- Resources Home 🏠
- Try SciSpace Copilot
- Search research papers
- Add Copilot Extension
- Try AI Detector
- Try Paraphraser
- Try Citation Generator
- April Papers
- June Papers
- July Papers
![hypothesis in research sample SciSpace Resources](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/01/Scispace--600---72-px---1-.png)
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
The Craft of Writing a Strong Hypothesis
![hypothesis in research sample Deeptanshu D](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2021/08/1585503406514.jpg)
Table of Contents
Writing a hypothesis is one of the essential elements of a scientific research paper. It needs to be to the point, clearly communicating what your research is trying to accomplish. A blurry, drawn-out, or complexly-structured hypothesis can confuse your readers. Or worse, the editor and peer reviewers.
A captivating hypothesis is not too intricate. This blog will take you through the process so that, by the end of it, you have a better idea of how to convey your research paper's intent in just one sentence.
What is a Hypothesis?
The first step in your scientific endeavor, a hypothesis, is a strong, concise statement that forms the basis of your research. It is not the same as a thesis statement , which is a brief summary of your research paper .
The sole purpose of a hypothesis is to predict your paper's findings, data, and conclusion. It comes from a place of curiosity and intuition . When you write a hypothesis, you're essentially making an educated guess based on scientific prejudices and evidence, which is further proven or disproven through the scientific method.
The reason for undertaking research is to observe a specific phenomenon. A hypothesis, therefore, lays out what the said phenomenon is. And it does so through two variables, an independent and dependent variable.
The independent variable is the cause behind the observation, while the dependent variable is the effect of the cause. A good example of this is “mixing red and blue forms purple.” In this hypothesis, mixing red and blue is the independent variable as you're combining the two colors at your own will. The formation of purple is the dependent variable as, in this case, it is conditional to the independent variable.
Different Types of Hypotheses
![hypothesis in research sample Types-of-hypotheses](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/07/Types-of-hypotheses.jpg)
Types of hypotheses
Some would stand by the notion that there are only two types of hypotheses: a Null hypothesis and an Alternative hypothesis. While that may have some truth to it, it would be better to fully distinguish the most common forms as these terms come up so often, which might leave you out of context.
Apart from Null and Alternative, there are Complex, Simple, Directional, Non-Directional, Statistical, and Associative and casual hypotheses. They don't necessarily have to be exclusive, as one hypothesis can tick many boxes, but knowing the distinctions between them will make it easier for you to construct your own.
1. Null hypothesis
A null hypothesis proposes no relationship between two variables. Denoted by H 0 , it is a negative statement like “Attending physiotherapy sessions does not affect athletes' on-field performance.” Here, the author claims physiotherapy sessions have no effect on on-field performances. Even if there is, it's only a coincidence.
2. Alternative hypothesis
Considered to be the opposite of a null hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis is donated as H1 or Ha. It explicitly states that the dependent variable affects the independent variable. A good alternative hypothesis example is “Attending physiotherapy sessions improves athletes' on-field performance.” or “Water evaporates at 100 °C. ” The alternative hypothesis further branches into directional and non-directional.
- Directional hypothesis: A hypothesis that states the result would be either positive or negative is called directional hypothesis. It accompanies H1 with either the ‘<' or ‘>' sign.
- Non-directional hypothesis: A non-directional hypothesis only claims an effect on the dependent variable. It does not clarify whether the result would be positive or negative. The sign for a non-directional hypothesis is ‘≠.'
3. Simple hypothesis
A simple hypothesis is a statement made to reflect the relation between exactly two variables. One independent and one dependent. Consider the example, “Smoking is a prominent cause of lung cancer." The dependent variable, lung cancer, is dependent on the independent variable, smoking.
4. Complex hypothesis
In contrast to a simple hypothesis, a complex hypothesis implies the relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. For instance, “Individuals who eat more fruits tend to have higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.” The independent variable is eating more fruits, while the dependent variables are higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.
5. Associative and casual hypothesis
Associative and casual hypotheses don't exhibit how many variables there will be. They define the relationship between the variables. In an associative hypothesis, changing any one variable, dependent or independent, affects others. In a casual hypothesis, the independent variable directly affects the dependent.
6. Empirical hypothesis
Also referred to as the working hypothesis, an empirical hypothesis claims a theory's validation via experiments and observation. This way, the statement appears justifiable and different from a wild guess.
Say, the hypothesis is “Women who take iron tablets face a lesser risk of anemia than those who take vitamin B12.” This is an example of an empirical hypothesis where the researcher the statement after assessing a group of women who take iron tablets and charting the findings.
7. Statistical hypothesis
The point of a statistical hypothesis is to test an already existing hypothesis by studying a population sample. Hypothesis like “44% of the Indian population belong in the age group of 22-27.” leverage evidence to prove or disprove a particular statement.
Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis
Writing a hypothesis is essential as it can make or break your research for you. That includes your chances of getting published in a journal. So when you're designing one, keep an eye out for these pointers:
- A research hypothesis has to be simple yet clear to look justifiable enough.
- It has to be testable — your research would be rendered pointless if too far-fetched into reality or limited by technology.
- It has to be precise about the results —what you are trying to do and achieve through it should come out in your hypothesis.
- A research hypothesis should be self-explanatory, leaving no doubt in the reader's mind.
- If you are developing a relational hypothesis, you need to include the variables and establish an appropriate relationship among them.
- A hypothesis must keep and reflect the scope for further investigations and experiments.
Separating a Hypothesis from a Prediction
Outside of academia, hypothesis and prediction are often used interchangeably. In research writing, this is not only confusing but also incorrect. And although a hypothesis and prediction are guesses at their core, there are many differences between them.
A hypothesis is an educated guess or even a testable prediction validated through research. It aims to analyze the gathered evidence and facts to define a relationship between variables and put forth a logical explanation behind the nature of events.
Predictions are assumptions or expected outcomes made without any backing evidence. They are more fictionally inclined regardless of where they originate from.
For this reason, a hypothesis holds much more weight than a prediction. It sticks to the scientific method rather than pure guesswork. "Planets revolve around the Sun." is an example of a hypothesis as it is previous knowledge and observed trends. Additionally, we can test it through the scientific method.
Whereas "COVID-19 will be eradicated by 2030." is a prediction. Even though it results from past trends, we can't prove or disprove it. So, the only way this gets validated is to wait and watch if COVID-19 cases end by 2030.
Finally, How to Write a Hypothesis
![hypothesis in research sample Quick-tips-on-how-to-write-a-hypothesis](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/07/Quick-Tips-on-how-to-write-a-hypothesis.jpg)
Quick tips on writing a hypothesis
1. Be clear about your research question
A hypothesis should instantly address the research question or the problem statement. To do so, you need to ask a question. Understand the constraints of your undertaken research topic and then formulate a simple and topic-centric problem. Only after that can you develop a hypothesis and further test for evidence.
2. Carry out a recce
Once you have your research's foundation laid out, it would be best to conduct preliminary research. Go through previous theories, academic papers, data, and experiments before you start curating your research hypothesis. It will give you an idea of your hypothesis's viability or originality.
Making use of references from relevant research papers helps draft a good research hypothesis. SciSpace Discover offers a repository of over 270 million research papers to browse through and gain a deeper understanding of related studies on a particular topic. Additionally, you can use SciSpace Copilot , your AI research assistant, for reading any lengthy research paper and getting a more summarized context of it. A hypothesis can be formed after evaluating many such summarized research papers. Copilot also offers explanations for theories and equations, explains paper in simplified version, allows you to highlight any text in the paper or clip math equations and tables and provides a deeper, clear understanding of what is being said. This can improve the hypothesis by helping you identify potential research gaps.
3. Create a 3-dimensional hypothesis
Variables are an essential part of any reasonable hypothesis. So, identify your independent and dependent variable(s) and form a correlation between them. The ideal way to do this is to write the hypothetical assumption in the ‘if-then' form. If you use this form, make sure that you state the predefined relationship between the variables.
In another way, you can choose to present your hypothesis as a comparison between two variables. Here, you must specify the difference you expect to observe in the results.
4. Write the first draft
Now that everything is in place, it's time to write your hypothesis. For starters, create the first draft. In this version, write what you expect to find from your research.
Clearly separate your independent and dependent variables and the link between them. Don't fixate on syntax at this stage. The goal is to ensure your hypothesis addresses the issue.
5. Proof your hypothesis
After preparing the first draft of your hypothesis, you need to inspect it thoroughly. It should tick all the boxes, like being concise, straightforward, relevant, and accurate. Your final hypothesis has to be well-structured as well.
Research projects are an exciting and crucial part of being a scholar. And once you have your research question, you need a great hypothesis to begin conducting research. Thus, knowing how to write a hypothesis is very important.
Now that you have a firmer grasp on what a good hypothesis constitutes, the different kinds there are, and what process to follow, you will find it much easier to write your hypothesis, which ultimately helps your research.
Now it's easier than ever to streamline your research workflow with SciSpace Discover . Its integrated, comprehensive end-to-end platform for research allows scholars to easily discover, write and publish their research and fosters collaboration.
It includes everything you need, including a repository of over 270 million research papers across disciplines, SEO-optimized summaries and public profiles to show your expertise and experience.
If you found these tips on writing a research hypothesis useful, head over to our blog on Statistical Hypothesis Testing to learn about the top researchers, papers, and institutions in this domain.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. what is the definition of hypothesis.
According to the Oxford dictionary, a hypothesis is defined as “An idea or explanation of something that is based on a few known facts, but that has not yet been proved to be true or correct”.
2. What is an example of hypothesis?
The hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship between two or more variables. An example: "If we increase the number of new users who join our platform by 25%, then we will see an increase in revenue."
3. What is an example of null hypothesis?
A null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between two variables. The null hypothesis is written as H0. The null hypothesis states that there is no effect. For example, if you're studying whether or not a particular type of exercise increases strength, your null hypothesis will be "there is no difference in strength between people who exercise and people who don't."
4. What are the types of research?
• Fundamental research
• Applied research
• Qualitative research
• Quantitative research
• Mixed research
• Exploratory research
• Longitudinal research
• Cross-sectional research
• Field research
• Laboratory research
• Fixed research
• Flexible research
• Action research
• Policy research
• Classification research
• Comparative research
• Causal research
• Inductive research
• Deductive research
5. How to write a hypothesis?
• Your hypothesis should be able to predict the relationship and outcome.
• Avoid wordiness by keeping it simple and brief.
• Your hypothesis should contain observable and testable outcomes.
• Your hypothesis should be relevant to the research question.
6. What are the 2 types of hypothesis?
• Null hypotheses are used to test the claim that "there is no difference between two groups of data".
• Alternative hypotheses test the claim that "there is a difference between two data groups".
7. Difference between research question and research hypothesis?
A research question is a broad, open-ended question you will try to answer through your research. A hypothesis is a statement based on prior research or theory that you expect to be true due to your study. Example - Research question: What are the factors that influence the adoption of the new technology? Research hypothesis: There is a positive relationship between age, education and income level with the adoption of the new technology.
8. What is plural for hypothesis?
The plural of hypothesis is hypotheses. Here's an example of how it would be used in a statement, "Numerous well-considered hypotheses are presented in this part, and they are supported by tables and figures that are well-illustrated."
9. What is the red queen hypothesis?
The red queen hypothesis in evolutionary biology states that species must constantly evolve to avoid extinction because if they don't, they will be outcompeted by other species that are evolving. Leigh Van Valen first proposed it in 1973; since then, it has been tested and substantiated many times.
10. Who is known as the father of null hypothesis?
The father of the null hypothesis is Sir Ronald Fisher. He published a paper in 1925 that introduced the concept of null hypothesis testing, and he was also the first to use the term itself.
11. When to reject null hypothesis?
You need to find a significant difference between your two populations to reject the null hypothesis. You can determine that by running statistical tests such as an independent sample t-test or a dependent sample t-test. You should reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.05.
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis in research sample](https://typeset.io/resources/assets/icon-192x192.png?v=af7ef697bc)
You might also like
![hypothesis in research sample Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/size/w1000/2024/02/scispace-gpt-vs-consensus-gpt.png)
Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research
Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences
![hypothesis in research sample Nikhil Seethi](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/size/w100/2023/11/NIKHILS.png)
Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)
Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey
![hypothesis in research sample Research hypothesis: What it is, how to write it, types, and examples](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/hero1.png)
What is a Research Hypothesis: How to Write it, Types, and Examples
![hypothesis in research sample](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/hero1.png)
Any research begins with a research question and a research hypothesis . A research question alone may not suffice to design the experiment(s) needed to answer it. A hypothesis is central to the scientific method. But what is a hypothesis ? A hypothesis is a testable statement that proposes a possible explanation to a phenomenon, and it may include a prediction. Next, you may ask what is a research hypothesis ? Simply put, a research hypothesis is a prediction or educated guess about the relationship between the variables that you want to investigate.
It is important to be thorough when developing your research hypothesis. Shortcomings in the framing of a hypothesis can affect the study design and the results. A better understanding of the research hypothesis definition and characteristics of a good hypothesis will make it easier for you to develop your own hypothesis for your research. Let’s dive in to know more about the types of research hypothesis , how to write a research hypothesis , and some research hypothesis examples .
Table of Contents
What is a hypothesis ?
A hypothesis is based on the existing body of knowledge in a study area. Framed before the data are collected, a hypothesis states the tentative relationship between independent and dependent variables, along with a prediction of the outcome.
What is a research hypothesis ?
Young researchers starting out their journey are usually brimming with questions like “ What is a hypothesis ?” “ What is a research hypothesis ?” “How can I write a good research hypothesis ?”
A research hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for an observable phenomenon or pattern. It guides the direction of a study and predicts the outcome of the investigation. A research hypothesis is testable, i.e., it can be supported or disproven through experimentation or observation.
![hypothesis in research sample](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AAP-Banner-1-1024x410.png)
Characteristics of a good hypothesis
Here are the characteristics of a good hypothesis :
- Clearly formulated and free of language errors and ambiguity
- Concise and not unnecessarily verbose
- Has clearly defined variables
- Testable and stated in a way that allows for it to be disproven
- Can be tested using a research design that is feasible, ethical, and practical
- Specific and relevant to the research problem
- Rooted in a thorough literature search
- Can generate new knowledge or understanding.
How to create an effective research hypothesis
A study begins with the formulation of a research question. A researcher then performs background research. This background information forms the basis for building a good research hypothesis . The researcher then performs experiments, collects, and analyzes the data, interprets the findings, and ultimately, determines if the findings support or negate the original hypothesis.
Let’s look at each step for creating an effective, testable, and good research hypothesis :
- Identify a research problem or question: Start by identifying a specific research problem.
- Review the literature: Conduct an in-depth review of the existing literature related to the research problem to grasp the current knowledge and gaps in the field.
- Formulate a clear and testable hypothesis : Based on the research question, use existing knowledge to form a clear and testable hypothesis . The hypothesis should state a predicted relationship between two or more variables that can be measured and manipulated. Improve the original draft till it is clear and meaningful.
- State the null hypothesis: The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between the variables you are studying.
- Define the population and sample: Clearly define the population you are studying and the sample you will be using for your research.
- Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis: Select appropriate research methods, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies, which will allow you to test your research hypothesis .
Remember that creating a research hypothesis is an iterative process, i.e., you might have to revise it based on the data you collect. You may need to test and reject several hypotheses before answering the research problem.
How to write a research hypothesis
When you start writing a research hypothesis , you use an “if–then” statement format, which states the predicted relationship between two or more variables. Clearly identify the independent variables (the variables being changed) and the dependent variables (the variables being measured), as well as the population you are studying. Review and revise your hypothesis as needed.
An example of a research hypothesis in this format is as follows:
“ If [athletes] follow [cold water showers daily], then their [endurance] increases.”
Population: athletes
Independent variable: daily cold water showers
Dependent variable: endurance
You may have understood the characteristics of a good hypothesis . But note that a research hypothesis is not always confirmed; a researcher should be prepared to accept or reject the hypothesis based on the study findings.
![hypothesis in research sample](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/01_WebBanner_780x200px.png)
Research hypothesis checklist
Following from above, here is a 10-point checklist for a good research hypothesis :
- Testable: A research hypothesis should be able to be tested via experimentation or observation.
- Specific: A research hypothesis should clearly state the relationship between the variables being studied.
- Based on prior research: A research hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and previous research in the field.
- Falsifiable: A research hypothesis should be able to be disproven through testing.
- Clear and concise: A research hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner.
- Logical: A research hypothesis should be logical and consistent with current understanding of the subject.
- Relevant: A research hypothesis should be relevant to the research question and objectives.
- Feasible: A research hypothesis should be feasible to test within the scope of the study.
- Reflects the population: A research hypothesis should consider the population or sample being studied.
- Uncomplicated: A good research hypothesis is written in a way that is easy for the target audience to understand.
By following this research hypothesis checklist , you will be able to create a research hypothesis that is strong, well-constructed, and more likely to yield meaningful results.
![hypothesis in research sample Research hypothesis: What it is, how to write it, types, and examples](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/hero2.png)
Types of research hypothesis
Different types of research hypothesis are used in scientific research:
1. Null hypothesis:
A null hypothesis states that there is no change in the dependent variable due to changes to the independent variable. This means that the results are due to chance and are not significant. A null hypothesis is denoted as H0 and is stated as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.
Example: “ The newly identified virus is not zoonotic .”
2. Alternative hypothesis:
This states that there is a significant difference or relationship between the variables being studied. It is denoted as H1 or Ha and is usually accepted or rejected in favor of the null hypothesis.
Example: “ The newly identified virus is zoonotic .”
3. Directional hypothesis :
This specifies the direction of the relationship or difference between variables; therefore, it tends to use terms like increase, decrease, positive, negative, more, or less.
Example: “ The inclusion of intervention X decreases infant mortality compared to the original treatment .”
4. Non-directional hypothesis:
While it does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables, a non-directional hypothesis states the existence of a relationship or difference between variables but not the direction, nature, or magnitude of the relationship. A non-directional hypothesis may be used when there is no underlying theory or when findings contradict previous research.
Example, “ Cats and dogs differ in the amount of affection they express .”
5. Simple hypothesis :
A simple hypothesis only predicts the relationship between one independent and another independent variable.
Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging .”
6 . Complex hypothesis :
A complex hypothesis states the relationship or difference between two or more independent and dependent variables.
Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging, reduces sun burn, and reduces the chances of skin cancer .” (Here, the three dependent variables are slowing skin aging, reducing sun burn, and reducing the chances of skin cancer.)
7. Associative hypothesis:
An associative hypothesis states that a change in one variable results in the change of the other variable. The associative hypothesis defines interdependency between variables.
Example: “ There is a positive association between physical activity levels and overall health .”
8 . Causal hypothesis:
A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect interaction between variables.
Example: “ Long-term alcohol use causes liver damage .”
Note that some of the types of research hypothesis mentioned above might overlap. The types of hypothesis chosen will depend on the research question and the objective of the study.
![hypothesis in research sample](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/blog-banner_extra.png)
Research hypothesis examples
Here are some good research hypothesis examples :
“The use of a specific type of therapy will lead to a reduction in symptoms of depression in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder.”
“Providing educational interventions on healthy eating habits will result in weight loss in overweight individuals.”
“Plants that are exposed to certain types of music will grow taller than those that are not exposed to music.”
“The use of the plant growth regulator X will lead to an increase in the number of flowers produced by plants.”
Characteristics that make a research hypothesis weak are unclear variables, unoriginality, being too general or too vague, and being untestable. A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and improper methods.
Some bad research hypothesis examples (and the reasons why they are “bad”) are as follows:
“This study will show that treatment X is better than any other treatment . ” (This statement is not testable, too broad, and does not consider other treatments that may be effective.)
“This study will prove that this type of therapy is effective for all mental disorders . ” (This statement is too broad and not testable as mental disorders are complex and different disorders may respond differently to different types of therapy.)
“Plants can communicate with each other through telepathy . ” (This statement is not testable and lacks a scientific basis.)
Importance of testable hypothesis
If a research hypothesis is not testable, the results will not prove or disprove anything meaningful. The conclusions will be vague at best. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher focus on the study outcome and understand the implication of the question and the different variables involved. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher make precise predictions based on prior research.
To be considered testable, there must be a way to prove that the hypothesis is true or false; further, the results of the hypothesis must be reproducible.
![hypothesis in research sample Research hypothesis: What it is, how to write it, types, and examples](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/hero3.png)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on research hypothesis
1. What is the difference between research question and research hypothesis ?
A research question defines the problem and helps outline the study objective(s). It is an open-ended statement that is exploratory or probing in nature. Therefore, it does not make predictions or assumptions. It helps a researcher identify what information to collect. A research hypothesis , however, is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables. Accordingly, it guides the study design and data analysis approach.
2. When to reject null hypothesis ?
A null hypothesis should be rejected when the evidence from a statistical test shows that it is unlikely to be true. This happens when the test statistic (e.g., p -value) is less than the defined significance level (e.g., 0.05). Rejecting the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the alternative hypothesis is true; it simply means that the evidence found is not compatible with the null hypothesis.
3. How can I be sure my hypothesis is testable?
A testable hypothesis should be specific and measurable, and it should state a clear relationship between variables that can be tested with data. To ensure that your hypothesis is testable, consider the following:
- Clearly define the key variables in your hypothesis. You should be able to measure and manipulate these variables in a way that allows you to test the hypothesis.
- The hypothesis should predict a specific outcome or relationship between variables that can be measured or quantified.
- You should be able to collect the necessary data within the constraints of your study.
- It should be possible for other researchers to replicate your study, using the same methods and variables.
- Your hypothesis should be testable by using appropriate statistical analysis techniques, so you can draw conclusions, and make inferences about the population from the sample data.
- The hypothesis should be able to be disproven or rejected through the collection of data.
4. How do I revise my research hypothesis if my data does not support it?
If your data does not support your research hypothesis , you will need to revise it or develop a new one. You should examine your data carefully and identify any patterns or anomalies, re-examine your research question, and/or revisit your theory to look for any alternative explanations for your results. Based on your review of the data, literature, and theories, modify your research hypothesis to better align it with the results you obtained. Use your revised hypothesis to guide your research design and data collection. It is important to remain objective throughout the process.
5. I am performing exploratory research. Do I need to formulate a research hypothesis?
As opposed to “confirmatory” research, where a researcher has some idea about the relationship between the variables under investigation, exploratory research (or hypothesis-generating research) looks into a completely new topic about which limited information is available. Therefore, the researcher will not have any prior hypotheses. In such cases, a researcher will need to develop a post-hoc hypothesis. A post-hoc research hypothesis is generated after these results are known.
6. How is a research hypothesis different from a research question?
A research question is an inquiry about a specific topic or phenomenon, typically expressed as a question. It seeks to explore and understand a particular aspect of the research subject. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a specific statement or prediction that suggests an expected relationship between variables. It is formulated based on existing knowledge or theories and guides the research design and data analysis.
7. Can a research hypothesis change during the research process?
Yes, research hypotheses can change during the research process. As researchers collect and analyze data, new insights and information may emerge that require modification or refinement of the initial hypotheses. This can be due to unexpected findings, limitations in the original hypotheses, or the need to explore additional dimensions of the research topic. Flexibility is crucial in research, allowing for adaptation and adjustment of hypotheses to align with the evolving understanding of the subject matter.
8. How many hypotheses should be included in a research study?
The number of research hypotheses in a research study varies depending on the nature and scope of the research. It is not necessary to have multiple hypotheses in every study. Some studies may have only one primary hypothesis, while others may have several related hypotheses. The number of hypotheses should be determined based on the research objectives, research questions, and the complexity of the research topic. It is important to ensure that the hypotheses are focused, testable, and directly related to the research aims.
9. Can research hypotheses be used in qualitative research?
Yes, research hypotheses can be used in qualitative research, although they are more commonly associated with quantitative research. In qualitative research, hypotheses may be formulated as tentative or exploratory statements that guide the investigation. Instead of testing hypotheses through statistical analysis, qualitative researchers may use the hypotheses to guide data collection and analysis, seeking to uncover patterns, themes, or relationships within the qualitative data. The emphasis in qualitative research is often on generating insights and understanding rather than confirming or rejecting specific research hypotheses through statistical testing.
Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.
Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place – Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !
Related Posts
![hypothesis in research sample Back to school 2024 sale](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/beautiful-cheerful-female-student-smiling-greeting-holding-folders-outdoors-1-800x600.jpg)
Back to School – Lock-in All Access Pack for a Year at the Best Price
![hypothesis in research sample research-paper-appendix](https://blog.researcher.life/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/young-student-working-assignment-1-800x600.jpg)
Research Paper Appendix: Format and Examples
- Bipolar Disorder
- Therapy Center
- When To See a Therapist
- Types of Therapy
- Best Online Therapy
- Best Couples Therapy
- Managing Stress
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Understanding Emotions
- Self-Improvement
- Healthy Relationships
- Student Resources
- Personality Types
- Sweepstakes
- Guided Meditations
- Verywell Mind Insights
- 2024 Verywell Mind 25
- Mental Health in the Classroom
- Editorial Process
- Meet Our Review Board
- Crisis Support
How to Write a Great Hypothesis
Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips
Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz
- The Scientific Method
Hypothesis Format
Falsifiability of a hypothesis.
- Operationalization
Hypothesis Types
Hypotheses examples.
- Collecting Data
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.
Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."
At a Glance
A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.
The Hypothesis in the Scientific Method
In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:
- Forming a question
- Performing background research
- Creating a hypothesis
- Designing an experiment
- Collecting data
- Analyzing the results
- Drawing conclusions
- Communicating the results
The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.
Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you expect to happen.
In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.
Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.
In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment do not support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.
In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."
In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."
Elements of a Good Hypothesis
So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:
- Is your hypothesis based on your research on a topic?
- Can your hypothesis be tested?
- Does your hypothesis include independent and dependent variables?
Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.
How to Formulate a Good Hypothesis
To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:
- Collect as many observations about a topic or problem as you can.
- Evaluate these observations and look for possible causes of the problem.
- Create a list of possible explanations that you might want to explore.
- After you have developed some possible hypotheses, think of ways that you could confirm or disprove each hypothesis through experimentation. This is known as falsifiability.
In the scientific method , falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.
Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that if something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.
One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.
The Importance of Operational Definitions
A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.
Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.
For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.
These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.
Replicability
One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.
Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.
Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.
To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.
Hypothesis Checklist
- Does your hypothesis focus on something that you can actually test?
- Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
- Can you manipulate the variables?
- Can your hypothesis be tested without violating ethical standards?
The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:
- Simple hypothesis : This type of hypothesis suggests there is a relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable.
- Complex hypothesis : This type suggests a relationship between three or more variables, such as two independent and dependent variables.
- Null hypothesis : This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables.
- Alternative hypothesis : This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.
- Statistical hypothesis : This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
- Logical hypothesis : This hypothesis assumes a relationship between variables without collecting data or evidence.
A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the dependent variable if you change the independent variable .
The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."
A few examples of simple hypotheses:
- "Students who eat breakfast will perform better on a math exam than students who do not eat breakfast."
- "Students who experience test anxiety before an English exam will get lower scores than students who do not experience test anxiety."
- "Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone."
- "Children who receive a new reading intervention will have higher reading scores than students who do not receive the intervention."
Examples of a complex hypothesis include:
- "People with high-sugar diets and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression."
- "Younger people who are regularly exposed to green, outdoor areas have better subjective well-being than older adults who have limited exposure to green spaces."
Examples of a null hypothesis include:
- "There is no difference in anxiety levels between people who take St. John's wort supplements and those who do not."
- "There is no difference in scores on a memory recall task between children and adults."
- "There is no difference in aggression levels between children who play first-person shooter games and those who do not."
Examples of an alternative hypothesis:
- "People who take St. John's wort supplements will have less anxiety than those who do not."
- "Adults will perform better on a memory task than children."
- "Children who play first-person shooter games will show higher levels of aggression than children who do not."
Collecting Data on Your Hypothesis
Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.
Descriptive Research Methods
Descriptive research such as case studies , naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.
Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a correlational study can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.
Experimental Research Methods
Experimental methods are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).
Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually cause another to change.
The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.
Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses . R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607
Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:]. Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z
Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004
Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ? PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies . Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18
Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
- Privacy Policy
![hypothesis in research sample Research Method](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/logo.png)
Home » What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide
What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide
Table of Contents
![hypothesis in research sample What is a Hypothesis](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/What_is_a_Hypothesis-1024x576.jpg)
Definition:
Hypothesis is an educated guess or proposed explanation for a phenomenon, based on some initial observations or data. It is a tentative statement that can be tested and potentially proven or disproven through further investigation and experimentation.
Hypothesis is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments and the collection and analysis of data. It is an essential element of the scientific method, as it allows researchers to make predictions about the outcome of their experiments and to test those predictions to determine their accuracy.
Types of Hypothesis
Types of Hypothesis are as follows:
Research Hypothesis
A research hypothesis is a statement that predicts a relationship between variables. It is usually formulated as a specific statement that can be tested through research, and it is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is no significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as a starting point for testing the research hypothesis, and if the results of the study reject the null hypothesis, it suggests that there is a significant difference or relationship between variables.
Alternative Hypothesis
An alternative hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is a significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as an alternative to the null hypothesis and is tested against the null hypothesis to determine which statement is more accurate.
Directional Hypothesis
A directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the direction of the relationship between variables. For example, a researcher might predict that increasing the amount of exercise will result in a decrease in body weight.
Non-directional Hypothesis
A non-directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the relationship between variables but does not specify the direction. For example, a researcher might predict that there is a relationship between the amount of exercise and body weight, but they do not specify whether increasing or decreasing exercise will affect body weight.
Statistical Hypothesis
A statistical hypothesis is a statement that assumes a particular statistical model or distribution for the data. It is often used in statistical analysis to test the significance of a particular result.
Composite Hypothesis
A composite hypothesis is a statement that assumes more than one condition or outcome. It can be divided into several sub-hypotheses, each of which represents a different possible outcome.
Empirical Hypothesis
An empirical hypothesis is a statement that is based on observed phenomena or data. It is often used in scientific research to develop theories or models that explain the observed phenomena.
Simple Hypothesis
A simple hypothesis is a statement that assumes only one outcome or condition. It is often used in scientific research to test a single variable or factor.
Complex Hypothesis
A complex hypothesis is a statement that assumes multiple outcomes or conditions. It is often used in scientific research to test the effects of multiple variables or factors on a particular outcome.
Applications of Hypothesis
Hypotheses are used in various fields to guide research and make predictions about the outcomes of experiments or observations. Here are some examples of how hypotheses are applied in different fields:
- Science : In scientific research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain natural phenomena. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular variable on a natural system, such as the effects of climate change on an ecosystem.
- Medicine : In medical research, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of treatments and therapies for specific conditions. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new drug on a particular disease.
- Psychology : In psychology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of human behavior and cognition. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular stimulus on the brain or behavior.
- Sociology : In sociology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of social phenomena, such as the effects of social structures or institutions on human behavior. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of income inequality on crime rates.
- Business : In business research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain business phenomena, such as consumer behavior or market trends. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new marketing campaign on consumer buying behavior.
- Engineering : In engineering, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of new technologies or designs. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the efficiency of a new solar panel design.
How to write a Hypothesis
Here are the steps to follow when writing a hypothesis:
Identify the Research Question
The first step is to identify the research question that you want to answer through your study. This question should be clear, specific, and focused. It should be something that can be investigated empirically and that has some relevance or significance in the field.
Conduct a Literature Review
Before writing your hypothesis, it’s essential to conduct a thorough literature review to understand what is already known about the topic. This will help you to identify the research gap and formulate a hypothesis that builds on existing knowledge.
Determine the Variables
The next step is to identify the variables involved in the research question. A variable is any characteristic or factor that can vary or change. There are two types of variables: independent and dependent. The independent variable is the one that is manipulated or changed by the researcher, while the dependent variable is the one that is measured or observed as a result of the independent variable.
Formulate the Hypothesis
Based on the research question and the variables involved, you can now formulate your hypothesis. A hypothesis should be a clear and concise statement that predicts the relationship between the variables. It should be testable through empirical research and based on existing theory or evidence.
Write the Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is the opposite of the alternative hypothesis, which is the hypothesis that you are testing. The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference or relationship between the variables. It is important to write the null hypothesis because it allows you to compare your results with what would be expected by chance.
Refine the Hypothesis
After formulating the hypothesis, it’s important to refine it and make it more precise. This may involve clarifying the variables, specifying the direction of the relationship, or making the hypothesis more testable.
Examples of Hypothesis
Here are a few examples of hypotheses in different fields:
- Psychology : “Increased exposure to violent video games leads to increased aggressive behavior in adolescents.”
- Biology : “Higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to increased plant growth.”
- Sociology : “Individuals who grow up in households with higher socioeconomic status will have higher levels of education and income as adults.”
- Education : “Implementing a new teaching method will result in higher student achievement scores.”
- Marketing : “Customers who receive a personalized email will be more likely to make a purchase than those who receive a generic email.”
- Physics : “An increase in temperature will cause an increase in the volume of a gas, assuming all other variables remain constant.”
- Medicine : “Consuming a diet high in saturated fats will increase the risk of developing heart disease.”
Purpose of Hypothesis
The purpose of a hypothesis is to provide a testable explanation for an observed phenomenon or a prediction of a future outcome based on existing knowledge or theories. A hypothesis is an essential part of the scientific method and helps to guide the research process by providing a clear focus for investigation. It enables scientists to design experiments or studies to gather evidence and data that can support or refute the proposed explanation or prediction.
The formulation of a hypothesis is based on existing knowledge, observations, and theories, and it should be specific, testable, and falsifiable. A specific hypothesis helps to define the research question, which is important in the research process as it guides the selection of an appropriate research design and methodology. Testability of the hypothesis means that it can be proven or disproven through empirical data collection and analysis. Falsifiability means that the hypothesis should be formulated in such a way that it can be proven wrong if it is incorrect.
In addition to guiding the research process, the testing of hypotheses can lead to new discoveries and advancements in scientific knowledge. When a hypothesis is supported by the data, it can be used to develop new theories or models to explain the observed phenomenon. When a hypothesis is not supported by the data, it can help to refine existing theories or prompt the development of new hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.
When to use Hypothesis
Here are some common situations in which hypotheses are used:
- In scientific research , hypotheses are used to guide the design of experiments and to help researchers make predictions about the outcomes of those experiments.
- In social science research , hypotheses are used to test theories about human behavior, social relationships, and other phenomena.
- I n business , hypotheses can be used to guide decisions about marketing, product development, and other areas. For example, a hypothesis might be that a new product will sell well in a particular market, and this hypothesis can be tested through market research.
Characteristics of Hypothesis
Here are some common characteristics of a hypothesis:
- Testable : A hypothesis must be able to be tested through observation or experimentation. This means that it must be possible to collect data that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
- Falsifiable : A hypothesis must be able to be proven false if it is not supported by the data. If a hypothesis cannot be falsified, then it is not a scientific hypothesis.
- Clear and concise : A hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner so that it can be easily understood and tested.
- Based on existing knowledge : A hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and research in the field. It should not be based on personal beliefs or opinions.
- Specific : A hypothesis should be specific in terms of the variables being tested and the predicted outcome. This will help to ensure that the research is focused and well-designed.
- Tentative: A hypothesis is a tentative statement or assumption that requires further testing and evidence to be confirmed or refuted. It is not a final conclusion or assertion.
- Relevant : A hypothesis should be relevant to the research question or problem being studied. It should address a gap in knowledge or provide a new perspective on the issue.
Advantages of Hypothesis
Hypotheses have several advantages in scientific research and experimentation:
- Guides research: A hypothesis provides a clear and specific direction for research. It helps to focus the research question, select appropriate methods and variables, and interpret the results.
- Predictive powe r: A hypothesis makes predictions about the outcome of research, which can be tested through experimentation. This allows researchers to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis and make new discoveries.
- Facilitates communication: A hypothesis provides a common language and framework for scientists to communicate with one another about their research. This helps to facilitate the exchange of ideas and promotes collaboration.
- Efficient use of resources: A hypothesis helps researchers to use their time, resources, and funding efficiently by directing them towards specific research questions and methods that are most likely to yield results.
- Provides a basis for further research: A hypothesis that is supported by data provides a basis for further research and exploration. It can lead to new hypotheses, theories, and discoveries.
- Increases objectivity: A hypothesis can help to increase objectivity in research by providing a clear and specific framework for testing and interpreting results. This can reduce bias and increase the reliability of research findings.
Limitations of Hypothesis
Some Limitations of the Hypothesis are as follows:
- Limited to observable phenomena: Hypotheses are limited to observable phenomena and cannot account for unobservable or intangible factors. This means that some research questions may not be amenable to hypothesis testing.
- May be inaccurate or incomplete: Hypotheses are based on existing knowledge and research, which may be incomplete or inaccurate. This can lead to flawed hypotheses and erroneous conclusions.
- May be biased: Hypotheses may be biased by the researcher’s own beliefs, values, or assumptions. This can lead to selective interpretation of data and a lack of objectivity in research.
- Cannot prove causation: A hypothesis can only show a correlation between variables, but it cannot prove causation. This requires further experimentation and analysis.
- Limited to specific contexts: Hypotheses are limited to specific contexts and may not be generalizable to other situations or populations. This means that results may not be applicable in other contexts or may require further testing.
- May be affected by chance : Hypotheses may be affected by chance or random variation, which can obscure or distort the true relationship between variables.
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
![hypothesis in research sample Research Questions](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Questions-145x100.png)
Research Questions – Types, Examples and Writing...
![hypothesis in research sample Research Methods](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Research_Methods-145x100.png)
Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide
![hypothesis in research sample Context of the Study](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Context_of_the_Study-145x100.png)
Context of the Study – Writing Guide and Examples
![hypothesis in research sample Research Recommendations](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Recommendations-145x100.png)
Research Recommendations – Examples and Writing...
![hypothesis in research sample Research Project](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Project-145x100.png)
Research Project – Definition, Writing Guide and...
![hypothesis in research sample Research Paper](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Paper-145x100.png)
Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing...
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Methodology
- How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples
How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples
Published on 6 May 2022 by Shona McCombes .
A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.
Table of contents
What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.
A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.
A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).
Variables in hypotheses
Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more variables . An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls. A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.
In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .
Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.
Step 1: ask a question.
Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.
Step 2: Do some preliminary research
Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.
At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalise more complex constructs.
Step 3: Formulate your hypothesis
Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.
Step 4: Refine your hypothesis
You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:
- The relevant variables
- The specific group being studied
- The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis
Step 5: Phrase your hypothesis in three ways
To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.
In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.
If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.
Step 6. Write a null hypothesis
If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .
Research question | Hypothesis | Null hypothesis |
---|---|---|
What are the health benefits of eating an apple a day? | Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will result in decreasing frequency of doctor’s visits. | Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will have no effect on frequency of doctor’s visits. |
Which airlines have the most delays? | Low-cost airlines are more likely to have delays than premium airlines. | Low-cost and premium airlines are equally likely to have delays. |
Can flexible work arrangements improve job satisfaction? | Employees who have flexible working hours will report greater job satisfaction than employees who work fixed hours. | There is no relationship between working hour flexibility and job satisfaction. |
How effective is secondary school sex education at reducing teen pregnancies? | Teenagers who received sex education lessons throughout secondary school will have lower rates of unplanned pregnancy than teenagers who did not receive any sex education. | Secondary school sex education has no effect on teen pregnancy rates. |
What effect does daily use of social media have on the attention span of under-16s? | There is a negative correlation between time spent on social media and attention span in under-16s. | There is no relationship between social media use and attention span in under-16s. |
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.
A hypothesis is not just a guess. It should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).
A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).
A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
McCombes, S. (2022, May 06). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 26 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/hypothesis-writing/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, operationalisation | a guide with examples, pros & cons, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples.
- Affiliate Program
![hypothesis in research sample Wordvice](https://pstatic.wordvice.com/wv-us/image/biglogo2.png)
- UNITED STATES
- 台灣 (TAIWAN)
- TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
- Academic Editing Services
- - Research Paper
- - Journal Manuscript
- - Dissertation
- - College & University Assignments
- Admissions Editing Services
- - Application Essay
- - Personal Statement
- - Recommendation Letter
- - Cover Letter
- - CV/Resume
- Business Editing Services
- - Business Documents
- - Report & Brochure
- - Website & Blog
- Writer Editing Services
- - Script & Screenplay
- Our Editors
- Client Reviews
- Editing & Proofreading Prices
- Wordvice Points
- Partner Discount
- Plagiarism Checker
- APA Citation Generator
- MLA Citation Generator
- Chicago Citation Generator
- Vancouver Citation Generator
- - APA Style
- - MLA Style
- - Chicago Style
- - Vancouver Style
- Writing & Editing Guide
- Academic Resources
- Admissions Resources
How to Write a Research Hypothesis: Good & Bad Examples
What is a research hypothesis?
A research hypothesis is an attempt at explaining a phenomenon or the relationships between phenomena/variables in the real world. Hypotheses are sometimes called “educated guesses”, but they are in fact (or let’s say they should be) based on previous observations, existing theories, scientific evidence, and logic. A research hypothesis is also not a prediction—rather, predictions are ( should be) based on clearly formulated hypotheses. For example, “We tested the hypothesis that KLF2 knockout mice would show deficiencies in heart development” is an assumption or prediction, not a hypothesis.
The research hypothesis at the basis of this prediction is “the product of the KLF2 gene is involved in the development of the cardiovascular system in mice”—and this hypothesis is probably (hopefully) based on a clear observation, such as that mice with low levels of Kruppel-like factor 2 (which KLF2 codes for) seem to have heart problems. From this hypothesis, you can derive the idea that a mouse in which this particular gene does not function cannot develop a normal cardiovascular system, and then make the prediction that we started with.
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a prediction?
You might think that these are very subtle differences, and you will certainly come across many publications that do not contain an actual hypothesis or do not make these distinctions correctly. But considering that the formulation and testing of hypotheses is an integral part of the scientific method, it is good to be aware of the concepts underlying this approach. The two hallmarks of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability (an evaluation standard that was introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper in 1934) and testability —if you cannot use experiments or data to decide whether an idea is true or false, then it is not a hypothesis (or at least a very bad one).
So, in a nutshell, you (1) look at existing evidence/theories, (2) come up with a hypothesis, (3) make a prediction that allows you to (4) design an experiment or data analysis to test it, and (5) come to a conclusion. Of course, not all studies have hypotheses (there is also exploratory or hypothesis-generating research), and you do not necessarily have to state your hypothesis as such in your paper.
But for the sake of understanding the principles of the scientific method, let’s first take a closer look at the different types of hypotheses that research articles refer to and then give you a step-by-step guide for how to formulate a strong hypothesis for your own paper.
Types of Research Hypotheses
Hypotheses can be simple , which means they describe the relationship between one single independent variable (the one you observe variations in or plan to manipulate) and one single dependent variable (the one you expect to be affected by the variations/manipulation). If there are more variables on either side, you are dealing with a complex hypothesis. You can also distinguish hypotheses according to the kind of relationship between the variables you are interested in (e.g., causal or associative ). But apart from these variations, we are usually interested in what is called the “alternative hypothesis” and, in contrast to that, the “null hypothesis”. If you think these two should be listed the other way round, then you are right, logically speaking—the alternative should surely come second. However, since this is the hypothesis we (as researchers) are usually interested in, let’s start from there.
Alternative Hypothesis
If you predict a relationship between two variables in your study, then the research hypothesis that you formulate to describe that relationship is your alternative hypothesis (usually H1 in statistical terms). The goal of your hypothesis testing is thus to demonstrate that there is sufficient evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis, rather than evidence for the possibility that there is no such relationship. The alternative hypothesis is usually the research hypothesis of a study and is based on the literature, previous observations, and widely known theories.
Null Hypothesis
The hypothesis that describes the other possible outcome, that is, that your variables are not related, is the null hypothesis ( H0 ). Based on your findings, you choose between the two hypotheses—usually that means that if your prediction was correct, you reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative. Make sure, however, that you are not getting lost at this step of the thinking process: If your prediction is that there will be no difference or change, then you are trying to find support for the null hypothesis and reject H1.
Directional Hypothesis
While the null hypothesis is obviously “static”, the alternative hypothesis can specify a direction for the observed relationship between variables—for example, that mice with higher expression levels of a certain protein are more active than those with lower levels. This is then called a one-tailed hypothesis.
Another example for a directional one-tailed alternative hypothesis would be that
H1: Attending private classes before important exams has a positive effect on performance.
Your null hypothesis would then be that
H0: Attending private classes before important exams has no/a negative effect on performance.
Nondirectional Hypothesis
A nondirectional hypothesis does not specify the direction of the potentially observed effect, only that there is a relationship between the studied variables—this is called a two-tailed hypothesis. For instance, if you are studying a new drug that has shown some effects on pathways involved in a certain condition (e.g., anxiety) in vitro in the lab, but you can’t say for sure whether it will have the same effects in an animal model or maybe induce other/side effects that you can’t predict and potentially increase anxiety levels instead, you could state the two hypotheses like this:
H1: The only lab-tested drug (somehow) affects anxiety levels in an anxiety mouse model.
You then test this nondirectional alternative hypothesis against the null hypothesis:
H0: The only lab-tested drug has no effect on anxiety levels in an anxiety mouse model.
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis in a research paper](https://ee-blog-cdn.wordvice.com/us/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/28182831/research-paper-hypothesis-1024x465.png)
How to Write a Hypothesis for a Research Paper
Now that we understand the important distinctions between different kinds of research hypotheses, let’s look at a simple process of how to write a hypothesis.
Writing a Hypothesis Step:1
Ask a question, based on earlier research. Research always starts with a question, but one that takes into account what is already known about a topic or phenomenon. For example, if you are interested in whether people who have pets are happier than those who don’t, do a literature search and find out what has already been demonstrated. You will probably realize that yes, there is quite a bit of research that shows a relationship between happiness and owning a pet—and even studies that show that owning a dog is more beneficial than owning a cat ! Let’s say you are so intrigued by this finding that you wonder:
What is it that makes dog owners even happier than cat owners?
Let’s move on to Step 2 and find an answer to that question.
Writing a Hypothesis Step 2:
Formulate a strong hypothesis by answering your own question. Again, you don’t want to make things up, take unicorns into account, or repeat/ignore what has already been done. Looking at the dog-vs-cat papers your literature search returned, you see that most studies are based on self-report questionnaires on personality traits, mental health, and life satisfaction. What you don’t find is any data on actual (mental or physical) health measures, and no experiments. You therefore decide to make a bold claim come up with the carefully thought-through hypothesis that it’s maybe the lifestyle of the dog owners, which includes walking their dog several times per day, engaging in fun and healthy activities such as agility competitions, and taking them on trips, that gives them that extra boost in happiness. You could therefore answer your question in the following way:
Dog owners are happier than cat owners because of the dog-related activities they engage in.
Now you have to verify that your hypothesis fulfills the two requirements we introduced at the beginning of this resource article: falsifiability and testability . If it can’t be wrong and can’t be tested, it’s not a hypothesis. We are lucky, however, because yes, we can test whether owning a dog but not engaging in any of those activities leads to lower levels of happiness or well-being than owning a dog and playing and running around with them or taking them on trips.
Writing a Hypothesis Step 3:
Make your predictions and define your variables. We have verified that we can test our hypothesis, but now we have to define all the relevant variables, design our experiment or data analysis, and make precise predictions. You could, for example, decide to study dog owners (not surprising at this point), let them fill in questionnaires about their lifestyle as well as their life satisfaction (as other studies did), and then compare two groups of active and inactive dog owners. Alternatively, if you want to go beyond the data that earlier studies produced and analyzed and directly manipulate the activity level of your dog owners to study the effect of that manipulation, you could invite them to your lab, select groups of participants with similar lifestyles, make them change their lifestyle (e.g., couch potato dog owners start agility classes, very active ones have to refrain from any fun activities for a certain period of time) and assess their happiness levels before and after the intervention. In both cases, your independent variable would be “ level of engagement in fun activities with dog” and your dependent variable would be happiness or well-being .
Examples of a Good and Bad Hypothesis
Let’s look at a few examples of good and bad hypotheses to get you started.
Good Hypothesis Examples
Working from home improves job satisfaction. | Employees who are allowed to work from home are less likely to quit within 2 years than those who need to come to the office. |
Sleep deprivation affects cognition. | Students who sleep <5 hours/night don’t perform as well on exams as those who sleep >7 hours/night. |
Animals adapt to their environment. | Birds of the same species living on different islands have differently shaped beaks depending on the available food source. |
Social media use causes anxiety. | Do teenagers who refrain from using social media for 4 weeks show improvements in anxiety symptoms? |
Bad Hypothesis Examples
Garlic repels vampires. | Participants who eat garlic daily will not be harmed by vampires. | Nobody gets harmed by vampires— . |
Chocolate is better than vanilla. | No clearly defined variables— . |
Tips for Writing a Research Hypothesis
If you understood the distinction between a hypothesis and a prediction we made at the beginning of this article, then you will have no problem formulating your hypotheses and predictions correctly. To refresh your memory: We have to (1) look at existing evidence, (2) come up with a hypothesis, (3) make a prediction, and (4) design an experiment. For example, you could summarize your dog/happiness study like this:
(1) While research suggests that dog owners are happier than cat owners, there are no reports on what factors drive this difference. (2) We hypothesized that it is the fun activities that many dog owners (but very few cat owners) engage in with their pets that increases their happiness levels. (3) We thus predicted that preventing very active dog owners from engaging in such activities for some time and making very inactive dog owners take up such activities would lead to an increase and decrease in their overall self-ratings of happiness, respectively. (4) To test this, we invited dog owners into our lab, assessed their mental and emotional well-being through questionnaires, and then assigned them to an “active” and an “inactive” group, depending on…
Note that you use “we hypothesize” only for your hypothesis, not for your experimental prediction, and “would” or “if – then” only for your prediction, not your hypothesis. A hypothesis that states that something “would” affect something else sounds as if you don’t have enough confidence to make a clear statement—in which case you can’t expect your readers to believe in your research either. Write in the present tense, don’t use modal verbs that express varying degrees of certainty (such as may, might, or could ), and remember that you are not drawing a conclusion while trying not to exaggerate but making a clear statement that you then, in a way, try to disprove . And if that happens, that is not something to fear but an important part of the scientific process.
Similarly, don’t use “we hypothesize” when you explain the implications of your research or make predictions in the conclusion section of your manuscript, since these are clearly not hypotheses in the true sense of the word. As we said earlier, you will find that many authors of academic articles do not seem to care too much about these rather subtle distinctions, but thinking very clearly about your own research will not only help you write better but also ensure that even that infamous Reviewer 2 will find fewer reasons to nitpick about your manuscript.
Perfect Your Manuscript With Professional Editing
Now that you know how to write a strong research hypothesis for your research paper, you might be interested in our free AI Proofreader , Wordvice AI, which finds and fixes errors in grammar, punctuation, and word choice in academic texts. Or if you are interested in human proofreading , check out our English editing services , including research paper editing and manuscript editing .
On the Wordvice academic resources website , you can also find many more articles and other resources that can help you with writing the other parts of your research paper , with making a research paper outline before you put everything together, or with writing an effective cover letter once you are ready to submit.
![hypothesis in research sample Enago Academy](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/enago-academy-sitelogo.png)
How to Develop a Good Research Hypothesis
![hypothesis in research sample ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2-170x150.png)
The story of a research study begins by asking a question. Researchers all around the globe are asking curious questions and formulating research hypothesis. However, whether the research study provides an effective conclusion depends on how well one develops a good research hypothesis. Research hypothesis examples could help researchers get an idea as to how to write a good research hypothesis.
This blog will help you understand what is a research hypothesis, its characteristics and, how to formulate a research hypothesis
Table of Contents
What is Hypothesis?
Hypothesis is an assumption or an idea proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested. It is a precise, testable statement of what the researchers predict will be outcome of the study. Hypothesis usually involves proposing a relationship between two variables: the independent variable (what the researchers change) and the dependent variable (what the research measures).
What is a Research Hypothesis?
Research hypothesis is a statement that introduces a research question and proposes an expected result. It is an integral part of the scientific method that forms the basis of scientific experiments. Therefore, you need to be careful and thorough when building your research hypothesis. A minor flaw in the construction of your hypothesis could have an adverse effect on your experiment. In research, there is a convention that the hypothesis is written in two forms, the null hypothesis, and the alternative hypothesis (called the experimental hypothesis when the method of investigation is an experiment).
Characteristics of a Good Research Hypothesis
As the hypothesis is specific, there is a testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. You may consider drawing hypothesis from previously published research based on the theory.
A good research hypothesis involves more effort than just a guess. In particular, your hypothesis may begin with a question that could be further explored through background research.
To help you formulate a promising research hypothesis, you should ask yourself the following questions:
- Is the language clear and focused?
- What is the relationship between your hypothesis and your research topic?
- Is your hypothesis testable? If yes, then how?
- What are the possible explanations that you might want to explore?
- Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
- Can you manipulate your variables without hampering the ethical standards?
- Does your research predict the relationship and outcome?
- Is your research simple and concise (avoids wordiness)?
- Is it clear with no ambiguity or assumptions about the readers’ knowledge
- Is your research observable and testable results?
- Is it relevant and specific to the research question or problem?
![hypothesis in research sample research hypothesis example](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ResearchHypothesis.jpg)
The questions listed above can be used as a checklist to make sure your hypothesis is based on a solid foundation. Furthermore, it can help you identify weaknesses in your hypothesis and revise it if necessary.
Source: Educational Hub
How to formulate a research hypothesis.
A testable hypothesis is not a simple statement. It is rather an intricate statement that needs to offer a clear introduction to a scientific experiment, its intentions, and the possible outcomes. However, there are some important things to consider when building a compelling hypothesis.
1. State the problem that you are trying to solve.
Make sure that the hypothesis clearly defines the topic and the focus of the experiment.
2. Try to write the hypothesis as an if-then statement.
Follow this template: If a specific action is taken, then a certain outcome is expected.
3. Define the variables
Independent variables are the ones that are manipulated, controlled, or changed. Independent variables are isolated from other factors of the study.
Dependent variables , as the name suggests are dependent on other factors of the study. They are influenced by the change in independent variable.
4. Scrutinize the hypothesis
Evaluate assumptions, predictions, and evidence rigorously to refine your understanding.
Types of Research Hypothesis
The types of research hypothesis are stated below:
1. Simple Hypothesis
It predicts the relationship between a single dependent variable and a single independent variable.
2. Complex Hypothesis
It predicts the relationship between two or more independent and dependent variables.
3. Directional Hypothesis
It specifies the expected direction to be followed to determine the relationship between variables and is derived from theory. Furthermore, it implies the researcher’s intellectual commitment to a particular outcome.
4. Non-directional Hypothesis
It does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables. The non-directional hypothesis is used when there is no theory involved or when findings contradict previous research.
5. Associative and Causal Hypothesis
The associative hypothesis defines interdependency between variables. A change in one variable results in the change of the other variable. On the other hand, the causal hypothesis proposes an effect on the dependent due to manipulation of the independent variable.
6. Null Hypothesis
Null hypothesis states a negative statement to support the researcher’s findings that there is no relationship between two variables. There will be no changes in the dependent variable due the manipulation of the independent variable. Furthermore, it states results are due to chance and are not significant in terms of supporting the idea being investigated.
7. Alternative Hypothesis
It states that there is a relationship between the two variables of the study and that the results are significant to the research topic. An experimental hypothesis predicts what changes will take place in the dependent variable when the independent variable is manipulated. Also, it states that the results are not due to chance and that they are significant in terms of supporting the theory being investigated.
Research Hypothesis Examples of Independent and Dependent Variables
Research Hypothesis Example 1 The greater number of coal plants in a region (independent variable) increases water pollution (dependent variable). If you change the independent variable (building more coal factories), it will change the dependent variable (amount of water pollution).
Research Hypothesis Example 2 What is the effect of diet or regular soda (independent variable) on blood sugar levels (dependent variable)? If you change the independent variable (the type of soda you consume), it will change the dependent variable (blood sugar levels)
You should not ignore the importance of the above steps. The validity of your experiment and its results rely on a robust testable hypothesis. Developing a strong testable hypothesis has few advantages, it compels us to think intensely and specifically about the outcomes of a study. Consequently, it enables us to understand the implication of the question and the different variables involved in the study. Furthermore, it helps us to make precise predictions based on prior research. Hence, forming a hypothesis would be of great value to the research. Here are some good examples of testable hypotheses.
More importantly, you need to build a robust testable research hypothesis for your scientific experiments. A testable hypothesis is a hypothesis that can be proved or disproved as a result of experimentation.
Importance of a Testable Hypothesis
To devise and perform an experiment using scientific method, you need to make sure that your hypothesis is testable. To be considered testable, some essential criteria must be met:
- There must be a possibility to prove that the hypothesis is true.
- There must be a possibility to prove that the hypothesis is false.
- The results of the hypothesis must be reproducible.
Without these criteria, the hypothesis and the results will be vague. As a result, the experiment will not prove or disprove anything significant.
What are your experiences with building hypotheses for scientific experiments? What challenges did you face? How did you overcome these challenges? Please share your thoughts with us in the comments section.
Frequently Asked Questions
The steps to write a research hypothesis are: 1. Stating the problem: Ensure that the hypothesis defines the research problem 2. Writing a hypothesis as an 'if-then' statement: Include the action and the expected outcome of your study by following a ‘if-then’ structure. 3. Defining the variables: Define the variables as Dependent or Independent based on their dependency to other factors. 4. Scrutinizing the hypothesis: Identify the type of your hypothesis
Hypothesis testing is a statistical tool which is used to make inferences about a population data to draw conclusions for a particular hypothesis.
Hypothesis in statistics is a formal statement about the nature of a population within a structured framework of a statistical model. It is used to test an existing hypothesis by studying a population.
Research hypothesis is a statement that introduces a research question and proposes an expected result. It forms the basis of scientific experiments.
The different types of hypothesis in research are: • Null hypothesis: Null hypothesis is a negative statement to support the researcher’s findings that there is no relationship between two variables. • Alternate hypothesis: Alternate hypothesis predicts the relationship between the two variables of the study. • Directional hypothesis: Directional hypothesis specifies the expected direction to be followed to determine the relationship between variables. • Non-directional hypothesis: Non-directional hypothesis does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables. • Simple hypothesis: Simple hypothesis predicts the relationship between a single dependent variable and a single independent variable. • Complex hypothesis: Complex hypothesis predicts the relationship between two or more independent and dependent variables. • Associative and casual hypothesis: Associative and casual hypothesis predicts the relationship between two or more independent and dependent variables. • Empirical hypothesis: Empirical hypothesis can be tested via experiments and observation. • Statistical hypothesis: A statistical hypothesis utilizes statistical models to draw conclusions about broader populations.
![hypothesis in research sample ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/ap_avatars/cfcd208495d565ef66e7dff9f98764da.jpg)
Wow! You really simplified your explanation that even dummies would find it easy to comprehend. Thank you so much.
Thanks a lot for your valuable guidance.
I enjoy reading the post. Hypotheses are actually an intrinsic part in a study. It bridges the research question and the methodology of the study.
Useful piece!
This is awesome.Wow.
It very interesting to read the topic, can you guide me any specific example of hypothesis process establish throw the Demand and supply of the specific product in market
Nicely explained
It is really a useful for me Kindly give some examples of hypothesis
It was a well explained content ,can you please give me an example with the null and alternative hypothesis illustrated
clear and concise. thanks.
So Good so Amazing
Good to learn
Thanks a lot for explaining to my level of understanding
Explained well and in simple terms. Quick read! Thank you
It awesome. It has really positioned me in my research project
Brief and easily digested
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis in research sample](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/800-X-210-1.jpg)
Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles
![hypothesis in research sample Content Analysis vs Thematic Analysis: What's the difference?](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/FeatureImages-16-210x136.png)
- Reporting Research
Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for data interpretation
In research, choosing the right approach to understand data is crucial for deriving meaningful insights.…
![hypothesis in research sample Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study Design](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/FeatureImages-14-210x136.png)
Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right approach
The process of choosing the right research design can put ourselves at the crossroads of…
![hypothesis in research sample](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/COPE-Forum-Discussion-210x136.png)
- Industry News
COPE Forum Discussion Highlights Challenges and Urges Clarity in Institutional Authorship Standards
The COPE forum discussion held in December 2023 initiated with a fundamental question — is…
![hypothesis in research sample Networking in Academic Conferences](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ethical-research-15-210x136.png)
- Career Corner
Unlocking the Power of Networking in Academic Conferences
Embarking on your first academic conference experience? Fear not, we got you covered! Academic conferences…
![hypothesis in research sample Research recommendation](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/910x340-3-210x136.png)
Research Recommendations – Guiding policy-makers for evidence-based decision making
Research recommendations play a crucial role in guiding scholars and researchers toward fruitful avenues of…
Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for…
Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right…
How to Design Effective Research Questionnaires for Robust Findings
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis in research sample](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/iwwa_dashboard.png)
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
- 2000+ blog articles
- 50+ Webinars
- 10+ Expert podcasts
- 50+ Infographics
- 10+ Checklists
- Research Guides
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
- Publishing Research
- AI in Academia
- Promoting Research
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Infographics
- Expert Video Library
- Other Resources
- Enago Learn
- Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
- Peer Review Week 2024
- Open Access Week 2023
- Conference Videos
- Enago Report
- Journal Finder
- Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
- Editing Services
- Publication Support Services
- Research Impact
- Translation Services
- Publication solutions
- AI-Based Solutions
- Thought Leadership
- Call for Articles
- Call for Speakers
- Author Training
- Edit Profile
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis in research sample](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ai-survey-sticky.jpg)
In your opinion, what is the most effective way to improve integrity in the peer review process?
- Research Process
- Manuscript Preparation
- Manuscript Review
- Publication Process
- Publication Recognition
- Language Editing Services
- Translation Services
![hypothesis in research sample Elsevier QRcode Wechat](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/themes/authentic/images/wechat-qrcode.jpg)
Step-by-Step Guide: How to Craft a Strong Research Hypothesis
- 4 minute read
- 359.4K views
Table of Contents
A research hypothesis is a concise statement about the expected result of an experiment or project. In many ways, a research hypothesis represents the starting point for a scientific endeavor, as it establishes a tentative assumption that is eventually substantiated or falsified, ultimately improving our certainty about the subject investigated.
To help you with this and ease the process, in this article, we discuss the purpose of research hypotheses and list the most essential qualities of a compelling hypothesis. Let’s find out!
How to Craft a Research Hypothesis
Crafting a research hypothesis begins with a comprehensive literature review to identify a knowledge gap in your field. Once you find a question or problem, come up with a possible answer or explanation, which becomes your hypothesis. Now think about the specific methods of experimentation that can prove or disprove the hypothesis, which ultimately lead to the results of the study.
Enlisted below are some standard formats in which you can formulate a hypothesis¹ :
- A hypothesis can use the if/then format when it seeks to explore the correlation between two variables in a study primarily.
Example: If administered drug X, then patients will experience reduced fatigue from cancer treatment.
- A hypothesis can adopt when X/then Y format when it primarily aims to expose a connection between two variables
Example: When workers spend a significant portion of their waking hours in sedentary work , then they experience a greater frequency of digestive problems.
- A hypothesis can also take the form of a direct statement.
Example: Drug X and drug Y reduce the risk of cognitive decline through the same chemical pathways
What are the Features of an Effective Hypothesis?
Hypotheses in research need to satisfy specific criteria to be considered scientifically rigorous. Here are the most notable qualities of a strong hypothesis:
- Testability: Ensure the hypothesis allows you to work towards observable and testable results.
- Brevity and objectivity: Present your hypothesis as a brief statement and avoid wordiness.
- Clarity and Relevance: The hypothesis should reflect a clear idea of what we know and what we expect to find out about a phenomenon and address the significant knowledge gap relevant to a field of study.
Understanding Null and Alternative Hypotheses in Research
There are two types of hypotheses used commonly in research that aid statistical analyses. These are known as the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis . A null hypothesis is a statement assumed to be factual in the initial phase of the study.
For example, if a researcher is testing the efficacy of a new drug, then the null hypothesis will posit that the drug has no benefits compared to an inactive control or placebo . Suppose the data collected through a drug trial leads a researcher to reject the null hypothesis. In that case, it is considered to substantiate the alternative hypothesis in the above example, that the new drug provides benefits compared to the placebo.
Let’s take a closer look at the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis with two more examples:
Null Hypothesis:
The rate of decline in the number of species in habitat X in the last year is the same as in the last 100 years when controlled for all factors except the recent wildfires.
In the next experiment, the researcher will experimentally reject this null hypothesis in order to confirm the following alternative hypothesis :
The rate of decline in the number of species in habitat X in the last year is different from the rate of decline in the last 100 years when controlled for all factors other than the recent wildfires.
In the pair of null and alternative hypotheses stated above, a statistical comparison of the rate of species decline over a century and the preceding year will help the research experimentally test the null hypothesis, helping to draw scientifically valid conclusions about two factors—wildfires and species decline.
We also recommend that researchers pay attention to contextual echoes and connections when writing research hypotheses. Research hypotheses are often closely linked to the introduction ² , such as the context of the study, and can similarly influence the reader’s judgment of the relevance and validity of the research hypothesis.
Seasoned experts, such as professionals at Elsevier Language Services, guide authors on how to best embed a hypothesis within an article so that it communicates relevance and credibility. Contact us if you want help in ensuring readers find your hypothesis robust and unbiased.
References
- Hypotheses – The University Writing Center. (n.d.). https://writingcenter.tamu.edu/writing-speaking-guides/hypotheses
- Shaping the research question and hypothesis. (n.d.). Students. https://students.unimelb.edu.au/academic-skills/graduate-research-services/writing-thesis-sections-part-2/shaping-the-research-question-and-hypothesis
![hypothesis in research sample Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Systematic-Literature-Review-or-Literature-Review-560x420.jpg)
Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review?
![hypothesis in research sample Problem Statement](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Picture1-560x420.jpg)
How to Write an Effective Problem Statement for Your Research Paper
You may also like.
![hypothesis in research sample Academic paper format](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Academic-paper-format-320x240.jpg)
Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?
![hypothesis in research sample Being Mindful of Tone and Structure in Artilces](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Being-Mindful-of-Tone-and-Structure-in-Artilces-320x240.jpg)
Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!
![hypothesis in research sample How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/How-to-Ensure-Inclusivity-in-Your-Scientific-Writing-320x240.jpg)
A Must-see for Researchers! How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing
![hypothesis in research sample impactful introduction section](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/impactful-introduction-section-1-320x240.jpg)
Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions
![hypothesis in research sample Limitations of a Research](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Limitations-of-a-Research-320x240.jpg)
Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?
![hypothesis in research sample Guide to Crafting Impactful Sentences](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Guide-to-Crafting-Impactful-Sentences-320x240.jpg)
A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing
![hypothesis in research sample Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Write-an-Excellent-Discussion-in-Your-Manuscript-320x240.png)
6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript
![hypothesis in research sample How to Write Clear Civil Engineering Papers](https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/How-to-Write-Clear-Civil-Engineering-Papers-320x240.jpg)
How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
![hypothesis in research sample U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- J Korean Med Sci
- v.37(16); 2022 Apr 25
![hypothesis in research sample Logo of jkms](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/logo-jkms.jpg)
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles
Edward barroga.
1 Department of General Education, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Glafera Janet Matanguihan
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Messiah University, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA.
The development of research questions and the subsequent hypotheses are prerequisites to defining the main research purpose and specific objectives of a study. Consequently, these objectives determine the study design and research outcome. The development of research questions is a process based on knowledge of current trends, cutting-edge studies, and technological advances in the research field. Excellent research questions are focused and require a comprehensive literature search and in-depth understanding of the problem being investigated. Initially, research questions may be written as descriptive questions which could be developed into inferential questions. These questions must be specific and concise to provide a clear foundation for developing hypotheses. Hypotheses are more formal predictions about the research outcomes. These specify the possible results that may or may not be expected regarding the relationship between groups. Thus, research questions and hypotheses clarify the main purpose and specific objectives of the study, which in turn dictate the design of the study, its direction, and outcome. Studies developed from good research questions and hypotheses will have trustworthy outcomes with wide-ranging social and health implications.
INTRODUCTION
Scientific research is usually initiated by posing evidenced-based research questions which are then explicitly restated as hypotheses. 1 , 2 The hypotheses provide directions to guide the study, solutions, explanations, and expected results. 3 , 4 Both research questions and hypotheses are essentially formulated based on conventional theories and real-world processes, which allow the inception of novel studies and the ethical testing of ideas. 5 , 6
It is crucial to have knowledge of both quantitative and qualitative research 2 as both types of research involve writing research questions and hypotheses. 7 However, these crucial elements of research are sometimes overlooked; if not overlooked, then framed without the forethought and meticulous attention it needs. Planning and careful consideration are needed when developing quantitative or qualitative research, particularly when conceptualizing research questions and hypotheses. 4
There is a continuing need to support researchers in the creation of innovative research questions and hypotheses, as well as for journal articles that carefully review these elements. 1 When research questions and hypotheses are not carefully thought of, unethical studies and poor outcomes usually ensue. Carefully formulated research questions and hypotheses define well-founded objectives, which in turn determine the appropriate design, course, and outcome of the study. This article then aims to discuss in detail the various aspects of crafting research questions and hypotheses, with the goal of guiding researchers as they develop their own. Examples from the authors and peer-reviewed scientific articles in the healthcare field are provided to illustrate key points.
DEFINITIONS AND RELATIONSHIP OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
A research question is what a study aims to answer after data analysis and interpretation. The answer is written in length in the discussion section of the paper. Thus, the research question gives a preview of the different parts and variables of the study meant to address the problem posed in the research question. 1 An excellent research question clarifies the research writing while facilitating understanding of the research topic, objective, scope, and limitations of the study. 5
On the other hand, a research hypothesis is an educated statement of an expected outcome. This statement is based on background research and current knowledge. 8 , 9 The research hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a new phenomenon 10 or a formal statement on the expected relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. 3 , 11 It provides a tentative answer to the research question to be tested or explored. 4
Hypotheses employ reasoning to predict a theory-based outcome. 10 These can also be developed from theories by focusing on components of theories that have not yet been observed. 10 The validity of hypotheses is often based on the testability of the prediction made in a reproducible experiment. 8
Conversely, hypotheses can also be rephrased as research questions. Several hypotheses based on existing theories and knowledge may be needed to answer a research question. Developing ethical research questions and hypotheses creates a research design that has logical relationships among variables. These relationships serve as a solid foundation for the conduct of the study. 4 , 11 Haphazardly constructed research questions can result in poorly formulated hypotheses and improper study designs, leading to unreliable results. Thus, the formulations of relevant research questions and verifiable hypotheses are crucial when beginning research. 12
CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
Excellent research questions are specific and focused. These integrate collective data and observations to confirm or refute the subsequent hypotheses. Well-constructed hypotheses are based on previous reports and verify the research context. These are realistic, in-depth, sufficiently complex, and reproducible. More importantly, these hypotheses can be addressed and tested. 13
There are several characteristics of well-developed hypotheses. Good hypotheses are 1) empirically testable 7 , 10 , 11 , 13 ; 2) backed by preliminary evidence 9 ; 3) testable by ethical research 7 , 9 ; 4) based on original ideas 9 ; 5) have evidenced-based logical reasoning 10 ; and 6) can be predicted. 11 Good hypotheses can infer ethical and positive implications, indicating the presence of a relationship or effect relevant to the research theme. 7 , 11 These are initially developed from a general theory and branch into specific hypotheses by deductive reasoning. In the absence of a theory to base the hypotheses, inductive reasoning based on specific observations or findings form more general hypotheses. 10
TYPES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
Research questions and hypotheses are developed according to the type of research, which can be broadly classified into quantitative and qualitative research. We provide a summary of the types of research questions and hypotheses under quantitative and qualitative research categories in Table 1 .
Quantitative research questions | Quantitative research hypotheses |
---|---|
Descriptive research questions | Simple hypothesis |
Comparative research questions | Complex hypothesis |
Relationship research questions | Directional hypothesis |
Non-directional hypothesis | |
Associative hypothesis | |
Causal hypothesis | |
Null hypothesis | |
Alternative hypothesis | |
Working hypothesis | |
Statistical hypothesis | |
Logical hypothesis | |
Hypothesis-testing | |
Qualitative research questions | Qualitative research hypotheses |
Contextual research questions | Hypothesis-generating |
Descriptive research questions | |
Evaluation research questions | |
Explanatory research questions | |
Exploratory research questions | |
Generative research questions | |
Ideological research questions | |
Ethnographic research questions | |
Phenomenological research questions | |
Grounded theory questions | |
Qualitative case study questions |
Research questions in quantitative research
In quantitative research, research questions inquire about the relationships among variables being investigated and are usually framed at the start of the study. These are precise and typically linked to the subject population, dependent and independent variables, and research design. 1 Research questions may also attempt to describe the behavior of a population in relation to one or more variables, or describe the characteristics of variables to be measured ( descriptive research questions ). 1 , 5 , 14 These questions may also aim to discover differences between groups within the context of an outcome variable ( comparative research questions ), 1 , 5 , 14 or elucidate trends and interactions among variables ( relationship research questions ). 1 , 5 We provide examples of descriptive, comparative, and relationship research questions in quantitative research in Table 2 .
Quantitative research questions | |
---|---|
Descriptive research question | |
- Measures responses of subjects to variables | |
- Presents variables to measure, analyze, or assess | |
What is the proportion of resident doctors in the hospital who have mastered ultrasonography (response of subjects to a variable) as a diagnostic technique in their clinical training? | |
Comparative research question | |
- Clarifies difference between one group with outcome variable and another group without outcome variable | |
Is there a difference in the reduction of lung metastasis in osteosarcoma patients who received the vitamin D adjunctive therapy (group with outcome variable) compared with osteosarcoma patients who did not receive the vitamin D adjunctive therapy (group without outcome variable)? | |
- Compares the effects of variables | |
How does the vitamin D analogue 22-Oxacalcitriol (variable 1) mimic the antiproliferative activity of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D (variable 2) in osteosarcoma cells? | |
Relationship research question | |
- Defines trends, association, relationships, or interactions between dependent variable and independent variable | |
Is there a relationship between the number of medical student suicide (dependent variable) and the level of medical student stress (independent variable) in Japan during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic? |
Hypotheses in quantitative research
In quantitative research, hypotheses predict the expected relationships among variables. 15 Relationships among variables that can be predicted include 1) between a single dependent variable and a single independent variable ( simple hypothesis ) or 2) between two or more independent and dependent variables ( complex hypothesis ). 4 , 11 Hypotheses may also specify the expected direction to be followed and imply an intellectual commitment to a particular outcome ( directional hypothesis ) 4 . On the other hand, hypotheses may not predict the exact direction and are used in the absence of a theory, or when findings contradict previous studies ( non-directional hypothesis ). 4 In addition, hypotheses can 1) define interdependency between variables ( associative hypothesis ), 4 2) propose an effect on the dependent variable from manipulation of the independent variable ( causal hypothesis ), 4 3) state a negative relationship between two variables ( null hypothesis ), 4 , 11 , 15 4) replace the working hypothesis if rejected ( alternative hypothesis ), 15 explain the relationship of phenomena to possibly generate a theory ( working hypothesis ), 11 5) involve quantifiable variables that can be tested statistically ( statistical hypothesis ), 11 6) or express a relationship whose interlinks can be verified logically ( logical hypothesis ). 11 We provide examples of simple, complex, directional, non-directional, associative, causal, null, alternative, working, statistical, and logical hypotheses in quantitative research, as well as the definition of quantitative hypothesis-testing research in Table 3 .
Quantitative research hypotheses | |
---|---|
Simple hypothesis | |
- Predicts relationship between single dependent variable and single independent variable | |
If the dose of the new medication (single independent variable) is high, blood pressure (single dependent variable) is lowered. | |
Complex hypothesis | |
- Foretells relationship between two or more independent and dependent variables | |
The higher the use of anticancer drugs, radiation therapy, and adjunctive agents (3 independent variables), the higher would be the survival rate (1 dependent variable). | |
Directional hypothesis | |
- Identifies study direction based on theory towards particular outcome to clarify relationship between variables | |
Privately funded research projects will have a larger international scope (study direction) than publicly funded research projects. | |
Non-directional hypothesis | |
- Nature of relationship between two variables or exact study direction is not identified | |
- Does not involve a theory | |
Women and men are different in terms of helpfulness. (Exact study direction is not identified) | |
Associative hypothesis | |
- Describes variable interdependency | |
- Change in one variable causes change in another variable | |
A larger number of people vaccinated against COVID-19 in the region (change in independent variable) will reduce the region’s incidence of COVID-19 infection (change in dependent variable). | |
Causal hypothesis | |
- An effect on dependent variable is predicted from manipulation of independent variable | |
A change into a high-fiber diet (independent variable) will reduce the blood sugar level (dependent variable) of the patient. | |
Null hypothesis | |
- A negative statement indicating no relationship or difference between 2 variables | |
There is no significant difference in the severity of pulmonary metastases between the new drug (variable 1) and the current drug (variable 2). | |
Alternative hypothesis | |
- Following a null hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis predicts a relationship between 2 study variables | |
The new drug (variable 1) is better on average in reducing the level of pain from pulmonary metastasis than the current drug (variable 2). | |
Working hypothesis | |
- A hypothesis that is initially accepted for further research to produce a feasible theory | |
Dairy cows fed with concentrates of different formulations will produce different amounts of milk. | |
Statistical hypothesis | |
- Assumption about the value of population parameter or relationship among several population characteristics | |
- Validity tested by a statistical experiment or analysis | |
The mean recovery rate from COVID-19 infection (value of population parameter) is not significantly different between population 1 and population 2. | |
There is a positive correlation between the level of stress at the workplace and the number of suicides (population characteristics) among working people in Japan. | |
Logical hypothesis | |
- Offers or proposes an explanation with limited or no extensive evidence | |
If healthcare workers provide more educational programs about contraception methods, the number of adolescent pregnancies will be less. | |
Hypothesis-testing (Quantitative hypothesis-testing research) | |
- Quantitative research uses deductive reasoning. | |
- This involves the formation of a hypothesis, collection of data in the investigation of the problem, analysis and use of the data from the investigation, and drawing of conclusions to validate or nullify the hypotheses. |
Research questions in qualitative research
Unlike research questions in quantitative research, research questions in qualitative research are usually continuously reviewed and reformulated. The central question and associated subquestions are stated more than the hypotheses. 15 The central question broadly explores a complex set of factors surrounding the central phenomenon, aiming to present the varied perspectives of participants. 15
There are varied goals for which qualitative research questions are developed. These questions can function in several ways, such as to 1) identify and describe existing conditions ( contextual research question s); 2) describe a phenomenon ( descriptive research questions ); 3) assess the effectiveness of existing methods, protocols, theories, or procedures ( evaluation research questions ); 4) examine a phenomenon or analyze the reasons or relationships between subjects or phenomena ( explanatory research questions ); or 5) focus on unknown aspects of a particular topic ( exploratory research questions ). 5 In addition, some qualitative research questions provide new ideas for the development of theories and actions ( generative research questions ) or advance specific ideologies of a position ( ideological research questions ). 1 Other qualitative research questions may build on a body of existing literature and become working guidelines ( ethnographic research questions ). Research questions may also be broadly stated without specific reference to the existing literature or a typology of questions ( phenomenological research questions ), may be directed towards generating a theory of some process ( grounded theory questions ), or may address a description of the case and the emerging themes ( qualitative case study questions ). 15 We provide examples of contextual, descriptive, evaluation, explanatory, exploratory, generative, ideological, ethnographic, phenomenological, grounded theory, and qualitative case study research questions in qualitative research in Table 4 , and the definition of qualitative hypothesis-generating research in Table 5 .
Qualitative research questions | |
---|---|
Contextual research question | |
- Ask the nature of what already exists | |
- Individuals or groups function to further clarify and understand the natural context of real-world problems | |
What are the experiences of nurses working night shifts in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic? (natural context of real-world problems) | |
Descriptive research question | |
- Aims to describe a phenomenon | |
What are the different forms of disrespect and abuse (phenomenon) experienced by Tanzanian women when giving birth in healthcare facilities? | |
Evaluation research question | |
- Examines the effectiveness of existing practice or accepted frameworks | |
How effective are decision aids (effectiveness of existing practice) in helping decide whether to give birth at home or in a healthcare facility? | |
Explanatory research question | |
- Clarifies a previously studied phenomenon and explains why it occurs | |
Why is there an increase in teenage pregnancy (phenomenon) in Tanzania? | |
Exploratory research question | |
- Explores areas that have not been fully investigated to have a deeper understanding of the research problem | |
What factors affect the mental health of medical students (areas that have not yet been fully investigated) during the COVID-19 pandemic? | |
Generative research question | |
- Develops an in-depth understanding of people’s behavior by asking ‘how would’ or ‘what if’ to identify problems and find solutions | |
How would the extensive research experience of the behavior of new staff impact the success of the novel drug initiative? | |
Ideological research question | |
- Aims to advance specific ideas or ideologies of a position | |
Are Japanese nurses who volunteer in remote African hospitals able to promote humanized care of patients (specific ideas or ideologies) in the areas of safe patient environment, respect of patient privacy, and provision of accurate information related to health and care? | |
Ethnographic research question | |
- Clarifies peoples’ nature, activities, their interactions, and the outcomes of their actions in specific settings | |
What are the demographic characteristics, rehabilitative treatments, community interactions, and disease outcomes (nature, activities, their interactions, and the outcomes) of people in China who are suffering from pneumoconiosis? | |
Phenomenological research question | |
- Knows more about the phenomena that have impacted an individual | |
What are the lived experiences of parents who have been living with and caring for children with a diagnosis of autism? (phenomena that have impacted an individual) | |
Grounded theory question | |
- Focuses on social processes asking about what happens and how people interact, or uncovering social relationships and behaviors of groups | |
What are the problems that pregnant adolescents face in terms of social and cultural norms (social processes), and how can these be addressed? | |
Qualitative case study question | |
- Assesses a phenomenon using different sources of data to answer “why” and “how” questions | |
- Considers how the phenomenon is influenced by its contextual situation. | |
How does quitting work and assuming the role of a full-time mother (phenomenon assessed) change the lives of women in Japan? |
Qualitative research hypotheses | |
---|---|
Hypothesis-generating (Qualitative hypothesis-generating research) | |
- Qualitative research uses inductive reasoning. | |
- This involves data collection from study participants or the literature regarding a phenomenon of interest, using the collected data to develop a formal hypothesis, and using the formal hypothesis as a framework for testing the hypothesis. | |
- Qualitative exploratory studies explore areas deeper, clarifying subjective experience and allowing formulation of a formal hypothesis potentially testable in a future quantitative approach. |
Qualitative studies usually pose at least one central research question and several subquestions starting with How or What . These research questions use exploratory verbs such as explore or describe . These also focus on one central phenomenon of interest, and may mention the participants and research site. 15
Hypotheses in qualitative research
Hypotheses in qualitative research are stated in the form of a clear statement concerning the problem to be investigated. Unlike in quantitative research where hypotheses are usually developed to be tested, qualitative research can lead to both hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating outcomes. 2 When studies require both quantitative and qualitative research questions, this suggests an integrative process between both research methods wherein a single mixed-methods research question can be developed. 1
FRAMEWORKS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
Research questions followed by hypotheses should be developed before the start of the study. 1 , 12 , 14 It is crucial to develop feasible research questions on a topic that is interesting to both the researcher and the scientific community. This can be achieved by a meticulous review of previous and current studies to establish a novel topic. Specific areas are subsequently focused on to generate ethical research questions. The relevance of the research questions is evaluated in terms of clarity of the resulting data, specificity of the methodology, objectivity of the outcome, depth of the research, and impact of the study. 1 , 5 These aspects constitute the FINER criteria (i.e., Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, and Relevant). 1 Clarity and effectiveness are achieved if research questions meet the FINER criteria. In addition to the FINER criteria, Ratan et al. described focus, complexity, novelty, feasibility, and measurability for evaluating the effectiveness of research questions. 14
The PICOT and PEO frameworks are also used when developing research questions. 1 The following elements are addressed in these frameworks, PICOT: P-population/patients/problem, I-intervention or indicator being studied, C-comparison group, O-outcome of interest, and T-timeframe of the study; PEO: P-population being studied, E-exposure to preexisting conditions, and O-outcome of interest. 1 Research questions are also considered good if these meet the “FINERMAPS” framework: Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant, Manageable, Appropriate, Potential value/publishable, and Systematic. 14
As we indicated earlier, research questions and hypotheses that are not carefully formulated result in unethical studies or poor outcomes. To illustrate this, we provide some examples of ambiguous research question and hypotheses that result in unclear and weak research objectives in quantitative research ( Table 6 ) 16 and qualitative research ( Table 7 ) 17 , and how to transform these ambiguous research question(s) and hypothesis(es) into clear and good statements.
Variables | Unclear and weak statement (Statement 1) | Clear and good statement (Statement 2) | Points to avoid |
---|---|---|---|
Research question | Which is more effective between smoke moxibustion and smokeless moxibustion? | “Moreover, regarding smoke moxibustion versus smokeless moxibustion, it remains unclear which is more effective, safe, and acceptable to pregnant women, and whether there is any difference in the amount of heat generated.” | 1) Vague and unfocused questions |
2) Closed questions simply answerable by yes or no | |||
3) Questions requiring a simple choice | |||
Hypothesis | The smoke moxibustion group will have higher cephalic presentation. | “Hypothesis 1. The smoke moxibustion stick group (SM group) and smokeless moxibustion stick group (-SLM group) will have higher rates of cephalic presentation after treatment than the control group. | 1) Unverifiable hypotheses |
Hypothesis 2. The SM group and SLM group will have higher rates of cephalic presentation at birth than the control group. | 2) Incompletely stated groups of comparison | ||
Hypothesis 3. There will be no significant differences in the well-being of the mother and child among the three groups in terms of the following outcomes: premature birth, premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at < 37 weeks, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical cord blood pH < 7.1, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and intrauterine fetal death.” | 3) Insufficiently described variables or outcomes | ||
Research objective | To determine which is more effective between smoke moxibustion and smokeless moxibustion. | “The specific aims of this pilot study were (a) to compare the effects of smoke moxibustion and smokeless moxibustion treatments with the control group as a possible supplement to ECV for converting breech presentation to cephalic presentation and increasing adherence to the newly obtained cephalic position, and (b) to assess the effects of these treatments on the well-being of the mother and child.” | 1) Poor understanding of the research question and hypotheses |
2) Insufficient description of population, variables, or study outcomes |
a These statements were composed for comparison and illustrative purposes only.
b These statements are direct quotes from Higashihara and Horiuchi. 16
Variables | Unclear and weak statement (Statement 1) | Clear and good statement (Statement 2) | Points to avoid |
---|---|---|---|
Research question | Does disrespect and abuse (D&A) occur in childbirth in Tanzania? | How does disrespect and abuse (D&A) occur and what are the types of physical and psychological abuses observed in midwives’ actual care during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania? | 1) Ambiguous or oversimplistic questions |
2) Questions unverifiable by data collection and analysis | |||
Hypothesis | Disrespect and abuse (D&A) occur in childbirth in Tanzania. | Hypothesis 1: Several types of physical and psychological abuse by midwives in actual care occur during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. | 1) Statements simply expressing facts |
Hypothesis 2: Weak nursing and midwifery management contribute to the D&A of women during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. | 2) Insufficiently described concepts or variables | ||
Research objective | To describe disrespect and abuse (D&A) in childbirth in Tanzania. | “This study aimed to describe from actual observations the respectful and disrespectful care received by women from midwives during their labor period in two hospitals in urban Tanzania.” | 1) Statements unrelated to the research question and hypotheses |
2) Unattainable or unexplorable objectives |
a This statement is a direct quote from Shimoda et al. 17
The other statements were composed for comparison and illustrative purposes only.
CONSTRUCTING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
To construct effective research questions and hypotheses, it is very important to 1) clarify the background and 2) identify the research problem at the outset of the research, within a specific timeframe. 9 Then, 3) review or conduct preliminary research to collect all available knowledge about the possible research questions by studying theories and previous studies. 18 Afterwards, 4) construct research questions to investigate the research problem. Identify variables to be accessed from the research questions 4 and make operational definitions of constructs from the research problem and questions. Thereafter, 5) construct specific deductive or inductive predictions in the form of hypotheses. 4 Finally, 6) state the study aims . This general flow for constructing effective research questions and hypotheses prior to conducting research is shown in Fig. 1 .
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is jkms-37-e121-g001.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039193/bin/jkms-37-e121-g001.jpg)
Research questions are used more frequently in qualitative research than objectives or hypotheses. 3 These questions seek to discover, understand, explore or describe experiences by asking “What” or “How.” The questions are open-ended to elicit a description rather than to relate variables or compare groups. The questions are continually reviewed, reformulated, and changed during the qualitative study. 3 Research questions are also used more frequently in survey projects than hypotheses in experiments in quantitative research to compare variables and their relationships.
Hypotheses are constructed based on the variables identified and as an if-then statement, following the template, ‘If a specific action is taken, then a certain outcome is expected.’ At this stage, some ideas regarding expectations from the research to be conducted must be drawn. 18 Then, the variables to be manipulated (independent) and influenced (dependent) are defined. 4 Thereafter, the hypothesis is stated and refined, and reproducible data tailored to the hypothesis are identified, collected, and analyzed. 4 The hypotheses must be testable and specific, 18 and should describe the variables and their relationships, the specific group being studied, and the predicted research outcome. 18 Hypotheses construction involves a testable proposition to be deduced from theory, and independent and dependent variables to be separated and measured separately. 3 Therefore, good hypotheses must be based on good research questions constructed at the start of a study or trial. 12
In summary, research questions are constructed after establishing the background of the study. Hypotheses are then developed based on the research questions. Thus, it is crucial to have excellent research questions to generate superior hypotheses. In turn, these would determine the research objectives and the design of the study, and ultimately, the outcome of the research. 12 Algorithms for building research questions and hypotheses are shown in Fig. 2 for quantitative research and in Fig. 3 for qualitative research.
![Click on image to zoom An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is jkms-37-e121-g002.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039193/bin/jkms-37-e121-g002.jpg)
EXAMPLES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS FROM PUBLISHED ARTICLES
- EXAMPLE 1. Descriptive research question (quantitative research)
- - Presents research variables to be assessed (distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes)
- “BACKGROUND: Since COVID-19 was identified, its clinical and biological heterogeneity has been recognized. Identifying COVID-19 phenotypes might help guide basic, clinical, and translational research efforts.
- RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the clinical spectrum of patients with COVID-19 contain distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes? ” 19
- EXAMPLE 2. Relationship research question (quantitative research)
- - Shows interactions between dependent variable (static postural control) and independent variable (peripheral visual field loss)
- “Background: Integration of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive sensations contributes to postural control. People with peripheral visual field loss have serious postural instability. However, the directional specificity of postural stability and sensory reweighting caused by gradual peripheral visual field loss remain unclear.
- Research question: What are the effects of peripheral visual field loss on static postural control ?” 20
- EXAMPLE 3. Comparative research question (quantitative research)
- - Clarifies the difference among groups with an outcome variable (patients enrolled in COMPERA with moderate PH or severe PH in COPD) and another group without the outcome variable (patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH))
- “BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in COPD is a poorly investigated clinical condition.
- RESEARCH QUESTION: Which factors determine the outcome of PH in COPD?
- STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics and outcome of patients enrolled in the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) with moderate or severe PH in COPD as defined during the 6th PH World Symposium who received medical therapy for PH and compared them with patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) .” 21
- EXAMPLE 4. Exploratory research question (qualitative research)
- - Explores areas that have not been fully investigated (perspectives of families and children who receive care in clinic-based child obesity treatment) to have a deeper understanding of the research problem
- “Problem: Interventions for children with obesity lead to only modest improvements in BMI and long-term outcomes, and data are limited on the perspectives of families of children with obesity in clinic-based treatment. This scoping review seeks to answer the question: What is known about the perspectives of families and children who receive care in clinic-based child obesity treatment? This review aims to explore the scope of perspectives reported by families of children with obesity who have received individualized outpatient clinic-based obesity treatment.” 22
- EXAMPLE 5. Relationship research question (quantitative research)
- - Defines interactions between dependent variable (use of ankle strategies) and independent variable (changes in muscle tone)
- “Background: To maintain an upright standing posture against external disturbances, the human body mainly employs two types of postural control strategies: “ankle strategy” and “hip strategy.” While it has been reported that the magnitude of the disturbance alters the use of postural control strategies, it has not been elucidated how the level of muscle tone, one of the crucial parameters of bodily function, determines the use of each strategy. We have previously confirmed using forward dynamics simulations of human musculoskeletal models that an increased muscle tone promotes the use of ankle strategies. The objective of the present study was to experimentally evaluate a hypothesis: an increased muscle tone promotes the use of ankle strategies. Research question: Do changes in the muscle tone affect the use of ankle strategies ?” 23
EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHESES IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES
- EXAMPLE 1. Working hypothesis (quantitative research)
- - A hypothesis that is initially accepted for further research to produce a feasible theory
- “As fever may have benefit in shortening the duration of viral illness, it is plausible to hypothesize that the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen may be hindering the benefits of a fever response when taken during the early stages of COVID-19 illness .” 24
- “In conclusion, it is plausible to hypothesize that the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen may be hindering the benefits of a fever response . The difference in perceived safety of these agents in COVID-19 illness could be related to the more potent efficacy to reduce fever with ibuprofen compared to acetaminophen. Compelling data on the benefit of fever warrant further research and review to determine when to treat or withhold ibuprofen for early stage fever for COVID-19 and other related viral illnesses .” 24
- EXAMPLE 2. Exploratory hypothesis (qualitative research)
- - Explores particular areas deeper to clarify subjective experience and develop a formal hypothesis potentially testable in a future quantitative approach
- “We hypothesized that when thinking about a past experience of help-seeking, a self distancing prompt would cause increased help-seeking intentions and more favorable help-seeking outcome expectations .” 25
- “Conclusion
- Although a priori hypotheses were not supported, further research is warranted as results indicate the potential for using self-distancing approaches to increasing help-seeking among some people with depressive symptomatology.” 25
- EXAMPLE 3. Hypothesis-generating research to establish a framework for hypothesis testing (qualitative research)
- “We hypothesize that compassionate care is beneficial for patients (better outcomes), healthcare systems and payers (lower costs), and healthcare providers (lower burnout). ” 26
- Compassionomics is the branch of knowledge and scientific study of the effects of compassionate healthcare. Our main hypotheses are that compassionate healthcare is beneficial for (1) patients, by improving clinical outcomes, (2) healthcare systems and payers, by supporting financial sustainability, and (3) HCPs, by lowering burnout and promoting resilience and well-being. The purpose of this paper is to establish a scientific framework for testing the hypotheses above . If these hypotheses are confirmed through rigorous research, compassionomics will belong in the science of evidence-based medicine, with major implications for all healthcare domains.” 26
- EXAMPLE 4. Statistical hypothesis (quantitative research)
- - An assumption is made about the relationship among several population characteristics ( gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with ADHD ). Validity is tested by statistical experiment or analysis ( chi-square test, Students t-test, and logistic regression analysis)
- “Our research investigated gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with ADHD in a Japanese clinical sample. Due to unique Japanese cultural ideals and expectations of women's behavior that are in opposition to ADHD symptoms, we hypothesized that women with ADHD experience more difficulties and present more dysfunctions than men . We tested the following hypotheses: first, women with ADHD have more comorbidities than men with ADHD; second, women with ADHD experience more social hardships than men, such as having less full-time employment and being more likely to be divorced.” 27
- “Statistical Analysis
- ( text omitted ) Between-gender comparisons were made using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and Students t-test for continuous variables…( text omitted ). A logistic regression analysis was performed for employment status, marital status, and comorbidity to evaluate the independent effects of gender on these dependent variables.” 27
EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHESIS AS WRITTEN IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES IN RELATION TO OTHER PARTS
- EXAMPLE 1. Background, hypotheses, and aims are provided
- “Pregnant women need skilled care during pregnancy and childbirth, but that skilled care is often delayed in some countries …( text omitted ). The focused antenatal care (FANC) model of WHO recommends that nurses provide information or counseling to all pregnant women …( text omitted ). Job aids are visual support materials that provide the right kind of information using graphics and words in a simple and yet effective manner. When nurses are not highly trained or have many work details to attend to, these job aids can serve as a content reminder for the nurses and can be used for educating their patients (Jennings, Yebadokpo, Affo, & Agbogbe, 2010) ( text omitted ). Importantly, additional evidence is needed to confirm how job aids can further improve the quality of ANC counseling by health workers in maternal care …( text omitted )” 28
- “ This has led us to hypothesize that the quality of ANC counseling would be better if supported by job aids. Consequently, a better quality of ANC counseling is expected to produce higher levels of awareness concerning the danger signs of pregnancy and a more favorable impression of the caring behavior of nurses .” 28
- “This study aimed to examine the differences in the responses of pregnant women to a job aid-supported intervention during ANC visit in terms of 1) their understanding of the danger signs of pregnancy and 2) their impression of the caring behaviors of nurses to pregnant women in rural Tanzania.” 28
- EXAMPLE 2. Background, hypotheses, and aims are provided
- “We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate and compare changes in salivary cortisol and oxytocin levels of first-time pregnant women between experimental and control groups. The women in the experimental group touched and held an infant for 30 min (experimental intervention protocol), whereas those in the control group watched a DVD movie of an infant (control intervention protocol). The primary outcome was salivary cortisol level and the secondary outcome was salivary oxytocin level.” 29
- “ We hypothesize that at 30 min after touching and holding an infant, the salivary cortisol level will significantly decrease and the salivary oxytocin level will increase in the experimental group compared with the control group .” 29
- EXAMPLE 3. Background, aim, and hypothesis are provided
- “In countries where the maternal mortality ratio remains high, antenatal education to increase Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness (BPCR) is considered one of the top priorities [1]. BPCR includes birth plans during the antenatal period, such as the birthplace, birth attendant, transportation, health facility for complications, expenses, and birth materials, as well as family coordination to achieve such birth plans. In Tanzania, although increasing, only about half of all pregnant women attend an antenatal clinic more than four times [4]. Moreover, the information provided during antenatal care (ANC) is insufficient. In the resource-poor settings, antenatal group education is a potential approach because of the limited time for individual counseling at antenatal clinics.” 30
- “This study aimed to evaluate an antenatal group education program among pregnant women and their families with respect to birth-preparedness and maternal and infant outcomes in rural villages of Tanzania.” 30
- “ The study hypothesis was if Tanzanian pregnant women and their families received a family-oriented antenatal group education, they would (1) have a higher level of BPCR, (2) attend antenatal clinic four or more times, (3) give birth in a health facility, (4) have less complications of women at birth, and (5) have less complications and deaths of infants than those who did not receive the education .” 30
Research questions and hypotheses are crucial components to any type of research, whether quantitative or qualitative. These questions should be developed at the very beginning of the study. Excellent research questions lead to superior hypotheses, which, like a compass, set the direction of research, and can often determine the successful conduct of the study. Many research studies have floundered because the development of research questions and subsequent hypotheses was not given the thought and meticulous attention needed. The development of research questions and hypotheses is an iterative process based on extensive knowledge of the literature and insightful grasp of the knowledge gap. Focused, concise, and specific research questions provide a strong foundation for constructing hypotheses which serve as formal predictions about the research outcomes. Research questions and hypotheses are crucial elements of research that should not be overlooked. They should be carefully thought of and constructed when planning research. This avoids unethical studies and poor outcomes by defining well-founded objectives that determine the design, course, and outcome of the study.
Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author Contributions:
- Conceptualization: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
- Methodology: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
- Writing - original draft: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
- Writing - review & editing: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
![hypothesis in research sample](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/GC-Logo-Registered.png)
What Is A Research (Scientific) Hypothesis? A plain-language explainer + examples
By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020
If you’re new to the world of research, or it’s your first time writing a dissertation or thesis, you’re probably noticing that the words “research hypothesis” and “scientific hypothesis” are used quite a bit, and you’re wondering what they mean in a research context .
“Hypothesis” is one of those words that people use loosely, thinking they understand what it means. However, it has a very specific meaning within academic research. So, it’s important to understand the exact meaning before you start hypothesizing.
Research Hypothesis 101
- What is a hypothesis ?
- What is a research hypothesis (scientific hypothesis)?
- Requirements for a research hypothesis
- Definition of a research hypothesis
- The null hypothesis
What is a hypothesis?
Let’s start with the general definition of a hypothesis (not a research hypothesis or scientific hypothesis), according to the Cambridge Dictionary:
Hypothesis: an idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved.
In other words, it’s a statement that provides an explanation for why or how something works, based on facts (or some reasonable assumptions), but that has not yet been specifically tested . For example, a hypothesis might look something like this:
Hypothesis: sleep impacts academic performance.
This statement predicts that academic performance will be influenced by the amount and/or quality of sleep a student engages in – sounds reasonable, right? It’s based on reasonable assumptions , underpinned by what we currently know about sleep and health (from the existing literature). So, loosely speaking, we could call it a hypothesis, at least by the dictionary definition.
But that’s not good enough…
Unfortunately, that’s not quite sophisticated enough to describe a research hypothesis (also sometimes called a scientific hypothesis), and it wouldn’t be acceptable in a dissertation, thesis or research paper . In the world of academic research, a statement needs a few more criteria to constitute a true research hypothesis .
What is a research hypothesis?
A research hypothesis (also called a scientific hypothesis) is a statement about the expected outcome of a study (for example, a dissertation or thesis). To constitute a quality hypothesis, the statement needs to have three attributes – specificity , clarity and testability .
Let’s take a look at these more closely.
Need a helping hand?
Hypothesis Essential #1: Specificity & Clarity
A good research hypothesis needs to be extremely clear and articulate about both what’ s being assessed (who or what variables are involved ) and the expected outcome (for example, a difference between groups, a relationship between variables, etc.).
Let’s stick with our sleepy students example and look at how this statement could be more specific and clear.
Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.
As you can see, the statement is very specific as it identifies the variables involved (sleep hours and test grades), the parties involved (two groups of students), as well as the predicted relationship type (a positive relationship). There’s no ambiguity or uncertainty about who or what is involved in the statement, and the expected outcome is clear.
Contrast that to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – and you can see the difference. “Sleep” and “academic performance” are both comparatively vague , and there’s no indication of what the expected relationship direction is (more sleep or less sleep). As you can see, specificity and clarity are key.
![research-hypothesis-1 A good research hypothesis needs to be very clear about what’s being assessed and very specific about the expected outcome.](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/research-hypothesis-1.png)
Hypothesis Essential #2: Testability (Provability)
A statement must be testable to qualify as a research hypothesis. In other words, there needs to be a way to prove (or disprove) the statement. If it’s not testable, it’s not a hypothesis – simple as that.
For example, consider the hypothesis we mentioned earlier:
Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.
We could test this statement by undertaking a quantitative study involving two groups of students, one that gets 8 or more hours of sleep per night for a fixed period, and one that gets less. We could then compare the standardised test results for both groups to see if there’s a statistically significant difference.
Again, if you compare this to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – you can see that it would be quite difficult to test that statement, primarily because it isn’t specific enough. How much sleep? By who? What type of academic performance?
So, remember the mantra – if you can’t test it, it’s not a hypothesis 🙂
![hypothesis-requirement-2 A good research hypothesis must be testable. In other words, you must able to collect observable data in a scientifically rigorous fashion to test it.](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/hypothesis-requirement-2.png)
Defining A Research Hypothesis
You’re still with us? Great! Let’s recap and pin down a clear definition of a hypothesis.
A research hypothesis (or scientific hypothesis) is a statement about an expected relationship between variables, or explanation of an occurrence, that is clear, specific and testable.
So, when you write up hypotheses for your dissertation or thesis, make sure that they meet all these criteria. If you do, you’ll not only have rock-solid hypotheses but you’ll also ensure a clear focus for your entire research project.
What about the null hypothesis?
You may have also heard the terms null hypothesis , alternative hypothesis, or H-zero thrown around. At a simple level, the null hypothesis is the counter-proposal to the original hypothesis.
For example, if the hypothesis predicts that there is a relationship between two variables (for example, sleep and academic performance), the null hypothesis would predict that there is no relationship between those variables.
At a more technical level, the null hypothesis proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations and that any differences are due to chance alone.
And there you have it – hypotheses in a nutshell.
If you have any questions, be sure to leave a comment below and we’ll do our best to help you. If you need hands-on help developing and testing your hypotheses, consider our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the research journey.
![title= hypothesis in research sample](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/course.png)
Psst... there’s more!
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
17 Comments
Very useful information. I benefit more from getting more information in this regard.
Very great insight,educative and informative. Please give meet deep critics on many research data of public international Law like human rights, environment, natural resources, law of the sea etc
In a book I read a distinction is made between null, research, and alternative hypothesis. As far as I understand, alternative and research hypotheses are the same. Can you please elaborate? Best Afshin
This is a self explanatory, easy going site. I will recommend this to my friends and colleagues.
Very good definition. How can I cite your definition in my thesis? Thank you. Is nul hypothesis compulsory in a research?
It’s a counter-proposal to be proven as a rejection
Please what is the difference between alternate hypothesis and research hypothesis?
It is a very good explanation. However, it limits hypotheses to statistically tasteable ideas. What about for qualitative researches or other researches that involve quantitative data that don’t need statistical tests?
In qualitative research, one typically uses propositions, not hypotheses.
could you please elaborate it more
I’ve benefited greatly from these notes, thank you.
This is very helpful
well articulated ideas are presented here, thank you for being reliable sources of information
Excellent. Thanks for being clear and sound about the research methodology and hypothesis (quantitative research)
I have only a simple question regarding the null hypothesis. – Is the null hypothesis (Ho) known as the reversible hypothesis of the alternative hypothesis (H1? – How to test it in academic research?
this is very important note help me much more
Hi” best wishes to you and your very nice blog”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
- What Is Research Methodology? Simple Definition (With Examples) - Grad Coach - […] Contrasted to this, a quantitative methodology is typically used when the research aims and objectives are confirmatory in nature. For example,…
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Print Friendly
Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
A research hypothesis, in its plural form “hypotheses,” is a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study, established at its outset. It is a key component of the scientific method .
Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding
Some key points about hypotheses:
- A hypothesis expresses an expected pattern or relationship. It connects the variables under investigation.
- It is stated in clear, precise terms before any data collection or analysis occurs. This makes the hypothesis testable.
- A hypothesis must be falsifiable. It should be possible, even if unlikely in practice, to collect data that disconfirms rather than supports the hypothesis.
- Hypotheses guide research. Scientists design studies to explicitly evaluate hypotheses about how nature works.
- For a hypothesis to be valid, it must be testable against empirical evidence. The evidence can then confirm or disprove the testable predictions.
- Hypotheses are informed by background knowledge and observation, but go beyond what is already known to propose an explanation of how or why something occurs.
Predictions typically arise from a thorough knowledge of the research literature, curiosity about real-world problems or implications, and integrating this to advance theory. They build on existing literature while providing new insight.
Types of Research Hypotheses
Alternative hypothesis.
The research hypothesis is often called the alternative or experimental hypothesis in experimental research.
It typically suggests a potential relationship between two key variables: the independent variable, which the researcher manipulates, and the dependent variable, which is measured based on those changes.
The alternative hypothesis states a relationship exists between the two variables being studied (one variable affects the other).
A hypothesis is a testable statement or prediction about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a key component of the scientific method. Some key points about hypotheses:
- Important hypotheses lead to predictions that can be tested empirically. The evidence can then confirm or disprove the testable predictions.
In summary, a hypothesis is a precise, testable statement of what researchers expect to happen in a study and why. Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding.
An experimental hypothesis predicts what change(s) will occur in the dependent variable when the independent variable is manipulated.
It states that the results are not due to chance and are significant in supporting the theory being investigated.
The alternative hypothesis can be directional, indicating a specific direction of the effect, or non-directional, suggesting a difference without specifying its nature. It’s what researchers aim to support or demonstrate through their study.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis states no relationship exists between the two variables being studied (one variable does not affect the other). There will be no changes in the dependent variable due to manipulating the independent variable.
It states results are due to chance and are not significant in supporting the idea being investigated.
The null hypothesis, positing no effect or relationship, is a foundational contrast to the research hypothesis in scientific inquiry. It establishes a baseline for statistical testing, promoting objectivity by initiating research from a neutral stance.
Many statistical methods are tailored to test the null hypothesis, determining the likelihood of observed results if no true effect exists.
This dual-hypothesis approach provides clarity, ensuring that research intentions are explicit, and fosters consistency across scientific studies, enhancing the standardization and interpretability of research outcomes.
Nondirectional Hypothesis
A non-directional hypothesis, also known as a two-tailed hypothesis, predicts that there is a difference or relationship between two variables but does not specify the direction of this relationship.
It merely indicates that a change or effect will occur without predicting which group will have higher or lower values.
For example, “There is a difference in performance between Group A and Group B” is a non-directional hypothesis.
Directional Hypothesis
A directional (one-tailed) hypothesis predicts the nature of the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. It predicts in which direction the change will take place. (i.e., greater, smaller, less, more)
It specifies whether one variable is greater, lesser, or different from another, rather than just indicating that there’s a difference without specifying its nature.
For example, “Exercise increases weight loss” is a directional hypothesis.
![Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples 1 hypothesis](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/hypothesis.jpg)
Falsifiability
The Falsification Principle, proposed by Karl Popper , is a way of demarcating science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory or hypothesis to be considered scientific, it must be testable and irrefutable.
Falsifiability emphasizes that scientific claims shouldn’t just be confirmable but should also have the potential to be proven wrong.
It means that there should exist some potential evidence or experiment that could prove the proposition false.
However many confirming instances exist for a theory, it only takes one counter observation to falsify it. For example, the hypothesis that “all swans are white,” can be falsified by observing a black swan.
For Popper, science should attempt to disprove a theory rather than attempt to continually provide evidence to support a research hypothesis.
Can a Hypothesis be Proven?
Hypotheses make probabilistic predictions. They state the expected outcome if a particular relationship exists. However, a study result supporting a hypothesis does not definitively prove it is true.
All studies have limitations. There may be unknown confounding factors or issues that limit the certainty of conclusions. Additional studies may yield different results.
In science, hypotheses can realistically only be supported with some degree of confidence, not proven. The process of science is to incrementally accumulate evidence for and against hypothesized relationships in an ongoing pursuit of better models and explanations that best fit the empirical data. But hypotheses remain open to revision and rejection if that is where the evidence leads.
- Disproving a hypothesis is definitive. Solid disconfirmatory evidence will falsify a hypothesis and require altering or discarding it based on the evidence.
- However, confirming evidence is always open to revision. Other explanations may account for the same results, and additional or contradictory evidence may emerge over time.
We can never 100% prove the alternative hypothesis. Instead, we see if we can disprove, or reject the null hypothesis.
If we reject the null hypothesis, this doesn’t mean that our alternative hypothesis is correct but does support the alternative/experimental hypothesis.
Upon analysis of the results, an alternative hypothesis can be rejected or supported, but it can never be proven to be correct. We must avoid any reference to results proving a theory as this implies 100% certainty, and there is always a chance that evidence may exist which could refute a theory.
How to Write a Hypothesis
- Identify variables . The researcher manipulates the independent variable and the dependent variable is the measured outcome.
- Operationalized the variables being investigated . Operationalization of a hypothesis refers to the process of making the variables physically measurable or testable, e.g. if you are about to study aggression, you might count the number of punches given by participants.
- Decide on a direction for your prediction . If there is evidence in the literature to support a specific effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, write a directional (one-tailed) hypothesis. If there are limited or ambiguous findings in the literature regarding the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, write a non-directional (two-tailed) hypothesis.
- Make it Testable : Ensure your hypothesis can be tested through experimentation or observation. It should be possible to prove it false (principle of falsifiability).
- Clear & concise language . A strong hypothesis is concise (typically one to two sentences long), and formulated using clear and straightforward language, ensuring it’s easily understood and testable.
Consider a hypothesis many teachers might subscribe to: students work better on Monday morning than on Friday afternoon (IV=Day, DV= Standard of work).
Now, if we decide to study this by giving the same group of students a lesson on a Monday morning and a Friday afternoon and then measuring their immediate recall of the material covered in each session, we would end up with the following:
- The alternative hypothesis states that students will recall significantly more information on a Monday morning than on a Friday afternoon.
- The null hypothesis states that there will be no significant difference in the amount recalled on a Monday morning compared to a Friday afternoon. Any difference will be due to chance or confounding factors.
More Examples
- Memory : Participants exposed to classical music during study sessions will recall more items from a list than those who studied in silence.
- Social Psychology : Individuals who frequently engage in social media use will report higher levels of perceived social isolation compared to those who use it infrequently.
- Developmental Psychology : Children who engage in regular imaginative play have better problem-solving skills than those who don’t.
- Clinical Psychology : Cognitive-behavioral therapy will be more effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety over a 6-month period compared to traditional talk therapy.
- Cognitive Psychology : Individuals who multitask between various electronic devices will have shorter attention spans on focused tasks than those who single-task.
- Health Psychology : Patients who practice mindfulness meditation will experience lower levels of chronic pain compared to those who don’t meditate.
- Organizational Psychology : Employees in open-plan offices will report higher levels of stress than those in private offices.
- Behavioral Psychology : Rats rewarded with food after pressing a lever will press it more frequently than rats who receive no reward.
![Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples 2 Print Friendly, PDF & Email](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/three-icons-with-text-light-blue.jpg)
![hypothesis in research sample helpful professor logo](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/logo-new-font-323x42.png)
15 Hypothesis Examples
![hypothesis in research sample 15 Hypothesis Examples](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chris-200px.jpg)
Chris Drew (PhD)
Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]
Learn about our Editorial Process
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis definition and example, explained below](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/hypothesis-definition-and-example-1024x724.jpg)
A hypothesis is defined as a testable prediction , and is used primarily in scientific experiments as a potential or predicted outcome that scientists attempt to prove or disprove (Atkinson et al., 2021; Tan, 2022).
In my types of hypothesis article, I outlined 13 different hypotheses, including the directional hypothesis (which makes a prediction about an effect of a treatment will be positive or negative) and the associative hypothesis (which makes a prediction about the association between two variables).
This article will dive into some interesting examples of hypotheses and examine potential ways you might test each one.
Hypothesis Examples
1. “inadequate sleep decreases memory retention”.
Field: Psychology
Type: Causal Hypothesis A causal hypothesis explores the effect of one variable on another. This example posits that a lack of adequate sleep causes decreased memory retention. In other words, if you are not getting enough sleep, your ability to remember and recall information may suffer.
How to Test:
To test this hypothesis, you might devise an experiment whereby your participants are divided into two groups: one receives an average of 8 hours of sleep per night for a week, while the other gets less than the recommended sleep amount.
During this time, all participants would daily study and recall new, specific information. You’d then measure memory retention of this information for both groups using standard memory tests and compare the results.
Should the group with less sleep have statistically significant poorer memory scores, the hypothesis would be supported.
Ensuring the integrity of the experiment requires taking into account factors such as individual health differences, stress levels, and daily nutrition.
Relevant Study: Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance (Curcio, Ferrara & De Gennaro, 2006)
2. “Increase in Temperature Leads to Increase in Kinetic Energy”
Field: Physics
Type: Deductive Hypothesis The deductive hypothesis applies the logic of deductive reasoning – it moves from a general premise to a more specific conclusion. This specific hypothesis assumes that as temperature increases, the kinetic energy of particles also increases – that is, when you heat something up, its particles move around more rapidly.
This hypothesis could be examined by heating a gas in a controlled environment and capturing the movement of its particles as a function of temperature.
You’d gradually increase the temperature and measure the kinetic energy of the gas particles with each increment. If the kinetic energy consistently rises with the temperature, your hypothesis gets supporting evidence.
Variables such as pressure and volume of the gas would need to be held constant to ensure validity of results.
3. “Children Raised in Bilingual Homes Develop Better Cognitive Skills”
Field: Psychology/Linguistics
Type: Comparative Hypothesis The comparative hypothesis posits a difference between two or more groups based on certain variables. In this context, you might propose that children raised in bilingual homes have superior cognitive skills compared to those raised in monolingual homes.
Testing this hypothesis could involve identifying two groups of children: those raised in bilingual homes, and those raised in monolingual homes.
Cognitive skills in both groups would be evaluated using a standard cognitive ability test at different stages of development. The examination would be repeated over a significant time period for consistency.
If the group raised in bilingual homes persistently scores higher than the other, the hypothesis would thereby be supported.
The challenge for the researcher would be controlling for other variables that could impact cognitive development, such as socio-economic status, education level of parents, and parenting styles.
Relevant Study: The cognitive benefits of being bilingual (Marian & Shook, 2012)
4. “High-Fiber Diet Leads to Lower Incidences of Cardiovascular Diseases”
Field: Medicine/Nutrition
Type: Alternative Hypothesis The alternative hypothesis suggests an alternative to a null hypothesis. In this context, the implied null hypothesis could be that diet has no effect on cardiovascular health, which the alternative hypothesis contradicts by suggesting that a high-fiber diet leads to fewer instances of cardiovascular diseases.
To test this hypothesis, a longitudinal study could be conducted on two groups of participants; one adheres to a high-fiber diet, while the other follows a diet low in fiber.
After a fixed period, the cardiovascular health of participants in both groups could be analyzed and compared. If the group following a high-fiber diet has a lower number of recorded cases of cardiovascular diseases, it would provide evidence supporting the hypothesis.
Control measures should be implemented to exclude the influence of other lifestyle and genetic factors that contribute to cardiovascular health.
Relevant Study: Dietary fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease (King, 2005)
5. “Gravity Influences the Directional Growth of Plants”
Field: Agronomy / Botany
Type: Explanatory Hypothesis An explanatory hypothesis attempts to explain a phenomenon. In this case, the hypothesis proposes that gravity affects how plants direct their growth – both above-ground (toward sunlight) and below-ground (towards water and other resources).
The testing could be conducted by growing plants in a rotating cylinder to create artificial gravity.
Observations on the direction of growth, over a specified period, can provide insights into the influencing factors. If plants consistently direct their growth in a manner that indicates the influence of gravitational pull, the hypothesis is substantiated.
It is crucial to ensure that other growth-influencing factors, such as light and water, are uniformly distributed so that only gravity influences the directional growth.
6. “The Implementation of Gamified Learning Improves Students’ Motivation”
Field: Education
Type: Relational Hypothesis The relational hypothesis describes the relation between two variables. Here, the hypothesis is that the implementation of gamified learning has a positive effect on the motivation of students.
To validate this proposition, two sets of classes could be compared: one that implements a learning approach with game-based elements, and another that follows a traditional learning approach.
The students’ motivation levels could be gauged by monitoring their engagement, performance, and feedback over a considerable timeframe.
If the students engaged in the gamified learning context present higher levels of motivation and achievement, the hypothesis would be supported.
Control measures ought to be put into place to account for individual differences, including prior knowledge and attitudes towards learning.
Relevant Study: Does educational gamification improve students’ motivation? (Chapman & Rich, 2018)
7. “Mathematics Anxiety Negatively Affects Performance”
Field: Educational Psychology
Type: Research Hypothesis The research hypothesis involves making a prediction that will be tested. In this case, the hypothesis proposes that a student’s anxiety about math can negatively influence their performance in math-related tasks.
To assess this hypothesis, researchers must first measure the mathematics anxiety levels of a sample of students using a validated instrument, such as the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale.
Then, the students’ performance in mathematics would be evaluated through standard testing. If there’s a negative correlation between the levels of math anxiety and math performance (meaning as anxiety increases, performance decreases), the hypothesis would be supported.
It would be crucial to control for relevant factors such as overall academic performance and previous mathematical achievement.
8. “Disruption of Natural Sleep Cycle Impairs Worker Productivity”
Field: Organizational Psychology
Type: Operational Hypothesis The operational hypothesis involves defining the variables in measurable terms. In this example, the hypothesis posits that disrupting the natural sleep cycle, for instance through shift work or irregular working hours, can lessen productivity among workers.
To test this hypothesis, you could collect data from workers who maintain regular working hours and those with irregular schedules.
Measuring productivity could involve examining the worker’s ability to complete tasks, the quality of their work, and their efficiency.
If workers with interrupted sleep cycles demonstrate lower productivity compared to those with regular sleep patterns, it would lend support to the hypothesis.
Consideration should be given to potential confounding variables such as job type, worker age, and overall health.
9. “Regular Physical Activity Reduces the Risk of Depression”
Field: Health Psychology
Type: Predictive Hypothesis A predictive hypothesis involves making a prediction about the outcome of a study based on the observed relationship between variables. In this case, it is hypothesized that individuals who engage in regular physical activity are less likely to suffer from depression.
Longitudinal studies would suit to test this hypothesis, tracking participants’ levels of physical activity and their mental health status over time.
The level of physical activity could be self-reported or monitored, while mental health status could be assessed using standard diagnostic tools or surveys.
If data analysis shows that participants maintaining regular physical activity have a lower incidence of depression, this would endorse the hypothesis.
However, care should be taken to control other lifestyle and behavioral factors that could intervene with the results.
Relevant Study: Regular physical exercise and its association with depression (Kim, 2022)
10. “Regular Meditation Enhances Emotional Stability”
Type: Empirical Hypothesis In the empirical hypothesis, predictions are based on amassed empirical evidence . This particular hypothesis theorizes that frequent meditation leads to improved emotional stability, resonating with numerous studies linking meditation to a variety of psychological benefits.
Earlier studies reported some correlations, but to test this hypothesis directly, you’d organize an experiment where one group meditates regularly over a set period while a control group doesn’t.
Both groups’ emotional stability levels would be measured at the start and end of the experiment using a validated emotional stability assessment.
If regular meditators display noticeable improvements in emotional stability compared to the control group, the hypothesis gains credit.
You’d have to ensure a similar emotional baseline for all participants at the start to avoid skewed results.
11. “Children Exposed to Reading at an Early Age Show Superior Academic Progress”
Type: Directional Hypothesis The directional hypothesis predicts the direction of an expected relationship between variables. Here, the hypothesis anticipates that early exposure to reading positively affects a child’s academic advancement.
A longitudinal study tracking children’s reading habits from an early age and their consequent academic performance could validate this hypothesis.
Parents could report their children’s exposure to reading at home, while standardized school exam results would provide a measure of academic achievement.
If the children exposed to early reading consistently perform better acadically, it gives weight to the hypothesis.
However, it would be important to control for variables that might impact academic performance, such as socioeconomic background, parental education level, and school quality.
12. “Adopting Energy-efficient Technologies Reduces Carbon Footprint of Industries”
Field: Environmental Science
Type: Descriptive Hypothesis A descriptive hypothesis predicts the existence of an association or pattern related to variables. In this scenario, the hypothesis suggests that industries adopting energy-efficient technologies will resultantly show a reduced carbon footprint.
Global industries making use of energy-efficient technologies could track their carbon emissions over time. At the same time, others not implementing such technologies continue their regular tracking.
After a defined time, the carbon emission data of both groups could be compared. If industries that adopted energy-efficient technologies demonstrate a notable reduction in their carbon footprints, the hypothesis would hold strong.
In the experiment, you would exclude variations brought by factors such as industry type, size, and location.
13. “Reduced Screen Time Improves Sleep Quality”
Type: Simple Hypothesis The simple hypothesis is a prediction about the relationship between two variables, excluding any other variables from consideration. This example posits that by reducing time spent on devices like smartphones and computers, an individual should experience improved sleep quality.
A sample group would need to reduce their daily screen time for a pre-determined period. Sleep quality before and after the reduction could be measured using self-report sleep diaries and objective measures like actigraphy, monitoring movement and wakefulness during sleep.
If the data shows that sleep quality improved post the screen time reduction, the hypothesis would be validated.
Other aspects affecting sleep quality, like caffeine intake, should be controlled during the experiment.
Relevant Study: Screen time use impacts low‐income preschool children’s sleep quality, tiredness, and ability to fall asleep (Waller et al., 2021)
14. Engaging in Brain-Training Games Improves Cognitive Functioning in Elderly
Field: Gerontology
Type: Inductive Hypothesis Inductive hypotheses are based on observations leading to broader generalizations and theories. In this context, the hypothesis deduces from observed instances that engaging in brain-training games can help improve cognitive functioning in the elderly.
A longitudinal study could be conducted where an experimental group of elderly people partakes in regular brain-training games.
Their cognitive functioning could be assessed at the start of the study and at regular intervals using standard neuropsychological tests.
If the group engaging in brain-training games shows better cognitive functioning scores over time compared to a control group not playing these games, the hypothesis would be supported.
15. Farming Practices Influence Soil Erosion Rates
Type: Null Hypothesis A null hypothesis is a negative statement assuming no relationship or difference between variables. The hypothesis in this context asserts there’s no effect of different farming practices on the rates of soil erosion.
Comparing soil erosion rates in areas with different farming practices over a considerable timeframe could help test this hypothesis.
If, statistically, the farming practices do not lead to differences in soil erosion rates, the null hypothesis is accepted.
However, if marked variation appears, the null hypothesis is rejected, meaning farming practices do influence soil erosion rates. It would be crucial to control for external factors like weather, soil type, and natural vegetation.
The variety of hypotheses mentioned above underscores the diversity of research constructs inherent in different fields, each with its unique purpose and way of testing.
While researchers may develop hypotheses primarily as tools to define and narrow the focus of the study, these hypotheses also serve as valuable guiding forces for the data collection and analysis procedures, making the research process more efficient and direction-focused.
Hypotheses serve as a compass for any form of academic research. The diverse examples provided, from Psychology to Educational Studies, Environmental Science to Gerontology, clearly demonstrate how certain hypotheses suit specific fields more aptly than others.
It is important to underline that although these varied hypotheses differ in their structure and methods of testing, each endorses the fundamental value of empiricism in research. Evidence-based decision making remains at the heart of scholarly inquiry, regardless of the research field, thus aligning all hypotheses to the core purpose of scientific investigation.
Testing hypotheses is an essential part of the scientific method . By doing so, researchers can either confirm their predictions, giving further validity to an existing theory, or they might uncover new insights that could potentially shift the field’s understanding of a particular phenomenon. In either case, hypotheses serve as the stepping stones for scientific exploration and discovery.
Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., Cernat, A., Sakshaug, J. W., & Williams, R. A. (2021). SAGE research methods foundations . SAGE Publications Ltd.
Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., & De Gennaro, L. (2006). Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance. Sleep medicine reviews , 10 (5), 323-337.
Kim, J. H. (2022). Regular physical exercise and its association with depression: A population-based study short title: Exercise and depression. Psychiatry Research , 309 , 114406.
King, D. E. (2005). Dietary fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. Molecular nutrition & food research , 49 (6), 594-600.
Marian, V., & Shook, A. (2012, September). The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. In Cerebrum: the Dana forum on brain science (Vol. 2012). Dana Foundation.
Tan, W. C. K. (2022). Research Methods: A Practical Guide For Students And Researchers (Second Edition) . World Scientific Publishing Company.
Waller, N. A., Zhang, N., Cocci, A. H., D’Agostino, C., Wesolek‐Greenson, S., Wheelock, K., … & Resnicow, K. (2021). Screen time use impacts low‐income preschool children’s sleep quality, tiredness, and ability to fall asleep. Child: care, health and development, 47 (5), 618-626.
![hypothesis in research sample Chris](https://helpfulprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Chris-200px-150x150.jpg)
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 15 Green Flags in a Relationship
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 15 Signs you're Burnt Out, Not Lazy
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 15 Toxic Things Parents Say to their Children
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
How to Write a Research Hypothesis
- Research Process
- Peer Review
Since grade school, we've all been familiar with hypotheses. The hypothesis is an essential step of the scientific method. But what makes an effective research hypothesis, how do you create one, and what types of hypotheses are there? We answer these questions and more.
Updated on April 27, 2022
![hypothesis in research sample the word hypothesis being typed on white paper](https://images.prismic.io/aje-cms-production/How-to-Write-a-Research-Hypothesis_AJE%20Scholar.png?auto=compress,format&rect=0,0,1104,735&w=60)
What is a research hypothesis?
General hypothesis.
Since grade school, we've all been familiar with the term “hypothesis.” A hypothesis is a fact-based guess or prediction that has not been proven. It is an essential step of the scientific method. The hypothesis of a study is a drive for experimentation to either prove the hypothesis or dispute it.
Research Hypothesis
A research hypothesis is more specific than a general hypothesis. It is an educated, expected prediction of the outcome of a study that is testable.
What makes an effective research hypothesis?
A good research hypothesis is a clear statement of the relationship between a dependent variable(s) and independent variable(s) relevant to the study that can be disproven.
Research hypothesis checklist
Once you've written a possible hypothesis, make sure it checks the following boxes:
- It must be testable: You need a means to prove your hypothesis. If you can't test it, it's not a hypothesis.
- It must include a dependent and independent variable: At least one independent variable ( cause ) and one dependent variable ( effect ) must be included.
- The language must be easy to understand: Be as clear and concise as possible. Nothing should be left to interpretation.
- It must be relevant to your research topic: You probably shouldn't be talking about cats and dogs if your research topic is outer space. Stay relevant to your topic.
How to create an effective research hypothesis
Pose it as a question first.
Start your research hypothesis from a journalistic approach. Ask one of the five W's: Who, what, when, where, or why.
A possible initial question could be: Why is the sky blue?
Do the preliminary research
Once you have a question in mind, read research around your topic. Collect research from academic journals.
If you're looking for information about the sky and why it is blue, research information about the atmosphere, weather, space, the sun, etc.
Write a draft hypothesis
Once you're comfortable with your subject and have preliminary knowledge, create a working hypothesis. Don't stress much over this. Your first hypothesis is not permanent. Look at it as a draft.
Your first draft of a hypothesis could be: Certain molecules in the Earth's atmosphere are responsive to the sky being the color blue.
Make your working draft perfect
Take your working hypothesis and make it perfect. Narrow it down to include only the information listed in the “Research hypothesis checklist” above.
Now that you've written your working hypothesis, narrow it down. Your new hypothesis could be: Light from the sun hitting oxygen molecules in the sky makes the color of the sky appear blue.
Write a null hypothesis
Your null hypothesis should be the opposite of your research hypothesis. It should be able to be disproven by your research.
In this example, your null hypothesis would be: Light from the sun hitting oxygen molecules in the sky does not make the color of the sky appear blue.
Why is it important to have a clear, testable hypothesis?
One of the main reasons a manuscript can be rejected from a journal is because of a weak hypothesis. “Poor hypothesis, study design, methodology, and improper use of statistics are other reasons for rejection of a manuscript,” says Dr. Ish Kumar Dhammi and Dr. Rehan-Ul-Haq in Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.
According to Dr. James M. Provenzale in American Journal of Roentgenology , “The clear declaration of a research question (or hypothesis) in the Introduction is critical for reviewers to understand the intent of the research study. It is best to clearly state the study goal in plain language (for example, “We set out to determine whether condition x produces condition y.”) An insufficient problem statement is one of the more common reasons for manuscript rejection.”
Characteristics that make a hypothesis weak include:
- Unclear variables
- Unoriginality
- Too general
- Too specific
A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and methods . The goal of a paper is to prove or disprove a hypothesis - or to prove or disprove a null hypothesis. If the hypothesis is not a dependent variable of what is being studied, the paper's methods should come into question.
A strong hypothesis is essential to the scientific method. A hypothesis states an assumed relationship between at least two variables and the experiment then proves or disproves that relationship with statistical significance. Without a proven and reproducible relationship, the paper feeds into the reproducibility crisis. Learn more about writing for reproducibility .
In a study published in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India by Dr. Suvarna Satish Khadilkar, she reviewed 400 rejected manuscripts to see why they were rejected. Her studies revealed that poor methodology was a top reason for the submission having a final disposition of rejection.
Aside from publication chances, Dr. Gareth Dyke believes a clear hypothesis helps efficiency.
“Developing a clear and testable hypothesis for your research project means that you will not waste time, energy, and money with your work,” said Dyke. “Refining a hypothesis that is both meaningful, interesting, attainable, and testable is the goal of all effective research.”
Types of research hypotheses
There can be overlap in these types of hypotheses.
Simple hypothesis
A simple hypothesis is a hypothesis at its most basic form. It shows the relationship of one independent and one independent variable.
Example: Drinking soda (independent variable) every day leads to obesity (dependent variable).
Complex hypothesis
A complex hypothesis shows the relationship of two or more independent and dependent variables.
Example: Drinking soda (independent variable) every day leads to obesity (dependent variable) and heart disease (dependent variable).
Directional hypothesis
A directional hypothesis guesses which way the results of an experiment will go. It uses words like increase, decrease, higher, lower, positive, negative, more, or less. It is also frequently used in statistics.
Example: Humans exposed to radiation have a higher risk of cancer than humans not exposed to radiation.
Non-directional hypothesis
A non-directional hypothesis says there will be an effect on the dependent variable, but it does not say which direction.
Associative hypothesis
An associative hypothesis says that when one variable changes, so does the other variable.
Alternative hypothesis
An alternative hypothesis states that the variables have a relationship.
- The opposite of a null hypothesis
Example: An apple a day keeps the doctor away.
Null hypothesis
A null hypothesis states that there is no relationship between the two variables. It is posed as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.
Researchers use a null hypothesis to work to be able to reject it. A null hypothesis:
- Can never be proven
- Can only be rejected
- Is the opposite of an alternative hypothesis
Example: An apple a day does not keep the doctor away.
Logical hypothesis
A logical hypothesis is a suggested explanation while using limited evidence.
Example: Bats can navigate in the dark better than tigers.
In this hypothesis, the researcher knows that tigers cannot see in the dark, and bats mostly live in darkness.
Empirical hypothesis
An empirical hypothesis is also called a “working hypothesis.” It uses the trial and error method and changes around the independent variables.
- An apple a day keeps the doctor away.
- Two apples a day keep the doctor away.
- Three apples a day keep the doctor away.
In this case, the research changes the hypothesis as the researcher learns more about his/her research.
Statistical hypothesis
A statistical hypothesis is a look of a part of a population or statistical model. This type of hypothesis is especially useful if you are making a statement about a large population. Instead of having to test the entire population of Illinois, you could just use a smaller sample of people who live there.
Example: 70% of people who live in Illinois are iron deficient.
Causal hypothesis
A causal hypothesis states that the independent variable will have an effect on the dependent variable.
Example: Using tobacco products causes cancer.
Final thoughts
Make sure your research is error-free before you send it to your preferred journal . Check our our English Editing services to avoid your chances of desk rejection.
![hypothesis in research sample Jonny Rhein, BA](https://images.prismic.io/aje-cms-production/b0015dd6-3542-4b84-9559-87e153dccdac_JonnyRhein.jpg?auto=compress,format&w=48)
Jonny Rhein, BA
See our "Privacy Policy"
- How it works
![hypothesis in research sample researchprospect post subheader](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/3-3.webp)
How to Write a Hypothesis – Steps & Tips
Published by Alaxendra Bets at August 14th, 2021 , Revised On October 26, 2023
What is a Research Hypothesis?
You can test a research statement with the help of experimental or theoretical research, known as a hypothesis.
If you want to find out the similarities, differences, and relationships between variables, you must write a testable hypothesis before compiling the data, performing analysis, and generating results to complete.
The data analysis and findings will help you test the hypothesis and see whether it is true or false. Here is all you need to know about how to write a hypothesis for a dissertation .
Research Hypothesis Definition
Not sure what the meaning of the research hypothesis is?
A research hypothesis predicts an answer to the research question based on existing theoretical knowledge or experimental data.
Some studies may have multiple hypothesis statements depending on the research question(s). A research hypothesis must be based on formulas, facts, and theories. It should be testable by data analysis, observations, experiments, or other scientific methodologies that can refute or support the statement.
Variables in Hypothesis
Developing a hypothesis is easy. Most research studies have two or more variables in the hypothesis, particularly studies involving correlational and experimental research. The researcher can control or change the independent variable(s) while measuring and observing the independent variable(s).
“How long a student sleeps affects test scores.”
In the above statement, the dependent variable is the test score, while the independent variable is the length of time spent in sleep. Developing a hypothesis will be easy if you know your research’s dependent and independent variables.
Once you have developed a thesis statement, questions such as how to write a hypothesis for the dissertation and how to test a research hypothesis become pretty straightforward.
Looking for dissertation help?
Researchprospect to the rescue then.
We have expert writers on our team who are skilled at helping students with quantitative dissertations across a variety of STEM disciplines. Guaranteeing 100% satisfaction!
![hypothesis in research sample dissertation help](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/quantitative_dissertation_help-removebg-preview.webp)
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Write a Hypothesis
Here are the steps involved in how to write a hypothesis for a dissertation.
Step 1: Start with a Research Question
- Begin by asking a specific question about a topic of interest.
- This question should be clear, concise, and researchable.
Example: Does exposure to sunlight affect plant growth?
Step 2: Do Preliminary Research
- Before formulating a hypothesis, conduct background research to understand existing knowledge on the topic.
- Familiarise yourself with prior studies, theories, or observations related to the research question.
Step 3: Define Variables
- Independent Variable (IV): The factor that you change or manipulate in an experiment.
- Dependent Variable (DV): The factor that you measure.
Example: IV: Amount of sunlight exposure (e.g., 2 hours/day, 4 hours/day, 8 hours/day) DV: Plant growth (e.g., height in centimetres)
Step 4: Formulate the Hypothesis
- A hypothesis is a statement that predicts the relationship between variables.
- It is often written as an “if-then” statement.
Example: If plants receive more sunlight, then they will grow taller.
Step 5: Ensure it is Testable
A good hypothesis is empirically testable. This means you should be able to design an experiment or observation to test its validity.
Example: You can set up an experiment where plants are exposed to varying amounts of sunlight and then measure their growth over a period of time.
Step 6: Consider Potential Confounding Variables
- Confounding variables are factors other than the independent variable that might affect the outcome.
- It is important to identify these to ensure that they do not skew your results.
Example: Soil quality, water frequency, or type of plant can all affect growth. Consider keeping these constant in your experiment.
Step 7: Write the Null Hypothesis
- The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no effect or no relationship between the variables.
- It is what you aim to disprove or reject through your research.
Example: There is no difference in plant growth regardless of the amount of sunlight exposure.
Step 8: Test your Hypothesis
Design an experiment or conduct observations to test your hypothesis.
Example: Grow three sets of plants: one set exposed to 2 hours of sunlight daily, another exposed to 4 hours, and a third exposed to 8 hours. Measure and compare their growth after a set period.
Step 9: Analyse the Results
After testing, review your data to determine if it supports your hypothesis.
Step 10: Draw Conclusions
- Based on your findings, determine whether you can accept or reject the hypothesis.
- Remember, even if you reject your hypothesis, it’s a valuable result. It can guide future research and refine questions.
Three Ways to Phrase a Hypothesis
Try to use “if”… and “then”… to identify the variables. The independent variable should be present in the first part of the hypothesis, while the dependent variable will form the second part of the statement. Consider understanding the below research hypothesis example to create a specific, clear, and concise research hypothesis;
If an obese lady starts attending Zomba fitness classes, her health will improve.
In academic research, you can write the predicted variable relationship directly because most research studies correlate terms.
The number of Zomba fitness classes attended by the obese lady has a positive effect on health.
If your research compares two groups, then you can develop a hypothesis statement on their differences.
An obese lady who attended most Zumba fitness classes will have better health than those who attended a few.
How to Write a Null Hypothesis
If a statistical analysis is involved in your research, then you must create a null hypothesis. If you find any relationship between the variables, then the null hypothesis will be the default position that there is no relationship between them. H0 is the symbol for the null hypothesis, while the hypothesis is represented as H1. The null hypothesis will also answer your question, “How to test the research hypothesis in the dissertation.”
H0: The number of Zumba fitness classes attended by the obese lady does not affect her health.
H1: The number of Zumba fitness classes attended by obese lady positively affects health.
Also see: Your Dissertation in Education
Hypothesis Examples
Research Question: Does the amount of sunlight a plant receives affect its growth? Hypothesis: Plants that receive more sunlight will grow taller than plants that receive less sunlight.
Research Question: Do students who eat breakfast perform better in school exams than those who don’t? Hypothesis: Students who eat a morning breakfast will score higher on school exams compared to students who skip breakfast.
Research Question: Does listening to music while studying impact a student’s ability to retain information? Hypothesis 1 (Directional): Students who listen to music while studying will retain less information than those who study in silence. Hypothesis 2 (Non-directional): There will be a difference in information retention between students who listen to music while studying and those who study in silence.
How can ResearchProspect Help?
If you are unsure about how to rest a research hypothesis in a dissertation or simply unsure about how to develop a hypothesis for your research, then you can take advantage of our dissertation services which cover every tiny aspect of a dissertation project you might need help with including but not limited to setting up a hypothesis and research questions, help with individual chapters , full dissertation writing , statistical analysis , and much more.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the 5 rules for writing a good hypothesis.
- Clear Statement: State a clear relationship between variables.
- Testable: Ensure it can be investigated and measured.
- Specific: Avoid vague terms, be precise in predictions.
- Falsifiable: Design to allow potential disproof.
- Relevant: Address research question and align with existing knowledge.
What is a hypothesis in simple words?
A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction about something that can be tested. It is a statement that suggests a possible explanation for an event or phenomenon based on prior knowledge or observation. Scientists use hypotheses as a starting point for experiments to discover if they are true or false.
What is the hypothesis and examples?
A hypothesis is a testable prediction or explanation for an observation or phenomenon. For example, if plants are given sunlight, then they will grow. In this case, the hypothesis suggests that sunlight has a positive effect on plant growth. It can be tested by experimenting with plants in varying light conditions.
What is the hypothesis in research definition?
A hypothesis in research is a clear, testable statement predicting the possible outcome of a study based on prior knowledge and observation. It serves as the foundation for conducting experiments or investigations. Researchers test the validity of the hypothesis to draw conclusions and advance knowledge in a particular field.
Why is it called a hypothesis?
The term “hypothesis” originates from the Greek word “hypothesis,” which means “base” or “foundation.” It’s used to describe a foundational statement or proposition that can be tested. In scientific contexts, it denotes a tentative explanation for a phenomenon, serving as a starting point for investigation or experimentation.
You May Also Like
Let’s briefly examine the concept of research paradigms, their pillars, purposes, types, examples, and how they can be combined.
Make sure that your selected topic is intriguing, manageable, and relevant. Here are some guidelines to help understand how to find a good dissertation topic.
How to write a hypothesis for dissertation,? A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested with the help of experimental or theoretical research.
USEFUL LINKS
LEARNING RESOURCES
![hypothesis in research sample researchprospect-reviews-trust-site](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/researchprospect-reviews-trust-site.webp)
COMPANY DETAILS
![hypothesis in research sample Research-Prospect-Writing-Service](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Research-Prospect-Writing-Service.webp)
- How It Works
How to write a research hypothesis
Last updated
19 January 2023
Reviewed by
Miroslav Damyanov
Start with a broad subject matter that excites you, so your curiosity will motivate your work. Conduct a literature search to determine the range of questions already addressed and spot any holes in the existing research.
Narrow the topics that interest you and determine your research question. Rather than focusing on a hole in the research, you might choose to challenge an existing assumption, a process called problematization. You may also find yourself with a short list of questions or related topics.
Use the FINER method to determine the single problem you'll address with your research. FINER stands for:
I nteresting
You need a feasible research question, meaning that there is a way to address the question. You should find it interesting, but so should a larger audience. Rather than repeating research that others have already conducted, your research hypothesis should test something novel or unique.
The research must fall into accepted ethical parameters as defined by the government of your country and your university or college if you're an academic. You'll also need to come up with a relevant question since your research should provide a contribution to the existing research area.
This process typically narrows your shortlist down to a single problem you'd like to study and the variable you want to test. You're ready to write your hypothesis statements.
Make research less tedious
Dovetail streamlines research to help you uncover and share actionable insights
- Types of research hypotheses
It is important to narrow your topic down to one idea before trying to write your research hypothesis. You'll only test one problem at a time. To do this, you'll write two hypotheses – a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (Ha).
You'll come across many terms related to developing a research hypothesis or referring to a specific type of hypothesis. Let's take a quick look at these terms.
Null hypothesis
The term null hypothesis refers to a research hypothesis type that assumes no statistically significant relationship exists within a set of observations or data. It represents a claim that assumes that any observed relationship is due to chance. Represented as H0, the null represents the conjecture of the research.
Alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis accompanies the null hypothesis. It states that the situation presented in the null hypothesis is false or untrue, and claims an observed effect in your test. This is typically denoted by Ha or H(n), where “n” stands for the number of alternative hypotheses. You can have more than one alternative hypothesis.
Simple hypothesis
The term simple hypothesis refers to a hypothesis or theory that predicts the relationship between two variables - the independent (predictor) and the dependent (predicted).
Complex hypothesis
The term complex hypothesis refers to a model – either quantitative (mathematical) or qualitative . A complex hypothesis states the surmised relationship between two or more potentially related variables.
Directional hypothesis
When creating a statistical hypothesis, the directional hypothesis (the null hypothesis) states an assumption regarding one parameter of a population. Some academics call this the “one-sided” hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis indicates whether the researcher tests for a positive or negative effect by including either the greater than (">") or less than ("<") sign.
Non-directional hypothesis
We refer to the alternative hypothesis in a statistical research question as a non-directional hypothesis. It includes the not equal ("≠") sign to show that the research tests whether or not an effect exists without specifying the effect's direction (positive or negative).
Associative hypothesis
The term associative hypothesis assumes a link between two variables but stops short of stating that one variable impacts the other. Academic statistical literature asserts in this sense that correlation does not imply causation. So, although the hypothesis notes the correlation between two variables – the independent and dependent - it does not predict how the two interact.
Logical hypothesis
Typically used in philosophy rather than science, researchers can't test a logical hypothesis because the technology or data set doesn't yet exist. A logical hypothesis uses logic as the basis of its assumptions.
In some cases, a logical hypothesis can become an empirical hypothesis once technology provides an opportunity for testing. Until that time, the question remains too expensive or complex to address. Note that a logical hypothesis is not a statistical hypothesis.
Empirical hypothesis
When we consider the opposite of a logical hypothesis, we call this an empirical or working hypothesis. This type of hypothesis considers a scientifically measurable question. A researcher can consider and test an empirical hypothesis through replicable tests, observations, and measurements.
Statistical hypothesis
The term statistical hypothesis refers to a test of a theory that uses representative statistical models to test relationships between variables to draw conclusions regarding a large population. This requires an existing large data set, commonly referred to as big data, or implementing a survey to obtain original statistical information to form a data set for the study.
Testing this type of hypothesis requires the use of random samples. Note that the null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing.
Causal hypothesis
The term causal hypothesis refers to a research hypothesis that tests a cause-and-effect relationship. A causal hypothesis is utilized when conducting experimental or quasi-experimental research.
Descriptive hypothesis
The term descriptive hypothesis refers to a research hypothesis used in non-experimental research, specifying an influence in the relationship between two variables.
- What makes an effective research hypothesis?
An effective research hypothesis offers a clearly defined, specific statement, using simple wording that contains no assumptions or generalizations, and that you can test. A well-written hypothesis should predict the tested relationship and its outcome. It contains zero ambiguity and offers results you can observe and test.
The research hypothesis should address a question relevant to a research area. Overall, your research hypothesis needs the following essentials:
Hypothesis Essential #1: Specificity & Clarity
Hypothesis Essential #2: Testability (Provability)
- How to develop a good research hypothesis
In developing your hypothesis statements, you must pre-plan some of your statistical analysis. Once you decide on your problem to examine, determine three aspects:
the parameter you'll test
the test's direction (left-tailed, right-tailed, or non-directional)
the hypothesized parameter value
Any quantitative research includes a hypothesized parameter value of a mean, a proportion, or the difference between two proportions. Here's how to note each parameter:
Single mean (μ)
Paired means (μd)
Single proportion (p)
Difference between two independent means (μ1−μ2)
Difference between two proportions (p1−p2)
Simple linear regression slope (β)
Correlation (ρ)
Defining these parameters and determining whether you want to test the mean, proportion, or differences helps you determine the statistical tests you'll conduct to analyze your data. When writing your hypothesis, you only need to decide which parameter to test and in what overarching way.
The null research hypothesis must include everyday language, in a single sentence, stating the problem you want to solve. Write it as an if-then statement with defined variables. Write an alternative research hypothesis that states the opposite.
- What is the correct format for writing a hypothesis?
The following example shows the proper format and textual content of a hypothesis. It follows commonly accepted academic standards.
Null hypothesis (H0): High school students who participate in varsity sports as opposed to those who do not, fail to score higher on leadership tests than students who do not participate.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): High school students who play a varsity sport as opposed to those who do not participate in team athletics will score higher on leadership tests than students who do not participate in athletics.
The research question tests the correlation between varsity sports participation and leadership qualities expressed as a score on leadership tests. It compares the population of athletes to non-athletes.
- What are the five steps of a hypothesis?
Once you decide on the specific problem or question you want to address, you can write your research hypothesis. Use this five-step system to hone your null hypothesis and generate your alternative hypothesis.
Step 1 : Create your research question. This topic should interest and excite you; answering it provides relevant information to an industry or academic area.
Step 2 : Conduct a literature review to gather essential existing research.
Step 3 : Write a clear, strong, simply worded sentence that explains your test parameter, test direction, and hypothesized parameter.
Step 4 : Read it a few times. Have others read it and ask them what they think it means. Refine your statement accordingly until it becomes understandable to everyone. While not everyone can or will comprehend every research study conducted, any person from the general population should be able to read your hypothesis and alternative hypothesis and understand the essential question you want to answer.
Step 5 : Re-write your null hypothesis until it reads simply and understandably. Write your alternative hypothesis.
What is the Red Queen hypothesis?
Some hypotheses are well-known, such as the Red Queen hypothesis. Choose your wording carefully, since you could become like the famed scientist Dr. Leigh Van Valen. In 1973, Dr. Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis to describe coevolutionary activity, specifically reciprocal evolutionary effects between species to explain extinction rates in the fossil record.
Essentially, Van Valen theorized that to survive, each species remains in a constant state of adaptation, evolution, and proliferation, and constantly competes for survival alongside other species doing the same. Only by doing this can a species avoid extinction. Van Valen took the hypothesis title from the Lewis Carroll book, "Through the Looking Glass," which contains a key character named the Red Queen who explains to Alice that for all of her running, she's merely running in place.
- Getting started with your research
In conclusion, once you write your null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (Ha), you’ve essentially authored the elevator pitch of your research. These two one-sentence statements describe your topic in simple, understandable terms that both professionals and laymen can understand. They provide the starting point of your research project.
Should you be using a customer insights hub?
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Editor’s picks
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 22 August 2024
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 August 2024
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 30 April 2024
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Latest articles
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.
Get started for free
![hypothesis in research sample hypothesis in research sample](https://cdn.paperpal.com/assets/images/paperpal_editage_logo.webp)
How to Write a Hypothesis? Types and Examples
![hypothesis in research sample how to write a hypothesis for research](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/pexels-andrew-3178744-1-1170x780.jpg)
All research studies involve the use of the scientific method, which is a mathematical and experimental technique used to conduct experiments by developing and testing a hypothesis or a prediction about an outcome. Simply put, a hypothesis is a suggested solution to a problem. It includes elements that are expressed in terms of relationships with each other to explain a condition or an assumption that hasn’t been verified using facts. 1 The typical steps in a scientific method include developing such a hypothesis, testing it through various methods, and then modifying it based on the outcomes of the experiments.
A research hypothesis can be defined as a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study. 2 Hypotheses help guide the research process and supplement the aim of the study. After several rounds of testing, hypotheses can help develop scientific theories. 3 Hypotheses are often written as if-then statements.
Here are two hypothesis examples:
Dandelions growing in nitrogen-rich soils for two weeks develop larger leaves than those in nitrogen-poor soils because nitrogen stimulates vegetative growth. 4
If a company offers flexible work hours, then their employees will be happier at work. 5
Table of Contents
- What is a hypothesis?
- Types of hypotheses
- Characteristics of a hypothesis
- Functions of a hypothesis
- How to write a hypothesis
- Hypothesis examples
- Frequently asked questions
What is a hypothesis?
![hypothesis in research sample Figure 1. Steps in research design](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/how-to-write-a-hypotheses.png)
A hypothesis expresses an expected relationship between variables in a study and is developed before conducting any research. Hypotheses are not opinions but rather are expected relationships based on facts and observations. They help support scientific research and expand existing knowledge. An incorrectly formulated hypothesis can affect the entire experiment leading to errors in the results so it’s important to know how to formulate a hypothesis and develop it carefully.
A few sources of a hypothesis include observations from prior studies, current research and experiences, competitors, scientific theories, and general conditions that can influence people. Figure 1 depicts the different steps in a research design and shows where exactly in the process a hypothesis is developed. 4
There are seven different types of hypotheses—simple, complex, directional, nondirectional, associative and causal, null, and alternative.
Types of hypotheses
The seven types of hypotheses are listed below: 5 , 6,7
- Simple : Predicts the relationship between a single dependent variable and a single independent variable.
Example: Exercising in the morning every day will increase your productivity.
- Complex : Predicts the relationship between two or more variables.
Example: Spending three hours or more on social media daily will negatively affect children’s mental health and productivity, more than that of adults.
- Directional : Specifies the expected direction to be followed and uses terms like increase, decrease, positive, negative, more, or less.
Example: The inclusion of intervention X decreases infant mortality compared to the original treatment.
- Non-directional : Does not predict the exact direction, nature, or magnitude of the relationship between two variables but rather states the existence of a relationship. This hypothesis may be used when there is no underlying theory or if findings contradict prior research.
Example: Cats and dogs differ in the amount of affection they express.
- Associative and causal : An associative hypothesis suggests an interdependency between variables, that is, how a change in one variable changes the other.
Example: There is a positive association between physical activity levels and overall health.
A causal hypothesis, on the other hand, expresses a cause-and-effect association between variables.
Example: Long-term alcohol use causes liver damage.
- Null : Claims that the original hypothesis is false by showing that there is no relationship between the variables.
Example: Sleep duration does not have any effect on productivity.
- Alternative : States the opposite of the null hypothesis, that is, a relationship exists between two variables.
Example: Sleep duration affects productivity.
![hypothesis in research sample](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/05_GenericBanner_780x200px-13.png)
Characteristics of a hypothesis
So, what makes a good hypothesis? Here are some important characteristics of a hypothesis. 8,9
- Testable : You must be able to test the hypothesis using scientific methods to either accept or reject the prediction.
- Falsifiable : It should be possible to collect data that reject rather than support the hypothesis.
- Logical : Hypotheses shouldn’t be a random guess but rather should be based on previous theories, observations, prior research, and logical reasoning.
- Positive : The hypothesis statement about the existence of an association should be positive, that is, it should not suggest that an association does not exist. Therefore, the language used and knowing how to phrase a hypothesis is very important.
- Clear and accurate : The language used should be easily comprehensible and use correct terminology.
- Relevant : The hypothesis should be relevant and specific to the research question.
- Structure : Should include all the elements that make a good hypothesis: variables, relationship, and outcome.
Functions of a hypothesis
The following list mentions some important functions of a hypothesis: 1
- Maintains the direction and progress of the research.
- Expresses the important assumptions underlying the proposition in a single statement.
- Establishes a suitable context for researchers to begin their investigation and for readers who are referring to the final report.
- Provides an explanation for the occurrence of a specific phenomenon.
- Ensures selection of appropriate and accurate facts necessary and relevant to the research subject.
To summarize, a hypothesis provides the conceptual elements that complete the known data, conceptual relationships that systematize unordered elements, and conceptual meanings and interpretations that explain the unknown phenomena. 1
![hypothesis in research sample](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Banner1-1-1024x410.png)
How to write a hypothesis
Listed below are the main steps explaining how to write a hypothesis. 2,4,5
- Make an observation and identify variables : Observe the subject in question and try to recognize a pattern or a relationship between the variables involved. This step provides essential background information to begin your research.
For example, if you notice that an office’s vending machine frequently runs out of a specific snack, you may predict that more people in the office choose that snack over another.
- Identify the main research question : After identifying a subject and recognizing a pattern, the next step is to ask a question that your hypothesis will answer.
For example, after observing employees’ break times at work, you could ask “why do more employees take breaks in the morning rather than in the afternoon?”
- Conduct some preliminary research to ensure originality and novelty : Your initial answer, which is your hypothesis, to the question is based on some pre-existing information about the subject. However, to ensure that your hypothesis has not been asked before or that it has been asked but rejected by other researchers you would need to gather additional information.
For example, based on your observations you might state a hypothesis that employees work more efficiently when the air conditioning in the office is set at a lower temperature. However, during your preliminary research you find that this hypothesis was proven incorrect by a prior study.
- Develop a general statement : After your preliminary research has confirmed the originality of your proposed answer, draft a general statement that includes all variables, subjects, and predicted outcome. The statement could be if/then or declarative.
- Finalize the hypothesis statement : Use the PICOT model, which clarifies how to word a hypothesis effectively, when finalizing the statement. This model lists the important components required to write a hypothesis.
P opulation: The specific group or individual who is the main subject of the research
I nterest: The main concern of the study/research question
C omparison: The main alternative group
O utcome: The expected results
T ime: Duration of the experiment
Once you’ve finalized your hypothesis statement you would need to conduct experiments to test whether the hypothesis is true or false.
Hypothesis examples
The following table provides examples of different types of hypotheses. 10 ,11
Null | Hyperactivity is not related to eating sugar. |
There is no relationship between height and shoe size. | |
Alternative | Hyperactivity is positively related to eating sugar. |
There is a positive association between height and shoe size. | |
Simple | Students who eat breakfast perform better in exams than students who don’t eat breakfast. |
Reduced screen time improves sleep quality. | |
Complex | People with high-sugar diet and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression. |
Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone. | |
Directional | As job satisfaction increases, the rate of employee turnover decreases. |
Increase in sun exposure increases the risk of skin cancer. | |
Non-directional | College students will perform differently from elementary school students on a memory task. |
Advertising exposure correlates with variations in purchase decisions among consumers. | |
Associative | Hospitals have more sick people in them than other institutions in society. |
Watching TV is related to increased snacking. | |
Causal | Inadequate sleep decreases memory retention. |
Recreational drugs cause psychosis. |
![hypothesis in research sample](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/blog-banner_extra.png)
Key takeaways
Here’s a summary of all the key points discussed in this article about how to write a hypothesis.
- A hypothesis is an assumption about an association between variables made based on limited evidence, which should be tested.
- A hypothesis has four parts—the research question, independent variable, dependent variable, and the proposed relationship between the variables.
- The statement should be clear, concise, testable, logical, and falsifiable.
- There are seven types of hypotheses—simple, complex, directional, non-directional, associative and causal, null, and alternative.
- A hypothesis provides a focus and direction for the research to progress.
- A hypothesis plays an important role in the scientific method by helping to create an appropriate experimental design.
Frequently asked questions
Hypotheses and research questions have different objectives and structure. The following table lists some major differences between the two. 9
Includes a prediction based on the proposed research | No prediction is made |
Designed to forecast the relationship of and between two or more variables | Variables may be explored |
Closed ended | Open ended, invites discussion |
Used if the research topic is well established and there is certainty about the relationship between the variables | Used for new topics that haven’t been researched extensively. The relationship between different variables is less known |
Here are a few examples to differentiate between a research question and hypothesis.
What is the effect of eating an apple a day by adults aged over 60 years on the frequency of physician visits? | Eating an apple each day, after the age of 60, will result in a reduction of frequency of physician visits |
What is the effect of flexible or fixed working hours on employee job satisfaction? | Workplaces that offer flexible working hours report higher levels of employee job satisfaction than workplaces with fixed hours. |
Does drinking coffee in the morning affect employees’ productivity? | Drinking coffee in the morning improves employees’ productivity. |
Yes, here’s a simple checklist to help you gauge the effectiveness of your hypothesis. 9 1. When writing a hypothesis statement, check if it: 2. Predicts the relationship between the stated variables and the expected outcome. 3. Uses simple and concise language and is not wordy. 4. Does not assume readers’ knowledge about the subject. 5. Has observable, falsifiable, and testable results.
As mentioned earlier in this article, a hypothesis is an assumption or prediction about an association between variables based on observations and simple evidence. These statements are usually generic. Research objectives, on the other hand, are more specific and dictated by hypotheses. The same hypothesis can be tested using different methods and the research objectives could be different in each case. For example, Louis Pasteur observed that food lasts longer at higher altitudes, reasoned that it could be because the air at higher altitudes is cleaner (with fewer or no germs), and tested the hypothesis by exposing food to air cleaned in the laboratory. 12 Thus, a hypothesis is predictive—if the reasoning is correct, X will lead to Y—and research objectives are developed to test these predictions.
Null hypothesis testing is a method to decide between two assumptions or predictions between variables (null and alternative hypotheses) in a statistical relationship in a sample. The null hypothesis, denoted as H 0 , claims that no relationship exists between variables in a population and any relationship in the sample reflects a sampling error or occurrence by chance. The alternative hypothesis, denoted as H 1 , claims that there is a relationship in the population. In every study, researchers need to decide whether the relationship in a sample occurred by chance or reflects a relationship in the population. This is done by hypothesis testing using the following steps: 13 1. Assume that the null hypothesis is true. 2. Determine how likely the sample relationship would be if the null hypothesis were true. This probability is called the p value. 3. If the sample relationship would be extremely unlikely, reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. If the relationship would not be unlikely, accept the null hypothesis.
![hypothesis in research sample](https://pp-blog.paperpal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/01_WebBanner_780x200px-8.png)
To summarize, researchers should know how to write a good hypothesis to ensure that their research progresses in the required direction. A hypothesis is a testable prediction about any behavior or relationship between variables, usually based on facts and observation, and states an expected outcome.
We hope this article has provided you with essential insight into the different types of hypotheses and their functions so that you can use them appropriately in your next research project.
References
- Dalen, DVV. The function of hypotheses in research. Proquest website. Accessed April 8, 2024. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1437933010?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals&imgSeq=1
- McLeod S. Research hypothesis in psychology: Types & examples. SimplyPsychology website. Updated December 13, 2023. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://www.simplypsychology.org/what-is-a-hypotheses.html
- Scientific method. Britannica website. Updated March 14, 2024. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method
- The hypothesis in science writing. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://berks.psu.edu/sites/berks/files/campus/HypothesisHandout_Final.pdf
- How to develop a hypothesis (with elements, types, and examples). Indeed.com website. Updated February 3, 2023. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/how-to-write-a-hypothesis
- Types of research hypotheses. Excelsior online writing lab. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://owl.excelsior.edu/research/research-hypotheses/types-of-research-hypotheses/
- What is a research hypothesis: how to write it, types, and examples. Researcher.life website. Published February 8, 2023. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://researcher.life/blog/article/how-to-write-a-research-hypothesis-definition-types-examples/
- Developing a hypothesis. Pressbooks website. Accessed April 12, 2024. https://opentext.wsu.edu/carriecuttler/chapter/developing-a-hypothesis/
- What is and how to write a good hypothesis in research. Elsevier author services website. Accessed April 12, 2024. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/manuscript-preparation/what-how-write-good-hypothesis-research/
- How to write a great hypothesis. Verywellmind website. Updated March 12, 2023. Accessed April 13, 2024. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-hypothesis-2795239
- 15 Hypothesis examples. Helpfulprofessor.com Published September 8, 2023. Accessed March 14, 2024. https://helpfulprofessor.com/hypothesis-examples/
- Editage insights. What is the interconnectivity between research objectives and hypothesis? Published February 24, 2021. Accessed April 13, 2024. https://www.editage.com/insights/what-is-the-interconnectivity-between-research-objectives-and-hypothesis
- Understanding null hypothesis testing. BCCampus open publishing. Accessed April 16, 2024. https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods/chapter/understanding-null-hypothesis-testing/#:~:text=In%20null%20hypothesis%20testing%2C%20this,said%20to%20be%20statistically%20significant
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
Related Reads:
- What is an Argumentative Essay? How to Write It (With Examples)
- Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics
- How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 Steps
- What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)
Measuring Academic Success: Definition & Strategies for Excellence
What are scholarly sources and where can you find them , you may also like, dissertation printing and binding | types & comparison , what is a dissertation preface definition and examples , how to write a research proposal: (with examples..., how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers....
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Starting the research process
- 10 Research Question Examples to Guide Your Research Project
10 Research Question Examples to Guide your Research Project
Published on October 30, 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on October 19, 2023.
The research question is one of the most important parts of your research paper , thesis or dissertation . It’s important to spend some time assessing and refining your question before you get started.
The exact form of your question will depend on a few things, such as the length of your project, the type of research you’re conducting, the topic , and the research problem . However, all research questions should be focused, specific, and relevant to a timely social or scholarly issue.
Once you’ve read our guide on how to write a research question , you can use these examples to craft your own.
Research question | Explanation |
---|---|
The first question is not enough. The second question is more , using . | |
Starting with “why” often means that your question is not enough: there are too many possible answers. By targeting just one aspect of the problem, the second question offers a clear path for research. | |
The first question is too broad and subjective: there’s no clear criteria for what counts as “better.” The second question is much more . It uses clearly defined terms and narrows its focus to a specific population. | |
It is generally not for academic research to answer broad normative questions. The second question is more specific, aiming to gain an understanding of possible solutions in order to make informed recommendations. | |
The first question is too simple: it can be answered with a simple yes or no. The second question is , requiring in-depth investigation and the development of an original argument. | |
The first question is too broad and not very . The second question identifies an underexplored aspect of the topic that requires investigation of various to answer. | |
The first question is not enough: it tries to address two different (the quality of sexual health services and LGBT support services). Even though the two issues are related, it’s not clear how the research will bring them together. The second integrates the two problems into one focused, specific question. | |
The first question is too simple, asking for a straightforward fact that can be easily found online. The second is a more question that requires and detailed discussion to answer. | |
? dealt with the theme of racism through casting, staging, and allusion to contemporary events? | The first question is not — it would be very difficult to contribute anything new. The second question takes a specific angle to make an original argument, and has more relevance to current social concerns and debates. |
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not . The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically . For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries. |
Note that the design of your research question can depend on what method you are pursuing. Here are a few options for qualitative, quantitative, and statistical research questions.
Type of research | Example question |
---|---|
Qualitative research question | |
Quantitative research question | |
Statistical research question |
Other interesting articles
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
- Sampling methods
- Simple random sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Cluster sampling
- Likert scales
- Reproducibility
Statistics
- Null hypothesis
- Statistical power
- Probability distribution
- Effect size
- Poisson distribution
Research bias
- Optimism bias
- Cognitive bias
- Implicit bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Anchoring bias
- Explicit bias
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, October 19). 10 Research Question Examples to Guide your Research Project. Scribbr. Retrieved August 28, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-question-examples/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to choose a dissertation topic | 8 steps to follow, evaluating sources | methods & examples, what is your plagiarism score.
- Open access
- Published: 24 August 2024
A (poly)phenol-rich diet reduces serum and faecal calprotectin in older adults with increased intestinal permeability: the MaPLE randomised controlled trial
- Mirko Marino 1 ,
- Cristian Del Bo’ 1 ,
- Daniela Martini 1 ,
- Simone Perna 1 ,
- Marisa Porrini 1 ,
- Antonio Cherubini 2 , 3 ,
- Giorgio Gargari 4 ,
- Tomás Meroño 5 ,
- Nicole Hidalgo-Liberona 5 ,
- Cristina Andres-Lacueva 5 ,
- Paul A Kroon 6 ,
- Simone Guglielmetti 7 &
- Patrizia Riso 1
BMC Geriatrics volume 24 , Article number: 707 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
45 Accesses
Metrics details
Older subjects are at risk of elevated intestinal permeability (IP) which can lead to immune system activation and low-grade systemic inflammation. Dietary changes are a potential strategy to reduce IP. The MaPLE project evaluated the hypothesis that increasing (poly)phenol intake would beneficially impact on several important markers and pathways related to IP. The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of the MaPLE (poly)phenol-rich diet (PR-diet) on additional IP-related biomarkers and any relationships between biomarker responses.
A randomised, controlled, crossover study was performed involving 51 participants (≥ 60 y) with increased IP, as determined by serum zonulin levels. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: a control diet (C-diet) or a PR-diet. Each intervention lasted 8 weeks and was separated by an 8-week washout period. For the present study, serum and faecal samples were used to measure zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), occludin, adiponectin, calprotectin, faecal calprotectin, soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14), interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), and vascular endothelial-cadherin (VEC) levels using quantitative ELISA assays. Data were analysed using ANOVA, and Spearman and network correlation analysis were performed to identify the relationship among biomarkers at baseline.
Among the different markers analysed, a significant reduction was observed for faecal and serum calprotectin ( p = 0.0378 and p = 0.0186, respectively) following the PR-diet, while a significant increase in ZO-1 was found ( p = 0.001) after both the intervention periods (PR-diet and C-diet). In addition, a time effect was observed for VEC levels showing a reduction ( p = 0.038) following the PR-diet. Based on network correlation analysis, two clusters of correlations were identified: one cluster with high levels of serum calprotectin, faecal calprotectin, sCD14, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-reactive protein (CRP) and bacterial DNAemia (16 S rRNA gene copies), with potential inflammatory-induced intestinal permeability. Differently, the other cluster had high levels of serum occludin, IL-6R, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and VEC, with potential inflammatory-induced endothelial dysfunction.
Conclusions
Overall, this study provides further support to the hypothesis that a (poly)phenol-rich diet may help to ameliorate intestinal permeability-associated conditions. In this regard, calprotectin might represent a promising biomarker since it is a protein that typically increases with age and it is considered indicative of intestinal and systemic inflammation. Further research is needed to develop targeted (poly)phenol-rich diets against age-related gut dysfunction and inflammation.
Trial registration
28/04/2017; ISRCTN10214981; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10214981 .
Peer Review reports
The intestinal barrier (IB) serves as a crucial physical and functional barrier, maintaining separation between the external environment and the systemic circulation. It plays a vital role in various essential functions, such as controlling the selective uptake of numerous substances [ 1 ]. The transport of molecules across the intestinal epithelium occurs through two major pathways: transcellular and paracellular routes. The transcellular route involves carrier-mediated transport facilitated by transporters and channels, while the paracellular route relies on diffusion and is not carrier-mediated [ 2 ]. An intact intestinal barrier (IB) is crucial for preventing the entry of pathogens, toxins, antigens, and pro-inflammatory agents [ 3 ]. This barrier is regulated by specialized transmembrane proteins called tight junctions (TJs) that are found at the connections between epithelial cells. These TJs play a vital role in controlling intestinal permeability (IP), which governs the exchange of molecules, such as solutes and fluids, between the intestinal lumen and the bloodstream [ 4 ]. When TJs are disrupted, paracellular permeability increases, allowing the passage of molecules via an unregulated diffusion process even if their molecular weight exceeds 150 Da [ 5 ]. This disruption results in a “leaky” intestine and an elevation in IP.
In this regard, emerging evidence suggests that aging might be associated with increased IP, contributing to the development of chronic low-grade inflammation, also known as inflammaging. In particular, pro-inflammatory molecules permeate from the intestinal lumen to the mucosal layer and eventually enter the bloodstream, triggering the activation of the mucosal immune system. Prolonged activation of the immune system leads to chronic inflammation, tissue damage, and subsequent systemic inflammatory responses, which can give rise to various age-related pathologies, including metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular disease [ 6 ]. However, the evaluation of IP in humans can be challenging for several reasons. Direct measure of IP, which involves the use of biopsies, is highly accurate but invasive and not applicable for routine clinical use [ 7 ]. Non-invasive techniques are preferred for assessing IP in humans. For example, the measurement of lactulose and mannitol excretion in urine after their oral administration as a test solution can indicate changes in IP. This approach relies on the differential molecular size of lactulose and mannitol to assess permeability. However, it is noteworthy that the method lacks specificity, as it can be influenced by factors like renal clearance and should be interpreted cautiously [ 8 ]. Also, blood tests can be used to assess the levels of certain biomarkers like zonulin and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which are associated with IP [ 9 ]. However, these biomarkers may not be exclusive to IP, making the interpretation challenging. Thus, there is specific interest in promoting research able to identify one or a set of markers potentially useful to target IP and related conditions and to verify the impact of intervention strategies.
Within this framework, diet could have a profound impact on gut function and overall gastrointestinal health due to a combination of various food components, including macronutrients, micronutrients, fibre, and bioactive compounds [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. It has been reported that specific dietary patterns, such as the Western diet characterised by a high intake of processed foods, red meat, and sugary beverages, are linked to an increased risk of developing gastrointestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and colorectal cancer [ 13 , 14 ]. In contrast, a balanced and diverse diet rich in food bioactives contributes to optimal gut function [ 15 ]. For instance, (poly)phenols have been proposed as potential modulators of IP. (Poly)phenols are a diverse group of plant-derived compounds that have been shown to exert antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties at both intestinal and systemic levels [ 16 ]. (Poly)phenols could act on various aspects of the intestinal barrier, both directly and indirectly. These include regulating tight junction function, modulating the production of inflammatory cytokines, and activating antioxidant genes [ 17 ]. Additionally, (poly)phenols are significantly metabolised by the gut microbiota, thus affecting the intestinal microbial ecosystem. Despite increasing evidence supporting the role of (poly)phenols in regulating IP, the precise mechanisms of action remain not completely understood. Moreover, there is a scarcity of human intervention studies that have specifically investigated the impact of (poly)phenols on IP. Additionally, although novel biomarkers for assessing IP have been proposed, there is still limited understanding of the roles of these molecules within the context of intestinal physiopathology thus posing challenges in interpreting the study findings.
In the context of the MaPLE (Microbiome mAnipulation through Polyphenols for managing Leakiness in the Elderly) project, we have obtained significant findings that underline the complexity of evaluating intestinal permeability (IP) and the associated challenges. Our randomised controlled crossover intervention with a (poly)phenol-rich diet (PR-diet) demonstrated a reduction in serum zonulin levels, particularly in women and in subjects with high initial zonulin levels, who also experienced reductions in diastolic blood pressure and blood glucose levels [ 18 ]. Additionally, we observed a negative correlation between fiber-fermenting and butyrate-producing bacteria and markers of inflammation, indicating a link between gut bacterial composition and inflammatory status [ 18 ]. The PR-diet also significantly increased these beneficial bacteria, reinforcing the interaction between fiber, (poly)phenols, and gut microbiota activity [ 18 ]. Moreover, metabolites produced following the PR-diet intervention were inversely associated with serum zonulin levels, and we noted differences in (poly)phenol metabolism based on serum zonulin levels [ 19 , 20 ]. Further, our findings revealed a positive association between serum zonulin and blood DNAemia, suggesting that paracellular permeability of epithelial and endothelial cell layers may facilitate bacterial translocation into the bloodstream [ 21 ]. The PR-diet intervention significantly reduced serum zonulin and interleukin-6 levels in subjects with higher blood DNAemia, with trends towards reductions in bacterial DNAemia, BMI, and TC/HDL ratio [ 22 ]. Collectively, these results indicate that a PR-diet may be a promising approach for managing IP, inflammation, and gut function.
Given the complexity highlighted by these results, it becomes evident that evaluating IP is multifaceted and requires additional biomarkers to better validate the effects of a (poly)phenol-rich dietary pattern. There is a pressing need to identify a panel of biomarkers that can effectively cluster subjects and more accurately reflect their intestinal health. Such an approach will not only enhance our understanding of the role of PR-diets in managing IP but also contribute to the development of reliable and accurate biomarkers for IP assessment, potentially serving as alternatives to the current gold standard methodologies when they are not applicable.
Therefore, the objective of this study was twofold. First, to assess the impact of the diet rich in (poly)phenols on selected biomarkers chosen due to their potential involvement in IP. Second, to identify potential clusters of markers that could function as indicators of physiological perturbations associated with IP in the older population.
Study design, subject selection, and characteristics of participants
Detailed information about the study design, subject selection and the characteristics of the participants is reported in Guglielmetti et al., [ 23 ] and Del Bo’ et al., [ 18 ]. Briefly, a total of 51 older subjects were enrolled at Civitas Vitae (OIC Foundation, Padua, Italy). The selection of subjects was carried out in collaboration with physicians and staff at Civitas Vitae [ 23 ]. Older subjects (age ≥ 60 years) with increased IP (evaluated by serum zonulin levels), a favourable nutritional and cognitive status, no current history of diabetes, heart disease and gastrointestinal conditions, including gastrointestinal intolerances and disorders, renal insufficiency, incontinence, and not taking antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs (in the last month before the intervention period) were selected and included in the study. The study was an 8-week randomised, repeated-measure crossover intervention trial comparing a (poly)phenol-rich (PR) diet versus a control (C) diet. The dietary intervention protocol involved substituting low-(poly)phenol products in the control diet with PR-foods, based on the nutrient composition and total (poly)phenol content of the participants’ daily menu. The PR-foods included berries and related products, blood orange and juice, pomegranate juice, green tea, Renetta apple and purée, as well as dark chocolate (callets and cocoa powder-based drink). The PR-diet was designed to approximately double the estimated total (poly)phenol intake compared to the control diet. The PR-foods provided an average of 724 mg of total (poly)phenols per day, as previously reported [ 18 ]. During the PR-dietary intervention, participants received three servings of selected PR-foods per day. Further details about the study design and the diet composition are reported in Guglielmetti et al. [ 23 ] and Martini et al. [ 24 ].
At the beginning and at the end of each intervention arm (C-diet vs. PR-diet), blood and faecal samples were collected for the analysis of the different markers as previously reported [ 18 ]. Briefly, following an overnight fast, blood samples were collected in Vacutainer tubes with silicone gel to separate the serum and kept at room temperature for at least 30 min. The serum was then isolated by centrifuging the tubes at 1400 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Fecal samples were collected using specific containers designed for this purpose. Serum and fecal samples were divided into small aliquots, placed into specific vials, and stored at -80 °C until further analysis.
The following study received approval by the Ethics Committee of the Università degli Studi di Milano (15/02/2016; ref.: 6/16/CE_15.02.16_Verbale_All-7) and registered at ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN10214981). Written consent was obtained from all participants.
Evaluation of clinical and functional parameters
The comprehensive details of measuring clinical and functional biomarkers in blood samples have been previously reported [ 18 ]. In summary, fasting serum levels of glucose, insulin, creatinine, uric acid, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were assessed using routine biochemical analysis. Zonulin, C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-6 were measured using ELISA kits (IDK ® Immundiagnostik; R&D Systems—cat#DCRP00, 150 HSTA00E, HS600B—respectively). The concentration of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in serum samples was determined using an ELISA kit (Booster ® , Vinci Biochem S.r.l.). The HOmeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) and Cockroft-Gault (CG) indexes were calculated based on previously defined formulas in the literature [ 25 ]. DNA damage was detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG)-sensitive sites and DNA resistance to H 2 O 2 -induced oxidative stress by comet assay [ 26 ]. Quantification analysis of blood bacterial DNA was performed by Vaiomer SAS (Labège, France) as previously reported [ 22 ].
Analysis of additional biomarkers
Serum was obtained after blood centrifugation for 15 min at 2300 X g at 4 °C. Two aliquots of the sample (200 µL) were split into 3 Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80 °C until analysis. In the present study serum and faecal samples were used to measure zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1; cat# MBS2605490), occludin (cat# MBS761051), adiponectin (cat#AG-45 A-0001YEK-KI01), calprotectin (cat# HK379), faecal calprotectin (cat# HK382), soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14; cat# HK320), interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R; cat# AB181424), human LPS binding protein (LBP; cat# AB279407), and vascular endothelial-cadherin (VEC; cat#EK1317) levels through ELISA kits. The assay is based on the method of competitive ELISA consisting in the addition to each sample (including standard and control samples) of a biotinylated tracer (at the first step) and the use of a pre-coated 96-well plate with polyclonal antibody. The peroxidase-labeled streptavidin addition is used to bind the biotinylated tracer. After the reaction, the plate reader TECAN Infinite F200 (Tecan Group Ltd. Mannedorf, Switzerland) was used to read the fluorescence at 450 nm. The concentration of serum biomarkers was calculated by a 4PL standard curve as reported by the manufacturer.
Statistical analysis
The normal distribution of the variables was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and using Q-Q graphs. Descriptive statistics representing raw data for each group (control and treatment) and the full sample were provided, including median, interquartile range and frequencies, where appropriate.
Non-normally distributed data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test to assess differences within groups. For each subject, we calculated the change (delta) between measurements in the two periods for each treatment. When the variable was normally distributed, paired t-test was used and the mean of differences was reported instead of the median of differences. Due to the small sample sizes and non-normally distributed data, the Friedman test was utilized to corroborate the statistical significance observed through the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test on intra-group deltas, to determine if there are significant differences in the responses between the various treatments. If significant differences were found, an additional post-hoc test Dunn’s multiple comparisons test has been performed to identify which specific treatments are different from each other. Variances were statistically significant for p-value < 0.05. All analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 for Windows, GraphPad Software, (Boston, Massachusetts USA).
A two-dimensional visualisation technique “heatmap” analysis has been applied to the Spearman correlation matrix using JASP software. (JASP Team, 2019; jasp-stats.org). A Network correlation analysis has been used considering the two main clusters related to intestinal permeability and vascular function (JASP Team, 2019; jasp-stats.org).
Baseline characteristics of the participants
The age of the 51 subjects (29 females and 22 males) enrolled ranged between 60 and 98 years with a mean of 78 ± 10 y. The clinical characteristics of the study participants at baseline, the consumption of both macro and micronutrients throughout the PR and control diet periods, and the key findings from the trial, have previously been published [ 18 ].
Effect of the dietary intervention on the biomarkers under study
Table 1 reports the values of biomarkers related to IP and inflammation at baseline and following the dietary intervention. A statistically significant effect was observed for faecal ( p = 0.0378) and serum calprotectin levels ( p = 0.0186), which decreased after the PR-diet (Fig. 1 a and b). Additionally, a statistically significant increase in ZO-1 was found ( p = 0.001) after both the PR-diet and C-diet. A time effect has been observed for vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin showing a reduction following the PR-diet ( p = 0.038). Conversely, sCD14, occludin, adiponectin and IL-6R were not significantly modified by the dietary intervention.
![hypothesis in research sample figure 1](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12877-024-05272-y/MediaObjects/12877_2024_5272_Fig1_HTML.png)
Effect of the dietary intervention on serum ( a ) and faecal ( b ) calprotectin. Data are expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Differences within groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Data with asterisk are significantly different ( p < 0.05). PR-diet, (poly)phenol-rich diet; C-diet, control diet
Correlation heatmap among the different biomarkers at baseline
Figure 2 shows the heatmap correlation at baseline for all investigated outcomes within the MaPLE project. Inflammatory biomarkers such as sCD14, CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α were directly correlated with each other. Serum levels of sCD14 were also positively correlated with serum calprotectin, LBP, age, SBP, creatinine, uric acid, TC/HDL, LDL/HDL, TG. Anti-inflammatory biomarker adiponectin was inversely correlated with CRP, BMI and HOMA index. Furtherly, serum calprotectin levels were positively correlated with LBP and 16 S rRNA gene copies, two candidate biomarkers of IP. Circulating calprotectin was also directly correlated with the age of participants, insulin, HOMA index, CRP, IL-6, TNF-α and faecal calprotectin. Faecal calprotectin was positively and strongly correlated with inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α), sVCAM-1 and age
![hypothesis in research sample figure 2](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12877-024-05272-y/MediaObjects/12877_2024_5272_Fig2_HTML.png)
Correlation heatmap among the different biomarkers at baseline. The heatmap provides a visual representation of the correlation coefficients between all biomarkers, with colours denoting the strength of associations. Colour intensity within the cells corresponds to the magnitude of these relationships, with blue hues indicating positive correlations and red hues signifying negative correlations. The colour scale, positioned to the right of the panel, quantitatively conveys the degree of correlation. Each cell displays pair-wise Spearman correlation coefficients as a measure of association. Soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14); vascular endothelial-cadherin (VE-Cadherin); interleukin-6 (IL-6); interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R); bacterial DNAemia (16 S); tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); C-reactive protein (CRP); zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1); lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP); body mass index (BMI); systolic blood pressure (SBP); diastolic blood pressure (DBP); total cholesterol (TC); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); triglycerides (TG); alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT); soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1); soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1)
Network correlation analysis among biomarkers at baseline
Figure 3 a and b show the network correlation analysis among the main panel of biomarkers statistically associated in Fig. 2 . In particular, this panel consists of biomarkers of intestinal permeability and biomarkers correlated to them.
Figure 3 a shows the network of biomarkers associated with neutrophil activation, inflammation and IP. Serum calprotectin levels show a pivotal role in the network, being positively correlated with all the biomarkers involved, such as faecal calprotectin, soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14), interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, C-reactive protein (CRP), bacterial DNAemia (16 S rRNA gene copies) and age.
In Fig. 3 b, the network of biomarkers associated with vascular endothelial function is shown. Specifically, this cluster of correlation has high levels of serum occludin, IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, with potential inflammatory-induced endothelial dysfunction.
![hypothesis in research sample figure 3](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12877-024-05272-y/MediaObjects/12877_2024_5272_Fig3_HTML.png)
Network analysis of biomarker correlations at baseline. Network representation of relationship between the main panels of biomarkers statistically associated in Fig. 2 . A panel of biomarkers related to inflammation and intestinal permeability (a) and a panel of biomarkers associated with vascular endothelial function (b). Blue lines represent positive associations and the number is the coefficient of correlation. Soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14); vascular endothelial-cadherin (VEC); interleukin-6 (IL-6); interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R); calprotectin (CP); faecal calprotectin (FCP); bacterial DNAemia (16 S); soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1); tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); C-reactive protein (CRP)
Our RCT demonstrated the efficacy of a (poly)phenol-rich diet in reducing a key biomarker of immune response and systemic inflammation such as serum calprotectin and a more specific biomarker of intestinal inflammation like faecal calprotectin in older subjects.
Although there are multiple sources of evidence to support the anti-inflammatory effects of (poly)phenols, their use in the context of IP has been almost exclusively studied in vitro or in animal models. In addition, no studies have been conducted in vivo evaluating the impact of phenolic compounds on serum calprotectin. Calprotectin, a protein secreted by neutrophils, is prominently released in response to inflammation. This protein holds significant importance in the innate immune response, serving as an indicator of immune system activation and systemic inflammation. Serum calprotectin has recently garnered increased interest as a practical blood-based biomarker for IBD, as various studies have demonstrated that its concentration in the blood is associated with faecal levels, which serve as a reliable indicator of IBD. For instance, Kalla et al. [ 27 ] employed multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the serum calprotectin levels in a cohort of 156 patients, including 83 individuals with IBD and 73 non-IBD subjects. The findings revealed a significant positive correlation between serum and faecal calprotectin levels. Moreover, serum calprotectin exhibited superior predictive capabilities for diagnosing IBD compared to other commonly used biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Notably, serum calprotectin demonstrated its potential as a prognostic indicator by accurately predicting treatment escalation and/or the need for surgery in IBD patients, particularly those with Crohn’s disease (CD). Also, Meuwis and coworkers [ 28 ] demonstrated that the median serum calprotectin level in CD patients was significantly higher (8,892 ng/mL) than in healthy controls (1,318 ng/mL). Furthermore, the authors showed that, when combined with CRP and faecal calprotectin, serum calprotectin could serve as a valuable complementary biomarker for predicting relapse after infliximab withdrawal in CD patients.
Consistent with earlier research, our study has confirmed a positive association between serum and faecal calprotectin levels and we found to be both reduced following the intervention. In accordance with our findings, the open pilot trial of Biedermann and colleagues [ 29 ] showed a reduction of faecal calprotectin in 11 male and female individuals diagnosed with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). In particular, the participants were administered a bilberry-anthocyanin supplement, specifically 160 g of bilberry preparation containing 840 mg of anthocyanin per day, over a 6-week intervention period. This was compared to a group receiving a control product without ACNs. The authors observed a reduction of 61% (from 778 to 305 µg/g), slightly higher compared to the 39% reduction (from 58.5 to 35.9 µg/g). The lower reduction we found is likely attributable to our study population characterised by lower baseline levels of faecal calprotectin compared to individuals with UC involved in the study by Biedermann et al. [ 29 ]. The intervention led also to an improvement in the mean Clinical Activity Index (CAI) score and a reduction in both the endoscopic Mayo score and complete Mayo score, reflecting positive changes in disease severity and overall UC activity. Conversely, Solch-Ottaiano and coworkers [ 30 ] did not observe a significant reduction of faecal calprotectin levels after an intervention with a high (poly)phenol cranberry beverage (953 mg per daily serving) in healthy obese adults. The lack of effect could be explained by the experimental design involving a treatment with aspirin to simulate the loss of barrier function in a study population with low levels of faecal calprotectin at baseline (7.24 µg/g with respect to 58.48 µg/g of our study subjects).
In a previous study, serum calprotectin correlated to different biomarkers linked to inflammatory processes and metabolic dysfunction such as the levels of CRP, leukocytes, LDL, PAI-1, resistin and visfatin, in line with our findings [ 31 ]. Indeed, we found that serum calprotectin was associated with a cluster of biomarkers related to IP, inflammatory response, and age. Thus, the inclusion of biomarkers such as bacterial DNAemia, faecal calprotectin, IL-6, sCD14, CRP, and TNF-a may provide a comprehensive examination of the immune and inflammatory pathways. These biomarkers are commonly studied in the context of intestinal health, inflammation, and aging, indicating a connection between systemic inflammation, gut barrier function, and the aging process. Together these biomarkers could be useful to investigate immune and inflammatory pathways in response to dietary interventions. In this study, we measured circulating bacterial DNA in terms of 16 S rRNA gene copies (bacterial DNAemia) as well as faecal and serum calprotectin. Our correlation analyses confirmed the validity of these biomarkers in evaluating intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation. The interconnections between bacterial DNAemia and calprotectin underscore the crucial influence of bacterial translocation on the inflammatory process and metabolic health, highlighting its potential as a target for therapeutic interventions. IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a role in immune regulation and has been associated with various age-related diseases. sCD14, a soluble form of the CD14 receptor, is involved in immune activation and has been linked to gut barrier dysfunction. CRP and TNF-α are inflammatory biomarkers that are elevated in response to infection or inflammation.
In our older subjects, we also found the presence of a cluster characterised by high levels of VE-cadherin, occludin, sICAM, and IL-6R. These biomarkers are associated with endothelial function, tight junction integrity, and immune regulation. Their correlation further strengthens the link between immune dysregulation, gut barrier disruption, and age-related perturbations. Occludin is a transmembrane protein that is a key component of tight junctions, which are intercellular junctions between epithelial and endothelial cells. Its primary role is to regulate the permeability of cellular barriers, including the blood-brain barrier and the intestinal barrier. As a biomarker, occludin can be indicative of the integrity and function of these cellular barriers. sICAM is a soluble form of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), a cell surface glycoprotein that is expressed in various cell types, including endothelial cells and immune cells. ICAM-1 plays a vital role in the adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells during inflammation, facilitating immune cell trafficking to sites of infection or tissue damage. The shedding of sICAM occurs when ICAM-1 is cleaved from the cell surface, and sICAM can be detected in the bloodstream. As a biomarker, sICAM levels can reflect immune activation and the presence of inflammation. Elevated sICAM levels have been associated with various inflammatory conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, and other autoimmune diseases. VE-cadherin is a transmembrane protein that plays a crucial role in cell-cell adhesion and maintaining endothelial barrier integrity. It is predominantly expressed in endothelial cells that line blood vessels and lymphatic vessels. VE-cadherin’s role as a biomarker lies in its association with vascular health, endothelial function, and its involvement in various physiological and pathological processes. Measuring VE-cadherin levels or activity can offer valuable information about endothelial barrier function, vascular permeability, and inflammatory responses, making it relevant in understanding and managing various vascular-related conditions and diseases [ 32 ]. Interestingly, in our study, we found a reduction of VE-cadherin levels following the intervention with the PR-diet. However, this difference in VE-cadherin levels was attributed to an effect of time but not to the treatment. Although there are no other intervention studies that have evaluated the effect of (poly)phenols on this biomarker, the results of some in vitro studies [ 33 , 34 ] have demonstrated a potential protective effect. Thus, we can speculate that a longer intervention duration or a larger sample size could be necessary to reveal a positive effect of the PR-diet on VE-cadherin levels. Conversely, an increase in ZO-1 serum levels in both intervention groups was documented. This increase could be explained by the fact that our study individuals represent a fragile population target. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the change was apparently negligible, its clinical significance remains uncertain due to the lack of data in the literature on ZO-1 levels in different conditions.
The findings of the current RCT suggest that the identified biomarker clusters, including serum calprotectin and related biomarkers, may serve as a panel of indicators reflecting individual physiological states. These biomarkers could potentially be used to identify at-risk subjects for age-related health complications and guide dietary interventions. Based on our results, some of these biomarkers could be modulated through a (poly)phenol-rich diet, possibly mitigating the adverse effects of aging on gut barrier function and systemic inflammation, thereby contributing to the promotion of healthier aging and reduced risk of age-related diseases. Despite serum and faecal calprotectin was found to be directly correlated and reduced by the intervention with the PR-diet, evaluating faecal calprotectin levels compared to serum calprotectin levels can provide different clinical insights. While elevated faecal calprotectin levels suggest ongoing inflammation in the gut and may help clinicians in determining the severity of GI inflammation and the efficacy of treatment in GI-related disorders, increased serum calprotectin levels indicate a systemic inflammatory response and may help identify inflammatory conditions affecting multiple organs or tissues beyond the GI tract. Both assessments could have distinct clinical applications and provide complementary information about inflammatory processes, depending on the focus of the investigation and the conditions under consideration. Furtherly, calprotectin stability, consistent assay reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness have established it as an invaluable tool for clinicians in supporting diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.
The study findings may hold significant implications for future research and dietary interventions. Firstly, they offer further evidence of the potential benefits of a diet rich in (poly)phenols in reducing immune activation, intestinal and systemic inflammation, which are common aspects of aging and age-related diseases. This underscores the importance of exploring dietary strategies for promoting healthy aging. Secondly, the observed correlation between calprotectin and markers related to IP, inflammatory response, and age supports a possible link between gut health, inflammation, and the aging process. This relationship opens up new paths for investigating the underlying mechanisms of these connections and the potential role of phenolic compounds in modulating gut barrier function and age-related inflammation. The development of biomarker panels that include calprotectin and other relevant markers could lead to a more comprehensive evaluation of immune dysregulation and gut health during the aging process.
Future research should aim to validate the current findings in a broader range of populations, encompassing individuals with specific health conditions or varying levels of inflammation and IP. In addition, long-term studies are essential to establish the long-lasting effects of a (poly)phenol-rich diet on calprotectin levels and its overall impact on health outcomes, but also to determine the most effective dose and type of (poly)phenols to enrich the diet for these purposes. Moreover, deeper investigations are necessary to shed light on the underlying mechanisms and to establish causal relationships between these biomarkers and age-related gut dysfunction and inflammation. By addressing these research gaps, we could better understand the potential role of (poly)phenols in promoting healthy aging and mitigating age-related health challenges.
The results obtained strengthen the hypothesis that a (poly)phenol-rich diet could play an important role in counteracting the worsening of intestinal permeability alteration and related conditions in the context of inflammaging by also reducing the levels of calprotectin, a promising biomarker as it is a protein known to typically elevate with age, serving as an indicator of both intestinal and systemic inflammation. If further research confirms these findings, it could be also possible in the future to develop and promote targeted/personalised (poly)phenol-rich diets to increase protection against age-related gut dysfunction and inflammation. By promoting a healthier intestinal barrier, (poly)phenols may potentially contribute to overall well-being and reduce the risk of age-related diseases associated with inflammaging.
Data availability
The MaPLE trial has been formally registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry, bearing the code ISRCTN10214981. In accordance with the data management plan of the MaPLE project, the datasets utilized in the present study are accessible via the Dataverse repository at https://dataverse.unimi.it/dataverse/DNAemia-Zonulin (dataset: https://doi.org/10.13130/RD_UNIMI/KGCL3D ).
Assimakopoulos SF, Triantos C, Maroulis I, Gogos C. The role of the gut barrier function in health and disease. Gastroenterology Res. 2018;11(4):261–3. https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1053w
Karasov WH. Integrative physiology of transcellular and paracellular intestinal absorption. J Exp Biol. 2017;220(14):2495–501. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.144048
Ghosh SS, Wang J, Yannie PJ, Ghosh S. Intestinal barrier dysfunction, LPS translocation, and disease development. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(2). https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvz039
Buckley A, Turner JR. Cell biology of tight junction barrier regulation and mucosal disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(1):a029314. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029314
Travis S, Menzies I. Intestinal permeability: functional assessment and significance. Clin Sci (Lond). 1992;82(5):471–88. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0820471
Chen L, Deng H, Cui H, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J et al. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget. 2018;9(6):7204–18. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23208
Thomson A, Smart K, Somerville MS, Lauder SN, Appanna G, Horwood J et al. The Ussing chamber system for measuring intestinal permeability in health and disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1002-4
Gan J, Nazarian S, Teare J, Darzi A, Ashrafian H, Thompson AJ. A case for improved assessment of gut permeability: a meta-analysis quantifying the lactulose:mannitol ratio in coeliac and Crohn’s disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02082-z
Perez-Diaz-del-Campo N, Castelnuovo G, Ribaldone DG, Caviglia GP. Fecal and circulating biomarkers for the non-invasive assessment of intestinal permeability. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(11):1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111976
Rackerby B, Kim HJ, Dallas DC et al. Understanding the effects of dietary components on the gut microbiome and human health. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2020;29, 1463–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-020-00811-w
Lankarani KB. Diet and the Gut. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2016;8(3):161–165. Available from: https:// https://doi.org/10.15171/mejdd.2016.28
Inczefi O, Bacsur P, Resál T, Keresztes C, Molnár T. The influence of Nutrition on Intestinal Permeability and the Microbiome in Health and Disease. Front Nutr. 2022;9:718710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.718710 .
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Khoshbin K, Camilleri M. Effects of dietary components on intestinal permeability in health and disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020;319(5):G589-G608. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00245.2020
Buscail C, Sabate JM, Bouchoucha M et al. Western Dietary Pattern Is Associated with Irritable Bowel Syndrome in the French NutriNet Cohort. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):986. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9090986
Jacquier EF, van de Wouw M, Nekrasov E, Contractor N, Kassis A, Marcu D. Local and Systemic Effects of Bioactive Food Ingredients: Is There a Role for Functional Foods to Prime the Gut for Resilience? Foods. 2024;13(5):739. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13050739
Shahidi F, Ambigaipalan P. Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects – A review. J Funct Foods. 2015;18:820–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018
Bernardi S, Del Bo’ C, Marino M, Gargari G, Cherubini A, Andrés-Lacueva C et al. Polyphenols and intestinal permeability: Rationale and future perspectives. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(7):1816–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02283
Del Bo’ C, Bernardi S, Cherubini A, Porrini M, Gargari G, Hidalgo-Liberona N et al. A polyphenol-rich dietary pattern improves intestinal permeability, evaluated as serum zonulin levels, in older subjects: The MaPLE randomised controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):3006–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.12.014
Peron G, Gargari G, Meroño T et al. Crosstalk among intestinal barrier, gut microbiota and serum metabolome after a polyphenol-rich diet in older subjects with leaky gut: The MaPLE trial. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(10):5288–5297. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.027
Hidalgo-Liberona N, González-Domínguez R, Vegas E et al. Correction to increased intestinal permeability in older subjects impacts the beneficial effects of dietary polyphenols by modulating their bioavailability. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(10):3266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01240
Gargari G, Mantegazza G, Taverniti V et al. Bacterial DNAemia is associated with serum zonulin levels in older subjects. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11054. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90476-0
Gargari G, Taverniti V, Del Bo’ C, Bernardi S, Hidalgo-Liberona N, Meroño T et al. Higher bacterial DNAemia can affect the impact of a polyphenol-rich dietary pattern on biomarkers of intestinal permeability and cardiovascular risk in older subjects. Eur J Nutr. 2022;61(3):1209–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02680-3
Guglielmetti S, Bernardi S, Del Bo’ C, Cherubini A, Porrini M, Gargari G et al. Effect of a polyphenol-rich dietary pattern on intestinal permeability and gut and blood microbiomics in older subjects: study protocol of the MaPLE randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1472-9
Martini D, Bernardi S, Del Bo’ C, Hidalgo Liberona N, Zamora-Ros R, Tucci M et al. Estimated intakes of nutrients and polyphenols in participants completing the MaPLE randomised controlled trial and its relevance for the future development of dietary guidelines for the older subjects. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082458
Antuna-Puente B, Disse E, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Laville M, Capeau J, Bastard J-P. How can we measure insulin sensitivity/resistance? Diabetes Metab. 2011;37(3):179–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2011.01.002
Marino M, Gigliotti L, Møller P, Riso P, Porrini M, Del Bo C. Impact of 12-month cryopreservation on endogenous DNA damage in whole blood and isolated mononuclear cells evaluated by the comet assay. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79670-8
Kalla R, Kennedy NA, Ventham NT, Boyapati RK, Adams AT, Nimmo ER et al. Serum calprotectin: A novel diagnostic and prognostic marker in inflammatory bowel diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1796–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.342
Meuwis M-A, Vernier-Massouille G, Grimaud JC, Bouhnik Y, Laharie D, Piver E et al. Serum calprotectin as a biomarker for Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(12):e678–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2013.06.008
Biedermann L, Mwinyi J, Scharl M, Frei P, Zeitz J, Kullak-Ublick GA et al. Bilberry ingestion improves disease activity in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis — An open pilot study. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(4):271–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2012.07.010
Solch-Ottaiano RJ, Judkins TC, Matott SH, McDermott CE, Nieves C Jr, Wang Y et al. High polyphenolic cranberry beverage alters specific fecal microbiota but not gut permeability following aspirin challenge in healthy obese adults: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. J Funct Foods. 2022;99(105332):105332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2022.1053
Ohlsson B, Roth B, Larsson E, Höglund P. Calprotectin in serum and zonulin in serum and feces are elevated after introduction of a diet with lower carbohydrate content and higher fiber, fat and protein contents. Biomed Rep. 2017;6(4):411–22. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2017.865
Gavard J. Endothelial permeability and VE-cadherin: A wacky comradeship. Cell Adh Migr. 2014;8(2):158–64. https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.29026
Liu Z-H, Zhang Y, Wang X, Fan X-F, Zhang Y, Li X et al. SIRT1 activation attenuates cardiac fibrosis by endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118(109227):109227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109227
Campagnolo P, Hong X, di Bernardini E, Smyrnias I, Hu Y, Xu Q. Resveratrol-induced vascular progenitor differentiation towards endothelial lineage via MiR-21/akt/β-catenin is protective in vessel graft models. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125122
Download references
Acknowledgements and fundings
We thank all the volunteers for their valuable contribution and dedication to the study and we are grateful to the nursing and medical staff working at Opera Immacolata Concezione (OIC Foundation, Padua, Italy) for their coordinating activities in the nursing home. We are also grateful to Barry Callebaut, Indena, Melinda, Oranfrizer, Roberts Berrie, Zuegg for providing the (poly)phenol-rich products. The software used to assess (poly)phenol contribution from foods and food surveys © Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER – Instituto de Salud Carlos III), any 2022. All rights reserved. Requests to use this software should be made to [email protected] or [email protected] work has been developed as part of the MAPLE project (Gut and Blood Microbiomics for Studying the Effect of a Polyphenol-Rich Dietary Pattern on Intestinal Permeability in the Elderly) supported within the European Joint Programming Initiative “A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life” (JPI HDHL, http://www.healthydietforhealthylife.eu/ ) granted by Mipaaft (Italy, D.M. 8245/7303/ 2016), MINECO (Spain, PCIN-2015-238), and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (UK, BB/N023951/1). PAK was also supported by the BBSRC through the Institute Strategic Programme Grants ‘Food Innovation and Health’ (BB/R012512/1 and its constituent project BBS/E/F/000PR10346 and ‘Food, Microbiome and Health’ (BB/X011054/1) and its constituent project BBS/E/F/000PR13632. PR, CDB and DM acknowledge the OnFoods project funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.3 - Call for proposals No. 341 of 15 March 2022 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union – NextGenerationEU; Award Number: Project code PE00000003, Concession Decree No. 1550 of 11 October 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP D93C22000890001, Project title “ON Foods - Research and innovation network on food and nutrition Sustainability, Safety and Security – Working ON Foods”. CAL, TM and NHL thank Grant PID2020-114921RB-C21 and PID2021-128542OA-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ and CIBERFES, CB16/10/00269, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III all of them by “ERDF A way of making Europe”. The Generalitat de Catalunya’s Agency AGAUR of 2021SGR00687. Maria de Maeztu Unit of Excellence grant (CEX2021-001234-M) funded by (MICIN/AEI/FEDER, UE). CAL thanks ICREA Academia Award. This work was supported by a contribution of the “Piano di Sostegno Alla Ricerca-Linea 2”, azione A-grant numbers PSR2022_MMARI.The sponsors of this work have no role in the development of the study protocol, methods, data collection and analyses, and the preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), Division of Human Nutrition, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Mirko Marino, Cristian Del Bo’, Daniela Martini, Simone Perna, Marisa Porrini & Patrizia Riso
Geriatria, Accettazione Geriatrica e Centro di Ricerca per l’Invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
Antonio Cherubini
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), Division of Food Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Giorgio Gargari
Biomarkers and Nutrimetabolomics Laboratory, Department of Nutrition, Food Sciences and Gastronomy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, CiberFES, ISCIII, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08028, Spain
Tomás Meroño, Nicole Hidalgo-Liberona & Cristina Andres-Lacueva
Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK
Paul A Kroon
Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences (BtBs), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 4, Milano, Italy
Simone Guglielmetti
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
PR and SG conceived and designed the trial. PR, SG, MP, AC, CAL and PAK optimised the experimental protocol including the selection of biomarkers and the development of the polyphenol-rich diet. MM, CDB and DM drafted the first version of the manuscript and contributed to develop part of the protocol. MM and CDB performed the analysis of biomarkers. SP and GG performed the statistical analysis in collaboration with TM. NHL and TM contributed to the elaboration of dietary polyphenol intake. All the authors critically revised the draft and approved the final version.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Cristian Del Bo’ or Patrizia Riso .
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
The authors affirm that all procedures adhered to the ethical guidelines outlined in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as amended in 2013. The research protocol received approval from the Research Ethics Committee at the Università degli Studi di Milano (opinion no. 6/16; February 15th, 2016). Written informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals for their inclusion in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Marino, M., Del Bo’, C., Martini, D. et al. A (poly)phenol-rich diet reduces serum and faecal calprotectin in older adults with increased intestinal permeability: the MaPLE randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 24 , 707 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05272-y
Download citation
Received : 01 February 2024
Accepted : 01 August 2024
Published : 24 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05272-y
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Inflammation
- Calprotectin
BMC Geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
- General enquiries: [email protected]
Unraveling entrepreneurial comebacks: the curvilinear relationship between entrepreneurial failure and reentry intention
- Published: 27 August 2024
Cite this article
- Shaoshuai Zhang 1 ,
- Hui Yang 1 &
- Yuan Wei ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-2671-5192 1
15 Accesses
Explore all metrics
Despite the powerful benefits of entrepreneurial failure experience with regard to experiential learning and future venture performance, our understanding of how failure experience impacts entrepreneurs’ decision to reenter entrepreneurship while taking advantage of the lessons that they have learned from their previous entrepreneurial endeavors remains limited. While some studies have highlighted the potential of entrepreneurial failure experience to stimulate reentry intention, other researchers have argued that failure experience can actually decrease subsequent entrepreneurial intention. This study draws on various streams of research on entrepreneurs’ responses to business failures at the cognitive, affective, and behavioral levels to propose the existence of a curvilinear relationship between entrepreneurial failure and reentry intention. We employ hierarchical regression to test a series of hypotheses by reference to a sample of 379 entrepreneurs who had experienced failure in their recent business ventures. The results reveal that the degree of failure exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with reentry intention. Furthermore, we find that the effect of entrepreneurial failure on reentry intention is mediated by entrepreneurs’ learning from failure and that entrepreneurial passion moderates the effects of entrepreneurial failure on both learning from failure and reentry intention. This article helps explain the distinctive effects of failure experience on reentry intention and provides empirical evidence that can facilitate the development of tailor-made support programs that can help previously failed entrepreneurs address the challenges that they encounter during the process of reentry into entrepreneurship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
![hypothesis in research sample](https://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-024-06511-6/MediaObjects/12144_2024_6511_Fig1_HTML.png)
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Aguzzoli, R., Lengler, J., Sousa, C. M. P., & Benito, G. R. G. (2021). Here we go again: A case study on re-entering a foreign market. British Journal of Management , 32 (2), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12407
Article Google Scholar
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Boso, N., & Antwi-Agyei, I. (2018). The effects of Business failure experience on successive entrepreneurial engagements: An evolutionary phase model. Group & Organization Management , 43 (4), 648–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116643447
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Ifere, S. E., Nyuur, R. B., & Khan, H. (2022). Entrepreneurs’ learning from business failures: An emerging market perspective. British Journal of Management , 33 (4), 1735–1756. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12557
Artinger, S., & Powell, T. C. (2016). Entrepreneurial failure: Statistical and psychological explanations [Article]. Strategic Management Journal , 37 (6), 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2378
Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing , 15 (2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.2.1
Baù, M., Sieger, P., Eddleston, K. A., & Chirico, F. (2017). Fail but try again? The effects of age, gender, and multiple–owner experience on failed entrepreneurs’ reentry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 41 (6), 909–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12233
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 , 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology , 89 , 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Belchior, R. F., & Castro-Silva, H. (2023). The virtuous cycle of entrepreneurial identity and experience - a longitudinal analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , 19 (4), 1739–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00898-7
Biraglia, A., & Kadile, V. (2017). The role of entrepreneurial passion and Creativity in developing entrepreneurial intentions: Insights from American homebrewers [Article]. Journal of Small Business Management , 55 (1), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12242
Boso, N., Adeleye, I., Donbesuur, F., & Gyensare, M. (2019). Do entrepreneurs always benefit from business failure experience? Journal of Business Research , 98 , 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.063
Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review , 57 (2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096207
Byrne, O., & Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Different strokes for different folks: Entrepreneurial narratives of emotion, cognition, and making sense of business failure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 39 (2), 375–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12046
Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing , 28 (3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.003
Cardon, M. S., & Kirk, C. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self-efficacy to persistence relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , 39 (5), 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12089
Cardon, M. S., Stevens, C. E., & Potter, D. R. (2011). Misfortunes or mistakes? Cultural sensemaking of entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing , 26 (1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.004
Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review , 34 (3), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2009.40633190
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing , 13 (4), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3
Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing , 26 (6), 604–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.002
Corner, P. D., Singh, S., & Pavlovich, K. (2017). Entrepreneurial resilience and venture failure. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship , 35 (6), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616685604
Costa, P. L., Ferreira, J. J., & de Torres, R. (2023). From entrepreneurial failure to re-entry [Article]. Journal of Business Research , 158 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113699 . Article 113699.
De Hoe, R., & Janssen, F. (2022). Re-creation after business failure: A conceptual model of the mediating role of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 842590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842590
De Sordi, J. O., dos Santos, A. R., de Azevedo, M. C., Jorge, C. F. B., & Hashimoto, M. (2022). Dark, down, and destructive side of entrepreneurship: Unveiling negative aspects of unsuccessful entrepreneurial action. International Journal of Management Education , 20 (3), 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100659
Drnovsek, M., Cardon, M. S., & Patel, P. C. (2016). Direct and indirect effects of passion on growing technology ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal , 10 (2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1213
Edeh, F. O., Zayed, N. M., Darwish, S., Nitsenko, V., Hanechko, I., & Islam, K. M. A. (2023). Impression management and employee contextual performance in service organizations (enterprises). Emerging Science Journal , 7 (2), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2023-07-02-05
Eftekhari, N., & Timmermans, B. (2022). New venture dissolution and the comobility of new venture teams. Small Business Economics , 59 (1), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00543-z
Eggers, J. P., & Song, L. (2015). Dealing with failure: Serial entrepreneurs and the costs of changing industries between ventures [Article]. Academy of Management Journal , 58 (6), 1785–1803. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0050
Espinoza-Benavides, J., & Díaz, D. (2019). The entrepreneurial profile after failure. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research , 25 (8), 1634–1651. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-04-2018-0242
Fanaja, R. A., Pradana, M., Eka Saputri, M., & Utami, D. G. (2023). Knowledge management as driver of women’s entrepreneurial innovativeness. Journal of Human Earth and Future , 4 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.28991/hef-2023-04-01-01
Fan-Osuala, O. (2021). All failures are not equal: Degree of failure and the launch of subsequent crowdfunding campaigns [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing Insights , 16 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00260 . Article e00260.
Fisher, R., Merlot, E., & Johnson, L. W. (2018). The obsessive and harmonious nature of entrepreneurial passion. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research , 24 (1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2017-0011
Franco, M., Haase, H., & António, D. (2021). Influence of failure factors on entrepreneurial resilience in Angolan micro, small and medium-sized enterprises [Article]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis , 29 (1), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2019-1829
Fu, H., Xiao, X. H., Ye, B. H. B., Fang, S. J., Li, Y. Q., & Wu, Y. Y. (2023). Stay passionate and carry on: Why passion exhausts and how it can be restored. Current Psychology , 42 (31), 27574–27592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03889-z
Guerrero, M., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2019). Renascence after post-mortem: The choice of accelerated repeat entrepreneurship [Article]. Small Business Economics , 52 (1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0015-7
Haans, R., Pieters, C., & He, Z. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and Testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal , 37 , 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
Henriquez-Daza, M. C., Capelleras, J. L., & Osorio-Tinoco, F. (2023). Does fear of failure affect entrepreneurial growth aspirations? The moderating role of institutional collectivism in emerging and developed countries [Article]. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies . https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2022-0232
He, V. F., Sirén, C., Singh, S., Solomon, G., & von Krogh, G. (2018). Keep calm and carry on: Emotion regulation in entrepreneurs’ learning from failure [Article]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , 42 (4), 605–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12273
Hsu, D. K., Shinnar, R. S., & Anderson, S. E. (2019). I wish I had a regular job’: An exploratory study of entrepreneurial regret [Article]. Journal of Business Research , 96 , 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.006
Hsu, D. K., Wiklund, J., & Cotton, R. D. (2017). Success, failure, and entrepreneurial reentry: An experimental assessment of the veracity of self-efficacy and prospect theory [Article]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , 41 (1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12166
Hurmerinta, L., Nummela, N., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2024). Boosted by failure? Entrepreneurial internationalisation as a cyclical learning process. European Journal of International Management , 22 (3). https://doi.org/10.1504/ejim.2024.136483
Hwang, K., & Choi, J. (2021). How do failed entrepreneurs cope with their prior failure when they seek subsequent re-entry into serial entrepreneurship? Failed entrepreneurs’ optimism and defensive pessimism and coping humor as a moderator. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 18 (13), 7021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137021
Jenkins, A., & McKelvie, A. (2016). What is entrepreneurial failure? Implications for future research. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship , 34 (2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615574011
Jenkins, A. S., Wiklund, J., & Brundin, E. (2014). Individual responses to firm failure: Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience. Journal of Business Venturing , 29 (1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.10.006
Karimi, S. (2020). The role of entrepreneurial passion in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Applied Economics , 52 (3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1645287
Kawai, N., Sibunruang, H., & Kazumi, T. (2023). Work-family conflict, entrepreneurial regret, and entrepreneurial outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic [Article]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , 19 (2), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00846-5
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kiani, A., Ali, A., Biraglia, A., & Wang, D. (2023). Why I persist while others leave? Investigating the path from passion to persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management , 61 (6), 2818–2848. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1938097
Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., Vendrell-Herrero, F., & Gomes, E. (2019). Bouncing back from failure: Entrepreneurial resilience and the internationalisation of subsequent ventures created by serial entrepreneurs. Applied Psychology , 68 (4), 658–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12175
Lattacher, W., & Wdowiak, M. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial learning from failure. A systematic review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research , 26 (5), 1093–1131. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-02-2019-0085
Lee, C. K., Cottle, G. W., Simmons, S. A., & Wiklund, J. (2021). Fear not, want not: Untangling the effects of social cost of failure on high-growth entrepreneurship [Article]. Small Business Economics , 57 (1), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00324-0
Lin, S., & Wang, S. (2019). How does the age of serial entrepreneurs influence their re-venture speed after a business failure? [Article]. Small Business Economics , 52 (3), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9977-0
Liu, Y., Li, Y., Hao, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Narcissism and learning from entrepreneurial failure [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing , 34 (3), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.003
Mandl, C., Berger, E. S. C., & Kuckertz, A. (2016). Do you plead guilty? Exploring entrepreneurs’ sensemaking-behavior link after business failure [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing Insights , 5 , 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2015.12.002
Mantere, S., Aula, P., Schildt, H., & Vaara, E. (2013). Narrative attributions of entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing , 28 (4), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.12.001
McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review , 24 (1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580438
Mueller, B. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2016). Making the most of failure experiences: Exploring the relationship between business failure and the identification of business opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 40 (3), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12116
Mueller, B. A., Wolfe, M. T., & Syed, I. (2017). Passion and grit: An exploration of the pathways leading to venture success. Journal of Business Venturing , 32 (3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.02.001
Murnieks, C. Y., Mosakowski, E., & Cardon, M. S. (2014). Pathways of passion: Identity centrality, passion, and behavior among entrepreneurs. Journal of Management , 40 (6), 1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433855
Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Moeller, J., & Chandan, G. G. (2021). Entrepreneurial passion: A review, synthesis, and agenda for future research. Applied Psychology , 70 (2), 816–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12236
Pimentel, L., Major, M., & Cruz, A. (2023). Collective action in institutional entrepreneurship: The case of a government agency. Emerging Science Journal , 7 (2), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2023-07-02-017
Plehn-Dujowich, J. (2010). A theory of serial entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics , 35 (4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9171-5
Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 29 (4), 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x
Politis, D., & Gabrielsson, J. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ attitudes towards failure - an experiential learning approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research , 15 (4), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550910967921
Rawal, A., Sarpong, D., & Singh, S. K. (2023). Phoenix rising: Rebounding to venture again post firm-failure. Industrial Marketing Management , 112 , 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.05.007
Sarasvathy, S. D., Menon, A. R., & Kuechle, G. (2013). Failing firms and successful entrepreneurs: Serial entrepreneurship as a temporal portfolio [Article]. Small Business Economics , 40 (2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9412-x
Saylors, R., Lahiri, A., Warnick, B., & Baid, C. (2023). Looking back to venture forward: Exploring idea and identity work in public failure narratives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 47 (2), 398–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211057027 . Article 10422587211057027.
Seckler, C., Funken, R., & Gielnik, M. (2017). Learning from entrepreneurial failure: Integrating emotional, motivational, and cognitive factors. In J. E. Ellingson & R. A. Noe (Eds.), Autonomous learning in the workplace (pp. 54–77). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315674131-4
Shahid, S., & Kundi, Y. M. (2022). Feel dragged out: A recovery perspective in the relationship between emotional exhaustion and entrepreneurial exit [Article]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development , 29 (2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2021-0199
Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review , 28 (2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416377
Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Harsh evaluations of entrepreneurs who fail: The role of sexual orientation, use of environmentally friendly technologies, and observers’ perspective taking. Journal of Management Studies , 52 (2), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12103
Shepherd, D. A., Wiklund, J., & Haynie, J. M. (2009). Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing , 24 (2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.002
Shirshitskaia, E., Zhou, X., & Zhang, L. (2021). The impact of learning from failure on new ventures’ sustainable development. Frontiers in Psychology , 12 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784518 . Original Research.
Shore, A., Pittaway, L., & Bortolotti, T. (2023). From negative emotions to personal growth: Failure and re-entry into Entrepreneurship. British Journal of Management . https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12785
Simmons, S. A., Wiklund, J., & Levie, J. (2014). Stigma and business failure: Implications for entrepreneurs’ career choices. Small Business Economics , 42 (3), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9519-3
Simmons, S. A., Wiklund, J., Levie, J., Bradley, S. W., & Sunny, S. A. (2019). Gender gaps and reentry into entrepreneurial ecosystems after business failure [Article]. Small Business Economics , 53 (2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9998-3
Singh, S., Corner, P. D., & Pavlovich, K. (2015). Failed, not finished: A narrative approach to understanding venture failure stigmatization. Journal of Business Venturing , 30 (1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.005
Singh, S., Corner, P., & Pavlovich, K. (2007). Coping with entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Management & Organization , 13 (4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2007.13.4.331
Slade Shantz, A., Zietsma, C., Kistruck, G. M., & Cruz, L. B. (2024). Exploring the relative efficacy of ‘within-logic contrasting’ and ‘cross-logic analogizing’ framing tactics for adopting new entrepreneurial practices in contexts of poverty. Journal of Business Venturing , 39 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106341
Smollan, R., & Singh, S. (2024). How social entrepreneurs respond to enterprise failure [Article]. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship , 15 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2021.1890189
Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing , 22 (4), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002
Stroe, S., Sirén, C., Shepherd, D., & Wincent, J. (2020). The dualistic regulatory effect of passion on the relationship between fear of failure and negative affect: Insights from facial expression analysis. Journal of Business Venturing , 35 (4), 105948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105948
Tu, Y., Hao, X., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Vasa, L., & Zhao, X. (2023). Obsessive passion, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial performance: The dual moderating effect of the fear of failure [Article]. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 1037250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037250
Ucbasaran, D., Shepherd, D. A., Lockett, A., & Lyon, S. J. (2013). Life after business failure: The process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs. Journal of Management , 39 (1), 163–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457823
Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing , 24 (2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.008
Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Flores, M. (2010). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing , 25 (6), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.001
Vaillant, Y., Mora-Esquivel, R., & Alvarado, M. (2024). The forgetting curve in entrepreneurship: Decaying learning benefits of past entrepreneurial experience. Small Business Economics . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00890-7
Walsh, G. S., & Cunningham, J. A. (2017). Regenerative failure and attribution: Examining the underlying processes affecting entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research , 23 (4), 688–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-03-2015-0072
Walsh, G. S., & Cunningham, J. A. (2023). Business failure and entrepreneur experiences of passion. International Small Business Journal-Researching Entrepreneurship . https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426231194482
Walter, S. G., & Block, J. H. (2016). Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: An institutional perspective. Journal of Business Venturing , 31 (2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.003
Wang, H., Zheng, C., Wu, W., & Sui, F. (2022). How entrepreneurs’ dual narcissism affects new venture growth: The roles of personal initiative and learning from entrepreneurial failure [Article]. Journal of Organizational Change Management , 35 (7), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2021-0313
Williams, T. A., Thorgren, S., & Lindh, I. (2020). Rising from failure, staying down, or more of the same? An inductive study of entrepreneurial reentry. Academy of Management Discoveries , 6 (4), 631–662. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0047
Yamakawa, Y., & Cardon, M. S. (2015). Causal ascriptions and perceived learning from entrepreneurial failure. Small Business Economics , 44 (4), 797–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9623-z
Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. (2015). Rising from the ashes: Cognitive determinants of venture growth after entrepreneurial failure [Article]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , 39 (2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12047
Yang, T., & Aldrich, H. E. (2012). Out of sight but not out of mind: Why failure to account for left truncation biases research on failure rates [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing , 27 (4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.01.001
Yao, K., Li, X., & Liang, B. (2021). Failure learning and entrepreneurial resilience: The moderating role of firms’ knowledge breadth and knowledge depth [Article]. Journal of Knowledge Management , 25 (9), 2141–2160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0772
Zhao, H., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Entrepreneurship resilience: Can psychological traits of entrepreneurial intention support overcoming entrepreneurial failure? Frontiers in Psychology , 12 , Article 707803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707803
Download references
Acknowledgements
The first author would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 72172165) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No: 2024A1515011283).
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, No.135 Xingang West Road, Guangzhou, 510275, Guangdong, China
Hui Fu, Min Xu, Shaoshuai Zhang, Hui Yang & Yuan Wei
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Yuan Wei .
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
We’ve obtained inform consent from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Fu, H., Xu, M., Zhang, S. et al. Unraveling entrepreneurial comebacks: the curvilinear relationship between entrepreneurial failure and reentry intention. Curr Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06511-6
Download citation
Accepted : 31 July 2024
Published : 27 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06511-6
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Entrepreneurial failure
- Reentry intention
- Learning from failure
- Entrepreneurial passion
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Developing a hypothesis (with example) Step 1. Ask a question. Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project. Example: Research question.
Learn how to formulate a research hypothesis for an interdisciplinary paper that involves law and another discipline. See sample hypotheses from previous senior seminar students on various topics.
Learn the basics of writing a hypothesis for scientific research, including its definition, types, examples, and characteristics. Find out how to distinguish a hypothesis from a prediction and avoid common pitfalls.
Learn what a research hypothesis is, how to write it, and what types of research hypothesis exist. See examples of null, alternative, directional, non-directional, simple, complex, associative, and causal hypotheses.
A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process. Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test ...
Learn what a hypothesis is, why it is important, and how to write one for different types of research. See examples of simple, complex, directional, non-directional, null, associative, and causal hypotheses.
Learn the definition, types, and characteristics of a hypothesis, and follow the steps to write your own for your research paper. See examples of simple, complex, null, alternative, logical, empirical, and statistical hypotheses.
Learn what a hypothesis is, how to write one, and what types of hypotheses are used in different fields of research. See examples of hypotheses in science, medicine, psychology, sociology, business and engineering.
Learn how to write a hypothesis for your research project, based on a research question, existing theories, and variables. See examples of different types of hypotheses and how to phrase them in if-then, correlation, or difference form.
The research hypothesis at the basis of this prediction is "the product of the KLF2 gene is involved in the development of the cardiovascular system in mice"—and this hypothesis is probably (hopefully) based on a clear observation, such as that mice with low levels of Kruppel-like factor 2 (which KLF2 codes for) seem to have heart ...
The steps to write a research hypothesis are: 1. Stating the problem: Ensure that the hypothesis defines the research problem. 2. Writing a hypothesis as an 'if-then' statement: Include the action and the expected outcome of your study by following a 'if-then' structure.
Hypotheses in research need to satisfy specific criteria to be considered scientifically rigorous. Here are the most notable qualities of a strong hypothesis: Testability: Ensure the hypothesis allows you to work towards observable and testable results. Brevity and objectivity: Present your hypothesis as a brief statement and avoid wordiness.
INTRODUCTION. Scientific research is usually initiated by posing evidenced-based research questions which are then explicitly restated as hypotheses.1,2 The hypotheses provide directions to guide the study, solutions, explanations, and expected results.3,4 Both research questions and hypotheses are essentially formulated based on conventional theories and real-world processes, which allow the ...
Learn what a research hypothesis is, how to write one, and what makes it different from a scientific hypothesis. See examples of clear, specific and testable hypotheses for academic research projects.
Examples. A research hypothesis, in its plural form "hypotheses," is a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study, established at its outset. It is a key component of the scientific method. Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding.
15 Hypothesis Examples. A hypothesis is defined as a testable prediction, and is used primarily in scientific experiments as a potential or predicted outcome that scientists attempt to prove or disprove (Atkinson et al., 2021; Tan, 2022). In my types of hypothesis article, I outlined 13 different hypotheses, including the directional hypothesis ...
Research hypothesis checklist. Once you've written a possible hypothesis, make sure it checks the following boxes: It must be testable: You need a means to prove your hypothesis. If you can't test it, it's not a hypothesis. It must include a dependent and independent variable: At least one independent variable ( cause) and one dependent ...
Step 5: Present your findings. The results of hypothesis testing will be presented in the results and discussion sections of your research paper, dissertation or thesis.. In the results section you should give a brief summary of the data and a summary of the results of your statistical test (for example, the estimated difference between group means and associated p-value).
Step 8: Test your Hypothesis. Design an experiment or conduct observations to test your hypothesis. Example: Grow three sets of plants: one set exposed to 2 hours of sunlight daily, another exposed to 4 hours, and a third exposed to 8 hours. Measure and compare their growth after a set period.
A research hypothesis defines the theory or problem your research intends to test. It is the "educated guess" of what the final results of your research or experiment will be. ... Testing this type of hypothesis requires the use of random samples. Note that the null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing ...
Learn what exactly a research (or scientific) hypothesis is and how to write high-quality hypothesis statements for any dissertation, thesis, or research pro...
A research hypothesis can be defined as a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study. 2 Hypotheses help guide the research process and supplement the aim of the study. After several rounds of testing, hypotheses can help develop scientific theories. 3 Hypotheses are often written as if-then statements.
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not focused or researchable. The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically feasible. For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries.
Background Older subjects are at risk of elevated intestinal permeability (IP) which can lead to immune system activation and low-grade systemic inflammation. Dietary changes are a potential strategy to reduce IP. The MaPLE project evaluated the hypothesis that increasing (poly)phenol intake would beneficially impact on several important markers and pathways related to IP. The objective of the ...
Research procedure and sample. As the focus of our research is on the impact of entrepreneurial failure on reentry intention, in line with previous studies (Shore et al., 2023), a cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect sensitive data regarding entrepreneurial failure experiences from entrepreneurs.To collect such data, questionnaires were sent to target respondents (i.e ...