Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of our Democracy
360° Perspective: Free speech on social media
Petition · Freedom Of Speech Across All Platforms Of Media · Change.org
Explain the Freedom of Speech & Expression in Social Media
Freedom of Speech On Social Media & Government Intervention
COMMENTS
What to Know About the Supreme Court Case on Free Speech on Social
Published Feb. 25, 2024 Updated Feb. 26, 2024. Social media companies are bracing for Supreme Court arguments on Monday that could fundamentally alter the way they police their sites. After ...
Elonis v. U.S.
The First Amendment provides that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech [.]" Elonis v. U.S. (2015) is the first time that the Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a case involving the constitutionality of prosecuting potential threats in a social media context.This is a relatively new and rapidly developing area of law.
Supreme Court tackles social media and free speech : NPR
Supreme Court tackles social media and free speech In a major First Amendment case, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the federal government's ability to combat what it sees as false ...
The Supreme Court Cases That Could Redefine the Internet
The Supreme Court in 1997 issued a very famous case called Reno v. ACLU. And this was a constitutional case about what was called the Communications Decency Act. This was a law that purported to ...
The Supreme Court Will Set an Important Precedent for Free Speech
As the Supreme Court explained in striking down the law, a government-mandated "right of access inescapably dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate.". The Supreme Court's established precedent for protecting editorial discretion applies to online platforms as well. Private speech on the internet should receive at least ...
Supreme Court wades into social media wars over free speech
Three major issues on the role of social media in society are before the justices, with oral arguments in the first two cases taking place this week. IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal ...
Supreme Court Rules For Cheerleader In Free Speech Case : NPR
In a victory for student speech rights, the Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a former cheerleader's online F-bombs about her school is protected speech under the First Amendment. But in an 8 ...
Supreme Court to hear free speech case over government pressure on
The case poses a significant test of the First Amendment's free speech protections in the digital age and stems from the Biden administration's efforts to pressure social media platforms to remove ...
The Evolving Free-Speech Battle Between Social Media and the Government
The judge wrote, in a preliminary injunction, "If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States ...
Supreme Court Sides With Cheerleader in First Amendment Social Media Case
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with a student cheerleader in a major free-speech case, ruling that the school's disciplinary action against the student for her off-campus social media post ...
Free Speech Supreme Court Cases
Free Speech Supreme Court Cases. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that the government must not "abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press.". Free speech has long been considered one of the pillars of a democracy. Explaining its importance, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. declared that "the best test of truth ...
Supreme Court debates student free speech rights on social media
ABC News. The U.S. Supreme Court wrestled openly on Wednesday with how to balance the free speech rights of American teenagers on social media with the needs of schools to maintain order and ...
Cheerleader prevails at U.S. Supreme Court in free speech case
The case involved the free speech rights of America's roughly 50 million public school students in the internet and social media era. Many schools and educators have argued that their ability to ...
Murthy v. Missouri: The First Amendment and Government Influence on
Murthy v. Missouri concerns whether the federal government's involvement in influencing content moderation choices at private social media companies, such as Facebook, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter), violated the First Amendment 's Free Speech Clause. 1 Footnote U.S. Const. amend. I (Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . .
Free Speech Constraints on Public Officials' Social Media Pages
Social Media Pages November 13, 2023 On October 31, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases challenging public officials' ... The First Amendment's Free Speech Clause prevents the government from "abridging the freedom of speech." The First Amendment only restricts the government. A private party's actions that burden ...
NYU Law Forum debates government efforts to halt social media
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government asked social media companies to take down misinformation about the spread of coronavirus and mask and vaccine efficacy. The Supreme Court is now considering a legal challenge to the constitutionality of these informal requests, known as government "jawboning".
Supreme Court wary of restricting government contact with social media
The Supreme Court heard a free speech case involving the Biden administration's efforts to pressure social media companies to remove what it said was false information.
Social Media, Freedom of Speech, and the Future of our Democracy
In Social Media, Free Speech, and the Future of Democracy, two of the nation's most distinguished First Amendment scholars, Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger and University of Chicago Law Professor Geoffrey R. Stone, have brought together experts from a variety of disciplines to explore the complexities of this problem.
Breaking down TikTok's legal arguments around free speech, national
Social media platform TikTok says that a bill banning the app in the U.S. is "unconstitutional" and that it will fight this latest attempt to restrict its use in court. The bill in question ...
Opinion
And we can do it without the government policing speech. In fact, Congress does not have to do anything. It doesn't even need to touch Section 230, the now infamous 1996 law that gives social ...
TikTok CEO Torches Potential Ban, Cites Freedom of Speech ...
As President Joe Biden signed a security bill that would force TikTok to be sold by its owner ByteDance or face a possible national ban, the social media platform's CEO Shou Zi Chew responded by ...
TikTok says US House bill that could ban app would 'trample' free speech
TikTok on Sunday repeated its free-speech concerns about a bill passed by the House of Representatives that would ban the popular social media app in the U.S. if Chinese owner ByteDance did not ...
Freedom of speech and LGBT rights: Americans' views of issues in
The Supreme Court case centers on a challenge to Colorado's public accommodations law by website designer Lorie Smith, who says the law violates her right to freedom of speech by requiring her to design wedding websites for same-sex couples. ... The Role of Alternative Social Media in the News and Information Environment. short read Aug 30, 2022.
Brazilian Government Forced Censorship on X: New Report Reveals
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the House Judiciary Committee released an interim staff report titled, "The Attack on Free Speech Abroad and the Biden Administration's Silence: The Case of Brazil."The report exposes Brazil's censorship campaign and presents a startling case study of how a government can justify censorship in the name of stopping so-called "hate" speech and the "subversion" of "order."
Senate passes bill forcing TikTok's parent company to sell or face ban
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate passed legislation Tuesday that would force TikTok's China-based parent company to sell the social media platform under the threat of a ban, a contentious move by U.S. lawmakers that's expected to face legal challenges and disrupt the lives of content creators who rely on the short-form video app for income.
Judge in Trump case orders media not to report where potential jurors
Anonymous juries have long existed, particularly in terrorism and mob-related cases or when there is a history of jury tampering. They have been ordered more frequently in the last two decades with the rising influence of social media and the anonymous hate speech that is sometimes associated with it.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Published Feb. 25, 2024 Updated Feb. 26, 2024. Social media companies are bracing for Supreme Court arguments on Monday that could fundamentally alter the way they police their sites. After ...
The First Amendment provides that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech [.]" Elonis v. U.S. (2015) is the first time that the Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a case involving the constitutionality of prosecuting potential threats in a social media context.This is a relatively new and rapidly developing area of law.
Supreme Court tackles social media and free speech In a major First Amendment case, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the federal government's ability to combat what it sees as false ...
The Supreme Court in 1997 issued a very famous case called Reno v. ACLU. And this was a constitutional case about what was called the Communications Decency Act. This was a law that purported to ...
As the Supreme Court explained in striking down the law, a government-mandated "right of access inescapably dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate.". The Supreme Court's established precedent for protecting editorial discretion applies to online platforms as well. Private speech on the internet should receive at least ...
Three major issues on the role of social media in society are before the justices, with oral arguments in the first two cases taking place this week. IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal ...
In a victory for student speech rights, the Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a former cheerleader's online F-bombs about her school is protected speech under the First Amendment. But in an 8 ...
The case poses a significant test of the First Amendment's free speech protections in the digital age and stems from the Biden administration's efforts to pressure social media platforms to remove ...
The judge wrote, in a preliminary injunction, "If the allegations made by plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with a student cheerleader in a major free-speech case, ruling that the school's disciplinary action against the student for her off-campus social media post ...
Free Speech Supreme Court Cases. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that the government must not "abridge the freedom of speech, or of the press.". Free speech has long been considered one of the pillars of a democracy. Explaining its importance, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. declared that "the best test of truth ...
ABC News. The U.S. Supreme Court wrestled openly on Wednesday with how to balance the free speech rights of American teenagers on social media with the needs of schools to maintain order and ...
The case involved the free speech rights of America's roughly 50 million public school students in the internet and social media era. Many schools and educators have argued that their ability to ...
Murthy v. Missouri concerns whether the federal government's involvement in influencing content moderation choices at private social media companies, such as Facebook, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter), violated the First Amendment 's Free Speech Clause. 1 Footnote U.S. Const. amend. I (Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . .
Social Media Pages November 13, 2023 On October 31, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases challenging public officials' ... The First Amendment's Free Speech Clause prevents the government from "abridging the freedom of speech." The First Amendment only restricts the government. A private party's actions that burden ...
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government asked social media companies to take down misinformation about the spread of coronavirus and mask and vaccine efficacy. The Supreme Court is now considering a legal challenge to the constitutionality of these informal requests, known as government "jawboning".
The Supreme Court heard a free speech case involving the Biden administration's efforts to pressure social media companies to remove what it said was false information.
In Social Media, Free Speech, and the Future of Democracy, two of the nation's most distinguished First Amendment scholars, Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger and University of Chicago Law Professor Geoffrey R. Stone, have brought together experts from a variety of disciplines to explore the complexities of this problem.
Social media platform TikTok says that a bill banning the app in the U.S. is "unconstitutional" and that it will fight this latest attempt to restrict its use in court. The bill in question ...
And we can do it without the government policing speech. In fact, Congress does not have to do anything. It doesn't even need to touch Section 230, the now infamous 1996 law that gives social ...
As President Joe Biden signed a security bill that would force TikTok to be sold by its owner ByteDance or face a possible national ban, the social media platform's CEO Shou Zi Chew responded by ...
TikTok on Sunday repeated its free-speech concerns about a bill passed by the House of Representatives that would ban the popular social media app in the U.S. if Chinese owner ByteDance did not ...
The Supreme Court case centers on a challenge to Colorado's public accommodations law by website designer Lorie Smith, who says the law violates her right to freedom of speech by requiring her to design wedding websites for same-sex couples. ... The Role of Alternative Social Media in the News and Information Environment. short read Aug 30, 2022.
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, the House Judiciary Committee released an interim staff report titled, "The Attack on Free Speech Abroad and the Biden Administration's Silence: The Case of Brazil."The report exposes Brazil's censorship campaign and presents a startling case study of how a government can justify censorship in the name of stopping so-called "hate" speech and the "subversion" of "order."
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate passed legislation Tuesday that would force TikTok's China-based parent company to sell the social media platform under the threat of a ban, a contentious move by U.S. lawmakers that's expected to face legal challenges and disrupt the lives of content creators who rely on the short-form video app for income.
Anonymous juries have long existed, particularly in terrorism and mob-related cases or when there is a history of jury tampering. They have been ordered more frequently in the last two decades with the rising influence of social media and the anonymous hate speech that is sometimes associated with it.