Techniques or tools used for gathering research data include:
Qualitative Techniques or Tools | Quantitative Techniques or Tools |
: these can be structured, semi-structured or unstructured in-depth sessions with the researcher and a participant. | Surveys or questionnaires: which ask the same questions to large numbers of participants or use Likert scales which measure opinions as numerical data. |
: with several participants discussing a particular topic or a set of questions. Researchers can be facilitators or observers. | Observation: which can either involve counting the number of times a specific phenomenon occurs, or the coding of observational data in order to translate it into numbers. |
: On-site, in-context or role-play options. | Document screening: sourcing numerical data from financial reports or counting word occurrences. |
: Interrogation of correspondence (letters, diaries, emails etc) or reports. | Experiments: testing hypotheses in laboratories, testing cause and effect relationships, through field experiments, or via quasi- or natural experiments. |
: Remembrances or memories of experiences told to the researcher. | |
SAGE research methods
- SAGE research methods online This link opens in a new window Research methods tool to help researchers gather full-text resources, design research projects, understand a particular method and write up their research. Includes access to collections of video, business cases and eBooks,
Help and Information
- Next: Finding qualitative research >>
- Last Updated: Aug 19, 2024 3:39 PM
- URL: https://libguides.newcastle.edu.au/researchmethods
How To Choose Your Research Methodology
Qualitative vs quantitative vs mixed methods.
By: Derek Jansen (MBA). Expert Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2021
Without a doubt, one of the most common questions we receive at Grad Coach is “ How do I choose the right methodology for my research? ”. It’s easy to see why – with so many options on the research design table, it’s easy to get intimidated, especially with all the complex lingo!
In this post, we’ll explain the three overarching types of research – qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods – and how you can go about choosing the best methodological approach for your research.
Overview: Choosing Your Methodology
Understanding the options – Qualitative research – Quantitative research – Mixed methods-based research
Choosing a research methodology – Nature of the research – Research area norms – Practicalities
1. Understanding the options
Before we jump into the question of how to choose a research methodology, it’s useful to take a step back to understand the three overarching types of research – qualitative , quantitative and mixed methods -based research. Each of these options takes a different methodological approach.
Qualitative research utilises data that is not numbers-based. In other words, qualitative research focuses on words , descriptions , concepts or ideas – while quantitative research makes use of numbers and statistics. Qualitative research investigates the “softer side” of things to explore and describe, while quantitative research focuses on the “hard numbers”, to measure differences between variables and the relationships between them.
Importantly, qualitative research methods are typically used to explore and gain a deeper understanding of the complexity of a situation – to draw a rich picture . In contrast to this, quantitative methods are usually used to confirm or test hypotheses . In other words, they have distinctly different purposes. The table below highlights a few of the key differences between qualitative and quantitative research – you can learn more about the differences here.
- Uses an inductive approach
- Is used to build theories
- Takes a subjective approach
- Adopts an open and flexible approach
- The researcher is close to the respondents
- Interviews and focus groups are oftentimes used to collect word-based data.
- Generally, draws on small sample sizes
- Uses qualitative data analysis techniques (e.g. content analysis , thematic analysis , etc)
- Uses a deductive approach
- Is used to test theories
- Takes an objective approach
- Adopts a closed, highly planned approach
- The research is disconnected from respondents
- Surveys or laboratory equipment are often used to collect number-based data.
- Generally, requires large sample sizes
- Uses statistical analysis techniques to make sense of the data
Mixed methods -based research, as you’d expect, attempts to bring these two types of research together, drawing on both qualitative and quantitative data. Quite often, mixed methods-based studies will use qualitative research to explore a situation and develop a potential model of understanding (this is called a conceptual framework), and then go on to use quantitative methods to test that model empirically.
In other words, while qualitative and quantitative methods (and the philosophies that underpin them) are completely different, they are not at odds with each other. It’s not a competition of qualitative vs quantitative. On the contrary, they can be used together to develop a high-quality piece of research. Of course, this is easier said than done, so we usually recommend that first-time researchers stick to a single approach , unless the nature of their study truly warrants a mixed-methods approach.
The key takeaway here, and the reason we started by looking at the three options, is that it’s important to understand that each methodological approach has a different purpose – for example, to explore and understand situations (qualitative), to test and measure (quantitative) or to do both. They’re not simply alternative tools for the same job.
Right – now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s look at how you can go about choosing the right methodology for your research.
2. How to choose a research methodology
To choose the right research methodology for your dissertation or thesis, you need to consider three important factors . Based on these three factors, you can decide on your overarching approach – qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. Once you’ve made that decision, you can flesh out the finer details of your methodology, such as the sampling , data collection methods and analysis techniques (we discuss these separately in other posts ).
The three factors you need to consider are:
- The nature of your research aims, objectives and research questions
- The methodological approaches taken in the existing literature
- Practicalities and constraints
Let’s take a look at each of these.
Factor #1: The nature of your research
As I mentioned earlier, each type of research (and therefore, research methodology), whether qualitative, quantitative or mixed, has a different purpose and helps solve a different type of question. So, it’s logical that the key deciding factor in terms of which research methodology you adopt is the nature of your research aims, objectives and research questions .
But, what types of research exist?
Broadly speaking, research can fall into one of three categories:
- Exploratory – getting a better understanding of an issue and potentially developing a theory regarding it
- Confirmatory – confirming a potential theory or hypothesis by testing it empirically
- A mix of both – building a potential theory or hypothesis and then testing it
As a rule of thumb, exploratory research tends to adopt a qualitative approach , whereas confirmatory research tends to use quantitative methods . This isn’t set in stone, but it’s a very useful heuristic. Naturally then, research that combines a mix of both, or is seeking to develop a theory from the ground up and then test that theory, would utilize a mixed-methods approach.
Let’s look at an example in action.
If your research aims were to understand the perspectives of war veterans regarding certain political matters, you’d likely adopt a qualitative methodology, making use of interviews to collect data and one or more qualitative data analysis methods to make sense of the data.
If, on the other hand, your research aims involved testing a set of hypotheses regarding the link between political leaning and income levels, you’d likely adopt a quantitative methodology, using numbers-based data from a survey to measure the links between variables and/or constructs .
So, the first (and most important thing) thing you need to consider when deciding which methodological approach to use for your research project is the nature of your research aims , objectives and research questions. Specifically, you need to assess whether your research leans in an exploratory or confirmatory direction or involves a mix of both.
The importance of achieving solid alignment between these three factors and your methodology can’t be overstated. If they’re misaligned, you’re going to be forcing a square peg into a round hole. In other words, you’ll be using the wrong tool for the job, and your research will become a disjointed mess.
If your research is a mix of both exploratory and confirmatory, but you have a tight word count limit, you may need to consider trimming down the scope a little and focusing on one or the other. One methodology executed well has a far better chance of earning marks than a poorly executed mixed methods approach. So, don’t try to be a hero, unless there is a very strong underpinning logic.
Need a helping hand?
Factor #2: The disciplinary norms
Choosing the right methodology for your research also involves looking at the approaches used by other researchers in the field, and studies with similar research aims and objectives to yours. Oftentimes, within a discipline, there is a common methodological approach (or set of approaches) used in studies. While this doesn’t mean you should follow the herd “just because”, you should at least consider these approaches and evaluate their merit within your context.
A major benefit of reviewing the research methodologies used by similar studies in your field is that you can often piggyback on the data collection techniques that other (more experienced) researchers have developed. For example, if you’re undertaking a quantitative study, you can often find tried and tested survey scales with high Cronbach’s alphas. These are usually included in the appendices of journal articles, so you don’t even have to contact the original authors. By using these, you’ll save a lot of time and ensure that your study stands on the proverbial “shoulders of giants” by using high-quality measurement instruments .
Of course, when reviewing existing literature, keep point #1 front of mind. In other words, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and questions. Don’t fall into the trap of adopting the methodological “norm” of other studies just because it’s popular. Only adopt that which is relevant to your research.
Factor #3: Practicalities
When choosing a research methodology, there will always be a tension between doing what’s theoretically best (i.e., the most scientifically rigorous research design ) and doing what’s practical , given your constraints . This is the nature of doing research and there are always trade-offs, as with anything else.
But what constraints, you ask?
When you’re evaluating your methodological options, you need to consider the following constraints:
- Data access
- Equipment and software
- Your knowledge and skills
Let’s look at each of these.
Constraint #1: Data access
The first practical constraint you need to consider is your access to data . If you’re going to be undertaking primary research , you need to think critically about the sample of respondents you realistically have access to. For example, if you plan to use in-person interviews , you need to ask yourself how many people you’ll need to interview, whether they’ll be agreeable to being interviewed, where they’re located, and so on.
If you’re wanting to undertake a quantitative approach using surveys to collect data, you’ll need to consider how many responses you’ll require to achieve statistically significant results. For many statistical tests, a sample of a few hundred respondents is typically needed to develop convincing conclusions.
So, think carefully about what data you’ll need access to, how much data you’ll need and how you’ll collect it. The last thing you want is to spend a huge amount of time on your research only to find that you can’t get access to the required data.
Constraint #2: Time
The next constraint is time. If you’re undertaking research as part of a PhD, you may have a fairly open-ended time limit, but this is unlikely to be the case for undergrad and Masters-level projects. So, pay attention to your timeline, as the data collection and analysis components of different methodologies have a major impact on time requirements . Also, keep in mind that these stages of the research often take a lot longer than originally anticipated.
Another practical implication of time limits is that it will directly impact which time horizon you can use – i.e. longitudinal vs cross-sectional . For example, if you’ve got a 6-month limit for your entire research project, it’s quite unlikely that you’ll be able to adopt a longitudinal time horizon.
Constraint #3: Money
As with so many things, money is another important constraint you’ll need to consider when deciding on your research methodology. While some research designs will cost near zero to execute, others may require a substantial budget .
Some of the costs that may arise include:
- Software costs – e.g. survey hosting services, analysis software, etc.
- Promotion costs – e.g. advertising a survey to attract respondents
- Incentive costs – e.g. providing a prize or cash payment incentive to attract respondents
- Equipment rental costs – e.g. recording equipment, lab equipment, etc.
- Travel costs
- Food & beverages
These are just a handful of costs that can creep into your research budget. Like most projects, the actual costs tend to be higher than the estimates, so be sure to err on the conservative side and expect the unexpected. It’s critically important that you’re honest with yourself about these costs, or you could end up getting stuck midway through your project because you’ve run out of money.
Constraint #4: Equipment & software
Another practical consideration is the hardware and/or software you’ll need in order to undertake your research. Of course, this variable will depend on the type of data you’re collecting and analysing. For example, you may need lab equipment to analyse substances, or you may need specific analysis software to analyse statistical data. So, be sure to think about what hardware and/or software you’ll need for each potential methodological approach, and whether you have access to these.
Constraint #5: Your knowledge and skillset
The final practical constraint is a big one. Naturally, the research process involves a lot of learning and development along the way, so you will accrue knowledge and skills as you progress. However, when considering your methodological options, you should still consider your current position on the ladder.
Some of the questions you should ask yourself are:
- Am I more of a “numbers person” or a “words person”?
- How much do I know about the analysis methods I’ll potentially use (e.g. statistical analysis)?
- How much do I know about the software and/or hardware that I’ll potentially use?
- How excited am I to learn new research skills and gain new knowledge?
- How much time do I have to learn the things I need to learn?
Answering these questions honestly will provide you with another set of criteria against which you can evaluate the research methodology options you’ve shortlisted.
So, as you can see, there is a wide range of practicalities and constraints that you need to take into account when you’re deciding on a research methodology. These practicalities create a tension between the “ideal” methodology and the methodology that you can realistically pull off. This is perfectly normal, and it’s your job to find the option that presents the best set of trade-offs.
Recap: Choosing a methodology
In this post, we’ve discussed how to go about choosing a research methodology. The three major deciding factors we looked at were:
- Exploratory
- Confirmatory
- Combination
- Research area norms
- Hardware and software
- Your knowledge and skillset
If you have any questions, feel free to leave a comment below. If you’d like a helping hand with your research methodology, check out our 1-on-1 research coaching service , or book a free consultation with a friendly Grad Coach.
Psst... there’s more!
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Very useful and informative especially for beginners
Nice article! I’m a beginner in the field of cybersecurity research. I am a Telecom and Network Engineer and Also aiming for PhD scholarship.
I find the article very informative especially for my decitation it has been helpful and an eye opener.
Hi I am Anna ,
I am a PHD candidate in the area of cyber security, maybe we can link up
The Examples shows by you, for sure they are really direct me and others to knows and practices the Research Design and prepration.
I found the post very informative and practical.
I struggle so much with designs of the research for sure!
I’m the process of constructing my research design and I want to know if the data analysis I plan to present in my thesis defense proposal possibly change especially after I gathered the data already.
Thank you so much this site is such a life saver. How I wish 1-1 coaching is available in our country but sadly it’s not.
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Research Process
- Manuscript Preparation
- Manuscript Review
- Publication Process
- Publication Recognition
- Language Editing Services
- Translation Services
Choosing the Right Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers
Table of Contents
Choosing an optimal research methodology is crucial for the success of any research project. The methodology you select will determine the type of data you collect, how you collect it, and how you analyse it. Understanding the different types of research methods available along with their strengths and weaknesses, is thus imperative to make an informed decision.
Understanding different research methods:
There are several research methods available depending on the type of study you are conducting, i.e., whether it is laboratory-based, clinical, epidemiological, or survey based . Some common methodologies include qualitative research, quantitative research, experimental research, survey-based research, and action research. Each method can be opted for and modified, depending on the type of research hypotheses and objectives.
Qualitative vs quantitative research:
When deciding on a research methodology, one of the key factors to consider is whether your research will be qualitative or quantitative. Qualitative research is used to understand people’s experiences, concepts, thoughts, or behaviours . Quantitative research, on the contrary, deals with numbers, graphs, and charts, and is used to test or confirm hypotheses, assumptions, and theories.
Qualitative research methodology:
Qualitative research is often used to examine issues that are not well understood, and to gather additional insights on these topics. Qualitative research methods include open-ended survey questions, observations of behaviours described through words, and reviews of literature that has explored similar theories and ideas. These methods are used to understand how language is used in real-world situations, identify common themes or overarching ideas, and describe and interpret various texts. Data analysis for qualitative research typically includes discourse analysis, thematic analysis, and textual analysis.
Quantitative research methodology:
The goal of quantitative research is to test hypotheses, confirm assumptions and theories, and determine cause-and-effect relationships. Quantitative research methods include experiments, close-ended survey questions, and countable and numbered observations. Data analysis for quantitative research relies heavily on statistical methods.
Analysing qualitative vs quantitative data:
The methods used for data analysis also differ for qualitative and quantitative research. As mentioned earlier, quantitative data is generally analysed using statistical methods and does not leave much room for speculation. It is more structured and follows a predetermined plan. In quantitative research, the researcher starts with a hypothesis and uses statistical methods to test it. Contrarily, methods used for qualitative data analysis can identify patterns and themes within the data, rather than provide statistical measures of the data. It is an iterative process, where the researcher goes back and forth trying to gauge the larger implications of the data through different perspectives and revising the analysis if required.
When to use qualitative vs quantitative research:
The choice between qualitative and quantitative research will depend on the gap that the research project aims to address, and specific objectives of the study. If the goal is to establish facts about a subject or topic, quantitative research is an appropriate choice. However, if the goal is to understand people’s experiences or perspectives, qualitative research may be more suitable.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, an understanding of the different research methods available, their applicability, advantages, and disadvantages is essential for making an informed decision on the best methodology for your project. If you need any additional guidance on which research methodology to opt for, you can head over to Elsevier Author Services (EAS). EAS experts will guide you throughout the process and help you choose the perfect methodology for your research goals.
Why is data validation important in research?
When Data Speak, Listen: Importance of Data Collection and Analysis Methods
You may also like.
Descriptive Research Design and Its Myriad Uses
Five Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Biomedical Research Paper
Making Technical Writing in Environmental Engineering Accessible
To Err is Not Human: The Dangers of AI-assisted Academic Writing
Writing a good review article
Scholarly Sources: What are They and Where can You Find Them?
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
Research Methods Help Guide
Introduction
Quantitative data, qualitative data.
- Types of Research
- Types of Studies
- Helpful Resources
- Get Help @ FIU
More Information
- Qualitative vs Quantitative LibGuide by the Ebling Library, Health Sciences Learning Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods Table comparing qualitative and quantitative research methods, created by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.
- Nursing Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Research Information provided by the University of Texas Arlington Libraries.
- Types of Variables From the UF Biostatistics Open Learning Textbook.
- Qualitative vs Quantitative Methods: Two Opposites that Make a Perfect Match Article discussing the different philosophies behind qualitative and quantitative methods, and an example of how to blend them in the health sciences.
Database Guides
- ERIC Search Guide by Ramces Marsilli Last Updated Aug 14, 2024 238 views this year
- PsycINFO Guide by Sarah J. Hammill Last Updated Jun 17, 2024 6191 views this year
Studies can use quantitative data, qualititative data, or both types of data. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. Explore the resources in the box at the left for more information.
Of the available library databases, only ERIC (for education topics) and PsycINFO (for psychology topics) allow you to limit your results by the type of data a study uses. Hover over the database name below for information on how to do so.
Note: database limits are helpful but not perfect. Rely on your own judgment when determining if data match the type you are seeking.
Numerical data.
| Quantitative variables can be or . : the variable can, in theory, be any value within a certain range. Can be measured. : the variable can only have certain values, usually whole numbers. Can be counted. |
- How to Analyze Quantitative Data
Non-numerical data.
| Qualitative variables can be or . : the variable does not have a specific order. : the variable has a specific order. |
- How to Analyze Qualitative Data
- << Previous: Quick Glossary
- Next: Types of Research >>
- Last Updated: Aug 16, 2024 5:59 PM
- URL: https://library.fiu.edu/researchmethods
Information
Fiu libraries floorplans, green library, modesto a. maidique campus.
Floor | Resources |
One | |
Two | |
Three | |
Four | |
Five | |
Six | |
Seven | |
Eight | |
Hubert Library, Biscayne Bay Campus
Floor | Resources |
One | |
Two | |
Three | |
Directions: Green Library, MMC
Directions: Hubert Library, BBC
Statistical Analysis in Research: Meaning, Methods and Types
Home » Videos » Statistical Analysis in Research: Meaning, Methods and Types
The scientific method is an empirical approach to acquiring new knowledge by making skeptical observations and analyses to develop a meaningful interpretation. It is the basis of research and the primary pillar of modern science. Researchers seek to understand the relationships between factors associated with the phenomena of interest. In some cases, research works with vast chunks of data, making it difficult to observe or manipulate each data point. As a result, statistical analysis in research becomes a means of evaluating relationships and interconnections between variables with tools and analytical techniques for working with large data. Since researchers use statistical power analysis to assess the probability of finding an effect in such an investigation, the method is relatively accurate. Hence, statistical analysis in research eases analytical methods by focusing on the quantifiable aspects of phenomena.
What is Statistical Analysis in Research? A Simplified Definition
Statistical analysis uses quantitative data to investigate patterns, relationships, and patterns to understand real-life and simulated phenomena. The approach is a key analytical tool in various fields, including academia, business, government, and science in general. This statistical analysis in research definition implies that the primary focus of the scientific method is quantitative research. Notably, the investigator targets the constructs developed from general concepts as the researchers can quantify their hypotheses and present their findings in simple statistics.
When a business needs to learn how to improve its product, they collect statistical data about the production line and customer satisfaction. Qualitative data is valuable and often identifies the most common themes in the stakeholders’ responses. On the other hand, the quantitative data creates a level of importance, comparing the themes based on their criticality to the affected persons. For instance, descriptive statistics highlight tendency, frequency, variation, and position information. While the mean shows the average number of respondents who value a certain aspect, the variance indicates the accuracy of the data. In any case, statistical analysis creates simplified concepts used to understand the phenomenon under investigation. It is also a key component in academia as the primary approach to data representation, especially in research projects, term papers and dissertations.
Most Useful Statistical Analysis Methods in Research
Using statistical analysis methods in research is inevitable, especially in academic assignments, projects, and term papers. It’s always advisable to seek assistance from your professor or you can try research paper writing by CustomWritings before you start your academic project or write statistical analysis in research paper. Consulting an expert when developing a topic for your thesis or short mid-term assignment increases your chances of getting a better grade. Most importantly, it improves your understanding of research methods with insights on how to enhance the originality and quality of personalized essays. Professional writers can also help select the most suitable statistical analysis method for your thesis, influencing the choice of data and type of study.
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive statistics is a statistical method summarizing quantitative figures to understand critical details about the sample and population. A description statistic is a figure that quantifies a specific aspect of the data. For instance, instead of analyzing the behavior of a thousand students, research can identify the most common actions among them. By doing this, the person utilizes statistical analysis in research, particularly descriptive statistics.
- Measures of central tendency . Central tendency measures are the mean, mode, and media or the averages denoting specific data points. They assess the centrality of the probability distribution, hence the name. These measures describe the data in relation to the center.
- Measures of frequency . These statistics document the number of times an event happens. They include frequency, count, ratios, rates, and proportions. Measures of frequency can also show how often a score occurs.
- Measures of dispersion/variation . These descriptive statistics assess the intervals between the data points. The objective is to view the spread or disparity between the specific inputs. Measures of variation include the standard deviation, variance, and range. They indicate how the spread may affect other statistics, such as the mean.
- Measures of position . Sometimes researchers can investigate relationships between scores. Measures of position, such as percentiles, quartiles, and ranks, demonstrate this association. They are often useful when comparing the data to normalized information.
Inferential Statistics
Inferential statistics is critical in statistical analysis in quantitative research. This approach uses statistical tests to draw conclusions about the population. Examples of inferential statistics include t-tests, F-tests, ANOVA, p-value, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon W test. This
Common Statistical Analysis in Research Types
Although inferential and descriptive statistics can be classified as types of statistical analysis in research, they are mostly considered analytical methods. Types of research are distinguishable by the differences in the methodology employed in analyzing, assembling, classifying, manipulating, and interpreting data. The categories may also depend on the type of data used.
Predictive Analysis
Predictive research analyzes past and present data to assess trends and predict future events. An excellent example of predictive analysis is a market survey that seeks to understand customers’ spending habits to weigh the possibility of a repeat or future purchase. Such studies assess the likelihood of an action based on trends.
Prescriptive Analysis
On the other hand, a prescriptive analysis targets likely courses of action. It’s decision-making research designed to identify optimal solutions to a problem. Its primary objective is to test or assess alternative measures.
Causal Analysis
Causal research investigates the explanation behind the events. It explores the relationship between factors for causation. Thus, researchers use causal analyses to analyze root causes, possible problems, and unknown outcomes.
Mechanistic Analysis
This type of research investigates the mechanism of action. Instead of focusing only on the causes or possible outcomes, researchers may seek an understanding of the processes involved. In such cases, they use mechanistic analyses to document, observe, or learn the mechanisms involved.
Exploratory Data Analysis
Similarly, an exploratory study is extensive with a wider scope and minimal limitations. This type of research seeks insight into the topic of interest. An exploratory researcher does not try to generalize or predict relationships. Instead, they look for information about the subject before conducting an in-depth analysis.
The Importance of Statistical Analysis in Research
As a matter of fact, statistical analysis provides critical information for decision-making. Decision-makers require past trends and predictive assumptions to inform their actions. In most cases, the data is too complex or lacks meaningful inferences. Statistical tools for analyzing such details help save time and money, deriving only valuable information for assessment. An excellent statistical analysis in research example is a randomized control trial (RCT) for the Covid-19 vaccine. You can download a sample of such a document online to understand the significance such analyses have to the stakeholders. A vaccine RCT assesses the effectiveness, side effects, duration of protection, and other benefits. Hence, statistical analysis in research is a helpful tool for understanding data.
Sources and links For the articles and videos I use different databases, such as Eurostat, OECD World Bank Open Data, Data Gov and others. You are free to use the video I have made on your site using the link or the embed code. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to write to me!
Support statistics and data, if you have reached the end and like this project, you can donate a coffee to “statistics and data”..
Copyright © 2022 Statistics and Data
Effective Use of Statistics in Research – Methods and Tools for Data Analysis
Remember that impending feeling you get when you are asked to analyze your data! Now that you have all the required raw data, you need to statistically prove your hypothesis. Representing your numerical data as part of statistics in research will also help in breaking the stereotype of being a biology student who can’t do math.
Statistical methods are essential for scientific research. In fact, statistical methods dominate the scientific research as they include planning, designing, collecting data, analyzing, drawing meaningful interpretation and reporting of research findings. Furthermore, the results acquired from research project are meaningless raw data unless analyzed with statistical tools. Therefore, determining statistics in research is of utmost necessity to justify research findings. In this article, we will discuss how using statistical methods for biology could help draw meaningful conclusion to analyze biological studies.
Table of Contents
Role of Statistics in Biological Research
Statistics is a branch of science that deals with collection, organization and analysis of data from the sample to the whole population. Moreover, it aids in designing a study more meticulously and also give a logical reasoning in concluding the hypothesis. Furthermore, biology study focuses on study of living organisms and their complex living pathways, which are very dynamic and cannot be explained with logical reasoning. However, statistics is more complex a field of study that defines and explains study patterns based on the sample sizes used. To be precise, statistics provides a trend in the conducted study.
Biological researchers often disregard the use of statistics in their research planning, and mainly use statistical tools at the end of their experiment. Therefore, giving rise to a complicated set of results which are not easily analyzed from statistical tools in research. Statistics in research can help a researcher approach the study in a stepwise manner, wherein the statistical analysis in research follows –
1. Establishing a Sample Size
Usually, a biological experiment starts with choosing samples and selecting the right number of repetitive experiments. Statistics in research deals with basics in statistics that provides statistical randomness and law of using large samples. Statistics teaches how choosing a sample size from a random large pool of sample helps extrapolate statistical findings and reduce experimental bias and errors.
2. Testing of Hypothesis
When conducting a statistical study with large sample pool, biological researchers must make sure that a conclusion is statistically significant. To achieve this, a researcher must create a hypothesis before examining the distribution of data. Furthermore, statistics in research helps interpret the data clustered near the mean of distributed data or spread across the distribution. These trends help analyze the sample and signify the hypothesis.
3. Data Interpretation Through Analysis
When dealing with large data, statistics in research assist in data analysis. This helps researchers to draw an effective conclusion from their experiment and observations. Concluding the study manually or from visual observation may give erroneous results; therefore, thorough statistical analysis will take into consideration all the other statistical measures and variance in the sample to provide a detailed interpretation of the data. Therefore, researchers produce a detailed and important data to support the conclusion.
Types of Statistical Research Methods That Aid in Data Analysis
Statistical analysis is the process of analyzing samples of data into patterns or trends that help researchers anticipate situations and make appropriate research conclusions. Based on the type of data, statistical analyses are of the following type:
1. Descriptive Analysis
The descriptive statistical analysis allows organizing and summarizing the large data into graphs and tables . Descriptive analysis involves various processes such as tabulation, measure of central tendency, measure of dispersion or variance, skewness measurements etc.
2. Inferential Analysis
The inferential statistical analysis allows to extrapolate the data acquired from a small sample size to the complete population. This analysis helps draw conclusions and make decisions about the whole population on the basis of sample data. It is a highly recommended statistical method for research projects that work with smaller sample size and meaning to extrapolate conclusion for large population.
3. Predictive Analysis
Predictive analysis is used to make a prediction of future events. This analysis is approached by marketing companies, insurance organizations, online service providers, data-driven marketing, and financial corporations.
4. Prescriptive Analysis
Prescriptive analysis examines data to find out what can be done next. It is widely used in business analysis for finding out the best possible outcome for a situation. It is nearly related to descriptive and predictive analysis. However, prescriptive analysis deals with giving appropriate suggestions among the available preferences.
5. Exploratory Data Analysis
EDA is generally the first step of the data analysis process that is conducted before performing any other statistical analysis technique. It completely focuses on analyzing patterns in the data to recognize potential relationships. EDA is used to discover unknown associations within data, inspect missing data from collected data and obtain maximum insights.
6. Causal Analysis
Causal analysis assists in understanding and determining the reasons behind “why” things happen in a certain way, as they appear. This analysis helps identify root cause of failures or simply find the basic reason why something could happen. For example, causal analysis is used to understand what will happen to the provided variable if another variable changes.
7. Mechanistic Analysis
This is a least common type of statistical analysis. The mechanistic analysis is used in the process of big data analytics and biological science. It uses the concept of understanding individual changes in variables that cause changes in other variables correspondingly while excluding external influences.
Important Statistical Tools In Research
Researchers in the biological field find statistical analysis in research as the scariest aspect of completing research. However, statistical tools in research can help researchers understand what to do with data and how to interpret the results, making this process as easy as possible.
1. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS)
It is a widely used software package for human behavior research. SPSS can compile descriptive statistics, as well as graphical depictions of result. Moreover, it includes the option to create scripts that automate analysis or carry out more advanced statistical processing.
2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
This software package is used among human behavior research and other fields. R is a powerful tool and has a steep learning curve. However, it requires a certain level of coding. Furthermore, it comes with an active community that is engaged in building and enhancing the software and the associated plugins.
3. MATLAB (The Mathworks)
It is an analytical platform and a programming language. Researchers and engineers use this software and create their own code and help answer their research question. While MatLab can be a difficult tool to use for novices, it offers flexibility in terms of what the researcher needs.
4. Microsoft Excel
Not the best solution for statistical analysis in research, but MS Excel offers wide variety of tools for data visualization and simple statistics. It is easy to generate summary and customizable graphs and figures. MS Excel is the most accessible option for those wanting to start with statistics.
5. Statistical Analysis Software (SAS)
It is a statistical platform used in business, healthcare, and human behavior research alike. It can carry out advanced analyzes and produce publication-worthy figures, tables and charts .
6. GraphPad Prism
It is a premium software that is primarily used among biology researchers. But, it offers a range of variety to be used in various other fields. Similar to SPSS, GraphPad gives scripting option to automate analyses to carry out complex statistical calculations.
This software offers basic as well as advanced statistical tools for data analysis. However, similar to GraphPad and SPSS, minitab needs command over coding and can offer automated analyses.
Use of Statistical Tools In Research and Data Analysis
Statistical tools manage the large data. Many biological studies use large data to analyze the trends and patterns in studies. Therefore, using statistical tools becomes essential, as they manage the large data sets, making data processing more convenient.
Following these steps will help biological researchers to showcase the statistics in research in detail, and develop accurate hypothesis and use correct tools for it.
There are a range of statistical tools in research which can help researchers manage their research data and improve the outcome of their research by better interpretation of data. You could use statistics in research by understanding the research question, knowledge of statistics and your personal experience in coding.
Have you faced challenges while using statistics in research? How did you manage it? Did you use any of the statistical tools to help you with your research data? Do write to us or comment below!
Frequently Asked Questions
Statistics in research can help a researcher approach the study in a stepwise manner: 1. Establishing a sample size 2. Testing of hypothesis 3. Data interpretation through analysis
Statistical methods are essential for scientific research. In fact, statistical methods dominate the scientific research as they include planning, designing, collecting data, analyzing, drawing meaningful interpretation and reporting of research findings. Furthermore, the results acquired from research project are meaningless raw data unless analyzed with statistical tools. Therefore, determining statistics in research is of utmost necessity to justify research findings.
Statistical tools in research can help researchers understand what to do with data and how to interpret the results, making this process as easy as possible. They can manage large data sets, making data processing more convenient. A great number of tools are available to carry out statistical analysis of data like SPSS, SAS (Statistical Analysis Software), and Minitab.
nice article to read
Holistic but delineating. A very good read.
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles
- Promoting Research
- Thought Leadership
- Trending Now
How Enago Academy Contributes to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Through Empowering Researchers
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a universal call to action to end…
Research Interviews: An effective and insightful way of data collection
Research interviews play a pivotal role in collecting data for various academic, scientific, and professional…
Planning Your Data Collection: Designing methods for effective research
Planning your research is very important to obtain desirable results. In research, the relevance of…
Best Plagiarism Checker Tool for Researchers — Top 4 to choose from!
While common writing issues like language enhancement, punctuation errors, grammatical errors, etc. can be dealt…
- Industry News
- Publishing News
2022 in a Nutshell — Reminiscing the year when opportunities were seized and feats were achieved!
It’s beginning to look a lot like success! Some of the greatest opportunities to research…
2022 in a Nutshell — Reminiscing the year when opportunities were seized and feats…
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
- 2000+ blog articles
- 50+ Webinars
- 10+ Expert podcasts
- 50+ Infographics
- 10+ Checklists
- Research Guides
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
- Publishing Research
- AI in Academia
- Career Corner
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Infographics
- Expert Video Library
- Other Resources
- Enago Learn
- Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
- Peer Review Week 2024
- Open Access Week 2023
- Conference Videos
- Enago Report
- Journal Finder
- Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
- Editing Services
- Publication Support Services
- Research Impact
- Translation Services
- Publication solutions
- AI-Based Solutions
- Call for Articles
- Call for Speakers
- Author Training
- Edit Profile
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
Which among these features would you prefer the most in a peer review assistant?
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Methodology
- Types of Research Designs Compared | Guide & Examples
Types of Research Designs Compared | Guide & Examples
Published on June 20, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on June 22, 2023.
When you start planning a research project, developing research questions and creating a research design , you will have to make various decisions about the type of research you want to do.
There are many ways to categorize different types of research. The words you use to describe your research depend on your discipline and field. In general, though, the form your research design takes will be shaped by:
- The type of knowledge you aim to produce
- The type of data you will collect and analyze
- The sampling methods , timescale and location of the research
This article takes a look at some common distinctions made between different types of research and outlines the key differences between them.
Table of contents
Types of research aims, types of research data, types of sampling, timescale, and location, other interesting articles.
The first thing to consider is what kind of knowledge your research aims to contribute.
Type of research | What’s the difference? | What to consider |
Basic vs. applied | Basic research aims to , while applied research aims to . | Do you want to expand scientific understanding or solve a practical problem? |
vs. | Exploratory research aims to , while explanatory research aims to . | How much is already known about your research problem? Are you conducting initial research on a newly-identified issue, or seeking precise conclusions about an established issue? |
| aims to , while aims to . | Is there already some theory on your research problem that you can use to develop , or do you want to propose new theories based on your findings? |
Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services
Discover proofreading & editing
The next thing to consider is what type of data you will collect. Each kind of data is associated with a range of specific research methods and procedures.
Type of research | What’s the difference? | What to consider |
Primary research vs secondary research | Primary data is (e.g., through or ), while secondary data (e.g., in government or scientific publications). | How much data is already available on your topic? Do you want to collect original data or analyze existing data (e.g., through a )? |
| , while . | Is your research more concerned with measuring something or interpreting something? You can also create a research design that has elements of both. |
vs | Descriptive research gathers data , while experimental research . | Do you want to identify characteristics, patterns and or test causal relationships between ? |
Finally, you have to consider three closely related questions: how will you select the subjects or participants of the research? When and how often will you collect data from your subjects? And where will the research take place?
Keep in mind that the methods that you choose bring with them different risk factors and types of research bias . Biases aren’t completely avoidable, but can heavily impact the validity and reliability of your findings if left unchecked.
Type of research | What’s the difference? | What to consider |
| allows you to , while allows you to draw conclusions . | Do you want to produce knowledge that applies to many contexts or detailed knowledge about a specific context (e.g. in a )? |
vs | Cross-sectional studies , while longitudinal studies . | Is your research question focused on understanding the current situation or tracking changes over time? |
Field research vs laboratory research | Field research takes place in , while laboratory research takes place in . | Do you want to find out how something occurs in the real world or draw firm conclusions about cause and effect? Laboratory experiments have higher but lower . |
Fixed design vs flexible design | In a fixed research design the subjects, timescale and location are begins, while in a flexible design these aspects may . | Do you want to test hypotheses and establish generalizable facts, or explore concepts and develop understanding? For measuring, testing and making generalizations, a fixed research design has higher . |
Choosing between all these different research types is part of the process of creating your research design , which determines exactly how your research will be conducted. But the type of research is only the first step: next, you have to make more concrete decisions about your research methods and the details of the study.
Read more about creating a research design
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Normal distribution
- Degrees of freedom
- Null hypothesis
- Discourse analysis
- Control groups
- Mixed methods research
- Non-probability sampling
- Quantitative research
- Ecological validity
Research bias
- Rosenthal effect
- Implicit bias
- Cognitive bias
- Selection bias
- Negativity bias
- Status quo bias
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. (2023, June 22). Types of Research Designs Compared | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/types-of-research/
Is this article helpful?
Shona McCombes
Other students also liked, what is a research design | types, guide & examples, qualitative vs. quantitative research | differences, examples & methods, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Indian J Anaesth
- v.60(9); 2016 Sep
Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis
Zulfiqar ali.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Neuroanaesthesiology, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
S Bala Bhaskar
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka, India
Statistical methods involved in carrying out a study include planning, designing, collecting data, analysing, drawing meaningful interpretation and reporting of the research findings. The statistical analysis gives meaning to the meaningless numbers, thereby breathing life into a lifeless data. The results and inferences are precise only if proper statistical tests are used. This article will try to acquaint the reader with the basic research tools that are utilised while conducting various studies. The article covers a brief outline of the variables, an understanding of quantitative and qualitative variables and the measures of central tendency. An idea of the sample size estimation, power analysis and the statistical errors is given. Finally, there is a summary of parametric and non-parametric tests used for data analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Statistics is a branch of science that deals with the collection, organisation, analysis of data and drawing of inferences from the samples to the whole population.[ 1 ] This requires a proper design of the study, an appropriate selection of the study sample and choice of a suitable statistical test. An adequate knowledge of statistics is necessary for proper designing of an epidemiological study or a clinical trial. Improper statistical methods may result in erroneous conclusions which may lead to unethical practice.[ 2 ]
Variable is a characteristic that varies from one individual member of population to another individual.[ 3 ] Variables such as height and weight are measured by some type of scale, convey quantitative information and are called as quantitative variables. Sex and eye colour give qualitative information and are called as qualitative variables[ 3 ] [ Figure 1 ].
Classification of variables
Quantitative variables
Quantitative or numerical data are subdivided into discrete and continuous measurements. Discrete numerical data are recorded as a whole number such as 0, 1, 2, 3,… (integer), whereas continuous data can assume any value. Observations that can be counted constitute the discrete data and observations that can be measured constitute the continuous data. Examples of discrete data are number of episodes of respiratory arrests or the number of re-intubations in an intensive care unit. Similarly, examples of continuous data are the serial serum glucose levels, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood and the oesophageal temperature.
A hierarchical scale of increasing precision can be used for observing and recording the data which is based on categorical, ordinal, interval and ratio scales [ Figure 1 ].
Categorical or nominal variables are unordered. The data are merely classified into categories and cannot be arranged in any particular order. If only two categories exist (as in gender male and female), it is called as a dichotomous (or binary) data. The various causes of re-intubation in an intensive care unit due to upper airway obstruction, impaired clearance of secretions, hypoxemia, hypercapnia, pulmonary oedema and neurological impairment are examples of categorical variables.
Ordinal variables have a clear ordering between the variables. However, the ordered data may not have equal intervals. Examples are the American Society of Anesthesiologists status or Richmond agitation-sedation scale.
Interval variables are similar to an ordinal variable, except that the intervals between the values of the interval variable are equally spaced. A good example of an interval scale is the Fahrenheit degree scale used to measure temperature. With the Fahrenheit scale, the difference between 70° and 75° is equal to the difference between 80° and 85°: The units of measurement are equal throughout the full range of the scale.
Ratio scales are similar to interval scales, in that equal differences between scale values have equal quantitative meaning. However, ratio scales also have a true zero point, which gives them an additional property. For example, the system of centimetres is an example of a ratio scale. There is a true zero point and the value of 0 cm means a complete absence of length. The thyromental distance of 6 cm in an adult may be twice that of a child in whom it may be 3 cm.
STATISTICS: DESCRIPTIVE AND INFERENTIAL STATISTICS
Descriptive statistics[ 4 ] try to describe the relationship between variables in a sample or population. Descriptive statistics provide a summary of data in the form of mean, median and mode. Inferential statistics[ 4 ] use a random sample of data taken from a population to describe and make inferences about the whole population. It is valuable when it is not possible to examine each member of an entire population. The examples if descriptive and inferential statistics are illustrated in Table 1 .
Example of descriptive and inferential statistics
Descriptive statistics
The extent to which the observations cluster around a central location is described by the central tendency and the spread towards the extremes is described by the degree of dispersion.
Measures of central tendency
The measures of central tendency are mean, median and mode.[ 6 ] Mean (or the arithmetic average) is the sum of all the scores divided by the number of scores. Mean may be influenced profoundly by the extreme variables. For example, the average stay of organophosphorus poisoning patients in ICU may be influenced by a single patient who stays in ICU for around 5 months because of septicaemia. The extreme values are called outliers. The formula for the mean is
where x = each observation and n = number of observations. Median[ 6 ] is defined as the middle of a distribution in a ranked data (with half of the variables in the sample above and half below the median value) while mode is the most frequently occurring variable in a distribution. Range defines the spread, or variability, of a sample.[ 7 ] It is described by the minimum and maximum values of the variables. If we rank the data and after ranking, group the observations into percentiles, we can get better information of the pattern of spread of the variables. In percentiles, we rank the observations into 100 equal parts. We can then describe 25%, 50%, 75% or any other percentile amount. The median is the 50 th percentile. The interquartile range will be the observations in the middle 50% of the observations about the median (25 th -75 th percentile). Variance[ 7 ] is a measure of how spread out is the distribution. It gives an indication of how close an individual observation clusters about the mean value. The variance of a population is defined by the following formula:
where σ 2 is the population variance, X is the population mean, X i is the i th element from the population and N is the number of elements in the population. The variance of a sample is defined by slightly different formula:
where s 2 is the sample variance, x is the sample mean, x i is the i th element from the sample and n is the number of elements in the sample. The formula for the variance of a population has the value ‘ n ’ as the denominator. The expression ‘ n −1’ is known as the degrees of freedom and is one less than the number of parameters. Each observation is free to vary, except the last one which must be a defined value. The variance is measured in squared units. To make the interpretation of the data simple and to retain the basic unit of observation, the square root of variance is used. The square root of the variance is the standard deviation (SD).[ 8 ] The SD of a population is defined by the following formula:
where σ is the population SD, X is the population mean, X i is the i th element from the population and N is the number of elements in the population. The SD of a sample is defined by slightly different formula:
where s is the sample SD, x is the sample mean, x i is the i th element from the sample and n is the number of elements in the sample. An example for calculation of variation and SD is illustrated in Table 2 .
Example of mean, variance, standard deviation
Normal distribution or Gaussian distribution
Most of the biological variables usually cluster around a central value, with symmetrical positive and negative deviations about this point.[ 1 ] The standard normal distribution curve is a symmetrical bell-shaped. In a normal distribution curve, about 68% of the scores are within 1 SD of the mean. Around 95% of the scores are within 2 SDs of the mean and 99% within 3 SDs of the mean [ Figure 2 ].
Normal distribution curve
Skewed distribution
It is a distribution with an asymmetry of the variables about its mean. In a negatively skewed distribution [ Figure 3 ], the mass of the distribution is concentrated on the right of Figure 1 . In a positively skewed distribution [ Figure 3 ], the mass of the distribution is concentrated on the left of the figure leading to a longer right tail.
Curves showing negatively skewed and positively skewed distribution
Inferential statistics
In inferential statistics, data are analysed from a sample to make inferences in the larger collection of the population. The purpose is to answer or test the hypotheses. A hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. Hypothesis tests are thus procedures for making rational decisions about the reality of observed effects.
Probability is the measure of the likelihood that an event will occur. Probability is quantified as a number between 0 and 1 (where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty).
In inferential statistics, the term ‘null hypothesis’ ( H 0 ‘ H-naught ,’ ‘ H-null ’) denotes that there is no relationship (difference) between the population variables in question.[ 9 ]
Alternative hypothesis ( H 1 and H a ) denotes that a statement between the variables is expected to be true.[ 9 ]
The P value (or the calculated probability) is the probability of the event occurring by chance if the null hypothesis is true. The P value is a numerical between 0 and 1 and is interpreted by researchers in deciding whether to reject or retain the null hypothesis [ Table 3 ].
P values with interpretation
If P value is less than the arbitrarily chosen value (known as α or the significance level), the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected [ Table 4 ]. However, if null hypotheses (H0) is incorrectly rejected, this is known as a Type I error.[ 11 ] Further details regarding alpha error, beta error and sample size calculation and factors influencing them are dealt with in another section of this issue by Das S et al .[ 12 ]
Illustration for null hypothesis
PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS
Numerical data (quantitative variables) that are normally distributed are analysed with parametric tests.[ 13 ]
Two most basic prerequisites for parametric statistical analysis are:
- The assumption of normality which specifies that the means of the sample group are normally distributed
- The assumption of equal variance which specifies that the variances of the samples and of their corresponding population are equal.
However, if the distribution of the sample is skewed towards one side or the distribution is unknown due to the small sample size, non-parametric[ 14 ] statistical techniques are used. Non-parametric tests are used to analyse ordinal and categorical data.
Parametric tests
The parametric tests assume that the data are on a quantitative (numerical) scale, with a normal distribution of the underlying population. The samples have the same variance (homogeneity of variances). The samples are randomly drawn from the population, and the observations within a group are independent of each other. The commonly used parametric tests are the Student's t -test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA.
Student's t -test
Student's t -test is used to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the means of the two groups. It is used in three circumstances:
where X = sample mean, u = population mean and SE = standard error of mean
where X 1 − X 2 is the difference between the means of the two groups and SE denotes the standard error of the difference.
- To test if the population means estimated by two dependent samples differ significantly (the paired t -test). A usual setting for paired t -test is when measurements are made on the same subjects before and after a treatment.
The formula for paired t -test is:
where d is the mean difference and SE denotes the standard error of this difference.
The group variances can be compared using the F -test. The F -test is the ratio of variances (var l/var 2). If F differs significantly from 1.0, then it is concluded that the group variances differ significantly.
Analysis of variance
The Student's t -test cannot be used for comparison of three or more groups. The purpose of ANOVA is to test if there is any significant difference between the means of two or more groups.
In ANOVA, we study two variances – (a) between-group variability and (b) within-group variability. The within-group variability (error variance) is the variation that cannot be accounted for in the study design. It is based on random differences present in our samples.
However, the between-group (or effect variance) is the result of our treatment. These two estimates of variances are compared using the F-test.
A simplified formula for the F statistic is:
where MS b is the mean squares between the groups and MS w is the mean squares within groups.
Repeated measures analysis of variance
As with ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA analyses the equality of means of three or more groups. However, a repeated measure ANOVA is used when all variables of a sample are measured under different conditions or at different points in time.
As the variables are measured from a sample at different points of time, the measurement of the dependent variable is repeated. Using a standard ANOVA in this case is not appropriate because it fails to model the correlation between the repeated measures: The data violate the ANOVA assumption of independence. Hence, in the measurement of repeated dependent variables, repeated measures ANOVA should be used.
Non-parametric tests
When the assumptions of normality are not met, and the sample means are not normally, distributed parametric tests can lead to erroneous results. Non-parametric tests (distribution-free test) are used in such situation as they do not require the normality assumption.[ 15 ] Non-parametric tests may fail to detect a significant difference when compared with a parametric test. That is, they usually have less power.
As is done for the parametric tests, the test statistic is compared with known values for the sampling distribution of that statistic and the null hypothesis is accepted or rejected. The types of non-parametric analysis techniques and the corresponding parametric analysis techniques are delineated in Table 5 .
Analogue of parametric and non-parametric tests
Median test for one sample: The sign test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test
The sign test and Wilcoxon's signed rank test are used for median tests of one sample. These tests examine whether one instance of sample data is greater or smaller than the median reference value.
This test examines the hypothesis about the median θ0 of a population. It tests the null hypothesis H0 = θ0. When the observed value (Xi) is greater than the reference value (θ0), it is marked as+. If the observed value is smaller than the reference value, it is marked as − sign. If the observed value is equal to the reference value (θ0), it is eliminated from the sample.
If the null hypothesis is true, there will be an equal number of + signs and − signs.
The sign test ignores the actual values of the data and only uses + or − signs. Therefore, it is useful when it is difficult to measure the values.
Wilcoxon's signed rank test
There is a major limitation of sign test as we lose the quantitative information of the given data and merely use the + or – signs. Wilcoxon's signed rank test not only examines the observed values in comparison with θ0 but also takes into consideration the relative sizes, adding more statistical power to the test. As in the sign test, if there is an observed value that is equal to the reference value θ0, this observed value is eliminated from the sample.
Wilcoxon's rank sum test ranks all data points in order, calculates the rank sum of each sample and compares the difference in the rank sums.
Mann-Whitney test
It is used to test the null hypothesis that two samples have the same median or, alternatively, whether observations in one sample tend to be larger than observations in the other.
Mann–Whitney test compares all data (xi) belonging to the X group and all data (yi) belonging to the Y group and calculates the probability of xi being greater than yi: P (xi > yi). The null hypothesis states that P (xi > yi) = P (xi < yi) =1/2 while the alternative hypothesis states that P (xi > yi) ≠1/2.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
The two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test was designed as a generic method to test whether two random samples are drawn from the same distribution. The null hypothesis of the KS test is that both distributions are identical. The statistic of the KS test is a distance between the two empirical distributions, computed as the maximum absolute difference between their cumulative curves.
Kruskal-Wallis test
The Kruskal–Wallis test is a non-parametric test to analyse the variance.[ 14 ] It analyses if there is any difference in the median values of three or more independent samples. The data values are ranked in an increasing order, and the rank sums calculated followed by calculation of the test statistic.
Jonckheere test
In contrast to Kruskal–Wallis test, in Jonckheere test, there is an a priori ordering that gives it a more statistical power than the Kruskal–Wallis test.[ 14 ]
Friedman test
The Friedman test is a non-parametric test for testing the difference between several related samples. The Friedman test is an alternative for repeated measures ANOVAs which is used when the same parameter has been measured under different conditions on the same subjects.[ 13 ]
Tests to analyse the categorical data
Chi-square test, Fischer's exact test and McNemar's test are used to analyse the categorical or nominal variables. The Chi-square test compares the frequencies and tests whether the observed data differ significantly from that of the expected data if there were no differences between groups (i.e., the null hypothesis). It is calculated by the sum of the squared difference between observed ( O ) and the expected ( E ) data (or the deviation, d ) divided by the expected data by the following formula:
A Yates correction factor is used when the sample size is small. Fischer's exact test is used to determine if there are non-random associations between two categorical variables. It does not assume random sampling, and instead of referring a calculated statistic to a sampling distribution, it calculates an exact probability. McNemar's test is used for paired nominal data. It is applied to 2 × 2 table with paired-dependent samples. It is used to determine whether the row and column frequencies are equal (that is, whether there is ‘marginal homogeneity’). The null hypothesis is that the paired proportions are equal. The Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test is a multivariate test as it analyses multiple grouping variables. It stratifies according to the nominated confounding variables and identifies any that affects the primary outcome variable. If the outcome variable is dichotomous, then logistic regression is used.
SOFTWARES AVAILABLE FOR STATISTICS, SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION AND POWER ANALYSIS
Numerous statistical software systems are available currently. The commonly used software systems are Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS – manufactured by IBM corporation), Statistical Analysis System ((SAS – developed by SAS Institute North Carolina, United States of America), R (designed by Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman from R core team), Minitab (developed by Minitab Inc), Stata (developed by StataCorp) and the MS Excel (developed by Microsoft).
There are a number of web resources which are related to statistical power analyses. A few are:
- StatPages.net – provides links to a number of online power calculators
- G-Power – provides a downloadable power analysis program that runs under DOS
- Power analysis for ANOVA designs an interactive site that calculates power or sample size needed to attain a given power for one effect in a factorial ANOVA design
- SPSS makes a program called SamplePower. It gives an output of a complete report on the computer screen which can be cut and paste into another document.
It is important that a researcher knows the concepts of the basic statistical methods used for conduct of a research study. This will help to conduct an appropriately well-designed study leading to valid and reliable results. Inappropriate use of statistical techniques may lead to faulty conclusions, inducing errors and undermining the significance of the article. Bad statistics may lead to bad research, and bad research may lead to unethical practice. Hence, an adequate knowledge of statistics and the appropriate use of statistical tests are important. An appropriate knowledge about the basic statistical methods will go a long way in improving the research designs and producing quality medical research which can be utilised for formulating the evidence-based guidelines.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest.
There are no conflicts of interest.
Qualitative vs Quantitative Research Methods & Data Analysis
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
The main difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the type of data they collect and analyze.
Quantitative data is information about quantities, and therefore numbers, and qualitative data is descriptive, and regards phenomenon which can be observed but not measured, such as language.
- Quantitative research collects numerical data and analyzes it using statistical methods. The aim is to produce objective, empirical data that can be measured and expressed numerically. Quantitative research is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and make predictions.
- Qualitative research gathers non-numerical data (words, images, sounds) to explore subjective experiences and attitudes, often via observation and interviews. It aims to produce detailed descriptions and uncover new insights about the studied phenomenon.
On This Page:
What Is Qualitative Research?
Qualitative research is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting non-numerical data, such as language. Qualitative research can be used to understand how an individual subjectively perceives and gives meaning to their social reality.
Qualitative data is non-numerical data, such as text, video, photographs, or audio recordings. This type of data can be collected using diary accounts or in-depth interviews and analyzed using grounded theory or thematic analysis.
Qualitative research is multimethod in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 2)
Interest in qualitative data came about as the result of the dissatisfaction of some psychologists (e.g., Carl Rogers) with the scientific study of psychologists such as behaviorists (e.g., Skinner ).
Since psychologists study people, the traditional approach to science is not seen as an appropriate way of carrying out research since it fails to capture the totality of human experience and the essence of being human. Exploring participants’ experiences is known as a phenomenological approach (re: Humanism ).
Qualitative research is primarily concerned with meaning, subjectivity, and lived experience. The goal is to understand the quality and texture of people’s experiences, how they make sense of them, and the implications for their lives.
Qualitative research aims to understand the social reality of individuals, groups, and cultures as nearly as possible as participants feel or live it. Thus, people and groups are studied in their natural setting.
Some examples of qualitative research questions are provided, such as what an experience feels like, how people talk about something, how they make sense of an experience, and how events unfold for people.
Research following a qualitative approach is exploratory and seeks to explain ‘how’ and ‘why’ a particular phenomenon, or behavior, operates as it does in a particular context. It can be used to generate hypotheses and theories from the data.
Qualitative Methods
There are different types of qualitative research methods, including diary accounts, in-depth interviews , documents, focus groups , case study research , and ethnography .
The results of qualitative methods provide a deep understanding of how people perceive their social realities and in consequence, how they act within the social world.
The researcher has several methods for collecting empirical materials, ranging from the interview to direct observation, to the analysis of artifacts, documents, and cultural records, to the use of visual materials or personal experience. Denzin and Lincoln (1994, p. 14)
Here are some examples of qualitative data:
Interview transcripts : Verbatim records of what participants said during an interview or focus group. They allow researchers to identify common themes and patterns, and draw conclusions based on the data. Interview transcripts can also be useful in providing direct quotes and examples to support research findings.
Observations : The researcher typically takes detailed notes on what they observe, including any contextual information, nonverbal cues, or other relevant details. The resulting observational data can be analyzed to gain insights into social phenomena, such as human behavior, social interactions, and cultural practices.
Unstructured interviews : generate qualitative data through the use of open questions. This allows the respondent to talk in some depth, choosing their own words. This helps the researcher develop a real sense of a person’s understanding of a situation.
Diaries or journals : Written accounts of personal experiences or reflections.
Notice that qualitative data could be much more than just words or text. Photographs, videos, sound recordings, and so on, can be considered qualitative data. Visual data can be used to understand behaviors, environments, and social interactions.
Qualitative Data Analysis
Qualitative research is endlessly creative and interpretive. The researcher does not just leave the field with mountains of empirical data and then easily write up his or her findings.
Qualitative interpretations are constructed, and various techniques can be used to make sense of the data, such as content analysis, grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), or discourse analysis .
For example, thematic analysis is a qualitative approach that involves identifying implicit or explicit ideas within the data. Themes will often emerge once the data has been coded .
Key Features
- Events can be understood adequately only if they are seen in context. Therefore, a qualitative researcher immerses her/himself in the field, in natural surroundings. The contexts of inquiry are not contrived; they are natural. Nothing is predefined or taken for granted.
- Qualitative researchers want those who are studied to speak for themselves, to provide their perspectives in words and other actions. Therefore, qualitative research is an interactive process in which the persons studied teach the researcher about their lives.
- The qualitative researcher is an integral part of the data; without the active participation of the researcher, no data exists.
- The study’s design evolves during the research and can be adjusted or changed as it progresses. For the qualitative researcher, there is no single reality. It is subjective and exists only in reference to the observer.
- The theory is data-driven and emerges as part of the research process, evolving from the data as they are collected.
Limitations of Qualitative Research
- Because of the time and costs involved, qualitative designs do not generally draw samples from large-scale data sets.
- The problem of adequate validity or reliability is a major criticism. Because of the subjective nature of qualitative data and its origin in single contexts, it is difficult to apply conventional standards of reliability and validity. For example, because of the central role played by the researcher in the generation of data, it is not possible to replicate qualitative studies.
- Also, contexts, situations, events, conditions, and interactions cannot be replicated to any extent, nor can generalizations be made to a wider context than the one studied with confidence.
- The time required for data collection, analysis, and interpretation is lengthy. Analysis of qualitative data is difficult, and expert knowledge of an area is necessary to interpret qualitative data. Great care must be taken when doing so, for example, looking for mental illness symptoms.
Advantages of Qualitative Research
- Because of close researcher involvement, the researcher gains an insider’s view of the field. This allows the researcher to find issues that are often missed (such as subtleties and complexities) by the scientific, more positivistic inquiries.
- Qualitative descriptions can be important in suggesting possible relationships, causes, effects, and dynamic processes.
- Qualitative analysis allows for ambiguities/contradictions in the data, which reflect social reality (Denscombe, 2010).
- Qualitative research uses a descriptive, narrative style; this research might be of particular benefit to the practitioner as she or he could turn to qualitative reports to examine forms of knowledge that might otherwise be unavailable, thereby gaining new insight.
What Is Quantitative Research?
Quantitative research involves the process of objectively collecting and analyzing numerical data to describe, predict, or control variables of interest.
The goals of quantitative research are to test causal relationships between variables , make predictions, and generalize results to wider populations.
Quantitative researchers aim to establish general laws of behavior and phenomenon across different settings/contexts. Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.
Quantitative Methods
Experiments typically yield quantitative data, as they are concerned with measuring things. However, other research methods, such as controlled observations and questionnaires , can produce both quantitative information.
For example, a rating scale or closed questions on a questionnaire would generate quantitative data as these produce either numerical data or data that can be put into categories (e.g., “yes,” “no” answers).
Experimental methods limit how research participants react to and express appropriate social behavior.
Findings are, therefore, likely to be context-bound and simply a reflection of the assumptions that the researcher brings to the investigation.
There are numerous examples of quantitative data in psychological research, including mental health. Here are a few examples:
Another example is the Experience in Close Relationships Scale (ECR), a self-report questionnaire widely used to assess adult attachment styles .
The ECR provides quantitative data that can be used to assess attachment styles and predict relationship outcomes.
Neuroimaging data : Neuroimaging techniques, such as MRI and fMRI, provide quantitative data on brain structure and function.
This data can be analyzed to identify brain regions involved in specific mental processes or disorders.
For example, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a clinician-administered questionnaire widely used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals.
The BDI consists of 21 questions, each scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Quantitative Data Analysis
Statistics help us turn quantitative data into useful information to help with decision-making. We can use statistics to summarize our data, describing patterns, relationships, and connections. Statistics can be descriptive or inferential.
Descriptive statistics help us to summarize our data. In contrast, inferential statistics are used to identify statistically significant differences between groups of data (such as intervention and control groups in a randomized control study).
- Quantitative researchers try to control extraneous variables by conducting their studies in the lab.
- The research aims for objectivity (i.e., without bias) and is separated from the data.
- The design of the study is determined before it begins.
- For the quantitative researcher, the reality is objective, exists separately from the researcher, and can be seen by anyone.
- Research is used to test a theory and ultimately support or reject it.
Limitations of Quantitative Research
- Context: Quantitative experiments do not take place in natural settings. In addition, they do not allow participants to explain their choices or the meaning of the questions they may have for those participants (Carr, 1994).
- Researcher expertise: Poor knowledge of the application of statistical analysis may negatively affect analysis and subsequent interpretation (Black, 1999).
- Variability of data quantity: Large sample sizes are needed for more accurate analysis. Small-scale quantitative studies may be less reliable because of the low quantity of data (Denscombe, 2010). This also affects the ability to generalize study findings to wider populations.
- Confirmation bias: The researcher might miss observing phenomena because of focus on theory or hypothesis testing rather than on the theory of hypothesis generation.
Advantages of Quantitative Research
- Scientific objectivity: Quantitative data can be interpreted with statistical analysis, and since statistics are based on the principles of mathematics, the quantitative approach is viewed as scientifically objective and rational (Carr, 1994; Denscombe, 2010).
- Useful for testing and validating already constructed theories.
- Rapid analysis: Sophisticated software removes much of the need for prolonged data analysis, especially with large volumes of data involved (Antonius, 2003).
- Replication: Quantitative data is based on measured values and can be checked by others because numerical data is less open to ambiguities of interpretation.
- Hypotheses can also be tested because of statistical analysis (Antonius, 2003).
Antonius, R. (2003). Interpreting quantitative data with SPSS . Sage.
Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design, measurement and statistics . Sage.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3, 77–101.
Carr, L. T. (1994). The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research : what method for nursing? Journal of advanced nursing, 20(4) , 716-721.
Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research. McGraw Hill.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln. Y. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications Inc.
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4) , 364.
Minichiello, V. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Longman Cheshire.
Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage
Further Information
- Mixed methods research
- Designing qualitative research
- Methods of data collection and analysis
- Introduction to quantitative and qualitative research
- Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
- Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
- Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach
- Using the framework method for the analysis of
- Qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research
- Content Analysis
- Grounded Theory
- Thematic Analysis
- Tips & Tricks
- Website & Apps
- ChatGPT Blogs
- ChatGPT News
- ChatGPT Tutorial
Types of Research Methods Explained with Examples
Research methods are the various strategies, techniques, and tools that researchers use to collect and analyze data . These methods help researchers find answers to their questions and gain a better understanding of different topics. Whether conducting experiments, surveys, or interviews, choosing the right research method is crucial for obtaining accurate and reliable results.
In the ever-evolving world of academia and professional inquiry, understanding the various research methods is crucial for anyone looking to delve into a new study or project. Research is a systematic investigation aimed at discovering and interpreting facts , plays a pivotal role in expanding our knowledge across various fields.
Table of Content
What is Research?
Types of research methods, types of research methodology, difference between qualitative and quantitative research.
This article will explore the different types of research methods , how they are used, and their importance in the world of research.
Research is the process of studying a subject in detail to discover new information or understand it better. This can be anything from studying plants or animals, to learning how people think and behave, to finding new ways to cure diseases. People do research by asking questions, collecting information, and then looking at that information to find answers or learn new things.
This table provides a quick reference to understand the key aspects of each research type.
Research Methods | Focus | Methodology | Applications |
Qualitative | Human behavior | Interviews, Observations | Social Sciences |
Quantitative | Data quantification | Statistical Analysis | Natural Sciences |
Descriptive | Phenomenon description | Surveys, Observations | Demographics |
Analytical | Underlying reasons | Data Comparison | Scientific Research |
Applied | Practical solutions | Collaborative Research | Healthcare |
Fundamental | Knowledge expansion | Theoretical Research | Physics, Math |
Exploratory | Undefined problems | Secondary Research | Product Development |
Conclusive | Decision-making | Experiments, Testing | Market Research |
1. Qualitative Research
Qualitative research method is a methodological approach primarily used in fields like social sciences, anthropology, and psychology . It’s aimed at understanding human behavior and the motivations behind it. Qualitative research delves into the nature of phenomena through detailed, in-depth exploration.
Definition and Approach: Qualitative research focuses on understanding human behavior and the reasons that govern such behavior. It involves in-depth analysis of non-numerical data like texts, videos, or audio recordings.
Key Features:
- Emphasis on exploring complex phenomena
- Involves interviews, focus groups , and observations
- Generates rich, detailed data that are often subjective
Applications: Widely used in social sciences, marketing, and user experience research.
2. Quantitative Research
Quantitative research method is a systematic approach used in various scientific fields to quantify data and generalize findings from a sample to a larger population.
Definition and Approach: Quantitative research is centered around quantifying data and generalizing results from a sample to the population of interest. It involves statistical analysis and numerical data .
- Relies on structured data collection instruments
- Large sample sizes for generalizability
- Statistical methods to establish relationships between variables
Applications: Common in natural sciences, economics, and market research.
3. Descriptive Research
Descriptive research is a type of research method that is used to describe characteristics of a population or phenomenon being studied . It does not answer questions about how or why things are the way they are. Instead, it focuses on providing a snapshot of current conditions or describing what exists.
Definition and Approach: This Types of Research method aims to accurately describe characteristics of a particular phenomenon or population.
- Provides detailed insights without explaining why or how something happens
- Involves surveys and observations
- Often used as a preliminary research method
Applications: Used in demographic studies, census, and organizational reporting.
4. Analytical Research
Analytical research is a type of research that s eeks to understand the underlying factors or causes behind phenomena or relationships . It goes beyond descriptive research by attempting to explain why things happen and how they happen.
Definition and Approach: Analytical research method goes beyond description to understand the underlying reasons or causes.
- Involves comparing data and facts to make evaluations
- Critical thinking is a key component
- Often hypothesis-driven
Applications: Useful in scientific research, policy analysis, and business strategy.
5. Applied Research
Applied research is a type of scientific research method that aims to solve specific practical problems or address practical questions . Unlike fundamental research, which seeks to expand knowledge for knowledge’s sake, applied research is directed towards solving real-world issues .
Definition and Approach: Applied research focuses on finding solutions to practical problems.
- Direct practical application
- Often collaborative , involving stakeholders
- Results are immediately applicable
Applications: Used in healthcare, engineering, and technology development.
6. Fundamental Research
Fundamental research, also known as basic research or pure research, is a type of scientific research method that aims to expand the existing knowledge base. It is driven by curiosity, interest in a particular subject, or the pursuit of knowledge for knowledge’s sake , rather than with a specific practical application in mind.
Definition and Approach: Also known as basic or pure research, it aims to expand knowledge without a direct application in mind.
- Theoretical framework
- Focus on understanding fundamental principles
- Long-term in nature
Applications: Foundational in fields like physics, mathematics, and social sciences.
7. Exploratory Research
Exploratory research is a type of research method conducted for a problem that has not been clearly defined. Its primary goal is to gain insights and familiarity with the problem or to gain more information about a topic. Exploratory research is often conducted when a researcher or investigator does not know much about the issue and is looking to gather more information.
Definition and Approach: This type of research is conducted for a problem that has not been clearly defined.
- Flexible and unstructured
- Used to identify potential hypotheses
- Relies on secondary research like reviewing available literature
Applications: Often the first step in social science research and product development.
8. Conclusive Research
Conclusive research, also known as confirmatory research, is a type of research method that aims to confirm or deny a hypotheses or provide answers to specific research questions. It is used to make conclusive decisions or draw conclusions about the relationships among variables.
Definition and Approach: Conclusive research is designed to provide information that is useful in decision-making.
- Structured and methodical
- Aims to test hypotheses
- Involves experiments, surveys, and testing
Applications: Used in market research, clinical trials, and policy evaluations.
Here is detailed difference between the qualitative and quantitative research –
| | |
| Focuses on exploring ideas, understanding concepts, and gathering insights. | Involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to describe, predict, or control variables of interest. |
| To gain a deep understanding of underlying reasons, motivations, and opinions. | To quantify data and generalize results from a sample to a larger population. |
| Non-numerical data such as words, images, or objects. | Numerical data, often in the form of numbers and statistics. |
| Interviews, focus groups, observations, and review of documents or artifacts. | Surveys, experiments, , and numerical measurements. |
| Interpretive, subjective analysis aimed at understanding context and complexity. | Statistical, objective analysis focused on quantifying data and generalizing findings. |
| Descriptive, detailed narrative or thematic analysis. | Statistical results, often presented in charts, tables, or graphs. |
| Generally smaller, focused on depth rather than breadth. | Larger to ensure statistical significance and representativeness. |
| High flexibility in research design, allowing for changes as the study progresses. | Structured and fixed design, with little room for changes once the study begins. |
| Exploratory, open-ended, and subjective. | Conclusive, closed-ended, and objective. |
| Social sciences, humanities, psychology, and market research for understanding behaviors and experiences. | Natural sciences, economics, and large-scale market research for testing hypotheses and making predictions. |
| Provides depth and detail, offers a more human touch and context, good for exploring new areas. | Allows for a broader study, involving a greater number of subjects, and enhances generalizability of results. |
| Can be time-consuming, harder to generalize due to small sample size, and may be subject to researcher bias. | May overlook the richness of context, less effective in understanding complex social phenomena. |
Understanding the different types of research methods is crucial for anyone embarking on a research project. Each type has its unique approach, methodology, and application area, making it essential to choose the right type for your specific research question or problem. This guide serves as a starting point for researchers to explore and select the most suitable research method for their needs, ensuring effective and reliable outcomes.
Types of Research Methods – FAQs
What are the 4 main types of research methods.
There are four main types of Quantitative research: Descriptive, Correlational, Causal-Comparative/Quasi-Experimental, and Experimental Research . attempts to establish cause- effect relationships among the variables. These types of design are very similar to true experiments, but with some key differences.
What are the 5 main purpose of research?
The primary purposes of basic research (as opposed to applied research) are documentation, discovery, interpretation, and the research and development (R&D) of methods and systems for the advancement of human knowledge .
What are 7 C’s of research?
The 7 C’s define the principles that are essential for conducting rigorous and credible research. They are Curiosity, Clarity, Conciseness, Correctness, Completeness, Coherence, Credibility.
- General Knowledge
- SSC/Banking
- tech-updates
Please Login to comment...
Types of irony explained (with examples), why can't a country print more currency - explained.
When is Easter 2024? - Date, Traditions, and Symbols Explained
What is youtube kids an app made just for kids, explained.
The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes' Ending Explained: The Director and Producer Break It Down (Exclusive)
Project 2025 Explained: Impact on Public Health, Trump's Agenda, and Biden-Harris Opposition - Latest News
List of research institutes in india, studentship program for ayurveda research ken (spark), innovation in science pursuit for inspired research (inspire) programme, cognitive science research initiative (csri) - full form, history and objectives.
- 105 Funny Things to Do to Make Someone Laugh
- Best PS5 SSDs in 2024: Top Picks for Expanding Your Storage
- Best Nintendo Switch Controllers in 2024
- Xbox Game Pass Ultimate: Features, Benefits, and Pricing in 2024
- #geekstreak2024 – 21 Days POTD Challenge Powered By Deutsche Bank
Improve your Coding Skills with Practice
What kind of Experience do you want to share?
Home » Quantitative Data – Types, Methods and Examples
Quantitative Data – Types, Methods and Examples
Table of Contents
Quantitative Data
Definition:
Quantitative data refers to numerical data that can be measured or counted. This type of data is often used in scientific research and is typically collected through methods such as surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis.
Quantitative Data Types
There are two main types of quantitative data: discrete and continuous.
- Discrete data: Discrete data refers to numerical values that can only take on specific, distinct values. This type of data is typically represented as whole numbers and cannot be broken down into smaller units. Examples of discrete data include the number of students in a class, the number of cars in a parking lot, and the number of children in a family.
- Continuous data: Continuous data refers to numerical values that can take on any value within a certain range or interval. This type of data is typically represented as decimal or fractional values and can be broken down into smaller units. Examples of continuous data include measurements of height, weight, temperature, and time.
Quantitative Data Collection Methods
There are several common methods for collecting quantitative data. Some of these methods include:
- Surveys : Surveys involve asking a set of standardized questions to a large number of people. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, via email or online, and can be used to collect data on a wide range of topics.
- Experiments : Experiments involve manipulating one or more variables and observing the effects on a specific outcome. Experiments can be conducted in a controlled laboratory setting or in the real world.
- Observational studies : Observational studies involve observing and collecting data on a specific phenomenon without intervening or manipulating any variables. Observational studies can be conducted in a natural setting or in a laboratory.
- Secondary data analysis : Secondary data analysis involves using existing data that was collected for a different purpose to answer a new research question. This method can be cost-effective and efficient, but it is important to ensure that the data is appropriate for the research question being studied.
- Physiological measures: Physiological measures involve collecting data on biological or physiological processes, such as heart rate, blood pressure, or brain activity.
- Computerized tracking: Computerized tracking involves collecting data automatically from electronic sources, such as social media, online purchases, or website analytics.
Quantitative Data Analysis Methods
There are several methods for analyzing quantitative data, including:
- Descriptive statistics: Descriptive statistics are used to summarize and describe the basic features of the data, such as the mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and range.
- Inferential statistics : Inferential statistics are used to make generalizations about a population based on a sample of data. These methods include hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and regression analysis.
- Data visualization: Data visualization involves creating charts, graphs, and other visual representations of the data to help identify patterns and trends. Common types of data visualization include histograms, scatterplots, and bar charts.
- Time series analysis: Time series analysis involves analyzing data that is collected over time to identify patterns and trends in the data.
- Multivariate analysis : Multivariate analysis involves analyzing data with multiple variables to identify relationships between the variables.
- Factor analysis : Factor analysis involves identifying underlying factors or dimensions that explain the variation in the data.
- Cluster analysis: Cluster analysis involves identifying groups or clusters of observations that are similar to each other based on multiple variables.
Quantitative Data Formats
Quantitative data can be represented in different formats, depending on the nature of the data and the purpose of the analysis. Here are some common formats:
- Tables : Tables are a common way to present quantitative data, particularly when the data involves multiple variables. Tables can be used to show the frequency or percentage of data in different categories or to display summary statistics.
- Charts and graphs: Charts and graphs are useful for visualizing quantitative data and can be used to highlight patterns and trends in the data. Some common types of charts and graphs include line charts, bar charts, scatterplots, and pie charts.
- Databases : Quantitative data can be stored in databases, which allow for easy sorting, filtering, and analysis of large amounts of data.
- Spreadsheets : Spreadsheets can be used to organize and analyze quantitative data, particularly when the data is relatively small in size. Spreadsheets allow for calculations and data manipulation, as well as the creation of charts and graphs.
- Statistical software : Statistical software, such as SPSS, R, and SAS, can be used to analyze quantitative data. These programs allow for more advanced statistical analyses and data modeling, as well as the creation of charts and graphs.
Quantitative Data Gathering Guide
Here is a basic guide for gathering quantitative data:
- Define the research question: The first step in gathering quantitative data is to clearly define the research question. This will help determine the type of data to be collected, the sample size, and the methods of data analysis.
- Choose the data collection method: Select the appropriate method for collecting data based on the research question and available resources. This could include surveys, experiments, observational studies, or other methods.
- Determine the sample size: Determine the appropriate sample size for the research question. This will depend on the level of precision needed and the variability of the population being studied.
- Develop the data collection instrument: Develop a questionnaire or survey instrument that will be used to collect the data. The instrument should be designed to gather the specific information needed to answer the research question.
- Pilot test the data collection instrument : Before collecting data from the entire sample, pilot test the instrument on a small group to identify any potential problems or issues.
- Collect the data: Collect the data from the selected sample using the chosen data collection method.
- Clean and organize the data : Organize the data into a format that can be easily analyzed. This may involve checking for missing data, outliers, or errors.
- Analyze the data: Analyze the data using appropriate statistical methods. This may involve descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, or other types of analysis.
- Interpret the results: Interpret the results of the analysis in the context of the research question. Identify any patterns, trends, or relationships in the data and draw conclusions based on the findings.
- Communicate the findings: Communicate the findings of the analysis in a clear and concise manner, using appropriate tables, graphs, and other visual aids as necessary. The results should be presented in a way that is accessible to the intended audience.
Examples of Quantitative Data
Here are some examples of quantitative data:
- Height of a person (measured in inches or centimeters)
- Weight of a person (measured in pounds or kilograms)
- Temperature (measured in Fahrenheit or Celsius)
- Age of a person (measured in years)
- Number of cars sold in a month
- Amount of rainfall in a specific area (measured in inches or millimeters)
- Number of hours worked in a week
- GPA (grade point average) of a student
- Sales figures for a product
- Time taken to complete a task.
- Distance traveled (measured in miles or kilometers)
- Speed of an object (measured in miles per hour or kilometers per hour)
- Number of people attending an event
- Price of a product (measured in dollars or other currency)
- Blood pressure (measured in millimeters of mercury)
- Amount of sugar in a food item (measured in grams)
- Test scores (measured on a numerical scale)
- Number of website visitors per day
- Stock prices (measured in dollars)
- Crime rates (measured by the number of crimes per 100,000 people)
Applications of Quantitative Data
Quantitative data has a wide range of applications across various fields, including:
- Scientific research: Quantitative data is used extensively in scientific research to test hypotheses and draw conclusions. For example, in biology, researchers might use quantitative data to measure the growth rate of cells or the effectiveness of a drug treatment.
- Business and economics: Quantitative data is used to analyze business and economic trends, forecast future performance, and make data-driven decisions. For example, a company might use quantitative data to analyze sales figures and customer demographics to determine which products are most popular among which segments of their customer base.
- Education: Quantitative data is used in education to measure student performance, evaluate teaching methods, and identify areas where improvement is needed. For example, a teacher might use quantitative data to track the progress of their students over the course of a semester and adjust their teaching methods accordingly.
- Public policy: Quantitative data is used in public policy to evaluate the effectiveness of policies and programs, identify areas where improvement is needed, and develop evidence-based solutions. For example, a government agency might use quantitative data to evaluate the impact of a social welfare program on poverty rates.
- Healthcare : Quantitative data is used in healthcare to evaluate the effectiveness of medical treatments, track the spread of diseases, and identify risk factors for various health conditions. For example, a doctor might use quantitative data to monitor the blood pressure levels of their patients over time and adjust their treatment plan accordingly.
Purpose of Quantitative Data
The purpose of quantitative data is to provide a numerical representation of a phenomenon or observation. Quantitative data is used to measure and describe the characteristics of a population or sample, and to test hypotheses and draw conclusions based on statistical analysis. Some of the key purposes of quantitative data include:
- Measuring and describing : Quantitative data is used to measure and describe the characteristics of a population or sample, such as age, income, or education level. This allows researchers to better understand the population they are studying.
- Testing hypotheses: Quantitative data is often used to test hypotheses and theories by collecting numerical data and analyzing it using statistical methods. This can help researchers determine whether there is a statistically significant relationship between variables or whether there is support for a particular theory.
- Making predictions : Quantitative data can be used to make predictions about future events or trends based on past data. This is often done through statistical modeling or time series analysis.
- Evaluating programs and policies: Quantitative data is often used to evaluate the effectiveness of programs and policies. This can help policymakers and program managers identify areas where improvements can be made and make evidence-based decisions about future programs and policies.
When to use Quantitative Data
Quantitative data is appropriate to use when you want to collect and analyze numerical data that can be measured and analyzed using statistical methods. Here are some situations where quantitative data is typically used:
- When you want to measure a characteristic or behavior : If you want to measure something like the height or weight of a population or the number of people who smoke, you would use quantitative data to collect this information.
- When you want to compare groups: If you want to compare two or more groups, such as comparing the effectiveness of two different medical treatments, you would use quantitative data to collect and analyze the data.
- When you want to test a hypothesis : If you have a hypothesis or theory that you want to test, you would use quantitative data to collect data that can be analyzed statistically to determine whether your hypothesis is supported by the data.
- When you want to make predictions: If you want to make predictions about future trends or events, such as predicting sales for a new product, you would use quantitative data to collect and analyze data from past trends to make your prediction.
- When you want to evaluate a program or policy : If you want to evaluate the effectiveness of a program or policy, you would use quantitative data to collect data about the program or policy and analyze it statistically to determine whether it has had the intended effect.
Characteristics of Quantitative Data
Quantitative data is characterized by several key features, including:
- Numerical values : Quantitative data consists of numerical values that can be measured and counted. These values are often expressed in terms of units, such as dollars, centimeters, or kilograms.
- Continuous or discrete : Quantitative data can be either continuous or discrete. Continuous data can take on any value within a certain range, while discrete data can only take on certain values.
- Objective: Quantitative data is objective, meaning that it is not influenced by personal biases or opinions. It is based on empirical evidence that can be measured and analyzed using statistical methods.
- Large sample size: Quantitative data is often collected from a large sample size in order to ensure that the results are statistically significant and representative of the population being studied.
- Statistical analysis: Quantitative data is typically analyzed using statistical methods to determine patterns, relationships, and other characteristics of the data. This allows researchers to make more objective conclusions based on empirical evidence.
- Precision : Quantitative data is often very precise, with measurements taken to multiple decimal points or significant figures. This precision allows for more accurate analysis and interpretation of the data.
Advantages of Quantitative Data
Some advantages of quantitative data are:
- Objectivity : Quantitative data is usually objective because it is based on measurable and observable variables. This means that different people who collect the same data will generally get the same results.
- Precision : Quantitative data provides precise measurements of variables. This means that it is easier to make comparisons and draw conclusions from quantitative data.
- Replicability : Since quantitative data is based on objective measurements, it is often easier to replicate research studies using the same or similar data.
- Generalizability : Quantitative data allows researchers to generalize findings to a larger population. This is because quantitative data is often collected using random sampling methods, which help to ensure that the data is representative of the population being studied.
- Statistical analysis : Quantitative data can be analyzed using statistical methods, which allows researchers to test hypotheses and draw conclusions about the relationships between variables.
- Efficiency : Quantitative data can often be collected quickly and efficiently using surveys or other standardized instruments, which makes it a cost-effective way to gather large amounts of data.
Limitations of Quantitative Data
Some Limitations of Quantitative Data are as follows:
- Limited context: Quantitative data does not provide information about the context in which the data was collected. This can make it difficult to understand the meaning behind the numbers.
- Limited depth: Quantitative data is often limited to predetermined variables and questions, which may not capture the complexity of the phenomenon being studied.
- Difficulty in capturing qualitative aspects: Quantitative data is unable to capture the subjective experiences and qualitative aspects of human behavior, such as emotions, attitudes, and motivations.
- Possibility of bias: The collection and interpretation of quantitative data can be influenced by biases, such as sampling bias, measurement bias, or researcher bias.
- Simplification of complex phenomena: Quantitative data may oversimplify complex phenomena by reducing them to numerical measurements and statistical analyses.
- Lack of flexibility: Quantitative data collection methods may not allow for changes or adaptations in the research process, which can limit the ability to respond to unexpected findings or new insights.
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
Secondary Data – Types, Methods and Examples
Primary Data – Types, Methods and Examples
Qualitative Data – Types, Methods and Examples
Information in Research – Types and Examples
Research Data – Types Methods and Examples
How to Use Data Triangulation in Qualitative Research
In qualitative research, data triangulation means approaching a question from multiple perspectives.
It involves using more than one data source or method to investigate a theory or corroborate a finding.
For something with such a mathematical-sounding name, it’s a pretty simple concept. But it’s a powerful one, too. Ask a group of five boaters why their watercraft sank in the sea and you’ll get five slightly different stories. Each individual tale holds the bias of its teller. Taken together, though, the individual accounts form a deeper and more accurate picture of what went wrong.
This logic applies to qualitative research. Since qualitative data isn’t as cut-and-dry as quantitative data , you need more than one perspective, data type, and method to shore it up.
With triangulation, you give the results a stronger platform to stand on.
When to Use Data Triangulation with Qualitative Data
If you ask me, there’s never a bad time to do data triangulation when you’re working with qualitative data.
From a researcher’s point of view, triangulation can help you verify key details and strengthen your findings—and your argument.
And if you’re someone who uses qualitative data to inform your business decisions, gathering data from multiple sources is smart. It can help you make critical choices with a level of confidence you wouldn’t (and shouldn’t) have if you relied on just one source.
In a 2014 journal article published in the Oncology Nursing Forum titled, “ The use of triangulation in qualitative research ,” authors Nancy Carter, et al., lay out two views of data triangulation.
They argue that it’s both “the use of multiple methods or data sources in qualitative research to develop a comprehensive understanding of phenomena” and “a qualitative research strategy to test validity through the convergence of information from different sources.”
Put into simpler words, qualitative data triangulation helps us:
- Gain a fuller understanding of a research topic or argument
- Put our research to the test by comparing and contrasting it with different sources on the same topic
Well-rounded arguments benefit everyone, all the time.
So if you’ve been on the fence about whether to draw sources from more than one place or use more than one method in your research, consider this your sign.
Do it.
How to Do Qualitative Data Triangulation
Before you begin running qualitative data triangulation, it’s helpful to know the four types, as outlined by Carter et al.:
- Method triangulation: Using two or more methods to gather data
- Investigator triangulation: Relying on the involvement of more than one researcher to collect or analyze the data
- Theory triangulation: Analyzing the data using different theoretical perspectives
- Data source triangulation: Drawing information from multiple data sources, including those from different times, places, and people
Knowing which type of triangulation to focus on can be tricky.
We’ll explore each type in more detail and suggest questions to ask yourself when you’re tackling the beginning of the triangulation process.
Method triangulation
Method triangulation means using a variety of research methods to study the same topic. In qualitative research, the most common data-gathering methods are:
- Focus groups
- Observation
- Open-ended surveys or questionnaires
So, in qualitative research, method triangulation means gathering data using at least two of these methods.
But method triangulation can also mean looping in non-qualitative forms of data collection, like demographic information or responses to closed-question (yes-or-no and/or multiple-choice) surveys. Since we’re focusing on qualitative data here, though, we’ll save mixed-method triangulation for another day.
Right now, our lens is firmly focused on qualitative research.
Use method triangulation when:
- Leaning heavily on one method will only give you a partial view of your research question or topic. Say you’re sending out a survey to find what people find most stressful about in-person grocery shopping. You get some interesting answers, but you want to dig deeper. You decide to send a group of shoppers into a store with cash and a grocery list to observe their lived, in-the-moment experiences. Along with the survey responses, you now have a more complete picture of common grocery-shopping stressors.
- You need to cross-validate findings from different methods . Imagine you’re doing in-depth interviews with employees to understand their job satisfaction. At the same time, you want to see if these self-reported experiences align with behaviors you can observe during the workday. You decide to pair the interviews with direct workplace observations. The goal? To see whether the employees’ daily actions match their satisfaction levels. If you see any inconsistencies, you can go over them with the interviewee for a more accurate picture of their experience.
Investigator Triangulation
The goal of investigator triangulation is to have more than one researcher (or team of researchers) analyze the same set of data. Like a peer review for a scholarly journal article, investigator triangulation helps reduce bias. This, in turn, strengthens the credibility of your research.
But you have to be careful not to invite researchers with your same opinions and biases to participate in this type of triangulation. You don’t want them to confirm everything you’ve researched. You want them to read it line by line, grappling with the information and pushing you to see it in a new light.
Reach out to people in different—but related—fields. Invite them to collaborate by analyzing your research and engaging with it from their own viewpoints. Listen carefully to what they have to say—don’t just dismiss it because you don’t see things the same way.
This is how you’ll get the most well-rounded analysis of your qualitative research.
Use investigator triangulation when:
- The research involves subjective interpretations or complex topics. If your data could be viewed differently depending on the researcher’s perspective, then you need fresh eyes to look at it. If you’re studying how patients perceive care in a hospital setting, for example, one researcher might focus on emotional aspects like empathy. Another might not consider this at all and instead focus on how efficient the care is. Both perspectives are important to your research.
- The topic is sensitive or controversial. If you feel like your data is going to ignite a firestorm of controversy, you need extra eyes. Lots of them. The more scrutiny before the data gets published or used to inform a decision, the better. You want minimal personal bias—and maximum credibility .
Theory Triangulation
With theory triangulation, you aren’t using different data collection methods or bringing in researchers with unique viewpoints.
Instead, you’re changing the lens through which you see the data.
This approach challenges researchers to set aside their original theories for analyzing information. It invites them to use at least one additional, theoretical perspective when they sit down to interpret the data.
Researchers usually use theory triangulation when their topic spans more than one discipline. If you were studying human grocery shopping behavior, for instance, you could analyze the results through three lenses:
- Psychological : Study how individual decision-making processes, emotions, and cognitive biases affect shopping choices. Does impulse buying play a role? What about decision fatigue?
- Sociological : Examine the influence of social factors. Do cultural norms, peer pressure, or family dynamics affect shopping habits? Does social class impact purchasing behavior? If so, how?
- Economic : Analyze the shoppers’ behavior through the lens of cost-benefit analysis, budget limits, and price sensitivity. How do incentives like discounts or promotions influence purchases—or not?
Basically, theory triangulation pushes you to consider things from viewpoints you hadn’t before. And it can make the results a lot meatier than if you relied on a single theory.
Use theory triangulation when:
- You are studying a complex topic that could use a few different theoretical perspectives to be understood. Say you’re looking at the factors behind employee motivation. You might use psychological theories like Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs to explore intrinsic motivators. Next, you could use economic theories to study how external factors like financial incentives influence performance.
- You want to compare or test the validity of multiple theories to see which framework best fits your data. Let’s imagine you’re studying educational outcomes. You could compare Constructivist Theory (focused on how students build knowledge) with Behaviorist Theory (focused on reinforcement and discipline), to see which one better explains student success.
Data Source Triangulation
With data source triangulation, your goal is to gather data from at least two sources, but probably more than that.
What does this look like in qualitative research?
It might mean gathering data from:
- Archival records
- Textual analysis of policy/legal documents
- Social media content
- News articles, blogs, and other media content
- The comments section of any forum, website, or blog
- Case studies
- Literature and artwork
The point of data source triangulation is to study one topic using these diverse data sources. (If you want to pull from quantitative data sources like web analytics and public databases, you can do that too.)
This is essentially another way to study your research question from multiple perspectives. But instead of a group of different researchers or a set of theories from multiple disciplines, those differing data sources are the other perspectives.
Use data source triangulation when:
- You need to collect data from different sources to gather perspectives on a topic—without direct interaction. For example, say you’re studying public perceptions of climate change. You want to capture the raw, unfiltered feelings and opinions behind this fraught topic. What better place to go than social media discussions, news articles (and their comments sections), and government reports? You’ll get tons of rich, probably brutally honest data without ever making your presence as a researcher known.
You want to validate findings across existing qualitative data sources. Let’s say you’re studying stigmas on mental health issues. You’ve already used methodological triangulation to gather qualitative data from interviews and surveys. Now, you want to compare this data with themes from online forums, blog posts, and personal memoirs. The data found in these sources can help validate your findings—or bring up new questions and interesting discrepancies to explore.
Make your website better. Instantly.
Keep reading about user experience.
In qualitative research, data triangulation means approaching a question from multiple perspectives. It involves using more than one data source or method to investigate a…
The 5 Best UI/UX Design Agencies Compared
UI/UX design agencies help bring brands to life and deliver optimized user experiences with well-researched and thoughtfully designed websites, apps, and products. All of the…
When to Use the 4 Qualitative Data Collection Methods
Qualitative data collection methods are the different ways to gather descriptive, non-numerical data for your research. Popular examples of qualitative data collection methods include surveys,…
dscout Review–The Good and Bad
dscout is a great tool for doing qualitative user research, like live interviews or diary studies. But it isn’t the best choice for everyone. If…
Out Of All Tips to Improve User Experience, 7 Are Legit
Figuring out the most effective ways to improve the user experience can be hard. There is tons of information out there, and it gets overwhelming…
Is Nominal Data Useful? Yes, In These Situations
Nominal data is descriptive information wherein rank and order don’t matter. Still confused? It helps to contrast nominal data with the other three main types…
What Is User Experience? Answers From 7 Top UX Designers
If you Google user experience the definition you’ll find is “the overall experience of a person using a product like a website or computer application,…
How to Do Each Qualitative Data Coding Type (All Steps)
Qualitative data coding is the process of organizing all the descriptive data you collect during a research project. It has nothing to do with computer…
7 Qualitative Data Examples and Why They Work
Qualitative data presents information using descriptive language, images, and videos instead of numbers. To help make sense of this type of data—as opposed to quantitative…
The 5 Best Usability Testing Tools Compared
Usability testing helps designers, product managers, and other teams figure out how easily users can use a website, app, or product. With these tools, user…
5 Qualitative Data Analysis Methods + When To Use Each
Qualitative data analysis is the work of organizing and interpreting descriptive data. Interview recordings, open-ended survey responses, and focus group observations all yield descriptive—qualitative—information. This…
The 5 Best UX Research Tools Compared
UX research tools help designers, product managers, and other teams understand users and how they interact with a company’s products and services. The tools provide…
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data: 7 Key Differences
Qualitative data is information you can describe with words rather than numbers. Quantitative data is information represented in a measurable way using numbers. One type…
6 Real Ways AI Has Improved the User Experience
It seems like every other company is bragging about their AI-enhanced user experiences. Consumers and the UX professionals responsible for designing great user experiences are…
12 Key UX Metrics: What They Mean + How To Calculate Each
UX metrics help identify where users struggle when using an app or website and where they are successful. The data collected helps designers, developers, and…
Over 300,000 websites use Crazy Egg to improve what's working, fix what isn't and test new ideas.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design. When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make. First, decide how you will collect data. Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question:
Introduction. Statistical analysis is necessary for any research project seeking to make quantitative conclusions. The following is a primer for research-based statistical analysis. It is intended to be a high-level overview of appropriate statistical testing, while not diving too deep into any specific methodology.
Research methods are specific procedures for collecting and analysing data. Developing your research methods is an integral part of your research design. When planning your methods, there are two key decisions you will make. First, decide how you will collect data. Your methods depend on what type of data you need to answer your research question:
Research data refers to any information or evidence gathered through systematic investigation or experimentation to support or refute a hypothesis or answer a research question. It includes both primary and secondary data, and can be in various formats such as numerical, textual, audiovisual, or visual. Research data plays a critical role in ...
Introduction to Statistical Methods. At its core, statistical methods are the backbone of data analysis, helping us make sense of numbers and patterns in the world around us. Whether you're looking at sales figures, medical research, or even your fitness tracker's data, statistical methods are what turn raw data into useful insights.
This article is a practical introduction to statistical analysis for students and researchers. We'll walk you through the steps using two research examples. The first investigates a potential cause-and-effect relationship, while the second investigates a potential correlation between variables. Example: Causal research question.
About Research Methods. This guide provides an overview of research methods, how to choose and use them, and supports and resources at UC Berkeley. As Patten and Newhart note in the book Understanding Research Methods, "Research methods are the building blocks of the scientific enterprise. They are the "how" for building systematic knowledge.
Research Methodology Types. Types of Research Methodology are as follows: Quantitative Research Methodology. This is a research methodology that involves the collection and analysis of numerical data using statistical methods. This type of research is often used to study cause-and-effect relationships and to make predictions.
When collecting and analyzing data, quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings. Both are important for gaining different kinds of knowledge. Quantitative research. Quantitative research is expressed in numbers and graphs. It is used to test or confirm theories and assumptions.
What are research methods. Research methods are the strategies, processes or techniques utilized in the collection of data or evidence for analysis in order to uncover new information or create better understanding of a topic. There are different types of research methods which use different tools for data collection.
Mixed methods-based research, as you'd expect, attempts to bring these two types of research together, drawing on both qualitative and quantitative data.Quite often, mixed methods-based studies will use qualitative research to explore a situation and develop a potential model of understanding (this is called a conceptual framework), and then go on to use quantitative methods to test that ...
Choosing an optimal research methodology is crucial for the success of any research project. The methodology you select will determine the type of data you collect, how you collect it, and how you analyse it. Understanding the different types of research methods available along with their strengths and weaknesses, is thus imperative to make an ...
Here are some key characteristics of quantitative research: Numerical data: Quantitative research involves collecting numerical data through standardized methods such as surveys, experiments, and observational studies. This data is analyzed using statistical methods to identify patterns and relationships.
Quantitative research methods are used to collect and analyze numerical data. This type of research is useful when the objective is to test a hypothesis, determine cause-and-effect relationships, and measure the prevalence of certain phenomena. Quantitative research methods include surveys, experiments, and secondary data analysis.
Numerical data. Quantitative variables can be continuous or discrete. Continuous: the variable can, in theory, be any value within a certain range. Can be measured. Examples: height, weight, blood pressure, cholesterol. Discrete: the variable can only have certain values, usually whole numbers. Can be counted.
Statistical Analysis in Research: Meaning, Methods and Types. The scientific method is an empirical approach to acquiring new knowledge by making skeptical observations and analyses to develop a meaningful interpretation. It is the basis of research and the primary pillar of modern science. Researchers seek to understand the relationships ...
Types of Statistical Research Methods. Statistical analysis is the process of analyzing samples of data into patterns or trends that help researchers anticipate situations and make appropriate research conclusions. Based on the type of data, statistical analyses are of the following type: 1. Descriptive Analysis
Other interesting articles. If you want to know more about statistics, methodology, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples. Statistics. Normal distribution. Skewness. Kurtosis. Degrees of freedom. Variance. Null hypothesis.
Statistical methods involved in carrying out a study include planning, designing, collecting data, analysing, drawing meaningful interpretation and reporting of the research findings. The statistical analysis gives meaning to the meaningless numbers, thereby breathing life into a lifeless data. The results and inferences are precise only if ...
The main difference between quantitative and qualitative research is the type of data they collect and analyze. Quantitative data is information about quantities, and therefore numbers, and qualitative data is descriptive, and regards phenomenon which can be observed but not measured, such as language. Quantitative research collects numerical ...
3. Data presentation. Data presentation is an extension of data cleaning, as it involves arranging the data for easy analysis. Here, you can use descriptive statistics tools to summarize the data. Data presentation can also help you determine the best way to present the data based on its arrangement. 4.
Statistical methods to establish relationships between variables; Applications: Common in natural sciences, economics, and market research. 3. Descriptive Research. Descriptive research is a type of research method that is used to describe characteristics of a population or phenomenon being studied. It does not answer questions about how or why ...
numerical data is analyzed using mathematical methods. Besides, both qualitative and quantitative research approaches are designed to describe a topic; however, the last part of the definition is the difference which con-centrates on different types of analysis methods which is mathematical using statistics in quantitative research.
The data collected during the investigation creates the hypothesis for the researcher in this research design model. What is the basic methodology for a QUALITATIVE research design? 1. Identify a general research question. 2. Choose main methods, sites, and subjects for research. Determine methods of documentation of data and access to subjects. 3.
Quantitative data refers to numerical data that can be measured or counted. This type of data is often used in scientific research and is typically collected through methods such as surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis. Quantitative Data Types. There are two main types of quantitative data: discrete and continuous.
Method triangulation means using a variety of research methods to study the same topic. In qualitative research, the most common data-gathering methods are: Interviews; Focus groups; Observation; Open-ended surveys or questionnaires; So, in qualitative research, method triangulation means gathering data using at least two of these methods.
Secure Transmission of Medical Data. Metrics Possibility of real-time analysis and detection. Accuracy of models. Categorization. Target organs covered. Techniques Used DL and its types. Time of Research and Publication Articles published in 2018 or later