serial killer presentation

Speaking of Psychology: Understanding the mind of a serial killer, with Louis Schlesinger, PhD

Episode 281.

From Jack the Ripper to Jeffrey Dahmer to the Gilgo Beach killer, serial killers have long inspired public fear—and public fascination. Louis Schlesinger, PhD, a professor of psychology at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York and coinvestigator of a research project on sexual and serial murder with the FBI Behavioral Science Unit, talks about what we really know about these murderers’ motivations and their methods, how some manage to avoid capture for so long, and how forensic psychology research can help investigators solve cases.

About the expert: Louis Schlesinger, PhD

Kim Mills: The following episode contains descriptions of sexual violence that some people may find disturbing. If you would rather not hear this type of content, please come back next week for a new episode. Thank you.

Last summer, police in New York arrested architect Rex Heuermann and charged him with a series of murders that took place on Long Island between 1996 and 2011. The arrest of the suspect in the so-called Gilgo Beach Killings appears to have closed one of the more recent chapters in the history of American serial killers. From Jeffrey Dahmer to Ted Bundy to Son of Sam, serial killers have long inspired public fear—and public fascination. What, we wonder, could drive someone to commit such crimes—and how do these people get away with murder for so long?

Today we’re going to talk with a forensic psychologist who studies serial killing. We will discuss what the research tells us about serial murderers’ motivations and methods. Are they all psychopaths or sociopaths or something else? What exactly do those terms mean? Do serial killers ever feel remorse for their actions? How common is serial murder and why do so many of us find it so fascinating?

Welcome to Speaking of Psychology , the flagship podcast of the American Psychological Association that examines the links between psychological science and everyday life. I’m Kim Mills.

My guest today is Dr. Louis Schlesinger, a professor of psychology at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. He has spent decades studying serial murder and is the coprincipal investigator of a joint research project with the FBI Behavioral Science Unit studying sexual and serial murder, rape, bias homicide, suicide by cop, and other extraordinary crimes. He is a board-certified forensic psychologist and an APA fellow, and has published many research articles and 10 books on the topics of homicide, sexual homicide, and criminal psychopathology. 

Dr. Schlesinger, thank you for joining me today.

Louis Schlesinger, PhD : Thank you.

Mills: Let’s start with a definition of the term. What constitutes a serial killer and is there a minimum number of such killings that one has to commit to meet the definition?

Schlesinger: Well, serial killer literally means killing people in a series. Now, when you speak about that, you have to talk about what type of serial killer you’re referring to, because they’re very, very different in terms of how they behave, their psychodynamics, what motivates them, and so on. The type of serial killer that we know most about and that what most people are interested in is the serial sexual murderer like the Boston Strangler, BTK, Ted Bundy, Jack the Ripper, and you mentioned the Gilgo Beach guy more recently. But there’s other types of individuals that kill in a series. For example, there’s contract killers that would kill people for money. It is a world of difference for someone who’s killing a series of people for money versus someone killing for sexual gratification.

There’s the health care serial killers. Those are people that go into a hospital for example, and kill a number of people. Some are nurses, some are physicians that do that. Again, it’s a very different type of dynamic. And if you go into any state prison or penitentiary in the United States, you’re going to find a number of people throughout their criminal career who have killed more than one or two people during a robbery, some sort of felony thing, and so on. So we have to keep it separate.

Now, what most people are interested in—and the serial sexual murderers that you refer to in the introduction, Jeffrey Dahmer and BTK and those sorts of things—are the serial sexual murderers. And so let me just talk about that and define that a little bit so the audience understands what we’re referring to. Most people can understand murder. Most people don’t have any problem understanding that. But sexual murder is very difficult for the average person to wrap their arms around.

And so the question is, what’s going on with these people? Before we talk about what’s going on in their mind, we have to get a couple of definitions straight. Serial sexual murder is not listed as a paraphilia in any of the diagnostic manuals. A paraphilia being an abnormal sexual arousal pattern like pedophilia, attraction to children, fetishism, sexual arousal to non-living objects, and this sort of thing. So it’s not listed in a diagnostic manual, and it’s also not defined in statute. Murder is defined in statute, but serial murder or serial sexual murder is not. Also an important point with respect to this, and many, many people get this wrong, including nonclinical psychologists and sociologists and so on, is there does not have to be intercourse in order for it to be sexual. Why? Because the violence takes the place of it. As a matter of fact, in many, many of these cases, there’s no sexual penetration at all.

In addition to, complicating the problem that that wasn’t enough, is there’s no national crime statistics on the number of serial sexual murders in the United States, and no country keeps these statistics. Now, Canada, for example, our neighbor to the north, used to keep statistics on serial sexual murder, but their definition was very different. It was killing someone in the context of a sex crime. In other words, they would commit a sex crime and then kill the victim so that they couldn’t turn him in. That’s very, very different than killing someone for sexual gratification. Statistics Canada, which is comparable to our Uniform Crime Reports, no longer categorizes sexual murder because I spoke to them recently about it, and it just becomes too complicated.

So serial sexual murder, this is somebody that is going out and killing repetitively because the murder itself is sexually gratifying. Let me say a couple things about human sexuality first. On one end of the continuum, you have heterosexuals, adults attracted to members of the opposite sex. On the other end of the continuum, you could have homosexuals, adults attracted to members of the same sex. But is that it for human sexuality? The answer is no. There’s many, many, many shades of gray in between there. There’s also abnormal sexual arousal patterns, as I mentioned: pedophilia, arousal to children; infantophilia, sexual arousal to preverbal infants; hebephilia, sexual arousal to pubescent adolescents. And there’s things like fetishism and exhibitionism and these sorts of things. In my view, the best way to understand serial sexual murder is another paraphilia, another abnormal sexual arousal pattern. And specifically in these cases, there’s a fusion of sex and aggression so that the aggressive act itself is eroticized, it’s stimulating.

And so people look at this and say, okay, murder—understand murder. I could even understand hatred of women, for example, let’s kill women. But what they can’t understand, which is very difficult to understand, is what they do at the crime scene with these victims. They very often leave the victim in a sexually degrading position with foreign object insertions, for example. And so why do they do it? And the answer to that question is, killing alone is not psychosexually sufficient. So they have to go above and beyond actually killing the person to get complete sexual gratification. And the sexual instinct itself is very, very strong. That’s why—that’s how God made us. So for example, if in order for a woman to become pregnant, she had to run 20 miles, most of women would say, you run 20 miles. I can’t be bothered. There’d be no species. But God was way too smart for that, right? So in order for propagation of the species, he made the sexual instinct very, very strong. And so most people have a sexual encounter, they don’t say, well, that’s good. I’m going to move on to something else. Now they want to do it again and again. And so what you see is a compulsive repetitive aspect to serial sexual murder.

Mills: Let me ask you this, though. What drives people to become serial sexual killers? I mean, how much do we really know about their motivations? And are there any common personality traits?

Schlesinger: The answer is it’s not due to trauma. It’s not due to poor parenting, and it’s not an American phenomenon. Serial sexual murder has been described as far back as the 1800s. As a matter of fact, the first person to describe in a scientific way in terms of case description was a psychiatrist in Germany named Richard von Krafft-Ebing. And his classic book is titled Psychopathia Sexualis . And there’s a chapter in there where he describes almost everything that we know about sexual murder today, was described in 1886 by Krafft-Ebing—not 1986 in Quantico, Virginia, but 1886. And so why did they do it? Again, you find it in every country, in every culture from premodern times, and there’s no evidence at all that it’s increasing—I did a study on that actually—not withstanding what you might hear in the news now.

Why do they do it? The best understanding I think we have at this point is that it’s a biopsychosocial phenomenon with, in my view, a heavy emphasis on neurobiology. Now, poor parenting, traumatic events, none of those things are helpful, that’s for sure. But the number of people who’ve had horrible childhoods, who’ve had terrible parenting, who’ve been abused, they don’t go out become serial sexual murderers. It’s a very, very small amount of the population. And in order for somebody to become a serial sexual murder, I believe many things have to go wrong. For example, I said neurobiological, is it hormonal? Is it chemical? Is it electrical? Is it a combination of those factors plus a head injury, plus trauma and poor parenting? And I think yes—I think the answer is is yes. And that’s why it’s very, very small. The number of people that do it, it’s always been around and there’s no evidence that it’s increasing. Now you hear different estimates. How many serial killers are there roaming around the country? The FBI has never put out an official statement with respect to that. It’s basically unknown, and I think unknowable, actually.

Let me just say one other thing to answer your question specifically with respect to our understanding of, you said personality traits and so on. If you look—serial sexual murder is very popularized. I mean, you can turn on one of the TV stations—every night, you’re going to see a crime documentary on this serial killer, that serial killer and so on. But if you look at the peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals in the past 20 years for popularized mental disorders like bipolar disorder, PTSD, eating disorders, those are popularized too. There’s between 60,000 and 75,000 articles on each of those disorders. Do you know how many peer-reviewed published articles there have been, empirical studies now, of serial sexual murder in the past 20 years? No, you don’t.

Mills: I don’t. It’s a tiny number.

Schlesinger: Yes. 22.

Mills: And how many of those did you write?

Schlesinger: A number. It was 21, but my latest publication made it 22, just came out a couple months ago. And so it’s hard to answer your question definitively, but I can say this with respect to personality traits—and that’s interesting as well. There’s generally two types of individuals who commit sexual murder. Some do it in a very planned fashion where they try to elude law enforcement, they’re forensically aware, and they leave crime scenes that are generally without a lot of physical evidence. If you look at it visually, you’ll see them as very organized. The murder weapon is taken with them, if it’s a ligature strangulation, for example. The room itself is not all broken up with furniture. There’s no blood of the offender on the victim. And so that’s one type of offender, and he usually does it in a series which is thought out.

Now there’s another group that acts out more spontaneously Now why? It’s because the underlying personality disturbance of that group is much more disturbed. If you look at people that kill one or two serial sexual murders and then they’re caught, these are people that have borderline personality, schizophrenia, schizotypal personality, that’s a severe personality disorder, for example. What’s the problem? The problem is that type of disorder, psychopathology, mental disorder does not allow the person to inhibit their impulses. So when they see, for example, a victim that crosses their path, they strike out, and if you strike out impulsively, there may be witnesses around, you'll leave forensic evidence around—you didn’t plan on killing anybody and you’re apprehended quickly.

The other type has more what’s often called psychopathic traits, narcissistic traits, and whatever personality they have, it doesn’t disable them from planning. You could be narcissistic, you could be psychopathic, but you can still plan and inhibit your impulses. And that’s what you see in those sorts of cases. And as a result, because they’re forensically aware and they can plan, they can rack up a very high number of victims. Those are the cases that the FBI usually becomes involved in. Why? Because the FBI’s called in almost always when it’s a difficult-to-solve case. Otherwise, if it’s just one murder or two, local law enforcement can usually make the apprehension.

Mills: So you mentioned psychopathy, but I’m wondering about sociopathy. I mean, are these people sociopaths, psychopaths? What’s the difference? Can you be one and not the other?

Schlesinger: Yes. Let me talk about three different terms—psychopathic personality, sociopathic and antisocial personality disorder—because they get kind of mushed together, particularly when you speak about these things and people refer to it and so on. The only official diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, that’s the manual that psychologists, psychiatrists and so on rely on, is antisocial personality disorder. That’s been the official diagnosis for years. Sociopathic personality was in the manual back in the 1950s, but it has since been eliminated. Interestingly, when someone pontificates about these sorts of things, they’ll always say he’s a psychopath. He’s a psychopath. Right. Now, psychopath, psychopathic personality is time honored. It’s been around since the 1800s when some of the early alienists, which what they called psychiatrists back in the turn of the last century was called moral insanity, and so on. And it’s always been in the literature, it’s been in the psychiatric literature, it’s been in the psychoanalytic literature, it’s been in the psychological literature, but it’s never been an official diagnosis.

But what is generally meant by psychopath is somebody who outwardly appears normal. They have what Hervey Cleckley called a mask of sanity. They can cover up the underlying disturbance, and the underlying disturbance is a lack of emotional attachment to other people. That’s what makes us human. We have attachments to other people. The psychopath in a general in a Cleckleyian sense does not have that, they’re devoid of that. And so they can cut off a person just like that. So that was Cleckley’s conception, and it’s used a lot.

Now, why is it used in serial killing? Why do you hear people say “He’s a psychopath, he’s a psychopath”? Psychopathy does not make you go out and kill people for sexual gratification. It doesn’t. What it does do is it determines how the murder is carried out. So if you have a psychopathic personality and you also have a sexual arousal pattern where there’s a fusion of sex and aggression so that the aggressive act itself is eroticized, then you can plan your crime. And if you can plan your crime and you’re forensically aware, you can elude law enforcement and rack up a high number of victims. And that’s the answer to that. It’s not causative. A personality disorder does not cause anybody to go out and kill women to get sexual gratification. It determines on how they go about doing it.

Mills: Now that leads to the question of remorse or even regret. I mean, do such people feel remorse? Do they regret or are they only remorseful when they get caught?

Schlesinger: Well, that’s a very difficult determination, how you determine if somebody is remorseful or not. Now, if you see any old criminal in prison, which I’ve been doing for 48 years now, almost all of them, not everyone, but almost all of them will say, oh, I never should have done it. I feel bad. It's terrible thing, and so on. So it’s very difficult to determine. The serial sexual murderer usually does not feel any type of remorse towards the victim himself. And I keep saying “himself” because these are 99.99% men killing women, generally speaking. So no, these are people again, as Cleckley said, they’re devoid of human emotion. They have trouble with empathy. Interestingly enough, although they don’t have bonding to other people, many people attach themselves to the psychopath and that’s why you see many psychopaths have an entourage following them around, hangers on and this type of thing.

Mills: Well, I mentioned Rex Heuermann in my intro. He was married. I mean, is that unusual for a serial sexual killer to actually have a marital relationship?

Schlesinger: No, that’s not uncommon. That’s not uncommon for the serial sexual murderer who plans his crimes because he has the type of personality that’s generally speaking, not off-putting. They look normal. They have a mask of normality. They can speak. They can engage, and so on. The other type of sexual murder who’s much more disturbed very often is not married. Any type of sexual involvement, it’s often with a sex worker. They very often live with a parent and so on. But those individuals that you see with a high number of victims very often are married or in a committed relationship at the time. And the partner, the wife usually says things like, “I knew something was odd about him or weird, but I never dreamed that he would be going around killing people.”

Now you say to yourself, now when you hear this, you say, “ah, come on, you live with this guy.” But this has been reported from Krafft-Ebing’s time, back in the 1800s. Because how would you know? To think that your partner is weird is one thing, but to think that he’s going out killing people is such an alien thought and it’s so remote, and that’s what so many of the women say who are subsequently interviewed—some serial sexual murderers, like the Boston Strangler for example, was generally speaking a fairly good husband and he was a good parent. I mean, the children of a lot of them said, my father is a fairly normal guy. He did this, he did that. And so on. Dennis Rader, BTK’s wife had no idea at all. As a matter of fact, the police who interacted with her said, she’s just a very, very nice person. And he raised a family and had a fairly responsible position. So this is way more complicated, this type of disorder, than for example, depression or PTSD and that sort of thing.

This is very complicated and I know that—well, let me say this a couple things. The American people want their serial killers to be evil geniuses with IQs of 180 who speak five languages, including Aramaic, who are connoisseurs of fine wine like Hannibal Lecter. Nothing could be further from the truth. Nothing could be further from the truth. And even those very few offenders who went to college for example, and had a degree—Bundy, you mentioned the Gilgo Beach guy— they really don’t use their intelligence as far as I can determine in any really, really productive way in carrying out their murders because we had the case up in the Pacific Northwest of Gary Ridgeway. They called him the Green River Killer. He eluded law enforcement for over 20 years. His IQ was 83 and so on.

Now you say, now why is that? Well, I’ll tell you a couple of reasons. The hardest thing—let me say it this way, the hardest thing for a serial killer is the abduction. How do you get a woman to go with you? That’s not so simple. And so that’s why you see sex workers are very often targeted. Part of their job description is to go with a stranger, have sex, take your clothes off, usually in a remote area. Also, if a sex worker turns up dead, you don’t know what her real identity is. She’s known on the street by a street name and she may have been killed in New York, but she could be from Chicago or Florida or anywhere. So it’s very, very, very, very difficult. And that’s why you see those women are targeted.

Mills: So what about female serial killers? Are they sexual serial killers, first of all, and is their profile similar to that of male serial killers?

Schlesinger: Well, female serial sexual murderers are generally non-existent. Now, there was a woman in Florida, Aileen Wuornos, who killed a bunch of men, but she was a sex worker. She hated men. She just killed men for the motivation of just revenge or something like that. And that was actually studied and a paper published on that as well. Yes, she killed in a series. So literally she was a serial killer, but the motivation was not sexual. Yeah, it’s really a different thing.

And again, keep in mind, in the past 20 years, we only have 22 publications on this. And so a lot of what you hear said is coming from folklore and Silence of the Lambs and people repeating these sorts of things, which can be dangerous in an investigation because serial sexual murderers, those who read the newspapers and follow the news, and they hear somebody pontificating about this may change their plan, may change their the method of operation.

We saw a good example of that about 10 years ago, I think in Washington, DC, where they had the DC sniper who was a guy with a young, I think 17-year-old juvenile with him going around shooting people, and there were people pontificating on TV about the signature, the signature. Now they got that from the serial killer routine, and then there was someone else talking about geographic profiling. And so the next murder that weekend was 90 miles away. It was outside of the DC area, which makes the investigation so much more difficult. Now you’ve got a tri-state area as opposed to a small area. So these sorts of things really don’t help.

Mills: But does there tend to be a signature in these types of serial sexual killings? I mean, part of the reason that Son of Sam got caught—I mean, there were a lot of reasons, but he did keep looking for the same type of woman to the point where women who lived in Brooklyn were wearing blonde wigs, that sort of thing. So are there signatures?

Schlesinger: Oh, well, let me say this. I did the only research study, empirical study on ritual and signature in serial sexual murder. It was published in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law back in 2010. And what we found is notwithstanding Silence of the Lambs and Hannibal Lecter who was talking about putting a moth or butterfly in the mouth of all these women, it’s way more complicated than that. They do behave in ritualistic ways, but not exact ways. Let me say two things of our study, without getting into the weeds, that I think people will find interesting. One thing is that their behavior at a crime scene tends to evolve, and so the more comfort they have in killing, the more elaborate their behavior at a crime scene will become. So initial torture becomes much more elaborate torture later on. But the most important finding that we found is that in 70% of the cases, a serial killer does something with one victim in a series that he does not do with others in a series.

For example, if they link five women in a series together, they’re linked for some reason. And you look at the five women, four of the bodies are just dumped with no clothes on, but one body is mutilated in some way. Her breasts are cut off, there’s something shoved in or that type of thing. Look at the average homicide detective with 25 years of experience. They’re going to say, that’s a different guy. Look at his behavior, what he did with that victim. That’s not true, and you would only know that if you studied a high number of these cases, which most don’t—the FBI does, I do, and there’s a couple of people in the country affiliated with the FBI that studies these sorts of things—but it’s counterintuitive. And so we found in 70% of the cases an offender will do something with one victim that he did not do with others in the series. So then we asked the question, well, where does he do it in the series, in the beginning, the middle, or the end? We thought in the end, once he gains more comfort, he’ll experiment at a crime scene and do something different. Not true. One third do it in the beginning, one third do it in the middle and one third do it in the end. That’s why you have to do the research rather than just rely on popular culture and this sort of thing.

Mills: But is it even possible to come up with an accurate profile—because it sounds like that’s what you’re trying to help with—when there are so few cases and there is this level of variety?

Schlesinger: Yeah, there is, and let me say it this way. You can come up with some sort of quote unquote “profile,” but not to go to court and link them with—link those crimes because there’s no scientific evidence that would pass the legal standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence, which is either called the Frye standard, is it generally accepted, or the Daubert standard, meaning is it more than generally accepted, is it empirically supported, published in peer reviewed journals and all the rest? The point of the Daubert standard is to keep junk science out of the courtroom, and so you can use a quote unquote “profile” in an investigation, but to go to court and say, this guy killed these five people based on behavior—there’s only one study, is my study basically, and that’s just not enough to meet the legal standard.

Mills: Earlier, I think you indicated that there may be some biosocial thing going on with people who become serial sexual killers. Has any study been done into the brains of these people to better understand what is going on that’s different?

Schlesinger: The answer is nothing really definitive at this point for a number of reasons. There’s so few cases, number one. Number two, to study their brains, they’re going to have to get their permission to become somewhat invasive, and a lot of these guys are just not doing that. There are some people that are looking at CAT scans and PET scans and MRIs and trying to come up with something, but it’s very, very difficult because of the number of cases. There just aren’t that many cases around, and there’s not that many cases accessible. As I mentioned before, if you want to study PTSD, easy to get cases, go to a VA hospital. You want to study alcoholism, go to a rehab center. You want to study bipolar disorder, go to a psychiatric hospital. You want to study serial sexual murder, where are you going to get the cases?

If you’re not connected with the FBI who has a national reach, it’s very, very, very difficult to do this. And at John Jay, we’ve had about a 20-year relationship with the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit down in Quantico, and we’re continuing to do this research and so on. I’ll tell you one interesting finding that was just published a couple of weeks ago in the Journal of Forensic Sciences is you would think that these individuals would have a history of sexual assault or rape in their background. They don’t. And so I looked very carefully at these studies going back to Krafft-Ebing. Even Krafft-Ebing described medical abnormalities, family histories, prior arrests, all sorts of characteristics, but didn’t describe one case of a history of sexual assault or rape. So we found in our cases, 26% of the offenders have a history of sexual assault, which means that three fourths of them don’t.

But we found something very important, that will help in an investigation, that is if an offender sexually penetrated a homicide victim in their series, there’s about an 80% chance he had a likelihood of a conviction in his rap sheet of sexual assault/rape. That helps enormously in an investigation because other things that we know in the background of serial sexual murders, such as inappropriate maternal sexual conduct in their upbringing, sadistic fantasy, animal cruelty, other types of mental health disorders, are not going to be available to an investigator in an investigation. Once you get a suspect, then you can get to mental health records and that might be available then. But in an investigation, you only have his rap sheet. And so if one in the series is sexually penetrated, that’s close to an 80% likelihood that he had sexual assault in his rap sheet, and it really helps the investigation a lot.

Mills: Do serial sexual killers as a rule, desire to become famous even as they need to hide their identity so that they can keep killing? I mean, how much of a motivator is that?

Schlesinger: No, that’s been overhyped right from the beginning. There’s so much of this is overhyped, that he’s playing with the police, he’s toying with the investigation, he’s sitting in his room and rolling his hands. No, they do not want to get caught, but very often they will do things that almost ensure that they’ll get caught. Take for example, Dennis Rader, the BTK guy from Kansas. Thirty years the cases were cold. What happened is a lawyer in the Topeka area where he was from wrote a book on these cases and it got some publicity and he wanted to get credit in a sense, in his own twisted mind. And so he started communicating with the police, and that will almost ensure that you’re going to get caught. And in fact, he did get caught—by and large did not want to get caught.

Let me just dispel one sort of myth that you mentioned about with David Berkowitz, the Son of Sam. Are they targeting people with specific characteristics? That came from the '70s and particularly the Ted Bundy investigation because the women that he killed in the 1970s when he was operative had brown hair parted down the middle. The problem with that is if you go to a yearbook of all coeds who were in college during the—they all had hair—long hair parted down the middle. That was a very, very popular hairstyle back then. And so no. Now, having said that, there is a subgroup of serial sexual murders that will target people based on specific physical characteristics, but it’s very, very rare. Most of them, it’s due to their vulnerability, the victim’s vulnerability and their accessibility. And it may not be as obvious as you might think, for example. Yes, certainly doing things like hitchhiking and leaving a bar with a stranger, those are all high risk things that most women know about. But if an individual is fixated on a victim obsessed with her, a neighbor, for example, and observes her when she goes to work, when she comes home Wednesday night and Friday night, her boyfriend stays over, is he going to try to abduct her on a Wednesday night or Friday night? No, because there’s a male figure there. And so that type of routine behavior pattern unwittingly is a vulnerability and very few people think about that as well.

Mills: Is it common for serial sexual killers also to be serial confessors? That is to confess to murders that they didn’t commit?

Schlesinger: Let me break it down this way. Yes, there are some people that will confess to murders that they didn’t commit to gain notoriety and to gain a lot of status in the institution. One of my cases is not a serial sexual murder, but it’s a very famous case that many people are aware of. Richard Kuklinski, the Iceman. He is a New Jersey case, and I evaluated him when he was apprehended back in the 1980s. He tells everyone he killed over a hundred people. He died a couple of years ago. I never believed that. Where are all the dead people? And when he is interviewed, it becomes more and more elaborate, all these things that—no, I never believed that at all, but generally speaking, that’s an aberration.

I’ll tell you what we did. We did a study—started to do a study of confessions in different types of crime. We know a lot about false confessions. I mean, there’s been a lot of research. Many of my colleagues at John Jay did some of the seminal research on false confessions, Saul Kassin, my colleague there and others as well. So we know a lot about that. But what about confessions in general? Do we know a lot about confessions? So we looked at intimate partner homicides and how they confess, and what we found is they’re not confessing to the police, they’re confessing to a family member. We also found eight cases where they confessed in a suicide note. So the type of confession depends upon the type of murder. And what we started to do is right before the pandemic started, we looked at serial sexual murderers and their confessions—and the study was stopped in the middle due to the pandemic. Our research is now back in gear since January of this year, but for almost 3 years it was shut down due to the pandemic. We just couldn’t do anything. So we started a study on serial killers and how they confessed, and what we found is 50% of them don’t confess. They say to the police, you do what you got to do, but I’m not saying a word. They’re sophisticated offenders. And that gives a little bit of insight into what you just said.

Mills: Now, a lot of people have violent, sexual and nonsexual fantasies, but they don’t act on them. Is there a precipitating factor that drives these people to actually finally act out on what they’ve been fantasizing about?

Schlesinger: Yes. In the general population, I won’t say most, but many, many people have very disturbed sexual fantasies that they keep private even to their partner because they’re afraid if they say to their partner, I want to do this, she’s going to say, what are you nuts? Do you have to see a doctor? I’m not doing that. What’s the matter with you? So they keep it very much to themselves. Same with those individuals who fantasize about killing women in this type of way. The number of people who have these perverse fantasies is much, much higher than those who actually acted out. And so why do some act it out? Well, I can say this. What we do know is that of those who do act out, there’s usually some precipitant, some sort of upsetting event, such as the loss of a relationship, which means a lot to a male, the loss of a job. Men usually get some level of status from a job. In so many ways, male psychology is much more fragile than women, for example, who a job, whatever, doesn’t mean all that much. And I’ve had a case where the guy began killing—he started his killing series when his girlfriend became pregnant, that upset him and so on. And so we can say in many cases what the precipitant is, but definitely not in all cases. And again, this requires more research and less hypothesizing and speculating and pontificating based on Silence of the Lambs and these other sorts of things.

Mills: Let me ask you about DNA evidence, which has become quite prevalent and very effective at this point, especially large-scale DNA databases that have really changed the way that police do their work. How is that changing the process of going after serial sexual killers?

Schlesinger: Well, DNA evidence, and not only serial sexual murder, but in all sorts of crime is just become enormously, enormously helpful. This is hard science and it’s very, very persuasive in court. In fact, in many, many cases, juries expect to hear DNA and other forensic evidence, although in some cases you can’t get DNA evidence. It’s very, very difficult. I had a case where the victim was underwater for a year, and of course you can’t get DNA evidence from that. Unfortunately, jurors expect it. Because of the popularity of crime shows in general,  the jurors are very different today than they were 20 or 30 years ago. I had a case I remember not that long ago where the jury hung on a case, and after it was all over, the judge who had a good rapport with the jury said, well, what was the problem? The evidence was overwhelming. And he said, well, we all thought he did it, but there was no luminol used. Luminol is a spray that makes blood—and you see it in all the shows. Well, what do you think the red stuff was coming out of the dead person? That’s blood. You don’t have to use luminol to determine it was blood, but they do in the shows. And so you have to be very careful now in jury selection. That’s really up to the judges, to voir dire these jurors to the extent that will you listen to what the judge is saying as opposed to what you heard on TV? And it’s very, very hard to undo something that you’ve heard so many times before.

Mills: Last question, and I guess I’m going to ask you to speculate a little bit here. Why do so many people, especially women, seem to find serial sexual killers and killing so morbidly fascinating?

Schlesinger: Well, yes. I mean, they certainly do. And if you look at the crime shows, like ID Discovery and I’ve done so many of those, and I speak to the producers, they say 80% of their viewers are women. And in my opinion, I think it’s a number of different factors. Number one, they tend to be the victim of these cases, and they want to learn how not to become a victim because so many of these guys, particularly the guys that they feature on the crime shows, look so normal and behave so normally. That’s one reason. The other reason is I think women, for example, more than men, are psychologically more interested in the complexity of the inner workings of the human mind as opposed to a guy. For example, in jury selection, you have one of these cases of someone going around and mutilating women. Many guys will say, kill him, he’s not a person. Whereas a woman may be more empathetic, may be more understanding, make sure to try to understand his background and this sort of thing. So I mean, those are two speculative answers as to why women become involved in this.

I’ll say one other thing as a closing thing, to answer your question a little bit differently. The death of a child of one of these people is devastating for not only the family members, but the community and even the country in highly publicized cases. And I’ve had the opportunity over the years to speak to family members who lost a child and talk about difference between men and women. In my experience, it particularly seems to affect fathers more than mothers. I mean, they’re just so devastated. And I remember one father said to me, I’ll never forget it, he said to me, if my daughter died of cancer, or my daughter died in a horrible car accident, that’s one thing. These things happen, but my daughter died because some guy got sexual gratification killing her. He said, I can’t wrap my head around that. I just can’t go on with that type of thought. And it’s a very, very disturbing thought. It just really, really is, and you just can’t help but feel such empathy for people and to spur us all on to try to unravel this as best we can. Also, in terms of preventing this, when we see some red flags like sexual burglaries and repetitive fire setting and these sorts of things, what kind of interventions can we have from a mental health perspective to intervene and try to prevent the development of these sorts of cases?

Mills: Dr. Schlesinger, I want to thank you for joining me today. This has been absolutely fascinating. Thank you.

Schlesinger: Thank you.

Mills: You can find previous episodes of Speaking of Psychology on our website at www.speakingofpsychology.org or on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get podcasts. And if you like what you’ve heard, please subscribe and leave us a review. If you have comments or ideas for future podcasts, you can email us at [email protected] . Speaking of Psychology is produced by Lea Winerman. Our sound editor is Chris Condayan.

Thank you for listening. For the American Psychological Association, I’m Kim Mills. 

Download Episode

Episode 281: Understanding the mind of a serial killer, with Louis Schlesinger, PhD

Save the MP3 file linked above to listen to it on your computer or mobile device.

• Louis Schlesinger, PhD

Speaking of Psychology

Speaking of Psychology is an audio podcast series highlighting some of the latest, most important, and relevant psychological research being conducted today.

Produced by the American Psychological Association, these podcasts will help listeners apply the science of psychology to their everyday lives.

Subscribe and download via:

Your host: Kim I. Mills

Kim I. Mills is senior director of strategic external communications and public affairs for the American Psychological Association, where she has worked since 2007. Mills led APA’s foray into social media and envisioned and launched APA’s award-winning podcast series Speaking of Psychology  in 2013. A former reporter and editor for The Associated Press, Mills has also written for publications including The Washington Post , Fast Company , American Journalism Review , Dallas Morning News , MSNBC.com and Harvard Business Review .

In her 30+-year career in communications, Mills has extensive media experience, including being interviewed by The New York Times , The Washington Post , The Wall Street Journal , and other top-tier print media. She has appeared on CNN, Good Morning America , Hannity and Colmes , CSPAN, and the BBC, to name a few of her broadcast engagements. Mills holds a bachelor’s degree in biology from Barnard College and a master’s in journalism from New York University.

Contact APA Office of Public Affairs

• My presentations

Auth with social network:

Download presentation

We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Forensic Psychology and Serial Killers:

Published by Emil Lindholm Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Forensic Psychology and Serial Killers:"— Presentation transcript:

Criminal Profiling Establishment of the FBI Behavioural Science Unit and now the Violent Criminal Investigation Unit (VI-CAP) in Researchers like.

SERIAL KILLER Defined as a person who kills three (two)or more people in the same manner in a period of more than 30 days, with a “cooling off” period.

Serial Murder. Serial Killer A serial killer is someone who commits three or more murders over an extended period of time with cooling-off periods in.

Chapter 30 CRC Press: Forensic Science, James and Nordby, 2nd Edition1 Chapter 30 Serial Offenders: Linking Cases by Modus Operandi and Signature.

Forensic Psychology Profiling and Victimology. Catching Serial Killers Difficult to catch because they easily blend back into society after they kill.

Day1- Topic: Serial Killer Project/ Unit for Criminology (What makes someone a serial killer?) EQ: What makes someone a serial killer? Why do serial killers.

SERIAL MURDER.

Criminal Profiling. Criminal Psychology refers to the study of the mental and behavioral characteristics of people who break laws Criminal/Forensic psychologists.

CJ 266 Deviance and Violence Seminar 8. SEMINAR OVERVIEW Welcome Final Assignment Guidelines Managing Serial Murder Cases Forensics Profiling—Benefits.

CJ 266 Deviance and Violence Seminar 8. SEMINAR OVERVIEW Welcome Final Essay Guidelines Managing Serial Murder Cases Forensics Profiling—Benefits and.

Serial Killers. The Forensic Psychiatrist Test a subject for mental illness Assesses a perpetrator’s sanity Makes sure they are not faking mental illness.

Forensic Psychology Introduction to Serial Killers.

Serial Killers. typically defined as: typically defined as: –An individual who has murdered three or more people over a period of more than a month, with.

Serial Crime Psychology 1. Serial Crime Many definitionsMany definitions Different from “multiple crimes”Different from “multiple crimes” Almost always.

Serial Killers and Criminal Profiling Notes to help with Profiling Project.

Criminal Patterns Chapter 5. Copyright ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 Crime Patterns & Human Behavior Human beings are largely.

SELF – REPORT TECHNIQUES

FBI Method of Profiling Violent Serial Offenders

Chapter 9 Practice Schedules.

CJ 425 Crime Mapping Unit 6 Seminar “Patterns”. Outline Repeat Incidents Tactical Analysis – Definition – Information Used 7 types of Patterns Inductive/Deductive.

About project

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.

• River City Live
• Newsletters

BREAKING NEWS

LIVE RADAR: Showers and storms make way across Northeast Florida

Entertainment, 'longlegs' star maika monroe's secret to success in hollywood is a healthy relationship to it.

Krysta Fauria

Associated Press

2024 Invision

Maika Monroe, a cast member in the film "Longlegs," poses for a portrait at the London Hotel, Tuesday, June 25, 2024, in West Hollywood, Calif. (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello)

LOS ANGELES – One of the few moments of levity in “Longlegs” — the Neon horror film in theaters now about a Satanist serial killer — happens when Maika Monroe’s character, Lee Harker, meets her co-worker’s young daughter.

It’s obvious the analytical FBI agent doesn’t spend a lot of time around kids. Her stoic, awkward personality is comically heightened by this interaction with the child, who asks Harker to do things she obviously has no interest in, like seeing the girl’s bedroom or coming to her birthday party.

Recommended Videos

Critics have praised the 31-year-old’s “Longlegs” performance — which says something when you share the screen with Nicolas Cage . But her calculated, offbeat character is even more impressive given Monroe’s affable, almost whimsical personality.

“There’s a kind of childlike quality to her that is extremely compelling and graceful and charming,” said Cage of his co-star.

Her endearing approachability is perhaps at least somewhat attributable to the fact that she has always kept Hollywood at arm’s length. “I don’t necessarily like being fully consumed in this world,” Monroe said in a recent interview.

Neither of her parents work in the entertainment industry and only reluctantly agreed to start driving her to Los Angeles from Santa Barbara for auditions as a kid while she balanced school and her kiteboarding hobby. And instead of obsessing about getting her big break after years of trying, Monroe took some time away to be a professional kiteboarder in the Dominican Republic when she was 17.

“I was pretty much like, ‘Acting just isn’t for me.’ I go to classes, I work on my lines, I work so hard for these auditions, and I feel like I’m doing all the things and it just isn’t clicking,” Monroe recalled. “It was so frustrating. And it was getting to a place where it just wasn’t feeling good anymore.”

But she wasn’t ready to give up entirely. Although she got rid of her agent, Monroe kept her manager, who would occasionally encourage her to send in audition tapes.

In almost a year, she only sent in four or five. She didn’t hear anything back — until she did.

Monroe enjoyed being a professional athlete and said it gave her a healthy perspective on her career, but as soon as she was cast in “At Any Price” alongside Zac Efron and Dennis Quaid, she rushed home. Soon after, her big break did come with David Robert Mitchell’s 2014 cult indie horror film, “It Follows.”

“There’s been so many ups and downs and so many times where I question, like, ‘What the hell am I doing here?’ And it’s such a tough industry, just mentally,” she admitted. “There’s been probably two other times throughout my career where I’m like, ‘I can’t do this anymore.’ And yet I just keep getting pulled back. And at the end of the day, I feel like this is what I’m meant to be doing and this is what I’m good at.”

Rather than look back on her time as a kiteboarder as a detour, Monroe said it was formative, especially since she competed at a time in the sport when women were considerably outnumbered. “I’m so grateful for the strength that I felt. I felt powerful and strong. And it was just like a very important experience for me,” she said.

Superstition makes her reluctant to admit it, but she said this feels like a turning point in her career. She is set to reprise her role as Jay Height for Mitchell’s “They Follow,” which is scheduled to begin production early next year.

But Monroe said she initially worried a sequel 10 years later might just be a cash grab or ruin the original.

“I was like, ‘Oh no’ ... because it was just so iconic at that time when it came out and the way that it ended,” she said. “But I always had faith in David. He’s so particular about what he does. Clearly, he does barely anything because he’s so picky. It has to be on his terms, his scripts. And yeah, I read it, and I was like, ‘Oh, okay. This is how you do it.’ So, I have high hopes.”

Although “It Follows” and “Longlegs” have been Monroe’s most high-profile horror films to date, her list of acting credits within the genre is an extensive one.

“I want a goddamn rom-com. Come on. Good God. What am I doing?” she joked about her reputation as a scream queen, but said that she’s happy to stay in the world of scary movies if it means continued creative fulfillment.

“The most interesting roles, the most interesting stories and scripts that I’ve been sent usually fall under this genre and usually end up being the films that I’m most proud of, not only as a whole, but my performance. And I feel like the most growth as an actor happens through these.”

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Click here to take a moment and familiarize yourself with our Community Guidelines.

A 19-year-old newspaper intern escaped a serial killer. It defined his career.

• Steve Fishman, a newspaper intern at the time, was hitchhiking and picked up by Robert Carr.
• Six months later, he found out Carr was a serial killer and he could have been a victim.
• The incident led Fishman to a career as a true-crime writer and podcaster.

When Steve Fishman did an exclusive jailhouse interview with a serial killer and rapist, he had one particularly important question.

"Why didn't you kill me?" the rookie reporter asked Robert Frederick Carr III as they sat in a cell in 1976.

"I thought you were too big," Carr replied. About a year earlier, Fishman was hitchhiking and had been picked up by the convicted serial killer.

Nearly 50 years later, Fishman is reflecting on his narrow escape in the true-crime podcast " Smoke Screen: My Friend, The Serial Killer ."

Fishman told Business Insider he was naive when he first covered the story. "I guess I tried to understand and humanize him," Fishman said, noting that his coverage focused heavily on the lack of psychological treatment for sex offenders at the time.

But with the wisdom he's gained throughout his career and as a father of three, he now describes Carr as a "monster" who showed no remorse.

Fishman thought the driver who picked him up would be an interesting subject for a story

Fishman, who was 19 at the time, was hitchhiking when he first met Carr. Fishman was a poorly paid intern at a local newspaper and needed a ride to his workplace in Norwich, Connecticut.

Carr drew up in his sedan, beckoned Fishman inside, and introduced himself as "Red." Carr, who was balding with wisps of ginger hair, was about a decade older than him.

"I run up excitedly," Fishman said. "But I'm also anxious because you never know what will be on the other side of that car door. I'm not a big guy and didn't shave then, so I looked younger than I was."

But Carr put his mind at ease, telling him he also lived in Norwich and knew a shortcut to their destination. "He seemed amiable, personable, and completely unthreatening," Fishman told BI.

Related stories

His journalist radar went off when Carr disclosed that he'd recently been released from prison . "Instead of it setting off an alarm bell, I thought, 'Maybe this could be a story, and I could interview him about his challenges getting back into the community.'"

Carr said he would interested in appearing in the paper and gave Fishman his phone number. The plan was for the intern to speak to Carr's probation team first.

Still, Fishman got scared after telling the driver where to pull over. "I said goodbye, but the handle on the door didn't work," he said. "It was anomalous — enough to cause a moment of anxiety and almost panic."

Carr said, "Sorry, I've got to get that door fixed," and told Fishman to wind down the window and release the handle from the outside. Fishman exited the car, wishing Carr a great day and promising to follow up on the story.

But Carr's probation supervisor nixed the story idea.

Disappointed, Fishman tossed Carr's number into the back of a file and got on with his job at The Norwich Bulletin. He mostly covered high-school sports and family events such as Easter egg hunts.

Six months later, Fishman saw Carr's photo on a breaking news alert.

The Associated Press reported that Carr had been arrested for the attempted rape of a hitchhiker in Florida. He had shocked police by confessing to kidnapping and raping more than a dozen people and murdering four of them.

"I can still feel the shudder when I read it," Fishman said.

The journalist's biggest scoop was a prison interview

Fishman dug out Carr's number. When he called, Carr's wife answered and agreed to be interviewed.

The reporter covered every aspect of the story, including Carr's sentencing deal. The murderer agreed to lead detectives to the bodies of his four victims. A judge sentenced Carr to three life terms plus 360 years instead of giving him the death penalty .

One of Fishman's biggest scoops was securing a face-to-face interview with Carr behind bars. "I was captivated by the excitement, the dead bodies, the deadlines, and the sense of purpose," Fishman said.

The journalist, who was then 20, said Carr's agenda dictated the conversation.

"He held forth for a couple of days, sitting at the head of the table in this little room," he said. "He intended to convince me and make me listen."

Carr, who died of prostate cancer in 2007 at the age of 63, talked about why he'd spared Fishman's life. Carr recalled every detail of the encounter and told Fishman he was put off by his size.

The journalist said the killer painted himself as a victim because the state had not provided him with therapy. "I took it very seriously — as I would do now," Fishman, who won national and regional press awards for reporting on the case, said.

The two men developed something of a friendship and frequently bantered on the phone. "He'd call collect to the newsroom from jail and joke around with me and the editors," Fishman said.

Meanwhile, Fishman's career flourished. He told BI that his experience with Carr helped "define" his journalism. "It gave me a deep hunger for being inside the story and wanting to understand it."

Fishman went on to interview the "Son of Sam" serial killer David Berkowitz in the 2000s. Berkowitz is serving a life sentence for crimes he committed in the mid-1970s. Fishman also interviewed the notorious Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff , who was sentenced to 150 years in prison, before Madoff's death in 2021.

Now a father, Fishman said that he would have advised his younger self to consider the human cost of the case more closely.

"At that point, I was extremely ambitious and driven," Fishman, whose children are 21, 15, and 2, said. "There was this seduction of having extreme access to this guy, so I told his story as he wanted. What I missed — but what I've learned a second time around — was that this guy was irredeemable."

• Main content

‘Longlegs’ Review: Nicolas Cage Worms His Way Into Your Nightmares With Dread-Filled Serial Killer Thriller

Osgood Perkins' ’90s-set horror movie disturbs more over time than it does in the moment, getting scary once its singularly Satanic boogeyman embeds in your head.

By Peter Debruge

Peter Debruge

Chief Film Critic

• How JD Vance Went From ‘Hillbilly Elegy’ to the Ultimate Celebrity Apprentice — Thanks to Hollywood’s Help 3 days ago
• With ‘Inside Out 2’ and ‘Despicable Me 4’ Propping Up the Summer Box Office, Could 2024 Be the Year of Animation? 1 week ago
• ‘Wallace & Gromit’ Creator Nick Park Credits Disney for Sparking Interest in Animation, Teases ‘Vengeance Most Fowl’ and Feathers’ Long-Awaited Return 1 week ago

SPOILER ALERT: The following review contains mild spoilers.

Now here’s a first: Apart from the pale-faced freak show of the film’s title, the experience of watching “ Longlegs ” didn’t strike me as all that frightening. At first. In the moment, it’s considerably less scary than the ecstatic early buzz — ginned up by Neon via whisper campaigns and strategic advance screenings — would have you believe. Less than 12 hours after seeing it, however, the demented Nicolas Cage character resurfaced in my nightmares, popping up out of nowhere to screech, “Hail Satan!” in that unnerving, high-pitched voice of his.

Related Stories

Why verizon’s latest play could make it the netflix of streaming bundlers, fremantle india's aradhana bhola unveils future plans as anurag kashyap's 'bad cop' arrests top spot on disney+ hotstar (exclusive), popular on variety.

That nickname applies to an instantly iconic Nicolas Cage creation, no less disturbing than Max Schreck’s hunchbacked Nosferatu, a performance that has been a career-long inspiration for Cage. Like that early screen vampire, Longlegs puts us on edge with his twisted body language and exaggerated gestures — that, plus odd framing that crops him off at the head, explains how the character manages to worm his way into our brains.

Visually, audiences can scarcely tell it’s Cage beneath all that makeup: With his stringy white hair, pasty foundation and faded pink uniform, he looks less like a man than an androgynous cross between Bette Davis in “What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?” and kindly character actor Celia Weston, who played the mom in “Junebug.” These are hardly your typical horror archetypes, and yet, once the film’s ultimate scheme is revealed, it leaves a more unsettling imprint.

We first see Longlegs driving up to an innocent girl’s white country house in a station wagon — easily the least threatening of cars, rendered ominous by DP Andres Arochi’s framing. The opening sequence is stylized to suggest a grainy home movie, with its vintage Kodak colors and rounded corners. Later, the frame expands to full anamorphic widescreen, creating a coffin-like shape that tends to isolate characters in threatening environments. As Cage interacts with what he calls “the almost birthday girl,” playing a twisted game of peekaboo, his demeanor suggests an incompetent clown or a bachelor uncle — one of those maladroit adults who grossly misjudge how to interact with kids. He’s the kind of sinister stranger little girls are well advised not to approach.

From this prologue, the film jumps forward from the ’70s to the Clinton administration to find Lee participating in an FBI search. She shows an almost psychic intuition as to the culprit’s whereabouts, but that isn’t enough to spare her partner, whose abrupt exit establishes how shocking the film’s violence can be. There’s a certain laziness to the storytelling, as Perkins relies on tired serial-killer tropes to skip over the film’s more egregious contrivances. (Lee’s personal connection to Longlegs is a coincidence too far, and the never-explained demonic orbs are more hokey than horrific.)

Rather than recycling the genre’s boilerplate elements, Perkins strips away most of the procedural bits and concentrates on distinguishing details: the eccentric mental hospital chief who dresses like a pimp, or the girl at the hardware store who might have been a victim in another movie, but instead deflates Longlegs’ menace when she quips, “Dad, that gross guy’s here again!”

Reviewed at Wilshire Screening Room, Los Angeles, July 1, 2024. MPA Rating: R. Running time: 101 MIN.

• Production: A Neon release and presentation, in association with C2, of a Traffic., Range, Oddfellows, Saturn Films production. Producers: Dan Kagan, Brian Kavanaugh-Jones, Nicolas Cage, Dave Caplan, Chris Ferguson. Executive producers: Jason Cloth, Andrea Bucko, Ronnie Exley, Lawrence Minicone, Sean Krajewski, David Gendron, Liz Destro, Tom Quinn, Jason Wald, Christian Parkes, Teddy Schwarzman, John Friedberg, Laura Austin-Little, Jesse Savath, Fred Berger.
• Crew: Director, writer: Osgood Perkins. Camera: Andrés Arochi Tinajero. Editors: Greg Ng, Graham Fortin. Musci: Zilgi.
• With: Maika Monroe, Blair Underwood, Alicia Witt, Nicolas Cage, Michelle Choi-Lee, Dakota Daulby.

More from Variety

Netflix tops 277 million subscribers with strong q2 gain, beats earnings forecasts, ‘dead rising’ remaster highlights rationale of video game re-releases and remakes, durban filmmart head magdalene reddy on africa’s financing boom, transformative power of cinema and how to ‘create a new vision’ for the continent, ‘wednesday’ season 2 set to become ‘largest production’ ever shot in ireland, how roblox is facilitating animated films’ domination of 2024 box office, netflix rejects direct streaming bundles with max, disney+ because it ‘already operates as a go-to destination’, more from our brands, where to buy tickets to the national and the war on drugs’ co-headlining tour, buffalo trace just opened an invite-only whiskey lounge in paris, ‘heretic’ lawyer behind houston christian’s house v. ncaa fight, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, lady in the lake: natalie portman stumbles into a twisty mystery in apple tv+ drama — read premiere recap.

• Action/Adventure
• Children's/Family
• Documentary/Reality
• Amazon Prime Video

More From Decider

R.I.P. Shannen Doherty: '90210' & 'Charmed' Actress Dead at 53

Bette Midler Tearfully Shuts Down Hoda Kotb's Questioning During Emotional...

Were Rats Scurrying Across The Screen In 'The Bachelorette' Season 21...

Netflix Basic Plan Discontinued: Is Netflix Getting Rid Of Its Cheapest...

Michael Strahan Returns To 'Good Morning America' After Two Weeks Off The...

'The Bear' Season 3 Review: Carmy Secures His Role as The Chairman of The...

R.I.P. Martin Mull: 'Clue' & 'Roseanne' Star Dead at 80

Every Kevin Costner Movie Is A Western (Even When They're Not)

Share this:.

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to copy URL

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Mastermind: To Think Like A Killer’ On Hulu, A Docuseries About Dr. Ann Burgess, Whose Methods Changed The Way Serial Killers Were Pursued

Where to stream:.

• Mastermind: To Think Like a Killer

Is ‘Lady in the Lake’ Based on a True Story? How Natalie Portman’s Apple TV+ Show Holds Crime Fans Accountable

‘betrayal: a father’s secret’ on hulu: everything we know about the jason lytton and ashley lytton true crime series, stream it or skip it: ‘homicide: los angeles’ on netflix, a dick wolf-produced docuseries about l.a. county’s most notorious murder cases, stream it or skip it: ‘sasha reid and the midnight order’ on freeform, a docuseries about a group of women who get in the minds of serial killers.

Mastermind: To Think Like A Killer is a three-part docuseries, directed by Abby Fuller and produced by Dani Sloane, Dakota Fanning and Elle Fanning, about Ann Burgess, a psychiatric nurse and college professor who pioneered how law enforcement pursues serial killers. Fuller not only gives viewers a biographical look at Burgess and her career, but Dr. Burgess gives a firsthand account of the cases she worked on.

MASTERMIND: TO THINK LIKE A KILLER : STREAM IT OR SKIP IT?

Opening Shot: We see the feet of a woman pulling back in a chair and sitting down. Then we see her loading paper in a typewriter and typing.

The Gist: Through interviews with Dr. Burgess, her four children, authors and law enforcement experts, as well as reenactments and archival footage, Fuller tells the story of how Dr. Burgess started to change the minds of the male law enforcement establishment, starting with the FBI, when it came to rape, where she interviewed victims, then got into the minds of serial killers by talking to them directly.

Burgess talks about how she became a psychiatric nurse; nurse was one profession women in the early 1960s regularly got jobs in, but she was one of the few nurses who asked patients how they felt instead of just worrying about their symptoms. She then co-wrote a book about how rape victims are often blamed for the sexual assaults that are inflicted on them, a revolutionary notion at the time. That got the attention of the FBI, who asked her to go to Quantico and lecture recalcitrant male agents on how women aren’t “asking for it” when they get raped, showing them slides of the real injuries rape victims suffer.

She started working with the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit, specifically agents John Douglas and Rob Ressler. They were interviewing and pursuing serial killers, and Dr. Burgess was interested in interviewing them to see how they were brought up, as well as get them to open up about what feeds their murderous impulses and how they feel after killing someone. We hear audiotapes of interviews with a number of famous serial killers, and we hear about how she assisted on the case of the Ski-Mask Rapist that terrorized women in Louisiana in the early 1980s.

What Shows Will It Remind You Of? Given the data points Dr. Burgess compiled about various serial killers, we were reminded of the recent series Sasha Reid And The Midnight Order , because Reid has taken the kind of information Burgess compiled 45 years ago and put them in a database to make a more granular analysis.

Our Take: The key to Mastermind is that Dr. Burgess herself is interviewed for the docuseries. It isn’t often when the subject of a biographical docuseries can actually talk to the person who is being examined, and her perspective is invaluable. Her descriptions of how skeptical FBI agents were with her initial presentation on rape victims could only come from her. But it was also refreshing to hear her determination to make a career for herself, despite the severe uphill climb women had back when she was establishing herself.

The interviews with her adult children also illustrate just how Burgess’ determination rubbed off on them. This isn’t a story where she was so wrapped up in her work that she neglected her family. No, this is about a woman who set a great example for her kids, who have gone on to their own distinguished careers. If that lack of conflict makes for boring TV, so be it. It may not make for the most interesting storytelling, but it’s a refreshing perspective.

Where the show really comes to life, though, is her involvement in raising awareness of the Behavioral Science Unit within the FBI and with the general public. Her analysis of interviews with serial killers like Monte Rissell, who was a serial rapist before he started killing people, was fascinating to learn about; she felt his case could inform the ski-mask case, given that the perpetrator there changed what he did to his victims after doing it a certain way for awhile. That led to the adrenaline theme, which led us to hearing tapes of Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper, two infamous serial killers that Burgess analyzed.

Where the first episode trips up is not doing enough to discern what Dr. Burgess’ contribution to the Ski-Mask Rapist case was. She not only identified possible patterns the rapist might follow via interviews with serial killers, but then interviewed victims to gather more information. It gets a little confusing that she actually did both, and doesn’t quite get to the heart of how interviews with Ted Bundy and Ed Kemper would inform the Ski-Mask Rapist case.

Sex and Skin: None.

Parting Shot: As we hear reports about the Ski-Mask Rapist committing his assaults in multiple states, we see Burgess looking out an office window. The frame slowly tilts.

Sleeper Star: As we stated, Burgess’ adult children are all great examples of how she set a standard for her kids, despite a busy career that gave her a modicum of national fame due to her media appearances.

Most Pilot-y Line: When Dr. Burgess talks about her first lectures about rape to the FBI, we cut between video of her giving a lecture with a number of vintage films of tie-clad men from the 1960s and ’70s. It’s obvious that the audience shots are stock footage, but the trick was used for a maddeningly long time.

Our Call: STREAM IT. Mastermind: To Think Like A Killer is an interesting look at the fascinating career of Dr. Ann Burgess, highlighting how she changed the way law enforcement looked at rape victims as well as serial killers.

Joel Keller ( @joelkeller ) writes about food, entertainment, parenting and tech, but he doesn’t kid himself: he’s a TV junkie. His writing has appeared in the New York Times, Slate, Salon, RollingStone.com , VanityFair.com , Fast Company and elsewhere.

• Stream It Or Skip It

'Golden Bachelor' Gerry Turner Introducing Theresa Nist As "My Lovely Wife" On 'Celebrity Family Feud' Serves Up One Final Moment of Cringe

What Time Does Trump Speak At The RNC? How To Watch His Speech

'Betrayal: A Father’s Secret’ On Hulu: Everything We Know About The Jason Lytton And Ashley Lytton True Crime Series

Kate Hudson Tells 'WWHL' She Could "Smell" Matthew McConaughey From "A Mile" Away While Filming ‘Fool’s Gold': "He Doesn't Wear Deodorant"

Were Prince Harry And Meghan Markle The Secret Buyers Of 'Owning Manhattan's $21 Million Space? We Asked Ryan Serhant!

R.I.P. Shannen Doherty: '90210' & 'Charmed' Actress Dead at 53

Serial Killers

Mar 19, 2019

1.37k likes | 4.21k Views

Serial Killers. Different Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 3+ # of events 1 1 3+ # of locations 1 2+ 3+ Cooling-off period no no yes. Serial Killers.

Share Presentation

• serial killers
• serial killer
• serial killer profile
• victims 4 2 3

Presentation Transcript

Different Types of Multiple Killers MassSpreeSerial # of victims 4+ 2+ 3+ # of events 1 1 3+ # of locations 1 2+ 3+ Cooling-off period no no yes

Serial Killers • Serial killer - commits 3+ murders over an extended period of time with cooling-off periods in between. In between their crimes, they appear to be quite normal, a state which has been called the "mask of sanity."

Serial Killer Profile • Mostly white males with average intelligence • Avg age is 29. • Usually from unstable home. • Absence of a loving and nurturing relationship. • Physical ailments or disabilities (head injuries common). • Triad – Animal Cruelty, Bedwetting, Pyromania.

Types of Serial Killers • Visionary Motive Type- considered insane or psychotic. • Voices tell them to commit crime (some see visions). Eg., Son of Sam • Mission-Oriented Type- no psychosis, but has a need to rid the outside world of what he considers immoral or unworthy. • Will select a certain group of individuals to kill (prostitutes, young women, gay men, etc.) Eg., Pickton

Types of Serial Killers • Thrill-Oriented Type- For the fun. • He is very sadistic and kills for excitement. Eg., Zodiac • Lust Killer- Sexual killer. Not psychotic. Kills for the pure turn-on. • The amount of pleasure is dependent on the amount of torture. The more heinous the torture, the more aroused they become. Eg., Dahmer

Serial Killers • Serial killers often keep mementos of their victims. • Souvenirs: Personal items allow the killer to enjoy the memories of the crime. • A trophy can become something of a shrine Some keep Polaroids Dahmer`s Bone Shrine

Common Traits • Top 10 (According to Listverse.com): • 10 – Alcohol and substance abuse • 9 – Psychological abuse during childhood • 8 – Sexually stressful events in childhood • 7 – Bedwetting • 6 – Growing up lonely and isolated • 5 – Fantasies • 4 – Preferring auto-erotic activities • 3 – Voyeurism and fetishism in adulthood • 2 – Acting out fantasies on animals • 1 – Physical injuries (often head trauma)

Henry Lee Lucas 3 years old • Mother forced him to watch her have sex with strangers • Spent 3 days in a coma after mother hit him with a plank of wood 7 years old • Mother made him go to school dressed like a girl until he was in the second grade • She beat him when his teacher gave him a pair of shoes 10 Years old • Mother shoots a mule he was given as a present by a family friend Murdered mother at age 24. Convicted of 11 murders. Linked with 213.

The MacDonald Triad Animal Cruelty/Bed Wetting/Pyromania • Secret compulsion seen as the seeds of greater mayhem. • Animal Cruelty – Dahmer often mutilated and tortured stray dogs. • Bed-wetting – 60% of serial killers wet their bed AFTER adolescence. • Pyromania – Destruction is sexually stimulating. Easy to make leap from destruction of property to destruction of human lives.

Organized vs. Disorganized • FBI has categorized serial killers into two different types:

Victim List of Subject # 1

Victim List of Subject # 1 1) Anna Slesers (55) Died 14th June 1962 2) Mary Mullen (85) Died 28th June 1962 3) Nina Nichols (68) Died 30th June 1962 4) Helen Blake (65) Died 30th June 1962 5) Ida Irga (75) Died 19th August 1962 6) Jane Sullivan (67) Died 20th August 1962 7) Sophie Clark (20) Died 5th December 1962 8) Patricia Bissette (23) Died 31st December 1962 9) Mary Brown (69) Died 9th March 1963 10) Beverley Samans (23) Died 6th May 1963 11) Evelyn Corbin (58) Died 8th September 1963 12) Joann Graff (23) Died 23rd November 1963 13) Mary Sullivan (19) Died 4th January 1964

Method of Subject # 1 • Victims all female • Age / race not consistent • Murdered in their own apartments • No forced entry • Victims all raped • Bodies left in obscene positions • Strangled, usually with their own silk stockings • Tied stockings in a bow under their chin • He terrorized Boston for 18 months

Albert De Salvo, Boston Strangler The Measurer, The Green Man Various minor crimes Abusive father 13 victims as the Boston strangler Rumored 300+ victims as The Measurer and The Green Man Paranoid schizophrenic Cold blooded killer, remorseless

Outcome While in custody for rape and breaking and entering, he confessed to also being the Boston strangler, and murdering 13 women. His wife took his two children to her homeland of Germany at the urging of his lawyer. He was never tried as the Boston strangler, but was given sentences for his rape and burglary charges that would ensure he spent the rest of his life in custody. Six years into those sentences he was stabbed while in the infirmary and found dead the next morning.

Victim List of Subject # 2

Victim List of Subject # 2 1) Steven Hicks June, 1978 2) Steven Tuomi Sept, 1987 3) James Doxtator January, 1988 4) Richard Guerrero March, 1988 5) Anthony Sears March, 1989 6) Edward Smith     June, 1990 7) Raymond Smith July, 1990 8) Ricky Lee Beeks   July, 1990   9) Ernest Miller    Sept., 1990 10) David Thomas   Sept., 1990 11) Curtis Straughter  Feb., 1991 12) Errol Lindsey   April, 1991 13) Anthony Hughes  May 24, 1991 14) KonerakSinthasomphone  May 27, 1991 15) Matt Turner  June 30, 1991 16) Jeremiah Weinberger  July 5, 1991 17) Oliver Lacey  July 12, 1991 18) Joseph Bradehoft  July 19, 1991

Method of Subject # 2 • Victims all male • Age / race not consistent • Murdered in killers home • All were homosexual • Victims all raped • Victims were lured to his home for intimate contact • Once there victims were drugged and tortured • Bodies were dismembered • Some body parts were eaten by the killer

Jeffrey Dahmer, Milwaukee Monster Various arrests for assault Devoted parents, happy home life 18 victims confirmed, many more suspected Started unusual fascination with death as a small child Necrophiliac, cannibal, “experimental neurosurgeon” Cold blooded killer, remorseless

Outcome One of his victims escaped and a neighbour called the police, who believed Dahmers’ story of the boy being his lover and released the boy to Dahmers’ custody and his death. A final victim was lucky enough to escape and this time the police took notice. He admitted to the murders and detailed his brutality. He plead guilty and insane but the jury found him guilty and sane, while he was in prison one inmate tried to slash Dahmers’ throat unsuccessfully, the next attack (with an iron bar) was successful in smashing Dahmers’ skull and killing him.

Victim List of Subject # 3

Victim List of Subject # 3 • 1) Lonnie Trumbull, 23/6/66 2) Donna Manson, 12/3/74 • 3) Susan Elaine Rancourt, 17/4/74 4) Kathy Parks, 6/5/74 • 5) Brenda Baker, 25/5/74 6) Brenda Ball, 1/6/74 • 7) Georgeann Hawkins, 11/ 6/74 8) Janice Ott, 14/7/74 • 9) Denise Naslund, 14/7/74 10) Jane Doe, 2/9/74 • 11) Nancy Wilcox, 2/10/74 12) Melissa Smith, 10/18/74 • 13) Laura Aimee, 31/10/74 14) Debbie Kent, 8/11/74 • 15) Caryn Campbell, 1/12/75 16) Julie Cunningham, 15/3/75 • 17) Denise Oliverson, 4/6/75 18) Melanie Cooley, 15/4/75 • 19) Lynette Culver, 5/6/75 20) Susan Curtis, 28/6/75 • 21) Shelley Robertson, 1/7/75 22) Nancy Baird, 4/ 7/75 • 23) Debbie Smith, ?/2/76 24) Lisa Levy, 15/1/78 • Margaret Bowman, 15/1/78 26) Kimberly Ann Leach, 9/2/78 • Several other victims survived, the actual number is unknown

Method of Subject # 3 • All victims were female • All victims were white and single • All victims were young (late teens) • All had long dark hair, parted in the middle and looked similar • Usually abducted and found some time later • All victims were seen talking to a man wearing a cast or sling shortly before their disappearance • Abducted in the evening • Severely beaten about the head • Dumped in woodland

Ted Bundy, Lady Killer College graduate, law student, politically ambitious, rape counselor. Respected and admired by (most) who met him. Popular with women, generally considered to be a nice guy. Chose victims who looked like his ex girlfriend. Crimes spanned four states Escaped from jail to resume his killing spree Protested his innocence until he was sentenced to death, when he showed remorse.

Outcome Bundy managed to escape detection by pure fluke several times before finally being caught for attempted kidnapping. His previous flukes were due to his reputation as an upstanding citizen, and his charm. After he was imprisoned for kidnapping, while awaiting extradition to face other charges he escaped and went on a further killing spree. This time he was seen trying to abduct a school girl, a few days later he was arrested again and sentenced to death. Hours before his execution he gave an interview, where he accepted responsibility for his crimes and wished to inform the public of the encouragement he had from pornographic material, saying it was an addiction that he constantly needed harder and more until he finally acted his fantasies out.

Gary Ridgeway: Green River Killer “I`m not a serial rapist, I`m a serial killer." Body Count: 49 - Proven 71-90+ - Possible

Ted Bundy: Campus Killer “You feel the last bit of breath leaving their body. You’re looking into their eyes. A person in that situation is God..." Body Count: 35 - Proven 36+ - Possible

“I should never have been convicted of anything more serious than running a cemetary without a license." John Gacy: Killer Clown Body Count: 33 - Proven 34+ - Possible

“I am deeply hurt by you calling me a woman hater. I am not. But I am a monster. I am the ‘Son of Sam’." David Berkowitz: Son of Sam Body Count: 6 - Proven

Jeffrey Dahmer:The Milwaukee Cannibal “After the fear and terror of what I had done had left…I started it all over again. From then on it was a craving, a hunger..." Body Count: 17 - Proven

Peter Sutcliffe: The Yorkshire Ripper “The women I killed were filth-bastard prostitutes who were littering the streets. I was just cleaning the place up a bit." Body Count: 13 - Proven 15 - Possible

Edmund Kemper: Co-Ed Killer “One side of me says ‘I’d like to talk to her, date her’. The other side of me says, ‘I wonder how her head would look on a stick’." Body Count: 10 - Proven

Aileen Wuornos: Highway Killer “I robbed them, and I killed them cold as ice, and I know I would kill another person because I’ve hated humans for a long time." Body Count: 6 - Proven 8+ - Possible

"The only thing I did wrong was not having her cremated. If I had had her cremated I wouldn't be having all this trouble." Harold Shipman: Dr. Death Body Count: 218 - Proven 250 - Possible

Andrei Chikatilo: Citizen X “I felt a kind of madness and ungovernability in perverted sexual acts. I couldn’t control my actions ." Body Count: 53 - Proven 56 - Possible

“The moment of death is enthralling and exciting. Only those who actually kill know what I mean…When I am released I will feel that moment again.” “I am the man of the century. No one will forget me.” Pedro Alonzo Lopez:Monster of the Andes Body Count: 110 - Proven 350 - Possible

• More by User

Serial Killers. serial killer…. person who murders 3 or more people over a period of more than 30 days, with a "cooling off" period between each murder - whose motivation for killing is largely based on psychological gratification.

2.73k views • 92 slides

Serial Killers. Dr. Mike Aamodt Radford University [email protected]. Updated 09/09/2012. Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 2+ # of events 1 1 2+ # of locations 1 2+ 2+ Cooling-off period no no yes.

1.13k views • 69 slides

Serial Killers. Video video 2 science of the mind video 3 science of psychopaths. Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 3+ # of events 1 1 3+ # of locations 1 2+ 3+ Cooling-off period no no yes. Serial Killer Frequency.

1.36k views • 48 slides

Serial Killers. Dr. Kelley Kline FSU-Panama City. I. What is the common profile for most serial killers?. Demographics: A. Ethnicity - The majority of serial killers are caucasian ( Estimates range from 82-86%).

1.01k views • 24 slides

Serial Killers. SIGNS OF A Future KILLER. Fire starting , invariably just for the thrill of destroying things.

401 views • 7 slides

Serial Killers. Forensic Psychology. Forensic Psychology. Where law meets the study of the mind, you’ll find the Forensic psychiatric/psychological professional . Psychiatrist is a medical doctor – medical treatment of the psyche

899 views • 26 slides

Serial Killers. Updated 09/09/2012. Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 2+ # of events 1 1 2+ # of locations 1 2+ 2+ Cooling-off period no no yes.

2.04k views • 69 slides

Serial Killers. Intro to Profiling. Types of Killers. Psychotic killer: murders as a result of mental disorder and is out of touch with reality Ego-Syntonic : murders without disruption of his ego function. The murder is rational and acceptable to him

609 views • 19 slides

Serial Killers. Before we get to the good stuff-. We have to learn about the criminal mind. The Forensic Psychiatrist. Test a subject for mental illness Assesses a perpetrator ’s sanity Makes sure they are not faking mental illness Profiles criminals and victims.

548 views • 27 slides

Serial Killers. Higgins O’Brien Spring 2012. Serial Killers. Serial Killers are part of popular culture, but real statistics are limited It is difficult to estimate victim numbers, as many murders go unsolved, and serial killers have been known to lie and exaggerate

615 views • 8 slides

Serial Killers. By: Sarah Winder. Gerald Gallego. Born 1946 and died 2002 He was known as the “Sex Slave Killer” There was 10 victims. His method of murder was shooting and beating. He was also rape his victims before hand

717 views • 15 slides

Criminology/Serial Killers

Criminology/Serial Killers. What do Serial Murders Have in Common? A minimum of three to four victims, with a "cooling off" period in between; The killer is usually a stranger to the victim — the murders appear unconnected or random;

736 views • 33 slides

SERIAL KILLERS

SERIAL KILLERS. Adele Smith >Jimmy Yarrington. RICHARD KUKLINSKI. (April 11 th , 1935- March 5 th , 2006) A convicted murderer and notorious contract killer. He worked for several Italian families and claims to have killed over 200 men. His first murder was at the age of 13. BIOGRAPHY.

564 views • 10 slides

Serial Killers. Dr. Mike Aamodt Radford University [email protected]. Updated 09/14/2013. Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 2+ # of events 1 1 2+ # of locations 1 2+ 2+ Cooling-off period no no yes.

1.44k views • 79 slides

Serial Killers. Dr. Mike Aamodt Radford University [email protected]. Updated 09/09/2012. Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 2+ # of events 1 1 2+ # of locations 1 2+ 2+ Cooling-off

1.21k views • 62 slides

Serial Killers. Dr. Mike Aamodt Radford University [email protected]. Updated 09/06/2014. Types of Multiple Killers. Mass Spree Serial # of victims 4+ 2+ 2+ # of events 1 1 2+ # of locations 1 2+ 2+ Cooling-off period no no yes.

1.1k views • 80 slides

Serial Killers. Not CEREAL KILLERS…. What do you know about Serial Killers in General?. Name some serial killers that you have heard of. Make a list of the things you know to be true about all or most serial killers. How do they look? What is their age/sex? What do they do for a living?

1.02k views • 34 slides

Serial Killers, Unmasked

Serial Killers, Unmasked. by Michael Anthony Abril English 102 hybrid, Section 8885. Serial Killers Not Born, Made. Bonding Childhood Abuse Behavioral disorders. Bonding. In the Womb

285 views • 15 slides

824 views • 80 slides

It some brief history of a serial killer.

255 views • 13 slides

ACTIVE SERIAL KILLERS

Active Serial killers

62 views • 1 slides