Content above adapted from Purdue Owl , Scribbr, and APA Style Manual, 7th ed. Instructional Aids
For complete details on updates to APA style in the 7th edition, see this page.
APA Citation Style does not have a separate category for government publications. According to APA, government documents can be considered Books, Technical/Research Reports or Brochures.
Helpful Tips:
Group Authors
Group authors are often government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and task forces. Follow these guidelines to format the names of group authors in the reference list.
Apa (american psychological association) style, nlm (national library of medicine style), general citation guides.
Proper citation is an essential aspect of scholarship. Citing properly allows your reader or audience to locate the materials you have used. Most importantly, citations give credit to the authors of quoted or consulted information. Failure to acknowledge sources of information properly may constitute plagiarism. For an explicit definition of plagiarism, see the Boston University Academic Conduct Code .
For detailed instructions on how to cite within the text of your paper, please consult a style manual listed in this guide. Please also note: some of the resources listed do not cover every possibility you might encounter when trying to cite your sources. For this reason, it is suggested that you consult a style manual to create your bibliography.
Finally, please also see our separate citation guides for Business students or for Science students .
The official style manual for the National Library of Medicine (NLM), and suggested when citing documents from the associated databases MedLine and PubMed. The online edition supercedes the print edition as the most up to date.
See also.....
The authors of the 7th edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2020) advise writers to:
For more detailed information, please see Publication manual of the American Psychological Association : the official guide to APA style . (Seventh edition.). (2020). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Chapters 8-10.
This guide provides templates as well as examples for citing different types of sources in APA . Use the tabs at the top of this guide to find general guidance and examples for:
A one-hour step-by-step tutorial in citation from APA . The annotated handouts are available here.
Introduction to Citation Styles: APA 7 th , by CSUDH University Library, is licensed under CC BY.
Reference management. Clean and simple.
This is a short guide how to format citations and the bibliography in a manuscript for Biology. For a complete guide how to prepare your manuscript refer to the journal's instructions to authors .
Typically you don't format your citations and bibliography by hand. The easiest way is to use a reference manager:
The citation style is built in and you can choose it in Settings > Citation Style or Paperpile > Citation Style in Google Docs. | |
Find the style here: | |
, and others | The style is either built in or you can download a that is supported by most references management programs. |
BibTeX syles are usually part of a LaTeX template. Check the if the publisher offers a LaTeX template for this journal. |
Those examples are references to articles in scholarly journals and how they are supposed to appear in your bibliography.
Not all journals organize their published articles in volumes and issues, so these fields are optional. Some electronic journals do not provide a page range, but instead list an article identifier. In a case like this it's safe to use the article identifier instead of the page range.
Here are examples of references for authored and edited books as well as book chapters.
Sometimes references to web sites should appear directly in the text rather than in the bibliography. Refer to the Instructions to authors for Biology .
This example shows the general structure used for government reports, technical reports, and scientific reports. If you can't locate the report number then it might be better to cite the report as a book. For reports it is usually not individual people that are credited as authors, but a governmental department or agency like "U. S. Food and Drug Administration" or "National Cancer Institute".
Theses including Ph.D. dissertations, Master's theses or Bachelor theses follow the basic format outlined below.
Unlike scholarly journals, news papers do not usually have a volume and issue number. Instead, the full date and page number is required for a correct reference.
References should be cited in the text by sequential numbers in square brackets :
Full journal title | Biology |
---|---|
Abbreviation | Biology (Basel) |
ISSN (online) | 2079-7737 |
Scope |
Don't forget to cite your sources for any data, graphics, or illustrations you include in your presentation.
Need to pull together your references for a paper or presentation? Click HERE for a detailed guide to using RefWorks.
Tcnj department of biology research paper style manual.
"This Style Manual is intended to provide formatting instructions, as well as appropriate content and organization, for each part of the research paper and is to be used as the standard throughout the entire four-year Biology Curriculum."
Some style guide options created outside TCNJ and widely used in scholarly publications:
Journal websites usually have a page called something like "Instructions for Authors." Your professor may suggest that you follow the style used by a particular journal. For example:
RefWorks is a web-based program that allows you to easily collect, manage, and organize bibliographic citations by interfacing with databases. RefWorks also operates directly with MS Word, making it easy to import citations and incorporate them into your writing as properly formatted footnotes or parenthetical citations according to the style of your choice.
NOTE: The RefWorks providers themselves urge you to examine your citations carefully to make sure they are correctly imported and formatted. To do this, you may need to consult the official style guide for whichever citation style your course requires.
Zotero is a free and open-source software that also allows you to collect and organize bibliographic citations. Like RefWorks, it also allows you to create citations and bibliographies in a number of styles. Zotero has a couple of specific advantages that set it apart from paid products like RefWorks and EndNote:
Although it does have a web version, to work best, Zotero needs to be downloaded onto your computer. To get started, visit Zotero's website here. Then use these resources to help get your Zotero up and running:
Some databases and journals will include references in a citation style using abbreviated journal titles the meanings of which may be ambiguous, e.g., Clin Eff Nurs or Nurs Health Sci .
To confirm the complete, correct journal title and obtain an ISSN (International Standard Serial Number), look up the abbreviation in:
If you cannot confirm a correct journal title yourself, rather than submit an incorrect title, try:
We want to hear from you! Fill out the Library's User Survey and enter to win.
Tutorials and e-modules | |
---|---|
Work through this e-module at your own pace. |
You must cite the source of an image used in a paper, lab report, presentation or seminar. When citing an image in the body of your paper, cite it in one of two ways:
Credit the source at the end of the image caption:
“Reproduced with permission from (a) H.E. Hoekstra and (c) J.L. Feder.”
“Reproduced from Thakur et al. (2008a) with permission (originally published in Nature, http://www.nature.com).”
Credit images found on the Internet as follows:
Figure 2 . “Water lily [Nymphaeaceae] blooming in Saint Petersburg’s Botanical Gardens, September 2005,” by A. L. Olsen. Retrieved from the NBII (National Biological Information Infrastructure) Digital Image Library website, maintained by the Center for Biological Informatics of the U.S. Geological Survey, http://life.nbii.gov/dml/mediadetail.do?id=2995
Sample citation for YouTube video:
Sample citation for YouTube channel:
JoVE video with no author listed:
Jove video with author listed:
The date noted should be the date that the video was uploaded.
My thanks to Liaison Librarian, Rebecca Hutchinson, for providing so much of the content for this page: https://subjectguides.uwaterloo.ca/WATPD/home
Research guides by subject
Course reserves
My library account
Book a study room
News and events
Work for the library
Support the library
We want to hear from you. You're viewing the newest version of the Library's website. Please send us your feedback !
Biol 160 - general biology (harper): apa 6 style.
Any time your work contains or refers to someone else's ideas, words, images, media, or sounds you need to include a citation.
1. In-text citations should be inserted at the point of use in your assignment and indicate that the information you just presented came from a source other than your own brain or common knowledge.
2. A Works Cited or References section should be included at the end of your assignment.
3. In Works Cited / References , list all the works you referred to with in-text citations in the body of your assignment.
4. There are many citation styles, each with it's own precise formatting. The most popular at Clark are MLA and APA .
According to the APA as of March 2017 , any of the following formats for digital object identifiers (doi) are correct APA style:
Guides from Clark College Libraries and other sources:
Here is a short step-by-step video of the directions below.
My Research Paper Student A. Body Clark College
If you have any questions about citations or plagiarism that are not answered on these pages, be sure to ask for clarification from:
Get help any time! Call, email, 24/7 chat. Library open hours.
If you include a graph, table, chart, or image that is not your own in the body of your text or on a presentation slide, use the following citation underneath it:
[Your Image Here]
|
Figure 1. Description, if needed. Adapted from "Title of Article or Webpage," by Author(s), Year, Title of Journal or Website , Volume, page number, retrieved from URL. Copyright Year by Copyright Holder.
See here and here for specific examples. Also see pages 150-167 of the APA Manual and this APA Style Blog post .
You should also include a full reference citation at the end of your paper or presentation.
facebook twitter blog youtube maps
Biol 110: biology: basic concepts and biodiversity.
Citing web pages in text, general guidelines, works by multiple authors.
Include an in-text citation when you refer to, summarize, paraphrase, or quote from another source. For every in-text citation in your paper, there must be a corresponding entry in your reference list.
APA in-text citation style uses the author's last name and the year of publication, for example: (Field, 2005). For direct quotations, include the page number as well, for example: (Field, 2005, p. 14). For sources such as websites and e-books that have no page numbers , use a paragraph number, for example: (Field, 2005, para. 1). More information on direct quotation of sources without pagination is given on the APA Style and Grammar Guidelines web page.
Example paragraph with in-text citation
A few researchers in the linguistics field have developed training programs designed to improve native speakers' ability to understand accented speech (Derwing et al., 2002; Thomas, 2004). Their training techniques are based on the research described above indicating that comprehension improves with exposure to non-native speech. Derwing et al. (2002) conducted their training with students preparing to be social workers, but note that other professionals who work with non-native speakers could benefit from a similar program.
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., & Munro, M. J. (2002). Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development , 23 (4), 245-259.
Thomas, H. K. (2004). Training strategies for improving listeners' comprehension of foreign-accented speech (Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder.
Cite web pages in text as you would any other source, using the author and date if known. Keep in mind that the author may be an organization rather than a person. For sources with no author, use the title in place of an author.
For sources with no date use n.d. (for no date) in place of the year: (Smith, n.d.). For more information on citations for sources with no date or other missing information see the page on missing reference information on the APA Style and Grammar Guidelines web page.
Below are examples of using in-text citation with web pages.
Web page with author:
In-text citation
Heavy social media use can be linked to depression and other mental disorders in teens (Asmelash, 2019).
Reference entry
Asmelash, L. (2019, August 14). Social media use may harm teens' mental health by disrupting positive activities, study says . CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/13/health/social-media-mental-health-trnd/index.html
Web page with organizational author:
More than 300 million people worldwide are affected by depression (World Health Organization, 2018).
World Health Organization. (2018, March 22). Depression . https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
Web page with no date:
Establishing regular routines, such as exercise, can help survivors of disasters recover from trauma (American Psychological Association [APA], n.d.).
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Recovering emotionally from disaste r. http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/recovering-disasters.aspx
In-text references should immediately follow the title, word, or phrase to which they are directly relevant, rather than appearing at the end of long clauses or sentences. In-text references should always precede punctuation marks. Below are examples of using in-text citation.
Author's name in parentheses:
One study found that the most important element in comprehending non-native speech is familiarity with the topic (Gass & Varonis, 1984).
Author's name part of narrative:
Gass and Varonis (1984) found that the most important element in comprehending non-native speech is familiarity with the topic.
Group as author: First citation: (American Psychological Association [APA], 2015) Subsequent citation: (APA, 2015)
Multiple works: (separate each work with semi-colons)
Research shows that listening to a particular accent improves comprehension of accented speech in general (Gass & Varonis, 1984; Krech Thomas, 2004).
Direct quote: (include page number and place quotation marks around the direct quote)
One study found that “the listener's familiarity with the topic of discourse greatly facilitates the interpretation of the entire message” (Gass & Varonis, 1984, p. 85).
Gass and Varonis (1984) found that “the listener’s familiarity with the topic of discourse greatly facilitates the interpretation of the entire message” (p. 85).
Note: For direct quotations of more than 40 words , display the quote as an indented block of text without quotation marks and include the authors’ names, year, and page number in parentheses at the end of the quote. For example:
This suggests that familiarity with nonnative speech in general, although it is clearly not as important a variable as topic familiarity, may indeed have some effect. That is, prior experience with nonnative speech, such as that gained by listening to the reading, facilitates comprehension. (Gass & Varonis, 1984, p. 77)
APA style has specific rules for citing works by multiple authors. Use the following guidelines to determine how to correctly cite works by multiple authors in text. For more information on citing works by multiple authors see the APA Style and Grammar Guidelines page on in-text citation .
Note: When using multiple authors' names as part of your narrative, rather than in parentheses, always spell out the word and. For multiple authors' names within a parenthetic citation, use &.
One author: (Field, 2005)
Two authors: (Gass & Varonis, 1984)
Three or more authors: (Tremblay et al., 2010)
There are many different citation styles that are used for research papers. There is no standard citation style for biology, however, in this guide we will focus on the Name-Year style from The Council of Science Editors (CSE). The CSE style is designed for the general sciences, including biology.
Ask your advisor or professor about the citation style they prefer. Regardless of the style, apply it consistently throughout your paper and make sure to proofread it the same way you would proofread the rest of your paper.
Here are some guides covering the CSE style:
Citation examples based on the References chapter from the 7th Edition of Scientific Style and Format (CSE 2006).
End Reference: Raoult D, Audic S, Robert C, Abergel C, Renesto P, Ogata H, La Scola B, Suzan M, Claverie JM. 2004. The 1.2-megabase genome sequence of Mimivirus. Science . 306(5700):1344–1350.
In-text reference: (Raoult et al. 2004)
End Reference: Pound P, Bracken MB. 2014. Is animal research sufficiently evidence based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research? BMJ [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jun 25]; 348:g3387. Available from http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3387 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3387
In-text reference: (Pound and Bracken 2014)
End Reference: Johnson G. 2013. Don't ever whisper: Darlene Keju, Pacific health pioneer, champion for nuclear survivors . [Lexington (KY)]: [Giff Johnson].
In-text reference: (Johnson 2013)
End Reference: de Silva K. 2009. Ka Mākālei a Kawainui. In: Kailua Historical Society. Kailua: in the wisps of the Malanai breeze . Kailua (Oʻahu): Kailua Historical Society. p. 50-53, 133-137, 161-165, 261-265.
In-text reference: (de Silva 2009)
End Reference: Perez K 3rd. 2013. Ecological evaluation of coral reef resources at Kahaluʻu bay, Hawaiʻi. [dissertation]. [Honolulu]: University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
In-text reference: (Perez 2013)
[CSE] Council of Science Editors, Style Manual Committee. 2006. Scientific style and format: the CSE manual for authors, editors, and publishers. 7th ed. Reston (VA): Council of Science Editors. Chapter 29, References; p. 490-575.
An equal opportunity/affirmative action institution . Use of this site implies consent with our Usage Policy .
Terms of Use | UH System | UH Mānoa
2550 McCarthy Mall Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 USA 808-956-7214 (Reference) 808-956-7203 (Circulation)
Library Digital Collections Disclaimer and Copyright information
© University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Library
Find resources to help with MLA or APA citations. If you need more help, check out our citation guide or contact the library .
One of the most frequently used style manuals for citing sources is the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers , which is published by the Modern Language Association.
The most recent edition, the eighth edition, was published in 2016. Copies of this edition are found in the Ready Reference section of the Library. The call number is Ready Reference LB 2369 .G53 2016 . Listed below are examples of sample citations.
Works Cited Page: General Rules
Here are some general rules on how to format your Works Cited page:
The works cited page appears at the end of your paper
Each cited source must be on the works cited page and each entry on the works cited page must be cited in the text of your paper
Begin the works cited page on a new page
Number each page, continuing the page numbers of the paper
Label the page "Works Cited"; centered at the top
Double-space all the text on the page
Indent one-half inch from the left margin all the lines after the first line (hanging indentation)
Capitalize each word in titles of articles, books, etc, do not capitalize article, prepositions or conjunctions
Italicize titles of larger works and quotation marks for titles of shorter works
Invert the authors' names; give the last name first, then the first name
Alphabetize the entries by the last name of the author of each work
Please note: These are basic guidelines, for more detailed information, consult the MLA Manual. You can view a sample MLA paper at the OWL at Purdue website. (Refer to page 12 for an example of a Works Cited page).
MLA 8th Edition: Guiding Principles
In the 7th edition of the Handbook, a separate set of citation instructions were given for each format type. The problem with this approach is that there is no way to anticipate all format types a student may encounter.
To solve this problem, this new edition of the MLA Handbook provides a "universal set of guidelines" for citing sources across all format types.
These guidelines state that, if given, these major elements should be included in the citation:
1. Author. 2. Title of Source 3. Title of Container 4. Other Contributors 5. Version 6. Number 7. Publisher 8. Publication date 9. Location
Sometimes, elements 3-9 will repeat again, if say, your journal was inside a database.
Putting it all together:
Goldman, Anne. "Questions of Transport: Reading Primo Levi Reading Dante." The Georgia Review , vol.64, no. 1, 2010, pp.69- 88. JSTOR , www.jstor.org/stable/41403188 .
Major Changes in the 8th Edition
1. vol. and no. are now spelled out.
Instead of 32.3; it's: vol. 32, no. 3
2. Place of publication is omitted.
3. Page numbers are designated with pp.
4. Date of access is omitted.
5. Medium of publication is omitted.
A Journal Article Retrieved from a Database
A source in two containers -
1. Author: Lorensen, Jutta. 2. Title of source: "Between Image and Word, Color, and Time: Jacob Lawrence's The Migration Series ." Container 1
Source: Works Cited: A Quick Guide
Works Cited entries: Format Examples
The discipline of English, as well as many other disciplines in the humanities, use MLA citation format. Below are some examples for formatting the Works Cited page. Look in the drop-down menu for examples of in-text citations.
Book, | Garcia Marquez, Gabriel. Vintage, 1988. |
Book, | Casell, Kay Ann and Uma Hiremath. Neal-Schuman, 2004. (NOTE: Authors should be listed in the order they are listed on the title page.) |
Book, | Robbins, Chandler S., et al. Golden, 1966. |
Book, | Homer. . Translated by Robert Fagles, Viking, 1996. Here are other common descriptions: Adapted by, Directed by, Edited by, Illustrated by, Introduction by, Narrated by, Performance by. |
A work (e.g., essay, short story) in an anthology or compilation. | Kimball, Jean. "Growing Up Together: Joyce and Psychoanalysis, 1900-1922." edited by Michael Patrick Gillespie, UP of Florida, 1999, pp. 25-45. |
Book, | Blamires, Harry. . 3rd ed., Routledge, 1996. |
Article in an Online Database | Hannah, Daniel K. "The Private Life, the Public Stage: Henry James in Recent Fiction." , vol.30, no. 3, 2007, pp. 70-94. , www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.uwf.edu/stable/30053134. Note: When including a URL, omit the http:// and https:// |
Article in Print Journal | Hannah, Daniel K. "The Private Life, the Public Stage: Henry James in Recent Fiction." , vol.30, no.3, 2007, pp. 70-94. |
Article (Web Page) on a Web Site | Farkas, Meredith. "Tips for Being a Great Blogger (and a Good Person)." , 19 July 2011, meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2011/07/19/tips-for-being-a-great-blogger-and-good-person/. Note: When including a URL, omit the http:// and https:// |
Website (Whole site) | Farkas, Meredith. . Jun. 2015, meredith.wolfwater.com. |
Some parts of this page were adapted from the Citing Sources (Citation Styles) L ibGuide created by Britt McGowan, Reference & Instruction Librarian at the University of West Florida.
The American Psychological Association publishes the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association as its style manual for the social sciences disciplines. It is also used by other disciplines as a handbook for authorship of papers.
The most recent edition, the seventh edition, was published in 2020. This edition can be found in the Ready Reference section of the Library at the Reference Desk on the first floor. The call number is Ready Reference BF 76.7 P83 2020 . Listed below are examples of sample citations.
APA Formating Rules
Here are some general rules on how to format your paper:
How do I create a citation?
A proper citation must include all of the elements in the example below when they are available.
Reference Page: General Rules
Here are some general rules on how to format your references page:
Please note : These are basic guidelines, for more detailed information, consult the APA Manual. You can view a sample APA paper at the OWL at Purdue website. (Refer to page 9 for an example of a reference page).
What’s Changed?
The newest version of the publication manual: the 7th edition was officially released in October 2019. Students : you should always check with your professor whether they’re expecting the 7th edition or the 6th edition.
Source: Elias, Daniel. “ APA Style 7th Edition: What's Changed? ” MyBib , MyBib, 14 Sept. 2019.
The following links provide more information on how to cite using MLA or APA
Citation Help
Use these websites to help you create citations.
Use the resources below to cite your articles and books for the BIOL190L Research Paper. These style guides and eBooks offered by the CSN Libraries will assist in avoiding plagiarism, help you in learning correct APA style, and provide examples of properly formatted APA papers.
This is the citationsy guide to biology citations, reference lists, in-text citations, and bibliographies. the complete, comprehensive guide shows you how easy citing any source can be. referencing books, youtube videos, websites, articles, journals, podcasts, images, videos, or music in biology..
How to reference a journal article in the biology citation style, how do you cite scientific papers in biology format, how to cite a website in a paper in biology style, how to cite a youtube video biology in 2024, how to cite a podcast using biology referencing style, how to cite a piece of music or a song using biology referencing style.
Citing sources and creating a Bibliography/Works Cited List:
pla·gia·rism (noun)
The practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. Synonyms - copying, infringement of copyright, piracy, theft, stealing. Informal - cribbing "accusations of plagiarism." Source: Google Definition
Plagiarism can be intentional or unintentional.
MLA (Modern Language Association) style specifies guidelines for formatting papers. MLA style also provides a system for referencing sources through parenthetical citations in essays and Works Cited pages.
APA format is the official style of the American Psychological Association (APA) and is commonly used to cite sources in psychology, education, and the social sciences. Most importantly, the use of APA style can protect writers from accusations of plagiarism, which is the purposeful or accidental uncredited use of material by other authors .
The Chicago Manual of Style sets the standard for scholarly publishing in the Humanities. Chicago offers two citation formats, the author-date reference format and the standard bibliographic format, each of which provides conventions for organizing footnotes or endnotes, as well as bibliographic citations. Most importantly, the use of the Chicago style can protect writers from accusations of plagiarism, which is the purposeful or accidental uncredited use of material by other authors .
Bainbridge State College. "Plagiarism: How to Avoid It." YouTube . YouTube, 5 Jan. 2010. Web. 19 Oct. 2014.
A transcript is in process for this video. If you need assistance, please contact the Reference Librarian at [email protected].
https://blog.writersdomain.net/2014/06/17/this-aint-your-high-school-english-class-why-plagiarism-is-a-big-deal/
MLA Documentation Overview
MLA Sample Paper
Don't let plagiarism errors spoil your paper, consider your source's credibility. ask these questions:, contributor/author.
Filled with a wide variety of examples and visuals, our Citation Machine® MLA guide will help you master the citation process. Learn how to cite websites, books, journal articles, magazines, newspapers, films, social media, and more!
MLA Citation Generator | Website | Books | Journal Articles | YouTube | Images | Movies | Interview | PDFs
Our Citation Machine® APA guide is a one-stop shop for learning how to cite in APA format. Read up on what APA is, or use our citing tools and APA examples to create citations for websites, books, journals, and more!
APA Citation Generator | Website | Books | Journal Articles | YouTube | Images | Movies | Interview | PDFs
Creating citations in Chicago style has never been easier thanks to our extensive Citation Machine® Chicago style guide and tools. Learn about footnotes, endnotes, and everything in between, or easily create citations for websites, books, journal articles, and more!
Chicago Citation Generator | Website | Books | Journal Articles | YouTube | Images | Movies | Interview | PDFs
Whether you’re a student, writer, foreign language learner, or simply looking to brush up on your grammar skills, our comprehensive grammar guides provide an extensive overview on over 50 grammar-related topics. Confused about reflexive verbs, demonstrative adjectives, or conjunctive adverbs? Look no further! Learn about these grammar topics and many, many more in our thorough and easy to understand reference guides!
Citing Sources Guide | Grammar Guide | Plagiarism Guide | Writing Tips
Stay up to date! Get research tips and citation information or just enjoy some fun posts from our student blog.
Loading metrics
Open Access
Community Page
The Community Page is a forum for organizations and societies to highlight their efforts to enhance the dissemination and value of scientific knowledge.
See all article types »
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation Departments of Medicine, Health Research and Policy, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
Affiliation Research Intelligence, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Affiliation SciTech Strategies, Inc., Wayne, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Affiliation SciTech Strategies, Inc., Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America
Published: August 12, 2019
Citation metrics are widely used and misused. We have created a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator. Separate data are shown for career-long and single-year impact. Metrics with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are given. Scientists are classified into 22 scientific fields and 176 subfields. Field- and subfield-specific percentiles are also provided for all scientists who have published at least five papers. Career-long data are updated to end of 2017 and to end of 2018 for comparison.
Citation: Ioannidis JPA, Baas J, Klavans R, Boyack KW (2019) A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biol 17(8): e3000384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384
Copyright: © 2019 Ioannidis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) has been funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation (funding to JPAI). The work of JPAI is also funded by an unrestricted gift from Sue and Bob O’Donnell. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. JPAI is a member of the editorial board of PLoS Biology. Jeroen Baas is an Elsevier employee. Elsevier runs Scopus, which is the source of this data, and also runs Mendeley Data where the database is now stored.
Provenance: peer reviewed, not commissioned.
Use of citation metrics has become widespread but is fraught with difficulties. Some challenges relate to what citations and related metrics fundamentally mean and how they can be interpreted or misinterpreted as a measure of impact or excellence [ 1 ]. Many other problems are of a technical nature and reflect lack of standardization and accuracy on various fronts. Several different citation databases exist, many metrics are available, users mine them in different ways, self-reported data in curriculum vitae documents are often inaccurate and not professionally calculated, handling of self-citations is erratic, and comparisons between scientific fields with different citation densities are tenuous. To our knowledge, there is no large-scale database that systematically ranks all the most-cited scientists in each and every scientific field to a sufficient ranking depth; e.g., Google Scholar allows scientists to create their profiles and share them in public, but not all researchers have created a profile. Clarivate Analytics provides every year a list of the most-cited scientists of the last decade, but the scheme uses a coarse classification of science in only 21 fields, and even the latest, expanded listing includes only about 6,000 scientists ( https://hcr.clarivate.com/worlds-influential-scientific-minds ), i.e., less than 0.1% of the total number of people coauthoring scholarly papers. Moreover, self-citations are not excluded in these existing rankings.
We have tried to offer a solution to overcome many of the technical problems and provide a comprehensive database of a sufficiently large number of most-cited scientists across science. Here, we used Scopus data to compile a database of the 100,000 most-cited authors across all scientific fields based on their ranking of a composite indicator that considers six citation metrics (total citations; Hirsch h-index; coauthorship-adjusted Schreiber hm-index; number of citations to papers as single author; number of citations to papers as single or first author; and number of citations to papers as single, first, or last author) [ 2 ].
The methodology behind the composite indicator has been already extensively described along with its strengths and residual caveats in [ 2 ]. We offer two versions of the database. One version (supplementary Table S1, http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-ad4249ac-f76f-4653-9e42-2dfebe5d9b01 ) is calculated using Scopus citation data over 22 years (from January 1, 1996 until December 31, 2017; complete data for 2018 will not be available until later in 2019). For papers published from 1960 until 1995, the citations received in 1996–2017 are also included in the calculations, but the citations received up to 1995 are not. Therefore, this version provides a measure of long-term performance, and for most living, active scientists, this also reflects their career-long impact or is a very good approximation thereof. In order to assess the robustness and validity of the calculations, they have been replicated on a second, independent platform and a data set with a slightly different timestamp (less than one month difference). Correlations between the two independent calculations for the composite indicator (r = 0.983) and number of papers (r = 0.991) for the top 1,000,000 authors confirm the calculations are accurate and stable.
The other version (supplementary Table S2, http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-b9b8c85e-6914-4b1d-815e-55daefb64f5e ) is calculated using data for citations in a single calendar year, 2017. It provides a measure of performance in that single recent year. Therefore, it removes the bias that may exist in comparing scientists with long accrual of citations over many years of active work versus younger ones with shorter time frame during which they may accumulate citations because it focuses on citation accrual only during a single year.
The constructed database shows, for each scientist, the values for each of the six metrics that are used in the calculation of the composite as well as the composite indicator itself, and all indicators are given with and without self-citations. Institutional affiliation and the respective country are inferred based on most recent publications according to the Scopus data as of May 2018. Therefore, only one affiliation is provided even though scientists may have worked in several institutions. Nevertheless, all their work in different institutions is all captured within their author record.
Extreme self-citations and “citation farms” (relatively small clusters of authors massively citing each other’s papers) make citation metrics spurious and meaningless, and we offer ways to identify such cases. We provide data that exclude self-citations to a paper by any author of that paper and, separately, data including all citations, e.g., if a paper has 12 authors and it has received 102 citations, but 24/102 have as a (co)author at least one of these 12 authors of the original paper, only 102 − 24 = 78 citations are counted. Among the top 100,000 authors for 1996–2017 data, the median percentage of self-citations is 12.7%, but it varies a lot across scientists (interquartile range, 8.6%–17.7%, full range 0.0%–93.8%). Among the top 100,000 authors for the 2017 single-year data, the median percentage of self-citations is 9.2% (interquartile range, 4.8%–14.7%, full range 0.0%–98.6%). With very high proportions of self-citations, we would advise against using any citation metrics since extreme rates of self-citation may herald also other spurious features. These need to be examined on a case-by-case basis for each author, and simply removing the self-citations may not suffice [ 3 ]. Indicatively, among the top 100,000 authors for 1996–2017 and 2017-only data, there are 1,085 and 1,565 authors, respectively, who have >40% self-citations, while 8,599 and 8,534 authors, respectively, have >25% self-citations.
We also provide data on the number of citing papers and on the ratio of citations divided by the number of citing papers. 5,709 authors in the career-long data set and 7,090 in the single-year data set have a ratio over 2. High ratios deserve more in-depth assessment of these authors. Sometimes, this may reflect that it is common for a small number of papers of the same author to be cited together. Alternatively, they may point to situations of spurious “citation farms.”
For each scientist, we provide the most common scientific field and the two most common scientific subfields of his/her publications, along with the percentage for each. All science is divided into 22 large fields (e.g., Clinical Medicine, Biology), and these are further divided into 176 subfields according to the Science-Metrix journal classification system [ 4 ] ( http://science-metrix.com/?q=en/classification ). Thus, users can rank scientists according to each of the six metrics or the composite indicator and can limit the ranking to scientists with similar scientific field or top subfield for different levels of desired similarity.
A separate file (supplementary Table S3, http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-e30a1e62-daf4-49f1-b1ca-484a979f6500 ) lists the total number of authors in Scopus who have published at least five papers and breaks this down by their most common area of publications (for the 22 fields and 176 subfields mentioned above). A total of 6,880,389 scientists have published at least five papers. Because each of the top 100,000 authors can be assigned to the most common field or subfield to which his/her work belongs, a ranking can be obtained among authors assigned to the same main area based on what journals they publish in; e.g., suppose a scientist is ranked 256 in some particular metric among the 120,051 scientists in the subfield of immunology. Therefore, the scientist is in the top 0.21% (256/120,051) of authors by that metric in immunology.
For all 6,880,389 scientists, Table 1 shows the career-long 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile of total citations and composite citation index according to each of the 22 fields. Table S3 provides the same information (along with 95th and 99th percentiles) for each of the 176 subfields as well. Thus, one can see the relative citation density of different fields. Moreover, any scientist who has published at least five papers can be ranked against these standard percentiles in his/her field or subfield based on his/her citation data from Scopus.
Total citations include self-citations.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384.t001
Existing ranking systems typically focus on single fields (e.g., ranking of authors in economics is performed by https://ideas.repec.org/top/ ) and use numbers of papers and total citations rather than multiple metrics. They also do not account for self-citation phenomena. Nevertheless, our databases still have limitations that have been discussed in detail previously in describing the methodology behind the composite indicator [ 2 ]. We should also caution again that citations from before 1996 are missing from our analysis. Overall, whole-career metrics place young scientists at a disadvantage. Single-year metrics remove much of this problem, although again, younger scientists have fewer years of publication history and thus probably fewer papers that can be cited in 2017. We have included the year of first (earliest) publication and the year of last (more recent) indexed publication of each author.
Publications of the scientists are extracted from the Scopus database using the author profiles, which are formed by a combination of curated profiles and profiles generated by an “author profiling” algorithm [ 5 ]. The reported precision and recall by Scopus in 2017 was 98% precision (i.e., on average, 98% of publications merged in a profile belong to one and the same person) at an average recall of 93.5% (i.e., on average, 93.5% of all publications of the same person are merged into one profile); the evaluation used a manual assessment of a sample of >6,000 authors for which the full publication history was collected and compared to what is available in the Scopus profiles. The precision/recall is higher as of April, 2019 at 99.9% and >94%, and the gold set used is also larger now, with >10,000 author records. Nevertheless, a few scientists still have their work split into multiple author records in Scopus; however, even then, one record usually carries the lion’s share of citations. We examined in depth a random sample of 500 author records among the top 1,000,000 records according to the 1996–2017 composite indicator, and we found 13 authors who had been split into two records each. It is possible that the most-cited/most-productive authors may have a higher chance of having split records. Among the top 150 in terms of composite indicator for 1996–2017, we found 20 who had two records and three who had three records among the top 1,000,000 records. However, in all cases, the top record captured the large majority of the citations, and for 11/23, the extra record(s) were not even among the top 100,000. Some other scientists with the same name may have been merged in the same record, but overall, disambiguation in Scopus has improved markedly in this regard, and major errors of this sort are currently very uncommon. They may be more common still for some Chinese and Korean names. Inappropriate merging may also be suspected when the top subfields are not contiguous, e.g., diabetes and particle physics.
Some citation indicators such as the h-index are highly popular, but all single indicators have shortcomings. For practical purposes, it is usually desirable to have a set of bibliometric indicators, each emphasizing a different aspect of the scientific impact of a scientist [ 6 ]. We offer the means to practice routinely such an approach. Of note, the six components of the composite indicator are not orthogonal but have correlations among themselves. Some bibliometrics experts may not favor composites that include correlated metrics and may prefer to inspect each one of them independently. Our databases also allow this approach.
The data sets that we provide also allow placing scientists in reference standards of almost two hundred fields. Still, some scientists may work in very small sub-subfields that may have different citation densities. Moreover, for very early career scientists, any citation metrics would have limited use since these researchers may not have published much yet and their papers would not have time to accrue citations.
A citation database is most useful when it can be regularly updated. We also provide here data that have been updated with an annual interval. We repeated the same exact analyses for career-long data until the end of 2018 (as opposed to the end of 2017) using a timestamped Scopus data set released on April 22, 2019. The data on the top-100,000–ranked scientists are provided in supplementary Table S4 ( http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-bade950e-3343-43e7-896b-fb2069ba3481 ). As one can see, the correlation between the two data sets is extremely high, and the vast majority of scientists do not change their ranking much. As an illustrative example, supplementary Table S5 ( http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.1#file-5d904ef8-fc87-4dbf-aaa7-ad33db9ac561 ) provides the ranking for a random sample of 100 authors sampled from those who were in the top 100,000 based on the composite index excluding self-citations. 93 of the 100 were among the top 100,000 in both assessments. Another five were very close to the top 100,000 with one assessment and at the lower end of the top 100,000 in the other assessment. Another two with modestly larger differences still did not shift by much in terms of their percentile ranking across all authors, with changes of 1% and 2% on the percentile ranking, respectively. Both of these changes were due to corrections in which papers are included in the author record rather than simply accrual of citations. For the vast majority of scientists, it is likely that percentile ranking may take many years to change substantially; therefore, the current databases that we have compiled can be used meaningfully for several years by the wider community before a new update is needed. We provide the databases as spreadsheets in Mendeley Data for entirely open, free public use. Instead of creating a formulaic website, spreadsheets can be downloaded, searched, and tailored for analyses by scientists in whatever fashion they prefer. Moreover, the percentile information could be used for placing a field-specific ranking for any scientist, not just the top 100,000.
We hope that the availability of standardized, field-annotated data will help achieve a more nuanced use of metrics, avoiding some of the egregious errors of raw bean-counting that are prevalent in misuse of citation metrics. Citation metrics should be used in a more systematic, less error-prone and more relevant, context-specific, and field-adjusted way and also allowing for removal of self-citations and detection of citation farms.
Citation analyses for individuals are used for various single-person or comparative assessments in the complex reward and incentive system of science [ 7 ]. Misuse of citation metrics in hiring, promotion or tenure decision, or other situations involving rewards (e.g., funding or awards) takes many forms, including but not limited to the use of metrics that are not very informative for scientists and their work (e.g., journal impact factors); focus on single citation metrics (e.g., h-index); and use of calculations that are not standardized, use different frames, and do not account for field. The availability of the data sets that we provide should help mitigate many of these problems. The database can also be used to perform evaluations of groups of individuals, e.g., at the level of scientific fields, institutions, countries, or memberships in diversely defined groups that may be of interest to users. Linkage to other author-based databases in the future may enhance the potential for further use in meta-research evaluations [ 8 ]. We discourage raw comparisons of scientists across very different fields. We cannot emphasize enough that use of these metrics needs to be prudent. Authors who detect errors in the entered data should contact Scopus to correct the respective entries and author records. We also welcome suggestions for more generic improvements that may augment the utility of the shared resource that we have generated.
COMMENTS
Citing your sources is an important part of contributing to this conversation -- it allows readers to understand how your work fits into the overall conversation. Citing your sources in a standard style also helps readers tell at a glance what type of source you used (book vs. journal article, etc), and it helps readers find and reference the ...
APA Citation 7th Edition. Keep our quick guide handy to answer your basic formatting questions and provide examples of commonly cited references. Also included are select pages from a sample paper. This sample paper will show you how to format your paper in APA style, including the placement of the running head, margin size, font, and font size ...
Spurious citation, biased citation, and over self-citation are also common problems of citation (Box 3). Self-citation, defined as citing one's own work in a scientific paper, is a common practice and is an essential part of scientific communication, which represents the continuous and cumulative nature of the research process ( 50 ).
The primary citation formats used in Biology are: APA Style and CSE Style. Print copies of both style guides are available in Ryan Library Reference (see call numbers below). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association by American Psychological Association Staff. Call Number: R 808.02 A512p 2010. ISBN: 1433805618.
The APA Citation Style. This resource guide will focus on the 7th edition of the APA publication style developed by the American Psychological Association, which is used by the Social Sciences and other curricular areas. Take a look at the links on the left for examples of APA 7 in-text citations, reference pages, and some useful sites and ...
In text citaiton. In addition to creating the References list, you are also required to include in text citation. This is a brief citation within your research paper that is placed after information which is quoted or paraphrased from the sources you. In text citation for APA generally requires three pieces of information: 1. Author's last name.
In the sentences of your paper, cite these sources using the number from the reference list. This means that the in-text citation 1 refers to the first source mentioned in your text. Example from Newbury (2013) :These interactions have been implicated in many systems, including small molecules 4, peptides 5, proteins 6, peptoids 7, and nucleic ...
Citations: APA Style - Biology Research - LibGuides at University of Massachusetts Lowell. APA style is a format for academic documents such as journal articles and books. It was developed by the American Psychological Association (APA) "to assist reading comprehension in the social and behavioral sciences, for clarity of communication".
The easiest way is to use a reference manager: Paperpile. The citation style is built in and you can choose it in Settings > Citation Style or Paperpile > Citation Style in Google Docs. EndNote. Find the style here: output styles overview. Mendeley, Zotero, Papers, and others. The style is either built in or you can download a CSL file that is ...
Citing Your Sources. Proper citation is an essential aspect of scholarship. Citing properly allows your reader or audience to locate the materials you have used. Most importantly, citations give credit to the authors of quoted or consulted information. Failure to acknowledge sources of information properly may constitute plagiarism.
The in-text citation appears in the body of the paper (including a table, figure, footnote, or appendix) and identifies the cited work by its author and publication date. Each reference list entry provides the author, date, title, and source of the work cited in the paper and enables the reader to both identify and retrieve the work. Cite ...
The easiest way is to use a reference manager: Paperpile. The citation style is built in and you can choose it in Settings > Citation Style or Paperpile > Citation Style in Google Docs. EndNote. Find the style here: output styles overview. Mendeley, Zotero, Papers, and others. The style is either built in or you can download a CSL file that is ...
Scientific research report format is based on the scientific method and is organized to enable the reader to quickly comprehend the main points of the investigation. The format required in all biology classes consists of a Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Literature Cited sections.
TCNJ Department of Biology Research Paper Style Manual "This Style Manual is intended to provide formatting instructions, as well as appropriate content and organization, for each part of the research paper and is to be used as the standard throughout the entire four-year Biology Curriculum." Additional Citation Style Guides.
Citing Images. You must cite the source of an image used in a paper, lab report, presentation or seminar. When citing an image in the body of your paper, cite it in one of two ways: Credit the source at the end of the image caption: "Reproduced with permission from (a) H.E. Hoekstra and (c) J.L. Feder.".
Highlight your text and page number and make sure that both are Times New Roman, size 12. You're done - your title page and headers for your APA paper are set up. To change the information on the template, go to Insert, Header and Edit Header. Creating an APA 6 title page and headers for Microsoft Word for Mac.
Include an in-text citation when you refer to, summarize, paraphrase, or quote from another source. For every in-text citation in your paper, there must be a corresponding entry in your reference list. APA in-text citation style uses the author's last name and the year of publication, for example: (Field, 2005).
There are many different citation styles that are used for research papers. There is no standard citation style for biology, however, in this guide we will focus on the Name-Year style from The Council of Science Editors (CSE). The CSE style is designed for the general sciences, including biology. Ask your advisor or professor about the ...
MLA. APA. One of the most frequently used style manuals for citing sources is the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, which is published by the Modern Language Association. The most recent edition, the eighth edition, was published in 2016. Copies of this edition are found in the Ready Reference section of the Library.
Use the resources below to cite your articles and books for the BIOL190L Research Paper. These style guides and eBooks offered by the CSN Libraries will assist in avoiding plagiarism, help you in learning correct APA style, and provide examples of properly formatted APA papers.
An Biology citation for a journal article includes the author name (s), publication year, article title, journal name, volume and issue number, page range of the article, and a DOI (if available). Here's how. Here's a Biology journal citation example using placeholders: 1. Author1 LastnameA.F.; Author3 LastnameA.F. Title.
MLA (Modern Language Association) style specifies guidelines for formatting papers. MLA style also provides a system for referencing sources through parenthetical citations in essays and Works Cited pages. The go-to resource for writers of research papers and anyone citing sources in MLA format. Watch the How to use MLA Handbook video and guide.
Scan your paper for plagiarism mistakes. Get help for 7,000+ citation styles including APA 7. Check for 400+ advanced grammar errors. Create in-text citations and save them. Free 3-day trial. Cancel anytime.*️. Try Citation Machine® Plus! *See Terms and Conditions. Consider your source's credibility.
Citation metrics are widely used and misused. We have created a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator. Separate data are shown for career-long and single ...