logic and critical thinking freshman course chapter 1 afaan oromoo

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Freshman course logic and critical thinking

2021, Ethiopian freshman course logic course

FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING COURSE CODE: PHIL 1011

Related Papers

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Jamie C Watson

Christoph Lumer

This contribution gives an overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation. It explains what an 'epistemological approach to argumentation' is, and justifies this approach as being better than a rhetorical or a consensualist approach. It systemizes the main directions and theories within the epistemological approach according to their criteria for good argumentation. It presents contributions by epistemological argumentation theorists to major topics of argumentation theory. Finally, it introduces the articles of the two special issues of "Informal Logic" about the epistemological approach to argumentation.

Julian Fernando Trujillo Amaya

George Boger

Argumentation

claudia cuadro

Informal Logic, 30(2), 2010, 159-184.

Douglas Walton

This paper explains how a fallacious argument can be deceptive by appearing to be a better argument of its kind than it really is. The explanation combines heuristics and argumentation schemes. Heuristics are fast and frugal shortcuts to a solution to a problem. They are reasonable to use, but sometimes jump to a conclusion that is not justified. In fallacious instances, according to the theory proposed, such a jump overlooks prerequisites of the defeasible argumentation scheme for the type of argument in question.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

David Botting

Godden, D. and Zenker, F. (2015). Denying antecedents and affirming consequents: The state of the art. Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice, 35, 88-134.

David Godden , Frank Zenker

Martin Hinton

Daniel L Robb

Logique & Analyse, Vol. 129-130, 1990. pp. 113-154.

INFORMAL LOGIC-WINDSOR ONTARIO-

Argumentation, Vol. 13, 1999. pp. 161-182.

Informal Logic

Godden, D. and Walton, D. (2004). Denying the antecedent as a legitimate argumentative strategy: A dialectical model. Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice, 24, 219-243.

David Godden , Douglas Walton

Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 2006, 745-777.

Ulrich de Balbian

Jim Mackenzie

Jean H.M. Wagemans

Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, ed. Iyad Rahwan and Guillermo Simari,Berlin, Springer, 2009, 1-24.

Adam Corner

Charlene Tan

Edwin Brandon

Logic Journal of the IGPL (Interest Group on Pure and Applied Logic), vol. 5, 1997. pp. 603-614.

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 73, 1998. pp. 711-735.

Argument and Computation, 5(2-3), 2014, 139-159.

Journal of Applied Logic, 6, 2008, 361-379.

Reasoning and Public Health

Louise Cummings

Dr. S. Lourdu nathan

Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Beginning of the XXIst Century, ed Henrique Jales Ribeiro,University of Coimbra Press, Coimbra, Portugal, 2009, 87-109.

Matheus Silva

Macagno, F. & Walton, D. (2017). Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation. The pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting. Amsterdam: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-319-62544-7.

FABRIZIO MACAGNO , Douglas Walton

Juho Ritola

International Commentary on Evidence

Tamkeen Shah

Open textbook

Matthew Van Cleave

Rethinking the BSE Crisis

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• FRESHMAN EXAMS
• __First Geography
• __Additional Geography
• __Final Geography
• _Psychology
• __First Psychology
• __Final Exam 1
• __Fina Exam 2
• _Logic and Critical
• __Logic unit 1-4
• __Fallacy part
• __Logic Final Exam
• _Emerging Technology
• __First Exam
• __Final Exam
• _Anthropology
• __Microbiology
• Website Design(Blogger)
• __Start Blogger
• __Add Custom Cursor
• __Steps to Write Questions
• _Saayikoloojii
• __Durbummaan maali?
• __Dubartoonni dhiira irraa maal jibbu
• __Digiriin Yoom Cittuu Waraqaa...
• _Kana Beektuu?
• __Iskolarshiippii Argachuuf
• __Sareen Walquunnamtii Saalaa booda
• __Gootota Afaan Oromoo
• __Hariiroo Profeesara Wajjiin
• __Kaayyoo Jireenyaa
• _Dinqisiisoo
• __Addunyaa sa'a 24 Aduun ba'u
• _Choose studying field
• __Study English

LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING LAST YEAR EXAM FROM UNIT 1-4 QUESTIONS AND THEIR ANSWERS

  LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING

FROM UNIT 1-4

QUESTIONS AND THEIR ANSWERS FROM LAST YEAR EXAM

WWW.OROTECHY.COM

1. According to Socrates philosophy not consists

A. Critical habit

B. Eternal vigilance

C. Reverence for truth

2. The often held set of views or belief about life and universe describes which feature of philosophy?

B. Informal

C. Wholeness

D. Logical analysis

3. Identify the field that deals with the deep nature of reality and existence.

A. The field of philosophy, Epistemology

B. The field of philosophy, Axiology

C. The field of philosophy, Metaphysics

4. Which one of the following deals with the body and mind of human relationship.

A. Cosmological

B. Theological

C. Ontological

D. Anthropological

5. …  Seeks where basic reality in matter found

A. Cosmological aspect of metaphysics

B. Ontological aspect of metaphysics

C. Anthropological aspect of metaphysics

D. Theological aspect of metaphysics

6. One of the following asks what is truth as well as the way in which we know whether it is or not?

A.  The field of philosophy,  Metaphysics

B.  The field of philosophy,  Axiology

C.   The field of philosophy,  Epistemology

7. By studying physics textbook Abraham understand the as earth revolves around the the sun. Your knowledge source here is:

A. Authority

B. Empiricism

C. Intuition

D. Revelation

8. In which type of knowledge source logic is a central core?

A. Empiricism

B. Intuition

C. Revelation

D. Rationalism

9. One is not the question of axiology?

A. What does it mean value

B. From where value came

C. How do we know truth

D. How to justify values

10. Identify the one not included under normative ethics

A. Deontological

B. Moral intuitionism

C. Teleological ethics

D. Virtue ethics

11. Which government form is the best? Which branch of ethics deals with this question?

A. Aesthetic

C. Normative

12. The meaning of good/bad? Which branch of ethics study this;

A. Normative

C. Meta ethics

13. Identify premise indicator from the below lists.

A. Owing to

C. Accordingly

D. It may be that

14. All Ethiopians are Africans. Abdul is Ethiopian. Therefore Abdul is African.

A. Inductive argument

B. Deductive argument

C. Conductive argument

D. None of the above

15. Identify non argument expression from the below list.

A. A pieces of advice

B. Statement of belief

D. Explanation

16. 82 bananas are selected randomly from a basket containing 100 bananas and they were found to be ripe.

B. Conductive argument

C. Deductive argument

D. All of the above

17. Which one is not deductive argument indicator word?

A. Definitely

B. Certainly

C. Plausibly

D. Absolutely

18. God is benevolent . Hence He has no any evil. Which from deductive argument is this?

A. Argument from analogy

B. Argument from pure mathematics

C. Argument from causal inference

D. Argument from definition

19. It was sunny for the whole of this week. This indicates that it will be sunny for the next weeks. The base for the above argument is:

B. Causation

C. Prediction

20. Deductive argument is invalid when:

A. When  conclusion is not true (false) and  premise is true

B. When  conclusion is true and  premise is not false(true)

D. When all true premise and all true conclusion

2 1. When the false premise actually support the conclusion, the argument is:

D. Uncogent

22. This room contains 100 computer. 80 of them are black in colour. It can be concluded that all the computers are red in colour. What this argument can be?

A. It is a valid inductive argument

B. It is a sound deductive argument

C. Weak inductive argument

D. Strong inductive argument

23. One of the following is not indicator of weak inductive argument?

D. Less than

24. Cogent argument is;

A. All true premise and strong

B. Single true conclusion and false premise

C. All false conclusion and false conclusion

D. Weak and one or both false premise

25. Which one of the following is not weakness of cognitive function of language?

A. Ambiguity

B. Vagueness

C. Lack of precision

26. I love Hawi. Which function of language this statement describes?

A. Cognitive function

B. Emotive function

C. Directive function

27. Identify from the following what " terms " do not consists?

A. Proper names

B. Common names

C. Descriptive phrases

28. Artists are persons like, Hachalu Hundessa, Gelana Garomsa, Tadele Gemechu. What type of definition this represents?

A. Connotation

B. Denomination

C. Denotation

D. Intentional

29. One of the following is not purpose of definition in logic:

A. To avoid confusion

B. Avoid obscurity

C. To introduce new words

D. To avoid misleading use of words

E. All of the above

F. None of the above

30. "Operation Sun set" What type of definition;

B. Stipulative

C. Precising

D. Theoretical

31. Which type of definition give restriction to the meaning of terms?

A. Theoretical

D. Stipulative

32. Window means this and this. This kind of definition is:

A. Ostensive

B. Enumerative

C. Definition by subclass

D. All can be the answer

33. In which type of definition definiendum is equal with definiens?

A. Operational

B. Definition by genus and difference

C. Etymological

D. Synonymous

35. The word "captain" is from latin; caput, meaning head. Which type of  intentional definition is this?

A. Synonymous

B. Operational

D. Definition by genus and difference

36. See means observe. Which one of the following intentional definition type is this?

B. Synonymous

C. Definition by genus and difference

D. Etymological

37. "Human being" means a featherless biped. Which rule of lexical definition is not satisfied here?

A. Standard of proper grammar

B. Should avoid circularity

C. Should not be too narrow

D. Should convey essential meaning

38. Identify the one not included in standard of critical thinking

A. Consistency

B. Relevance

C. Completeness

D.  None of the above

39. Taye says one thing and performs another thing. Which standard of critical thinking Taye lacks here?

B. Logical consistency

C. Practical consistency

D. Fairness

E. Accuracy

40. One of the following is not traits of uncritical thinkers.

A. Impatient with complexity

B. Preoccupied with themselves

C. Base judgement on first impression

D. Willingly pay attention to others view

41. One of the following is not included under barriers to critical thinking:

A. Wishful thinking

B. Relativistic thinking

C. Unwanted assumption

D. Egocentrism

E. None of the above

MORE QUESTIONS👉 HERE

Post a Comment

Contact form.

Afaan Oromo/Chapter 01

• 1 Shopping Conversation
• 2.1 Numbers
• 2.2 Ordinals
• 2.3 Fractions
• 2.4 Combining Numbers
• 3 Chapter Vocabulary

Shopping Conversation

[For translation see here ]

The Numbers in Oromo

Numbers come after the noun they modify, so that “two mangoes” is “ mangoo lama ”, just as “five birr” is “ qarshii shan ” and 200 is dhibba lama . Ordinal numbers are formed by adding the suffix - ffaa or - affaa to the number. Fractions can be expressed by saying the numerator as a cardinal number and then the denominator as an ordinal number.

1st — tokkoffaa 2nd — lamaffaa 3rd — sadaffaa 4th — arfaffaa, afraffa 5th — shanaffaa 6th — jahaffaa 7th — torbaffaa 8th — saddeetaffaa 9th — sagalaffaa 10th — kurnaffaa, kudhaffaa 11th — kudha tokoffaa …

1/2 — walakkaa ( tokko lamaffaa ) 1/3 — siisoo, nuusii ( tokko sadaffa ) 1/4 — kurmaana, ruubi ( tokko arfaffaa ) 7/8 — torba saddeetaffaa

Combining Numbers

When the same number is repeated, it applies to all items. Thus, “ lama lama ” means “everything is two (birr)”. Two numbers said together indicate amount of birr for number of items, as in “ lama sadii ” for “two (birr) for three (items)”.

Chapter Vocabulary

• Book:Afaan Oromo

Navigation menu

Ethio-Russian Business Forum Held in Moscow - ENA English

• Environment

Ethio-Russian Business Forum Held in Moscow

Addis Ababa, February 6/2024(ENA)- The Ethio-Russian business forum was held in Moscow, in cooperation between the Ethiopian Trade and Sector Associations, the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Coordinating Committee for Economic Cooperation with African Countries (AFROCOM), and the Ethiopian Embassy in Russia.

The forum was attended by more than 100 Russian and 30 local businesses that operate in main focus areas of the country. 

The Ethiopian Investment Commission commissioner, the president of the Ethiopian Trade and Sector Associations and officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs attended the forum. 

Presentations were made to promote opportunities in our country in the fields of investment, trade and tourism, followed by Business-to-Business (B2B) and Business-to-Government (B2G) discussions.