strategic thinking and critical thinking

• Onsite training

3,000,000+ delegates

15,000+ clients

1,000+ locations

• KnowledgePass
• Log a ticket

01344203999 Available 24/7

Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking: Which is Better?

Dive into the world of "Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking" and discover which is the superior mindset for success. Gain insights into what critical thinking and strategic thinking entail. Uncover how critical and strategic thinking can complement each other and by the end, you'll have a clearer understanding of which thinking style suits your objectives best.

Exclusive 40% OFF

Training Outcomes Within Your Budget!

We ensure quality, budget-alignment, and timely delivery by our expert instructors.

Share this Resource

• Strategic Planning and Thinking Course
• Active Listening Training
• Nonverbal Communication Training
• Attention Management Training
• Interpersonal Skills Training Course

In reality, both can complement each and be used together to get better outcomes. Want to know how? Read this blog to learn about the key differences between Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking. Also, understand how they can be used together to drive success. 

Table of Contents   

1) Understanding Critical Thinking and Strategic Thinking  

     a) What is Critical Thinking? 

     b) Exploring Strategic Thinking    

2) Difference between Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking  

     a) Focus and emphasis  

     b) Mindset and approach  

     c) Timeframe and scope    

     d) Application and outcomes    

     3) Complementary nature of Critical Thinking and Strategic Thinking  

4) Conclusion  

Understanding Critical Thinking and Strategic Thinking   

Before exploring the difference between the two and which is better, it is essential to understand both. Let's have a brief look at both the skills: 

What is Critical Thinking?  

Critical Thinking is a systematic and objective approach to analysing and evaluating information. It involves gathering evidence, questioning assumptions, and applying logical reasoning to form well-informed judgments. Key components of Critical Thinking include the following:  

a) Information analysis : Gathering and examining information from various sources before forming opinions or making decisions.  

b) Objective evaluation : Assessing evidence for reliability and validity, identifying biases, and detecting fallacies in arguments.  

c) Problem-solving : Breaking down complex problems, considering alternative perspectives, and generating practical solutions.  

By developing Critical Thinking skills, individuals become more effective problem solvers, make informed decisions, and achieve a broader understanding of the world. 

Learn how to take strategic decisions. Register for our  Strategic Planning And Thinking Training now!  

Understanding Strategic Thinking   

Strategic Thinking is a process that involves a proactive and forward-looking approach to planning, goal setting, and decision-making. It goes beyond immediate problem-solving and focuses on long-term implications, patterns, and connections. Strategic Thinking encompasses several key elements:  

a) Planning and goal setting : Strategic Thinking emphasises the creation of a roadmap for achieving desired outcomes. It involves setting clear goals, defining strategies, and outlining steps to reach those objectives.  

b) Vision and foresight : Strategic thinkers can envision future possibilities and anticipate challenges and opportunities. They consider long-term implications and trends to make decisions that align with the desired outcomes.  

c) Pattern recognition : Strategic thinking focuses on identifying patterns, trends, and interrelationships among various factors. They can understand the underlying connections to get an overview of a situation.  

d) Risk assessment and opportunity evaluation : Strategic Thinking involves assessing potential risks and rewards associated with different actions. It allows individuals to make calculated decisions by weighing the potential benefits against potential drawbacks.  

Strategic Thinking is particularly valuable in planning and navigating uncertain or complex situations. By adopting a strategic mindset, individuals can anticipate challenges, adapt to changing circumstances, and take advantage of emerging opportunities. 

Difference between Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking   

Focus and emphasis   

Critical Thinking primarily focuses on analysing and evaluating information objectively. Its main emphasis is on logical reasoning, evidence assessment, and identifying biases or fallacies in arguments. Critical Thinking ensures accuracy, clarity, and sound judgment in decision-making and problem-solving.  

Strategic Thinking prioritises planning, goal-setting, and long-term vision. It looks beyond immediate analysis and focuses on understanding patterns, connections, and future implications. Strategic Thinking aims to align actions and decisions with long-term objectives and effectively navigate complex or uncertain environments. 

Mindset and approach   

Critical Thinking involves a mindset of scepticism and intellectual curiosity. It encourages individuals to question assumptions, challenge conventional wisdom, and seek evidence-based conclusions. Moreover, Critical Thinking is more analytical and fact-based, aiming to uncover the truth and make well-reasoned judgments. 

On the other hand, Strategic Thinking involves a mindset of forward-thinking and creativity. It encourages individuals to explore future possibilities, envision desired outcomes, and think holistically about the bigger picture. The Strategic Thinking approach is more visionary, seeking to develop plans and strategies that align with long-term goals and capitalise on emerging opportunities. 

Learn how to build a to-do list and create time checks with our Time Management Training - Get better at managing time.  

Timeframe and scope   

Critical Thinking tends to focus on immediate issues and problems at hand. It involves analysing a situation in detail, gathering relevant information, and evaluating it objectively. Additionally, Critical Thinking is crucial for making informed decisions in real time and solving specific problems effectively. 

In contrast, Strategic Thinking takes a broader and more long-term perspective. It considers the larger context, trends, and potential future scenarios. Considering these factors allows for assessing risks, anticipating challenges, and developing plans encompassing multiple aspects of a situation. Strategic Thinking also provides a roadmap for achieving long-term objectives and navigating complex environments. 

Application and outcomes   

Critical Thinking is highly valuable in situations that require objective analysis, such as evaluating evidence, assessing arguments, or identifying flaws in reasoning. It is crucial for making informed decisions based on facts and evidence, especially in scientific research, critical analysis, or logical problem-solving. 

Complementary nature of Critical Thinking and Strategic Thinking   

Critical Thinking and Strategic Thinking are complementary approaches that enhance decision-making, problem-solving, and planning. While Critical Thinking provides a solid foundation of analysis, objectivity, and evidence evaluation, ensuring accuracy in strategic plans. Strategic Thinking adds creativity, foresight, and a long-term perspective, encouraging individuals to envision desired outcomes and adapt to changing circumstances. 

By integrating Critical and Strategic Thinking, individuals balance short-term needs and long-term goals. They can analyse problems effectively and consider broader contexts. This combination fosters adaptability, agility, and robust, well-informed and forward-thinking decision-making. 

Conclusion   

While there are some fundamental differences between Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking, both are valuable thinking styles that can be developed and applied to improve decisions and solve problems. So, embrace the power of Strategic & Critical Thinking in your process and lead yourself to success. 

Develop your business and personal skills with our Personal Development Training and set yourself up for success.  

Frequently Asked Questions

Upcoming business skills resources batches & dates.

Fri 27th Sep 2024

Fri 25th Oct 2024

Fri 22nd Nov 2024

Fri 27th Dec 2024

Fri 10th Jan 2025

Fri 14th Mar 2025

Fri 9th May 2025

Fri 11th Jul 2025

Fri 12th Sep 2025

Fri 14th Nov 2025

Get A Quote

WHO WILL BE FUNDING THE COURSE?

My employer

By submitting your details you agree to be contacted in order to respond to your enquiry

• Business Analysis
• Lean Six Sigma Certification

Share this course

Our biggest summer sale.

We cannot process your enquiry without contacting you, please tick to confirm your consent to us for contacting you about your enquiry.

By submitting your details you agree to be contacted in order to respond to your enquiry.

We may not have the course you’re looking for. If you enquire or give us a call on 01344203999 and speak to our training experts, we may still be able to help with your training requirements.

Or select from our popular topics

• ITIL® Certification
• Scrum Certification
• ISO 9001 Certification
• Change Management Certification
• Microsoft Azure Certification
• Microsoft Excel Courses
• Explore more courses

Press esc to close

Fill out your  contact details  below and our training experts will be in touch.

Fill out your   contact details   below

Thank you for your enquiry!

One of our training experts will be in touch shortly to go over your training requirements.

Back to Course Information

Fill out your contact details below so we can get in touch with you regarding your training requirements.

* WHO WILL BE FUNDING THE COURSE?

Preferred Contact Method

No preference

Back to course information

Fill out your  training details  below

Fill out your training details below so we have a better idea of what your training requirements are.

HOW MANY DELEGATES NEED TRAINING?

HOW DO YOU WANT THE COURSE DELIVERED?

Online Instructor-led

Online Self-paced

WHEN WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE THIS COURSE?

Next 2 - 4 months

WHAT IS YOUR REASON FOR ENQUIRING?

Looking for some information

Looking for a discount

I want to book but have questions

One of our training experts will be in touch shortly to go overy your training requirements.

Your privacy & cookies!

Like many websites we use cookies. We care about your data and experience, so to give you the best possible experience using our site, we store a very limited amount of your data. Continuing to use this site or clicking “Accept & close” means that you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more about our privacy policy and cookie policy cookie policy .

We use cookies that are essential for our site to work. Please visit our cookie policy for more information. To accept all cookies click 'Accept & close'.

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• AI Essentials for Business
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Creating Brand Value
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading Change and Organizational Renewal
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

4 Ways to Develop Your Strategic Thinking Skills

• 10 Sep 2020

Think back to the last time you participated in a strategic planning meeting for your organization. You were likely presented with a challenge to solve or goal to achieve.

Do you remember your contributions during that meeting? Did you offer compelling ideas and plot a course of action, or find it difficult to think strategically and develop a solution? Did you have a good idea, but struggle to communicate it in a logical way? Were you an active participant in the conversation, or did others helm it?

Strategic thinking skills are among the most highly sought-after management competencies. Why? Because employees capable of thinking critically, logically, and strategically can have a tremendous impact on a business’s trajectory.

If you want to improve your strategic thinking skills, the good news is that, with the right mindset and practice, you can.

Here are four ways to improve your strategy skills , so the next time you’re involved in a strategic planning meeting, you can ensure your contributions are noticed.

Access your free e-book today.

What Are Strategic Thinking Skills?

Strategic thinking skills are any skills that enable you to use critical thinking to solve complex problems and plan for the future. These skills are essential to accomplish business objectives, overcome obstacles, and address challenges—particularly if they’re projected to take weeks, months, or even years to achieve.

Strategic thinking skills include:

• Analytical skills: To ideate a strategy that helps your organization reach its objectives, you must be capable of analyzing a variety of inputs—from financial statements and KPIs , to market conditions, emerging business trends, and internal resource allocation. This initial analysis is crucial to creating a strategy that aligns with the current reality facing your organization.
• Communication skills: Putting a strategy into place for your company, regardless of its size, requires solid communication skills . The ability to communicate complex ideas, collaborate with internal and external stakeholders, build consensus, and ensure everyone is aligned and working toward shared goals are all central to strategic thinking.
• Problem-solving skills: Strategic planning is often used to solve problems or address challenges, such as missed financial targets, inefficient workflows, or an emerging competitor. Implementing a strategy that addresses the central challenge you face requires you to first understand the problem and its potential solutions. From there, you can craft a strategy that solves it.
• Planning and management skills: Strategy isn’t just about thinking of a solution—it involves implementation, too. Once data has been analyzed, the problem is understood, and a solution has been identified, you need strong planning and management skills to bring everything together.

How to Improve Your Strategic Thinking Skills

1. ask strategic questions.

If you want to improve your strategic thinking skills, one of the simplest things you can do is ask more strategic questions. Doing so allows you to exercise your planning skills, become adept at spotting opportunities, and develop a more strategic mindset you can leverage throughout your career.

According to the Harvard Business School Online course Disruptive Strategy , strategic questions can relate to a challenge, opportunity, or ambiguity you face in your current situation, whether personal or professional. They might, for instance, relate to launching a new business or product, beating a competitor, or structuring your organization for innovation.

It’s also important that your questions apply to your role and responsibilities so you can act on them.

Some examples of strategic questions you might ask include:

• How can we strategically position ourselves to enter a new market?
• What’s the direction for growth for each of our products or services?
• Where will the organization's growth come from in the next five years, and how does it compare with where growth has historically come from?
• How should the organization respond to the threat presented by potentially disruptive competitors ?

2. Observe and Reflect

In addition to asking strategic questions, you need to answer and address them skillfully. One of the most effective ways of accomplishing this is to observe and reflect on your current situation, ensuring any strategy you conceive is grounded in facts.

For example, imagine that the business you work for has begun losing market share for one of its products among its traditional customers. At the same time, it’s gained market share from an entirely new customer base. It’s easy to assume why this might be happening, but doing so can lead you down the wrong path at a critical moment in your organization’s existence.

Instead of blindly following an assumption, gather as much information as possible to use when crafting your strategy. For example, this might include conducting user interviews with new customers to identify the different jobs they hire your product to perform.

Understanding why new customers are attracted to your product can enable you to tailor your marketing strategy and product development to better embrace their needs .

3. Consider Opposing Ideas

Once you’ve landed on a strategy that can help your organization reach its goals, question your assumptions, and put your hypothesis through rigorous testing. By doing so, you can ensure you’re not overlooking another possibility.

Playing devil’s advocate with your ideas can allow you to preemptively identify weaknesses in your argument, and equip you to defend your strategy when others ask questions. It can also help you sharpen the logic skills you need to communicate and execute your strategy.

To develop this skill, get in the habit of questioning yourself any time you’re about to make an assertion. Should you consider a different perspective? Is there another possibility you may have overlooked?

4. Embrace Formal Training

By practicing the methods described above, you can improve your strategic thinking skills at your own pace. However, there are other learning options you can pursue.

If you need to quickly ramp up your strategy skills—to address a pressing need your organization is facing, position yourself for a new role, or finally launch your own business—formal training might be your best option.

For example, by enrolling in the online course Disruptive Strategy , you can discover how to make innovation a reality for your organization. Over six weeks, you’ll learn about the jobs to be done framework and disruptive innovation theory, and build skills to identify and execute high-level strategy.

Cultivating a Strategic Mindset

Whether in the long- or short-term, a strategic mindset can be developed through self-exploration, critical questioning, and formal training.

The advantage of having a strategic mindset is learning how to think rather than what to think. Although you might not always have the right answers, strategic thinking skills can empower you to spot new opportunities, address emerging challenges, and plan for future success.

Are you looking to develop a strategic mindset? Explore our portfolio of online strategy courses and download the free flowchart to determine which is the best fit for you and your goals.

About the Author

• Scroll to top
•   / Sign Up

Strategic Thinking Definition, Skills, Examples, and Steps

Published: 29 January, 2024

Social Share:

Welcome to Digital Leadership, where we are committed to harnessing emerging technologies and innovative business models to better serve customers. As experts in innovation and digital transformation, our mission is to guide organizations in creating value for all stakeholders, supporting them from strategic conceptualization to effective execution. The ability to think strategically is a cornerstone for success, strategic thinking centres on discovering and cultivating distinctive opportunities to enhance organizational value.

Digital Leadership’s expertise in strategy and execution, invites business entrepreneurs to delve deeper into the realms of strategic thinking for enduring success. We provide Strategic Management Consulting services to empower businesses to elevate their strategic acumen and navigate the complex landscape of value creation . Through collaborative initiatives, we guide organizations in unlocking unique opportunities and ensuring enduring success in today’s dynamic business environment.

Find out how we can help you

Corporate training, innovation consulting and much more.

This article delves into the intricacies of strategic thinking , outlining its definition, key characteristics, and its vital role in both leadership and business. We will explore the steps to develop strategic thinking skills and provide real-life examples to illustrate its application. As we navigate through this exploration, we will differentiate strategic thinking from strategic planning and highlight its significance in digital transformation strategy.

What is Strategic Thinking?

Strategic thinking is centred on identifying and cultivating distinctive opportunities that can generate value for your organization. It asserts that even non-statistically significant data in various forms deserves thorough consideration to inform decisions about the future. It is a multifaceted concept that goes beyond mere planning. It involves the ability to analyze situations, anticipate future trends, and make informed decisions that contribute to an organization’s long-term success.

Your download is now available!

You can now access the complete Business Model Canvas Package, including a full presentation, related models and instructions for use.

The UNITE Perspectives On Strategy – A Framework For Strategic Thinking

Strategic thinking is a crucial element of effective leadership, involving the ability to envision and plan for the future while navigating the complexities of the present. It goes beyond day-to-day tasks, focusing on long-term business goals and adapting to dynamic environments. Strategic thinking and strategic planning, while interconnected, serve distinct roles in organizational development and decision-making. Strategic thinking is a continuous and dynamic mental activity that envisions the future, identifies opportunities, and fosters innovation. It emphasizes creativity, adaptability, and a proactive mindset, laying the conceptual foundation for an organization’s direction.

Strategic planning is a systematic process that translates strategic thinking into actionable plans. It involves setting specific goals, defining measurable objectives, and outlining the steps and resources needed for implementation. While strategic thinking explores possibilities and challenges assumptions, strategic planning focuses on specific actions, resource allocation, and timelines. Strategic thinking is future-oriented and adaptable, providing the vision upon which strategic planning builds the roadmap for organizational development. Both are essential components, working collaboratively to navigate the complexities of the business landscape.

At Digital Leadership, strategic thinking is perceived as the art of proactively shaping an organization’s future. This involves anticipating challenges, recognizing opportunities, and aligning resources effectively. To delve deeper into the intricacies of strategic thinking and its role in crafting innovative business strategies , explore the insights provided in our book, “How to Create Innovation.” It serves as a comprehensive guide, offering valuable perspectives on navigating the dynamic landscape of strategic decision-making and fostering a culture of innovation within your organization.

The Only Book On Innovation You’ll Ever Need

+FREE access to 50+ complimentary download packages covering the details with plenty of helpful background information

Strategic Thinking Skills

Enhancing strategic thinking skills is crucial for effective decision-making and leadership. Here are key skills compiled from various sources:

• Active Listening: Engage attentively to comprehend diverse perspectives.
• Analytical Skills: Utilize data and insights to make informed decisions.
• Implement the Plan: Execute strategies efficiently to achieve business goals.
• Observing and Seeking Trends: Stay vigilant to identify emerging patterns and trends.
• Question Everything: Foster a questioning mindset to challenge assumptions.
• Strategic Thinking: Cultivate the ability to envision and plan for the future.
• Understand the Consequences: Evaluate potential outcomes and impacts.
• Articulate Your Goals Clearly: Clearly express your objectives for better alignment.
• Being Creative: Embrace creativity to generate innovative solutions.
• Communicate Clearly: Convey ideas and strategies with clarity.
• Consider Opposing Ideas: Encourage diverse viewpoints for comprehensive decision-making.
• Critical Thinking: Assess information objectively to make well-founded decisions.
• Get Other Perspectives: Seek input from different sources to broaden your understanding.
• Learn and Improve: Embrace a continuous learning mindset for personal and professional growth.
• Vision and Purpose: Align decisions with a clear vision and overarching purpose.
• Prioritization: Effectively prioritize tasks and goals based on strategic importance.
• Adaptability: Be flexible and adapt strategies to changing circumstances.
• Ask Strategic Questions: Pose insightful questions to deepen strategic insights.
• Be Aware of Bias: Recognize and mitigate personal biases in decision-making.
• Analysis: Break down complex situations into manageable components for analysis.
• Scenario Planning: Anticipate potential scenarios and plan accordingly.

These skills collectively contribute to developing a robust strategic thinking mindset, essential for navigating complex business landscapes.

How to Develop Strategic Thinking Skills

Acquiring the art of strategic thinking is a developed skill, not an innate talent. This section outlines practical steps to guide individuals in enhancing their strategic thinking skills . Tailored for aspiring strategic thinkers and leaders, these steps offer valuable insights to successfully navigate the complexities of the business landscape.

(1) Pose Thoughtful Queries for Strategic Insights

Challenge conventional wisdom by formulating insightful questions that stimulate critical thinking, fostering a deeper understanding of issues and encouraging innovative solutions.

(2) Observe, Reflect, and Stay Informed

Allocate time to observe industry trends and changes, reflecting on these observations to gain valuable insights that inform strategic decisions.

(3) Embrace Diverse Perspectives Through Opposing Ideas

Foster a culture that values diverse viewpoints, actively seeking and considering opposing ideas to formulate well-rounded and robust strategic plans.

(4) Invest in Continuous Learning and Professional Development

Systematically refine strategic thinking skills through continuous learning. Enroll in courses, workshops, or programs dedicated to enhancing strategic thinking.

(5) Master Your Organization and Industry Dynamics

Acquire in-depth knowledge of your organization, industry, and market sector to make informed strategic decisions based on a comprehensive understanding of internal and external factors.

(6) Prioritize Strategic Thinking with Dedicated Time

Schedule specific time slots for focused strategic thinking in your routine. Utilize this time to address fundamental questions about your organization’s direction, challenges, and opportunities.

(7) Effectively Communicate Strategic Insights to Influence

Cultivate strong communication skills to articulate strategic insights clearly. Effective communication is pivotal for gaining support and buy-in for proposed strategic initiatives.

By systematically incorporating these steps into your professional journey, you actively develop and refine your strategic thinking skills. This intentional approach empowers you to confidently navigate the complexities of strategic decision-making.

Strategic Thinking Examples

Strategic thinking manifests in various scenarios, demonstrating its impact on organizational success. Below are real-life examples showcasing how strategic thinking has influenced key decisions and outcomes:

• Distinguish between urgent and important tasks to allocate resources efficiently and achieve optimal outcomes.
• Strategically allocate resources based on the prioritization of tasks, ensuring maximum efficiency and effectiveness.
• Systematically analyze customer feedback to identify trends and insights, informing strategic decisions for product enhancements and customer satisfaction.
• Develop a strategic roadmap by setting both long-term and short-term business goals aligned with the organization’s overarching vision.
• Utilize past sales data to derive insights, identify patterns, and inform strategic decisions for future product development and market positioning.
• Conduct thorough market analysis to identify gaps and opportunities, allowing for strategic entry or expansion into specific market segments.
• Evaluate the alignment between products and market demands, ensuring a strategic fit that resonates with the target audience.
• Develop and implement a deliberate brand positioning strategy that aligns with market trends, consumer preferences, and organizational values.

These examples showcase how strategic thinking is applied across various facets of business operations. By integrating these practices, organizations can foster a strategic mindset, leading to informed decision-making and sustainable success.

In a real-world scenario, imagine a tech company facing fierce market competition and disruptive technological shifts. A strategic thinker in the managerial role would first pinpoint the challenges: intense competition and the impact of tech disruptions. By actively analyzing industry trends and asking crucial questions, such as how to stand out in a crowded market, strategic thinking takes shape.

Encouraging team discussions to gather diverse perspectives ensures a comprehensive understanding of potential strategies. Crafting innovative solutions collaboratively, like exploring unique product features or strategic partnerships, follows. Proactively anticipating future challenges and formulating contingency plans showcase the hands-on nature of strategic thinking.

Effective communication of the strategic vision is crucial. Aligning stakeholders, fostering commitment to the plan, and conveying a well-defined vision are integral. This example highlights that strategic thinking is not just theory; it’s a practical skill with tangible outcomes in navigating complex business landscapes.

What is Strategic Thinking in Leadership

Strategic thinking in leadership goes beyond day-to-day decision-making; it involves a comprehensive approach to envisioning and navigating an organization’s future. It’s the capability of leaders to analyze the current landscape, anticipate future challenges and opportunities, and formulate innovative strategies to drive the organization toward success. Here’s a deeper exploration of what strategic thinking entails in leadership:

• Visionary Leadership: Strategic thinking leaders possess a visionary outlook, setting a clear and inspiring direction for the organization’s future.
• Long-Term Planning: Instead of focusing solely on immediate concerns, strategic leaders plan for the long term, considering sustainable growth and evolution.
• Adaptability: Leaders who think strategically are adaptable, and ready to adjust strategies in response to changing circumstances and market dynamics.
• Risk Management: They evaluate risks meticulously, making calculated decisions that balance potential rewards with potential pitfalls.
• Innovation Advocacy: Encouraging innovation is a key aspect. Strategic leaders foster a culture where novel ideas are valued, leading to continuous improvement.
• Decision-Making: Strategic thinking leaders make decisions based on a holistic understanding of the organization’s goals, industry trends, and competitive landscape.
• Collaborative Approach: They understand the importance of collaboration, seeking input from diverse teams to enhance the quality of strategic decisions.
• Communication Skills: Effective communication is paramount. Leaders articulate the strategic vision in a way that inspires and aligns the entire organization.
• Alignment with Values: Strategic leaders ensure that strategic initiatives align with the organization’s core values and mission.
• Continuous Learning: Leaders committed to strategic thinking engage in continuous learning, staying informed about industry advancements and emerging trends.

In essence, strategic thinking in leadership is about proactively shaping the organization’s future, and making informed choices that lead to sustained success and relevance in a dynamic business environment.

Key Characteristics of Strategic Thinking

Strategic thinking is a multifaceted skill encompassing various key characteristics that contribute to its effectiveness. These attributes set strategic thinkers apart and form the foundation for navigating complex business landscapes. Here are the key characteristics of strategic thinking:

• Forward-Thinking: Strategic thinkers have a future-oriented mindset, anticipating trends, challenges, and opportunities to proactively shape the organization’s destiny.
• Analytical Acumen: The ability to analyze vast amounts of information, discern patterns, and derive meaningful insights is crucial for strategic thinking.
• Innovative Vision: Strategic thinkers embrace innovation, seeking novel solutions and envisioning possibilities that disrupt conventional norms.
• Adaptability: Recognizing the dynamic nature of the business environment, strategic thinkers are adaptable and agile in responding to changes and uncertainties.
• Holistic Perspective: They consider the bigger picture, understanding the interconnectedness of various elements within and outside the organization.
• Risk Assessment: Strategic thinkers evaluate risks objectively, weighing potential rewards against potential drawbacks and making informed decisions.
• Long-Term Orientation: Rather than focusing solely on short-term gains, strategic thinkers prioritize long-term objectives and sustainable growth.
• Open-Mindedness: Embracing diverse perspectives and being receptive to new ideas fosters a climate of creativity and robust strategic planning.
• Effective Communication: Strategic thinkers communicate their vision and plans clearly, ensuring alignment and understanding throughout the organization.
• Results-Driven: Ultimately, strategic thinkers are driven by results, aiming to create lasting value and impact for the organization’s stakeholders.

These key characteristics collectively empower individuals to think strategically, guiding organizations toward success in today’s dynamic and competitive business landscape.

Strategic Thinking in Business

Strategic thinking in the realm of business is a dynamic and critical process that involves the exploration and refinement of existing business models . This approach entails a comprehensive evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in the current model. By strategically thinking, businesses can foster innovation, identify new revenue streams , optimise operational processes, and adjust to the evolving demands of the market. This strategic perspective is essential for staying competitive and ensuring long-term success in the business landscape.

Applying Strategic Thinking to Business Models

Strategic thinking serves as a catalyst for transforming and optimizing traditional business models. This process entails a meticulous examination of the current model, pinpointing both its strengths and weaknesses. Through strategic thinking, businesses can unleash innovation by exploring novel revenue streams, refining operational processes, and adapting to the ever-changing landscape of market demands. This application of strategic thinking is instrumental in steering businesses towards resilience, growth, and sustained success.

The Business Model Canvas becomes a crucial tool in the strategic thinking process. It provides a visual framework for understanding, designing, and reinventing business models. By leveraging the canvas, organizations gain insights into key components such as value proposition , customer segments, channels , and cost structures. This clarity enhances strategic decision-making and fosters a more agile and adaptive business model.

The UNITE Business Model Canvas

The significance of strategic thinking in digital transformation.

In digital transformation, strategic thinking holds immense significance. It serves as the guiding force that shapes and directs the course of digital initiatives. It ensures a holistic approach, considering not only technological aspects but also the broader implications on business models, processes, and customer experiences. By strategically navigating the complexities of the digital transformation strategy , organizations can leverage emerging technologies effectively, enhance operational efficiency, and stay ahead in the competitive digital landscape. The application of strategic thinking becomes a linchpin for organizations aiming to achieve meaningful and sustainable digital transformation outcomes.

Real-Life Examples of Strategic Thinking in Business

To illustrate the tangible impact of strategic thinking, let’s delve into real-life examples where organizations successfully applied this approach to achieve remarkable outcomes.

• Apple Inc.: Apple’s strategic thinking is evident in its continuous innovation and product development. The introduction of the iPod, iPhone, and iPad showcased a forward-thinking approach that revolutionized the consumer electronics industry.
• Amazon: Amazon’s strategic thinking is exemplified in its customer-centric model and diversification. The company started as an online bookstore and strategically expanded into diverse product categories, cloud services (AWS), and even original content creation.
• Tesla: Tesla’s strategic thinking is embodied in its pursuit of sustainable energy solutions. The decision to focus on electric vehicles, solar energy, and energy storage reflects a long-term vision that goes beyond automotive manufacturing.
• Netflix: Netflix’s strategic thinking is evident in its shift from a DVD rental service to a global streaming platform. Embracing digital disruption, Netflix strategically invested in original content creation, transforming the entertainment industry.
• Google: Google’s strategic thinking is showcased in its commitment to innovation. From dominating the search engine market, Google expanded into diverse areas such as online advertising, mobile operating systems (Android), and artificial intelligence.

Differentiating Strategic Thinking from Other Types of Thinking

Thinking is a multifaceted cognitive process that varies across different contexts and objectives. Let’s delve into the distinctions between strategic thinking and other types of thinking:

• Strategic Thinking: Involves envisioning the future, identifying opportunities, and devising plans to achieve long-term goals.
• Critical Thinking: Focuses on analyzing, evaluating, and forming judgments about information or situations, emphasizing logical reasoning.
• Strategic Thinking: Emphasizes planning and decision-making for achieving organizational objectives, often involving a systematic approach.
• Creative Thinking: Involves generating novel ideas, solutions, or approaches, fostering innovation and unconventional thoughts.
• Strategic Thinking: Encompasses a holistic view, considering the overall direction and positioning of the organization.
• Analytical Thinking: Concentrates on breaking down complex problems into smaller components for in-depth examination and understanding.
• Strategic Thinking: Primarily concerned with defining goals, formulating plans, and aligning resources to achieve a predefined vision.
• Design Thinking: Centers around a human-centric approach, empathizing with end-users, and iteratively prototyping solutions for complex problems.
• Strategic Thinking: Focuses on organizational strategy, often involving hierarchical planning and coordination.
• Systems Thinking: Considers the interrelated components and relationships within a system, emphasizing holistic understanding and feedback loops.
• Strategic Thinking: Involves dynamic, adaptive, and non-linear planning, considering various scenarios and external influences.
• Linear Thinking: Follows a sequential and step-by-step approach to problem-solving without necessarily accounting for broader systemic factors.
• Strategic Thinking: Concentrates on forward-looking planning, often in a structured manner, to gain a competitive advantage.
• Lateral Thinking: Encourages unconventional and creative approaches to problem-solving, challenging traditional thought patterns.

Understanding these differences is crucial as it highlights the versatility of thinking processes and underscores the need for a well-rounded cognitive toolkit, incorporating strategic thinking when long-term planning and vision are paramount.

In conclusion, strategic thinking is the compass that guides businesses through the complexities of today’s ever-evolving landscape. By developing and nurturing strategic thinking skills , organizations can pave the way for sustained success and create value for everyone they serve. At Digital Leadership, we are passionate about empowering organizations to embrace strategic thinking. If you’re ready to elevate your strategic approach, contact us today for a transformative journey from strategy to execution.

Related Posts

Continuous improvement steps for enhancing digital leadership.

In digital leadership, organizations must not only keep up with industry trends1

Recent Posts

Examples and Types of Effective Functional Level Strategy for Business Support

A key objective of any business strategy is to improve operational efficiencies...

The Three Levels of Strategy: Corporate Strategy, Business Strategy, and Functional Strategy

Understanding the intricate levels of strategy is crucial for any organization aiming...

Register For Your FREE 
Innovation WorkShop Seat Now!

Learn how to overcome the 90% failure rate in innovation from a master innovator and best-selling author.

Expert tactics to boost your innovation odds.

Insights on capturing customer needs for innovation.

Tools that turn your ideas into triumphs.

First name *

Last name *

Professional E-mail *

I want to be kept up-to-date and accept the privacy statement *

By signing up, you agree to receive news and accept the privacy statement (mandatory)

Verify your e-mail address now by entering the 6-digit code we’ve just sent to your inbox

Don't receive Code? Resend code

Last one step

Help us better understand our innovation Show members

Country * Please Select Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin (Dahomey) Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Brunswick and Lüneburg Bulgaria Burkina Faso (Upper Volta) Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Central American Federation Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Free State Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Grand Duchy of Tuscany Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Holy See Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Namibia Nassau Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papal States Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Piedmont-Sardinia Poland Portugal Qatar Republic of Congo Republic of Korea (South Korea) Republic of the Congo Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Schaumburg-Lippe Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Württemberg Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Industry * Please Select Automotive, mobilty & transport Financial Services Chemical & agriculture Construction & Real Estate Consulting Education Energy Banking, insurance & FS FMCG Food Gov / Public Industry Health & lifestyle Logistics, Aero & Shipping Media & Entertainment Natural resources & mining Pharma & Biotech Retail & trade Tech & E-Commerce Telco Tourism design Information technology & services Management consulting Retail Pharmaceuticals International trade & development Professional training & coaching luxury goods & jewelry Automotive Insurance Mechanical or industrial engineering Company Size * XS - 1-10 S - 10-100 M - 100-1000 L - 1000-5000 XL - > 5000

Seniority * Please Select Junior Consultant Senior Consultant Manager Senior Manager Director VP SVP Partner CXO Board Member

Areas of interest * Innovation Digital Transformation Culture & Organization IT Strategy & Bus. Alignment Customer Experience

Discover the largest library of innovation & transformation tools on the entire Internet!

LOG IN VIA E-MAIL

Forgot password?

New to Digital Leadership? Create your account

Thanks, We’ve Received Your Updated Details

Learn how to overcome the 90% failure rate in innovation from a master innovator & bestselling author!

Your e-mail address: * Your first name: *

One Last Step..

Help us better understand the UNITE community

Free guide to improve your innovation success rate*

Our 35-page comprehensive innovation guide covers the key areas why innovation fails. While it cannot cover all the solutions (that would take books to fill), it provides you with a convenient starting point for your analysis and provides further resources and links to the corresponding UNITE models, ultimately allowing you to work towards a doubling and tripling your chances of success.

Get access to the UNITE Models now!

Discover the largest library of innovation & transformation tools on the internet!

Choose Your Password *

Confirm Your Password *

Already have an account? Log in

Country * Please Select Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin (Dahomey) Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Brunswick and Lüneburg Bhutan Bulgaria Burkina Faso (Upper Volta) Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Central American Federation Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Free State Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Eswatini Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Grand Duchy of Tuscany Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Holy See Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nassau Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papal States Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Piedmont-Sardinia Poland Portugal Qatar Republic of Congo Republic of Korea (South Korea) Republic of the Congo Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Schaumburg-Lippe Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland State of Palestine Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United States United Arab Emirates United Kingdom Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Württemberg Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Industry * Please Select Automotive, mobilty & transport Financial Services Chemical & agriculture Construction & Real Estate Consulting Education Energy Banking, insurance & FS FMCG Food Gov / Public Industry Health & lifestyle Logistics, Aero & Shipping Media & Entertainment Natural resources & mining Pharma & Biotech Retail & trade Tech & E-Commerce Telco Tourism design Information technology & services Management consulting Retail Pharmaceuticals International trade & development Professional training & coaching luxury goods & jewelry Automotive Insurance Mechanical or industrial engineering Company Size * XS - 1-10 S - 10-100 M - 100-1000 L - 1000-5000 XL - > 5000

Editable UNITE models (PowerPoint) included

Most of our models and canvases are designed to be applied! 


To help you personalize them to your exact business requirements, you can download fully editable versions of the UNITE models available (PowerPoint format)!

They are straightforward to work with, and you can directly incorporate them into your presentations as you need…thus saving countless hours of replication!

PS: did you know that you are also getting hi-res print-ready versions for your workshops?

Monthly live webinars

Each month we host our exclusive, invitation-only webinar series where one of our industry-leading experts updates our members on the latest news, progress and concepts around business strategy, innovation and digital transformation, as well as other related topics. 



You will receive the book in PDF and EPUB formats, ideal for your computer, Kindle, Tablet or other eReading device.

Bi-weekly live group Q&A sessions

These sessions are your opportunity to bring any questions or challenges you’re facing and receive expert guidance on the spot. 


Come and be a part of engaging discussions where your unique concerns are heard and addressed.

1x personal coaching session / month

If you are occasionally looking for a sparring partner or you need limited support, then this option will be ideal for you. Coaching sessions are 1-2 hours where we can discuss any challenge or opportunity you are currently facing.

If you need a few more hours outside of this provision, then these could be billed transparently.

Unlimited video call support! – it’s like always making the right decision!

We believe support shouldn’t be limited. Because we typically find that the occasional hour just doesn’t cut it – particularly if you and your team are in the midst of a large and complex project.

Your time with Stefan is therefore unlimited (fair usage applies) – in his function as coach and sparring partner. That does mean that you will still have to do the work – we cannot take that off you, unless you hire us as consultants. But you will get valuable strategic insight and direction to make sure you are always focusing your efforts where they will lead to the best results.

One personal coaching session / month 
+ unlimited support via e-mail & WhatsApp

We believe support shouldn’t be limited. If you generally know what you are doing but want a sparring partner to frequently raise questions to, this is the perfect choice!

In addition to your monthly 1-1 live coaching sessions with Stefan, you will also get unlimited support from him via email and WhatsApp messaging (fair usage applies). This not only allows you to get valuable strategic direction in your calls, but also gives you instant access to expert help as you work through your plans each month.



The fact that support is text-based means that we can speed up our responses to you while keeping the overall cost of support down.

Welcome gift of our book 
 “How to Create Innovation” 
 (digital + physical editions)*

As a welcome gift, you will receive the both the digital and physical version of our book “How to Create Innovation”, which covers numerous relevant resources and provides additional deep dives into our UNITE models and concepts.


The print version will be shipped out to you on sign-up. The digital version will be emailed to you, and comes in PDF and EPUB formats, ideal for your computer, Kindle, Tablet or other eReading device.

1x major workshop or 2x smaller workshops / month

1x major or 2x smaller workshops based on the UNITE models.

• Topics covered: almost any challenge under the header of #strategy, #innovation or #transformation, leveraging the UNITE models.
• Hands-On Learning: solve your challenges while learning the practical application of the UNITE models and walk away with concrete plans and tools to take your next steps.
• Industry thought leadership: facilitated by Stefan, the founder of Digital Leadership and the main author of the UNITE models, ensuring top-tier guidance and knowledge sharing.
• Collaborative approach: engage in interactive sessions that foster collaboration, idea exchange, and real-time problem-solving among peers and industry leaders.
• Continuous Improvement: Regular workshops ensure ongoing development in your organization staying ahead of industry trends and customer needs.

Access all of our UNITE models, 
 (incl. editable & print versions)

All of our Professional plans offer full access to the following:

• 6x UNITE model package downloads are included per month, if you need something in addition to these however, please let us know!
• Hi-res, print-ready versions you can use in your workshops
• Fully editable PowerPoint versions where applicable – personalize to your needs.
• Exclusive access to our vault of never-before-published strategic materials. We have much more to share – a lot of our concepts have never been published!

Exclusive access to our private UNITE community (upcoming)

We are currently in the process of launching our brand new community., we are designing our community to specifically help you:.

• Get answers to questions (“How do I …”)
• Share leading practices & knowledge
• Jointly develop new models
• Network amongst a highly qualified group of peers

Please, select the reason

Cancelling your plan will deactivate your plan after the current billing period ends. You will not be charged further, but also won’t be able to access [exclusive features/services].

• Cost-related issues
• Unsatisfied with the service
• Features I need are missing
• Switching to a different service
• Other (Please specify)

Book Your Initial Blueprint Session Now

Simply fill out the below form and book in a time for our initial session that works for you. This initial session is free, no strings attached, and is where we can discuss your Blueprint needs more in-depth before moving forward.

Stefan F. Dieffenbacher

Founder of digital leadership.

Adam D. Wisniewski

Partner for it strategy & business alignment.

Get in touch with Digital Leadership

Speak to our team today to find the best solution for your business to grow and scale.

We are here to support you across the entire lifecycle in all topics related to #digital, #innovation, #transformation and #marketing!

Stefan F. Dieffenbacher Founder of Digital Leadership

Contact Us!

Contact form, contact details, book a call.

Title, first name & last name * Email address * Phone number Please let us know how we can best support you! *

By clicking “Send”, I agree to Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Let’s have a conversation!

“Please be invited to reach out! We are happy to help and look forward to a first meeting!”

+41 (0) 44 562 42 24

[email protected]

Schedule Your Call With Our Team

Find a time on our calender that best suits you !

Founder and CEO of Digital Leadership

SCHEDULE YOUR INITIAL CALL

A Quick Survey!

What is the main challenge you're currently facing in your business?

You Want To Drive Change?

Let’s find the best solution for your business to grow and scale sustainably!

Let’s kick start it!

We will uncover your current business situation and goals and provide you with a bespoke solution that helps you drastically grow your business working with us.

Stefan F. Dieffenbacher, M.B.A.

Feedback about our consulting that we are proud of

Read the reviews and make sure that this is not a waste of time, but a super effective tool.

You want to drive change?

Schedule your free business assessment call with our founder.

On this call, we will uncover your current business situation and goals and talk about how to drive change and solve your need.

Choose the meeting type that applies to your needs and schedule a time to meet with someone from our team. We look forward to speaking with you soon!

Schedule Your Free Business Assessment

Schedule Your Free Business Assessment Call With Adam D. Wisniewski

Welcome to our scheduling page.

Let’s Design your Customer Experience Blueprint !

In a uniquely designed 60 or 90 minute session* , we will …

• > identify where to start with near-certainty
• > define what approach it takes to create success in your organization

Based on the Blueprinting session, you will receive a tailored blueprint that aligns with your objectives, vision and goals, ensuring that your initiative is a success from start to finish.

In this session, you will be working together with Patrick Zimmermann, Associate Partner for Customer Experience

Let’s Design your Culture & Org-Change Blueprint !

In this session, you will be working together with Dr. Andreas Rein, Partner at Digital Leadership for Culture & Org Change

Let’s Design your Innovation Blueprint !

In this session, you will be working together with Sascha Martini, Partner at Digital Leadership for Innovation and Digital Transformation

Let’s Design your Transformation Blueprint !

In this session, you will be working together with Stefan F. Dieffenbacher, Founder of Digital Leadership Stefan is a global thought leader in the innovation space

Let’s Design your IT Strategy & Business Alignment Blueprint !

In this session, you will be working together with Adam D. Wisniewski, Partner for IT Strategy & Business Alignment

Patrick Zimmermann

Sascha Martini

Dr. Andreas Rein

Write a personalized review! Log in

Create Review

Ideas and insights from Harvard Business Publishing Corporate Learning

Strategic Thinking: Because Good Ideas Can Come From Anywhere

As part of our update to the Harvard ManageMentor Strategic Thinking topic, we asked Mason Weintraub, Director of Digital Engagement at Oxfam America, about the importance of strategic thinking. Here’s what Mason had to say:

I often think I’m expected to have all the answers about what to do with digital strategy. But the reality is that I lead a very talented team, and one of the ideas that we have tried to engender on the team is that good ideas can come from anywhere.

“Good ideas can come from anywhere.” Most of us recognize the wisdom embedded in that statement, yet we still see strategy as the realm of our organization’s senior leaders. That may be because of our tendency to equate strategic thinking with strategic planning. Although these practices are related and equally necessary for organizational success, they are actually quite distinct.

Strategic planning vs. strategic thinking

In strategic planning, leaders gather data and decide on the path the organization will take to achieve its goals. With strategic thinking, employees at all levels and in all functions continually scan for new ways to contribute to the organization’s success. They apply those insights as they carry out organizational priorities and provide input to the overall strategy. In this way, strategic thinking is part of everyone’s job – whatever their role or level of responsibility.

Why is this ability to think strategically especially important now? Today’s organizations are more dispersed and less hierarchical than ever before. With the pace of change continuing to rise, it’s no longer feasible for people to wait for “orders from above.” All employees must keep an eye on the future, not just react to what’s happening in the present. They need to look beyond their functional areas to become aware of the bigger context in which they operate. And they have to be agile learners who identify opportunities by challenging their own and their team’s assumptions about how things work in their organization and industry.

Becoming a strategic thinker

With strategic thinking taking on even greater importance in organizations, we’ve made key updates to the Harvard ManageMentor Strategic Thinking topic. The content we’ve added is geared to helping people boost their productivity and effectiveness by making strategic thinking a habit, and includes practical ways that enable them to do so.

One practice is simply making the time to think strategically – something that’s not always easy in today’s fast-paced business settings. Another involves inviting dissent on your team. To make strategic decisions, you need people on all sides of an issue to speak their minds. By letting team members know that speaking up is an important part of their jobs, you free them to provide important input.

Other strategic thinking practices are useful for training yourself to see opportunities and threats well before they happen. For example, most of us are comfortable using convergent thinking – analysis, logic, and reasoning – to come up with the “best” option from a set of choices. We tend to be less adept at divergent thinking, which involves generating lots of ideas with the goal of finding innovative solutions. This isn’t an either-or process: When you first diverge as a team to generate ideas and then converge on a path forward, you improve your ability to design and implement strategic actions.

Don’t let the future surprise you

The future will undoubtedly look a lot different from today. No one can predict tomorrow, but by identifying different scenarios, you and members of your team stretch your thinking about what opportunities and threats might emerge, how they might impact your organization, and what you can do about them. You learn to enact truly meaningful change rather than make incremental improvements. And it all begins with strategic thinking.

How do you foster strategic thinking throughout your organization?

Janice Molloy is a content researcher with Harvard Business Publishing Corporate Learning. Email her at  [email protected] . 

Let’s talk

Change isn’t easy, but we can help. Together we’ll create informed and inspired leaders ready to shape the future of your business.

© 2024 Harvard Business School Publishing. All rights reserved. Harvard Business Publishing is an affiliate of Harvard Business School.

• Privacy Policy
• Copyright Information
• Terms of Use
• About Harvard Business Publishing
• Higher Education
• Harvard Business Review
• Harvard Business School

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .

Cookie and Privacy Settings

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Komita Liggans

Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking: Unpacking the Difference

Hello there! In today’s article, we will be discussing two essential thinking styles: critical thinking and strategic thinking. While both are critical for making balanced and informed decisions, they differ in their approaches.

Critical thinking involves assessing information objectively, breaking it down into parts, and evaluating the logic and reasoning behind it. Strategic thinking , on the other hand, focuses on longer-term planning, anticipating future challenges, and making proactive decisions.

Let’s dive deeper into the differences between critical thinking and strategic thinking and explore how both contribute to better decision-making.

We will also examine the  importance of critical thinking in decision-making , and provide tips on how to develop these skills.

Understanding Critical Thinking

Hello there, my fellow readers! Up first in this discussion of Critical Thinking vs. Strategic Thinking is a topic that’s very close to my heart – critical thinking.

I’ve come to appreciate the value of  critical thinking skills . Let’s dive in and explore what critical thinking is and how we can develop it.

Firstly, let’s define what critical thinking means.

Critical thinking is a cognitive process that involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information to make informed decisions. It’s an essential skill that helps us approach problems and decision-making with a logical and objective mindset.

Now that we’re on the same page, let’s talk about  developing critical thinking  skills. It’s important to note that critical thinking is not a natural talent but a learned skill. With practice and dedication, we can all develop our critical thinking abilities.

One of the first steps to  developing critical thinking  is to gather information from various sources and analyze it thoroughly.

It’s crucial to evaluate information objectively and question assumptions and biases. By doing this, we can make informed decisions based on logic and reasoning.

Another essential skill for critical thinking is problem-solving. We need to identify problems and create logical solutions by considering all possible outcomes and analyzing the pros and cons of each solution.

Finally, critical thinking involves active listening and effective communication. By actively listening to others and communicating our thoughts and ideas clearly, we can better understand different perspectives and collaborate effectively to make informed decisions.

Overall,  developing critical thinking  skills is essential for making sound and informed decisions.

By gathering information, analyzing it objectively, problem-solving, and effective communication, we can enhance our critical thinking abilities and become more effective decision-makers.

Exploring Strategic Thinking

When it comes to decision-making, strategic thinking involves taking a long-term approach and considering all potential outcomes. This thinking style requires analyzing future scenarios, identifying potential obstacles, and making proactive decisions.

As such, there are various techniques and examples to illustrate strategic thinking in action.

Thinking Outside the Box

One of the main components of strategic thinking is creativity . Embracing new and innovative ideas can help you develop unique solutions to problems and anticipate future challenges. By thinking outside the box, you may be able to identify opportunities that you would have otherwise missed.

Anticipating the Future

Another key component of strategic thinking is anticipating future scenarios. This involves considering a variety of factors, including technological advancements, changes in the market, and shifts in consumer behavior. By keeping your finger on the pulse of these trends, you can prepare yourself for potential changes and adapt to new circumstances.

Proactive Decision-Making

Strategic thinking also involves making decisions proactively, rather than simply reacting to situations as they arise. By taking a proactive approach, you can identify potential obstacles early on and take steps to prevent them from becoming larger issues down the line. This can help you stay ahead of the curve and maintain a competitive edge.

Real-Life Examples

Examples of strategic thinking can be found across various industries and professions. For instance, a marketing team may use strategic thinking to develop a long-term plan for promoting a new product. Alternatively, a CEO may use strategic thinking to expand the company’s offerings to new markets or identify potential mergers or acquisitions. Regardless of the specific application, strategic thinking is an essential tool for success in today’s fast-paced and ever-changing world.

Comparing Critical Thinking vs Strategic Thinking

As we’ve explored, critical thinking and strategic thinking are two distinct approaches to decision-making, each with its own unique qualities.

While critical thinking involves analyzing and evaluating information to make informed decisions, strategic thinking focuses on long-term planning and proactively anticipating future scenarios.

One of the main differences between critical thinking and strategic thinking is that critical thinking tends to be more reactive, while strategic thinking is proactive.

Critical thinking is often used to evaluate and respond to immediate problems or challenges, while strategic thinking is used to prepare for future challenges and opportunities. Another key difference is that critical thinking is more focused on analyzing and evaluating information, while strategic thinking is more concerned with synthesizing information and developing a big-picture perspective.

Critical thinking relies heavily on logic and objective analysis, while strategic thinking involves creativity, intuition, and future-oriented thinking.

Despite these differences, both critical thinking and strategic thinking are valuable approaches to decision-making and are often used in combination to achieve the best possible outcomes. By leveraging the strengths of each approach, individuals can become more effective and well-rounded thinkers.

In the next sections, we will explore the importance of critical and strategic thinking in decision-making, as well as strategies for developing and improving these thinking skills.

The Importance of Critical Thinking in Decision Making

As a professional coach,  my  decision-making process is critical to creating well-informed and objective sessions and workshops.

In any situation,  I  am tasked with assessing information, analyzing its relevance, and drawing logical conclusions. This is where critical thinking plays a crucial role.

The  importance of critical thinking in decision-making  cannot be overstated. It enables us to evaluate information objectively, research thoroughly, identify biases, and consider multiple perspectives. With these skills,  I  am equipped to make well-reasoned and rational decisions.

At its core, critical thinking is about asking questions, challenging assumptions, and seeking out evidence.  I  find it useful to break down problems into smaller parts, analyzing each aspect separately before bringing them together to form a complete picture. This approach helps me avoid making snap decisions based on incomplete information.

Without  critical thinking skills ,  I  risk falling prey to cognitive biases, misinterpreting data, and making poor decisions.

By cultivating a critical thinking mindset,  I  am better equipped to navigate complex situations and make informed choices.

The Benefits of Strategic Thinking

As I explored earlier, strategic thinking is a valuable mindset that can enhance decision-making processes in various settings. Here are some of the key  benefits of strategic thinking :

Overall, strategic thinking can help individuals and organizations to become more agile, innovative, and effective in accomplishing their goals.

Strategies for Critical Thinking:

Being a critical thinker is a valuable skill that can set you apart in your personal and professional life. Here are some  critical thinking strategies  to help improve your decision-making abilities:

• Ask questions:  One of the key skills of critical thinking is being able to ask thoughtful questions. When faced with a problem or decision, take the time to ask questions that will help clarify the situation and potential solutions.
• Be an active listener:  Listening actively involves giving your full attention to the person speaking, asking follow-up questions, and checking for understanding. This will help you gather more information and identify potential biases or assumptions.
• Use logical reasoning:  Logical reasoning involves thinking through a problem step by step and considering the implications of each solution. This helps you avoid making impulsive decisions or jumping to conclusions.

By incorporating these  critical thinking strategies  into your daily life, you can develop a more thoughtful and objective approach to decision making.

Enhancing Strategic Thinking Abilities

Developing strategic thinking skills is essential for effective decision-making. Here are some practical tips to improve your strategic thinking abilities:

• Embrace creativity:  Incorporating creativity into problem-solving processes can spark new ideas and lead to innovative solutions. Take a break from traditional thinking methods and consider new perspectives.
• Embrace ambiguity:  The ability to tolerate and manage ambiguity is crucial to strategic thinking. By accepting uncertainty and ambiguity, we can approach problems with a more open and adaptable mindset.
• Foster a future-oriented mindset:  Strategic thinking requires a forward-thinking approach. Consider the long-term implications of decisions and anticipate future challenges.

By following these tips, you can develop your strategic thinking abilities and become a more effective decision-maker.

Improving Critical Thinking Skills

Developing  critical thinking skills  takes practice, but it can be done. Here are some strategies to help improve your critical thinking:

• Ask effective questions:  Asking the right questions can help uncover hidden assumptions and biases. Encourage critical thinking by asking open-ended questions that require thoughtful responses.
• Listen actively:  Active listening is essential to critical thinking. By listening actively, we can gain a better understanding of opposing viewpoints and improve our ability to evaluate arguments.
• Use logical reasoning:  Logical reasoning is the backbone of critical thinking. Use logic to evaluate arguments and identify fallacies.

By applying these strategies, you can improve your critical thinking skills and become a more well-rounded thinker.

Applying Critical and Strategic Thinking in Everyday Life

Developing critical thinking skills and  strategic thinking techniques  can enhance not only your professional life but also your personal relationships and problem-solving abilities.

By applying these thinking styles, you can become a more effective communicator, better understand others’ perspectives, and make informed decisions.

In Personal Relationships

When interacting with friends or family, critical thinking skills can help you identify and overcome potential conflicts. By actively listening and asking thoughtful questions, you can gain a deeper understanding of others’ feelings and perspectives. Strategic thinking, on the other hand, can help you plan for the future of your relationships and make proactive decisions to strengthen them.

In Problem-Solving

Problem-solving requires both critical and strategic thinking. With critical thinking skills, you can analyze the situation objectively, question assumptions, and consider multiple perspectives. Strategic thinking, on the other hand, can help you anticipate future challenges and develop proactive solutions.

In Career Advancement

Employers value employees who possess strong critical thinking and strategic thinking skills. By demonstrating these skills in the workplace, you can stand out as a valuable asset to your team. Additionally, strategic thinking can help you plan for your long-term career goals and make informed decisions about your professional development .

Overall, developing critical thinking skills and  strategic thinking techniques  can enhance various aspects of your life. By applying these thinking styles in everyday situations, you can become a more effective and well-rounded thinker.

Key Takeaways:

• Critical thinking and strategic thinking are both essential approaches to decision-making.
• Critical thinking involves analyzing and evaluating information objectively to make informed decisions.
• Strategic thinking focuses on long-term planning and anticipating future scenarios.
• Both skills are vital for making sound and rational decisions.
• Critical thinking and strategic thinking have unique qualities.

Q: What is the difference between critical thinking and strategic thinking?

A: Critical thinking involves analyzing and evaluating information to make informed decisions, while strategic thinking focuses on long-term planning and proactive decision-making.

Q: How can I develop my critical thinking skills?

A: Developing critical thinking skills involves practicing effective questioning techniques, actively listening, and using logical reasoning to assess information objectively.

Q: What are some examples of strategic thinking?

A: Examples of strategic thinking include anticipating future scenarios, considering multiple perspectives, and making decisions that align with long-term goals and objectives.

Q: What are the fundamental differences between critical thinking and strategic thinking?

A: Critical thinking is centered around analyzing and evaluating information, while strategic thinking focuses on making proactive decisions and considering long-term implications.

Q: Why is critical thinking important in decision-making?

A: Critical thinking is vital in decision-making because it allows us to assess information objectively, identify biases, and consider multiple perspectives, leading to more sound and rational decisions.

Q: What are the benefits of strategic thinking?

A: Strategic thinking offers benefits such as improved problem-solving abilities, increased adaptability, and better preparedness for future challenges.

Q: What strategies can I use to improve my critical thinking skills?

A: Strategies for improving critical thinking skills include practicing effective questioning techniques, actively listening, and engaging in logical reasoning.

Q: How can I enhance my strategic thinking abilities?

A: To enhance strategic thinking abilities, it is important to embrace creativity, be comfortable with ambiguity, and cultivate a future-oriented mindset.

Q: How can critical and strategic thinking be applied in everyday life?

A: Critical and strategic thinking are applicable in personal relationships, problem-solving scenarios, and career advancement opportunities.

Q: What is the importance of understanding the difference between critical thinking and strategic thinking?

A: Understanding the  difference between critical thinking and strategic thinking  allows individuals to apply the appropriate approach depending on the situation, resulting in more effective decision-making.

In conclusion, when it comes to  critical thinking vs strategic thinking , both approaches have their unique strengths and play important roles in decision making.

It’s essential to understand the differences between these thinking styles and their practical applications. By improving both critical thinking and strategic thinking skills, we can become more effective problem-solvers and decision-makers. Critical thinking allows us to analyze information objectively and make rational decisions, while strategic thinking encourages us to plan for the long term and anticipate future challenges.

Remember, critical thinking and strategic thinking are not mutually exclusive. Instead, the two styles complement each other.

By embracing both, we can become more well-rounded thinkers and make better-informed decisions.

So, whether you’re applying these thinking styles in your personal relationships, professional life, or problem-solving, always remember to utilize both critical and strategic thinking to achieve success.

Looking to boost your skills and creativity ? Come join us at GK Liggans where it is all about building skills and creative mindsets in life, work, and leadership.

I'm a certified coach and multi-creative artist who loves to live, work, and lead with creativity while helping others do the same. Passionate about making your professional development easy. It's all about the right mindset, skillset, and toolset.

Similar Posts

Master the Art of Assertiveness: 7 Ninja Techniques to Stand Your Ground (Without Burning Bridges)

Ever found yourself in a difficult situation, torn between speaking up and staying quiet? Your heart races, palms sweat, and you’re faced with a choice: shrink into passive silence or explode in angry aggression. Welcome to the world of assertive communication, where the line between confident self-expression and being perceived as rude is razor-thin. The…

How to Express Assertive Anger in a Healthy Way

Have you ever felt frustrated or angry, but didn’t know how to communicate your feelings constructively? What if you knew how to express assertive anger in a healthy way? Could harnessing the power of assertive anger improve your relationships, boost your self-esteem, and enhance your mental and physical well-being? YES! By mastering the art of…

Breaking Free from the Perfectionism Cycle: Practical Strategies That Work

The perfectionism cycle is a destructive loop where individuals set unattainably high standards, fail to meet them, and become increasingly self-critical. This cycle breeds anxiety and lowers self-esteem, making it a relentless struggle to achieve personal goals. This article will offer practical strategies to break free from it. Key Takeaways Understanding the Perfectionism Cycle Perfectionism…

7 Key Microlearning Strategies for Solopreneurs

“The most valuable commodity of the 21st century will be the ability to learn, unlearn, and relearn.” – Alvin Toffler Today, I’m talking about microlearning – bite-sized learning that fits your schedule and addresses your unique challenges – and how you can integrate it into your solopreneurial journey. More specifically, let me share what I…

9 Best Indoor Hydroponic Gardens for Creatives and Working Professionals in 2024

Explore the best indoor hydroponic gardens for artists and professionals, with appealing designs, advanced features, and easy maintenance.

9 Strategies for Managing Microstress: Boosting Performance and Wellbeing

Explore the impact of microstress on your daily life and discover effective strategies to manage it, boosting performance, resilience, and overall well-being.

New ebook : 10 Best Practices to Optimize Your Product Org

The Ultimate Guide to Understanding Strategic Thinking vs. Strategic Planning

In today's rapidly changing business landscape, it is essential for organizations to adopt a proactive approach to achieve their goals and objectives. This is where strategic thinking and strategic planning come into play. While both terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct meanings and purposes. In this ultimate guide, we will delve into the essence of strategic thinking and strategy planning, highlighting their differences and exploring their significance in various aspects of business management.

Decoding the Essence of Strategic Thinking

Strategic thinking is a cognitive process that involves envisioning future possibilities, evaluating the current state of affairs, and formulating innovative strategies to achieve desired outcomes. Unlike operational thinking, which focuses on day-to-day tasks, strategic thinking takes a broader perspective and emphasizes long-term success. It enables individuals and organizations to adapt to changing circumstances, identify opportunities, and overcome challenges.

When it comes to strategic thinking, there are several key elements that contribute to its effectiveness. One important aspect is the ability to think analytically. Strategic thinkers have a natural inclination to analyze data, identify patterns, and draw meaningful insights from complex information. This analytical mindset allows them to make informed decisions based on a thorough understanding of the situation at hand.

Essential Skills for Strategic Thinkers

Developing strong strategic thinking skills is crucial for individuals aspiring to leadership roles and organizations aiming to stay ahead of the competition. Effective strategic thinkers possess a combination of analytical, creative, and critical thinking skills. They have a knack for identifying patterns, trends, and opportunities, while also considering potential risks and constraints. Furthermore, they are excellent communicators, collaborators, and forward-thinkers.

Creative thinking is another vital skill for strategic thinkers. It involves the ability to generate new ideas, think outside the box, and explore alternative solutions. By embracing creativity, strategic thinkers can come up with innovative strategies that differentiate their organizations from competitors and drive sustainable growth.

The Impact of Strategic Thinking on Decision Making

Strategic thinking has a profound influence on decision-making processes within organizations. By considering multiple perspectives and potential outcomes, strategic thinkers can make informed choices that align with organizational goals and values. Moreover, they are adept at prioritizing and allocating resources strategically, which optimizes efficiency and helps organizations navigate complex environments.

Another aspect of strategic thinking that greatly impacts decision making is the ability to think critically. Strategic thinkers are skilled at evaluating information, questioning assumptions, and challenging the status quo. This critical mindset allows them to identify potential pitfalls, anticipate obstacles, and make proactive adjustments to their strategies.

In conclusion, strategic thinking is a powerful cognitive process that enables individuals and organizations to thrive in today's dynamic and competitive landscape. By combining analytical, creative, and critical thinking skills, strategic thinkers can envision the future, make informed decisions, and drive long-term success. Embracing strategic thinking is essential for those who aspire to leadership roles and organizations that strive to stay ahead of the curve.

Demystifying Strategy Planning

While strategic thinking lays the foundation for success, effective strategy planning is the roadmap that guides organizations towards their desired destination. Strategy planning involves translating abstract concepts and ideas into concrete action plans that can be executed by individuals and teams. It involves identifying objectives, setting targets, allocating resources, and formulating strategies to achieve specific goals.

Key Steps to Effective Strategy Planning

1. Assessing the Current Reality: To develop an effective strategy, it is essential to have a clear understanding of the organization's current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. This involves conducting a thorough analysis of both internal and external factors that impact the organization's performance.

2. Defining Objectives and Goals: Strategy planning begins with defining clear and measurable objectives that align with the organization's mission and vision. These objectives serve as a guidepost for decision making and resource allocation.

3. Formulating Strategies: Once objectives are established, strategic planners develop strategies to achieve them. Strategies outline the broad approach and actions that need to be taken to reach the desired outcomes.

4. Resource Allocation: Effective strategy planning requires allocating resources such as budget, personnel, and technology strategically. This ensures that the necessary tools and support are available to implement the chosen strategies.

5. Implementation and Evaluation: Strategy planning is an ongoing process that involves both implementation and evaluation. It is crucial to monitor progress, reassess strategies when necessary, and make adjustments to ensure that goals are being achieved.

6. Communication and Collaboration: In addition to the key steps mentioned above, effective strategy planning also involves fostering a culture of communication and collaboration within the organization. This includes creating channels for open dialogue, encouraging feedback, and promoting cross-functional teamwork.

7. Risk Assessment and Mitigation: A comprehensive strategy planning process also includes assessing potential risks and developing mitigation strategies. This involves identifying potential obstacles or challenges that may arise during the implementation phase and proactively planning for them.

By expanding the scope of strategy planning to include communication and collaboration, organizations can enhance their ability to execute strategies effectively. This ensures that all stakeholders are aligned, informed, and engaged in the strategic planning process, leading to increased buy-in and commitment.

The Significance of Strategic Thinking in Product Management

In the realm of product management, strategic thinking plays a critical role in ensuring the success of products and services. Product managers are responsible for identifying market opportunities, defining product strategies, and guiding the development and launch of new offerings. Strategic thinking enables product managers to navigate market dynamics, anticipate customer needs, and position products effectively in competitive landscapes.

Moreover, strategic thinking in product management involves not only understanding the current market trends but also forecasting future shifts in consumer behavior and technology. By conducting thorough market research and competitor analysis, product managers can stay ahead of the curve and proactively adapt their strategies to meet evolving customer demands.

The Crucial Role of Product Managers in Organizational Strategy

Product managers are the bridge between the organization's overall strategy and the specific products and services it offers. They collaborate with various stakeholders, including marketing, sales, and engineering teams, to align product strategies with organizational goals. A strong strategic mindset enables product managers to make data-informed decisions, prioritize features, and allocate resources effectively.

Furthermore, product managers also play a vital role in fostering innovation within the organization. By encouraging a culture of creativity and experimentation, product managers can inspire cross-functional teams to think outside the box and develop groundbreaking solutions that drive business growth. This collaborative approach not only enhances product development processes but also cultivates a dynamic and forward-thinking organizational culture.

Differentiating Strategic Thinking from Strategy Planning

While strategic thinking and strategy planning are closely intertwined , it is essential to understand their nuances to leverage their benefits effectively. Let's explore the variances in nature and scope between these two essential components of organizational success.

Analyzing the Variances in Nature and Scope

Strategic thinking is a cognitive process that involves generating ideas, envisioning possibilities, and analyzing potential outcomes. It is a mindset that emphasizes innovation, adaptability, and long-term vision. On the other hand, strategy planning is a systematic and structured approach to translate strategic thinking into actionable plans. It focuses on defining goals, allocating resources, and outlining specific actions required to achieve desired outcomes.

Understanding the Time Horizon in Strategic Processes

Another key distinction is the time horizon associated with strategic thinking and strategy planning. Strategic thinking often takes a long-term perspective, considering future trends, developments, and potential scenarios. It enables organizations to anticipate and prepare for change. In contrast, strategy planning has a shorter time horizon, typically focusing on immediate and medium-term goals. It involves setting targets and developing short-term action plans.

Delving into the Decision-Making Processes

Strategic thinking and strategy planning also differ in their approaches to decision making. Strategic thinking emphasizes understanding complex issues, considering multiple perspectives, and exploring innovative solutions. It involves a more intuitive and exploratory decision-making process. In contrast, strategy planning involves making deliberate choices based on a systematic analysis of available data and resources. It prioritizes structured decision-making to achieve specific goals.

Tools and Techniques in Strategic Thinking vs. Strategy Planning

To support strategic thinking and strategy planning, various tools and techniques are available. Strategic thinking often involves brainstorming, scenario planning, SWOT analysis, and PESTLE analysis. These techniques encourage creativity, insight, and holistic thinking. Strategy planning, on the other hand, may rely on tools like the Balanced Scorecard, Porter's Five Forces, and value chain analysis to guide decision making, resource allocation, and performance measurement.

The Purpose and Objectives of Strategic Thinking

Strategic thinking serves as the foundation for effective strategy planning. It helps organizations anticipate change, identify opportunities, and ensure long-term success. The objectives of strategic thinking include fostering a culture of innovation, promoting adaptability, and enhancing an organization's competitive advantage.

Furthermore, strategic thinking is not limited to a specific group of individuals within an organization. It is a mindset that can be cultivated and encouraged at all levels. By empowering employees to think strategically, organizations can tap into a wealth of diverse perspectives and ideas, leading to more robust strategies and innovative solutions.

Moreover, strategic thinking goes beyond the confines of the business world. It can also be applied to personal development and decision making. By adopting a strategic mindset, individuals can navigate through life's challenges, set meaningful goals, and make informed choices that align with their long-term aspirations.

Inclusivity in Strategic Processes: Why It Matters

Lastly, it is crucial to recognize the significance of inclusivity in strategic processes. Strategic thinking and strategy planning benefit immensely from diverse perspectives and collaborative decision making. Inclusive strategic processes involve engaging stakeholders from different backgrounds, experiences, and expertise. This approach fosters creativity, encourages critical thinking, and ensures a holistic understanding of complex challenges.

As organizations navigate an increasingly complex and competitive business environment, understanding the nuances of strategic thinking and strategy planning is imperative. By harnessing the power of both approaches, organizations can pave the way for long-term success, innovation, and growth. Strategic thinking enables organizations to anticipate change and identify opportunities, while strategy planning provides a structured framework to translate ideas into action. By embracing both strategic thinking and strategy planning, organizations can stay ahead of the competition and achieve their desired outcomes.

Moreover, inclusivity in strategic processes goes beyond just involving diverse stakeholders; it also encompasses creating an environment where every voice is heard and valued. When individuals from various backgrounds feel included and respected in the strategic planning process, they are more likely to contribute their unique insights and ideas. This not only enriches the decision-making process but also fosters a sense of belonging and ownership among team members.

Additionally, inclusivity in strategic processes can lead to better risk management and problem-solving. When a diverse group of stakeholders is involved in identifying potential risks and developing strategies to mitigate them, the organization benefits from a wider range of perspectives and expertise. This collaborative approach not only enhances the quality of decision making but also increases the likelihood of successful implementation and outcomes.

Additional Resources

You might also like

Strategic Thinking vs Strategic Planning: Unveiling the Key Differences

The Ultimate Guide to Crafting a Brilliant Business Strategy

Mastering the Three Horizons of Product Strategy: A Comprehensive Guide for Success

Thinking strategically

In the late 1970s, Fred Gluck led an effort to revitalize McKinsey’s thinking on strategy while, in parallel, Tom Peters and Robert Waterman were leading a similar effort to reinvent the Firm’s thinking on organization. The first published product of Gluck’s strategy initiative was a 1978 staff paper, "The evolution of strategic management."

The ostensible purpose of Gluck’s article was to throw light on the then-popular but ill-defined term "strategic management," using data from a recent McKinsey study of formal strategic planning in corporations. The authors concluded that such planning routinely evolves through four distinct phases of development, rising in sophistication from simple year-to-year budgeting to strategic management, in which strategic planning and everyday management are inextricably intertwined.

But the power of the article comes from the authors’ insights into the true nature of strategy and what constitutes high-quality strategic thinking. The article is also noteworthy for setting forth McKinsey’s original definition of strategy as "an integrated set of actions designed to create a sustainable advantage over competitors" and includes a description of the well-known "nine-box" matrix that formed the basis of McKinsey’s approach to business portfolio analysis.

Ten years later, a team from the Firm’s Australian office took portfolio analysis a step further. Rather than basing portfolio strategy only on metrics of a business unit’s absolute attractiveness, as suggested by the nine-box matrix, John Stuckey and Ken McLeod recommended adding a key new decision variable: how well-suited is the parent company to run the business unit as compared with other possible owners? If the parent is best suited to extract value from a unit, it often makes no sense to sell, even if that unit doesn’t compete in a particularly profitable industry. Conversely, if a parent company determines that it is not the best possible owner of a business unit, the parent maximizes value by selling it to the most appropriate owner, even if the unit happens to be in a business that is fundamentally attractive. In short, the "market-activated corporate strategy framework" prompts managers to view their portfolios with an investor’s value-maximizing eye.

The evolution of strategic management

Frederick W. Gluck, Stephen P. Kaufman, and A. Steven Walleck

A minor but pervasive frustration that seems to be unique to management as a profession is the rapid obsolescence of its jargon. As soon as a new management concept emerges, it becomes popularized as a buzzword, generalized, overused, and misused until its underlying substance has been blunted past recognition. The same fate could easily befall one of the brightest new concepts to come along lately: strategic management.

In seeking to understand what strategic management is, we have conducted a major study of the planning systems at large corporations. This study is unique in that it attempts to pass judgment on the quality of the business plans produced rather than only on the planning process.

We found that planning routinely progresses through four discrete phases of development. The first phase, financial planning, is the most basic and can be found at all companies. It is simply the process of setting annual budgets and using them to monitor progress. As financial planners extend their time horizons beyond the current year, they often cross into forecast-based planning, which is the second phase. A few companies have advanced beyond forecast-based planning by entering the third phase, which entails a profound leap forward in the effectiveness of strategic planning. We call this phase externally oriented planning, since it derives many of its advantages from more thorough and creative analyses of market trends, customers, and the competition. Only phase four—which is really a systematic, company-wide embodiment of externally oriented planning—earns the appellation strategic management, and its practitioners are very few indeed.

It doesn’t appear possible to skip a step in the process, because at each phase a company adopts attitudes and gains capabilities needed in the phases to come. Many companies have enjoyed considerable success without advancing beyond the rudimentary levels of strategic development. Some large, successful enterprises, for instance, are still firmly embedded in the forecast-based planning phase. You might well ask, are these companies somehow slipping behind, or are they simply responding appropriately to an environment that changes more slowly? The answer must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Phase one: Financial planning

Financial planning, as we have said, is nothing more than the familiar annual budgeting process. Managers forecast revenue, costs, and capital needs a year in advance and use these numbers to benchmark performance. In well over half of the companies McKinsey studied—including some highly successful ones—formal planning was still at this most basic phase.

Note the word formal. Many firms that lack a sophisticated formal planning process make up for it with an informal "implicit strategy" worked out by the chief executive officer and a few top managers. Formal strategic planning, in fact, is just one of the possible sources of sound strategy development. There are at least two others: strategic thinking and opportunistic strategic decision making (Exhibit 1). All three routes can result in an effective strategy, which we define as "an integrated set of actions designed to create a sustainable advantage over competitors."

Phase-one companies, then, do have strategies, even though such companies often lack a formal system for planning them. The quality of the strategy of such a company depends largely on the entrepreneurial vigor of its CEO and other top executives. Do they have a good feel for the competition? Do they know their own cost structures? If the answer to such questions is yes, there may be little advantage to formal strategic planning. Ad-hoc studies by task forces and systematic communication of the essence of the strategy to those who need to know may suffice.

Phase two: Forecast-based planning

Still, most large enterprises are too complex to be managed with only an implicit strategy. Companies usually learn the shortcomings of phase-one planning as their treasurers struggle to estimate capital needs and make trade-offs among various financing plans, based on no more than a one-year budget. Ultimately, the burden becomes unbearable, and the company evolves toward phase two. At first, phase-two planning differs little from annual budgeting except that it covers a longer period of time. Very soon, however, planners become frustrated because the real world does not behave as their extrapolations predict. Their first response is usually to develop more sophisticated forecasting tools: trend analysis, regression models, and, finally, simulation models.

This initial response brings some improvement, but sooner or later all extrapolative models fail. At this point, a creative spark stirs the imaginations of the planners. They suddenly realize that their responsibility is not to chart the future—which is, in fact, impossible—but, rather, to lay out for managers the key issues facing the company. We call this spark "issue orientation."

The tough strategic issue that most often triggers the move to issue orientation is the problem of resource allocation: how to set up a flow of capital and other resources among the business units of a diversified company. The technique most commonly applied to this problem is portfolio analysis, a means of depicting a diversified company’s business units in a way that suggests which units should be kept and which sold off and how financial resources should be allocated among them. McKinsey’s standard portfolio analysis tool is the nine-box matrix (Exhibit 2), in which each business unit is plotted along two dimensions: the attractiveness of the relevant industry and the unit’s competitive strength within that industry. Units below the diagonal of the matrix are sold, liquidated, or run purely for cash, and they are allowed to consume little in the way of new capital. Those on the diagonal—marked "Selectivity, earnings"—can be candidates for selective investment. And business units above the diagonal, as the label suggests, should pursue strategies of either selective or aggressive investment and growth.

Phase three: Externally oriented planning

Once planners see their main role as identifying issues, they shift their attention from the details of their companies’ activities to the outside world, where the most profound issues reside. The planners’ in-depth analyses, previously reserved for inwardly focused financial projections, are now turned outward, to customers, potential customers, competitors, suppliers, and others. This outward focus is the chief characteristic of phase three: externally oriented planning.

The process can be time-consuming and rigorous—scrutinizing the outside world is a much larger undertaking than studying the operations of a single company—but it can also pay off dramatically. Take the example of a heavy-equipment maker that spent nine person-months reverse engineering its competitor’s product, reconstructing that competitor’s manufacturing facilities on paper, and estimating its production costs. The result: the company decided that no achievable level of cost reduction could meet the competition and that it therefore made no sense to seek a competitive advantage on price.

Phase-three plans can sometimes achieve this kind of dramatic impact because they are very different from the kind of static, deterministic, sterile plans that result from phase-two efforts. In particular, they share the following features:

Phase-three resource allocation is dynamic rather than static. The planner looks for opportunities to "shift the dot" of a business into a more attractive region of the portfolio matrix. This can be done by creating new capabilities that will help the company meet the most important prerequisite for success within a market, by redefining the market itself, or by changing the customers’ buying criteria to correspond to the company’s strengths.

Phase-three plans are adaptive rather than deterministic. They do not work from a standard strategy, such as "invest for growth." Instead, they continually aim to uncover new ways of defining and satisfying customer needs, new ways of competing more effectively, and new products or services.

Phase-three strategies are often surprise strategies. The competition often does not even recognize them as a threat until after they have taken effect.

Phase-three plans often recommend not one course of action but several, acknowledging the trade-offs among them. This multitude of possibilities is precisely what makes phase three very uncomfortable for top managers. As in-depth dynamic planning spreads through the organization, top managers realize that they cannot control every important decision. Of course, lower-level staff members often make key decisions under phase-one and phase-two regimes, but because phase three makes this process explicit, it is more unsettling for top managers and spurs them to invest even more in the strategic-planning process.

Phase Four: Strategic management

When this investment is successful, the result is strategic management: the melding of strategic planning and everyday management into a single, seamless process. In phase four, it is not that planning techniques have become more sophisticated than they were in phase three but that they have become inseparable from the process of management itself. No longer is planning a yearly, or even quarterly, activity. Instead, it is woven into the fabric of operational decision making.

No more than a few of the world’s companies—mainly diversified multinationals that manufacture electrical and electronic products—have reached this fourth phase. Perhaps the need to plan for hundreds of fast-evolving businesses serving thousands of product markets in dozens of nations has accelerated evolution at these companies. Observing them can teach executives much about strategic management.

The key factor that distinguishes strategically managed companies from their counterparts in phase three is not the sophistication of their planning techniques but rather the care and thoroughness with which they link strategic planning to operational decision making. This often boils down to the following five attributes:

A well-understood conceptual framework that sorts out the many interrelated types of strategic issues. This framework is defined by tomorrow’s strategic issues rather than by today’s organizational structure. Strategic issues are hung on the framework like ornaments on a Christmas tree. Top management supervises the process and decides which issues it must address and which should be assigned to operating managers.

Strategic thinking capabilities that are widespread throughout the company, not limited to the top echelons.

A process for negotiating trade-offs among competing objectives that involves a series of feedback loops rather than a sequence of planning submissions. A well-conceived strategy plans for the resources required and, where resources are constrained, seeks alternatives.

A performance review system that focuses the attention of top managers on key problem and opportunity areas, without forcing those managers to struggle through an in-depth review of each business unit’s strategy every year.

A motivational system and management values that reward and promote the exercise of strategic thinking.

Although it is not possible to make everyone at a company into a brilliant strategic thinker, it is possible to achieve widespread recognition of what strategic thinking is. This understanding is based on some relatively simple rules.

Strategic thinking seeks hard, fact-based, logical information. Strategists are acutely uncomfortable with vague concepts like "synergy." They do not accept generalized theories of economic behavior but look for underlying market mechanisms and action plans that will accomplish the end they seek.

Strategic thinking questions everyone’s unquestioned assumptions. Most business executives, for example, regard government regulation as a bothersome interference in their affairs. But a few companies appear to have revised that assumption and may be trying to participate actively in the formation of regulatory policies to gain a competitive edge.

Strategic thinking is characterized by an all-pervasive unwillingness to expend resources. A strategist is always looking for opportunities to win at low or, better yet, no cost.

Strategic thinking is usually indirect and unexpected rather than head-on and predictable. Basil Henry Liddell Hart, probably the foremost thinker on military strategy in the 20th century, has written, "To move along the line of natural expectation consolidates the opponent’s balance and thus his resisting power." "In strategy," says Liddell Hart, "the longest way around is often the shortest way home." 1 1. See B. H. Liddell Hart, Strategy , second edition, Columbus, Ohio: Meridian Books, 1991.

It appears likely that strategic management will improve a company’s long-term business success. Top executives in strategically managed companies point with pride to many effective business strategies supported by coherent functional plans. In every case, they can identify individual successes that have repaid many times over the company’s increased investment in planning.

About the Authors

Frederick Gluck  was the managing director of McKinsey from 1988 to 1994;  Stephen Kaufman  and Steven Walleck  are alumni of McKinsey’s Cleveland office. This article is adapted from a McKinsey staff paper dated October 1978.

MACS: The market-activated corporate strategy framework

Ken McLeod and John Stuckey

McKinsey’s nine-box strategy matrix, prevalent in the 1970s, plotted the attractiveness of a given industry along one axis and the competitive position of a particular business unit in that industry along the other. Thus, the matrix could reduce the value-creation potential of a company’s many business units to a single, digestible chart.

However, the nine-box matrix applied only to product markets: those in which companies sell goods and services to customers. Because a comprehensive strategy must also help a parent company win in the market for corporate control—where business units themselves are bought, sold, spun off, and taken private—we have developed an analytical tool called the market-activated corporate strategy (MACS) framework.

MACS represents much of McKinsey’s most recent thinking in strategy and finance. Like the old nine-box matrix, MACS includes a measure of each business unit’s stand-alone value within the corporation, but it adds a measure of a business unit’s fitness for sale to other companies. This new measure is what makes MACS especially useful.

The key insight of MACS is that a corporation’s ability to extract value from a business unit relative to other potential owners should determine whether the corporation ought to hold onto the unit in question. In particular, this issue should not be decided by the value of the business unit viewed in isolation. Thus, decisions about whether to sell off a business unit may have less to do with how unattractive it really is (the main concern of the nine-box matrix) and more to do with whether a company is, for whatever reason, particularly well suited to run it.

In the MACS matrix, the axes from the old nine-box framework measuring the industry’s attractiveness and the business unit’s ability to compete have been collapsed into a single horizontal axis, representing a business unit’s potential for creating value as a stand-alone enterprise (Exhibit 3). The vertical axis in MACS represents a parent company’s ability, relative to other potential owners, to extract value from a business unit. And it is this second measure that makes MACS unique.

Managers can use MACS just as they used the nine-box tool, by representing each business unit as a bubble whose radius is proportional to the sales, the funds employed, or the value added by that unit. The resulting chart can be used to plan acquisitions or divestitures and to identify the sorts of institutional skill-building efforts that the parent corporation should be engaged in.

The horizontal dimension: The potential to create value

The horizontal dimension of a MACS matrix shows a business unit’s potential value as an optimally managed stand-alone enterprise. Sometimes, this measure can be qualitative. When precision is needed, though, you can calculate the maximum potential net present value (NPV) of the business unit and then scale that NPV by some factor—such as sales, value added, or funds employed—to make it comparable to the values of the other business units. If the business unit might be better run under different managers, its value is appraised as if they already do manage it, since the goal is to estimate optimal, not actual, value.

That optimal value depends on three basic factors:

Industry attractiveness is a function of the structure of an industry and the conduct of its players, both of which can be assessed using the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) model. Start by considering the external forces impinging on an industry, such as new technologies, government policies, and lifestyle changes. Then consider the industry’s structure, including the economics of supply, demand, and the industry chain. Finally, look at the conduct and the financial performance of the industry’s players. The feedback loops shown in Exhibit 4 interact over time to determine the attractiveness of the industry at any given moment. 

The position of your business unit within its industry depends on its ability to sustain higher prices or lower costs than the competition does. Assess this ability by considering the business unit as a value delivery system, where "value" means benefits to buyers minus price. 2 2. See Michael J. Lanning and Edward G. Michaels, 'A business is a value delivery system,' on page 53 of this anthology.

Chances to improve the attractiveness of the industry or the business unit’s competitive position within it come in two forms: opportunities to do a better job of managing internally and possible ways of shaping the structure of the industry or the conduct of its participants.

The vertical dimension: The ability to extract value

The vertical axis of the MACS matrix measures a corporation’s relative ability to extract value from each business unit in its portfolio. The parent can be classified as "in the pack," if it is no better suited than other companies to extract value from a particular business unit, or as a "natural owner," if it is uniquely suited for the job. The strength of this vertical dimension is that it makes explicit the true requirement for corporate performance: extracting more value from assets than anyone else can.

Many qualities can make a corporation the natural owner of a certain business unit. The parent corporation may be able to envision the future shape of the industry—and therefore to buy, sell, and manipulate assets in a way that anticipates a new equilibrium. It may excel at internal control: cutting costs, squeezing suppliers, and so on. It may have other businesses that can share resources with the new unit or transfer intermediate products or services to and from it. (In our experience, corporations tend to overvalue synergies that fall into this latter category. Believing that the internal transfer of goods and services is always a good thing, these companies never consider the advantages of arm’s-length market transactions.) Finally, there may be financial or technical factors that determine, to one extent or other, the natural owner of a business unit. These can include taxation, owners’ incentives, imperfect information, and differing valuation techniques.

Using the framework

Once a company’s business units have been located on the MACS matrix, the chart can be used to plan preliminary strategies for each of them. The main principle guiding this process should be the primary one behind MACS itself: the decision about whether a unit ought to be part of a company’s portfolio hangs more on that company’s relative ability to extract value from the unit than on its intrinsic value viewed in isolation.

The matrix itself can suggest some powerful strategic prescriptions—for example:

Divest structurally attractive businesses if they are worth more to someone else.

Retain structurally mediocre (or even poor) businesses if you can coax more value out of them than other owners could.

Give top priority to business units that lie toward the far left of the matrix—either by developing them internally if you are their natural owner or by selling them as soon as possible if someone else is.

Consider improving a business unit and selling it to its natural owner if you are well equipped to increase the value of the business unit through internal improvements but not in the best position to run it once it is in top shape.

Of course, the MACS matrix is just a snapshot. Sometimes, a parent company can change the way it extracts value, and in so doing it can become the natural owner of a business even if it wasn’t previously. But such a change will come at a cost to the parent and to other units in its portfolio. The manager’s objective is to find the combination of corporate capabilities and business units that provides the best overall scope for creating value.

MACS, a descendent of the old nine-box matrix, packages much of McKinsey’s thinking on strategy and finance. We have found that it serves well as a means of assessing strategy along the critical dimensions of value creation potential and relative ability to extract value.

Ken McLeod  is an alumnus of McKinsey’s Melbourne office, and  John Stuckey  is a director in the Sydney office. This article is adapted from a McKinsey staff paper dated July 1989. Copyright © 1989, 2000 McKinsey & Company. All rights reserved.

Explore a career with us

Insight • November 6, 2019

Three Types of Thinking and Why They’re All Important

By Krista Gerhard

How often do you think about thinking ?  For most of us, the answer would probably be, “not very.”  As we manage our lives and do our jobs, we tend to employ different approaches to thinking without really being aware of it.  For the most part, that works. 

However, the times keep on changing and it’s becoming increasingly important for us to be more conscious of how we think, and to develop our thinking skills.  This is especially important if you work in a Learning & Development (L&D) role because you’re also responsible for developing those skills in others and helping them succeed in this changing world. 

In this article, we will define three very important types of thinking:  Critical, Strategic, and Entrepreneurial.  In subsequent articles, we will go into more detail about how L&D can use—and teach—all three forms of thinking.

Multiple types of thinking skills are becoming more important

In its Future of Jobs Report, the World Economic Forum shares its 2022 Skills Outlook .  This is a listing of the top skills that employers will demand in the global economy of 2022.  Let’s take a look at the top 10 growing skills:

• Analytical thinking and innovation
• Active learning and learning strategies
• Creativity, originality and initiative
• Technology design and programming
• Critical thinking and analysis
• Complex problem-solving
• Leadership and social influence
• Emotional intelligence
• Reasoning, problem-solving and ideation
• Systems analysis and evaluation

It’s interesting that at least 7 of the top 10 hinge on one or more forms of thinking mentioned above.  For many roles, individuals will need to be proficient critical, strategic, and entrepreneurial thinkers.

Critical, strategic, and entrepreneurial thinking:  What’s the difference?

Critical thinking.

We’ve written before about critical thinking , including the link between critical thinking and confidence.  However, we didn’t offer a definition.  Well, here it goes: 

Critical thinking is an effortful and continuous analysis and revision of one’s thinking processes and output for reasoning and logic and to eliminate bias in order to increase the probability of a desirable outcome. 1

Wow!  That’s a mouthful.  It basically means that critical thinkers actively think about how they think! They gather, synthesize, and evaluate information in order to make decisions; however, they do so in a way that uses logic and reason.  Plus, they consciously work to avoid falling prey to various cognitive biases that can cloud their judgement.  At its heart, critical thinking is analytical and logical.

Strategic Thinking

Strategic thinking is a mental process that is applied when one is trying to achieve some goal or set of goals.  Whereas critical thinking is all about analysis, logic and reason, strategic thinking is about planning.  It involves being able to understand cause and effect and seeing several steps ahead in order to achieve some desired outcome. 

Strategic thinking does not exist in a vacuum.  Strategic thinkers typically must employ solid critical thinking skills to analyze and understand their current situations, then layer in strategic thinking to forge a path forward.  When thinking strategically, a person should also use critical thinking to discern the likely outcomes of one planned action versus another.

Entrepreneurial Thinking

Entrepreneurial thinking can also be called creative thinking.  It involves seeing things differently than most other people.  Entrepreneurial thinkers are able to identify opportunities that others may miss.  They’re also able to see problems and develop solutions that others might consider “outside the box.” 

Entrepreneurial thinking also doesn’t exist in a vacuum.  An entrepreneurial thinker must think critically about the ideas that he or she generates.  Otherwise, they run the risk of developing “flashy” ideas that are unworkable in the real world.  They must also think strategically when working to bring the best entrepreneurial ideas to reality.

Here’s another important point:  critical, strategic, and entrepreneurial thinking skills can be taught.  Sure, most people will have differing natural aptitudes for various types of thinking. For example, Person A might naturally be more “entrepreneurial” in their thinking whereas Person B might be more inclined to think critically.  However, people can learn to use all three types of thinking.

Coming next…

In upcoming articles, we’ll explore two different aspects of all this that will be relevant to L&D professionals.  First, we’ll take a look at how L&D can use critical, strategic, and entrepreneurial thinking to improve the way L&D engages with its stakeholders and increase its effectiveness.  Second, we’ll dive into how L&D can help improve its learners’ critical, strategic, and entrepreneurial thinking skills.

• Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking. New York: Psychology Press. Note: This definition is a compilation of various definitions from pages 8 and 9 in the source listed including one obtained via consensus from among 500 policy makers, employers and educators.

Sign up for our monthly email newsletter to receive articles like this directly to your inbox.

You may also like

5 steps to boosting the impact & strategic value of learning & development.

Insights • October 23, 2019

If you’re part of a learning and development (L&D) team, then no doubt you’ve been called a “miracle worker” at […]

The Link Between Confidence and Critical Thinking

Insights • October 7, 2019

Over the last few years, we’ve been hearing the word “confidence” used quite a bit.  Whenever we partner with clients […]

Email Newsletter

Sign up for our monthly email to receive a curation of articles, podcasts and resources on learning science, biopharma industry challenges, and learning & development best practices.

• Email Address *
• Salience Learning may contact me with information regarding its capabilities or services. Please review our Website Privacy Policy .

We use cookies to provide website functionality and give you the best possible experience. Our Cookie Statement provides more information and explains how to amend your cookie settings.

Privacy Overview

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Make Time for Strategic Thinking Every Day

If you believe that only senior executives need to think strategically, think again. No matter what level you’re at, strategic thinking is a critical skill — one that can always be improved. To hone your capacity to see the big picture, start by making sure you have a solid understanding of the industry context and […]

If you believe that only senior executives need to think strategically, think again. No matter what level you’re at, strategic thinking is a critical skill — one that can always be improved. To hone your capacity to see the big picture, start by making sure you have a solid understanding of the industry context and business drivers. Make it a routine to explore the internal trends in your day-to-day work. Pay attention to the issues that get raised repeatedly, and synthesize the common obstacles your colleagues face. Be proactive about connecting with peers in your organization and in your industry to understand their observations of the marketplace, and share this information across your network. Take the time to understand the unique information and perspective that your job function contributes to the company. Thinking at this higher level will position you to be more strategic in your role.

Source: Adapted from “4 Ways to Improve Your Strategic Thinking Skills,” by Nina Bowman

Partner Center

Enhancing Strategic Thinking: Key Skills and Benefits

In today’s fast-paced and ever-changing business landscape, the ability to think strategically is a vital skill for success. Enhancing strategic thinking is not just reserved for executives; it is a skill that everyone in the organization should possess.

By neglecting strategic thinking, individuals risk missing out on valuable opportunities and failing to make meaningful contributions to the overall strategy. However, by developing and honing strategic thinking skills, individuals can enhance their decision-making abilities, problem-solving skills, creativity, and overall leadership effectiveness.

This article explores key skills and benefits of enhancing strategic thinking in a concise and persuasive manner, providing valuable insights for those seeking innovation and career advancement.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

• Strategic thinking is important for all levels of the organization, not just senior executives.
• Developing strategic thinking skills is necessary for career advancement and budget allocation.
• There are strategies to improve strategic thinking, such as observing and seeking trends, asking tough questions, sounding strategic in communication, and making time for thinking and embracing conflict.
• Improving strategic thinking skills enhances decision-making abilities, problem-solving skills, adaptability to change, creativity and innovation, and overall leadership effectiveness.

The Importance of Strategic Thinking Skills

Developing strategic thinking skills is essential for individuals at all levels of the organization. It enhances decision-making abilities, problem-solving skills, adaptability to change, creativity and innovation, and overall leadership effectiveness.

Strategic thinking is a critical component of the strategic decision-making process. It involves the ability to analyze complex problems, think critically, and make informed decisions that align with the organization’s goals and objectives.

By incorporating strategic thinking into their daily work, individuals can contribute to the development and implementation of effective strategies that drive innovation and success.

Furthermore, strategic thinking enables individuals to anticipate and adapt to changes in the business environment, ensuring the organization remains competitive and agile.

In an increasingly dynamic and fast-paced world, the importance of critical thinking and strategic decision-making cannot be overstated. It is the key to unlocking new opportunities and achieving sustainable growth.

Strategies for Developing Strategic Thinking

To cultivate strategic thinking skills, individuals must actively engage in observing trends, challenging assumptions, and prioritizing structured communication. Developing strategies to enhance these skills is crucial for success in any role.

Here are five key strategies to improve strategic thinking:

Know: Observe and Seek Trends: Understand the industry context, explore internal trends, and connect with peers to gain insights into the marketplace.

Think: Ask the Tough Questions: Broaden perspective by challenging assumptions, exploring different possibilities, and engaging colleagues and senior executives for project success.

Speak: Sound Strategic: Prioritize and structure communication to guide others in identifying issues and framing strategic choices.

Act: Make Time for Thinking and Embrace Conflict: Allocate dedicated thinking time, prioritize reflection, and embrace debate without personalizing it.

Share: Enhance Strategic Understanding: Share findings across your network to deepen strategic understanding.

The Power of Asking Tough Questions

Asking tough questions allows individuals to challenge assumptions, explore different possibilities, and broaden their perspective.

Curiosity plays a crucial role in strategic thinking, as it drives individuals to question the status quo and seek alternative perspectives.

By leveraging diverse perspectives in tough questions, individuals can tap into the collective intelligence of their teams and uncover innovative solutions. This approach encourages collaboration and fosters a culture of open-mindedness, where differing viewpoints are valued and considered.

Through the process of asking tough questions, individuals are able to uncover hidden assumptions, identify potential blind spots, and generate fresh insights. This not only enhances strategic thinking but also leads to more informed decision-making and ultimately drives innovation within organizations.

Embracing the power of asking tough questions is essential for those seeking to challenge the norm and drive meaningful change.

Effective Communication for Strategic Impact

Effective communication plays a pivotal role in ensuring that strategic thinking has a meaningful impact on the organization. To effectively communicate strategic thinking, it is crucial to employ certain techniques and practices that enhance the overall effectiveness of the message.

Key techniques for effective communication include prioritizing and structuring thoughts in verbal and written communication, guiding others in identifying strategic choices, and challenging the status quo. By utilizing these techniques, the audience can focus on the core message and better understand the underlying assumptions.

Strategic communication practices involve sharing findings across networks to enhance strategic understanding, engaging colleagues and senior executives for project success, and fostering a perception of thoughtfulness and strategic thinking. By embracing these practices, strategic thinking can be communicated more effectively, leading to improved decision-making abilities, problem-solving skills, adaptability to change, creativity, innovation, and overall leadership effectiveness.

Making Time for Thinking and Embracing Conflict

Embracing dedicated thinking time on the calendar and inviting healthy conflict are crucial for individuals looking to improve their strategic thinking skills.

Balancing reflection and action is essential in the pursuit of innovation and effective decision-making. By setting aside specific time for deep thinking and reflection, individuals can analyze complex problems, identify patterns, and generate creative solutions. This intentional focus allows for a deeper understanding of the organization’s goals and challenges, enabling individuals to make more informed strategic decisions.

Additionally, embracing constructive conflict fosters a culture of diverse perspectives, challenging assumptions, and encouraging innovation. By inviting different viewpoints and encouraging healthy debates, individuals can uncover new insights, identify potential risks, and ultimately arrive at more robust and effective strategies.

The Benefits of Improving Strategic Thinking Skills

Improving strategic thinking skills allows individuals to make more informed decisions, adapt to change, and foster innovation. By developing these skills, individuals can reap a multitude of benefits in their personal and professional lives.

Advantages of developing strategic skills include:

• Enhanced decision-making abilities: Strategic thinking enables individuals to analyze complex situations, weigh different options, and make sound decisions based on a broader perspective.
• Improved problem-solving skills: Strategic thinkers are adept at identifying and addressing root causes of problems, leading to more effective and efficient solutions.
• Increased adaptability to change: With strategic thinking skills, individuals can anticipate and navigate through change, embracing new opportunities and minimizing disruption.
• Boosted creativity and innovation: Strategic thinkers are more open to exploring new ideas, thinking outside the box, and challenging the status quo, which fosters a culture of innovation.
• Enhanced overall leadership effectiveness: Strategic thinking skills empower individuals to lead with clarity, purpose, and a long-term vision, inspiring and mobilizing others towards success.

Challenges in Developing Strategic Thinking Skills

While enhancing strategic thinking skills offers numerous benefits, there are also challenges that individuals may face in developing these skills.

One of the main hurdles is dealing with uncomfortable feelings that arise when stepping outside of one’s comfort zone. Strategic thinking requires individuals to challenge assumptions and question established norms, which can be unsettling.

Additionally, managing through ambiguity and imperfect information can be a challenge, as it requires individuals to make decisions without complete certainty.

Developing comfort with conflict and curiosity is also crucial, as strategic thinking often involves engaging in discussions and debates to explore different perspectives.

Lastly, taking risks to contribute at a higher level can be daunting, but it is necessary for growth and development in strategic thinking.

Overcoming these challenges is essential for individuals to fully develop their strategic thinking skills and unlock their innovative potential.

Overcoming Uncomfortable Feelings and Challenging Assumptions

Individuals may encounter discomfort and resistance when they confront their assumptions and step outside their comfort zones to develop their strategic thinking abilities. Overcoming these uncomfortable feelings is essential for growth and innovation.

By questioning assumptions and challenging the status quo, individuals can unlock new perspectives and possibilities. Embracing discomfort allows for the exploration of different approaches and outcomes, fostering creativity and innovation. It also helps in managing through ambiguity and imperfect information, enabling individuals to make better-informed decisions.

Navigating Ambiguity and Taking Risks for Higher-Level Contributions

Navigating ambiguity and embracing risk-taking are crucial for individuals seeking to make higher-level contributions and enhance their leadership effectiveness. In today’s rapidly changing and unpredictable business landscape, uncertainty is the norm.

Leaders who can navigate through this uncertainty and take calculated risks are more likely to identify new opportunities and drive innovation. By embracing vulnerability, they are open to new ideas, perspectives, and feedback, fostering a culture of collaboration and growth.

Navigating ambiguity requires the ability to adapt quickly, think critically, and make informed decisions in the face of incomplete information. It also involves being comfortable with the discomfort of not having all the answers.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can strategic thinking skills be applied in different levels of the organization.

Strategic thinking skills can be applied across different levels of the organization to achieve organizational alignment and foster strategic leadership. It enables individuals to align their actions with the overall strategic goals and make informed decisions.

What Are Some Practical Ways to Observe and Seek Trends in the Industry?

Observation techniques and trend analysis are practical ways to seek trends in the industry. By observing market indicators and analyzing data, individuals can identify emerging patterns and make informed strategic decisions.

How Can Strategic Thinking Skills Enhance Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Abilities?

Enhancing decision-making and problem-solving abilities can be achieved through the development of strategic thinking skills. By broadening perspectives, challenging assumptions, and exploring different possibilities, individuals can make more informed and innovative choices.

What Are Some Effective Strategies for Prioritizing and Sequencing Thoughts in Verbal and Written Communication?

Prioritizing and sequencing thoughts in verbal and written communication is vital for effective strategic thinking. By structuring communication to focus on the core message and challenging assumptions, individuals can enhance their strategic impact.

How Can Individuals Overcome the Discomfort and Unsettling Feelings Associated With Developing Strategic Thinking Skills?

Individuals can overcome discomfort and unsettling feelings associated with developing strategic thinking skills by building resilience. They can embrace uncertainty, seek feedback, and view challenges as opportunities for growth, ultimately fostering a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation.

UNLOCK YOUR COPY

Strategic Thinking vs Strategic Planning: Key Differences Explained

Strategic thinking and strategic planning are essential components of an organization’s success, but they are not the same. Understanding the differences between these two concepts can help leaders more effectively address the challenges their organizations face. Both processes require vision, creative problem-solving, and an understanding of the organization’s goals, but they approach these tasks differently.

While strategic planning typically focuses on a specific project or effort, strategic thinking is an ongoing endeavor that informs every aspect of an organization’s operations. By nurturing both strategic thinking and planning, organizations can more effectively adapt to changing market conditions and maintain a strong competitive advantage.

Strategic Thinking vs Strategic Planning

Strategic thinking is an ongoing, proactive mental process that focuses on the generation of innovative ideas and goals. It encourages creativity and a broader perspective, allowing individuals to develop unique solutions for common business challenges. Strategic thinking can be a nurtured attribute and is not limited to specific projects or efforts. It is applicable across all levels and functions within an organization, enabling employees to contribute to the organization’s success constantly.

Strategic Planning

To summarize, strategic thinking and strategic planning serve distinct purposes in an organization’s success. While strategic thinking focuses on generating innovative ideas, strategic planning is a structured process that defines the steps required to achieve the organization’s goals. Both components must work together to ensure a successful and sustainable business landscape.

Defining Strategic Thinking and Strategic Planning

Definition of strategic thinking, definition of strategic planning.

On the other hand, strategic planning is a structured process that deals with the tactical actions needed to achieve the organization’s vision as informed by strategic thinking 2 . In strategic planning, leaders gather data and decide on the path the organization will take to reach its goals 3 . Unlike strategic thinking, strategic planning is more focused on the specific steps and resources required to accomplish the objectives.

Skills and Abilities Involved

Strategic thinking skills.

Strategic thinking involves the development of an organization’s vision and goals. It often requires creativity and innovation to find unique solutions to common business challenges or establish new ways to achieve objectives.

Strategic Planning Skills

While strategic thinking is more abstract, strategic planning refers to the specific, detailed process of creating an action plan to achieve the organization’s goals. The focus here is on developing clear objectives, assigning resources, and monitoring progress to ensure a successful outcome.

Key skills needed for strategic planning include:

Role in Organizational Success

Communication and leadership.

Strategic thinking and strategic planning both play crucial roles in an organization’s success. They serve different purposes but are interconnected in many ways. One of the significant differences between the two is the way they involve communication and leadership.

Effectiveness and Productivity

Both strategic thinking and strategic planning impact organizational effectiveness and productivity, but they do so in different ways. Strategic thinking is more about generating innovative ideas and setting the long-term direction for the organization. It involves identifying opportunities, assessing risks, and evaluating the competitive landscape. When employees engage in strategic thinking, they develop a deeper understanding of the organization’s purpose and objectives, leading to increased commitment and motivation. This can, in turn, contribute to higher productivity.

The Processes

In this section, we will explore the processes involved in both strategic thinking and strategic planning. These processes are essential for creating a solid foundation for an organization’s growth, direction, and success.

Process of Strategic Thinking

Process of strategic planning.

Strategic planning, on the other hand, is a structured process that translates an organization’s strategic thinking into actionable goals and initiatives. It involves establishing a clear direction, setting specific objectives, and developing a roadmap to achieve them. The strategic planning process generally follows these steps:

Both strategic thinking and strategic planning play crucial roles in shaping an organization’s future and determining its success. Strategic thinking generates creative and innovative solutions, while strategic planning provides a structured approach to implementing those solutions and achieving desired outcomes. Understanding the processes involved in each can help organizations navigate the ever-changing business landscape with clarity and confidence.

Strategic Vision and Direction

The foundation of both strategic thinking and strategic planning lies in setting a clear and compelling vision for the organization. A well-defined vision helps in identifying long-term goals and establishing a roadmap to guide the company’s direction.

Vision for the Organization

Competitive advantage, long-term and short-term goals.

Both strategic thinking and strategic planning involve setting long-term and short-term goals that align with the organization’s vision. These goals serve as milestones on the path to achieving the organization’s overall objectives.

Innovation and Creativity

Innovation and creativity play crucial roles in distinguishing strategic thinking from strategic planning. While strategic planning involves gathering data and deciding the organization’s path to achieve its goals, strategic thinking encourages employees at all levels to continually scan for new ways to contribute to the organization’s success 1 .

Some ways to develop strategic thinking skills which include innovation and creativity are:

Goal Setting and Objective Length

When approaching strategic thinking and strategic planning, it is essential to understand the concepts of goal setting and objective length to create a clear and actionable plan.

On the other hand, strategic planning focuses on defining short-term goals that serve as stepping stones to achieving broader, long-term objectives. These goals are more measurable and typically have a shorter timeline or a specific project attached to them 2 .

Overall, understanding the differences in goal setting and objective length for strategic thinking and strategic planning helps organizations effectively develop strategies, make informed decisions, and navigate complex environments with greater success.

Proactivity and Reactive Change

To strike a balance between proactivity and reactive change, organizations should:

Careers and Professional Development

Strategic thinking career paths.

Strategic thinking is a vital skill for professionals seeking to excel and innovate in many career paths. This skill enables individuals to generate creative solutions and shape growth-oriented strategies for their organizations. Some popular careers involving strategic thinking include:

Strategic Planning Career Paths

Certifications and training.

Pursuing these certifications and training opportunities can not only enhance one’s skill set but also increase their potential for promotions and career growth in their respective fields.

Tools and Techniques for Efficient Planning

Project management skills, to-do list and due dates.

By applying these tools and techniques for efficient planning, you can improve your project management skills and enhance your strategic thinking and planning efforts. Remember that regular monitoring and adaptation are key to success in strategic planning.

You may also like

Strategic thinking examples: practical applications for success, how to use military strategy to advance your career path.

Best Puzzles for Strategic Thinking: Top Picks to Sharpen Your Mind

How the Romans Used Strategic Thinking: Mastering Warfare and Empire Expansion

Download this free ebook.

Center for Simplified Strategic Planning, Inc

Course and Direction

The path to strategic success.

• K. Venkat Reddy 3 &
• G. Suvarna Lakshmi 4  

This chapter contains summaries of six articles that are machine generated. The summaries discuss the multitude ways in which the field of critical thinking has been understood and defined. Mostly the summaries included in the chapter project the view that critical thinking is all about certain cognitive abilities belonging to the higher order of thinking. The first summary explains the definition of critical thinking using a meta-level approach; it uses this approach because the problem of defining critical thinking is a meta-problem. The authors argue that the definitions proposed earlier were either subject-specific or skill-specific resulting in definitions that are neither universally applicable nor acceptable. The authors therefore have attempted to propose an approach that has three proper criteria that the definition should satisfy. They are: (1) rely on criteria, (2) self-correcting, and (3) sensitive to context. The summary of the second article on the skills required for the twenty-first-century education is based on the lists of skills proposed by various bodies that are broadly categorized as productive, critical, and creative thinking along with digital skills. The author proposes that the curriculum should incorporate skills that are required as per the current pace of change and the need of the hour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

McPeck, J. (1981). Critical thinking and education . St. Martin’s Press.

Google Scholar  

Ennis, R. (1987). A conception of critical thinking—With some curriculum suggestions. APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy Summer , 1–5.

Ennis, R. (1989). Critical thinking and subject-specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18 , 4–10.

Article   Google Scholar  

Paul, R. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world . Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46 (September), 38–43.

Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, C., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., & Martin, C. (2003). EnGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age . NCREL. http://www.pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf

ISTE [International Society for Technology in Education]. (2007). National educational technology standards for students. (2nd rev. ed.). : ISTE. www.iste.org.

Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42 (3), 237–249.

Higgins, S., & Baumfield, V. (1998). A defence of teaching general thinking skills. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 32 (3), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00103

Colwill, I., & Gallagher, C. (2007). Developing a curriculum for the twenty-first century: The experiences of England and Northern Ireland. Prospects, 37 (4), 411–425.

Benjamin, H. R. W. (1939). Saber-tooth curriculum, including other lectures in the history of Paleolithic education . McGraw-Hill.

Bahar, M., & Tongac, E. (2009). The effect of teaching approaches on the pattern of pupils’ cognitive structure: Some evidence from the field. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18 (1), 21–45.

McPeck, J. E. (1990). Teaching critical thinking . Chapman and Hall.

Norris, S. P. (1985). Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educational Leadership, 42 (8), 40–45.

Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument . Palgrave Macmillan.

Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn . Cambridge University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment . Council of Chief State School Officers.

UNESCO IBE. (2013b). Statement on learning in the post-2015 education and development agenda . UNESCO IBE.

UNESCO IBE [International Bureau of Education]. (2013a). Key curricular and learning issues in the post-2015 education and development agenda. Document prepared for the UNESCO IBE international experts’ meeting, 23–25 September, Geneva. UNESCO IBE.

U. S. Office of Education. (1991). America 2000: An education strategy . U. S. Government Printing Office.

Ennis, R. (1996). Critical thinking . Prentice-Hall.

Bailin, S., & Battersby, M. (2010). Reason in the balance: An inquiry approach to critical thinking . McGraw-Hill Ryerson.

Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22 (1), 61–79.

Pease, M., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Science Education, 95 , 57–86.

Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48 , 1157–1186.

Ennis, R. (1984). Problems in testing informal logic, critical thinking, reasoning ability. Inf Logic, 6 , 3–9.

Ennis, R. (2003). Critical thinking assessment. In D. Fasko (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current theories, research, and practice . Hampton.

Ennis, R. (2008). Nationwide testing of critical thinking for higher education: Vigilance required. Teaching Philosophy, 31 (1), 1–26.

Ennis, R. (2009). Investigating and assessing multiple-choice critical thinking tests. In J. Sobocan & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking education and assessment: Can higher order thinking be tested? Althouse.

Ennis, R., & Norris, S. (1990). Critical thinking assessment: Status, issues, needs. In S. Legg & J. Algina (Eds.), Cognitive assessment of language and math outcomes . Ablex.

Fisher, A., & Scriven, M. (1997). Critical thinking: Its definition and assessment . Edgepress.

Norris, S., & Ennis, R. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking . Midwest Publications.

Groarke, L. (2009). What’s wrong with the California critical thinking skills test? CT testing and accountability. In J. Sobocan & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking education and assessment: Can higher order thinking be tested? Althouse Press.

Possin, K. (2008). A field guide to critical thinking assessment. Teaching Philosophy, 31 (3), 201–228.

Possin K (2013a) A serious flaw in the collegiate learning assessment [CLA] test. Inf Log 33(3):390–405. Also posted in Italian at http://unibec.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/un-grave-difetto-del-test-colligiate-learning-assessment-cla/

Possin, K. (2013b). Some problems with the Halpern critical thinking assessment [HCTA] test. Inquiry, 28 (3), 4–12.

Possin, K. (2013c). A fatal flaw in the collegiate learning assessment test. Assessment Update, 25 (1), 8–11.

Possin, K. (2014). Critique of the Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal test: The more you know, the lower your score. Inf Log, 34 (4), 393–416.

Sobocan, J., & Groarke, L. (Eds.). (2009). Critical thinking education and assessment: Can higher order thinking be tested? Althouse.

Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research, vol 2: A third decade of research . Jossey Bass.

Solon, T. (2007). Critical thinking infusion and course content learning in introductory psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34 (2), 95–109.

Johnson, R. H., & Hamby, B. (2015). A meta-level approach to the problem of defining ‘critical thinking’. Argumentation, 29 , 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9356-4

Higgins, S. (2014). Critical thinking for 21 st -century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum? Prospects, 44 , 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9323-0

Battersby, M., & Bailin, S. (2011). Critical inquiry: Considering the context. Argumentation, 25 , 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9205-z

Yu, K.-C., Lin, K.-Y., & Fan, S.-C. (2014). An exploratory study on the application of conceptual knowledge and critical thinking to technological issues. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25 , 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9289-5

Acedo, C., & Hughes, C. (2014). Principles for learning and competences in the 21st-century curriculum. Prospects, 44 , 503–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9330-1

Ennis, R. H. (2016). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37 , 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Training and Development, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

K. Venkat Reddy

Department of English Language Teaching, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

G. Suvarna Lakshmi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of English Language Teaching, English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Reddy, K.V., Lakshmi, G.S. (2024). Introduction to Critical Thinking Skills. In: Reddy, K.V., Lakshmi, G.S. (eds) Critical Thinking for Professional and Language Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37951-2_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37951-2_1

Published : 04 September 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-37950-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-37951-2

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

More From Forbes

The hot-hand fallacy: what it is and how to overcome it.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

The hot-hand fallacy is a cognitive bias that leads individuals to believe that a person who has experienced success with a random event has a higher chance of continued success in subsequent attempts.

The term “hot hand” originated in the context of basketball, where players, coaches, and fans often believe that a player who has made several successful shots in a row is “hot” and therefore more likely to continue making shots.

Los Angeles Laker Kobe Bryant (C) gets a shot off against the Boston Celtics Paul Pierce (L) and Ray ... [+] Allen (R) during game three of the NBA Finals on June 8, 2010 in Boston. AFP PHOTO / DON EMMERT (Photo credit should read DON EMMERT/AFP via Getty Images)

Despite its intuitive appeal, the hot-hand fallacy has been widely debunked as a misconception rooted in misinterpretation of random sequences. It is the reverse of the gambler’s fallacy that I wrote about in my last column – the mistaken belief that if something happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future, or vice versa.

What Is the Hot-hand Fallacy?

The hot-hand fallacy occurs when people perceive patterns in random sequences of outcomes, such as a series of successful basketball shots, and infer that these patterns are likely to persist. In the classic study by Gilovich, Vallone, and Tversky (1985) , researchers found no evidence to support the belief that basketball players had a “hot hand.” Their analysis showed that the probability of making a shot was not significantly different after a series of successful shots compared to after a miss. In essence, each shot was an independent event, with the outcome not influenced by the previous shots.

Best High-Yield Savings Accounts Of 2024

Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024.

The hot-hand fallacy can extend beyond sports to any situation where success or failure is determined by chance. In financial markets, for example, investors may believe that a stock or fund manager on a “hot streak” will continue to outperform, leading them to make investment decisions based on perceived momentum rather than rational analysis.

How the Hot-Hand Fallacy Impacts Decision Making

The hot-hand fallacy can have profound effects on decision making, particularly in high-stakes environments like business, finance, and sports. When leaders or decision-makers fall victim to this bias, they may make choices based on faulty assumptions, leading to suboptimal outcomes.

The hot-hand fallacy can cause individuals to overestimate their abilities to predict future success. A business leader who has made several successful strategic decisions in a row might believe they have a special knack for decision making, leading to overconfidence. This overconfidence can result in riskier decisions without proper consideration of potential downsides.

In organizations, the hot-hand fallacy can lead to the reinforcement of strategies that have worked in the past but may no longer be optimal. Leaders might continue to invest in a particular product line or market because of past success, ignoring changing conditions or new opportunities. This can stifle innovation and prevent the organization from adapting to new challenges.

The belief in a “hot hand” can lead to the misallocation of resources, particularly in investment and gambling scenarios. For instance, an investor might pour additional funds into a stock that has been performing well, without considering fundamentals or market conditions. This can lead to financial losses if the perceived momentum does not continue.

The hot-hand fallacy can also create undue pressure on individuals who are perceived to have a “hot hand.” In sports, for example, a player on a streak might feel an overwhelming expectation to continue performing at a high level, leading to stress and potential burnout. In business, a leader who is expected to replicate past successes might feel compelled to take on more risk or work longer hours, ultimately harming their well-being and decision-making ability.

4 Ways to Overcome the Hot-Hand Fallacy

To overcome the hot-hand fallacy, it is essential to recognize that random events are often just that – random. While it is natural to seek patterns and predictability in uncertain situations, understanding the nature of randomness can help mitigate the impact of this bias on decision making.

Here are some strategies that you can use to avoid the hot-hand fallacy:

• Increase Education and Awareness : One of the most effective ways to counter the hot-hand fallacy is through education and training. Decision-makers should be made aware of common cognitive biases, including the hot-hand fallacy, and how these biases can influence their thinking. Regular training sessions on cognitive biases and decision-making heuristics can help individuals recognize when they are falling prey to faulty reasoning.
• Rely on Data and Evidence : To counteract the hot-hand fallacy, it is crucial to base decisions on data and evidence rather than perceived patterns. In business, this means conducting thorough analyses before making strategic decisions, rather than relying on past successes as indicators of future performance.
• Encourage Diverse Perspectives : In group decision making, encouraging diverse perspectives can help mitigate the impact of the hot-hand fallacy. When multiple viewpoints are considered, there is a greater likelihood that someone will challenge the assumption of a “hot hand” and advocate for a more rational approach.
• Implement Decision-Making Frameworks : Structured decision-making frameworks, such as red teaming and Red Team Thinking, can help organizations avoid the pitfalls of the hot-hand fallacy. These frameworks encourage critical thinking, challenge assumptions, and stress-test strategies, ensuring that decisions are based on sound reasoning rather than cognitive biases.

By understanding the nature of this fallacy, recognizing its impact, and implementing strategies to counteract it, decision-makers can avoid the pitfalls of overconfidence and misallocated resources.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Join The Conversation

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's  Terms of Service.   We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

• False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
• Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
• Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
• Content that otherwise violates our site's  terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

• Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
• Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
• Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
• Actions that otherwise violate our site's  terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

• Stay on topic and share your insights
• Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
• ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
• Protect your community.
• Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's  Terms of Service.