research paper on current issues

Every print subscription comes with full digital access

Science News

Can solar farms and crop farms coexist?

Researchers working in the field of agrivoltaics are studying how to combine solar farming with grazing, crop production or ecological restoration.

Can taking ashwagandha supplements improve health?

Scientists find a long-sought electric field in Earth’s atmosphere

Mega El Niños kicked off the world’s worst mass extinction

Talking to a chatbot may weaken someone’s belief in conspiracy theories

How much is climate change to blame for extreme weather?

Ancient DNA unveils a previously unknown line of Neandertals

Trending stories.

Geoscientists found the most dangerous part of a famous West Coast fault

A quantum computer corrected its own errors, improving its calculations 

Spotlight on Health

A next-gen pain drug shows promise, but chronic sufferers need more options

A new painkiller nearing approval called suzetrigine may prove to be an opioid alternative. But for many with chronic pain, treatment must go beyond pills.

A new drug shows promise for hot flashes due to menopause

What is ‘stage 0’ breast cancer and how is it treated, from the archives.

Attention, Biological Clockwatchers

September 7, 1974 Vol. 106 No. #10

Science News Magazine

September 7, 2024 Vol. 206 No. 4

Squall line tornadoes are sneaky, dangerous and difficult to forecast

Stonehenge’s mysterious altar stone had roots in scotland, nasty-tasting cane toads teach crocodiles a lifesaving lesson.

Featured Media

Fiddler crabs are migrating north to cooler waters

The crabs are climate migrants and could be a harbinger of changes to come as more species move in.

Here’s how an arthropod pulls off the world’s fastest backflip

National Geographic’s ‘OceanXplorers’ dives into the ocean’s mysteries

A risk-tolerant immune system may enable house sparrows’ wanderlust

A new element on the periodic table might be within reach 

Follow Science News

• Follow Science News on X
• Follow Science News on Facebook
• Follow Science News on Instagram

More Stories

Remote seamounts in the southeast Pacific may be home to 20 new species

This protist unfolds its ‘neck’ up to 30 times its body length to scout prey, the largest known genome belongs to a tiny fern.

World record speeds for two Olympics events have fallen over time. We can go faster

Does social status shape height, rain bosworth studies how deaf children experience the world.

Summer-like heat is scorching the Southern Hemisphere — in winter

Zapping sand to create rock could help curb coastal erosion, the world’s record-breaking hot streak has lasted 14 months. when will it end.

The nearest midsized black hole might instead be a horde of lightweights

A distant quasar may be zapping all galaxies around itself, some meteors leave trails lasting up to an hour. now we may know why.

A nuclear clock prototype hints at ultraprecise timekeeping 

Mayo is weirdly great for understanding nuclear fusion experiments, the world’s fastest microscope makes its debut, health & medicine.

California droughts may help valley fever spread

The first face transplant to include an eye shows no rejection a year later, 50 years ago, some of plastic’s toxic hazards were exposed.

Quartz generates an electrical voltage when it is strained, and during earthquakes this characteristic may stimulate the deposition of gold.

How earthquakes build beefy gold nuggets

Mantle waves buoy continents upward and bedeck them with diamonds, ‘turning to stone’ paints rocks as storytellers and mentors, science & society.

‘After 1177 B.C.’ describes how societies fared when the Bronze Age ended

Scientists are fixing flawed forensics that can lead to wrongful convictions, language models may miss signs of depression in black people’s facebook posts.

Subscribers, enter your e-mail address for full access to the Science News archives and digital editions.

Not a subscriber? Become one now .

Frontiers | Science News

• Science News

Research Topics

Top 10 research topics from 2021.

Find the answers to your biggest research questions from 2021. With collective views of over 3.7 million, researchers explored topics spanning from nutritional immunology and political misinformation to sustainable agriculture and the human-dog bond .

Research Topics:

Shape the future of your field.

Become a guest editor for an article collection around your own research theme. Benefit from increased impact and discoverability, a dedicated platform and support team, and rigorous peer review for every paper.

Suggest your topic

Post related info

January 17, 2022

Frontiers Communications

Post categories, sustainability, related subjects, research topics, related content.

Pride Month 2021: Research Topics on Visibility, Unity, and Equality

International Earth Day 2021: Research Topics to Restore Our Earth

World Bee Day 2021: Research Topics to Build Back Better for Bees

Latest posts.

Kids in families with too much screen time struggle with language skills

Three Research Topics exploring dementia diagnosis and treatment

Excessive light pollution may increase risk of Alzheimer's, especially in younger people

Will humans accept robots that can lie? Scientists find it depends on the lie

When procrastination becomes unhealthy: Here are five Frontiers articles you won’t want to miss

Get the latest research updates, subscribe to our newsletter

HBR’s Most-Read Research Articles of 2021

by Dagny Dukach

Summary .   

What will it take to make work better? Over the past year, HBR has published a wide array of research-backed articles that explore topics ranging from retaining employees to overcoming meeting overload to fostering gender equity in the workplace. In this end-of-year roundup, we share key insights and trends from our most-read research articles of 2021.

As the workplace rapidly transforms in the wake of the pandemic, social movements, and more, a fundamental question remains: How can we ensure we’re making work better — for employees, organizations, and society at large?

Partner Center

• Skip to main content
• Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

Research News

• Subscribe to Health Newsletter

Images taken from Dickson fjord show before (August 2023) and after (September 2023) photos of the mountain peak and glacier where a large landslide triggered a tsunami. Søren Rysgaard hide caption

A landslide linked to climate change ‘rang’ the Earth for 9 days, researchers say

September 13, 2024 • The scale of the geological event is like something from prehistoric times, with a tsunami 200 meters--656 feet--in height. But it happened last year. Researchers warn that similar events may reoccur.

Can dogs understand the meaning of words? Scientists are trying to figure it out

September 6, 2024 • Last year, a dog named Bunny went viral on TikTok for pressing buttons with words on them to "communicate" with her owner. But can dogs even understand those words on a soundboard in the first place? A new study in the journal PLOS One seeks answers. Host Regina G. Barber and producer Rachel Carlson break down that story and more of the week's news with the help of All Things Considered's Ari Shapiro.

Aging and Alzheimer's leave the brain starved of energy. Now scientists think they've found a way to aid the brain's metabolism — in mice. PM Images/Getty Images hide caption

Shots - Health News

This metabolic brain boost revives memory in alzheimer’s mice.

September 2, 2024 • An experimental cancer drug that helps the brain turn glucose into energy was able to reverse memory loss in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.

A drug that restores brain metabolism could help treat Alzheimer's

A squat lobster in the genus Sternostylus, thought to be a newly identified species, was photographed along the Nazca Ridge off the coast of Chile. ROV SuBastian/Schmidt Ocean Institute hide caption

A newly mapped underwater mountain could be home to 20 new species

August 30, 2024 • Researchers who led the 28-day expedition along the nearly 2-mile tall seamount hope the discoveries made will inform future policies safeguarding the understudied, high-seas region.

Corn rootworm is known as the 'billion dollar bug' for how much damage it causes to corn crops in the United States. Researcher Emily Bick is tackling the problem by eavesdropping on this and other insects. Lina Tran hide caption

How listening to the sounds of insects can help detect agricultural pests

August 30, 2024 • From Indonesia to Wisconsin, farmers all over the world struggle with a huge problem: pests. On top of that, it's tough for farmers to identify where exactly they have the pests and when. Reporter Lina Tran from NPR member station WUWM in Milwaukee joins host Emily Kwong to tell the story of how researchers in the Midwest are inventing new forms of pest detection that involve eavesdropping on the world of insects. Plus, hear what aphid slurping sounds like.

A white-browed sparrow weaver inspects a roost under construction, after just receiving some grass brought by another member of its group. Maria Cristina Tello-Ramos hide caption

When birds build nests, they're also building a culture

August 29, 2024 • Nest-building isn’t just instinct. Birds can learn from others, letting groups within one species develop their own distinctive nest-building traditions.

Shells, composed mostly of invasive zebra mussels pile up at Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore in Michigan. The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Species Control and Prevention Act of 1990 and the United States Geological Survey's Nonindigenous Aquatic Species database were created in response to this mussel. corfoto/Getty Images hide caption

Here's what's missing from the invasive species narrative

August 28, 2024 • At first glance, the whole narrative of aquatic invasive species may seem straightforward: A bad non-native species comes into a new ecosystem and overruns good native species. But the truth? It's a little more complicated. To tear down everything we thought we knew about invasive species and construct a more nuanced picture, host Emily Kwong talks to experts Ian Pfingsten, who works on the United States Geological Survey's Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, and Nicholas Reo, a Canada Excellence Research Chair in Coastal Relationalities and Regeneration.

Many people get into their phones when they're bored, then scroll through social media in the hopes of alleviating that boredom. But new research suggests that swiping from video to video might increase boredom, not alleviate it. Tippapatt/Getty Images hide caption

Scrolling might make you MORE bored, not less

August 23, 2024 • Have you ever scrolled through a TikTok without finishing it? Switched between YouTube videos halfway through one or the other? Pressed "fast forward" on a Netflix episode that just wasn't holding your interest? That habit is called "digital switching" — and it might be causing the exact thing you're trying to avoid: boredom. Emily and Regina break that and more of the week's news down with the help of All Things Considered 's Ailsa Chang.

Invasive cane toads like this one have fanned out across Australia, killing numerous predators in their wake, including freshwater crocodiles. Joshua Prieto/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images hide caption

To save wild crocodiles in Australia, scientists gave them food poisoning

August 16, 2024 • Freshwater crocodiles die every year in Australia from eating poisonous cane toads that humans introduced to the continent. Now scientists have found a way to teach the crocs to avoid the toxic toads.

Saving freshwater crocodiles — by teaching them to not eat poisonous toads

Conservation biologist Gliselle Marin carefully untangles a bat from a net in Belize during the annual Bat-a-thon. Her fanny pack is decorated with printed bats. Luis Echeverría for NPR hide caption

Goats and Soda

This scientist has a bat tat and earrings. she says there's a lot to learn from bats.

August 12, 2024 • Gliselle Marin joins the “Bat-a-thon,” a group of 80-some bat researchers who converge on Belize each year to study these winged mammals.

A scientist in Belize hopes bats can galvanize locals to protect their forests

Researchers glued cameras and tracking instruments to small pieces of neoprene, that they then glued to the fur of the sea lions Nathan Angelakis hide caption

Scientists attach video cameras to sea lions to map the ocean floor

August 9, 2024 • How do you study unmapped areas of the ocean and identify critical habitat for an endangered species? You include the study animal in the scientific process! Researchers from the University of Adelaide fitted endangered Australian sea lions with cameras and tracking devices to better understand where they spent their time. The information could help scientists protect critical sea lion habitat and could give researchers a new tool for mapping the ocean.

"Everything that we are as human beings is in our brain," Dr. Theodore Schwartz says. Brian Marcus /Penguin Randomhouse hide caption

Health Care

For this brain surgeon, the operating room is 'the ultimate in mindful meditation'.

August 5, 2024 • Dr. Theodore Schwartz has been treating neurological illnesses for nearly 30 years. He says being a brain surgeon requires steady hands — and a strong bladder. His new book is Gray Matters.

New blood tests that help detect Alzheimer's disease are opening up a new era in diagnosis and treatment, doctors say. Marcus Brandt/picture alliance/Getty Images hide caption

New blood tests can help diagnose Alzheimer's. Are doctors ready for what's next?

August 2, 2024 • A new generation of blood tests can help diagnose Alzheimer’s disease. But many doctors don’t yet know how to use them.

Alzheimer's blood tests

Some researchers say the African coral tree has a racial slur embedded in its name. This month, scientists at an international meeting voted to have that epithet removed. tree-species/Flickr hide caption

Some plant names can be racist. Scientists are looking to rename them

July 31, 2024 • An international group of researchers has voted to modify the scientific names of more than 200 plant species whose names carry a derogatory word.

Researchers are revising botanical names to address troubling connotations

A key protein called Reelin may help stave off Alzheimer's disease, according to a growing body of research. GSO Images/The Image Bank/Getty Images hide caption

A protein called Reelin keeps popping up in brains that resist aging and Alzheimer’s

July 29, 2024 • Early in life, the protein Reelin helps assemble the brain. Later on, it appears to protect the organ from Alzheimer’s and other threats to memory and thinking.

Alzheimer's resilience

There are over eight hundred species of leeches, but researchers estimate that only ten percent of all leeches are terrestrial. Auscape/Contributor/Getty Images hide caption

We hate to tell you this, but there are leeches that can jump

July 29, 2024 • Generally, we at Short Wave are open-minded to the creepies and the crawlies, but even we must admit that leeches are already the stuff of nightmares. They lurk in water. They drink blood. There are over 800 different species of them. And now, as scientists have confirmed ... at least some of them can jump!

Two chimpanzees groom each other — a behavior that can involve several gestures. Anup Shah/Getty Images hide caption

What chimpanzee gestures reveal about human communication

July 26, 2024 • Chimpanzees are humans' closest living relatives. But does much of their communication resembles ours? According to a new study published earlier this week in the journal Current Biology , chimpanzees gesture back-and-forth in a similar way to how humans take turns speaking. The research presents an intriguing possibility that this style of communication may have evolved before humans split off from great apes, and tells researchers more about how turn-taking evolved.

Project RattleCam lets people observe rattlesnakes with a live webcam. Scott Boback hide caption

Watch a livestream of Colorado’s ‘mega den’ of pregnant rattlesnakes

July 24, 2024 • On a rocky hillside in Colorado is a “mega den” of hundreds of rattlesnakes — along with cameras livestreaming the whole thing.

 Pregnant Rattlesnakes Webcam

Glyptodonts were giant, armadillo-like shelled mammals that went extinct about 10,000 years ago. A study reveals that cut marks on a glyptodont fossil in South America could have been made by humans a little over 20,000 years ago. Daniel Eskridge/Stocktrek Images/Science Source hide caption

When did humans get to South America? This giant shelled mammal fossil may hold clues

July 23, 2024 • A fossil of an armadillo-like mammal appears to bear cut marks from butchering by humans, suggesting people were living in South America at least 20,000 years ago, even earlier than once thought.

Ancient Armadillos

Once completed, India's National River Linking Project will transfer an estimated 200 billion cubic meters of water around the country each year. STRDEL / Stringer/Getty Images hide caption

India's plan to reroute rivers could have unintended consequences on rainfall

July 19, 2024 • More than a hundred years ago, a British engineer proposed linking two rivers in India to better irrigate the area and cheaply move goods. The link never happened, but the idea survived. Today, due to extreme flooding in some parts of the country mirrored by debilitating drought in others, India's National Water Development Agency plans to dig thirty links between rivers across the country. It's the largest project of its kind and will take decades to complete. But scientists are worried what moving that much water could do to the land, the people — and even the weather. Host Emily Kwong talks to journalist Sushmita Pathak about her recent story on the project.

In 2022, a large, unexpected rogue wave struck the Viking Polaris, breaking windows. One passenger died and others were injured. Alexis Delisi/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

Rogue waves can strike without warning. These scientists found a way to predict them

July 18, 2024 • Scientists have created a new tool that can give 5 minutes advance warning of a dangerous rogue wave in the ocean.

A study finds that psilocybin can desynchronize networks in the brain, potentially enhancing its plasticity. Sara Moser/Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis hide caption

A scientist took a psychedelic drug — and watched his own brain 'fall apart'

July 18, 2024 • Scientists scanned the brains of people who took psilocybin, including a member of the research team. The scans showed how the drug disrupts key networks, potentially enhancing brain plasticity.

A prominent brain scientist took psilocybin as part of his own brain study

TODAY'S HOURS:

Research Topic Ideas

• Picking a Topic
• Area & Interdisciplinary Studies
• Behavioral & Social Sciences
• Business, Economics, & Management

Not Sure Which Topic to Choose?

Controversial issues and current events, flint water crisis.

• Education & Social Work
• Health Sciences
• Natural and Physical Sciences

Look at the "Picking a Topic" tab on this guide for help brainstorming your topic. Also, our Research Process guide can help you throughout your research process.

• Research Process by Liz Svoboda Last Updated Aug 12, 2024 14458 views this year

• Affirmative Action
• Affordable Care Act
• Alternative medicine
• America's global influence
• Artificial intelligence
• Assisted suicide
• Bilingual education
• Black Lives Matter
• Border security
• Capital punishment
• Charter schools
• Childhood obesity
• Civil rights
• Climate change
• Concussions in football
• COVID restrictions
• Cryptocurrency
• Cyber bullying
• Cybersecurity
• Drug legalization
• Early voting
• Eating disorders
• Equal Rights Amendment
• Executive order
• Factory farming
• Foreign aid
• Freedom of speech
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Genetic engineering
• Gerrymandering
• Green New Deal
• Hate speech
• Health insurance
• Human trafficking
• Immigration
• Israel-Palestine relations
• Judicial activism
• Labor unions
• Land acknowledgments
• #MeToo movement
• Minimum wage
• Misinformation
• Net neutrality
• Nuclear energy
• Offshore drilling
• Online anonymity
• Organic food
• Outsourcing
• Police reform
• Political activism
• Prescription drug addiction
• Racial profiling
• Reparations
• Russian hacking
• Sanctuary city
• Screen addiction
• Self-driving cars
• Sex education
• Smart speakers
• Social Security reform
• Standardized testing
• Stimulus packages
• Supreme Court confirmation
• Syrian civil war
• Title IX enforcement
• Trade tariffs
• Transgender rights
• Ukraine and Russia
• Urban agriculture
• Vaccination mandates
• Violence in the media
• Voter ID laws
• Voting fraud and security
• White nationalism
• Women's rights
• Zero tolerance policies

Related suggested databases

Covers contemporary social issues with pro & con and background information. Also allows searching of the collection Global Issues.

Covers contemporary social issues, from Offshore Drilling to Climate Change, Health Care to Immigration. Helps students research, analyze and organize a broad variety of data for conducting research, completing writing assignments, preparing for debates, creating presentations, and more. This resource helps students explore issues from all perspectives, and includes: pro/con viewpoint essays, topic overviews, primary source documents, biographies of social activists and reformers, court-case overviews, periodical articles, statistical tables, charts and graphs, images and a link to Google Image Search, podcasts (including weekly presidential addresses and premier NPR programs), and a national and state curriculum standards search correlated to the content that allows educators to quickly identify material by grade and discipline. Keyword(s): United States

In-depth, unbiased coverage of health, social trends, criminal justice, international affairs, education, the environment, technology, and the economy.

1923-present. Each single-themed, 12,000-word report is researched and written by a seasoned journalist, and contains an introductory overview; background and chronology on the topic; an assessment of the current situation; tables and maps; pro & con statements from representatives of opposing positions; and bibliographies of key sources.

Balanced, accurate discussions of over 250 controversial topics in the news along with chronologies, illustrations, maps, tables, sidebars, contact info, and bibliographies, including primary source documents and news editorials.

Covers 1995-present. A Read Aloud button is available for text-to-speech for much of the content.

Series of short books that offer a balanced and authoritative treatment of current events and countries of the world.

What Everyone Needs to Know has short overviews designed to offer a balanced and authoritative treatment on complex current events and countries of the world. Includes books in these areas:

• Arts & Humanities  
• Medicine & Health  
• Science & Mathematics  
• Social Sciences  
• Art as commentary
• Early childhood development
• Citizen scientists
• Emergency manager law
• Environmental health
• Government regulations
• Health care access
• Infrastructure
• Investigative journalism
• Lead and Copper Rule
• Lead toxicity
• Volunteerism
• Water filtration
• Water Resource Development Act (S.2848)
• Water rights
• Water supply policy
• Water supply regulation

Related subject guide

• The Flint Water Crisis: A Guide to Information Resources by Paul Streby Last Updated May 22, 2024 600 views this year
• << Previous: Business, Economics, & Management
• Next: Education & Social Work >>
• Last Updated: Jul 10, 2024 5:18 PM
• URL: https://libguides.umflint.edu/topics

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Healthcare (Basel)

Current Issues on Research Conducted to Improve Women’s Health

Charalampos siristatidis.

1 Assisted Reproduction Unit, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion Hospital, 76 Vass Sofias, 11528 Athens, Greece

Vasilios Karageorgiou

2 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon Hospital, 1 Rimini Street, 12642 Athens, Greece; moc.liamtoh@groegaraksav

Paraskevi Vogiatzi

3 Andromed Health & Reproduction Diagnostic Lab, 3 Mesogion Str, 15126 Maroussi, Greece; moc.liamg@iztaigovive

Associated Data

Not applicable.

There are varied lessons to be learned regarding the current methodological approaches to women’s health research. In the present scheme of growing medical literature and inflation of novel results claiming significance, the sheer amount of information can render evidence-based practice confusing. The factors that classically determined the impact of discoveries appear to be losing ground: citation count and publication rates, hierarchy in author lists according to contribution, and a journal’s impact factor. Through a comprehensive literature search on the currently available data from theses, opinion, and original articles and reviews on this topic, we seek to present to clinicians a narrative synthesis of three crucial axes underlying the totality of the research production chain: (a) critical advances in research methodology, (b) the interplay of academy and industry in a trial conduct, and (c) review- and publication-associated developments. We also provide specific recommendations on the study design and conduct, reviewing the processes and dissemination of data and the conclusions and implementation of findings. Overall, clinicians and the public should be aware of the discourse behind the marketing of alleged breakthrough research. Still, multiple initiatives, such as patient review and strict, supervised literature synthesis, have become more widely accepted. The “bottom-up” approach of a wide dissemination of information to clinicians, together with practical incentives for stakeholders with competing interests to collaborate, promise to improve women’s healthcare.

1. Introduction

Women’s health has been at the center of interest and growing concern in the last few decades. As a measurable outcome, it has been studied at the level of mortality [ 1 ], serious morbidity [ 2 ], and nutritional status [ 3 ] and through proven, evidence-based interventions. The implementation of such interventions is essential to guide national and international policies and programs, targeting the achievement of universal coverage of health services. In this respect, conducting the best quality of research (research that provides firm and ethical evidence adhering to the principles of professionalism, transparency, and auditability) with the use of robust methods is mandatory. Towards this goal, the current reality is far from encouraging.

In accordance with scientific literature guidelines and research quality guidelines (e.g., the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)), impact factors, and citation count are considered the norms in current research evaluation modalities. However, recent works in research methodology challenge this simplifying notion [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].

The pitfalls reported are associated with various—albeit specific—“cultural, ethical, operational, regulatory, and infrastructural factors” linked with a lack of adequately trained researchers and subject attrition bias [ 7 ]. As a result, the clinical research environment is more or less inseminated with various types of bias, leading to the discouragement of sponsors. The growing plethora of questionable quality trials and reviews is another issue to consider. “From 14 reports of trials published per day in 1980 [to] 75 trials and 11 systematic reviews of trials per day, a plateau in growth has not yet been reached”, stated a policy forum article reported in 2010 [ 8 ]; additionally, the authors noted that “the staple of medical literature synthesis remains the non-systematic narrative review”, further pointing out the need for freely available simple yet valid answers to most patients’ questions [ 8 ]. In the same context, current data concerning women’s health derived from protocols, full study reports, and participant-level datasets are rarely available to a wide audience. At the same time, selective reporting of methods and results plagues reports. With the reduced quality of information produced, a lot of money has been wasted; subsequently, the existence of all kinds of bias affect the research itself and jeopardize the validity of the findings and, consequently, the care of women [ 9 ].

Issues have been raised by exploring different approaches to evaluate the quality of scientific input to the community. The ultimate goal remains a robust and uniform literature evaluation system adapted to the evolving conduct of studies and to the application of modern tools to re-ensure robust methodology and reporting of data and results. Here, we perform a narrative overview on current issues in study quality assessment regarding clinical medicine. We electronically searched PubMed using the following keywords: “clinical trials”, “meta-analysis”, “IPD”, “sponsor”, “challenges”, “regulatory”, “women’s health”, “evidence-based medicine/trends”, “policy making”, “publishing”, “research methods and practices”, “consumers network”, “bias”, “industry-sponsored trials”, “biomedical bibliographic databases”, and “quality research”, trying to collect data irrespective of type of report and language. Based on this evidence, we propose a combination of interventions at various levels, underlining quality aspects that we consider significant, and other routes of judgments.

2. The “Standard” Factors

Citation count and publication rates in international databases, hierarchy in author lists according to contribution, and the impact factor of the journal are considered important factors in the quality of a study, especially for the “scientific reader” seeking quality information on a specific topic. This has been extensively studied by other workgroups [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] and represents a justified trend accounting for the prestige of a scientific journal and the publication itself, along with language and availability, and ultimately skewing scientific trends or potentially leaving some important contributions in obscurity. Even though previous works contemplate the importance of the aforementioned factors in the true quality of research studies and publications, all considerations are derived from a common denominator, that is, that the currently used quality standards either for the common user or for greater structures and institutions most probably do not reflect quality but rather popularity. In this context, the citation rate (including self-citation and “negative citing”) and an impact statement on the individual author (a concise summary of the impact of somebody’s career) have been proposed. In addition, other metrics, including altmetrics, bibliometrics, and H-index, combined with updated mathematical models, such as artificial neural networks, might be the tools of the future; these models constitute more accurate tools due to the special characteristics of these “learning through training” processes, resembling the capacity of the brain to learn and judge [ 14 ].

3. The Type of Research Question and Studies

Although multiple outcomes may be reported at once and variability in study designs fluctuates, a primary role belongs to the type of research question explored by a study or publication, which will inevitably determine the methodology to be followed. For example, in past years, there is a disproportionate output of Systematic Reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses from Asian countries produced on a massive scale [ 15 , 16 ] as a means of “publishing in order to publish” with questionable quality and methods. Their numbers are so high that, in some cases, it overtakes original trials. Of note, the use of such studies in the biomedical field was occasional until the 1990s [ 17 ]. Moreover, those from the Cochrane collaboration, the fundamental organization for good quality systematic reviews, are only a small fraction of this output [ 8 ].

With regard to Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), suggestions have been made in recent reports on better conduct [ 18 ]: trial protocols should be simple, reproducible, and well organized, with predefined and well-described study populations/participants and should have sound interventions, and representative comparisons and outcomes. Of note, these could be based on the conclusions of previously conducted SRs that often point out issues in quality and methodology of the original trials. Minimal deviations from protocols and a priori specification of useful core outcomes that translate directly to women’s wellbeing are the focus of the CROWN Initiative [ 19 ]. According to the authors, there has been a multi-targeted set of suggestions to “ensure that critical and important outcomes with good measurement properties are incorporated and reported, in advancing the usefulness of research, in informing readers, including guideline and policy developers, who are involved in decision-making, and in improving evidence-based practice”.

A priori description of the outcomes of interest can alleviate the known issues/biases associated with exploratory analyses. A change in outcome, especially in cases where the results do not support the rationale of the study, can mask the original intentions of the authors and can recontextualize the same results in a more positive manner [ 20 ]. Still, an exploratory analysis has a significant role in deducing potentially valuable conjectures for future studies. However, it is central for transparency that the authors explicitly state when this is the case, i.e., when an analysis is conducted post hoc. In order to ease the distinction of post hoc and a priori analyses by SR authors and readers, Dwan et al. (2014) proposed the publication of both protocols and pre-specified analyses [ 21 ].

We cannot anticipate that SRs can retrospectively solve the potential gaps and inconsistencies in the methodology and outcome reporting. For robust answers, research questions must be well defined from the start. However, more elaborate techniques of evidence synthesis can guide future research in more meaningful ways and are becoming more popular. Specifically, prospective and individual patient data meta-analyses (IPDMA) may need to become the norm in literature synthesis [ 22 , 23 ]. A major difficulty in IPDMA is the fact that securing sensitive patient data is a time-consuming task that demands the establishment of mutual trust. Even when representative evidence has been secured, data availability may still affect the pooled evidence. A recent study assessing IPDMA’s treating oncological topics suggested that studies for which they were available differed significantly from studies in which the authors did not share them [ 24 ]. Still, IPDMA is a trustworthy methodology that can assess the effect of patient-level covariates on treatment outcomes or diagnostic accuracy more thoroughly than the standard procedure of a meta-regression used in aggregate-data meta-analyses [ 25 ]. Given the current ethos of openness in clinical trials and common repositories becoming more widespread, IPDMA is likely to become the mainstay of critical synthesis of literature [ 26 ].

Finally, we have to include observational research in an effort to improve women’s health in the context of greater personalization of care and stratified medicine. Such studies have traditionally served as tools for understanding the nature of particular clinical conditions, for determining risk factors and mechanisms of actions, and for identifying potential intervention targets. Their disadvantages associated with methodological issues such as confounds and the fact that they are prone to limited internal validity could be restricted through guidelines such as the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement [ 27 ].

4. The Inclusion of Young Authors

The encouragement of younger and/or less experienced scientists and ultimately their inclusion in the respective workgroups and in the list of contributors may provide an unexpected topic or question and a clearer view on established research schemes. The productivity of highly cited papers is related to the advanced age of their authors; adversely, better funding opportunities for younger researchers would give them unique chances to build strong productivity [ 28 ]. The advancement of knowledge taught during academic training as well as a higher probability of compliance with robust methods of reporting should encourage the inclusion of younger scientists. Tips and recommendations of young authors and early career scientists have been plenty, including collaborating with researchers within as well as outside their field and/or country, sending their research article to an appropriate journal, and adequately highlighting the novelty and impact of their research [ 29 , 30 ].

Towards this goal, the improvement of the scientific literacy of young scholars is the main step, and this burden falls on to the shoulders of the trainers. There are “uncomfortable truths” in training [ 31 ], but scientific research and the mode of thinking are processes continuously accumulated and must be taught by each director or responsible authority: they should improve the skills and capabilities of young scholars in scientific and technological literacy and in communication and productivity.

5. Quality in Reporting

Reporting quality must be ensured by avoiding bias, such as selective reporting, deliberate or not. Avoiding reporting insignificant data and outcomes could lead to severe distortion in the SR [ 32 ]. Thus, flaws in design, conduct, analysis, or reporting of RCTs can produce bias in the estimates of a treatment effect.

For example, in a large meta-epidemiological study of 1973 RCTs, a lack of blinding was associated with an average 22% exaggeration of treatment effects among trials that reported subjectively assessed outcomes [ 33 ]. This deviation is enough to adversely affect the interpretation of the results and further negatively influences regulatory settings and clinical practice.

Another example involves the evidence base on recent cancer drug approvals. Between 2014 and 2016, a quarter of the relevant studies were not RCTs; of the RCTs, the majority of them did not measure overall survival or quality of life outcomes as primary endpoints, and half of them were judged to be at high risk of bias; the authors’ judgments changed for a fifth of them when they relied on information reported in regulatory documents and scientific publications separately [ 34 ].

6. Strict Implementation of Rules in the Peer Review Processes

These processes first appeared in 1655 in a collection of scientific essays by Denis de Sallo in the Journal des Scavans , and almost 100 years later (1731), their implementation became a standard of practice by almost all biomedical journals [ 35 ]. Maintaining the quality and scientific integrity of publications; evaluating for competence, significance, and originality; and ensuring internal and external validity of submissions are crucial points. Similarly, the appropriate selection and training of reviewers to provide quality and specialized reviews without bias is an essential part of the process [ 36 ].

7. Sponsorship

Ethical and other issues surrounding sponsorships, to ensure credibility of a study, have been addressed in the past. One of the main sources of funding remains the industry [ 37 ]. Indeed, sponsored clinical research has always been questioned, influenced by reports of selective or biased disclosure of research results, ghostwriting and guest authorship, and inaccurate or incomplete reporting of potential conflicts of interest [ 38 ]. Although these may be a scarce incidence nowadays, active monitoring in funded studies should be implemented throughout in order to eliminate this possibility or any other conflicts of interest. An alarming analysis of 319 trials indicated that only a small minority (three out of 182 funded trials) were funded by multiple sponsors with competing interests. The presence of industry funding also almost tripled (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6, 4.7) the possibility of a study having reported favorable findings [ 39 ]. Furthermore, registered study protocols that announced funding were less likely to be published after their completion (non-publication rate: 32% vs. 18% [ 40 ].

8. Change in the Notion of Publishing

The change in notion and perception of the impact of outcomes is perhaps the most important part of the improvement in research conduct and implementation. This can be achieved through differentiation and modern adaptation of our scientific culture fighting inner and external incentives. Every scientific input should target a wider human benefit. A change in notion and incentives in publishing is crucial, from the level of the investigator aiming to publish/individual behaviors up to the social forces that provide affordances and incentives for those behaviors [ 41 , 42 , 43 ].

In a specific area of research, a clinical evaluation should precede publication in order to ensure relevance. A dramatic example is the scientific literature demonstrating an overload of various biomarkers for various diseases in which only a few of them have been confirmed by subsequent research and few have entered routine clinical practice [ 44 ]. In addition, biomarkers should also be judged on the grounds of cost-effectiveness and incremental net benefit [ 45 ]. Multiple indices may have comparable diagnostic accuracy, but their cost, an unavoidable concern in public health, may differ significantly.

Therefore, the selection of information to be published should be conducted on safer grounds and should be adequately supported by the authors, based on our knowledge on the scheme to date, and importantly, a summary of previous attempts should note the effective interventions and provide a concluding remark for the scientist through a good quality review.

9. Patient’s Contribution to Evaluation and Sex/Gender Analyses

In the era of evidence-based medicine, feedback from the recipients of healthcare development is gaining more importance and platforms for opinion exchange between patients and investigators have been established. This has already been implemented by the Cochrane Collaboration, where patient review is an integral part of the SR publication process and plain language summaries target a nontechnical audience. This process could be adopted as standard practice if accordingly modified. If the patient review, for example, is to be widely implemented in other journals, it would constitute a potentially radical paradigm shift that aims to solidify the review process. Of course, technical difficulties, such as acknowledgement and incentives for patients participating in review processes, are fields where further developments will enhance this policy [ 46 ].

It has been noted that the women population represents an “unequal majority” in health and health care. It is also well established that women’s health needs are dissimilar from those of men, resulting from the fact that both the woman’s body and brain functions differ critically from a man’s and that she reacts differently to even the same stimuli, such as medications or environmental events. It is indicative that, even though a large proportion of study protocols included women, only 3% of them planned an analytical approach for quantifying sex differences [ 47 ]; similarly, a recent report on therapies for atrial fibrillation concluded that the sex-specific reporting in trials comparing them was extremely low [ 48 ]. As a result, women have not received an ideal “personalized” health care, in many cases, so far. Thus, a specific design for studies on women’s health should be required.

There are several examples in the history of women’s health research where the contribution of the consumer women’s health movement in promoting research in women’s interests was critical. One of them concerned the collaborations between consumer groups and researchers in obtaining funding in the U.S. and France for a follow-up on a cohort of diethylstilboestrol-exposed people when the drug was discovered to be a transplacental carcinogen in pregnancy in 1971.

Another important issue is the nonavailability of sex/gender data from primary studies and consequently from SRs, which are the main tools to provide the necessary evidence for the formation of relevant policies [ 49 ]: the authors stated that even “Cochrane and the Campbell Collaboration have no specific policy on the reporting of sex/gender in systematic reviews, although Cochrane has endorsed the SAGER guidelines developed by the European Association of Science Editors” [ 50 ]. In their review, they found that the Methods sections of these collaborations included the most reports on sex/gender in both Campbell (50.8%) and Cochrane (83.1%) reviews, but the majority of these were descriptive considerations of sex/gender. They also reported that 62% of Campbell and 86% of Cochrane reviews did not report sex/gender in the abstract but included sex/gender considerations in a later section. A previous study on the subject reported that almost half of SRs described the sex/gender of the included populations but only 4% assessed sex/gender differences or included sex/gender when making judgments on the implications of the evidence [ 51 ].

10. An Improvement in the Dissemination of Studies

Despite advances in the dissemination of study information, half of health-related studies remain unpublished [ 52 ]. Problems in the publishing scheme in the selection of studies that appear to have a higher impact or that come from a respectable institution can lead to biased publishing. At the extreme, unsafe, ineffective, or even harmful interventions may enter clinical practice, as was the case with hormone replacement therapy [ 53 ]. In some instances, even a shift in healthcare resource allocation is reported [ 9 ]. It is standard practice in critical readings of literature to evaluate publication bias. This method attempts to address, with controversial success, precisely the unfortunate keenness of editors to promote positive results that imply novelty. A classic example of this inflation of positive and supposedly important results is the 2012 study by Fanelli [ 54 ], in which studies classified as related to clinical medicine showed a gradual increase in reporting positive findings. The author criticized the efficacy of measures taken to attenuate publication bias, e.g., protocol registration.

On the other hand, a respectable amount of research is published in other languages and not indexed in U.S. National Library of Medicine [ 55 ], while their quality remains controversial [ 56 ]; the authors of the above studies stated that peer review processes need to be improved through guidelines aiming to identify the authenticity of the studies.

The bulk of peer reviews remain a voluntary occupation, with the main motivation being recognition by peers. In addition, statistical review, a time-consuming process, is not performed in all published research. This process can be accelerated by practices that promote data and code sharing. It is also suggested that, even when papers are retracted, this could have been avoided with the simple measure of an active data sharing policy [ 57 ].

11. Role of the Stakeholders and Foundations

For the stakeholders and collaborative systems, a more energetic role is required in ensuring the conduct of multicenter massive-trials with increased clinical relevance. The main problem in the conduct of research is the lowered clinical value of the results from small sample sizes, even in RCTs. Mathematical models have been developed to predict sample sizes corresponding to the clinical value of the outcomes, while patient data from databases could easily increase the sample size of trials at much lower costs. Such paradigms could include the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (PCORnet) [ 58 ]. Also, new levels of patient engagement can raise the possibility of improving clinical outcomes on health. Involving multiple stakeholders (with potentially conflicting interests) in shared conversations on research has been proposed [ 59 ].

New foundations should be placed in research by focusing on the improvement of quality, such as NIH and PCORI [ 60 ]. The Cochrane Collaboration represents one of the very few large-scale initiatives in this context; importantly, both conduct high quality reviews, and participant education at all levels are based mostly from volunteers who care about science and high-quality evidence.

12. Cooperation of All Forces: The Role of Industry/Funding

The central point of problem is funding. USA-affiliated industry-funded trials and related activities represent more than 5% of US healthcare expenditure, with approximately $70 billion in commercial and $40 billion in governmental and non-profit funding annually. The NIH invests $41.7 billion annually in medical research: 80 percent is awarded for extramural research, through 50,000 competitive grants to more than 300,000 researchers at more than 2500 universities, medical schools, and other research institutions [ 61 ]. Concerns have been raised that this approach appears inefficient for how biomedical research is chosen, designed, regulated, financed, managed, disseminated, and reported [ 62 , 63 , 64 ].

The scheme, however, has been shifting in favor of Asian countries. Factors, such as ease of recruitment, population, and various epidemiological factors (e.g., increased incidence of infectious disease) have contributed positively to an inflation of local clinical trials [ 7 ]. Severe accusations regarding clinical data management have been raised, although the magnitude of the problem cannot be safely evaluated [ 65 ]. This unavoidably hinders the validity and future usefulness of these results despite initial enthusiasm from editors and the industry.

Economic forces are important, and ultimately, the industry seeks to maximize profit by providing new products and services to the medical market [ 66 ]. In industry-funded clinical research, intentional and unintentional commercial motives can control the study design and comparators. Governmental involvement [ 66 ] has an important role in distributing research funds in areas important for the protection and restoration of human health, even when the prospects for commercial profit are poor or nonexistent. The recruitment of specialized and qualified professionals should set higher standards of rigor when they are involved in commercial or unavoidably conflicted relationships and to disseminate the resources evenly, especially when nowadays these are scarce.

Funders and academic institutions are responsible for the moral status, as research usually initiates from there and determines any kind of shift in the process. Academics might be judged on the methodological rigor and full dissemination of their research, the quality of their reports, and the reproducibility of their findings. Previous reports suggest ways to increase the relevance and to optimize resource allocation in biomedical research, indicating how resource allocation should be conducted, along with revisions in the appropriateness of research design, methods, and analysis, with efficient research regulation and management fully accessible information, promoting unbiased and usable reports. Additionally, motivation must be given to authors to share their data [ 67 ], as has been performed in the field of genetics [ 68 ]. Of note, synthesis of evidence on the meta-epidemiological level cannot always confidently provide answers to practical clinical questions [ 69 ].

Compromised ethics should be traced and removed from independent research and academia, while journals should on no occasion put profit and publicity above quality. The solution to this lies on the progressive refinement of methods and improvement of the objective and controlled processes.

13. Training

Essential training and interprofessional learning of clinicians and other hands-on scientists in the medical field are an absolute must. There is a growing need to improve their scientific insight and judgment. Reviewers should learn how to apply an unbiased critical thinking and evaluation of the methods explored, of the study questions, and of the resulting impact towards good clinical practice and human welfare. This not only applies to organizational refinement by the Academic Institutes and Publishing Organizations but also to the scientists themselves to obtain the drive to train, along with methodologists and statisticians, so that specialization and knowledge is shared and every contributor works soundly towards a common cause.

14. Conclusions

Research is a solid foundation for the progression of sciences, and the key importance in maintaining the evolution of knowledge is “contributing and sharing”, but this has to be performed adequately. Although there are several criteria and controlled circumstances under which new data and overviews of data are published, research and publishing methods require continuous readjustments and modifications to ensure quality. An overview of the published literature on women’s health and its relevant subtopics is an excellent paradigm on a crucial field of the different types of research and publications that one may encounter but also an example of the vast variability in information available, not only in terms of results but also in terms of design, analysis, quality of information, and implementation of results. In clinical practice, it is imperative to assess information collectively a researcher, medical expert, funder, reviewer, and patient, and this should encourage the improvement of evidence-based patient management.

This review aimed to present the major nodal points of quality and to propose a combination of interventions at various levels, along with other routes of judgement. We also sought to address potential flaws and pitfalls in research conduct and to provide recommendations upon improvement of study designs/methods and scientific reporting to promote publication quality and stricter criteria for release with support from the appropriate structures. A summary of recommendations towards evidence implementation as presented in Table 1 could comprise valuable guidance to both the health experts and the health service recipients to which these standards are quality criteria. A meticulous study design that promotes the transparency of methods and potential conflicts allows a clear distinction of the pathologies and targeted groups and that provides substantial scientific background should be pursued by both researchers and readers. Robust implementation of the pre-stated methods and approaches of analysis, with active participation of collective fronts tied to the subject, should allow quality output to be published and should add value to the findings. Patient-first and common welfare should be considered throughout in conjunction with supporting and providing evidence on robust outcomes for the improvement of healthcare, that may be facilitated by healthy and network collaborations.

Summary of the recommendations for the steps towards evidence implementation.

How these recommendations should be accounted for, evaluated, and implemented relies on the individual discretion of the reader, the scientist, the author, or any entity affiliated with a publishing organization and should be customized to be applied individually for each specialized academic and scientific field but also tailored across continents and countries. The latter is derived from the realization that research conduct, funding, and even the monitoring authorities of clinical studies rely on nonuniform procedures among countries and unions and conforms to different legal frameworks across countries. Nevertheless, a core of actions, precautions, and a quality exemplar of golden standards should be constructed and widely applied to meet the standards that describe a representative scientific contribution, for example, uniform, widely accepted, and practiced standards through policies, guidelines, and rules on a national and/or international level created either by in-country legislation or by scientific entities; allocation of the resources for their implementation; and mechanisms of control for their application and adherence by all.

In conclusion, multiple steps throughout the long and costly process of trial conduct are prone to bias. Notably, increasing international competition favors faster and cheaper patient recruitment, conduct, and analysis and, in turn, produces questionable research. Literature synthesis through SRs and/or meta-analysis has a primarily retrospective role that guides future research and sheds light on arguable topics but cannot erase the wrongdoings of primary studies, which are often concealed. The “bottom-up” approach of a wide dissemination of information to clinicians, together with practical incentives for stakeholders with competing interests to collaborate, promise to improve women’s healthcare.

Author Contributions

C.S. conceived and designed the study and prepared the manuscript. P.V. and V.K. contributed to the design and reporting of the research. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by the first author.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable due to the nature of this study.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of interest.

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Select a Research Topic: Current Events and Controversial Issues

• Finding a Research Topic
• Current Events and Controversial Issues
• Computer Science
• Earth Science & Astronomy
• Engineering
• Health Sciences
• Mathematics & Physics
• Physical Therapy
• Political Science
• Social Work
• Research Topic Guides

Food for Thought

When writing on controversial issues, exercise caution when considering a topic that has the potential to be overdone.  Issues such as gun control, abortion, corporal punishment, etc. have been written about so much for so long that it may be difficult to find something new to add to the conversation. Here are a few databases that have extensive browse for topic features:

Issues and Controversies is the place to go to prepare for a debate, discussion, research paper, or persuasive writing assignment. This database explores more than 800 hot topics in business, politics, government, education, and popular culture.

Learn more about Issues and Controversies using the resources below:

Search Tips

View our OneFile Research Guide to learn more about navigating GALE databases. 

More Places to Search

Explore our General Resources for Research: Multidisciplinary Databases research guide for additional resources. 

Opposing Viewpoints in Context is a rich resource for debaters and includes viewpoints, reference articles, infographics, news, images, video, audio, and more. This database centers on the key social issues of our time.

Learn more about Opposing Viewpoints in Context using the resources below:

View our tip sheet for information on how to locate materials in this database. View our OneFile Research Guide to learn more about navigating GALE databases. 

Points of View Reference Center contains many topics, each with an overview (objective background/description), point (argument) and counterpoint (opposing argument). For each topic, this database also offers a Guide to Critical Analysis, which helps the reader evaluate the controversial topics.

View our tip sheet and our YouTube tutorial for information on how to locate materials in this database. View our EBSCO Research Guide to learn more about navigating EBSCO databases. 

Download the EBSCO app on your Android or iOS device for mobile searching. 

Controversial Issues

• Abstinence only education
• Affirmative Action
• Alternative medicine
• America's global influence
• Animal Testing
• Artificial intelligence
• Assisted suicide
• Bilingual education
• Book banning
• Capital punishment
• Charter schools
• Childhood obesity
• Civil rights
• Climate change
• Concealed weapons
• Cryptocurrency
• Cyber bullying 
• Death penalty
• Drug legalization
• Eating disorders
• Energy crisis
• Ethnic Adoption
• Factory farming
• Foreign aid
• Freedom of speech
• Genetic Cloning
• Genetic engineering
• Hacking 
• Health insurance
• Human Trafficking
• Identity theft
• Immigration
• Labor unions
• Local food movement
• Mandatory National Service
• Minimum wage
• Nuclear energy
• Organic food
• Offshore drilling
• Outsourcing
• Plastic Surgery
• Racial profiling
• Recreational Marijuana
• Roe v. Wade
• School safety
• School uniforms
• Second Amendment
• Self-defense laws
• Self-driving cars
• Sex education
• Social security
• Standardized testing
• Student Loan Debt
• Urban agriculture
• Violence in the media
• Women's rights
• Zero tolerance policies

Current Events

• 2020 Census
• Affordable Care Act
• Afghanistan crisis 
• Arming teachers
• Black Lives Matter
• Brazil political crisis
• Confederate memorials
• COVID-19 vaccines & mandates
• Cybersecurity
• Electoral College
• Equal Rights Amendment
• Federal interest rates
• Filibuster 
• Gender nutral restrooms
• Gerrymandering
• Government shut down
• Hate speech
• Hydraulic fracturing (fracking)
• Impeachment
• Internet privacy
• Iran nuclear deal
• Islamophobia
• Lethal Injections
• Marijuana legalization
• Mass incarceration
• Mass shooting
• Medical Devices
• Me Too movement
• Migrant crisis
• Mueller Report
• Net neutrality
• North Dakota Access Pipeline
• North Korea
• Paris Climate Agreement
• Planned Parenthood
• Poverty gap
• Prescription drug addiction
• Racism in America
• Refugee crisis
• Russian hacking
• Sanctuary city
• School violence
• Sexual assault on campus
• Supreme Court Justice oversight
• Syrian civil war
• Transgender rights
• Trump, Donald
• UK leaving EU (Brexit)
• Vaccination
• Voter fraud
• Voting laws
• Warehouse Working Conditions (Amazon, UPS, Walmart)
• White nationalism
• << Previous: Finding a Research Topic
• Next: Art >>
• Last Updated: Jul 24, 2024 4:00 PM
• URL: https://southern.libguides.com/researchtopics

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

Publications

• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Politics & Policy

In tied presidential race, harris and trump have contrasting strengths, weaknesses.

About half of registered voters (49%) say if the election were held today, they would vote for Harris, while an identical share say they would back Trump.

White Protestants and Catholics support Trump, but voters in other U.S. religious groups prefer Harris

The political values of harris and trump supporters, war in ukraine: wide partisan differences on u.s. responsibility and support, joe biden, public opinion and his withdrawal from the 2024 race, sign up for our politics newsletter.

Our latest politics data every month

Can Americans be optimistic about their democracy?

Americans’ grim political mood and desire for change show up across our surveys. But despite divisions, there are hopeful signs for the future.

How U.S. Public Opinion Has Changed in 20 Years of Our Surveys

We took a closer look at how Americans’ views and experiences have evolved on a variety of topics over the last 20 years.

Among White evangelicals, support for Trump is higher among those who attend church regularly than among those who don’t.

Trump leads on the economy; Harris, on abortion and several personal traits. And supporters of the candidates have different views of what governing actions would be acceptable.

Support for a U.S. TikTok ban continues to decline, and half of adults doubt it will happen

The share of Americans who support the U.S. government banning TikTok now stands at 32%, down from 38% in fall 2023 and 50% in March 2023.

From ‘traditional’ to ‘open-minded,’ how Americans describe themselves

Roughly six-in-ten Republicans (58%) describe themselves as traditional, but just 19% of Democrats say the same.

Key things to know about U.S. election polling in 2024

Polls are more useful to the public if people have realistic expectations about what surveys can do well – and what they cannot.

Many around the globe say it’s important their leader stands up for people’s religious beliefs

Adults in Indonesia, Bangladesh and the Philippines are the most likely to say it is important to have a leader who stands up for people with their religious beliefs.

A majority of U.S. presidents and vice presidents have been relatively close in age

Of the 51 president-vice president pairs, a majority (59%) have been closer than 10 years in age.

Among supporters of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, there continue to be wide gaps on cultural issues, the role of government and America’s place in the world.

REFINE YOUR SELECTION

Research teams, signature reports, changing partisan coalitions in a politically divided nation.

Amid shifts in demographics and partisan allegiances, registered voters are now evenly split between the Democratic Party and the GOP.

Americans’ Dismal Views of the Nation’s Politics

Americans’ views of politics and elected officials are unrelentingly negative, with little hope of improvement on the horizon. 65% of Americans say they always or often feel exhausted when thinking about politics. By contrast, just 10% say they always or often feel hopeful about politics.

Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology

Pew Research Center’s political typology provides a roadmap to today’s fractured political landscape. It organizes the public into nine distinct groups, based on an analysis of their attitudes and values. Even in a polarized era, the 2021 survey reveals deep divisions in both partisan coalitions.

In a Politically Polarized Era, Sharp Divides in Both Partisan Coalitions

Partisanship remains the strongest factor dividing the American public. Yet there are substantial divisions within both parties on fundamental political values, views of current issues and the severity of the problems facing the nation.

Across the Table: Would you share your views of Donald Trump over dinner?

Tuning out: americans on the edge of politics, voters say those on the other side ‘don’t get’ them. here’s what they want them to know., political typology quiz.

901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan, nonadvocacy fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, computational social science research and other data-driven research. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts , its primary funder.

© 2024 Pew Research Center

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024): Current Issues in Education’s Spring Issue

Welcome to the Spring issue of Current Issues in Education, where we embark on a journey through the dynamic landscape of contemporary educational research. In this edition, we are delighted to present a collection of insightful papers that delve into critical topics shaping the field of education today.

As we navigate the complexities of education, one recurring theme that emerges from our exploration is the pursuit of equity and social justice. From examining the limitations in education in regards to developing the possible selves of young Black men through Hip Hop-based education (Robinson, 2024) to identifying barriers to parental involvement in early childhood education (Wildmon et al., 2024) or beginning teachers’struggles in regards to students’ and their own social-emotional development and needs (Martin, 2024), the papers in this issue underscore the importance of ensuring equitable access to quality education for all learners. Through rigorous inquiry, the authors shed light on the challenges faced by marginalized communities and advocate for inclusive practices that empower every student.

Another prominent theme that permeates the research presented here is the need for adaptability and resilience in education. Whether it is navigating the transformation of courses between different modalities in higher education (Bernauer et al., 2024) or responding to the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (Scheopner Torres & D’Souza, 2024), educators and institutions must be flexible and innovative to meet learners' evolving needs, which are changing rapidly due to broader societal demands (e.g., Caddy & Sandilands, 2019).The papers in this issue provide valuable insights that can help in building resilient educational systems capable of withstanding 21st-century challenges and re-emphasize the importance of communities, both those of practice and local, in shaping the experiences of teachers and students. 

As lead editors, we extend our gratitude to the authors for their dedication to advancing knowledge in the field of education. We also express appreciation to the reviewers and editorial team for their meticulous attention to detail and commitment to academic excellence.

We invite you to immerse yourself in the rich tapestry of research presented in this issue, engage with the findings and insights, and join us in the ongoing dialogue surrounding the future of education. Together, let us work towards building a more equitable, resilient, and inclusive educational landscape for generations to come.

Warm regards,

Tipsuda Chaomuangkhong and Bregje van Geffen

Lead Editors of Current Issues in Education

References:

Bernauer, J.A., Fuller, R.G., & Cassels, A.M. (2024). Transforming courses across teaching modalities in higher education. Current Issues in Education, 25 (1). https://doi.org/10.14507/cie.vol25iss1.2157

Caddy, J., & Sandilands, R. (2019). Analytical Framework for Case Study Collection Effective Learning Environments . OECD.

Martin, P.C. (2024). Teacher SEL Space: Addressing Beginning Teachers’ Social Emotionalm Learning in a Support Group Structure. Current Issues in Education, 25 (3). https://doi.org/10.14507 /cie.vol25iss1.2186

Robinson, S. R. (2024). Hip Hop, social reproduction, and the possible selves of young Black men. Current Issues in Education, 25 (1).   https://doi.org/10.14507/cie.vol25iss1.2143

Scheopner Torres, A., & D’Souza, L. A. (2024). Pipeline disruption: The impact of COVID-19 on the next generation of teachers. Current Issues in Education, 25 (1). https://doi.org/10.14507/cie.vol25iss1.2125

Wildmon, M.E., Anthony, K.V., & Kamau, Z.J. (2024). Identifying and navigating the barriers of parental involvement in early childhood education. Current Issues in Education, 25 (1).  https://doi.org/10.14507/cie.vol25iss1.2146

Picture: " Education is All " by cogdogblog is licensed under CC BY 2.0 .

Teacher SEL Space: Addressing Beginning Teachers’ Social Emotional Learning in a Support Group Structure

Identifying and navigating the barriers of parental involvement in early childhood education, pipeline disruption: the impact of covid-19 on the next generation of teachers, transforming courses across teaching modalities in higher education, hip hop, social reproduction, and the possible selves of young black men, make a submission.

Become a Reviewer

Journal Summary

Current Issues in Education ( CIE; ISSN 1099-839X) is an open access, peer-reviewed academic education journal produced by doctoral students at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College of Arizona State University. The journal’s mission is to advance scholarly thought by publishing articles that promote dialogue, research, practice, and policy, and to advance a community of scholarship.

CIE publishes articles on a broad range of education topics that are timely and have relevance nationally and internationally. We seek innovative scholarship that tackles challenging issues facing education using various theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches. CIE welcomes original research, practitioner experience papers, and submissions in alternative formats.

Authors wishing to submit a manuscript for peer review must register for a journal account and should examine our author guidelines . As an open-access journal, authors maintain the copyright to their published work. 

To enhance diversity and inclusion in scholarly publication, and support a greater global exchange of knowledge, CIE does not charge any fee to authors at any stage of the publication process. 

Developed By