army assignment preferences

• Cover Letters
• Jobs I've Applied To
• Saved Searches
• Subscriptions

Marine Corps

Coast guard.

• Space Force
• Military Podcasts
• Benefits Home
• Military Pay and Money
• Veteran Health Care
• VA eBenefits
• Veteran Job Search
• Military Skills Translator
• Upload Your Resume
• Veteran Employment Project
• Vet Friendly Employers
• Career Advice
• Military Life Home
• Military Trivia Game
• Veterans Day
• Spouse & Family
• Military History
• Discounts Home
• Featured Discounts
• Veterans Day Restaurant Discounts
• Electronics
• Join the Military Home
• Contact a Recruiter
• Military Fitness

NCOs Can Now Rank Their Assignment Preferences Under a New Army System

For the first time, the U.S. Army will allow noncommissioned officers to rank where they would like to be assigned.

Similar to its Assignment Interactive Module for officers, in use since 2016, the service announced earlier this month that it will roll out the virtual "Assignment Satisfaction Key -- Enlisted Marketplace" (ASK-EM) for the 2021 manning cycle.

Those eligible include active-duty soldiers in the ranks of E-6 through E-8, according to a release. They can give their top five choices for assignment location.

Read Next: Fort Bragg Now Admits its Twitter Account Wasn't Hacked

"Soldier preference is important because we believe a Soldier performs at a higher level when they're in an assignment that interests them," Col. Michael McGregor, director of the Enlisted Personnel Management Directorate, said in the release. "Soldiers have some input into their assignments now, but that will increase significantly as we field ASK-EM."

The goal is to more accurately pair noncommissioned officers with their duty station based on their "knowledge, skills, behaviors and preferences," the release states.

"These initiatives optimize the Army's ability to get the right Soldier with the right talents to the right assignment at the right time. It will also allow commanders to maximize the talent provided them," McGregor said.

The new program is set to go live Nov. 11, according to a separate announcement .

Leaders will get more information about when a soldier is best available for a permanent change-of-station move or temporary duty assignment to match gaps the service needs to fill.

"Heightened awareness about Soldier talent, along with knowing when he or she is available to move, will help us make informed decisions when assigning the most qualified Soldiers to meet Army requirements," McGregor explained.

ASK-EM follows two pilot programs that involved 1,700 NCOs, according to Army Human Resources Command.

According to Col. Bryan Harris, Armor Enlisted Branch chief at the command, 55% of those participating received one of their top five choices.

The automated marketplace will someday serve an average of 35,000 NCOs per year, and will be tied to "five enlisted manning cycles per year, compared to two cycles for officers," the command said.

-- Oriana Pawlyk can be reached at [email protected] . Follow her on Twitter at @oriana0214.

Related: Air Force to Let Fighter Pilots, Crew Stay at Preferred Bases

Oriana Pawlyk

You May Also Like

Defense officials focused on unmanned weapons and artificial intelligence to make up for the declining number of service...

The Army commander in charge of the U.S. military's Gaza pier project said the mission was the biggest “organizational...

For Americans involved in this ad hoc effort, the war has reverberated through their lives, weighed on their relationships...

At least six of the warplanes are believed to have been delivered by European countries.

Military News

• Investigations and Features
• Military Opinion

Select Service

• National Guard

Most Popular Military News

Joni Smith, the mother-in-law of the instructor pilot of the aircraft, told Military.com she had submitted letters raising...

An alleged fight between an Arlington National Cemetery official and staffers from former President Donald Trump's...

A top Army general suspended earlier this year following a Military.com investigation into his attempts to influence a...

The VA's effort to recover payments to service members voluntarily or involuntarily separated from their respective military...

In 2021, fresh off his previous role as deputy commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Minihan knew that a massive overhaul...

Latest Benefits Info

• VA Loan Eligibility for Surviving Spouses
• Air Force Tuition Assistance
• National Guard Tuition Assistance
• Coast Guard Tuition Assistance
• Marine Corps Tuition Assistance

More Military Headlines

Unlike most naval officers who find themselves facing the military justice system, Capt. Brad Geary is not staying quiet.

• Challenges of the Gaza Humanitarian Aid Pier Offer Lessons for the US Army
• Army Says Arlington National Cemetery Employee Being 'Unfairly Attacked' by Trump Campaign
• Soldier's Child Porn Charges Come as Feds Pursue Cases in Which Artificial Intelligence Was Used to Make Images
• Osprey Crash Investigations Often Blame the Pilots and Crew. Is That Fair?
• Air Force Leaker Jack Teixeira's Court-Martial Tentatively Scheduled for March
• Judge Allows Bond for Fired Florida Deputy in Fatal Shooting of Black Airman
• Navy SEAL Commander Who Oversaw Training During Mullen Death Faults Drugs, Not Leadership
• Navy's Innovative Programs Pay Off as It Meets Recruiting Goal for First Time in Years
• US Forces Ready with a 'Range of Options' to Deal with South China Sea Aggression, US Admiral Says

Military Benefits Updates

• The Next Deadline for Backdated PACT Act Payments Is Coming Soon. Here’s What You Need to Know
• VA Fertility Benefits for Military Veterans
• Fertility Benefits for Active-Duty Service Members
• Marine Corps Cammie Items Are Back in Stock After Shortages Due to Pandemic-Related Supply Disruptions
• How Merica Bourbon's Founder Leveraged Years of Work Experience to Start His Own Line of Products
• California to Deploy Surplus C-130 Aircraft from Coast Guard to Fight Wildfires
• Defendant in Titan Submersible Wrongful Death Lawsuit Files to Move Case to Federal Court
• How Moves Put Military Families of Color at Risk

Entertainment

• Military Families Overseas Now Can Watch the Entire 2024 NFL Season Live on the American Forces Network App
• 'Tis Not Our War': Why Most Americans Dodged the Civil War Draft and Deserted the Union Army
• Air Force Veteran and Beloved 'Famous Amos' Founder Wally Amos Dies at 88

• Subscribe Now Opens in new window
• Air Force Times Opens in new window
• Marine Corps Times Opens in new window
• Navy Times Opens in new window
• Pentagon & Congress
• Defense News Opens in new window
• Flashpoints
• Benefits Guide Opens in new window
• Military Pay Center
• Military Retirement
• Military Benefits
• Discount Depot
• Gear Scout Opens in new window
• Military Culture
• Military Fitness
• Military Movies & Video Games
• Military Sports
• Transition Guide Opens in new window
• Pay It Forward Opens in new window
• Black Military History Opens in new window
• Congressional Veterans Caucus Opens in new window
• Military Appreciation Month Opens in new window
• Military History
• Vietnam Vets & Rolling Thunder Opens in new window
• Honor the Fallen Opens in new window
• Hall of Valor Opens in new window
• Service Members of the Year Opens in new window
• Create an Obituary Opens in new window
• Medals & Misfires
• Installation Guide Opens in new window
• Task Force Violent
• Battle Bracket
• CFC Givers Guide
• Photo Galleries
• Early Bird Brief
• Newsletters Opens in new window
• Long-Term Care Partners
• Navy Federal
• Digital Edition Opens in new window

Army updates online tool for selecting assignments

The Army is updating a program that allows active-duty enlisted soldiers to choose preferences for assignments and locations.

The Assignment Satisfaction Key, or ASK, program has been redesigned by the Army Human Resources Command to be an expanded career development tool, according to an Army news release .

As in the past, soldiers can use the Web-based program to choose their preferences for future assignments and locations. Enlisted soldiers in ranks E-1 through E-8 non-promotable can view requisitions via the online tool, then volunteer for them and indicate their preferences.

When a soldier logs in to ASK, he or she will only see assignments they are eligible for, based on MOS, rank, time on station, and military education. This provides troops with realistic expectations, according to the release.

Once a soldier submits the request, it shows up in the Army's Enlisted Distribution and Assignment System, and Human Resources Command assignment managers will work on the order.

The updated tool allows soldiers to select assignments with lower requisition priority, instead of only showing assignments that have the most in-demand needs to be filled.

This has increased the number of assignments soldiers can view, an HRC spokeswoman said.

"Requisitions are each assigned a priority, based on Army Manning Guidance, that dictates which assignments should be filled first," Lt. Col. Janet Herrick said.

ASK now includes additional priorities, allowing soldiers to select from a higher number of available units and locations, she said.

The updated program now has one screen that's easier to navigate, and it also offers soldiers the option of indicating his or her availability for broadening opportunities, including drill sergeant and recruiter assignments, or other special-duty interests.

Soldiers who nominate themselves for assignment through ASK will receive feedback via email.

The assignment tool is available at https://www.ask.army.mil/ask . An Army Knowledge Online account password is needed to gain access.

Charlsy Panzino covers the Guard and Reserve, training, technology, operations and features for Army Times and Air Force Times. Email her at [email protected] .  

Charlsy is a Reporter and Engagement Manager for Military Times. Email her at [email protected].

In Other News

New household goods shipment program ramping up this fall

U.s. transportation command is unifying and privatizing the military moving process..

Army blasts Trump trip to Arlington cemetery for violating decorum

Service officials said a cemetery staffer was shoved by trump campaign staff during the former president's visit on monday..

Price tag for VA’s new GI Bill online platform has jumped nearly $500M

Va officials said the original $453 million contract for the work has now been updated 25 times. the new price tag for the project is $932 million..

Legion officials jab Harris, Trump for skipping veterans conventions

Legion officials said they invited both harris and trump to resume the tradition this year, but were rebuffed..

Trump campaign denies fighting with Arlington National Cemetery staff

Npr reported that a cemetery official tried to prevent trump staffers from filming in section 60, but the individual was verbally abused and shoved aside..

The Field Grade Leader

Organizational leadership in the us army, aim-ing for the best assignment: how to make the most out of aim 2.0, a guest post by jarod a. taylor and agustin m. gonzalez.

Army Secretary Mark Esper addresses the Talent Management Task Force he created to overhaul the cumbersome, centralized military personnel bureaucracy.

How should Army officers pursue desired future assignments under the new talent management system, the Army’s Assignment Interactive Module (AIM) 2.0 ? This article provides an overview of AIM 2.0 and makes recommendations for officers preparing for the reassignment process.

Officers identified to move in the summer of 2019 recently completed the process of requesting new assignments from the Army’s Human Resources Command (HRC). The process for individual officers is almost always opaque, with the officer’s branch manager at HRC occupying a powerful role, charged with doing what is simultaneously best for the Army, unit, and officer. Recent initiatives are pushing the Army, much like the rest of the Department of Defense, to implement personnel policies that emphasize talent management, where vacancies are matched to the particular skills of the employee filling that duty position. Decades of industrial-age personnel policy, required by law in the 1980 Defense Officer Personnel Management Act (DOPMA), combined with a generational shift in the All-Volunteer Force during the ongoing Global War on Terror resulted in various analysts warning about the risks of “brain drain” and “bleeding talent. ”

AIM 2.0, the Army’s latest talent management initiative, seems to be inching the DoD’s largest workforce closer to some of these recommendations. AIM 2.0 is the Army’s bridging solution towards a future talent management concept embodied by the proposed functions of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System – Army (IPPS-A) . This system is supposed to ensure that career managers are making informed assignment decisions and also creates a market to better match officer talent with organizational requirements.

By using the AIM 2.0 marketplace, the Army attempts to establish a labor market, but the term “market” is somewhat of a misnomer. A labor market refers to the supply and demand for units of labor. In our situation, employees (field grade officers) provide the supply and employers (gaining organizations) provide the demand. Each officer “enters the market” on a specific date and views the “market demand,” which is the list of jobs available to that specific officer. Officers are expected to provide feedback on the market (list of preferences) according to rules set by their assignment manager at HRC. The implicit goal for the online “marketplace” is to match officers’ and organizations’ top preferences with the needs of the Army.

While AIM 2.0 provides officers and organizations the opportunity to identify their preferences for each other through the system, HRC maintains a heavy regulatory grip on the actual function of assignments regardless of individual officers’ preferences. Despite the expressed preferences from each party, career managers still need to account for other factors such as Exceptional Family Member Program (EFMP) considerations, the Married Army Couples Program (MACP), and branch-specific restrictions such as the infantry’s vehicular/non-vehicular imperative. Though the open market provides officers with greater visibility on the wide range of possible jobs, the branch interventions distort the market-based approach.

Additionally, in this new “marketplace,” there is not a currency to limit or shape either individual or organizational preferences. Organizations and officers are free to request their preferences without imposed costs because there is not an instrumental differentiation between higher or lower utility for each officer or assignment. Because of the absence of basic pricing and lack of resource constraints, information is king.

Ultimately, under the new AIM 2.0 system, the assignment system functions similarly to before, with the only significant change being that officers have more information to consume and analyze before indicating preferences. There are still other centralized, and opaque, protocols which influence the final assignment decisions.

People Are Policy: Moving Towards a Better Talent Management System

Participating fully in the AIM 2.0 project represents an officer’s first opportunity to individually address the “brain drain” challenge. The Army seeks to effectively manage, develop, and acquire talent and has decided that this effort is a critical function to maintain a dominant fighting force . While there are a few things the Army can improve in AIM 2.0 to effectively manage talent and improve the user experience, officers should not abdicate their responsibilities within the current system.

AIM 2.0 facilitates self-identification of knowledge, skills, and behaviors (KSBs) and officers have the responsibility to communicate the value of unique KSBs gained through their operational and broadening assignment experiences. Officers who are unable to communicate their individual KSBs hamper the Army’s ability to inventory the KSBs resident in its 1+ million-person uniformed workforce. Such failures handicap strategies to manage the talent required to maintain the Army’s qualitative advantages over strategic competitors. In short, after years of vocal informal leaders speaking out about the Army’s ignorance of unique KSBs among its workforce, our leadership has listened and acted , but needs individual officers’ to help implement the necessary improvements.

The core strength of the AIM 2.0 “market” is that it provides officers with more information than ever about personnel requirements. Most field grade maneuver leaders in the market for a key developmental assignment can reasonably assume that at least one validated requirement is available at the post they most desire. This means there is always a chance, however small or large, to end up at a highly preferred location. Smaller career fields may have more restricted markets. With AIM 2.0, officers are armed with the information needed to make informed decisions, rather than just providing a blind set of preferences to HRC and hoping for a miracle.

Before AIM 2.0, the key engagement to achieve an officer’s preferred relocation was likely a career manager at HRC. Under AIM 2.0, career managers still maintain their dominance in the process, but organizations have access to more information about each officer and thus have the ability to make more refined decisions about their preferences. Because of the increased availability, and hopefully quality, of information throughout the reassignment process, officers need to participate decisively to make the system work for them. Below are a few tips which can help officers make the most out of AIM 2.0.

How to Land Your Desired Duty Location with AIM 2.0

1. Craft a Clear Communications Strategy: Officers need to craft an individual communications strategy which conveys their value to their preferred organizations. The Army loses when officers are unable to communicate their KSBs to units who may be in need of those specific skills. Officers who request an interview with their preferred organization, understand the organization’s mission, and can clearly articulate their value to the organization will put themselves ahead of their peers who fail to prepare.

Officers pursuing broadening assignments that divert from a typical career path such as fellowships, advanced civil schooling , or joint assignments need a communications strategy even more than those who hew to the traditional path. For example, Brigade Combat Teams sensibly flock to the Army’s CGSC to interview and fill their personnel requirements for Majors because CGSC is the largest supply of officers at that grade. To the authors’ knowledge, there is not an equivalent opportunity for officers in ILE-crediting programs away from Fort Leavenworth. This strategy is economical from an organization’s perspective, but it fails to account for the unique KSBs acquired by the external population that are relevant to specific organizational requirements. Officers in this special population, even more than most, must seek help, ask questions, equip themselves with information, and communicate with prospective organizations to convey their value and interest in serving in that unit.

2. Aggressively Pursue Interviews: Officers should request an interview with their preferred organizations. This is an officer’s first opportunity to highlight his or her value to prospective units. In some cases, like the CGSC model mentioned before, there is a structural mechanism already in place for officers to interview. However, this luxury is not readily available to many officers. For junior Majors seeking assignments following a non-Leavenworth ILE program, correcting for this opportunity cost is truly where an officer’s “network” matters the most. However, all officers seeking assignment must not be shy about reaching out to past mentors who may be able to facilitate introductions to organizational leaders or advocate on their behalf.

Officers who do not interview are missing the opportunity to influence the organization’s decision and thus fail to facilitate a potential “market match” between the organization and prospective officer. At highly desired locations, like Italy or Germany, the assignment decision may come down to organizational preference. If officers have not interviewed with that organization, they will likely not rank highly on the organization’s preferences.

3. Make Your AIM 2.0 Resumé Work for You:  Officers must project their value to potential employers through the AIM 2.0 resumé. The resuméis designed to complement the Officer Record Brief (ORB) and help units better match talent with positions. Therefore, an AIM 2.0 resumé should be customized to fit the officer’s desired job requirements, much like a civilian resumé should be tailored to fit individual job applications . Additionally, the resumé provides a crowd-sourced product for Army personnel managers to gather data and make informed talent management decisions. Therefore, if officers want to market themselves, they must identify the needs of their desired organization and craft their AIM 2.0 resumés appropriately.

The typical KSBs expected of Majors transitioning into key developmental positions are easy to find in various places, to include DA Pamphlet 600-3. Using these resources, prospective field grade officers should highlight the work they have completed that separates them from their peers. These areas should account for the officer’s service as a junior officer and during his or her broadening assignments. Those officers who wish to take it a step further, should express in their resumé how the skills or knowledge they gained during their unique broadening assignments prepared them for the specific challenges they expect to face as a field grade officer in their desired organizations.

AIM-ing for an Optimistic Future in Army Talent Management

The Army is moving in the right direction to achieve an enterprise-level talent management solution using AIM 2.0, but there is still a lot of work to be done. Iterative improvements will close the gap between objective and reality, but there are some things that could be changed quickly to improve the experience and boost enthusiastic participation among officers.

For example, instead of seeing each individual validated personnel requirement, it would be simpler for the officers if identical opportunities were grouped by Brigade Combat Team or equivalent organization. In the authors’ experience, there were 83 different assignments in the market, but only 29 real options because of multiple indistinguishable opportunities in some organizations. In addition, locally moving officers should be projected as well, because a failure to do so distorts the information available in the “marketplace.” Adjusting the protocol to incorporate higher priority considerations, such as EFMP and MACP, prior to “market entry” would also improve the experience for each officer. Introducing a comprehensive and logical currency and pricing system to the market would solve some of these challenges, but perhaps adds some potential risks to organizational cohesion that might be unacceptable to Army leadership.

The AIM 2.0 system gives officers unprecedented access to assignment information and that is a distinctly positive development. However, officers have the responsibility to adequately market their experience to help the system make smart market matches. Officers also should continue to use their network and the AIM 2.0 resumé to appropriately market themselves. Future iterations of the AIM 2.0 system and IPPS-A should take into account user experience with the assignment protocol, not just the technical tool, to make rapid and welcome improvements en route to a truly talent-focused personnel management process.

Major Jarod A. Taylor currently serves as a General Wayne A. Downing Scholar at Yale University Jackson Institute for Global Affairs where he is pursuing a Master of Arts degree in Global Affairs with a concentration in International Security. Jarod has over ten years of military experience, serving in the 82d Airborne Division, the 3d Cavalry Regiment, and the NATO Allied Land Command. These views are his own and do not represent the United States Army or the Department of Defense. Follow him on Twitter @JarodATaylor .

Major Agustin M. Gonzalez currently serves as a General Wayne A. Downing Scholar at Duke University Sanford School of Public Policy where he is pursuing a Master of Public Policy degree with a concentration in National Security. Agustin has over thirteen years of military experience, serving in the 101st Airborne Division, the 82d Airborne Division, and the 75th Ranger Regiment. These views are his own and do not represent the United States Army or the Department of Defense. Follow him on Twitter @amdg11b .

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

One thought on “ AIM-ing for the Best Assignment: How to Make the Most Out of AIM 2.0 ”

Good read. As you point out, getting an actual interview is key. During a recent LPD we asked one of our leaders how they use the information provided in AIM 2 (resume, etc.) to make hiring decisions. They very candidly said that they review the information but don’t make decisions off of it. Instead it guides follow up conversations…and that is where the decision is really made.

Comments are closed.