing taxes and duties, implementing price controls, and encouraging investment and economic growth.
Agriculture is a crucial sector in Pakistan and its growth and productivity are essential for controlling inflation. The government can implement several measures, such as providing subsidies and incentives to farmers, improving irrigation systems, and encouraging the use of modern technologies, to increase agricultural productivity and control inflation.
Inflation is a persistent problem in Pakistan, affecting the purchasing power of individuals and the overall economy. The root causes of inflation in Pakistan are complex. Still, they can be addressed through a combination of monetary and fiscal policy measures, as well as enhancing agricultural productivity and empowering the private sector. By implementing these measures, the government can take steps to control inflation, stabilize the economy, and improve the standard of living for all citizens. It’s crucial for policymakers to work together to tackle the inflation epidemic and ensure a bright future for the people of Pakistan.
Find more Essays on the following Topics
You might like, my aim in life essay with quotations.
Explore the role of passion, dedication, and service in the pursuit of happiness and fulfillment in this...
Essay 1 (400 Words) : My Favourite Personality Is My Mother My favourite personality is my mother. She is kind,...
400 Words Essay on Why I Love Pakistan With Quotation Pakistan is a country full of diversity and richness in culture,...
Explore the evolution, challenges, and progress of democracy in Pakistan in this in-depth essay. Gain insights into...
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Submit Comment
IMAGES
COMMENTS
The main policy used is monetary policy (changing interest rates). However, in theory, there are a variety of tools to control inflation including: Monetary policy - Higher interest rates reduce demand in the economy, leading to lower economic growth and lower inflation. Control of money supply - Monetarists argue there is a close link ...
It is the responsibility of a nation's central bank to prevent inflation through monetary policy. Monetary policy primarily involves changing interest rates to control inflation. Fiscal policy ...
Furman said that inflation could last for years. "Some of the inflation is probably transitory. I don't think the underlying true inflation rate in the economy is 8%. But it probably isn't 2%, either.
Inflation is the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services is rising and, consequently, the purchasing power of currency is falling. Central banks attempt to limit inflation ...
Cost-push inflation occurs when the rising price of input goods and services increases the price of final goods and services. ... Edict on Maximum Prices, a series of price and wage controls designed to stop the rise of prices and wages (one helpful control was a maximum price for a male lion). But because the edict didn't address the root ...
14 August 2024. After three decades of relative price stability, inflation has returned with a vengeance to the world's advanced economies. The trend began in early 2021, and though inflation rates seem to have peaked in the UK, the US and the EU, it remains unclear how long it will take for price stability to return.
This paper examines what strategies policymakers have used to both reduce and control inflation. It first outlines why a consensus has emerged that inflation needs to be controlled. Then it examines four basic strategies: exchange rate pegging, monetary targeting, inflation targeting, and the just ...
Alisha Jucevic for The New York Times. The government reported on Friday that consumer prices climbed 8.6 percent over the year through May, the fastest rate of increase in four decades. Americans ...
Six Ways to Fight Inflation. Jun 30, 2022. Economics. Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) inflation rose by 6.3 percent over the past year and 0.6 percent last month according to new data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, well above the Federal Reserve's 2 percent annual (0.166 percent monthly) target.
So if inflation rises from 2 percent to 5 percent, interest rates should rise by 4.5 percentage points. Add a baseline of 2 percent for the inflation target and 1 percent for the long-run real rate of interest, and the rule recommends a central-bank rate of 7.5 percent. If inflation accelerates further before central banks act, reining it in ...
The impact of inflation on subnational governments varies depending on how the local jurisdiction raises its own-source revenues and how well it can control spending. On the revenue side, income and sales tax receipts will largely keep pace with inflation, so moderate inflation is unlikely to have a major impact.
Defying cost volatility: A strategic pricing response. Getting real about mitigating price inflation. Inflation hit a 40-year high last month, leaping 7 percent from the year prior. As households grapple with greater price hikes for groceries and other essentials, companies are contending with booming consumer demand and persistent supply-chain ...
The Federal Reserve attempts to control inflation by raising interest rates. Therefore, if the former rises, so does the latter in response. ... These include white papers, government data ...
Essay on Inflation! Essay on the Meaning of Inflation: Inflation and unemployment are the two most talked-about words in the contemporary society. These two are the big problems that plague all the economies. ... If the consumption spending is countered by the government via price control and rationing device, the inflationary situation may be ...
Supply side policies seek to increase productivity, competition and innovation - all of which can maintain lower prices. These are ways of controlling inflation in the medium term. i.A reduction in company taxes to encourage greater investment. ii.A reduction in taxes which increases risk-taking and incentives to work - a cut in income ...
Policies to Control Inflation. In 2018, the average rate of consumer price inflation in the world economy was 3.8% (according to the IMF's World Economic Outlook). In South Africa, inflation was 5.3%, Argentina 31%, Turkey 16% and Ethiopia 9%. In these countries, the annual rate of inflation was significantly higher than the world averaged ...
As Friedman emphasized, "Inflation is an old, old disease. We've had thousands of years of experience of it. There is nothing simpler than stopping an inflation—from the technical point of view."1 That remedy took a specific form: "The only cure for inflation is to reduce the rate at which total spending is growing.".
As price rise, wages are forced up, which raises production costs, which raises selling prices, and so on, in a never ending cycle. Throughout history, inflation has occurred frequently. Second, Inflation is the term used to describe a rise of average prices through the economy. It means that money is losing its value.
9.46%. Sources: www.investopedia.com www.slideshare.net. We can see from the given graph that during the year 1992-93 there was decrease in inflation rate from 13.74% to 10.76%. Preferred inflation is considered as 6%. The rate of inflation decreases in the year 1999-2000 to 3.27%. The growth of economy at that time was good.
The Measures To Control Inflation. Inflation is a sustained rise in the general level of prices of goods and services over a period of one year. In other words, it indicates the percentage rise in the general prices today compared to a year ago. The rise (fall) in inflation mans that purchasing power of money declines (increases).
Get original essay. Firstly, the government can control inflation by adopting a tight monetary policy. This policy can be achieved by increasing the interest rates. The increase in interest rates will discourage borrowing, reduce consumer spending and investment, thereby decreasing demand and reducing inflation.
At its most basic level, inflation represents an increase in consumer prices over time. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the current unadjusted 12-month inflation rate as of ...
Inflation is easing, but grocery prices are still high — up 21%, on average, since inflation started to surge more than three years ago. FILE - People buy groceries at a Walmart Superstore in ...
Why Is Inflation Rising Right Now? The U.S. hasn't seen price gains like this since the era of hyperinflation in the 1970s and early 1980s. Monthly inflation data peaked at an annualized rate of ...
This essay will first outline the main theories put forward to explain the causes of inflation and the methods that each theory suggests would control inflation. The next section considers inflation in the UK from 1997 to date, and then evaluates the measures employed by the Bank of England in order to try to control inflation in that period.
Monetary policy is the primary tool used by the central bank to control inflation in Pakistan. The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) can use several monetary policy tools to reduce inflation, including: Reducing the money supply. Regulating credit and lending. Strengthening the exchange rate.
The headline inflation reading falling below 3% for the first time since 2021 is incredible. The fact that inflation has fallen to 2.9% from over 9% in just two years, without causing a recession ...
The platform instead talks of bringing down inflation and drilling for oil to reduce energy costs, but is thin on specific policy proposals. Abortion and family Project 2025 does not call outright ...