importance of analysis of case study

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• AI Essentials for Business
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Creating Brand Value
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading Change and Organizational Renewal
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

5 Benefits of Learning Through the Case Study Method

• 28 Nov 2023

While several factors make HBS Online unique —including a global Community and real-world outcomes —active learning through the case study method rises to the top.

In a 2023 City Square Associates survey, 74 percent of HBS Online learners who also took a course from another provider said HBS Online’s case method and real-world examples were better by comparison.

Here’s a primer on the case method, five benefits you could gain, and how to experience it for yourself.

Access your free e-book today.

What Is the Harvard Business School Case Study Method?

The case study method , or case method , is a learning technique in which you’re presented with a real-world business challenge and asked how you’d solve it. After working through it yourself and with peers, you’re told how the scenario played out.

HBS pioneered the case method in 1922. Shortly before, in 1921, the first case was written.

“How do you go into an ambiguous situation and get to the bottom of it?” says HBS Professor Jan Rivkin, former senior associate dean and chair of HBS's master of business administration (MBA) program, in a video about the case method . “That skill—the skill of figuring out a course of inquiry to choose a course of action—that skill is as relevant today as it was in 1921.”

Originally developed for the in-person MBA classroom, HBS Online adapted the case method into an engaging, interactive online learning experience in 2014.

In HBS Online courses , you learn about each case from the business professional who experienced it. After reviewing their videos, you’re prompted to take their perspective and explain how you’d handle their situation.

You then get to read peers’ responses, “star” them, and comment to further the discussion. Afterward, you learn how the professional handled it and their key takeaways.

Learn more about HBS Online's approach to the case method in the video below, and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more.

HBS Online’s adaptation of the case method incorporates the famed HBS “cold call,” in which you’re called on at random to make a decision without time to prepare.

“Learning came to life!” said Sheneka Balogun , chief administration officer and chief of staff at LeMoyne-Owen College, of her experience taking the Credential of Readiness (CORe) program . “The videos from the professors, the interactive cold calls where you were randomly selected to participate, and the case studies that enhanced and often captured the essence of objectives and learning goals were all embedded in each module. This made learning fun, engaging, and student-friendly.”

If you’re considering taking a course that leverages the case study method, here are five benefits you could experience.

5 Benefits of Learning Through Case Studies

1. take new perspectives.

The case method prompts you to consider a scenario from another person’s perspective. To work through the situation and come up with a solution, you must consider their circumstances, limitations, risk tolerance, stakeholders, resources, and potential consequences to assess how to respond.

Taking on new perspectives not only can help you navigate your own challenges but also others’. Putting yourself in someone else’s situation to understand their motivations and needs can go a long way when collaborating with stakeholders.

2. Hone Your Decision-Making Skills

Another skill you can build is the ability to make decisions effectively . The case study method forces you to use limited information to decide how to handle a problem—just like in the real world.

Throughout your career, you’ll need to make difficult decisions with incomplete or imperfect information—and sometimes, you won’t feel qualified to do so. Learning through the case method allows you to practice this skill in a low-stakes environment. When facing a real challenge, you’ll be better prepared to think quickly, collaborate with others, and present and defend your solution.

3. Become More Open-Minded

As you collaborate with peers on responses, it becomes clear that not everyone solves problems the same way. Exposing yourself to various approaches and perspectives can help you become a more open-minded professional.

When you’re part of a diverse group of learners from around the world, your experiences, cultures, and backgrounds contribute to a range of opinions on each case.

On the HBS Online course platform, you’re prompted to view and comment on others’ responses, and discussion is encouraged. This practice of considering others’ perspectives can make you more receptive in your career.

“You’d be surprised at how much you can learn from your peers,” said Ratnaditya Jonnalagadda , a software engineer who took CORe.

In addition to interacting with peers in the course platform, Jonnalagadda was part of the HBS Online Community , where he networked with other professionals and continued discussions sparked by course content.

“You get to understand your peers better, and students share examples of businesses implementing a concept from a module you just learned,” Jonnalagadda said. “It’s a very good way to cement the concepts in one's mind.”

4. Enhance Your Curiosity

One byproduct of taking on different perspectives is that it enables you to picture yourself in various roles, industries, and business functions.

“Each case offers an opportunity for students to see what resonates with them, what excites them, what bores them, which role they could imagine inhabiting in their careers,” says former HBS Dean Nitin Nohria in the Harvard Business Review . “Cases stimulate curiosity about the range of opportunities in the world and the many ways that students can make a difference as leaders.”

Through the case method, you can “try on” roles you may not have considered and feel more prepared to change or advance your career .

5. Build Your Self-Confidence

Finally, learning through the case study method can build your confidence. Each time you assume a business leader’s perspective, aim to solve a new challenge, and express and defend your opinions and decisions to peers, you prepare to do the same in your career.

According to a 2022 City Square Associates survey , 84 percent of HBS Online learners report feeling more confident making business decisions after taking a course.

“Self-confidence is difficult to teach or coach, but the case study method seems to instill it in people,” Nohria says in the Harvard Business Review . “There may well be other ways of learning these meta-skills, such as the repeated experience gained through practice or guidance from a gifted coach. However, under the direction of a masterful teacher, the case method can engage students and help them develop powerful meta-skills like no other form of teaching.”

How to Experience the Case Study Method

If the case method seems like a good fit for your learning style, experience it for yourself by taking an HBS Online course. Offerings span eight subject areas, including:

• Business essentials
• Leadership and management
• Entrepreneurship and innovation
• Digital transformation
• Finance and accounting
• Business in society

No matter which course or credential program you choose, you’ll examine case studies from real business professionals, work through their challenges alongside peers, and gain valuable insights to apply to your career.

Are you interested in discovering how HBS Online can help advance your career? Explore our course catalog and download our free guide —complete with interactive workbook sections—to determine if online learning is right for you and which course to take.

About the Author

What the Case Study Method Really Teaches

by Nitin Nohria

Summary .   

It’s been 100 years since Harvard Business School began using the case study method. Beyond teaching specific subject matter, the case study method excels in instilling meta-skills in students. This article explains the importance of seven such skills: preparation, discernment, bias recognition, judgement, collaboration, curiosity, and self-confidence.

During my decade as dean of Harvard Business School, I spent hundreds of hours talking with our alumni. To enliven these conversations, I relied on a favorite question: “What was the most important thing you learned from your time in our MBA program?”

Partner Center

• Privacy Policy

Home » Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Table of Contents

A case study is a research method that involves an in-depth examination and analysis of a particular phenomenon or case, such as an individual, organization, community, event, or situation.

It is a qualitative research approach that aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive understanding of the case being studied. Case studies typically involve multiple sources of data, including interviews, observations, documents, and artifacts, which are analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, and grounded theory. The findings of a case study are often used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Types of Case Study

Types and Methods of Case Study are as follows:

Single-Case Study

A single-case study is an in-depth analysis of a single case. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand a specific phenomenon in detail.

For Example , A researcher might conduct a single-case study on a particular individual to understand their experiences with a particular health condition or a specific organization to explore their management practices. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a single-case study are often used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Multiple-Case Study

A multiple-case study involves the analysis of several cases that are similar in nature. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to identify similarities and differences between the cases.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a multiple-case study on several companies to explore the factors that contribute to their success or failure. The researcher collects data from each case, compares and contrasts the findings, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as comparative analysis or pattern-matching. The findings of a multiple-case study can be used to develop theories, inform policy or practice, or generate new research questions.

Exploratory Case Study

An exploratory case study is used to explore a new or understudied phenomenon. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to generate hypotheses or theories about the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an exploratory case study on a new technology to understand its potential impact on society. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as grounded theory or content analysis. The findings of an exploratory case study can be used to generate new research questions, develop theories, or inform policy or practice.

Descriptive Case Study

A descriptive case study is used to describe a particular phenomenon in detail. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to provide a comprehensive account of the phenomenon.

For Example, a researcher might conduct a descriptive case study on a particular community to understand its social and economic characteristics. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of a descriptive case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Instrumental Case Study

An instrumental case study is used to understand a particular phenomenon that is instrumental in achieving a particular goal. This type of case study is useful when the researcher wants to understand the role of the phenomenon in achieving the goal.

For Example, a researcher might conduct an instrumental case study on a particular policy to understand its impact on achieving a particular goal, such as reducing poverty. The researcher collects data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, and documents, and uses various techniques to analyze the data, such as content analysis or thematic analysis. The findings of an instrumental case study can be used to inform policy or practice or generate new research questions.

Case Study Data Collection Methods

Here are some common data collection methods for case studies:

Interviews involve asking questions to individuals who have knowledge or experience relevant to the case study. Interviews can be structured (where the same questions are asked to all participants) or unstructured (where the interviewer follows up on the responses with further questions). Interviews can be conducted in person, over the phone, or through video conferencing.

Observations

Observations involve watching and recording the behavior and activities of individuals or groups relevant to the case study. Observations can be participant (where the researcher actively participates in the activities) or non-participant (where the researcher observes from a distance). Observations can be recorded using notes, audio or video recordings, or photographs.

Documents can be used as a source of information for case studies. Documents can include reports, memos, emails, letters, and other written materials related to the case study. Documents can be collected from the case study participants or from public sources.

Surveys involve asking a set of questions to a sample of individuals relevant to the case study. Surveys can be administered in person, over the phone, through mail or email, or online. Surveys can be used to gather information on attitudes, opinions, or behaviors related to the case study.

Artifacts are physical objects relevant to the case study. Artifacts can include tools, equipment, products, or other objects that provide insights into the case study phenomenon.

How to conduct Case Study Research

Conducting a case study research involves several steps that need to be followed to ensure the quality and rigor of the study. Here are the steps to conduct case study research:

• Define the research questions: The first step in conducting a case study research is to define the research questions. The research questions should be specific, measurable, and relevant to the case study phenomenon under investigation.
• Select the case: The next step is to select the case or cases to be studied. The case should be relevant to the research questions and should provide rich and diverse data that can be used to answer the research questions.
• Collect data: Data can be collected using various methods, such as interviews, observations, documents, surveys, and artifacts. The data collection method should be selected based on the research questions and the nature of the case study phenomenon.
• Analyze the data: The data collected from the case study should be analyzed using various techniques, such as content analysis, thematic analysis, or grounded theory. The analysis should be guided by the research questions and should aim to provide insights and conclusions relevant to the research questions.
• Draw conclusions: The conclusions drawn from the case study should be based on the data analysis and should be relevant to the research questions. The conclusions should be supported by evidence and should be clearly stated.
• Validate the findings: The findings of the case study should be validated by reviewing the data and the analysis with participants or other experts in the field. This helps to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.
• Write the report: The final step is to write the report of the case study research. The report should provide a clear description of the case study phenomenon, the research questions, the data collection methods, the data analysis, the findings, and the conclusions. The report should be written in a clear and concise manner and should follow the guidelines for academic writing.

Examples of Case Study

Here are some examples of case study research:

• The Hawthorne Studies : Conducted between 1924 and 1932, the Hawthorne Studies were a series of case studies conducted by Elton Mayo and his colleagues to examine the impact of work environment on employee productivity. The studies were conducted at the Hawthorne Works plant of the Western Electric Company in Chicago and included interviews, observations, and experiments.
• The Stanford Prison Experiment: Conducted in 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment was a case study conducted by Philip Zimbardo to examine the psychological effects of power and authority. The study involved simulating a prison environment and assigning participants to the role of guards or prisoners. The study was controversial due to the ethical issues it raised.
• The Challenger Disaster: The Challenger Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion in 1986. The study included interviews, observations, and analysis of data to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.
• The Enron Scandal: The Enron Scandal was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the Enron Corporation’s bankruptcy in 2001. The study included interviews, analysis of financial data, and review of documents to identify the accounting practices, corporate culture, and ethical issues that led to the company’s downfall.
• The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster : The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster was a case study conducted to examine the causes of the nuclear accident that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan in 2011. The study included interviews, analysis of data, and review of documents to identify the technical, organizational, and cultural factors that contributed to the disaster.

Application of Case Study

Case studies have a wide range of applications across various fields and industries. Here are some examples:

Business and Management

Case studies are widely used in business and management to examine real-life situations and develop problem-solving skills. Case studies can help students and professionals to develop a deep understanding of business concepts, theories, and best practices.

Case studies are used in healthcare to examine patient care, treatment options, and outcomes. Case studies can help healthcare professionals to develop critical thinking skills, diagnose complex medical conditions, and develop effective treatment plans.

Case studies are used in education to examine teaching and learning practices. Case studies can help educators to develop effective teaching strategies, evaluate student progress, and identify areas for improvement.

Social Sciences

Case studies are widely used in social sciences to examine human behavior, social phenomena, and cultural practices. Case studies can help researchers to develop theories, test hypotheses, and gain insights into complex social issues.

Law and Ethics

Case studies are used in law and ethics to examine legal and ethical dilemmas. Case studies can help lawyers, policymakers, and ethical professionals to develop critical thinking skills, analyze complex cases, and make informed decisions.

Purpose of Case Study

The purpose of a case study is to provide a detailed analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. A case study is a qualitative research method that involves the in-depth exploration and analysis of a particular case, which can be an individual, group, organization, event, or community.

The primary purpose of a case study is to generate a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case, including its history, context, and dynamics. Case studies can help researchers to identify and examine the underlying factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and detailed understanding of the case, which can inform future research, practice, or policy.

Case studies can also serve other purposes, including:

• Illustrating a theory or concept: Case studies can be used to illustrate and explain theoretical concepts and frameworks, providing concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Developing hypotheses: Case studies can help to generate hypotheses about the causal relationships between different factors and outcomes, which can be tested through further research.
• Providing insight into complex issues: Case studies can provide insights into complex and multifaceted issues, which may be difficult to understand through other research methods.
• Informing practice or policy: Case studies can be used to inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.

Advantages of Case Study Research

There are several advantages of case study research, including:

• In-depth exploration: Case study research allows for a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific phenomenon, issue, or problem in its real-life context. This can provide a comprehensive understanding of the case and its dynamics, which may not be possible through other research methods.
• Rich data: Case study research can generate rich and detailed data, including qualitative data such as interviews, observations, and documents. This can provide a nuanced understanding of the case and its complexity.
• Holistic perspective: Case study research allows for a holistic perspective of the case, taking into account the various factors, processes, and mechanisms that contribute to the case and its outcomes. This can help to develop a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the case.
• Theory development: Case study research can help to develop and refine theories and concepts by providing empirical evidence and concrete examples of how they can be applied in real-life situations.
• Practical application: Case study research can inform practice or policy by identifying best practices, lessons learned, or areas for improvement.
• Contextualization: Case study research takes into account the specific context in which the case is situated, which can help to understand how the case is influenced by the social, cultural, and historical factors of its environment.

Limitations of Case Study Research

There are several limitations of case study research, including:

• Limited generalizability : Case studies are typically focused on a single case or a small number of cases, which limits the generalizability of the findings. The unique characteristics of the case may not be applicable to other contexts or populations, which may limit the external validity of the research.
• Biased sampling: Case studies may rely on purposive or convenience sampling, which can introduce bias into the sample selection process. This may limit the representativeness of the sample and the generalizability of the findings.
• Subjectivity: Case studies rely on the interpretation of the researcher, which can introduce subjectivity into the analysis. The researcher’s own biases, assumptions, and perspectives may influence the findings, which may limit the objectivity of the research.
• Limited control: Case studies are typically conducted in naturalistic settings, which limits the control that the researcher has over the environment and the variables being studied. This may limit the ability to establish causal relationships between variables.
• Time-consuming: Case studies can be time-consuming to conduct, as they typically involve a detailed exploration and analysis of a specific case. This may limit the feasibility of conducting multiple case studies or conducting case studies in a timely manner.
• Resource-intensive: Case studies may require significant resources, including time, funding, and expertise. This may limit the ability of researchers to conduct case studies in resource-constrained settings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Transformative Design – Methods, Types, Guide

Quasi-Experimental Research Design – Types...

Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide

Experimental Design – Types, Methods, Guide

Basic Research – Types, Methods and Examples

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods

What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods

Published on May 8, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 20, 2023.

A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organization, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research.

A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods , but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good for describing , comparing, evaluating and understanding different aspects of a research problem .

Table of contents

When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyze the case, other interesting articles.

A case study is an appropriate research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. It allows you to explore the key characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case.

Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation . They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or resources to do large-scale research.

You might use just one complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Once you have developed your problem statement and research questions , you should be ready to choose the specific case that you want to focus on. A good case study should have the potential to:

• Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject
• Challenge or complicate existing assumptions and theories
• Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem
• Open up new directions for future research

TipIf your research is more practical in nature and aims to simultaneously investigate an issue as you solve it, consider conducting action research instead.

Unlike quantitative or experimental research , a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. In fact, case studies often deliberately focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases which may shed new light on the research problem.

Example of an outlying case studyIn the 1960s the town of Roseto, Pennsylvania was discovered to have extremely low rates of heart disease compared to the US average. It became an important case study for understanding previously neglected causes of heart disease.

However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience or phenomenon.

Example of a representative case studyIn the 1920s, two sociologists used Muncie, Indiana as a case study of a typical American city that supposedly exemplified the changing culture of the US at the time.

While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. It might aim to:

• Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation
• Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
• Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions

To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework . This means identifying key concepts and theories to guide your analysis and interpretation.

There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using methods such as interviews , observations , and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). Sometimes a case study will also collect quantitative data.

Example of a mixed methods case studyFor a case study of a wind farm development in a rural area, you could collect quantitative data on employment rates and business revenue, collect qualitative data on local people’s perceptions and experiences, and analyze local and national media coverage of the development.

The aim is to gain as thorough an understanding as possible of the case and its context.

In writing up the case study, you need to bring together all the relevant aspects to give as complete a picture as possible of the subject.

How you report your findings depends on the type of research you are doing. Some case studies are structured like a standard scientific paper or thesis , with separate sections or chapters for the methods , results and discussion .

Others are written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyze its meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ).

In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Quantitative research
• Ecological validity

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). What Is a Case Study? | Definition, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/case-study/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, primary vs. secondary sources | difference & examples, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is action research | definition & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

The Ultimate Guide to Qualitative Research - Part 1: The Basics

• Introduction and overview
• What is qualitative research?
• What is qualitative data?
• Examples of qualitative data
• Qualitative vs. quantitative research
• Mixed methods
• Qualitative research preparation
• Theoretical perspective
• Theoretical framework
• Literature reviews

Research question

• Conceptual framework
• Conceptual vs. theoretical framework

Data collection

• Qualitative research methods
• Focus groups
• Observational research

What is a case study?

Applications for case study research, what is a good case study, process of case study design, benefits and limitations of case studies.

• Ethnographical research
• Ethical considerations
• Confidentiality and privacy
• Power dynamics
• Reflexivity

Case studies

Case studies are essential to qualitative research , offering a lens through which researchers can investigate complex phenomena within their real-life contexts. This chapter explores the concept, purpose, applications, examples, and types of case studies and provides guidance on how to conduct case study research effectively.

Whereas quantitative methods look at phenomena at scale, case study research looks at a concept or phenomenon in considerable detail. While analyzing a single case can help understand one perspective regarding the object of research inquiry, analyzing multiple cases can help obtain a more holistic sense of the topic or issue. Let's provide a basic definition of a case study, then explore its characteristics and role in the qualitative research process.

Definition of a case study

A case study in qualitative research is a strategy of inquiry that involves an in-depth investigation of a phenomenon within its real-world context. It provides researchers with the opportunity to acquire an in-depth understanding of intricate details that might not be as apparent or accessible through other methods of research. The specific case or cases being studied can be a single person, group, or organization – demarcating what constitutes a relevant case worth studying depends on the researcher and their research question .

Among qualitative research methods , a case study relies on multiple sources of evidence, such as documents, artifacts, interviews , or observations , to present a complete and nuanced understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. The objective is to illuminate the readers' understanding of the phenomenon beyond its abstract statistical or theoretical explanations.

Characteristics of case studies

Case studies typically possess a number of distinct characteristics that set them apart from other research methods. These characteristics include a focus on holistic description and explanation, flexibility in the design and data collection methods, reliance on multiple sources of evidence, and emphasis on the context in which the phenomenon occurs.

Furthermore, case studies can often involve a longitudinal examination of the case, meaning they study the case over a period of time. These characteristics allow case studies to yield comprehensive, in-depth, and richly contextualized insights about the phenomenon of interest.

The role of case studies in research

Case studies hold a unique position in the broader landscape of research methods aimed at theory development. They are instrumental when the primary research interest is to gain an intensive, detailed understanding of a phenomenon in its real-life context.

In addition, case studies can serve different purposes within research - they can be used for exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory purposes, depending on the research question and objectives. This flexibility and depth make case studies a valuable tool in the toolkit of qualitative researchers.

Remember, a well-conducted case study can offer a rich, insightful contribution to both academic and practical knowledge through theory development or theory verification, thus enhancing our understanding of complex phenomena in their real-world contexts.

What is the purpose of a case study?

Case study research aims for a more comprehensive understanding of phenomena, requiring various research methods to gather information for qualitative analysis . Ultimately, a case study can allow the researcher to gain insight into a particular object of inquiry and develop a theoretical framework relevant to the research inquiry.

Why use case studies in qualitative research?

Using case studies as a research strategy depends mainly on the nature of the research question and the researcher's access to the data.

Conducting case study research provides a level of detail and contextual richness that other research methods might not offer. They are beneficial when there's a need to understand complex social phenomena within their natural contexts.

The explanatory, exploratory, and descriptive roles of case studies

Case studies can take on various roles depending on the research objectives. They can be exploratory when the research aims to discover new phenomena or define new research questions; they are descriptive when the objective is to depict a phenomenon within its context in a detailed manner; and they can be explanatory if the goal is to understand specific relationships within the studied context. Thus, the versatility of case studies allows researchers to approach their topic from different angles, offering multiple ways to uncover and interpret the data .

The impact of case studies on knowledge development

Case studies play a significant role in knowledge development across various disciplines. Analysis of cases provides an avenue for researchers to explore phenomena within their context based on the collected data.

This can result in the production of rich, practical insights that can be instrumental in both theory-building and practice. Case studies allow researchers to delve into the intricacies and complexities of real-life situations, uncovering insights that might otherwise remain hidden.

Types of case studies

In qualitative research , a case study is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Depending on the nature of the research question and the specific objectives of the study, researchers might choose to use different types of case studies. These types differ in their focus, methodology, and the level of detail they provide about the phenomenon under investigation.

Understanding these types is crucial for selecting the most appropriate approach for your research project and effectively achieving your research goals. Let's briefly look at the main types of case studies.

Exploratory case studies

Exploratory case studies are typically conducted to develop a theory or framework around an understudied phenomenon. They can also serve as a precursor to a larger-scale research project. Exploratory case studies are useful when a researcher wants to identify the key issues or questions which can spur more extensive study or be used to develop propositions for further research. These case studies are characterized by flexibility, allowing researchers to explore various aspects of a phenomenon as they emerge, which can also form the foundation for subsequent studies.

Descriptive case studies

Descriptive case studies aim to provide a complete and accurate representation of a phenomenon or event within its context. These case studies are often based on an established theoretical framework, which guides how data is collected and analyzed. The researcher is concerned with describing the phenomenon in detail, as it occurs naturally, without trying to influence or manipulate it.

Explanatory case studies

Explanatory case studies are focused on explanation - they seek to clarify how or why certain phenomena occur. Often used in complex, real-life situations, they can be particularly valuable in clarifying causal relationships among concepts and understanding the interplay between different factors within a specific context.

Intrinsic, instrumental, and collective case studies

These three categories of case studies focus on the nature and purpose of the study. An intrinsic case study is conducted when a researcher has an inherent interest in the case itself. Instrumental case studies are employed when the case is used to provide insight into a particular issue or phenomenon. A collective case study, on the other hand, involves studying multiple cases simultaneously to investigate some general phenomena.

Each type of case study serves a different purpose and has its own strengths and challenges. The selection of the type should be guided by the research question and objectives, as well as the context and constraints of the research.

The flexibility, depth, and contextual richness offered by case studies make this approach an excellent research method for various fields of study. They enable researchers to investigate real-world phenomena within their specific contexts, capturing nuances that other research methods might miss. Across numerous fields, case studies provide valuable insights into complex issues.

Critical information systems research

Case studies provide a detailed understanding of the role and impact of information systems in different contexts. They offer a platform to explore how information systems are designed, implemented, and used and how they interact with various social, economic, and political factors. Case studies in this field often focus on examining the intricate relationship between technology, organizational processes, and user behavior, helping to uncover insights that can inform better system design and implementation.

Health research

Health research is another field where case studies are highly valuable. They offer a way to explore patient experiences, healthcare delivery processes, and the impact of various interventions in a real-world context.

Case studies can provide a deep understanding of a patient's journey, giving insights into the intricacies of disease progression, treatment effects, and the psychosocial aspects of health and illness.

Asthma research studies

Specifically within medical research, studies on asthma often employ case studies to explore the individual and environmental factors that influence asthma development, management, and outcomes. A case study can provide rich, detailed data about individual patients' experiences, from the triggers and symptoms they experience to the effectiveness of various management strategies. This can be crucial for developing patient-centered asthma care approaches.

Other fields

Apart from the fields mentioned, case studies are also extensively used in business and management research, education research, and political sciences, among many others. They provide an opportunity to delve into the intricacies of real-world situations, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of various phenomena.

Case studies, with their depth and contextual focus, offer unique insights across these varied fields. They allow researchers to illuminate the complexities of real-life situations, contributing to both theory and practice.

Whatever field you're in, ATLAS.ti puts your data to work for you

Download a free trial of ATLAS.ti to turn your data into insights.

Understanding the key elements of case study design is crucial for conducting rigorous and impactful case study research. A well-structured design guides the researcher through the process, ensuring that the study is methodologically sound and its findings are reliable and valid. The main elements of case study design include the research question , propositions, units of analysis, and the logic linking the data to the propositions.

The research question is the foundation of any research study. A good research question guides the direction of the study and informs the selection of the case, the methods of collecting data, and the analysis techniques. A well-formulated research question in case study research is typically clear, focused, and complex enough to merit further detailed examination of the relevant case(s).

Propositions

Propositions, though not necessary in every case study, provide a direction by stating what we might expect to find in the data collected. They guide how data is collected and analyzed by helping researchers focus on specific aspects of the case. They are particularly important in explanatory case studies, which seek to understand the relationships among concepts within the studied phenomenon.

Units of analysis

The unit of analysis refers to the case, or the main entity or entities that are being analyzed in the study. In case study research, the unit of analysis can be an individual, a group, an organization, a decision, an event, or even a time period. It's crucial to clearly define the unit of analysis, as it shapes the qualitative data analysis process by allowing the researcher to analyze a particular case and synthesize analysis across multiple case studies to draw conclusions.

Argumentation

This refers to the inferential model that allows researchers to draw conclusions from the data. The researcher needs to ensure that there is a clear link between the data, the propositions (if any), and the conclusions drawn. This argumentation is what enables the researcher to make valid and credible inferences about the phenomenon under study.

Understanding and carefully considering these elements in the design phase of a case study can significantly enhance the quality of the research. It can help ensure that the study is methodologically sound and its findings contribute meaningful insights about the case.

Ready to jumpstart your research with ATLAS.ti?

Conceptualize your research project with our intuitive data analysis interface. Download a free trial today.

Conducting a case study involves several steps, from defining the research question and selecting the case to collecting and analyzing data . This section outlines these key stages, providing a practical guide on how to conduct case study research.

Defining the research question

The first step in case study research is defining a clear, focused research question. This question should guide the entire research process, from case selection to analysis. It's crucial to ensure that the research question is suitable for a case study approach. Typically, such questions are exploratory or descriptive in nature and focus on understanding a phenomenon within its real-life context.

Selecting and defining the case

The selection of the case should be based on the research question and the objectives of the study. It involves choosing a unique example or a set of examples that provide rich, in-depth data about the phenomenon under investigation. After selecting the case, it's crucial to define it clearly, setting the boundaries of the case, including the time period and the specific context.

Previous research can help guide the case study design. When considering a case study, an example of a case could be taken from previous case study research and used to define cases in a new research inquiry. Considering recently published examples can help understand how to select and define cases effectively.

Developing a detailed case study protocol

A case study protocol outlines the procedures and general rules to be followed during the case study. This includes the data collection methods to be used, the sources of data, and the procedures for analysis. Having a detailed case study protocol ensures consistency and reliability in the study.

The protocol should also consider how to work with the people involved in the research context to grant the research team access to collecting data. As mentioned in previous sections of this guide, establishing rapport is an essential component of qualitative research as it shapes the overall potential for collecting and analyzing data.

Collecting data

Gathering data in case study research often involves multiple sources of evidence, including documents, archival records, interviews, observations, and physical artifacts. This allows for a comprehensive understanding of the case. The process for gathering data should be systematic and carefully documented to ensure the reliability and validity of the study.

Analyzing and interpreting data

The next step is analyzing the data. This involves organizing the data , categorizing it into themes or patterns , and interpreting these patterns to answer the research question. The analysis might also involve comparing the findings with prior research or theoretical propositions.

Writing the case study report

The final step is writing the case study report . This should provide a detailed description of the case, the data, the analysis process, and the findings. The report should be clear, organized, and carefully written to ensure that the reader can understand the case and the conclusions drawn from it.

Each of these steps is crucial in ensuring that the case study research is rigorous, reliable, and provides valuable insights about the case.

The type, depth, and quality of data in your study can significantly influence the validity and utility of the study. In case study research, data is usually collected from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the case. This section will outline the various methods of collecting data used in case study research and discuss considerations for ensuring the quality of the data.

Interviews are a common method of gathering data in case study research. They can provide rich, in-depth data about the perspectives, experiences, and interpretations of the individuals involved in the case. Interviews can be structured , semi-structured , or unstructured , depending on the research question and the degree of flexibility needed.

Observations

Observations involve the researcher observing the case in its natural setting, providing first-hand information about the case and its context. Observations can provide data that might not be revealed in interviews or documents, such as non-verbal cues or contextual information.

Documents and artifacts

Documents and archival records provide a valuable source of data in case study research. They can include reports, letters, memos, meeting minutes, email correspondence, and various public and private documents related to the case.

These records can provide historical context, corroborate evidence from other sources, and offer insights into the case that might not be apparent from interviews or observations.

Physical artifacts refer to any physical evidence related to the case, such as tools, products, or physical environments. These artifacts can provide tangible insights into the case, complementing the data gathered from other sources.

Ensuring the quality of data collection

Determining the quality of data in case study research requires careful planning and execution. It's crucial to ensure that the data is reliable, accurate, and relevant to the research question. This involves selecting appropriate methods of collecting data, properly training interviewers or observers, and systematically recording and storing the data. It also includes considering ethical issues related to collecting and handling data, such as obtaining informed consent and ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of the participants.

Data analysis

Analyzing case study research involves making sense of the rich, detailed data to answer the research question. This process can be challenging due to the volume and complexity of case study data. However, a systematic and rigorous approach to analysis can ensure that the findings are credible and meaningful. This section outlines the main steps and considerations in analyzing data in case study research.

Organizing the data

The first step in the analysis is organizing the data. This involves sorting the data into manageable sections, often according to the data source or the theme. This step can also involve transcribing interviews, digitizing physical artifacts, or organizing observational data.

Categorizing and coding the data

Once the data is organized, the next step is to categorize or code the data. This involves identifying common themes, patterns, or concepts in the data and assigning codes to relevant data segments. Coding can be done manually or with the help of software tools, and in either case, qualitative analysis software can greatly facilitate the entire coding process. Coding helps to reduce the data to a set of themes or categories that can be more easily analyzed.

Identifying patterns and themes

After coding the data, the researcher looks for patterns or themes in the coded data. This involves comparing and contrasting the codes and looking for relationships or patterns among them. The identified patterns and themes should help answer the research question.

Interpreting the data

Once patterns and themes have been identified, the next step is to interpret these findings. This involves explaining what the patterns or themes mean in the context of the research question and the case. This interpretation should be grounded in the data, but it can also involve drawing on theoretical concepts or prior research.

Verification of the data

The last step in the analysis is verification. This involves checking the accuracy and consistency of the analysis process and confirming that the findings are supported by the data. This can involve re-checking the original data, checking the consistency of codes, or seeking feedback from research participants or peers.

Like any research method , case study research has its strengths and limitations. Researchers must be aware of these, as they can influence the design, conduct, and interpretation of the study.

Understanding the strengths and limitations of case study research can also guide researchers in deciding whether this approach is suitable for their research question . This section outlines some of the key strengths and limitations of case study research.

Benefits include the following:

• Rich, detailed data: One of the main strengths of case study research is that it can generate rich, detailed data about the case. This can provide a deep understanding of the case and its context, which can be valuable in exploring complex phenomena.
• Flexibility: Case study research is flexible in terms of design , data collection , and analysis . A sufficient degree of flexibility allows the researcher to adapt the study according to the case and the emerging findings.
• Real-world context: Case study research involves studying the case in its real-world context, which can provide valuable insights into the interplay between the case and its context.
• Multiple sources of evidence: Case study research often involves collecting data from multiple sources , which can enhance the robustness and validity of the findings.

On the other hand, researchers should consider the following limitations:

• Generalizability: A common criticism of case study research is that its findings might not be generalizable to other cases due to the specificity and uniqueness of each case.
• Time and resource intensive: Case study research can be time and resource intensive due to the depth of the investigation and the amount of collected data.
• Complexity of analysis: The rich, detailed data generated in case study research can make analyzing the data challenging.
• Subjectivity: Given the nature of case study research, there may be a higher degree of subjectivity in interpreting the data , so researchers need to reflect on this and transparently convey to audiences how the research was conducted.

Being aware of these strengths and limitations can help researchers design and conduct case study research effectively and interpret and report the findings appropriately.

Ready to analyze your data with ATLAS.ti?

See how our intuitive software can draw key insights from your data with a free trial today.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods

Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods

Published on 5 May 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on 30 January 2023.

A case study is a detailed study of a specific subject, such as a person, group, place, event, organisation, or phenomenon. Case studies are commonly used in social, educational, clinical, and business research.

A case study research design usually involves qualitative methods , but quantitative methods are sometimes also used. Case studies are good for describing , comparing, evaluating, and understanding different aspects of a research problem .

Table of contents

When to do a case study, step 1: select a case, step 2: build a theoretical framework, step 3: collect your data, step 4: describe and analyse the case.

A case study is an appropriate research design when you want to gain concrete, contextual, in-depth knowledge about a specific real-world subject. It allows you to explore the key characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case.

Case studies are often a good choice in a thesis or dissertation . They keep your project focused and manageable when you don’t have the time or resources to do large-scale research.

You might use just one complex case study where you explore a single subject in depth, or conduct multiple case studies to compare and illuminate different aspects of your research problem.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Once you have developed your problem statement and research questions , you should be ready to choose the specific case that you want to focus on. A good case study should have the potential to:

• Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject
• Challenge or complicate existing assumptions and theories
• Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem
• Open up new directions for future research

Unlike quantitative or experimental research, a strong case study does not require a random or representative sample. In fact, case studies often deliberately focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases which may shed new light on the research problem.

If you find yourself aiming to simultaneously investigate and solve an issue, consider conducting action research . As its name suggests, action research conducts research and takes action at the same time, and is highly iterative and flexible. 

However, you can also choose a more common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience, or phenomenon.

While case studies focus more on concrete details than general theories, they should usually have some connection with theory in the field. This way the case study is not just an isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. It might aim to:

• Exemplify a theory by showing how it explains the case under investigation
• Expand on a theory by uncovering new concepts and ideas that need to be incorporated
• Challenge a theory by exploring an outlier case that doesn’t fit with established assumptions

To ensure that your analysis of the case has a solid academic grounding, you should conduct a literature review of sources related to the topic and develop a theoretical framework . This means identifying key concepts and theories to guide your analysis and interpretation.

There are many different research methods you can use to collect data on your subject. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using methods such as interviews, observations, and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). Sometimes a case study will also collect quantitative data .

The aim is to gain as thorough an understanding as possible of the case and its context.

In writing up the case study, you need to bring together all the relevant aspects to give as complete a picture as possible of the subject.

How you report your findings depends on the type of research you are doing. Some case studies are structured like a standard scientific paper or thesis, with separate sections or chapters for the methods , results , and discussion .

Others are written in a more narrative style, aiming to explore the case from various angles and analyse its meanings and implications (for example, by using textual analysis or discourse analysis ).

In all cases, though, make sure to give contextual details about the case, connect it back to the literature and theory, and discuss how it fits into wider patterns or debates.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, January 30). Case Study | Definition, Examples & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/case-studies/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, correlational research | guide, design & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples, descriptive research design | definition, methods & examples.

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is a Case Study in Research? Definition, Methods, and Examples

Case study methodology offers researchers an exciting opportunity to explore intricate phenomena within specific contexts using a wide range of data sources and collection methods. It is highly pertinent in health and social sciences, environmental studies, social work, education, and business studies. Its diverse applications, such as advancing theory, program evaluation, and intervention development, make it an invaluable tool for driving meaningful research and fostering positive change.[ 1]  

Table of Contents

What is a Case Study?  

A case study method involves a detailed examination of a single subject, such as an individual, group, organization, event, or community, to explore and understand complex issues in real-life contexts. By focusing on one specific case, researchers can gain a deep understanding of the factors and dynamics at play, understanding their complex relationships, which might be missed in broader, more quantitative studies.  

When to do a Case Study?  

A case study design is useful when you want to explore a phenomenon in-depth and in its natural context. Here are some examples of when to use a case study :[ 2]  

• Exploratory Research: When you want to explore a new topic or phenomenon, a case study can help you understand the subject deeply. For example , a researcher studying a newly discovered plant species might use a case study to document its characteristics and behavior.  
• Descriptive Research: If you want to describe a complex phenomenon or process, a case study can provide a detailed and comprehensive description. For instance, a case study design   could describe the experiences of a group of individuals living with a rare disease.  
• Explanatory Research: When you want to understand why a particular phenomenon occurs, a case study can help you identify causal relationships. A case study design could investigate the reasons behind the success or failure of a particular business strategy.  
• Theory Building: Case studies can also be used to develop or refine theories. By systematically analyzing a series of cases, researchers can identify patterns and relationships that can contribute to developing new theories or refining existing ones.  
• Critical Instance: Sometimes, a single case can be used to study a rare or unusual phenomenon, but it is important for theoretical or practical reasons. For example , the case of Phineas Gage, a man who survived a severe brain injury, has been widely studied to understand the relationship between the brain and behavior.  
• Comparative Analysis: Case studies can also compare different cases or contexts. A case study example involves comparing the implementation of a particular policy in different countries to understand its effectiveness and identifying best practices.  

How to Create a Case Study – Step by Step  

Step 1: select a case  .

Careful case selection ensures relevance, insight, and meaningful contribution to existing knowledge in your field. Here’s how you can choose a case study design :[ 3]  

• Define Your Objectives: Clarify the purpose of your case study and what you hope to achieve. Do you want to provide new insights, challenge existing theories, propose solutions to a problem, or explore new research directions?  
• Consider Unusual or Outlying Cases: Focus on unusual, neglected, or outlying cases that can provide unique insights.  
• Choose a Representative Case: Alternatively, select a common or representative case to exemplify a particular category, experience, or phenomenon.   
• Avoid Bias: Ensure your selection process is unbiased using random or criteria-based selection.  
• Be Clear and Specific: Clearly define the boundaries of your study design , including the scope, timeframe, and key stakeholders.   
• Ethical Considerations: Consider ethical issues, such as confidentiality and informed consent.  

Step 2: Build a Theoretical Framework  

To ensure your case study has a solid academic foundation, it’s important to build a theoretical framework:   

• Conduct a Literature Review: Identify key concepts and theories relevant to your case study .  
• Establish Connections with Theory: Connect your case study with existing theories in the field.  
• Guide Your Analysis and Interpretation: Use your theoretical framework to guide your analysis, ensuring your findings are grounded in established theories and concepts.   

Step 3: Collect Your Data  

To conduct a comprehensive case study , you can use various research methods. These include interviews, observations, primary and secondary sources analysis, surveys, and a mixed methods approach. The aim is to gather rich and diverse data to enable a detailed analysis of your case study .  

Step 4: Describe and Analyze the Case  

How you report your findings will depend on the type of research you’re conducting. Here are two approaches:   

• Structured Approach: Follows a scientific paper format, making it easier for readers to follow your argument.  
• Narrative Approach: A more exploratory style aiming to analyze meanings and implications.  

Regardless of the approach you choose, it’s important to include the following elements in your case study :   

• Contextual Details: Provide background information about the case, including relevant historical, cultural, and social factors that may have influenced the outcome.  
• Literature and Theory: Connect your case study to existing literature and theory in the field. Discuss how your findings contribute to or challenge existing knowledge.  
• Wider Patterns or Debates: Consider how your case study fits into wider patterns or debates within the field. Discuss any implications your findings may have for future research or practice.  

What Are the Benefits of a Case Study   

Case studies offer a range of benefits , making them a powerful tool in research.  

1. In-Depth Analysis  

• Comprehensive Understanding: Case studies allow researchers to thoroughly explore a subject, understanding the complexities and nuances involved.  
• Rich Data: They offer rich qualitative and sometimes quantitative data, capturing the intricacies of real-life contexts.  

2. Contextual Insight  

• Real-World Application: Case studies provide insights into real-world applications, making the findings highly relevant and practical.  
• Context-Specific: They highlight how various factors interact within a specific context, offering a detailed picture of the situation.  

3. Flexibility  

• Methodological Diversity: Case studies can use various data collection methods, including interviews, observations, document analysis, and surveys.  
• Adaptability: Researchers can adapt the case study approach to fit the specific needs and circumstances of the research.  

4. Practical Solutions  

• Actionable Insights: The detailed findings from case studies can inform practical solutions and recommendations for practitioners and policymakers.  
• Problem-Solving: They help understand the root causes of problems and devise effective strategies to address them.  

5. Unique Cases  

• Rare Phenomena: Case studies are particularly valuable for studying rare or unique cases that other research methods may not capture.  
• Detailed Documentation: They document and preserve detailed information about specific instances that might otherwise be overlooked.  

What Are the Limitations of a Case Study   

While case studies offer valuable insights and a detailed understanding of complex issues, they have several limitations .  

1. Limited Generalizability  

• Specific Context: Case studies often focus on a single case or a small number of cases, which may limit the generalization of findings to broader populations or different contexts.  
• Unique Situations: The unique characteristics of the case may not be representative of other situations, reducing the applicability of the results.  

2. Subjectivity  

• Researcher Bias: The researcher’s perspectives and interpretations can influence the analysis and conclusions, potentially introducing bias.  
• Participant Bias: Participants’ responses and behaviors may be influenced by their awareness of being studied, known as the Hawthorne effect.  

3. Time-Consuming  

• Data Collection and Analysis: Gathering detailed, in-depth data requires significant time and effort, making case studies more time-consuming than other research methods.  
• Longitudinal Studies: If the case study observes changes over time, it can become even more prolonged.  

4. Resource Intensive  

• Financial and Human Resources: Conducting comprehensive case studies may require significant financial investment and human resources, including trained researchers and participant access.  
• Access to Data: Accessing relevant and reliable data sources can be challenging, particularly in sensitive or proprietary contexts.  

5. Replication Difficulties  

• Unique Contexts: A case study’s specific and detailed context makes it difficult to replicate the study exactly, limiting the ability to validate findings through repetition.  
• Variability: Differences in contexts, researchers, and methodologies can lead to variations in findings, complicating efforts to achieve consistent results.  

By acknowledging and addressing these limitations , researchers can enhance the rigor and reliability of their case study findings.  

Key Takeaways  

Case studies are valuable in research because they provide an in-depth, contextual analysis of a single subject, event, or organization. They allow researchers to explore complex issues in real-world settings, capturing detailed qualitative and quantitative data. This method is useful for generating insights, developing theories, and offering practical solutions to problems. They are versatile, applicable in diverse fields such as business, education, and health, and can complement other research methods by providing rich, contextual evidence. However, their findings may have limited generalizability due to the focus on a specific case.  

Frequently Asked Questions  

Q: What is a case study in research?  

A case study in research is an impactful tool for gaining a deep understanding of complex issues within their real-life context. It combines various data collection methods and provides rich, detailed insights that can inform theory development and practical applications.  

Q: What are the advantages of using case studies in research?  

Case studies are a powerful research method, offering advantages such as in-depth analysis, contextual insights, flexibility, rich data, and the ability to handle complex issues. They are particularly valuable for exploring new areas, generating hypotheses, and providing detailed, illustrative examples that can inform theory and practice.  

Q: Can case studies be used in quantitative research?  

While case studies are predominantly associated with qualitative research, they can effectively incorporate quantitative methods to provide a more comprehensive analysis. A mixed-methods approach leverages qualitative and quantitative research strengths, offering a powerful tool for exploring complex issues in a real-world context. For example , a new medical treatment case study can incorporate quantitative clinical outcomes (e.g., patient recovery rates and dosage levels) along with qualitative patient interviews.  

Q: What are the key components of a case study?  

A case study typically includes several key components:   

• Introductio n, which provides an overview and sets the context by presenting the problem statement and research objectives;  
• Literature review , which connects the study to existing theories and prior research;  
• Methodology , which details the case study design , data collection methods, and analysis techniques;   
• Findings , which present the data and results, including descriptions, patterns, and themes;   
• Discussion and conclusion , which interpret the findings, discuss their implications, and offer conclusions, practical applications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.  

Together, these components ensure a comprehensive, systematic, and insightful exploration of the case.  

References  

• de Vries, K. (2020). Case study methodology. In  Critical qualitative health research  (pp. 41-52). Routledge.  
• Fidel, R. (1984). The case study method: A case study.  Library and Information Science Research ,  6 (3), 273-288.  
• Thomas, G. (2021). How to do your case study.  How to do your case study , 1-320.  

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

Back to School – Lock-in All Access Pack for a Year at the Best Price

Journal Turnaround Time: Researcher.Life and Scholarly Intelligence Join Hands to Empower Researchers with Publication Time Insights 

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

• Annotated Bibliography
• Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
• Group Presentations
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• Types of Structured Group Activities
• Group Project Survival Skills
• Leading a Class Discussion
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Works
• Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Writing a Case Study
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Reflective Paper
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Generative AI and Writing
• Acknowledgments

A case study research paper examines a person, place, event, condition, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis in order to extrapolate  key themes and results that help predict future trends, illuminate previously hidden issues that can be applied to practice, and/or provide a means for understanding an important research problem with greater clarity. A case study research paper usually examines a single subject of analysis, but case study papers can also be designed as a comparative investigation that shows relationships between two or more subjects. The methods used to study a case can rest within a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method investigative paradigm.

Case Studies. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010 ; “What is a Case Study?” In Swanborn, Peter G. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London: SAGE, 2010.

How to Approach Writing a Case Study Research Paper

General information about how to choose a topic to investigate can be found under the " Choosing a Research Problem " tab in the Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper writing guide. Review this page because it may help you identify a subject of analysis that can be investigated using a case study design.

However, identifying a case to investigate involves more than choosing the research problem . A case study encompasses a problem contextualized around the application of in-depth analysis, interpretation, and discussion, often resulting in specific recommendations for action or for improving existing conditions. As Seawright and Gerring note, practical considerations such as time and access to information can influence case selection, but these issues should not be the sole factors used in describing the methodological justification for identifying a particular case to study. Given this, selecting a case includes considering the following:

• The case represents an unusual or atypical example of a research problem that requires more in-depth analysis? Cases often represent a topic that rests on the fringes of prior investigations because the case may provide new ways of understanding the research problem. For example, if the research problem is to identify strategies to improve policies that support girl's access to secondary education in predominantly Muslim nations, you could consider using Azerbaijan as a case study rather than selecting a more obvious nation in the Middle East. Doing so may reveal important new insights into recommending how governments in other predominantly Muslim nations can formulate policies that support improved access to education for girls.
• The case provides important insight or illuminate a previously hidden problem? In-depth analysis of a case can be based on the hypothesis that the case study will reveal trends or issues that have not been exposed in prior research or will reveal new and important implications for practice. For example, anecdotal evidence may suggest drug use among homeless veterans is related to their patterns of travel throughout the day. Assuming prior studies have not looked at individual travel choices as a way to study access to illicit drug use, a case study that observes a homeless veteran could reveal how issues of personal mobility choices facilitate regular access to illicit drugs. Note that it is important to conduct a thorough literature review to ensure that your assumption about the need to reveal new insights or previously hidden problems is valid and evidence-based.
• The case challenges and offers a counter-point to prevailing assumptions? Over time, research on any given topic can fall into a trap of developing assumptions based on outdated studies that are still applied to new or changing conditions or the idea that something should simply be accepted as "common sense," even though the issue has not been thoroughly tested in current practice. A case study analysis may offer an opportunity to gather evidence that challenges prevailing assumptions about a research problem and provide a new set of recommendations applied to practice that have not been tested previously. For example, perhaps there has been a long practice among scholars to apply a particular theory in explaining the relationship between two subjects of analysis. Your case could challenge this assumption by applying an innovative theoretical framework [perhaps borrowed from another discipline] to explore whether this approach offers new ways of understanding the research problem. Taking a contrarian stance is one of the most important ways that new knowledge and understanding develops from existing literature.
• The case provides an opportunity to pursue action leading to the resolution of a problem? Another way to think about choosing a case to study is to consider how the results from investigating a particular case may result in findings that reveal ways in which to resolve an existing or emerging problem. For example, studying the case of an unforeseen incident, such as a fatal accident at a railroad crossing, can reveal hidden issues that could be applied to preventative measures that contribute to reducing the chance of accidents in the future. In this example, a case study investigating the accident could lead to a better understanding of where to strategically locate additional signals at other railroad crossings so as to better warn drivers of an approaching train, particularly when visibility is hindered by heavy rain, fog, or at night.
• The case offers a new direction in future research? A case study can be used as a tool for an exploratory investigation that highlights the need for further research about the problem. A case can be used when there are few studies that help predict an outcome or that establish a clear understanding about how best to proceed in addressing a problem. For example, after conducting a thorough literature review [very important!], you discover that little research exists showing the ways in which women contribute to promoting water conservation in rural communities of east central Africa. A case study of how women contribute to saving water in a rural village of Uganda can lay the foundation for understanding the need for more thorough research that documents how women in their roles as cooks and family caregivers think about water as a valuable resource within their community. This example of a case study could also point to the need for scholars to build new theoretical frameworks around the topic [e.g., applying feminist theories of work and family to the issue of water conservation].

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (October 1989): 532-550; Emmel, Nick. Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2013; Gerring, John. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?” American Political Science Review 98 (May 2004): 341-354; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Seawright, Jason and John Gerring. "Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research." Political Research Quarterly 61 (June 2008): 294-308.

Structure and Writing Style

The purpose of a paper in the social sciences designed around a case study is to thoroughly investigate a subject of analysis in order to reveal a new understanding about the research problem and, in so doing, contributing new knowledge to what is already known from previous studies. In applied social sciences disciplines [e.g., education, social work, public administration, etc.], case studies may also be used to reveal best practices, highlight key programs, or investigate interesting aspects of professional work.

In general, the structure of a case study research paper is not all that different from a standard college-level research paper. However, there are subtle differences you should be aware of. Here are the key elements to organizing and writing a case study research paper.

I.  Introduction

As with any research paper, your introduction should serve as a roadmap for your readers to ascertain the scope and purpose of your study . The introduction to a case study research paper, however, should not only describe the research problem and its significance, but you should also succinctly describe why the case is being used and how it relates to addressing the problem. The two elements should be linked. With this in mind, a good introduction answers these four questions:

• What is being studied? Describe the research problem and describe the subject of analysis [the case] you have chosen to address the problem. Explain how they are linked and what elements of the case will help to expand knowledge and understanding about the problem.
• Why is this topic important to investigate? Describe the significance of the research problem and state why a case study design and the subject of analysis that the paper is designed around is appropriate in addressing the problem.
• What did we know about this topic before I did this study? Provide background that helps lead the reader into the more in-depth literature review to follow. If applicable, summarize prior case study research applied to the research problem and why it fails to adequately address the problem. Describe why your case will be useful. If no prior case studies have been used to address the research problem, explain why you have selected this subject of analysis.
• How will this study advance new knowledge or new ways of understanding? Explain why your case study will be suitable in helping to expand knowledge and understanding about the research problem.

Each of these questions should be addressed in no more than a few paragraphs. Exceptions to this can be when you are addressing a complex research problem or subject of analysis that requires more in-depth background information.

II.  Literature Review

The literature review for a case study research paper is generally structured the same as it is for any college-level research paper. The difference, however, is that the literature review is focused on providing background information and  enabling historical interpretation of the subject of analysis in relation to the research problem the case is intended to address . This includes synthesizing studies that help to:

• Place relevant works in the context of their contribution to understanding the case study being investigated . This would involve summarizing studies that have used a similar subject of analysis to investigate the research problem. If there is literature using the same or a very similar case to study, you need to explain why duplicating past research is important [e.g., conditions have changed; prior studies were conducted long ago, etc.].
• Describe the relationship each work has to the others under consideration that informs the reader why this case is applicable . Your literature review should include a description of any works that support using the case to investigate the research problem and the underlying research questions.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research using the case study . If applicable, review any research that has examined the research problem using a different research design. Explain how your use of a case study design may reveal new knowledge or a new perspective or that can redirect research in an important new direction.
• Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies . This refers to synthesizing any literature that points to unresolved issues of concern about the research problem and describing how the subject of analysis that forms the case study can help resolve these existing contradictions.
• Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research . Your review should examine any literature that lays a foundation for understanding why your case study design and the subject of analysis around which you have designed your study may reveal a new way of approaching the research problem or offer a perspective that points to the need for additional research.
• Expose any gaps that exist in the literature that the case study could help to fill . Summarize any literature that not only shows how your subject of analysis contributes to understanding the research problem, but how your case contributes to a new way of understanding the problem that prior research has failed to do.
• Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important!] . Collectively, your literature review should always place your case study within the larger domain of prior research about the problem. The overarching purpose of reviewing pertinent literature in a case study paper is to demonstrate that you have thoroughly identified and synthesized prior studies in relation to explaining the relevance of the case in addressing the research problem.

III.  Method

In this section, you explain why you selected a particular case [i.e., subject of analysis] and the strategy you used to identify and ultimately decide that your case was appropriate in addressing the research problem. The way you describe the methods used varies depending on the type of subject of analysis that constitutes your case study.

If your subject of analysis is an incident or event . In the social and behavioral sciences, the event or incident that represents the case to be studied is usually bounded by time and place, with a clear beginning and end and with an identifiable location or position relative to its surroundings. The subject of analysis can be a rare or critical event or it can focus on a typical or regular event. The purpose of studying a rare event is to illuminate new ways of thinking about the broader research problem or to test a hypothesis. Critical incident case studies must describe the method by which you identified the event and explain the process by which you determined the validity of this case to inform broader perspectives about the research problem or to reveal new findings. However, the event does not have to be a rare or uniquely significant to support new thinking about the research problem or to challenge an existing hypothesis. For example, Walo, Bull, and Breen conducted a case study to identify and evaluate the direct and indirect economic benefits and costs of a local sports event in the City of Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. The purpose of their study was to provide new insights from measuring the impact of a typical local sports event that prior studies could not measure well because they focused on large "mega-events." Whether the event is rare or not, the methods section should include an explanation of the following characteristics of the event: a) when did it take place; b) what were the underlying circumstances leading to the event; and, c) what were the consequences of the event in relation to the research problem.

If your subject of analysis is a person. Explain why you selected this particular individual to be studied and describe what experiences they have had that provide an opportunity to advance new understandings about the research problem. Mention any background about this person which might help the reader understand the significance of their experiences that make them worthy of study. This includes describing the relationships this person has had with other people, institutions, and/or events that support using them as the subject for a case study research paper. It is particularly important to differentiate the person as the subject of analysis from others and to succinctly explain how the person relates to examining the research problem [e.g., why is one politician in a particular local election used to show an increase in voter turnout from any other candidate running in the election]. Note that these issues apply to a specific group of people used as a case study unit of analysis [e.g., a classroom of students].

If your subject of analysis is a place. In general, a case study that investigates a place suggests a subject of analysis that is unique or special in some way and that this uniqueness can be used to build new understanding or knowledge about the research problem. A case study of a place must not only describe its various attributes relevant to the research problem [e.g., physical, social, historical, cultural, economic, political], but you must state the method by which you determined that this place will illuminate new understandings about the research problem. It is also important to articulate why a particular place as the case for study is being used if similar places also exist [i.e., if you are studying patterns of homeless encampments of veterans in open spaces, explain why you are studying Echo Park in Los Angeles rather than Griffith Park?]. If applicable, describe what type of human activity involving this place makes it a good choice to study [e.g., prior research suggests Echo Park has more homeless veterans].

If your subject of analysis is a phenomenon. A phenomenon refers to a fact, occurrence, or circumstance that can be studied or observed but with the cause or explanation to be in question. In this sense, a phenomenon that forms your subject of analysis can encompass anything that can be observed or presumed to exist but is not fully understood. In the social and behavioral sciences, the case usually focuses on human interaction within a complex physical, social, economic, cultural, or political system. For example, the phenomenon could be the observation that many vehicles used by ISIS fighters are small trucks with English language advertisements on them. The research problem could be that ISIS fighters are difficult to combat because they are highly mobile. The research questions could be how and by what means are these vehicles used by ISIS being supplied to the militants and how might supply lines to these vehicles be cut off? How might knowing the suppliers of these trucks reveal larger networks of collaborators and financial support? A case study of a phenomenon most often encompasses an in-depth analysis of a cause and effect that is grounded in an interactive relationship between people and their environment in some way.

NOTE:   The choice of the case or set of cases to study cannot appear random. Evidence that supports the method by which you identified and chose your subject of analysis should clearly support investigation of the research problem and linked to key findings from your literature review. Be sure to cite any studies that helped you determine that the case you chose was appropriate for examining the problem.

IV.  Discussion

The main elements of your discussion section are generally the same as any research paper, but centered around interpreting and drawing conclusions about the key findings from your analysis of the case study. Note that a general social sciences research paper may contain a separate section to report findings. However, in a paper designed around a case study, it is common to combine a description of the results with the discussion about their implications. The objectives of your discussion section should include the following:

Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings Briefly reiterate the research problem you are investigating and explain why the subject of analysis around which you designed the case study were used. You should then describe the findings revealed from your study of the case using direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results. Highlight any findings that were unexpected or especially profound.

Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important Systematically explain the meaning of your case study findings and why you believe they are important. Begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most important or surprising finding first, then systematically review each finding. Be sure to thoroughly extrapolate what your analysis of the case can tell the reader about situations or conditions beyond the actual case that was studied while, at the same time, being careful not to misconstrue or conflate a finding that undermines the external validity of your conclusions.

Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. The discussion section should relate your case study results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for choosing your subject of analysis. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your case study design and the subject of analysis differs from prior research about the topic.

Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings Remember that the purpose of social science research is to discover and not to prove. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations revealed by the case study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. Be alert to what the in-depth analysis of the case may reveal about the research problem, including offering a contrarian perspective to what scholars have stated in prior research if that is how the findings can be interpreted from your case.

Acknowledge the Study's Limitations You can state the study's limitations in the conclusion section of your paper but describing the limitations of your subject of analysis in the discussion section provides an opportunity to identify the limitations and explain why they are not significant. This part of the discussion section should also note any unanswered questions or issues your case study could not address. More detailed information about how to document any limitations to your research can be found here .

Suggest Areas for Further Research Although your case study may offer important insights about the research problem, there are likely additional questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or findings that unexpectedly revealed themselves as a result of your in-depth analysis of the case. Be sure that the recommendations for further research are linked to the research problem and that you explain why your recommendations are valid in other contexts and based on the original assumptions of your study.

V.  Conclusion

As with any research paper, you should summarize your conclusion in clear, simple language; emphasize how the findings from your case study differs from or supports prior research and why. Do not simply reiterate the discussion section. Provide a synthesis of key findings presented in the paper to show how these converge to address the research problem. If you haven't already done so in the discussion section, be sure to document the limitations of your case study and any need for further research.

The function of your paper's conclusion is to: 1) reiterate the main argument supported by the findings from your case study; 2) state clearly the context, background, and necessity of pursuing the research problem using a case study design in relation to an issue, controversy, or a gap found from reviewing the literature; and, 3) provide a place to persuasively and succinctly restate the significance of your research problem, given that the reader has now been presented with in-depth information about the topic.

Consider the following points to help ensure your conclusion is appropriate:

• If the argument or purpose of your paper is complex, you may need to summarize these points for your reader.
• If prior to your conclusion, you have not yet explained the significance of your findings or if you are proceeding inductively, use the conclusion of your paper to describe your main points and explain their significance.
• Move from a detailed to a general level of consideration of the case study's findings that returns the topic to the context provided by the introduction or within a new context that emerges from your case study findings.

Note that, depending on the discipline you are writing in or the preferences of your professor, the concluding paragraph may contain your final reflections on the evidence presented as it applies to practice or on the essay's central research problem. However, the nature of being introspective about the subject of analysis you have investigated will depend on whether you are explicitly asked to express your observations in this way.

Problems to Avoid

Overgeneralization One of the goals of a case study is to lay a foundation for understanding broader trends and issues applied to similar circumstances. However, be careful when drawing conclusions from your case study. They must be evidence-based and grounded in the results of the study; otherwise, it is merely speculation. Looking at a prior example, it would be incorrect to state that a factor in improving girls access to education in Azerbaijan and the policy implications this may have for improving access in other Muslim nations is due to girls access to social media if there is no documentary evidence from your case study to indicate this. There may be anecdotal evidence that retention rates were better for girls who were engaged with social media, but this observation would only point to the need for further research and would not be a definitive finding if this was not a part of your original research agenda.

Failure to Document Limitations No case is going to reveal all that needs to be understood about a research problem. Therefore, just as you have to clearly state the limitations of a general research study , you must describe the specific limitations inherent in the subject of analysis. For example, the case of studying how women conceptualize the need for water conservation in a village in Uganda could have limited application in other cultural contexts or in areas where fresh water from rivers or lakes is plentiful and, therefore, conservation is understood more in terms of managing access rather than preserving access to a scarce resource.

Failure to Extrapolate All Possible Implications Just as you don't want to over-generalize from your case study findings, you also have to be thorough in the consideration of all possible outcomes or recommendations derived from your findings. If you do not, your reader may question the validity of your analysis, particularly if you failed to document an obvious outcome from your case study research. For example, in the case of studying the accident at the railroad crossing to evaluate where and what types of warning signals should be located, you failed to take into consideration speed limit signage as well as warning signals. When designing your case study, be sure you have thoroughly addressed all aspects of the problem and do not leave gaps in your analysis that leave the reader questioning the results.

Case Studies. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007; Merriam, Sharan B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education . Rev. ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998; Miller, Lisa L. “The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (2018): TBD; Mills, Albert J., Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Putney, LeAnn Grogan. "Case Study." In Encyclopedia of Research Design , Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010), pp. 116-120; Simons, Helen. Case Study Research in Practice . London: SAGE Publications, 2009;  Kratochwill,  Thomas R. and Joel R. Levin, editors. Single-Case Research Design and Analysis: New Development for Psychology and Education .  Hilldsale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992; Swanborn, Peter G. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London : SAGE, 2010; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Los Angeles, CA, SAGE Publications, 2014; Walo, Maree, Adrian Bull, and Helen Breen. “Achieving Economic Benefits at Local Events: A Case Study of a Local Sports Event.” Festival Management and Event Tourism 4 (1996): 95-106.

Writing Tip

At Least Five Misconceptions about Case Study Research

Social science case studies are often perceived as limited in their ability to create new knowledge because they are not randomly selected and findings cannot be generalized to larger populations. Flyvbjerg examines five misunderstandings about case study research and systematically "corrects" each one. To quote, these are:

Misunderstanding 1 :  General, theoretical [context-independent] knowledge is more valuable than concrete, practical [context-dependent] knowledge. Misunderstanding 2 :  One cannot generalize on the basis of an individual case; therefore, the case study cannot contribute to scientific development. Misunderstanding 3 :  The case study is most useful for generating hypotheses; that is, in the first stage of a total research process, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building. Misunderstanding 4 :  The case study contains a bias toward verification, that is, a tendency to confirm the researcher’s preconceived notions. Misunderstanding 5 :  It is often difficult to summarize and develop general propositions and theories on the basis of specific case studies [p. 221].

While writing your paper, think introspectively about how you addressed these misconceptions because to do so can help you strengthen the validity and reliability of your research by clarifying issues of case selection, the testing and challenging of existing assumptions, the interpretation of key findings, and the summation of case outcomes. Think of a case study research paper as a complete, in-depth narrative about the specific properties and key characteristics of your subject of analysis applied to the research problem.

Flyvbjerg, Bent. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (April 2006): 219-245.

• << Previous: Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Next: Writing a Field Report >>
• Last Updated: Jun 3, 2024 9:44 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• BMC Med Res Methodol

The case study approach

Sarah crowe.

1 Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Kathrin Cresswell

2 Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Ann Robertson

3 School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Anthony Avery

Aziz sheikh.

The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.

Introduction

The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.

The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.

This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables ​ Tables1, 1 , ​ ,2, 2 , ​ ,3 3 and ​ and4) 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 - 7 ].

Example of a case study investigating the reasons for differences in recruitment rates of minority ethnic people in asthma research[ 3 ]

Example of a case study investigating the process of planning and implementing a service in Primary Care Organisations[ 4 ]

Example of a case study investigating the introduction of the electronic health records[ 5 ]

Example of a case study investigating the formal and informal ways students learn about patient safety[ 6 ]

What is a case study?

A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table ​ (Table5), 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.

Definitions of a case study

Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.

These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table ​ (Table1), 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables ​ Tables2, 2 , ​ ,3 3 and ​ and4) 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 - 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table ​ (Table2) 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].

What are case studies used for?

According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables ​ Tables2 2 and ​ and3, 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table ​ (Table4 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.

Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table ​ (Table6). 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].

Example of epistemological approaches that may be used in case study research

How are case studies conducted?

Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.

Defining the case

Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table ​ Table7 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].

Example of a checklist for rating a case study proposal[ 8 ]

For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table ​ (Table3), 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.

Selecting the case(s)

The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table ​ (Table1) 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.

For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.

In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.

The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table ​ Table3) 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.

It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.

In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.

Collecting the data

In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 - 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table ​ (Table2 2 )[ 4 ].

Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.

In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.

Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies

Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.

The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table ​ (Table1 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table ​ (Table3 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table ​ (Table4 4 )[ 6 ].

Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.

When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table ​ Table3, 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].

What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?

The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table ​ (Table4), 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.

Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table ​ Table8 8 )[ 8 , 18 - 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table ​ (Table9 9 )[ 8 ].

Potential pitfalls and mitigating actions when undertaking case study research

Stake's checklist for assessing the quality of a case study report[ 8 ]

Conclusions

The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

• Yin RK. Case study research, design and method. 4. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Keen J, Packwood T. Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995; 311 :444–446. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J. et al. Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009; 6 (10):1–11. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO) 2008. http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf
• Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T. et al. Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010; 41 :c4564. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P. the Patient Safety Education Study Group. Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010; 15 :4–10. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA. The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002; 60 (1):17–37. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stake RE. The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R. Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52 (482):746–51. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• King G, Keohane R, Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• Doolin B. Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998; 13 :301–311. doi: 10.1057/jit.1998.8. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• George AL, Bennett A. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eccles M. the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG) Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006; 1 :1–8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A. Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005; 365 (9456):312–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G. Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004; 59 (7):634. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U. 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005; 4 :7–22. doi: 10.1177/1471301205049188. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Som CV. Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005; 18 :463–477. doi: 10.1108/09513550510608903. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1985. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001; 322 :1115–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000; 320 :50–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mason J. Qualitative researching. London: Sage; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V. Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008; 7 :5–17. doi: 10.1177/1534735407313395. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2. CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000; 320 :114–116. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10 (1):67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-67. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001; 358 :483–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yin R. Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34 :1209–1224. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 2. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Howcroft D, Trauth E. Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Blakie N. Approaches to Social Enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
• Doolin B. Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004; 14 :343–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bloomfield BP, Best A. Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992; 40 :533–560. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shanks G, Parr A. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. Naples; 2003. Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. [ Google Scholar ]

What Is The Purpose Of A Case Study?

A case study serves the purpose of deeply examining a specific subject or phenomenon within its real-life context. By meticulously analyzing a single case in detail, researchers aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the complexities, nuances, and dynamics involved in the subject matter under investigation. Case studies offer a unique opportunity to explore and elucidate how various factors interact and influence outcomes, providing valuable insights that can inform theories, practices, and decision-making processes within academic disciplines and professional fields alike. They offer a means to investigate rare or exceptional situations, shed light on causal processes, and generate rich empirical data, all of which contribute to the advancement of knowledge and understanding.

Table of Contents

Definition of a case study

A case study is a research strategy that involves an in-depth examination of a particular individual, group, organization, or event. It aims to provide comprehensive and detailed insights into the chosen subject of study, delving into the complexities of real-life situations. A case study typically involves multiple data sources, including interviews, observations, documents, and other relevant materials. The findings of a case study can be used to generate insights, develop solutions, and inform decision-making processes.

Importance of case studies

Case studies hold significant importance in various academic fields, including psychology, sociology, business, and medicine, among others. They provide researchers with a unique opportunity to explore complex phenomena in their natural settings, allowing for a thorough understanding of real-life situations. Furthermore, case studies enable researchers to test and refine theories, explore new perspectives, and generate knowledge that can be applied in practical contexts. They also help bridge the gap between theory and practice, offering practitioners valuable insights and lessons learned.

Understanding the Problem

Identifying the research question.

Before embarking on a case study, it is crucial to identify a clear research question that will guide the investigation. The research question should be specific, focused, and relevant to the field of study. It should address an existing knowledge gap or seek to uncover new insights. The research question will serve as a compass throughout the case study, ensuring that the investigation remains focused and coherent.

Exploring the background and context

To fully understand the problem at hand, it is essential to explore the background and context surrounding the chosen case study subject. This involves gathering information about the historical, social, economic, and cultural factors that may influence the subject. By comprehensively examining the context, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities and dynamics involved, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of the case.

Research Design

Choosing the case study approach.

When designing a case study, researchers must choose the appropriate approach that aligns with the research question and objectives. There are several types of case study approaches, including exploratory, explanatory, and descriptive. Exploratory case studies aim to generate hypotheses and explore new areas of research. Explanatory case studies seek to determine cause-and-effect relationships. Descriptive case studies aim to provide a detailed account of a specific phenomenon. The chosen approach will shape the overall research design and methodology.

Selecting the appropriate case

Selecting the appropriate case for study is a critical decision that impacts the validity and generalizability of the findings. Researchers must consider various factors when selecting a case, such as relevance, uniqueness, and feasibility. The case should be relevant to the research question and offer valuable insights into the phenomena of interest. It should also possess unique characteristics or features that make it worthy of investigation. Additionally, the feasibility of accessing data and conducting the study should be carefully evaluated.

Data Collection

Determining data sources.

Data sources play a crucial role in case study research. These sources can include interviews, observations, documents, archival records, and other relevant materials. Typically, a combination of primary and secondary data sources is used to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case. Primary data sources involve firsthand information collected directly from participants or through direct observations. Secondary data sources involve pre-existing information that is analyzed in relation to the case study.

Collecting primary data

Collecting primary data involves engaging with participants or observing the case firsthand. This can be achieved through various methods, such as interviews, focus groups, surveys, or participant observation. Interviews allow researchers to gather detailed information and explore participants’ perspectives, experiences, and motivations. Focus groups provide a platform for participants to engage in group discussions and share insights. Surveys offer a structured way to collect data from a larger sample. Participant observation involves immersing oneself in the case study environment to directly observe and record behaviors and interactions.

Gathering secondary data

Secondary data sources complement primary data and enhance the richness of the case study. These sources include existing documents, archival records, scholarly articles, industry reports, and other relevant materials. Researchers must carefully select and analyze secondary data, ensuring it aligns with the research question and complements the primary data. A thorough examination of secondary data can contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the case and provide historical or background contextual information.

Data Analysis

Applying data analysis techniques.

Data analysis is a crucial step in case study research and involves transforming raw data into meaningful insights. Various data analysis techniques can be employed, including thematic analysis, content analysis, narrative analysis, and statistical analysis, among others. Thematic analysis involves identifying and categorizing themes or patterns within the data. Content analysis focuses on identifying and analyzing specific words, phrases, or concepts within the data. Narrative analysis seeks to uncover the underlying stories and narratives that emerge from the data. Statistical analysis involves quantifying and analyzing numerical data.

Identifying patterns and themes

During the data analysis process, researchers must carefully examine the data to identify patterns, themes, and relationships. This involves organizing and categorizing the data based on recurring ideas, concepts, or patterns that emerge. By identifying these patterns and themes, researchers can gain insights into the relationships and dynamics present in the case study. It allows for a deeper understanding of the complexities and nuances within the data and supports the generation of meaningful conclusions.

Generating Insights

Linking findings to research question.

The findings derived from the data analysis should be linked back to the research question and objectives of the case study. It is essential to establish the relevance and significance of the findings in relation to the original research question. By establishing this link, researchers can validate the findings and ensure their alignment with the objectives of the study. This step is crucial for generating insights that contribute to the existing knowledge base and address the research question effectively.

Drawing meaningful conclusions

Drawing meaningful conclusions from the case study involves synthesizing the key findings and deriving insights from the analysis. Researchers must critically evaluate the findings, considering their strengths and limitations, and interpret them in light of the research question and relevant literature. The conclusions should be justified and supported by empirical evidence. Meaningful conclusions will contribute to a deeper understanding of the case, provide practical implications, and pave the way for further research or the development of solutions.

Developing Solutions

Identifying potential solutions.

Based on the insights generated from the case study, researchers can identify potential solutions to the problem at hand. These solutions should be grounded in empirical evidence and address the key issues identified through the research. It is crucial to consider multiple perspectives and approaches when identifying potential solutions, evaluating their feasibility, effectiveness, and ethical implications. The solutions should align with the objectives of the case study and offer practical recommendations for addressing the problem.

Evaluating feasibility and effectiveness

After identifying potential solutions, it is important to evaluate their feasibility and effectiveness. This involves considering the resources, constraints, and practical implications associated with implementing the proposed solutions. Feasibility assessment involves evaluating whether the proposed solutions can be realistically implemented within the given context, timeframe, and available resources. Effectiveness evaluation involves assessing the potential impact of the solutions and their ability to address the identified problem.

Knowledge Application

Informing decision-making.

The findings and insights derived from a case study can be instrumental in informing decision-making processes. Decision-makers can draw upon the knowledge generated through the case study to make informed choices and develop strategies. The detailed analysis of the case, combined with the empirical evidence and practical implications, provides decision-makers with valuable insights and evidence-based recommendations. By utilizing the knowledge gained from case studies, decision-makers can optimize outcomes and enhance the effectiveness of their decisions.

Sharing lessons learned

Case studies also serve as a valuable source of knowledge dissemination. Sharing the lessons learned from a case study can benefit researchers, practitioners, academics, and other stakeholders in the field. By presenting the findings, insights, and recommendations, case studies contribute to the existing knowledge base, spark further discussions, and inspire new research. Sharing lessons learned facilitates the exchange of ideas, promotes collaboration, and supports ongoing learning and development within the respective field.

Strengths and Limitations

Highlighting advantages of case studies.

Case studies offer various advantages as a research method. They provide researchers with the opportunity to explore real-life phenomena in their natural context, offering a deep understanding of complex situations. Case studies can generate rich and detailed data, allowing for in-depth analysis and insights. They also provide a holistic perspective, considering multiple factors and variables. Case studies are particularly useful for exploring complex and dynamic phenomena that cannot be easily captured through quantitative methods.

Addressing potential biases

Like any research method, case studies are not without limitations. One potential limitation is the presence of biases in the data collection and analysis process. Researchers must be aware of their own biases and take steps to minimize their influence on the findings. To address this limitation, researchers can engage in reflexivity, seeking to critically evaluate their own perspectives and assumptions throughout the research process. Additionally, triangulation, the use of multiple data sources and perspectives, can help mitigate potential biases and enhance the validity of the findings.

Promoting Further Research

Building on existing knowledge.

Case studies often uncover new areas of research and generate additional questions for further investigation. Researchers can build on existing knowledge by exploring gaps identified through the case study and proposing new research avenues. The in-depth analysis and insights gained from the case study can inform the development of hypotheses or theories, which can then be tested through quantitative research methods. By building on existing knowledge, researchers contribute to the advancement of the field and foster ongoing exploration and discovery.

Exploring new perspectives

Case studies provide an opportunity to explore new perspectives and alternative approaches to understanding a phenomenon. Researchers can use the detailed analysis and insights gained from a case study to challenge existing theories or assumptions and propose new perspectives. This exploration of new perspectives can lead to innovative insights and alternative explanations for complex phenomena. By embracing diverse perspectives and exploring new avenues, researchers can push the boundaries of knowledge and stimulate new lines of inquiry.

In conclusion, case studies serve as a valuable research strategy for gaining an in-depth understanding of complex phenomena. By employing a systematic approach for each stage of the case study process, researchers can ensure rigor, validity, and relevance to the research question. Case studies have the potential to generate rich insights, inform decision-making, and contribute to the existing knowledge base within various academic fields. However, it is important to acknowledge the strengths and limitations of case studies and continually strive to promote further research and exploration of new perspectives.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• All , Business Analysis

The Importance of Case Studies

Case studies are, arguably, one of the most essential components of any marketing or communications strategy. They may take time and effort, but the payoffs are well worth their effort and have been seen time and again, from organizations both big and small.

As Business Analysts, we’re often involved in creating or contributing to case studies, so it is important we understand what they are, the purpose they serve, and the benefits that they can bring. 

What Are Case Studies?

In essence, a case study is a report published by a company that highlights its approach to a challenge, the strategy used to solve the issue(s), and the effectiveness of the solution. It presents a holistic, in-depth review with valuable information about the costs involved, the expertise of the company employed, and the benefits achieved.

The Many Benefits of Case Studies

Case studies have a huge range of benefits, from insight to influence. They are used in nearly every industry, from finance to health care and they offer organizations the ability to convert observations into useable data.

But that barely scratches the surface of the many benefits of case studies. Let’s dig a little deeper and look at some of the long-lasting effects that case studies can have.

1. Boost Customer Confidence

Case studies are an excellent way to display your team’s skill and expertise in action. It’s one thing to propose a plan for improvement, or a solution to a challenge, but some customers may be skeptical of your team’s ability to follow through or produce the appealing results you’re promising. 

Case studies are exactly the type of proof they need to help push them past skepticism and into belief, and possibly, across the finish line to approval of your partnership. If it’s an internal project, case studies could be enough to convince decision-makers to pursue your solution to a challenge.

2. Improve Brand Awareness and Reputation

The reality of the world today is that every company in every industry has competition. Consumers are also becoming smarter about marketing tactics and messaging, so providing proof and backing up claims is essential for presenting your company as genuine in its promises. That’s where case studies come in. 

Case studies are social proof that the promises and claims that your company is making are true. They provide facts and statistics to show how your company improved productivity for your clients by ‘x’ amount, increased profits by ‘x’ amount, or implemented ‘x’ solution to combat a specific issue. 

Providing such proof of expertise bolsters your reputation and can increase brand awareness. Case studies can be published and distributed to current customers to remind them of why they partnered with you initially, and can help increase your company’s reputation and brand image as new potential customers discover you. 

3. Provide a Strategic Solution

No customer wants to partner with a company that acts erratically or thoughtlessly. Case studies provide insight into real challenges and an in-depth look at how your company goes about solving them. They give you a chance to display your strategic thinking and approach, your expertise and innovation, and your ability to follow through on your promised solution. 

4. Assist with Furthering Research

A case study helps show how different aspects of your business work together. They highlight a problem and how the executed solution provided value. They can also play a role in broader research. As you explore and analyze new ideas, other theories and methods can surface. This additional information can help you refine your strategies and further grow the value you provide. Case studies make great reference points that can show, not only how innovative, productive, and proficient your company and teams have become, but how trends have unfolded within your customers and services.

Final Thoughts

As you can see, case studies play a crucial role in the communication of how your team and you, as a Business Analyst, face challenging situations head-on and provide strategic, value-driven solutions for your customers. Once you have a better understanding of case studies and the deep benefits they provide to you and your brand, it’s easy to justify the time and effort that goes into creating them. As you create your next case study, use it as a reminder to take pride in the hard work you’ve done and the results you’ve achieved.

– Written by Jeremy Aschenbrenner, The BA Guide

Join the Conversation Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Posts

Lessons Learned and Wisdom Gained: Reflections from Experienced Business Analysts

• All , Business Analysis Community

Top Business Analysis Tools and Software for Success

• All , Business Analysis , Tools and Techniques

How Business Analysis Creates Valuable Customer Experiences: Part 2

How Business Analysis Creates Valuable Customer Experiences: Part 1

Check out our self-paced courses on business analysis

Related articles.

The Power of Prototyping in Business Analysis

• Business Analysis , Tools and Techniques

The Role of Business Analysts in Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives

• Business Analysis

Quick Tips for Clean Process Modeling

• Tools and Techniques

How to Conduct a Cost-Benefit Analysis for Business Changes

Check out our recommended courses.

Project Management Techniques and Tools for the Business Analyst

Software Testing Processes and Techniques

Become an Agile Business Analyst

Essential Modeling Skills and Techniques

Agile Fundamentals: Including Scrum and Kanban

Land Your First Business Analysis Position

Never miss an article.

Sign up now to receive our latest blog posts directly in your inbox. Each article is a trove of insights, tips, and practical knowledge, curated by experts to enhance your business analysis understanding and skills.

Seriously, it’s free learning, don’t miss out!

We’re committed to your privacy. TheBAGUIDE uses the information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information, check out our privacy policy .

Let's Connect!

Copyright © 2023 – BA Guide LLC   Privacy Policy   |  Terms & Conditions

What Is a Case Study and Why You Should Use Them

Case studies can provide more insights into your business while helping you conduct further research with robust qualitative data analysis to learn more.

If you're in charge of running a company, then you're likely always looking for new ways to run your business more efficiently and increase your customer base while streamlining as many processes as possible.

Unfortunately, it can sometimes be difficult to determine how to go about implementing the proper program in order to be successful. This is why many business owners opt to conduct a case study, which can help significantly. Whether you've been struggling with brand consistency or some other problem, the right case study can identify why your problem exists as well as provide a way to rectify it.

A case study is a great tool that many businesses aren't even aware exists, and there are marketing experts like Mailchimp who can provide you with step-by-step assistance with implementing a plan with a case study. Many companies discover that not only do they need to start a blog in order to improve business, but they also need to create specific and relevant blog titles.

If your company already has a blog, then optimizing your blog posts may be helpful. Regardless of the obstacles that are preventing you from achieving all your professional goals, a case study can work wonders in helping you reverse this issue.

What is a case study?

A case study is a comprehensive report of the results of theory testing or examining emerging themes of a business in real life context. Case studies are also often used in the healthcare industry, conducting health services research with primary research interest around routinely collected healthcare data.

However, for businesses, the purpose of a case study is to help small business owners or company leaders identify the issues and conduct further research into what may be preventing success through information collection, client or customer interviews, and in-depth data analysis.

Knowing the case study definition is crucial for any business owner. By identifying the issues that are hindering a company from achieving all its goals, it's easier to make the necessary corrections to promote success through influenced data collection.

Why are case studies important?

Now that we've answered the questions, "what is a case study?" Why are case studies important? Some of the top reasons why case studies are important include:

• Understand complex issues: Even after you conduct a significant amount of market research , you might have a difficult time understanding exactly what it means. While you might have the basics down, conducting a case study can help you see how that information is applied. Then, when you see how the information can make a difference in business decisions, it could make it easier to understand complex issues.
• Collect data: A case study can also help with data tracking . A case study is a data collection method that can help you describe the information that you have available to you. Then, you can present that information in a way the reader can understand.
• Conduct evaluations: As you learn more about how to write a case study, remember that you can also use a case study to conduct evaluations of a specific situation. A case study is a great way to learn more about complex situations, and you can evaluate how various people responded in that situation. By conducting a case study evaluation, you can learn more about what has worked well, what has not, and what you might want to change in the future.
• Identify potential solutions: A case study can also help you identify solutions to potential problems. If you have an issue in your business that you are trying to solve, you may be able to take a look at a case study where someone has dealt with a similar situation in the past. For example, you may uncover data bias in a specific solution that you would like to address when you tackle the issue on your own. If you need help solving a difficult problem, a case study may be able to help you.

Remember that you can also use case studies to target your audience . If you want to show your audience that you have a significant level of expertise in a field, you may want to publish some case studies that you have handled in the past. Then, when your audience sees that you have had success in a specific area, they may be more likely to provide you with their business. In essence, case studies can be looked at as the original method of social proof, showcasing exactly how you can help someone solve their problems.

What are the benefits of writing a business case study?

Although writing a case study can seem like a tedious task, there are many benefits to conducting one through an in depth qualitative research process.

• Industry understanding: First of all, a case study can give you an in-depth understanding of your industry through a particular conceptual framework and help you identify hidden problems that are preventing you from transcending into the business world.
• Develop theories: If you decide to write a business case study, it provides you with an opportunity to develop new theories. You might have a theory about how to solve a specific problem, but you need to write a business case study to see exactly how that theory has unfolded in the past. Then, you can figure out if you want to apply your theory to a similar issue in the future.
• Evaluate interventions: When you write a business case study that focuses on a specific situation you have been through in the past, you can uncover whether that intervention was truly helpful. This can make it easier to figure out whether you want to use the same intervention in a similar situation in the future.
• Identify best practices: If you want to stay on top of the best practices in your field, conducting case studies can help by allowing you to identify patterns and trends and develop a new list of best practices that you can follow in the future.
• Versatility: Writing a case study also provides you with more versatility. If you want to expand your business applications, you need to figure out how you respond to various problems. When you run a business case study, you open the door to new opportunities, new applications, and new techniques that could help you make a difference in your business down the road.
• Solve problems: Writing a great case study can dramatically improve your chances of reversing your problem and improving your business.
• These are just a few of the biggest benefits you might experience if you decide to publish your case studies. They can be an effective tool for learning, showcasing your talents, and teaching some of your other employees. If you want to grow your audience , you may want to consider publishing some case studies.

What are the limitations of case studies?

Case studies can be a wonderful tool for any business of any size to use to gain an in-depth understanding of their clients, products, customers, or services, but there are limitations.

One limitation of case studies is the fact that, unless there are other recently published examples, there is nothing to compare them to since, most of the time, you are conducting a single, not multiple, case studies.

Another limitation is the fact that most case studies can lack scientific evidence.

Types of case studies

There are specific types of case studies to choose from, and each specific type will yield different results. Some case study types even overlap, which is sometimes more favorable, as they provide even more pertinent data.

Here are overviews of the different types of case studies, each with its own theoretical framework, so you can determine which type would be most effective for helping you meet your goals.

Explanatory case studies

Explanatory case studies are pretty straightforward, as they're not difficult to interpret. This type of case study is best if there aren't many variables involved because explanatory case studies can easily answer questions like "how" and "why" through theory development.

Exploratory case studies

An exploratory case study does exactly what its name implies: it goes into specific detail about the topic at hand in a natural, real-life context with qualitative research.

The benefits of exploratory case studies are limitless, with the main one being that it offers a great deal of flexibility. Having flexibility when writing a case study is important because you can't always predict what obstacles might arise during the qualitative research process.

Collective case studies

Collective case studies require you to study many different individuals in order to obtain usable data.

Case studies that involve an investigation of people will involve many different variables, all of which can't be predicted. Despite this fact, there are many benefits of collective case studies, including the fact that it allows an ongoing analysis of the data collected.

Intrinsic case studies

This type of study differs from the others as it focuses on the inquiry of one specific instance among many possibilities.

Many people prefer these types of case studies because it allows them to learn about the particular instance that they wish to investigate further.

Instrumental case studies

An instrumental case study is similar to an intrinsic one, as it focuses on a particular instance, whether it's a person, organization, or something different.

One thing that differentiates instrumental case studies from intrinsic ones is the fact that instrumental case studies aren't chosen merely because a person is interested in learning about a specific instance.

Tips for writing a case study

If you have decided to write case studies for your company, then you may be unsure of where to start or which type to conduct.

However, it doesn't have to be difficult or confusing to begin conducting a case study that will help you identify ways to improve your business.

Here are some helpful tips for writing your case studies:

1. Your case study must be written in the proper format

When writing a case study, the format that you should be similar to this:

Administrative summary

The executive summary is an overview of what your report will contain, written in a concise manner while providing real-life context.

Despite the fact that the executive summary should appear at the beginning of your case studies, it shouldn't be written until you've completed the entire report because if you write it before you finish the report, this summary may not be completely accurate.

Key problem statement

In this section of your case study, you will briefly describe the problem that you hope to solve by conducting the study. You will have the opportunity to elaborate on the problem that you're focusing on as you get into the breadth of the report.

Problem exploration

This part of the case study isn't as brief as the other two, and it goes into more detail about the problem at hand. Your problem exploration must include why the identified problem needs to be solved as well as the urgency of solving it.

Additionally, it must include justification for conducting the problem-solving, as the benefits must outweigh the efforts and costs.

Proposed resolution

This case study section will also be lengthier than the first two. It must include how you propose going about rectifying the problem. The "recommended solution" section must also include potential obstacles that you might experience, as well as how these will be managed.

Furthermore, you will need to list alternative solutions and explain the reason the chosen solution is best. Charts can enhance your report and make it easier to read, and provide as much proof to substantiate your claim as possible.

Overview of monetary consideration

An overview of monetary consideration is essential for all case studies, as it will be used to convince all involved parties why your project should be funded. You must successfully convince them that the cost is worth the investment it will require. It's important that you stress the necessity for this particular case study and explain the expected outcome.

Execution timeline

In the execution times of case studies, you explain how long you predict it will take to implement your study. The shorter the time it will take to implement your plan, the more apt it is to be approved. However, be sure to provide a reasonable timeline, taking into consideration any additional time that might be needed due to obstacles.

Always include a conclusion in your case study. This is where you will briefly wrap up your entire proposal, stressing the benefits of completing the data collection and data analysis in order to rectify your problem.

2. Make it clear and comprehensive

You want to write your case studies with as much clarity as possible so that every aspect of the report is understood. Be sure to double-check your grammar, spelling, punctuation, and more, as you don't want to submit a poorly-written document.

Not only would a poorly-written case study fail to prove that what you are trying to achieve is important, but it would also increase the chances that your report will be tossed aside and not taken seriously.

3. Don't rush through the process

Writing the perfect case study takes time and patience. Rushing could result in your forgetting to include information that is crucial to your entire study. Don't waste your time creating a study that simply isn't ready. Take the necessary time to perform all the research necessary to write the best case study possible.

Depending on the case study, conducting case study research could mean using qualitative methods, quantitative methods, or both. Qualitative research questions focus on non-numerical data, such as how people feel, their beliefs, their experiences, and so on.

Meanwhile, quantitative research questions focus on numerical or statistical data collection to explain causal links or get an in-depth picture.

It is also important to collect insightful and constructive feedback. This will help you better understand the outcome as well as any changes you need to make to future case studies. Consider using formal and informal ways to collect feedback to ensure that you get a range of opinions and perspectives.

4. Be confident in your theory development

While writing your case study or conducting your formal experimental investigation, you should have confidence in yourself and what you're proposing in your report. If you took the time to gather all the pertinent data collected to complete the report, don't second-guess yourself or doubt your abilities. If you believe your report will be amazing, then it likely will be.

5. Case studies and all qualitative research are long

It's expected that multiple case studies are going to be incredibly boring, and there is no way around this. However, it doesn't mean you can choose your language carefully in order to keep your audience as engaged as possible.

If your audience loses interest in your case study at the beginning, for whatever reason, then this increases the likelihood that your case study will not be funded.

Case study examples

If you want to learn more about how to write a case study, it might be beneficial to take a look at a few case study examples. Below are a few interesting case study examples you may want to take a closer look at.

• Phineas Gage by John Martin Marlow : One of the most famous case studies comes from the medical field, and it is about the story of Phineas Gage, a man who had a railroad spike driven through his head in 1848. As he was working on a railroad, an explosive charge went off prematurely, sending a railroad rod through his head. Even though he survived this incident, he lost his left eye. However, Phineas Gage was studied extensively over the years because his experiences had a significant, lasting impact on his personality. This served as a case study because his injury showed different parts of the brain have different functions.
• Kitty Genovese and the bystander effect : This is a tragic case study that discusses the murder of Kitty Genovese, a woman attacked and murdered in Queens, New York City. Shockingly, while numerous neighbors watched the scene, nobody called for help because they assumed someone else would. This case study helped to define the bystander effect, which is when a person fails to intervene during an emergency because other people are around.
• Henry Molaison and the study of memory : Henry Molaison lost his memory and suffered from debilitating amnesia. He suffered from childhood epilepsy, and medical professionals attempted to remove the part of his brain that was causing his seizures. He had a portion of his brain removed, but it completely took away his ability to hold memories. Even though he went on to live until the age of 82, he was always forced to live in the present moment, as he was completely unable to form new memories.

Case study FAQs

When should you do a case study.

There are several scenarios when conducting a case study can be beneficial. Case studies are often used when there's a "why" or "how" question that needs to be answered. Case studies are also beneficial when trying to understand a complex phenomenon, there's limited research on a topic, or when you're looking for practical solutions to a problem.

How can case study results be used to make business decisions?

You can use the results from a case study to make future business decisions if you find yourself in a similar situation. As you assess the results of a case study, you can identify best practices, evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention, generate new and creative ideas, or get a better understanding of customer needs.

How are case studies different from other research methodologies?

When compared to other research methodologies, such as experimental or qualitative research methodology, a case study does not require a representative sample. For example, if you are performing quantitative research, you have a lot of subjects that expand your sample size. If you are performing experimental research, you may have a random sample in front of you. A case study is usually designed to deliberately focus on unusual situations, which allows it to shed new light on a specific business research problem.

Writing multiple case studies for your business

If you're feeling overwhelmed by the idea of writing a case study and it seems completely foreign, then you aren't alone. Writing a case study for a business is a very big deal, but fortunately, there is help available because an example of a case study doesn't always help.

Mailchimp, a well-known marketing company that provides comprehensive marketing support for all sorts of businesses, can assist you with your case study, or you can review one of their own recently published examples.

Mailchimp can assist you with developing the most effective content strategy to increase your chances of being as successful as possible. Mailchimp's content studio is a great tool that can help your business immensely.

Importance of Case Analysis and Understanding of Cases in Legal Studies

This article explains the importance of analyzing cases in the legal field and the purpose of case analysis. It also provides a guide on how to read and understand cases, including the significance of headnotes, facts, and issues in case analysis. Further, it emphasizes the need for a slower, more careful approach to reading cases, comparing different case reports, and understanding cases in their historical context.

Meaning of Analysis

Purpose of analysis, reading a case, understanding cases.

Although in most legal systems, statutory law plays a far more critical role in the day-to-day life of individuals than cases decided by courts, many legal studies focus, wholly or in part, on the understanding and analysis of cases.

The fundamental reason for giving attention to cases is that courts interpret statutes, constitutional provisions and administrative regulations, explain earlier court opinions on points of legal significance, and declare the meaning and scope of the application of legal rules. In addition, they often develop and express new legal regulations and principles.

Analysis of cases is the process of identifying and understanding legal principles. Cases may be analyzed for a variety of purposes, which may include the following:

1.  To see whether a court opinion based on a case applies to a given fact situation. Lawyers routinely do this as part of their professional work. This may also be done by students required to write a problem-based assignment (essay, term paper, project, etc.) , often done by researchers working on a dissertation and thesis.

2. To compare two or more or a series of cases to examine how the courts have decided cases on specific legal issues, such as the parameters used by courts in awarding damages for unfair dismissal or professional negligence.

3. To examine the ‘approach’ adopted by courts for critical analysis and evaluation of the appropriateness or otherwise of the judicial attitude on a specific matter, such as the court approach on certain provisions of the constitution or in issues of employer-employee disputes.

In this regard, the following steps are to be followed carefully:

1. Slower Reading

Fast or quick movement is the rule of the day. But in case law analysis, this is not a good principle. “Fast reading’ of case law does not produce the best result in studying or assimilating case law.

For example , a speedy reading may lead to an inaccurate comprehension of ratio decidendi or preclude the reader from appreciating the delicate nuances of a case or a point emerging from between the lines.

On the other hand, a slower reader with watchful eyes may get enough time to grasp the facts and statements to assess the attitude of the court and its feelings to ascertain the law.

2. Comparing Different Case Reports

Usually, the judgments pronounced by a Superior Court are reported in many journals and reports. When more than one report is available to the researcher, he must look at them because new ideas often strike the reader when he compares different case reports. Moreover, with time, reporting processes acquire more straightforward and subtle forms. Therefore, their reading may help in the emergence of new ideas; as far as possible unabridged reports should be compared to determine if there is a difference between them.

3. Reading Case Law in its Historical Context

The historical background of a case is of considerable importance as it sheds light on the proper grounds of and on the policy related to the decision. It also helps in distinguishing the case from other similar cases or treating it as absolute or as obscure. Similarly, the reading of cases in their political, social, and economic context is equally essential from the point of view of the problem at hand, especially in the area of property rights, right to liberty, freedom of trade and commerce, use changes in these areas are very frequent.

In any legal research involving case law analysis, a good understanding of the various parts of a case is the first step.

1. Headnotes

Headnotes, which are found at the beginning of a case, generally provide a piece of brief information as to the facts of the case, the main issues involved, the holding of the court, and often give a summary of the main points in the court’s ruling.

The paragraphs in the headnotes are usually arranged in the same sequence in which the issues are to be taken up by judges. In some law reports, the headnotes also mention the cases followed, overturned, or distinguished.

However, the cases merely considered are generally not mentioned in the headnotes. Instead, before the beginning of the judgment, a list of all the cases used in the parties’ arguments or used in the judgment is provided, indicating which cases were merely considered, followed, not followed, distinguished, and so on.

Editors of the concerned law report prepare headnotes. These are copyrighted material, whereas the reported case is not.

In a case analysis, the researcher should not rely only on headnotes. It is necessary that the case in full, or those parts that are relevant to the research, should be examined. Headnotes may sometimes be misleading.

Facts are statements of what happened that gave rise to legal issues (both in civil and criminal proceedings) presented before the court for its judgment.

A court, before discussing the legal issues, expressing its opinion on the issues, giving its decision, and entering the judgment, states the facts presented by the concerned parties.

Not all cases involve simple and brief facts. Often the facts are stated in elaborate detail and are complicated.

Understanding the facts is essential because the essence of case law research requires locating cases with similar factual circumstances. A case with like facts will often deal with issues identical to those in the problem being researched.

Cases resolve legal disputes presented by the concerned parties. Legal issues emerge from the disputed facts presented by the parties. However, the court finally determines the legal issues upon which the court is called to decide.

Sometimes, there may be only one legal issue based on simple facts. The statement of law made by the court on such an issue will be its holding (the ratio decidendi) .

On the other hand, some cases may involve several issues, and the court may have to give its ruling on all such issues.

The researcher’s task is to pick up only such issues and rulings relevant to the matter under consideration, leaving out the rest. A researcher often has to deal with many cases, each containing several legal issues. Therefore, the researcher should first select the most relevant cases and then pick up only those issues and rulings relevant to some aspects of the study.

4. Decision

A decision is the court’s conclusion. The conclusion is based on the particular facts of the case and the legal rule or principle that the court applies to the facts. The effect of a decision is to resolve the disputed issue.

For example , a civil case determines the rights and liabilities of parties (plaintiff and defendant, or appellant and respondent) , declares who wins and who loses, and provides the relief and remedies accordingly. In a criminal case, it determines whether the accused/defendant is liable for the alleged offence. The decision of the court is the outcome of the case.

5. Judgment

The term judgment is used in two senses.

In its limited sense, it refers to the ultimate order of the court, such as an order that dismisses an appeal, determines the damages payable by a party, or determines the punishment.

In its general sense, the word refers to the whole case- issues, the decision and the reasons the court gives for its decision.

6. Judicial Reasoning

Reasoning is the process the court uses in choosing a rule and applying it to the facts of the case it is considering. The rule may be found in a constitutional or statutory provision, administrative regulations, court rules, cases decided earlier, a customary practice, or any other source recognizable judicially.

The rule may also be found in unwritten principles or concepts such as the ‘principles of natural justice, judicial policy’.

The reasoning is the court’s analysis and justification for deciding the case the way it did. In a standard law system like India, cases play an essential role in legal reasoning and analysis.

7. Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta

A decision of the court has two aspects:

i. What the case decides between the parties? and ii. What principle it lays down?

It is not everything said by a judge when giving judgment that constitutes a precedent. Law quality relates to the principle behind a decision. The focus on which the case was determined is the only aspect of a judge’s ruling that serves as an authority for other judges. That which binds is called its ratio decidendi , i.e., the rule of law .

During the judgment, a judge must let various observations not precisely relevant to the issue before him. These observations are obiter dicta . They are without binding authority but are nonetheless important.

A statement made by a judge during a ruling that might not be entirely pertinent to the matter at hand is known as an obiter dictum .

Ratio decidendi is the rule acted upon by the court and becomes a precedent, whereas an obiter dictum suggests the trend of the courts’ thinking but not the rule of law.

Ratio and dicta tend to shade into each other. The rations have law quality and are binding on lower courts; the dicta, too, have law quality but are not binding at all.

Though rations of a higher court are binding on lower courts, the rations of lower court decisions have only persuasive force in higher courts like that of a dictum. Some dicta are so authoritative that the decision between ratio and dictum is reduced to a vanishing point. Dicta, which have no force, are propositions stated by way of illustration or on hypothetical facts.

Case analysis is a specific feature of legal research. One of the important sources of law, especially in common law countries, is judicial precedents. The study of decided case laws is integral to legal research.

Read Next: 1. What Is Case Law Research and Its Advantages and Disadvantages? 2. What Are Case Comments and Their Significance in Legal Analysis? 3. What Do You Mean by Citation of Cases? 4. What Is Factual Proposition and Its Importance?

• Latest Posts

• What Is the Burden of Proof Under the PMLA? - 18th April 2024
• Ranjit D Udeshi vs State of Maharashtra – Case Explained - 11th April 2024
• What Is Proceeds of Crime Under PMLA (With Case Laws) - 7th April 2024

How to Start Studying Law – For New, Existing, and Old Students

How to Study and Prepare for Judiciary Exams (13 tips)

11 Tips to Pass AIBE With Bare Acts and MCQ Tests in 2024

How to Write the Best Answer in Judiciary Mains Exam

10 Legal Jobs and Career Options After Law in 2024

Best Books for Judiciary Exam Preparation in 2024

My name is Ankur . I am a law graduate. I was my college topper for five years. In March 2018, I started WritingLaw.com . The main motive was to make a modern law website that is clean and comfortable.

Everything is going well . This is because of law students, advocates, judges and professors like you, who give me satisfaction, hope and the motivation to keep working. Thank you for your love and support. I hope you have a fruitful time here.

Law Study Material

© 2018-2024 | About Us |  Contact Us | Privacy Policy | T&C | Disclaimer | Cookies | Sitemap

• Previous Article
• Next Article

Determining the accuracy of mineral resource estimation using spatial statistical analysis – Case study in nickel laterite ore

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data
• Peer Review
• Reprints and Permissions
• Cite Icon Cite
• Search Site

Waterman Sulistyana Bargawa , M. Anwar Safi’i , Muhammad Tri Aditya; Determining the accuracy of mineral resource estimation using spatial statistical analysis – Case study in nickel laterite ore. AIP Conf. Proc. 6 September 2024; 3019 (1): 080005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0227377

Download citation file:

• Ris (Zotero)
• Reference Manager

Mineral resource modeling and estimation has an important role in determining grade-tonnage curves, ore grade distribution, 3D model, mine boundaries and life of mine. The heterogeneity and homogeneity of ore grades affect the accuracy of ore resource estimates. The mismatch of the variogram model causes the grade estimation to be inaccurate. This study aims to determine the accuracy of mineral resource estimation using spatial statistical analysis. The data in this study is the grade of nickel laterite ore. The research methodology starts from data entry to create a database of each drilling data based on sample heterogeneity for the estimation of nickel laterite grade. The resource model construction approximates the actual model to provide an accurate estimate. Geological modeling and estimation of nickel ore grades using interpolation techniques in geostatistical methods. Kriging is an interpolation technique through semi-variogram and uses the concept of spatial correlation between data. Comparative linear regression analysis between the model and composite data at the same block location in the XY-plot and the cumulative probability curve shows the accuracy of the estimation results. Low CV values and informative variogram parameters facilitate the choice of estimation techniques, because all estimation techniques have the same relative accuracy.

Citing articles via

Publish with us - request a quote.

Sign up for alerts

• Online ISSN 1551-7616
• Print ISSN 0094-243X
• For Researchers
• For Librarians
• For Advertisers
• Our Publishing Partners  
• Physics Today
• Conference Proceedings
• Special Topics

pubs.aip.org

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Use

Connect with AIP Publishing

This feature is available to subscribers only.

Sign In or Create an Account

• Resources Home
• All Publications
• Digital Resources
• The BERA Podcast
• Research Intelligence
• BERA Journals
• Ethics and guidance
• BERA Blog Home
• About the blog
• Blog special issues
• Blog series
• Submission policy
• Opportunities Home
• Awards and Funding
• Communities Home
• Special Interest Groups
• Early Career Researcher Network
• Events Home
• BERA Conference 2024
• Upcoming Events
• Past Events
• Past Conferences
• BERA Membership

Resources for research Part of series: Research Ethics Case Studies 2024

Research Ethics Case Studies 2024: Classroom observation for ‘insider’ teacher-researchers

This case study examines some of the ethical issues involved in ‘insider’ research. It highlights the importance of thinking through and anticipating potential conflicts of interest when teacher-researchers, and other researchers with dual roles such as lecturers and managers, conduct insider research.

Sarah is a primary school teacher who is also completing a part-time master’s degree in educational assessment. As part of her studies, Sarah is exploring teachers’ use of formative assessment and feedback to improve pupil outcomes, and she incorporates lesson observation as a research method. While observing one of the teachers participating in the study, Sarah has concerns about the children’s behaviour in the classroom, the manner in which the teacher attempts to manage this and the stress he appears to be under. How can Sarah draw firm lines between her researcher role and her everyday capacity as a colleague of this teacher?

Drawing on BERA’s  Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research , this case study discusses key ethical issues, including:

• researchers’ duty of care towards participants and responsibilities to identify and minimise any potential harm arising from their participation in research
• consent, transparency and the right to withdraw
• confidentiality and the circumstances in which this may need to be broken
• responsibilities for researchers’ wellbeing and development.

About this series

BERA’s  Research Ethics Case Studies , edited by Sin Wang Chong and Alison Fox, complement BERA’s  Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research , fifth edition (2024)  by giving concrete examples of how those guidelines can be applied during the research process. 

Annotations in the margins of each case study document indicate where, among the numbered paragraphs of BERA’s  Ethical Guidelines , readers can find full advice on the issues raised. The annotations include hyperlinks to the relevant passages of the guidelines.

For a full account of ethical best practice as recommended by BERA, researchers should refer to our  Ethical Guidelines , which these case studies are intended to illustrate without themselves offering guidance or recommendations.

Teacher & Curriculum Lead at Wandle Learning Partnership

Matthew Courtney is a member of the DfE’s English Hubs Council. He has completed a MSc Education Research Design and Methodology at the University of Oxford and is an Evidence Lead in Education.

Professor at Queen's University Belfast

Daniel Muijs is Head of the School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work and Professor of Education at Queen’s University Belfast. He is an acknowledged expert in the fields of educational and teacher effectiveness, school improvement...

More related content

Publication series

Resources for research 10 Apr 2024

Publishing opportunity Closed

BERA in the news 6 Sep 2024

News 30 Aug 2024

News 12 Aug 2024

News 2 Aug 2024

• Open access
• Published: 31 August 2024

Spatial analysis of the impact of urban built environment on cardiovascular diseases: a case study in Xixiangtang, China

• Shuguang Deng 1 ,
• Jinlong Liang 1 ,
• Ying Peng 2 ,
• Wei Liu 3 ,
• Jinhong Su 1 &
• Shuyan Zhu 1  

BMC Public Health volume  24 , Article number:  2368 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

The built environment, as a critical factor influencing residents' cardiovascular health, has a significant potential impact on the incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

Taking Xixiangtang District in Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China as a case study, we utilized the geographic location information of CVD patients, detailed road network data, and urban points of interest (POI) data. Kernel density estimation (KDE) and spatial autocorrelation analysis were specifically employed to identify the spatial distribution patterns, spatial clustering, and spatial correlations of built environment elements and diseases. The GeoDetector method (GDM) was used to assess the impact of environmental factors on diseases, and geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis was adopted to reveal the spatial heterogeneity effect of environmental factors on CVD risk.

The results indicate that the built environment elements and CVDs samples exhibit significant clustering characteristics in their spatial distribution, with a positive correlation between the distribution density of environmental elements and the incidence of CVDs (Moran’s I > 0, p  < 0.01). Further factor detection revealed that the distribution of healthcare facilities had the most significant impact on CVDs ( q  = 0.532, p  < 0.01), followed by shopping and consumption ( q  = 0.493, p  < 0.01), dining ( q  = 0.433, p  < 0.01), and transportation facilities ( q  = 0.423, p  < 0.01), while the impact of parks and squares ( q  = 0.174, p  < 0.01) and road networks ( q  = 0.159, p  < 0.01) was relatively smaller. Additionally, the interaction between different built environment elements exhibited a bi-factor enhancement effect on CVDs. In the local analysis, the spatial heterogeneity of different built environment elements on CVDs further revealed the regional differences and complexities.

Conclusions

The spatial distribution of built environment elements is significantly correlated with CVDs to varying degrees and impacts differently across regions, underscoring the importance of the built environment on cardiovascular health. When planning and improving urban environments, elements and areas that have a more significant impact on CVDs should be given priority consideration.

Peer Review reports

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have become one of the most common lethal diseases worldwide, with both the number of affected individuals and the mortality rate continuously rising over the past two decades. Statistical data reveal that from 1990 to 2019, the number of individuals with CVDs globally increased from 271 to 523 million, while deaths climbed from 12.1 million to 18.6 million, accounting for approximately one-third of the total annual global deaths [ 1 ]. The severity of CVDs poses not only a global health challenge but also exerts immense pressure on the healthcare system and the economy [ 2 ]. According to the World Heart Federation, global medical costs for CVDs are projected to rise from approximately 863 billion US dollars in 2010 to 1044 billion US dollars by 2030 [ 3 ]. Thus, it is particularly important to deeply explore the mechanisms that influence CVDs and to develop effective and sustainable strategies to reduce risk and prevent these diseases.

The urban built environment refers to the comprehensive physical structure and man-made surroundings of an urban area, including buildings, transportation systems, infrastructure, land use planning, and elements of natural and artificial spaces [ 4 ]. Numerous studies have focused on the close connection between the built environment and human health, particularly with respect to cardiovascular health. Research indicates that the impact of the built environment on cardiovascular health is a process network structure with various influencing factors, including but not limited to factors contributing to CVDs such as obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ], environmental issues like traffic noise and air pollution [ 11 , 12 ], as well as aspects of physical exercise, psychological stress, and lifestyle [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], all of which collectively affect the pathogenesis of CVDs [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Studies show that optimizing urban design, such as rational land allocation and planning street layouts, can guide people to access more life services, cultivate proactive attitudes and healthy bodies, thereby reducing the risk of CVDs [ 21 , 22 ]. Urban spatially compact development models can encourage physical activity, reducing the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic issues [ 23 ]. In contrast, long commutes and high traffic density may lead to chronic stress and lack of exercise, increasing the risk of obesity and hypertension. Conversely, appropriate intersection density, land-use diversity, destination convenience, and accessibility might encourage walking, improve health, and reduce the risk of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, which are cardiovascular-related problems [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. The density and accessibility of supermarkets have a direct impact on the dietary habits of community residents, wherein excessive density may increase the risk of obesity and diabetes and correlate with blood pressure levels [ 27 ]. Urban green spaces and outdoor recreational areas have a positive effect on cardiovascular health; green spaces not only offer places for exercise and relaxation but also help alleviate stress, improve mental states, and enhance air quality, thus mitigating the harm caused by air pollution and protecting cardiac and vascular health [ 28 ]. Research also indicates that individuals residing in areas with high greenery rates are more likely to enjoy opportunities that promote physical activity, mental health, and healthy lifestyles, thereby minimizing CVD risks [ 29 , 30 ]. In summary, scientific and rational urban planning, such as diversified land use, appropriate building density, good street connectivity, convenient destinations, short-distance commuting, and beautiful environments, are key factors in promoting overall health and preventing CVDs.

Although numerous studies have focused on exploring the relationship between the built environment and CVDs, the specific mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. This knowledge gap is mainly due to the complexity of the built environment itself and the multifactorial pathogenesis of CVDs. Current research mostly concentrates on individual aspects of the built environment, such as noise, air pollution, green spaces, and transportation [ 31 ], lacking consideration for the overall complexity of the built environment. Many elements of the built environment are interactive; for instance, pedestrian-friendly urban design may enhance physical activity and social interaction, yet it could also be counteracted by air and noise pollution caused by urban traffic [ 32 ]. Therefore, the same element of the built environment might have different effects in different contexts, adding complexity to the study of the built environment. Furthermore, while existing research has exhibited considerable depth and breadth in exploring the complex and dynamic relationship between the built environment and CVDs, many areas still require further improvement and deepening. Traditional linear correlation analyses, such as OLS and logistic regression models, have been widely used to assess the significance level between built environment characteristics and CVDs mortality rates, and to investigate factors such as intersection density, slope, greening, and commercial density [ 33 , 34 ]. However, these methods fall short in addressing the complexity and non-linear characteristics of spatial data.

Therefore, from a geographical perspective, it is particularly important to adopt more appropriate methods to capture the non-stationarity and heterogeneity of spatial data and to explore the spatial correlation characteristics between the built environment and CVDs. However, current research utilizing spatial models has mainly focused on macro-level perspectives, such as national or provincial levels. For example, ŞENER et al. employed spatial autocorrelation models and hot spot analysis models to assess the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of CVD mortality across multiple provincial administrative regions [ 35 ]. Baptista et al. analyzed the impact of factors such as per capita GDP, urbanization rate, education, and cigarette consumption on the growth trends of CVD incidence using spatial lag and spatial error models across different countries or regions [ 36 ]. Eun et al. used Bayesian spatial multilevel models to measure built environment variables in 546 administrative districts of Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, and evaluated the impact of the built environment on CVDs [ 37 ]. While these studies have, to some extent, revealed the spatial distribution characteristics of CVDs and their spatial relationships with environmental features, the scope of these studies is often large, and they tend to overlook the heterogeneity at the micro-level within cities and its specific impact on residents' health. As a result, it is challenging to accurately capture the differential effects of the built environment on CVD incidence across different areas within a city, and many critical environmental factors at the micro-geographical scale, which are directly related to the daily lives and health of residents, may be obscured.

Given this, we focus on Xixiangtang District in Nanning City, China, and construct a research framework centered on multi-source data, including the distribution of CVDs, road networks, and urban POI data. By employing KDE to reveal hotspot areas, spatial autocorrelation analysis to explore spatial dependence, the GDM to dissect key factors, and GWR to capture the spatial heterogeneity effects, we deeply analyze the complex mechanisms by which the urban built environment influences the incidence of CVDs. Our study aims to answer: Is there a significant spatial association between urban built environment elements and the incidence rate of CVDs? To what extent do different built environment elements impact CVDs? And, what are the regional differences in the impact of built environment elements on CVDs in different areas?

This study focuses on Xixiangtang District in Nanning City (Fig.  1 ), an important administrative district located in the northwest of Nanning City, covering an area of approximately 1,276 square kilometers with a permanent population of over one million. As an exemplary early-developed area of Nanning City, the built environment of Xixiangtang not only carries a rich historical and cultural heritage but also witnesses the transformation from a traditional old town to a modern emerging area, forming a unique urban–rural transitional zone. However, with the acceleration of urbanization, Xixiangtang District also faces numerous environmental challenges, such as declining air quality, congested traffic networks, increasing noise pollution, and continuously rising population density, all of which may pose potential threats to residents' cardiovascular health. Therefore, choosing the built environment of Xixiangtang as the core area of this study is not only due to its representativeness but also because the issues faced by this area are of profound practical significance for exploring the health impacts of urbanization and formulating effective environmental improvement strategies.

Location of study area

The CVD case data is sourced from the cardiovascular department's medical records at Guangxi National Hospital. Located in the southeastern core area of Xixiangtang District, near metro stations and densely populated areas, the hospital's superior geographical location and convenient transportation conditions greatly facilitate patient visits, especially for those seeking high-level cardiovascular medical services. Although spatial distance is an important consideration for patients when choosing a medical facility, our study on the spatial distribution patterns of CVDs also takes into account various influencing factors, including socioeconomic status, environmental factors, patient health conditions, and healthcare-seeking behaviors, ensuring the depth and accuracy of the results. Additionally, Guangxi National Hospital is one of the few top-tier (tertiary A) comprehensive hospitals in Xixiangtang District, with its cardiovascular department being a key specialty. The department's outstanding reputation and wide influence, combined with its advantages in equipment, technology, and healthcare costs compared to other non-specialized cardiovascular departments in the region, make it particularly attractive to patients in Xixiangtang, thus rendering the data relatively representative. To ensure the fairness of our study results, we have implemented multiple verification measures, including comprehensive data collection, independent evaluation of medical standards, rigorous statistical analysis, and consideration of healthcare costs.

With authorization from Guangxi National Hospital, we obtained and analyzed the cardiovascular department's data records. Our study adheres to ethical principles and does not involve any operations that have a substantial impact on patients. The cardiovascular data records include basic patient information (such as age, gender, address, etc.), diagnostic information (disease type, diagnosis date, etc.), and treatment records. We focused on CVD patients diagnosed between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. Through systematic screening and organization, we constructed a database of CVD patients during this period. During the data processing procedure, we implemented a rigorous data cleaning process, identifying and excluding incomplete, duplicate, or abnormal data records. This included checking for missing data, logical errors (such as extremely large or small ages), and consistency in diagnostic codes, ensuring the quality and reliability of the data. After data cleaning, we selected 3,472 valid samples, which are representative in terms of disease types, patient characteristics, and geographic distribution. Considering the study involves geographic location analysis, we used a text-to-coordinate tool developed based on the Amap (Gaode) API to convert patient address information into precise geographic coordinates. Finally, using ArcGIS 10.8 software, we visualized the processed case data on a map.

As a multidimensional and comprehensive conceptual framework, the built environment encompasses a vast and intricate system of elements. Given the accessibility, completeness of data, and the robust foundation in current research domains, we have centered our in-depth analysis on two core components: the urban road system and urban POIs. Road data is primarily sourced from OpenStreetMap (OSM) and processed using ArcGIS 10.8 to filter and handle incomplete records. We ultimately selected five types of roads for analysis: highways, expressways, arterial roads, secondary roads, and local roads [ 38 ]. Urban POI data was selected based on existing research and obtained through Amap. Amap is a leading map service provider in China, known for its vast user data, precise geocoding system, and advanced intelligent analysis technology, which accurately captures and presents the spatial distribution and attribute characteristics of various urban facilities. We used Amap's API interface and offline map data package to obtain the coordinates and basic attributes of POIs in the study area, including six key environment elements: dining [ 39 ], parks [ 40 ], transportation [ 20 ], shopping [ 41 ], sports [ 42 ], and healthcare [ 43 ] (Table  1 ). These elements significantly reflect the distribution status of the urban built environment. This comprehensive and detailed data provides a solid foundation for further exploring the relationship between the built environment and cardiovascular health.

• Spatial analysis

Based on existing research findings, we have identified key built environment factors that influence the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and meticulously processed the data sourced from [ 34 , 35 , 44 ]. The preprocessed data was then subjected to spatial analysis utilizing software tools such as ArcGIS 10.8, Geoda, and the Geographic Detector. Through various methods including KDE, spatial autocorrelation analysis (encompassing both univariate and bivariate analyses), factor detection and interaction detection using the Geographic Detector, as well as GWR, we aimed to explore the potential links between the urban built environment and CVDs (Fig.  2 ).

Research framework

Kernel Density Estimation (KDE)

Before delving into the complex relationship between the built environment and CVDs, it is crucial to accurately depict the spatial distribution of these key elements within the study area. Given this need, KDE, an advanced non-parametric statistical technique, was introduced as our core analytical tool. KDE is a non-parametric method used to estimate the probability density function of a random variable, and we implemented it using ArcGIS 10.8 software. Compared to other density estimation methods, such as simple counting or histograms, KDE more accurately reflects the true distribution of spatial elements, helping us identify hotspots and cold spots in the city with greater precision. The core of this method lies in assigning a smooth kernel function to each observation point, which describes the influence range of the observation point on its surrounding space, known as bandwidth. The density distribution map of the entire area is then obtained by overlaying the kernel functions of all observation point [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. In parameter settings, we set the cell size to 100 m, based on a comprehensive consideration of the study area's scope, the distribution characteristics of geographic phenomena, and computational resource limitations. This aimed to maintain sufficient precision while avoiding excessive computational burden and amplification of data noise. To further refine the analysis and visually present the continuous spatial distribution of CVDs, we used the natural breaks method to classify the KDE results into five levels. KDE visually displays the continuous spatial distribution of CVDs, identifying high-risk and low-risk areas, and provides foundational data support for subsequent spatial analyses.

Spatial autocorrelation analysis

Spatial autocorrelation analysis is a statistical method used to assess the similarity or correlation between observed values in geographic space. We derived the point attribute values from the kernel density transformation and conducted univariate global spatial autocorrelation analysis, as well as bivariate global spatial autocorrelation analysis between built environment factors and CVDs using Geoda software. Univariate global spatial autocorrelation analysis was used to study the spatial distribution characteristics of the overall dataset, using Moran's I to evaluate whether the dataset exhibits spatial autocorrelation, indicating clustering or dispersion trends [ 48 , 49 ]. Bivariate global spatial autocorrelation further analyzed the spatial correlation between different indicators [ 50 , 51 ]. Spatial autocorrelation analysis helps verify whether the spatial clustering in KDE results is significant and preliminarily explores whether there is spatial interdependence between environmental factors and CVDs.

The results of spatial autocorrelation analysis include the Moran's I index, which directly reflects the strength and direction of spatial autocorrelation, as well as key indicators such as p values and Z values, together constructing a comprehensive quantitative system for evaluating spatial autocorrelation. In the results of spatial autocorrelation analysis, when the p -value is less than 0.01, the confidence level reaches 99%, and the Z value is greater than 2.58, the null hypothesis can be rejected, indicating that the research results are highly reliable. The degree of spatial clustering of variables is measured by Moran's I. The range of Moran's I is [-1, 1]; if Moran's I > 0, it indicates positive correlation, with higher values indicating stronger clustering; if Moran's I < 0, it indicates negative correlation, with lower values indicating stronger clustering; and if Moran's I = 0, the variables are not clustered and show a dispersed distribution, with the correlation weakening as the value approaches 0 [ 52 ].

The GeoDetector method (GDM)

We analyzed the processed kernel density attribute data using the GDM to parse the influence of the built environment on CVDs and uncover the underlying driving factors. The geographic detector tool was developed by a team led by Researcher Jinfeng Wang at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ 53 ]. The GDM mainly includes factor detection, interaction detection, risk area detection, and ecological detection, and it has been widely applied in multiple fields. We used the factor detection function to evaluate the impact of environmental factors on the distribution of CVDs and utilized the interaction detection function to analyze the interaction between different environmental factors [ 54 , 55 ]. The purpose of the factor detector is to detect the extent to which independent variables explain the spatial differentiation of the dependent variable. It quantifies the influence of independent variables on the spatial distribution of the dependent variable to reveal which factors are the main contributors to the spatial distribution differences of the dependent variable. However, the impact of built environment elements on CVDs may not be determined by a single factor but rather by the synergistic effect of multiple built environment factors. Therefore, through the means of interaction detection, we further analyzed the synergistic impact of pairs of built environment elements on the spatial distribution of CVDs.

In this analysis, the q value was used as a quantitative indicator of the influence of environmental factors on CVDs, with values ranging between [0,1]. A higher q value indicates a more significant influence of the environmental factor, whereas a lower q value indicates a smaller influence. Additionally, a significance level of p  < 0.01 further emphasizes the reliability of these factors' significant impact on the distribution of CVD samples.

Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR)

However, while the GDM can reveal the overall impact of built environment elements on CVDs, its limitation lies in its difficulty to finely characterize the specific differences and dynamic changes of these impacts within different geographic spatial units. To address this shortcoming, we introduced the GWR model through the spatial analysis tools of ArcGIS 10.8 software for local analysis. This model dynamically maps the distribution and variation trajectory of regression coefficients in geographic space, incorporating the key variable of spatial location into the regression analysis. In this way, the GWR model can reveal the spatial heterogeneity of parameters at different geographic locations, accurately capturing the relationships between local variables, thus overcoming the limitations of traditional global regression models in handling spatial non-stationarity [ 56 , 57 ]. Compared to traditional global regression models, the GWR model excels in reducing model residuals and improving fitting accuracy.

When interpreting the results of the GWR model, it is necessary to consider the regression coefficients, R 2 (coefficient of determination), and adjusted R 2 comprehensively. The dynamic changes in regression coefficients in space reveal the complex relationships between independent and dependent variables at different geographic locations, with their sign and magnitude directly reflecting the nature and intensity of the impact. Although the R 2 value, as an indicator of the model's goodness of fit, focuses more on local effects in the GWR, its variation still helps to assess the explanatory power of the model in each area. These comprehensive indicators together form a thorough evaluation of the GWR model's performance. Through a comprehensive evaluation of the GWR model results, we can more precisely capture the relationships between local variables, revealing the specific impact of environmental factors on CVD risk within different regions.

Kernel density distribution characteristics

By applying kernel density analysis, the spatial distribution pattern of CVD samples and various built environment elements was detailed, effectively capturing their spatial density characteristics. The obtained kernel density levels were divided into five tiers using the natural breaks method and arranged in descending order, as shown in Fig.  3 . Analysis results indicate that high-density areas of elements such as shopping, dining, transportation facilities, and medical care are mainly focused in the southeastern part of the city, i.e., the city center. The high-density areas of the road network extend along the southern Yonjiang belt and appear patchy in the city center. Dense areas of parks are mostly near the southern riverside areas, while high-density distributions of sports facilities extend in the southeastern and central regions. Overall, the distribution pattern of these environmental factors reveals that Xixiangtang District's development trend mainly extends from southeast to northwest, indicating that the northeastern part of the region is relatively underdeveloped, with a sparse population and a lack of various infrastructure layouts. Additionally, kernel density distribution characteristics show that high-incidence areas of CVDs are concentrated in the southeast, highly coinciding with the high-density areas of most built environment elements.

Distribution of nuclear density of each element in the study area

Spatial Autocorrelation Characteristics

To explore the spatial relationship between urban built environment elements and the distribution of CVDs, spatial autocorrelation analysis was performed using Geoda software [ 58 ]. The study involved univariate and bivariate global spatial autocorrelation analyses (Table  2 ). The results of the analysis passed the significance level test at 0.01, with p values below 0.01 and Z values exceeding 2.58, achieving a 99% confidence level. This reinforces the reliability of the spatial autocorrelation results.

Univariate analysis is used to evaluate the clustering or dispersion status of feature points in space. In univariate analysis, the Moran's I value of the road network was 0.957, which significantly indicates a clustering trend in its spatial distribution. Moran's I values for other built environment elements, such as parks, transportation facilities, sports and fitness, and medical care, all exceeded 0.9, while the Moran's I values for shopping and dining also surpassed 0.8. By comparison, the Moran's I value for CVD samples was 0.697, approaching 0.7, revealing significant aggregation. Overall, the clustering nature of the built environment elements and CVD samples in Xixiangtang District implies that these elements are not randomly deployed but follow some patterns of hierarchical assembly.

Bivariate analysis, on the other hand, is used to evaluate the spatial correlation between different environmental factors and CVDs. Bivariate analysis further revealed the spatial interaction between environmental factors and CVDs. The results show that all considered environmental elements exhibited significant positive correlation with CVDs. The spatial association between medical care elements and CVDs was the strongest, with a Moran's I value of 0.431, surpassing the significant threshold of 0.4. Additionally, the Moran's I values for dining, transportation facilities, shopping, and sports and fitness were all over 0.3. Road networks and parks, on the other hand, showed relatively weaker correlations with CVDs, with Moran's I values around 0.1, indicating that in that region, the spatial connection between these built environment elements and CVDs is comparably weak.

Geodetector results analysis

A detailed analysis of the impact of various environmental factors on CVDs was achieved through the factor detection model of the GDM. According to the factor detection results shown in Table  3 , significant differences in the impact of environmental factors on the distribution of CVD samples were observed. The analysis results indicate that the environmental factors influencing the distribution of CVDs, in descending order of impact, are: healthcare services > shopping > dining > transportation facilities > sports and fitness > parks and squares > road networks. Specifically, healthcare services lead with a q value of 0.532, indicating that the spatial distribution of healthcare services has the most significant impact on the spatial distribution of CVDs. This highlights the importance of a high-density layout of healthcare facilities in the prevention and treatment of CVDs and suggests that individuals at risk for CVDs tend to prefer living in areas with convenient access to medical services [ 59 ].

Subsequently, shopping, dining, and transportation facilities all have q values exceeding 0.4, reflecting their significant effects on the urban built environment's clustering characteristics and regional commercial vitality. The concentration of human traffic brought about by these factors may, while increasing residents' lifestyle choices, also lead to certain psychological burdens and declining air quality, thereby indirectly placing a burden on the cardiovascular system. In contrast, parks and squares and road networks have relatively low q values (both less than 0.2), suggesting that the incidence of CVDs is lower in areas concentrated with these environmental elements, likely related to their ecological and transportation benefits.

Subsequently, interaction detection was used to analyze the synergistic impact of pairs of built environment elements on the spatial distribution of CVDs. From the results shown in Table  4 , it is evident that any two built environment elements exhibit a bi-factor enhancement effect on CVDs, suggesting that the combined influence of two built environment elements exceeds the effect of a single element. Among these, the interaction between healthcare services and shopping has the greatest impact on CVDs, with a value of 0.571. This indicates that CVDs patients or high-risk individuals tend to prefer living in areas rich in healthcare resources and convenient for shopping, as they can more easily access health services and daily necessities. Conversely, the interaction between road networks and parks and squares has the weakest impact on CVDs, with a value of 0.313. This suggests that their combined effect in reducing CVD risk is relatively limited, possibly due to the negative impacts of road networks, such as traffic congestion and air pollution, which may offset some of the health benefits provided by parks and squares. This result further validates an important point: the impact of the built environment on CVDs is not driven by a single element but by the synergistic effects of multiple environmental factors working together.

Geographically weighted regression analysis

The GDM revealed the influence of built environment factors on CVDs. To further uncover the spatial heterogeneity effects of built environment elements on CVDs in different regions, we employed the GWR model. To ensure the rigor of the analysis, we conducted multicollinearity detection for all built environment elements before establishing the model. We confirmed that the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values for all elements did not exceed the conventional threshold of 5, effectively avoiding multicollinearity issues and ensuring the robustness of the model results. The GWR model results showed that the model's coefficient of determination R 2 was 0.596, and the adjusted R 2 was 0.575, indicating that the model could adequately explain the relationships between variables in the study. The analysis results also highlighted the spatial non-stationarity of the effects of built environment elements, manifested by different degrees of variation and fluctuation characteristics, as shown by the coefficient magnitudes and their dynamic changes in spatial distribution in Table  5 .

Looking more closely at the details, as demonstrated in Fig.  4 , the regression coefficients of the dining elements fluctuated relatively little, ranging from -0.372 to 0.471, reflecting a relatively balanced spatial effect. Moreover, although this factor's impact in the Xixiangtang District showed both positive and negative aspects in different areas, more than half of the analysis units indicated positive values, especially in the southern and northeastern parts of the Xixiangtang District. In contrast, the high-incidence areas of CVDs in the eastern part and areas in the north showed negative correlations.

Spatial distribution of regression coefficient of built-up environmental factors

The GWR coefficients and their fluctuations for parks were significant, ranging from -69.757 to 35.43, indicating significant spatial differences in their impact on the distribution of CVDs. Specifically, the spatial distribution of positive and negative impacts was nearly 1:1, revealing the complexity of its effects. In high-incidence areas of CVDs, the distribution of parks showed a significantly negative correlation with disease distribution, while a significant increase in positive correlation was observed north of the significantly negative regions. This implies the presence of other moderating factors influencing the direction of the impact of parks on CVDs.

The regression coefficients and fluctuations for shopping were the smallest among the seven environmental factors, confined to a range of -0.093 to 0.219, suggesting a high consistency in its spatial effects. In the Xixiangtang built-up area, nearly two-thirds of the spatial units yielded positive impacts. Particularly in the northern, northeastern, southern, and southeastern regions, the positive impacts of shopping were especially pronounced.

The regression coefficients and fluctuations for transportation facilities were relatively large, ranging from -0.487 to 7.363. For the Xixiangtang District, nearly three-quarters of the analysis units displayed positive spatial impacts, with the largest positive value areas concentrated in the southeastern part. However, areas with negative impacts from transportation facilities were relatively fewer, suggesting a clear positive correlation with the distribution of CVDs.

The fluctuation range for sports and fitness regression coefficients was also broad, from -10.578 to 33.256. The analysis indicated that only a quarter of the analysis units in the Xixiangtang District had a positive correlation. The most significant positive values were located near the high-density areas for CVDs, suggesting that sports and fitness facilities might have a positive correlation with the disease distribution in these areas. Meanwhile, the intensity of the negative correlation increased north of the areas with significant positive values, potentially pointing to other factors' potential moderating effects on the relationship between sports and CVDs.

The regression coefficients and their fluctuations for healthcare were relatively small, ranging from -1.235 to 3.352. In the Xixiangtang District, the vast majority of analysis units showed a positive correlation, especially in the northern regions. The southern areas exhibited negative correlations, highlighting potential differences in medical resources in that region.

Of all the built environment elements, road networks had the largest range of regression coefficients and fluctuations, swinging from -7905.743 to 411.617, demonstrating extremely strong spatial variability. Only a small portion of the spatial units in the Xixiangtang District showed positive correlations, while the significantly negative regions were mostly concentrated in high-incidence areas for CVDs. This phenomenon was similar to the negative correlation distribution trend of parks, pointing to a significantly negative correlation between park distribution and the distribution of CVDs. Notably, the effect of road networks was opposite to transportation facilities, which could be related to the connectivity of the road network and traffic congestion conditions, factors that could influence the incidence of CVDs.

This study reveals a high-density aggregation of CVDs and various built environment elements in the southeastern part of the study area, i.e., the urban central area. Through spatial statistical analysis, all examined environmental elements and CVDs showed high Moran's I values, indicating significant clustering in their spatial distribution. Furthermore, the positive spatial correlation between these environmental elements and CVDs corroborates the deep connection between the urban built environment and the incidence of CVDs.

Geodetector analysis reveals significant differences in the impact of different built environment elements on CVDs. Healthcare facilities had the most influence, followed by shopping, dining, and transportation facilities, while parks and road networks had relatively weaker impacts. Notably, the occurrence of CVDs is not only related to individual built environment elements but likely results from the combined effects of multiple elements. Further interaction detection analysis confirmed this hypothesis, finding that the joint impact of any two environmental elements was stronger than any individual element, showing a clear dual-factor enhancement effect. Specifically, the interaction between healthcare and shopping had the most significant impact on the distribution of CVDs, while the combined effect of road networks and parks was the least. By delving into individual factors and their interaction effects, this study reveals a comprehensive view of the impact of the built environment on CVDs, highlighting the complex relationships and differences between environmental elements and the occurrence of diseases.

The GWR model was used to analyze in detail how built environment elements affect CVDs in different regions, aiming to gain a deep understanding of the local effects of the built environment. The research results showed the regression coefficients of built environment elements and their range of variation. Specifically, the regression coefficients for dining exhibited relatively stable trends in spatial distribution. Although the overall impact was moderate, slight fluctuations revealed a slightly enhanced positive correlation in specific areas such as densely commercial or culturally vibrant dining regions. Particularly in the southern and northeastern parts, the combination of diverse dining options and frequent dining consumption patterns showed a slight positive correlation with CVD risk. This reflects the complex impact of dietary habits, food composition, and intake levels on cardiovascular health [ 60 , 61 ].

The regression coefficients for parks and squares showed relatively large fluctuations in spatial distribution, indicating significant regional heterogeneity. This is mainly due to factors such as differences in regional population density and per capita park and square area. In our study, the southeastern region, which is a high-incidence area for CVDs, exhibited negative regression coefficients for parks and squares. This is because this region is the central urban area with a high population density, leading to a significant shortage of per capita green space, thus showing a negative correlation. Conversely, in the northern region, where population distribution is more balanced and parks and squares are more abundant, the per capita green space is relatively sufficient. Therefore, CVD patients have more access to green spaces and exercise areas, showing a positive correlation [ 29 ].

The regression coefficients for shopping consumption showed the smallest fluctuations in spatial distribution. The positive and negative effects were not significantly different, with the positive effects being notably concentrated in the northern, northeastern, and southern commercial thriving areas. Compared to other regions, these areas might have relatively well-developed commercial facilities or superior shopping environments. This could indirectly affect CVD risk through various dimensions, such as physical exertion from walking or cycling during shopping and the regulation of psychological states like satisfaction and pleasure after shopping [ 44 ].

The regression coefficients for transportation facilities showed a significant positive correlation in high-incidence areas of CVDs, with notable fluctuations. This deeply reveals the direct and important impact of traffic conditions, especially congestion and pollution, on cardiovascular health across different regions. In traffic-dense areas such as city centers and transportation hubs, high traffic volume, severe congestion, and increased noise and air pollution collectively pose major threats to residents' cardiovascular health. This not only directly harms the cardiovascular system through accumulated psychological stress and exposure to air pollution but also further exacerbates the risk due to a lack of exercise opportunities [ 62 ].

The regression coefficients for sports and fitness facilities exhibited a high degree of heterogeneity in spatial distribution, showing a significant positive correlation in the southeastern high-incidence area for CVDs, which gradually shifts to a negative correlation towards the outer regions. This deeply reflects the regional differences in the allocation of sports and fitness facilities, residents' exercise habits, and participation rates. In areas with well-developed urban facilities and strong resident awareness of physical activity, the positive effects of sports and fitness activities on cardiovascular health are particularly significant. These activities effectively reduce CVD risk by enhancing physical activity, optimizing cardiopulmonary function, and lowering body fat percentage. However, in areas with relatively scarce sports facilities and poor exercise habits among residents, negative impacts may be observed, highlighting the potential threats to public health due to uneven distribution of sports resources and a lack of exercise culture [ 63 ].

The regression coefficients for healthcare services showed regional differences in spatial distribution. In the northern region, due to the lower population density, the abundance and superior quality of per capita healthcare resources have a significant positive effect on residents' cardiovascular health. In contrast, the southern region, with relatively scarce resources or limited service quality, fails to fully realize the potential benefits of healthcare services. This disparity not only reveals the current uneven distribution of healthcare resources but also emphasizes the importance of enhancing the equalization of healthcare services [ 64 ]. The positive impact of healthcare on CVDs is primarily achieved through efficient prevention, precise diagnosis, and timely treatment. Its effectiveness is influenced by multiple factors, including the sufficiency of medical resources, service quality, residents' healthcare-seeking behavior, medical policies, and technological advancements.

The road network and transportation facilities together constitute the urban transportation system. In the process of transportation planning, we advocate for the continuous optimization of the road network layout, reserving space for future traffic growth, and utilizing intelligent technology to optimize traffic signal management to alleviate congestion. Meanwhile, in the densely populated eastern and southeastern areas, we emphasize enhancing the convenience of public transportation by adding routes and optimizing station locations, making it the preferred mode of travel for residents. Additionally, measures such as the construction of sound barriers and green belts are implemented to effectively reduce noise and air pollution caused by public transportation. Furthermore, we actively promote green travel methods such as cycling and walking by building a comprehensive network of bike lanes and pedestrian paths, thereby promoting public health and environmental protection [ 20 ].

These findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions between built environment elements and CVDs. Therefore, it is essential to balance the integrated impact of these factors in urban planning and public health interventions. Based on a comprehensive analysis of existing research and our study's results, we propose the following viewpoints.

Firstly, healthcare is the primary factor influencing the distribution of CVDs. Living near medical institutions offers substantial benefits to cardiovascular patients, not only enhancing the accessibility of medical services but also helping to quickly respond to emergency medical situations, providing a sense of security for patients. We suggest establishing additional medical centers in the densely populated southeastern region to ensure that community members can easily access high-quality medical services [ 65 ].

Secondly, shopping and dining are the next most important factors affecting the spatial distribution of CVDs. Although the spatial variation of these factors is not significant, their long-term cumulative impact should not be overlooked. We recommend that future urban renewal or renovation efforts reasonably control and plan the density of commercial areas, especially in the eastern region. This requires ensuring that residents can enjoy convenient shopping services to meet their daily needs while avoiding the increased living costs and stress caused by excessive commercial concentration. Additionally, it is necessary to strengthen the management of dining environments, including encouraging dining establishments to offer more healthy food options, such as low-sugar, low-fat, and high-fiber dishes. It is also important to increase the availability of healthy dining options by establishing healthy restaurants and vegetarian eateries, while reasonably controlling and optimizing the layout and number of high-sugar and high-fat food outlets within communities to reduce health risks induced by frequent exposure to such foods [ 66 ].

Road networks and transportation facilities together form the city's transportation system. In transportation planning, we advocate for the continuous optimization of road network layouts, reserving space for future traffic growth, and leveraging intelligent technology to optimize traffic signal management to alleviate congestion. Additionally, enhancing the convenience of public transportation by adding routes and optimizing stops can make it the preferred mode of travel for residents. Complementing this with the construction of sound barriers and green belts can effectively reduce noise and air pollution caused by public transportation. Furthermore, promoting green travel methods such as cycling and walking by building a comprehensive network of cycling lanes and walking paths can foster both health and environmental benefits [ 20 ].

Sports and fitness facilities, along with parks and squares, are essential for improving residents' quality of life and promoting healthy lifestyles. During planning, sports and fitness facilities should be reasonably distributed, especially in the northern part of the study area, to ensure that all communities have convenient access to exercise amenities. Diverse fitness facilities catering to different age groups and exercise needs, such as basketball courts, soccer fields, and fitness equipment zones, should be provided to meet the varied exercise requirements of different groups. Additionally, parks and squares, as crucial spaces for residents' leisure and entertainment, should be planned with a harmonious balance of ecology and landscape. In densely populated and space-constrained southeastern areas, small green spaces, leisure seating, and children's play facilities can be added to provide residents with a pleasant environment for relaxation and nature interaction [ 67 ].

We have explored the mechanisms by which environmental elements impact CVDs and proposed suggestions for optimizing the urban built environment, but this paper still has certain limitations. The impact of the environment on health and disease is complex, and due to time and resource constraints, it was not possible to consider and analyze all potential variables comprehensively, which may have some impact on the research results. To further deepen the study of the relationship between the built environment and cardiovascular health, future research could consider the following aspects: first, expand the scope of research, collecting and analyzing data from different cities and regions to better understand geographical differences in the impact of the built environment on cardiovascular health; second, enhance the scientific nature of the research methods, using more objective and precise methods for data collection and analysis to improve the reliability and accuracy of the research; and finally, deepen the study of the mechanisms between the built environment and cardiovascular health, exploring biological and psychological mechanisms to better understand their relationship.

Focusing on the built-up area of Xixiangtang in Nanning City as the research area, this study delves into the intrinsic connection between the urban built environment and CVDs, uncovering several findings. Utilizing hospital cardiovascular data and urban POI data, and employing spatial analysis techniques such as KDE, spatial autocorrelation analysis, geodetectors, and GWR, we systematically assessed the extent and mechanisms through which various built environment elements impact CVDs. The results show a significant positive correlation between the urban built environment and CVDs. Particularly, healthcare facilities, shopping venues, restaurants, and transportation facilities have significant effects on the incidence and distribution of CVDs. The spatial aggregation of these elements and the dense distribution of CVDs demonstrate significant consistency, further confirming the close link between the built environment and CVDs. Simultaneously, we discovered spatial heterogeneity in the impact of different built environment elements on CVDs. This indicates that in planning and improving the urban environment, elements and areas with a greater impact on CVDs should be considered specifically.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Cardiovascular Disease

Geographically weighted regression

Multiscale geographically weighted regression

The GeoDetector method

OpenStreetMap

Kernel Density Estimation

Points of Interest

Variance Inflation Factor

Application Programming Interface

Roth GA, Mensah GA, Fuster V. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks: a compass for global action. American College of Cardiology Foundation Washington DC; 2020. p. 2980–1.

Masaebi F, Salehi M, Kazemi M, Vahabi N, Azizmohammad Looha M, Zayeri F. Trend analysis of disability adjusted life years due to cardiovascular diseases: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–13.

Article   Google Scholar  

Murray CJ, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223–49.

Bloom DE, Cafiero E, Jané-Llopis E, Abrahams-Gessel S, Bloom LR, Fathima S, et al. The global economic burden of noncommunicable diseases. Program on the Global Demography of Aging; 2012.

Xu J, Jing Y, Xu X, Zhang X, Liu Y, He H, et al. Spatial scale analysis for the relationships between the built environment and cardiovascular disease based on multi-source data. Health Place. 2023;83:103048.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. Are exposures to ready-to-eat food environments associated with type 2 diabetes? A cross-sectional study of 347 551 UK Biobank adult participants. Lancet Planetary Health. 2018;2(10):e438–50.

Grazuleviciene R, Andrusaityte S, Gražulevičius T, Dėdelė A. Neighborhood social and built environment and disparities in the risk of hypertension: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7696.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Ghosh-Dastidar B, Cohen D, Hunter G, Zenk SN, Huang C, Beckman R, et al. Distance to store, food prices, and obesity in urban food deserts. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(5):587–95.

Braun LM, Rodríguez DA, Evenson KR, Hirsch JA, Moore KA, Roux AVD. Walkability and cardiometabolic risk factors: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Health Place. 2016;39:9–17.

Anza-Ramirez C, Lazo M, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Avila-Palencia I, Bilal U, Hernández-Vásquez A, et al. The urban built environment and adult BMI, obesity, and diabetes in Latin American cities. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7977.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   CAS   Google Scholar  

Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23(2):109–23.

Levy L. Dietary strategies, policy and cardiovascular disease risk reduction in England. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2013;72(4):386–9.

Article   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Dalal HM, Zawada A, Jolly K, Moxham T, Taylor RS. Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340.

Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(3):188–99.

Jia X, Yu Y, Xia W, Masri S, Sami M, Hu Z, et al. Cardiovascular diseases in middle aged and older adults in China: the joint effects and mediation of different types of physical exercise and neighborhood greenness and walkability. Environ Res. 2018;167:175–83.

Murtagh EM, Nichols L, Mohammed MA, Holder R, Nevill AM, Murphy MH. The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Prev Med. 2015;72:34–43.

Newby DE, Mannucci PM, Tell GS, Baccarelli AA, Brook RD, Donaldson K, et al. Expert position paper on air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(2):83–93.

Chum A, O’Campo P. Cross-sectional associations between residential environmental exposures and cardiovascular diseases. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–12.

Diener A, Mudu P. How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces’ mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective-with implications for urban planning. Sci Total Environ. 2021;796:148605.

Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Influence of urban and transport planning and the city environment on cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(7):432–8.

Chandrabose M, den Braver NR, Owen N, Sugiyama T, Hadgraft N. Built environments and cardiovascular health: review and implications. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2022;42(6):416–22.

Lee E, Choi J, Lee S, Choi B. P70 Association between built environment and cardiovascular diseases. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; 2019.

Sallis JF, Floyd MF, Rodríguez DA, Saelens BE. Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2012;125(5):729–37.

Chandrabose M, Rachele JN, Gunn L, Kavanagh A, Owen N, Turrell G, et al. Built environment and cardio-metabolic health: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Obes Rev. 2019;20(1):41–54.

Ewing R, Cervero R. “Does compact development make people drive less?” The answer is yes. J Am Plann Assoc. 2017;83(1):19–25.

Loo CJ, Greiver M, Aliarzadeh B, Lewis D. Association between neighbourhood walkability and metabolic risk factors influenced by physical activity: a cross-sectional study of adults in Toronto, Canada. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013889.

Dendup T, Feng X, Clingan S, Astell-Burt T. Environmental risk factors for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):78.

Malambo P, Kengne AP, De Villiers A, Lambert EV, Puoane T. Built environment, selected risk factors and major cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0166846.

Seo S, Choi S, Kim K, Kim SM, Park SM. Association between urban green space and the risk of cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal study in seven Korean metropolitan areas. Environ Int. 2019;125:51–7.

Yeager RA, Smith TR, Bhatnagar A. Green environments and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30(4):241–6.

Liu M, Meijer P, Lam TM, Timmermans EJ, Grobbee DE, Beulens JW, et al. The built environment and cardiovascular disease: an umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023;30(16):1801–27.

Koohsari MJ, McCormack GR, Nakaya T, Oka K. Neighbourhood built environment and cardiovascular disease: knowledge and future directions. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(5):261–3.

Howell NA, Tu JV, Moineddin R, Chen H, Chu A, Hystad P, et al. Interaction between neighborhood walkability and traffic-related air pollution on hypertension and diabetes: the CANHEART cohort. Environ Int. 2019;132:104799.

Patino JE, Hong A, Duque JC, Rahimi K, Zapata S, Lopera VM. Built environment and mortality risk from cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Medellín, Colombia: An ecological study. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;213:104126.

Şener R, Türk T. Spatiotemporal analysis of cardiovascular disease mortality with geographical information systems. Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2021;14(4):929–45.

Baptista EA, Queiroz BL. Spatial analysis of cardiovascular mortality and associated factors around the world. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1556.

Lee EY, Choi J, Lee S, Choi BY. Objectively measured built environments and cardiovascular diseases in middle-aged and older Korean adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1861.

Pourabdollah A, Morley J, Feldman S, Jackson M. Towards an authoritative OpenStreetMap: conflating OSM and OS OpenData national maps’ road network. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf. 2013;2(3):704–28.

Mazidi M, Speakman JR. Association of Fast-Food and Full-Service Restaurant Densities With Mortality From Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke, and the Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(11):e007651.

Grazuleviciene R, Vencloviene J, Kubilius R, Grizas V, Dedele A, Grazulevicius T, et al. The effect of park and urban environments on coronary artery disease patients: a randomized trial. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015.

Haralson MK, Sargent RG, Schluchter M. The relationship between knowledge of cardiovascular dietary risk and food shopping behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 1990;6(6):318–22.

Hoevenaar-Blom MP, Wendel-Vos GW, Spijkerman AM, Kromhout D, Verschuren WM. Cycling and sports, but not walking, are associated with 10-year cardiovascular disease incidence: the MORGEN Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2011;18(1):41–7.

Sepehrvand N, Alemayehu W, Kaul P, Pelletier R, Bello AK, Welsh RC, et al. Ambulance use, distance and outcomes in patients with suspected cardiovascular disease: a registry-based geographic information system study. Eur Heart J. 2020;9(1_suppl):45–58.

Google Scholar  

Malambo P, De Villiers A, Lambert EV, Puoane T, Kengne AP. The relationship between objectively-measured attributes of the built environment and selected cardiovascular risk factors in a South African urban setting. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–9.

Chen W, Liu L, Liang Y. Retail center recognition and spatial aggregating feature analysis of retail formats in Guangzhou based on POI data. Geogr Res. 2016;35(4):703–16.

Feng L, Lei G, Nie Y. Exploring the eco-efficiency of cultivated land utilization and its influencing factors in black soil region of Northeast China under the goal of reducing non-point pollution and net carbon emission. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2023;82(4):94.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Guan Z, Wang T, Zhi X. Temporal-spatial pattern differentiation of traditional villages in central plains economic region. Econ Geogr. 2017;37(9):225–32.

Chen Y. Development and method improvement of spatial autocorrelation theory based on Moran statistics. Geogr Res. 2009;28(6):1449–63.

Pang R, Teng F, Wei Y. A gwr-based study on dynamic mechanism of population urbanization in JIlin province. Sci Geogr Sin. 2014;34:1210–7.

Anselin L, Rey SJ. Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. (No Title). 2014.

Zhang Z, Shan B, Lin Q, Chen Y, Yu X. Influence of the spatial distribution pattern of buildings on the distribution of PM2. 5 concentration. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment. 2022:1–13.

Dehnad K. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Taylor & Francis; 1987.

Wang JF, Li XH, Christakos G, Liao YL, Zhang T, Gu X, et al. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2010;24(1):107–27.

Shu T, Ren Y, Shen L, Qian Y. Study on spatial heterogeneity of consumption vibrancy and its driving factors in large city: a case of Chengdu City. Urban Development Studies. 2020;27(1):16–21.

Jinfeng W, Chengdong X. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geogr Sin. 2017;72(1):116–34.

Feuillet T, Commenges H, Menai M, Salze P, Perchoux C, Reuillon R, et al. A massive geographically weighted regression model of walking-environment relationships. J Transp Geogr. 2018;68:118–29.

Yu H, Gong H, Chen B, Liu K, Gao M. Analysis of the influence of groundwater on land subsidence in Beijing based on the geographical weighted regression (GWR) model. Sci Total Environ. 2020;738:139405.

Anselin L. An introduction to spatial autocorrelation analysis with GeoDa. Spatial Analysis Laboratory: University of Illinois, Champagne-Urbana, Illinois; 2003.

Nicholl J, West J, Goodacre S, Turner J. The relationship between distance to hospital and patient mortality in emergencies: an observational study. Emerg Med J. 2007;24(9):665–8.

Osman AA, Abumanga ZM. The relationship between physical activity status and dietary habits with the risk of cardiovascular diseases. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2019;7(2):72.

Shan Z, Li Y, Baden MY, Bhupathiraju SN, Wang DD, Sun Q, et al. Association between healthy eating patterns and risk of cardiovascular disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(8):1090–100.

Münzel T, Treede H, Hahad O, Daiber A. Too loud to handle? Transportation noise and cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2023;39(9):1204–18.

Halonen JI, Stenholm S, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Subramanian S, Kawachi I, et al. Is change in availability of sports facilities associated with change in physical activity? A prospective cohort study Prev Med. 2015;73:10–4.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Wekesah FM, Kyobutungi C, Grobbee DE, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Understanding of and perceptions towards cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors: a qualitative study among residents of urban informal settings in Nairobi. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e026852.

Berlin C, Panczak R, Hasler R, Zwahlen M. Do acute myocardial infarction and stroke mortality vary by distance to hospitals in Switzerland? Results from the Swiss National Cohort Study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013090.

Lim K, Kwan Y, Tan C, Low L, Chua A, Lee W, et al. The association between distance to public amenities and cardiovascular risk factors among lower income Singaporeans. Preventive medicine reports. 2017;8:116–21.

Pereira G, Foster S, Martin K, Christian H, Boruff BJ, Knuiman M, et al. The association between neighborhood greenness and cardiovascular disease: an observational study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1–9.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not appliable.

The General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education in 2020: A Study on the Assessment and Planning of Healthy Cities Based on Spatial Data Mining (No. 20YJA630011) and the Natural Resources Digital Industry Academy Construction Project.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Geographical and Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, 530100, Guangxi, China

Shuguang Deng, Jinlong Liang, Jinhong Su & Shuyan Zhu

School of Architecture, Guangxi Arts University, Nanning, 530009, Guangxi, China

Fatulty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau, 999078, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

D.S. Provides research topics, conceptual guidance, translation, paper revision and financial support; L.J. Conceived the framework and wrote the original draft; P.Y. Manuscript checking, chart optimization; L.W. Provided suggestions for revision, and reviewed and edited them; S.J. Is responsible for data acquisition and editing; Z.S. Edits the visual map.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinlong Liang .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Our study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as relevant national and institutional guidelines for human research. The study received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Nationality Hospital (Approval No.: 2024–65). The de-identified data records from the cardiovascular department that we accessed and analyzed were authorized by Guangxi Nationality Hospital. These data were collected and maintained in compliance with the hospital's patient data management policies and procedures. Given that our study involved only a retrospective analysis of existing medical records, with no direct interaction with patients and no potential for causing any substantial harm, the Medical Ethics Committee of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Nationality Hospital determined that individual patient informed consent was not required. Nonetheless, we have ensured that all data used in the study were fully anonymized and protected, adhering to the highest standards of confidentiality and privacy.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Deng, S., Liang, J., Peng, Y. et al. Spatial analysis of the impact of urban built environment on cardiovascular diseases: a case study in Xixiangtang, China. BMC Public Health 24 , 2368 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19884-x

Download citation

Received : 27 April 2024

Accepted : 26 August 2024

Published : 31 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19884-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Built environment
• Impact mechanism

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

• General enquiries: [email protected]

• Open access
• Published: 27 June 2011

The case study approach

• Sarah Crowe 1 ,
• Kathrin Cresswell 2 ,
• Ann Robertson 2 ,
• Guro Huby 3 ,
• Anthony Avery 1 &
• Aziz Sheikh 2  

BMC Medical Research Methodology volume  11 , Article number:  100 ( 2011 ) Cite this article

792k Accesses

1111 Citations

42 Altmetric

Metrics details

The case study approach allows in-depth, multi-faceted explorations of complex issues in their real-life settings. The value of the case study approach is well recognised in the fields of business, law and policy, but somewhat less so in health services research. Based on our experiences of conducting several health-related case studies, we reflect on the different types of case study design, the specific research questions this approach can help answer, the data sources that tend to be used, and the particular advantages and disadvantages of employing this methodological approach. The paper concludes with key pointers to aid those designing and appraising proposals for conducting case study research, and a checklist to help readers assess the quality of case study reports.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The case study approach is particularly useful to employ when there is a need to obtain an in-depth appreciation of an issue, event or phenomenon of interest, in its natural real-life context. Our aim in writing this piece is to provide insights into when to consider employing this approach and an overview of key methodological considerations in relation to the design, planning, analysis, interpretation and reporting of case studies.

The illustrative 'grand round', 'case report' and 'case series' have a long tradition in clinical practice and research. Presenting detailed critiques, typically of one or more patients, aims to provide insights into aspects of the clinical case and, in doing so, illustrate broader lessons that may be learnt. In research, the conceptually-related case study approach can be used, for example, to describe in detail a patient's episode of care, explore professional attitudes to and experiences of a new policy initiative or service development or more generally to 'investigate contemporary phenomena within its real-life context' [ 1 ]. Based on our experiences of conducting a range of case studies, we reflect on when to consider using this approach, discuss the key steps involved and illustrate, with examples, some of the practical challenges of attaining an in-depth understanding of a 'case' as an integrated whole. In keeping with previously published work, we acknowledge the importance of theory to underpin the design, selection, conduct and interpretation of case studies[ 2 ]. In so doing, we make passing reference to the different epistemological approaches used in case study research by key theoreticians and methodologists in this field of enquiry.

This paper is structured around the following main questions: What is a case study? What are case studies used for? How are case studies conducted? What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided? We draw in particular on four of our own recently published examples of case studies (see Tables 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ) and those of others to illustrate our discussion[ 3 – 7 ].

What is a case study?

A case study is a research approach that is used to generate an in-depth, multi-faceted understanding of a complex issue in its real-life context. It is an established research design that is used extensively in a wide variety of disciplines, particularly in the social sciences. A case study can be defined in a variety of ways (Table 5 ), the central tenet being the need to explore an event or phenomenon in depth and in its natural context. It is for this reason sometimes referred to as a "naturalistic" design; this is in contrast to an "experimental" design (such as a randomised controlled trial) in which the investigator seeks to exert control over and manipulate the variable(s) of interest.

Stake's work has been particularly influential in defining the case study approach to scientific enquiry. He has helpfully characterised three main types of case study: intrinsic , instrumental and collective [ 8 ]. An intrinsic case study is typically undertaken to learn about a unique phenomenon. The researcher should define the uniqueness of the phenomenon, which distinguishes it from all others. In contrast, the instrumental case study uses a particular case (some of which may be better than others) to gain a broader appreciation of an issue or phenomenon. The collective case study involves studying multiple cases simultaneously or sequentially in an attempt to generate a still broader appreciation of a particular issue.

These are however not necessarily mutually exclusive categories. In the first of our examples (Table 1 ), we undertook an intrinsic case study to investigate the issue of recruitment of minority ethnic people into the specific context of asthma research studies, but it developed into a instrumental case study through seeking to understand the issue of recruitment of these marginalised populations more generally, generating a number of the findings that are potentially transferable to other disease contexts[ 3 ]. In contrast, the other three examples (see Tables 2 , 3 and 4 ) employed collective case study designs to study the introduction of workforce reconfiguration in primary care, the implementation of electronic health records into hospitals, and to understand the ways in which healthcare students learn about patient safety considerations[ 4 – 6 ]. Although our study focusing on the introduction of General Practitioners with Specialist Interests (Table 2 ) was explicitly collective in design (four contrasting primary care organisations were studied), is was also instrumental in that this particular professional group was studied as an exemplar of the more general phenomenon of workforce redesign[ 4 ].

What are case studies used for?

According to Yin, case studies can be used to explain, describe or explore events or phenomena in the everyday contexts in which they occur[ 1 ]. These can, for example, help to understand and explain causal links and pathways resulting from a new policy initiative or service development (see Tables 2 and 3 , for example)[ 1 ]. In contrast to experimental designs, which seek to test a specific hypothesis through deliberately manipulating the environment (like, for example, in a randomised controlled trial giving a new drug to randomly selected individuals and then comparing outcomes with controls),[ 9 ] the case study approach lends itself well to capturing information on more explanatory ' how ', 'what' and ' why ' questions, such as ' how is the intervention being implemented and received on the ground?'. The case study approach can offer additional insights into what gaps exist in its delivery or why one implementation strategy might be chosen over another. This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table 4 )[ 6 , 10 ]. Key questions to consider when selecting the most appropriate study design are whether it is desirable or indeed possible to undertake a formal experimental investigation in which individuals and/or organisations are allocated to an intervention or control arm? Or whether the wish is to obtain a more naturalistic understanding of an issue? The former is ideally studied using a controlled experimental design, whereas the latter is more appropriately studied using a case study design.

Case studies may be approached in different ways depending on the epistemological standpoint of the researcher, that is, whether they take a critical (questioning one's own and others' assumptions), interpretivist (trying to understand individual and shared social meanings) or positivist approach (orientating towards the criteria of natural sciences, such as focusing on generalisability considerations) (Table 6 ). Whilst such a schema can be conceptually helpful, it may be appropriate to draw on more than one approach in any case study, particularly in the context of conducting health services research. Doolin has, for example, noted that in the context of undertaking interpretative case studies, researchers can usefully draw on a critical, reflective perspective which seeks to take into account the wider social and political environment that has shaped the case[ 11 ].

How are case studies conducted?

Here, we focus on the main stages of research activity when planning and undertaking a case study; the crucial stages are: defining the case; selecting the case(s); collecting and analysing the data; interpreting data; and reporting the findings.

Defining the case

Carefully formulated research question(s), informed by the existing literature and a prior appreciation of the theoretical issues and setting(s), are all important in appropriately and succinctly defining the case[ 8 , 12 ]. Crucially, each case should have a pre-defined boundary which clarifies the nature and time period covered by the case study (i.e. its scope, beginning and end), the relevant social group, organisation or geographical area of interest to the investigator, the types of evidence to be collected, and the priorities for data collection and analysis (see Table 7 )[ 1 ]. A theory driven approach to defining the case may help generate knowledge that is potentially transferable to a range of clinical contexts and behaviours; using theory is also likely to result in a more informed appreciation of, for example, how and why interventions have succeeded or failed[ 13 ].

For example, in our evaluation of the introduction of electronic health records in English hospitals (Table 3 ), we defined our cases as the NHS Trusts that were receiving the new technology[ 5 ]. Our focus was on how the technology was being implemented. However, if the primary research interest had been on the social and organisational dimensions of implementation, we might have defined our case differently as a grouping of healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors and/or nurses). The precise beginning and end of the case may however prove difficult to define. Pursuing this same example, when does the process of implementation and adoption of an electronic health record system really begin or end? Such judgements will inevitably be influenced by a range of factors, including the research question, theory of interest, the scope and richness of the gathered data and the resources available to the research team.

Selecting the case(s)

The decision on how to select the case(s) to study is a very important one that merits some reflection. In an intrinsic case study, the case is selected on its own merits[ 8 ]. The case is selected not because it is representative of other cases, but because of its uniqueness, which is of genuine interest to the researchers. This was, for example, the case in our study of the recruitment of minority ethnic participants into asthma research (Table 1 ) as our earlier work had demonstrated the marginalisation of minority ethnic people with asthma, despite evidence of disproportionate asthma morbidity[ 14 , 15 ]. In another example of an intrinsic case study, Hellstrom et al.[ 16 ] studied an elderly married couple living with dementia to explore how dementia had impacted on their understanding of home, their everyday life and their relationships.

For an instrumental case study, selecting a "typical" case can work well[ 8 ]. In contrast to the intrinsic case study, the particular case which is chosen is of less importance than selecting a case that allows the researcher to investigate an issue or phenomenon. For example, in order to gain an understanding of doctors' responses to health policy initiatives, Som undertook an instrumental case study interviewing clinicians who had a range of responsibilities for clinical governance in one NHS acute hospital trust[ 17 ]. Sampling a "deviant" or "atypical" case may however prove even more informative, potentially enabling the researcher to identify causal processes, generate hypotheses and develop theory.

In collective or multiple case studies, a number of cases are carefully selected. This offers the advantage of allowing comparisons to be made across several cases and/or replication. Choosing a "typical" case may enable the findings to be generalised to theory (i.e. analytical generalisation) or to test theory by replicating the findings in a second or even a third case (i.e. replication logic)[ 1 ]. Yin suggests two or three literal replications (i.e. predicting similar results) if the theory is straightforward and five or more if the theory is more subtle. However, critics might argue that selecting 'cases' in this way is insufficiently reflexive and ill-suited to the complexities of contemporary healthcare organisations.

The selected case study site(s) should allow the research team access to the group of individuals, the organisation, the processes or whatever else constitutes the chosen unit of analysis for the study. Access is therefore a central consideration; the researcher needs to come to know the case study site(s) well and to work cooperatively with them. Selected cases need to be not only interesting but also hospitable to the inquiry [ 8 ] if they are to be informative and answer the research question(s). Case study sites may also be pre-selected for the researcher, with decisions being influenced by key stakeholders. For example, our selection of case study sites in the evaluation of the implementation and adoption of electronic health record systems (see Table 3 ) was heavily influenced by NHS Connecting for Health, the government agency that was responsible for overseeing the National Programme for Information Technology (NPfIT)[ 5 ]. This prominent stakeholder had already selected the NHS sites (through a competitive bidding process) to be early adopters of the electronic health record systems and had negotiated contracts that detailed the deployment timelines.

It is also important to consider in advance the likely burden and risks associated with participation for those who (or the site(s) which) comprise the case study. Of particular importance is the obligation for the researcher to think through the ethical implications of the study (e.g. the risk of inadvertently breaching anonymity or confidentiality) and to ensure that potential participants/participating sites are provided with sufficient information to make an informed choice about joining the study. The outcome of providing this information might be that the emotive burden associated with participation, or the organisational disruption associated with supporting the fieldwork, is considered so high that the individuals or sites decide against participation.

In our example of evaluating implementations of electronic health record systems, given the restricted number of early adopter sites available to us, we sought purposively to select a diverse range of implementation cases among those that were available[ 5 ]. We chose a mixture of teaching, non-teaching and Foundation Trust hospitals, and examples of each of the three electronic health record systems procured centrally by the NPfIT. At one recruited site, it quickly became apparent that access was problematic because of competing demands on that organisation. Recognising the importance of full access and co-operative working for generating rich data, the research team decided not to pursue work at that site and instead to focus on other recruited sites.

Collecting the data

In order to develop a thorough understanding of the case, the case study approach usually involves the collection of multiple sources of evidence, using a range of quantitative (e.g. questionnaires, audits and analysis of routinely collected healthcare data) and more commonly qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews, focus groups and observations). The use of multiple sources of data (data triangulation) has been advocated as a way of increasing the internal validity of a study (i.e. the extent to which the method is appropriate to answer the research question)[ 8 , 18 – 21 ]. An underlying assumption is that data collected in different ways should lead to similar conclusions, and approaching the same issue from different angles can help develop a holistic picture of the phenomenon (Table 2 )[ 4 ].

Brazier and colleagues used a mixed-methods case study approach to investigate the impact of a cancer care programme[ 22 ]. Here, quantitative measures were collected with questionnaires before, and five months after, the start of the intervention which did not yield any statistically significant results. Qualitative interviews with patients however helped provide an insight into potentially beneficial process-related aspects of the programme, such as greater, perceived patient involvement in care. The authors reported how this case study approach provided a number of contextual factors likely to influence the effectiveness of the intervention and which were not likely to have been obtained from quantitative methods alone.

In collective or multiple case studies, data collection needs to be flexible enough to allow a detailed description of each individual case to be developed (e.g. the nature of different cancer care programmes), before considering the emerging similarities and differences in cross-case comparisons (e.g. to explore why one programme is more effective than another). It is important that data sources from different cases are, where possible, broadly comparable for this purpose even though they may vary in nature and depth.

Analysing, interpreting and reporting case studies

Making sense and offering a coherent interpretation of the typically disparate sources of data (whether qualitative alone or together with quantitative) is far from straightforward. Repeated reviewing and sorting of the voluminous and detail-rich data are integral to the process of analysis. In collective case studies, it is helpful to analyse data relating to the individual component cases first, before making comparisons across cases. Attention needs to be paid to variations within each case and, where relevant, the relationship between different causes, effects and outcomes[ 23 ]. Data will need to be organised and coded to allow the key issues, both derived from the literature and emerging from the dataset, to be easily retrieved at a later stage. An initial coding frame can help capture these issues and can be applied systematically to the whole dataset with the aid of a qualitative data analysis software package.

The Framework approach is a practical approach, comprising of five stages (familiarisation; identifying a thematic framework; indexing; charting; mapping and interpretation) , to managing and analysing large datasets particularly if time is limited, as was the case in our study of recruitment of South Asians into asthma research (Table 1 )[ 3 , 24 ]. Theoretical frameworks may also play an important role in integrating different sources of data and examining emerging themes. For example, we drew on a socio-technical framework to help explain the connections between different elements - technology; people; and the organisational settings within which they worked - in our study of the introduction of electronic health record systems (Table 3 )[ 5 ]. Our study of patient safety in undergraduate curricula drew on an evaluation-based approach to design and analysis, which emphasised the importance of the academic, organisational and practice contexts through which students learn (Table 4 )[ 6 ].

Case study findings can have implications both for theory development and theory testing. They may establish, strengthen or weaken historical explanations of a case and, in certain circumstances, allow theoretical (as opposed to statistical) generalisation beyond the particular cases studied[ 12 ]. These theoretical lenses should not, however, constitute a strait-jacket and the cases should not be "forced to fit" the particular theoretical framework that is being employed.

When reporting findings, it is important to provide the reader with enough contextual information to understand the processes that were followed and how the conclusions were reached. In a collective case study, researchers may choose to present the findings from individual cases separately before amalgamating across cases. Care must be taken to ensure the anonymity of both case sites and individual participants (if agreed in advance) by allocating appropriate codes or withholding descriptors. In the example given in Table 3 , we decided against providing detailed information on the NHS sites and individual participants in order to avoid the risk of inadvertent disclosure of identities[ 5 , 25 ].

What are the potential pitfalls and how can these be avoided?

The case study approach is, as with all research, not without its limitations. When investigating the formal and informal ways undergraduate students learn about patient safety (Table 4 ), for example, we rapidly accumulated a large quantity of data. The volume of data, together with the time restrictions in place, impacted on the depth of analysis that was possible within the available resources. This highlights a more general point of the importance of avoiding the temptation to collect as much data as possible; adequate time also needs to be set aside for data analysis and interpretation of what are often highly complex datasets.

Case study research has sometimes been criticised for lacking scientific rigour and providing little basis for generalisation (i.e. producing findings that may be transferable to other settings)[ 1 ]. There are several ways to address these concerns, including: the use of theoretical sampling (i.e. drawing on a particular conceptual framework); respondent validation (i.e. participants checking emerging findings and the researcher's interpretation, and providing an opinion as to whether they feel these are accurate); and transparency throughout the research process (see Table 8 )[ 8 , 18 – 21 , 23 , 26 ]. Transparency can be achieved by describing in detail the steps involved in case selection, data collection, the reasons for the particular methods chosen, and the researcher's background and level of involvement (i.e. being explicit about how the researcher has influenced data collection and interpretation). Seeking potential, alternative explanations, and being explicit about how interpretations and conclusions were reached, help readers to judge the trustworthiness of the case study report. Stake provides a critique checklist for a case study report (Table 9 )[ 8 ].

Conclusions

The case study approach allows, amongst other things, critical events, interventions, policy developments and programme-based service reforms to be studied in detail in a real-life context. It should therefore be considered when an experimental design is either inappropriate to answer the research questions posed or impossible to undertake. Considering the frequency with which implementations of innovations are now taking place in healthcare settings and how well the case study approach lends itself to in-depth, complex health service research, we believe this approach should be more widely considered by researchers. Though inherently challenging, the research case study can, if carefully conceptualised and thoughtfully undertaken and reported, yield powerful insights into many important aspects of health and healthcare delivery.

Yin RK: Case study research, design and method. 2009, London: Sage Publications Ltd., 4

Google Scholar  

Keen J, Packwood T: Qualitative research; case study evaluation. BMJ. 1995, 311: 444-446.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Sheikh A, Halani L, Bhopal R, Netuveli G, Partridge M, Car J, et al: Facilitating the Recruitment of Minority Ethnic People into Research: Qualitative Case Study of South Asians and Asthma. PLoS Med. 2009, 6 (10): 1-11.

Article   Google Scholar  

Pinnock H, Huby G, Powell A, Kielmann T, Price D, Williams S, et al: The process of planning, development and implementation of a General Practitioner with a Special Interest service in Primary Care Organisations in England and Wales: a comparative prospective case study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). 2008, [ http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/99-final-report.pdf ]

Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T, et al: Prospective evaluation of the implementation and adoption of NHS Connecting for Health's national electronic health record in secondary care in England: interim findings. BMJ. 2010, 41: c4564-

Pearson P, Steven A, Howe A, Sheikh A, Ashcroft D, Smith P, the Patient Safety Education Study Group: Learning about patient safety: organisational context and culture in the education of healthcare professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010, 15: 4-10. 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

van Harten WH, Casparie TF, Fisscher OA: The evaluation of the introduction of a quality management system: a process-oriented case study in a large rehabilitation hospital. Health Policy. 2002, 60 (1): 17-37. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00187-7.

Stake RE: The art of case study research. 1995, London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Sheikh A, Smeeth L, Ashcroft R: Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. Br J Gen Pract. 2002, 52 (482): 746-51.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

King G, Keohane R, Verba S: Designing Social Inquiry. 1996, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Doolin B: Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretative research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology. 1998, 13: 301-311. 10.1057/jit.1998.8.

George AL, Bennett A: Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. 2005, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Eccles M, the Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG): Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 2006, 1: 1-8. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.

Article   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Netuveli G, Hurwitz B, Levy M, Fletcher M, Barnes G, Durham SR, Sheikh A: Ethnic variations in UK asthma frequency, morbidity, and health-service use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9456): 312-7.

Sheikh A, Panesar SS, Lasserson T, Netuveli G: Recruitment of ethnic minorities to asthma studies. Thorax. 2004, 59 (7): 634-

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hellström I, Nolan M, Lundh U: 'We do things together': A case study of 'couplehood' in dementia. Dementia. 2005, 4: 7-22. 10.1177/1471301205049188.

Som CV: Nothing seems to have changed, nothing seems to be changing and perhaps nothing will change in the NHS: doctors' response to clinical governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005, 18: 463-477. 10.1108/09513550510608903.

Lincoln Y, Guba E: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Newbury Park: Sage Publications

Barbour RS: Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001, 322: 1115-1117. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.

Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000, 320: 50-52. 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.

Mason J: Qualitative researching. 2002, London: Sage

Brazier A, Cooke K, Moravan V: Using Mixed Methods for Evaluating an Integrative Approach to Cancer Care: A Case Study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 5-17. 10.1177/1534735407313395.

Miles MB, Huberman M: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 1994, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative research in health care. BMJ. 2000, 320: 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.

Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A: Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10 (1): 67-10.1186/1472-6947-10-67.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001, 358: 483-488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Yin R: Case study research: design and methods. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 2

Yin R: Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999, 34: 1209-1224.

Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. 2009, Los Angeles: Sage, 2

Howcroft D, Trauth E: Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research, Theory and Application. 2005, Cheltenham, UK: Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar

Book   Google Scholar  

Blakie N: Approaches to Social Enquiry. 1993, Cambridge: Polity Press

Doolin B: Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Info Systems J. 2004, 14: 343-362. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00176.x.

Bloomfield BP, Best A: Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems. Sociological Review. 1992, 40: 533-560.

Shanks G, Parr A: Positivist, single case study research in information systems: A critical analysis. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. 2003, Naples

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants and colleagues who contributed to the individual case studies that we have drawn on. This work received no direct funding, but it has been informed by projects funded by Asthma UK, the NHS Service Delivery Organisation, NHS Connecting for Health Evaluation Programme, and Patient Safety Research Portfolio. We would also like to thank the expert reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Allison Worth who commented on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Division of Primary Care, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Sarah Crowe & Anthony Avery

Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Kathrin Cresswell, Ann Robertson & Aziz Sheikh

School of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Crowe .

Additional information

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AS conceived this article. SC, KC and AR wrote this paper with GH, AA and AS all commenting on various drafts. SC and AS are guarantors.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A. et al. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 11 , 100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Download citation

Received : 29 November 2010

Accepted : 27 June 2011

Published : 27 June 2011

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Case Study Approach
• Electronic Health Record System
• Case Study Design
• Case Study Site
• Case Study Report

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

A Case Series of Concomitant Falls and COVID-19 Infection Among Older Adults

Falls and covid-19 among older adults.

• Marisa-Nicole Zayat, M.D. Department of Population Health, The University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita
• Micah Vander Griend, MPH, MS-4 Department of Population Health, The University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita
• Nathan Flescher, M.D. Department of Population Health, The University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita
• Kelly Lightwine, MPH Department of Trauma Services, Ascension Via Christi Hospital Saint Francis
• Hayrettin Okut, Ph.D. Department of Population Health, The University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita
• Elizabeth Ablah, Ph.D., MPH, CPH Department of Population Health, The University of Kansas School of Medicine – Wichita
• James M. Haan, M.D. Ascension Via Christi St. Francis

Introduction.  Few studies have examined the hospital course and patient outcomes among elderly trauma patients with COVID-19 and traumatic fall-related injuries. This study aimed to describe patient characteristics and hospital outcomes for older adults who sustained fall-related injuries and were concurrently infected with COVID-19.

Methods.   A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients 65 years or older admitted to a level 1 trauma center between March 3, 2020 and March 3, 2021 with fall-related injuries.

Results. Of the 807 patients who presented for fall-related injuries during the study timeframe, 16% (n=128) were tested for COVID-19, with 17% (n=22) testing positive. One patient was excluded, resulting in 21 patients included for analysis. Common presenting comorbidities were hypertension (86%, n=18), dyslipidemia (57%, n=12), or diabetes (43%, n=9). On admission, 62% (n=13) of patients had respiratory symptoms such as cough, shortness of breath, and hypoxemia. Approximately one-fourth (n=5) of patients were asymptomatic for COVID-19 on presentation. Most overall complications included unplanned intensive care unit or operating room visits (29%, n=6). COVID-19-related complications included acute hypoxic respiratory failure (67%, n=14) and pneumonia (43%, n=9). Nineteen percent of patients (n=4) patients died in hospital.

Conclusions. Study findings suggest that elderly fall patients admitted with COVID-19 experienced a high frequency of complications and in-hospital mortality. Therefore, it is important to recognize COVID-19 as a severe and potentially lethal comorbidity among older adults who experience fall-related injuries.

Copyright (c) 2024 Marisa-Nicole Zayat, M.D., Micah Vander Griend, MPH, MS-4, Nathan Flescher, M.D., Kelly Lightwine, MPH, Hayrettin Okut, Ph.D., Elizabeth Ablah, Ph.D., MPH, CPH, James M. Haan, M.D.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .

All articles in the Kansas Journal of Medicine are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) . 

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Make a Submission

Information.

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Vol. 17 Supplement 2: Abstracts from the 2024 KUMC Student Research Forum

"Lightning Outside Waverly, KS,"   June 2000 Photo courtesy of Michael Kenned y, MD

Online ISSN: 1948-2035

This journal is supported by the University of Kansas Libraries .

IEEE Account

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.