toyota kaizen case study

(Still) learning from Toyota

In the two years since I retired as president and CEO of Canadian Autoparts Toyota (CAPTIN), I’ve had the good fortune to work with many global manufacturers in different industries on challenges related to lean management. Through that exposure, I’ve been struck by how much the Toyota production system has already changed the face of operations and management, and by the energy that companies continue to expend in trying to apply it to their own operations.

Yet I’ve also found that even though companies are currently benefiting from lean, they have largely just scratched the surface, given the benefits they could achieve. What’s more, the goal line itself is moving—and will go on moving—as companies such as Toyota continue to define the cutting edge. Of course, this will come as no surprise for any student of the Toyota production system and should even serve as a challenge. After all, the goal is continuous improvement.

Room to improve

The two pillars of the Toyota way of doing things are kaizen (the philosophy of continuous improvement) and respect and empowerment for people, particularly line workers. Both are absolutely required in order for lean to work. One huge barrier to both goals is complacency. Through my exposure to different manufacturing environments, I’ve been surprised to find that senior managers often feel they’ve been very successful in their efforts to emulate Toyota’s production system—when in fact their progress has been limited.

The reality is that many senior executives—and by extension many organizations—aren’t nearly as self-reflective or objective about evaluating themselves as they should be. A lot of executives have a propensity to talk about the good things they’re doing rather than focus on applying resources to the things that aren’t what they want them to be.

When I recently visited a large manufacturer, for example, I compared notes with a company executive about an evaluation tool it had adapted from Toyota. The tool measures a host of categories (such as safety, quality, cost, and human development) and averages the scores on a scale of zero to five. The executive was describing how his unit scored a five—a perfect score. “Where?” I asked him, surprised. “On what dimension?”

“Overall,” he answered. “Five was the average.”

When he asked me about my experiences at Toyota over the years and the scores its units received, I answered candidly that the best score I’d ever seen was a 3.2—and that was only for a year, before the unit fell back. What happens in Toyota’s culture is that as soon as you start making a lot of progress toward a goal, the goal is changed and the carrot is moved. It’s a deep part of the culture to create new challenges constantly and not to rest when you meet old ones. Only through honest self-reflection can senior executives learn to focus on the things that need improvement, learn how to close the gaps, and get to where they need to be as leaders.

A self-reflective culture is also likely to contribute to what I call a “no excuse” organization, and this is valuable in times of crisis. When Toyota faced serious problems related to the unintended acceleration of some vehicles, for example, we took this as an opportunity to revisit everything we did to ensure quality in the design of vehicles—from engineering and production to the manufacture of parts and so on. Companies that can use crises to their advantage will always excel against self-satisfied organizations that already feel they’re the best at what they do.

A common characteristic of companies struggling to achieve continuous improvement is that they pick and choose the lean tools they want to use, without necessarily understanding how these tools operate as a system. (Whenever I hear executives say “we did kaizen ,” which in fact is an entire philosophy, I know they don’t get it.) For example, the manufacturer I mentioned earlier had recently put in an andon system, to alert management about problems on the line. 1 1. Many executives will have heard of the andon cord, a Toyota innovation now common in many automotive and assembly environments: line workers are empowered to address quality or other problems by stopping production. Featuring plasma-screen monitors at every workstation, the system had required a considerable development and programming effort to implement. To my mind, it represented a knee-buckling amount of investment compared with systems I’d seen at Toyota, where a new tool might rely on sticky notes and signature cards until its merits were proved.

An executive was explaining to me how successful the implementation had been and how well the company was doing with lean. I had been visiting the plant for a week or so. My back was to the monitor out on the shop floor, and the executive was looking toward it, facing me, when I surprised him by quoting a series of figures from the display. When he asked how I’d done so, I pointed out that the tool was broken; the numbers weren’t updating and hadn’t since Monday. This was no secret to the system’s operators and to the frontline workers. The executive probably hadn’t been visiting with them enough to know what was happening and why. Quite possibly, the new system receiving such praise was itself a monument to waste.

Room to reflect

At the end of the day, stories like this underscore the fact that applying lean is a leadership challenge, not just an operational one. A company’s senior executives often become successful as leaders through years spent learning how to contribute inside a particular culture. Indeed, Toyota views this as a career-long process and encourages it by offering executives a diversity of assignments, significant amounts of training, and even additional college education to help prepare them as lean leaders. It’s no surprise, therefore, that should a company bring in an initiative like Toyota’s production system—or any lean initiative requiring the culture to change fundamentally—its leaders may well struggle and even view the change as a threat. This is particularly true of lean because, in many cases, rank-and-file workers know far more about the system from a “toolbox standpoint” than do executives, whose job is to understand how the whole system comes together. This fact can be intimidating to some executives.

Senior executives who are considering lean management (or are already well into a lean transformation and looking for ways to get more from the effort and make it stick) should start by recognizing that they will need to be comfortable giving up control. This is a lesson I’ve learned firsthand. I remember going to CAPTIN as president and CEO of the company and wanting to get off to a strong start. Hoping to figure out how to get everyone engaged and following my initiatives, I told my colleagues what I wanted. Yet after six or eight months, I wasn’t getting where I wanted to go quickly enough. Around that time, a Japanese colleague told me, “Deryl, if you say ‘do this’ everybody will do it because you’re president, whether you say ‘go this way,’ or ‘go that way.’ But you need to figure out how to manage these issues having absolutely no power at all.”

So with that advice in mind, I stepped back and got a core group of good people together from all over the company—a person from production control, a night-shift supervisor, a manager, a couple of engineers, and a person in finance—and challenged them to develop a system. I presented them with the direction but asked them to make it work.

And they did. By the end of the three-year period we’d set as a target, for example, we’d dramatically improved our participation rate in problem-solving activities—going from being one of the worst companies in Toyota Motor North America to being one of the best. The beauty of the effort was that the team went about constructing the program in ways I never would have thought of. For example, one team member (the production-control manager) wanted more participation in a survey to determine where we should spend additional time training. So he created a storyboard highlighting the steps of problem solving and put it on the shop floor with questionnaires that he’d developed. To get people to fill them out, his team offered the respondents a hamburger or a hot dog that was barbecued right there on the shop floor. This move was hugely successful.

Another tip whose value I’ve observed over the years is to find a mentor in the company, someone to whom you can speak candidly. When you’re the president or CEO, it can be kind of lonely, and you won’t have anyone to talk with. I was lucky because Toyota has a robust mentorship system, which pairs retired company executives with active ones. But executives anywhere can find a sounding board—someone who speaks the same corporate language you do and has a similar background. It’s worth the effort to find one.

Finally, if you’re going to lead lean, you need knowledge and passion. I’ve been around leaders who had plenty of one or the other, but you really need both. It’s one thing to create all the energy you need to start a lean initiative and way of working, but quite another to keep it going—and that’s the real trick.

Room to run

Even though I’m retired from Toyota, I’m still engaged with the company. My experiences have given me a unique vantage point to see what Toyota is doing to push the boundaries of lean further still.

For example, about four years ago Toyota began applying lean concepts from its factories beyond the factory floor—taking them into finance, financial services, the dealer networks, production control, logistics, and purchasing. This may seem ironic, given the push so many companies outside the auto industry have made in recent years to drive lean thinking into some of these areas. But that’s very consistent with the deliberate way Toyota always strives to perfect something before it’s expanded, looking to “add as you go” rather than “do it once and stop.”

Of course, Toyota still applies lean thinking to its manufacturing operations as well. Take major model changes, which happen about every four to eight years. They require a huge effort—changing all the stamping dies, all the welding points and locations, the painting process, the assembly process, and so on. Over the past six years or so, Toyota has nearly cut in half the time it takes to do a complete model change.

Similarly, Toyota is innovating on the old concept of a “single-minute exchange of dies” 2 2. Quite honestly, the single-minute exchange of dies aspiration is really just that—a goal. The fastest I ever saw anyone do it during my time at New United Motor Manufacturing (NUMMI) was about 10 to 15 minutes. and applying that thinking to new areas, such as high-pressure injection molding for bumpers or the manufacture of alloy wheels. For instance, if you were making an aluminum-alloy wheel five years ago and needed to change from one die to another, that would require about four or five hours because of the nature of the smelting process. Now, Toyota has adjusted the process so that the changeover time is down to less than an hour.

Finally, Toyota is doing some interesting things to go on pushing the quality of its vehicles. It now conducts surveys at ports, for example, so that its workers can do detailed audits of vehicles as they are funneled in from Canada, the United States, and Japan. This allows the company to get more consistency from plant to plant on everything from the torque applied to lug nuts to the gloss levels of multiple reds so that color standards for paint are met consistently.

The changes extend to dealer networks as well. When customers take delivery of a car, the salesperson is accompanied by a technician who goes through it with the new owner, in a panel-by-panel and option-by-option inspection. They’re looking for actionable information: is an interior surface smudged? Is there a fender or hood gap that doesn’t look quite right? All of this checklist data, fed back through Toyota’s engineering, design, and development group, can be sent on to the specific plant that produced the vehicle, so the plant can quickly compare it with other vehicles produced at the same time.

All of these moves to continue perfecting lean are consistent with the basic Toyota approach I described: try and perfect anything before you expand it. Yet at the same time, the philosophy of continuous improvement tells us that there’s ultimately no such thing as perfection. There’s always another goal to reach for and more lessons to learn.

Deryl Sturdevant, a senior adviser to McKinsey, was president and CEO of Canadian Autoparts Toyota (CAPTIN) from 2006 to 2011. Prior to that, he held numerous executive positions at Toyota, as well as at the New United Motor Manufacturing (NUMMI) plant (a joint venture between Toyota and General Motors), in Fremont, California.

Explore a career with us

What is kaizen and how does Toyota use it?

What is Kaizen? It is one of the core principles of the Toyota Production System.

The English translation is, broadly speaking, continuous improvement . ‘Kai’ means ‘change’ and ‘zen’ means ‘for the better’. It is a philosophy that helps to ensure maximum quality, the elimination of waste, and improvements in efficiency, both in terms of equipment and work procedures.

Kaizen improvements in standardised work help maximise productivity at every worksite. Standardised work involves following procedures consistently and therefore employees can identify the problems promptly.

Within the Toyota Production System, Kaizen humanises the workplace, empowering individual members to identify areas for improvement and suggest practical solutions.

The focused activity surrounding this solution is often referred to as a  kaizen blitz , while it is the responsibility of each member to adopt the improved standardised procedure and eliminate waste from within the local environment.

Kaizen begins in the early designs of a production line and continues through its lifetime of use by a process of consensus known as Nemawashi – read our explanation here .

Alternatively, see more about the Toyota Production System in our glossary .

Discover the 12 other pillars of the Toyota Production System: Konnyaku Stone Poka-Yoke Hansei Andon Jidoka   Just-In-Time Heijunka Kaizen Genchi Genbutsu Nemawashi Kanban Muda, Muri, Mura Genba

The pillars of the Toyota Production System don’t just inform the processes within our own factories and offices. Toyota’s expertise at applying ‘the lean approach’ is highly valued by other industries.

Toyota Manufacturing UK offers Lean Approach Seminars in which team leaders from other businesses are immersed in the philosophy and taught how to apply the techniques and ideas to their own processes.

Share Story

19 comments.

Hello. I am fascinated by the concept of kaizen. How does is time divided between carrying out manufacturing and improving the manufacturing technique? 90% producing 10% improving for example?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

To be the first to hear about all of our latest news, offers and events, check the box below, we’ll send these communications by email, phone, SMS or post. Be assured that Toyota will only share your personal information with companies that are an integral part of fulfilling the services we deliver. If you would like to find out more about how we process your data please visit our privacy policy for details.

Yes, I'd like to receive the latest news, offers and events from Toyota.

I understand that I can unsubscribe at any time.

Related Posts

Toyota awards 2024: praise for our cars and people

Our regularly updated list of the awards, achievements and accolades given to Toyota GB's cars, services and people during 2024.

W2RC 2024 result: BP Ultimate Rally-Raid

Toyota Gazoo Racing increased its advantage in the manufacturers' standings following a hard-fought third round of the always-tough W2RC 2024.

How Toyota is contributing to International Women’s Day 2024

What is International Women's Day 2024, and how has Toyota (GB) been contributing to this annual global initiative to #InspireInclusion?

2024 Toyota C-HR reviews: the first media drives

Selected media outlets were invited to test-drive hybrid versions of our new evolved icon. What were their 2024 Toyota C-HR reviews?

To hear about the latest Toyota news and offers, sign up here

Privacy Overview

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

The Contradictions That Drive Toyota’s Success

• Hirotaka Takeuchi,
• Norihiko Shimizu

Stable and paranoid, systematic and experimental, formal and frank: The success of Toyota, a pathbreaking six-year study reveals, is due as much to its ability to embrace contradictions like these as to its manufacturing prowess.

Reprint: R0806F

Toyota has become one of the world’s greatest companies only because it developed the Toyota Production System, right? Wrong, say Takeuchi, Osono, and Shimizu of Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo. Another factor, overlooked until now, is just as important to the company’s success: Toyota’s culture of contradictions.

TPS is a “hard” innovation that allows the company to continuously improve the way it manufactures vehicles. Toyota has also mastered a “soft” innovation that relates to human resource practices and corporate culture. The company succeeds, say the authors, because it deliberately fosters contradictory viewpoints within the organization and challenges employees to find solutions by transcending differences rather than resorting to compromises. This culture generates innovative ideas that Toyota implements to pull ahead of competitors, both incrementally and radically.

The authors’ research reveals six forces that cause contradictions inside Toyota. Three forces of expansion lead the company to change and improve: impossible goals, local customization, and experimentation. Not surprisingly, these forces make the organization more diverse, complicate decision making, and threaten Toyota’s control systems. To prevent the winds of change from blowing down the organization, the company also harnesses three forces of integration: the founders’ values, “up-and-in” people management, and open communication. These forces stabilize the company, help employees make sense of the environment in which they operate, and perpetuate Toyota’s values and culture.

Emulating Toyota isn’t about copying any one practice; it’s about creating a culture. And because the company’s culture of contradictions is centered on humans, who are imperfect, there will always be room for improvement.

No executive needs convincing that Toyota Motor Corporation has become one of the world’s greatest companies because of the Toyota Production System (TPS). The unorthodox manufacturing system enables the Japanese giant to make the planet’s best automobiles at the lowest cost and to develop new products quickly. Not only have Toyota’s rivals such as Chrysler, Daimler, Ford, Honda, and General Motors developed TPS-like systems, organizations such as hospitals and postal services also have adopted its underlying rules, tools, and conventions to become more efficient. An industry of lean-manufacturing experts have extolled the virtues of TPS so often and with so much conviction that managers believe its role in Toyota’s success to be one of the few enduring truths in an otherwise murky world.

• Hirotaka Takeuchi is a professor in the strategy unit of Harvard Business School.
• EO Emi Osono ( [email protected] ) is an associate professor;
• NS and Norihiko Shimizu ( [email protected] ) is a visiting professor at Hitotsubashi University’s Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy in Tokyo. This article is adapted from their book Extreme Toyota: Radical Contradictions That Drive Success at the World’s Best Manufacturer , forthcoming from John Wiley & Sons.

Partner Center

» Operations Case Studies » Case Studies Collection » ICMR HOME » Operations Short Case Studies » View Detailed Pricing Info » How To Order This Case » Business Case Studies » Case Studies by Area » Case Studies by Industry » Case Studies by Company

» Understand the concept of Kaizen and pre-requisites for its implementation in an organization

Case Studies Links:- Case Studies , Short Case Studies , Simplified Case Studies . Other Case Studies:- Multimedia Case Studies , Cases in Other Languages . Business Reports Link:- Business Reports . Books:- Text Books , Work Books , Case Study Volumes .

The Diversity and Reality of Kaizen in Toyota

• First Online: 06 October 2018

Cite this chapter

• Shumpei Iwao 5  

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science ((EESCS,volume 12))

737 Accesses

In the existing literature, kaizen (continuous improvement) has often been conceived of as the accumulation of similarly small, mutually independent, incremental process innovations that are conducted by workers, work teams, and their leaders. This chapter attempts to observe continuous improvement in a certain factory for a certain period and to show the diversity and reality of kaizen in Toyota. Through longitudinal observations, seven case studies are examined, showing that (1) kaizen consists of a series of innovations with various scales, such as number of stakeholders, amount of investment, and economic outcomes (e.g., cost reduction effect); (2) kaizen sometimes induces small changes in product design and affects the organizational activities of production design as a small-scale product innovation; and (3) kaizen activities sometimes influence other kaizen activities. With regard to these characteristics of kaizen, this study implies that (4) kaizen management needs organizational design. For example, in Toyota’s case, not only work teams but also product/process design engineers contribute to kaizen, and shop floor engineers play a vital role in coordinating between shop floors and engineering departments on the basis of the staff-in-line structure of organizations.

This chapter originally appeared as an article in Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review (EIER) Vol. 14, No. 1 (Iwao 2017 ).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

This article uses the word kaizen as an uncountable noun.

Boer and Gertsen ( 2003 ) define continuous innovation as process and product innovation, but they also think of continuous innovation as relatively small and numerous changes.

Womack et al. ( 1990 ) also studies Takaoka.

Following D’Adderio ( 2011 ), an organizational routine change was deemed to have occurred when an explicit operating procedure was altered.

For example, operational improvement, process/production engineering, product/design engineering, etc. could be included in kaizen projects as innovations.

This is calculated as 12 times 0.5 = 6.

100 yen was equivalent to approximately US$1 in 2015.

Takt is a Japanese-English term used in factories. Takt time means the time needed to assemble one unit.

The hood is the hinged cover over the engine.

The side panel is also called the “side member.”

Of course, a factor not to be overlooked is that the weighted scope of coordination is a kind of investment.

Based on these cases, we can say that kaizen consists of a variable scale of innovations, and we can measure this by the scope of coordination, in addition to the amount of investment and cost reduction effects.

Of course, it is doubtful whether Toyota can always determine the exact extent of coordination needed for kaizen.

The term “line” here means both organizational positions: line and production line.

Mintzberg ( 1980 ) calls an organization resembling staff in line “the Divisionalized Form organization” (p 335). However, here the staff in line is nearer the plant floor than in Mintzberg’s model and is unique in serving two roles.

Interview conducted on February 13, 2014.

The scale of innovations (and variability thereof) is also a function of the scope of innovations because innovative activities in this context are organizational in nature and require coordination.

Anand G et al (2009) Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure. J Oper Manag 27(6):444–461

Article   Google Scholar  

Barnard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Boston

Google Scholar  

Barratt M et al (2011) Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends research outcomes and future research implications. J Oper Manag 29(4):329–342

Bessant J, Caffyn S (1997) High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. Int J Technol Manag 14(1):7–28

Bhuiyan N, Baghel A (2005) An overview of continuous improvement: from the past to the present. Manage Decis 43(5):761–771

Boer H, Gertsen F (2003) From continuous improvement to continuous innovation: a (retro) (per) spective. Int J Technol Manag 26(8):805–827

D’Adderio L (2011) Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory. J Inst Econ 7(2):197–123

Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

Fujimoto T (1999) The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. Oxford University Press, New York

Fujimoto T (2007) Competing to be really really good: the behind-the-scenes drama of capability-building competition in the automobile industry. International House of Japan, Tokyo

Fujimoto T (2014) The long tail of the auto industry life cycle. J Prod Innov Manag 31(1):8–16

Gulick L, Urwick L (eds) (1937) Papers on the science of administration. Institute of Public Administration, New York

Imai M (1986) Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. Random House Business Division, New York

Iwao S (2015) Organizational routine and coordinated imitation. Ann Bus Adm Sci 14(5):279–291

Iwao S (2017) Revisiting the existing notion of continuous improvement ( Kaizen ): literature review and field research of Toyota from a perspective of innovation. Evol Inst Econ Rev 14(1):29–59

Iwao S, Marinov M (2018) Linking continuous improvement to manufacturing performance. Benchmark Int J 25(5):1319–1332

Lindberg P, Berger A (1997) Continuous improvement: design organization and management. Int J Technol Manag 14(1):86–101

March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA

Mintzberg H (1980) Structure in 5’s: a synthesis of the research on organization design. Manag Sci 26(3):322–341

Myers S, Marquis DG (1969) Successful industrial innovations (NSF 69-17). National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, New York

Book   Google Scholar  

Plowman DA et al (2007) Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change. Acad Manag J 50(3):515–543

Shingo S (1981) A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint. Japan Management Association, Tokyo

Simon HA (1947) (1997) Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York

Thompson VA (1965) Bureaucracy and innovation. Adm Sci Q 10(1):1–20

Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Ann Rev Psychol 50(1):361–386

Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24(10):991–995

Womack JP, Jones T, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates, New York

Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Economics, Meiji Gakuin University, Tokyo, Japan

Shumpei Iwao

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shumpei Iwao .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Takahiro Fujimoto

Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Fumihiko Ikuine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Iwao, S. (2018). The Diversity and Reality of Kaizen in Toyota. In: Fujimoto, T., Ikuine, F. (eds) Industrial Competitiveness and Design Evolution. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 12. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_9

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55145-4_9

Published : 06 October 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Tokyo

Print ISBN : 978-4-431-55144-7

Online ISBN : 978-4-431-55145-4

eBook Packages : Economics and Finance Economics and Finance (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Bendi Drexel
• Switch to Electric
• Batteries & Chargers
• Racking & Shelving
• Online Catalog
• Fleet Management
• Toyota Lean Management
• Agriculture Industry
• Beverage Industry
• Distribution Industry
• Manufacturing Industry
• Concrete Industry
• Problems We Solve
• MyToyota Parts Store
• Forklift Certification Training Course
• Safety Checklists
• Safety Products
• Safety Videos
• Why Work with Us
• Hiring Forklift Technicians
• Leadership Library

Toyota’s Lean Management Program Explained (with Real Life Examples)

by Frank Stuart , on Nov 1, 2023 3:45:00 AM

If you’ve ever searched for information online about the Toyota Production System, you've probably seen a variety of house-shaped graphics. But even though we all know what a house is, understanding what the TPS house graphic means can be a challenge — especially when some of the words are Japanese.

In this article, I’ll explain the house graphic and Toyota’s lean management principles. Because I worked for Toyota and have spent many years as a Toyota lean practitioner, I’ll share insights you won’t find anywhere else including:

• How the Toyota management system boosts employee retention
• Three common misinterpretations of Toyota’s lean methodology
• Several real-world examples and a customer case study

The Toyota Production System is What Makes Toyota #1

Toyota has made the best-selling forklift in North America since 2002. That’s a long time to be number one. How do they do it? By following the Toyota Production System (TPS). 

What is Toyota Lean Management vs. The Toyota Production System? Toyota Lean Management (TLM) is a system that takes the principles of the Toyota Production System and applies them to other industries such as construction, supply chain, healthcare and of course manufacturing. I’ve yet to find a business that doesn’t benefit from the Toyota production management system.

Toyota Principles Improve Retention and Your Bottom Line

Improving efficiency and customer satisfaction are the best-known reasons for following Toyota’s lean management practices. Most people don't know it can also improve employee retention.

Hiring and retaining qualified workers was the number one challenge reported in MHI’s 2024 Top Supply Chain Challenges survey . The responses come from more than 2000 manufacturing and supply chain industry leaders from a wide range of industries. 

This isn’t the first year hiring and retention created major heartburn for supply chain operations, and it likely won’t be the last. If finding and keeping good people is something your organization struggles with, TLM can help with that too .

Here’s my version of the TPS house.

Why is it a House?

Most people use a house-shaped graphic to explain TPS because the function of a house is to preserve what’s inside . All the parts of the house interact with each other to protect what’s the business and its people — from the groundwork to the pillars to the roof.

The Groundwork

Respect for People, Long-Term Thinking and Continually Improve

Respect for People, Long-Term Thinking and Continually Improve are fundamental management philosophies that drive all policy and decision-making under the Toyota way.

Respect for People is not about being nice (although that is important). This principle is about creating a home-like atmosphere where everyone is encouraged and supported to reach their full potential. 

EXAMPLE: A supervisor has monthly one-on-one meetings with each associate to:

• Review personal performance
• Discuss issues with work processes
• Uncover opportunities for improvement

This mentor-mentee program develops people from within. Associates move into higher and higher positions so eventually, the people leading the company not only know the product but understand the work.

Respect for people also includes being mindful of how decisions in one department affect another. Uncoordinated decisions can negatively impact the customer.

EXAMPLE: If sales and marketing decide to have a big sale the weekend before Thanksgiving, the extra orders could overwhelm an already understaffed shipping department — creating delays for the customer and/or increased overtime expenses.

Last but not least, respect for people means providing stable employment. This leads us to the next fundamental principle… 

Long-Term Thinking — During COVID and the supply chain challenges that followed, many companies made the hard decision to lay off workers. I was in the training department at Raymond during this time.

Instead of letting workers go, we chose to strengthen the company by training associates and improving processes. We developed online training programs on various topics for hundreds of associates in various roles. These actions and this type of thinking goes back to the 1950s when Toyota decided to focus on building a strong, stable company for the long term. The economy will cycle up and down, but because our people are our most important asset, we must take care of them and protect them, even during economic downturns.

Short-term decisions, like letting experienced and tenured employees go, can improve the bottom line in the short term, but long term it hurts the business. All too often, corporate culture lives and dies on a quarterly report. This is short-sighted. When times are good, you have to squirrel money away in your war chest to protect the company and its people when times are bad .

Continually Improve – It is said in business, as in life, we are either growing or dying. A structured focus on continual improvement ( kaizen ) and challenging the status quo ensures a company stays competitive and growing.

EXAMPLE: We challenged the team who reconditioned our forklifts this year. At the beginning of the year, our lead time was 12 weeks. By mapping the process, improving flow and using a kaizen philosophy, we are now at 6 weeks. We are not satisfied with this improvement and have further challenged the team to cut the lead time in half again by the end of this year.  

The Foundation

Organize, Standardize, Optimize

The next level of the TPS house is all about creating an efficient work environment. It starts with a clean, orderly workspace where the next tool (or whatever the worker needs) is right there and not hidden in a pile of clutter.

If we don’t give people an organized workspace and standards to follow, we’re not helping them be successful. Even worse, we’re wasting their time. It goes back to respect for people.

EXAMPLE: The litmus test I used in the factory was to have a workstation set up with all the necessary tools. If I could take a tool away from the workstation and the operator couldn’t tell me within five seconds what was missing, that meant we had more work to do to. 

To be clear, it isn’t about telling people: you must do it this way or to make changes for the sake of making changes. The goal is to:

• Find the best way of doing things for the people who are doing the work
• Develop standards and best practices
• If a better way is found, everyone starts using that new way instead

That last bullet point is the principle of kaizen showing up again. Toyota Lean Management is an ongoing process where small, incremental changes result in measurable improvements to quality or reduced cost, cycle or delivery times.

FYI, we haven’t gotten to the actual Toyota Production System yet. The groundwork and the foundation are the basis for TPS. The system doesn’t work without establishing the groundwork and creating a solid foundation. 

Creating optimized workspaces and processes are deceptively simple assignments. It’s really easy to make work hard and it’s hard to make work easy. When you’re stuck in chaos it can be hard to see the way out. 

The foundation of TPS helps make work easy. Once an orderly, efficient system has been established, we work on the two pillars.

TPS Pillars: The Toyota Production System

Just in Time & Continuous Flow

The first pillar is all about having what you need, when you need it. Waste, in the form of wasted time or excess inventory, should be avoided. 

Back in 2021, Bloomberg and other news organizations excitedly reported how Toyota had abandoned its “just in time” philosophy because it started stockpiling computer chips. This is just one example of how Toyota principles are misunderstood by the Western world.

Misunderstanding #1 Here’s what most news outlets got wrong: After the earthquake and tsunami in 2011, Toyota reevaluated the lead time required for semiconductors and other parts. Their assessment revealed they were unprepared for a major shock to the supply chain, such a natural disaster. 

To ensure a continuous flow of chips to their factories, Toyota required suppliers to carry a 2-6 month supply of semiconductors. When COVID hit, the news reported Toyota was “stockpiling” chips when, in fact, the company was simply following a plan it had created ten years earlier. 

Our business training in the Western world is all about the balance sheet. Reducing inventory becomes a goal unto itself and that’s when things start to go badly. “Just in time” doesn’t mean “last minute.” It means keeping enough supply to ensure a continuous flow.

For Toyota, "just in time" meant a supply that could weather supply chain ups and downs. In 2021, when the chip shortage forced other automakers to stop their production lines, Toyota kept churning out vehicles and raised its earnings forecast by 54% . 

Visual Management & Zero Defects

EXAMPLE: Zero defects is pretty self-explanatory, but here’s an example of zero defects through visual management. The first thing Mr. Toyoda built was an automated loom for the textile industry. Occasionally, a thread would break and the operator wouldn’t see it. When this happened, the final product had to be thrown away. 

To fix the problem, Mr. Toyoda put a washer in the thread. If the thread broke, the washer fell off into the machine and it stopped. The operator could fix the problem without any waste (defective product). This also allowed one operator to oversee multiple machines.

Misunderstanding #2 Some people say Toyota Lean Management is basically the same as Six Sigma. I disagree. There are major differences between the two systems , but here’s a big one related to TPS Pillar Two: Six Sigma says you can have 3.4 defects per million operations. An “operation” is defined as a single action, such as attaching a wire or screwing a bolt. Building a jumbo jet requires millions of operations. Knowing 3.4 defects are permitted per million operations, would you rather fly on an airplane built by a company that follows Six Sigma principles or Toyota?

Another comparison you may have heard is one about a GM versus a Toyota factory. At GM, workers can get in trouble for stopping the line. At Toyota, it’s the opposite. If workers aren’t periodically stopping the line, managers get concerned. It goes back to the fundamental principles we talked about in the very beginning: respect for people and a culture of continuous improvement.

Toyota Lean Management Case Study

I worked with a hard cider manufacturer in upstate NY. The company was approaching its busy season and trying to build up its inventory to supply its distributor. Their “we gotta get this done” mentality caused them to overrun their facility.

A Foundational Problem The company thought they were following the “just in time” lean methodology. What they had was a mess. 

• Product and supplies were all over the place
• Equipment was haphazardly maintained
• They didn't have good standards on how to clean the kegs

A bottleneck in their system meant a new batch would get stuck behind the previous batch and unfinished inventory would pile up. Disorganization and stress led to unnecessary handling, damage and waste (wasted time and wasted product). 

After speaking to everyone who helped produce the cider, we created a list of best practices. Next, we helped the company organize, standardize and optimize the workspaces and procedures throughout their facility. With groundwork laid and a firm foundation in place, we were ready to move on to Pillars One and Two.

Guess what? The company had more than enough capacity. They didn’t need to build up inventory for their distributor. All they had to do was tame their operational chaos.

• Standardized practices saved time and improved product quality
• Clear processes and optimized workspaces helped everyone work more efficiently
• The company reclaimed space previously used to store inventory

Cider Batches Now Flow Continuously Once the bottleneck was subdued and equipment was kept in good working order, the cider company could run continuously with minimal downtime between batches. By staggering five batches to start over six weeks the company could meet customer demands.

The Core of the House: Its People

Grow People: Skills, Competence, Leaders

I added this circle in the center of the house (you won’t find it in other TPS house graphics) because I was fortunate to learn about Toyota’s lean management system directly from Toyota executives. 

The addition was inspired by a story I heard that really stuck in my mind. Mr. Onishi, Toyota’s president, visited a plant in Canada. He asked one of the plant managers to explain TPS. The manager described the house and the elements of zero defects, continuous improvement, etc. Mr. Onishi politely said, “It’s actually a people development process. We want to improve people’s skills and competence and grow them into leaders. Our goal is to promote people from within because they know the products, the customers and understand the work.”

The TPS Circle

Everything starts and ends with respect. 

Teamwork is about supporting the person who does the thing the customer is paying for. 

EXAMPLE: At SST, that means the technician working on a customer’s forklift.

Go and See — when a problem arises, the best way to find a solution is to observe the problem. 

EXAMPLE #1: At the forklift factory, units occasionally came off the line with the wrong counterweight. We observed the employee do everything right until one time he read the build sheet but chose the wrong counterweight. He was always on the go which created an opportunity for this mistake. By adding a simple step, stopping to highlight the weight info, the problem disappeared.

EXAMPLE #2: A warehouse thought they needed to buy more pallet rack and even had a rack consultant on-site while I was there. Turns out the company had plenty of rack space. They just needed to throw out three years of inventory they couldn't sell. The executive team almost wasted thousands of dollars on rack they didn’t need rather than take a hit on their balance sheet.

Challenge does not mean I had a challenging day because two associates didn’t show up for work. It means aiming for the stars and making it to the moon.

To generate significant improvements, you need an aggressive challenge and a team that’s committed to reaching a common goal. It changes your approach. To keep the space analogy going, consider all the technological innovations we enjoy that came from putting a man on the moon .

Misunderstanding #3 Toyota’s Production System strives for 100% customer satisfaction by eliminating wasteful activities. Many business leaders incorrectly believe running lean means using cheaper materials or reducing staff. By now you know this isn't the Toyota way. Building a strong house requires leaders who respect their people and think long-term. 

Companies that refuse to think beyond the bottom line will always struggle to stay competitive. Their short-term savings on cheap materials create long-term losses as customers become dissatisfied. They will also waste money hiring and training people who leave when they aren’t treated with respect. 

Sometimes I have to have a conversation with new clients about helping team members overcome challenges. When something goes wrong, some companies look for someone to blame (reprimand or fire) but that’s not the Toyota way.

Toyota’s approach focuses on fixing broken systems, not pointing fingers. We encourage leaders to challenge their team members to improve processes, but if the team member fails and gets fired after one try, how is that person’s replacement going to feel about taking on the same challenge?

The Roof of the TPS House

The roof protects the house and the people inside. A safe workplace that produces quality products at the lowest cost with the shortest delivery time in a good environment generates high morale and protects the business. By protecting the business, you protect the people inside and help them to grow into successful leaders. 

Request a Free Toyota Lean Management Consultation

If you’d like to reduce costs and turnover while increasing customer satisfaction, why not schedule a free consultation ? Toyota Lean Management has a low cost of implementation and is designed to help you get more out of your existing resources. 

During the initial consultation, we’ll talk about where your company is now versus where you’d like to be. The next steps depend on the individual client, but typically we’ll Go and See your space and look for:

• Inventory build-ups
• Excessive transportation
• Cluttered workspaces
• Unnecessary motion
• Producing more than what’s needed for the near-term
• Piles of defects

To learn more, contact us online or by phone (800) 226-2345.

FLORIDA : Jacksonville South, Jacksonville North, Ocala, Orlando, Lakeland, Tampa, Winter Haven GEORGIA : Albany, Macon, Midland, Valdosta

The SST Blog

Want to increase your productivity, increase your safety, and increase your profits? Our blog can help. Fill out our form below to subscribe.

Subscribe to Updates

• Aerial Equipment (3)
• Electric (11)
• Finance and Leasing (5)
• Fleet Management (7)
• Forklift Batteries (5)
• Forklift Maintenance (24)
• Forklift Parts (6)
• Forklift Repair (15)
• Forklifts (47)
• Industrial Cleaning (5)
• Insider (2)
• Loading Dock (1)
• New Equipment (9)
• Pallet Jack (2)
• Pallet Rack (10)
• Problems We Solve (7)
• Recruitment (3)
• Safety (31)
• Scissor Lift (3)
• Special Offers (3)
• Stacker (2)
• Toyota Lean Management (3)
• Training (10)
• Used Equipment (4)
• Utility Vehicles (2)
• Warehouse Automation (4)
• Warehouse Solutions (24)
• May 2023 (4)
• May 2019 (3)
• December 2019 (3)
• February 2020 (3)
• May 2020 (3)
• October 2020 (3)
• May 2021 (3)
• September 2021 (3)
• March 2022 (3)
• July 2022 (3)
• September 2022 (3)
• July 2023 (3)
• August 2023 (3)
• October 2023 (3)
• April 2024 (3)
• August 2018 (2)
• June 2019 (2)
• July 2019 (2)
• September 2019 (2)
• July 2020 (2)
• August 2020 (2)
• November 2020 (2)
• December 2020 (2)
• January 2021 (2)
• March 2021 (2)
• April 2021 (2)
• June 2021 (2)
• July 2021 (2)
• August 2021 (2)
• October 2021 (2)
• November 2021 (2)
• December 2021 (2)
• January 2022 (2)
• February 2022 (2)
• April 2022 (2)
• June 2022 (2)
• November 2022 (2)
• February 2023 (2)
• April 2023 (2)
• June 2023 (2)
• September 2023 (2)
• November 2023 (2)
• December 2023 (2)
• January 2024 (2)
• February 2024 (2)
• March 2024 (2)
• February 2019 (1)
• April 2019 (1)
• August 2019 (1)
• October 2019 (1)
• January 2020 (1)
• April 2020 (1)
• June 2020 (1)
• February 2021 (1)
• May 2022 (1)
• August 2022 (1)
• October 2022 (1)
• December 2022 (1)
• January 2023 (1)

Southern States Toyotalift

Corporate office 115 s. 78th st,  tampa, fl 33619  call:  800.226.2345  •  813.734.7940 accounts receivable: (813) 549-3545 / [email protected], florida locations.

Winter Haven, FL 863.967.8551

Orlando, FL 407.859.3000

Ocala, FL 352.840.0030

Jacksonville, FL 904.764.7662

Lakeland, FL 863.577.5438

Georgia Locations

Valdosta, GA 229.247.8377

Macon, GA 478.788.0520  

Midland, GA 706.660.0067

Albany, GA 229.338.7277

• Spotter Trucks
• Personnel Carriers
• JLG Aerial Platforms
• Industrial Floor Cleaners

Product details

Teaching and learning

Back to Top

Welcome to NashFact ! We bring you thought-provoking and fact-based blogs, along with insightful videos, on technology, current affairs, business, investments and more. Join us as we delve into the latest happenings, providing well-researched articles and engaging videos that offer unique perspectives on the world around us. Explore our website to expand your knowledge, gain insights, and participate in the conversation. Stay informed, watch captivating videos, and discover the power of informed opinions

• Home  / 
•  / Case Study of The Infamous Toyota Recall Crisis of 2010

Financial Management

• 18 September 2023

Case Study of The Infamous Toyota Recall Crisis of 2010

I’m Nabeel — a seasoned Chartered Accountant with a remarkable 17-year journey through the worlds of investment banking, management consulting, and entrepreneurship . In this case study, we will delve into the infamous Toyota Recall Crisis of 2010, examining its historical context, the root causes of the crisis, its financial impact , and the strategic solutions that helped Toyota regain its standing in the automotive industry.  

History of Toyota: Pioneering Excellence in Automobiles  

In the early 20th century, Japan was on the cusp of an industrial revolution, and a visionary named Kiichiro Toyoda played a pivotal role in shaping its future. In 1937, Kiichiro Toyoda founded Toyota Motor Corporation, following in the footsteps of his father, Sakichi Toyoda, a renowned inventor. Toyota’s journey began with the intent to create automobiles that would revolutionize the industry, not only in Japan but worldwide. This marked the inception of a legacy known for innovation, quality, and reliability.  

Kiichiro Toyoda: A Visionary Leader

Kiichiro Toyoda, the son of Sakichi Toyoda, was born on June 11, 1894, in Japan. He inherited his father’s passion for innovation and manufacturing. Under Kiichiro’s leadership, Toyota began producing its first passenger car, the Model AA, in 1936.

His commitment to quality and efficiency laid the foundation for Toyota’s renowned Production System (TPS), a model of manufacturing excellence that continues to influence industries globally.

Recalls by Major Automakers  

The crisis of 2009 to 2011 toyota vehicle recalls  .

As we dive into the heart of the matter, it becomes clear that Toyota’s recall crisis from 2009 to 2011 was a turning point in the company’s history.  

• The scope of the crisis was immense, affecting more than 8.5 million vehicles globally.  
• The total number of recalls surpassed 10 million units , spanning various Toyota models.  
• This crisis took a substantial financial toll on Toyota, with an estimated cost of approximately $2 billion .  

The focal point of this crisis was the issue of unintended acceleration , where vehicles experienced sudden and unexpected acceleration without any input from the driver. These occurrences led to numerous incidents and accidents, raising serious concerns about the safety of Toyota vehicles.  

The exact number of incidents and casualties can vary depending on different sources and investigations. Toyota acknowledged and addressed these cases as part of their recall and safety improvement efforts. The media spotlight and public scrutiny compounded the urgency for Toyota to address these issues comprehensively and swiftly.  

Root Causes of the Company’s Problems: What Went Wrong  

To gain a holistic understanding of this crisis, it’s imperative to examine the root causes that contributed to Toyota’s predicament:  

• Technical Issues : Investigations revealed that sticky accelerator pedals and improperly placed floor mats were the culprits behind unintended acceleration.  
• Communication Gap : Toyota was heavily criticized for its slow and inadequate response to reports and allegations, leading to a significant communication gap.  
• Regulatory Pressure : Regulatory agencies, particularly the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the United States, conducted investigations that further intensified the crisis.  

Possible Alternatives to Address the Causes: A Path Forward  

In hindsight, Toyota could have explored various alternatives to address the issues:  

• Improved Quality Control : Enhancing quality control processes in manufacturing could have prevented technical issues at the source.  
• Effective Communication : A more proactive, transparent communication strategy with regulators and customers could have mitigated the impact of recalls.  
• Regulatory Compliance : Stricter adherence to regulatory standards would have reduced the legal and financial risks associated with the crisis.  

The Financial Impact of the Toyota Recall Crisis  

• Sales dropped by 16% in January 2010 due to safety concerns, a significant decline not seen in a decade.  
• Toyota’s stock price fell by about 10% overall and 30% compared to the S&P 500 index from September 2009 to April 2010. In contrast, Ford’s stock price increased by 80% during the same period.  
• The Wall Street Journal estimated Toyota’s financial impact at over $5 billion for the next fiscal year, covering litigation, warranty costs, increased marketing, and incentive campaigns.  
• Initial recall costs were approximately $2 billion , but future expenses, including potential litigation settlements, could reach up to $5.5 billion .  
• Fitch placed Toyota’s “A+” credit rating on negative watch, potentially increasing borrowing costs.  
• Toyota agreed to pay a $16.4 million fine to the NHTSA for delaying recalls.  
• Despite the financial toll, Toyota reported a $1.2 billion profit for Q4 and $2.2 billion for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010. However, recall expenses amounted to $1.1 billion , with a global sales loss of $800 million , and a $233 million operating loss in the North American region.  

Solutions and Plan of Action: Restoring Trust  

Toyota’s enduring commitment to quality, safety, and innovation ultimately proved to be the cornerstone of its recovery. By diligently addressing the root causes of the recall crisis, improving communication strategies, and fostering a corporate culture of accountability, Toyota managed to rebuild its reputation and reassert its position as an industry leader.

Toyota initiated a comprehensive plan of action to rebuild its reputation and regain customer trust. Here are some of the key actions taken by Toyota:

Recall and Repairs

Toyota initiated a comprehensive recall of affected vehicles to address the technical issues responsible for unintended acceleration. This involved fixing or replacing the faulty accelerator pedals and floor mats that were causing the problem.  

• Management Changes

The company replaced its President, Akio Toyoda, and implemented structural changes to improve internal communication and decision-making processes. These changes aimed to ensure a more proactive and responsive approach to quality and safety issues.  

• Quality Control

Toyota significantly increased its focus on quality control and safety measures within its manufacturing processes. The company implemented rigorous testing and quality assurance protocols to identify and address potential design flaws before they could become widespread issues.  

Transparency

Enhancements in transparency and openness in communication with regulators, customers, and the public were prioritized. Toyota began sharing more information about its decision-making processes, safety measures, and recall progress with stakeholders.  

Collaboration with Regulatory Agencies

Toyota worked closely with regulatory agencies, particularly the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the United States, to address safety concerns and regulatory compliance. This collaboration aimed to ensure that Toyota’s vehicles met and exceeded safety standards.  

Enhanced Safety Features

Toyota introduced new safety features in its vehicles to prevent unintended acceleration and enhance overall safety. These included brake override systems and smart throttle technology, which could reduce the risk of sudden acceleration incidents.  

Public Awareness Campaigns

Toyota launched public awareness campaigns to educate consumers about the safety measures and improvements implemented in its vehicles. These campaigns aimed to rebuild consumer trust and confidence in the brand.  

Continuous Improvement

Toyota embraced a philosophy of continuous improvement (kaizen) across its operations, including quality control and safety measures. The company committed to learning from the recall crisis and implementing ongoing improvements to prevent similar issues in the future.

Through these efforts, Toyota not only recovered from the crisis but also strengthened its position in the automotive industry. The company’s enduring commitment to quality, safety, and innovation allowed it to rebuild its reputation and reassert its position as a leader.

Lessons in Resilience

The Toyota recall crisis of 2010 offers a profound lesson for organizations worldwide. Despite facing monumental challenges, Toyota emerged from the crisis with its legacy of innovation and commitment to excellence unscathed, a testament to its enduring values and unwavering vision.

Key Lessons from the Toyota Recall Crisis (2010):

• Safety and Quality First: Prioritize safety and quality to avoid reputational and financial damage.
• Transparent Communication: Timely and transparent communication builds trust during crises.
• Effective Crisis Management: Swift action and leadership accountability are vital for crisis resolution.
• Continuous Improvement: Embrace a culture of improvement to prevent issues from escalating.
• Collaboration with Regulators: Work closely with regulators for compliance and safety.
• Consumer Trust: Regaining consumer trust is challenging once lost; safeguard it at all costs.
• Long-Term Focus: Maintain a long-term perspective and stay committed to core values.
• Learn from Mistakes: Crises are learning opportunities; use them to enhance processes.
• Brand Resilience: Resilience in adversity strengthens brand reputation and credibility.

Conclusion: Toyota’s Resilience and the Road Ahead

In conclusion, as a seasoned management consultant, I believe the Toyota crisis of 2010 serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of safety, quality, and transparent communication, especially during crises. The key lessons from this experience are effective crisis management , leadership accountability , and a commitment to continuous improvement .

Despite the significant financial impact of the recalls, Toyota reported a profit of $1.2 billion for the fourth fiscal quarter and $2.2 billion for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010. This demonstrated the company’s financial resilience.

Toyota’s resilience showcases the enduring value of brand reputation and long-term vision. As businesses strive for excellence and innovation, core values, customer satisfaction, and safety must always be at the forefront.

In today’s dynamic business landscape, these lessons guide us in building enduring organizations that emerge stronger and more resilient from challenges, upholding the principles of accountability, quality, and trustworthiness.

Let’s apply these lessons as we navigate our paths to success, ensuring safety, quality, and transparent communication at every step, forging a future where our organizations thrive and legacies endure.

• Accountability
• Financial Impact
• Lessons Learned
• Recall Crisis
• Root Causes
• Safety Measures
• Unintended Acceleration

Related post

The Power of Unity: Leveraging Strategic Partnerships for Business…

The Steve Jobs Of China: Xiaomi’s Phenomenal Journey

Story of Volkswagen: From Dark Past to Global Leadership

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study

Introduction, implementation of tqm in toyota, tqm practices in toyota, benefits of tqm in toyota, examples of tqm in toyota, toyota quality management, toyota tqm implementation challenges.

The Toyota Corporation case study report is based on the implementation of total quality management (TQM) meant to improve the overall performance and operations of this automobile company. TQM involves the application of quality management standards to all elements of the business.

It requires that quality management standards be applied in all branches and at all levels of the organization. The characteristic of Toyota Corporation going through the total quality process is unambiguous and clear.

Toyota has limited interdepartmental barriers, excellent customer and supplier relations, spares time to be spent on training, and the recognition that quality is realized through offering excellent products as well as the quality of the entire firm, including personnel, finance, sales, and other functions.

The top management at Toyota Corporation has the responsibility for quality rather than the employees, and it is their role to provide commitment, support, and leadership to the human and technical processes (Kanji & Asher, 1996).

Whereas the TQM initiative is to succeed, the management has to foster the participation of Toyota Corporation workers in quality improvement and create a quality culture by altering attitudes and perceptions towards quality.

This research report assesses the implementation of TQM and how Toyota manages quality in all organization management systems while focusing on manufacturing quality. The report evaluates the organization management elements required when implementing TQM, identifies, and investigates the challenges facing Quality Managers or Executives in implementing Quality Management Systems.

In order to implement TQM, Toyota corporations focused on the following phases:

• The company extended the management responsibility past the instantaneous services and products
• Toyota examined how consumers applied the products generated, and this enabled the company to develop and improve its commodities
• Toyota focused on the insubstantial impacts on the procedures as well as how such effects could be minimized through optimization
• Toyota focused on the kaizen (incessant process development) in order to ensure that all procedures are measurable, repeatable, and visible.

The commitment from business executives is one of the key TQM implementation principles that make an organization successful. In fact, the organizational commitment present in the senior organizational staff ranges from top to lower administration. These occur through self-driven motives, motivation, and employee empowerment. Total Quality Management becomes achievable at Toyota by setting up the mission and vision statements, objectives, and organizational goals.

In addition, the TQM is achievable via the course of active participation in organizational follow-up actions. These actions denote the entire activities needed and involved during the implementation of the set-out ideologies of the organization. From Toyota Corporation’s report, TQM has been successful through the commitment of executive management and the organizational workforce (Toyota Motor Corporation, 2012).

Through inventory and half the bottlenecks at half cost and time, the adopters of TMS (Toyota Management System) are authorized to manufacture twice above the normal production. To manage the quality in all organizational management systems, the Toyota Production System incorporates different modernisms like strategy or Hoshin Kanri use, overall value supervision, and just-in-time assembly.

The amalgamation of these innovations enables Toyota to have a strong competitive advantage despite the fact that Toyota never originated from all of them. The 1914 Henry Ford invention relied on the just-in-time production model. The Ford system of production, from a grand perspective, warrants massive production, thus quality (Toyota Motor Corporation, 2012).

Kanji and Asher (1996) claim that to manage the minute set of production necessitated by the splintered and small post-war marketplaces, the JIT system focuses on the motion and elimination of waste materials. This reduces crave for work-in-process inventory by wrapping up the long production lines. Toyota Corp wraps the production lines into slashed change-over times, a multi-trained workforce that runs manifold machines, and new-fangled cells into a U shape.

When supplementing the just-in-cells, the system of kanban is employed by the Toyota Corporation to connect the cells that are unable to integrate physically. Equally, the system helps Toyota integrate with other external companies, consumers, and suppliers.

The TQM and the creativity of Toyota proprietors both support the quality at the source. The rectification and discovery of the production problems require the executives to be committed. At the forefront of Toyota operations, the managers integrate a number of forms of operational quality checks to ensure quality management at all levels.

The uninterrupted tests help the Toyota workforce engaging in the assembly course to scrutinize the value of apparatus, implements, and resources utilized in fabrication. The checks help in the scrutiny of the previously performed tasks by other workers. However, the corporation’s own test enables the workers to revise their personal advances in the assembly course.

The Toyota process owners set up the mistake-proofing (Poka-yoke) procedures and devices to capture the awareness of management and involuntarily correct and surface the augmenting problems. This is essential for the critical production circumstances and steps that prove impractical and tricky for Toyota employees to inspect.

Nevertheless, the policy deployment system decentralizes the process of decision-making at Toyota. This context of implementing Total Quality Management originates from Hoshin Kanri’s management by objective (MBO).

This aspect becomes more advantageous to Toyota when dealing with quality management. The system initially puts into practice the coordinated approach and provides a clear structure for the suppliers, producers, and consumers through inter-organizational cost administration. Moreover, Toyota executives can solve the concurrent delivery, cost, and quality bottlenecks, thus replacing and increasing the relatively slow accounting management mechanisms.

Customer focus that leads to the desired customer satisfaction at Toyota Company is one of the major success factors in TQM implementation. For every business to grow, it should have understanding, reliable, and trustworthy customers. The principle of customer satisfaction and focus has been the most presently well-thought-out aspect of Toyota’s manufacturing quality.

The TQM may characteristically involve total business focus towards meeting and exceeding customers’ expectations and requirements by considering their personal interests. The mission of improving and achieving customer satisfaction ought to stream from customer focus.

Thus, when focusing on manufacturing quality, this aspect enhances TQM implementation. The first priorities at Toyota are community satisfaction, employees, owners, consumers, and mission. The diverse consumer-related features from liberty. The concern to care is eminent in Toyota Corporation during manufacturing.

Toyota has three basic perspectives of TQM that are customer-oriented. These are based on its manufacturing process traced back to the 1950s. The strategies towards achieving quality manufacturing, planning, and having a culture towards quality accomplishment are paramount for TQM implementation to remain successful. To enhance and maintain quality through strategic planning schemes, all managers and employers must remain effectively driven.

This involves training workers on principles concerning quality culture and achievement. Scheduling and planning are analytical applications at Toyota Company that purposes in assessing customer demand, material availability, and plant capacity during manufacturing.

The Toyota Corporation has considerable approaches that rank it among the successful and renowned implementers of TQM. From the inherent and designed structure of Toyota, it becomes feasible to comprehend why quality manufacturing is gradually becoming effective. The inspection department is responsible for taking corrective measures, salvaging, and sorting the desired manufactured product or service quality.

The Toyota Corporation also has a quality control system that is involved in determining quality policies, reviewing statistics, and establishing quality manuals or presentation data. Furthermore, quality assurance is one of the integral principles in quality implementation that is practically present at Toyota. The quality assurance and quality inspectors throughout the Toyota Company structure also manage research and development concerning the quality of manufactured products and services.

The Toyota production and operations management system is similarly dubbed as the managerial system. In fact, in this corporation, operational management is also referred to as the production process, production management, or operations (Chary, 2009). These simply incorporate the actual production and delivery of products.

The managerial system involves product design and the associated product process, planning and implementing production, as well as acquiring and organizing resources. With this broad scope, the production and operation managers have a fundamental role to play in the company’s ability to reach the TQM implementation goals and objectives.

The Toyota Corporation operations managers are required to be conversant and familiar with the TQM implementation concepts and issues that surround this functional area. Toyota’s operation management system is focused on fulfilling the requirements of the customers.

The corporation realizes this by offering loyal and express commodities at logical fees and assisting dealers in progressing commodities proffered. As Slack et al. (2009) observed, the basic performance objectives, which pertain to all the Toyota’s operations, include quality, speed, flexibility, dependability, and cost. Toyota Company has been successful in meeting these objectives through its production and operation functions.

Over several decades, Toyota’s operational processes and management systems were streamlined, resulting in the popularly known Toyota Production System. Although the system had been extensively researched, many companies, such as Nissan, experienced difficulties in replicating TPS.

The TPS was conceived when the company realized that producing massive quantities from limited product lines and ensuring large components to achieve maximum economies of scale led to flaws. Its major objectives were to reduce cost, eliminate waste, and respond to the changing needs of the customers. The initial feature of this system was set-up time reduction, and this forms the basis of TQM implementation.

At Toyota Corporation, quality is considered as acting responsibly through the provision of blunder-gratis products that please the target clientele. Toyota vehicles are among the leading brands in customer satisfaction. Due to good quality, its success has kept growing, and in 2012, the company was the best worldwide. Moreover, Toyota has been keen on producing quality vehicles via the utilization of various technologies that improve the performance of the vehicles.

While implementing TQM, Toyota perceives speed as a key element. In this case, speed objective means doing things fast in order to reduce the time spent between ordering and availing the product to the customer.

The TPS method during processing concentrates on reducing intricacy via the use of minute and uncomplicated machinery that is elastic and full-bodied. The company’s human resources and managers are fond of reorganizing streams and designs to promote minimalism. This enhances the speed of production.

Another objective during TQM implementation is dependability. This means timely working to ensure that customers get their products within the promised time. Toyota has included a just-in-time production system comprised of multi-skilled employees who work in teams. The kanban control allows the workers to deliver goods and services as promised. Advancing value and effectiveness appears to be the distress for administrators, mechanical specialists, and other Toyota human resources.

During TQM implementation, Toyota responds to the demands by changing its products and the way of doing business. Chary (2009) argues that while implementing TQM, organizations must learn to like change and develop responsive and flexible organizations to deal with the changing business environment.

Within Toyota plants, this incorporates the ability to adopt the manufacturing resources to develop new models. The company is able to attain an elevated degree of suppleness, manufacturing fairly tiny bunches of products devoid of losses in excellence or output.

The organizational hierarchy and job descriptions also determine the successful implementation of the TQM. Toyota is amongst the few companies whose organizational structure and task allocation have proved viable in TQM implementation. The company has three levels of management. See the diagram below.

Management hierarchy

Despite the hierarchy and task specification, employees are able to make independent decisions and take corrective measures when necessary to ensure quality during production. Team working is highly encouraged at Toyota Corporation, and this plays a significant role during TQM implementation. All stakeholders are incorporated in quality control initiatives to ensure client demands are satisfied.

However, all employees are required to carry out their assigned tasks, and the management closely supervises the ways of interactions between workers. The management ensures that the manufacturing lines are well-built and all employees are motivated to learn how to improve the production processes.

Toyota is among the few manufacturers in the complete automobile industry that consistently profited during the oil crisis in 1974. The discovery was the unique team working of the Japanese that utilized scientific management rules (Huczynski & Buchanan, 2007).

The joint effort in Japan, usually dubbed Toyotaism, is a kind of job association emphasizing ‘lean-assembly.’ The technique merges just-in-time production, dilemma-answering groups, job equivalence, authoritative foremost-streak administration, and continued procedure perfection.

Just-in-time (JIT) assembly scheme attempts to accomplish all clients’ needs instantly, devoid of misuse but with ideal excellence. JIT appears to be dissimilar from the conventional functional performances in that it emphasizes speedy production and ravage purging that adds to stumpy supply.

Control and planning of many JIT approaches are concerned directly with pull scheduling, leveled scheduling, kanban control, synchronization of flow, and mixed-model scheduling (Slack et al., 2009).

Toyota appears to be amongst the principal participants in changing Japan to a kingpin in car production. Companies, which have adopted the company’s production system, have increased efficiency and productivity. The 2009 industrial survey of manufacturers indicates that many world-class firms have adopted continuous-flow or just-in-time production and many techniques Toyota has been developing many years ago.

In addition, the manufacturing examination of top plant victors illustrates that the mainstream them utilize lean production techniques widely. Thus, team-working TPS assists Toyota Corporation in the implementation of TQM.

Executives and Quality Managers face some challenges while implementing Quality Management Systems in organizations. In fact, with a lack of the implementation resources such as monetary and human resources in any organization, the implementation of TQM cannot be successful. Towards the implementation of programs and projects in organizations, financial and human resources have become the pillar stones.

The approach of TQM impels marketplace competence from all kinds of organizational proceeds to ensure profitability and productivity. To meet the desired results in TQM implementation, an organization ought to consider the availability of human and financial resources that are very important for the provision of an appropriate milieu for accomplishing organizational objectives.

In the case of Toyota, which originated and perfected the philosophy of TQM, the Executives, and Quality Managers met some intertwined problems during TQM implementation. The flaw in the new product development is increasingly becoming complicated for the managers to break and accelerate, thus creating reliability problems. Besides, secretive culture and dysfunctional organizational structure cause barriers in communication between the top management, thus, in turn, augmenting public outrage.

The top executives may fail to provide and scale up adequate training to the suppliers and new workforces. As a result, cracks are created in the rigorous TPS system. In addition, a lack of leadership at the top management might cause challenges in the implementation of TQM. Therefore, in designing the organizational structures and systems that impact quality, the senior executives and managers must be responsible, as elaborated in Figure 2 below.

Total Quality Management is a concept applied in the automobile industry, including the Toyota Corporation. It focuses on continuous improvement across all branches and levels of an organization. Being part of Toyota, the concept defines the way in which the organization can create value for its customers and other stakeholders. Through TQM, Toyota Corporation has been able to create value, which eventually leads to operation efficiencies.

These efficiencies have particularly been achieved by continuous correction of deficiencies identified in the process. A particular interest is the central role that information flow and management have played in enabling TQM initiatives to be implemented, especially through continuous learning and team working culture.

The Toyota way (kaizen), which aims at integrating the workforce suggestions while eliminating overproduction and manufacturing wastes, helps the company to respect all the stakeholders and give clients first priority. The objectives are realized through TPS.

Chary, D. 2009, Production and operations management , Tata McGraw-Hill Education Press, Mumbai.

Huczynski, A. & Buchanan, D. 2007, Organizational behavior; an introductory text, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.

Kanji, G. K. & Asher, M. 1996, 100 methods for total quality management , SAGE Thousands Oak, CA.

Slack, N. et al. 2009, Operations and process management: principles and practice for strategic management, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.

Toyota Motor Corporation 2012, Annual report 2012. Web.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, March 30). Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study. https://ivypanda.com/essays/total-quality-management-tqm-implementation-toyota/

"Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study." IvyPanda , 30 Mar. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/total-quality-management-tqm-implementation-toyota/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study'. 30 March.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study." March 30, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/total-quality-management-tqm-implementation-toyota/.

1. IvyPanda . "Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study." March 30, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/total-quality-management-tqm-implementation-toyota/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Implementation of Total Quality Management (TQM): Toyota Case Study." March 30, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/total-quality-management-tqm-implementation-toyota/.

• Synchronous and Just-In-Time Manufacturing and Planning
• Just-in-Time Learning Approach
• The Just-In-Time Concept in Operations Management
• Provision of Just-In-Time Technology
• Major Global Corporation: Toyota
• Total “Just-In-Time” Management, Its Pros and Cons
• Just-In-Time Training Principles in the Workplace
• First World Hotel: Just-in-Time Manufacturing Model
• Motorola Company's Just-in-Time Implementation
• Toyota Motor Corporation's Sustainability
• Barriers and Facilitators of Workplace Learning
• The Science of Behavior in Business
• Standards, models, and quality: Management
• Managerial and Professional Development: Crowe Horwath CPA limited
• Managerial and Professional Development: Deloitte & Touché Company

• Our Services

Kaizen (change for the better) has long been recognised as one of the major tools of the Toyota Production System (TPS).

Practising Kaizen on a daily basis ensures that we constantly challenge to find a better way of working and therefore eliminate waste within our operations. For that reason TPS never stands still and constantly evolves to the next level.

It is a process that engages, empowers and motivates the employees at all levels. Tapping into the innovation and creativity of our people ensures we can make continuous improvement without the need for massive levels of investment expenditure.

Key Study Areas

• The 3M’s Muda(Waste), Muri(Overburden) & Mura(Unevenness)
• The 7 wastes
• The prerequisites for successful kaizen
• The philosophy of Work Kaizen before Equipment Kaizen

All levels up to and including managers

Course Information

This course can be undertaken at Deeside or at a client's site.

Course duration is one day with the start time flexible to suit your requirements.

£435+VAT per person.

Customer Comments

"Competitive and engaging." - 12/04/18