writing up research answer key

Samantha Putterman, PolitiFact Samantha Putterman, PolitiFact

Leave your feedback

• Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-warnings-from-democrats-about-project-2025-and-donald-trump

Fact-checking warnings from Democrats about Project 2025 and Donald Trump

This fact check originally appeared on PolitiFact .

Project 2025 has a starring role in this week’s Democratic National Convention.

And it was front and center on Night 1.

WATCH: Hauling large copy of Project 2025, Michigan state Sen. McMorrow speaks at 2024 DNC

“This is Project 2025,” Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, D-Royal Oak, said as she laid a hardbound copy of the 900-page document on the lectern. “Over the next four nights, you are going to hear a lot about what is in this 900-page document. Why? Because this is the Republican blueprint for a second Trump term.”

Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, has warned Americans about “Trump’s Project 2025” agenda — even though former President Donald Trump doesn’t claim the conservative presidential transition document.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” Harris said July 23 in Milwaukee. “He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. Like, we know we got to take this seriously, and can you believe they put that thing in writing?”

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, has joined in on the talking point.

“Don’t believe (Trump) when he’s playing dumb about this Project 2025. He knows exactly what it’ll do,” Walz said Aug. 9 in Glendale, Arizona.

Trump’s campaign has worked to build distance from the project, which the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, led with contributions from dozens of conservative groups.

Much of the plan calls for extensive executive-branch overhauls and draws on both long-standing conservative principles, such as tax cuts, and more recent culture war issues. It lays out recommendations for disbanding the Commerce and Education departments, eliminating certain climate protections and consolidating more power to the president.

Project 2025 offers a sweeping vision for a Republican-led executive branch, and some of its policies mirror Trump’s 2024 agenda, But Harris and her presidential campaign have at times gone too far in describing what the project calls for and how closely the plans overlap with Trump’s campaign.

PolitiFact researched Harris’ warnings about how the plan would affect reproductive rights, federal entitlement programs and education, just as we did for President Joe Biden’s Project 2025 rhetoric. Here’s what the project does and doesn’t call for, and how it squares with Trump’s positions.

Are Trump and Project 2025 connected?

To distance himself from Project 2025 amid the Democratic attacks, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he “knows nothing” about it and has “no idea” who is in charge of it. (CNN identified at least 140 former advisers from the Trump administration who have been involved.)

The Heritage Foundation sought contributions from more than 100 conservative organizations for its policy vision for the next Republican presidency, which was published in 2023.

Project 2025 is now winding down some of its policy operations, and director Paul Dans, a former Trump administration official, is stepping down, The Washington Post reported July 30. Trump campaign managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita denounced the document.

WATCH: A look at the Project 2025 plan to reshape government and Trump’s links to its authors

However, Project 2025 contributors include a number of high-ranking officials from Trump’s first administration, including former White House adviser Peter Navarro and former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson.

A recently released recording of Russell Vought, a Project 2025 author and the former director of Trump’s Office of Management and Budget, showed Vought saying Trump’s “very supportive of what we do.” He said Trump was only distancing himself because Democrats were making a bogeyman out of the document.

Project 2025 wouldn’t ban abortion outright, but would curtail access

The Harris campaign shared a graphic on X that claimed “Trump’s Project 2025 plan for workers” would “go after birth control and ban abortion nationwide.”

The plan doesn’t call to ban abortion nationwide, though its recommendations could curtail some contraceptives and limit abortion access.

What’s known about Trump’s abortion agenda neither lines up with Harris’ description nor Project 2025’s wish list.

Project 2025 says the Department of Health and Human Services Department should “return to being known as the Department of Life by explicitly rejecting the notion that abortion is health care.”

It recommends that the Food and Drug Administration reverse its 2000 approval of mifepristone, the first pill taken in a two-drug regimen for a medication abortion. Medication is the most common form of abortion in the U.S. — accounting for around 63 percent in 2023.

If mifepristone were to remain approved, Project 2025 recommends new rules, such as cutting its use from 10 weeks into pregnancy to seven. It would have to be provided to patients in person — part of the group’s efforts to limit access to the drug by mail. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a legal challenge to mifepristone’s FDA approval over procedural grounds.

WATCH: Trump’s plans for health care and reproductive rights if he returns to White House The manual also calls for the Justice Department to enforce the 1873 Comstock Act on mifepristone, which bans the mailing of “obscene” materials. Abortion access supporters fear that a strict interpretation of the law could go further to ban mailing the materials used in procedural abortions, such as surgical instruments and equipment.

The plan proposes withholding federal money from states that don’t report to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention how many abortions take place within their borders. The plan also would prohibit abortion providers, such as Planned Parenthood, from receiving Medicaid funds. It also calls for the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure that the training of medical professionals, including doctors and nurses, omits abortion training.

The document says some forms of emergency contraception — particularly Ella, a pill that can be taken within five days of unprotected sex to prevent pregnancy — should be excluded from no-cost coverage. The Affordable Care Act requires most private health insurers to cover recommended preventive services, which involves a range of birth control methods, including emergency contraception.

Trump has recently said states should decide abortion regulations and that he wouldn’t block access to contraceptives. Trump said during his June 27 debate with Biden that he wouldn’t ban mifepristone after the Supreme Court “approved” it. But the court rejected the lawsuit based on standing, not the case’s merits. He has not weighed in on the Comstock Act or said whether he supports it being used to block abortion medication, or other kinds of abortions.

Project 2025 doesn’t call for cutting Social Security, but proposes some changes to Medicare

“When you read (Project 2025),” Harris told a crowd July 23 in Wisconsin, “you will see, Donald Trump intends to cut Social Security and Medicare.”

The Project 2025 document does not call for Social Security cuts. None of its 10 references to Social Security addresses plans for cutting the program.

Harris also misleads about Trump’s Social Security views.

In his earlier campaigns and before he was a politician, Trump said about a half-dozen times that he’s open to major overhauls of Social Security, including cuts and privatization. More recently, in a March 2024 CNBC interview, Trump said of entitlement programs such as Social Security, “There’s a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting.” However, he quickly walked that statement back, and his CNBC comment stands at odds with essentially everything else Trump has said during the 2024 presidential campaign.

Trump’s campaign website says that not “a single penny” should be cut from Social Security. We rated Harris’ claim that Trump intends to cut Social Security Mostly False.

Project 2025 does propose changes to Medicare, including making Medicare Advantage, the private insurance offering in Medicare, the “default” enrollment option. Unlike Original Medicare, Medicare Advantage plans have provider networks and can also require prior authorization, meaning that the plan can approve or deny certain services. Original Medicare plans don’t have prior authorization requirements.

The manual also calls for repealing health policies enacted under Biden, such as the Inflation Reduction Act. The law enabled Medicare to negotiate with drugmakers for the first time in history, and recently resulted in an agreement with drug companies to lower the prices of 10 expensive prescriptions for Medicare enrollees.

Trump, however, has said repeatedly during the 2024 presidential campaign that he will not cut Medicare.

Project 2025 would eliminate the Education Department, which Trump supports

The Harris campaign said Project 2025 would “eliminate the U.S. Department of Education” — and that’s accurate. Project 2025 says federal education policy “should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated.” The plan scales back the federal government’s role in education policy and devolves the functions that remain to other agencies.

Aside from eliminating the department, the project also proposes scrapping the Biden administration’s Title IX revision, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. It also would let states opt out of federal education programs and calls for passing a federal parents’ bill of rights similar to ones passed in some Republican-led state legislatures.

Republicans, including Trump, have pledged to close the department, which gained its status in 1979 within Democratic President Jimmy Carter’s presidential Cabinet.

In one of his Agenda 47 policy videos, Trump promised to close the department and “to send all education work and needs back to the states.” Eliminating the department would have to go through Congress.

What Project 2025, Trump would do on overtime pay

In the graphic, the Harris campaign says Project 2025 allows “employers to stop paying workers for overtime work.”

The plan doesn’t call for banning overtime wages. It recommends changes to some Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, regulations and to overtime rules. Some changes, if enacted, could result in some people losing overtime protections, experts told us.

The document proposes that the Labor Department maintain an overtime threshold “that does not punish businesses in lower-cost regions (e.g., the southeast United States).” This threshold is the amount of money executive, administrative or professional employees need to make for an employer to exempt them from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

In 2019, the Trump’s administration finalized a rule that expanded overtime pay eligibility to most salaried workers earning less than about $35,568, which it said made about 1.3 million more workers eligible for overtime pay. The Trump-era threshold is high enough to cover most line workers in lower-cost regions, Project 2025 said.

The Biden administration raised that threshold to $43,888 beginning July 1, and that will rise to $58,656 on Jan. 1, 2025. That would grant overtime eligibility to about 4 million workers, the Labor Department said.

It’s unclear how many workers Project 2025’s proposal to return to the Trump-era overtime threshold in some parts of the country would affect, but experts said some would presumably lose the right to overtime wages.

Other overtime proposals in Project 2025’s plan include allowing some workers to choose to accumulate paid time off instead of overtime pay, or to work more hours in one week and fewer in the next, rather than receive overtime.

Trump’s past with overtime pay is complicated. In 2016, the Obama administration said it would raise the overtime to salaried workers earning less than $47,476 a year, about double the exemption level set in 2004 of $23,660 a year.

But when a judge blocked the Obama rule, the Trump administration didn’t challenge the court ruling. Instead it set its own overtime threshold, which raised the amount, but by less than Obama.

Support Provided By: Learn more

Educate your inbox

Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.

Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.

• DOI: 10.2307/3587381
• Corpus ID: 143856305

Writing Up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English

• S. Buker , Robert C. Weissberg
• Published 1 February 1990
• Education, Agricultural and Food Sciences, Computer Science

232 Citations

Basic english writing: a classroom experiment in student-oriented design and textbook.

• Highly Influenced

Developing an Instructional Model to Teach Thai Research Assistants to Write English Scientific Research Articles

• 20 Excerpts

EFL Academic writing. What should Dutch business communication students learn

A scientist in interdisciplinary team-teaching in an english for research publication purposes classroom: beyond a “cameo role”, integrating academic reading and writing skills development with core content in science and engineering, teaching english for research publication purposes to science students in china: a case study of an experienced teacher in the classroom, teaching scientific/academic writing in the digital age., assisting pre-university esl learners to gain control of the report writing based on graphical data: a genre-based approach, second language reading instruction: a study of an awareness-raising reading course in an agriculture college in portugal, solving the problems of designing and teaching a packed english for specific purposes course, 14 references, a comparative study of a traditional lecture method and a group-paced, multimedia, non-lecture method used in teaching college biology..

• Highly Influential

The tenth year of English: Review of a project concerning second language learning at university level

Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory., eyewitness testimony: the role of commitment in increasing reliability., the prediction of success in intensive foreign language training., related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

• My presentations

Auth with social network:

Download presentation

We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Writing Up Research Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English Robert Weissberg and Suzanne Buker.

Published by Ashlie Webb Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Writing Up Research Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English Robert Weissberg and Suzanne Buker."— Presentation transcript:

Tense in citation Source: Weissberg, R., & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. Englewood.

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process

Physical Oceanography

3.3 Answers.

In this presentation you will:

1 END 011 科技英文寫作 ( 二 )-12 English Technical Writing ( 二 )-12 Prof. Jeffrey Shiang Fu 傅祥 教授 / (03) *5795.

Climatology Climatology is the study of Earth’s climate and the factors that affect past, present, and future climatic changes. Climate describes the long-term.

Writing a Research Paper

Technical Writing S03 Providence University 1 Introduction - Establishing a Context PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY College of Management Wu-Lin Chen

Providence University College of Management I NTRODUCTION - Reviewing Previous Research - Advancing to Present Research Wu-Lin Chen

Essential Principles Challenge

English for Water Managers

Chapter One of Your Thesis

Objective: Understand Causes, Effects and Solutions of Global Warming

Climate and Climate Change

Writing a Research Proposal

Air Quality and Climate Change. Coal and Oil Formation Both are Fossil Fuels: remains of plants and animals that died anywhere from 400 million to 1 million.

Using My NASA Data to Explore Earth Systems Lynne H. Hehr John G. Hehr University of Arkansas Department of Geosciences And Center for Math and Science.

I NTRODUCTIONS. W HY HAVE AN INTRODUCTION ? To provide context for the study and to create a research space for yourself Follow the CARS ( c reate a r.

Global Warming What Is It?.

About project

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.

Dissertations and research projects

• Sessions and recordings
• Skill guide
• Finding the gap
• Developing research questions
• Epistemology
• Ethical approval
• Methodology and Methods
• Recruiting participants
• Planning your analysis
• Writing your research proposal
• Hypothesis testing
• Reliability and validity
• Approaches to quantitative research
• Developing a theoretical framework
• Reflecting on your position
• Extended literature reviews
• Presenting qualitative data
• Introduction
• Literature review
• Methodology
• Conclusions
• 5) Working with a supervisor
• e-learning and books
• Quick resources
• SkillsCheck This link opens in a new window
• Review this resource

Writing up your research project

In this section on Writing up your research you can find out about the following aspects:

You might also want to consult our other sections on  Planning your research  (including Writing your research proposal ),  Quantitative research ,  Qualitative research , and check out the Additional resources .

• << Previous: Presenting qualitative data
• Next: Abstracts >>

Adsetts Library

Collegiate library, sheffield hallam university, city campus, howard street, sheffield s1 1wb, contact us / live chat, +44 (0)114 225 2222, [email protected], accessibility, legal information, privacy and gdpr, login to libapps.

Writing up a Research Report

• First Online: 04 January 2024

Cite this chapter

• Stefan Hunziker 3 &
• Michael Blankenagel 3  

709 Accesses

A research report is one big argument about how and why you came up with your conclusions. To make it a convincing argument, a typical guiding structure has developed. In the different chapters, there are distinct issues that need to be addressed to explain to the reader why your conclusions are valid. The governing principle for writing the report is full disclosure: to explain everything and ensure replicability by another researcher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Barros, L. O. (2016). The only academic phrasebook you’ll ever need . Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

Google Scholar  

Field, A. (2016). An adventure in statistics. The reality enigma . SAGE.

Field, A. (2020). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.

Früh, M., Keimer, I., & Blankenagel, M. (2019). The impact of Balanced Scorecard excellence on shareholder returns. IFZ Working Paper No. 0003/2019. https://zenodo.org/record/2571603#.YMDUafkzZaQ . Accessed: 9 June 2021.

Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Wirtschaft/IFZ, Campus Zug-Rotkreuz, Hochschule Luzern, Zug-Rotkreuz, Zug, Switzerland

Stefan Hunziker & Michael Blankenagel

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Hunziker .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Hunziker, S., Blankenagel, M. (2024). Writing up a Research Report. In: Research Design in Business and Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42739-9_4

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42739-9_4

Published : 04 January 2024

Publisher Name : Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

Print ISBN : 978-3-658-42738-2

Online ISBN : 978-3-658-42739-9

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Foreign Language Study & Reference

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

Writing Up Research: Experimental Research Report Writing for Students of English Later Printing Edition

• ISBN-10 0139708316
• ISBN-13 978-0139708312
• Edition Later Printing
• Publisher Prentice Hall
• Publication date January 1, 1990
• Language English
• Dimensions 7 x 0.5 x 9.25 inches
• Print length 208 pages
• See all details

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Prentice Hall; Later Printing edition (January 1, 1990)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 208 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0139708316
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0139708312
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 11.2 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 7 x 0.5 x 9.25 inches
• #23,980 in Foreign Language Reference
• #28,379 in Professional

About the author

Robert weissberg.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

• Request new password
• Create a new account

Research Methods in Early Childhood: An Introductory Guide

Student resources, multiple choice quiz.

Test your understanding of each chapter by taking the quiz below. Click anywhere on the question to reveal the answer. Good luck!

1. What is an abstract?

• A short footnote in the text of your work
• A chance to acknowledge those who have helped you in your research project, placed at the beginning of the written-up project
• A brief resume of the study to entice the reader to read more
• An introduction to the research

2. What should always be included in an introduction?

• Detail of your research findings
• Your interview schedule (or detail of any other research instruments)
• A rationale for conducting the study and key research questions
• Recommendations for early childhood practice in detail

3. What is a literature review?

• A place to provide autobiographic detail
• A place to outline all the reading you have done in your studies
• A place to link your reading to your research findings
• A place to discuss literature which helps to frame your study

4. Where is a literature review typically found in written-up research?

• Before the methodology chapter
• After the findings chapter
• In the appendices
• Integrated into the data analysis

5. What would you expect to find in a methodology chapter in a piece of empirical research?

• Detail of the methodological approach taken
• Detail of the methods employed
• Detail of ethical considerations linked to the research project
• All of the above

6. Should data and discussion of data be presented as two separate chapters?

• Never. They are inappropriate for early childhood research
• Always. Students tend to undertake qualitative research projects
• Possibly, depending on the kind of research undertaken and tutor advice
• Possibly, depending if there is time to complete two chapters as opposed to one larger chapter

7. What should a conclusion chapter contain?

• A sense of the research story
• A summary of the key findings
• Reflection on what these findings mean
• Discussion of possible implications for practice or future research

8. Having read the chapter, what do Mukherji and Albon advise in relation to using ‘I’ when writing up research?

• You should always use the personal pronoun when writing up research as it reflects that it is a personal piece of work
• Writing seems far too ‘chatty’ if you use ‘I’ when writing. In order to write academically use of ‘I’ should always be avoided
• If talking about the decisions you made in research and your own viewpoint, it is hard to avoid use of ‘I’ and it does not necessarily mean lack of academic tone if used judiciously (but do ask your tutor!)
• You could be in danger of failing a module if you use the personal pronoun in your work. You will never see academic journal articles using ‘I’

Writing Up Qualitative Research

• October 2005
• Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 86(4):589-593
• 86(4):589-593

• Smith College

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• J Sociol Soc Welfare
• Heather C. Pizzanello
• Roberto Filippi
• Andrew Holliman

• Antonia Layard
• Laura De Vito
• Hannah Moersberger

• Lean Bernardo-Gregorio

• Elealeh Gaid-Suan
• Leila Jedi-Sari-Biglar

• Kharolrena E Wong

• Suzanne D’Souza

• Jeane W. Anastas
• B.G. Glaser
• Anselm L. Strauss
• David S. Cordray
• Michael Quinn Patton
• Karen Golden-Biddle
• J. Duncombe

• Maryann Downing
• Margaret Anzul
• N.K. Denzin
• Y.S. Lincoln
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Starting the research process

A Beginner's Guide to Starting the Research Process

When you have to write a thesis or dissertation , it can be hard to know where to begin, but there are some clear steps you can follow.

The research process often begins with a very broad idea for a topic you’d like to know more about. You do some preliminary research to identify a  problem . After refining your research questions , you can lay out the foundations of your research design , leading to a proposal that outlines your ideas and plans.

This article takes you through the first steps of the research process, helping you narrow down your ideas and build up a strong foundation for your research project.

Table of contents

Step 1: choose your topic, step 2: identify a problem, step 3: formulate research questions, step 4: create a research design, step 5: write a research proposal, other interesting articles.

First you have to come up with some ideas. Your thesis or dissertation topic can start out very broad. Think about the general area or field you’re interested in—maybe you already have specific research interests based on classes you’ve taken, or maybe you had to consider your topic when applying to graduate school and writing a statement of purpose .

Even if you already have a good sense of your topic, you’ll need to read widely to build background knowledge and begin narrowing down your ideas. Conduct an initial literature review to begin gathering relevant sources. As you read, take notes and try to identify problems, questions, debates, contradictions and gaps. Your aim is to narrow down from a broad area of interest to a specific niche.

Make sure to consider the practicalities: the requirements of your programme, the amount of time you have to complete the research, and how difficult it will be to access sources and data on the topic. Before moving onto the next stage, it’s a good idea to discuss the topic with your thesis supervisor.

>>Read more about narrowing down a research topic

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

So you’ve settled on a topic and found a niche—but what exactly will your research investigate, and why does it matter? To give your project focus and purpose, you have to define a research problem .

The problem might be a practical issue—for example, a process or practice that isn’t working well, an area of concern in an organization’s performance, or a difficulty faced by a specific group of people in society.

Alternatively, you might choose to investigate a theoretical problem—for example, an underexplored phenomenon or relationship, a contradiction between different models or theories, or an unresolved debate among scholars.

To put the problem in context and set your objectives, you can write a problem statement . This describes who the problem affects, why research is needed, and how your research project will contribute to solving it.

>>Read more about defining a research problem

Next, based on the problem statement, you need to write one or more research questions . These target exactly what you want to find out. They might focus on describing, comparing, evaluating, or explaining the research problem.

A strong research question should be specific enough that you can answer it thoroughly using appropriate qualitative or quantitative research methods. It should also be complex enough to require in-depth investigation, analysis, and argument. Questions that can be answered with “yes/no” or with easily available facts are not complex enough for a thesis or dissertation.

In some types of research, at this stage you might also have to develop a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses .

>>See research question examples

The research design is a practical framework for answering your research questions. It involves making decisions about the type of data you need, the methods you’ll use to collect and analyze it, and the location and timescale of your research.

There are often many possible paths you can take to answering your questions. The decisions you make will partly be based on your priorities. For example, do you want to determine causes and effects, draw generalizable conclusions, or understand the details of a specific context?

You need to decide whether you will use primary or secondary data and qualitative or quantitative methods . You also need to determine the specific tools, procedures, and materials you’ll use to collect and analyze your data, as well as your criteria for selecting participants or sources.

>>Read more about creating a research design

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Finally, after completing these steps, you are ready to complete a research proposal . The proposal outlines the context, relevance, purpose, and plan of your research.

As well as outlining the background, problem statement, and research questions, the proposal should also include a literature review that shows how your project will fit into existing work on the topic. The research design section describes your approach and explains exactly what you will do.

You might have to get the proposal approved by your supervisor before you get started, and it will guide the process of writing your thesis or dissertation.

>>Read more about writing a research proposal

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Methodology

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked.

• Writing Strong Research Questions | Criteria & Examples

What Is a Research Design | Types, Guide & Examples

• How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

More interesting articles

• 10 Research Question Examples to Guide Your Research Project
• How to Choose a Dissertation Topic | 8 Steps to Follow
• How to Define a Research Problem | Ideas & Examples
• How to Write a Problem Statement | Guide & Examples
• Relevance of Your Dissertation Topic | Criteria & Tips
• Research Objectives | Definition & Examples
• What Is a Fishbone Diagram? | Templates & Examples
• What Is Root Cause Analysis? | Definition & Examples

"I thought AI Proofreading was useless but.."

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Research Paper

Definition:

Research Paper is a written document that presents the author’s original research, analysis, and interpretation of a specific topic or issue.

It is typically based on Empirical Evidence, and may involve qualitative or quantitative research methods, or a combination of both. The purpose of a research paper is to contribute new knowledge or insights to a particular field of study, and to demonstrate the author’s understanding of the existing literature and theories related to the topic.

Structure of Research Paper

The structure of a research paper typically follows a standard format, consisting of several sections that convey specific information about the research study. The following is a detailed explanation of the structure of a research paper:

The title page contains the title of the paper, the name(s) of the author(s), and the affiliation(s) of the author(s). It also includes the date of submission and possibly, the name of the journal or conference where the paper is to be published.

The abstract is a brief summary of the research paper, typically ranging from 100 to 250 words. It should include the research question, the methods used, the key findings, and the implications of the results. The abstract should be written in a concise and clear manner to allow readers to quickly grasp the essence of the research.

Introduction

The introduction section of a research paper provides background information about the research problem, the research question, and the research objectives. It also outlines the significance of the research, the research gap that it aims to fill, and the approach taken to address the research question. Finally, the introduction section ends with a clear statement of the research hypothesis or research question.

Literature Review

The literature review section of a research paper provides an overview of the existing literature on the topic of study. It includes a critical analysis and synthesis of the literature, highlighting the key concepts, themes, and debates. The literature review should also demonstrate the research gap and how the current study seeks to address it.

The methods section of a research paper describes the research design, the sample selection, the data collection and analysis procedures, and the statistical methods used to analyze the data. This section should provide sufficient detail for other researchers to replicate the study.

The results section presents the findings of the research, using tables, graphs, and figures to illustrate the data. The findings should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with reference to the research question and hypothesis.

The discussion section of a research paper interprets the findings and discusses their implications for the research question, the literature review, and the field of study. It should also address the limitations of the study and suggest future research directions.

The conclusion section summarizes the main findings of the study, restates the research question and hypothesis, and provides a final reflection on the significance of the research.

The references section provides a list of all the sources cited in the paper, following a specific citation style such as APA, MLA or Chicago.

How to Write Research Paper

You can write Research Paper by the following guide:

• Choose a Topic: The first step is to select a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. Brainstorm ideas and narrow down to a research question that is specific and researchable.
• Conduct a Literature Review: The literature review helps you identify the gap in the existing research and provides a basis for your research question. It also helps you to develop a theoretical framework and research hypothesis.
• Develop a Thesis Statement : The thesis statement is the main argument of your research paper. It should be clear, concise and specific to your research question.
• Plan your Research: Develop a research plan that outlines the methods, data sources, and data analysis procedures. This will help you to collect and analyze data effectively.
• Collect and Analyze Data: Collect data using various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments. Analyze data using statistical tools or other qualitative methods.
• Organize your Paper : Organize your paper into sections such as Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Ensure that each section is coherent and follows a logical flow.
• Write your Paper : Start by writing the introduction, followed by the literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Ensure that your writing is clear, concise, and follows the required formatting and citation styles.
• Edit and Proofread your Paper: Review your paper for grammar and spelling errors, and ensure that it is well-structured and easy to read. Ask someone else to review your paper to get feedback and suggestions for improvement.
• Cite your Sources: Ensure that you properly cite all sources used in your research paper. This is essential for giving credit to the original authors and avoiding plagiarism.

Research Paper Example

Note : The below example research paper is for illustrative purposes only and is not an actual research paper. Actual research papers may have different structures, contents, and formats depending on the field of study, research question, data collection and analysis methods, and other factors. Students should always consult with their professors or supervisors for specific guidelines and expectations for their research papers.

Research Paper Example sample for Students:

Title: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health among Young Adults

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults. A literature review was conducted to examine the existing research on the topic. A survey was then administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Introduction: Social media has become an integral part of modern life, particularly among young adults. While social media has many benefits, including increased communication and social connectivity, it has also been associated with negative outcomes, such as addiction, cyberbullying, and mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults.

Literature Review: The literature review highlights the existing research on the impact of social media use on mental health. The review shows that social media use is associated with depression, anxiety, stress, and other mental health problems. The review also identifies the factors that contribute to the negative impact of social media, including social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Methods : A survey was administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The survey included questions on social media use, mental health status (measured using the DASS-21), and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis.

Results : The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Discussion : The study’s findings suggest that social media use has a negative impact on the mental health of young adults. The study highlights the need for interventions that address the factors contributing to the negative impact of social media, such as social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Conclusion : In conclusion, social media use has a significant impact on the mental health of young adults. The study’s findings underscore the need for interventions that promote healthy social media use and address the negative outcomes associated with social media use. Future research can explore the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health. Additionally, longitudinal studies can investigate the long-term effects of social media use on mental health.

Limitations : The study has some limitations, including the use of self-report measures and a cross-sectional design. The use of self-report measures may result in biased responses, and a cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causality.

Implications: The study’s findings have implications for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers. Mental health professionals can use the findings to develop interventions that address the negative impact of social media use on mental health. Educators can incorporate social media literacy into their curriculum to promote healthy social media use among young adults. Policymakers can use the findings to develop policies that protect young adults from the negative outcomes associated with social media use.

References :

• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive medicine reports, 15, 100918.
• Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Barrett, E. L., Sidani, J. E., Colditz, J. B., … & James, A. E. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among US young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 1-9.
• Van der Meer, T. G., & Verhoeven, J. W. (2017). Social media and its impact on academic performance of students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 383-398.

Appendix : The survey used in this study is provided below.

Social Media and Mental Health Survey

• How often do you use social media per day?
• Less than 30 minutes
• 30 minutes to 1 hour
• 1 to 2 hours
• 2 to 4 hours
• More than 4 hours
• Which social media platforms do you use?
• Others (Please specify)
• How often do you experience the following on social media?
• Social comparison (comparing yourself to others)
• Cyberbullying
• Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)
• Have you ever experienced any of the following mental health problems in the past month?
• Do you think social media use has a positive or negative impact on your mental health?
• Very positive
• Somewhat positive
• Somewhat negative
• Very negative
• In your opinion, which factors contribute to the negative impact of social media on mental health?
• Social comparison
• In your opinion, what interventions could be effective in reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health?
• Education on healthy social media use
• Counseling for mental health problems caused by social media
• Social media detox programs
• Regulation of social media use

Thank you for your participation!

Applications of Research Paper

Research papers have several applications in various fields, including:

• Advancing knowledge: Research papers contribute to the advancement of knowledge by generating new insights, theories, and findings that can inform future research and practice. They help to answer important questions, clarify existing knowledge, and identify areas that require further investigation.
• Informing policy: Research papers can inform policy decisions by providing evidence-based recommendations for policymakers. They can help to identify gaps in current policies, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and inform the development of new policies and regulations.
• Improving practice: Research papers can improve practice by providing evidence-based guidance for professionals in various fields, including medicine, education, business, and psychology. They can inform the development of best practices, guidelines, and standards of care that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
• Educating students : Research papers are often used as teaching tools in universities and colleges to educate students about research methods, data analysis, and academic writing. They help students to develop critical thinking skills, research skills, and communication skills that are essential for success in many careers.
• Fostering collaboration: Research papers can foster collaboration among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers by providing a platform for sharing knowledge and ideas. They can facilitate interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships that can lead to innovative solutions to complex problems.

When to Write Research Paper

Research papers are typically written when a person has completed a research project or when they have conducted a study and have obtained data or findings that they want to share with the academic or professional community. Research papers are usually written in academic settings, such as universities, but they can also be written in professional settings, such as research organizations, government agencies, or private companies.

Here are some common situations where a person might need to write a research paper:

• For academic purposes: Students in universities and colleges are often required to write research papers as part of their coursework, particularly in the social sciences, natural sciences, and humanities. Writing research papers helps students to develop research skills, critical thinking skills, and academic writing skills.
• For publication: Researchers often write research papers to publish their findings in academic journals or to present their work at academic conferences. Publishing research papers is an important way to disseminate research findings to the academic community and to establish oneself as an expert in a particular field.
• To inform policy or practice : Researchers may write research papers to inform policy decisions or to improve practice in various fields. Research findings can be used to inform the development of policies, guidelines, and best practices that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
• To share new insights or ideas: Researchers may write research papers to share new insights or ideas with the academic or professional community. They may present new theories, propose new research methods, or challenge existing paradigms in their field.

Purpose of Research Paper

The purpose of a research paper is to present the results of a study or investigation in a clear, concise, and structured manner. Research papers are written to communicate new knowledge, ideas, or findings to a specific audience, such as researchers, scholars, practitioners, or policymakers. The primary purposes of a research paper are:

• To contribute to the body of knowledge : Research papers aim to add new knowledge or insights to a particular field or discipline. They do this by reporting the results of empirical studies, reviewing and synthesizing existing literature, proposing new theories, or providing new perspectives on a topic.
• To inform or persuade: Research papers are written to inform or persuade the reader about a particular issue, topic, or phenomenon. They present evidence and arguments to support their claims and seek to persuade the reader of the validity of their findings or recommendations.
• To advance the field: Research papers seek to advance the field or discipline by identifying gaps in knowledge, proposing new research questions or approaches, or challenging existing assumptions or paradigms. They aim to contribute to ongoing debates and discussions within a field and to stimulate further research and inquiry.
• To demonstrate research skills: Research papers demonstrate the author’s research skills, including their ability to design and conduct a study, collect and analyze data, and interpret and communicate findings. They also demonstrate the author’s ability to critically evaluate existing literature, synthesize information from multiple sources, and write in a clear and structured manner.

Characteristics of Research Paper

Research papers have several characteristics that distinguish them from other forms of academic or professional writing. Here are some common characteristics of research papers:

• Evidence-based: Research papers are based on empirical evidence, which is collected through rigorous research methods such as experiments, surveys, observations, or interviews. They rely on objective data and facts to support their claims and conclusions.
• Structured and organized: Research papers have a clear and logical structure, with sections such as introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. They are organized in a way that helps the reader to follow the argument and understand the findings.
• Formal and objective: Research papers are written in a formal and objective tone, with an emphasis on clarity, precision, and accuracy. They avoid subjective language or personal opinions and instead rely on objective data and analysis to support their arguments.
• Citations and references: Research papers include citations and references to acknowledge the sources of information and ideas used in the paper. They use a specific citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, to ensure consistency and accuracy.
• Peer-reviewed: Research papers are often peer-reviewed, which means they are evaluated by other experts in the field before they are published. Peer-review ensures that the research is of high quality, meets ethical standards, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
• Objective and unbiased: Research papers strive to be objective and unbiased in their presentation of the findings. They avoid personal biases or preconceptions and instead rely on the data and analysis to draw conclusions.

Advantages of Research Paper

Research papers have many advantages, both for the individual researcher and for the broader academic and professional community. Here are some advantages of research papers:

• Contribution to knowledge: Research papers contribute to the body of knowledge in a particular field or discipline. They add new information, insights, and perspectives to existing literature and help advance the understanding of a particular phenomenon or issue.
• Opportunity for intellectual growth: Research papers provide an opportunity for intellectual growth for the researcher. They require critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which can help develop the researcher’s skills and knowledge.
• Career advancement: Research papers can help advance the researcher’s career by demonstrating their expertise and contributions to the field. They can also lead to new research opportunities, collaborations, and funding.
• Academic recognition: Research papers can lead to academic recognition in the form of awards, grants, or invitations to speak at conferences or events. They can also contribute to the researcher’s reputation and standing in the field.
• Impact on policy and practice: Research papers can have a significant impact on policy and practice. They can inform policy decisions, guide practice, and lead to changes in laws, regulations, or procedures.
• Advancement of society: Research papers can contribute to the advancement of society by addressing important issues, identifying solutions to problems, and promoting social justice and equality.

Limitations of Research Paper

Research papers also have some limitations that should be considered when interpreting their findings or implications. Here are some common limitations of research papers:

• Limited generalizability: Research findings may not be generalizable to other populations, settings, or contexts. Studies often use specific samples or conditions that may not reflect the broader population or real-world situations.
• Potential for bias : Research papers may be biased due to factors such as sample selection, measurement errors, or researcher biases. It is important to evaluate the quality of the research design and methods used to ensure that the findings are valid and reliable.
• Ethical concerns: Research papers may raise ethical concerns, such as the use of vulnerable populations or invasive procedures. Researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines and obtain informed consent from participants to ensure that the research is conducted in a responsible and respectful manner.
• Limitations of methodology: Research papers may be limited by the methodology used to collect and analyze data. For example, certain research methods may not capture the complexity or nuance of a particular phenomenon, or may not be appropriate for certain research questions.
• Publication bias: Research papers may be subject to publication bias, where positive or significant findings are more likely to be published than negative or non-significant findings. This can skew the overall findings of a particular area of research.
• Time and resource constraints: Research papers may be limited by time and resource constraints, which can affect the quality and scope of the research. Researchers may not have access to certain data or resources, or may be unable to conduct long-term studies due to practical limitations.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Scope of the Research – Writing Guide and...

Tables in Research Paper – Types, Creating Guide...

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Figures in Research Paper – Examples and Guide

APA Research Paper Format – Example, Sample and...

Dissertation vs Thesis – Key Differences

Think Like a Researcher: Instruction Resources: #6 Developing Successful Research Questions

• Guide Organization
• Overall Summary
• #1 Think Like a Researcher!
• #2 How to Read a Scholarly Article
• #3 Reading for Keywords (CREDO)
• #4 Using Google for Academic Research
• #4 Using Google for Academic Research (Alternate)
• #5 Integrating Sources
• Research Question Discussion
• #7 Avoiding Researcher Bias
• #8 Understanding the Information Cycle
• #9 Exploring Databases
• #10 Library Session
• #11 Post Library Session Activities
• Summary - Readings
• Summary - Research Journal Prompts
• Summary - Key Assignments
• Jigsaw Readings
• Permission Form

Course Learning Outcome:   Develop ability to synthesize and express complex ideas; demonstrate information literacy and be able to work with evidence

Goal:  Develop students’ ability to recognize and create successful research questions

Specifically, students will be able to

• identify the components of a successful research question.
• create a viable research question.

What Makes a Good Research Topic Handout

These handouts are intended to be used as a discussion generator that will help students develop a solid research topic or question. Many students start with topics that are poorly articulated, too broad, unarguable, or are socially insignificant. Each of these problems may result in a topic that is virtually un-researchable. Starting with a researchable topic is critical to writing an effective paper.

Research shows that students are much more invested in writing when they are able to choose their own topics. However, there is also research to support the notion that students are completely overwhelmed and frustrated when they are given complete freedom to write about whatever they choose. Providing some structure or topic themes that allow students to make bounded choices may be a way mitigate these competing realities.

These handouts can be modified or edited for your purposes.  One can be used as a handout for students while the other can serve as a sample answer key.  The document is best used as part of a process.  For instance, perhaps starting with discussing the issues and potential research questions, moving on to problems and social significance but returning to proposals/solutions at a later date.

• Research Questions - Handout Key (2 pgs) This document is a condensed version of "What Makes a Good Research Topic". It serves as a key.
• Research Questions - Handout for Students (2 pgs) This document could be used with a class to discuss sample research questions (are they suitable?) and to have them start thinking about problems, social significance, and solutions for additional sample research questions.
• Research Question Discussion This tab includes materials for introduction students to research question criteria for a problem/solution essay.

Additional Resources

These documents have similarities to those above.  They represent original documents and conversations about research questions from previous TRAIL trainings.

• What Makes a Good Research Topic? - Original Handout (4 pgs)
• What Makes a Good Research Topic? Revised Jan. 2016 (4 pgs)
• What Makes a Good Research Topic? Revised Jan 2016 with comments

Topic Selection (NCSU Libraries)

Howard, Rebecca Moore, Tricia Serviss, and Tanya K. Rodrigues. " Writing from sources, writing from sentences ." Writing & Pedagogy 2.2 (2010): 177-192.

Research Journal

Assign after students have participated in the Developing Successful Research Topics/Questions Lesson OR have drafted a Research Proposal.

Think about your potential research question.

• What is the problem that underlies your question?
• Is the problem of social significance? Explain.
• Is your proposed solution to the problem feasible? Explain.
• Do you think there is evidence to support your solution?

Keys for Writers - Additional Resource

Keys for Writers (Raimes and Miller-Cochran) includes a section to guide students in the formation of an arguable claim (thesis).  The authors advise students to avoid the following since they are not debatable. 

• "a neutral statement, which gives no hint of the writer's position"
• "an announcement of the paper's broad subject"
• "a fact, which is not arguable"
• "a truism (statement that is obviously true)"
• "a personal or religious conviction that cannot be logically debated"
• "an opinion based only on your feelings"
• "a sweeping generalization" (Section 4C, pg. 52)

The book also provides examples and key points (pg. 53) for a good working thesis.

• << Previous: #5 Integrating Sources
• Next: Research Question Discussion >>
• Last Updated: Apr 26, 2024 10:23 AM
• URL: https://libguides.ucmerced.edu/think_like_a_researcher

How To Write A Research Paper

Step-By-Step Tutorial With Examples + FREE Template

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewer: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | March 2024

For many students, crafting a strong research paper from scratch can feel like a daunting task – and rightly so! In this post, we’ll unpack what a research paper is, what it needs to do , and how to write one – in three easy steps. 🙂 

Overview: Writing A Research Paper

What (exactly) is a research paper.

• How to write a research paper
• Stage 1 : Topic & literature search
• Stage 2 : Structure & outline
• Stage 3 : Iterative writing
• Key takeaways

Let’s start by asking the most important question, “ What is a research paper? ”.

Simply put, a research paper is a scholarly written work where the writer (that’s you!) answers a specific question (this is called a research question ) through evidence-based arguments . Evidence-based is the keyword here. In other words, a research paper is different from an essay or other writing assignments that draw from the writer’s personal opinions or experiences. With a research paper, it’s all about building your arguments based on evidence (we’ll talk more about that evidence a little later).

Now, it’s worth noting that there are many different types of research papers , including analytical papers (the type I just described), argumentative papers, and interpretative papers. Here, we’ll focus on analytical papers , as these are some of the most common – but if you’re keen to learn about other types of research papers, be sure to check out the rest of the blog .

With that basic foundation laid, let’s get down to business and look at how to write a research paper .

Overview: The 3-Stage Process

While there are, of course, many potential approaches you can take to write a research paper, there are typically three stages to the writing process. So, in this tutorial, we’ll present a straightforward three-step process that we use when working with students at Grad Coach.

These three steps are:

• Finding a research topic and reviewing the existing literature
• Developing a provisional structure and outline for your paper, and
• Writing up your initial draft and then refining it iteratively

Let’s dig into each of these.

Need a helping hand?

Step 1: Find a topic and review the literature

As we mentioned earlier, in a research paper, you, as the researcher, will try to answer a question . More specifically, that’s called a research question , and it sets the direction of your entire paper. What’s important to understand though is that you’ll need to answer that research question with the help of high-quality sources – for example, journal articles, government reports, case studies, and so on. We’ll circle back to this in a minute.

The first stage of the research process is deciding on what your research question will be and then reviewing the existing literature (in other words, past studies and papers) to see what they say about that specific research question. In some cases, your professor may provide you with a predetermined research question (or set of questions). However, in many cases, you’ll need to find your own research question within a certain topic area.

Finding a strong research question hinges on identifying a meaningful research gap – in other words, an area that’s lacking in existing research. There’s a lot to unpack here, so if you wanna learn more, check out the plain-language explainer video below.

Once you’ve figured out which question (or questions) you’ll attempt to answer in your research paper, you’ll need to do a deep dive into the existing literature – this is called a “ literature search ”. Again, there are many ways to go about this, but your most likely starting point will be Google Scholar .

If you’re new to Google Scholar, think of it as Google for the academic world. You can start by simply entering a few different keywords that are relevant to your research question and it will then present a host of articles for you to review. What you want to pay close attention to here is the number of citations for each paper – the more citations a paper has, the more credible it is (generally speaking – there are some exceptions, of course).

Ideally, what you’re looking for are well-cited papers that are highly relevant to your topic. That said, keep in mind that citations are a cumulative metric , so older papers will often have more citations than newer papers – just because they’ve been around for longer. So, don’t fixate on this metric in isolation – relevance and recency are also very important.

Beyond Google Scholar, you’ll also definitely want to check out academic databases and aggregators such as Science Direct, PubMed, JStor and so on. These will often overlap with the results that you find in Google Scholar, but they can also reveal some hidden gems – so, be sure to check them out.

Once you’ve worked your way through all the literature, you’ll want to catalogue all this information in some sort of spreadsheet so that you can easily recall who said what, when and within what context. If you’d like, we’ve got a free literature spreadsheet that helps you do exactly that.

Step 2: Develop a structure and outline

With your research question pinned down and your literature digested and catalogued, it’s time to move on to planning your actual research paper .

It might sound obvious, but it’s really important to have some sort of rough outline in place before you start writing your paper. So often, we see students eagerly rushing into the writing phase, only to land up with a disjointed research paper that rambles on in multiple

Now, the secret here is to not get caught up in the fine details . Realistically, all you need at this stage is a bullet-point list that describes (in broad strokes) what you’ll discuss and in what order. It’s also useful to remember that you’re not glued to this outline – in all likelihood, you’ll chop and change some sections once you start writing, and that’s perfectly okay. What’s important is that you have some sort of roadmap in place from the start.

At this stage you might be wondering, “ But how should I structure my research paper? ”. Well, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution here, but in general, a research paper will consist of a few relatively standardised components:

• Introduction
• Literature review
• Methodology

Let’s take a look at each of these.

First up is the introduction section . As the name suggests, the purpose of the introduction is to set the scene for your research paper. There are usually (at least) four ingredients that go into this section – these are the background to the topic, the research problem and resultant research question , and the justification or rationale. If you’re interested, the video below unpacks the introduction section in more detail. 

The next section of your research paper will typically be your literature review . Remember all that literature you worked through earlier? Well, this is where you’ll present your interpretation of all that content . You’ll do this by writing about recent trends, developments, and arguments within the literature – but more specifically, those that are relevant to your research question . The literature review can oftentimes seem a little daunting, even to seasoned researchers, so be sure to check out our extensive collection of literature review content here .

With the introduction and lit review out of the way, the next section of your paper is the research methodology . In a nutshell, the methodology section should describe to your reader what you did (beyond just reviewing the existing literature) to answer your research question. For example, what data did you collect, how did you collect that data, how did you analyse that data and so on? For each choice, you’ll also need to justify why you chose to do it that way, and what the strengths and weaknesses of your approach were.

Now, it’s worth mentioning that for some research papers, this aspect of the project may be a lot simpler . For example, you may only need to draw on secondary sources (in other words, existing data sets). In some cases, you may just be asked to draw your conclusions from the literature search itself (in other words, there may be no data analysis at all). But, if you are required to collect and analyse data, you’ll need to pay a lot of attention to the methodology section. The video below provides an example of what the methodology section might look like.

By this stage of your paper, you will have explained what your research question is, what the existing literature has to say about that question, and how you analysed additional data to try to answer your question. So, the natural next step is to present your analysis of that data . This section is usually called the “results” or “analysis” section and this is where you’ll showcase your findings.

Depending on your school’s requirements, you may need to present and interpret the data in one section – or you might split the presentation and the interpretation into two sections. In the latter case, your “results” section will just describe the data, and the “discussion” is where you’ll interpret that data and explicitly link your analysis back to your research question. If you’re not sure which approach to take, check in with your professor or take a look at past papers to see what the norms are for your programme.

Alright – once you’ve presented and discussed your results, it’s time to wrap it up . This usually takes the form of the “ conclusion ” section. In the conclusion, you’ll need to highlight the key takeaways from your study and close the loop by explicitly answering your research question. Again, the exact requirements here will vary depending on your programme (and you may not even need a conclusion section at all) – so be sure to check with your professor if you’re unsure.

Step 3: Write and refine

Finally, it’s time to get writing. All too often though, students hit a brick wall right about here… So, how do you avoid this happening to you?

Well, there’s a lot to be said when it comes to writing a research paper (or any sort of academic piece), but we’ll share three practical tips to help you get started.

First and foremost , it’s essential to approach your writing as an iterative process. In other words, you need to start with a really messy first draft and then polish it over multiple rounds of editing. Don’t waste your time trying to write a perfect research paper in one go. Instead, take the pressure off yourself by adopting an iterative approach.

Secondly , it’s important to always lean towards critical writing , rather than descriptive writing. What does this mean? Well, at the simplest level, descriptive writing focuses on the “ what ”, while critical writing digs into the “ so what ” – in other words, the implications . If you’re not familiar with these two types of writing, don’t worry! You can find a plain-language explanation here.

Last but not least, you’ll need to get your referencing right. Specifically, you’ll need to provide credible, correctly formatted citations for the statements you make. We see students making referencing mistakes all the time and it costs them dearly. The good news is that you can easily avoid this by using a simple reference manager . If you don’t have one, check out our video about Mendeley, an easy (and free) reference management tool that you can start using today.

Recap: Key Takeaways

We’ve covered a lot of ground here. To recap, the three steps to writing a high-quality research paper are:

• To choose a research question and review the literature
• To plan your paper structure and draft an outline
• To take an iterative approach to writing, focusing on critical writing and strong referencing

Remember, this is just a b ig-picture overview of the research paper development process and there’s a lot more nuance to unpack. So, be sure to grab a copy of our free research paper template to learn more about how to write a research paper.

Can you help me with a full paper template for this Abstract:

Background: Energy and sports drinks have gained popularity among diverse demographic groups, including adolescents, athletes, workers, and college students. While often used interchangeably, these beverages serve distinct purposes, with energy drinks aiming to boost energy and cognitive performance, and sports drinks designed to prevent dehydration and replenish electrolytes and carbohydrates lost during physical exertion.

Objective: To assess the nutritional quality of energy and sports drinks in Egypt.

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study assessed the nutrient contents, including energy, sugar, electrolytes, vitamins, and caffeine, of sports and energy drinks available in major supermarkets in Cairo, Alexandria, and Giza, Egypt. Data collection involved photographing all relevant product labels and recording nutritional information. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests were employed to analyze and compare the nutritional values of energy and sports drinks.

Results: The study analyzed 38 sports drinks and 42 energy drinks. Sports drinks were significantly more expensive than energy drinks, with higher net content and elevated magnesium, potassium, and vitamin C. Energy drinks contained higher concentrations of caffeine, sugars, and vitamins B2, B3, and B6.

Conclusion: Significant nutritional differences exist between sports and energy drinks, reflecting their intended uses. However, these beverages’ high sugar content and calorie loads raise health concerns. Proper labeling, public awareness, and responsible marketing are essential to guide safe consumption practices in Egypt.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts

Writing and Publishing Your Research Findings

Charles t. quinn.

* Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX

† Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX

A. John Rush

‡ Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX

§ Clinical Sciences, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore

Writing clearly is critical to the success of your scientific career. Unfortunately, this skill is not taught in medical school or postgraduate training. This article summarizes our approach to the writing and publication of your research. Here we focus on empirical or experimental reports of translational and clinically oriented research. We review the process of choosing what to write, how to write it clearly, and how to navigate the process of submission and publication.

INTRODUCTION

Articulate writing is critical to scientific success.

This article summarizes material presented in a course that we have taught at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. The material is a synthesis of material from a variety of sources (see References), to which we have added our own, sometimes idiosyncratic, suggestions for developing peer-reviewed journal reports of clinical and translational research. We particularly want to acknowledge Essentials of Writing Biomedical Research Papers by Mimi Zeiger 1 at the University of California at San Francisco, whose book we highly recommend.

Writing clearly and accurately is critical to the success of your scientific career. If you do not write clearly, your article will not be cited. If you are not cited, you will not get promoted. If you do not get promoted, you will not have a job. Writing clearly to maximize your likelihood of being cited by others is key to your scientific survival. Published research is your only final product. A poorly written report could mean that you have wasted years conducting your study, because what you have done will not be cited or known. As such, it will not impact the field. The threat of career failure should be a powerful motivator for writing clearly, as is doing the very best science that one can.

Each article tells a story, but there is no “one true path” to writing. We each learn how to use our talents, overcome our deficiencies, and develop our skills differently. Each article we write is less difficult, but none is ever easy. To avoid feeling overwhelmed by the effort, we suggest that you approach writing as a series of questions to be clearly answered. What was the research question? Why does the answer matter? What was done? What was found? Has anyone else found that (or not)? What might it mean? What limitations or qualifications apply to the findings?

Define What to Report

What are you going to write? Obviously, the primary paper focuses on the main hypotheses that you tested. But there may be several secondary hypotheses and maybe a couple of tertiary papers that are hypothesis generating. But be careful. Do not write trivial papers (third-rate papers with too small samples). They take too much time, are not cited, and have minimal to no payoff.

So, consider at the outset what aspects of the project are to be submitted, where, and in what order. What is the primary paper? Are there secondary papers? Clinical investigation often requires many people, so consider which colleagues might like to take the lead on a secondary paper. That is, depending on the size of the study and the contributions, needs, and expertise of your multidisciplinary research team, think about additional papers for others than yourself.

Getting Started

How often have you heard, “I have writer’s block”? What does that mean? Everybody who has attended medical, dental, or nursing school can write. Thus, “writer’s block” is a fiction— an excuse. The underlying fear may be that either one cannot think clearly enough to be able to say what was done (in which case, a career change is indicated!) or one is afraid that the product will not be “good enough” and therefore procrastinates.

To overcome “writer’s block,” simply realize at the outset that most of the words in the first draft will not make it to the final draft. Once you have something on paper, however, you can edit it—repeatedly. To get it on paper, dictate, type, or handwrite it (whatever is fastest for you). We recommend that you start with an outline. The outline is straightforward: title, abstract, introduction, methods, results (with tables and figures), discussion, conclusions, references, acknowledgements, and disclosures. Then write a topic sentence for each paragraph in each section. The outline and the topic sentences should take you about an hour-and-a-half to write. Then start to write each paragraph in the 4 key sections (introduction, methods, results, and discussion).

One place to begin is with the protocol that you followed to conduct the study. The protocol contains the aims, hypotheses/questions, rationale, and methods. Thus, the protocol is the basis for the first drafts of the introduction and methods. You may need to update the significance (to beef up the introduction) and to cite the newest relevant literature. Borrow from what you have done to begin.

Recall that journals limit articles to 3000 to 4000 words. If each paragraph has 200 words, you have to write 18 to 20 paragraphs ( Table 1 ). The introduction has 3 to 4 paragraphs (never longer than 2 manuscript pages); discussion has 5; results typically has 4 to 6, depending on the number of questions; leaving 5 to 6 for methods. Once you break it down this way, it does not seem so bad.

The Main Elements of a Manuscript

Prepare to Spend Time

Realize that writing takes a lot of time. You must set aside uninterrupted time, which in our view is best inserted between other activities that do not involve writing. Write for a while, then stop and leave it alone. When you go back later, you will be more objective and be better able to edit your prior work. Too many people frustrate themselves by expecting to write up 4 years of work in 4 weeks. That is not realistic, especially if you have not written many prior papers, if you have other duties, or both. So think about what you want to produce and divide the work into “doable” pieces (eg, the major sections noted above). Allocate a fixed amount of uninterrupted time each day to work on 1 section at a time to assemble these pieces without regard to how well it is written and without thinking about references. Simply tell the story.

Tell the Story

Look at the big picture first. Recall that you know more about what you have done than anybody else, so do not get nervous. You know the story—what you did and why you did it. Writing the first draft should not be a big thing. Polishing your drafts is where the time is.

The most important thing is to tell the story. Most people get stuck in the details and lose track of the story. Readers want to know what the issues were, why they matter, and what questions were asked (introduction). Then how were the issues addressed, questions answered, and hypotheses tested (methods)? Next, what were the answers (results)? The results section is divided into subheadings, often based on the questions or hypotheses at the end of the introduction. A table or figure should accompany each question. Finally, what do you make of the results (discussion)? These are the major sections of each empirical report for scientific journals ( Tables 1 and ​ and2 2 ).

Elements of the Story Line

Recall for Whom You Are Writing

Do not write your paper for scientists, colleagues, the promotion and tenure committee, or your department chair. Tell the story as if you were talking to somebody who is not an expert in your area. If you make the article that simple and straightforward, readers will be able to understand what you did and be able to cite the paper. If you use a lot of jargon, compound sentences, or obscure wording, only you and your coauthors will actually know what you are saying.

Table 3 highlights the most common reasons for rejection/revision. Most of these issues can be addressed by being pithy (succinct but full of substance and meaning) and consistent. Sentences should be simple: subject, verb, object, period. Whenever possible, avoid compound sentences. Do not change terminology throughout the paper (eg, do not interchangeably use subjects, participants, patients, or volunteers). Readers will wonder why you changed the names. Whatever word or phrase you use to describe something, keep using the same term. This is not an English essay or creative-writing class. A scientific article uses an expository writing style—it simply tells the facts. The reader needs specificity, clarity, and brevity—not engaging phraseology. Be very specific. Avoid general statements such as, “The patients improved.” What does that mean? Better to say something like “Patients in group A had a greater reduction in X than did patients in group B; test, P value (Table X).” Finally, physicians tend to be pompous in their style of writing. Avoid this; it prevents clear communication. Invest in a guide to clear medical writing to help. 2

Common Reasons for Rejection or Revision

Let us now consider each element in a manuscript.

THE MANUSCRIPT

The title should have 12 words or fewer (pithy). Notice that movies do not have long titles. The Fugitive . Not Escaping Jail Following an Unfair Conviction in Chicago . Just The Fugitive .

Do not say: “A study of X.” Of course it is a study. That wastes words. Begin the title with a key word. Be to the point. Grab the reader’s attention. Table 4 lists characteristics of a good title.

Characteristics of a Good Title

There are 2 kinds of abstracts: structured and unstructured. Structured abstracts have distinct subsections: objectives, methods, results, and conclusions (these may vary by journal). Unstructured abstracts contain the same information, but are just 1 long paragraph.

Most people do not read an entire article. Everyone reads the abstract. So whatever is in the abstract is what everyone thinks is in the article. Therefore, it is critical to edit, polish, and perfect the abstract, because it is almost the only information that readers will take home.

What is the state of knowledge? What was the question (background)? What did you do and how did you do it (methods)? What did you find (results)? What is the bottom line (conclusion)? That’s it!

We like to write the abstract first because it forces us to give the 10-second version of the paper. Then we polish it repeatedly after we write the article. The abstract will change a lot—often not substantively, but especially in terms of clarifying and simplifying the presentation. If you write your abstract first, you must ensure that it matches the final manuscript.

Introduction

At the beginning, tell the readers the problem ( Table 5 ). What do we know and what do we not know? Why does this matter? Then, what are the questions or hypotheses to be addressed or tested? What, in brief, was the approach?

The Introduction: Start Broadly, Then Narrow

The introduction should hook the reader. Paragraph no. 1: What is known? For example, “Diabetes is bad news, especially when it is associated with fatty liver.” Paragraph no. 2: What is unknown? For example, “We do not know how to treat patients with this complication.”

Paragraph no. 3: What is the question or hypothesis? “This study was conducted to determine whether A is better than B in improving fatty liver in patients with diabetes.” What was done? “We addressed this question by conducting a randomized controlled trial of A versus B in diabetic patients with fatty liver.” Be sure the introduction states your questions or hypotheses. End the introduction with a statement of your hypothesis: “We hypothesized that A was significantly better than B at decreasing fatty liver because….” Bingo, the introduction is done.

The introduction is NOT a literature review. Do not over-reference. Seven to 10 references are plenty. Less experienced writers seem to feel the need to cite the entire literature before getting to the methods. Do not. Everybody will trust that you can read. What they want to know is what was the issue. Why is it important? How did you approach the problem?

A poorly written methods section is a major reason for rejection. Be specific. Give details. Readers must know what you did. Remember, someone may try to replicate what you did! If the replication fails, your credibility is questioned. Give enough detail to ensure that another scientist can replicate exactly what you did. Give no more detail than is necessary, but give all the details that are required for replication.

The methods section is typically in chronological order. What did you do first? Then what did you do? Methods can be dense. Use subheadings in the text to guide the reader. Table 6 lists common elements (subheadings) of methods.

Common Elements of the Methods

First, provide the study overview. What was the design? When was the study done? Where was it done? For example, “We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial of drug A versus placebo for 6 months in participants with type 2 diabetes and fatty liver.” This brief, 30,000-ft overview primes the reader for the dense (but clear) text that follows.

Then provide the details ( Table 6 ). How did you recruit the sample? Consecutive? When you felt like it? How did you define who is eligible? When did the study start and stop? And so on. Do not include results in the methods section. The rules for obtaining the sample are in methods. The sample that you obtained by using these rules is described in the first paragraph of results. 3 , 4 It is very important to say how the current sample relates to other reports of the same or related samples. Be very clear about whether patients in your study were or were not included in any prior reports. People doing meta-analyses or literature reviews, for example, must know whether the present sample is distinct or not from other samples. Surprisingly, you often cannot tell whether 2 reported samples are partially overlapping, the same, or distinct.

Describe where the study was conducted. Define all the variables used in the report, but none of the variables not in the report. Sometimes you might collect variables not included in this report. If they are in another report, you do not have to put them in this report.

What was the rationale for the randomization? Was it stratified? Was it computer based or did you use a table? Did you randomize in blocks? What was the informed consent process? Was there institutional review board or data safety monitoring board oversight? Were measurements blinded? Who was blinded and how?

How did you deliver the treatment of interest? How often were they treated? Who provided the treatment? How else were they managed? Could there be home visits? Could there be extra visits? Be very specific.

Did you assess whether patients adhered to treatment? If so, how? Did you ask them, count pills, or use MEMS caps?

How did you ensure that the people who delivered the study treatment did what they were supposed to do? Was there a manual? Was there quality control?

How were concomitant medicines managed? What rescue treatments or other efforts were used when patients worsened?

What were your outcomes or end points? Which was your primary outcome? Which were secondary? Who measured or obtained the end points? How? When? Was there quality control for these measures? Who did it? How? How often?

What sample size did you use? What kind of difference did you expect? What difference was expected? Did you power the study to detect this difference? What is the power? Why did you choose the statistical tests you did? Who did the analyses? Finally, it is very important that your coauthors see the data and have some discussion with the statistician so they really understand how the study was analyzed. You have to assume that your coauthors are going to make slides from this study and present it somewhere. If they do not understand the analysis, the audience will not. And they will be misinformed, unfairly judge your study, or both.

When writing the results, we first build the tables and figures. Then we write the text to tell the story, answering the study questions, around the tables and figures. The text of results is often brief because the tables and figures provide the findings. Be pithy. The less you elaborate, the clearer you will be. You want the bottom line to be very, very clear. Remember, results is for the results. The introduction tells readers why you did the study. How you arrived at the results is in methods. What the results mean is in discussion.

Start with the results of the most important question, then the second most important, and so on. Or organize the section chronologically. Use subheadings to denote each question or section. There should be no interpretation of findings in results. Make the results exciting, but do not hype. Table 7 lists important points to consider when writing this section.

The Results

If your patient sample is not extremely simple in composition, use a CONSORT chart. 3 , 4 This chart explicitly and clearly shows how you obtained the evaluable sample. It will save you many words. Journals may require this chart, especially for clinical trials. If 2 (or more) groups were compared, describe and compare these groups at baseline. Serious adverse events, tolerability, attrition, and dosing may be in subsequent tables. Describe patients sensitively. People are not schizophrenics or diabetics. They are patients with schizophrenia or diabetes. They are participants, not subjects. Why participants? Because they chose to participate by giving consent. Subjects, such as rats, do not give consent. 5

It is critical that the tables and figures carry the message. Do not repeat in the text what is in the tables and figures. Why? People can read the tables and figures. Use the text to direct the reader to the tables and figures. A sentence or 2 in the text to draw attention to a few key findings might be useful in the results section, but do not comment on every item in each table.

Tables and Figures

Figures and tables should stand alone. That is, each should be understood without reference to the text. The text simply alerts the reader when to look for them. So, if you use abbreviations or acronyms here, spell them out in the footnotes and legends. A figure has a title and legend that explains it; a table has a title and footnotes, if necessary, but no legend. Each figure or table should be on a separate sheet of paper. Remember, readers may use your tables and figures as slides. Make them clear and self-contained so that the slide has meaning.

Provide clear names for each column of your table. The study variables (eg, age, sex, severe adverse events, remission rates) are typically in the leftmost column, and each defines a row. The data are in the columns to the right. Avoid vertical lines in tables. The rows should have few to no horizontal lines.

Whenever you use a percentage in tables (and elsewhere), give the numerator and denominator so the reader can see how you derived it. We like to put significant P values in bold, but always follow journal style. Give the actual P value, not “NS” or “<0.05.” Only use decimal places that are informative. For example, nobody knows what 48.134 years of age means. Report 48.1 years. Keep it simple.

Good figures are worth a thousand words and probably several tables. Figures should show your primary comparisons. The reader should be able to look at the figures and tables and know what the questions and answers are without reading the text. Avoid 3-dimensional figures and gratuitous color and shading. Most of the ink used to print your table should represent your data, not explanatory or decorative material. Creating clear and meaningful figures is a skill one learns. Practice it. Texts by Tufte 6 and Goodman and Edwards 2 can aid you in good design.

Next to the abstract, we find the discussion to be the most difficult part to write. We may be excited about what we have found and have lots to say about it. This may make the discussion wander. Here is a way to organize the discussion ( Table 8 ).

Elements of the Discussion

The first paragraph summarizes what you found. “This study was designed to determine whether A is better than B with regard to X. We found A was better than B in terms of tolerability, side effects, and remission rates, but not in terms of Y.” If there was a second question, then the findings follow in the same first paragraph. You told them the questions (hypotheses) at the end of the introduction. Now, you summarize the answers. Avoid repeating the results; you just stated them.

The second paragraph of discussion addresses the question: “Has anybody else found anything like or different from what you found?” That is, how does it compare to the literature? If your findings are different, why? Is it the method, the sample, or measurement differences?

The third paragraph addresses the theoretical or clinical implications of the findings. What do these results mean about the utility or mechanisms of the study treatment or the pathophysiology of the disease being studied?

The fourth paragraph highlights limitations (and strengths). Limitations commonly include design, methods, generalizability, and internal validity. How certain are you about the results? A small study cannot be generalized. Measurements may have been too infrequent or too insensitive to detect an effect. Attrition may have been high. How does that affect certainty? Do not overstate the certainty of your findings. If you do not acknowledge the limitations of your report, the reviewers will make you. This is low-hanging fruit. Do not give reviewers the opportunity. Be honest, but this is your chance to frame the limitations in the best light. Remember, all studies have weaknesses. Do not feel embarrassed to list and discuss them. If your study has particular strengths, you may also highlight them here. This may soften the blow of the limitations.

Conclusions are pithy. Three sentences are enough—only 1 paragraph. A conclusion is: “A is better than B for these kinds of patients. This conclusion is limited by X and Y.” Some journals like you to suggest policy, economic, or practice implications—this is your final sentence: “Since X is better than Y and we have no other treatment for these patients, we recommend despite the limitations of this first trial that X might be a better treatment, but confirmatory studies are needed.” A common phrase that ends the conclusion is “more studies are needed.” Do not use it. More studies are always needed. Instead, state what studies you think are needed.

Leave the insertion of citations for the end. Where do references come up in the article? Largely in the introduction (7–10), methods (6–9), and discussion (15–20) (maximum, 30–40). The few references in the introduction should help lay out the problem and say why it is important. An introduction is NOT a literature review. The references in methods refer to measurements or techniques described in detail elsewhere. You do not have to describe them again; reference them.

If you use someone else’s idea, give appropriate credit. Remember, that person could be a reviewer. You do not have to cite everything, just that which is immediately relevant to support your point. Rely on peer-reviewed literature, reports, and reviews.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements are undervalued by authors but highly valued by colleagues. Be generous. Cite those people who substantially assisted in the project (eg, research assistants, key staff). Remember all the people who truly contributed to the success of the study, but who are not authors, and recognize them here.

Disclosures

Journals have different but increasingly strict rules about disclosure. Follow them closely. If you are in doubt about a relationship, disclose it. Only underdisclosing, not overdisclosing, will embarrass you.

GETTING IT PUBLISHED

This is a thorny issue. If you are the principal investigator, we strongly advise that you meet with your study team when you launch a study to talk about authorship. Consider who will write up the primary question and key secondary questions. Talk it through early, so everybody knows the expectations from the beginning. This is especially important for junior faculty who need to know, after spending a couple of years on the study, what are they going to get out of it.

Who is supposed to be an author? Most journals have specific requirements. Those who have contributed to the design and execution of the project and helped in developing the manuscript are logical possible coauthors. Just raising funds or being the chairman of the department does not qualify (use the acknowledgements for these individuals).

Typically, hired or support staff are not authors, but there may be exceptions, depending on their contributions. Students or fellows can certainly qualify if they make a substantive contribution either at the beginning, during the data analysis, or with the writing.

For large or multisite studies, it is extremely important to have a publication committee. Try to get on the publication committee. Some studies base authorship on enrollment, scientific expertise, execution of the study, and leadership. Have these discussions early and be up-front about authorship. Most people do not like to talk about authorship (as they do not like to talk about their salary). But you cannot be shy. Younger faculty need to be first, second, or third author. Beyond third author, you are “et al.” Last is for senior authors.

Rewrites are critical. There are many reasons to rewrite ( Table 9 ). We suggest that you go after specific targets with each rewrite. If you have coauthors, use them. The first author should not have to write everything if coauthors are to merit the recognition. Once you get a draft, share it with coauthors and direct each one to a task. “X, please revise the introduction.” “Y, please revise the methods.” You distribute the work and have it come back to you. You have final editorial say as the first author. It also helps you to see how your coauthors interpret what you have written, what questions they have, and what changes they suggest.

Reasons to Rewrite

When you ask coauthors to rewrite, set the time frame and tell them exactly what you want them to do. “Please give me feedback on the results section. Please review and revise within 7 days.” Everybody has a large pile of things to do. Without a scheduled time limit, the article goes to the bottom of the pile. Rewrite 1 section at a time. Sequence the writers, so somebody does one section and someone else does another. But remember, the manuscript should not read as if there was a different author for each section. So, you have to ensure that the entire text “flows” and is stylistically consistent.

Table 9 shows areas of attention for rewrites. Shorten the introduction. Polish the abstract. Shorten the discussion. Double-check the methods to be sure the words are totally explicit, specific, and detailed. Delete jargon. Delete words. Make sure your tables and figures, if read alone, tell the results all by themselves.

Outside Readers

Once you and coauthors have written the article to its “final version,” send it to 2 people who have no idea what you do, but who are intelligent and can communicate. They do not have to be experts in your area. Ask them to proofread the paper. Then ask them to tell you in their own words what you found. That way you will know whether they got the message.

Choosing a Journal

In choosing a journal, select one that is highly regarded with a high citation index. The journal content should match what you are reporting, so the readership will be interested in what you have to say. Some journals restrict length a lot—some less so, which might be a consideration in choosing a journal. Pick a journal as your first target that is bit of a long shot (sort of a stretch), but have in mind a second choice if the first rejects the paper. It is helpful if your second choice has similar requirements as the first. For example, you do not want to be limited to 4000 words for the first journal but to 2500 words for the second.

Rejections and Resubmissions

Rejections and negative reviews can be very frustrating. You may even feel angry or defeated. This is normal. Read the reviews through once, then put them aside for a while. If you are given the opportunity to resubmit, do not formulate your responses yet. Return several days later and read the reviews again. You will have a clearer mind then, and you will be less likely to respond angrily or with condescension. Some rejections are valid. Some are due to misunderstanding, which means that you were not clear. The reviewers took the time to read your article. If they did not “get it,” it is your writing.

Sometimes the editorial response highlights the problem and seems to say either “Please fix this and resubmit” or “It’s a long shot, but we’ll re-review it if you want to try—no guarantee though.” Always respond item-by-item to each of the reviewers’ comments in a detailed letter. Be careful with your tone. A negative tone in your responses will work against you. We like to write the response letter before revising the paper. Think through everything you want to do, then revise the paper and show your changes. Always include your coauthors in this process, because they are signing off on what you are resubmitting.

We hope this synopsis is helpful. It took 15 drafts. It could still be better. So, writing is never easy. But what you want to get back from the reviewers is “This is a clearly written, succinct report of X. I have some remaining questions….” No report is perfect. Recall that the reviewers are your helpers, but they cannot help improve your manuscript (or science) if you have not been clear in telling the story, specific in describing what you’ve done, and to the point throughout the paper. Good luck!