research on child labour pdf

• Search Menu
• Advance articles
• Editor's Choice
• Supplements
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• About Journal of Public Health
• About the Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom
• Editorial Board
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction, methodology.

• < Previous

Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Abdalla Ibrahim, Salma M Abdalla, Mohammed Jafer, Jihad Abdelgadir, Nanne de Vries, Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries, Journal of Public Health , Volume 41, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 18–26, https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy018

• Permissions Icon Permissions

To summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on physical and mental health.

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for studies that included participants aged 18 years or less, conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and reported quantitative data. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and assessment of study quality.

A total of 25 studies were identified, the majority of which were cross-sectional. Child labor was found to be associated with a number of adverse health outcomes, including but not limited to poor growth, malnutrition, higher incidence of infectious and system-specific diseases, behavioral and emotional disorders, and decreased coping efficacy. Quality of included studies was rated as fair to good.

Child labor remains a major public health concern in LMICs, being associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Current efforts against child labor need to be revisited, at least in LMICs. Further studies following a longitudinal design, and using common methods to assess the health impact of child labor in different country contexts would inform policy making.

For decades, child labor has been an important global issue associated with inadequate educational opportunities, poverty and gender inequality. 1 Not all types of work carried out by children are considered child labor. Engagement of children or adolescents in work with no influence on their health and schooling is usually regarded positive. The International Labor Organization (ILO) describes child labor as ‘work that deprives children of their childhood, potential and dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development’. 2 This definition includes types of work that are mentally, physically, socially or morally harmful to children; or disrupts schooling.

The topic gained scientific attention with the industrial revolution. Research conducted in the UK, because of adverse outcomes in children, resulted in acts for child labor in 18 02. 3 Many countries followed the UK, in recognition of the associated health risks. The ILO took its first stance in 1973 by setting the minimum age for work. 4 Nevertheless, the ILO and other international organizations that target the issue failed to achieve goals. Child labor was part of the Millennium Development Goals, adopted by 191 nations in 20 00 5 to be achieved by 2015. Subsequently, child labor was included in the Sustainable Development Goals, 6 which explicitly calls for eradication of child labor by 2030.

Despite the reported decline in child labor from 1995 to 2000, it remains a major concern. In 2016, it was estimated that ~150 million children under the age of 14 are engaged in labor worldwide, with most of them working under circumstances that denies them a playful childhood and jeopardize their health. 7 Most working children are 11–14 years, but around 60 million are 5–11 years old. 7 There are no exact numbers of the distribution of child labor globally; however, available statistics show that 96% of child workers are in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 1

Research into the impacts of child labor suggests several associations between child labor and adverse health outcomes. Parker 1 reported that child labor is associated with certain exposures like silica in industries, and HIV infection in prostitution. Additionally, as child labor is associated with maternal illiteracy and poverty, children who work are more susceptible to malnutrition, 1 which predisposes them to various diseases.

A meta-analysis on the topic was published in 20 07. 8 However, authors reported only an association of child labor with higher mortality and morbidity than in the general population, without reporting individual outcome specific effects. 8 Another meta-analysis investigated the effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), including child labor, on health. They reported that ACEs are risk factors for many adverse health outcomes. 9

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that attempts to summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on both physical and mental health, based on specific outcomes. We review the most recent evidence on the health impacts of child labor in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) according to the World Bank classification. We provide an informative summary of current studies of the impacts of child labor, and reflect upon the progress of anti-child labor policies and laws.

Search strategy

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Search was restricted to publications from year 1997 onwards. Only studies written in English were considered. Our search algorithm was [(‘child labor’ OR ‘child labor’ OR ‘working children’ OR ‘occupational health’ OR ‘Adolescent work’ OR ‘working adolescents’) AND (Health OR medical)]. The first third of the algorithm was assigned to titles/abstracts to ensure relevance of the studies retrieved, while the rest of the terms were not. On PubMed, we added […AND (poverty OR ‘low income’ OR ‘developing countries’)] to increase the specificity of results; otherwise, the search results were ~60 times more, with the majority of studies being irrelevant.

Study selection

Studies that met the following criteria were considered eligible: sample age 18 years or less; study was conducted in LMICs; and quantitative data was reported.

Two authors reviewed the titles obtained, a.o. to exclude studies related to ‘medical child labor’ as in childbirth. Abstracts of papers retained were reviewed, and subsequently full studies were assessed for inclusion criteria. Two authors assessed the quality of studies using Downs and Black tool for quality assessment. 10 The tool includes 27 items, yet not all items fit every study. In such cases, we used only relevant items. Total score was the number of items positively evaluated. Studies were ranked accordingly (poor, fair, good) (Table 1 ).

Characteristics of studies included

* The quality is based on the percentage of Downs and Black 10 tool, < 50% = poor, 50–75% = fair, > 75% = good.

** BMI, body mass index.

*** HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

Data extraction and management

Two authors extracted the data using a standardized data extraction form. It included focus of study (i.e. physical and/or mental health), exposure (type of child labor), country of study, age group, gender, study design, reported measures (independent variables) and outcome measures (Table 1 ). The extraction form was piloted to ensure standardization of data collection. A third author then reviewed extracted data. Disagreements were solved by discussion.

Search results

A flow diagram (Fig. 1 ) shows the studies selection process. We retrieved 1050 studies on PubMed and 833 studies on Science Direct, with no duplicates in the search results. We also retrieved 23 studies through screening of the references, following the screening by title of retrieved studies. By reviewing title and abstract, 1879 studies were excluded. After full assessment of the remaining studies, 25 were included.

Study selection process.

Characteristics of included studies

Among the included studies ten documented only prevalence estimates of physical diseases, six documented mental and psychosocial health including abuse, and nine reported the prevalence of both mental and physical health impacts (Table 1 ). In total, 24 studies were conducted in one country; one study included data from the Living Standard Measurement Study of 83 LMIC. 8

In total, 12 studies compared outcomes between working children and a control group (Table 1 ). Concerning physical health, many studies reported the prevalence of general symptoms (fever, cough and stunting) or diseases (malnutrition, anemia and infectious diseases). Alternatively, some studies documented prevalence of illnesses or symptoms hypothesized to be associated with child labor (Table 1 ). The majority of studies focusing on physical health conducted clinical examination or collected blood samples.

Concerning mental and psychosocial health, the outcomes documented included abuse with its different forms, coping efficacy, emotional disturbances, mood and anxiety disorders. The outcomes were measured based on self-reporting and using validated measures, for example, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), in local languages.

The majority of studies were ranked as of ‘good quality’, with seven ranked ‘fair’ and one ranked ‘poor’ (Table 1 ). The majority of them also had mixed-gender samples, with only one study restricted to females. 24 In addition, valid measures were used in most studies (Table 1 ). Most studies did not examine the differences between genders.

Child labor and physical health

Fifteen studies examined physical health effects of child labor, including nutritional status, physical growth, work-related illnesses/symptoms, musculoskeletal pain, HIV infection, systematic symptoms, infectious diseases, tuberculosis and eyestrain. Eight studies measured physical health effects through clinical examination or blood samples, in addition to self-reported questionnaires. All studies in which a comparison group was used reported higher prevalence of physical diseases in the working children group.

Two studies were concerned with physical growth and development. A study conducted in Pakistan, 11 reported that child labor is associated with wasting, stunting and chronic malnutrition. A similar study conducted in India compared physical growth and genital development between working and non-working children and reported that child labor is associated with lower BMI, shorter stature and delayed genital development in working boys, while no significant differences were found among females. 12

Concerning work-related illnesses and injuries, a study conducted in Bangladesh reported that there is a statistically significant positive association between child labor and the probability to report any injury or illness, tiredness/exhaustion, body injury and other health problems. Number of hours worked and the probability of reporting injury and illness were positively correlated. Younger children were more likely to suffer from backaches and other health problems (infection, burns and lung diseases), while probability of reporting tiredness/exhaustion was greater in the oldest age group. Furthermore, the frequency of reporting any injury or illness increases with the number of hours worked, with significant variation across employment sectors. 13 A study in Iran reported that industrial workrooms were the most common place for injury (58.2%). Falling from heights or in horizontal surface was the most common mechanism of injury (44%). None of the patients was using a preventive device at the time of injury. Cuts (49.6%) were the most commonly reported injuries. 14

Other studies that investigated the prevalence of general symptoms in working children in Pakistan, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Indonesia reported that child labor is negatively associated with health. 15 – 19 Watery eyes, chronic cough and diarrhea were common findings, in addition to history of a major injury (permanent loss of an organ, hearing loss, bone fractures, permanent disability). 20 One study, conducted in India reported that working children suffered from anemia, gastrointestinal tract infections, vitamin deficiencies, respiratory tract infections, skin diseases and high prevalence of malnutrition. 21 Another study—of poor quality—in India reported that child labor was associated with higher incidence of infectious diseases compared to non-working children. 22

Only a few studies focused on specific diseases. A study in Brazil compared the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain between working and non-working children. Authors reported that the prevalence of pain in the neck, knee, wrist or hands, and upper back exceeded 15%. Workers in manufacturing had a significantly increased risk for musculoskeletal pain and back pain, while child workers in domestic services had 17% more musculoskeletal pain and 23% more back pain than non-workers. Awkward posture and heavy physical work were associated with musculoskeletal pain, while monotonous work, awkward posture and noise were associated with back pain. 23 A study in Nicaragua, which focused on children working in agriculture, reported that child labor in agriculture poses a serious threat to children’s health; specifically, acute pesticides poisoning. 24

A study conducted in India reported that the prevalence of eyestrain in child laborers was 25.9%, which was significantly more than the 12.4% prevalence in a comparison group. Prevalence was higher in boys and those who work more than 4 h daily. 25 Another study conducted in India documented that the difference between working and non-working children in the same area in respiratory morbidities (TB, hilar gland enlargement/calcification) was statistically significant. 26

A study in Iran explored the prevalence of viral infections (HIV, HCV and HBV) in working children. 27 The study reported that the prevalence among working street children was much higher than in general population. The 4.5% of children were HIV positive, 1.7% were hepatitis B positive and 2.6% hepatitis C positive. The likelihood of being HIV positive among working children of Tehran was increased by factors like having experience in trading sex, having parents who used drugs or parents infected with HCV.

Lastly, one study was a meta-analysis conducted on data of working children in 83 LMIC documented that child labor is significantly and positively related to adolescent mortality, to a population’s nutrition level, and to the presence of infectious diseases. 8

Child labor and mental health

Overall, all studies included, except one, 28 reported that child labor is associated with higher prevalence of mental and/or behavioral disorders. In addition, all studies concluded that child labor is associated with one or more forms of abuse.

A study conducted in Jordan reported a significant difference in the level of coping efficacy and psychosocial health between working non-schooled children, working school children and non-working school children. Non-working school children had a better performance on the SDQ scale. Coping efficacy of working non-schooled children was lower than that of the other groups. 29

A study conducted in Pakistan reported that the prevalence of behavioral problems among working children was 9.8%. Peer problems were most prevalent, followed by problems of conduct. 30 A study from Ethiopia 31 reported that emotional and behavioral disorders are more common among working children. However, another study in Ethiopia 28 reported a lower prevalence of mental/behavioral disorders in child laborers compared to non-working children. The stark difference between these two studies could be due to the explanation provided by Alem et al. , i.e. that their findings could have been tampered by selection bias or healthy worker effect.

A study concerned with child abuse in Bangladesh reported that the prevalence of abuse and child exploitation was widespread. Boys were more exposed. Physical assault was higher towards younger children while other types were higher towards older ones. 32 A similar study conducted in Turkey documented that 62.5% of the child laborers were subjected to abuse at their workplaces; 21.8% physical, 53.6% emotional and 25.2% sexual, 100% were subjected to physical neglect and 28.7% were subjected to emotional neglect. 33

One study focused on sexual assault among working females in Nigeria. They reported that the sexual assault rate was 77.7%. In 38.6% of assault cases, the assailant was a customer. Girls who were younger than 12 years, had no formal education, worked for more than 8 h/day, or had two or more jobs were more likely to experience sexual assault. 34

Main findings of this study

Through a comprehensive systematic review, we conclude that child labor continues to be a major public health challenge. Child labor continues to be negatively associated with the physical and psychological health of children involved. Although no cause–effect relation can be established, as all studies included are cross-sectional, studies documented higher prevalence of different health issues in working children compared to control groups or general population.

This reflects a failure of policies not only to eliminate child labor, but also to make it safer. Although there is a decline in the number of working children, the quality of life of those still engaged in child labor seems to remain low.

Children engaged in labor have poor health status, which could be precipitated or aggravated by labor. Malnutrition and poor growth were reported to be highly prevalent among working children. On top of malnutrition, the nature of labor has its effects on child’s health. Most of the studies adjusted for the daily working hours. Long working hours have been associated with poorer physical outcomes. 18 , 19 , 25 , 26 , 35 It was also reported that the likelihood of being sexually abused increased with increasing working hours. 34 The different types and sectors of labor were found to be associated with different health outcomes as well. 13 , 18 , 24 However, comparing between the different types of labor was not possible due to lack of data.

The majority of studies concluded that child labor is associated with higher prevalence of mental and behavioral disorders, as shown in the results. School attendance, family income and status, daily working hours and likelihood of abuse, in its different forms, were found to be associated with the mental health outcomes in working children. These findings are consistent with previous studies and research frameworks. 36

Child labor subjects children to abuse, whether verbally, physically or sexually which ultimately results in psychological disturbances and behavioral disorders. Moreover, peers and colleagues at work can affect the behavior of children, for example, smoking or drugs. The effects of child labor on psychological health can be long lasting and devastating to the future of children involved.

What is already known on this topic

Previous reviews have described different adverse health impacts of child labor. However, there were no previous attempts to review the collective health impacts of child labor. Working children are subjected to different risk factors, and the impacts of child labor are usually not limited to one illness. Initial evidence of these impacts was published in the 1920s. Since then, an increasing number of studies have used similar methods to assess the health impacts of child labor. Additionally, most of the studies are confined to a single country.

What this study adds

To our knowledge, this is the first review that provides a comprehensive summary of both the physical and mental health impacts of child labor. Working children are subjected to higher levels of physical and mental stress compared to non-working children and adults performing the same type of work. Unfortunately, the results show that these children are at risk of developing short and long-term health complications, physically or mentally.

Though previous systematic reviews conducted on the topic in 19 97 1 and 20 07 8 reported outcomes in different measures, our findings reflect similar severity of the health impacts of child labor. This should be alarming to organizations that set child labor as a target. We have not reviewed the policies targeting child labor here, yet our findings show that regardless of policies in place, further action is needed.

Most of the current literature about child labor follow a cross-sectional design, which although can reflect the health status of working children, it cannot establish cause–effect associations. This in turn affects strategies and policies that target child labor.

In addition, comparing the impacts of different labor types in different countries will provide useful information on how to proceed. Further research following a common approach in assessing child labor impacts in different countries is needed.

Limitations of this study

First, we acknowledge that all systematic reviews are subject to publication bias. Moreover, the databases used might introduce bias as most of the studies indexed by them are from industrialized countries. However, these databases were used for their known quality and to allow reproduction of the data. Finally, despite our recognition of the added value of meta-analytic methods, it was not possible to conduct one due to lack of a common definition for child labor, differences in inclusion and exclusion criteria, different measurements and different outcome measures. Nevertheless, to minimize bias, we employed rigorous search methods including an extensive and comprehensive search, and data extraction by two independent reviewers.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Parker DL . Child labor. The impact of economic exploitation on the health and welfare of children . Minn Med 1997 ; 80 : 10 – 2 .

Google Scholar

Hilowitz J . Child Labour: A Textbook for University Students . International Labour Office , 2004 .

Google Preview

Humphries J . Childhood and child labour in the British industrial revolution . Econ Hist Rev 2013 ; 66 ( 2 ): 395 – 418 .

Dahlén M . The negotiable child: the ILO child labour campaign 1919–1973. Diss . 2007 .

Sachs JD , McArthur JW . The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals . Lancet 2005 ; 365 ( 9456 ): 347 – 53 .

Griggs D et al.  Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet . Nature 2013 ; 495 ( 7441 ): 305 – 7 .

UNICEF . The state of the world’s children 2016: a fair chance for every child. Technical Report, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2016 .

Roggero P , Mangiaterra V , Bustreo F et al.  The health impact of child labor in developing countries: evidence from cross-country data . Am J Public Health 2007 ; 97 ( 2 ): 271 – 5 .

Hughes K , Bellis MA , Hardcastle KA et al.  The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Lancet Public Health 2017 ; 2 ( 8 ): e356 – 66 .

Downs SH , Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions . J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 ; 52 ( 6 ): 377 – 84 .

Ali M , Shahab S , Ushijima H et al.  Street children in Pakistan: a situational analysis of social conditions and nutritional status . Soc Sci Med 2004 ; 59 ( 8 ): 1707 – 17 .

Ambadekar NN , Wahab SN , Zodpey SP et al.  Effect of child labour on growth of children . Public Health 1999 ; 113 ( 6 ): 303 – 6 .

Ahmed S , Ray R . Health consequences of child labour in Bangladesh . Demogr Res 2014 ; 30 : 111 – 50 .

Hosseinpour M , Mohammadzadeh M , Atoofi M . Work-related injuries with child labor in Iran . Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014 ; 24 ( 01 ): 117 – 20 .

Mohammed ES , Ewis AA , Mahfouz EM . Child labor in a rural Egyptian community: an epidemiological study . Int J Public Health 2014 ; 59 ( 4 ): 637 – 44 .

Nuwayhid IA , Usta J , Makarem M et al.  Health of children working in small urban industrial shops . Occup Environ Med 2005 ; 62 ( 2 ): 86 – 94 .

Wolff FC . Evidence on the impact of child labor on child health in Indonesia, 1993–2000 . Econ Hum Biol 2008 ; 6 ( 1 ): 143 – 69 .

Hamdan-Mansour AM , Al-Gamal E , Sultan MK et al.  Health status of working children in Jordan: comparison between working and nonworking children at schools and industrial sites . Open J Nurs 2013 ; 3 ( 01 ): 55 .

Tiwari RR , Saha A . Morbidity profile of child labor at gem polishing units of Jaipur, India . Int J Occup Environ Med 2014 ; 5 ( 3 ): 125 – 9 .

Khan H , Hameed A , Afridi AK . Study on child labour in automobile workshops of Peshawar, Pakistan, 2007 .

Banerjee SR , Bharati P , Vasulu TS et al.  Whole time domestic child labor in metropolitan city of Kolkata, 2008 .

Daga AS , Working IN . Relative risk and prevalence of illness related to child labor in a rural block . Indian Pediatr 2000 ; 37 ( 12 ): 1359 – 60 .

Fassa AG , Facchini LA , Dall’Agnol MM et al.  Child labor and musculoskeletal disorders: the Pelotas (Brazil) epidemiological survey . Public Health Rep 2005 ; 120 ( 6 ): 665 – 73 .

Corriols M , Aragón A . Child labor and acute pesticide poisoning in Nicaragua: failure to comply with children’s rights . Int J Occup Environ Health 2010 ; 16 ( 2 ): 175 – 82 .

Tiwari RR . Eyestrain in working children of footwear making units of Agra, India . Indian Pediatr 2013 ; 50 ( 4 ): 411 – 3 .

Tiwari RR , Saha A , Parikh JR . Respiratory morbidities among working children of gem polishing industries, India . Toxicol Ind Health 2009 ; 25 ( 1 ): 81 – 4 .

Foroughi M , Moayedi-Nia S , Shoghli A et al.  Prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among street and labour children in Tehran, Iran . Sex Transm Infect 2016 ; 93 ( 6 ): 421 – 23 .

Alem AA , Zergaw A , Kebede D et al.  Child labor and childhood behavioral and mental health problems in Ethiopia . Ethiopian J Health Dev 2006 ; 20 ( 2 ): 119 – 26 .

Al-Gamal E , Hamdan-Mansour AM , Matrouk R et al.  The psychosocial impact of child labour in Jordan: a national study . Int J Psychol 2013 ; 48 ( 6 ): 1156 – 64 .

Bandeali S , Jawad A , Azmatullah A et al.  Prevalence of behavioural and psychological problems in working children . J Pak Med Assoc 2008 ; 58 ( 6 ): 345 .

Fekadu D , Alem A , Hägglöf B . The prevalence of mental health problems in Ethiopian child laborers . J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006 Sep 1; 47 ( 9 ): 954 – 9 .

Hadi A . Child abuse among working children in rural Bangladesh: prevalence and determinants . Public Health 2000 ; 114 ( 5 ): 380 – 4 .

Öncü E , Kurt AÖ , Esenay FI et al.  Abuse of working children and influencing factors, Turkey . Child Abuse Negl 2013 ; 37 ( 5 ): 283 – 91 .

Audu B , Geidam A , Jarma H . Child labor and sexual assault among girls in Maiduguri, Nigeria . Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009 Jan 31; 104 ( 1 ): 64 – 7 .

Gross R , Landfried B , Herman S . Height and weight as a reflection of the nutritional situation of school-aged children working and living in the streets of Jakarta . Soc Sci Med 1996 Aug 1; 43 ( 4 ): 453 – 8 .

Woodhead M . Psychosocial impacts of child work: a framework for research, monitoring and intervention . Int J Child Rts 2004 ; 12 : 321 .

• developing countries
• mental health
• child labor

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1741-3850
• Print ISSN 1741-3842
• Copyright © 2024 Faculty of Public Health
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

We use cookies. Read more about them in our Privacy Policy.

• Accept site cookies
• Reject site cookies

Search results:

• Afghanistan
• American Samoa
• Antigua and Barbuda
• Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
• Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• British Virgin Islands
• Brunei Darussalam
• Burkina Faso
• Cayman Islands
• Central African Republic
• Channel Islands
• China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
• China, Macao Special Administrative Region
• China, Taiwan Province of China
• Cook Islands
• Côte d'Ivoire
• Democratic People's Republic of Korea
• Democratic Republic of the Congo
• Dominican Republic
• El Salvador
• Equatorial Guinea
• Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
• Faroe Islands
• French Guiana
• French Polynesia
• Guinea-Bissau
• Humanitarian Action Countries
• Iran (Islamic Republic of)
• Isle of Man
• Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
• Lao People's Democratic Republic
• Liechtenstein
• Marshall Islands
• Micronesia (Federated States of)
• Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
• New Caledonia
• New Zealand
• North Macedonia
• Northern Mariana Islands
• OECD Fragile Contexts
• Papua New Guinea
• Philippines
• Puerto Rico
• Republic of Korea
• Republic of Moldova
• Russian Federation
• Saint Barthélemy
• Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
• Saint Kitts and Nevis
• Saint Lucia
• Saint Martin (French part)
• Saint Pierre and Miquelon
• Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
• Sao Tome and Principe
• Saudi Arabia
• Sierra Leone
• Sint Maarten
• Solomon Islands
• South Africa
• South Sudan
• State of Palestine
• Switzerland
• Syrian Arab Republic
• Timor-Leste
• Trinidad and Tobago
• Turkmenistan
• Turks and Caicos Islands
• United Arab Emirates
• United Kingdom
• United Republic of Tanzania
• United States
• Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
• Virgin Islands U.S.
• Wallis and Futuna

Search countries

Search for data in 238 countries

• SDG Progress Data
• Child Marriage
• Immunization
• Benchmarking child-related SDGs
• Maternal and Newborn Health Disparities
• Continuity of essential health services
• Country profiles
• Interactive data visualizations
• Journal articles
• Publications
• Data Warehouse

Child Labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward

UNICEF/ILO joint publication

The latest global estimates indicate that the number of children in child labour has risen to 160 million worldwide – an increase of 8.4 million children in the last four years. 63 million girls and 97 million boys were in child labour globally at the beginning of 2020, accounting for almost 1 in 10 of all children worldwide. 

This report warns that global progress to end child labour has stalled for the first time in 20 years. The number of children aged 5 to 17 years in hazardous work – defined as work that is likely to harm their health, safety or morals – has risen by 6.5 million to 79 million since 2016. In sub-Saharan Africa, population growth, extreme poverty, and inadequate social protection measures have led to an additional 16.6 million children in child labour over the past four years. 

Additional economic shocks and school closures caused by COVID-19 mean that children already in child labour may be working longer hours or under worsening conditions, while many more may be forced into the worst forms of child labour due to job and income losses among vulnerable families. The report warns that globally 9 million additional children are at risk of being pushed into child labour by the end of 2022 as a result of the pandemic.

Children in child labour are at risk of physical and mental harm. Child labour compromises children’s education, restricting their rights and limiting their future opportunities, and leads to vicious inter-generational cycles of poverty and child labour.

Download the Report

Download the Executive summary

Child labour

Related resources, child labour methodology report.

Impact of Unpaid Household Services on the Measurement of Child Labour

Child Labour data

Join our community

Receive the latest updates from the UNICEF Data team

• Don’t miss out on our latest data
• Get insights based on your interests

The dataset you are about to download is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license.

Factors Fuelling the Persistence of Child Labour: Evidence from Pakistan

• Published: 16 May 2024

Cite this article

• Shahla Akram   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-3950 1 ,
• Mehboob Ul Hassan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-695X 2 &
• Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-4139 3  

The persistence of child labour globally can be attributed to a complex interplay of multifaceted factors. This study examines the relationship between these diverse factors of child labour, such as economic activities, working hours, hazardous conditions and overall prevalence. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using data from Pakistan’s Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS sixth wave). According to the data, poor quality education worsens child labour, while parental education and wealth protect against it. Gender differences, child disabilities, regional differences and non-violent behaviour all have significant impacts on labour force participation. This study highlights the complex interactions between socioeconomic and regional factors in determining child labour. It fills gaps in the existing literature by focusing on previously overlooked elements such as nonviolent behaviour and comprehensive disability interactions, as well as conducting a comprehensive examination of socioeconomic determinants. Understanding these dynamics is critical to targeted initiatives to eliminate child labour and ensure the well-being of children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Data Availability

Publicly available data.

Abdullah, A., Huynh, I., Emery, C. R., & Jordan, L. P. (2022). Social norms and family child labor: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 19 (7), 4082.

Article   Google Scholar  

Abebe, T., & Bessell, S. (2011). Dominant discourses, debates and silences on child labour in Africa and Asia. Third World Quarterly , 32 (4), 765–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.567007

Adonteng-Kissi, O. (2018). Causes of child labour: Perceptions of rural and urban parents in Ghana. Children and Youth Services Review , 91 , 55–65.

Adonteng-Kissi, O. (2023). Parental perceptions of the nature of child labour in rural and urban Ghana: Cultural versus economic necessity. Child Care in Practice , 29 (2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2020.1868407

Afriyie, L. T., Saeed, B. I., & Alhassan, A. (2019). Determinants of child labour practices in Ghana. Journal of Public Health , 27 , 211–217.

Alam, A. (2022). Positive psychology goes to School: Conceptualizing students’ happiness in 21st Century Schools while ‘Minding the mind!’ Are we there yet? Evidence-backed, school-based positive psychology interventions. ECS Transactions , 107 (1), 11199. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.11199ecst

Alam, S., Adnan, Z. H., Baten, M. A., & Bag, S. (2022). Assessing vulnerability of informal floating workers in Bangladesh before and during COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal , 29 (5), 1677–1702.

Ali, I., Manzoor, M., Ahmad, S., Noreen, S., Masroor, A., & Mahmood, Z. (2022). Socio-economic and health determinants of child labor: An overview of multiple index cluster survey. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences , 16 (02), 860–860.

Aman, S., Mahmood, F., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Are migrant children at Risk of Child Labour? Empirical evidence from Pakistan . Forum for Social Economics.

Google Scholar  

Ansar, A. (2023). Bangladeshi women migrants amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting globalization, dependency and gendered precarity in south–south labour migration. Global Networks , 23 (1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12368

Arslan, M. (2020). Mechanisms of labour exploitation: The case of Pakistan. International Journal of Law and Management , 62 (1), 1–21.

Aslam, M. (2009). Education gender gaps in Pakistan: Is the labor market to blame? Economic Development and Cultural Change , 57 (4), 747–784.

Atteraya, M. S., Ebrahim, N. B., & Gnawali, S. (2018). Determinants of child maltreatment in Nepal: Results from the 2014 Nepal multiple indicator cluster survey (the 2014 NMICS). Child Abuse & Neglect , 76 , 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.11.018

Awaworyi Churchill, S., Iqbal, N., Nawaz, S., & Yew, S. L. (2021). Unconditional cash transfers, child labour and education: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 186 , 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.012

Bansal, V., Wallach, J., Lira Brandão, J., Lord, S., Taha, N., Akoglu, T., Kiss, L., & Zimmerman, C. (2023). An intervention-focused review of modern slave labor in Brazil’s mining sector. World Development , 171 , 106362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106362

Bhalotra, S. (2007). Is child work necessary? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics , 69 (1), 29–55.

Bousselin, A. (2022). Access to universal childcare and its effect on maternal employment. Review of Economics of the Household , 20 (2), 497–532.

Brown, K. (2019). Vulnerability and child sexual exploitation: Towards an approach grounded in life experiences. Critical Social Policy , 39 (4), 622–642.

Bundervoet, T., Dávalos, M. E., & Garcia, N. (2022). The short-term impacts of COVID-19 on households in developing countries: An overview based on a harmonized dataset of high-frequency surveys. World Development , 153 , 105844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105844

Burrone, S., & Giannelli, G. C. (2020). Child labour, gender and vulnerable employment in adulthood. Evidence for Tanzania. The Journal of Development Studies , 56 (12), 2235–2250.

Caroleo, F. E., Rocca, A., Neagu, G., & Keranova, D. (2022). NEETs and the process of transition from school to the labor market: A comparative analysis of Italy, Romania, and Bulgaria. Youth & Society , 54 (2_suppl), 109S–129S.

Chudgar, A., Grover, V., Hatakeyama, S., & Bizhanova, A. (2022). Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Prospects , 52 (1), 137–156.

Colmer, J. (2021). Rainfall variability, child labor, and human capital accumulation in rural Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 103 (3), 858–877.

Constantino, S. M., Sparkman, G., Kraft-Todd, G. T., Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Scaling up change: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for Climate Action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 23 (2), 50–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221105279

Crea, T. M., Evans, K., Hasson, I. I. I., Neville, R. G., Werner, S., Wanjiku, K., Okumu, E., Arnold, N., Velandria, G. S., E., & Bruni, D. (2023). Inclusive education for children with disabilities in a refugee camp. Disasters , 47 (1), 99–113.

Dahal, P., Joshi, S. K., & Swahnberg, K. (2022). A qualitative study on gender inequality and gender-based violence in Nepal. BMC Public Health , 22 (1), 2005. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14389-x

Das, K. S. (2022). Child labour and its determinants in India. Children and Youth Services Review , 138 , 106523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106523

Dayıoğlu, M., & Kırdar, M. G. (2022). Keeping kids in school and out of work: Compulsory schooling and child labor in Turkey. Journal of Human Capital , 16 (4), 526–555.

Editorial. (2023). Advancing the rights of street and working children. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , 7 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00058-5

Emerson, E., & Llewellyn, G. (2021). Youth with disabilities are more likely than their peers to engage in hazardous child labour. Child: Care Health and Development , 47 (1), 119–127.

Gatignon, A., & Capron, L. (2023). The firm as an architect of polycentric governance: Building open institutional infrastructure in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal , 44 (1), 48–85.

Graham, M., Weale, V., Lambert, K. A., Kinsman, N., Stuckey, R., & Oakman, J. (2021). Working at home: The impacts of COVID 19 on health, family-work-life conflict, gender, and parental responsibilities. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine , 63 (11), 938–943. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002337

Grech, S. (2019). Disabled families: The impacts of disability and care on family labour and poverty in rural Guatemala. Societies , 9 (4), 76.

Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P. F., & Sánchez, M. A. (2006). Child labor and school achievement in Latin America. The World Bank Economic Review , 20 (1), 31–54.

Gupta, A., Zhu, H., Doan, M. K., Michuda, A., & Majumder, B. (2021). Economic impacts of the COVID– 19 lockdown in a remittance-dependent region. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 103 (2), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12178

Haile, G., & Haile, B. (2012). Child labour and child schooling in rural Ethiopia: Nature and trade-off. Education Economics , 20 (4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2011.623376

Hamenoo, E. S., Dwomoh, E. A., & Dako-Gyeke, M. (2018). Child labour in Ghana: Implications for children’s education and health. Children and Youth Services Review , 93 , 248–254.

Hattar-Pollara, M. (2019). Barriers to education of Syrian refugee girls in Jordan: Gender-based threats and challenges. Journal of Nursing Scholarship , 51 (3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12480

Hoque, M. M. (2021). Forced labour and access to education of Rohingya refugee children in Bangladesh: Beyond a humanitarian crisis. Journal of Modern Slavery: A Multidisciplinary Exploration of Human Trafficking Solutions, 6 (3), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.22150/jms/ppjy4309

Hoque, M. M. (2023). Understanding the role of structural factors and realities in normalizing child labour in urban slums of Bangladesh. Cogent Social Sciences , 9 (2), 2272319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2272319

Ichimura, H., & Thompson, T. S. (1998). Maximum likelihood estimation of a binary choice model with random coefficients of unknown distribution. Journal of Econometrics , 86 (2), 269–295.

ILO (1999). International Labour Standards on Child labour . Retrieved 18 April from https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/subjects-covered-by-international-labour-standards/child-labour/lang--en/index.htm#:~:text=It%20requires%20ratifying%20states%20to,children%20for%20use%20in%20armed

Islam, R., & Hoque, M. M. (2022). Trade-off between schooling and labor for children: Understanding the determinative factors among rural households in Bangladesh [Original Research]. Frontiers in Sociology , 7 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.839231

Ismailov, M., & Ono, Y. (2021). Assignment design and its effects on Japanese college freshmen’s motivation in L2 emergency online courses: A qualitative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher , 30 , 263–278.

Jan, A. U. (2021). Role of child labor in agriculture sector of district Mardan (Pakistan): A multinomial logistic regression analysis. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture , 37 (2).

Jayachandran, S. (2021). Social Norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries. IMF Economic Review , 69 (3), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00140-w

Josenhans, V., Kavenagh, M., Smith, S., & Wekerle, C. (2020). Gender, rights and responsibilities: The need for a global analysis of the sexual exploitation of boys. Child Abuse & Neglect , 110 , 104291.

Kenny, K., & Fotaki, M. (2023). The costs and labour of whistleblowing: Bodily vulnerability and post-disclosure survival. Journal of Business Ethics , 182 (2), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05012-x

Khanam, R. (2010). Child labour and schooling in developing countries: A review of the literature. International Journal of Business Research , 10 (3), 137–142.

Khanam, R., & Rahman, M. M. (2008). Child labour in developing countries: The role of education, poverty and birth order. Journal of Social and Economic Development , 10 (2), 173–195.

Khatab, K., Raheem, M. A., Sartorius, B., & Ismail, M. (2019). Prevalence and risk factors for child labour and violence against children in Egypt using bayesian geospatial modelling with multiple imputation. PLoS ONE , 14(5), e0212715.

Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics , 11 (4), 181–209.

Larmar, S., Sunuwar, M., Sherpa, H., Joshi, R., & Jordan, L. P. (2021). Strengthening community engagement in Nepal during COVID-19: Community-based training and development to reduce child labour. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development , 31 (1–2), 23–30.

Lovat, T., & Clement, N. (2008). Quality teaching and values education: Coalescing for effective learning. Journal of Moral Education , 37 (1), 1–16.

Mackinnon, J., Jakob, P., & Kustner, C. (2023). Staff experiences of using non-violent resistance in a residential care home for young people with high-risk behaviours. Journal of Family Therapy , 45 (4), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12423

Majeed, M. T., & Kiran, F. (2019). Women’s decision making power and child labor: Evidence from Pakistan. Quality & Quantity , 53 (4), 2175–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00864-y

Makwela, M. M., & Smit, E. I. (2022). Psychosocial challenges of children with disabilities in Sekhukhune District, Limpopo province of South Africa: Towards a responsive integrated disability strategy. African Journal of Disability , 11 , 799.

Middel, F., López López, M., Fluke, J., & Grietens, H. (2022). Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in child protection decision-making: What role do stereotypes play? Child Abuse & Neglect , 127 , 105579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105579

Mladenov, T., & Brennan, C. S. (2021). Social vulnerability and the impact of policy responses to COVID-19 on disabled people. Sociology of Health & Illness , 43 (9), 2049–2065.

Muhammad, M., Shirazi, N. S., & Kayani, Z. (2024). Parental education and child labour: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Education Economics and Development , 15 (1–2), 285–298.

Musizvingoza, R., Blagbrough, J., & Pocock, N. S. (2022). Are child domestic workers worse off than their peers? Comparing children in domestic work, child marriage, and kinship care with biological children of household heads: Evidence from Zimbabwe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 19 (12), 7405. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7405

Nahal, M. S., Axelsson, Å. B., Imam, A., & Wigert, H. (2019). Palestinian children’s narratives about living with spina bifida: Stigma, vulnerability, and social exclusion. Child: Care Health and Development , 45 (1), 54–62.

Naseem, R., & Bilal, M. (2023). An exploratory study of child labor in Brick Kilns in Sheikhupura District, Punjab, Pakistan: 10.2478/bjlp-2023-00000197. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics , 16 (3), 2645–2667.

Ng, I. Y. H., Tan, J. Q., Mathew, M., Ho, K. W., & Ting, Y. T. (2023). The importance of considering debt and young children in activation: A survival analysis of Return to Welfare. Social Policy and Society , 22 (2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000518

Nigar, N., & Qayyum, U. (2022). Households’ risk management and coping strategies: How do the poor respond to various idiosyncratic and covariate shocks in Pakistan? Journal of Asian and African Studies , 57 (4), 794–818.

Nordman, C. J., Sharma, S., & Sunder, N. (2022). Here comes the rain again: Productivity shocks, educational investments, and child work. Economic Development and Cultural Change , 70 (3), 1041–1063.

Oberg, C., Hodges, H., Gander, S., Nathawad, R., & Cutts, D. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on children’s lives in the United States: Amplified inequities and a just path to recovery. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health care , 52 (7), 101181.

Ocran, J. (2022). There is something like a barrier: Disability stigma, structural discrimination and middle-class persons with disability in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences , 8 (1), 2084893.

Ofuoku, A. U., Idoge, D. E., & Ovwigho, B. O. (2014). Child labor in agricultural production and socioeconomic variables among arable farming households in Nigeria. Journal of Rural Social Sciences , 29 (2), 4.

Pengpid, S., & Peltzer, K. (2020). Prevalence and associated factors of child abuse and child labour among children in Iraq: Results of the 2018 multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. International Journal of Child & Adolescent Health , 13 (1).

Perera, C., Bakrania, S., Ipince, A., Nesbitt-Ahmed, Z., Obasola, O., Richardson, D., Van de Scheur, J., & Yu, R. (2022). Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews , 18 (2), e1240.

Pierik, R., & Houwerzijl, M. (2006). Western policies on child labor abroad. Ethics & International Affairs , 20 (2), 193–218.

Psaki, S., Haberland, N., Mensch, B., Woyczynski, L., & Chuang, E. (2022). Policies and interventions to remove gender-related barriers to girls’ school participation and learning in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Campbell Systematic Reviews , 18 (1), e1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1207

Quattri, M., & Watkins, K. (2019). Child labour and education– a survey of slum settlements in Dhaka (Bangladesh). World Development Perspectives , 13 , 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2019.02.005

Radfar, A., Asgharzadeh, S. A. A., Quesada, F., & Filip, I. (2018). Challenges and perspectives of child labor. Industrial Psychiatry Journal , 27 (1), 17.

Raman, S., Muhammad, T., Goldhagen, J., Seth, R., Kadir, A., Bennett, S., D’Annunzio, D., Spencer, N. J., Bhutta, Z. A., & Gerbaka, B. (2021). Ending violence against children: What can global agencies do in partnership? Child Abuse & Neglect , 119 , 104733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104733

Ramaswamy, S., & Seshadri, S. (2020). Children on the brink: Risks for child protection, sexual abuse, and related mental health problems in the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Psychiatry , 62 (Suppl 3), S404-s413. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_1032_20

Ray, R. (2000). Analysis of child labour in Peru and Pakistan: A comparative study. Journal of Population Economics , 13 (1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050119

Rehman, L., & Khan, F. (2021). An analysis of out of schoolchildren factors: A case study of Pakistan. Journal of Social Transformation and Education , 2 (1), 10–25.

Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Sumberg, J. (2022). Breaking out of the policy enclave approach to child labour in sub-saharan African agriculture. Global Social Policy , 22 (1), 46–66.

Santos, É. S., & Colagrossi, A. L. R. (2024). Unveiling the psychological dimensions of child labor. In Children Around the World: The Future of Our Earth (pp. 135). https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=lWABEQAAQBAJ

Sarker, M. R. (2021). Labor market and unpaid works implications of COVID-19 for Bangladeshi women. Gender Work & Organization , 28 (S2), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12587

Shohel, M. M. C. (2022). Education in emergencies: Challenges of providing education for Rohingya children living in refugee camps in Bangladesh. Education Inquiry , 13 (1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1823121

Sovacool, B. K. (2021). When subterranean slavery supports sustainability transitions? Power, patriarchy, and child labor in artisanal Congolese cobalt mining. The Extractive Industries and Society , 8 (1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.11.018

Steele, L. (2023). Ending disability segregated employment:‘modern slavery’law and disabled people’s human right to work. International Journal of Law in Context , 19 (2), 217–235.

Sultana, M., & ILO Country Office for Pakistan. (2021). Pakistan’s journey towards elimination of child labour: a timeline . https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1815140/pakistans-journey-towards-elimination-of-child-labour/

Tang, C., Zhao, L., & Zhao, Z. (2020). Does free education help combat child labor? The effect of a free compulsory education reform in rural China. Journal of Population Economics , 33 (2), 601–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-019-00741-w

Tarleton, B., & Turney, D. (2020). Understanding ‘Successful Practice/s’ with parents with learning difficulties when there are concerns about child neglect: The contribution of social practice theory. Child Indicators Research , 13 (2), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-019-09682-y

Thi, A. M., Zimmerman, C., & Ranganathan, M. (2023). Hazardous child labour, psychosocial functioning, and school dropouts among children in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional analysis of UNICEF’s multiple Indicator Cluster surveys (MICS). Children , 10 (6), 1021. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/10/6/1021

Tusińska, M. (2020). Inequality of opportunity–gender bias in education in Pakistan. Nierówności społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy , 63 , 233–245.

UNICEF (2017–2020). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) . https://mics.unicef.org/surveys

United Nations (2023). 2023 Theme: Social Justice for All. End Child Labour! https://www.un.org/en/observances/world-day-against-child-labour

Winzer, M., & Mazurek, K. (2019). UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. A critique of article 24 of the CRPD: Precedents, polarized paradigms, flawed contingencies. World Studies in Education , 20 (2), 5–22.

Woodhead, M. (1999). Combatting child labour: Listen to what the children say. Childhood , 6 (1), 27–49.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the support from the Deanship of Scientific Research under the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R997), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

No Funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Economics, National College of Business Administration & Economics, Lahore, Pakistan

Shahla Akram

Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 7115, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Mehboob Ul Hassan

College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People’s Republic of China

Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahla Akram .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval.

I affirm ethical research, using public data, ensuring privacy, and providing unbiased insights for the Journal. 

Permission to Reproduce Material from other Sources

Conflict of interest, additional information, publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Akram, S., Hassan, M.U. & Shahzad, M.F. Factors Fuelling the Persistence of Child Labour: Evidence from Pakistan. Child Ind Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10141-6

Download citation

Accepted : 10 May 2024

Published : 16 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10141-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Child Labour
• Child disabilities
• Socioeconomic factors
• Child nonviolent
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Ind Psychiatry J
• v.27(1); Jan-Jun 2018

Challenges and perspectives of child labor

Amir radfar.

College of Graduate Health Studies, A.T. Still University, Mesa, Arizona, USA

Seyed Ahmad Ahmadi Asgharzadeh

1 Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Fernando Quesada

2 Department of Medicine, Universidad de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador

Irina Filip

3 Department of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, California, USA

Child labor is one of the oldest problems in our society and still an ongoing issue. During the time, child labor evolved from working in agriculture or small handicraft workshops to being forced into work in factories in the urban setting as a result of the industrial revolution. Children were very profitable assets since their pay was very low, were less likely to strike, and were easy to be manipulated. Socioeconomic disparities and lack of access to education are among others contributing to the child labor. Religious and cultural beliefs can be misguiding and concealing in delineating the limits of child labor. Child labor prevents physical, intellectual, and emotional development of children. To date, there is no international agreement to fully enforced child labor. This public health issue demands a multidisciplinary approach from the education of children and their families to development of comprehensive child labor laws and regulations.

INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL FACTS

Child labor is an old problem well rooted in human history. Children were exploited to various extents during different periods of time. The problem was common in poor and developing countries. In the 1800's, child labor was part of economic life and industrial growth. Children less than 14 years old worked in agriculture, factories, mining, and as street vendors.[ 1 ] Children from poor families were expected to participate to the family income, and sometimes they worked in dangerous conditions in 12-hour shifts.[ 1 ]

In the 1900's, in England, more than a quarter of poor families lost their children to diseases and death, endangering their extra financial support.[ 1 ] Boys worked in glass factories in high heat in three shifts because the furnaces were kept fired all the time to increase productivity, while girls were forced into prostitution. In 1910, it was estimated that more than two million children in the United States were working.[ 1 ]

With the increase of education, economy, and the emergence of labor laws, child labor decreased. However, child labor is still a widespread problem in many parts of the world in developed and developing countries. With the development of agriculture, children were again forced to be employed mostly by the families rather than factories. The main cause of child labor is the lack of schools and poverty.[ 2 ]

Per International Labor Organization (ILO, 2002), in the world, there are 211 million children laborers, 73 million under 10 years of age, 126 million children work in the worst forms of child labor, and more than 8 million are kept as slaves for domestic work, in trafficking, armed conflict, prostitution, and pornography. More than 20,000 children die yearly due to work-related accidents. Nearly, one-third of the world's children work in Africa.[ 3 ] Countries such as India have made efforts to tackle the worst forms of child labor. Despite this, 56.4% of children aged 5–14 work in agriculture and 33.1% work in industry.[ 4 ] Indian children are forced into labor to pay family debt. They work sometimes in hazardous environments, being forced into commercial sexual exploitation, human trafficking, or forcibly recruited or kidnapped to be part of terrorist groups.[ 4 ]

Child labor is morally and ethically unacceptable. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) was the first international body that signed in 1989 the Convention on the Rights of the Children. It is for the first time in history when children are seen as humans with rights rather than economic assets of their parents. Child labor was defined as labor that harms the health of the children and deprives them of education rights. This law does not exclude children that work for their families.

ETHICAL FACETS OF CHILD LABOR

Child labor has many facets from the ethical point of view. Autonomy, beneficence, justice, nonmaleficence, privacy, and veracity are endangered during child labor.[ 5 ] Utilitarianists would support the idea of child labor as long as they are the sole providers for the family and without their income, the family would not survive and as long as the labor is voluntarily provided. The ends justify the means. Forced child labor is unethical because it is against the autonomy of the children. The consent of the working child is mostly manipulated by the parents. To give consent, a child needs to understand the situation, the consequences, and voluntarily agree to work. Children of young age, who have a less than fully competent capacity, can assent to an action by getting involved in the decision-making process. Children fall easy victims to unfair job conditions, and they do not have the power to stand-up against mistreatments.[ 6 ] The maleficence of this act has long-term physical, psychological, behavioral, and societal consequences. Even if they are lacking the competency of making informed decisions, they are considered individuals with autonomy that should be protected and safeguarded.[ 6 ]

Child labor is more common in developing countries where more than 90% of children live.[ 3 ] Child labor in developing countries affects 211 million children.[ 3 ] The continent with the highest child employment rate is Asia with 61%, followed by Africa and Latin America. Nearly 41% of the children in Africa are below 14 years old, followed by Asia with 22% and Latin America 17%.[ 3 ] India has made progress in reducing the child labor. However, more than 4 million children in India between 5 and 14 years old work more than 6 hours a day, while about 2 million children aged 5–14 work 3–6 months in a year.[ 4 ]

CULTURAL BELIEFS AND CHILD LABOR

Cultural beliefs have an important role in encouraging child labor. In developing countries, people believe that work has a constructive effect on character building and increases skill development in children. There is a tradition in these families, where children follow the parents' footsteps and learn the job from an early age. Some cultural beliefs may contribute to the misguided concept that a girl's education is not as important as a boy's education, and therefore, girls are pushed into child labor as providers of domestic services.[ 7 ] In India, not putting a child to work means the family would not make enough income to sustain their living. Sociocultural aspects such as the cast system, discrimination, and cultural biases against girls contribute to child labor.[ 4 ]

RELIGION AND CHILD LABOR

It is generally accepted that parents have the fundamental right to educate and raise their children. Parents almost always try to act in the child's best interest at the best of their knowledge and beliefs. In doing so, they are reasonably motivated by their intellectual growth, social development, and at times by spiritual salvation. Oftentimes, parents seek guidance in religion to shape the upbringing of their children and to enhance their progress. Hard work is among others, an important religious value to instill from a young age.

Krolikowski found that Christian children were the least likely to work, while Muslim children, children with no religion, and children affiliated with a traditional African religion were more likely to work than Christians.[ 8 ] The 40% higher incidence of child labor among Indian Muslims compared with Indian Hindus is due perhaps to the impoverishment of Muslim community.[ 4 ] Amish people's life is also regulated by religious values. They believe that work and faith bring people closer to God.[ 9 ] Amish children are initiated from childhood into apprenticeship to learn the trade, and beyond eighth grade, they have to provide like an adult for the community. Education of children beyond eighth grade is considered a threat to the community values. The U. S. labor laws forbid children less than 16 years of age to work in hazardous places such as sawmill or woodworking. However, in 2004 an exception was made by the United States Department of Labor, who approved an amendment that allows Amish children between 14 and 18 years old to work.[ 10 ]

POLICIES AND CHILD LABOR

Child labor is rooted in poverty, income insecurity, social injustice, lack of public services, and lack of political will.[ 7 ] Working children are deprived from a proper physical and mental development. The millennium development goals (MDGs), issued in 2001 to implement the Millennium Declaration, set up commitments for poverty reduction, education, and women's empowerment. Persistence of poverty is the major cause of labor. However, child labor also causes poverty because it deprives the children from education and from a normal physical and mental development hampering a prosperous life as adults. The first MDG in addressing poverty is the elimination of child labor.[ 11 ]

The International Program on the Elimination of Child Labor (IPEC) was created by ILO in 1992 to progressively eliminate child labor. The priority addresses the worst forms of child labor such as slavery, prostitution, drug trafficking, and recruitment of children in armed conflicts.[ 12 ] IPEC is working with stakeholders from many countries to increase strengths and promote the fight against child labor. IPEC engage with multiple organizations, international and governmental bodies, community-based organizations, religious groups, private plural form businesses, children and their families.

Policy reform was promoted through country-based programs. The capacity building of institutions has been increased to better understand the obstacles and increase the ability of obtaining sustainable measures. These measures were meant to decrease child labor and bring children back in schools. In all these processes, statistical data were collected at the worldwide level, methodologies were set in place, and guidelines were created.

The Child Labor Platform was created as a business-led initiative by ILO in 2012, to identify the obstacles of the implementation of ILO conventions at the community level and to come up with solutions. This platform is a win-win situation for all parties involved: stakeholders as well children and their families. This platform offers training, research, and specialized tools to member companies, so they can carry out activities against child labor. Eliminating child labor is part of the corporates' social responsibility in line with their values and is what the society expects from them. This platform provides information how to get involved and how to find businesses that work collaboratively with the communities to solve the problem. Training and knowledge is a real value added for companies.[ 12 ] The Indian Government implemented a national project deemed to assist population to eradicate child labor, and set in place enforcements of criminal and labor law.[ 4 ]

ARGUMENTS FAVORING CHILD LABOR

Despite all these international and national measures against child labor, there are arguments in favor of child labor. Some argue that poor families would be even poorer without the supplemental financial contribution of children. Lack of money will deprive them of the basic needs of food and shelter which will decrease their survival rate. In addition, an increase in poverty would make children even more susceptible to exploitation.

The supporters of these ideas argue that the benefit of creating a safe workplace and allowing children to work is helpful in certain situations. They also emphasize that child work is not child labor as long as it does not interfere with schooling and children have safe workplace conditions with a limited number of hours per day.[ 13 ]

STAKEHOLDERS’ ROLE AND CHILD LABOR

The stakeholders most directly affected are the children and their families. Children are working at the expense of their education and normal mental development. Education is important not only for the intellectual development but also for the empowerment and acquisition of new skills for adult life. The health of children is endangered by work in hazardous conditions, abuse, exhaustion, malnutrition, or exposure to toxic materials. The psychological harm leads to behavioral problems later on in life.[ 14 ]

Despite the implementation of laws and measurements at the international level, child labor still persists, and it is caused by the same factors as 100 years ago. There is a need to address poverty and access to education. To date, there is no international agreement to define child labor. Every country has different laws and regulations regarding the minimum age for starting working based on the type of labor. The lack of international consensus on child labor makes the limits of child labor very unclear.[ 15 ]

Therefore, it is mandatory to create international policies that adopt a holistic approach to free quality education for all children, including labor children from poor families. Education should be continued beyond the primary school level and should be done in a formal setting. Studies show that nonformal education is a necessary but not a sufficient prerequisite for permanently withdrawing children from work.[ 15 ] The public educational system should be expanded to accommodate laborer children who still do not have access to school. More schools should be built, more teachers should be trained, and more educational materials should be available. A special attention should be given to children living in exceptional geographical conditions and mobility should be provided at the cost of the community. Children who dropped out of school should receive adequate guidance and support, and a smooth reentry should be facilitated. The development of schools in the rural areas would decrease the load of children in urban schools. This will allow parents to accommodate children's needs without having to migrate in big cities.

Another phenomenon that should be addressed is the social exclusion. Children engaged in the worst forms of child labor come from the lowest strata of the society. International Labor Organization launched a project on Indigen and tribal people, who are the most targeted by social exclusion. This project promotes their rights and encourages building capacity among their community.[ 15 ] Proper enforcement of child labor policies and the focus on education can break the cycle of poverty that drives the children into labor.

Child labor is a public health issue with negative outcomes that demands special attention. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to tackle child labor issues. Per ILO, poverty is a major single cause behind child labor. Lack of affordable schools and affordable education is another major factor to force children to work. Certain cultural beliefs rationalize this practice and encourage child labor as character building and skill development for children. Some cultural traditions encourage child labor as footsteps to their parents' jobs. Socioeconomic disparities, poor governance, and poor implementation of international agreements are among major causes of child labor. Macroeconomic factors also encourage child labor by the growth of low pay informal economy. Child labor prevents the normal well-being including physical, intellectual, and emotional psychosocial development of children. This public health issue cannot be eliminated by only enforcement of child labor laws and regulations. Any comprehensive policies should engulf a holistic approach on the education of children and their families, investment in early childhood development programs, establishing public education task forces in rural areas, implementing policies with focus on increasing adult wages, and discouraging consumers to buy products made by forced child labor. As such, ethical practice requires protection of all rights of children and protective policies and procedures which support the provisions of ILO's standards.

Financial support and sponsorship

Conflicts of interest.

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank the University Writing Center at A.T. Still University for assistance with this manuscript.

• CEU PU - Deutsch
• Közép-európai Egyetem

Funding granted for research on young mothers’ labor supply, mental health and child development

Tímea Laura Molnár, Assistant Professor in CEU’s Department of Economics and Business, will co-lead the research project, “Mothers’ Return to Work After Childbirth, and the Role of Spousal Involvement in Shaping Parents’ Mental Health and Children’s Development”. The joint project with Gaëlle Simard-Duplain (Carleton) was granted 24,774 CAD of funding by the Vanier Institute of the Family, a Canadian independent think tank committed to research on enhancing family wellbeing.

“There is a large and still growing literature showing that the earnings of mothers decrease following childbirth, to an extent not experienced by fathers, leading to a large gender pay gap associated with childbirth,” Molnár explained. “In this context, considerable work has focused on policies that may facilitate the return of mothers to the workplace. However, we still know very little about the implications of the timing of mothers’ return to work on their mental health and on their children’s development, and about the role fathers’ supportive involvement at home. Our proposed research fills in this gap in the context of the large labor market involvement of mothers with small children, the inter-relatedness of being productive at work and mentally balanced at home as a parent, both shaping family circumstances in early childhood.”

Advancing social justice, promoting decent work ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations

ILO Library

With over a century of history, the ILO Library is a key source of information on labour, the world of work, and economic and social development. Serving as the central repository of ILO documents, it houses print, electronic and digital publications produced in Geneva and ILO offices globally. Through the ILO Library, researchers, policymakers, delegates, and the public have access to a comprehensive collection of resources. 

ILO Institutional Repositories

The ILO institutional and Open Access repository

Research Repository

Access to ILO research and ILO experts

Researcher Profiles

Find out about ILO experts, their key areas of study and publications

ILO Library Search Tool

LabourDiscovery

Discover e-books, e-journals, articles, reports, working papers and more

Ask a Librarian

Can’t find what you’re looking for? Ask an ILO Librarian

Library Resources

Explore the ILO Library

• Library History
• Historical Collections

Research Tools

• Research Guides
• Finding Aids
• ILO Databases : A to Z

ILO Terminology

• ILO Thesaurus
• ILO Taxonomy

Resources for you

ILO Library Research Guides are a good way to start your research and familiarize yourself with ILO concepts.

In addition, we recommend :

Labordoc - Access ILO publications, meeting documents, ILO products in Open Access, and the International Labour Review (ILR) collection of articles since 1921. 

ILO Research Repository – Access to ILO research and ILO experts. 

LabourDiscovery – Browse the library’s collection of non-ILO publications.

A-Z ILO Databases – Search more than 120 databases and access International Labour Standards (NORMLEX), download labour statistics (ILOSTAT), or Industrial Relations Data (IRData).

Finding Aids – Discover our tools to assist your research on specific ILO topics.

External researchers wishing to conduct research on the ILO Library’s premises are invited to make an appointment by contacting our virtual information service at  [email protected]   at least 48 hours before your visit.

The ILO Institutional and Open Access Repository -  Labordoc  offers you access to ILO publications and ILO meeting documents online. You will find ILO Governing Body Papers, Conference Reports, Sectorial Meeting documents, Flagship reports, Working Papers, etc. 

You can search the Library Search Tool  -   LabourDiscovery  to find out the latest non-ILO publications. 

A-Z ILO Databases allows you to access International Labour Standards, Labour Statistics and more.

Explore our Digital Collections, like the  List of delegates to the ILC : from 1919 until now.

Library resources: visit our Research Guides and discover ILO documentation in our Finding Aids:  

• ILO General Surveys Reports: by theme, by year, or by ILO Instrument.
• International Labour Conference (ILC) : by sessions, by year, or by Maritime sessions.
• ILO Instruments: preparatory reports work. All conventions, protocols and recommendations by number and session (Under construction)

GOALI - Global Online Access to Legal Information is a programme led by the ILO providing free or low-cost online access to legal research and training in the developing world. Find more information in this link. 

The ILO Library is open from Monday to Friday: 09:00 - 17:00 .  To get personalised assistance on the library premises, please make an appointment by contacting our virtual information service at  [email protected]   at least 48 hours before your visit.

The ILO Institutional and Open Access Repository - Labordoc  offers access to ILO publications and meeting documents online. You can also access Open Access Publications.

The Library’s Search Tool is LabourDiscovery  

A-Z ILO Databases:  A-Z list

The ILO Library is open from Monday to Friday: 09:00 - 17:00 .  To get assistance on the library premises, please make an appointment by contacting our virtual information service at  [email protected]   at least 48 hours before your visit. 

The ILO Institutional and Open Access Repository -   Labordoc  offers access to ILO publications and meeting documents online. You can also access Open Access Publications.

The Library’s Search Tool is   LabourDiscovery  

Visit our Finding Aids to dive in the ILO documentation:

To know more about our controlled vocabularies visit: 

If you require interlibrary loan services, drop us a line at  [email protected]

Open Access policy at the ILO

ILO strives to be at the forefront of knowledge generation, and it is vital that our materials on the world of work are easily available to and usable by our government, employer and worker constituents as well as wider stakeholders. 

Gilbert F. Houngbo, ILO Director-General

 The International Labour Organization goes Open Access

Library Services

We offer an enquiry service to help you navigate and find information on the world of work. Ask a Librarian  to get:  

• Advice on where to find ILO sources of information;
• Guidance on where to find national legislation or statistical data;
• Support on how to begin a topic search, or to fill in gaps in research that is already underway.
• Any ILO documents such as ILO Conventions, ILO flagship, working papers, special studies, articles, reports of the Governing Body and International Labour Conference.

If you, as an ILO user, cannot locate the document you are looking for in the ILO library collection, you may request an interlibrary loan by contacting [email protected]   

UN Libraries and University Libraries can also request documents on loan if they are unavailable in electronic format.

Ask a Librarian service provided by the ILO Library

Monday - Friday: 09:00 - 17:00 Except Good Friday, Easter Monday, 1st May and 25th December to 1st January, when the ILO in Geneva is usually closed.

ILO Library 4 route des Morillons CH-1211 Geneva 22 Switzerland

Email : [email protected] 

The reading room of the ILO Library is open from Monday to Friday  by appointment only . 

External visitors

External researchers wishing to conduct research are invited to make an appointment by contacting our virtual information service at [email protected] at least 48 hours before your visit.