• ...is an important factor/concept/idea/ to consider because...
• … will be argued/outlined in this paper.
Once you have finished writing your first draft it is recommended that you spend time revising your work. Proofreading and editing are two different stages of the revision process.
As can be seen in the figure above there are four main areas that you should review during the editing phase of the revision process. The main things to consider when editing include content, structure, style, and sources. It is important to check that all the content relates to the assignment task, the structure is appropriate for the purposes of the assignment, the writing is academic in style, and that sources have been adequately acknowledged. Use the checklist below when editing your work.
Editing checklist
There are also several key things to look out for during the proofreading phase of the revision process. In this stage it is important to check your work for word choice, grammar and spelling, punctuation and referencing errors. It can be easy to mis-type words like ‘from’ and ‘form’ or mix up words like ‘trail’ and ‘trial’ when writing about research, apply American rather than Australian spelling, include unnecessary commas or incorrectly format your references list. The checklist below is a useful guide that you can use when proofreading your work.
Proofreading checklist
This chapter has examined the experience of writing assignments. It began by focusing on how to read and break down an assignment question, then highlighted the key components of essays. Next, it examined some techniques for paraphrasing and summarising, and how to build an argument. It concluded with a discussion on planning and structuring your assignment and giving it that essential polish with editing and proof-reading. Combining these skills and practising them, can greatly improve your success with this very common form of assessment.
Academic Skills Centre. (2013). Writing an introduction and conclusion . University of Canberra, accessed 13 August, 2013, http://www.canberra.edu.au/studyskills/writing/conclusions
Balkis, M., & Duru, E. (2016). Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: underregulation or misregulation form. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31 (3), 439-459.
Custer, N. (2018). Test anxiety and academic procrastination among prelicensure nursing students. Nursing education perspectives, 39 (3), 162-163.
Yerdelen, S., McCaffrey, A., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Longitudinal examination of procrastination and anxiety, and their relation to self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: Latent growth curve modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16 (1).
Writing Assignments Copyright © 2021 by Kate Derrington; Cristy Bartlett; and Sarah Irvine is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Java SE > Java SE Specifications > Java Language Specification
Chapter 5. Conversions and Contexts | ||
---|---|---|
Table of Contents
Every expression written in the Java programming language either produces no result ( §15.1 ) or has a type that can be deduced at compile time ( §15.3 ). When an expression appears in most contexts, it must be compatible with a type expected in that context; this type is called the target type . For convenience, compatibility of an expression with its surrounding context is facilitated in two ways:
First, for some expressions, termed poly expressions ( §15.2 ), the deduced type can be influenced by the target type. The same expression can have different types in different contexts.
Second, after the type of the expression has been deduced, an implicit conversion from the type of the expression to the target type can sometimes be performed.
If neither strategy is able to produce the appropriate type, a compile-time error occurs.
The rules determining whether an expression is a poly expression, and if so, its type and compatibility in a particular context, vary depending on the kind of context and the form of the expression. In addition to influencing the type of the expression, the target type may in some cases influence the run time behavior of the expression in order to produce a value of the appropriate type.
Similarly, the rules determining whether a target type allows an implicit conversion vary depending on the kind of context, the type of the expression, and, in one special case, the value of a constant expression ( §15.28 ). A conversion from type S to type T allows an expression of type S to be treated at compile time as if it had type T instead. In some cases this will require a corresponding action at run time to check the validity of the conversion or to translate the run-time value of the expression into a form appropriate for the new type T .
Example 5.0-1. Conversions at Compile Time and Run Time
A conversion from type Object to type Thread requires a run-time check to make sure that the run-time value is actually an instance of class Thread or one of its subclasses; if it is not, an exception is thrown.
A conversion from type Thread to type Object requires no run-time action; Thread is a subclass of Object , so any reference produced by an expression of type Thread is a valid reference value of type Object .
A conversion from type int to type long requires run-time sign-extension of a 32-bit integer value to the 64-bit long representation. No information is lost.
A conversion from type double to type long requires a non-trivial translation from a 64-bit floating-point value to the 64-bit integer representation. Depending on the actual run-time value, information may be lost.
The conversions possible in the Java programming language are grouped into several broad categories:
Identity conversions
Widening primitive conversions
Narrowing primitive conversions
Widening reference conversions
Narrowing reference conversions
Boxing conversions
Unboxing conversions
Unchecked conversions
Capture conversions
String conversions
Value set conversions
There are six kinds of conversion contexts in which poly expressions may be influenced by context or implicit conversions may occur. Each kind of context has different rules for poly expression typing and allows conversions in some of the categories above but not others. The contexts are:
Assignment contexts ( §5.2 , §15.26 ), in which an expression's value is bound to a named variable. Primitive and reference types are subject to widening, values may be boxed or unboxed, and some primitive constant expressions may be subject to narrowing. An unchecked conversion may also occur.
Strict invocation contexts ( §5.3 , §15.9 , §15.12 ), in which an argument is bound to a formal parameter of a constructor or method. Widening primitive, widening reference, and unchecked conversions may occur.
Loose invocation contexts ( §5.3 , §15.9 , §15.12 ), in which, like strict invocation contexts, an argument is bound to a formal parameter. Method or constructor invocations may provide this context if no applicable declaration can be found using only strict invocation contexts. In addition to widening and unchecked conversions, this context allows boxing and unboxing conversions to occur.
String contexts ( §5.4 , §15.18.1 ), in which a value of any type is converted to an object of type String .
Casting contexts ( §5.5 ), in which an expression's value is converted to a type explicitly specified by a cast operator ( §15.16 ). Casting contexts are more inclusive than assignment or loose invocation contexts, allowing any specific conversion other than a string conversion, but certain casts to a reference type are checked for correctness at run time.
Numeric contexts ( §5.6 ), in which the operands of a numeric operator may be widened to a common type so that an operation can be performed.
The term "conversion" is also used to describe, without being specific, any conversions allowed in a particular context. For example, we say that an expression that is the initializer of a local variable is subject to "assignment conversion", meaning that a specific conversion will be implicitly chosen for that expression according to the rules for the assignment context.
Example 5.0-2. Conversions In Various Contexts
This program produces the output:
Specific type conversions in the Java programming language are divided into 13 categories.
A conversion from a type to that same type is permitted for any type.
This may seem trivial, but it has two practical consequences. First, it is always permitted for an expression to have the desired type to begin with, thus allowing the simply stated rule that every expression is subject to conversion, if only a trivial identity conversion. Second, it implies that it is permitted for a program to include redundant cast operators for the sake of clarity.
19 specific conversions on primitive types are called the widening primitive conversions :
byte to short , int , long , float , or double
short to int , long , float , or double
char to int , long , float , or double
int to long , float , or double
long to float or double
float to double
A widening primitive conversion does not lose information about the overall magnitude of a numeric value in the following cases, where the numeric value is preserved exactly:
from an integral type to another integral type
from byte , short , or char to a floating point type
from int to double
from float to double in a strictfp expression ( §15.4 )
A widening primitive conversion from float to double that is not strictfp may lose information about the overall magnitude of the converted value.
A widening primitive conversion from int to float , or from long to float , or from long to double , may result in loss of precision - that is, the result may lose some of the least significant bits of the value. In this case, the resulting floating-point value will be a correctly rounded version of the integer value, using IEEE 754 round-to-nearest mode ( §4.2.4 ).
A widening conversion of a signed integer value to an integral type T simply sign-extends the two's-complement representation of the integer value to fill the wider format.
A widening conversion of a char to an integral type T zero-extends the representation of the char value to fill the wider format.
Despite the fact that loss of precision may occur, a widening primitive conversion never results in a run-time exception ( §11.1.1 ).
Example 5.1.2-1. Widening Primitive Conversion
This program prints:
thus indicating that information was lost during the conversion from type int to type float because values of type float are not precise to nine significant digits.
22 specific conversions on primitive types are called the narrowing primitive conversions :
short to byte or char
char to byte or short
int to byte , short , or char
long to byte , short , char , or int
float to byte , short , char , int , or long
double to byte , short , char , int , long , or float
A narrowing primitive conversion may lose information about the overall magnitude of a numeric value and may also lose precision and range.
A narrowing primitive conversion from double to float is governed by the IEEE 754 rounding rules ( §4.2.4 ). This conversion can lose precision, but also lose range, resulting in a float zero from a nonzero double and a float infinity from a finite double . A double NaN is converted to a float NaN and a double infinity is converted to the same-signed float infinity.
A narrowing conversion of a signed integer to an integral type T simply discards all but the n lowest order bits, where n is the number of bits used to represent type T . In addition to a possible loss of information about the magnitude of the numeric value, this may cause the sign of the resulting value to differ from the sign of the input value.
A narrowing conversion of a char to an integral type T likewise simply discards all but the n lowest order bits, where n is the number of bits used to represent type T . In addition to a possible loss of information about the magnitude of the numeric value, this may cause the resulting value to be a negative number, even though chars represent 16-bit unsigned integer values.
A narrowing conversion of a floating-point number to an integral type T takes two steps:
In the first step, the floating-point number is converted either to a long , if T is long , or to an int , if T is byte , short , char , or int , as follows:
If the floating-point number is NaN ( §4.2.3 ), the result of the first step of the conversion is an int or long 0 .
Otherwise, if the floating-point number is not an infinity, the floating-point value is rounded to an integer value V , rounding toward zero using IEEE 754 round-toward-zero mode ( §4.2.3 ). Then there are two cases:
If T is long , and this integer value can be represented as a long , then the result of the first step is the long value V .
Otherwise, if this integer value can be represented as an int , then the result of the first step is the int value V .
Otherwise, one of the following two cases must be true:
The value must be too small (a negative value of large magnitude or negative infinity), and the result of the first step is the smallest representable value of type int or long .
The value must be too large (a positive value of large magnitude or positive infinity), and the result of the first step is the largest representable value of type int or long .
In the second step:
If T is int or long , the result of the conversion is the result of the first step.
If T is byte , char , or short , the result of the conversion is the result of a narrowing conversion to type T ( §5.1.3 ) of the result of the first step.
Despite the fact that overflow, underflow, or other loss of information may occur, a narrowing primitive conversion never results in a run-time exception ( §11.1.1 ).
Example 5.1.3-1. Narrowing Primitive Conversion
The results for char , int , and long are unsurprising, producing the minimum and maximum representable values of the type.
The results for byte and short lose information about the sign and magnitude of the numeric values and also lose precision. The results can be understood by examining the low order bits of the minimum and maximum int . The minimum int is, in hexadecimal, 0x80000000 , and the maximum int is 0x7fffffff . This explains the short results, which are the low 16 bits of these values, namely, 0x0000 and 0xffff ; it explains the char results, which also are the low 16 bits of these values, namely, '\u0000' and '\uffff' ; and it explains the byte results, which are the low 8 bits of these values, namely, 0x00 and 0xff .
Example 5.1.3-2. Narrowing Primitive Conversions that lose information
The following conversion combines both widening and narrowing primitive conversions:
byte to char
First, the byte is converted to an int via widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 ), and then the resulting int is converted to a char by narrowing primitive conversion ( §5.1.3 ).
A widening reference conversion exists from any reference type S to any reference type T , provided S is a subtype ( §4.10 ) of T .
Widening reference conversions never require a special action at run time and therefore never throw an exception at run time. They consist simply in regarding a reference as having some other type in a manner that can be proved correct at compile time.
Six kinds of conversions are called the narrowing reference conversions :
From any reference type S to any reference type T , provided that S is a proper supertype of T ( §4.10 ).
An important special case is that there is a narrowing reference conversion from the class type Object to any other reference type ( §4.12.4 ).
From any class type C to any non-parameterized interface type K , provided that C is not final and does not implement K .
From any interface type J to any non-parameterized class type C that is not final .
From any interface type J to any non-parameterized interface type K , provided that J is not a subinterface of K .
From the interface types Cloneable and java.io.Serializable to any array type T [] .
From any array type SC [] to any array type TC [] , provided that SC and TC are reference types and there is a narrowing reference conversion from SC to TC .
Such conversions require a test at run time to find out whether the actual reference value is a legitimate value of the new type. If not, then a ClassCastException is thrown.
Boxing conversion converts expressions of primitive type to corresponding expressions of reference type. Specifically, the following nine conversions are called the boxing conversions :
From type boolean to type Boolean
From type byte to type Byte
From type short to type Short
From type char to type Character
From type int to type Integer
From type long to type Long
From type float to type Float
From type double to type Double
From the null type to the null type
This rule is necessary because the conditional operator ( §15.25 ) applies boxing conversion to the types of its operands, and uses the result in further calculations.
At run time, boxing conversion proceeds as follows:
If p is a value of type boolean , then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Boolean , such that r .booleanValue() == p
If p is a value of type byte , then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Byte , such that r .byteValue() == p
If p is a value of type char , then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Character , such that r .charValue() == p
If p is a value of type short , then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Short , such that r .shortValue() == p
If p is a value of type int , then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Integer , such that r .intValue() == p
If p is a value of type long , then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Long , such that r .longValue() == p
If p is a value of type float then:
If p is not NaN, then boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Float , such that r .floatValue() evaluates to p
Otherwise, boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Float such that r .isNaN() evaluates to true
If p is a value of type double , then:
If p is not NaN, boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Double , such that r .doubleValue() evaluates to p
Otherwise, boxing conversion converts p into a reference r of class and type Double such that r .isNaN() evaluates to true
If p is a value of any other type, boxing conversion is equivalent to an identity conversion ( §5.1.1 ).
If the value p being boxed is an integer literal of type int between -128 and 127 inclusive ( §3.10.1 ), or the boolean literal true or false ( §3.10.3 ), or a character literal between '\u0000' and '\u007f' inclusive ( §3.10.4 ), then let a and b be the results of any two boxing conversions of p . It is always the case that a == b .
Ideally, boxing a primitive value would always yield an identical reference. In practice, this may not be feasible using existing implementation techniques. The rule above is a pragmatic compromise, requiring that certain common values always be boxed into indistinguishable objects. The implementation may cache these, lazily or eagerly. For other values, the rule disallows any assumptions about the identity of the boxed values on the programmer's part. This allows (but does not require) sharing of some or all of these references. Notice that integer literals of type long are allowed, but not required, to be shared.
This ensures that in most common cases, the behavior will be the desired one, without imposing an undue performance penalty, especially on small devices. Less memory-limited implementations might, for example, cache all char and short values, as well as int and long values in the range of -32K to +32K.
A boxing conversion may result in an OutOfMemoryError if a new instance of one of the wrapper classes ( Boolean , Byte , Character , Short , Integer , Long , Float , or Double ) needs to be allocated and insufficient storage is available.
Unboxing conversion converts expressions of reference type to corresponding expressions of primitive type. Specifically, the following eight conversions are called the unboxing conversions :
From type Boolean to type boolean
From type Byte to type byte
From type Short to type short
From type Character to type char
From type Integer to type int
From type Long to type long
From type Float to type float
From type Double to type double
At run time, unboxing conversion proceeds as follows:
If r is a reference of type Boolean , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .booleanValue()
If r is a reference of type Byte , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .byteValue()
If r is a reference of type Character , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .charValue()
If r is a reference of type Short , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .shortValue()
If r is a reference of type Integer , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .intValue()
If r is a reference of type Long , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .longValue()
If r is a reference of type Float , unboxing conversion converts r into r .floatValue()
If r is a reference of type Double , then unboxing conversion converts r into r .doubleValue()
If r is null , unboxing conversion throws a NullPointerException
A type is said to be convertible to a numeric type if it is a numeric type ( §4.2 ), or it is a reference type that may be converted to a numeric type by unboxing conversion.
A type is said to be convertible to an integral type if it is an integral type, or it is a reference type that may be converted to an integral type by unboxing conversion.
Let G name a generic type declaration with n type parameters.
There is an unchecked conversion from the raw class or interface type ( §4.8 ) G to any parameterized type of the form G < T 1 ,..., T n > .
There is an unchecked conversion from the raw array type G [] k to any array type of the form G < T 1 ,..., T n > [] k . (The notation [] k indicates an array type of k dimensions.)
Use of an unchecked conversion causes a compile-time unchecked warning unless all type arguments T i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ) are unbounded wildcards ( §4.5.1 ), or the unchecked warning is suppressed by the SuppressWarnings annotation ( §9.6.4.5 ).
Unchecked conversion is used to enable a smooth interoperation of legacy code, written before the introduction of generic types, with libraries that have undergone a conversion to use genericity (a process we call generification). In such circumstances (most notably, clients of the Collections Framework in java.util ), legacy code uses raw types (e.g. Collection instead of Collection<String> ). Expressions of raw types are passed as arguments to library methods that use parameterized versions of those same types as the types of their corresponding formal parameters.
Such calls cannot be shown to be statically safe under the type system using generics. Rejecting such calls would invalidate large bodies of existing code, and prevent them from using newer versions of the libraries. This in turn, would discourage library vendors from taking advantage of genericity. To prevent such an unwelcome turn of events, a raw type may be converted to an arbitrary invocation of the generic type declaration to which the raw type refers. While the conversion is unsound, it is tolerated as a concession to practicality. An unchecked warning is issued in such cases.
Let G name a generic type declaration ( §8.1.2 , §9.1.2 ) with n type parameters A 1 ,..., A n with corresponding bounds U 1 ,..., U n .
There exists a capture conversion from a parameterized type G < T 1 ,..., T n > ( §4.5 ) to a parameterized type G < S 1 ,..., S n > , where, for 1 ≤ i ≤ n :
If T i is a wildcard type argument ( §4.5.1 ) of the form ? , then S i is a fresh type variable whose upper bound is U i [ A 1 := S 1 ,..., A n := S n ] and whose lower bound is the null type ( §4.1 ).
If T i is a wildcard type argument of the form ? extends B i , then S i is a fresh type variable whose upper bound is glb( B i , U i [ A 1 := S 1 ,..., A n := S n ] ) and whose lower bound is the null type.
glb( V 1 ,..., V m ) is defined as V 1 & ... & V m .
It is a compile-time error if, for any two classes (not interfaces) V i and V j , V i is not a subclass of V j or vice versa.
If T i is a wildcard type argument of the form ? super B i , then S i is a fresh type variable whose upper bound is U i [ A 1 := S 1 ,..., A n := S n ] and whose lower bound is B i .
Otherwise, S i = T i .
Capture conversion on any type other than a parameterized type ( §4.5 ) acts as an identity conversion ( §5.1.1 ).
Capture conversion is not applied recursively.
Capture conversion never requires a special action at run time and therefore never throws an exception at run time.
Capture conversion is designed to make wildcards more useful. To understand the motivation, let's begin by looking at the method java.util.Collections.reverse() :
The method reverses the list provided as a parameter. It works for any type of list, and so the use of the wildcard type List<?> as the type of the formal parameter is entirely appropriate.
Now consider how one would implement reverse() :
The implementation needs to copy the list, extract elements from the copy, and insert them into the original. To do this in a type-safe manner, we need to give a name, T , to the element type of the incoming list. We do this in the private service method rev() . This requires us to pass the incoming argument list, of type List<?> , as an argument to rev() . In general, List<?> is a list of unknown type. It is not a subtype of List<T> , for any type T . Allowing such a subtype relation would be unsound. Given the method:
the following code would undermine the type system:
So, without some special dispensation, we can see that the call from reverse() to rev() would be disallowed. If this were the case, the author of reverse() would be forced to write its signature as:
This is undesirable, as it exposes implementation information to the caller. Worse, the designer of an API might reason that the signature using a wildcard is what the callers of the API require, and only later realize that a type safe implementation was precluded.
The call from reverse() to rev() is in fact harmless, but it cannot be justified on the basis of a general subtyping relation between List<?> and List<T> . The call is harmless, because the incoming argument is doubtless a list of some type (albeit an unknown one). If we can capture this unknown type in a type variable X , we can infer T to be X . That is the essence of capture conversion. The specification of course must cope with complications, like non-trivial (and possibly recursively defined) upper or lower bounds, the presence of multiple arguments etc.
Mathematically sophisticated readers will want to relate capture conversion to established type theory. Readers unfamiliar with type theory can skip this discussion - or else study a suitable text, such as Types and Programming Languages by Benjamin Pierce, and then revisit this section.
Here then is a brief summary of the relationship of capture conversion to established type theoretical notions. Wildcard types are a restricted form of existential types. Capture conversion corresponds loosely to an opening of a value of existential type. A capture conversion of an expression e can be thought of as an open of e in a scope that comprises the top level expression that encloses e .
The classical open operation on existentials requires that the captured type variable must not escape the opened expression. The open that corresponds to capture conversion is always on a scope sufficiently large that the captured type variable can never be visible outside that scope. The advantage of this scheme is that there is no need for a close operation, as defined in the paper On Variance-Based Subtyping for Parametric Types by Atsushi Igarashi and Mirko Viroli, in the proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Object Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2002). For a formal account of wildcards, see Wild FJ by Mads Torgersen, Erik Ernst and Christian Plesner Hansen, in the 12th workshop on Foundations of Object Oriented Programming (FOOL 2005).
Any type may be converted to type String by string conversion .
A value x of primitive type T is first converted to a reference value as if by giving it as an argument to an appropriate class instance creation expression ( §15.9 ):
If T is boolean , then use new Boolean( x ) .
If T is char , then use new Character( x ) .
If T is byte , short , or int , then use new Integer( x ) .
If T is long , then use new Long( x ) .
If T is float , then use new Float( x ) .
If T is double , then use new Double( x ) .
This reference value is then converted to type String by string conversion.
Now only reference values need to be considered:
If the reference is null , it is converted to the string " null " (four ASCII characters n , u , l , l ).
Otherwise, the conversion is performed as if by an invocation of the toString method of the referenced object with no arguments; but if the result of invoking the toString method is null , then the string " null " is used instead.
The toString method is defined by the primordial class Object ( §4.3.2 ). Many classes override it, notably Boolean , Character , Integer , Long , Float , Double , and String .
See §5.4 for details of the string context.
Any conversion that is not explicitly allowed is forbidden.
Value set conversion is the process of mapping a floating-point value from one value set to another without changing its type.
Within an expression that is not FP-strict ( §15.4 ), value set conversion provides choices to an implementation of the Java programming language:
If the value is an element of the float-extended-exponent value set, then the implementation may, at its option, map the value to the nearest element of the float value set. This conversion may result in overflow (in which case the value is replaced by an infinity of the same sign) or underflow (in which case the value may lose precision because it is replaced by a denormalized number or zero of the same sign).
If the value is an element of the double-extended-exponent value set, then the implementation may, at its option, map the value to the nearest element of the double value set. This conversion may result in overflow (in which case the value is replaced by an infinity of the same sign) or underflow (in which case the value may lose precision because it is replaced by a denormalized number or zero of the same sign).
Within an FP-strict expression ( §15.4 ), value set conversion does not provide any choices; every implementation must behave in the same way:
If the value is of type float and is not an element of the float value set, then the implementation must map the value to the nearest element of the float value set. This conversion may result in overflow or underflow.
If the value is of type double and is not an element of the double value set, then the implementation must map the value to the nearest element of the double value set. This conversion may result in overflow or underflow.
Within an FP-strict expression, mapping values from the float-extended-exponent value set or double-extended-exponent value set is necessary only when a method is invoked whose declaration is not FP-strict and the implementation has chosen to represent the result of the method invocation as an element of an extended-exponent value set.
Whether in FP-strict code or code that is not FP-strict, value set conversion always leaves unchanged any value whose type is neither float nor double .
Assignment contexts allow the value of an expression to be assigned ( §15.26 ) to a variable; the type of the expression must be converted to the type of the variable.
Assignment contexts allow the use of one of the following:
an identity conversion ( §5.1.1 )
a widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 )
a widening reference conversion ( §5.1.5 )
a boxing conversion ( §5.1.7 ) optionally followed by a widening reference conversion
an unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ) optionally followed by a widening primitive conversion.
If, after the conversions listed above have been applied, the resulting type is a raw type ( §4.8 ), an unchecked conversion ( §5.1.9 ) may then be applied.
In addition, if the expression is a constant expression ( §15.28 ) of type byte , short , char , or int :
A narrowing primitive conversion may be used if the type of the variable is byte , short , or char , and the value of the constant expression is representable in the type of the variable.
A narrowing primitive conversion followed by a boxing conversion may be used if the type of the variable is:
Byte and the value of the constant expression is representable in the type byte .
Short and the value of the constant expression is representable in the type short .
Character and the value of the constant expression is representable in the type char .
The compile-time narrowing of constant expressions means that code such as:
is allowed. Without the narrowing, the fact that the integer literal 42 has type int would mean that a cast to byte would be required:
Finally, a value of the null type (the null reference is the only such value) may be assigned to any reference type, resulting in a null reference of that type.
It is a compile-time error if the chain of conversions contains two parameterized types that are not in the subtype relation ( §4.10 ).
An example of such an illegal chain would be:
The first three elements of the chain are related by widening reference conversion, while the last entry is derived from its predecessor by unchecked conversion. However, this is not a valid assignment conversion, because the chain contains two parameterized types, Comparable<Integer> and Comparable<String> , that are not subtypes.
If the type of the expression cannot be converted to the type of the variable by a conversion permitted in an assignment context, then a compile-time error occurs.
If the type of an expression can be converted to the type of a variable by assignment conversion, we say the expression (or its value) is assignable to the variable or, equivalently, that the type of the expression is assignment compatible with the type of the variable.
If the type of the variable is float or double , then value set conversion ( §5.1.13 ) is applied to the value v that is the result of the conversion(s):
If v is of type float and is an element of the float-extended-exponent value set, then the implementation must map v to the nearest element of the float value set. This conversion may result in overflow or underflow.
If v is of type double and is an element of the double-extended-exponent value set, then the implementation must map v to the nearest element of the double value set. This conversion may result in overflow or underflow.
The only exceptions that may arise from conversions in an assignment context are:
A ClassCastException if, after the conversions above have been applied, the resulting value is an object which is not an instance of a subclass or subinterface of the erasure ( §4.6 ) of the type of the variable.
This circumstance can only arise as a result of heap pollution ( §4.12.2 ). In practice, implementations need only perform casts when accessing a field or method of an object of parameterized type when the erased type of the field, or the erased return type of the method, differ from its unerased type.
An OutOfMemoryError as a result of a boxing conversion.
A NullPointerException as a result of an unboxing conversion on a null reference.
An ArrayStoreException in special cases involving array elements or field access ( §10.5 , §15.26.1 ).
Example 5.2-1. Assignment Conversion for Primitive Types
The following program, however, produces compile-time errors:
because not all short values are char values, and neither are all char values short values.
Example 5.2-2. Assignment Conversion for Reference Types
The following test program illustrates assignment conversions on reference values, but fails to compile, as described in its comments. This example should be compared to the preceding one.
Example 5.2-3. Assignment Conversion for Array Types
In this example:
The value of veclong cannot be assigned to a Long variable, because Long is a class type other than Object . An array can be assigned only to a variable of a compatible array type, or to a variable of type Object , Cloneable or java.io.Serializable .
The value of veclong cannot be assigned to vecshort , because they are arrays of primitive type, and short and long are not the same primitive type.
The value of cpvec can be assigned to pvec , because any reference that could be the value of an expression of type ColoredPoint can be the value of a variable of type Point . The subsequent assignment of the new Point to a component of pvec then would throw an ArrayStoreException (if the program were otherwise corrected so that it could be compiled), because a ColoredPoint array cannot have an instance of Point as the value of a component.
The value of pvec cannot be assigned to cpvec , because not every reference that could be the value of an expression of type ColoredPoint can correctly be the value of a variable of type Point . If the value of pvec at run time were a reference to an instance of Point[] , and the assignment to cpvec were allowed, a simple reference to a component of cpvec , say, cpvec[0] , could return a Point , and a Point is not a ColoredPoint . Thus to allow such an assignment would allow a violation of the type system. A cast may be used ( §5.5 , §15.16 ) to ensure that pvec references a ColoredPoint[] :
Invocation contexts allow an argument value in a method or constructor invocation ( §8.8.7.1 , §15.9 , §15.12 ) to be assigned to a corresponding formal parameter.
Strict invocation contexts allow the use of one of the following:
Loose invocation contexts allow a more permissive set of conversions, because they are only used for a particular invocation if no applicable declaration can be found using strict invocation contexts. Loose invocation contexts allow the use of one of the following:
a boxing conversion ( §5.1.7 ) optionally followed by widening reference conversion
an unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ) optionally followed by a widening primitive conversion
If, after the conversions listed for an invocation context have been applied, the resulting type is a raw type ( §4.8 ), an unchecked conversion ( §5.1.9 ) may then be applied.
A value of the null type (the null reference is the only such value) may be assigned to any reference type.
If the type of the expression cannot be converted to the type of the parameter by a conversion permitted in a loose invocation context, then a compile-time error occurs.
If the type of an argument expression is either float or double , then value set conversion ( §5.1.13 ) is applied after the conversion(s):
If an argument value of type float is an element of the float-extended-exponent value set, then the implementation must map the value to the nearest element of the float value set. This conversion may result in overflow or underflow.
If an argument value of type double is an element of the double-extended-exponent value set, then the implementation must map the value to the nearest element of the double value set. This conversion may result in overflow or underflow.
The only exceptions that may arise in an invocation context are:
A ClassCastException if, after the type conversions above have been applied, the resulting value is an object which is not an instance of a subclass or subinterface of the erasure ( §4.6 ) of the corresponding formal parameter type.
Neither strict nor loose invocation contexts include the implicit narrowing of integer constant expressions which is allowed in assignment contexts. The designers of the Java programming language felt that including these implicit narrowing conversions would add additional complexity to the rules of overload resolution ( §15.12.2 ).
Thus, the program:
causes a compile-time error because the integer literals 12 and 2 have type int , so neither method m matches under the rules of overload resolution. A language that included implicit narrowing of integer constant expressions would need additional rules to resolve cases like this example.
String contexts apply only to an operand of the binary + operator which is not a String when the other operand is a String .
The target type in these contexts is always String , and a string conversion ( §5.1.11 ) of the non- String operand always occurs. Evaluation of the + operator then proceeds as specified in §15.18.1 .
Casting contexts allow the operand of a cast operator ( §15.16 ) to be converted to the type explicitly named by the cast operator.
Casting contexts allow the use of one of:
a narrowing primitive conversion ( §5.1.3 )
a widening and narrowing primitive conversion ( §5.1.4 )
a widening reference conversion ( §5.1.5 ) optionally followed by either an unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ) or an unchecked conversion ( §5.1.9 )
a narrowing reference conversion ( §5.1.6 ) optionally followed by either an unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ) or an unchecked conversion ( §5.1.9 )
a boxing conversion ( §5.1.7 ) optionally followed by a widening reference conversion ( §5.1.5 )
an unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ) optionally followed by a widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 ).
Value set conversion ( §5.1.13 ) is applied after the type conversion.
The compile-time legality of a casting conversion is as follows:
An expression of a primitive type may undergo casting conversion to another primitive type, by an identity conversion (if the types are the same), or by a widening primitive conversion, or by a narrowing primitive conversion, or by a widening and narrowing primitive conversion.
An expression of a primitive type may undergo casting conversion to a reference type without error, by boxing conversion.
An expression of a reference type may undergo casting conversion to a primitive type without error, by unboxing conversion.
An expression of a reference type may undergo casting conversion to another reference type if no compile-time error occurs given the rules in §5.5.1 .
The following tables enumerate which conversions are used in certain casting conversions. Each conversion is signified by a symbol:
- signifies no casting conversion allowed
≈ signifies identity conversion ( §5.1.1 )
ω signifies widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 )
η signifies narrowing primitive conversion ( §5.1.3 )
ω η signifies widening and narrowing primitive conversion ( §5.1.4 )
⇑ signifies widening reference conversion ( §5.1.5 )
⇓ signifies narrowing reference conversion ( §5.1.6 )
⊕ signifies boxing conversion ( §5.1.7 )
⊗ signifies unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 )
In the tables, a comma between symbols indicates that a casting conversion uses one conversion followed by another. The type Object means any reference type other than the eight wrapper classes Boolean , Byte , Short , Character , Integer , Long , Float , Double .
Table 5.5-A. Casting conversions to primitive types
To → | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
From ↓ | ||||||||
≈ | ω | ωη | ω | ω | ω | ω | - | |
η | ≈ | η | ω | ω | ω | ω | - | |
η | η | ≈ | ω | ω | ω | ω | - | |
η | η | η | ≈ | ω | ω | ω | - | |
η | η | η | η | ≈ | ω | ω | - | |
η | η | η | η | η | ≈ | ω | - | |
η | η | η | η | η | η | ≈ | - | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | ≈ | |
⊗ | ⊗,ω | - | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | - | |
- | ⊗ | - | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | - | |
- | - | ⊗ | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | - | |
- | - | - | ⊗ | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | - | |
- | - | - | - | ⊗ | ⊗,ω | ⊗,ω | - | |
- | - | - | - | - | ⊗ | ⊗,ω | - | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | ⊗ | - | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | ⊗ | |
⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ | ⇓,⊗ |
Table 5.5-B. Casting conversions to reference types
To → | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
From ↓ | |||||||||
⊕ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | ⊕ | - | - | - | - | - | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | - | ⊕ | - | - | - | - | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | - | - | ⊕ | - | - | - | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | ⊕ | - | - | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | - | ⊕ | - | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | ⊕ | - | ⊕,⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | ⊕ | ⊕,⇑ | |
≈ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ⇑ | |
- | ≈ | - | - | - | - | - | - | ⇑ | |
- | - | ≈ | - | - | - | - | - | ⇑ | |
- | - | - | ≈ | - | - | - | - | ⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | ≈ | - | - | - | ⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | - | ≈ | - | - | ⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | ≈ | - | ⇑ | |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | ≈ | ⇑ | |
⇓ | ⇓ | ⇓ | ⇓ | ⇓ | ⇓ | ⇓ | ⇓ | ≈ |
Given a compile-time reference type S (source) and a compile-time reference type T (target), a casting conversion exists from S to T if no compile-time errors occur due to the following rules.
If S is a class type:
If T is a class type, then either | S | <: | T |, or | T | <: | S |. Otherwise, a compile-time error occurs.
Furthermore, if there exists a supertype X of T , and a supertype Y of S , such that both X and Y are provably distinct parameterized types ( §4.5 ), and that the erasures of X and Y are the same, a compile-time error occurs.
If T is an interface type:
If S is not a final class ( §8.1.1 ), then, if there exists a supertype X of T , and a supertype Y of S , such that both X and Y are provably distinct parameterized types, and that the erasures of X and Y are the same, a compile-time error occurs.
Otherwise, the cast is always legal at compile time (because even if S does not implement T , a subclass of S might).
If S is a final class ( §8.1.1 ), then S must implement T , or a compile-time error occurs.
If T is a type variable, then this algorithm is applied recursively, using the upper bound of T in place of T .
If T is an array type, then S must be the class Object , or a compile-time error occurs.
If T is an intersection type, T 1 & ... & T n , then it is a compile-time error if there exists a T i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ) such that S cannot be cast to T i by this algorithm. That is, the success of the cast is determined by the most restrictive component of the intersection type.
If S is an interface type:
If T is an array type, then S must be the type java.io.Serializable or Cloneable (the only interfaces implemented by arrays), or a compile-time error occurs.
If T is a class or interface type that is not final ( §8.1.1 ), then if there exists a supertype X of T , and a supertype Y of S , such that both X and Y are provably distinct parameterized types, and that the erasures of X and Y are the same, a compile-time error occurs.
Otherwise, the cast is always legal at compile time (because even if T does not implement S , a subclass of T might).
If T is a class type that is final , then:
If S is not a parameterized type or a raw type, then T must implement S , or a compile-time error occurs.
Otherwise, S is either a parameterized type that is an invocation of some generic type declaration G , or a raw type corresponding to a generic type declaration G . Then there must exist a supertype X of T , such that X is an invocation of G , or a compile-time error occurs.
Furthermore, if S and X are provably distinct parameterized types then a compile-time error occurs.
If T is an intersection type, T 1 & ... & T n , then it is a compile-time error if there exists a T i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ) such that S cannot be cast to T i by this algorithm.
If S is a type variable, then this algorithm is applied recursively, using the upper bound of S in place of S .
If S is an intersection type A 1 & ... & A n , then it is a compile-time error if there exists an A i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ) such that A i cannot be cast to T by this algorithm. That is, the success of the cast is determined by the most restrictive component of the intersection type.
If S is an array type SC [] , that is, an array of components of type SC :
If T is a class type, then if T is not Object , then a compile-time error occurs (because Object is the only class type to which arrays can be assigned).
If T is an interface type, then a compile-time error occurs unless T is the type java.io.Serializable or the type Cloneable (the only interfaces implemented by arrays).
If T is an array type TC [] , that is, an array of components of type TC , then a compile-time error occurs unless one of the following is true:
TC and SC are the same primitive type.
TC and SC are reference types and type SC can undergo casting conversion to TC .
Example 5.5.1-1. Casting Conversion for Reference Types
Here, the first compile-time error occurs because the class types Long and Point are unrelated (that is, they are not the same, and neither is a subclass of the other), so a cast between them will always fail.
The second compile-time error occurs because a variable of type EndPoint can never reference a value that implements the interface Colorable . This is because EndPoint is a final type, and a variable of a final type always holds a value of the same run-time type as its compile-time type. Therefore, the run-time type of variable e must be exactly the type EndPoint , and type EndPoint does not implement Colorable .
Example 5.5.1-2. Casting Conversion for Array Types
This program compiles without errors and produces the output:
A cast from a type S to a type T is statically known to be correct if and only if S <: T ( §4.10 ).
A cast from a type S to a parameterized type ( §4.5 ) T is unchecked unless at least one of the following is true:
All of the type arguments ( §4.5.1 ) of T are unbounded wildcards
T <: S and S has no subtype X other than T where the type arguments of X are not contained in the type arguments of T .
A cast from a type S to a type variable T is unchecked unless S <: T .
A cast from a type S to an intersection type T 1 & ... & T n is unchecked if there exists a T i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ) such that a cast from S to T i is unchecked.
An unchecked cast from S to a non-intersection type T is completely unchecked if the cast from | S | to | T | is statically known to be correct. Otherwise, it is partially unchecked .
An unchecked cast from S to an intersection type T 1 & ... & T n is completely unchecked if, for all i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ), a cast from S to T i is either statically known to be correct or completely unchecked. Otherwise, it is partially unchecked .
An unchecked cast causes a compile-time unchecked warning, unless suppressed by the SuppressWarnings annotation ( §9.6.4.5 ).
A cast is checked if it is not statically known to be correct and it is not unchecked.
If a cast to a reference type is not a compile-time error, there are several cases:
The cast is statically known to be correct.
No run-time action is performed for such a cast.
The cast is a completely unchecked cast.
The cast is a partially unchecked or checked cast to an intersection type.
Where the intersection type is T 1 & ... & T n , then for all i (1 ≤ i ≤ n ), any run-time check required for a cast from S to T i is also required for the cast to the intersection type.
The cast is a partially unchecked cast to a non-intersection type.
Such a cast requires a run-time validity check. The check is performed as if the cast had been a checked cast between | S | and | T |, as described below.
The cast is a checked cast to a non-intersection type.
Such a cast requires a run-time validity check. If the value at run time is null , then the cast is allowed. Otherwise, let R be the class of the object referred to by the run-time reference value, and let T be the erasure ( §4.6 ) of the type named in the cast operator. A cast conversion must check, at run time, that the class R is assignment compatible with the type T , via the algorithm in §5.5.3 .
Note that R cannot be an interface when these rules are first applied for any given cast, but R may be an interface if the rules are applied recursively because the run-time reference value may refer to an array whose element type is an interface type.
Here is the algorithm to check whether the run-time type R of an object is assignment compatible with the type T which is the erasure ( §4.6 ) of the type named in the cast operator. If a run-time exception is thrown, it is a ClassCastException .
If R is an ordinary class (not an array class):
If T is a class type, then R must be either the same class ( §4.3.4 ) as T or a subclass of T , or a run-time exception is thrown.
If T is an interface type, then R must implement ( §8.1.5 ) interface T , or a run-time exception is thrown.
If T is an array type, then a run-time exception is thrown.
If R is an interface:
If T is a class type, then T must be Object ( §4.3.2 ), or a run-time exception is thrown.
If T is an interface type, then R must be either the same interface as T or a subinterface of T , or a run-time exception is thrown.
If R is a class representing an array type RC [] , that is, an array of components of type RC :
If T is an interface type, then a run-time exception is thrown unless T is the type java.io.Serializable or the type Cloneable (the only interfaces implemented by arrays).
This case could slip past the compile-time checking if, for example, a reference to an array were stored in a variable of type Object .
If T is an array type TC [] , that is, an array of components of type TC , then a run-time exception is thrown unless one of the following is true:
TC and RC are the same primitive type.
TC and RC are reference types and type RC can be cast to TC by a recursive application of these run-time rules for casting.
Example 5.5.3-1. Incompatible Types at Run Time
This program uses casts to compile, but it throws exceptions at run time, because the types are incompatible.
Numeric contexts apply to the operands of an arithmetic operator.
Numeric contexts allow the use of:
A numeric promotion is a process by which, given an arithmetic operator and its argument expressions, the arguments are converted to an inferred target type T . T is chosen during promotion such that each argument expression can be converted to T and the arithmetic operation is defined for values of type T .
The two kinds of numeric promotion are unary numeric promotion ( §5.6.1 ) and binary numeric promotion ( §5.6.2 ).
Some operators apply unary numeric promotion to a single operand, which must produce a value of a numeric type:
If the operand is of compile-time type Byte , Short , Character , or Integer , it is subjected to unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ). The result is then promoted to a value of type int by a widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 ) or an identity conversion ( §5.1.1 ).
Otherwise, if the operand is of compile-time type Long , Float , or Double , it is subjected to unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ).
Otherwise, if the operand is of compile-time type byte , short , or char , it is promoted to a value of type int by a widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 ).
Otherwise, a unary numeric operand remains as is and is not converted.
After the conversion(s), if any, value set conversion ( §5.1.13 ) is then applied.
Unary numeric promotion is performed on expressions in the following situations:
Each dimension expression in an array creation expression ( §15.10.1 )
The index expression in an array access expression ( §15.10.3 )
The operand of a unary plus operator + ( §15.15.3 )
The operand of a unary minus operator - ( §15.15.4 )
The operand of a bitwise complement operator ~ ( §15.15.5 )
Each operand, separately, of a shift operator << , >> , or >>> ( §15.19 ).
A long shift distance (right operand) does not promote the value being shifted (left operand) to long .
Example 5.6.1-1. Unary Numeric Promotion
When an operator applies binary numeric promotion to a pair of operands, each of which must denote a value that is convertible to a numeric type, the following rules apply, in order:
If any operand is of a reference type, it is subjected to unboxing conversion ( §5.1.8 ).
Widening primitive conversion ( §5.1.2 ) is applied to convert either or both operands as specified by the following rules:
If either operand is of type double , the other is converted to double .
Otherwise, if either operand is of type float , the other is converted to float .
Otherwise, if either operand is of type long , the other is converted to long .
Otherwise, both operands are converted to type int .
After the conversion(s), if any, value set conversion ( §5.1.13 ) is then applied to each operand.
Binary numeric promotion is performed on the operands of certain operators:
The multiplicative operators * , / , and % ( §15.17 )
The addition and subtraction operators for numeric types + and - ( §15.18.2 )
The numerical comparison operators < , <= , > , and >= ( §15.20.1 )
The numerical equality operators == and != ( §15.21.1 )
The integer bitwise operators & , ^ , and | ( §15.22.1 )
In certain cases, the conditional operator ? : ( §15.25 )
Example 5.6.2-1. Binary Numeric Promotion
The example converts the ASCII character G to the ASCII control-G (BEL), by masking off all but the low 5 bits of the character. The 7 is the numeric value of this control character.
Chapter 4. Types, Values, and Variables | Chapter 6. Names |
Overview: This assignment (which we will refer to as the context comparison) serves as prewriting for your arguing essays by providing an opportunity to analyze the audiences and contexts for your arguments. Understanding your two audiences is important since you need to know who your readers are before you can effectively convince them to consider your arguments. Examining your contexts is equally important because your argument will only be taken seriously or be considered for publication if it meets context expectations. Since you are examining two contexts, the assignment implies that you’ll need to think about how you would compare and contrast these writing situations, even though the format of this written analysis doesn’t require the formal use of the comparison/contrast mode of writing.
Purposes for this Analysis: To distinguish the audiences and contexts of two arguing essays.
Audience: You and your instructor.
Length of the Analysis: Your analysis should be roughly 750-1000 words (or 3-4 pages) in length.
Format of the Analysis: You need not think of this assignment as a paper. Your analysis will consist of three parts. You may use headings. You may also number your responses. You do NOT need to think of this as a comparison/contrast paper even though your thinking will compel you to consider the similarities and differences between two distinctive publications.
Part I - Purpose
Part II - Context Analysis
· What is each publication’s general purpose?
· Who are the target readers of each?
· What type of content is most suitable for each publication? What kinds of topics and issues are typically addressed within them?
· What is the appropriate length of a text written for these publications?
· What do typical pieces of writing for these publications look like? (Describe fully.)
· How would you describe the tone, style, and register (level of formality in word choice, use of jargon, etc.) used by writers whose work appear in these publications?
· What patterns can you note? (i.e. Do all articles or columns begin the same way? Are most arguments well supported? Are they highly opinionated?)
· Are there specific requirements of which you should be aware, such as guidelines for citing sources?
Part III - Audience Analysis
When you encounter a vocabulary word with which you are unfamiliar, what do you do? Use the context clues to determine the word's meaning. In addition to the great context clues worksheets on this page, check out this free context clues game that I made. Students learn hundreds of challenging vocabulary words while playing a fun climbing game.
I used the context clues worksheets on this page to help my students in the classroom. I am sharing them with you in the hopes that they will help you as well. The words have been selected from texts recommended by Common Core. These context clues worksheets have been divided into three levels:
These are the easiest context clues worksheets. These worksheets were designed to help struggling students or students in lower grades. They were written to help students reading at a 3rd to 6th grade reading level . Be sure to preview all materials before using them in your classroom.
Context clues are hints in the sentence that help good readers figure out the meanings of unfamiliar words. When we look at the "context" of a word, we look at how it is being used. Based on how these words are used, and on our knowledge of the other words in the sentence, we make an educated prediction as to what the challenging vocabulary word may mean.
Examine these lines from Lewis Carroll's poem, "Jabberwocky":
Jubjub , frumious , and Bandersnatch were NOT words before Carroll coined them. Yet readers are able to get meaning from them based on how the words are used. A reading of the whole poem is helpful way to introduce context clues to your students.
Carl anthony peterson.
Excellent worksheet/resources to use to help your young person build and increase their vocabulary. Thank you sharing!
Coming from a country where english is our third or 4th language but its also our language of instruction
YOUR MATERIALS HERE ARE AWSOME
I REALLY THANK YOU ALL FOR ALL THE BEAUTIFUL MATERIALS
TREVINA GIMA
I would like to express my warmest gratitude for these worksheets. It helps us educators to intensify the skills of students in reading comprehension through context clues. Thank you! God Bless and More Power!
thank you so much. These worksheets are helpful.
you are very generous to have share this very helpful to me as
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.
As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.
The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.
Basic Definitions and Concepts:
An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).
An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.
The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.
Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.
No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.
Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)
The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.
The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)
The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.
More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.
And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.
Novation Compared to Assignment:
Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”
A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.
Equitable Assignments:
An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.
In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.
An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.
Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .
But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.
Enforceability of Assignments:
Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.
In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.
After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.
Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.
Assignment of Contractual Rights:
Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.
If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.
In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).
On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.
The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.
Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.
A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.
Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:
Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.
A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.
Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.
Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.
A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.
Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.
A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.
Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.
It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)
It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.
Conclusion:
In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.
As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.
One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.
Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.
Read more about our firm
© 2024, Stimmel, Stimmel & Roeser, All rights reserved | Terms of Use | Site by Bay Design
Home » Assignment – Types, Examples and Writing Guide
Table of Contents
Definition:
Assignment is a task given to students by a teacher or professor, usually as a means of assessing their understanding and application of course material. Assignments can take various forms, including essays, research papers, presentations, problem sets, lab reports, and more.
Assignments are typically designed to be completed outside of class time and may require independent research, critical thinking, and analysis. They are often graded and used as a significant component of a student’s overall course grade. The instructions for an assignment usually specify the goals, requirements, and deadlines for completion, and students are expected to meet these criteria to earn a good grade.
The use of assignments as a tool for teaching and learning has been a part of education for centuries. Following is a brief history of the Assignment.
Here are some of the most common types of assignments:
An essay is a piece of writing that presents an argument, analysis, or interpretation of a topic or question. It usually consists of an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Essay structure:
A research paper involves gathering and analyzing information on a particular topic, and presenting the findings in a well-structured, documented paper. It usually involves conducting original research, collecting data, and presenting it in a clear, organized manner.
Research paper structure:
A case study involves analyzing a real-life situation, problem or issue, and presenting a solution or recommendations based on the analysis. It often involves extensive research, data analysis, and critical thinking.
Case study structure:
A lab report is a scientific document that summarizes the results of a laboratory experiment or research project. It typically includes an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.
Lab report structure:
A presentation involves delivering information, data or findings to an audience, often with the use of visual aids such as slides, charts, or diagrams. It requires clear communication skills, good organization, and effective use of technology.
Presentation structure:
A creative project is an assignment that requires students to produce something original, such as a painting, sculpture, video, or creative writing piece. It allows students to demonstrate their creativity and artistic skills.
Creative project structure:
Following are Examples of Assignment templates samples:
Essay template:
I. Introduction
II. Body paragraphs
III. Conclusion
Research paper template:
I. Title page
II. Abstract
III. Introduction
IV. Literature review
V. Methodology
VI. Results
VII. Discussion
VIII. Conclusion
Case study template:
II. Analysis
III. Solution/recommendations
IV. Conclusion
Lab report template:
IV. Materials and methods
VI. Discussion
VII. Conclusion
Presentation template:
II. Main points
Creative writing template:
Here is a general guide on how to write an assignment:
Assignments have many applications across different fields and industries. Here are a few examples:
The purpose of an assignment varies depending on the context in which it is given. However, some common purposes of assignments include:
Assignments are typically given by instructors or professors as part of a course or academic program. The timing of when to write an assignment will depend on the specific requirements of the course or program, but in general, assignments should be completed within the timeframe specified by the instructor or program guidelines.
It is important to begin working on assignments as soon as possible to ensure enough time for research, writing, and revisions. Waiting until the last minute can result in rushed work and lower quality output.
It is also important to prioritize assignments based on their due dates and the amount of work required. This will help to manage time effectively and ensure that all assignments are completed on time.
In addition to assignments given by instructors or professors, there may be other situations where writing an assignment is necessary. For example, in the workplace, assignments may be given to complete a specific project or task. In these situations, it is important to establish clear deadlines and expectations to ensure that the assignment is completed on time and to a high standard.
Here are some common characteristics of assignments:
There are several advantages of assignment, including:
There are also some limitations of assignments that should be considered, including:
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
Text: what to do with essay assignments.
Writing assignments can be as varied as the instructors who assign them. Some assignments are explicit about what exactly you’ll need to do, in what order, and how it will be graded. Some assignments are very open-ended, leaving you to determine the best path toward answering the project. Most fall somewhere in the middle, containing details about some aspects but leaving other assumptions unstated. It’s important to remember that your first resource for getting clarification about an assignment is your instructor—she or he will be very willing to talk out ideas with you, to be sure you’re prepared at each step to do well with the writing.
Most writing in college will be a direct response to class materials—an assigned reading, a discussion in class, an experiment in a lab. Generally speaking, these writing tasks can be divided into three broad categories.
Being asked to summarize a source is a common task in many types of writing. It can also seem like a straightforward task: simply restate, in shorter form, what the source says. A lot of advanced skills are hidden in this seemingly simple assignment, however.
An effective summary does the following:
That last point is often the most challenging: we are opinionated creatures, by nature, and it can be very difficult to keep our opinions from creeping into a summary, which is meant to be completely neutral.
In college-level writing, assignments that are only summary are rare. That said, many types of writing tasks contain at least some element of summary, from a biology report that explains what happened during a chemical process, to an analysis essay that requires you to explain what several prominent positions about gun control are, as a component of comparing them against one another.
Many writing tasks will ask you to address a particular topic or a narrow set of topic options. Even with the topic identified, however, it can sometimes be difficult to determine what aspects of the writing will be most important when it comes to grading.
Although the topic may be defined, you can’t just grind out four or five pages of discussion, explanation, or analysis. It may seem strange, but even when you’re asked to “show how” or “illustrate,” you’re still being asked to make an argument. You must shape and focus that discussion or analysis so that it supports a claim that you discovered and formulated and that all of your discussion and explanation develops and supports.
Defined-topic writing assignments are used primarily to identify your familiarity with the subject matter.
Another writing assignment you’ll potentially encounter is one in which the topic may be only broadly identified (“water conservation” in an ecology course, for instance, or “the Dust Bowl” in a U.S. History course), or even completely open (“compose an argumentative research essay on a subject of your choice”).
The first hurdle with this type of task is to find a focus that interests you. Don’t just pick something you feel will be “easy to write about”—that almost always turns out to be a false assumption. Instead, you’ll get the most value out of, and find it easier to work on, a topic that intrigues you personally in some way.
The same getting-started ideas described for defined-topic assignments will help with these kinds of projects, too. You can also try talking with your instructor or a writing tutor (at your college’s writing center) to help brainstorm ideas and make sure you’re on track. You want to feel confident that you’ve got a clear idea of what it means to be successful in the writing and not waste time working in a direction that won’t be fruitful.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Context, in terms of the study of High School English, is best described as the circumstances surrounding the composition of a text. When we discuss the context of a text, we need to think about the following aspects of the text's composition: Historical - What has happened at the time. Political - What the political climate and events of ...
Your primary purpose for academic writing may be to inform, to persuade, or to entertain your audience. In the examples above, your primary purpose was to inform your listeners about cybersecurity. Audience and purpose work together, as in these examples: I need to write a letter to my landlord explaining why my rent is late so she won't be ...
Assignment formats Many assignments follow a basic format. Assignments often begin with an overview of the topic, include a central verb or verbs that describe the task, and offer some additional suggestions, questions, or prompts to get you started.
Writing in college is usually a response to class materials—an assigned reading, a discussion in class, an experiment in a lab. Generally speaking, these writing tasks can be divided into three broad categories: summary assignments, defined-topic assignments, and undefined-topic assignments.
In the context of an assignment, however, discussion entails fulfilling a defined and organized task: to construct an argument that considers and responds to an ample range of materials.
Context is information that helps the message of a literary text make sense. Whether it's a novel, a memoir, or a collection of short stories, a piece of writing can be interpreted variably depending on the contextual factors you provide as the author. Some context is obviously stated and some requires a close reading of the literary work—so it's important for every writer to know what ...
6. How to write an assignment introduction? The introduction should capture the reader's attention with an engaging opening, provide relevant background information and context, highlight the significance of the topic, and present a clear and concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or purpose of the assignment.
How to Write an Effective Assignment. At their base, all assignment prompts function a bit like a magnifying glass—they allow a student to isolate, focus on, inspect, and interact with some portion of your course material through a fixed lens of your choosing.
Understanding Your Assignment. Every assignment poses a challenge and presents an opportunity to show that you can think clearly and concisely, and on your own, about the course material. Writing assignments do more than give you a topic to discuss in vague terms—they invite you to. formulate an idea. about your topic.
Assignment description. Provide a concise description (a few sentences) of the most essential elements of the assignment. It is helpful to make sure the most important information about the genre, purpose, topic (s), and length of the paper are very easy to find. You could think of this as the "executive summary" of the assignment. Context (or keys to success). This section of an assignment ...
2. Assignment Context This section refers to the 'context' section of the assignment brief where you are required to provide background information on your chosen organisation.
This resource describes some steps you can take to better understand the requirements of your writing assignments. This resource works for either in-class, teacher-led discussion or for personal use.
Each assignment—be it an argumentative paper, reaction paper, reflective paper, lab report, discussion question, blog post, essay exam, project proposal, or what have you—is ultimately about your learning. To succeed with writing assignments (and benefit from them) you first have to understand their learning-related purposes.
Assignments are a common method of assessment at university and require careful planning and good quality research. Developing critical thinking and writing skills are also necessary to demonstrate your ability to understand and apply information about your topic. It is not uncommon to be unsure about the processes of writing assignments at ...
What is context in writing? Read on to discover the four types of context in writing, and for an explanation about why context is important.
The contexts are: Assignment contexts (§5.2, §15.26), in which an expression's value is bound to a named variable. Primitive and reference types are subject to widening, values may be boxed or unboxed, and some primitive constant expressions may be subject to narrowing. An unchecked conversion may also occur.
Portfolio 3: Audience and Context Comparative Analysis Overview: This assignment (which we will refer to as the context comparison) serves as prewriting for your arguing essays by providing an opportunity to analyze the audiences and contexts for your arguments.
Context Clues Worksheets When you encounter a vocabulary word with which you are unfamiliar, what do you do? Use the context clues to determine the word's meaning. In addition to the great context clues worksheets on this page, check out this free context clues game that I made. Students learn hundreds of challenging vocabulary words while playing a fun climbing game.
Assignments: The Basic Law The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.
Assignment is a task given to students by a teacher or professor, usually as a means of assessing their understanding and application of course material. Assignments can take various forms, including essays, research papers, presentations, problem sets, lab reports, and more.
Text: What to Do with Essay Assignments. Writing assignments can be as varied as the instructors who assign them. Some assignments are explicit about what exactly you'll need to do, in what order, and how it will be graded. Some assignments are very open-ended, leaving you to determine the best path toward answering the project.
The goal of this post is to provide you with enough technical information about how application assignments work to help you better plan and troubleshoot your..
Project Coconut is hitting all gears for the presidential campaign of Vice President and potential Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. The newest trend established by her supporters features a series of posts with the catchphrase I Understand The Assignment' with the hopes of getting the endorsement from the Gen X and Boomers.