3D printing for ultra-precision machining: current status, opportunities, and future perspectives
- Review Article
- Open access
- Published: 16 August 2024
- Volume 19 , article number 23 , ( 2024 )
Cite this article
You have full access to this open access article
- Wai Sze Yip 1 ,
- Edward Hengzhou Yan 1 ,
- Jiuxing Tang 1 ,
- Muhammad Rehan 1 ,
- Long Teng 2 ,
- Chi Ho Wong 3 ,
- Linhe Sun 1 ,
- Baolong Zhang 1 ,
- Feng Guo 1 ,
- Shaohe Zhang 4 &
- Suet To 1
121 Accesses
1 Altmetric
Explore all metrics
Additive manufacturing, particularly 3D printing, has revolutionized the manufacturing industry by allowing the production of complex and intricate parts at a lower cost and with greater efficiency. However, 3D-printed parts frequently require post-processing or integration with other machining technologies to achieve the desired surface finish, accuracy, and mechanical properties. Ultra-precision machining (UPM) is a potential machining technology that addresses these challenges by enabling high surface quality, accuracy, and repeatability in 3D-printed components. This study provides an overview of the current state of UPM for 3D printing, including the current UPM and 3D printing stages, and the application of UPM to 3D printing. Following the presentation of current stage perspectives, this study presents a detailed discussion of the benefits of combining UPM with 3D printing and the opportunities for leveraging UPM on 3D printing or supporting each other. In particular, future opportunities focus on cutting tools manufactured via 3D printing for UPM, UPM of 3D-printed components for real-world applications, and post-machining of 3D-printed components. Finally, future prospects for integrating the two advanced manufacturing technologies into potential industries are discussed. This study concludes that UPM is a promising technology for 3D-printed components, exhibiting the potential to improve the functionality and performance of 3D-printed products in various applications. It also discusses how UPM and 3D printing can complement each other.
Article PDF
Download to read the full article text
Similar content being viewed by others
3D Printing and CNC Machining: Materials, Technologies, and Process Parameters
3D Printing Technology: Materials, Application and Current Trends in Process Improvement
Investigating the Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Roughness for 3D Printed Parts Using a Multi-jet Printer
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene
Artificial intelligence
Additive manufacturing
Artificial neural network
Binder jetting
Computer numerical control
Direct energy deposition
Depth of cut
Direct laser metal forming
Direct laser metal sintering
Electron beam melting
Finite element modeling
Fused decomposition modeling
Focused ion beam
Focused ion beam induced deposition
Integrated circuit
Laser-engineered net shaping
Laminated object manufacturing
Micro-electromechanical system
Molecular dynamics
Powder bed fusion
Polydimethylsiloxane
Polylactic acid
Single crystal silicon
Stereolithography
Selective laser melting
Selective laser sintering
Single-point diamond turning
Ultra-precision machining
Ultra-precision grinding
Ultraviolet
Vat photo-polymerization
Markopoulos A P. Preface to “Precision Machining”. MDP-Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. 2022, 10–12
Google Scholar
Li M, Yuan J L, Wu Z, Lyu B H, Sun L, Zhao P. Progress in ultra-precision machining methods of complex curved parts. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(5): 178–191
Article Google Scholar
Yuan J L, Lyu B H, Hang W, Deng Q F. Review on the progress of ultra-precision machining technologies. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 12(2): 158–180
Dornfeld D, Min S, Takeuchi Y. Recent advances in mechanical micromachining. CIRP Annals, 2006, 55(2): 745–768
Brinksmeier E, Preuss W. Micro-machining. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2012, 370(1973): 3973–3992
Liu X L, Zhang X D, Fang F Z, Zeng Z. Prrformncee-controllable manufacture of optical surfaces by ultra-precision machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 94(9–12): 4289–4299
Ding X, Lim G C, Cheng C K, Butler D L, Shaw K C, Liu K, Fong W S. Fabrication of a micro-size diamond tool using a focused ion beam. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2008, 18(7): 075017
Chen G D, Liang Y C, Sun Y Z, Chen W Q, Wang B. Volumetric error modeling and sensitivity analysis for designing a five-axis ultra-precision machine tool. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 68(9–12): 2525–2534
Yip W S, To S. Sustainable ultra-precision machining of titanium alloy using intermittent cutting. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2020, 7(2): 361–373
Yip W S, To S, Zhou H T. Social network analysis for optimal machining conditions in ultra-precision manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2020, 56: 93–103
Yip W S, To S. Identification of stakeholder related barriers in sustainable manufacturing using social network analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 27: 1903–1917
Precision engineering machines market size, share & trends analysis report by end-use (automotive, non-Automotive), by region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa), and segment forecasts, 2023–2030. Available at the website of Grand View Research
G G, Malayath G, Mote R G. A review of cutting tools for ultra-precision machining. Machining Science and Technology, 2022, 26(6): 923–976
Lucca D A, Klopfstein M J, Riemer O. Ultra-precision machining: cutting with diamond tools. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2020, 142(11): 110817
Jung H J, Hayasaka T, Shamoto E. Study on process monitoring of elliptical vibration cutting by utilizing internal data in ultrasonic elliptical vibration device. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2018, 5(5): 571–581
Zhang S J, To S, Zhang G Q. Diamond tool wear in ultra-precision machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 88(1–4): 613–641
Osman Zahid M N, Case K, Watts D. End mill tools integration in CNC machining for rapid manufacturing processes: simulation studies. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2015, 3(1): 274–288
Zhang S J, To S, Wang S J, Zhu Z W. A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2015, 91: 76–95
Simoneau A, Ng E, Elbestawi M A. Surface defects during microcutting. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2006, 46(12–13): 1378–1387
Wang S J, To S, Cheung C F. An investigation into material-induced surface roughness in ultra-precision milling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 68(1–4): 607–616
Zhang S J, To S, Zhang G Q, Zhu Z W. A review of machine-tool vibration and its influence upon surface generation in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2015, 91: 34–42
Marie N. Optical components: market shares, strategies, and forecasts, worldwide, 2013 to 2019. Global License Report. 2013
Childs T H C, Dornfeld D, Lee D E, Min S, Sekiya K, Tezuka R, Yamane Y. The influence of cutting edge sharpness on surface finish in facing with round nosed cutting tools. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2008, 1(2): 70–75
Liu K, Melkote S N. Finite element analysis of the influence of tool edge radius on size effect in orthogonal micro-cutting process. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2007, 49(5): 650–660
Ngo T D, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen K T Q, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018, 143: 172–196
Zhang S J, To S. A theoretical and experimental study of surface generation under spindle vibration in ultra-precision raster milling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2013, 75: 36–45
Wang H, To S, Chan C Y, Cheung C F, Lee W B. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tool-tip vibration and its influence upon surface generation in single-point diamond turning. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2010, 50(3): 241–252
Cheng M N, Cheung C F, Lee W B, To S, Kong L B. Theoretical and experimental analysis of nano-surface generation in ultra-precision raster milling. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2008, 48(10): 1090–1102
Kong L B, Cheung C F, To S, Lee W B. An investigation into surface generation in ultra-precision raster milling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(8): 4178–4185
He C L, Zong W J, Zhang J J. Influencing factors and theoretical modeling methods of surface roughness in turning process: state-of-the-art. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2018, 129: 15–26
Zhao L, Zhang J J, Zhang J G, Dai H F, Hartmaier A, Sun T. Numerical simulation of materials-oriented ultra-precision diamond cutting: review and outlook. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2023, 5(2): 022001
Zhao C Y, Cheung C F, Liu M Y. Modeling and simulation of a machining process chain for the precision manufacture of polar microstructure. Micromachines, 2017, 8(12): 345
Shi C K, Luo H H, Xu Z W, Fang F Z. Nitrogen-vacancy color centers in diamond fabricated by ultrafast laser nanomachining. In: Zhang J, Guo B, and Zhang J, eds. Simulation and Experiments of Material-Oriented Ultra-Precision Machining. Singapore: Springer, 2019, 277–305
Chapter Google Scholar
Dai H F, Hu Y, Wu W L, Yue H X, Meng X S, Li P, Duan H G. Molecular dynamics simulation of ultra-precision machining 3C-SiC assisted by ion implantation. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 69: 398–411
Guo X G, Li Q, Liu T, Kang R K, Jin Z J, Guo D M. Advances in molecular dynamics simulation of ultra-precision machining of hard and brittle materials. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 12(1): 89–98
Guo B, Wu M T, Zhao Q L. The FEM simulation of ultra-precision grinding of optical glass with micro-structured coarsegrained diamond wheels. In: Proceedings of Optical Design and Fabrication 2017. Optica Publishing Group, 2017, 1–2
Khalil A. K, Yip W S, To S. Theoretical and experimental investigations of magnetic field assisted ultra-precision machining of titanium alloys. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2022, 300: 117429
Shao Y Z, Adetoro O B, Cheng K. Development of multiscale multiphysics-based modelling and simulations with the application to precision machining of aerofoil structures. Engineering Computations, 2021, 38(3): 1330–1349
Hu K, Lo S L, Wu H, To S. Study on influence of ultrasonic vibration on the ultra-precision turning of Ti6Al4V alloy based on simulation and experiment. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2019, 7: 33640–33651
Huang W W, Tang J Y, Zhou W H, Wen J, Yi M H. Molecular dynamics simulations of ultrasonic vibration-assisted grinding of polycrystalline iron: nanoscale plastic deformation mechanism and microstructural evolution. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 640: 158440
Basheer A C, Dabade U A, Joshi S S, Bhanuprasad V V, Gadre V M. Modeling of surface roughness in precision machining of metal matrix composites using ANN. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 197(1–3): 439–444
Chapman G. Ultra- precision machining systems: an enabling technology for perfect surfaces. In: Moore Nanotechnology Systems. Nanotech, 2001, 1–9
Meng S T, Yin Z Q, Guo Y W, Yao J H, Chai N. Ultra-precision machining of polygonal Fresnel lens on roller mold. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 108(7–8): 2445–2452
Elton J. A light to lighten our darkness: lighthouse optics and the later development of Fresnel’s revolutionary refracting lens 1780–1900. The International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology, 2009, 79(2): 183–244
Khamooshi M, Salati H, Egelioglu F, Hooshyar Faghiri A, Tarabishi J, Babadi S. A review of solar photovoltaic concentrators. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2014, 2014(1): 958521
Li J Y, Zhu J B, Zhu X, Zhang D M, Li X G, Liu J H, Xu C Y. XU C. Processing behavior and surface quality control of the engine fuel nozzle precision machining by AFM containing magnetic particles. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 113(5–6): 1577–1590
Shahrubudin N, Lee T C, Ramlan R. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, 35: 1286–1296
Liu G, Zhang X, Chen X, He Y, Cheng L, Huo M, Yin J, Hao F, Chen S, Wang P, Yi S, Wan L, Mao Z, Chen Z, Wang X, Cao Z, Lu J. Additive manufacturing of structural materials. Materials Science and Engineering: R Reports, 2021, 145: 100596
Jandyal A, Chaturvedi I, Wazir I, Raina A, Irfan Ul Haq M. 3D printing—a review of processes, materials and applications in Industry 4.0. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2022, 3: 33–42
Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G. Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 83(1–4): 389–405
Sing S L, Tey C F, Tan J H K, Huang S, Yeong W Y. 3D printing of metals in rapid prototyping of biomaterials: techniques in additive manufacturing. In: Narayan R, ed. Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials. 2nd ed. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing. 2020, 17–40
Lee J Y, An J, Chua C K. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Applied Materials Today, 2017, 7: 120–133
King W E, Anderson A T, Ferencz R M, Hodge N E, Kamath C, Khairallah S A, Rubenchik A M. Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Applied Physics Reviews, 2015, 2(4): 041304
Li J, Monaghan T, Nguyen T T, Kay R W, Friel R J, Harris R A. Multifunctional metal matrix composites with embedded printed electrical materials fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 113: 342–354
Bagaria V, Bhansali R, Pawar P. 3D printing—creating a blueprint for the future of orthopedics: current concept review and the road ahead! Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2018, 9(3): 207–212
Rouf S, Malik A, Singh N, Raina A, Naveed N, Siddiqui M I H, Haq M I U. Additive manufacturing technologies: industrial and medical applications. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 2022, 3: 258–274
Mohanraj T, Jegadeeshwaran R. Introduction to Industry 4.0. In: Jena H, Katiyar J K, Patnaik A, eds. Tribology of Polymer and Polymer Composites for Industry 4.0. Singapore: Springer, 2021, 113–127
Kwon S B, Nagaraj A, Xi D L, Du Y Y, Kim D N, Kim W K, Min S. Studying crack generation mechanism in single-crystal sapphire during ultra-precision machining by MD simulation-based slip/fracture activation model. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2023, 24(5): 715–727
Paszkiewicz A, Bolanowski M, Budzik G, Przeszlowski Ł, Oleksy M. Process of creating an integrated design and manufacturing environment as part of the structure of industry 4.0. Processes, 2020, 8(9): 1019
Hao B T, Lin G M. 3D printing technology and its application in industrial manufacturing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 782(2): 022065
Eyers D R, Potter A T. Industrial additive manufacturing: a manufacturing systems perspective. Computers in Industry, 2017, 92–93: 208–218
Petrovic V, Vicente Haro Gonzalez J, Jordá Ferrando O, Delgado Gordillo J, Ramón Blasco Puchades J, Portolés Griñan L. Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49(4): 1061–1079
Praveena B A, Lokesh N, Buradi A, Santhosh N, Praveena B L, Vignesh R. A comprehensive review of emerging additive manufacturing (3D printing technology): methods, materials, applications, challenges, trends and future potential. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 52(3): 1309–1313
Irfan Ul Haq M, Khuroo S, Raina A, Khajuria S, Javaid M, Farhan Ul Haq M, Haleem A. 3D printing for development of medical equipment amidst coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic—review and advancements. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 38(1): 305–315
Ahn S H, Yoon H S, Jang K H, Kim E S, Lee H T, Lee G Y, Kim C S, Cha S W. Nanoscale 3D printing process using aerodynamically focused nanoparticle (AFN) printing, micro-machining, and focused ion beam (FIB). CIRP Annals, 2015, 64(1): 523–526
Yamazaki T. Development of a hybrid multi-tasking machine tool: integration of additive manufacturing technology with CNC machining. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 42: 81–86
Raina A, Haq M I U, Javaid M, Rab S, Haleem A. 4D printing for automotive industry applications. Journal of the Institution of Engineers: Series D, 2021, 102(2): 521–529
Anonymous. Cyclists take industrial 3D printing for a spin. Metal Powder Report, 2013, 68 (3): 26–29
Bozkurt Y, Karayel E. 3D printing technology; methods, biomedical applications, future opportunities and trends. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 14: 1430–1450
Zolfaghari A, Chen T T, Yi A Y. Additive manufacturing of precision optics at micro and nanoscale. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2019, 1(1): 012005
Muldoon K, Song Y H, Ahmad Z, Chen X, Chang M W. High precision 3D printing for micro to nano scale biomedical and electronic devices. Micromachines, 2022, 13(4): 642
Dai J T, Li P, Spintzyk S, Liu C F, Xu S L. Influence of additive manufacturing method and build angle on the accuracy of 3D-printed palatal plates. Journal of Dentistry, 2023, 132: 104449
Behera D, Cullinan M. Current challenges and potential directions towards precision microscale additive manufacturing – part I: direct ink writing/jetting processes. Precision Engineering, 2021, 68: 326–337
Johnson L K, Richburg C, Lew M, Ledoux W R, Aubin P M, Rombokas E. 3D printed lattice microstructures to mimic soft biological materials. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2018, 14(1): 016001
Kim J, Cao Y S, Eddy C, Deng Y Y, Levine H, Rappel W J, Sun B. The mechanics and dynamics of cancer cells sensing noisy 3D contact guidance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(10): e2024780118
Liu X F, George M N, Park S, Miller A L II, Gaihre B, Li L L, Waletzki B E, Terzic A, Yaszemski M J, Lu L C. 3D-printed scaffolds with carbon nanotubes for bone tissue engineering: fast and homogeneous one-step functionalization. Acta Biomaterialia, 2020, 111: 129–140
Chizari S, Shaw L A, Behera D, Roy N K, Zheng X M, Panas R M, Hopkins J B, Chen S C, Cullinan M A. Current challenges and potential directions towards precision microscale additive manufacturing – part III: energy induced deposition and hybrid electrochemical processes. Precision Engineering, 2021, 68 174–186
Jiang S, Guo D L, Zhang L, Li K, Song B, Huang Y A. Electropolishing-enhanced, high-precision 3D printing of metallic pentamode metamaterials. Materials & Design, 2022, 223: 111211
Müller M, Wings E. An architecture for hybrid manufacturing combining 3D printing and CNC machining. International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 2016, 2016(1): 8609108
Kapil S, Legesse F, Negi S, Karunakaran K P, Bag S. Hybrid layered manufacturing of a bimetallic injection mold of P20 tool steel and mild steel with conformal cooling channels. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 5(2): 183–198
Behera D, Chizari S, Shaw L A, Porter M, Hensleigh R, Xu Z P, Zheng X M, Connolly L G, Roy N K, Panas R M, Saha S K, Zheng X Y, Hopkins J B, Chen S C, Cullinan M A. Current challenges and potential directions towards precision microscale additive manufacturing – part IV: future perspectives. Precision Engineering, 2021, 68: 197–205
Berger U. Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2015, 10(2): 49–57
Behera D, Chizari S, Shaw L A, Porter M, Hensleigh R, Xu Z P, Zheng X M, Connolly L G, Roy N K, Panas R M, Saha S K, Zheng X Y, Hopkins J B, Chen S C, Cullinan M A. Current challenges and potential directions towards precision microscale additive manufacturing – part II: laser-based curing, heating, and trapping processes. Precision Engineering, 2021, 68: 301–318
Singh S, Ramakrishna S, Singh R. Material issues in additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2017, 25: 185–200
Valino A D, Dizon J R C, Espera A H, Chen Q Y, Messman J, Advincula R C. Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Progress in Polymer Science, 2019, 98: 101162
Wu J J, Zhang S H, Qu F L, Zhou H, Tang J. Matrix material for a new 3D-printed diamond-impregnated bit with grid-shaped matrix. International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Metals, 2019, 82: 199–207
Grzesik W. Hybrid manufacturing of metallic parts integrated additive and subtractive processes. Mechanik, 2018, 91(7): 468–475
Mochizuki T, Kawamura T. 3D printer of five-axis laminate-shaping with FDM method and its application. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Geometry and Graphics. Cham: Springer, 2019, 903–911
Ghibaudo C, Maculotti G, Gobber F, Saboori A, Galetto M, Biamino S, Ugues D. Information-rich quality controls prediction model based on non-destructive analysis for porosity determination of AISI H13 produced by electron beam melting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 126(3–4): 1159–1173
Rajaguru K, Karthikeyan T, Vijayan V. Additive manufacturing – state of art. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 21: 628–633
Adel M, Abdelaal O, Gad A, Nasr A B, Khalil A M. Polishing of fused deposition modeling products by hot air jet: evaluation of surface roughness. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2018, 251: 73–82
Thrasher C J, Schwartz J J, Boydston A J. Modular elastomer photoresins for digital light processing additive manufacturing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(45): 39708–39716
Cong W L, Ning F D. A fundamental investigation on ultrasonic vibration-assisted laser engineered net shaping of stainless steel. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2017, 121: 61–69
Senthilkumaran K, Pandey P M, Rao P V M. Influence of building strategies on the accuracy of parts in selective laser sintering. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(8): 2946–2954
Bhushan B, Caspers M. An overview of additive manufacturing (3D printing) for microfabrication. Microsystem Technologies, 2017, 23(4): 1117–1124
Karunakaran R, Ortgies S, Tamayol A, Bobaru F, Sealy M P. Additive manufacturing of magnesium alloys. Bioactive Materials, 2020, 5(1): 44–54
Gan J, Gao H, Wen S F, Zhou Y, Tan S C, Duan L C. Simulation, forming process and mechanical property of Cu–Sn–Ti/diamond composites fabricated by selective laser melting. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2020, 87: 105144
Wu J J, Zhang S H, Liu L L, Qu F L, Zhou H, Su Z. Rock breaking characteristics of a 3D printing grid-matrix impregnated diamond bit. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2020, 89: 105212
Durão L F C S, Barkoczy R, Zancul E, Lee Ho L, Bonnard R. Optimizing additive manufacturing parameters for the fused deposition modeling technology using a design of experiments. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 4(3): 291–313
Bakar N S A, Alkahari M R, Boejang H. Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 2010, 11(12): 972–977
Hwang S, Reyes E I, Moon K S, Rumpf R C, Kim N S. Thermomechanical characterization of metal/polymer composite filaments and printing parameter study for fused deposition modeling in the 3D printing process. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2015, 44(3): 771–777
Gong H J, Snelling D, Kardel K, Carrano A. Comparison of stainless steel 316L parts made by FDM- and SLM-based additive manufacturing processes. The Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 2019, 71(3): 880–885
Wu H D, Liu W, Xu Y R, Lin L F, Li Y H, Wu S H. Vat photopolymerization-based 3D printing of complex-shaped and high-performance Al2O3 ceramic tool with chip-breaking grooves: cutting performance and wear mechanism. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies, 2023, 11(1): 159–169
Zhou M P, Liu W, Wu H D, Song X, Chen Y, Cheng L X, He F P, Chen S X, Wu S H. Preparation of a defect-free alumina cutting tool via additive manufacturing based on stereolithography – optimization of the drying and debinding processes. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(10): 11598–11602
Yang Y, Chen Y H, Wei Y, Li Y T. 3D printing of shape memory polymer for functional part fabrication. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84(9–12): 2079–2095
Deja M, Zieliński D, Kadir A Z A, Humaira S N. Applications of additively manufactured tools in abrasive machining—a literature review. Materials, 2021, 14(5): 1318
Maekawa K, Yokoyama Y, Ohshima I. Fabrication of metal-bonded grinding/polishing tools by greentape laser sintering method. Key Engineering Materials, 2001, 196: 133–140
Denkena B, Krödel A, Harmes J, Kempf F, Griemsmann T, Hoff C, Hermsdorf J, Kaierle S. Additive manufacturing of metal-bonded grinding tools. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 107(5–6): 2387–2395
Ai Q F, Khosravi J, Azarhoushang B, Daneshi A, Becker B. Digital light processing-based additive manufacturing of resin bonded SiC grinding wheels and their grinding performance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 118(5–6): 1641–1657
Chen B, Chen P, Huang Y J, Xu X X, Liu Y B, Wang S X. Blade segment with a 3D lattice of diamond grits fabricated via an additive manufacturing process. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 33(1): 73
Traxel K D, Bandyopadhyay A. Diamond-reinforced cutting tools using laser-based additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 37: 101602
Skrzyniarz M, Nowakowski L, Blasiak S. Geometry, structure and surface quality of a maraging steel milling cutter printed by direct metal laser melting. Materials, 2022, 15(3): 773
He T, Zhang S H, Kong X W, Wu J J, Liu L L, Wu D Y, Su Z. Influence of diamond parameters on microstructure and properties of copper-based diamond composites manufactured by fused deposition modeling and sintering (FDMS). Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2023, 931: 167492
Su Z, Zhang S H, Liu L L, Wu J J. Microstructure and performance characterization of co-based diamond composites fabricated via fused deposition molding and sintering. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2021, 871: 159569
Kong X W, Su Z, He T, Wu J J, Wu D Y, Zhang S H. Development and properties evaluation of diamond-containing metal composites for fused filament fabrication of diamond tool. Diamond and Related Materials, 2022, 130: 109423
Sandhu K, Singh G, Singh S, Kumar R, Prakash C, Ramakrishna S, Królczyk G, Pruncu C I. Surface characteristics of machined polystyrene with 3D printed thermoplastic tool. Materials, 2020, 13(12): 2729
He T, Zhang S H, Yip W S, To S, Wu J J, Liu L L, Wu D Y, Kong X W, Rong L L. Investigation on the machining performance of copper-based diamond ultra-thin dicing blades manufactured by fused deposition modeling and sintering (FDMS). Tribology International, 2023, 187: 108702
Zhang L, Yi A Y, Yan J W. Flexible fabrication of Fresnel microlens array by off-spindle-axis diamond turning and precision glass molding. Precision Engineering, 2022, 74: 186–194
Georgiadis K. The failure mechanisms of coated precision glass molding tools. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Aachen: RWTH Aachen University, 2015
Zhang Y Y, Liang R G, Spires O J, Yin S H, Yi A, Milster T D. Precision glass molding of diffractive optical elements with high surface quality. Optics Letters, 2020, 45(23): 6438–6441
Xu Z Q, Wang J, Yin S H, Wu H, Yi L Y. Compound machining of tungsten alloy aspheric mould by oblique-axis grinding and magnetorheological polishing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2021, 22(9): 1487–1496
Altaf K, Qayyum J A, Rani A M A, Ahmad F, Megat-Yusoff P S M, Baharom M, Aziz A R A, Jahanzaib M, German R M. Performance analysis of enhanced 3D printed polymer molds for metal injection molding process. Metals, 2018, 8(6): 433
Boros R, Kannan Rajamani P, Kovács J G. Combination of 3D printing and injection molding: overmolding and overprinting. eExpress Polymer Letters, 2019, 13(10): 889–897
Gohn A M, Brown D, Mendis G, Forster S, Rudd N, Giles M. Mold inserts for injection molding prototype applications fabricated via material extrusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 2022, 51: 102595
Yang X X, Wu T, Liu D S, Wu J Y, Wang Y X, Lu Y Z, Ji Z Y, Jia X, Jiang P, Wang X L. 3D printing of release-agent retaining molds. Additive Manufacturing, 2023, 71: 103580
Assefa B G, Pekkarinen M, Partanen H, Biskop J, Turunen J, Saarinen J. Imaging- quality 3D-printed centimeter-scale lens. Optics Express, 2019, 27(9): 12630–12637
Luo N N, Zhang Z M. Fabrication of a curved microlens array using double gray-scale digital maskless lithography. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2017, 27(3): 035015
Asadollahbaik A, Thiele S, Weber K, Kumar A, Drozella J, Sterl F, Herkommer A M, Giessen H, Fick J. Highly efficient dualfiber optical trapping with 3D printed diffractive fresnel lenses. ACS Photonics, 2020, 7(1): 88–97
Seniutinas G, Weber A, Padeste C, Sakellari I, Farsari M, David C. Beyond 100 nm resolution in 3D laser lithography—post processing solutions. Microelectronic Engineering, 2018, 191: 25–31
Sung Y L, Jeang J, Lee C H, Shih W C. Fabricating optical lenses by inkjet printing and heat-assisted in situ curing of polydimethylsiloxane for smartphone microscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2015, 20(4): 047005
Zhu Y Z, Tang T T, Zhao S Y, Joralmon D, Poit Z, Ahire B, Keshav S, Raje A R, Blair J, Zhang Z L, Li X J. Recent advancements and applications in 3D printing of functional optics. Additive Manufacturing, 2022, 52: 102682
Yuan C, Kowsari K, Panjwani S, Chen Z C, Wang D, Zhang B, Ng C J X, Alvarado P V Y, Ge Q. Ultrafast three-dimensional printing of optically smooth microlens arrays by oscillation-assisted digital light processing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(43): 40662–40668
Guo P, Wei Z P, Zhang S J, Xiong Z W, Liu M Y. Feature-adaptive toolpath planning with enhanced surface texture uniformity for ultra-precision diamond milling of freeform optics. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2024, 323: 118220
Lim J, Kim Y K, Won D J, Choi I H, Lee S, Kim J. 3D printing of freestanding overhanging structures utilizing an in situ light guide. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2019, 4(8): 1900118
Wang S, Zhao Q L, Pan Y C, Guo B. Ultra- precision raster grinding biconical optics with a novel profile error compensation technique based on on-machine measurement and wavelet decomposition. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 67: 128–140
Liu C X, Oriekhov T, Lee C, Harvey C M, Fokine M. Rapid fabrication of silica microlens arrays via glass 3D printing. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2024, 11(2): 460–466
Lin C B, Huang P J, Chen G C. Integrating a fused deposition modeling 3D printing design with computer numerical control milling machines. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 125(7–8): 3869–3880
Durna A, Fries J, Hrabovsky L, Sliva A, Zarnovsky J. Research and development of laser engraving and material cutting machine from 3D printer. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2020, 28(1): 47–52
Kostakis V, Papachristou M. Commons- based peer production and digital fabrication: the case of a RepRap-based, Lego-built 3D printing-milling machine. Telematics and Informatics, 2014, 31(3): 434–443
Feng K P, Zhao T C, Lyu B H, Zhou Z Z. Ultra-precision grinding of 4H-SiC wafer by PAV/PF composite sol-gel diamond wheel. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 13(9): 16878140211044929
Yan J W, Syoji K, Tamaki J. Some observations on the wear of diamond tools in ultra-precision cutting of single-crystal silicon. Wear, 2003, 255(7–12): 1380–1387
Zhang Y X, Wang D, Gao W, Kang R K. Residual stress analysis on silicon wafer surface layers induced by ultra-precision grinding. Rare Metals, 2011, 30(3): 278–281
Tao H F, Liu Y H, Zhao D W, Lu X C. The material removal and surface generation mechanism in ultra-precision grinding of silicon wafers. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2022, 222: 107240
Li C, Li X L, Huang S Q, Li L Q, Zhang F H. Ultra-precision grinding of Gd 3 Ga 5 O 12 crystals with graphene oxide coolant: material deformation mechanism and performance evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2021, 61: 417–427
Huo F W, Kang R K, Li Z, Guo D M. Origin, modeling and suppression of grinding marks in ultra precision grinding of silicon wafers. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2013, 66: 54–65
Young H T, Liao H T, Huang H Y. Surface integrity of silicon wafers in ultra precision machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 29(3–4): 372–378
Ayomoh M, Abou-El-Hossein K. Surface finish in ultra-precision diamond turning of single-crystal silicon. In: Bentley J L, Stoebenau S, eds. Optifab 2015. Rochester: SPIE, 2015, 96331I
Wu W L, Hu Y, Meng X S, Liao B K, Dai H F. Molecular dynamics analysis of the influence of ion implantation parameters on ultra-precision machining of silicon carbide. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022, 82: 174–191
Wang M H, Wang W, Lu Z S. Critical cutting thickness in ultra-precision machining of single crystal silicon. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 65(5–8): 843–851
Park Y G, Yun I, Chung W G, Park W, Lee D H, Park J U. High-resolution 3D printing for electronics. Advanced Science, 2022, 9(8): 2270046
Zong W, Ouyang Y, Miao Y E, Liu T X, Lai F L. Recent advances and perspectives of 3D printed micro-supercapacitors: from design to smart integrated devices. Chemical Communications, 2022, 58(13): 2075–2095
Zhang W, Liu H Z, Zhang X, Li X J, Zhang G H, Cao P. 3D printed micro-electrochemical energy storage devices: from design to integration. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(40): 2104909
Park Y G, Yun I, Chung W G, Park W, Lee D H, Park J U. High-resolution 3D printing for electronics. Advanced Science, 2022, 9(8): 2104623
Waldbaur A, Rapp H, Länge K, Rapp B E. Let there be chip - towards rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices: one-step manufacturing processes. Analytical Methods, 2011, 3(12): 2681–2716
Gross B C, Erkal J L, Lockwood S Y, Chen C P, Spence D M. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(7): 3240–3253
Alapan Y, Hasan M N, Shen R C, Gurkan U A. Three-dimensional printing based hybrid manufacturing of microfluidic devices. Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine, 2015, 6(2): 021007
Sochol R D, Sweet E, Glick C C, Wu S Y, Yang C, Restaino M, Lin L W. 3D printed microfluidics and microelectronics. Microelectronic Engineering, 2018, 189: 52–68
Khanna N, Zadafiya K, Patel T, Kaynak Y, Rahman Rashid R A, Vafadar A. Review on machining of additively manufactured nickel and titanium alloys. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 15: 3192–3221
Pragana J P M, Sampaio R F V, Bragança I M F, Silva C M A, Martins P A F. Hybrid metal additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 2021, 2: 100032
Grossi N, Scippa A, Venturini G, Campatelli G. Process parameters optimization of thin-wall machining for wire arc additive manufactured parts. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(21): 7575
Ming W W, Dang J Q, An Q L, Chen M. Chip formation and hole quality in dry drilling additive manufactured Ti6Al4V. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2020, 35(1): 43–51
Dang J Q, Zhang H, Ming W W, An Q L, Chen M. New observations on wear characteristics of solid Al 2 O 3 /Si 3 N 4 ceramic tool in high speed milling of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V. Ceramics International, 2020, 46(5): 5876–5886
Rein C, Toner M, Sevenler D. Rapid prototyping for high-pressure microfluidics. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 1232
Unger M A, Chou H P, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake S R. Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science, 2000, 288(5463): 113–116
Shikida M, Sato K, Tokoro K, Uchikawa D. Differences in anisotropic etching properties of KOH and TMAH solutions. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2000, 80(2): 179–188
Golonka L. Technology and applications of low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) based sensors and microsystems. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 2006, 54: 221–231
Walczak R. Inkjet 3D printing—towards new micromachining tool for MEMS fabrication. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 2018, 66(2): 179–186
Mehta V, Rath S N. 3D printed microfluidic devices: a review focused on four fundamental manufacturing approaches and implications on the field of healthcare. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 2021, 4(2): 311–343
Phung S C, Zhu Q F, Plevniak K, He M. 3D printed microfluidic devices and applications. In: Li X J, Zhou Y, eds. Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications. 2nd ed. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing, 2021, 659–679
Razavi Bazaz S, Rouhi O, Raoufi M A, Ejeian F, Asadnia M, Jin D Y, Ebrahimi Warkiani M. 3D printing of inertial microfluidic devices. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 5929
Comina G, Suska A, Filippini D. PDMS lab-on-a-chip fabrication using 3D printed templates. Lab on a Chip, 2014, 14(2): 424–430
Su R T, Wang F J, McAlpine M C. 3D printed microfluidics: advances in strategies, integration, and applications. Lab on a Chip, 2023, 23(5): 1279–1299
Au A K, Lee W, Folch A. Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices. Lab on a Chip, 2014, 14(7): 1294–1301
Behroodi E, Latifi H, Bagheri Z, Ermis E, Roshani S, Salehi Moghaddam M. A combined 3D printing/CNC micro-milling method to fabricate a large-scale microfluidic device with the small size 3D architectures: an application for tumor spheroid production. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 22171
Oyelola O, Crawforth P, M’Saoubi R, Clare A T. On the machinability of directed energy deposited Ti6Al4V. Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 19: 39–50
Sun Z G, Tian Y B, Fan Z H, Qian C, Ma Z, Li L, Yu H L, Guo J. Experimental investigations on enhanced alternating-magnetic field-assisted finishing of stereolithographic 3D printing zirconia ceramics. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(24): 36609–36619
Ni C B, Zhu L D, Zheng Z P, Zhang J Y, Yang Y, Yang J, Bai Y C, Weng C, Lu W F, Wang H. Effect of material anisotropy on ultra-precision machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020, 848: 156457
Varghese V, Mujumdar S. Micromilling-induced surface integrity of porous additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy. Procedia Manufacturing, 2021, 53: 387–394
Aldesoki M, Keilig L, Dörsam I, Evers-Dietze B, Elshazly T M, Bourauel C. Trueness and precision of milled and 3D printed root-analogue implants: a comparative in vitro study. Journal of Dentistry, 2023, 130: 104425
Wu Y Y, Qian S Q, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Cao H B, Huang M Y. Experimental study on three-dimensional microstructure copper electroforming based on 3D printing technology. Micromachines, 2019, 10(12): 887
Martin J J, Fiore B E, Erb R M. Designing bioinspired composite reinforcement architectures via 3D magnetic printing. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 8641
Mehta S, Suresh A, Nayak Y, Narayan R, Nayak U Y. Hybrid nanostructures: versatile systems for biomedical applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2022, 460: 214482
Miyoshi H, Adachi T, Ju J, Lee S M, Cho D J, Ko J S, Uchida G, Yamagata Y. Characteristics of motility-based filtering of adherent cells on microgrooved surfaces. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(2): 395–401
Liu H F, He L M, Kuzmanovic M, Huang Y T, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhu Q, Ren Y, Dong Y C, Cardon L, Gou M L. Advanced nanomaterials in medical 3D printing. Small Methods, 2024, 8(3): 2301121
Cheng K, Niu Z C, Wang R C, Rakowski R, Bateman R. Smart cutting tools and smart machining: development approaches, and their implementation and application perspectives. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30(5): 1162–1176
Selvaraj V, Xu Z C, Min S K. Intelligent operation monitoring of an ultra-precision CNC machine tool using energy data. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2023, 10(1): 59–69
Ren Z S, Gao L, Clark S J, Fezzaa K, Shevchenko P, Choi A, Everhart W, Rollett A D, Chen L Y, Sun T. Machine learning-aided real-time detection of keyhole pore generation in laser powder bed fusion. Science, 2023, 379(6627): 89–94
Shevchik S, Le-Quang T, Meylan B, Farahani F V, Olbinado M P, Rack A, Masinelli G, Leinenbach C, Wasmer K. Supervised deep learning for real-time quality monitoring of laser welding with X-ray radiographic guidance. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 3389
Xu Z C, Selvaraj V, Min S. Intelligent G-code-based power prediction of ultra-precision CNC machine tools through 1DCNN-LSTM-Attention model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2024: 1–24
Download references
Acknowledgements
This research was jointly supported by the State Key Laboratories in Hong Kong, China, from the Innovation and Technology Commission (project code: BBR3) of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; the Research Office (project codes: BBXM and BBX) of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China; the Project of Strategic Importance (project codes: 1-ZE0G and SBBD) of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China; and the Research Committee (project code: RMAC) of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
State Key Laboratory of Ultra-precision Machining Technology, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
Tao He, Wai Sze Yip, Edward Hengzhou Yan, Jiuxing Tang, Muhammad Rehan, Linhe Sun, Baolong Zhang, Feng Guo & Suet To
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
Department of Physics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Chi Ho Wong
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China
Shaohe Zhang
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to Wai Sze Yip or Suet To .
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the Creative Commons license is provided, and the changes made are indicated.
The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ to view a copy of this license.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
He, T., Yip, W.S., Yan, E.H. et al. 3D printing for ultra-precision machining: current status, opportunities, and future perspectives. Front. Mech. Eng. 19 , 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-024-0792-4
Download citation
Received : 12 December 2023
Accepted : 21 March 2024
Published : 16 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-024-0792-4
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- ultra-precision machining
- 3D printing
- additive manufacturing
- future perspectives
- start-of-the-art-review
Advertisement
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
- Engineering
- Manufacturing Engineering
- 3D Printing
Artificial Intelligence in 3D Printing
- In book: Enabling Machine Learning Applications in Data Science (pp.77-88)
- Kafrelsheikh University
- Faculty of computer and information science
Abstract and Figures
Discover the world's research
- 25+ million members
- 160+ million publication pages
- 2.3+ billion citations
- J INTELL MANUF
- COMPUT AIDED DESIGN
- Elena M. Blinova
- Igor I. Bezukladnikov
- Heming Zhang
- Zhaojing Zhang
- Kai-Yin Fok
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
Article Menu
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
The effect of 3d printing layer thickness and post-polymerization time on the flexural strength and hardness of denture base resins.
1. Introduction
2. materials and methods, 2.1. specimens preparation, 2.2. specimens testing, 2.2.1. flexural strength, 2.2.2. hardness, 2.3. statistical analysis, 4. discussion, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
- Witkowski, S. (CAD-)/CAM in dental technology. Quintessence Dent. Technol. 2005 , 28 , 169–184. [ Google Scholar ]
- Revilla-León, M.; Özcan, M. Additive Manufacturing Technologies Used for Processing Polymers: Current Status and Potential Application in Prosthetic Dentistry. J. Prosthodont. 2019 , 28 , 146–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Jawahar, A.; Maragathavalli, G. Applications of 3D printing in dentistry—A review. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019 , 11 , 1670–1675. [ Google Scholar ]
- Gad, M.M.; Fouda, S.M. Factors affecting flexural strength of 3D-printed resins: A systematic review. J. Prosthodont. 2023 , 32 , 96–110. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Alshamrani, A.A.; Raju, R.; Ellakwa, A. Effect of Printing Layer Thickness and Postprinting Conditions on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of a 3D-Printed Resin. BioMed Res. Int. 2022 , 2022 , 8353137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Barazanchi, A.; Li, K.C.; Al-Amleh, B.; Lyons, K.; Waddell, J.N. Additive Technology: Update on Current Materials and Applications in Dentistry. J. Prosthodont. 2017 , 26 , 156–163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kim, D.; Shim, J.S.; Lee, D.; Shin, S.H.; Nam, N.E.; Park, K.H.; Shim, J.S.; Kim, J.E. Effects of Post-Curing Time on the Mechanical and Color Properties of Three-Dimensional Printed Crown and Bridge Materials. Polymers 2020 , 12 , 2762. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Scotti, C.K.; Velo, M.M.A.C.; Rizzante, F.A.P.; Nascimento, T.R.L.; Mondelli, R.F.L.; Bombonatti, J.F.S. Physical and surface properties of a 3D-printed composite resin for a digital workflow. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020 , 124 , 614.e1–614.e5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- KEßLER, A.; Hickel, R.; Ilie, N. In vitro investigation of the influence of printing direction on the flexural strength, flexural modulus and fractographic analysis of 3D-printed temporary materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2021 , 40 , 641–649. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Pagac, M.; Hajnys, J.; Ma, Q.P.; Jancar, L.; Jansa, J.; Stefek, P.; Mesicek, J. A Review of Vat Photopolymerization Technology: Materials, Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends of 3D Printing. Polymers 2021 , 13 , 598. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Figueiredo-Pina, C.G.; Serro, A.P. 3D Printing for Dental Applications. Materials 2023 , 16 , 4972. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Srinivasan, M.; Kalberer, N.; Kamnoedboon, P.; Mekki, M.; Durual, S.; Özcan, M.; Müller, F. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: An evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. J. Dent. 2021 , 114 , 103785. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Chen, S.; Yang, J.; Jia, Y.G.; Lu, B.; Ren, L. A Study of 3D-Printable Reinforced Composite Resin: PMMA Modified with Silver Nanoparticles Loaded Cellulose Nanocrystal. Materials 2018 , 11 , 2444. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Perea-Lowery, L.; Gibreel, M.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L.V. 3D-Printed vs. Heat-Polymerizing and Autopolymerizing Denture Base Acrylic Resins. Materials 2021 , 14 , 5781. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Bayarsaikhan, E.; Lim, J.H.; Shin, S.H.; Park, K.H.; Park, Y.B.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.E. Effects of Postcuring Temperature on the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Three-Dimensional Printed Dental Resin Material. Polymers 2021 , 13 , 1180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Aati, S.; Akram, Z.; Shrestha, B.; Patel, J.; Shih, B.; Shearston, K.; Ngo, H.; Fawzy, A. Effect of post-curing light exposure time on the physico-mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of 3D-printed denture base material. Dent. Mater. 2022 , 38 , 57–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Li, P.; Lambart, A.L.; Stawarczyk, B.; Reymus, M.; Spintzyk, S. Postpolymerization of a 3D-printed denture base polymer: Impact of post-curing methods on surface characteristics, flexural strength, and cytotoxicity. J. Dent. 2021 , 115 , 103856. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Gad, M.M.; Al-Harbi, F.A.; Akhtar, S.; Fouda, S.M. 3D-Printable Denture Base Resin Containing SiO 2 Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Analysis of Mechanical and Surface Properties. J. Prosthodont. 2022 , 31 , 784–790. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Tahayeri, A.; Morgan, M.; Fugolin, A.P.; Bompolaki, D.; Athirasala, A.; Pfeifer, C.S.; Ferracane, J.L.; Bertassoni, L.E. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent. Mater. 2018 , 34 , 192–200. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Alharbi, N.; Osman, R.; Wismeijer, D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016 , 115 , 760–767. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Osman, R.B.; Alharbi, N.; Wismeijer, D. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology? Int. J. Prosthodont. 2017 , 30 , 182–188. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Seelbach, P.; Brueckel, C.; Wöstmann, B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2013 , 17 , 1759–1764. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Mangal, U.; Seo, J.Y.; Yu, J.; Kwon, J.S.; Choi, S.H. Incorporating Aminated Nanodiamonds to Improve the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Resin-Based Biomedical Appliances. Nanomaterials 2020 , 10 , 827. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Aati, S.; Akram, Z.; Ngo, H.; Fawzy, A.S. Development of 3D printed resin reinforced with modified ZrO 2 nanoparticles for long-term provisional dental restorations. Dent. Mater. 2021 , 37 , e360–e374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kwon, J.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Mangal, U.; Seo, J.Y.; Lee, M.J.; Jin, J.; Yu, J.H.; Choi, S.H. Durable Oral Biofilm Resistance of 3D-Printed Dental Base Polymers Containing Zwitterionic Materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 , 22 , 417. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Shim, J.S.; Kim, J.E.; Jeong, S.H.; Choi, Y.J.; Ryu, J.J. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020 , 124 , 468–475. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Derban, P.; Negrea, R.; Rominu, M.; Marsavina, L. Influence of the Printing Angle and Load Direction on Flexure Strength in 3D Printed Materials for Provisional Dental Restorations. Materials 2021 , 14 , 3376. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Väyrynen, V.O.; Tanner, J.; Vallittu, P.K. The anisotropicity of the flexural properties of an occlusal device material processed by stereolithography. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016 , 116 , 811–817. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Unkovskiy, A.; Bui, P.H.; Schille, C.; Geis-Gerstorfer, J.; Huettig, F.; Spintzyk, S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dent. Mater. 2018 , 34 , e324–e333. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Perea-Lowery, L.; Gibreel, M.; Vallittu, P.K.; Lassila, L. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021 , 115 , 104254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Sabbah, A.; Romanos, G.; Delgado-Ruiz, R. Impact of Layer Thickness and Storage Time on the Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Dies. Materials 2021 , 14 , 509. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Kalberer, N.; Mehl, A.; Schimmel, M.; Müller, F.; Srinivasan, M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019 , 121 , 637–643. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Gad, M.M.; Fouda, S.M.; Abualsaud, R.; Alshahrani, F.A.; Al-Thobity, A.M.; Khan, S.Q.; Akhtar, S.; Ateeq, I.S.; Helal, M.A.; Al-Harbi, F.A. Strength and Surface Properties of a 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymer. J. Prosthodont. 2022 , 31 , 412–418. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Al-Dulaijan, Y.A.; Alsulaimi, L.; Alotaibi, R.; Alboainain, A.; Akhtar, S.; Khan, S.Q.; Al-Ghamdi, M.; Gad, M.M. Effect of Printing Orientation and Postcuring Time on the Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Resins. J. Prosthodont. 2023 , 32 , 45–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Kim, T.; Lee, S.; Kim, G.B.; Hong, D.; Kwon, J.; Park, J.W.; Kim, N. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020 , 124 , 195–201.e2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Prpić, V.; Schauperl, Z.; Ćatić, A.; Dulčić, N.; Čimić, S. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials. J. Prosthodont. 2020 , 29 , 524–528. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Jeong, M.; Radomski, K.; Lopez, D.; Liu, J.T.; Lee, J.D.; Lee, S.J. Materials and Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Dentistry: An Overview. Dent. J. 2023 , 12 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Al-Dulaijan, Y.A.; Alsulaimi, L.; Alotaibi, R.; Alboainain, A.; Alalawi, H.; Alshehri, S.; Khan, S.Q.; Alsaloum, M.; AlRumaih, H.S.; Alhumaidan, A.A.; et al. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Hardness of 3D Printed Resins. Materials 2022 , 15 , 6822. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Borella, P.S.; Alvares, L.A.S.; Ribeiro, M.T.H.; Moura, G.F.; Soares, C.J.; Zancopé, K.; Mendonça, G.; Rodrigues, F.P.; das Neves, F.D. Physical and mechanical properties of four 3D-printed resins at two different thick layers: An in vitro comparative study. Dent. Mater. 2023 , 39 , 686. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Click here to enlarge figure
Tested Properties | Source | Type III Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 1,830,191.145 | 1 | 1,830,191.145 | 265,529.755 | <0.001 * | |
PPT * LT | 304.365 | 6 | 50.728 | 7.360 | <0.001 * | |
PPT * material | 92.842 | 6 | 15.474 | 2.245 | 0.039 * | |
LT * material | 387.215 | 4 | 96.804 | 14.045 | <0.001 * | |
PPT * LT * material | 208.642 | 12 | 17.387 | 2.523 | 0.003 * | |
Error | 2233.203 | 324 | 6.893 | |||
Total | 1,842,379.701 | 360 | ||||
Intercept | 376,812.803 | 1 | 376,812.803 | 91,298.700 | <0.001 * | |
PPT * LT | 500.563 | 6 | 83.427 | 20.214 | <0.001 * | |
PPT * material | 389.934 | 6 | 64.989 | 15.746 | <0.001 * | |
LT * material | 601.516 | 4 | 150.379 | 36.436 | <0.001 * | |
PPT * LT * material | 206.518 | 12 | 17.210 | 4.170 | <0.001 * | |
Error | 1337.230 | 324 | 4.127 | |||
Total | 391,758.049 | 360 |
Materials | Printing Layer Thickness | Post-Polymerization Time (Mean ± SD) | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | |||
ASIGA | 25 µm | 66.1 (1.9) | 68.3 (2.5) | 71.1 (1.7) | 76.7 (1.3) | <0.001 * |
50 µm | 66.3 (2.6) | 69.6 (1.7) | 73.3 (2.4) | 76.9 (2.8) | <0.001 * | |
100 µm | 60.7 (3.3) | 65.8 (3.1) | 68.7 (2.6) | 70.2 (3.1) | <0.001 * | |
p value | <0.001 * | 0.008 * | 0.001 * | <0.001 * | ||
NextDent | 25 µm | 67.1 (1.7) | 74.0 (2.5) | 80.4 (2.5) | 83.5 (2.1) | <0.001 * |
50 µm | 65.5 (2.7) | 70.6 (3.0) | 74.3 (4.4) | 76.4 (3.1) | <0.001 * | |
100 µm | 63.1 (2.8) | 69.4 (3.6) | 69.5 (2.7) | 71.4 (2.9) | <0.001 * | |
p value | 0.005 * | 0.008 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | ||
FormLabs | 25 µm | 68.1 (2.1) | 71.1 (2.3) | 75.3 (2.4) | 80.4 (2.0) | <0.001 * |
50 µm | 66.9 (1.9) | 72.7 (1.9) | 75.8 (2.5) | 81.7 (3.8) | <0.001 * | |
100 µm | 64.4 (2.0) | 68.4 (2.9) | 70.7 (2.3) | 72.1 (2.3) | <0.001 * | |
p value | 0.001 * | 0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * |
Materials | Printing Layer Thickness | Post-Polymerization Time (Mean ± SD) | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | |||
ASIGA | 25 µm | 32.1 (1.9) | 36.3 (1.9) | 39.7 (1.2) | 39.6 (1.6) | <0.001 * |
50 µm | 29.2 (2.1) | 31.4 (2.0) | 31.4 (2.1) | 33.3 (2.0) | <0.001 * | |
100 µm | 23.7 (2.7) | 31.5 (2.1) | 31.4 (1.5) | 33.3 (1.7) | <0.001 * | |
p value | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | ||
NextDent | 25 µm | 26.4 (2.0) | 33.1 (1.9) | 36.3 (2.0) | 39.3 (2.1) | <0.001 * |
50 µm | 28.6 (1.7) | 32.2 (1.8) | 35.7 (1.6) | 37.3 (1.7) | <0.001 * | |
100 µm | 20.8 (2.7) | 22.0 (1.6) | 24.3 (2.4) | 23.7 (2.0) | <0.005 * | |
p value | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | ||
FormLabs | 25 µm | 30.3 (2.0) | 35.2 (3.4) | 42.5 (2.2) | 45.3 (2.4) | <0.001 * |
50 µm | 28.8 (1.8) | 36.0 (2.6) | 40.2 (1.5) | 43.6 (1.8) | <0.001 * | |
100 µm | 28.2 (2.0) | 30.7 (1.7) | 32.4 (1.6) | 34.3 (2.2) | <0.001 * | |
p value | 0.064 | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Share and Cite
AlRumaih, H.S.; Gad, M.M. The Effect of 3D Printing Layer Thickness and Post-Polymerization Time on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of Denture Base Resins. Prosthesis 2024 , 6 , 970-978. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040070
AlRumaih HS, Gad MM. The Effect of 3D Printing Layer Thickness and Post-Polymerization Time on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of Denture Base Resins. Prosthesis . 2024; 6(4):970-978. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040070
AlRumaih, Hamad S., and Mohammed M. Gad. 2024. "The Effect of 3D Printing Layer Thickness and Post-Polymerization Time on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of Denture Base Resins" Prosthesis 6, no. 4: 970-978. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6040070
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
COMMENTS
After a new sheet of paper is fed into the 3D printer from the paper feed mechanism and placed on top of the selectively applied adhesive on the previous layer, the build plate is moved up to a ...
"The inception of 3D printing can be traced back to 1976, when the inkjet printer was invented. In 1984, adaptations and advances on the inkjet concept morphed the technology from printing with ink to printing with materials. Click on infographic to the right to read more about the evolution of 3D printing." (History of 3D Printing, para.2)
This guide outlines 3D printing, its basics, getting started, and the top commercial 3D printing processes and materials used today. What is 3D Printing? 3D printing is a manufacturing process where materials are joined together to make objects from 3D model data (CAD). Typically, 3D printing is a layer-by-layer process
In the 90s processes for metal printing were starting development along with medical applications of 3D printing. In 2009, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) printing patents expired. In 2000s to present day, there are continued advancements in the types of materials that can be used and the ability to create more detailed 3D prints.
Additive Manufacturing Process. Definition: the process of joining materials to make objects from 3D models, usually layer upon layer, with a 3D printer. Subtractive manufacturing use techniques such as milling, cutting, or turning to create an object from a single piece of material.
Advantages. Ability to deposit large cell populations in a spatially controlled manner. Very fast fabrication (minutes) and broad range of possible materials. Capable of different crosslinking techniques: access to larger library of materials. Multi-nozzle printing enables multi-material printing with varying properties.
3D PRINTING FLOW. Download or create a 3D model and save it in .stl format. Printer software takes model (.stl) and "slices" it into layers for printing and then produces "gcode". Gcode tells stepper motors X/Y/Z, temperature and extruder speed. Gcode streamed to an Arduino Atmel microcontroller which directly drives the motors for X/Y ...
INTRODUCTION. • 3D printing or additive manufacturing, creates. physical objects from a geometrical representation by. successive addition of materials. 3D printing technology can print an ...
Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is an industry-standard 3D printing process in which thermoplastic-based lament is heated and extruded through a nozzle in discrete layers to create a part. Some FFF laments are "lled" with micro carbon bers, but the resultant part strength is similar to plastic. Carbon Fiber Reinforcement (CFR) is a process ...
Introduction to 3D Printing. March 2021. roduction to 3D Printing1ALL RIGHTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF THIS REPORT RESIDES WITH THE ORGANISATIONS LISTED BELOW THIS PUBLICATION CAN BE TRANSLATED, REPRODUCED, STORED IN OR INTRODUCED INTO A RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, OR TRANSMITTED, BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC, MECHANICAL, PHOTOCOPYING, RECORDING, OR ...
Benefits of 3D Printing Today, more and more companies in a wide range of industries are embracing 3D printing technology due to the significant advantages it has over more traditional manufacturing methods, such as subtraction manufacturing and injection molding. The main benefits of 3D printing are realized in its cost, flexibility, and speed ...
Digital fabrication technology, known as 3D printing, develops physical objects from a geometrical representation by adding materials (Shahrubudin et al., 2019). With the support of computer-aided ...
A presentation for an online workshop held on the 9th of July 2020. The presentation included some details about the 3D printing techniques (print process, advantages, disadvantages), the ...
Introduction to 3D Printing Three-dimensional (3D) printing has evolved dramatically in the last few years. 3D printers have become plentiful and affordable enough that anyone can own one.1 Indeed, the cost of 3D printers (as little as $200 USD) makes them an attractive choice for small businesses, researchers, educators, and hobbyists alike.
Rapid Prototyping. Process of designing a 3D model with computer aided design software (CAD), and producing a prototype, typically out of plastic, via 3D printing technology. Viewable model to envision final product. Sample Prototypes.
Intro to 3D Printing. AGGIE INNOVATION SPACE. WHAT IS IT? • 3-D printing is additive manufacturing with (usually) low strength thermoplastics. • Taking a 3-D design/sketch and adding layer by layer of some material to create a physical model. • It has been around for 30 years and is increasing in popularity, mostly in the consumer space.
Introduction to 3D printing.pptx - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt / .pptx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. 3D printing is an additive manufacturing process that builds up objects layer by layer. It allows for quick and inexpensive production of complex objects without expensive tools. 3D printing works by building successive layers of ...
3D printing is a manufacturing process where successive layers of material are laid down on top of each other in an additive process. Although 3D printing is often spoken of as a new technology, it has actually been around for over 30 years. Around 8 years ago, patents around 3D printing began to expire and 3D printing opened up to mass audiences.
6. Evaluate 3D printing industry and the global effects of 3D printing 7. Develop presentation skills and foster team work 8. Develop ability to search literature for peer-reviewed articles, and learn critical reading Course Outline • What is 3D printing? • History and evolution of 3D printing technology
in Metal 3D Printing. Metal 3D printing technologies, while . diverse in method and media, share two key commonalities: powder-based metal media and a high-energy event during the printing process. Let's examine some distinctions in each process. Metal 3D Printing Fundamentals. 3D printed Inconel 625 cruicble clips from Nieka Systems.
Additive manufacturing, particularly 3D printing, has revolutionized the manufacturing industry by allowing the production of complex and intricate parts at a lower cost and with greater efficiency. However, 3D-printed parts frequently require post-processing or integration with other machining technologies to achieve the desired surface finish, accuracy, and mechanical properties. Ultra ...
PDF | On Jul 7, 2021, Khaled Fouda and others published 3D Printing Presentation 2 | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Section snippets 3D printing techniques. 3D printing technologies are mainly based on the working of the type of printer used. These are broadly classified as laser-based writing systems, ink-based printing technology, and material extrusion or nozzle-based deposition systems, as can be seen illustrated in Figure 1.1. 11 Mechanisms of 3DP are based mainly on powder adhesion, liquid ...
3D printing technology to develop more rapidly. Artificial intelligence is a form of intelligence displayed by machines, sometimes. called machine intelligence. This kind of machine can obtain ...
Purpose: This study evaluates and compares the effect of printing layer thickness (LT) and post-polymerization time (PPT) on the flexural strength and hardness of three 3D-printed resins after thermal aging. Methods: A bar shape (64 × 10 × 3.3 mm) and a disc shape (15 × 2 mm) were designed for flexural strength and hardness testing, respectively. ASIGA, NextDent, and FormLabs 3D-printed ...