Hypothesis in a Sentence  🔊

Definition of Hypothesis

a proposed explanation or theory that is studied through scientific testing

Examples of Hypothesis in a sentence

The scientist’s hypothesis did not stand up, since research data was inconsistent with his guess.  🔊

Each student gave a hypothesis and theorized which plant would grow the tallest during the study.  🔊

A hypothesis was presented by the panel, giving a likely explanation for why the trial medicine didn’t seem to have much of an effect on the patients.  🔊

During the study, the researcher changed her hypothesis to a new assumption that fit with current data.  🔊

To confirm his hypothesis on why the dolphin wasn’t eating, the marine biologists did several tests over a week’s time.  🔊

Other words in the Opinion, Belief category:

Most Searched Words (with Video)

Voracious: In a Sentence

Voracious: In a Sentence

Verbose: In a Sentence

Verbose: In a Sentence

Vainglorious: In a Sentence

Vainglorious: In a Sentence

Pseudonym: In a Sentence

Pseudonym: In a Sentence

Propinquity: In a Sentence

Propinquity: In a Sentence

Orotund: In a Sentence

Orotund: In a Sentence

Magnanimous: In a Sentence

Magnanimous: In a Sentence

Inquisitive: In a Sentence

Inquisitive: In a Sentence

Epoch: In a Sentence

Epoch: In a Sentence

Aberrant: In a Sentence

Aberrant: In a Sentence

Apprehensive: In a Sentence

Apprehensive: In a Sentence

Obdurate: In a Sentence

Obdurate: In a Sentence

Heresy: In a Sentence

Heresy: In a Sentence

Gambit: In a Sentence

Gambit: In a Sentence

Pneumonia: In a Sentence

Pneumonia: In a Sentence

Otiose: In a Sentence

Otiose: In a Sentence

HYPOTHESIS in a Sentence Examples: 21 Ways to Use Hypothesis

Have you ever wondered what a “hypothesis” is and how it fits into the scientific method? A hypothesis is a proposed explanation or educated guess that can be tested through research and experimentation to determine its validity.

Table of Contents

7 Examples Of Hypothesis Used In a Sentence For Kids

14 sentences with hypothesis examples, how to use hypothesis in sentences.

Hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction that can be tested through observation or experimentation. When incorporating this term into a sentence, it is important to clearly identify it so readers can understand its significance.

Here are some tips on how to use hypothesis effectively in a sentence:

Clearly state your hypothesis in a simple and concise manner. For example, “The scientist’s hypothesis is that plants will grow faster with added sunlight.”

Make sure to refer back to your hypothesis when discussing the results of your experiment. For example, “The data supported our initial hypothesis that exercise leads to improved cardiovascular health.”

By following these guidelines, you can effectively incorporate hypothesis into your writing to communicate your predictions or expectations clearly and accurately.

In conclusion, sentences with the keyword “hypothesis” often express a proposed explanation or prediction that can be tested through research or observation. These sentences play a crucial role in scientific inquiry by guiding investigations and exploring relationships between variables. For example, “The researchers formulated a hypothesis to predict the effect of sunlight on plant growth” demonstrates how hypotheses are used to frame a study’s objectives and outcomes.

Related Posts

In front or infront: which is the correct spelling, targeted vs. targetted: correct spelling explained in english (us) usage.

Are you unsure about whether to use “targetted” or “targeted”?…  Read More » Targeted vs. Targetted: Correct Spelling Explained in English (US) Usage

As per Request or As per Requested: Understanding the Correct Usage

  • More from M-W
  • To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In

Definition of hypothesis

Did you know.

The Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory

A hypothesis is an assumption, an idea that is proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true.

In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review. You ask a question, read up on what has been studied before, and then form a hypothesis.

A hypothesis is usually tentative; it's an assumption or suggestion made strictly for the objective of being tested.

A theory , in contrast, is a principle that has been formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data. It is used in the names of a number of principles accepted in the scientific community, such as the Big Bang Theory . Because of the rigors of experimentation and control, it is understood to be more likely to be true than a hypothesis is.

In non-scientific use, however, hypothesis and theory are often used interchangeably to mean simply an idea, speculation, or hunch, with theory being the more common choice.

Since this casual use does away with the distinctions upheld by the scientific community, hypothesis and theory are prone to being wrongly interpreted even when they are encountered in scientific contexts—or at least, contexts that allude to scientific study without making the critical distinction that scientists employ when weighing hypotheses and theories.

The most common occurrence is when theory is interpreted—and sometimes even gleefully seized upon—to mean something having less truth value than other scientific principles. (The word law applies to principles so firmly established that they are almost never questioned, such as the law of gravity.)

This mistake is one of projection: since we use theory in general to mean something lightly speculated, then it's implied that scientists must be talking about the same level of uncertainty when they use theory to refer to their well-tested and reasoned principles.

The distinction has come to the forefront particularly on occasions when the content of science curricula in schools has been challenged—notably, when a school board in Georgia put stickers on textbooks stating that evolution was "a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things." As Kenneth R. Miller, a cell biologist at Brown University, has said , a theory "doesn’t mean a hunch or a guess. A theory is a system of explanations that ties together a whole bunch of facts. It not only explains those facts, but predicts what you ought to find from other observations and experiments.”

While theories are never completely infallible, they form the basis of scientific reasoning because, as Miller said "to the best of our ability, we’ve tested them, and they’ve held up."

  • proposition
  • supposition

hypothesis , theory , law mean a formula derived by inference from scientific data that explains a principle operating in nature.

hypothesis implies insufficient evidence to provide more than a tentative explanation.

theory implies a greater range of evidence and greater likelihood of truth.

law implies a statement of order and relation in nature that has been found to be invariable under the same conditions.

Examples of hypothesis in a Sentence

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'hypothesis.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

Greek, from hypotithenai to put under, suppose, from hypo- + tithenai to put — more at do

1641, in the meaning defined at sense 1a

Phrases Containing hypothesis

  • counter - hypothesis
  • nebular hypothesis
  • null hypothesis
  • planetesimal hypothesis
  • Whorfian hypothesis

Articles Related to hypothesis

hypothesis

This is the Difference Between a...

This is the Difference Between a Hypothesis and a Theory

In scientific reasoning, they're two completely different things

Dictionary Entries Near hypothesis

hypothermia

hypothesize

Cite this Entry

“Hypothesis.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypothesis. Accessed 7 Sep. 2024.

Kids Definition

Kids definition of hypothesis, medical definition, medical definition of hypothesis, more from merriam-webster on hypothesis.

Nglish: Translation of hypothesis for Spanish Speakers

Britannica English: Translation of hypothesis for Arabic Speakers

Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article about hypothesis

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Play Quordle: Guess all four words in a limited number of tries.  Each of your guesses must be a real 5-letter word.

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Word of the day.

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Popular in Grammar & Usage

Plural and possessive names: a guide, 31 useful rhetorical devices, more commonly misspelled words, why does english have so many silent letters, your vs. you're: how to use them correctly, popular in wordplay, 8 words for lesser-known musical instruments, it's a scorcher words for the summer heat, 7 shakespearean insults to make life more interesting, birds say the darndest things, 10 words from taylor swift songs (merriam's version), games & quizzes.

Play Blossom: Solve today's spelling word game by finding as many words as you can using just 7 letters. Longer words score more points.

What's the opposite of
Meaning of the word
Words that rhyme with
Sentences with the word
Translate to
Find Words Use * for blank tiles (max 2) Use * for blank spaces
Find the of
Pronounce the word in
Find Names    
Appearance
Use device theme  
Dark theme
Light theme
in a sentence ? Here are some examples. is incoherent for deep metaphysical and empirical reasons.
To test this could throw useful light on seasonal regulation of northern insects.
In 1915, with his theory of general relativity, Einstein extended this to include gravitation.
Democracies work well, and my is that this is because people in the mass have a different kind of intelligence at work.
To test this , we established 20 X 30 m field plots of lima beans with many pods and with few pods.
However, this has never been systematically tested using mortuary data from sites representing this time period.
Saccheri then studied the of the acute angle and derived many theorems of non-Euclidean geometry without realising what he was doing.
They may not have given sufficient weight to two other factors, one an arguable and the other a central fact of British politics.
This NY Times article describes Dr. Amar J. S. Klar's that there is a specific dominant gene that causes right-handedness.
Einstein used Planck's quantum to describe the electromagnetic radiation of light.
For, even by his simplistic , it is difficult to tell in which half Floyd lies.
You start with the that an applicant is serving a life sentence.
One of my objections to the has been that it's hard to rationalize, mechanistically.
My hypothesis that the watch is in your pocket because you stole it, is not an ad hoc .
According to the heterotroph , hydrogen was not a chief component of the atmosphere when life began.
This provides a rationale for a respecting adstrate development in the area.
Further data of the energetic cost of breeding for males and females of other ratite species would be valuable for testing that .
They do not lend themselves, as entities or wholes, to scientific testing.
This contradicts the view that people fight to secure control over environmental riches.
Where the influence of a stream or river is possible, even of short duration, that should be considered.
If you're looking for a , it may be interesting to document how different antenna lengths impact radio reception.
The segmented market explains the yield curve's shape in terms of relative supply and demand for securities at different maturities.
This needs to be tested by using long acting and short acting antimalarials and studying their effect on immune responses.
With the growth of anatomical knowledge, the literal of the morbidly wandering womb became increasingly untenable.
Evolutionary biologists call this phenomenon, in which an organism evolves just to stay in place, the Red Queen .
This, of course, is all debatable as well, but it at least seems like a working .
Take the case of accepting something as a working or for the sake of argument.
The wrangler has no to establish or no concern for truth but the only aim is to create doubt regarding well established facts.
Our secondary was that relapse rates would be same in the two treatment regimens.
Our data support the that bone lead may be mobilized during pregnancy and lactation.
Our study supports the of allogenic coexistence of American beech and sugar maple in Warren Woods.
This phylogenetic had been held valid until it was recently reinvestigated.
But detailed examination of Yanomami ecology failed to support Harris's .
If, however, we adopt the second , we have to inquire only as to the relation between cause and effect.
We used the test with Yates's correction to avoid spurious rejection of the null when expectations are too small.
I pondered the significance of this statement before agreeing, yes, his may prove correct.
She had covered most of the distance when the light turned amber, then green, thus confirming her .
This has led to the that this treatment may be helpful in dampening that lateralized hyperexcitability.
In other work, I have used the inverted spectrum as an argument against functionalism and representationism.
This study supported the that plateau zokor kept their gut capacity stable in the natural environment.
Thus, testing the developed in this paper remains a future research objective.
Our results provide further support for the that the male genital tract may serve as a reservoir of HPV infection.
A third is that depression occurs through the same biologic mechanisms as the underlying disease.
Nonetheless, the circadian clock of plants is currently being dissected and this evidence may be helpful for formation.
Scientists can't check Ohno's by watching the DVD of the Y's life story, complete with quadraphonic sound.
This well explains why even the same cave has different patterns of calving and different chisel marks.
The foregoing is not to say that Newton does not appreciate the fact that a phylogenetic can be important in biogeography.
He concluded that the only tenable for the horse's abilities was that the horse was telepathic.
I think I mostly agree with Chris's , albeit with a couple of important qualifications.
Although these results do not definitively pinpoint the source of the steps, they confirm the earlier that shortening is quantal.
Carried to its extreme, this suggests that at one time all the matter of the universe was compacted together.
If this should be mistaken, there still remains a curious mystery here.
During a short tea break, Dyson had connected quantum physics with the Riemann .
All that was necessary to test that was to get on a ship and go to one of these uncharted areas and see.
There are some other small details militating against the jogging .
Finally, we propose a biogeographical of speciation events within the N. mediocris species complex.
According to this , the profit was to be found in the saving in transport and tariffs.
These ideas were largely a carry over from Edward Forbes in the late 1800's, who proposed the azoic for the deep sea.
A long-discredited to explain this holds that substituting carbs and sugar for fat is a bad trade-off.
The other major invokes particle charging interactions of either an inductive or microphysical nature.
Ostrom introduced the cursorial predator of the origin of avian flight.
In part, the involved tiny grains of the naturally magnetic mineral magnetite, which is commonly found in basalt.
Unlike my , she speaks in her baroque and breathless way not only when upset or anxious but also when she is up and effusive.
It is a simple chemical, and a viable is that autointoxication by similar molecules may cause sporadic diseases.
The is that autistics fail at holistic processing of an image, instead remaining focused on its individual parts.
In this , the silts form by aeolian abrasion and attrition of sand grains and by rock-weathering processes.
Confirming Frank's involves not only undercooling the right material, but also measuring its atomic structure.
The analysis presented here shows that filling in some blanks in the current matrix will not overturn the optimal it supports.
Furthermore, our measurements of 10 atm of adhesion pressure strongly contradict the suction .
The of this study was that variation in observed plant associations were correlated with variations in soil properties.
However, he insisted that figure was a and that the final toll was not expected for several weeks.
A possible is that he and his allies did not reveal the existence of 60 Armalite rifles to the IRA's Belfast Brigade leaders.
Voltinism bears on the , especially in regard to T2 species, in two respects.
It is biogeochemistry that lends substance to the that Ediacaran and Cambrian faunas are separated by mass extinction.
Other studies also have concluded that tissue allocation does not adequately explain control of growth of Arctic geese.
The idea was to test his exchange rate in a tightly specified model.
This is based on lithological variations in lacustrine rocks from eastern China, but there is a large degree of uncertainty with this .
This biogenetic indicates an alternative pathway to produce these metabolites, leading to a new class of indole alkaloids.
If evidence is to be found to support such a , it will be by examining patterns of genomic organization.
Therefore, the collapse is not self-consistent with the initial scaling and consequently is incorrect.
However, such a is again unable to explain the selective maintenance of alleles in humans.
The multidimensionality of racial identity and its impact on the various communication dimensions of classroom learning led to the following research question and .
To test this in the two fossil species, I measured eight aspects of 60 astragali from UCMP locality 1100, the type locality of S. nevadanus.
For the most part, these questions should be held in abeyance until other researchers either validate or disprove the outlined in the present study.
One is the dual coding that imaginal and verbal codes are mnemonically independent and, therefore, additive in their effects on item memory.
The first assumes that triploidy is associated with the origin of parthenogenesis and that both diploid and tetraploid parthenogenetic forms are derived.
Similarly, the initial is often way off base and this subtly drives home the fact that whilst these people are supremely good at their jobs, no one is perfect.
The results of analysis of the amphimictic progenies confirmed the proposed earlier that the development of black patches in koi is controlled by one dominant gene.
The present paper investigates the that accumulation of metal ions from soils by terricolous mosses is important in ameliorating SO 2 toxicity.
Furthermore, in no other lepospondyl is the parietal foramen found on the parietal-postparietal suture, as would be required following McGinnis' .
A few years ago, some molecular embryology data on amphioxus have revived the long forgotten that the ancestor of coelomates was a segmented animal.
He developed a for their formation called pediplanation in which slopes retreat parallel, leaving behind a series of generally flat surfaces separated by scarps.
Another, more speculative is that perhaps fungi, which live within the roots of many distantly related plants, served as a conduit for the jumping genes.
A popular theory is the Red Queen , named after the Lewis Carroll character who tells Alice that she must keep running simply to stay in the same place.
This result is contrary to our that the pollination-dependent detrimental fitness effects of clipping were caused by increased self-pollination in damaged plants.
The Minoans were not Greek and spoke the Cypriot language and so the established was that there was some relation between Linear A and B and the Cypriot script.
There are many objections to this , but it may explain why the hazards of cardiovascular risk are synergistic or multiplicative rather than just additive.
A third is based on the idea that resident and migratory species may use different strategies to acquire territories and breeding opportunities.
According to the proponents of the silvicultural , several processes combined to make forests increasingly vulnerable to budworm outbreaks.
Bloom says we ought to think of truth as resembling a scientific that helps us hold together our bits of knowledge.
Though researchers have struggled to understand exactly what contributes to this gender difference, Dr. Rohan has one .
He talks with doctors and scientists who study cognition, and cites a raft of research that bolsters his .
An alternative was suggested to me years ago by a veteran China-watcher.
The angle between Mars and the line of apsides is greater than 90 degrees in the unbisected vicarious , and less than 90 degrees in the bisected version.
In yet another scenario, the so-called binary planet, or co-accretion, , the Earth and the Moon all formed at the same time by the accretion of small bodies.
It can be used as an approximative measure of support for one or the other model and, therefore, allows estimating the evidence in favor of one or the other .
So if the zombie is correct, physicalism is false.
This is in accord with rational choice theory, which suggests that criminals think rationally and strategically to accrue the benefits of their crime.
There were no accurate measurements of the weather to call upon during this time but the discovery and colonization of Greenland by Eric the Red supports this .
Old, numerous and bipartisan are the tales that corroborate this dreary .
To test this , the researchers drilled a series of wells downstream from where they dripped the acetate and periodically took water samples.
One is that they actually alter the chemical composition of the atmosphere, thus playing a role in ozone depletion and the climate on Earth.
I'll float the even if I don't hold with it for one moment.
So there's no evidence, mechanistically, on either side of the .
Finding that the isotopes of neon have atomic weights that are whole numbers vindicated Prout's that hydrogen was the basis for all the elements.
For the latter taxa, an alternative would imply the iterative invasion of shelf habitats by morphologically conservative populations from shallow refugia.
Their is that watching excessive amounts of television reduces a person's ability to concentrate.
However, the style of the ascriptions of works to Philips in the section devoted to instrumental works may be an important clue in support of the .
In spite of its arbitrariness, that had a singular fortune, for it dominated Western thought in one form or another almost until the eighteenth century.
The scientist James Lovelock named his influential theory of global interconnectedness the gaia after her.
Again, the bioacoustic idea is still a , one that has to be carefully tested in a lab.
As early as 1850, however, a new of the rat's origins was beginning to develop.
A coastal east Asian source population is integral to the marine migration .
The is based on similarities between European Solutrean and Clovis lithic technologies.
However, a 2008 article in the American Journal of Human Genetics by researchers in Brazil took up the argument against the Solutrean .
It is described as possibly being the oldest art object yet found in the Americas and may yet provide hope for the Solutrean .
Professional historians contend that Zheng He reached the eastern coast of Africa, and dismiss Menzies's as entirely without proof.
On the second question, no definite consensus has been formed, and the intentional discovery lacks solid proof.
Modern historians reject this , which is sustained by no archeological evidence.
Birds were also widely used in studies of the niche and Georgii Gause's competitive exclusion principle.
This hypothesis is generally less accepted than the previous , but nonetheless provides a possible alternative.
One is that humans hunted large mammals, such as the woolly mammoth, into extinction.
At present, we can take as a that Europeans have more Neandertal ancestry than Asians.
The most vocal proponent of the hybridization is Erik Trinkaus of Washington University.
Ever since its initial description, the actinic physiopathogenic has been debated by many authors.
This however contradicts another supported by some researchers saying the Veleti moved westward from the Vistula delta.
Another is that the rulers of Charax had expansionist designs on Parthian Babylon, giving them a rationale for alliance with Trajan.
According to this the Geats would have not only resided in southern Sweden but also in Jutland, where Beowulf would have lived.
This is still accepted among many historians, but has been the subject of scholarly debate in the 21st century.
Our view relies on a plenitudinous metaphysics to which we are antecedently sympathetic, and adds to it one bold .
The Sonderweg attributed Germany's difficult 20th century to the weak political, legal, and economic basis of the new empire.
Haeckel argued that humans were closely related to the primates of Southeast Asia and rejected Darwin's of Africa.
This also generates and stimulates ideas and perhaps further research.
This and the analyses of data that it rests upon have received serious criticism.
Though no direct evidence of mammoth hunting has been found, today this is not considered as a valid observation to discard any .
This has been confirmed by further more recent studies, which refined this somewhat.
The of generative grammar is that language is a structure of the human mind.
Other theories include the Anatolian , the Armenia , the Paleolithic Continuity Theory, and the indigenous Aryans theory.
The Middle English creole argues that English is itself a creole.
If this is untrue, the creole with the largest number of speakers is Haitian Creole, with almost ten million native speakers.
The consequences of accepting the pseudonymy hypothesis are similar to those of accepting the forgery .
There is a that the contrast between fortis and lenis consonants is related to the contrast between voiceless and voiced consonants.
For illustrations of different analyses of noun phrases depending on whether the DP is rejected or accepted, see the next section.
The second tree assumes the DP , namely that determiners rather than nouns serve as phrase heads.
We realize what Archimedes had only in , weighting a single grain against the globe of earth.
The value of given data can and must be judged regardless of the they are supposed to support or refudiate.
Thus, any event in the rejection region leads to rejection of the null .
This has been refuted by studies showing that air and water are not absorbed.
Recently enacted three-strikes laws in several states similarly provide an opportunity to test the deterrence .
In the past, I think the that many have held is that anemia causes radiobiologically significant hypoxia.
The efficient market keeps a relation with the random walk theory.
The results of the experiment did not support his .
This supports the broad that many of the neurodevelopmental disorders are, to a certain extent, aetiologically linked.
Only on the that what is learnt in one generation is remembered by the next, can there be any feeling of againness or of expectancy.
To test my , I created a wind tunnel and wind mill to measure the different blades' power output.
My is that the symmetrical airfoils will outperform the others and the control blades.
Testing the of the multidimensional model of anorexia nervosa in adolescents.
The backhandedness of this procedure reflects the fact that null tests are motivated by rhetorical considerations.
The third theory which was advanced to explain the formation of phosphorites is the classical biolith .
Had the world been coagmented from that supposed fortuitous jumble, this had been tolerable.
The ensembled classifier is a collection of classifiers representing a single .
This mainstream of the epileptogenicity of hemosiderin provided strong support to our results.
Objection is sometimes offered to this system upon the that all but the rich or fullhanded, are excluded from our sanctuaries.
As we will discuss later, our phylogenetic reconstructs the presence of ossicones as a basal feature of all the giraffomorphs.
Another , said to be the cause of mammoth extinction in Siberia, comes from the idea that many may have drowned.
This view has been challenged by the that the Celtic languages of the British Isles form a phylogenetic Insular Celtic dialect group.
There is some evidence to support the treaty , based on the grave finds of the period.
His was written up in De corpore saturni but before the work was published, Huygens presented his theory of the rings of Saturn.
Immediately Wren recognised this as a better than his own and De corpore saturni was never published.
Arsenic is a strong preservative, and therefore this supported the poisoning .
Their was that the calomel given to Napoleon became an overdose, which killed him and left extensive tissue damage behind.
The aetherial was vague, but the particle was definite enough for Thomson to test.
A new competitor may decrease the likeliness of an old , but it will usually not change its loveliness.
Dawkins has also been strongly critical of the Gaia of the independent scientist James Lovelock.
Before the discovery of Mendelian genetics, one common was blending inheritance.
Moreover, he refused to even offer a as to the cause of this force on grounds that to do so was contrary to sound science.
One is that they drove elephants, rhinoceroses and hippopotamuses over the tops of cliffs or into bogs to more easily kill them.
He included in his Dutch, Albanian, Greek, Latin, Persian, and German, later adding Slavic, Celtic, and Baltic languages.
However, in general this is considered to attribute too much weight to the Anatolian evidence.
By such means, a may gain acceptance, although in a probabilistic, rather than certain, sense.
To assess this , the urbanicity of a boy's place of residence was run against enlistment.
Unlike the dopamine , the adrenochrome hypothesis accounts for many biochemical patterns common among schizophrenic patients.
It is an empirical that is subject to revision and, hence, lacks the dogmatic stance of classical materialism.
Depending on how well the tests match the predictions, the original may require refinement, alteration, expansion or even rejection.
If a particular becomes very well supported a general theory may be developed.
A is a conjecture, based on knowledge obtained while formulating the question.
The purpose of an experiment is to determine whether observations agree with or conflict with the predictions derived from a .
Terms commonly associated with statistical hypotheses are null hypothesis and alternative .
This is an investigation of whether the real world behaves as predicted by the .
Furthermore, failure of an experiment does not necessarily mean the is false.
The predictions of the hypothesis are compared to those of the null , to determine which is better able to explain the data.
Once a is strongly supported by evidence, a new question can be asked to provide further insight on the same topic.
Any useful will enable predictions, by reasoning including deductive reasoning.
Only in this case does a successful outcome increase the probability that the is true.
If the outcome is already known, it is called a consequence and should have already been considered while formulating the .
But since there no experiment now known which can test this , science itself can have little to say about the possibility.
They might adopt the characterization and formulate their own , or they might adopt the hypothesis and deduce their own predictions.
Published results of experiments can also serve as a predicting their own reproducibility.
Touches of prosaic detail are imperative and a rigorous adherence to the .
In the work, Boyle presents his that every phenomenon was the result of collisions of particles in motion.
The was accepted and published in the New Review of Spanish Philology in the 2011 article.
For example, according to this , the eating habits of the giraffe must have changed before its elongated neck evolved.
Clearly I have a duty to say why design strikes me as a nonsilly , and even as a simple and attractive one.
One is that the global increase in jellyfish bloom frequency may stem from human impact.
Polyploidy or polyteny may account for this large cellular DNA content, but studies of DNA reassociation kinetics do not support this .
As further information comes to hand, the may be confirmed or refuted.
This evidence bolstered the that heavier elements are the product of nucleosynthesis in stars.
An even more speculative is that intense radiation from a nearby supernova was responsible for the extinctions.
Such a was raised by reviewing letters sent by Brazilian authorities at the time of the earthquake.
Male hooded seals are known to have several mates in a single mating season, following the that they are polygynous.
In this the shifting of the continents can be simply explained by a large increase in size of the Earth since its formation.
Subsequent fieldwork, metamorphic studies and radiometric dating has refined their chronology but supported their original .
That led to the of a migration route between the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets to explain the early settlement.
This recognized differences between microbats and megabats and acknowledged that flight has only evolved once in mammals.
Another is that flying has reduced their mortality rate, which would also be true for birds and gliding mammals.
A route through Beringia is seen as more likely than the Solutrean .
The was headlined when The New York Times published it in December 1996, shortly before it was published in an academic journal.
Relevant to the is that its description has led some to connect this catastrophe with prehistoric flood myths.
However, Gulf Coast geologists do not regard this as having any credibility.
When Alfred Wegener first presented a of continental drift in 1912, he suggested that continents ploughed through the ocean crust.
Studies in the 2000s have given rise to the that large amounts of dust reduce the strength of tropical cyclones.
Preliminary data from the northern Atlantic coast seem to support the Azores High .
Another by McCormac and Evans assumes that the Earth's field disappears entirely during reversals.
This is supported by the relatively late date of the arrival of modern humans in Europe as well as by archaeological and DNA evidence.
This attempts to explain why haplogroup N is predominant in Europe and why haplogroup M is absent in Europe.
The anatomist Thomas Huxley had also supported the and suggested that African apes have a close evolutionary relationship with humans.
Attribution theory and the overjustification provide still another explanation.
First, we specify a first-order autoregressive error process and test the null that the errors are not first-order autocorrelated.
To test the that mindin would contribute to airway disease after inhalation of either lipopolysaccharide or ozone, Frush et al.
The finding supports the that lipoprotein plays a causal role in coronary disease.
The bindingness , see supra note 72, may also yield a necessary condition on a legal institution.
Consistent with our , patients scored significantly higher on the majority of early maladaptive schemas than their intimate partners.
He postulates the that suffixation is constrained by selectional restrictions of the affixes involved.
To test their , they need to know where in the developing embryo Shh is expressed.
These works also confirm that Pandey's remains useful to explain the different alternatives observed to microsporogenesis.
Published partial molecular hypothetical trees to date for cardinalfish do not support, in part, either .
Ultimately, this evidence is used in a re-evaluation of the mul tepal that has dominated the view on rulership at Chichen Itza.
To test this , NMR was used to compare the metabolic profiles of three cultures, an anaerobic fungal monoculture Piromyces sp.
My is that a description that aspires to consistency with regard to the phonetic facts must distinguish between weak and strong moras.
Taking a cue from the clausal domain, I will explore the that these are the nominal counterparts of v and INNER ASPECT, cf.
According to one , they become trapped at synapses, inhibiting nerve impulse signals.
Lourenco considered the stridulation organ to be synapomorphic for Rhopalurus, a that has yet to be tested cladistically.
Type II error is when we have failed to reject the null when, in fact, it is false.
Even as putting forth the that stochastic terms are not correlated, this value is nonconvergent.
The that nonelective admissions require more inpatient resources is based on several factors.
A contextualist reply to the skeptical says that it is only a worry if we are monolithic about the meaning of knowledge.
There are also districts that provide contradictive evidence to our such as Chicago and Kansas.
But the extension of the linguistic uniformitarian to writing is, in my opinion, counterproductive.
Her concerned the role of an enzyme called sucrose synthase in the ripening process.
Both the concepts and operational definition flow logically from the area in research method area.
The final test of any palaeoanthropological is its ability to explain why hominins are unique.
Brennan, from McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts, said his team was not surprised that memantine reduced binge episodes since that was their initial .
Albanian is often seen as the descendant of Illyrian, although this has been challenged by some linguists, who maintain that it derives from Dacian or Thracian.
Imperfect L2 learning is compatible with other approaches, notably the European dialect origin and the universalist models of language transmission.
More generally it is not always clear, if evidence contradicts a , that this is a sign of flaws in the hypothesis rather than of flaws in the evidence.
Another objection is that it is not always possible to demonstrate falsehood definitively, especially if one is using statistical criteria to evaluate a null .
One item of evidence in favour of this is found in the Spanish book Compendio Historial, written in 1571 by the Basque writer Esteban de Garibay.
The biodiversity says that the less contact people have with a microbially diverse natural environment, the less diverse their own commensal microbiota.
A is presented where the combination of a thin cell wall and large microfibril angle are responsible for the superior properties exhibited by the DN 30 pulp.
However, this is no longer actively investigated, as there are examples of creoles, such as Hezhou, which evidently have nothing to do with the Lingua Franca.
The cosmic censorship rules out the formation of such singularities, when they are created through the gravitational collapse of realistic matter.
His later maps used the Azores, following the magnetic .
The overview offers a picture to the readers in which the commonly advertized Sino-Tibetan has always been criticized within the academic circles.
Any which explains the facts is justified critically.
For it is not sufficient that a should be a justifiable one.
Failure of an experiment to produce interesting results may lead a scientist to reconsider the experimental method, the , or the definition of the subject.
Failure of a to produce interesting and testable predictions may lead to reconsideration of the or of the definition of the subject.
If the predictions are not accessible by observation or experience, the is not yet testable and so will remain to that extent unscientific in a strict sense.
However, this is disputed within the anthropological community.
A is a suggested explanation of a phenomenon, or alternately a reasoned proposal suggesting a possible correlation between or among a set of phenomena.
Previous studies suggested an association between elevated CRP levels and colon cancer, which fits with the that chronic inflammation increases cancer risk.
The purpose of an experiment is to determine whether observations of the real world agree with or conflict with the predictions derived from a .
This step involves determining the logical consequences of the .
The impressive improvement in response to valacyclovir documented in this study lends support to the viral of mental illness, she said.
The study may put to rest an idea, known as the Solutrean , that ancient Europeans crossed the Atlantic and established the Clovis culture in the New World.
Specifically, we fit stable Paretian distributions to the residuals for some important macro-economic variates testing the null of finite moments.
Researchers normally want to show that the null is false.
The that older age class raccoons would have higher fluke infection rates and parasite loads due to increased exposure to cercariae was statistically tested.
A is a conjecture, based on knowledge obtained while formulating the question, that may explain the observed behavior of a part of our universe.
The of an Etruscan origin is a viable alternative.
This suggestion was accepted by many subsequent writers, but in 1703, Jean Mabillon put forth a new , claiming that the entire forehead was shaven back to the ears.
Furthermore, consistent with our , we determine that good corporate governance alleviates spillovers of bad news from corporate scandals experienced by competitors.
As we are learning more and more about the brain, there is a that when a child is going through puberty, that is the time that accents start.
The main I will work from is that Mirkwood by and large fits within the literary topos of the enchanted forests in the fairy-tale tradition.
Thus, for all cases, arrival data was successfully modelled as the Poisson distribution and the was ascertained by evaluating chi-square tests.
Acceptance is dependent upon the falsifiable surviving tests.
The book opens by introducing the Lovelock Gaia and motivating glacier science as a major abiotic component of the homeostatic planetary system.
Sometimes an economic is only qualitative, not quantitative.
This experimental evidence supports the possibility of interplanetary transport of lifeforms and makes the lithopanspermia more realistic.
Jenner successfully tested his on 23 additional subjects.
Use * for blank tiles (max 2)
Use * for blank spaces

bottom_desktop desktop:[300x250]

go
Word Tools Finders & Helpers Apps More Synonyms


Copyright WordHippo © 2024

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

  • Knowledge Base

Methodology

  • How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

Published on May 6, 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 20, 2023.

A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection .

Example: Hypothesis

Daily apple consumption leads to fewer doctor’s visits.

Table of contents

What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Variables in hypotheses

Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more types of variables .

  • An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls.
  • A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.

If there are any control variables , extraneous variables , or confounding variables , be sure to jot those down as you go to minimize the chances that research bias  will affect your results.

In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Step 1. Ask a question

Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.

Step 2. Do some preliminary research

Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.

At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to ensure that you’re embarking on a relevant topic . This can also help you identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalize more complex constructs.

Step 3. Formulate your hypothesis

Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.

4. Refine your hypothesis

You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:

  • The relevant variables
  • The specific group being studied
  • The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis

5. Phrase your hypothesis in three ways

To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in  if…then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.

In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.

If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.

6. Write a null hypothesis

If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis . The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .

  • H 0 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has no effect on their final exam scores.
  • H 1 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has a positive effect on their final exam scores.
Research question Hypothesis Null hypothesis
What are the health benefits of eating an apple a day? Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will result in decreasing frequency of doctor’s visits. Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will have no effect on frequency of doctor’s visits.
Which airlines have the most delays? Low-cost airlines are more likely to have delays than premium airlines. Low-cost and premium airlines are equally likely to have delays.
Can flexible work arrangements improve job satisfaction? Employees who have flexible working hours will report greater job satisfaction than employees who work fixed hours. There is no relationship between working hour flexibility and job satisfaction.
How effective is high school sex education at reducing teen pregnancies? Teenagers who received sex education lessons throughout high school will have lower rates of unplanned pregnancy teenagers who did not receive any sex education. High school sex education has no effect on teen pregnancy rates.
What effect does daily use of social media have on the attention span of under-16s? There is a negative between time spent on social media and attention span in under-16s. There is no relationship between social media use and attention span in under-16s.

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

  • Sampling methods
  • Simple random sampling
  • Stratified sampling
  • Cluster sampling
  • Likert scales
  • Reproducibility

 Statistics

  • Null hypothesis
  • Statistical power
  • Probability distribution
  • Effect size
  • Poisson distribution

Research bias

  • Optimism bias
  • Cognitive bias
  • Implicit bias
  • Hawthorne effect
  • Anchoring bias
  • Explicit bias

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/hypothesis/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, construct validity | definition, types, & examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, operationalization | a guide with examples, pros & cons, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

PrepScholar

Choose Your Test

  • Search Blogs By Category
  • College Admissions
  • AP and IB Exams
  • GPA and Coursework

What Is a Hypothesis and How Do I Write One?

author image

General Education

body-glowing-question-mark

Think about something strange and unexplainable in your life. Maybe you get a headache right before it rains, or maybe you think your favorite sports team wins when you wear a certain color. If you wanted to see whether these are just coincidences or scientific fact, you would form a hypothesis, then create an experiment to see whether that hypothesis is true or not.

But what is a hypothesis, anyway? If you’re not sure about what a hypothesis is--or how to test for one!--you’re in the right place. This article will teach you everything you need to know about hypotheses, including: 

  • Defining the term “hypothesis” 
  • Providing hypothesis examples 
  • Giving you tips for how to write your own hypothesis

So let’s get started!

body-picture-ask-sign

What Is a Hypothesis?

Merriam Webster defines a hypothesis as “an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument.” In other words, a hypothesis is an educated guess . Scientists make a reasonable assumption--or a hypothesis--then design an experiment to test whether it’s true or not. Keep in mind that in science, a hypothesis should be testable. You have to be able to design an experiment that tests your hypothesis in order for it to be valid. 

As you could assume from that statement, it’s easy to make a bad hypothesis. But when you’re holding an experiment, it’s even more important that your guesses be good...after all, you’re spending time (and maybe money!) to figure out more about your observation. That’s why we refer to a hypothesis as an educated guess--good hypotheses are based on existing data and research to make them as sound as possible.

Hypotheses are one part of what’s called the scientific method .  Every (good) experiment or study is based in the scientific method. The scientific method gives order and structure to experiments and ensures that interference from scientists or outside influences does not skew the results. It’s important that you understand the concepts of the scientific method before holding your own experiment. Though it may vary among scientists, the scientific method is generally made up of six steps (in order):

  • Observation
  • Asking questions
  • Forming a hypothesis
  • Analyze the data
  • Communicate your results

You’ll notice that the hypothesis comes pretty early on when conducting an experiment. That’s because experiments work best when they’re trying to answer one specific question. And you can’t conduct an experiment until you know what you’re trying to prove!

Independent and Dependent Variables 

After doing your research, you’re ready for another important step in forming your hypothesis: identifying variables. Variables are basically any factor that could influence the outcome of your experiment . Variables have to be measurable and related to the topic being studied.

There are two types of variables:  independent variables and dependent variables. I ndependent variables remain constant . For example, age is an independent variable; it will stay the same, and researchers can look at different ages to see if it has an effect on the dependent variable. 

Speaking of dependent variables... dependent variables are subject to the influence of the independent variable , meaning that they are not constant. Let’s say you want to test whether a person’s age affects how much sleep they need. In that case, the independent variable is age (like we mentioned above), and the dependent variable is how much sleep a person gets. 

Variables will be crucial in writing your hypothesis. You need to be able to identify which variable is which, as both the independent and dependent variables will be written into your hypothesis. For instance, in a study about exercise, the independent variable might be the speed at which the respondents walk for thirty minutes, and the dependent variable would be their heart rate. In your study and in your hypothesis, you’re trying to understand the relationship between the two variables.

Elements of a Good Hypothesis

The best hypotheses start by asking the right questions . For instance, if you’ve observed that the grass is greener when it rains twice a week, you could ask what kind of grass it is, what elevation it’s at, and if the grass across the street responds to rain in the same way. Any of these questions could become the backbone of experiments to test why the grass gets greener when it rains fairly frequently.

As you’re asking more questions about your first observation, make sure you’re also making more observations . If it doesn’t rain for two weeks and the grass still looks green, that’s an important observation that could influence your hypothesis. You'll continue observing all throughout your experiment, but until the hypothesis is finalized, every observation should be noted.

Finally, you should consult secondary research before writing your hypothesis . Secondary research is comprised of results found and published by other people. You can usually find this information online or at your library. Additionally, m ake sure the research you find is credible and related to your topic. If you’re studying the correlation between rain and grass growth, it would help you to research rain patterns over the past twenty years for your county, published by a local agricultural association. You should also research the types of grass common in your area, the type of grass in your lawn, and whether anyone else has conducted experiments about your hypothesis. Also be sure you’re checking the quality of your research . Research done by a middle school student about what minerals can be found in rainwater would be less useful than an article published by a local university.

body-pencil-notebook-writing

Writing Your Hypothesis

Once you’ve considered all of the factors above, you’re ready to start writing your hypothesis. Hypotheses usually take a certain form when they’re written out in a research report.

When you boil down your hypothesis statement, you are writing down your best guess and not the question at hand . This means that your statement should be written as if it is fact already, even though you are simply testing it.

The reason for this is that, after you have completed your study, you'll either accept or reject your if-then or your null hypothesis. All hypothesis testing examples should be measurable and able to be confirmed or denied. You cannot confirm a question, only a statement! 

In fact, you come up with hypothesis examples all the time! For instance, when you guess on the outcome of a basketball game, you don’t say, “Will the Miami Heat beat the Boston Celtics?” but instead, “I think the Miami Heat will beat the Boston Celtics.” You state it as if it is already true, even if it turns out you’re wrong. You do the same thing when writing your hypothesis.

Additionally, keep in mind that hypotheses can range from very specific to very broad.  These hypotheses can be specific, but if your hypothesis testing examples involve a broad range of causes and effects, your hypothesis can also be broad.  

body-hand-number-two

The Two Types of Hypotheses

Now that you understand what goes into a hypothesis, it’s time to look more closely at the two most common types of hypothesis: the if-then hypothesis and the null hypothesis.

#1: If-Then Hypotheses

First of all, if-then hypotheses typically follow this formula:

If ____ happens, then ____ will happen.

The goal of this type of hypothesis is to test the causal relationship between the independent and dependent variable. It’s fairly simple, and each hypothesis can vary in how detailed it can be. We create if-then hypotheses all the time with our daily predictions. Here are some examples of hypotheses that use an if-then structure from daily life: 

  • If I get enough sleep, I’ll be able to get more work done tomorrow.
  • If the bus is on time, I can make it to my friend’s birthday party. 
  • If I study every night this week, I’ll get a better grade on my exam. 

In each of these situations, you’re making a guess on how an independent variable (sleep, time, or studying) will affect a dependent variable (the amount of work you can do, making it to a party on time, or getting better grades). 

You may still be asking, “What is an example of a hypothesis used in scientific research?” Take one of the hypothesis examples from a real-world study on whether using technology before bed affects children’s sleep patterns. The hypothesis read s:

“We hypothesized that increased hours of tablet- and phone-based screen time at bedtime would be inversely correlated with sleep quality and child attention.”

It might not look like it, but this is an if-then statement. The researchers basically said, “If children have more screen usage at bedtime, then their quality of sleep and attention will be worse.” The sleep quality and attention are the dependent variables and the screen usage is the independent variable. (Usually, the independent variable comes after the “if” and the dependent variable comes after the “then,” as it is the independent variable that affects the dependent variable.) This is an excellent example of how flexible hypothesis statements can be, as long as the general idea of “if-then” and the independent and dependent variables are present.

#2: Null Hypotheses

Your if-then hypothesis is not the only one needed to complete a successful experiment, however. You also need a null hypothesis to test it against. In its most basic form, the null hypothesis is the opposite of your if-then hypothesis . When you write your null hypothesis, you are writing a hypothesis that suggests that your guess is not true, and that the independent and dependent variables have no relationship .

One null hypothesis for the cell phone and sleep study from the last section might say: 

“If children have more screen usage at bedtime, their quality of sleep and attention will not be worse.” 

In this case, this is a null hypothesis because it’s asking the opposite of the original thesis! 

Conversely, if your if-then hypothesis suggests that your two variables have no relationship, then your null hypothesis would suggest that there is one. So, pretend that there is a study that is asking the question, “Does the amount of followers on Instagram influence how long people spend on the app?” The independent variable is the amount of followers, and the dependent variable is the time spent. But if you, as the researcher, don’t think there is a relationship between the number of followers and time spent, you might write an if-then hypothesis that reads:

“If people have many followers on Instagram, they will not spend more time on the app than people who have less.”

In this case, the if-then suggests there isn’t a relationship between the variables. In that case, one of the null hypothesis examples might say:

“If people have many followers on Instagram, they will spend more time on the app than people who have less.”

You then test both the if-then and the null hypothesis to gauge if there is a relationship between the variables, and if so, how much of a relationship. 

feature_tips

4 Tips to Write the Best Hypothesis

If you’re going to take the time to hold an experiment, whether in school or by yourself, you’re also going to want to take the time to make sure your hypothesis is a good one. The best hypotheses have four major elements in common: plausibility, defined concepts, observability, and general explanation.

#1: Plausibility

At first glance, this quality of a hypothesis might seem obvious. When your hypothesis is plausible, that means it’s possible given what we know about science and general common sense. However, improbable hypotheses are more common than you might think. 

Imagine you’re studying weight gain and television watching habits. If you hypothesize that people who watch more than  twenty hours of television a week will gain two hundred pounds or more over the course of a year, this might be improbable (though it’s potentially possible). Consequently, c ommon sense can tell us the results of the study before the study even begins.

Improbable hypotheses generally go against  science, as well. Take this hypothesis example: 

“If a person smokes one cigarette a day, then they will have lungs just as healthy as the average person’s.” 

This hypothesis is obviously untrue, as studies have shown again and again that cigarettes negatively affect lung health. You must be careful that your hypotheses do not reflect your own personal opinion more than they do scientifically-supported findings. This plausibility points to the necessity of research before the hypothesis is written to make sure that your hypothesis has not already been disproven.

#2: Defined Concepts

The more advanced you are in your studies, the more likely that the terms you’re using in your hypothesis are specific to a limited set of knowledge. One of the hypothesis testing examples might include the readability of printed text in newspapers, where you might use words like “kerning” and “x-height.” Unless your readers have a background in graphic design, it’s likely that they won’t know what you mean by these terms. Thus, it’s important to either write what they mean in the hypothesis itself or in the report before the hypothesis.

Here’s what we mean. Which of the following sentences makes more sense to the common person?

If the kerning is greater than average, more words will be read per minute.

If the space between letters is greater than average, more words will be read per minute.

For people reading your report that are not experts in typography, simply adding a few more words will be helpful in clarifying exactly what the experiment is all about. It’s always a good idea to make your research and findings as accessible as possible. 

body-blue-eye

Good hypotheses ensure that you can observe the results. 

#3: Observability

In order to measure the truth or falsity of your hypothesis, you must be able to see your variables and the way they interact. For instance, if your hypothesis is that the flight patterns of satellites affect the strength of certain television signals, yet you don’t have a telescope to view the satellites or a television to monitor the signal strength, you cannot properly observe your hypothesis and thus cannot continue your study.

Some variables may seem easy to observe, but if you do not have a system of measurement in place, you cannot observe your hypothesis properly. Here’s an example: if you’re experimenting on the effect of healthy food on overall happiness, but you don’t have a way to monitor and measure what “overall happiness” means, your results will not reflect the truth. Monitoring how often someone smiles for a whole day is not reasonably observable, but having the participants state how happy they feel on a scale of one to ten is more observable. 

In writing your hypothesis, always keep in mind how you'll execute the experiment.

#4: Generalizability 

Perhaps you’d like to study what color your best friend wears the most often by observing and documenting the colors she wears each day of the week. This might be fun information for her and you to know, but beyond you two, there aren’t many people who could benefit from this experiment. When you start an experiment, you should note how generalizable your findings may be if they are confirmed. Generalizability is basically how common a particular phenomenon is to other people’s everyday life.

Let’s say you’re asking a question about the health benefits of eating an apple for one day only, you need to realize that the experiment may be too specific to be helpful. It does not help to explain a phenomenon that many people experience. If you find yourself with too specific of a hypothesis, go back to asking the big question: what is it that you want to know, and what do you think will happen between your two variables?

body-experiment-chemistry

Hypothesis Testing Examples

We know it can be hard to write a good hypothesis unless you’ve seen some good hypothesis examples. We’ve included four hypothesis examples based on some made-up experiments. Use these as templates or launch pads for coming up with your own hypotheses.

Experiment #1: Students Studying Outside (Writing a Hypothesis)

You are a student at PrepScholar University. When you walk around campus, you notice that, when the temperature is above 60 degrees, more students study in the quad. You want to know when your fellow students are more likely to study outside. With this information, how do you make the best hypothesis possible?

You must remember to make additional observations and do secondary research before writing your hypothesis. In doing so, you notice that no one studies outside when it’s 75 degrees and raining, so this should be included in your experiment. Also, studies done on the topic beforehand suggested that students are more likely to study in temperatures less than 85 degrees. With this in mind, you feel confident that you can identify your variables and write your hypotheses:

If-then: “If the temperature in Fahrenheit is less than 60 degrees, significantly fewer students will study outside.”

Null: “If the temperature in Fahrenheit is less than 60 degrees, the same number of students will study outside as when it is more than 60 degrees.”

These hypotheses are plausible, as the temperatures are reasonably within the bounds of what is possible. The number of people in the quad is also easily observable. It is also not a phenomenon specific to only one person or at one time, but instead can explain a phenomenon for a broader group of people.

To complete this experiment, you pick the month of October to observe the quad. Every day (except on the days where it’s raining)from 3 to 4 PM, when most classes have released for the day, you observe how many people are on the quad. You measure how many people come  and how many leave. You also write down the temperature on the hour. 

After writing down all of your observations and putting them on a graph, you find that the most students study on the quad when it is 70 degrees outside, and that the number of students drops a lot once the temperature reaches 60 degrees or below. In this case, your research report would state that you accept or “failed to reject” your first hypothesis with your findings.

Experiment #2: The Cupcake Store (Forming a Simple Experiment)

Let’s say that you work at a bakery. You specialize in cupcakes, and you make only two colors of frosting: yellow and purple. You want to know what kind of customers are more likely to buy what kind of cupcake, so you set up an experiment. Your independent variable is the customer’s gender, and the dependent variable is the color of the frosting. What is an example of a hypothesis that might answer the question of this study?

Here’s what your hypotheses might look like: 

If-then: “If customers’ gender is female, then they will buy more yellow cupcakes than purple cupcakes.”

Null: “If customers’ gender is female, then they will be just as likely to buy purple cupcakes as yellow cupcakes.”

This is a pretty simple experiment! It passes the test of plausibility (there could easily be a difference), defined concepts (there’s nothing complicated about cupcakes!), observability (both color and gender can be easily observed), and general explanation ( this would potentially help you make better business decisions ).

body-bird-feeder

Experiment #3: Backyard Bird Feeders (Integrating Multiple Variables and Rejecting the If-Then Hypothesis)

While watching your backyard bird feeder, you realized that different birds come on the days when you change the types of seeds. You decide that you want to see more cardinals in your backyard, so you decide to see what type of food they like the best and set up an experiment. 

However, one morning, you notice that, while some cardinals are present, blue jays are eating out of your backyard feeder filled with millet. You decide that, of all of the other birds, you would like to see the blue jays the least. This means you'll have more than one variable in your hypothesis. Your new hypotheses might look like this: 

If-then: “If sunflower seeds are placed in the bird feeders, then more cardinals will come than blue jays. If millet is placed in the bird feeders, then more blue jays will come than cardinals.”

Null: “If either sunflower seeds or millet are placed in the bird, equal numbers of cardinals and blue jays will come.”

Through simple observation, you actually find that cardinals come as often as blue jays when sunflower seeds or millet is in the bird feeder. In this case, you would reject your “if-then” hypothesis and “fail to reject” your null hypothesis . You cannot accept your first hypothesis, because it’s clearly not true. Instead you found that there was actually no relation between your different variables. Consequently, you would need to run more experiments with different variables to see if the new variables impact the results.

Experiment #4: In-Class Survey (Including an Alternative Hypothesis)

You’re about to give a speech in one of your classes about the importance of paying attention. You want to take this opportunity to test a hypothesis you’ve had for a while: 

If-then: If students sit in the first two rows of the classroom, then they will listen better than students who do not.

Null: If students sit in the first two rows of the classroom, then they will not listen better or worse than students who do not.

You give your speech and then ask your teacher if you can hand out a short survey to the class. On the survey, you’ve included questions about some of the topics you talked about. When you get back the results, you’re surprised to see that not only do the students in the first two rows not pay better attention, but they also scored worse than students in other parts of the classroom! Here, both your if-then and your null hypotheses are not representative of your findings. What do you do?

This is when you reject both your if-then and null hypotheses and instead create an alternative hypothesis . This type of hypothesis is used in the rare circumstance that neither of your hypotheses is able to capture your findings . Now you can use what you’ve learned to draft new hypotheses and test again! 

Key Takeaways: Hypothesis Writing

The more comfortable you become with writing hypotheses, the better they will become. The structure of hypotheses is flexible and may need to be changed depending on what topic you are studying. The most important thing to remember is the purpose of your hypothesis and the difference between the if-then and the null . From there, in forming your hypothesis, you should constantly be asking questions, making observations, doing secondary research, and considering your variables. After you have written your hypothesis, be sure to edit it so that it is plausible, clearly defined, observable, and helpful in explaining a general phenomenon.

Writing a hypothesis is something that everyone, from elementary school children competing in a science fair to professional scientists in a lab, needs to know how to do. Hypotheses are vital in experiments and in properly executing the scientific method . When done correctly, hypotheses will set up your studies for success and help you to understand the world a little better, one experiment at a time.

body-whats-next-post-it-note

What’s Next?

If you’re studying for the science portion of the ACT, there’s definitely a lot you need to know. We’ve got the tools to help, though! Start by checking out our ultimate study guide for the ACT Science subject test. Once you read through that, be sure to download our recommended ACT Science practice tests , since they’re one of the most foolproof ways to improve your score. (And don’t forget to check out our expert guide book , too.)

If you love science and want to major in a scientific field, you should start preparing in high school . Here are the science classes you should take to set yourself up for success.

If you’re trying to think of science experiments you can do for class (or for a science fair!), here’s a list of 37 awesome science experiments you can do at home

Trending Now

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

ACT vs. SAT: Which Test Should You Take?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Get Your Free

PrepScholar

Find Your Target SAT Score

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

How to Get a Perfect SAT Score, by an Expert Full Scorer

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading and Writing

How to Improve Your Low SAT Score

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading and Writing

Find Your Target ACT Score

Complete Official Free ACT Practice Tests

How to Get a Perfect ACT Score, by a 36 Full Scorer

Get a 36 on ACT English

Get a 36 on ACT Math

Get a 36 on ACT Reading

Get a 36 on ACT Science

How to Improve Your Low ACT Score

Get a 24 on ACT English

Get a 24 on ACT Math

Get a 24 on ACT Reading

Get a 24 on ACT Science

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Follow us on Facebook (icon)

Ashley Sufflé Robinson has a Ph.D. in 19th Century English Literature. As a content writer for PrepScholar, Ashley is passionate about giving college-bound students the in-depth information they need to get into the school of their dreams.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

Examples of “Hypothesis” In A Sentence

Hypothesis In A Sentence

The hypothesis is a very important part of doing science and thinking carefully. It is like the strong supporting structure of a building for the process of research. A hypothesis is a clever guess or idea that can be tested to see if it is true or not. It helps us understand things or predict what might happen. In this article, we will look at many examples of ‘hypothesis’ in sentences .

Table of Contents

Sentences with Hypothesis

  • Hypothesis : The sun rises in the east.
  • They formulated a null hypothesis to compare against the alternative.
  • We need to revise the original hypothesis .
  • They discussed the hypothesis with colleagues in their field.
  • They formulated competing hypotheses to compare and contrast the findings.
  • The students generated multiple hypotheses for their investigation.
  • The hypothesis was generated from observations.
  • The hypothesis is the starting point of scientific investigation.
  • The researchers tested the hypothesis using various methodologies.
  • We need to investigate the hypothesis
  • The hypothesis needs more evidence to be proven.
  • The hypothesis was rejected due to flaws in the experimental design.
  • They tested the hypothesis using computer simulations.
  • The team tested the hypothesis using advanced technology.
  • The hypothesis was derived from logical reasoning.
  • They conducted surveys to gather data for their hypotheses .
  • They proposed alternative hypotheses for further exploration.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with data from other studies.
  • The hypothesis was based on logical reasoning.
  • The hypothesis was supported by the statistical analysis.

Sentences with “Hypothesis”

  • The hypothesis was proven incorrect.
  • The hypothesis was rejected due to lack of evidence.
  • They discussed the hypothesis with their peers.
  • The hypothesis was proposed based on logical deductions.
  • The hypothesis was validated through rigorous peer review.
  • The team discussed potential hypotheses during brainstorming sessions.
  • They discussed the limitations of their hypothesis
  • The students proposed various hypotheses for the investigation.
  • The hypothesis was confirmed by independent replication studies.
  • The students formed testable hypotheses for their projects.
  • They used a control group to test their hypothesis .
  • The hypothesis was formulated as a cause-and-effect relationship.
  • The hypothesis was supported by the literature review.
  • Scientists test their hypotheses through experiments.
  • The hypothesis was proposed based on observations in nature.
  • They analyzed the data to validate the hypothesis .
  • They designed the experiment to test the hypothesis
  • The hypothesis was based on previous research findings.
  • They revised the hypothesis based on constructive feedback.
  • They presented their hypotheses at a research symposium.
  • They conducted experiments to test their hypotheses .
  • The hypothesis was supported by a large and diverse sample.
  • The researchers tested the hypothesis using a variety of methodologies.
  • They conducted surveys to gather data that supported their hypothesis .
  • The team formulated new hypotheses for future investigations.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with experimental results.

“Hypothesis” Use in Sentence

  • They discussed the implications of the hypothesis on their field.
  • The researchers discussed the implications of their hypotheses .
  • The hypothesis was derived from careful observation and analysis.
  • The team developed alternative hypotheses for further investigation.
  • They presented their hypotheses to the research community.
  • The hypothesis was based on a comprehensive review of the literature.
  • The hypothesis was supported by strong logical reasoning.
  • They discussed the implications of their hypothesis for future research.
  • The hypothesis was based on a well-established scientific theory.
  • The researchers tested their hypotheses using different methodologies.
  • The hypothesis was supported by empirical evidence.
  • The researchers evaluated their hypotheses
  • The hypothesis was disproven by contradictory evidence.
  • The researchers discussed the limitations of their hypotheses .
  • The hypothesis was based on a well-established theory.
  • The hypothesis was supported by a large sample size.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with patterns observed in nature.
  • They proposed new hypotheses for future investigation.
  • The hypothesis was confirmed by the results of the study.
  • The hypothesis guided the research process.
  • The hypothesis was supported by strong scientific consensus.
  • The hypothesis was rejected due to methodological limitations.
  • The researchers proposed several hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.
  • The hypothesis was confirmed by multiple researchers in the field.
  • The hypothesis was validated through multiple studies.

Sentences Using “Hypothesis”

  • The researchers conducted experiments to test their hypotheses .
  • The hypothesis was based on observations from nature.
  • The hypothesis was supported by a wide range of evidence.
  • They formed competing hypotheses to compare.
  • Scientists often revise their hypotheses based on new data.
  • They conducted experiments to support their hypotheses .
  • The team discussed their hypothesis during the meeting.
  • The students discussed their hypotheses in class.
  • They developed a new hypothesis based on recent findings.
  • They discussed the hypothesis with other experts in the field.
  • The hypothesis was supported by a significant p-value.
  • The hypothesis was generated from real-world observations.
  • Mary’s hypothesis was supported by the data.
  • They tested their hypotheses across different populations.
  • The researchers tested multiple hypotheses to find the answer.
  • They presented their hypothesis at a scientific conference.
  • The hypothesis was supported by strong evidence.
  • They presented their hypotheses in a clear and concise manner.
  • The researchers proposed a working hypothesis to start their study.
  • The team discussed the hypothesis during the brainstorming session.
  • The researchers proposed different hypotheses for the observed behavior.
  • The hypothesis is a crucial part of any scientific study.
  • The hypothesis was refuted by the experimental results.

“Hypothesis” Sentences Examples

  • We need to gather more data to test the hypothesis .
  • The hypothesis was consistent with existing theories.
  • The hypothesis was supported by a strong theoretical framework.
  • The hypothesis was based on previous studies.
  • They formulated a null hypothesis as the default assumption.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with theoretical predictions.
  • The hypothesis was based on prior knowledge.
  • The hypothesis was supported by strong experimental data.
  • The team formed a new hypothesis after analyzing the data.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with the findings of previous studies.
  • The hypothesis was rejected due to methodological flaws.
  • The hypothesis was proven right after extensive testing.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with real-world observations.
  • The team tested their hypothesis in different conditions.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with the predictions.
  • The students generated their hypotheses for the experiment.
  • The hypothesis was confirmed by multiple independent studies.
  • The hypothesis was tested using a randomized controlled trial.
  • They formulated a null hypothesis to compare against.
  • The hypothesis was based on inductive reasoning.
  • The hypothesis was validated through repeated experiments.
  • The hypothesis guided the design of the experiment.
  • They used statistical analysis to validate the hypothesis .
  • The researchers discussed the implications of their hypothesis on society.
  • They revised the hypothesis based on feedback from experts.
  • The hypothesis was confirmed by expert analysis.
  • Hypotheses are essential in the scientific method.
  • Lisa proposed an interesting hypothesis for her project.
  • They analyzed the data to support their hypothesis .
  • The hypothesis was supported by compelling arguments.
  • They conducted interviews to explore their hypotheses .

Use “Hypothesis” In A Sentence

  • Sarah formulated a new hypothesis for her research.
  • The hypothesis was confirmed by the experiment.
  • The hypothesis was generated from prior observations.
  • They conducted surveys to test their hypotheses .
  • The hypothesis was supported by well-documented experimental results.
  • The hypothesis was supported by strong correlations.
  • The hypothesis was proposed after reviewing the literature.
  • They proposed a working hypothesis to guide their study.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with the observed results.
  • They proposed alternative hypotheses for future exploration.
  • The hypothesis was validated through rigorous statistical methods.
  • The researchers tested their hypotheses
  • John’s hypothesis led to groundbreaking discoveries.
  • The hypothesis was supported by statistical significance.
  • The researchers formulated a null hypothesis to compare against.
  • The hypothesis was supported by theoretical predictions.
  • They formed competing hypotheses to compare and contrast.
  • The hypothesis was consistent with historical data.
  • The hypothesis was supported by multiple lines of evidence.
  • The hypothesis was revised based on feedback from reviewers.
  • The scientists formulated a specific hypothesis to test.
  • The hypothesis was based on empirical data.

Use Adaptable In A Sentence

Manifestation in a sentence

Sentences with Effective

Daily Routine Sentences in English

Hypothesis In A Sentence | Images

Sentences with Hypothesis

Related Posts

Types of sentences with examples

Types of sentences with examples

daily use short english sentences

100 Short English Sentences Used in Daily Life

Conversation Simple English Sentences For Daily Use

Conversation Simple English Sentences For Daily Use

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Therapy Center
  • When To See a Therapist
  • Types of Therapy
  • Best Online Therapy
  • Best Couples Therapy
  • Managing Stress
  • Sleep and Dreaming
  • Understanding Emotions
  • Self-Improvement
  • Healthy Relationships
  • Student Resources
  • Personality Types
  • Sweepstakes
  • Guided Meditations
  • Verywell Mind Insights
  • 2024 Verywell Mind 25
  • Mental Health in the Classroom
  • Editorial Process
  • Meet Our Review Board
  • Crisis Support

How to Write a Great Hypothesis

Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips

Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz

  • The Scientific Method

Hypothesis Format

Falsifiability of a hypothesis.

  • Operationalization

Hypothesis Types

Hypotheses examples.

  • Collecting Data

A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.

Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."

At a Glance

A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.

The Hypothesis in the Scientific Method

In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:

  • Forming a question
  • Performing background research
  • Creating a hypothesis
  • Designing an experiment
  • Collecting data
  • Analyzing the results
  • Drawing conclusions
  • Communicating the results

The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.

Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you  expect  to happen.

In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.

Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.

In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment  do not  support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.

In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."

In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."

Elements of a Good Hypothesis

So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:

  • Is your hypothesis based on your research on a topic?
  • Can your hypothesis be tested?
  • Does your hypothesis include independent and dependent variables?

Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the  journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.

How to Formulate a Good Hypothesis

To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:

  • Collect as many observations about a topic or problem as you can.
  • Evaluate these observations and look for possible causes of the problem.
  • Create a list of possible explanations that you might want to explore.
  • After you have developed some possible hypotheses, think of ways that you could confirm or disprove each hypothesis through experimentation. This is known as falsifiability.

In the scientific method ,  falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.

Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that  if  something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.

One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.

The Importance of Operational Definitions

A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.

Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.

For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.

These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.

Replicability

One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.

Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.

Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.

To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.

Hypothesis Checklist

  • Does your hypothesis focus on something that you can actually test?
  • Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
  • Can you manipulate the variables?
  • Can your hypothesis be tested without violating ethical standards?

The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:

  • Simple hypothesis : This type of hypothesis suggests there is a relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable.
  • Complex hypothesis : This type suggests a relationship between three or more variables, such as two independent and dependent variables.
  • Null hypothesis : This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables.
  • Alternative hypothesis : This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.
  • Statistical hypothesis : This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
  • Logical hypothesis : This hypothesis assumes a relationship between variables without collecting data or evidence.

A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the  dependent variable  if you change the  independent variable .

The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."

A few examples of simple hypotheses:

  • "Students who eat breakfast will perform better on a math exam than students who do not eat breakfast."
  • "Students who experience test anxiety before an English exam will get lower scores than students who do not experience test anxiety."​
  • "Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone."
  • "Children who receive a new reading intervention will have higher reading scores than students who do not receive the intervention."

Examples of a complex hypothesis include:

  • "People with high-sugar diets and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression."
  • "Younger people who are regularly exposed to green, outdoor areas have better subjective well-being than older adults who have limited exposure to green spaces."

Examples of a null hypothesis include:

  • "There is no difference in anxiety levels between people who take St. John's wort supplements and those who do not."
  • "There is no difference in scores on a memory recall task between children and adults."
  • "There is no difference in aggression levels between children who play first-person shooter games and those who do not."

Examples of an alternative hypothesis:

  • "People who take St. John's wort supplements will have less anxiety than those who do not."
  • "Adults will perform better on a memory task than children."
  • "Children who play first-person shooter games will show higher levels of aggression than children who do not." 

Collecting Data on Your Hypothesis

Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.

Descriptive Research Methods

Descriptive research such as  case studies ,  naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when  conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.

Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a  correlational study  can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.

Experimental Research Methods

Experimental methods  are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).

Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually  cause  another to change.

The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.

Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses .  R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607

Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:].  Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z

Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004

Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ?  PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691

Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies .  Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18

Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

helpful professor logo

15 Hypothesis Examples

15 Hypothesis Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

hypothesis definition and example, explained below

A hypothesis is defined as a testable prediction , and is used primarily in scientific experiments as a potential or predicted outcome that scientists attempt to prove or disprove (Atkinson et al., 2021; Tan, 2022).

In my types of hypothesis article, I outlined 13 different hypotheses, including the directional hypothesis (which makes a prediction about an effect of a treatment will be positive or negative) and the associative hypothesis (which makes a prediction about the association between two variables).

This article will dive into some interesting examples of hypotheses and examine potential ways you might test each one.

Hypothesis Examples

1. “inadequate sleep decreases memory retention”.

Field: Psychology

Type: Causal Hypothesis A causal hypothesis explores the effect of one variable on another. This example posits that a lack of adequate sleep causes decreased memory retention. In other words, if you are not getting enough sleep, your ability to remember and recall information may suffer.

How to Test:

To test this hypothesis, you might devise an experiment whereby your participants are divided into two groups: one receives an average of 8 hours of sleep per night for a week, while the other gets less than the recommended sleep amount.

During this time, all participants would daily study and recall new, specific information. You’d then measure memory retention of this information for both groups using standard memory tests and compare the results.

Should the group with less sleep have statistically significant poorer memory scores, the hypothesis would be supported.

Ensuring the integrity of the experiment requires taking into account factors such as individual health differences, stress levels, and daily nutrition.

Relevant Study: Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance (Curcio, Ferrara & De Gennaro, 2006)

2. “Increase in Temperature Leads to Increase in Kinetic Energy”

Field: Physics

Type: Deductive Hypothesis The deductive hypothesis applies the logic of deductive reasoning – it moves from a general premise to a more specific conclusion. This specific hypothesis assumes that as temperature increases, the kinetic energy of particles also increases – that is, when you heat something up, its particles move around more rapidly.

This hypothesis could be examined by heating a gas in a controlled environment and capturing the movement of its particles as a function of temperature.

You’d gradually increase the temperature and measure the kinetic energy of the gas particles with each increment. If the kinetic energy consistently rises with the temperature, your hypothesis gets supporting evidence.

Variables such as pressure and volume of the gas would need to be held constant to ensure validity of results.

3. “Children Raised in Bilingual Homes Develop Better Cognitive Skills”

Field: Psychology/Linguistics

Type: Comparative Hypothesis The comparative hypothesis posits a difference between two or more groups based on certain variables. In this context, you might propose that children raised in bilingual homes have superior cognitive skills compared to those raised in monolingual homes.

Testing this hypothesis could involve identifying two groups of children: those raised in bilingual homes, and those raised in monolingual homes.

Cognitive skills in both groups would be evaluated using a standard cognitive ability test at different stages of development. The examination would be repeated over a significant time period for consistency.

If the group raised in bilingual homes persistently scores higher than the other, the hypothesis would thereby be supported.

The challenge for the researcher would be controlling for other variables that could impact cognitive development, such as socio-economic status, education level of parents, and parenting styles.

Relevant Study: The cognitive benefits of being bilingual (Marian & Shook, 2012)

4. “High-Fiber Diet Leads to Lower Incidences of Cardiovascular Diseases”

Field: Medicine/Nutrition

Type: Alternative Hypothesis The alternative hypothesis suggests an alternative to a null hypothesis. In this context, the implied null hypothesis could be that diet has no effect on cardiovascular health, which the alternative hypothesis contradicts by suggesting that a high-fiber diet leads to fewer instances of cardiovascular diseases.

To test this hypothesis, a longitudinal study could be conducted on two groups of participants; one adheres to a high-fiber diet, while the other follows a diet low in fiber.

After a fixed period, the cardiovascular health of participants in both groups could be analyzed and compared. If the group following a high-fiber diet has a lower number of recorded cases of cardiovascular diseases, it would provide evidence supporting the hypothesis.

Control measures should be implemented to exclude the influence of other lifestyle and genetic factors that contribute to cardiovascular health.

Relevant Study: Dietary fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease (King, 2005)

5. “Gravity Influences the Directional Growth of Plants”

Field: Agronomy / Botany

Type: Explanatory Hypothesis An explanatory hypothesis attempts to explain a phenomenon. In this case, the hypothesis proposes that gravity affects how plants direct their growth – both above-ground (toward sunlight) and below-ground (towards water and other resources).

The testing could be conducted by growing plants in a rotating cylinder to create artificial gravity.

Observations on the direction of growth, over a specified period, can provide insights into the influencing factors. If plants consistently direct their growth in a manner that indicates the influence of gravitational pull, the hypothesis is substantiated.

It is crucial to ensure that other growth-influencing factors, such as light and water, are uniformly distributed so that only gravity influences the directional growth.

6. “The Implementation of Gamified Learning Improves Students’ Motivation”

Field: Education

Type: Relational Hypothesis The relational hypothesis describes the relation between two variables. Here, the hypothesis is that the implementation of gamified learning has a positive effect on the motivation of students.

To validate this proposition, two sets of classes could be compared: one that implements a learning approach with game-based elements, and another that follows a traditional learning approach.

The students’ motivation levels could be gauged by monitoring their engagement, performance, and feedback over a considerable timeframe.

If the students engaged in the gamified learning context present higher levels of motivation and achievement, the hypothesis would be supported.

Control measures ought to be put into place to account for individual differences, including prior knowledge and attitudes towards learning.

Relevant Study: Does educational gamification improve students’ motivation? (Chapman & Rich, 2018)

7. “Mathematics Anxiety Negatively Affects Performance”

Field: Educational Psychology

Type: Research Hypothesis The research hypothesis involves making a prediction that will be tested. In this case, the hypothesis proposes that a student’s anxiety about math can negatively influence their performance in math-related tasks.

To assess this hypothesis, researchers must first measure the mathematics anxiety levels of a sample of students using a validated instrument, such as the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale.

Then, the students’ performance in mathematics would be evaluated through standard testing. If there’s a negative correlation between the levels of math anxiety and math performance (meaning as anxiety increases, performance decreases), the hypothesis would be supported.

It would be crucial to control for relevant factors such as overall academic performance and previous mathematical achievement.

8. “Disruption of Natural Sleep Cycle Impairs Worker Productivity”

Field: Organizational Psychology

Type: Operational Hypothesis The operational hypothesis involves defining the variables in measurable terms. In this example, the hypothesis posits that disrupting the natural sleep cycle, for instance through shift work or irregular working hours, can lessen productivity among workers.

To test this hypothesis, you could collect data from workers who maintain regular working hours and those with irregular schedules.

Measuring productivity could involve examining the worker’s ability to complete tasks, the quality of their work, and their efficiency.

If workers with interrupted sleep cycles demonstrate lower productivity compared to those with regular sleep patterns, it would lend support to the hypothesis.

Consideration should be given to potential confounding variables such as job type, worker age, and overall health.

9. “Regular Physical Activity Reduces the Risk of Depression”

Field: Health Psychology

Type: Predictive Hypothesis A predictive hypothesis involves making a prediction about the outcome of a study based on the observed relationship between variables. In this case, it is hypothesized that individuals who engage in regular physical activity are less likely to suffer from depression.

Longitudinal studies would suit to test this hypothesis, tracking participants’ levels of physical activity and their mental health status over time.

The level of physical activity could be self-reported or monitored, while mental health status could be assessed using standard diagnostic tools or surveys.

If data analysis shows that participants maintaining regular physical activity have a lower incidence of depression, this would endorse the hypothesis.

However, care should be taken to control other lifestyle and behavioral factors that could intervene with the results.

Relevant Study: Regular physical exercise and its association with depression (Kim, 2022)

10. “Regular Meditation Enhances Emotional Stability”

Type: Empirical Hypothesis In the empirical hypothesis, predictions are based on amassed empirical evidence . This particular hypothesis theorizes that frequent meditation leads to improved emotional stability, resonating with numerous studies linking meditation to a variety of psychological benefits.

Earlier studies reported some correlations, but to test this hypothesis directly, you’d organize an experiment where one group meditates regularly over a set period while a control group doesn’t.

Both groups’ emotional stability levels would be measured at the start and end of the experiment using a validated emotional stability assessment.

If regular meditators display noticeable improvements in emotional stability compared to the control group, the hypothesis gains credit.

You’d have to ensure a similar emotional baseline for all participants at the start to avoid skewed results.

11. “Children Exposed to Reading at an Early Age Show Superior Academic Progress”

Type: Directional Hypothesis The directional hypothesis predicts the direction of an expected relationship between variables. Here, the hypothesis anticipates that early exposure to reading positively affects a child’s academic advancement.

A longitudinal study tracking children’s reading habits from an early age and their consequent academic performance could validate this hypothesis.

Parents could report their children’s exposure to reading at home, while standardized school exam results would provide a measure of academic achievement.

If the children exposed to early reading consistently perform better acadically, it gives weight to the hypothesis.

However, it would be important to control for variables that might impact academic performance, such as socioeconomic background, parental education level, and school quality.

12. “Adopting Energy-efficient Technologies Reduces Carbon Footprint of Industries”

Field: Environmental Science

Type: Descriptive Hypothesis A descriptive hypothesis predicts the existence of an association or pattern related to variables. In this scenario, the hypothesis suggests that industries adopting energy-efficient technologies will resultantly show a reduced carbon footprint.

Global industries making use of energy-efficient technologies could track their carbon emissions over time. At the same time, others not implementing such technologies continue their regular tracking.

After a defined time, the carbon emission data of both groups could be compared. If industries that adopted energy-efficient technologies demonstrate a notable reduction in their carbon footprints, the hypothesis would hold strong.

In the experiment, you would exclude variations brought by factors such as industry type, size, and location.

13. “Reduced Screen Time Improves Sleep Quality”

Type: Simple Hypothesis The simple hypothesis is a prediction about the relationship between two variables, excluding any other variables from consideration. This example posits that by reducing time spent on devices like smartphones and computers, an individual should experience improved sleep quality.

A sample group would need to reduce their daily screen time for a pre-determined period. Sleep quality before and after the reduction could be measured using self-report sleep diaries and objective measures like actigraphy, monitoring movement and wakefulness during sleep.

If the data shows that sleep quality improved post the screen time reduction, the hypothesis would be validated.

Other aspects affecting sleep quality, like caffeine intake, should be controlled during the experiment.

Relevant Study: Screen time use impacts low‐income preschool children’s sleep quality, tiredness, and ability to fall asleep (Waller et al., 2021)

14. Engaging in Brain-Training Games Improves Cognitive Functioning in Elderly

Field: Gerontology

Type: Inductive Hypothesis Inductive hypotheses are based on observations leading to broader generalizations and theories. In this context, the hypothesis deduces from observed instances that engaging in brain-training games can help improve cognitive functioning in the elderly.

A longitudinal study could be conducted where an experimental group of elderly people partakes in regular brain-training games.

Their cognitive functioning could be assessed at the start of the study and at regular intervals using standard neuropsychological tests.

If the group engaging in brain-training games shows better cognitive functioning scores over time compared to a control group not playing these games, the hypothesis would be supported.

15. Farming Practices Influence Soil Erosion Rates

Type: Null Hypothesis A null hypothesis is a negative statement assuming no relationship or difference between variables. The hypothesis in this context asserts there’s no effect of different farming practices on the rates of soil erosion.

Comparing soil erosion rates in areas with different farming practices over a considerable timeframe could help test this hypothesis.

If, statistically, the farming practices do not lead to differences in soil erosion rates, the null hypothesis is accepted.

However, if marked variation appears, the null hypothesis is rejected, meaning farming practices do influence soil erosion rates. It would be crucial to control for external factors like weather, soil type, and natural vegetation.

The variety of hypotheses mentioned above underscores the diversity of research constructs inherent in different fields, each with its unique purpose and way of testing.

While researchers may develop hypotheses primarily as tools to define and narrow the focus of the study, these hypotheses also serve as valuable guiding forces for the data collection and analysis procedures, making the research process more efficient and direction-focused.

Hypotheses serve as a compass for any form of academic research. The diverse examples provided, from Psychology to Educational Studies, Environmental Science to Gerontology, clearly demonstrate how certain hypotheses suit specific fields more aptly than others.

It is important to underline that although these varied hypotheses differ in their structure and methods of testing, each endorses the fundamental value of empiricism in research. Evidence-based decision making remains at the heart of scholarly inquiry, regardless of the research field, thus aligning all hypotheses to the core purpose of scientific investigation.

Testing hypotheses is an essential part of the scientific method . By doing so, researchers can either confirm their predictions, giving further validity to an existing theory, or they might uncover new insights that could potentially shift the field’s understanding of a particular phenomenon. In either case, hypotheses serve as the stepping stones for scientific exploration and discovery.

Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., Cernat, A., Sakshaug, J. W., & Williams, R. A. (2021).  SAGE research methods foundations . SAGE Publications Ltd.

Curcio, G., Ferrara, M., & De Gennaro, L. (2006). Sleep loss, learning capacity and academic performance.  Sleep medicine reviews ,  10 (5), 323-337.

Kim, J. H. (2022). Regular physical exercise and its association with depression: A population-based study short title: Exercise and depression.  Psychiatry Research ,  309 , 114406.

King, D. E. (2005). Dietary fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease.  Molecular nutrition & food research ,  49 (6), 594-600.

Marian, V., & Shook, A. (2012, September). The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. In Cerebrum: the Dana forum on brain science (Vol. 2012). Dana Foundation.

Tan, W. C. K. (2022). Research Methods: A Practical Guide For Students And Researchers (Second Edition) . World Scientific Publishing Company.

Waller, N. A., Zhang, N., Cocci, A. H., D’Agostino, C., Wesolek‐Greenson, S., Wheelock, K., … & Resnicow, K. (2021). Screen time use impacts low‐income preschool children’s sleep quality, tiredness, and ability to fall asleep. Child: care, health and development, 47 (5), 618-626.

Chris

  • Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
  • Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
  • Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
  • Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

  • Knowledge Base
  • Methodology
  • How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples

How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples

Published on 6 May 2022 by Shona McCombes .

A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.

Table of contents

What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).

Variables in hypotheses

Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more variables . An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls. A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.

In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Step 1: ask a question.

Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.

Step 2: Do some preliminary research

Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.

At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalise more complex constructs.

Step 3: Formulate your hypothesis

Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.

Step 4: Refine your hypothesis

You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:

  • The relevant variables
  • The specific group being studied
  • The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis

Step 5: Phrase your hypothesis in three ways

To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.

In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.

If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.

Step 6. Write a null hypothesis

If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .

Research question Hypothesis Null hypothesis
What are the health benefits of eating an apple a day? Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will result in decreasing frequency of doctor’s visits. Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will have no effect on frequency of doctor’s visits.
Which airlines have the most delays? Low-cost airlines are more likely to have delays than premium airlines. Low-cost and premium airlines are equally likely to have delays.
Can flexible work arrangements improve job satisfaction? Employees who have flexible working hours will report greater job satisfaction than employees who work fixed hours. There is no relationship between working hour flexibility and job satisfaction.
How effective is secondary school sex education at reducing teen pregnancies? Teenagers who received sex education lessons throughout secondary school will have lower rates of unplanned pregnancy than teenagers who did not receive any sex education. Secondary school sex education has no effect on teen pregnancy rates.
What effect does daily use of social media have on the attention span of under-16s? There is a negative correlation between time spent on social media and attention span in under-16s. There is no relationship between social media use and attention span in under-16s.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

A hypothesis is not just a guess. It should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).

A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).

A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, May 06). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/hypothesis-writing/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, operationalisation | a guide with examples, pros & cons, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples.

eslwriting.org

A panoply of teaching resources.

world history map

Writing Hypothesis Sentences

Some English students have a hard time expressing complex ideas in short sentences. They don’t know how to summarize or synthesize information. This short lesson helps students overcome that barrier by teaching them how to construct a hypothesis with an easy to learn sentence pattern. 

Lesson Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students should be able to:

  • define hypothesis
  • use it to communicate and synthesize complex ideas

Student Level: intermediate +

Lesson time: 50-75 minutes

Extra resource: pdf file with images and suggested answers for class review .

Part 1. Overview: Hypothesis Sentence Pattern (10 minutes)

A hypothesis is a sentence which shows us how two different things are connected. There are many ways to write a hypothesis. This lessons focuses on one sentence pattern because it is easy to understand and use.

Here are some examples:

  • The more water a plant gets, the faster the plant will grow.
  • The more I study , the more I learn.
  • The richer the country, the more waste is produced.
  • The hotter the temperature , the more ice cream people buy.

When writing a hypothesis sentence, it is important to remember this:

  • The things you are looking at must be measurable. These are called variables.
  • That means, we have to be able to count or measure quantify the variables we are trying to connect.

Now look at the key words in the 4 hypothesis sentences above. How can we measure these different things?

Check this file for a few possible answers .

Part 2: Practice #1 (10 minutes)

In this short task, students apply their new found knowledge of the hypothesis sentence pattern. The task uses a famous video clip with Steve Jobs .

Step 1: Introduce video clip. It is a small part of a speech made by Steve Jobs at a university convocation.

Step 2: Students listen to the video and summarize the main idea in the form of a hypothesis sentence pattern.

Step 3: Play video 2-3 times.

Step 4: Students to work in pairs and create one hypothesis sentence that summarizes the speaker’s main idea.

Step 5: Review answers in class. 

Part 3: Practice #2 (10 minutes)

Another practice round where students summarize data by creating hypothesis sentences. The suggested teaching approach is a pair work fluency drill.

Step 1: Put students in pairs or small groups.

Step 2: Introduce task. Students look at an image for one minute. They write one sentence hypothesis sentence that summarizes the data.

Step 3: Show the first image as a group practice effort.

Step 4: Give students 1 to 2 minutes to study the image and write a hypothesis sentence with their partner.

Step 5: After time has passed, review answers in class. 

Step 6: Begin the drill. Show each image for 1 – 2 minutes, or enough time for students to think about, create and write down one hypothesis statement.

Step 7: After all images have been examined, review sentences on whiteboard with whole class.

Here are some images and data sets for the drill:

Check this file to few the graphs and show some  possible answers .

Part 4: World History Video Summary (20-40 minutes)

This video shows the history of Earth . 200 years of change in 4 minutes. It is a unique presentation that will help build your students’ vocabulary and listening skills. The video is also a good example of telling a great story with hypothesis sentences.

Step 1. Watch the video one time.

Step 2. Make notes and answer these questions with a partner.

  • What is the variable for each axis on the graph?
  • How is each variable counted or measured?
  • Write one hypothesis sentence using the data from the video.

Step 3. Discuss answers with whole class.

Step 4. Write a paragraph or more to explain the cause and effect relationship in the hypothesis.

Optional Step: Vocabulary Preview

Depending on the needs of your class, it might be a good idea to preview some vocabulary before students watch the video. Here are some words and phrases critical to video comprehension.

  • life expectancy
  • income per person
  • Middle East
  • industrial revolution
  • Great Depression
  • to catch up
  • inequalities

Enjoy the lesson. Cheers!

Teach writing?

If you teach writing in an EFL classroom, why not buy a useful resource,  Teach Essential Writing Skills . Transform the quality of EFL student writing by focusing on four essential skills. Click here for details about the ebook that should be part of every writing teacher’s resource library.

Save time. Teach well.

3 thoughts on “writing hypothesis sentences”.

Great site!

Thank you for the video. I can understand it, but I can’t define or explain it in ratio form. Please define and answer your question for me, so I can better understand. Thank you again.

Really good explanation. I’ll try to use it during lessons. I like a lot creative lessons ant this is one of them.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

  • Top1000 word
  • Top5000 word
  • Conjunction
  • Sentence into pic

Hypothesis in a sentence

hypothesis in a sentence

  • 某某   2016-01-13 联网相关的政策
  • improvement  (238+32)
  • on balance  (53)
  • wicked  (168+7)
  • handlebar  (25)
  • rainy  (165+9)
  • trudge  (41+1)
  • checkpoint  (102)
  • events  (166+80)
  • courage  (289+31)
  • blizzard  (120+5)
  • weary  (158+11)
  • rationalize  (57+1)
  • refund  (173+13)
  • pack up  (56)
  • at dusk  (69+1)
  • university  (168+75)
  • outdoors  (157+12)
  • be concerned about  (42)
  • on one's own  (38)
  • aristocrat  (50)

Cambridge Dictionary

  • Cambridge Dictionary +Plus

Meaning of hypothesis in English

Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio

  • abstraction
  • accepted wisdom
  • afterthought
  • anthropocentrism
  • determinist
  • non-dogmatic
  • non-empirical
  • social Darwinism
  • supersensible
  • the domino theory

hypothesis | Intermediate English

Hypothesis | business english, examples of hypothesis, translations of hypothesis.

Get a quick, free translation!

{{randomImageQuizHook.quizId}}

Word of the Day

kick something into the long grass

to delay dealing with something, especially because you want people to forget about it

Like a bull in a china shop: talking about people who are clumsy

Like a bull in a china shop: talking about people who are clumsy

hypothesis in a sentence

Learn more with +Plus

  • Recent and Recommended {{#preferredDictionaries}} {{name}} {{/preferredDictionaries}}
  • Definitions Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English English Learner’s Dictionary Essential British English Essential American English
  • Grammar and thesaurus Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English Grammar Thesaurus
  • Pronunciation British and American pronunciations with audio English Pronunciation
  • English–Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified)–English
  • English–Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional)–English
  • English–Dutch Dutch–English
  • English–French French–English
  • English–German German–English
  • English–Indonesian Indonesian–English
  • English–Italian Italian–English
  • English–Japanese Japanese–English
  • English–Norwegian Norwegian–English
  • English–Polish Polish–English
  • English–Portuguese Portuguese–English
  • English–Spanish Spanish–English
  • English–Swedish Swedish–English
  • Dictionary +Plus Word Lists
  • English    Noun
  • Intermediate    Noun
  • Business    Noun
  • Translations
  • All translations

To add hypothesis to a word list please sign up or log in.

Add hypothesis to one of your lists below, or create a new one.

{{message}}

Something went wrong.

There was a problem sending your report.

  • Resources Home 🏠
  • Try SciSpace Copilot
  • Search research papers
  • Add Copilot Extension
  • Try AI Detector
  • Try Paraphraser
  • Try Citation Generator
  • April Papers
  • June Papers
  • July Papers

SciSpace Resources

The Craft of Writing a Strong Hypothesis

Deeptanshu D

Table of Contents

Writing a hypothesis is one of the essential elements of a scientific research paper. It needs to be to the point, clearly communicating what your research is trying to accomplish. A blurry, drawn-out, or complexly-structured hypothesis can confuse your readers. Or worse, the editor and peer reviewers.

A captivating hypothesis is not too intricate. This blog will take you through the process so that, by the end of it, you have a better idea of how to convey your research paper's intent in just one sentence.

What is a Hypothesis?

The first step in your scientific endeavor, a hypothesis, is a strong, concise statement that forms the basis of your research. It is not the same as a thesis statement , which is a brief summary of your research paper .

The sole purpose of a hypothesis is to predict your paper's findings, data, and conclusion. It comes from a place of curiosity and intuition . When you write a hypothesis, you're essentially making an educated guess based on scientific prejudices and evidence, which is further proven or disproven through the scientific method.

The reason for undertaking research is to observe a specific phenomenon. A hypothesis, therefore, lays out what the said phenomenon is. And it does so through two variables, an independent and dependent variable.

The independent variable is the cause behind the observation, while the dependent variable is the effect of the cause. A good example of this is “mixing red and blue forms purple.” In this hypothesis, mixing red and blue is the independent variable as you're combining the two colors at your own will. The formation of purple is the dependent variable as, in this case, it is conditional to the independent variable.

Different Types of Hypotheses‌

Types-of-hypotheses

Types of hypotheses

Some would stand by the notion that there are only two types of hypotheses: a Null hypothesis and an Alternative hypothesis. While that may have some truth to it, it would be better to fully distinguish the most common forms as these terms come up so often, which might leave you out of context.

Apart from Null and Alternative, there are Complex, Simple, Directional, Non-Directional, Statistical, and Associative and casual hypotheses. They don't necessarily have to be exclusive, as one hypothesis can tick many boxes, but knowing the distinctions between them will make it easier for you to construct your own.

1. Null hypothesis

A null hypothesis proposes no relationship between two variables. Denoted by H 0 , it is a negative statement like “Attending physiotherapy sessions does not affect athletes' on-field performance.” Here, the author claims physiotherapy sessions have no effect on on-field performances. Even if there is, it's only a coincidence.

2. Alternative hypothesis

Considered to be the opposite of a null hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis is donated as H1 or Ha. It explicitly states that the dependent variable affects the independent variable. A good  alternative hypothesis example is “Attending physiotherapy sessions improves athletes' on-field performance.” or “Water evaporates at 100 °C. ” The alternative hypothesis further branches into directional and non-directional.

  • Directional hypothesis: A hypothesis that states the result would be either positive or negative is called directional hypothesis. It accompanies H1 with either the ‘<' or ‘>' sign.
  • Non-directional hypothesis: A non-directional hypothesis only claims an effect on the dependent variable. It does not clarify whether the result would be positive or negative. The sign for a non-directional hypothesis is ‘≠.'

3. Simple hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a statement made to reflect the relation between exactly two variables. One independent and one dependent. Consider the example, “Smoking is a prominent cause of lung cancer." The dependent variable, lung cancer, is dependent on the independent variable, smoking.

4. Complex hypothesis

In contrast to a simple hypothesis, a complex hypothesis implies the relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. For instance, “Individuals who eat more fruits tend to have higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.” The independent variable is eating more fruits, while the dependent variables are higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.

5. Associative and casual hypothesis

Associative and casual hypotheses don't exhibit how many variables there will be. They define the relationship between the variables. In an associative hypothesis, changing any one variable, dependent or independent, affects others. In a casual hypothesis, the independent variable directly affects the dependent.

6. Empirical hypothesis

Also referred to as the working hypothesis, an empirical hypothesis claims a theory's validation via experiments and observation. This way, the statement appears justifiable and different from a wild guess.

Say, the hypothesis is “Women who take iron tablets face a lesser risk of anemia than those who take vitamin B12.” This is an example of an empirical hypothesis where the researcher  the statement after assessing a group of women who take iron tablets and charting the findings.

7. Statistical hypothesis

The point of a statistical hypothesis is to test an already existing hypothesis by studying a population sample. Hypothesis like “44% of the Indian population belong in the age group of 22-27.” leverage evidence to prove or disprove a particular statement.

Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis

Writing a hypothesis is essential as it can make or break your research for you. That includes your chances of getting published in a journal. So when you're designing one, keep an eye out for these pointers:

  • A research hypothesis has to be simple yet clear to look justifiable enough.
  • It has to be testable — your research would be rendered pointless if too far-fetched into reality or limited by technology.
  • It has to be precise about the results —what you are trying to do and achieve through it should come out in your hypothesis.
  • A research hypothesis should be self-explanatory, leaving no doubt in the reader's mind.
  • If you are developing a relational hypothesis, you need to include the variables and establish an appropriate relationship among them.
  • A hypothesis must keep and reflect the scope for further investigations and experiments.

Separating a Hypothesis from a Prediction

Outside of academia, hypothesis and prediction are often used interchangeably. In research writing, this is not only confusing but also incorrect. And although a hypothesis and prediction are guesses at their core, there are many differences between them.

A hypothesis is an educated guess or even a testable prediction validated through research. It aims to analyze the gathered evidence and facts to define a relationship between variables and put forth a logical explanation behind the nature of events.

Predictions are assumptions or expected outcomes made without any backing evidence. They are more fictionally inclined regardless of where they originate from.

For this reason, a hypothesis holds much more weight than a prediction. It sticks to the scientific method rather than pure guesswork. "Planets revolve around the Sun." is an example of a hypothesis as it is previous knowledge and observed trends. Additionally, we can test it through the scientific method.

Whereas "COVID-19 will be eradicated by 2030." is a prediction. Even though it results from past trends, we can't prove or disprove it. So, the only way this gets validated is to wait and watch if COVID-19 cases end by 2030.

Finally, How to Write a Hypothesis

Quick-tips-on-how-to-write-a-hypothesis

Quick tips on writing a hypothesis

1.  Be clear about your research question

A hypothesis should instantly address the research question or the problem statement. To do so, you need to ask a question. Understand the constraints of your undertaken research topic and then formulate a simple and topic-centric problem. Only after that can you develop a hypothesis and further test for evidence.

2. Carry out a recce

Once you have your research's foundation laid out, it would be best to conduct preliminary research. Go through previous theories, academic papers, data, and experiments before you start curating your research hypothesis. It will give you an idea of your hypothesis's viability or originality.

Making use of references from relevant research papers helps draft a good research hypothesis. SciSpace Discover offers a repository of over 270 million research papers to browse through and gain a deeper understanding of related studies on a particular topic. Additionally, you can use SciSpace Copilot , your AI research assistant, for reading any lengthy research paper and getting a more summarized context of it. A hypothesis can be formed after evaluating many such summarized research papers. Copilot also offers explanations for theories and equations, explains paper in simplified version, allows you to highlight any text in the paper or clip math equations and tables and provides a deeper, clear understanding of what is being said. This can improve the hypothesis by helping you identify potential research gaps.

3. Create a 3-dimensional hypothesis

Variables are an essential part of any reasonable hypothesis. So, identify your independent and dependent variable(s) and form a correlation between them. The ideal way to do this is to write the hypothetical assumption in the ‘if-then' form. If you use this form, make sure that you state the predefined relationship between the variables.

In another way, you can choose to present your hypothesis as a comparison between two variables. Here, you must specify the difference you expect to observe in the results.

4. Write the first draft

Now that everything is in place, it's time to write your hypothesis. For starters, create the first draft. In this version, write what you expect to find from your research.

Clearly separate your independent and dependent variables and the link between them. Don't fixate on syntax at this stage. The goal is to ensure your hypothesis addresses the issue.

5. Proof your hypothesis

After preparing the first draft of your hypothesis, you need to inspect it thoroughly. It should tick all the boxes, like being concise, straightforward, relevant, and accurate. Your final hypothesis has to be well-structured as well.

Research projects are an exciting and crucial part of being a scholar. And once you have your research question, you need a great hypothesis to begin conducting research. Thus, knowing how to write a hypothesis is very important.

Now that you have a firmer grasp on what a good hypothesis constitutes, the different kinds there are, and what process to follow, you will find it much easier to write your hypothesis, which ultimately helps your research.

Now it's easier than ever to streamline your research workflow with SciSpace Discover . Its integrated, comprehensive end-to-end platform for research allows scholars to easily discover, write and publish their research and fosters collaboration.

It includes everything you need, including a repository of over 270 million research papers across disciplines, SEO-optimized summaries and public profiles to show your expertise and experience.

If you found these tips on writing a research hypothesis useful, head over to our blog on Statistical Hypothesis Testing to learn about the top researchers, papers, and institutions in this domain.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. what is the definition of hypothesis.

According to the Oxford dictionary, a hypothesis is defined as “An idea or explanation of something that is based on a few known facts, but that has not yet been proved to be true or correct”.

2. What is an example of hypothesis?

The hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship between two or more variables. An example: "If we increase the number of new users who join our platform by 25%, then we will see an increase in revenue."

3. What is an example of null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between two variables. The null hypothesis is written as H0. The null hypothesis states that there is no effect. For example, if you're studying whether or not a particular type of exercise increases strength, your null hypothesis will be "there is no difference in strength between people who exercise and people who don't."

4. What are the types of research?

• Fundamental research

• Applied research

• Qualitative research

• Quantitative research

• Mixed research

• Exploratory research

• Longitudinal research

• Cross-sectional research

• Field research

• Laboratory research

• Fixed research

• Flexible research

• Action research

• Policy research

• Classification research

• Comparative research

• Causal research

• Inductive research

• Deductive research

5. How to write a hypothesis?

• Your hypothesis should be able to predict the relationship and outcome.

• Avoid wordiness by keeping it simple and brief.

• Your hypothesis should contain observable and testable outcomes.

• Your hypothesis should be relevant to the research question.

6. What are the 2 types of hypothesis?

• Null hypotheses are used to test the claim that "there is no difference between two groups of data".

• Alternative hypotheses test the claim that "there is a difference between two data groups".

7. Difference between research question and research hypothesis?

A research question is a broad, open-ended question you will try to answer through your research. A hypothesis is a statement based on prior research or theory that you expect to be true due to your study. Example - Research question: What are the factors that influence the adoption of the new technology? Research hypothesis: There is a positive relationship between age, education and income level with the adoption of the new technology.

8. What is plural for hypothesis?

The plural of hypothesis is hypotheses. Here's an example of how it would be used in a statement, "Numerous well-considered hypotheses are presented in this part, and they are supported by tables and figures that are well-illustrated."

9. What is the red queen hypothesis?

The red queen hypothesis in evolutionary biology states that species must constantly evolve to avoid extinction because if they don't, they will be outcompeted by other species that are evolving. Leigh Van Valen first proposed it in 1973; since then, it has been tested and substantiated many times.

10. Who is known as the father of null hypothesis?

The father of the null hypothesis is Sir Ronald Fisher. He published a paper in 1925 that introduced the concept of null hypothesis testing, and he was also the first to use the term itself.

11. When to reject null hypothesis?

You need to find a significant difference between your two populations to reject the null hypothesis. You can determine that by running statistical tests such as an independent sample t-test or a dependent sample t-test. You should reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.05.

hypothesis in a sentence

You might also like

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Sumalatha G

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences

Nikhil Seethi

Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)

Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

A research hypothesis, in its plural form “hypotheses,” is a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study, established at its outset. It is a key component of the scientific method .

Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding

Some key points about hypotheses:

  • A hypothesis expresses an expected pattern or relationship. It connects the variables under investigation.
  • It is stated in clear, precise terms before any data collection or analysis occurs. This makes the hypothesis testable.
  • A hypothesis must be falsifiable. It should be possible, even if unlikely in practice, to collect data that disconfirms rather than supports the hypothesis.
  • Hypotheses guide research. Scientists design studies to explicitly evaluate hypotheses about how nature works.
  • For a hypothesis to be valid, it must be testable against empirical evidence. The evidence can then confirm or disprove the testable predictions.
  • Hypotheses are informed by background knowledge and observation, but go beyond what is already known to propose an explanation of how or why something occurs.
Predictions typically arise from a thorough knowledge of the research literature, curiosity about real-world problems or implications, and integrating this to advance theory. They build on existing literature while providing new insight.

Types of Research Hypotheses

Alternative hypothesis.

The research hypothesis is often called the alternative or experimental hypothesis in experimental research.

It typically suggests a potential relationship between two key variables: the independent variable, which the researcher manipulates, and the dependent variable, which is measured based on those changes.

The alternative hypothesis states a relationship exists between the two variables being studied (one variable affects the other).

A hypothesis is a testable statement or prediction about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a key component of the scientific method. Some key points about hypotheses:

  • Important hypotheses lead to predictions that can be tested empirically. The evidence can then confirm or disprove the testable predictions.

In summary, a hypothesis is a precise, testable statement of what researchers expect to happen in a study and why. Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding.

An experimental hypothesis predicts what change(s) will occur in the dependent variable when the independent variable is manipulated.

It states that the results are not due to chance and are significant in supporting the theory being investigated.

The alternative hypothesis can be directional, indicating a specific direction of the effect, or non-directional, suggesting a difference without specifying its nature. It’s what researchers aim to support or demonstrate through their study.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis states no relationship exists between the two variables being studied (one variable does not affect the other). There will be no changes in the dependent variable due to manipulating the independent variable.

It states results are due to chance and are not significant in supporting the idea being investigated.

The null hypothesis, positing no effect or relationship, is a foundational contrast to the research hypothesis in scientific inquiry. It establishes a baseline for statistical testing, promoting objectivity by initiating research from a neutral stance.

Many statistical methods are tailored to test the null hypothesis, determining the likelihood of observed results if no true effect exists.

This dual-hypothesis approach provides clarity, ensuring that research intentions are explicit, and fosters consistency across scientific studies, enhancing the standardization and interpretability of research outcomes.

Nondirectional Hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis, also known as a two-tailed hypothesis, predicts that there is a difference or relationship between two variables but does not specify the direction of this relationship.

It merely indicates that a change or effect will occur without predicting which group will have higher or lower values.

For example, “There is a difference in performance between Group A and Group B” is a non-directional hypothesis.

Directional Hypothesis

A directional (one-tailed) hypothesis predicts the nature of the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. It predicts in which direction the change will take place. (i.e., greater, smaller, less, more)

It specifies whether one variable is greater, lesser, or different from another, rather than just indicating that there’s a difference without specifying its nature.

For example, “Exercise increases weight loss” is a directional hypothesis.

hypothesis

Falsifiability

The Falsification Principle, proposed by Karl Popper , is a way of demarcating science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory or hypothesis to be considered scientific, it must be testable and irrefutable.

Falsifiability emphasizes that scientific claims shouldn’t just be confirmable but should also have the potential to be proven wrong.

It means that there should exist some potential evidence or experiment that could prove the proposition false.

However many confirming instances exist for a theory, it only takes one counter observation to falsify it. For example, the hypothesis that “all swans are white,” can be falsified by observing a black swan.

For Popper, science should attempt to disprove a theory rather than attempt to continually provide evidence to support a research hypothesis.

Can a Hypothesis be Proven?

Hypotheses make probabilistic predictions. They state the expected outcome if a particular relationship exists. However, a study result supporting a hypothesis does not definitively prove it is true.

All studies have limitations. There may be unknown confounding factors or issues that limit the certainty of conclusions. Additional studies may yield different results.

In science, hypotheses can realistically only be supported with some degree of confidence, not proven. The process of science is to incrementally accumulate evidence for and against hypothesized relationships in an ongoing pursuit of better models and explanations that best fit the empirical data. But hypotheses remain open to revision and rejection if that is where the evidence leads.
  • Disproving a hypothesis is definitive. Solid disconfirmatory evidence will falsify a hypothesis and require altering or discarding it based on the evidence.
  • However, confirming evidence is always open to revision. Other explanations may account for the same results, and additional or contradictory evidence may emerge over time.

We can never 100% prove the alternative hypothesis. Instead, we see if we can disprove, or reject the null hypothesis.

If we reject the null hypothesis, this doesn’t mean that our alternative hypothesis is correct but does support the alternative/experimental hypothesis.

Upon analysis of the results, an alternative hypothesis can be rejected or supported, but it can never be proven to be correct. We must avoid any reference to results proving a theory as this implies 100% certainty, and there is always a chance that evidence may exist which could refute a theory.

How to Write a Hypothesis

  • Identify variables . The researcher manipulates the independent variable and the dependent variable is the measured outcome.
  • Operationalized the variables being investigated . Operationalization of a hypothesis refers to the process of making the variables physically measurable or testable, e.g. if you are about to study aggression, you might count the number of punches given by participants.
  • Decide on a direction for your prediction . If there is evidence in the literature to support a specific effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, write a directional (one-tailed) hypothesis. If there are limited or ambiguous findings in the literature regarding the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, write a non-directional (two-tailed) hypothesis.
  • Make it Testable : Ensure your hypothesis can be tested through experimentation or observation. It should be possible to prove it false (principle of falsifiability).
  • Clear & concise language . A strong hypothesis is concise (typically one to two sentences long), and formulated using clear and straightforward language, ensuring it’s easily understood and testable.

Consider a hypothesis many teachers might subscribe to: students work better on Monday morning than on Friday afternoon (IV=Day, DV= Standard of work).

Now, if we decide to study this by giving the same group of students a lesson on a Monday morning and a Friday afternoon and then measuring their immediate recall of the material covered in each session, we would end up with the following:

  • The alternative hypothesis states that students will recall significantly more information on a Monday morning than on a Friday afternoon.
  • The null hypothesis states that there will be no significant difference in the amount recalled on a Monday morning compared to a Friday afternoon. Any difference will be due to chance or confounding factors.

More Examples

  • Memory : Participants exposed to classical music during study sessions will recall more items from a list than those who studied in silence.
  • Social Psychology : Individuals who frequently engage in social media use will report higher levels of perceived social isolation compared to those who use it infrequently.
  • Developmental Psychology : Children who engage in regular imaginative play have better problem-solving skills than those who don’t.
  • Clinical Psychology : Cognitive-behavioral therapy will be more effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety over a 6-month period compared to traditional talk therapy.
  • Cognitive Psychology : Individuals who multitask between various electronic devices will have shorter attention spans on focused tasks than those who single-task.
  • Health Psychology : Patients who practice mindfulness meditation will experience lower levels of chronic pain compared to those who don’t meditate.
  • Organizational Psychology : Employees in open-plan offices will report higher levels of stress than those in private offices.
  • Behavioral Psychology : Rats rewarded with food after pressing a lever will press it more frequently than rats who receive no reward.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

StatAnalytica

Step-by-step guide to hypothesis testing in statistics

hypothesis testing in statistics

Hypothesis testing in statistics helps us use data to make informed decisions. It starts with an assumption or guess about a group or population—something we believe might be true. We then collect sample data to check if there is enough evidence to support or reject that guess. This method is useful in many fields, like science, business, and healthcare, where decisions need to be based on facts.

Learning how to do hypothesis testing in statistics step-by-step can help you better understand data and make smarter choices, even when things are uncertain. This guide will take you through each step, from creating your hypothesis to making sense of the results, so you can see how it works in practical situations.

What is Hypothesis Testing?

Table of Contents

Hypothesis testing is a method for determining whether data supports a certain idea or assumption about a larger group. It starts by making a guess, like an average or a proportion, and then uses a small sample of data to see if that guess seems true or not.

For example, if a company wants to know if its new product is more popular than its old one, it can use hypothesis testing. They start with a statement like “The new product is not more popular than the old one” (this is the null hypothesis) and compare it with “The new product is more popular” (this is the alternative hypothesis). Then, they look at customer feedback to see if there’s enough evidence to reject the first statement and support the second one.

Simply put, hypothesis testing is a way to use data to help make decisions and understand what the data is really telling us, even when we don’t have all the answers.

Importance Of Hypothesis Testing In Decision-Making And Data Analysis

Hypothesis testing is important because it helps us make smart choices and understand data better. Here’s why it’s useful:

  • Reduces Guesswork : It helps us see if our guesses or ideas are likely correct, even when we don’t have all the details.
  • Uses Real Data : Instead of just guessing, it checks if our ideas match up with real data, which makes our decisions more reliable.
  • Avoids Errors : It helps us avoid mistakes by carefully checking if our ideas are right so we don’t make costly errors.
  • Shows What to Do Next : It tells us if our ideas work or not, helping us decide whether to keep, change, or drop something. For example, a company might test a new ad and decide what to do based on the results.
  • Confirms Research Findings : It makes sure that research results are accurate and not just random chance so that we can trust the findings.

Here’s a simple guide to understanding hypothesis testing, with an example:

1. Set Up Your Hypotheses

Explanation: Start by defining two statements:

  • Null Hypothesis (H0): This is the idea that there is no change or effect. It’s what you assume is true.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (H1): This is what you want to test. It suggests there is a change or effect.

Example: Suppose a company says their new batteries last an average of 500 hours. To check this:

  • Null Hypothesis (H0): The average battery life is 500 hours.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average battery life is not 500 hours.

2. Choose the Test

Explanation: Pick a statistical test that fits your data and your hypotheses. Different tests are used for various kinds of data.

Example: Since you’re comparing the average battery life, you use a one-sample t-test .

3. Set the Significance Level

Explanation: Decide how much risk you’re willing to take if you make a wrong decision. This is called the significance level, often set at 0.05 or 5%.

Example: You choose a significance level of 0.05, meaning you’re okay with a 5% chance of being wrong.

4. Gather and Analyze Data

Explanation: Collect your data and perform the test. Calculate the test statistic to see how far your sample result is from what you assumed.

Example: You test 30 batteries and find they last an average of 485 hours. You then calculate how this average compares to the claimed 500 hours using the t-test.

5. Find the p-Value

Explanation: The p-value tells you the probability of getting a result as extreme as yours if the null hypothesis is true.

Example: You find a p-value of 0.0001. This means there’s a very small chance (0.01%) of getting an average battery life of 485 hours or less if the true average is 500 hours.

6. Make Your Decision

Explanation: Compare the p-value to your significance level. If the p-value is smaller, you reject the null hypothesis. If it’s larger, you do not reject it.

Example: Since 0.0001 is much less than 0.05, you reject the null hypothesis. This means the data suggests the average battery life is different from 500 hours.

7. Report Your Findings

Explanation: Summarize what the results mean. State whether you rejected the null hypothesis and what that implies.

Example: You conclude that the average battery life is likely different from 500 hours. This suggests the company’s claim might not be accurate.

Hypothesis testing is a way to use data to check if your guesses or assumptions are likely true. By following these steps—setting up your hypotheses, choosing the right test, deciding on a significance level, analyzing your data, finding the p-value, making a decision, and reporting results—you can determine if your data supports or challenges your initial idea.

Understanding Hypothesis Testing: A Simple Explanation

Hypothesis testing is a way to use data to make decisions. Here’s a straightforward guide:

1. What is the Null and Alternative Hypotheses?

  • Null Hypothesis (H0): This is your starting assumption. It says that nothing has changed or that there is no effect. It’s what you assume to be true until your data shows otherwise. Example: If a company says their batteries last 500 hours, the null hypothesis is: “The average battery life is 500 hours.” This means you think the claim is correct unless you find evidence to prove otherwise.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (H1): This is what you want to find out. It suggests that there is an effect or a difference. It’s what you are testing to see if it might be true. Example: To test the company’s claim, you might say: “The average battery life is not 500 hours.” This means you think the average battery life might be different from what the company says.

2. One-Tailed vs. Two-Tailed Tests

  • One-Tailed Test: This test checks for an effect in only one direction. You use it when you’re only interested in finding out if something is either more or less than a specific value. Example: If you think the battery lasts longer than 500 hours, you would use a one-tailed test to see if the battery life is significantly more than 500 hours.
  • Two-Tailed Test: This test checks for an effect in both directions. Use this when you want to see if something is different from a specific value, whether it’s more or less. Example: If you want to see if the battery life is different from 500 hours, whether it’s more or less, you would use a two-tailed test. This checks for any significant difference, regardless of the direction.

3. Common Misunderstandings

  • Clarification: Hypothesis testing doesn’t prove that the null hypothesis is true. It just helps you decide if you should reject it. If there isn’t enough evidence against it, you don’t reject it, but that doesn’t mean it’s definitely true.
  • Clarification: A small p-value shows that your data is unlikely if the null hypothesis is true. It suggests that the alternative hypothesis might be right, but it doesn’t prove the null hypothesis is false.
  • Clarification: The significance level (alpha) is a set threshold, like 0.05, that helps you decide how much risk you’re willing to take for making a wrong decision. It should be chosen carefully, not randomly.
  • Clarification: Hypothesis testing helps you make decisions based on data, but it doesn’t guarantee your results are correct. The quality of your data and the right choice of test affect how reliable your results are.

Benefits and Limitations of Hypothesis Testing

  • Clear Decisions: Hypothesis testing helps you make clear decisions based on data. It shows whether the evidence supports or goes against your initial idea.
  • Objective Analysis: It relies on data rather than personal opinions, so your decisions are based on facts rather than feelings.
  • Concrete Numbers: You get specific numbers, like p-values, to understand how strong the evidence is against your idea.
  • Control Risk: You can set a risk level (alpha level) to manage the chance of making an error, which helps avoid incorrect conclusions.
  • Widely Used: It can be used in many areas, from science and business to social studies and engineering, making it a versatile tool.

Limitations

  • Sample Size Matters: The results can be affected by the size of the sample. Small samples might give unreliable results, while large samples might find differences that aren’t meaningful in real life.
  • Risk of Misinterpretation: A small p-value means the results are unlikely if the null hypothesis is true, but it doesn’t show how important the effect is.
  • Needs Assumptions: Hypothesis testing requires certain conditions, like data being normally distributed . If these aren’t met, the results might not be accurate.
  • Simple Decisions: It often results in a basic yes or no decision without giving detailed information about the size or impact of the effect.
  • Can Be Misused: Sometimes, people misuse hypothesis testing, tweaking data to get a desired result or focusing only on whether the result is statistically significant.
  • No Absolute Proof: Hypothesis testing doesn’t prove that your hypothesis is true. It only helps you decide if there’s enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, so the conclusions are based on likelihood, not certainty.

Final Thoughts 

Hypothesis testing helps you make decisions based on data. It involves setting up your initial idea, picking a significance level, doing the test, and looking at the results. By following these steps, you can make sure your conclusions are based on solid information, not just guesses.

This approach lets you see if the evidence supports or contradicts your initial idea, helping you make better decisions. But remember that hypothesis testing isn’t perfect. Things like sample size and assumptions can affect the results, so it’s important to be aware of these limitations.

In simple terms, using a step-by-step guide for hypothesis testing is a great way to better understand your data. Follow the steps carefully and keep in mind the method’s limits.

What is the difference between one-tailed and two-tailed tests?

 A one-tailed test assesses the probability of the observed data in one direction (either greater than or less than a certain value). In contrast, a two-tailed test looks at both directions (greater than and less than) to detect any significant deviation from the null hypothesis.

How do you choose the appropriate test for hypothesis testing?

The choice of test depends on the type of data you have and the hypotheses you are testing. Common tests include t-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA. You get more details about ANOVA, you may read Complete Details on What is ANOVA in Statistics ?  It’s important to match the test to the data characteristics and the research question.

What is the role of sample size in hypothesis testing?  

Sample size affects the reliability of hypothesis testing. Larger samples provide more reliable estimates and can detect smaller effects, while smaller samples may lead to less accurate results and reduced power.

Can hypothesis testing prove that a hypothesis is true?  

Hypothesis testing cannot prove that a hypothesis is true. It can only provide evidence to support or reject the null hypothesis. A result can indicate whether the data is consistent with the null hypothesis or not, but it does not prove the alternative hypothesis with certainty.

Related Posts

how-to-find-the=best-online-statistics-homework-help

How to Find the Best Online Statistics Homework Help

why-spss-homework-help-is-an-important-aspects-for-students

Why SPSS Homework Help Is An Important aspect for Students?

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

IMAGES

  1. 13 Different Types of Hypothesis (2024)

    hypothesis in a sentence

  2. How to Write a Hypothesis: The Ultimate Guide with Examples

    hypothesis in a sentence

  3. Examples of “Hypothesis” In A Sentence

    hypothesis in a sentence

  4. How to Write a Hypothesis

    hypothesis in a sentence

  5. How to Write a Hypothesis: The Ultimate Guide with Examples

    hypothesis in a sentence

  6. Examples of Hypothesis: 15+ Ideas to Help You Formulate Yours

    hypothesis in a sentence

VIDEO

  1. Concept of Hypothesis

  2. What Is A Hypothesis?

  3. What is a Hypothesis?

  4. Michel Foucault: Discourse description and elaboration in Urdu/Hindi

  5. How To Formulate The Hypothesis/What is Hypothesis?

  6. Writing a hypothesis

COMMENTS

  1. Examples of "Hypothesis" in a Sentence

    Learn how to use the word hypothesis in a sentence with various meanings and contexts. See examples of hypothesis as a noun, a verb, and a part of a compound phrase.

  2. Examples of 'Hypothesis' in a Sentence

    Synonyms for hypothesis. The results of the experiment did not support his hypothesis. Their hypothesis is that watching excessive amounts of television reduces a person's ability to concentrate. Other chemists rejected his hypothesis. Isaac Newton initially argued against a parabolic orbit for the … comet of 1680, preferring the hypothesis ...

  3. Hypothesis in a Sentence

    Learn the definition and examples of hypothesis, a proposed explanation or theory that is studied through scientific testing. Find out how to use hypothesis in a sentence and other related words in the opinion, belief category.

  4. How to Write a Hypothesis in 6 Steps, With Examples

    Learn the definition, types, and characteristics of a hypothesis, and follow the steps to write your own with examples. A hypothesis is a statement that explains the predictions and reasoning of your research as an educated guess.

  5. HYPOTHESIS in a Sentence Examples: 21 Ways to Use Hypothesis

    Learn what a hypothesis is and how to use it in a sentence with 21 examples. Find out how to formulate, test, and communicate your hypotheses effectively in scientific inquiry.

  6. Hypothesis Definition & Meaning

    Learn the meaning of hypothesis, a tentative assumption made to test its logical or empirical consequences, and see examples of its usage in sentences. Compare and contrast hypothesis with theory and law, and explore its synonyms and etymology.

  7. How to use hypothesis in a sentence

    Find out how to use the word hypothesis in a sentence with different meanings and contexts. Browse through various sentences and phrases with the word hypothesis from WordHippo, a free online thesaurus.

  8. Examples of 'hypothesis' in a sentence

    Learn how to use the word 'hypothesis' in different contexts with sentences from Collins dictionaries and corpus. Find out the definition, synonyms, pronunciation, and grammar of 'hypothesis'.

  9. How to Write a Strong Hypothesis

    5. Phrase your hypothesis in three ways. To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if…then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable. If a first-year student starts attending more lectures, then their exam scores will improve.

  10. What Is a Hypothesis and How Do I Write One? · PrepScholar

    Merriam Webster defines a hypothesis as "an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument.". In other words, a hypothesis is an educated guess. Scientists make a reasonable assumption--or a hypothesis--then design an experiment to test whether it's true or not.

  11. Examples of "Hypothesis" In A Sentence

    Sentences with Hypothesis. Hypothesis: The sun rises in the east. They formulated a null hypothesis to compare against the alternative. We need to revise the original hypothesis. They discussed the hypothesis with colleagues in their field. They formulated competing hypotheses to compare and contrast the findings.

  12. Examples of "Hypotheses" in a Sentence

    Learn how to use "hypotheses" in a sentence with 108 example sentences on YourDictionary. Dictionary Thesaurus Sentences Grammar ... The primary difference between a hypothesis and a theory is the point at which they are formed in the scientific process. A hypothesis is made before an experiment while a theory is formed after collecting a lot ...

  13. Hypothesis: Definition, Examples, and Types

    A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process. Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test ...

  14. 15 Hypothesis Examples (2024)

    15 Hypothesis Examples. A hypothesis is defined as a testable prediction, and is used primarily in scientific experiments as a potential or predicted outcome that scientists attempt to prove or disprove (Atkinson et al., 2021; Tan, 2022). In my types of hypothesis article, I outlined 13 different hypotheses, including the directional hypothesis ...

  15. How to Write a Strong Hypothesis

    Learn how to write a hypothesis for your research project, with steps, examples and tips. A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research and predicts a relationship between variables.

  16. HYPOTHESIS

    HYPOTHESIS definition: 1. an idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved…. Learn more.

  17. How to Write a Hypothesis w/ Strong Examples

    Simple Hypothesis Examples. Increasing the amount of natural light in a classroom will improve students' test scores. Drinking at least eight glasses of water a day reduces the frequency of headaches in adults. Plant growth is faster when the plant is exposed to music for at least one hour per day.

  18. How to Write a Strong Hypothesis in 6 Simple Steps

    Learning how to write a hypothesis comes down to knowledge and strategy. So where do you start? Learn how to make your hypothesis strong step-by-step here.

  19. Teach English Writing: Hypothesis

    They write one sentence hypothesis sentence that summarizes the data. Step 3: Show the first image as a group practice effort. Step 4: Give students 1 to 2 minutes to study the image and write a hypothesis sentence with their partner. Step 5: After time has passed, review answers in class. Step 6: Begin the drill.

  20. Hypothesis in a sentence (esp. good sentence like quote, proverb...)

    226+9 sentence examples: 1. Let me enumerate many flaws in your hypothesis. 2. She wrote something to summarize her hypothesis. 3. The researcher sets up experiments to test the hypothesis. 4. Scientists have proposed a bold hypothesis. 5.

  21. HYPOTHESIS

    HYPOTHESIS meaning: 1. an idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved…. Learn more.

  22. Research Hypothesis: Definition, Types, Examples and Quick Tips

    Research Hypothesis: Definition, Types, Examples and ...

  23. Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples

    Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples

  24. Step-by-step guide to hypothesis testing in statistics

    Here's a simple guide to understanding hypothesis testing, with an example: 1. Set Up Your Hypotheses. Explanation: Start by defining two statements: Null Hypothesis (H0): This is the idea that there is no change or effect. It's what you assume is true. Alternative Hypothesis (H1): This is what you want to test. It suggests there is a ...

  25. Atypical vocal imitation of speech and song in autism spectrum disorder

    For example, when autistic individuals try to imitate prosodic patterns, such as making a sentence sound like a question or a statement, or expressing likes or dislikes, they often exhibit prolonged durations of the sentences compared to their non-autistic peers (Diehl & Paul, ... Contrary to our hypothesis, however, both reduced relative pitch ...