Average Ratings: 2.96/5 Score: 86% Positive Reviews Counted:9 Positive:6 Neutral:2 Negative:1
Ratings: — Review By: Komal Nahta Site:Zee ETC Bollywood Business
Vamshi Paidipally, Hari and Ahishor Solomon have written a story of the kind which used to be in vogue in the 1980s and 1990s. The incidents in the family drama are all of the kind one has seen in films of a bygone era. The trios screenplay is slow-paced as well as predictable. Nothing, therefore, comes as a shocker. The resolution also does not warm the cockles of the heart because it seems to be too hurried.On the whole, Varisu is an ordinary fare and will do very ordinary business at the turnstiles because it offers nothing new or fresh.
Visit Site For More
Ratings: 3/5 Review By: Divya Site:Rediff
While the media-shy Vijay Sir can easily charm his devoted fan base with Varisu featuring action, dance sequences and masterful punch dialogues customised to feed his star image, it isn’t too hard to see the hypocrisy behind the humbling man who calls himself his own competitor even in real life. It really doesn’t matter how I view this movie because this is a film written for an audience that thrives on Vijay’s stardom and it satisfies them thoroughly.
Visit Site For more
Ratings: 2.25/5 Review By: Mirchi9 Site:Mirchi9
Overall, Varisu is that utterly predictable and template-driven film that still manages to survive due to the hero and some commercial elements within the standard setup. If you dont mind the utter routineness and want to watch something with your family for the festival, Varisu is the option. Otherwise, stay away.
Ratings: 3.5/5 Review By: Priyanka Site:NewsMinute
From advocating sticking to family no matter how toxic they are (and we mean toxic in the level of an attempted murder), to sending goons flying as a manner of conflict resolution in business, actor Vijay’s latest outing Varisu is everything that its trailer promised it would be. And with it, the actor manages to deliver a tried and tested drama, which €” while highly predictable €” still manages to entertain the audience.
Ratings: 3.5/5 Review By: Suganth Site:Times Of India
If there are slip-ups in the form of a rather slight romantic track, and less-than-formidable villains, the film makes up for all of it through its leading star. Vijay is in terrific form, cracking one-liners that have us break out into a smile, make self-referential punches and show earnestness in the sentimental moments.
Ratings: 3/5 Review By: Latha Site:India Today
Vijay choosing to do this family entertainer is not surprising given that he likes to change gears ever so often and, in this film, he has acted, danced and fought his heart out throughout the film. And director Vamshi Padaipally has ensured that the movie is packed with plenty of family sentiment, action, romance and comedy to cater to Vijay fans and the audience. Vijays cute guy meets tough businessman characterisation takes some getting used to as weve not seen him in such a role play in a long time.
Ratings: 2.75/5 Review By: Behindwoods Review Board Site:Behindwoods
Overall the film has all elements to end up as a pucca family entertainer and a Pongal feast. Vijay’s comic sense stands out and is the backbone of the film. It does have a few flaws but at the end of the day, when you look at the film as a theatrical experience, it is worth your money and time. The boss returns. In style.
Ratings: 3.25/5 Review By: Siddarth Site:OnlyKollywood
Varisu is far from being a perfect entertainer that gets everything right. But yes, the film treats itself scene by scene, and perfects out what the fans want and also what the families want. A Vijay film coming in such a package is definitely worth a visit to the theatre, say what.
Ratings: 2.5/5 Review By: MovieCrow Site:Movie Crow
A light-hearted film that could have been related if it had been executed well, Thanks to Vijay and Thaman, despite many issues, the film stays as a fairly watchable entertainer largely due to them.
Varisu Box Office
Varisu Advance Booking
Thunivu Review
Thunivu Box Office
Thunivu Advance Booking
Tamil Box Office
Top 10 Tamil Movies 2022
Top 20 Tamil Movies Opening Day of All Time
Highest-Grossing South Indian Movies
Top South Indian Movies of All Time
Top 10 Malayalam Movies of 2022
Top 10 Indian Movies 2022
Top 10 Telugu Movies of 2022
Top 10 Web Series
Prince Review
Prince Box Office Collection
Cobra Box Office Collection
Thiruchitrambalam Box Office Collection
Thiruchitrambalam Review
Best Telugu Movies 2022
Upcoming Telugu Movies
Upcoming Tamil Movies
Tollywood Box Office
Kerala Box Office
Top Hollywood Movies of 2022
Top 10 Best Hindi Movies
Vijay Rajendran is a happy-go-lucky man, but everything changes after the unexpected death of his foster father.
Jan 11, 2023 ( India) straight to Theaters
Vijay as Vijay Rajendran Rashmika Mandanna R. Sarathkumar as Rajendran, Vijay’s father Prabhu Prakash Raj as Jayaprakash
Vamshi Paidipally
Dil Raju Sirish
Sri Venkateswara Creations PVP Cinema
Seven Screen Studio Red Giant Movies
2 Hours 47 Minutes (167 minutes)
Remember Me
Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories .
In Maria, a biopic of the late, great opera singer Maria Callas that premiered here at the Venice Film Festival on Thursday, Angelina Jolie tackles her first big leading role in three years—and her first major dramatic role in far longer. She was, it seems, drawn to director Pablo Larraín ’s woozy picture of an icon in decline, perhaps because Larraín has done this before, with good results for his actors.
Maria is the third film in Larraín’s series of interior, nonlinear studies of famous women at a crossroads. Jackie follows Jacqueline Kennedy in the days immediately after the assassination of her husband. Spencer peers in on Princess Diana as she spends one last miserable weekend with then Prince Charles and his family. Larraín has developed something of a brand, an upending of biopic norms that seeks to uncover core emotional truth rather than dutifully reenact a series of events. It worked brilliantly in the strangely frightening Jackie, slightly less so in the stiflingly gloomy Spencer.
Maria is the thinnest of the three, psychologically facile and overly mannered. There is something arbitrary, unspecific about the film. With a few details removed, Maria could be about any grand diva, this blurry picture of a woman swanning through the final week of her life. Larraín and screenwriter Steven Knight don’t convince us of the iconography; they shoot past artful abstraction and land in the realm of vagueness.
This could partly be blamed on their choice of subject. Callas, who died at 53 in 1977, was certainly a legend of the opera world, renowned around the globe. She suffered her fair share of tragedies and tabloid scandals. But she does not engender the same sort of international fascination associated with Jackie and Diana, such enduring emblems of glamour and privilege darkened by cruel twists of fate. I’d imagine that most audience members will walk into Maria with fewer preconceived notions, less readiness to fill in the gaps in Larraín’s portraiture. His particular trick proves less effective when it isn’t subverting or complicating long-held ideas about a person.
What biographical information the film does contain is clunkily delivered. In black-and-white flashback, we learn that Callas was essentially pimped out by her own mother during the Second World War, a trauma that this version of Callas never recovers from. That’s compelling pathology, but Larraín doesn’t linger on it. He’s more interested in Callas’s affair with Aristotle Onassis ( Haluk Bilginer ), which would eventually be undone by Onassis’s marriage to Jackie Kennedy. (Perhaps Larraín is quite deliberately looping back on himself.) The film trusts we will feel the grand drama of this tortured romance, but such swells of emotion never arrive. Similarly undercooked and overly telegraphed are Callas’s hallucinatory musings about life, art, and career, given to an imagined interviewer played by Kodi Smit-McPhee. There is little insight to be found in these interludes, coy and generic as they are.
Still, Jolie brings some life to this programmatic exercise. She murmurs and laments in a pleasing midcentury accent, one that doesn’t sound much like the real Callas’s but is a nifty bit of transformation anyway. Jolie keenly renders Callas’s regret and wounded pride, which flicker across her face as she tries to keep her head held as high as a prima donna’s should be. She doesn’t push as far into inner depths as Natalie Portman did in Jackie, but that’s not exactly being asked of Jolie here. In some ways she is meant only to be a physical manifestation of the music—recordings of Callas that play throughout the film, sometimes mixed in with Jolie’s own singing. Jolie struggles in these scenes, never quite convincing us that these huge notes and plaintive lilts are actually coming from her. Whether that’s a problem with Jolie’s performance or the postproduction sound-matching process, the film suffers for it. These moments of Callas lost in song, or struggling through it, are the tentpoles of Maria, but they prove pretty wobbly.
The uncanny-valley singing is representative of the fussy artifice of Maria as a whole. Our admiration for the ardor Larraín feels for these oft-misunderstood women, figures battered and ennobled by the forces of money and history, begins to curdle. With Spencer and especially with Maria, the director seems less like he is reaching for understanding and more like he is bending his subjects’ legacies toward his preferred style—as if he has been merely searching for tragic women of the past to send wandering around his luxe, prefabricated haunted houses.
I still prefer his mode of biography to the standard varietal—at least in these sorts of films, there is some attempt to grapple with the ineffable. But should Larraín continue this project, it might serve him well to adjust the approach. Perhaps he could turn his focus to characters like the ones sensitively played by Pierfrancesco Favino and Alba Rohrwacher in Maria, a doting butler and cook who tend to their ailing employer with the care of concerned family members. Through their quiet and despairing presence, Maria hits on something stirring, the idea that these two individuals might be the last people on earth who truly know this dying star. It’s only in their eyes that we catch the glimmering reflection of something Maria otherwise denies us: a woman in full.
Live Updates From the 2024 Venice Film Festival
Inside Nicole Kidman’s New Erotic Drama , Babygirl
September Cover Star Jenna Ortega Is Settling Into Fame
Trump Has Chernobyl-Level Meltdown Over Harris’s DNC Triumph
These Are the Fall 2024 TV Shows That We’ll Be Watching
RFK Jr.’s Whale-Beheading Story Gives RFK Jr.’s Bear-Murder Story a Run for Its Money
From the Archive: Murder at Sutton Place
Chief critic.
“Reagan” runs for 135 minutes, and yet at the end, it's hard to say we've learned anything insightful about such an influential figure in American politics
“Is there anything worse than an actor with a cause?” asks an annoyed Jane Wyman, Ronald Reagan’s first wife, early in “Reagan,” the new biopic starring Dennis Quaid.
Well, after watching two more hours of this story, an adoring look back at the man who served two terms as our 40th president, we can report that there is definitely one thing worse: An actor without a movie.
Let’s not blame the star, though. Quaid, who has played more than one president, has certainly got the charismatic grin, the pomaded hair and especially that distinctive, folksy voice down — close your eyes, and it sounds VERY familiar. If he were to appear on “Saturday Night Live” in the role, it would feel like a casting coup akin to Larry David as Bernie Sanders.
But this is not an “SNL” skit, despite the fact that Jon Voight appears throughout with a heavy Russian accent as a KGB spy, but we’ll get to that. This is a 135-minute film that demands a lot more depth. And, so, to co-opt a political phrase from Bill Clinton, whom Quaid also has played: It’s the script, stupid.
Lovingly directed by Sean McNamara with a screenplay by Howard Klausner, “Reagan” begins with a chilling event (and a parallel to a recent one): the assassination attempt on Reagan in Washington in March 1981, only two months after he became president.
There are those who say Reagan cemented his relationship with the public by surviving that attempt; he famously told wife Nancy from his bed: “Honey, I forgot to duck.” In any case, the filmmakers use the event to set up their story, and will return to it later on, chronologically.
But their early point is that Reagan came away from the scare with a divine plan. “My mother used to say that everything in life happens for a reason, even the most disheartening setbacks,” he says. And as he will tell Tip O’Neill, the House speaker, everything from then on will be part of that divine plan.
The yet broader point here is that Reagan, according to this film, was basically solely responsible for the eventual downfall of the Soviet Union, because he showed the people of the world what freedom meant. “I knew that he was the one,” says Viktor Petrovich, the retired spy played by Voight as a narrator figure throughout — meaning the one who would bring it all down. The script is based on Paul Kengor’s “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism,” and Kengor has said Viktor is based on a number of KGB agents and analysts who tracked Reagan for years.
That point is made early and often. The rest is a history reel, with lots of glorious, loving lighting around our star. We go back to his younger years, learning about his mother and what she taught him about faith, and then his Hollywood years as an actor, Screen Actors Guild president (and a Democrat) before fully committing to politics, and the GOP.
We also see a newly divorced Reagan meet a winsome Nancy Davis, who will become his second wife, loving partner and constant companion. Like Quaid, Penelope Ann Miller is a perfectly fine actor who has little nuance to work with here. Together, they embark on the path to political stardom, starting with the California governorship. When they arrive at a neighbor’s home to campaign, the housewife at the door hears Reagan's “RR” initials and thinks he's Roy Rogers.
But a decade and change later, Reagan is sworn in as president, beginning his eight years in office. “It became my obsession to understand what was beneath the facade,” says Voight’s Petrovich, explaining why Reagan was so consequential.
Maybe, then, he could let us know?
Because when this movie ends, with the president’s death in 2004 a decade after announcing he had Alzheimer’s disease, we don’t know a lot more than when we began about a figure so influential in American politics.
Sure, we get all the great hits. ”Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” we see him say in 1987 in Berlin, a scene with much buildup.
And it’s fun to see the famous debate lines, like “There you go again,” to Jimmy Carter in 1980, and of course his famously deft deflection of the age issue in 1984, with Walter Mondale. “I will not make age an issue of this campaign,” the 73-year-old president told his questioner. “I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”
The line, which made Mondale himself laugh, got Reagan back on track in the race. The movie, not so much.
“History is never about when, why, how — it always comes down to ‘who,’” says Voight’s Petrovich. However historians feel about that, we would have gladly taken a more incisive look at when, why, how or anything else that would give us real insight, instead of an extended and glowing commercial, into who this man really was.
“Reagan,” a Showbiz Direct release, has been rated PG-13 by the Motion Picture Association “for violent content and smoking.” Running time: 135 minutes. One and a half stars out of four.
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events
By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Christian blauvelt.
The cruelty is the point.
How is it that — following the 2020 election at least — there weren’t congressional hearings, the appointment of a special prosecutor, and charges filed, related to the policy? It ostensibly ended in the summer of 2018 after massive public outcry, but over 1,000 children remain in U.S. custody, still un-reunited with their parents. That is an abandonment of governance almost as damning of the Biden administration as of the Trump administration that actually carried out the policy.
Morris recognizes an essential truth from the start: Much of the American public, and certainly the U.S. government, seems to have “moved on” from this injustice, turning their attention to the parade of crises that have occurred since. It’s necessary then for a total refresher. He starts “Separated,” based on NBC News reporter Jacob Soboroff’s book of the same name, from the very beginning: how the policy came to be, who was steering it, and how it affected thousands of children, ripped from their parents’ arms as the families were caught illegally entering the U.S. at its southern border. The idea was to deter the waves of migrants fleeing Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, countries consumed with gang violence: Come to the U.S. illegally, and you may never see your children again. And they may end up in cages.
Instead, Morris dramatizes the kind of dangers that so many migrants face when fleeing Central America. Working not with reenactments as much as poetic narrative composites of what any number of migrants might experience on their journey, Morris focuses on a young mother (Gabriela Cartol) and her son (Diego Armando Lara Lagunes) as they pack the belongings they want to take with them, then set out on foot over rough terrain. They sneak aboard a freight train to carry them north. The boy almost drowns when they swim across a river. And finally, they’re apprehended by ICE agents after they’ve crossed the U.S. border. Then, they’re separated.
The head of the ORR who carried out this policy, Scott Lloyd, is interviewed on-camera by Morris and comes across like a dullard. But Morris spends significant time showing how such a dehumanizing policy came about: By imagining emails, all in the public record and an FOIA request away, being written by Lloyd and others as they’re trying to formulate this policy. These are antiseptic animated recreations totally at odds with the urgent humanity of the mother-son journey Morris has dramatized. The emails bear a tone of office-like formality, with the distinct impersonality of corporate-speak. It’s all about the senders and recipients “getting aligned” on the policy and issuing “quick clarifications” and correcting misunderstandings in a way where no one person bears responsibility for everything. It’s human suffering masked with red tape, and indifference so profound that the separated kids being reduced to numbers on a spreadsheet is even still too much. One accusation against Lloyd in the film alleges he suggested not even keeping those spreadsheets of the kids, thus possibly deliberately losing track of what kids belong to what parents, at all. ( Lloyd has long since denied that claim. )
With its punchy 93-minute running time, “Separated” seems calculated on Morris’s part to break through in an attention economy where attention spans keep getting shorter and shorter and outrage about one thing only lasts until there’s the next thing to be outraged about. There’s probably a deeper version of this movie that could have been made, one that really addresses the life cycle of the public’s empathy. One that even holds a critical lens up to, say, MSNBC, which has offered airtime to ex-Trump officials such as Olivia Troye and Stephanie Grisham, now apparently on the right side of history because they’ve spoken out against the former president. But when kids were in cages, they did not resign their posts.
That’s not what “Separated” is. And maybe that would be asking too much. When Trump held up his squiggle signature and ended the separation policy in July 2018, that was the end of it for many. Morris and Soboroff remind us very clearly of what it would take to bring the policy back: simply another stroke of that pen.
“Separated” world premiered at the 2024 Venice Film Festival . It is currently seeking U.S. distribution.
You may also like.
Live Coverage
In “Slingshot,” a space-travel thriller directed by Mikael Håfström, the title refers to a risky flight maneuver involving orbital mechanics. Astronauts journeying a billion and a half miles to one of Saturn’s moons , Titan, will need a whip-around gravity assist — the “slingshot” in question — from Jupiter’s orbital velocity in order to make it all the way. Why are they going to Titan? It’s the only other celestial body that has liquid on its surface, methane that they intend to harvest for clean energy to combat climate change on Earth.
But despite the seemingly action-oriented premise, this psychological character study starring Casey Affleck is a slog. The film isn’t about the slingshot or the methane gas — or even climate change — but about the challenges of the journey itself. In order to endure the years-long trip, the crew needs to “hibernate” in three-month-long chunks, their sleep aided by heavy doses of drugs, which cause disorientation and confusion every time they wake up to perform some task.
John (Affleck), an ambitious pilot who made it through a rigorous selection process for this dangerous mission, spends most of his time on board trying and failing to shake off dreamy visions of a former lover, Zoe (Emily Beecham), one of the designers of the cutting-edge spacecraft. Every time he goes to sleep, he dreams of Zoe rolling around in bedsheets, and every time he wakes up, he’s fighting through brain fog in order to discern what’s real and what’s not, or fighting with his colleagues about their orders.
The situation with his crewmates, Capt. Franks (Laurence Fishburne) and scientist Nash (Tomer Capone), becomes increasingly untenable as their mental health devolves over many taxing hibernation cycles. When the ship is mysteriously damaged, perhaps from structural stress, Franks is determined to finish the mission, while Nash wants to turn back. John is caught in the middle. Despite this central tension, “Slingshot” is an undeniably sleepy film, in which a groggy Affleck stumbles around a spaceship for most of the running time.
We’ve mapped out 27 of the best movie theaters in L.A., from the TCL Chinese and the New Beverly to the Alamo Drafthouse and which AMC reigns in Burbank.
Nov. 22, 2023
As Nash sows the seeds of mutiny, Franks attempts to violently wrest back control, using both physical force and mental manipulation. Ultimately, it plays out a bit like “Gaslight” in space, with Fishburne playing Charles Boyer to Affleck’s Ingrid Bergman. Screenwriters R. Scott Adams and Nathan Parker don’t bother digging into the available themes and instead throw twist after twist into the script just to keep things from getting too somnambulant.
The desire to know what’s real and what’s not sustains enough mild interest to keep us engaged, but the continual flashbacks to a syrupy and unconvincing romance, in which John and Zoe lie on the floor talking about moths, have a devastating effect on the momentum. The terrific Beecham is saddled with a dismal hairdo and an even more dismal role, her character simply an object of wan yearning for the drowsy John. Affleck seems lethargic even in flashback, and is entirely implausible as a hot-shot pilot in his late 30s. He sleepwalks through this film in more ways than one.
Håfström’s direction is equally sluggish. While there’s some pretty lighting in the hibernation pods, the creative choices made around John’s hallucinations are predictable and pat. There’s just simply nothing to hook into aside from Fishburne’s performance, which is the only captivating element of the film, and even that is derivative of his iconic Morpheus from “The Matrix.” Despite its many twists and turns, “Slingshot” shows no signs of life.
Katie Walsh is a Tribune News Service film critic.
'Slingshot'
Rating: R, for language and some violence/bloody images Running time: 1 hour, 49 minutes Playing: In wide release Friday, Aug. 30
Aug. 17, 2024
Aug. 14, 2024
Aug. 9, 2024
Only good movies
Get the Indie Focus newsletter, Mark Olsen's weekly guide to the world of cinema.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Aug. 29, 2024
Travel & Experiences
Just because this Casey Affleck-led thriller sticks the landing doesn’t mean the journey is worth your time
This summer we’ve celebrated the 45th anniversary of “Alien” and the 15th anniversary of “Moon,” two of the greatest stuck-in-space films ever made. We’ve also been watching a related plot play out in reality, as Boeing’s ill-fated Starliner has left astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore idling at the International Space Station.
So perhaps at another time, Mikael Håfström’s “Slingshot” would get a pass for effort, if nothing else.
This is, admittedly, a challenging genre. But given its provocative potential (and Håfström’s repeated references to Stanley Kubrick’s all-time interstellar icon, “2001: A Space Odyssey”), a halfhearted take feels particularly disappointing.
The film’s listless energy begins with John (Casey Affleck), an astronaut years into his mission to Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. For someone trapped in a metal capsule, John initially appears to be doing ok. But when his ground commander (David Morrissey) checks in “to stress the importance of your psych evaluation,” we’ve got a pretty clear idea where things are headed.
There are only two other people aboard the Odyssey: John’s colleague Nash (Tomer Capone) and their captain, Franks (Laurence Fishburne). So it’s a little odd that John and Nash are continually required to cycle in and out of a drug-induced hypersleep. Stranger still, they wake up each time feeling increasingly confused and paranoid. Although … is it paranoia if you might be right?
For starters, when the capsule is damaged and a panicked Nash notes the dangers in continuing their mission, Franks shuts him down with suspicious speed. As Nash pushes for an insurrection and Franks prepares to fight back, a disoriented John is stuck in the middle, unsure of who he should trust.
It’s no wonder, then, that each time he goes back to “sleep,” he returns to the comfort of pre-launch memories. Mostly, he thinks about his girlfriend Zoe (Emily Beecham), who also works for the space program. He warned her early on that he didn’t have time for a relationship, as he was hoping to be chosen for this mission. But when they fell in love, he surprised himself by the depth of their connection. We, unfortunately, are less convinced. These flashbacks are both underdeveloped and overlong, which only emphasizes how little chemistry there is between Affleck and Beecham. She seems uncomfortable, and he just seems bored.
Affleck’s disaffection carries through almost every scene — until the very end. For this is, as it turns out, one of those movies that relies so heavily on its final twist that the rest of the story becomes an afterthought. Affleck, Håfström (“1408”), and screenwriters R. Scott Adams (“Donner Pass”) and Nathan Parker (who co-wrote the infinitely superior “Moon”) seem so sure our minds will eventually be blown, they’re simply connecting dots until they can scribble madly across the page. Not everyone got the memo, though, so the actors often appear to be in different movies.
Affleck’s scenes tend to be long and quiet, but he’s so unemotive they mostly feel inert. A jumpy Capone (“Fauda”) and intense Fishburne work overtime to add energy, but they’re stuck in a thriller with few thrills, while Affleck and Beecham seem to be in a drama with little drama.
Similarly, Steffen Thum’s portentous score tries to build some menace, but ultimately has nowhere to go. Until, of course, that final scene, towards which we’ve been hurtling since the start. The good news is that the ending really is as strong as the filmmakers believe. And since Håfström and his crew stick their landing, those who particularly enjoy second-hand claustrophobia may find it worth the long journey. Everyone else, however, will be better served by more engaging enterprises here on Earth.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
My Subscriptions
Ic 814 the kandahar hijack review: this gripping netflix series starring vijay varma, naseeruddin shah, pankaj kapur presents the events in such a way that once you start watching, you're mentally hijacked. rating: 3.5.
IC 814 The Kandahar Hijack Review: What goes through the mind of a hijacker? What truly happens during a hijacking—inside the plane, outside the plane, among political leaders, and within intelligence agencies? Most of us know about the infamous hijacking of the Indian Airlines flight IC 814, which was taken from Kathmandu to Kandahar, but this gripping Netflix series starring Vijay Varma, Naseeruddin Shah, Pankaj Kapur delves deeper, presenting the events in such a compelling way that once you start watching, you're mentally hijacked until the very end.
The story is well-known—a plane hijacked on its way from Kathmandu to Delhi, ultimately landing in Kandahar. But how was the situation handled? How were the passengers saved, except for one? This series meticulously explores every aspect of the hijacking, from the harrowing experiences of the passengers to the strategic moves by agencies, making it a detailed retelling of events that kept the entire nation on edge.
Imagine a single scene with legendary actors like Naseeruddin Shah, Pankaj Kapur, Arvind Swami, Manoj Pahwa, Kumud Mishra, and Divyendu Bhattacharya—all in one frame. Bringing together such seasoned talents is a testament to the effort poured into making this series, and it shows. The six-episode series, with each episode lasting 30 to 40 minutes, moves at such a fast pace that you won't want to skip a moment. There's no unnecessary heroism, no exaggerated cinematic liberties—just a carefully crafted narrative that reveals the layers of each character, explains the background of every event, and uses real footage from the time to enhance authenticity. Even if you know the ending, the journey will keep you hooked, making it a perfect binge-watch.
The series is packed with powerhouse performances. Naseeruddin Shah, Pankaj Kapur, Manoj Pahwa, Arvind Swami, Kumud Mishra, and Divyendu Bhattacharya deliver outstanding performances. Amidst this ensemble of veteran actors, Vijay Varma shines as the pilot. Vijay's strength lies in knowing when to underplay and when to showcase subtle heroism. He brings depth to his character, proving once again that his involvement signals quality content. Patralekhaa excels as the air hostess, portraying the emotional turmoil of a flight attendant caught in a hijacking with authenticity. Her character’s struggle to protect her passengers, even at the cost of her own safety, is palpable. Dia Mirza is convincing as a journalist, while Amrita Puri stands out as a sharp and determined reporter. Rajeev Thakur surprises as the hijacker, delivering a chilling performance.
The series is helmed by Anubhav Sinha, and his experience is evident throughout. His research, dedication, and ability to bring together such an ensemble cast to tell a story that everyone already knows, yet still manages to surprise, showcase his directorial prowess. Sinha successfully crafts a taut, engaging series that keeps you at the edge of your seat.
This series is a masterful retelling of the IC 814 hijacking, with stellar performances and expert direction. It offers insights and details that will leave you with a deeper understanding of the events, even if you thought you knew the whole story.
Rating: 3.5
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Varisu Movie Review: Critics Rating: 3.5 stars, click to give your rating/review,Vijay is in terrific form, cracking one-liners that have us break out into a smile, make self-refere
All Critics. Top Critics. All Audience. Verified Audience. Ishmeet Nagpal Common Sense Media. The film struggles to set tone, switching between drama and comedy at random times, often mid-scene ...
Varisu: Directed by Vamshi Paidipally. With Joseph Vijay, Rashmika Mandanna, Shaam, Prabhu. Vijay Rajendran is a happy to-go lucky man. Things change when his father becomes terminally ill, and he is left to manage his business empire.
Watch Varisu with a subscription on Prime Video. ... Rated 4/5 Stars • Rated 4 out of 5 stars 01/17/23 Full Review SubS Unrealistic movie that Tamil cinema had in 2000 Rated 1/5 Stars • Rated ...
Varisu review: Vijay-starrer Varisu turns out exactly the way you want it to be. There's nothing novel about the plot of the film. ... Rating: 3 out of 5. Written by Kirubhakar Purushothaman Chennai | Updated: January 12, 2023 08:28 IST. Follow Us ... Vedaa movie review: Sharvari breaks the mould.
Varisu (2023) : Movie Review - Vamshi Paidipally teams up with superstar Vijay for a family masala entertainer, Varisu. This is nothing but Vanshi and Vijay's attempt at remodelling Allu Arjun's "Ala Vaikunthapurumoolu" (which celebrates its 3rd anniversary today, along with its Hindi remake Shehzada dropping the trailer on the same day).
But, as with most hero films, Varisu too needs Vijay to play the knight in shining armour for every small problem in the house. And thus, we have an unnecessary track on someone getting kidnapped ...
Varisu Movie Review: An in-form Vijay and self-aware writing elevate this conventional family drama. Vamshi and co give the age-old family drama recipe a refreshing twist by adding an ample dose of self-awareness and humour. Right from the posters and trailer to the pre-release interviews, everything about Varisu clearly indicated a formulaic ...
Jan 11, 2023 08:25 AM IST. Varisu movie review: It's a quintessential family drama with all the familiar beats. Along with Vijay, the film also stars Rashmika Mandanna, Sarath Kumar, Jayasudha ...
In Short. Vijay's Varisu releases worldwide on January 11. This is a family entertainer and a multi-starrer. Vijay plays the son of a rich businessman in the film. Rating: Release Date: 11 Jan, 2023. This movie has been long awaited by Vijay fans given that it is Pongal treat and a film that is a family entertainer.
Gift, Give or Receive a ticket to The Forge With The Kingdom Builders Gifted Ticket Program. Rediscover the magic of Hogwarts! Get tickets at a theater near you. Discounted Movie Tickets $2 off Movie Tickets Using the Code BACK2SCHOOL. 2X FanRewards Points Earn Double FanRewards Points on select movies! Varisu (2023) Fan Reviews and Ratings.
Our review: Parents say: Not yet rated Rate movie. Kids say: Not yet rated Rate movie. Vijay brings his signature charm, comedic timing, and excellent dancing skills to this rather predictable Indian drama. However, Varisu misses a trick by under utilizing Prakash Raj as Jayaprakash, the film's antagonist, who could have brought some much ...
Varisu (aka) Vaarisu review. Varisu (aka) Vaarisu is a Tamil movie. Bharath Reddy, Ganesh Venkatraman, Jayasudha, John Vijay, Kushboo Sundar, Nandini Rai, Prakash Raj, Rashmika Mandanna, Samyuktha Shanmughanatha, Sanjana, Sarath Kumar, Shaam, Sriman, Vijay, VTV Ganesh, Yogi Babu are part of the cast of Varisu (aka) Vaarisu. The movie is directed by Vamshi Paidipally.
Varisu Review: Now Streaming On Prime Video, The Film Is A Templated Celebration Of The "Toxic" Family. Vamshi Paidipally makes a film that Vijay is perfect for — song, dance, fight and some snide antics. Sadly, that's precisely what makes Varisu rather superficial and, therefore, ordinary. Ranjani Krishnakumar. Updated on : 22 Feb 2023, 12 ...
Varisu, directed by Vamshi Paidipally and starring Vijay Thalapathy, Rashmika Mandanna, R Sarathkumar, Jayasudha, Srikanth Meka, Shaam, Prakash Raj, released on January 11, 2023, and will now be releasing nationwide in Hindi on January 13, 2023.A family entertainer, the movie narrates the tale of a father eventually finding the right heir to his business among three of his sons, but what ...
Varisu starring Vijay, Rashmika Mandanna, Sarathkumar, Prakash Raj, Prabhu and Jayasudha is directed by Vamsi Paidipally. The film is a family entertainer. ... Movie Reviews. 3 min read. A a. A a ...
Varisu (/ ˈ v ɑː ˌ r i s ʊ / transl. Heir) is a 2023 Indian Tamil-language action drama film directed by Vamshi Paidipally, who co-wrote the film with Hari, Ashishor Solomon and Vivek Velmurugan.Produced jointly by Dil Raju and Sirish under the banner of Sri Venkateswara Creations and PVP Cinema.The film stars an ensemble cast of Vijay, Rashmika Mandanna, R. Sarathkumar, Srikanth, Shaam ...
Varisu. Tamil (Theatres) Director: Vamshi Paidipally. Cast: Vijay, Rashmika Mandanna, R Sarathkumar, Jayasudha, Prakash Raj. Rating: 2.5/5. "It's all about loving your family," said the tagline of ...
தொழிலதிபர் ராஜேந்திரனுக்கு (சரத்குமார்) 3 மகன்கள். மூத்த மகன் ...
Varisu Movie Review: Direction, Music Vamshi Paidipally had everything at his disposal, a bankable star, a decent cast, money-making genre but the only thing he missed churning out was a ...
Varisu movie review, release LIVE UPDATES: Vijay's film goes head to head with Ajith's Thunivu at box office, this is how much they earned on day 1 Vijay-starrer Varisu movie review, movie launch LIVE UPDATES: Vijay's film Varisu to face tough competition against Ajith's Thunivu. Both films have released simultaneously in Tamil Nadu.
Varisu Review - Vijay Shines in this Passable Entertainer!Ashwin Ram Varisu is a family entertainer starring Thalapathy Vijay, Rashmika Mandanna in th ... Rating: 2.5/5. Story; Songs; Gallery; Videos; Critic Reviews; User Reviews; close. To write your own review about this movie Login Now. Add Review. next>> <<previous. News - 26 Jul '24 ...
Ratings:3.25/5 Review By: Siddarth Site:OnlyKollywood. Varisu is far from being a perfect entertainer that gets everything right. But yes, the film treats itself scene by scene, and perfects out what the fans want and also what the families want. A Vijay film coming in such a package is definitely worth a visit to the theatre, say what.
To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories. This could partly be blamed on their choice of subject. Callas, who died at 53 in 1977, was certainly a legend of the opera ...
Movie Review: Quaid looks (and sounds) the part, but 'Reagan' is more glowing commercial than biopic "Reagan" runs for 135 minutes, and yet at the end, it's hard to say we've learned ...
Venice: The film is based on the book by Jacob Soboroff, the most notable U.S. TV news reporter who continued pursuing this story long after it left headlines. How is it that — following the ...
Over almost two decades, Chilean director Pablo Larraín has been making Spanish-language films that have ranged from creepy tales ("Fuga," "Post Mortem") to political stories ("No ...
Review: A notorious day in L.A. history becomes the backdrop of a so-so heist thriller in '1992' Movies Amid global turmoil, the Telluride Film Festival returns with a politically charged lineup
This is, admittedly, a challenging genre. But given its provocative potential (and Håfström's repeated references to Stanley Kubrick's all-time interstellar icon, "2001: A Space Odyssey ...
Rating: 3.5. IC 814 The Kandahar Hijack Review: This gripping Netflix series starring Vijay Varma, Naseeruddin Shah, Pankaj Kapur presents the events in such a way that once you start watching, you're mentally hijacked. Rating: 3.5 ... Live Now Premium Video Reels Web Stories Photo Gallery Podcast Games Movie Review Opinion.