assignment debt definition

Assignment Of Debt Agreement: Definition & Sample

Jump to section, what is an assignment of debt agreement.

An assignment of debt agreement is a legal document between a debtor and creditor that outlines the repayment terms. An assignment of debt agreement can be used as an alternative to bankruptcy, but several requirements must be met for it to work.

In addition, if obligations are not met under a debt agreement, it might still be necessary to file for bankruptcy later on. Therefore, consulting with an attorney specializing in debt agreements is always recommended before entering into one of these contracts.

Assignment Of Debt Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10 5 exhibit1024f10qsbmay04.htm EXHIBIT 10.24 , Viewed December 20, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment Of Debt Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment of debt agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of debt agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment of debt agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Meet some of our Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers

Kimbrelly K.

Attorney Kegler has been licensed to practice law in ​the State of North Carolina since 1998. Over the years,​ she has worked in firms that focused on small​ business financing, initial startup formation, to​ starting several businesses of her own with bootstrap​ financing to venture capital funding. As a Certified​ Dream Manager, she couples the skills of listening to​ understand the big picture to get to solutions that not​ only fit today's needs but also the long term needs of​ her entrepreneurial clients.​

Christina S.

I am an attorney who has been practicing for over a decade, experienced in multiple areas of law, both from a litigation and more procedural side. The great thing about my practice is that it has trained me to deal with so many different types of problems and to find solutions in a variety of legal scenarios that are almost never similar.

Ferraro Law Firm was founded by Dean C. Ferraro. Dean earned his Bachelor's Degree from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona ("Cal Poly Pomona") in 1992 and his J.D. Degree from the University of Mississippi School of Law ("Ole Miss") in 1996. He is licensed to practice law in the State Courts of Colorado, Tennessee, and California. Dean is also admitted to practice before the United States District Courts of Colorado (District of Colorado), California (Central District), and Tennessee (Eastern District). Shortly after earning his law license and working for a private law firm, Dean joined the District Attorney's office, where he worked for five successful years as one of the leading prosecuting attorneys in the State of Tennessee. After seven years of practicing law in Tennessee, Dean moved back to his birth state and practiced law in California from 2003-2015. In 2015, Dean moved with his family to Colorado, practicing law in beautiful Castle Rock, where he is recognized as a highly-effective attorney, well-versed in many areas of law. Dean's career has entailed practicing multiple areas of law, including civil litigation with a large law firm, prosecuting criminal cases as an Assistant District Attorney, In-House Counsel for Safeco Insurance, and as the founding member of an online law group that helped thousands of people get affordable legal services. Pursuing his passion for helping others, Dean now utilizes his legal and entrepreneurial experience to help his clients in their personal and business lives. Dean is also a bestselling author of two legal thrillers, Murder in Santa Barbara and Murder in Vail. He currently is working on his next legal thriller, The Grove Conspiracy, set to be published in 2023.

Karl D. Shehu, has a multidisciplinary practice encompassing small business law, estate and legacy planning, real estate law, and litigation. Attorney Shehu has assisted families, physicians, professionals, and people of faith provide for their loved ones by crafting individualized estate and legacy plans. Protecting families and safeguarding families is his passion. Attorney Shehu routinely represents lenders, buyers, sellers, and businesses in real estate transactions, researching and resolving title defects, escrowing funds, and drafting lending documents. To date, Attorney Shehu has closed a real estate deal in every town in Connecticut. As a litigator, Attorney Shehu has proven willing to engage in contentious court battles to obtain results for his clients. While practicing at DLA Piper, LLP, in Boston, Attorney Shehu represented the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies in multidistrict litigations filed throughout the United States. He has been a passionate advocate for immigrants and the seriously injured, frequently advising against lowball settlement offers. He is willing to try every case to verdict, and he meticulously prepares every case for trial. Attorney Shehu began his legal career as a consumer lawyer, utilizing fee-shifting statutes to force unscrupulous businesses to pay the legal fees of aggrieved consumers. For example, in Access Therapies v. Mendoza, 1:13-cv-01317 (S.D. Ind. 2014), Attorney Shehu utilized unique interpretations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, Truth-in-Lending Act, and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to obtain a favorable result for his immigrant client. Attorney Shehu is a Waterbury, Connecticut native. He attended Our Lady of Mount Carmel grammar school, The Loomis Chaffee School, and Chase Collegiate School before earning degrees from Boston College, the University of Oxford’s Said Business School in England, and Pepperdine University School of Law. At Oxford, Karl was voted president of his class. Outside of his law practice, Attorney Shehu has worked to improve the world around him by participating in numerous charitable endeavors. He is a former candidate for the Connecticut Senate and a parishioner of St. Patrick Parish and Oratory in Waterbury. In addition, Attorney Shehu has written extensively on the Twenty-fifth Amendment and law firm retention by multinational firms.

For over 20 years Myron E. Mims Esq. has provided legal and consulting services to small and medium sized businesses. Mims served as regional counsel for a real estate investment and development firm where he managed the Company’s contract execution and management, and dispute resolution affairs. Mims was responsible for oversight and risk management of all legal affairs, including management of a robust litigation docket consisting of a seven figure, multi-party construction lawsuit, and multiple vendor and tenant disputes. Mims prepared new contract docs and implemented execution and management processes that lead to the reduction of litigation. As a managing partner of Nixon Mims, LLP Mims provided legal and consulting services to clients of that consisted of real estate, construction, telecommunications, media and food industry businesses. Mims routinely assisted clients with developing corporate governance and management protocols, strategic planning initiatives, and advised clients in the negotiation and execution of complex business transactions. Mims routinely provided operational oversight and technical analysis for management. During this period Mims obtained firsthand experience of the access to capital impediments and challenges that growth-stage businesses face.

Maigan is a registered nurse and attorney with tech law experience, specifically in Web3, including NFTs. Maigan acted as general counsel for a NFT platform for two years and speaks and understands smart contracts. As a registered nurse, Maigan is in a unique position to understand health law issues and graduated with a concentration in health law distinction. Maigan is happy to help you create a business entity, draft and negotiate contracts and agreements, apply for trademarks, draft terms of service and privacy notices, draft terms of sale for NFT drops, draft web3 licenses, and act as a consultant for other attorneys looking for someone who understands web3 and NFTs. Maigan speaks conversational Spanish.

Founder David W. Weygandt, the Singing Lawyer, is passionate about helping families and businesses stay in tune with what they care about and avoid conflict. When injustice has been done, David is proud to stand up to the modern Goliath and vindicate your rights on your behalf. David lives and practices law in The Woodlands, Texas, and assists clients all across Texas.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities

• Austin Financial Lawyers
• Boston Financial Lawyers
• Chicago Financial Lawyers
• Dallas Financial Lawyers
• Denver Financial Lawyers
• Houston Financial Lawyers
• Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
• New York Financial Lawyers
• Phoenix Financial Lawyers
• San Diego Financial Lawyers
• Tampa Financial Lawyers

Assignment Of Debt Agreement lawyers by city

• Austin Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Boston Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Denver Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Houston Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• New York Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment Of Debt Agreement Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Debt Assignment: Understanding the Mechanics, Risks, and Benefits with Real-world Examples

Last updated 03/19/2024 by

Fact checked by

What is debt assignment?

How debt assignments work, special considerations, criticism of debt assignment.

• Enhanced liquidity for creditors.
• Risk reduction by divesting high-risk loans.
• Quick injection of capital for urgent financial needs.
• Opportunity to free up resources from aging debts.
• Potential for unethical practices by debt collectors.
• Allegations of harassment and threats towards debtors.
• Risk of pursuing debts that have already been settled.

Frequently asked questions

Is debt assignment legal, can a debtor reject a debt assignment, how does debt assignment impact the debtor’s credit score, what recourse do debtors have if faced with unethical debt collection practices, key takeaways.

• Debt assignment involves the legal transfer of debt and associated rights to a third party.
• Notification to the debtor is crucial to prevent unintentional default and ensure proper payment channels.
• Third-party debt collectors operate under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
• Creditors may assign debt to improve liquidity, reduce risk exposure, or deal with aging debts.
• Debt assignment has faced criticism for unethical practices by some debt buyers.

Show Article Sources

You might also like.

What Is an Assignment of Debt?

George Simons | December 02, 2022

Co-Founder of SoloSuit George Simons, JD/MBA

George Simons is the co-founder and CEO of SoloSuit. He has helped Americans protect over $1 billion from predatory debt lawsuits. George graduated from BYU Law school in 2020 with a JD-MBA. In his spare time, George likes to cook, because he likes to eat.

Edited by Hannah Locklear

Editor at SoloSuit Hannah Locklear, BA

Hannah Locklear is SoloSuit’s Marketing and Impact Manager. With an educational background in Linguistics, Spanish, and International Development from Brigham Young University, Hannah has also worked as a legal support specialist for several years.

Summary: Have a debt collection agency coming after you for a past due account? Not convinced that they have the right to sue you? Learn about the assignment of debt and how you can beat a debt collector in court.

Assignment of debt means that the debt has been transferred, including all obligations and rights, from the creditor to another party. The debt assignment means there has been a legal transfer to another party, who now owns the debt. Usually, the debt assignment involves a debt collector who takes the responsibility to collect your debt.

How does a debt assignment work?

When the creditor lends you money, it does so thinking that what it lends you as well as interest will be paid back according to the legal agreement. The lender will wait to get the money back according to the contract.

When the debt is assigned to another party, you must be notified when it happens so you know who owns the debt and where to send your payments. If you send payments to the previous creditor, the payments probably will be rejected and you could default.

When the debtor gets this notice, it's wise for them to check that the creditor has the right balance and the payment that you should pay each month. Sometimes, you may be able to offer changes to the terms of the loan. If you decide to try this, the creditor must respond.

Respond to debt collection lawsuit in 15 minutes with SoloSuit.

Why creditors assign debts

Note that debt assignments and debt collectors must adhere to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act . This is a law overseen by the FTC that restricts when the debtor can contact you and how. For example, they only can call you between 8 am and 9 pm and they cannot call you at work if you tell them not to do so.

If the FDCPA is broken by the debt collector, you can file a countersuit and may get them to pay damages and your attorney fees.

There are many reasons why the creditor may assign a debt. The most common reason is to boost their liquidity and reduce risk. The creditor could need capital, so they'll sell off some of their debts to debt collection companies.

Also, the creditor may have many higher-risk loans and they could be worried they could have a lot of defaults. In these situations, the creditor may be ok with selling debts for pennies on the dollar if it enhances their financial outlook and reassures investors.

Or, the creditor may think the debt is too old to worry about and may not assign it at all.

Different perspectives on debt assignment

Debt assignment is often criticized, especially in the past 30 years. Debt buyers often engage in shady practices. For example, some debt collectors may call consumers in the middle of the night and harass them to pay debts. Or, they may call friends and family looking for you. Some debt collectors even use foul language with consumers and threaten them.

Sometimes the debt is sold several times, so the consumer is chased for a debt she doesn't owe. Or, the debt amount could be different than what the debt collector claims.

Don't let debt collectors harass you. Respond with SoloSuit.

What to do if a debt collector comes after you

If you owe a debt and the debt has been assigned to a debt collector, you may be getting a lot of phone calls at all hours to get you to pay what you allegedly owe. This can continue for months or even years.

Sometimes, you can just ignore the phone calls and nothing happens. However, if enough money is involved, the debt collector could file a lawsuit against you. The worst thing you can do in this situation is to ignore the lawsuit.

What you should do is use the debt assignment game against them. What happens is this: The debt was probably sold a few times. You want to make the debt collector prove that the debt is yours and that you owe what they say you owe.

When the debt has been sold several times, it can be difficult for them to track down all that paperwork. You need to respond to the lawsuit by filing an answer with your clerk of court and then mail that answer to the debt collector by certified mail.

If you are being pursued for a debt that has been purchased by a third party debt buyer, there is a good chance you can get the issue resolved fairly easily. For example, in many instances, you may be able to negotiate a fairly low settlement on the debt, if you prefer to do so. This is because many companies who specialize in debt assignments actually purchased the debt for pennies on the dollar and are not actually looking to collect on the full amount owed.

Even if you cannot negotiate a settlement, make sure to log all of your interaction with the debt buyer since the collection agents they employ are notorious for routinely violating provisions contained within the FDCPA, which means you may have grounds to file a counterclaim and demand compensatory damages.

What is SoloSuit?

SoloSuit makes it easy to respond to a debt collection lawsuit.

How it works: SoloSuit is a step-by-step web-app that asks you all the necessary questions to complete your answer. Upon completion, you can either print the completed forms and mail in the hard copies to the courts or you can pay SoloSuit to file it for you and to have an attorney review the document.

Respond with SoloSuit

"First time getting sued by a debt collector and I was searching all over YouTube and ran across SoloSuit, so I decided to buy their services with their attorney reviewed documentation which cost extra but it was well worth it! SoloSuit sent the documentation to the parties and to the court which saved me time from having to go to court and in a few weeks the case got dismissed!" – James

>>Read the FastCompany article: Debt Lawsuits Are Complicated: This Website Makes Them Simpler To Navigate

>>Read the NPR story on SoloSuit: A Student Solution To Give Utah Debtors A Fighting Chance

How to answer a summons for debt collection in your state

Here's a list of guides for other states.

All 50 states .

Guides on how to beat every debt collector

Being sued by a different debt collector? We're making guides on how to beat each one.

• Waypoint Resource Group

Win against credit card companies

Is your credit card company suing you? Learn how you can beat each one.

• Wells Fargo

Going to Court for Credit Card Debt — Key Tips

How to Negotiate Credit Card Debts

How to Settle a Credit Card Debt Lawsuit — Ultimate Guide

Get answers to these FAQs

Need more info on statutes of limitations? Read our 50-state guide.

Why do debt collectors block their phone numbers?

How long do debt collectors take to respond to debt validation letters?

What are the biggest debt collector companies in the US?

Is Zombie Debt Still a Problem in 2019?

SoloSuit FAQ

If a car is repossessed, do I still owe the debt?

Is Portfolio Recovery Associates Legit?

Is There a Judgment Against Me Without my Knowledge?

Should I File Bankruptcy Before or After a Judgment?

What is a default judgment?— What do I do?

Summoned to Court for Medical Bills — What Do I Do?

What Happens If Someone Sues You and You Have No Money?

What Happens If You Never Answer Debt Collectors?

What Happens When a Debt Is Sold to a Collection Agency

What is a Stipulated Judgment?

What is the Deadline for a Defendant's Answer to Avoid a Default Judgment?

Can a Judgement Creditor Take my Car?

Can I Settle a Debt After Being Served?

Can I Stop Wage Garnishment?

Can You Appeal a Default Judgement?

Do I Need a Debt Collection Defense Attorney?

Do I Need a Payday Loans Lawyer?

Do student loans go away after 7 years? — Student Loan Debt Guide

Am I Responsible for My Spouse's Medical Debt?

Should I Marry Someone With Debt?

Can a Debt Collector Leave a Voicemail?

How Does Debt Assignment Work?

What Happens If a Defendant Does Not Pay a Judgment?

Can You Serve Someone with a Collections Lawsuit at Their Work?

What Is a Warrant in Debt?

How Many Times Can a Judgment be Renewed in Oklahoma?

Can an Eviction Be Reversed?

Does Debt Consolidation Have Risks?

What Happens If You Avoid Getting Served Court Papers?

Does Student Debt Die With You?

Can Debt Collectors Call You at Work in Texas?

How Much Do You Have to Be in Debt to File for Chapter 7?

What Is the Statute of Limitations on Debt in Washington?

How Long Does a Judgment Last?

Can Private Disability Payments Be Garnished?

Can Debt Collectors Call From Local Numbers?

Does the Fair Credit Reporting Act Work in Florida?

The Truth: Should You Never Pay a Debt Collection Agency?

Should You Communicate with a Debt Collector in Writing or by Telephone?

Do I Need a Debt Negotiator?

What Happens After a Motion for Default Is Filed?

Can a Process Server Leave a Summons Taped to My Door?

Learn More With These Additional Resources:

Need help managing your finances? Check out these resources.

How to Make a Debt Validation Letter - The Ultimate Guide

How to Make a Motion to Compel Arbitration Without an Attorney

How to Stop Wage Garnishment — Everything You Need to Know

How to File an FDCPA Complaint Against Your Debt Collector (Ultimate Guide)

Defending Yourself in Court Against a Debt Collector

Tips on you can to file an FDCPA lawsuit against a debt collection agency

Advice on how to answer a summons for debt collection.

Effective strategies for how to get back on track after a debt lawsuit

New Hampshire Statute of Limitations on Debt

Sample Cease and Desist Letter Against Debt Collectors

The Ultimate Guide to Responding to a Debt Collection Lawsuit in Utah

West Virginia Statute of Limitations on Debt

What debt collectors cannot do — FDCPA explained

Defending Yourself in Court Against Debt Collector

How to Liquidate Debt

Arkansas Statute of Limitations on Debt

You're Drowning in Debt — Here's How to Swim

Help! I'm Being Sued by My Debt Collector

How to Make a Motion to Vacate Judgment

How to Answer Summons for Debt Collection in Vermont

North Dakota Statute of Limitations on Debt

ClearPoint Debt Management Review

Indiana Statute of Limitations on Debt

Oregon Eviction Laws - What They Say

CuraDebt Debt Settlement Review

How to Write a Re-Aging Debt Letter

How to Appear in Court by Phone

How to Use the Doctrine of Unclean Hands

Debt Consolidation in Eugene, Oregon

Summoned to Court for Medical Bills? What to Do Next

How to Make a Debt Settlement Agreement

Received a 3-Day Eviction Notice? Here's What to Do

How to Answer a Lawsuit for Debt Collection

Tips for Leaving the Country With Unpaid Credit Card Debt

Kansas Statute of Limitations on Debt Collection

How to File in Small Claims Court in Iowa

How to File a Civil Answer in Kings County Supreme Court

Roseland Associates Debt Consolidation Review

How to Stop a Garnishment

Debt Eraser Review

It only takes 15 minutes. And 50% of our customers' cases have been dismissed in the past.

"Finding yourself on the wrong side of the law unexpectedly is kinda scary. I started researching on YouTube and found SoloSuit's channel. The videos were so helpful, easy to understand and encouraging. When I reached out to SoloSuit they were on it. Very professional, impeccably prompt. Thanks for the service!" – Heather

Not sued yet? Use our Debt Validation Letter.

Our Debt Validation Letter is the best way to respond to a collection letter. Many debt collectors will simply give up after receiving it.

What is an Assignment of Debt?

By Sej Lamba

Updated on 23 July 2024 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

When Could an Assignment of Debt Happen?

Key issues on assignment of debt, drafting the correct documentation, giving notice, key takeaways.

Debts are increasingly common in today’s financial climate, and unfortunately, many people struggle to repay what they owe. Debts owed can be sold to third parties and a lot of companies in the UK purchase debts. However, this can be complicated as specific legal formalities apply when assigning debts. This article will explain some of the critical issues around the assignment of debt. 

Debt collection can be a complex process. There are various reasons as to why debt is assigned. For example, a company owed debt may want to avoid putting in time and effort to chase it or want to take legal action to recover it. 

To picture a scenario, imagine this:

• Joe Bloggs gets a brand-new shiny credit card. Joe purchases lots of nice things for his family with the credit card. Usually, he can keep up with payments as he keeps track of them and earns enough to pay them back;
• suddenly, Joe has an injury and cannot work anymore. He has to give up his job and now can’t afford to pay the credit card company back;
• Joe ignores various letters chasing the debt and hopes the problem will disappear. Ultimately, after months, the credit card company gives up and sells Joe’s debt to a debt collection agency.  

So, in summary – after the debt sale, Joe now owes money to a different company. 

In practice, debt assignments can be complex, and the parties must follow the relevant legal rules and draft the correct documentation.

An assignment of debt essentially transfers the debt from one party (the assignor) to a third party (an assignee). 

In practice, this will mean the original debtor (e.g. Joe Bloggs) will now owe the debt to a new third-party creditor (e.g. the debt collection business). Therefore, in the scenario above, Joe must now repay the debt to the third-party debt collection business.

This process can be complex. There have been several legal cases in the courts where this process has given rise to disputes.

To avoid lengthy and expensive disputes, it’s important to have up-to-date legal contracts in place. Our contract lawyers can review and update your contracts to ensure your business is protected. Book a complimentary consultation today by filling out the form on this page.

There are two different types of assignment of debt – a legal assignment of debt and an equitable assignment of debt. 

In simple terms:

• a legal assignment of debt will transfer the right for enforcement of the debt; and
• an equitable assignment of debt will transfer only the benefit of the debt without the right to enforce it. 

Let us explore each type below.

Legal Assignment of Debt 

If the assignment complies with specific legal requirements under the Law of Property Act 1925, it will be a ‘legal assignment’. This means that the assignee will be the new owner of the debt. 

A legal assignment requires various formalities to be effective. For example, it must:

• be in writing and signed by the assignor;
• the debtor must be given written notice of the assignment;
• be absolute with no conditions attached to it;
• relate to the whole of the debt and not just part of it; and
• not be a charge.

After the transfer of the debt, the assignor can sue the debtor in its own name. 

Equitable Assignment of Debt

It is also possible to have an equitable debt transfer – the requirements for this are much less strict. For example, this can be done informally by the assignor informing the assignee that the rights are transferred to them. 

Download this free Commercial Contracts Checklist to ensure your contracts will meet your business’ needs.

For an equitable assignment, giving notice is not essential, but still always highly advisable. 

Where an equitable assignment is made, the assignee won’t have the right to pursue court action for the debt. In this case, the assignee will have to join forces with the assignor to sue for the debt to sue for the debt. 

The debtor should receive notice of any debt transfer so they know to whom the money is owed. Following notice, the new debt owner can pursue the debt owed. 

A legal assignment is the best option for an assignee of debt – this will give them full rights to enforce the debt. 

Assignments of debts can be very complex. For a legal assignment of debt, you need to follow various formalities. Otherwise, it may be unenforceable and lead to disputes. If you need help executing a debt assignment correctly, you should seek legal advice from an experienced lawyer.

If you need help with an assignment of debt, LegalVision’s experienced business lawyers can assist as part of our LegalVision membership. You will have unlimited access to lawyers to answer your questions and draft and review your documents for a low monthly fee. Call us today on 0808 196 8584 or visit our membership page .

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

5 legal essentials startup founders need to know, startup law 101: tips for startups and tech companies, sexual harassment: new employer duties under the workplace laws, hiring top talent: legal strategies for small businesses, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

3 Key Considerations to Manage Contract Risks

3 Business Benefits of Working With a Specialist Commercial Contracts Lawyer

 What Are the Risks of a Verbal Contract With Your Customers?

3 Points Your Business Should Consider to Minimise Risk Before Signing a New Contract

We’re an award-winning law firm

2023 Economic Innovator of the Year Finalist - The Spectator

2023 Law Company of the Year Finalist - The Lawyer Awards

2023 Future of Legal Services Innovation - Legal Innovation Awards

2021 Fastest Growing Law Firm in APAC - Financial Times

• Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

• In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
• In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
• Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

Necessary cookies . These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on.

Analytics and other third-party cookies . We would like to use analytics and limited other third-party cookies to improve our website and your experience using it. These cookies collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. If you are happy to allow us to use these cookies, please click “all cookies” or you can turn individual cookies on by clicking "manage cookies". You can change your preferences at any time by visiting our cookie details page.

We use cookies on our website, details of which are set out below.

Necessary cookies

These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on, although you may be able to disable these cookies via your browser if you wish. Please note that if these cookies are disabled then you may not be able to use some or all of the functionality of our website.

Ideally over time we would like to be able to improve our website and your experience using it. We would like to deploy analytics cookies to enable us to do this, which would collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. However, we will only use these cookies with your consent and these cookies are switched off until you opt to turn them on. Click here for a full list of analytics cookies used on our website.

Third-party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on our website.

Search our site

Assignment of Debt – What You Need to Know

By aqila zulaiqha zulkifli ~ 23 june 2023.

Share this article:

Aqila Zulaiqha Zulkifli

Email Me  |  View Profile

Occasionally, to ensure liquidity and to reduce financial risk, a creditor may assign its rights to a debt repayment to another party. Such an arrangement is known as the assignment of debt.

An assignment generally means the transfer of contractual rights and liabilities to a third party without the concurrence of the other party to the contract. [1] The assigning party is known as the assignor, whereas the recipient party is known as the assignee.

Once an assignment occurs, the assignee stands in the exact position as the assignor and has the legal right to a debt, other remedies therein, and even the power to discharge the debt. The debtor must then, make all payments to the assignee, and not the assignor. In fact, if the debtor pays the assignor without the consent of the assignee, the debtor may risk having to pay the assignee all over again. [2]

An assignment of debt is governed by Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 (the “Act”) (cited with approval in the Federal Court case of UMW Industries Sdn Bhd v Ah Fook [3] , in which, the elements of a statutory assignment of debt can be summarized as follows:

• the assignment must be in writing under the hand of the assignor (and not, i.e the agent of the assignor);
• the assignment must be absolute and not by way of charge only; and
• the express notice in writing must have been given to the person liable to the assignor (i.e the debtor).

The effect of a statutory assignment is that the assignee possesses the legal right to the debt and the right to sue the debtor in respect of the debt without needing to join the assignor. [4]

However, rest assured, an assignment that is not in compliance with Section 4(3) of the Act is not automatically invalid. A non-statutory assignment could still be valid in equity [5] , though the assignee would have to join the assignor in the proceeding, either as a plaintiff or defendant [6] . This is to ensure a just disposal of the action, by ensuring that all relevant parties are before the Court so that the assignor would not make a claim against the debtor in respect of the same debt.

As such, in conclusion, before accepting an assignment of debt, it is prudent for an assignee to ensure that the elements in Section 4(3) of the Act abovementioned are fulfilled. If the assignment is meant to be absolute, such terms should be clearly reflected in the deed of assignment, or the assignee runs the risk of being crippled in a legal proceeding to recover the debt in the absence of the assignor.

[1] United General Insurance Co Sdn Bhd v Progress Credit Sdn Bhd [1988] 2 MLJ 297

[2] malayawata steel berhad v government of malaysia & anor [1980] 2 mlj 103, [3] [1996] 1 mlj 365, [4] mbf factors sdn bhd v tay hing ju (t/a new general trading) [2002] 5 mlj 536, [5] khaw poh chhuan v ng gaik peng & ors [1996] 1 mlj 761 (fc), [6] chan min swee v melawangi sdn bhd [2000] 7 clj 1.

RESOURCES /

• Recent Reported Cases
• Talks by Thomas Philip
• TP Legal Clinic

• Practical Law

Assignment of debt

Practical law uk legal update 1-100-2291  (approx. 2 pages), get full access to this document with a free trial.

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

• General Contract and Boilerplate

• Need Help? Get Support
• Login/Register

Deeds of Assignment of a Debt – Your Top Questions Answered

Posted by david cammack on february 7, 2020.

Home / Blog / Deeds of Assignment of a Debt – Your Top Questions Answered

( Revised for 2023. )

Do you want to know more about what a deed of assignment of a debt is, if you need one, or what to include in it? If so, our blog article has all the answers. So today, we are answering the top questions from the Internet about deeds of assignment of a debt.

1. Can a debt be assigned? How do I assign a debt in the UK?

Yes. Banks regularly buy and sell debts. If you are a creditor, then you can do so too. But you need to do so in writing. A deed of assignment of a debt is the document to use for this. You would need to assign the whole of a debt, as you cannot assign only part of it. The debtor cannot assign the debt to someone else unless the creditor agrees and you would then do this via a deed of novation.

2. What is an assignment of a loan?

This means the same thing as an assignment of a debt. It is always the right to receive repayment of the debt or loan that you are assigning.

3. What is a deed of assignment of a debt?

This is a legal document that transfers the ownership of the debt to another person. By ‘ownership’ we mean the right to receive repayment of that debt from the same original debtor or borrower.

4. What does assignment of debt mean?

The assignment of a debt will mean that the original debtor or borrower now owes the debt to a different creditor. So the debtor will now need to repay that debt to a new person, because you have transferred the debt.

5. Is a deed of assignment of a debt a legal document?

If prepared correctly, yes, a deed of assignment is a legally-binding document. In order to make the assignment legally binding on the debtor, the creditor should give notice of the assignment to the debtor. Our template includes a notice of the assignment of the debt, so you can complete it and send it to the debtor.

6. What is a notice of assignment of a debt? What do I need to do to give notice of an assignment of a debt?

Once you have assigned a debt, then you need to give the debtor notice of the transfer of the debt. Otherwise, how will they know to repay the new owner of the debt? Ideally, the deed of assignment of debt will mention this and include a form for the notice. (Legalo’s template does.) Wikipedia explains why such notice is necessary here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_in_Dearle_v_Hall#Criticisms .

7. How do you draft a deed of assignment of a debt?

If you require this deed, then the quickest way to get one is with a template from Legalo. Find our great template here: just click on this link .

8. What are the contents of a deed of assignment of a debt?

If you click on this link and scroll down to the section about the Guide to the template, then you will see the contents of our template for a deed of assignment of a debt.

9. Who can prepare a deed of assignment of a debt? Can a non-lawyer prepare a deed of assignment of a debt?

A non-lawyer can use any of the documents we sell as templates. So this includes a deed of assignment of a debt.

10. Does a deed of assignment of a debt need to be signed by both parties?

The parties who do need to sign it are (a) the original creditor and (b) the one buying (or otherwise taking) the debt from the original creditor. The debtor does not sign it.

11. Does a deed of assignment of a debt need to be witnessed?

All deeds need to be signed correctly with an adult witness, preferably one who none of the persons signing are related to.

12. Does an assignment of debt need to be a deed?

If there is no price being paid for the purchase of the debt, then the document does need to be a deed, in order to ensure it is legally binding. Otherwise, technically it does not need to be prepared and signed as a deed, but generally it is better to do it as a deed in case there is any doubt. Legalo’s template is set up to be signed as a deed.

13. Does a deed of assignment of a debt need to be registered?

Not unless you have secured the debt, for example on a property in the UK at the Land Registry. In such a case, then you would need to register the transfer of the security separately at the Land Registry. You do not register the assignment of the debt itself.

14. How long does a deed of assignment of a debt take to draft?

Legalo’s template makes it easy, so you should only need a few minutes to draft your deed of assignment.

15. How much does a deed of assignment of a debt cost? How much does a notice of assignment of a debt cost? How much do lawyers charge for deed of assignment of a debt?

Our template for a deed of assignment includes a notice of assignment and costs only £24.95. Solicitors would charge an estimated £500 plus VAT for one, so ours represents a significant cost saving.

In just a few minutes yours can be ready. What’s more, Legalo’s templates each come with a guide to make it clear how to complete it. We also provide a free helpline just in case you need any extra assistance to use it. So it could not be easier.

So if you need one, you know where to find it.

Get Legal & Compliance tips straight to your inbox, free!

Understanding Deed of Assignment: Definition, Uses, and Legal Implications Explained

A deed of assignment is a legal document that transfers the ownership of a tangible or intangible asset from one party (assignor) to another (assignee). It is used to formalize the transfer of rights, interests, or benefits associated with the asset specified in the deed. This document is commonly used in various legal and financial transactions to ensure clarity and enforceability of the transfer.

Table of Contents

Key characteristics of deed of assignment.

• Legal Form : It is a formal written document recognized under legal jurisdictions.
• Transfer of Rights : Involves transferring ownership or interests in a specific asset.
• Specificity : Clearly defines the asset being transferred and the terms of transfer.
• Enforceability : Once executed, it becomes legally binding on both parties.

How Deed of Assignment Works

Examples and usage, 1. transfer of debt example.

• Definition : A debtor assigns their debt obligation to a new creditor.
• Process : A deed of assignment is used to transfer the rights to receive payment from the debtor to the new creditor.

2. Intellectual Property Transfer

• Definition : An author assigns their copyright in a book to a publishing company.
• Procedure : A deed of assignment outlines the transfer of intellectual property rights from the author to the publisher.

Advantages of Deed of Assignment

• Legal Clarity : Provides a clear record of the transfer of rights or interests.
• Enforceability : Ensures that the assignee can legally enforce their rights against the assignor.
• Asset Protection : Helps protect the rights of the assignee against claims by third parties.

Challenges of Deed of Assignment

Considerations.

• Legal Requirements : Must adhere to specific legal formalities to be enforceable.
• Risk of Breach : Potential for disputes over the validity or terms of the assignment.

Importance of Deed of Assignment

Practical applications, legal transfers.

• Debt Assignments : Transferring debt obligations from one creditor to another.
• Property Transfers : Assigning ownership rights in real estate or intellectual property.

Real-world Implications

Legal and financial security.

• Contractual Agreements : Facilitates smooth transfers of rights and responsibilities.
• Risk Management : Helps mitigate risks associated with ownership disputes or claims.

Example Scenario

Application in debt assignment, scenario: debt transfer deed of assignment.

• Context : A company assigns its accounts receivable to a factoring company.
• Procedure : Signing a deed of assignment outlining the transfer of rights to receive payment from debtors to the factoring company.

A deed of assignment is a crucial legal instrument used to transfer ownership or rights from one party to another. Whether for debts, intellectual property, or other assets, it ensures clarity and enforceability in legal transactions. By documenting the specifics of the transfer and adhering to legal requirements, parties can safeguard their interests and ensure that the transfer is legally binding. Understanding the purpose and implications of a deed of assignment is essential for navigating legal transfers of rights and assets effectively. It provides a structured approach to asset transfers, protecting the rights of both assignors and assignees under legal frameworks. Overall, deeds of assignment play a significant role in facilitating smooth and legally secure transfers of various types of assets and rights between parties.

Related Posts

Written-down value (wdv) explained for beginners.

If you’re new to finance and accounting, terms like “Written-Down Value” or WDV might sound…

Activity Sampling (Work Sampling): Unveiling Insights into Work Efficiency

Activity Sampling, also known as Work Sampling, is a method used in various industries to…

Automated page speed optimizations for fast site performance

Assignment vs Novation: Everything You Need to Know

Assignment vs. novation: What's the difference? An assignment agreement transfers one party's rights and obligations under a contract to another party. 4 min read updated on September 19, 2022

Assignment vs. novation: What's the difference? An assignment agreement transfers one party's rights and obligations under a contract to another party. The party transferring their rights and duties is the assignor; the party receiving them is the assignee. Novation is a mechanism where one party transfers all its obligations and rights under a contract to a third party, with the consent of the original counterparty.

The transfer of a benefit or interest from one party to another is referred to as an assignment. While the benefits can be transferred, the obligation or burden behind the contract cannot be. A contract assignment occurs when a party assigns their contractual rights to a third party. The benefit that the issuing party would have received from the contract is now assigned to the third party. The party appointing their rights is referred to as the assignor, while the party obtaining the rights is the assignee. 

The assignor continues to carry the burden and can be held liable by the assignee for failing to fulfill their duties under the contract. Purchasing an indemnity clause from the assignee may help protect the assignor from a future liability. Unlike notation, assignment contracts do not annul the initial agreement and do not establish a new agreement. The original or initial contract continues to be enforced. 

Assignment contracts generally do not require the authorization from all parties in the agreement. Based on the terms, the assignor will most likely only need to notify the nonassigning party.

In regards to a contract being assignable, if an agreement seems silent or unclear, courts have decided that the contract is typically assignable. However, this does not apply to personal service contracts where consent is mandatory. The Supreme Court of Canada , or SCC, has determined that a personal service contract must be created for the original parties based on the special characteristics, skills, or confidences that are uniquely displayed between them. Many times, the courts need to intervene to determine whether an agreement is indeed a personal service contract.

Overall, assignment is more convenient for the assignor than novation. The assignor is not required to ask for approval from a third party in order to assign their interest in an agreement to the assignee. The assignor should be aware of the potential liability risk if the assignee doesn't perform their duties as stated in the assigned contract.

Novation has the potential to limit future liabilities to an assignor, but it also is usually more burdensome for the parties involved. Additionally, it's not always achievable if a third party refuses to give consent.

It's essential for the two parties in an agreement to appraise their relationship before transitioning to novation. An assignment is preferential for parties that would like to continue performing their obligations, but also transition some of their rights to another party.

A novation occurs when a party would like to transfer both the benefits and the burden within a contract to another party. Similar to assignment, the benefits are transferred, but unlike assignment, the burden is also transferred. When a novation is completed, the original contract is deleted and is replaced with a new one. In this new contract, a third party is now responsible for the obligations and rights. Generally, novation does not cancel any past obligations or rights under the initial contract, although it is possible to novate these as well.

Novation needs to be approved by both parties of the original contract and the new joining third party. Some amount of consideration must also be provided in the new contract in order for it to be novated, unless the novation is cited in a deed that is signed by all parties to the contract. In this situation, consideration is referring to something of value that is being gained through the contract.

Novation occurs when the purchaser to the original agreement is attempting to replace the seller of an original contract. Once novated, the original seller is released from any obligation under the initial contract. The SCC has established a three-point test to implement novation. The asserting party must prove:

• The purchaser accepts complete liability
• The creditor to the original contract accepts the purchaser as the official debtor, and not simply as a guarantor or agent of the seller
• The creditor to the original contract accepts the new contract as the replacement for the old one

Also, the SSC insisted that if a new agreement doesn't exist, the court would not find novation unless the precedence was unusually compelling.

If you need help determining if assignment vs. novation is best for you, you can  post your job  on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

• Contract Transfer
• Novation Agreement
• What is Novation of Contract
• Novation of Contract
• Contract Novation Letter
• Deed of Novation
• Contract Novation
• Loan Novation Agreement
• Assignment of Rights Example
• Contract Novation Agreement

The Law Dictionary

DEBT ASSIGNMENT

TheLaw.com Law Dictionary & Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.

The transfer of debt or debt accounts from a creditor to a third party so as to absolve the debt account owner from debt to the third party. An assignment of debt accounts.

No related posts found

• Legal Terms
• Editorial Guidelines
• © 1995 – 2016 TheLaw.com LLC

• [email protected]

Stamp Duty on Debt Assignment

Home | Knowledge Center | Thought Papers Stamp Duty on Debt Assignment

13th Feb, 2018

• /our-partners/ /"> ,

Introduction

Assignment of debt is one of the most common forms of transactions in financial markets. It essentially entails transfer of a debt from a creditor (assignor) to a third-party (assignee). One of the biggest challenges faced in debt assignment transactions in India is the significant stamp duty implication on the deed of assignment. Considering the volume of assignment transactions undertaken generally by banks and financial institutions or by asset reconstruction companies (“ ARCs ”), the stamp duty levied becomes a significant cost in such transactions. The Constitution of India (“ Constitution ”) confers upon the Parliament and each State Legislature the power to levy taxes and other duties. The subjects on which the Parliament or a State Legislature or both can legislate are specified in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The Seventh Schedule is divided into 3 (three) lists:

• Union List;
• State List; and
• Concurrent List.

The Parliament has the exclusive power to legislate on the subjects enumerated in the Union List. The State List enumerates the subjects on which each State Legislature can legislate and such laws operate within the territory of each State. The Parliament, as well as the State Legislatures, have the power to legislate over the subjects listed in the Concurrent List.

The entry pertaining to levy of stamp duty in the Union List is as follows: -

“91. Rates of stamp duty in respect of bills of exchange, cheques, promissory notes, bills of lading, letters of credit, policies of insurance, transfer of shares, debentures, proxies and receipts.”

The entry pertaining to levy of stamp duty in the State List is as follows: -

“63. Rates of stamp duty in respect of documents other than those specified in the provisions of List I with regard to rates of stamp duty.”

The entry pertaining to levy of stamp duty in the Concurrent List is as follows: -

“44. Stamp duties other than duties or fees collected by means of judicial stamps, but not including rates of stamp duty.” [emphasis supplied]

From the aforementioned entries, it is clear that the power to legislate on the rate of stamp duty chargeable on instruments of debt assignment (since it is not covered under Entry 91 of the Union List) is with the State Legislature. However, the power to determine whether stamp duty can be charged or not on a specific instrument is in the Concurrent List. In this regard, it may be noted that pursuant to the Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debt Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 2016 (“ Amendment Act ”), the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (“ SARFAESI ”) and the Indian Stamp Act were amended to provide for an exemption from stamp duty on a deed of assignment in favour of an ARC.

As mentioned above, the power to legislate on whether stamp duty is payable or not on an instrument is in the Concurrent List. Therefore, the Parliament has the power to legislate on the aforesaid subject.

Pursuant to the Amendment Act, section 5(1A) was inserted in SARFAESI which provides that any agreement or document for transfer or assignment of rights or interest in financial assets under section 5(1) of SARFAESI in favour of an ARC is not liable to payment of stamp duty.

In several States, notifications have been issued for remission and/ or reduction of stamp duties on debt assignment transactions. For instance, in Rajasthan, the stamp duty chargeable on any agreement or other document executed for transfer or assignment of rights or interests in financial assets of banks or financial institutions under section 5 of SARFAESI in favour of ARCs 1 has been remitted. Further, in Maharashtra, the stamp duty on instrument of securitization of loans or assignment of debt with underlying security has been reduced to 0.1% (zero point one percent) of the loan securitized or the debt assigned subject to a maximum of Rs. 1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) 2 .

Certain State Governments, such as those of Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu have reduced the stamp duty based on the nature of the financial asset being assigned. In Rajasthan, the stamp duty has been reduced for assignment of standard assets whilst in Tamil Nadu, the stamp duty has been reduced for assignment of non-performing assets and assignment in favour of ARCs.

This paper discusses a recent decision by the Allahabad High Court in the case of Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. State of UP & Ors. 3 (“ Kotak case ”), where it was held that an instrument of assignment is chargeable with stamp duty under Article 62(c) (Transfer) of Schedule 1B of the Indian Stamp Act, as applicable in Uttar Pradesh (“ UP Stamp Act ”), as opposed to Article 23 (Conveyance) of Schedule 1B of the UP Stamp Act.

The stamp duty payable in various States under Article 23 or the relevant provision for conveyance is on an ad valorem basis whereas the stamp payable under Article 62(c) or relevant provision for transfer of interest secured, inter alia, by bond or mortgage deed, is a nominal amount. For instance, in Uttar Pradesh, the stamp duty payable under Article 62(c) is Rs. 100 (Rupees one hundred).

Decision in the Kotak case

In the Kotak case, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (“ Kotak ”) had purchased and acquired certain loans from State Bank of India (“ Assignor ”) along with the underlying securities.

The question for consideration before the full bench of the Allahabad High Court was whether the deed executed by the applicant with the underlying securities would be chargeable with duty under Article 62(c) or Article 23 of Schedule 1B of the UP Stamp Act.

The court observed that in order to determine whether an instrument is sufficiently stamped, one must look at the instrument in its entirety to find out the true character and the dominant purpose of the instrument. In this case it was observed that the dominant purpose of the deed of assignment entered into between Kotak and the Assignor (“ Instrument ”), was to transfer/ assign the debts along with the underlying securities, thereby, entitling Kotak to demand, receive and recover the debts in its own name and right.

Article 11 of Schedule 1B of the UP Stamp Act provides that an instrument of assignment can be charged to stamp duty either as a conveyance, a transfer or a transfer of lease. The court observed that since the Instrument was not a transfer of lease, it would either be a conveyance or a transfer.

The court referred to the definition of conveyance in the UP Stamp Act, which reads as follows:

““ Conveyance ”. — “Conveyance” includes a conveyance on sale and every instrument by which property, whether movable or immovable, is transferred inter vivos and which is not otherwise specifically provided for [by Schedule I, Schedule IA or Schedule IB] [as the case may be];” [emphasis supplied]

The court held that the term conveyance denotes an instrument in writing by which some title or interest is transferred from one person to other and that the use of the words “on sale” and “is transferred” denote that the document itself should create or vest a complete title in the subject matter of the transfer, in the vendee. In this case since under the Instrument, the rights of the Assignor to recover the debts secured by the underlying securities had been transferred to Kotak, it was held that the requirement of conveyance or sale cannot be said to be satisfied.

The court further observed that debt is purely an intangible property which has to be claimed or enforced by action and not by taking physical possession thereof, in contrast to immovable and movable property. Where a transaction does not affect the transfer of any immovable or movable property, Article 23 of Schedule 1B cannot have any applicability.

The court’s view was that since debt along with underlying securities is an interest secured by bonds and/ or mortgages, transfer of such debt would be chargeable under Article 62(c).

The court further clarified that under the Instrument, merely the right under the contract to recover the debts had been transferred. Since the borrower(s) had never transferred the title in the immovable property given in security to the Assignor, the Assignor could merely transfer its rights i.e. mortgagee's rights in the property to recover the debts. It was further observed that the Assignor never had any title to the underlying securities and that it merely had the right to enforce the security interest upon default of the borrower(s) in repayment. The right transferred to Kotak was primarily the right to recover the debts, in accordance with law, by proceeding against the underlying security furnished by the bonds/ mortgage deed(s).

Therefore, the court held that the Instrument was chargeable with stamp duty under Article 62(c) of Schedule 1B of the UP Stamp Act.

Whilst coming to the conclusion that assignment of debt would not constitute a conveyance, the court referred to the definition of conveyance to state that debt is an intangible property which has to be claimed or enforced by action and not by taking physical possession thereof, in contrast to immovable and movable property.

In this regard, it may be noted that there are various judicial precedents 4 , where it has been held that an interest (including mortgage interest) in immovable property is itself immovable property.

However, even assuming assignment of debt with underlying securities over immovable property amounts to a conveyance, it

may be pertinent to refer to the definition of conveyance in the UP Stamp Act which specifically excludes a conveyance which is otherwise provided for by the Schedule to the UP Stamp Act.

Article 62(c) of the UP Stamp Act reads as follows:

“62. Transfer (whether with or without consideration) – … (c) of any interest secured by a bond, mortgagedeed or policy of insurance--”

In view of the above, transfer of any interest secured by a mortgage deed, which is covered under Article 62(c), would be excluded from the meaning of conveyance and would be chargeable to stamp duty under Article 62.

In this regard it may be pertinent to refer to the definitions of ‘bond’ and ‘mortgage deed’ under the UP Stamp Act, which is as follows:

“" Bond " includes

(a) any instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another, on condition that the obligation shall be void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be;

(b) any instrument attested by a witness and not payable to order or bearer, whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another; and

(c) any instrument so attested, whereby a person obliges himself to deliver grain or other agricultural produce to another

“" Mortgage-deed ". — "mortgage-deed" includes every instrument whereby, for the purpose of securing money advanced, or to be advanced, by way of loan, or an existing or future debt, or the performance of an engagement, one person transfers, or creates, to, or in favour of another, a right over or in respect of specified property;”

In view of the above, where a debt secured by a bond or a mortgage deed is assigned under a deed of assignment, the stamp duty payable on such deed of assignment will be under Article 62(c) of the UP Stamp Act or corresponding provisions of the Stamp Act of other States.

However, in cases of unsecured loans or loans secured by an equitable mortgage (where there is no mortgage deed), the deed of assignment would attract ad valorem stamp duty chargeable on conveyance, since the same will not get covered under Article 62(c) or similar provisions in other states.

The market practice until now has been to stamp the deed of assignment of debt under the relevant article for Conveyance in the applicable Stamp Act. In fact, in States such as Maharashtra, the State Government has issued notifications for reduction of stamp duty on a deed of assignment under the article for Conveyance.

The judgment passed by the Allahabad High Court in the Kotak case may prove to be a welcome step in reducing the incidence of stamp duty on debt assignment transactions. However, it would need to be seen whether in other States a similar view is taken by stamp duty authorities.

This update has been prepared by Aastha (Partner), Debopam Dutta (Managing Associate) and Abhay Jain (Associate).

1 Notification No. F4(3)FD/Tax/2017-110 dated March 8, 2017 issued by Finance Department (Tax Division) Government Of Rajasthan.

2 Notification No.Mudrank-2002/875/C.R.173-M-1 dated May 6, 2002 issued by Revenue & Forests Department, Government of Maharashtra.

3 Reference Against MISC. Acts. No. 1 of 2016, order dated February 9, 2018.

4 Bank of Upper India Ltd. (in liquidation) v. Fanny Skinner and Ors., AIR 1929 All 161. See also Prahlad Dalsukhrai and Ors. v. Maganlal Muljibhai Tewar, AIR 1952 Bom 454 and Harihar Pandey v. Vindhayachal Rai and Ors., AIR 1949 Pat 170.

Our Offices

11, 1st Floor, Free Press House 215, Nariman Point Mumbai – 400021

+91 22 67362222

7A, 7th Floor, Tower C, Max House, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase 3, New Delhi – 110020

+91 11 6904 4200

68 Nandidurga Road Jayamahal Extension Bengaluru – 560046

+91 80 46462300

Binoy Bhavan 3rd Floor, 27B Camac Street Kolkata – 700016

+91 33 40650155/56

The rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit advocates to solicit work or advertise in any manner. This website has been created only for informational purposes and is not intended to constitute solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work in any manner. By clicking on 'Agree' below, you acknowledge and confirm the following:

a) there has been no solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;

b) you are desirous of obtaining further information about us on your own accord and for your use;

c) no information or material provided on this website is to be construed as a legal opinion and use of this website will not create any lawyer-client relationship;

d) while reasonable care has been taken in ensuring the accuracy of the contents of the website, Argus Partners shall not be responsible for the results of any actions taken on the basis of information provided in this website or for any error or omission in the website; and

e) in cases where the user has any legal issues, the user must seek independent legal advice.

• Voter Guide
• Crime & Courts
• Special Reports
• Faith & Values
• National Politics
• The American South
• Women of the Century
• Coronavirus

Why are my student loans in forbearance? Why this legal battle led to surprise notification for millions of borrowers

President Joe Biden's administration has worked to forgive or lower student loan repayments , but now one of the main programs helping millions of Americans is in court and borrowers are in forbearance.

Around eight million people with a Saving On A Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan woke up to an email Friday from companies managing their student loan repayments stating that they were now in forbearance for an undetermined time. And while forbearance isn't a new program, this mass execution of it is.

An administrative stay was granted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit in St. Louis at the end of July, based on a request by Missouri and six other Republican-led states. This stay blocked Biden's administration from continuing to implement the student debt relief plan, according to reports from USA TODAY .

Here's what it means and why people on the SAVE plan are now in this situation.

What is the SAVE student loan plan?

This repayment plan was meant to help millions of borrowers repay their student loans off in a way that didn't devastate them financially.

The income-driven repayment plan allows those in lower income brackets to pay a smaller monthly amount based on what they make and their family size. It also had a higher income threshold to qualify for $0 monthly payments on eligible loans, but it also required just 5% of the borrower's income after they paid for housing, food, taxes and other necessary bills instead of the typical 10%, according to reports from Forbes .

SAVE also paved the way for student loan forgiveness. Borrows who paid on undergraduate loans for 20 years and/or graduate loans for 25 years could have whatever was still owed on the loan after that time cleared.

What is forbearance?

When it comes to student loans forbearance is when you don't have to make a payment, or you can temporarily make a smaller payment during a certain time period, according to the Federal Student Aid Department with the Department of Education.

In most cases, borrowers need to apply to get a forbearance, but in this case, the Biden administration froze payments as legal battles around the SAVE plan continue.

“Borrowers enrolled in the SAVE plan will be placed in an interest-free forbearance while our administration continues to vigorously defend the SAVE plan in court,” Miguel Cardona, the secretary of education, said in a statement in July. “The Department will be providing regular updates to borrowers affected by these rulings in the coming days.”

Why is the SAVE plan in court?

The income-driven repayment plan implemented by the Biden administration in 2023 met with stark criticism from Republicans. Soon Republican states were taking the SAVE plan to court

In June, two federal judges in Kansas and Missouri blocked the administration from further implementing the student debt relief plan. These two decisions blocked part of the SAVE plan.

In July, seven state attorney generals led by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey asked the 8th Circuit to block the rest of the SAVE Plan. The court did so through a one-page order granting an administrative stay, according to USA TODAY reports.

Bailey on the social platform X hailed the ruling as a "huge win for every American who still believes in paying their own way." He said the student loan plan "would have saddled working Americans with half-a-trillion dollars in Ivy League debt."

When do I have to start paying on my student loans again?

Right now, there is no set date for when the forbearance will end and when people will once again have to start paying back their student loans.

• Share full article

How an Instagram-Perfect Life in the Hamptons Ended in Tragedy

Candice and Brandon Miller showed the public a world of glittering parties and vacations. The money to sustain it did not exist.

Candice and Brandon Miller. In photographs shared online, their lives were full of parties and luxurious vacations. Credit... Joe Schildhorn/BFA.com, via Shutterstock

Supported by

By Katherine Rosman

• Published Aug. 8, 2024 Updated Aug. 9, 2024

In the modern Gilded Age of New York, where Instagram is awash in unrestrained displays of wealth, Brandon and Candice Miller were royalty.

At their 10th wedding anniversary “Midsummer Night’s Dream” party, they celebrated with a few dozen friends in the backyard of their 5,500-square-foot vacation home in the Hamptons.

Beautiful women in gowns watched with their handsome husbands as the couple renewed their vows near a swimming pool strewn with peonies and rose petals beneath a canopy of lights.

It was a grand public display of their perfect life and marriage. Ms. Miller told a lifestyle blogger who wrote about the party that her husband’s speech “made me cry by the end with his authentic, raw emotion and romantic words.”

It all culminated in the kind of envy-inducing images anticipated by the roughly 80,000 followers of “Mama and Tata,” Ms. Miller’s popular Instagram feed, which featured a near-constant stream of photographs and videos of her glittering life.

The Midsummer Night party was in 2019. Five years later, the glamorous image that Ms. Miller cultivated and promoted has disappeared, replaced with heartbreak, anger and a mountain of once-secret debt.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

Advertisement

• Search Search Please fill out this field.

1. Consumer Inflation Expected to Be Steady, Makes Fed Rate Cut Case

2. cisco expected to post lower q4 results, 3. kellanova jumps as mars reportedly close to $30b deal.

• 4. Starbucks Edges Lower After Soaring on Hiring of Chipotle CEO Niccol
• 5. Elliott Intends to Nominate 10 Southwest Airlines Board Directors

5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens

News of the day for August 14, 2024

Liao Pan / China News Service / VCG via Getty Images

The closely watched  Consumer Price Index (CPI)  report for July is due this morning, with moderate gains expected by economists; Cisco Systems ( CSCO ) is expected to report lower fourth-quarter results after the bell; Kellanova ( K ) shares are jumping in premarket trading as candy giant Mars reportedly closes in on buying the Pop-Tarts maker for about $30 billion; Starbucks ( SBUX ) shares are edging lower after soaring Tuesday on news the Seattle-based coffee chain has hired Chipotle Mexican Grill's ( CMG ) Brian Niccol as its new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) ; and activist Elliott Investment Management, which has been in Starbucks' crosshairs, intends to nominate 10 directors to the 15-person board at Southwest Airlines ( LUV ). U.S. stock futures are little changed after major indexes soared yesterday after the latest  Producer Price Index (PPI)  data showed a  lower-than-expected uptick  in wholesale prices during July. Here's what investors need to know today.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) , due to be released at 8:30 a.m. ET, is expected to show prices increased at an annual rate of 3.0%—the same as it was in June —according to economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires . For the closely watched core CPI figure , which strips out volatile food and energy costs, economists expect an annual rate of 3.2%, just a tick down from 3.3% in June and stubbornly above the Federal Reserve 's target of 2%. Still, the  Producer Price Index (PPI) report released Tuesday showed wholesale inflation chalking up a smaller gain than expected, fortifying economists' confidence that inflation is trending down.

Cisco Systems ( CSCO ) is expected to report year-over-year declines in quarterly sales and profits after the bell, with the networking-equipment pioneer possibly announcing another round of job cuts. Cisco's revenue for its fiscal fourth quarter is expected to fall 11% to $13.54 billion, according to consensus analysts' estimates compiled by Visible Alpha, with earnings per share (EPS ) down 47% at $0.52. Reuters reported last week that the company may also announce another round of layoffs as it pivots its focus to higher-growth areas like cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (AI) . Cisco shares are little changed in premarket trading.

Kellanova ( K ) shares are jumping 8% in premarket trading as candy giant Mars reportedly closes in on an all-cash deal to buy the maker of Pop-Tarts and Pringles at a nearly $30 billion valuation. Mars, which makes M&M's and Skittles, plans to pay $83.50 per share for Kellanova, according to The Wall Street Journal , which along with Reuters flagged the potential transaction earlier this month. A deal by Mars for Kellanova, which was spun out  of Kellogg last year, would expand the privately held firm's access to snack foods. Kellanova shares closed at $74.50 Tuesday. 

4. Starbucks Edges Lower After Soaring on Hiring of Chipotle CEO Niccol 

Starbucks ( SBUX ) shares are edging lower in premarket trading after surging 24.5% to be the S&P 500's top performer Tuesday on its announcement that it hired Chipotle Mexican Grill ( CMG ) Brian Niccol as its new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) . The sudden replacement of CEO Laxman Narasimhan came amid reported pressure from activist investors Elliott Investment Management and Starboard Value. Niccol, who turned around Chipotle as the fast-casual chain struggled to move past a 2016 E. coli outbreak, will have to deal not just with activist investors' demands but also slumping U.S. sales and a slowdown in China.

5.  Elliott Intends to Nominate 10 Southwest Airlines Board Directors

Elliott Investment Management is preparing to launch a proxy fight for Southwest Airlines ( LUV ), saying it intends to nominate 10 directors to the airline's 15-person board. Elliott, which manages funds that own around 11% of the Dallas-based airline, has been fighting to change the board and leadership at Southwest, whose stock is down more than 10% this year as it  struggles with weak bookings . Last month, the  airline implemented  a so-called " poison pill " shareholder rights plan to prevent being taken over by Elliott, and also  announced  a series of steps to boost revenue, including ending its long-held practice of open seating. Southwest shares are up about 1.5% in premarket trading.

MarketWatch. “ This Week's Major U.S. Economic Reports & Fed Speakers .”

Reuters. “ Exclusive: Cisco to lay off thousands more in second job cut this year .”

The Wall Street Journal. “ Mars Near $30 Billion Deal for Cheez-It and Eggo Maker Kellanova .”

Southwest Airlines. " Board of Directors ."

PR Newswire. " Elliott Management Announces Director Candidates for the Board of Southwest Airlines ."

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy