OR
: PICO is one option, there are other frameworks you can use too! |
Use the interactive PICO worksheet to get started with your question, or you can download the worksheet document.
Here are some different frameworks you may want to use:
opulation ( atient), ntervention, omparison ( ontrol) and utcome. Add a imeframe if required. Used particularly for treatment type questions. | |
A variation of PICO where = xposure and = imeframe if required. | |
Developed in the context of practice guideline adaptation. Includes = rofessionals/ atients, = utcome and = ealthcare Setting. | |
= etting (where), = erspective (for whom), = ntervention (what), = omparison (compared with what), = valuation (Booth 2006). | |
= ample, = henomenon of interest, = esign, = valuation, = esearch type. Useful for qualitative or mixed method studies (Cooke, Smith and Booth 2012). | |
= Expectations, = lient group, = ocation, = Impact, = rofession, = ervice (Wildridge & Bell 2002). | |
= Political, = Economic, = ocial, = echnological, = nvironmental, = egal (CIPD 2010). |
There are a number of PICO variations which can be used for different types of questions, such as qualitative, and background and foreground questions. Visit the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Guide to learn more:
The text within this Guide is licensed CC BY 4.0 . Image licenses can be found within the image attributions document on the last page of the Guide. Ask the Library for information about reuse rights for other content within this Guide.
Table of contents
Sometimes, coming up with an interesting topic is much more challenging than even writing a 10-page essay. After all, there are so many unique themes you could divulge, and choosing the only one that would suit your needs best can be overwhelming.
To narrow down your list of potential nutrition topics for research, it’s in your best interest to start with broader themes that spark your interest. For example, do you want to know more about how food impacts health and disease? Are you more interested in the psychological and emotional connection to food? Perhaps you’ve always been curious about nutrition and muscle development or weight loss?
Once you have a general direction, you’d like to go in, and finding suitable topics becomes much easier.
But if you’re still struggling with finding inspiration for your next essay, you should check out PapersOwl’s nutrition research paper topic suggestions. We’ve compiled a list of dozens of unique topics that’ll help you finish your assignment.
And if you need more than just suggestions, you can always find nutrition and nursing papers for sale on our platform.
Without further ado, let’s get into some of the best topic ideas!
The following are some of the best nutrition research paper topics for college students who want to learn more about the themes that directly affect them. In case you need assistance with writing any of the following topics, you can order custom research papers and receive authentic, plagiarism-free content written by nutrition experts.
If you’d prefer a bit more exciting topic that encourages debate and gets your readers immersed, take a look at the following nutrition research paper topic suggestions.
Analyzing diets and their impact on our health and fitness is always intriguing. Learn more about nutrition and dietetics with some of the following nutrition research topics:
Student-athletes always want to know more about how food and nutrition impact their performance. The following topics can be just as useful to them as they are to med students.
Miscellaneous topics can often be some of the most interesting ones, especially since few students ever opt for them. Browse through these ten unique topics and choose the one that suits you best.
Once you’ve found a great topic, writing becomes a much easier task. But if you can’t find the time for your paper, a quick search for services that can “ write my research paper for me ” could be a God-send.
Food Safety and Packaging Innovations:
Nutritional Strategies for Disease Prevention and Management:
Gut Health and Microbiota:
Bioactive Compounds and Nutraceuticals:
Marine and Aquatic Nutrition:
Pediatric and Maternal Nutrition:
Advances in Dietary Supplements:
Environmental and Sustainable Nutrition:
Processing and Preservation Technologies:
Exploring the ways how human bodies work and react has interested people for thousands of years. No wonder there are a lot of engaging dietary and nursing research topics for modern students to choose from. You’ve already got acquainted with 70 of our top nutrition topics for research papers, so gather inspiration from our list and get started with your essay!
If you need further assistance with your writing, PapersOwl’s experts are available 24/7. Contact us, and place your order for custom nutrition papers.
Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.
25+ Practical Examples & Ideas To Help You Get Started
By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | October 2023
A well-crafted research question (or set of questions) sets the stage for a robust study and meaningful insights. But, if you’re new to research, it’s not always clear what exactly constitutes a good research question. In this post, we’ll provide you with clear examples of quality research questions across various disciplines, so that you can approach your research project with confidence!
Let’s start by looking at some examples of research questions that you might encounter within the discipline of psychology.
How does sleep quality affect academic performance in university students?
This question is specific to a population (university students) and looks at a direct relationship between sleep and academic performance, both of which are quantifiable and measurable variables.
What factors contribute to the onset of anxiety disorders in adolescents?
The question narrows down the age group and focuses on identifying multiple contributing factors. There are various ways in which it could be approached from a methodological standpoint, including both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Do mindfulness techniques improve emotional well-being?
This is a focused research question aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of a specific intervention.
How does early childhood trauma impact adult relationships?
This research question targets a clear cause-and-effect relationship over a long timescale, making it focused but comprehensive.
Is there a correlation between screen time and depression in teenagers?
This research question focuses on an in-demand current issue and a specific demographic, allowing for a focused investigation. The key variables are clearly stated within the question and can be measured and analysed (i.e., high feasibility).
Next, let’s look at some examples of well-articulated research questions within the business and management realm.
How do leadership styles impact employee retention?
This is an example of a strong research question because it directly looks at the effect of one variable (leadership styles) on another (employee retention), allowing from a strongly aligned methodological approach.
What role does corporate social responsibility play in consumer choice?
Current and precise, this research question can reveal how social concerns are influencing buying behaviour by way of a qualitative exploration.
Does remote work increase or decrease productivity in tech companies?
Focused on a particular industry and a hot topic, this research question could yield timely, actionable insights that would have high practical value in the real world.
How do economic downturns affect small businesses in the homebuilding industry?
Vital for policy-making, this highly specific research question aims to uncover the challenges faced by small businesses within a certain industry.
Which employee benefits have the greatest impact on job satisfaction?
By being straightforward and specific, answering this research question could provide tangible insights to employers.
Next, let’s look at some potential research questions within the education, training and development domain.
How does class size affect students’ academic performance in primary schools?
This example research question targets two clearly defined variables, which can be measured and analysed relatively easily.
Do online courses result in better retention of material than traditional courses?
Timely, specific and focused, answering this research question can help inform educational policy and personal choices about learning formats.
What impact do US public school lunches have on student health?
Targeting a specific, well-defined context, the research could lead to direct changes in public health policies.
To what degree does parental involvement improve academic outcomes in secondary education in the Midwest?
This research question focuses on a specific context (secondary education in the Midwest) and has clearly defined constructs.
What are the negative effects of standardised tests on student learning within Oklahoma primary schools?
This research question has a clear focus (negative outcomes) and is narrowed into a very specific context.
Shifting to a different field, let’s look at some examples of research questions within the healthcare space.
What are the most effective treatments for chronic back pain amongst UK senior males?
Specific and solution-oriented, this research question focuses on clear variables and a well-defined context (senior males within the UK).
How do different healthcare policies affect patient satisfaction in public hospitals in South Africa?
This question is has clearly defined variables and is narrowly focused in terms of context.
Which factors contribute to obesity rates in urban areas within California?
This question is focused yet broad, aiming to reveal several contributing factors for targeted interventions.
Does telemedicine provide the same perceived quality of care as in-person visits for diabetes patients?
Ideal for a qualitative study, this research question explores a single construct (perceived quality of care) within a well-defined sample (diabetes patients).
Which lifestyle factors have the greatest affect on the risk of heart disease?
This research question aims to uncover modifiable factors, offering preventive health recommendations.
Last but certainly not least, let’s look at a few examples of research questions within the computer science world.
What are the perceived risks of cloud-based storage systems?
Highly relevant in our digital age, this research question would align well with a qualitative interview approach to better understand what users feel the key risks of cloud storage are.
Which factors affect the energy efficiency of data centres in Ohio?
With a clear focus, this research question lays a firm foundation for a quantitative study.
How do TikTok algorithms impact user behaviour amongst new graduates?
While this research question is more open-ended, it could form the basis for a qualitative investigation.
What are the perceived risk and benefits of open-source software software within the web design industry?
Practical and straightforward, the results could guide both developers and end-users in their choices.
In this post, we’ve tried to provide a wide range of research question examples to help you get a feel for what research questions look like in practice. That said, it’s important to remember that these are just examples and don’t necessarily equate to good research topics . If you’re still trying to find a topic, check out our topic megalist for inspiration.
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Research ideas on Political Science
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
When it comes to healthy eating, there’s a lot we already know.
Just take a look at the scientific report issued by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee , the group of scientific experts behind the newly released 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans . At 835 pages, the report spans a rigorous review of current research on dozens of topics, from whether eating peanuts early in life reduces the likelihood of peanut allergies (it probably does), to how much added sugar we can eat and still maintain a healthy diet ( way less than what we’re eating now ). It also outlines the broad contours of a healthy diet, which has changed little from past editions of the Dietary Guidelines : it’s typically higher in vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, low- or non-fat dairy, lean meat and poultry, seafood, nuts, and unsalted vegetable oils, and lower in red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and drinks, and refined grains.
But food is more than just nutrition. We also know that food can affect the health of many people before it even reaches our plates. For example, pollution caused by fertilizer runoff from farms have left communities without access to safe drinking water, while many of the people who produce our food don’t earn enough to afford healthy diets themselves. So, is it possible to eat in ways that promote health and produce better outcomes for our collective wellbeing, livelihoods, and natural resources? And what would it take to get us there?
These are complex questions, but critical ones—and if the federal government made it a national priority to answer them, we might have a chance at avoiding otherwise devastating consequences.
That’s why leading experts and scientific bodies, including the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee , are increasingly calling attention to the importance of research on sustainable diets . Though there is no official record of how much federal funding is currently supporting this field, funding for nutrition research across the board has remained stagnant for decades . Research funding at the intersection of food and agriculture issues, in particular, is decidedly inadequate to address the magnitude of the public health challenges before us, including climate change, threats to food security, and persistent poverty and health disparities.
Many, including UCS, are working to change that by advocating for greater government investment in sustainable diets research. Here are three of the most pressing questions that research can answer to enable more sustainable eating for all.
Research on healthy and environmentally sustainable diets has seen extraordinary growth in recent years. According to UCS research , nearly 100 new scholarly articles were published on this topic between 2015 and 2019, including 22 articles focused specifically on US diets. For reference, that’s more than four times the number of articles published on the same topic between 2000 and 2015—in about a quarter of the time.
Much of this research agrees that, in general, healthy diets that are higher in plant-based foods and lower in animal-based foods are more environmentally sustainable—meaning they are often associated with reduced energy and land use, as well as less air and water pollution.
This is an important finding that enables us to take the first steps toward more sustainable diets—and each step is critical, given the urgency and magnitude of dual public health and climate crises. Indeed, a number of other countries already have acted on existing knowledge to incorporate sustainability into national dietary guidance .
But the more we know, the faster (and further) we can move forward.
For example, we need to better understand the impacts of all different kinds of dietary shifts that could improve health and sustainability, and the most effective ways to encourage such shifts at the individual, institutional, and societal levels . We also need to better understand how a wide variety of sustainable diets align with diverse cultures and culinary traditions . Both of these areas of research will be crucial to informing practical public health interventions and policy recommendations that can help all people make meaningful changes.
There are also challenges with available data and models. Many studies on sustainable diets rely on models called Life Cycle Assessments , which help estimate the cumulative environmental impacts of the foods we eat. For example, how much energy is required to process, package, and transport a pound of beef from the farm to the grocery store? How much land, water, and energy was required to raise the cattle? While a Life Cycle Assessment is useful in providing general estimates, it’s often based on averages that don’t account for key differences in production methods, for example, or regions. More data—and more diverse data sources—could make this an even more powerful and practical tool.
These and other outstanding research gaps prompted the Interagency Committee on Human Nutrition Research (ICHNR), an interdisciplinary group of leaders across key federal agencies, to identify sustainable diets as a research priority in the creation of its 2016-2021 National Nutrition Research Roadmap. And though interest in this topic continues to grow, there is evidence that federal funding remains woefully inadequate to support independent research on sustainable diets and food systems.
While environmental sustainability receives a lot of attention, a truly sustainable diet also takes into account the social and economic conditions that can threaten our health, wellbeing, and the future of our food supply.
Among these considerations are the persistent health and economic disparities embedded in the current US food system, which disproportionately affect Black, Indigenous, and other resilient communities of color who have faced decades of racist and discriminatory practices and policies. Even before the pandemic, the people working throughout the US food system —nearly 40 percent of whom are people of color—experienced greater poverty, poorer healthcare access, and higher occupational health hazards relative to the general population. Many of these same populations are also most vulnerable to the environmental consequences of unsustainable food systems, such as climate change, water pollution, and other environmental impacts. The irony should not be lost on anyone that many Indigenous populations have for generations produced food in harmony with ecological systems—a way of living that, in the US and elsewhere, was deeply and violently disrupted by colonization and genocide.
Pervasive exploitation in the food chain can function to make certain foods cheap, while also preventing workers from being able to afford healthy diets themselves. And unfortunately, this isn’t a challenge unique to workers in the food chain. Many US households are already struggling to afford a healthy —let alone sustainable—diet.
So how can research help?
For one, there are an increasing number of studies that are putting dollar signs on healthier and more sustainable diets. Understanding what these diets might cost consumers, and what segments of the population might be unable to afford them, is an important first step in creating policy and programs that can bring healthier and more sustainable eating into reach for more people. Existing research on programs and initiatives such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (also known as SNAP), cash assistance programs, or minimum wage increases will also be useful in identifying the best ways to increase consumer purchasing power, particularly among low-income households. Perhaps most importantly, effective community-based participatory research can support community efforts to resist and address the root causes of social and economic disparities, including racism and exploitative economic systems. Organizations like the HEAL Food Alliance , a multi-racial coalition building a national movement to transform food and farming systems, should be looked to as experts and leaders in shaping the goals and objectives of research that will impact the communities they represent.
Not every food choice that supports health will support sustainability, and vice versa. In fact, as our research shows , if the US population shifted from our current diet to a healthier diet, greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, and water use could actually increase. This is due in part to the fact that many fruits and vegetables—which most of us don’t eat nearly enough of—are produced in ways that require a lot of water and energy.
Another commonly cited example is the conflict between US dietary recommendations for fish and shellfish and the ability of fisheries to meet this demand in a sustainable way—an issue highlighted by experts in a National Academies of Science workshop and the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee .
None of this is to say that we should abandon our efforts to eat healthfully. Rather, it’s to say that we need to do some problem-solving if we want to eat in ways that are healthy and sustainable for people and the planet, and research can play a key role in helping us get there.
It was more than thirty years ago that federal policy established the first specific directives for prioritizing nutrition research, yet its funding has remained stagnant for decades and coordination across federal agencies remains inconsistent. Meanwhile, many complex factors are fueling the public health challenges embedded in the US food system: rates of diet-related disease and health disparities continue to climb, the degradation of soil and other natural resources has grown more dire, many workers are still underpaid and unsafe, and climate change is now a reality that looms large in our daily lives.
It’s time for the next generation of nutrition research. To fill these gaps in research and provide information we need to make the best possible policy decisions, we must invest in research that is systems-oriented and can help identify healthy diets that deliver the best possible social, economic, and environmental benefits for all populations. Such research must span disciplines, take leadership from communities most affected by health disparities and environmental injustices, and at its core focus on tackling root causes of the greatest threats facing the food system, including the systemic exploitation of people and finite resources.
President Biden’s administration has no shortage of opportunities to prioritize this area of research, which sits at the nexus of some of its foremost policy priorities . US Department of Agriculture Secretary Vilsack is well positioned to play a powerful role in lifting up and improving coordination of nutrition research needs, particularly as he works to rebuild capacity in the department’s research arms. And Congress, for its part, can leverage legislative opportunities such as appropriations and the potential reauthorization of child nutrition programs to ensure that funding is finally available to answer these and other critical nutrition research questions.
We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you accept our use of cookies. Learn more .
How to develop a question, developing a project, research process video tutorial.
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on October 26, 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 21, 2023.
A research question pinpoints exactly what you want to find out in your work. A good research question is essential to guide your research paper , dissertation , or thesis .
All research questions should be:
How to write a research question, what makes a strong research question, using sub-questions to strengthen your main research question, research questions quiz, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research questions.
You can follow these steps to develop a strong research question:
The way you frame your question depends on what your research aims to achieve. The table below shows some examples of how you might formulate questions for different purposes.
Research question formulations | |
---|---|
Describing and exploring | |
Explaining and testing | |
Evaluating and acting | is X |
Example research problem | Example research question(s) |
---|---|
Teachers at the school do not have the skills to recognize or properly guide gifted children in the classroom. | What practical techniques can teachers use to better identify and guide gifted children? |
Young people increasingly engage in the “gig economy,” rather than traditional full-time employment. However, it is unclear why they choose to do so. | What are the main factors influencing young people’s decisions to engage in the gig economy? |
Note that while most research questions can be answered with various types of research , the way you frame your question should help determine your choices.
Discover proofreading & editing
Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them. The criteria below can help you evaluate the strength of your research question.
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Focused on a single topic | Your central research question should work together with your research problem to keep your work focused. If you have multiple questions, they should all clearly tie back to your central aim. |
Answerable using | Your question must be answerable using and/or , or by reading scholarly sources on the to develop your argument. If such data is impossible to access, you likely need to rethink your question. |
Not based on value judgements | Avoid subjective words like , , and . These do not give clear criteria for answering the question. |
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Answerable within practical constraints | Make sure you have enough time and resources to do all research required to answer your question. If it seems you will not be able to gain access to the data you need, consider narrowing down your question to be more specific. |
Uses specific, well-defined concepts | All the terms you use in the research question should have clear meanings. Avoid vague language, jargon, and too-broad ideas. |
Does not demand a conclusive solution, policy, or course of action | Research is about informing, not instructing. Even if your project is focused on a practical problem, it should aim to improve understanding rather than demand a ready-made solution. If ready-made solutions are necessary, consider conducting instead. Action research is a research method that aims to simultaneously investigate an issue as it is solved. In other words, as its name suggests, action research conducts research and takes action at the same time. |
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Cannot be answered with or | Closed-ended, / questions are too simple to work as good research questions—they don’t provide enough for robust investigation and discussion. |
Cannot be answered with easily-found facts | If you can answer the question through a single Google search, book, or article, it is probably not complex enough. A good research question requires original data, synthesis of multiple sources, and original interpretation and argumentation prior to providing an answer. |
Criteria | Explanation |
---|---|
Addresses a relevant problem | Your research question should be developed based on initial reading around your . It should focus on addressing a problem or gap in the existing knowledge in your field or discipline. |
Contributes to a timely social or academic debate | The question should aim to contribute to an existing and current debate in your field or in society at large. It should produce knowledge that future researchers or practitioners can later build on. |
Has not already been answered | You don’t have to ask something that nobody has ever thought of before, but your question should have some aspect of originality. For example, you can focus on a specific location, or explore a new angle. |
Chances are that your main research question likely can’t be answered all at once. That’s why sub-questions are important: they allow you to answer your main question in a step-by-step manner.
Good sub-questions should be:
Here are a few examples of descriptive and framing questions:
Keep in mind that sub-questions are by no means mandatory. They should only be asked if you need the findings to answer your main question. If your main question is simple enough to stand on its own, it’s okay to skip the sub-question part. As a rule of thumb, the more complex your subject, the more sub-questions you’ll need.
Try to limit yourself to 4 or 5 sub-questions, maximum. If you feel you need more than this, it may be indication that your main research question is not sufficiently specific. In this case, it’s is better to revisit your problem statement and try to tighten your main question up.
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
Statistics
Research bias
The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .
A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.
As you cannot possibly read every source related to your topic, it’s important to evaluate sources to assess their relevance. Use preliminary evaluation to determine whether a source is worth examining in more depth.
This involves:
A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (“ x affects y because …”).
A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses . In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.
Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .
However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, November 21). Writing Strong Research Questions | Criteria & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 19, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-questions/
Other students also liked, how to define a research problem | ideas & examples, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, 10 research question examples to guide your research project, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Patrick j. brady.
1 Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
2 Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
3 University of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa City, Iowa
Sarah kersten, haley hopkins.
4 Iowa Department of Public Health, Des Moines, Iowa
Faryle nothwehr, brandi janssen.
5 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
6 Department of Economics, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic affected food availability and accessibility for many older adults, especially those experiencing food insecurity. Food citizenship is a theoretical framework that encourages the use of alternate over industrial food sources and can characterize where foods are acquired and how food choices are made.
The purpose of this study is to explore how Iowans aged 50 years and older made choices about what foods to acquire and where to acquire foods during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic using food citizenship as a theoretical framework.
We used in-depth interviews with Iowans aged 50 years and older (N = 60).
We recruited respondents through Area Agencies on Aging, food banks, and food pantries. Individuals who contacted the research team, were aged 50 years and older, and spoke English were eligible. Half of the sample screened as food insecure.
We conducted a thematic analysis to identify recurring themes.
Food costs, personal preferences, and the healthfulness of food were cited as the most influential factors. Respondents said that the pandemic had not changed how they make choices, but increased prices had made costs more salient. Respondents primarily got their food from industrial food retailers, government programs, or food pantries. More than half of the respondents also acquired food from an alternate food source, such as a farmers’ market. Reasons for not using alternate food sources included cost and transportation barriers.
It is essential to ensure that older adults have access to affordable, healthy foods, especially during crises such as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Alternate food sources provided supplementary, healthy food for many respondents, but there are opportunities to expand the use of these food sources. Incentivizing the use of alternate food sources through government programs and connecting the emergency food system to local producers could increase the consumption of healthy food.
Research Question: How has the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic influenced the food choices and food sources of adults aged 50 years and older?
Key Findings: Food prices, personal preferences, and a food’s healthfulness were the primary factors driving choices. Although respondents said the pandemic had not changed the factors motivating their choices, they mentioned that food prices had become particularly relevant. Similarly, food sources did not change, and respondents used retailers in the industrial food system, government programs, or food pantries as their primary food source. Many respondents supplemented their diets with foods from the alternate food system, mainly farmers’ markets.
Older adults who experience food insecurity generally consume a poor diet 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 and are at increased risk for malnutrition. 4 , 6 Older adults who experience food insecurity also have an increased chronic disease burden compared with those who are food secure. 7 Barriers such as poor access to 8 , 9 and high costs of 10 , 11 healthy and sustainably grown food make it difficult to consume a heath-promoting diet. Because of this, government programs and emergency food services offer support to individuals experiencing food insecurity, 12 , 13 , 14 but these services may not be available to all who need them and are underutilized by older adults. 15 , 16 , 17
Food citizenship is a food movement and theoretical framework that has been used to address poor diet and food insecurity by enabling access to healthy, sustainably produced foods. 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 Whereas the food citizenship framework has been more fully described elsewhere, 21 rights and responsibilities are key concepts within food citizenship that should be considered here. Food citizenship is based on the fundamental and inalienable right to access healthy, nutritious foods produced in a just and sustainable way. 21 Based on this right, all members of the food system have responsibilities around food production, distribution, procurement, preparation, and consumption behaviors. 21 For food producers, distributors, and retailers, there is a responsibility to provide whole and truthful information about their foods and to increase equitable access to healthy, nutritious foods. 21 For individual consumers, food citizenship states that they have a responsibility to consider how their food-related behaviors and choices influence themselves and others. 21 By enabling all to practice the right to food and satisfying these responsibilities, we can improve our food system as well as individual dietary intake, health, and well-being.
It is important to reflect on why older adults choose the foods they do. Older adults have been shown to make food choices based on personal beliefs and preference as well as outside factors such as costs, 22 and these choices differ based on socioeconomic status 23 or food security status. 24 Furthermore, changing physiological and social circumstances associated with aging influence food choices. 25 Although food choices among older adults have been studied, 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 they have not been examined using food citizenship, which emphasizes a wide range of responsibilities associated with food choices that often were not considered in previous studies.
One manner in which older adults could engage with their responsibilities around food is utilizing the alternate food system. Alternate food systems often focus on local production and consumption and include food sources outside the industrial food systems such as farmers’ markets, gardens, or community-supported agriculture. This is in contrast to industrial food systems, which are those that are characterized by large-scale operations, often featuring vertical integration and concentration of power, and where the focus is efficiency and increasing profit. 26 , 27 In addition, the emergency food system exists as a safety net to provide food to those in need at no cost, and consists of meal sites, food pantries, food banks, and food rescue programs. 14 These systems are not independent; that is, a producer may sell food directly to consumers as part of the alternate food system but also have products in a grocery store as part of the industrial food system. Furthermore, emergency food systems rely on donations from large, multinational corporations but also receive food from local producers. However, by characterizing different food sources based on their focus and practices (eg, small-scale, local productions vs multinational, vertically integrated production), researchers can broadly understand from what type of institutions or organizations individuals are acquiring their foods. It is important to examine why older adults do or do not use certain food sources and understand what barriers may exist for individuals with food security, such as food costs or transportation. 28 , 29 This is especially true given the increased rates of food insecurity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. 30 , 31 , 32
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many barriers to consuming healthy food items have been exacerbated, but little is known about how these barriers influenced food choices or where older adults acquired food. When there are disruptions to the food supply chain or changes in factors that influence food choices, such as price, individuals may respond by seeking to acquire food from new or different sources. This study aimed to answer two general research questions about adults who were approaching older age and older adults. First, we were interested in understanding what factors influenced food choices during the COVID-19 pandemic among adults aged 50 years and older and how these factors align with food citizenship. Second, we were interested in how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced where adults aged 50 years and older get their food and how their food sources align with food citizenship.
This study was part of a larger project conducted in collaboration with the Iowa Department of Public Health’s Supplemental Nutrition Program Education (SNAP-Ed) program and the Iowa Food Bank Association. The goal of the larger project was to increase produce consumption among older Iowans with food insecurity through food bank services.
The population was English-speaking adults aged 50 years and older who were living in Iowa. Iowa’s overall demographic profile can be found elsewhere. 33 We initially chose our population as individuals aged 50 years and older to capture the perspectives of those in near-retirement age as well as older adults, who we define based on the age-eligibility guidelines for Older American Act Nutrition Programs (ie, those older than age 60 years). Although we originally intended to use quota sampling to facilitate comparisons based on age, gender, and rural status, due to limitations introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic, we used a convenience sample. We chose to do this to collect timely data from as many individuals as possible during the data collection period so our results could potentially inform actions aimed to lessen food hardship among Iowans aged 50 years and older. Recruitment occurred between June and November 2020. During our first round of recruitment, we distributed a flyer through the congregate or home-delivered meal programs at four Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) in Iowa. These four agencies cover 61 of Iowa’s 99 counties. Some individuals who did not participate in the AAA meal programs contacted us after hearing about the study through word of mouth. For the second round of recruitment, the flyer was distributed by three food banks to their partner agencies and mobile pantry programs. The flyer included details about the study and asked interested parties to contact the research team either by telephone or e-mail. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Iowa.
Because this was a preliminary, qualitative study, the number of participants was guided by the aims of the study and the responses of the participants, specifically, the collection of new, meaningful information throughout the data collection. After conducting 46 interviews in our first round of recruitment, we had reached saturation. 34 , 35 However, we did not have many respondents from the 50- to 59-year old age group, from historically marginalized populations, from the northeastern and western regions of the state, and from those living in more rural areas. From the second round of recruitment, we conducted an additional 14 interviews for a total of 60 interviews. We had participants from 15 counties of which six are considered metropolitan and nine of which are considered nonmetropolitan according to 2013 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. 36 Each of the state’s four congressional districts (which correspond to the Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, and Southwest of the state) were represented in the sample. Although the second round of recruited participants added diversity to our sample, there were no major differences in the responses between the rounds.
We used in-depth interviews to gather the thoughts, experiences, and perspectives of adults aged 50 years and older. We developed an interview guide to explore where respondents were obtaining their food, why they were obtaining food from those places, and how they chose which foods to get (see Figure 1 , available at www.jandonline.org ). Following 10 pilot interviews, the interview guide was updated by reordering the sequence of the questions, eliminating original stems and replacing them with probes, and rewording questions to be more specific. An example of rewording a question was asking about how choices were made for selecting specific types of food vs generally (eg, “Last time you got fruit, how did you choose which fruits you were going to get?” vs “How do you make choices about what food you get?”). The interview guide asks about two general time periods, before the COVID-19 pandemic began and since the pandemic started because we were interested in exploring changes in these topics influenced by the pandemic.
We also collected demographic information (age, gender, Hispanic ethnicity, race, educational attainment, and monthly income), their living situation (the type of housing, whether they rent or own, and if they lived alone), and the use of food assistance programs and services (eg, SNAP, Older Americans Act nutrition programs, and food pantries/banks). We used a two-item food insecurity screening questionnaire 37 that has been validated in the general US population and for older adults 38 to identify individuals who had experienced food insecurity during the past year.
The data collection team consisted of three interviewers (authors P.J.B., H.T., and S.K.) trained in conducting interviews with older adults. After a potential study participant contacted us to schedule an interview, we verified they were older than age 50 years, obtained verbal consent, and either carried out the interview or scheduled it for a later date. The first 10 interviews served as a pilot and were completed by the first author. Because the changes to the interview guide were minor, the 10 interviews used as a pilot were included in the analysis. Following the pilot interviews, the remaining interviews were split between the three research team members. All interviews were completed over the telephone and were audiorecorded. Participants were compensated with a $25 gift card following the interview. A typical interview lasted approximately 30 minutes, but some lasted longer than an hour. The interviews occurred between June and November 2020. The audio files were transcribed by a third-party transcription service. In the limited cases where participants did not want to be audiorecorded (n = 3) or the audio files were corrupted (n = 1), detailed notes were used instead of an interview transcript. We uploaded the de-identified and cleaned transcripts to the Dedoose software program. 39
We used a thematic analysis approach to code each transcript. 40 We developed a codebook using a deductive approach based on the aim of this study, the research questions, and the initial reading of the transcripts. After developing a draft codebook, each member of the research team coded three interviews independently. We then combined the coded interviews and met to discuss code applications and to refine the draft codebook. We finalized the codebook by reaching a consensus on code definitions and rules for code applications. Each member of the research team then independently coded a selection of the remaining transcripts. We reviewed the coded transcripts, met to discuss the code applications, and reached a final consensus. Following the initial coding, the first author categorized the factors that influence food choices as factors outside individual control (eg, food prices or food availability), factors related to responsibilities for themselves (eg, personal health or taste preferences), and factors related to responsibilities to others (eg, supporting farmers or environmental sustainability). We then compared responses between respondents who were food secure and food insecure to identify group differences. We had originally intended to compare emergent themes between adults in each age group to explore differences in experiences by age category (50 to 59 vs 60 to 69 vs ≥70 years) in addition to comparisons between respondents reporting food security and food insecurity, but this was not possible given the number of participants in the age 50 to 59 years category. We also did not observe differences in emergent themes between respondents in the age 60 to 69 years and age 70 years and older groups. Therefore, we do not discuss differences in emergent themes between age categories.
Respondents’ demographic characteristics are shown in the Table . The sample was mostly older, women, and White. We did not have any respondents who identified as Hispanic or Latino. The vast majority of the respondents were not employed and had completed a high school education or equivalent. Most of the respondents earned <$1,500 per month, lived alone, rented their residence, and lived in an apartment. Half of the sample screened as experiencing food insecurity in the past year. Half the respondents were participating in SNAP at the time of the interview and about two-thirds of the respondents described using a food pantry or food bank during the pandemic.
Demographic characteristics of respondents (N = 60) in an interview study about food-related behaviors and factors contributing to food choices among Iowans aged 50 years and older conducted between June and November 2020
Characteristic | n | % |
---|---|---|
Age (y) | ||
50-59 | 6 | 10.0 |
60-69 | 24 | 40.0 |
70+ | 30 | 50.0 |
White | 53 | 88.3 |
Black | 5 | 10.0 |
Other or multiple responses | 2 | 3.3 |
Male | 11 | 18.3 |
Female | 48 | 80.0 |
Non-binary | 1 | 1.7 |
Employed | 6 | 10 |
Not employed | 54 | 90.0 |
Less than high school | 4 | 6.7 |
High school or equivalent | 15 | 25.0 |
More than high school | 41 | 68.3 |
Less than $1,500 | 39 | 65.0 |
$1500 to $4,000 | 16 | 26.7 |
More than $4,000 | 4 | 6.7 |
Refused | 1 | 1.6 |
Apartment | 41 | 68.3 |
House | 17 | 28.4 |
Other | 2 | 3.3 |
Rent | 46 | 76.7 |
Own | 14 | 23.3 |
Yes | 50 | 83.3 |
No | 10 | 16.7 |
Food secure | 30 | 50.0 |
Food insecure | 30 | 50.0 |
Yes | 30 | 50.0 |
No | 30 | 50.0 |
Yes | 39 | 65.0 |
No | 22 | 35.0 |
Overall themes and quotes regarding food choices during the COVID-19 pandemic are shown in Figure 2 and discussed in more detail below. The majority of respondents cited food costs, personal preferences, and health concerns or the food’s healthfulness as the major factors driving food decisions. The respondents frequently discussed balancing these factors; respondents often said they considered their preferences, health, and outside factors such as price together when selecting foods. The pandemic did not seem to introduce new influences on the respondents’ dietary choices, except when they were able to acquire more expensive food items that they would normally not purchase due to pandemic-related efforts to address unmet food needs. Some respondents highlighted factors such as price and healthfulness of foods that have become more relevant. For example, due to increased health risks due to the pandemic, some respondents described trying to eat healthier to strengthen their immune system. Food insecure respondents described prices as the major factor driving their food choices more often and more intensely compared with those who did not experience food insecurity. Respondents with food security were more likely to cite personal preferences. There were no other evident differences in responses based on food security status.
Themes related to food choices emerging from an interview study about food-related behaviors and factors contributing to food choices among Iowans aged 50 years and older conducted between June and November 2020.
Themes and subthemes | Example quote(s) |
---|---|
Food costs | |
Seasonality | |
Shelf-life | |
Healthfulness | |
Personal preferences | |
Availability and accessibility | |
Support for local food |
Respondents most often discussed that food prices ultimately determined their food choices, regardless of the source of food or other factors they may consider ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Food costs). The respondents noted that this was true prior to the pandemic, but that increased food prices during the pandemic had changed what foods they chose or the quantity of foods they purchased ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Food costs). Respondents often noted that foods from alternate food sources were more expensive than at industrial retailers, but respondents also considered these foods to be healthier ( Figure 2 ; Themes: Food costs and Support for local food). Because price was often the major factor driving food choices and a barrier to selecting certain foods, there is an unmet responsibility under food citizenship in ensuring individual’s food choices are not constrained by systemic factors. Other outside factors influencing food choices were not necessarily framed in reference to outside responsibilities that one would consider as a food citizen even when they were emphasized as important by the respondents. One example of this is seasonality. Although some respondents mentioned picking produce according to the season, it was due to price and food quality and not a responsibility toward environmental sustainability ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Food costs, Subtheme: Seasonality), which would be an important concern under food citizenship. In addition, many of the respondents discussed choosing foods for their shelf life or to prevent food waste, but this was out of economic concerns ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Food costs, Subtheme: Shelf-life).
Many respondents reported that their food choices were influenced by the foods they like to consume and how those foods would influence their health ( Figure 2 ; Themes: Healthfulness and Personal Preferences). Because autonomy of choice is a key concept in food citizenship, it is important for individuals to have access to the foods they would like to consume. Despite this, many respondents experienced cost barriers to purchasing foods they would prefer to eat, such as with foods that were perceived to be healthier ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Food costs). Respondents who discussed the health benefits of certain foods influencing their choices cited both chronic conditions (eg, low sodium for hypertension) and to support an overall healthy lifestyle ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Healthfulness). Food citizenship emphasizes a responsibility to one’s own health, therefore considering individual health in food choices is consistent with food citizenship.
A few respondents mentioned the availability of food items as a challenge ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Availability and Accessibility), but most of the respondents did not describe foods being out of stock or unavailable. In fact, a number of respondents described increased accessibility since the pandemic started, due to increased SNAP benefits, participation in other government programs, or receiving food from a food pantry or food bank ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Availability and Accessibility). Despite the increased accessibility of foods and the ability to choose a wider variety of foods, respondents focused on maximizing their individual benefit, whether that was around price, taste, or health, rather than considering how their food choices influence others or larger systems.
None of the respondents cited outside factors (eg, for environmental sustainability, supporting local producers, other economic benefits to the community) as their primary reason for purchasing food items, but a few respondents did specifically mention these as influencing their food choices. Some respondent mentioned supporting their local food economy ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Support for local food), which is integral to food citizenship. They also discussed how the decision to acquire food from alternate food sources and support local producers was influenced both by increased costs compared to industrial food retailers and responsibilities for protecting individual health through healthier dietary intake ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Support for local food).
Overall themes and quotes regarding food sources during the COVID-19 pandemic are shown in Figure 3 and discussed in more detail below. All respondents used an industrial food retailer (ie, grocery store, supermarket, or dollar store), government program (in this case, the Commodities Supplemental Food Program or Older Americans Act Nutrition Services), or a food pantry/bank as their primary source of food ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Main food sources). These were often the places that the respondent had acquired food from before the pandemic, but in some cases, respondents moved from one grocery or super store to another for various reasons such as price, offering delivery services, or out of concerns for safety related to COVID-19 ( Figure 3 ; Themes: Main food sources and COVID–19-related barriers to accessing food sources). A few respondents indicated that retailers in the industrial food system were not enforcing safety precautions such as social distancing and mask wearing while others were implementing these precautions ( Figure 3 ; Theme: COVID–19-related barriers to accessing food sources).
Themes related to food sources and use of alternate food sources emerging from an interview study about food-related behaviors and factors contributing to food choices among Iowans aged 50 years and older conducted between June and November 2020. a COVID = coronavirus disease 2019.
Themes and subthemes | Example quote(s) |
---|---|
Main food sources | .” (age 73 years, White, female, food secure) |
Coronavirus disease 2019-related barriers to accessing food sources | |
Alternate food sources | |
Financial support | |
Accessibility of alternate food sources |
More than half of respondents also acquired food from an alternate food source, but this often was not out of a desire to support the local food economy, but instead due to personal preferences ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources) and having financial support ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources, Subtheme: Financial support). The majority of respondents using alternate food sources discussed using farmers’ markets, while a few said that they had their own gardens. The respondents who shopped at farmers’ markets cited the foods’ taste and health profile as reasons for shopping there ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources). In addition, many who attended the farmers’ markets received Senior Farmers’ Nutrition Program (SFMNP) vouchers from their AAA, which reduced price barriers to accessing these food sources ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources, Subtheme: Financial support). Some stated that they would spend their own money at farmers’ markets, whereas others would only use the SFMNP vouchers. Some respondents also started growing their own food in response to the pandemic, whether that was due to worries over food shortages or increasing food prices ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources).
The use of alternate food sources did not differ between respondents who did and did not experience food insecurity, but rather depended on the availability and accessibility of these food sources, financial support to purchase foods from local vendors, and personal preference. Even though there did not appear to be a major factor influencing the use of alternate food sources, the prices of foods were cited by some respondents who were experiencing food insecurity as a reason to not shop at alternate food sources ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources, Subtheme: Accessibility of alternate food sources). In addition, some respondents reported transportation barriers preventing them from using farmers markets ( Figure 2 ; Theme: Alternate food sources, Subtheme: Accessibility of alternate food sources). Similar to retailers in the industrial food system, a few respondents indicated that farmers’ markets were not enforcing safety precautions while others were ( Figure 3 ; Theme: COVID–19-related barriers to accessing food sources). These barriers indicate that there are unfulfilled responsibilities around ensuring alternate food sources are accessible for all. Some respondents who use food pantries discussed how these emergency food providers connected them with locally produced foods ( Figure 3 ; Theme: Alternate food sources, Subtheme: Accessibility of alternate food sources), increasing access to food from the alternate food system.
When examining where the respondents got their food and why through the lens of food citizenship, it is clear these respondents were not actively participating as food citizens, but often due to structural barriers such as physical and financial access. The majority of the respondents who used alternate food sources stated that they only used them because they had financial support to do so. There were a few examples of individuals being connected to local food sources through new programs as a result of the pandemic, which indicates that local producers and emergency food providers were acting on their responsibility to provide access to healthy, nutritious food to all. It was also clear that some retailers, both in the industrial and alternate food systems, were not acting responsibly in regard to the safety of their customers and precautions around the spread of COVID-19. Overall, it does not appear that the respondents moved toward acquiring food from alternate food sources in response to the pandemic. Despite this, farmers’ markets, gardens, and locally produced foods received through the emergency food system were an important source of healthy foods during this time.
This study explored the factors leading to food choices and food sources among Iowans aged 50 years and older during the COVID-19 pandemic using food citizenship as a theoretical framework. These results show that factors such as personal preference, health, and price were consistent determinants of food choices before and during the pandemic and that food acquisition behaviors did not change substantially. Although the pandemic did not cause the issues the respondents described, it exacerbated already existing vulnerabilities regarding food access and security and highlighted various structural and societal barriers to consuming healthy and preferable foods. In addition, the responses to this crisis, such as strengthening SNAP and expanding access to emergency food resources, provide insight on potential paths forward to improve food security and access. It will be critical for practitioners in nutrition, dietetics, public health, and public policy to learn from these times to build a foundation where all people and communities have access to healthy, preferable food.
Food choices among respondents were primarily based on material and personal factors, which is consistent with previous literature, 10 , 11 , 24 , 25 but largely did not consider wider social responsibilities, such as to consume ethically produced and distributed food. Food citizenship is defined by a right to access healthy nutritious foods and a responsibility to promote justice and equity through individual and collective actions. 21 These results show that the actions prescribed under this movement may not be feasible for adults aged 50 years and older given unmet societal responsibilities creating barriers to accessing healthy, nutritious foods produced in a just manner.
Whereas respondents’ sources of food remained fairly consistent during the COVID-19 pandemic, some respondents described increased barriers to accessing healthy food due to increase food prices, whereas others said responses to the pandemic, like increasing SNAP benefits, improved their access. It is clear from these results that Iowans aged 50 years and older, especially those who were experiencing food insecurity, were not actively acting as food citizens when making their food choices. Food prices and personal preference were most often described as what motivated food choices, which agrees with previous qualitative research identifying similar factors, such as taste, monetary, and health considerations. 24 The respondents material situation and personal needs may have been more pressing than loftier motivations described under food citizenship because no respondents cited responsibilities to others or the greater good as their primary reason for choosing food. Despite this, some respondents noted these responsibilities as an additional consideration, indicating that certain responsibilities described under food citizenship may be more salient in this population in the case that current factors such as price that overwhelmingly influenced food choices were addressed. Conceivably, these more immediate needs will have to be met to enable older adults to consider wider, societal obligations they have when choosing their foods, especially in the context of a global pandemic. Dietitians, other food and nutrition practitioners, and health care professionals working in clinical and community settings should aim to address these immediate needs by connecting patients experiencing food insecurity with resources such SNAP and emergency food providers, including aiding in navigating the administrative hurdles to accessing these services.
Food prices are a major influence on food choices and a barrier to healthy eating for food insecure individuals, 10 , 11 and the respondents indicated that rising food prices were a concern. Although COVID-19 may not have been the sole reason for changes in food prices, the respondents here perceived it as the reason for changes in food prices and often discussed how higher food prices had influenced their food choices during this time, particularly for meat and produce. Respondents also described panic buying resulting in less availability of low-cost items, forcing them to choose more expensive options. The respondents described this effect being blunted or eliminated in cases where the increase in SNAP benefits countered the increase in cost. It was clear from the respondents that the increase SNAP benefits were viewed as immensely beneficial and that previous benefits levels were inadequate to support a healthy diet. This study provides initial evidence suggesting that some of the policies enacted in response to the pandemic were effective in improving food security and dietary intake. There is limited information on the influence of the pandemic and accompanying food assistance and economic supports on diet quality of older adults. These results indicate that at least for some, dietary intake may have improved due to policy and nongovernmental responses to the pandemic, and future research is needed to quantify the influence of these policy interventions on food security and dietary intake.
Respondents’ use of multiple food sources agrees with the previous literature showing that households rely on a number of sources for food, including grocery stores, supermarkets, convenience stores, and restaurants, 41 , 42 and that spending at alternate food sources is much lower than at other sources. 43 Alternate food sources provided access to fresh produce, which was perceived by the respondents as healthier and of higher quality compared with foods from industrial food retailers. These perceptions are supported by previous research on consumer perceptions of food from farmers’ markets. 44 , 45 , 46 They also offered the opportunity to obtain foods in season, which were noted as an important factor in food choices by respondents in this study. In previous studies, receiving food from alternate food sources was beneficial to older adults’ fruit and vegetable consumption 47 and diet quality, 48 and because acquiring foods from alternate food sources also has broader societal benefits, 49 facilitating the use of alternate food sources is a vital strategy to improve our food system. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners can facilitative the transition toward consuming more foods from the alternate food system by linking clinical or community services to alternate food systems. For example, in SNAP-Ed nutrition education and produce prescription programs or by connecting patients to resources that increase accessibility to these foods, such as emergency food providers who work with local producers and the SFMNP.
In a few cases, respondents were connected to local food sources through initiatives in the emergency food system. Previous interventions addressing food insecurity using food citizenship have aimed to distribute locally produced foods to low-income individuals through government food programs 19 and nonprofits. 20 Respondents in this study also described benefits from efforts that increased access to locally produced foods, including through food pantries and government programs. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners and health care providers should work with providers in the emergency food system to connect them to local food resource and promote these foods to their clients. Integrating food recovery and redistribution efforts with emergency food systems and incentivizing the purchase of locally produced foods through government programs can provide local produce to individuals who may not be able to afford to shop in the alternate food system, 50 aligns with the goals of food citizenship, 21 and has the potential to improve dietary intake and health for vulnerable households who rely on food pantries to acquire food.
A number of respondents said they were trying to eat healthier food in response to the pandemic, often citing the benefits food has on one’s immune response. The healthfulness of food has been identified as an influential factor motivating food choices in older adults. 25 Furthermore, some respondents discussed being able to eat healthier foods because of increased benefits, participation in government programs, or access to emergency food systems, which were available in response to the pandemic. These results suggest that if foods produced in more just and environmentally sustainable ways were affordable and accessible at comparable levels to food from the industrial food system, it is likely that these respondents would prefer, purchase, and consume them. Nutrition and dietetics practitioners can increase healthy food consumption among adults aged 50 years and older and benefit society by leveraging their desire to eat healthy foods while connecting them to the resources required to access, prepare, and consume foods produced in just and environmentally sustainable ways.
For those who did not use alternate food sources, the barriers to use were also reflected in the previous literature and included factors discussed by the respondents, such as cost and transportation barriers. 31 , 32 Despite these barriers, we believe there are multiple opportunities to improve older adults’ diet through facilitating connections to the alternate food system. This could be done by brining foods from the alternative food system into nutrition education programs, leveraging perceived healthfulness of foods from the alternative food system to reduce intake of ultraprocessed foods, connecting participants to financial support (such as the SMFNP), for acquiring foods from the alternate food system, and connecting the alternate food and emergency food systems. It should also be noted that this study was conducted when alternate food sources were widely available (ie, summer and fall), and the seasonality of these food sources is also likely to be a barrier to using alternate food sources at other times of the year. Additional barriers were introduced by the pandemic, specifically in the case where providers and customers were not following safety precautions (eg, wearing masks and social distancing). Efforts should be made to ensure that older adults are able to safely shop in any outlet because it is a societal responsibility to ensure that all individuals are able to safely access the food retailers of their choice.
The recruitment strategy for this study introduces a few limitations. First, because of limitations associated with conducting research during a pandemic with a vulnerable population, we chose to use a convenience sample for this study, which resulted in a sample that was mostly women, and we did not have any respondents who identified as Hispanic. We also recruited the majority of the sample through AAAs. This is likely why we saw such a large proportion of the sample receiving vouchers for the SFMNP because AAAs distribute the SFMNP vouchers in Iowa. A smaller group of our sample was recruited through the food banking system, which increased the geographic, racial, and age diversity of our sample. Because of where we recruited participants, we largely interviewed individuals who were already connected to either an AAA or a food bank, and therefore we do not include the perspective of individuals who are not connected to either a government or nonprofit support system. In other words, this sample likely did not include the most marginalized individuals of any demographic group included in the sample, which should be considered when interpreting these results. Because we had reached saturation, indicating that increasing the sample size would not add new, meaningful data and our results would not change, it is important to consider how the limitations of the recruitment strategy affect who was included in this study. These limitations could be addressed in future research by recruiting outside of food assistance programs and services, using more purposeful selection criteria, and using quota sampling; for example, requiring a certain proportion of the sample is not receiving emergency food or participating in government food assistance. In addition, we were not able to examine differences in emergent themes between respondents in the 50 to 59 ages groups vs other age categories, which are likely given then different circumstances of those in this age group compared with those older than age 60 years. Further research is needed on how changes in food choices and sources differed by age category. Finally, the recruitment strategy relied on participants reaching out to schedule an interview, which would introduce self-selection bias because those who are willing to reach out likely differ from those who are not in some ways. For example, our sample was heavily women, which may be due to self-selection of female-identifying individuals into the sample vs male-identifying individuals.
This study used in-depth interviews with Iowans aged 50 years and older to explore factors influencing food choices and food sources during the COVID-19 pandemic. The factors that determined food choices among respondents were mostly outside of individual control (food prices) and/or related to responsibilities toward one’s self (eg, personal preferences or for health reasons) rather than for responsibilities to the greater good. Acquiring foods from alternate food sources has individual dietary benefits and collective benefits, such as promoting environmental sustainability. Dietitians and food and nutrition practitioners should work to connect eligible clients aged 50 years and older to resources that provide material resources (eg, SNAP) and increase accessibility to alternate food sources (eg, SFMNP and emergency food providers) while providing the knowledge and skills needed to prepare and consume those foods to promote the consumption of these foods. By promoting and incentivizing the use of alternate food sources and consumption of locally produced foods, there is the opportunity to meet the nutrition needs of older adults and improve population health while working toward a more sustainable and just food system.
The authors thank Doris Montgomery, MS, RDN, LDN and the Iowa Food Bank Association for advice and assistance. The authors also thank the interview participants for the time and effort they provided.
P. Brady is a postdoctoral fellow, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
N. Askelson is an associate professor, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, and a research fellow, University of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa City.
H. Thompson are research assistants, and S. Ashida and F. Nothwehr are associate professors, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City.
S. Kersten are research assistants, are associate professors, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City.
S. Ashida are associate professors, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City.
F. Nothwehr are associate professors, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City.
H. Hopkins is a community health consultant, Iowa Department of Public Health, Des Moines.
B. Janssen is a clinical associate professor, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City.
D. Frisvold is an associate professor, Department of Economics, Tippie College of Business, and a senior research fellow, University of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa City.
Supplementary materials: Figure 1 is available at www.jandonline.org
STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
FUNDING/SUPPORT This study was supported by the USDepartment of Agriculture Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and it was developed by the Iowa Department of Public Health and the University of Iowa in partnership with the Iowa Department of Human Services (Iowa Nutrition Network Food Bank Project, grant no. 5880NU29). The first author is supported by Award no. T32DK083250 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIDDK or National Institutes of Health.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS All authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria for authorship. P. Brady, N. Askelson, H. Thompson, S. Kersten, H. Hopkins, S. Ashida, B. Janssen, F. Nothwehr, and D. Frisvold, made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. P. Brady, H. Thompson, S. Kersten, and H. Hopkins contributed to the acquisition of the data. P. Brady, N. Askelson, H. Thompson, S. Kersten, S. Ashida, B. Janssen, F. Nothwehr, and D. Frisvold, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. P. Brady, N. Askelson, S. Ashida, B. Janssen, F. Nothwehr, and D. Frisvold, wrote the first draft. All authors revised subsequent drafts and gave final approval of the work.
Older adult interview guide.
Creating a successful food product depends on crucial market insights. Check out these sample survey questions for a new food product to get you started.
New food product survey questions, what information do you need to develop a successful food product, survey question examples for new food products , what are you bringing to the table next.
Whenever you try to build something new, it’s best done together, right?
In your food product development process, you don’t just say ‘bon appétit’ when you market a new product and put it in front of your ideal customer. What if they don’t care for it at all?
Take a step back. Try to create something together .
How? No need to invite a bunch of hungry customers to your production facility and let them play with ingredients. With a new food product survey, you can perfectly gauge what they’re hungry for and create a product that’s a match made in heaven.
We’re following up our recent guide on market research for product development with some practical examples of survey questions you can use. This article will focus specifically on food products, but make sure to also take a peek if you’re stuck on another type of product — we’re sure you’ll find some inspiration either way.
How exactly can you use a survey to create a new food product? It’s not like your customers know what resources and ideas you have.
It’s all about timing. Once you’ve come out of the woods of the initial ideation phase and are playing with different options, it’s time to ask the public. You’ll be building on options that you’ve verified to be viable in that initial stage, based on your market research, of course.
At the same time, you’ll use the survey to scratch away any ideas that your customer base doesn’t like, leaving you with a most-desirable product.
So essentially, a food product survey isn’t a build-your-perfect-snack survey for your customers. It’s a tool that will help you determine which options that you’ve already played with are most likely to form a recipe for success.
Regardless of if you’re sending out a survey vs a questionnaire , you’ll need to ask the right questions, or find out how to write good survey questions . These are some of the best:
2. What are you missing in food product category X ?
4. what foods do you like to combine product x with, 5. if you could adapt one thing in product x, which would be the first thing, 6. if you could magnify one aspect of our product, what would it be, 7. how would you like to put product x to some other use, 8. if you could eliminate something from your diet, what would it be.
9. What food habits would you like to replace, and with what?
Get reliable insights into your target customers
Check our list of the top market research providers to make sure you choose the right tool for your goals
A new food product survey shouldn’t be a carte blanche with all the options your food scientists can create. You make it more specific and tie it to, ideally, one objective.
Before we get into the list, here are some of the most exciting direct-to-consumer food brands to whet your appetite. And insightful new product research isn’t limited to food products—here are some successful brands who’ve tested beverage branding ideas with consumer research.
Let’s look at some of the factors that play a role in food products.
You can’t ask your customers to fill in all the blanks. You should use the survey to fill in the blanks you can’t just assume. Let’s say your market research has shown that there’s a considerable demand for one-person portions of healthy vegan meals, for the microwave. That ticks the boxes for size, nutrition and occasion.
But you’re missing an important element: taste. This is what you can find out in your survey.
It depends on who you ask.
Product managers tend to say “go” if a product concept does not look bad; researchers want to say “stop” unless it looks good. Jay E. Klompmaker, G. David Hughes & Russell I. Haley, Test Marketing in New Product Development
There’s a difference between a product reaching certain requirements, and it being set up for success. Product managers want to launch a successful product. Researchers want to prevent expensive failed launches.
Of course, you’ll need both, but a new product survey and ad copy testing should be used for product managers — to reach for excellence and step away from the status quo. The bare minimum that your product needs to succeed needs to be established before you launch a survey. What you’ll get from the survey is almost literally the icing on the cake of your new product.
Find out what customers are missing in the supermarket. What flavours they could not stop buying if they exist. What products they haven’t been buying because of their dietary restrictions.
Or gather information that will help you create a product that is unique in some way. Go beyond learning what products your customers already love — use that only as your baseline.
Organic Valley has used Attest go find out what flavours to introduce next – and what to name them.
“We were able to identify the top three flavors that we then wanted to bring into the pilot labs. But while our primary insight was around flavors, we also got back a secondary unanticipated insight around how the consumers were clustered around the naming of products as well.
It wasn’t just around choosing the right flavor but it was choosing the right flavor in the context of a broader name. To get specific, one of the options was ‘spicy tomato salsa egg bites’ and the consumers said it reminded them of the Mexican dish huevos rancheros. And so then we were able to test ‘spicy tomato salsa egg bites’ versus ‘Mexican egg bites with rancheros salsa’.”
Did that get you hungry? Read the full Organic Valley case study .
You came for questions, and that’s what we’ll give you. We’ve gathered some practical examples of what you could ask in a new food product development survey, or when you’re ready to create a food brand .
Before we dive into the questions, we want to explain the concept question 3 to 9 are based on. Ever heard of scamper? It’s an acronym — which is the name of a checklist designed to boost creative thinking. It basically takes an existing product, and lets you modify it in a more structured way than just saying: have your way with it.
Now, how do you use these questions and more specifically, the answers? The hope is that there will be some consensus in the answers. For instance, for Modify/Magnify, you’ll get a lot of similar answers from your customer base. Or 90% wants to eliminate the same thing from a product — let’s say sugar.
With that in mind, here are the questions!
This brings us back to the jobs-to-be-done part of any product, and for food products, this shouldn’t be overlooked. Are people searching for something that spices things up in the kitchen, that adds to their nutrition or that’s for comfort or a quick snack?
Knowing this for sure, without assuming, will help you to position your product accordingly. Here’s list of examples for jobs-to-be-done you can present in the survey:
See how you can get intel about your audience with Attest
Make smarter decisions for your brand with reliable quantitative and qualitative consumer insights from Attest
There’s no doubt about it: veganism is no longer a trend. But if you or any of your friends are vegan, you know how frustrating it can be to find the right snacks for movie night. Because yes, there’s such a thing as too many Oreos!
So, let’s say you’ve narrowed it down to the following:
And taste…? With the survey, you could tap into what people who went vegan are missing the most from the snack aisle. Is it more urgent to create vegan cheese-flavoured crisps, or vegan M&M’s?
Here you can list all the flavours you’re currently selling, and give a list of options that you’ve been considering.
Maybe your customers have found a golden combination of products you haven’t thought of when creating the product. Think peanut butter and jelly, or the ever-controversial pineapple on pizza.
You can either guide your respondents here by giving them a list of options — after all, you know what is actually possible. Think sizes, price, packaging. Or let them dream out loud by giving them the room for all ideas.
Bigger portions? A stronger flavour? More serving suggestions? Find out what your customers can’t get enough of and double down on that.
Would you like an ice cream that is suitable for breakfast? A slice of pizza that you can take as a snack without having to carry an entire box? Find out how your customers are really using certain products, or how they would like to use them if the packaging or portion was suitable for it.
Get more inspo for your research from our concept testing survey template !
This might sound useless in new product development, but in the bigger picture — which a survey should reveal — this could be very useful information. Maybe you’re looking to create a new breakfast product, but you want it to fit into someone’s dietary restrictions. So, should you focus on gluten-free options? This question will help you find out.
Here you can again give your respondents two lists to choose from: one with common food habits, and one with healthier — or at least different ones. Like question 8, this type of question will help you see the bigger picture and also helps with positioning.
We’re certain that with all their resources, Red Bull and Coca-Cola could create spectacular tea. But it would probably not catch on, because that’s just not what their brand stands for. So, in your product development survey, do take a moment to see if your brand-new idea actually fits your brand, to prevent a marketing disaster.
Is your food business always testing new flavours and ideas and do you want to bring those products to market with more certainty of success, and more speed? Then Attest is the place to start. Have a look at our free new product development survey templates and make them all yours to gather actionable data.
Fu0026amp;B Digest – Wellness foods issue
In the latest edition of our Fu0026amp;B Digest, we’ve digested data from 1,000 UK consumers to discover trends and opportunities in this growing sector.
Customer Research Lead
Nick joined Attest in 2021, with more than 10 years' experience in market research and consumer insights on both agency and brand sides. As part of the Customer Research Team team, Nick takes a hands-on role supporting customers uncover insights and opportunities for growth.
Net promoter score (nps): the complete guide, brand tracking, what is brand perception how to measure and improve it, attest raises $60 million series b to empower brands with continuous consumer insights, subscribe to our newsletter.
Fill in your email and we’ll drop fresh insights and events info into your inbox each week.
* I agree to receive communications from Attest. Privacy Policy .
You're now subscribed to our mailing list to receive exciting news, reports, and other updates!
Are you looking for good topics about food? Luckily, there are so many food topics you can research! You can focus on food safety, the link between nutrition and health, food insecurity, national cuisines, food waste in supply chains, food processing technologies, and many more. Check this list of the most exciting food research questions and titles!
🏆 best essay topics on food, ❓ research questions about food, 👍 good food research topics & essay examples, 📝 food argumentative essay topics, 🌶️ hot food topics to research, 🔎 current food topics for research paper, 🎓 most interesting food topics to write about, 🗣️ persuasive speech topics about food, 💡 simple research topics about food, 📌 easy food essay topics.
If you need a good idea for your argumentative essay, check out some food related topics to debate:
Do you want to write a paper on the latest advancements in food science and technology? Here are some current food-related research topics to discuss:
If you’re looking for persuasive topics about food to talk about, here are some suggestions for you:
Thanks for reading! On this page, we’ve collected:
You’ll discover a wide range of analytical, informative, and argumentative essay topics about food. | |
Do you want to write a paper about food processing and storage techniques? StudyCorgi has suitable ideas for you! | |
Feel free to use the titles below for your presentation, persuasive speech, project, and other assignments. | |
Check out interesting samples below to get inspired and better understand how to structure your own paper about food. |
Cite this post
StudyCorgi. (2021, September 9). 457 Food Essay Topics & Research Questions to Write about. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/food-essay-topics/
"457 Food Essay Topics & Research Questions to Write about." StudyCorgi , 9 Sept. 2021, studycorgi.com/ideas/food-essay-topics/.
StudyCorgi . (2021) '457 Food Essay Topics & Research Questions to Write about'. 9 September.
1. StudyCorgi . "457 Food Essay Topics & Research Questions to Write about." September 9, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/food-essay-topics/.
Bibliography
StudyCorgi . "457 Food Essay Topics & Research Questions to Write about." September 9, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/food-essay-topics/.
StudyCorgi . 2021. "457 Food Essay Topics & Research Questions to Write about." September 9, 2021. https://studycorgi.com/ideas/food-essay-topics/.
These essay examples and topics on Food were carefully selected by the StudyCorgi editorial team. They meet our highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, and fact accuracy. Please ensure you properly reference the materials if you’re using them to write your assignment.
This essay topic collection was updated on June 22, 2024 .
Copyright © SurveySparrow Inc. 2024 Privacy Policy Terms of Service SurveySparrow Inc.
Last Updated: 23 May 2024
Table Of Contents
Do you want to evaluate the quality of your food? Need some sample food quality survey questions to come up with your own?
The best way to improve the quality of your food is to ask your customers for feedback.
And what better way to gather feedback than surveying your customers?
In this article, we’ve curated a list of the best food quality survey questions you can ask your customers to evaluate the quality of the food you serve at your restaurant.
As a bonus, we’ve also listed the best restaurant survey questions you should ask your customers to measure their overall satisfaction with your food and their experience so far.
Most importantly, We’ve also added a Free Food Quality Survey Template , which is used by brands worldwide, which you can start using for free to collect feedback from customers.
Sign up with your mail and customize the survey how you want in just a few minutes, and you’re ready to circulate it.
Try our food quality survey to test the conversational experience!
Preview Template
Here’s what more we’ll cover in this article:
Here are 30+ food survey questions you can ask your customers:
Start Creating Surveys Just Like That. Sign Up with SurveySparrow.
14-Day-Free Trial • Cancel Anytime • No Credit Card Required • Need a Demo?
Here are 30+ questions to ask in your restaurant surveys:
If you’re a restaurant owner, you need to know what your customers truly think about the food you serve at your restaurant. Improving the quality of the food you provide is one of the best ways to grow your restaurant, and a survey for food is an excellent tool for that.
Are you a restaurant owner looking to conduct a food quality survey and evaluate the quality of your food? SurveySparrow provides you with everything you need to create your very own food quality survey that matches your brand.
It provides you with a simple drag-and-drop interface and premade template that anyone can use to create a food quality survey in minutes.
Most of your customers will complete your food survey as they would be pleased to take food surveys that are conversational in nature, and are quite different from the long, boring forms you’ve seen on the internet.
If you’re looking to boost your survey responses and create pleasant experiences, take the conversational way and try SurveySparrow today!
Have you got any questions about creating a food quality survey? Any interesting tips or hacks for creating effective food quality surveys? Let us know in the comment section below.
Looking for a survey tool that makes it easy and effective to conduct interactive and conversational food quality surveys? Wondering whether SurveySparrow is the right fit for creating and sharing your food quality surveys? Reach out to us for a free, personalized demo!
Work Culture
Turn every feedback into a growth opportunity.
14-day free trial • Cancel Anytime • No Credit Card Required • Need a Demo?
Josh Domingues put purpose before profit when he created the Flashfood app to sell less-than-perfect groceries at discounted prices. A case study by Reza Satchu explores Domingues' successes and failures, and what other social entrepreneurs can learn.
Policy makers in the developing world face important tradeoffs in reacting to a pandemic. The quick and complete recovery of India’s food supply chain suggests that strict lockdown measures at the onset of pandemics need not cause long-term economic damage.
COVID-19 represents not only a health crisis but a crisis of food insecurity and starvation for migrants. Central governments should ensure that food security policies are implemented effectively and engage with local governments and local stakeholders to distribute food to migrants in the immediate term.
The pandemic could almost double the number of people facing food crises in lower-income populations by the end of 2020. Howard Stevenson and Shirley Spence show how organizations are responding. Open for comment; 0 Comments.
Ray Goldberg discusses how the CEO of the Wegmans grocery chain faced a food safety issue and then helped the industry become more proactive. Open for comment; 0 Comments.
The public is losing trust in many institutions involved in putting food on our table, says Ray A. Goldberg, author of the new book Food Citizenship. Here's what needs to be done. Open for comment; 0 Comments.
Governments sometimes consider targeted price controls when popular goods become less affordable. Looking at price controls in Argentina between 2007 and 2015, this study’s findings suggest that new technologies like mobile phones are allowing governments to better enforce targeted price control programs, but the impact of these policies on aggregate inflation is small and short-lived.
Research by Ai Hisano exposes cellophane's key role in developing self-service merchandising in American grocery stores, and how its manufacturers tried to control the narrative of how women buy food. Open for comment; 0 Comments.
The food industry is under intense study at Harvard Business School. This story sampler looks at issues including restaurant marketing, chefs as CEOs, and the business of food science. Open for comment; 0 Comments.
Beginning in the late 19th century, US food manufacturers tried to create the “right” color of foods that many consumers would recognize and in time take for granted. The United States became a leading country in the food coloring business with the rise of extensive mass marketing. By 1938, when Congress enacted the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the food coloring business had become a central and permanent component of food marketing strategies. This paper shows how food manufacturers, dye makers, and regulators co-created the food coloring business. Food-coloring practices became integrated into an entire strategy of manufacturing and marketing in the food industry.
When restaurants source from local growers, it can be more difficult to assess product safety—just another wrinkle in high-stakes efforts to keep our food from harming us. Just ask Chipotle. John A. Quelch discusses a recent case study on food testing. Open for comment; 0 Comments.
How do people’s preferences differ when they make choices for the near term versus the more distant future? Providing evidence from a field study of an online grocer, this research shows that people act as if they will be increasingly virtuous the further into the future they project. Researchers examined how the length of delay between when an online grocery order is completed and when it is delivered affects what consumers order. They find that consumers purchase more "should" (healthy) groceries such as vegetables and less "want" (unhealthy) groceries such as ice cream the greater the delay between order completion and order delivery. The results have implications for public policy, supply chain managers, and models of time discounting. Key concepts include: Consumers spend less and order a higher percentage of "should" items and a lower percentage of "want" items the further in advance of delivery they place a grocery order. Encouraging people to order their groceries up to 5 days in advance of consumption could influence the healthfulness of the foods that people consume. Similarly, asking students in schools to select their lunches up to a week in advance could considerably increase the healthfulness of the foods they elect to eat. Online and catalog retailers that offer a range of goods as well as different delivery options might be able to improve their demand forecasting by understanding these findings. Closed for comment; 0 Comments.
The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Arctic ‘mercury bomb’ threatens food chain as climate warms, australia could prevent thousands of bats from being killed each year by wind turbines with simple fix, study finds, u.s. signals new support for global plastics reduction, reports say, aquaculture 101: everything you need to know, massachusetts to phase out toxic pfas ‘forever chemicals’ in firefighting gear, 4 billion people worldwide lack access to safe drinking water, study finds, 'my cheerfulness around work': speaking with environmental justice attorney and graphic novelist eddie ahn, gulf of maine in peril: pbs documentary explores the ocean’s threats and resilience, coal + ice: an expansive climate breakdown exhibit, museum exhibit draws parallels between 'little ice age' resiliency and modern climate crisis, meet the winners of the 11th annual un world oceans day photo competition, the next great human migration: abrahm lustgarten on america's future climate, 'it's got to be a fight': author adam welz on surviving climate breakdown and saving species of a 'tarnished eden', sounds right recognizes nature as musician, with royalties going to environmental causes, learn about deregulated energy, learn about windows, 3 research questions could hold the key to sustainable eating.
A woman harvests home-grown lettuce. sanjeri / Getty Images
By Sarah Reinhardt
When it comes to healthy eating, there’s a lot we already know.
Just take a look at the scientific report issued by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee , the group of scientific experts behind the newly released 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans . At 835 pages, the report spans a rigorous review of current research on dozens of topics, from whether eating peanuts early in life reduces the likelihood of peanut allergies (it probably does), to how much added sugar we can eat and still maintain a healthy diet ( way less than what we’re eating now ). It also outlines the broad contours of a healthy diet, which has changed little from past editions of the Dietary Guidelines : it’s typically higher in vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, low- or non-fat dairy, lean meat and poultry, seafood, nuts, and unsalted vegetable oils, and lower in red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened foods and drinks, and refined grains.
But food is more than just nutrition. We also know that food can affect the health of many people before it even reaches our plates. For example, pollution caused by fertilizer runoff from farms have left communities without access to safe drinking water, while many of the people who produce our food don’t earn enough to afford healthy diets themselves. So, is it possible to eat in ways that promote health and produce better outcomes for our collective wellbeing, livelihoods, and natural resources? And what would it take to get us there?
These are complex questions, but critical ones—and if the federal government made it a national priority to answer them, we might have a chance at avoiding otherwise devastating consequences.
That’s why leading experts and scientific bodies, including the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee , are increasingly calling attention to the importance of research on sustainable diets . Though there is no official record of how much federal funding is currently supporting this field, funding for nutrition research across the board has remained stagnant for decades . Research funding at the intersection of food and agriculture issues, in particular, is decidedly inadequate to address the magnitude of the public health challenges before us, including climate change, threats to food security, and persistent poverty and health disparities.
Many, including UCS, are working to change that by advocating for greater government investment in sustainable diets research. Here are three of the most pressing questions that research can answer to enable more sustainable eating for all.
Research on healthy and environmentally sustainable diets has seen extraordinary growth in recent years. According to UCS research , nearly 100 new scholarly articles were published on this topic between 2015 and 2019, including 22 articles focused specifically on US diets. For reference, that’s more than four times the number of articles published on the same topic between 2000 and 2015—in about a quarter of the time.
Much of this research agrees that, in general, healthy diets that are higher in plant-based foods and lower in animal-based foods are more environmentally sustainable—meaning they are often associated with reduced energy and land use, as well as less air and water pollution.
This is an important finding that enables us to take the first steps toward more sustainable diets—and each step is critical, given the urgency and magnitude of dual public health and climate crises. Indeed, a number of other countries already have acted on existing knowledge to incorporate sustainability into national dietary guidance .
But the more we know, the faster (and further) we can move forward.
For example, we need to better understand the impacts of all different kinds of dietary shifts that could improve health and sustainability, and the most effective ways to encourage such shifts at the individual, institutional, and societal levels . We also need to better understand how a wide variety of sustainable diets align with diverse cultures and culinary traditions . Both of these areas of research will be crucial to informing practical public health interventions and policy recommendations that can help all people make meaningful changes.
There are also challenges with available data and models. Many studies on sustainable diets rely on models called Life Cycle Assessments , which help estimate the cumulative environmental impacts of the foods we eat. For example, how much energy is required to process, package, and transport a pound of beef from the farm to the grocery store? How much land, water, and energy was required to raise the cattle? While a Life Cycle Assessment is useful in providing general estimates, it’s often based on averages that don’t account for key differences in production methods, for example, or regions. More data—and more diverse data sources—could make this an even more powerful and practical tool.
These and other outstanding research gaps prompted the Interagency Committee on Human Nutrition Research (ICHNR), an interdisciplinary group of leaders across key federal agencies, to identify sustainable diets as a research priority in the creation of its 2016-2021 National Nutrition Research Roadmap. And though interest in this topic continues to grow, there is evidence that federal funding remains woefully inadequate to support independent research on sustainable diets and food systems.
While environmental sustainability receives a lot of attention, a truly sustainable diet also takes into account the social and economic conditions that can threaten our health, wellbeing, and the future of our food supply.
Among these considerations are the persistent health and economic disparities embedded in the current US food system, which disproportionately affect Black, Indigenous, and other resilient communities of color who have faced decades of racist and discriminatory practices and policies. Even before the pandemic, the people working throughout the US food system —nearly 40 percent of whom are people of color—experienced greater poverty, poorer healthcare access, and higher occupational health hazards relative to the general population. Many of these same populations are also most vulnerable to the environmental consequences of unsustainable food systems, such as climate change, water pollution, and other environmental impacts. The irony should not be lost on anyone that many Indigenous populations have for generations produced food in harmony with ecological systems—a way of living that, in the US and elsewhere, was deeply and violently disrupted by colonization and genocide.
Pervasive exploitation in the food chain can function to make certain foods cheap, while also preventing workers from being able to afford healthy diets themselves. And unfortunately, this isn’t a challenge unique to workers in the food chain. Many US households are already struggling to afford a healthy —let alone sustainable—diet.
So how can research help?
For one, there are an increasing number of studies that are putting dollar signs on healthier and more sustainable diets. Understanding what these diets might cost consumers, and what segments of the population might be unable to afford them, is an important first step in creating policy and programs that can bring healthier and more sustainable eating into reach for more people. Existing research on programs and initiatives such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (also known as SNAP), cash assistance programs, or minimum wage increases will also be useful in identifying the best ways to increase consumer purchasing power, particularly among low-income households. Perhaps most importantly, effective community-based participatory research can support community efforts to resist and address the root causes of social and economic disparities, including racism and exploitative economic systems. Organizations like the HEAL Food Alliance , a multi-racial coalition building a national movement to transform food and farming systems, should be looked to as experts and leaders in shaping the goals and objectives of research that will impact the communities they represent.
Not every food choice that supports health will support sustainability, and vice versa. In fact, as our research shows , if the US population shifted from our current diet to a healthier diet, greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, and water use could actually increase. This is due in part to the fact that many fruits and vegetables—which most of us don’t eat nearly enough of—are produced in ways that require a lot of water and energy.
Another commonly cited example is the conflict between US dietary recommendations for fish and shellfish and the ability of fisheries to meet this demand in a sustainable way—an issue highlighted by experts in a National Academies of Science workshop and the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee .
None of this is to say that we should abandon our efforts to eat healthfully. Rather, it’s to say that we need to do some problem-solving if we want to eat in ways that are healthy and sustainable for people and the planet, and research can play a key role in helping us get there.
It was more than thirty years ago that federal policy established the first specific directives for prioritizing nutrition research, yet its funding has remained stagnant for decades and coordination across federal agencies remains inconsistent. Meanwhile, many complex factors are fueling the public health challenges embedded in the US food system: rates of diet-related disease and health disparities continue to climb, the degradation of soil and other natural resources has grown more dire, many workers are still underpaid and unsafe, and climate change is now a reality that looms large in our daily lives.
It’s time for the next generation of nutrition research. To fill these gaps in research and provide information we need to make the best possible policy decisions, we must invest in research that is systems-oriented and can help identify healthy diets that deliver the best possible social, economic, and environmental benefits for all populations. Such research must span disciplines, take leadership from communities most affected by health disparities and environmental injustices, and at its core focus on tackling root causes of the greatest threats facing the food system, including the systemic exploitation of people and finite resources.
President Biden’s administration has no shortage of opportunities to prioritize this area of research, which sits at the nexus of some of its foremost policy priorities . US Department of Agriculture Secretary Vilsack is well positioned to play a powerful role in lifting up and improving coordination of nutrition research needs, particularly as he works to rebuild capacity in the department’s research arms. And Congress, for its part, can leverage legislative opportunities such as appropriations and the potential reauthorization of child nutrition programs to ensure that funding is finally available to answer these and other critical nutrition research questions.
Reposted with permission from Union of Concerned Scientists.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our editorial team is committed to creating independent and objective content focused on helping our readers make informed decisions. To help support these efforts we receive compensation from companies that advertise with us.
The compensation we receive from these companies may impact how and where products appear on this site. This compensation does not influence the recommendations or advice our editorial team provides within our content. We do not include all companies, products or offers that may be available.
#scribendiinc
Written by Scribendi
So, you've got a research grant in your sights or you've been admitted to your school of choice, and you now have to write up a proposal for the work you want to perform. You know your topic, have done some reading, and you've got a nice quiet place where nobody will bother you while you try to decide where you'll go from here. The question looms:
Your research question will be your focus, the sentence you refer to when you need to remember why you're researching. It will encapsulate what drives you and be something your field needs an answer for but doesn't have yet.
Whether it seeks to describe a phenomenon, compare things, or show how one variable influences another, a research question always does the same thing: it guides research that will be judged based on how well it addresses the question.
So, what makes a research question good or bad? This article will provide examples of good and bad research questions and use them to illustrate both of their common characteristics so that you can evaluate your research question and improve it to suit your needs.
At the start of your research paper, you might be wondering, "What is a good research question?"
A good research question focuses on one researchable problem relevant to your subject area.
To write a research paper , first make sure you have a strong, relevant topic. Then, conduct some preliminary research around that topic. It's important to complete these two initial steps because your research question will be formulated based on this research.
With this in mind, let's review the steps that help us write good research questions.
When selecting a topic to form a good research question, it helps to start broad. What topics interest you most? It helps when you care about the topic you're researching!
Have you seen a movie recently that you enjoyed? How about a news story? If you can't think of anything, research different topics on Google to see which ones intrigue you the most and can apply to your assignment.
Also, before settling on a research topic, make sure it's relevant to your subject area or to society as a whole. This is an important aspect of developing your research question, because, in general, your research should add value to existing knowledge .
Now that you've chosen a broad but relevant topic for your paper, research it thoroughly to see which avenues you might want to explore further.
For example, let's say you decide on the broad topic of search engines. During this research phase, try skimming through sources that are unbiased, current, and relevant, such as academic journals or sources in your university library.
Check out: 21 Legit Research Databases for Free Articles in 2022
Pay close attention to the subtopics that come up during research, such as the following: Which search engines are the most commonly used? Why do some search engines dominate specific regions? How do they really work or affect the research of scientists and scholars?
Be on the lookout for any gaps or limitations in the research. Identifying the groups or demographics that are most affected by your topic is also helpful, in case that's relevant to your work.
Now that you've spent some time researching your broad topic, it's time to narrow it down to one specific subject. A topic like search engines is much too broad to develop a research paper around. What specifically about search engines could you explore?
When refining your topic, be careful not to be either too narrow or too broad. You can ask yourself the following questions during this phase:
Can I cover this topic within the scope of my paper, or would it require longer, heavier research? (In this case, you'd need to be more specific.)
Conversely, is there not enough research about my topic to write a paper? (In this case, you'd need to be broader.)
Keep these things in mind as you narrow down your topic. You can always expand your topic later if you have the time and research materials.
When narrowing down your topic, it helps to identify a single issue or problem on which to base your research. Ask open-ended questions, such as why is this topic important to you or others? Essentially, have you identified the answer to "so what"?
For example, after asking these questions about our search engine topic, we might focus only on the issue of how search engines affect research in a specific field. Or, more specifically, how search engine algorithms manipulate search results and prevent us from finding the critical research we need.
Asking these "so what" questions will help us brainstorm examples of research questions we can ask in our field of study.
Now that you have your main issue or problem, it's time to write your research question. Do this by reviewing your topic's big problem and formulating a question that your research will answer.
For example, ask, "so what?" about your search engine topic. You might realize that the bigger issue is that you, as a researcher, aren't getting the relevant information you need from search engines.
How can we use this information to develop a research question? We might phrase the research question as follows:
"What effect does the Google search engine algorithm have on online research conducted in the field of neuroscience?"
Note how specific we were with the type of search engine, the field of study, and the research method. It's also important to remember that your research question should not have an easy yes or no answer. It should be a question with a complex answer that can be discovered through research and analysis.
Hire an expert academic editor , or get a free sample, how to find good research topics for your research.
It can be fun to browse a myriad of research topics for your paper, but there are a few important things to keep in mind.
First, make sure you've understood your assignment. You don't want to pick a topic that's not relevant to the assignment goal. Your instructor can offer good topic suggestions as well, so if you get stuck, ask them!
Next, try to search for a broad topic that interests you. Starting broad gives you more options to work with. Some research topic examples include infectious diseases, European history, and smartphones .
Then, after some research, narrow your topic to something specific by extracting a single element from that subject. This could be a current issue on that topic, a major question circulating around that topic, or a specific region or group of people affected by that topic.
It's important that your research topic is focused. Focus lets you clearly demonstrate your understanding of the topic with enough details and examples to fit the scope of your project.
For example, if Jane Austen is your research topic, that might be too broad for a five-page paper! However, you could narrow it down to a single book by Austen or a specific perspective.
To keep your research topic focused, try creating a mind map. This is where you put your broad topic in a circle and create a few circles around it with similar ideas that you uncovered during your research.
Mind maps can help you visualize the connections between topics and subtopics. This could help you simplify the process of eliminating broad or uninteresting topics or help you identify new relationships between topics that you didn't previously notice.
Keeping your research topic focused will help you when it comes to writing your research question!
A researchable question should have enough available sources to fill the scope of your project without being overwhelming. If you find that the research is never-ending, you're going to be very disappointed at the end of your paper—because you won't be able to fit everything in! If you are in this fix, your research question is still too broad.
Search for your research topic's keywords in trusted sources such as journals, research databases , or dissertations in your university library. Then, assess whether the research you're finding is feasible and realistic to use.
If there's too much material out there, narrow down your topic by industry, region, or demographic. Conversely, if you don't find enough research on your topic, you'll need to go broader. Try choosing two works by two different authors instead of one, or try choosing three poems by a single author instead of one.
Make sure that the topic for your research question is a reasonable one to pursue. This means it's something that can be completed within your timeframe and offers a new perspective on the research.
Research topics often end up being summaries of a topic, but that's not the goal. You're looking for a way to add something relevant and new to the topic you're exploring. To do so, here are two ways to uncover strong, reasonable research topics as you conduct your preliminary research:
Check the ends of journal articles for sections with questions for further discussion. These make great research topics because they haven't been explored!
Check the sources of articles in your research. What points are they bringing up? Is there anything new worth exploring? Sometimes, you can use sources to expand your research and more effectively narrow your topic.
For your research topic to stand on its own, it should be specific. This means that it shouldn't be easily mistaken for another topic that's already been written about.
If you are writing about a topic that has been written about, such as consumer trust, it should be distinct from everything that's been written about consumer trust so far.
There is already a lot of research done on consumer trust in specific products or services in the US. Your research topic could focus on consumer trust in products and services in a different region, such as a developing country.
If your research feels similar to existing articles, make sure to drive home the differences.
Whether it's developed for a thesis or another assignment, a good research topic question should be complex enough to let you expand on it within the scope of your paper.
For example, let's say you took our advice on researching a topic you were interested in, and that topic was a new Bridezilla reality show. But when you began to research it, you couldn't find enough information on it, or worse, you couldn't find anything scholarly.
In short, Bridezilla reality shows aren't complex enough to build your paper on. Instead of broadening the topic to all reality TV shows, which might be too overwhelming, you might consider choosing a topic about wedding reality TV shows specifically.
This would open you up to more research that could be complex enough to write a paper on without being too overwhelming or narrow.
Because research papers aim to contribute to existing research that's already been explored, the relevance of your topic within your subject area can't be understated.
Your research topic should be relevant enough to advance understanding in a specific area of study and build on what's already been researched. It shouldn't duplicate research or try to add to it in an irrelevant way.
For example, you wouldn't choose a research topic like malaria transmission in Northern Siberia if the mosquito that transmits malaria lives in Africa. This research topic simply isn't relevant to the typical location where malaria is transmitted, and the research could be considered a waste of resources.
The art and science of asking questions is the source of all knowledge.
–Thomas Berger
First, a bit of clarification: While there are constants among research questions, no matter what you're writing about, you will use different standards for the humanities and social sciences than for hard sciences, such as chemistry. The former depends on subjectivity and the perspective of the researcher, while the latter requires answers that must be empirically tested and replicable.
For instance, if you research Charles Dickens' writing influences, you will have to explain your stance and observations to the reader before supporting them with evidence. If you research improvements in superconductivity in room-temperature material, the reader will not only need to understand and believe you but also duplicate your work to confirm that you are correct.
Research questions help you clarify the path your research will take. They are answered in your research paper and usually stated in the introduction.
There are two main types of research—qualitative and quantitative.
If you're conducting quantitative research, it means you're collecting numerical, quantifiable data that can be measured, such as statistical information.
Qualitative research aims to understand experiences or phenomena, so you're collecting and analyzing non-numerical data, such as case studies or surveys.
The structure and content of your research question will change depending on the type of research you're doing. However, the definition and goal of a research question remains the same: a specific, relevant, and focused inquiry that your research answers.
Below, we'll explore research question examples for different types of research.
Comparative research questions are designed to determine whether two or more groups differ based on a dependent variable. These questions allow researchers to uncover similarities and differences between the groups tested.
Because they compare two groups with a dependent variable, comparative research questions usually start with "What is the difference in…"
A strong comparative research question example might be the following:
"What is the difference in the daily caloric intake of American men and women?" ( Source .)
In the above example, the dependent variable is daily caloric intake and the two groups are American men and women.
A poor comparative research example might not aim to explore the differences between two groups or it could be too easily answered, as in the following example:
"Does daily caloric intake affect American men and women?"
Always ensure that your comparative research question is focused on a comparison between two groups based on a dependent variable.
Descriptive research questions help you gather data about measurable variables. Typically, researchers asking descriptive research questions aim to explain how, why, or what.
These research questions tend to start with the following:
What percentage?
How likely?
What proportion?
For example, a good descriptive research question might be as follows:
"What percentage of college students have felt depressed in the last year?" ( Source .)
A poor descriptive research question wouldn't be as precise. This might be something similar to the following:
"What percentage of teenagers felt sad in the last year?"
The above question is too vague, and the data would be overwhelming, given the number of teenagers in the world. Keep in mind that specificity is key when it comes to research questions!
Correlational research measures the statistical relationship between two variables, with no influence from any other variable. The idea is to observe the way these variables interact with one another. If one changes, how is the other affected?
When it comes to writing a correlational research question, remember that it's all about relationships. Your research would encompass the relational effects of one variable on the other.
For example, having an education (variable one) might positively or negatively correlate with the rate of crime (variable two) in a specific city. An example research question for this might be written as follows:
"Is there a significant negative correlation between education level and crime rate in Los Angeles?"
A bad correlational research question might not use relationships at all. In fact, correlational research questions are often confused with causal research questions, which imply cause and effect. For example:
"How does the education level in Los Angeles influence the crime rate?"
The above question wouldn't be a good correlational research question because the relationship between Los Angeles and the crime rate is already inherent in the question—we are already assuming the education level in Los Angeles affects the crime rate in some way.
Be sure to use the right format if you're writing a correlational research question.
Ask the right questions, and the answers will always reveal themselves.
–Oprah Winfrey
If finding the right research question was easy, doing research would be much simpler. However, research does not provide useful information if the questions have easy answers (because the questions are too simple, narrow, or general) or answers that cannot be reached at all (because the questions have no possible answer, are too costly to answer, or are too broad in scope).
For a research question to meet scientific standards, its answer cannot consist solely of opinion (even if the opinion is popular or logically reasoned) and cannot simply be a description of known information.
However, an analysis of what currently exists can be valuable, provided that there is enough information to produce a useful analysis. If a scientific research question offers results that cannot be tested, measured, or duplicated, it is ineffective.
Here are examples of bad research questions with brief explanations of what makes them ineffective for the purpose of research.
"What's red and bad for your teeth?"
This question has an easy, definitive answer (a brick), is too vague (What shade of red? How bad?), and isn't productive.
"Do violent video games cause players to act violently?"
This question also requires a definitive answer (yes or no), does not invite critical analysis, and allows opinion to influence or provide the answer.
"How many people were playing balalaikas while living in Moscow on July 8, 2019?"
This question cannot be answered without expending excessive amounts of time, money, and resources. It is also far too specific. Finally, it doesn't seek new insight or information, only a number that has no conceivable purpose.
The quality of a question is not judged by its complexity but by the complexity of thinking it provokes.
–Joseph O'Connor
What makes a good research question? A good research question topic is clear and focused. If the reader has to waste time wondering what you mean, you haven't phrased it effectively.
It also needs to be interesting and relevant, encouraging the reader to come along with you as you explain how you reached an answer.
Finally, once you explain your answer, there should be room for astute or interested readers to use your question as a basis to conduct their own research. If there is nothing for you to say in your conclusion beyond "that's the truth," then you're setting up your research to be challenged.
Here are some examples of good research questions. Take a look at the reasoning behind their effectiveness.
"What are the long-term effects of using activated charcoal in place of generic toothpaste for routine dental care?"
This question is specific enough to prevent digressions, invites measurable results, and concerns information that is both useful and interesting. Testing could be conducted in a reasonable time frame, without excessive cost, and would allow other researchers to follow up, regardless of the outcome.
"Why do North American parents feel that violent video game content has a negative influence on their children?"
While this does carry an assumption, backing up that assumption with observable proof will allow for analysis of the question, provide insight on a significant subject, and give readers something to build on in future research.
It also discusses a topic that is recognizably relevant. (In 2022, at least. If you are reading this article in the future, there might already be an answer to this question that requires further analysis or testing!)
"To what extent has Alexey Arkhipovsky's 2013 album, Insomnia , influenced gender identification in Russian culture?"
While it's tightly focused, this question also presents an assumption (that the music influenced gender identification) and seeks to prove or disprove it. This allows for the possibilities that the music had no influence at all or had a demonstrable impact.
Answering the question will involve explaining the context and using many sources so that the reader can follow the logic and be convinced of the author's findings. The results (be they positive or negative) will also open the door to countless other studies.
If something is wrong, fix it if you can. But train yourself not to worry. Worry never fixes anything.
–Ernest Hemingway
How do you turn something that won't help your research into something that will? Start by taking a step back and asking what you are expected to produce. While there are any number of fascinating subjects out there, a grant paying you to examine income disparity in Japan is not going to warrant an in-depth discussion of South American farming pollution.
Use these expectations to frame your initial topic and the subject that your research should be about, and then conduct preliminary research into that subject. If you spot a knowledge gap while researching, make a note of it, and add it to your list of possible questions.
If you already have a question that is relevant to your topic but has flaws, identify the issues and see if they can be addressed. In addition, if your question is too broad, try to narrow it down enough to make your research feasible.
Especially in the sciences, if your research question will not produce results that can be replicated, determine how you can change it so a reader can look at what you've done and go about repeating your actions so they can see that you are right.
Moreover, if you would need 20 years to produce results, consider whether there is a way to tighten things up to produce more immediate results. This could justify future research that will eventually reach that lofty goal.
If all else fails, you can use the flawed question as a subtopic and try to find a better question that fits your goals and expectations.
When you have your early work edited, don't be surprised if you are told that your research question requires revision. Quite often, results or the lack thereof can force a researcher to shift their focus and examine a less significant topic—or a different facet of a known issue—because testing did not produce the expected result.
If that happens, take heart. You now have the tools to assess your question, find its flaws, and repair them so that you can complete your research with confidence and publish something you know your audience will read with fascination.
Of course, if you receive affirmation that your research question is strong or are polishing your work before submitting it to a publisher, you might just need a final proofread to ensure that your confidence is well placed. Then, you can start pursuing something new that the world does not yet know (but will know) once you have your research question down.
About the author.
Scribendi's in-house editors work with writers from all over the globe to perfect their writing. They know that no piece of writing is complete without a professional edit, and they love to see a good piece of writing transformed into a great one. Scribendi's in-house editors are unrivaled in both experience and education, having collectively edited millions of words and obtained nearly 20 degrees. They love consuming caffeinated beverages, reading books of various genres, and relaxing in quiet, dimly lit spaces.
Have You Read?
"The Complete Beginner's Guide to Academic Writing"
Upload your file(s) so we can calculate your word count, or enter your word count manually.
We will also recommend a service based on the file(s) you upload.
File | Word Count | Include in Price? |
---|
English is not my first language. I need English editing and proofreading so that I sound like a native speaker.
I need to have my journal article, dissertation, or term paper edited and proofread, or I need help with an admissions essay or proposal.
I have a novel, manuscript, play, or ebook. I need editing, copy editing, proofreading, a critique of my work, or a query package.
I need editing and proofreading for my white papers, reports, manuals, press releases, marketing materials, and other business documents.
I need to have my essay, project, assignment, or term paper edited and proofread.
I want to sound professional and to get hired. I have a resume, letter, email, or personal document that I need to have edited and proofread.
Prices include your personal % discount.
Prices include % sales tax ( ).
PhD candidate, Department of Consumer and Food Sciences, University of Pretoria
Nomzamo N. Dlamini receives funding from: The National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF) and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program.
University of Pretoria provides funding as a partner of The Conversation AFRICA.
View all partners
You’re in a shop or market and you’re buying food for the next day. How do you choose what to buy? Does it depend on how much you can spend, on what’s the healthiest, the most attractively packaged? Understanding this is an important part of food product development as well as consumer education and diet interventions for better public health.
Researchers all over the world use tools such as questionnaires to study what motivates people’s food choices. However, most of these questionnaires were developed in the global north using insights from people living in those contexts. The food choice determinants of people in emerging economies like South Africa, where a large percentage of the population live below the national poverty line , may not be fully captured by these instruments.
So, as a researcher in consumer food science working on a PhD about the factors driving food choice in an emerging economy, I set out, with my supervisors , to develop a questionnaire suitable for use in this context.
A more relevant research tool can provide a more accurate understanding of the factors driving people’s food choices. This could inform necessary changes in a country like South Africa, where diseases related to diet or lifestyle, like hypertension, are among the leading causes of death .
To gather insights on the factors driving food choice in this context, we conducted focus group discussions with urban people from low, middle and high income backgrounds. Each discussion included between four and six people – a small group, to make sure participants had ample opportunity to contribute.
Read more: Diet and nutrition: how well Tanzanians eat depends largely on where they live
Focus group discussions can reveal diverse views and insights from people with different habits, beliefs, attitudes and experiences. This method allowed us to collect detailed data and to encourage interaction among participants, which could uncover more insights.
We collected hundreds of statements about people’s reasons for eating or purchasing certain food. Then we built surveys, which we sent out to wider groups of people online and analysed statistically.
From this we obtained a seven-factor food choice questionnaire with 31 statements. The factors were: 1) Healthy eating constraints, 2) Emotional eating, 3) Meat appeal, 4) Frugality (being money savvy), 5) Quality seeking, 6) Cooking constraints and 7) Weather.
Several of these factors were unique; they don’t appear in conventional food choice questionnaires. For instance, those questionnaires don’t ask about constraints to healthy eating (like “I find it hard to change poor food habits”); instead they tend to feature health-positive questions (like “It’s important to me that the food I eat on a typical day is nutritious”).
Read more: Poor South African households can't afford nutritious food – what can be done
Another example is the importance of eating meat. Although unusual compared to other food choice instruments, the presence of a distinct meat-related factor is appropriate and fitting in this context. For many Africans, eating meat is aspirational and an important part of culture and socialisation . Everyday meals and special occasions are also planned and built around meat.
In contrast, people in developed countries like Australia, Canada, Belgium, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Singapore are adjusting to eating less meat and it may lose its significance in these countries.
Read more: 1 in 10 Americans say they don't eat meat – a growing share of the population
Eating less meat has been identified as a way to make the global food system more sustainable.
But just because our participants considered meat an important part of their preferred diets does not mean that they don’t think about sustainability. They were strongly averse to wasting food, partly because their resources were limited. This is likely true for the general South African population.
Sub-Saharan Africa produces less post-harvest waste than Europe and the Americas, and the least household food waste when compared to Europe, the Americas and Asia. This shows that the behaviours contributing to sustainability vary by geographical area.
Surprisingly, despite weather being a driver of food choice in this study, it has not been reflected in any other food choice measurement output. It is not typically asked or featured as a food choice driver.
Compared to developed countries, there is often much less infrastructure in South Africa to protect people from temperature extremes during the warm and cold seasons. Thus, it is more probable that people in South Africa would rely more on food to either cool down or keep warm. This explains why weather was a significant food choice driver among our respondents.
We have produced an alternative food choice questionnaire for use in emerging economies: a food choice questionnaire for Africans, by Africans.
This questionnaire is nuanced and can be used by researchers in such contexts to understand the factors driving food choice.
For instance, governments could use the questionnaire to collect data about the barriers to healthy eating, then prepare specific, evidence-based messaging to educate people or to inform policies related to the food environment.
Read more: Street food keeps Johannesburg going - but working conditions of vendors are unhealthy
The questionnaire could also be used for diet intervention strategies specific to certain demographic groups and inform the development of new food products.
We have not stopped at developing the questionnaire. We’ve also conducted a follow-up, cross-cultural study as part of the InnoFood Africa project . The questionnaire has been administered to urban dwellers in seven countries (South Africa, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, France, Finland and Norway). Analysis of the data will begin soon.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Fast Food Research Paper Topics: The impact of fast food consumption on obesity rates in children. The influence of fast food advertising on consumer behavior. The correlation between fast food consumption and cardiovascular diseases. The role of fast food in the development of type 2 diabetes.
1. Generate with AI, choose a template, or start from scratch. If you want to take advantage of the latest technology, use forms.app's AI. Additionally, you can start from scratch if you wish to decide on the whole details. And if you want to save time, you can also choose ready-to-use food survey templates.
Frameworks for Research Questions. Applying a framework when developing a research question can help to identify the key concepts and determine inclusion and exclusion criteria. PICo: Population/Participants, phenomenon of Interest, Context; PICO(S): Patient/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, (Study design)
Captivating Food Research Topics. Evaluate the properties of Oil obtained from Carica Papaya Seeds. Discuss the effects of blending cow milk with soy milk and analyze the quality of yogurt. Evaluate the vegetable oil refining process and its food value. Explain the functional properties of plantain flour.
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not focused or researchable. The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically feasible. For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries.
150+ Ideas of Experimental Research Titles about Food. If you are unsure what title about food to work on for your research paper, here we are. Below are some of the best examples of thesis titles or professional thesis writers about food for students and researchers. Research Title about Food Processing. Plant sterols in treating high cholesterol
The following are some examples of potential food science research topics: Food Processing Techniques on Nutrient Retention and Bioavailability. Exploring the Potential Health Benefits of Functional Foods Fortified with Probiotics. Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods.
This guide delineates 45 questions, distributed across consumer-centric and business-centric areas, designed to afford you a nuanced understanding of your audience. Ask the right questions and you can garner invaluable data that enriches your understanding of your food business and its clientele. Lets tuck in. Example consumer-centric questions
Developing a question helps you focus on an aspect of your topic, which will streamline your research and writing. To create a research question: Pick a topic you are interested in. Narrow the topic to a particular aspect. Brainstorm some questions around your topic aspect. Select a question to work with. Focus the question by making it more ...
2 Interesting Nutrition Topics for Research Paper. 3 Research Topics in Nutrition and Dietetics. 4 Sports Nutrition Topics for Research. 5 Nutritional Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. 6 Advances in Food Technology and Biotechnology. 7 Emerging Topics in Nutrition and Health. 8 Innovations in Food and Dietary Patterns.
A well-crafted research question (or set of questions) sets the stage for a robust study and meaningful insights. But, if you're new to research, it's not always clear what exactly constitutes a good research question. In this post, we'll provide you with clear examples of quality research questions across various disciplines, so that you can approach your research project with confidence!
When it comes to healthy eating, there's a lot we already know. Just take a look at the scientific report issued by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, the group of scientific experts behind the newly released 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.At 835 pages, the report spans a rigorous review of current research on dozens of topics, from whether eating peanuts early in ...
Relevant answer. Raghad Mouhamad. Nov 24, 2023. Answer. One possibility is that calciphytolite is a product of biomineralization, a process by which living organisms produce minerals, such as ...
How to Develop a Question. The PICO Format. Simple tool to help focus your research question on a specific issue (from the Evidence Analysis Manual) Template for Asking PICO (T) Questions handout. This template can help you figure out how parts of your research question fit into the PICO (T) format. Tips for Writing a Good PICO.
A good research question is essential to guide your research paper, dissertation, or thesis. All research questions should be: Focused on a single problem or issue. Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources. Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints. Specific enough to answer thoroughly.
Research Question: How has the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic influenced the food choices and food sources of adults aged 50 years and older? Key Findings: Food prices, personal preferences, and a food's healthfulness were the primary factors driving choices. Although respondents said the pandemic had not changed the factors motivating their choices, they mentioned that food prices had ...
You can either guide your respondents here by giving them a list of options — after all, you know what is actually possible. Think sizes, price, packaging. Or let them dream out loud by giving them the room for all ideas. Your customers can have unique perspectives on how to improve your products. 6.
Check this list of the most exciting food research questions and titles! Table of Contents. 🥫 TOP 7 Food Topics - 2024. 🏆 Best Essay Topics on Food. Research Questions About Food. 👍 Good Food Research Topics & Essay Examples ... These essay examples and topics on Food were carefully selected by the StudyCorgi editorial team. They ...
11. Food quality induces a miscible disease with relevance to Alzheimer's disease and Neurological diseases, J Food Research, vol. 5, pp.45-52, 2016. 12. Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides Change ...
As a bonus, we've also listed the best restaurant survey questions you should ask your customers to measure their overall satisfaction with your food and their experience so far. Most importantly, We've also added a Free Food Quality Survey Template , which is used by brands worldwide, which you can start using for free to collect feedback ...
How a Mission to Cut Food Waste Launched a Multimillion-Dollar Venture. by Lane Lambert. Josh Domingues put purpose before profit when he created the Flashfood app to sell less-than-perfect groceries at discounted prices. A case study by Reza Satchu explores Domingues' successes and failures, and what other social entrepreneurs can learn.
Here are three of the most pressing questions that research can answer to enable more sustainable eating for all. 1. When it comes to healthy and environmentally sustainable diets, what exactly is on the menu? Research on healthy and environmentally sustainable diets has seen extraordinary growth in recent years.
If your research feels similar to existing articles, make sure to drive home the differences. 5. Complex. Whether it's developed for a thesis or another assignment, a good research topic question should be complex enough to let you expand on it within the scope of your paper.
Nomzamo N. Dlamini receives funding from: The National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF) and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. You're in a shop or market ...