⊕⊕⊕⊕
⊕⊕⊕◯
⊕⊕◯◯
⊕◯◯◯
We now describe in more detail the five reasons (or domains) for downgrading the certainty of a body of evidence for a specific outcome. In each case, if no reason is found for downgrading the evidence, it should be classified as 'no limitation or not serious' (not important enough to warrant downgrading). If a reason is found for downgrading the evidence, it should be classified as 'serious' (downgrading the certainty rating by one level) or 'very serious' (downgrading the certainty grade by two levels). For non-randomized studies assessed with ROBINS-I, rating down by three levels should be classified as 'extremely' serious.
(1) Risk of bias or limitations in the detailed design and implementation
Our confidence in an estimate of effect decreases if studies suffer from major limitations that are likely to result in a biased assessment of the intervention effect. For randomized trials, these methodological limitations include failure to generate a random sequence, lack of allocation sequence concealment, lack of blinding (particularly with subjective outcomes that are highly susceptible to biased assessment), a large loss to follow-up or selective reporting of outcomes. Chapter 8 provides a discussion of study-level assessments of risk of bias in the context of a Cochrane Review, and proposes an approach to assessing the risk of bias for an outcome across studies as ‘Low’ risk of bias, ‘Some concerns’ and ‘High’ risk of bias for randomized trials. Levels of ‘Low’. ‘Moderate’, ‘Serious’ and ‘Critical’ risk of bias arise for non-randomized studies assessed with ROBINS-I ( Chapter 25 ). These assessments should feed directly into this GRADE domain. In particular, ‘Low’ risk of bias would indicate ‘no limitation’; ‘Some concerns’ would indicate either ‘no limitation’ or ‘serious limitation’; and ‘High’ risk of bias would indicate either ‘serious limitation’ or ‘very serious limitation’. ‘Critical’ risk of bias on ROBINS-I would indicate extremely serious limitations in GRADE. Review authors should use their judgement to decide between alternative categories, depending on the likely magnitude of the potential biases.
Every study addressing a particular outcome will differ, to some degree, in the risk of bias. Review authors should make an overall judgement on whether the certainty of evidence for an outcome warrants downgrading on the basis of study limitations. The assessment of study limitations should apply to the studies contributing to the results in the ‘Summary of findings’ table, rather than to all studies that could potentially be included in the analysis. We have argued in Chapter 7, Section 7.6.2 , that the primary analysis should be restricted to studies at low (or low and unclear) risk of bias where possible.
Table 14.2.a presents the judgements that must be made in going from assessments of the risk of bias to judgements about study limitations for each outcome included in a ‘Summary of findings’ table. A rating of high certainty evidence can be achieved only when most evidence comes from studies that met the criteria for low risk of bias. For example, of the 22 studies addressing the impact of beta-blockers on mortality in patients with heart failure, most probably or certainly used concealed allocation of the sequence, all blinded at least some key groups and follow-up of randomized patients was almost complete (Brophy et al 2001). The certainty of evidence might be downgraded by one level when most of the evidence comes from individual studies either with a crucial limitation for one item, or with some limitations for multiple items. An example of very serious limitations, warranting downgrading by two levels, is provided by evidence on surgery versus conservative treatment in the management of patients with lumbar disc prolapse (Gibson and Waddell 2007). We are uncertain of the benefit of surgery in reducing symptoms after one year or longer, because the one study included in the analysis had inadequate concealment of the allocation sequence and the outcome was assessed using a crude rating by the surgeon without blinding.
(2) Unexplained heterogeneity or inconsistency of results
When studies yield widely differing estimates of effect (heterogeneity or variability in results), investigators should look for robust explanations for that heterogeneity. For instance, drugs may have larger relative effects in sicker populations or when given in larger doses. A detailed discussion of heterogeneity and its investigation is provided in Chapter 10, Section 10.10 and Section 10.11 . If an important modifier exists, with good evidence that important outcomes are different in different subgroups (which would ideally be pre-specified), then a separate ‘Summary of findings’ table may be considered for a separate population. For instance, a separate ‘Summary of findings’ table would be used for carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade stenosis (70% to 99%) in which the intervention is, in the hands of the right surgeons, beneficial, and another (if review authors considered it relevant) for asymptomatic patients with low grade stenosis (less than 30%) in which surgery appears harmful (Orrapin and Rerkasem 2017). When heterogeneity exists and affects the interpretation of results, but review authors are unable to identify a plausible explanation with the data available, the certainty of the evidence decreases.
(3) Indirectness of evidence
Two types of indirectness are relevant. First, a review comparing the effectiveness of alternative interventions (say A and B) may find that randomized trials are available, but they have compared A with placebo and B with placebo. Thus, the evidence is restricted to indirect comparisons between A and B. Where indirect comparisons are undertaken within a network meta-analysis context, GRADE for network meta-analysis should be used (see Chapter 11, Section 11.5 ).
Second, a review may find randomized trials that meet eligibility criteria but address a restricted version of the main review question in terms of population, intervention, comparator or outcomes. For example, suppose that in a review addressing an intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, most identified studies happened to be in people who also had diabetes. Then the evidence may be regarded as indirect in relation to the broader question of interest because the population is primarily related to people with diabetes. The opposite scenario can equally apply: a review addressing the effect of a preventive strategy for coronary heart disease in people with diabetes may consider studies in people without diabetes to provide relevant, albeit indirect, evidence. This would be particularly likely if investigators had conducted few if any randomized trials in the target population (e.g. people with diabetes). Other sources of indirectness may arise from interventions studied (e.g. if in all included studies a technical intervention was implemented by expert, highly trained specialists in specialist centres, then evidence on the effects of the intervention outside these centres may be indirect), comparators used (e.g. if the comparator groups received an intervention that is less effective than standard treatment in most settings) and outcomes assessed (e.g. indirectness due to surrogate outcomes when data on patient-important outcomes are not available, or when investigators seek data on quality of life but only symptoms are reported). Review authors should make judgements transparent when they believe downgrading is justified, based on differences in anticipated effects in the group of primary interest. Review authors may be aided and increase transparency of their judgements about indirectness if they use Table 14.2.b available in the GRADEpro GDT software (Schünemann et al 2013).
(4) Imprecision of results
When studies include few participants or few events, and thus have wide confidence intervals, review authors can lower their rating of the certainty of the evidence. The confidence intervals included in the ‘Summary of findings’ table will provide readers with information that allows them to make, to some extent, their own rating of precision. Review authors can use a calculation of the optimal information size (OIS) or review information size (RIS), similar to sample size calculations, to make judgements about imprecision (Guyatt et al 2011b, Schünemann 2016). The OIS or RIS is calculated on the basis of the number of participants required for an adequately powered individual study. If the 95% confidence interval excludes a risk ratio (RR) of 1.0, and the total number of events or patients exceeds the OIS criterion, precision is adequate. If the 95% CI includes appreciable benefit or harm (an RR of under 0.75 or over 1.25 is often suggested as a very rough guide) downgrading for imprecision may be appropriate even if OIS criteria are met (Guyatt et al 2011b, Schünemann 2016).
(5) High probability of publication bias
The certainty of evidence level may be downgraded if investigators fail to report studies on the basis of results (typically those that show no effect: publication bias) or outcomes (typically those that may be harmful or for which no effect was observed: selective outcome non-reporting bias). Selective reporting of outcomes from among multiple outcomes measured is assessed at the study level as part of the assessment of risk of bias (see Chapter 8, Section 8.7 ), so for the studies contributing to the outcome in the ‘Summary of findings’ table this is addressed by domain 1 above (limitations in the design and implementation). If a large number of studies included in the review do not contribute to an outcome, or if there is evidence of publication bias, the certainty of the evidence may be downgraded. Chapter 13 provides a detailed discussion of reporting biases, including publication bias, and how it may be tackled in a Cochrane Review. A prototypical situation that may elicit suspicion of publication bias is when published evidence includes a number of small studies, all of which are industry-funded (Bhandari et al 2004). For example, 14 studies of flavanoids in patients with haemorrhoids have shown apparent large benefits, but enrolled a total of only 1432 patients (i.e. each study enrolled relatively few patients) (Alonso-Coello et al 2006). The heavy involvement of sponsors in most of these studies raises questions of whether unpublished studies that suggest no benefit exist (publication bias).
A particular body of evidence can suffer from problems associated with more than one of the five factors listed here, and the greater the problems, the lower the certainty of evidence rating that should result. One could imagine a situation in which randomized trials were available, but all or virtually all of these limitations would be present, and in serious form. A very low certainty of evidence rating would result.
Table 14.2.a Further guidelines for domain 1 (of 5) in a GRADE assessment: going from assessments of risk of bias in studies to judgements about study limitations for main outcomes across studies
|
|
|
|
|
Low risk of bias | Most information is from results at low risk of bias. | Plausible bias unlikely to seriously alter the results. | No apparent limitations. | No serious limitations, do not downgrade. |
Some concerns | Most information is from results at low risk of bias or with some concerns. | Plausible bias that raises some doubt about the results. | Potential limitations are unlikely to lower confidence in the estimate of effect. | No serious limitations, do not downgrade. |
Potential limitations are likely to lower confidence in the estimate of effect. | Serious limitations, downgrade one level. | |||
High risk of bias | The proportion of information from results at high risk of bias is sufficient to affect the interpretation of results. | Plausible bias that seriously weakens confidence in the results. | Crucial limitation for one criterion, or some limitations for multiple criteria, sufficient to lower confidence in the estimate of effect. | Serious limitations, downgrade one level. |
Crucial limitation for one or more criteria sufficient to substantially lower confidence in the estimate of effect. | Very serious limitations, downgrade two levels. |
Table 14.2.b Judgements about indirectness by outcome (available in GRADEpro GDT)
| |||||
|
|
| |||
| Probably yes | Probably no | No | ||
|
|
|
|
Intervention:
Yes | Probably yes | Probably no | No |
|
|
|
|
Comparator:
Direct comparison:
Final judgement about indirectness across domains:
|
|
|
Although NRSI and downgraded randomized trials will generally yield a low rating for certainty of evidence, there will be unusual circumstances in which review authors could ‘upgrade’ such evidence to moderate or even high certainty ( Table 14.3.a ).
Review authors should report the grading of the certainty of evidence in the Results section for each outcome for which this has been performed, providing the rationale for downgrading or upgrading the evidence, and referring to the ‘Summary of findings’ table where applicable.
Table 14.3.a provides a framework and examples for how review authors can justify their judgements about the certainty of evidence in each domain. These justifications should also be included in explanatory notes to the ‘Summary of Findings’ table (see Section 14.1.6.10 ).
Chapter 15, Section 15.6 , describes in more detail how the overall GRADE assessment across all domains can be used to draw conclusions about the effects of the intervention, as well as providing implications for future research.
Table 14.3.a Framework for describing the certainty of evidence and justifying downgrading or upgrading
|
|
|
| Describe the risk of bias based on the criteria used in the risk-of-bias table. | Downgraded because of 10 randomized trials, five did not blind patients and caretakers. |
| Describe the degree of inconsistency by outcome using one or more indicators (e.g. I and P value), confidence interval overlap, difference in point estimate, between-study variance. | Not downgraded because the proportion of the variability in effect estimates that is due to true heterogeneity rather than chance is not important (I = 0%). |
| Describe if the majority of studies address the PICO – were they similar to the question posed? | Downgraded because the included studies were restricted to patients with advanced cancer. |
| Describe the number of events, and width of the confidence intervals. | The confidence intervals for the effect on mortality are consistent with both an appreciable benefit and appreciable harm and we lowered the certainty. |
| Describe the possible degree of publication bias. | 1. The funnel plot of 14 randomized trials indicated that there were several small studies that showed a small positive effect, but small studies that showed no effect or harm may have been unpublished. The certainty of the evidence was lowered. 2. There are only three small positive studies, it appears that studies showing no effect or harm have not been published. There also is for-profit interest in the intervention. The certainty of the evidence was lowered. |
| Describe the magnitude of the effect and the widths of the associate confidence intervals. | Upgraded because the RR is large: 0.3 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.4), with a sufficient number of events to be precise. |
| The studies show a clear relation with increases in the outcome of an outcome (e.g. lung cancer) with higher exposure levels. | Upgraded because the dose-response relation shows a relative risk increase of 10% in never smokers, 15% in smokers of 10 pack years and 20% in smokers of 15 pack years. |
| Describe which opposing plausible biases and confounders may have not been considered. | The estimate of effect is not controlled for the following possible confounders: smoking, degree of education, but the distribution of these factors in the studies is likely to lead to an under-estimate of the true effect. The certainty of the evidence was increased. |
Authors: Holger J Schünemann, Julian PT Higgins, Gunn E Vist, Paul Glasziou, Elie A Akl, Nicole Skoetz, Gordon H Guyatt; on behalf of the Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group (formerly Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group) and the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
Acknowledgements: Andrew D Oxman contributed to earlier versions. Professor Penny Hawe contributed to the text on adverse effects in earlier versions. Jon Deeks provided helpful contributions on an earlier version of this chapter. For details of previous authors and editors of the Handbook , please refer to the Preface.
Funding: This work was in part supported by funding from the Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health.
Alonso-Coello P, Zhou Q, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Mills E, Heels-Ansdell D, Johanson JF, Guyatt G. Meta-analysis of flavonoids for the treatment of haemorrhoids. British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93 : 909-920.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer TT, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW, Jr., Zaza S. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328 : 1490.
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011; 64 : 401-406.
Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schünemann H, Sprague S, Mears D, Schemitsch EH, Heels-Ansdell D, Devereaux PJ. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004; 170 : 477-480.
Brophy JM, Joseph L, Rouleau JL. Beta-blockers in congestive heart failure. A Bayesian meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001; 134 : 550-560.
Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Santesso N, Neumann I, Mustafa RA, Mbuagbaw L, Etxeandia Ikobaltzeta I, De Stio C, McCullagh LJ, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl JJ, Vandvik PO, Brozek JL, Akl EA, Bossuyt P, Churchill R, Glenton C, Rosenbaum S, Tugwell P, Welch V, Garner P, Guyatt G, Schünemann HJ. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016; 74 : 7-18.
Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Effect measures for meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editors. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in Context . 2nd ed. London (UK): BMJ Publication Group; 2001. p. 313-335.
Devereaux PJ, Choi PT, Lacchetti C, Weaver B, Schünemann HJ, Haines T, Lavis JN, Grant BJ, Haslam DR, Bhandari M, Sullivan T, Cook DJ, Walter SD, Meade M, Khan H, Bhatnagar N, Guyatt GH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2002; 166 : 1399-1406.
Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, Olkin I, Lau J. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19 : 1707-1728.
Furukawa TA, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE. Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002; 31 : 72-76.
Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 2007; 32 : 1735-1747.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann H. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336 : 3.
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011a; 64 : 383-394.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Freyschuss B, Vist G, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Jr., Murad MH, Sinclair D, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Whittington C, Thorlund K, Andrews J, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011b; 64 : 1283-1293.
Iorio A, Spencer FA, Falavigna M, Alba C, Lang E, Burnand B, McGinn T, Hayden J, Williams K, Shea B, Wolff R, Kujpers T, Perel P, Vandvik PO, Glasziou P, Schünemann H, Guyatt G. Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. BMJ 2015; 350 : h870.
Langendam M, Carrasco-Labra A, Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Brignardello-Petersen R, Ventresca M, Heus P, Lasserson T, Moustgaard R, Brozek J, Schünemann HJ. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016; 74 : 19-27.
Levine MN, Raskob G, Landefeld S, Kearon C, Schulman S. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 : 287S-310S.
Orrapin S, Rerkasem K. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017; 6 : CD001081.
Salpeter S, Greyber E, Pasternak G, Salpeter E. Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007; 4 : CD002967.
Santesso N, Carrasco-Labra A, Langendam M, Brignardello-Petersen R, Mustafa RA, Heus P, Lasserson T, Opiyo N, Kunnamo I, Sinclair D, Garner P, Treweek S, Tovey D, Akl EA, Tugwell P, Brozek JL, Guyatt G, Schünemann HJ. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016; 74 : 28-39.
Schünemann HJ, Best D, Vist G, Oxman AD, Group GW. Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003; 169 : 677-680.
Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, Bria WF, El-Solh AA, Ernst A, Fahy BF, Gould MK, Horan KL, Krishnan JA, Manthous CA, Maurer JR, McNicholas WT, Oxman AD, Rubenfeld G, Turino GM, Guyatt G. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2006; 174 : 605-614.
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, Williams JW, Jr., Kunz R, Craig J, Montori VM, Bossuyt P, Guyatt GH. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 2008a; 336 : 1106-1110.
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Bossuyt P, Chang S, Muti P, Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. ACP Journal Club 2008b; 149 : 2.
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa R, Brozek J. [Diagnostic accuracy and linked evidence--testing the chain]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2012; 106 : 153-160.
Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Reeves BC, Akl EA, Santesso N, Spencer FA, Shea B, Wells G, Helfand M. Non-randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Research Synthesis Methods 2013; 4 : 49-62.
Schünemann HJ. Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2016; 75 : 6-15.
Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, Mustafa RA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, Morgan RL, Gartlehner G, Kunz R, Katikireddi SV, Sterne J, Higgins JPT, Guyatt G, Group GW. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018.
Spencer-Bonilla G, Quinones AR, Montori VM, International Minimally Disruptive Medicine W. Assessing the Burden of Treatment. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2017; 32 : 1141-1145.
Spencer FA, Iorio A, You J, Murad MH, Schünemann HJ, Vandvik PO, Crowther MA, Pottie K, Lang ES, Meerpohl JJ, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH. Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects. BMJ 2012; 345 : e7401.
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355 : i4919.
Thompson DC, Rivara FP, Thompson R. Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000; 2 : CD001855.
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials 2007; 8 .
van Dalen EC, Tierney JF, Kremer LCM. Tips and tricks for understanding and using SR results. No. 7: time‐to‐event data. Evidence-Based Child Health 2007; 2 : 1089-1090.
For permission to re-use material from the Handbook (either academic or commercial), please see here for full details.
Home » Research Findings – Types Examples and Writing Guide
Table of Contents
Definition:
Research findings refer to the results obtained from a study or investigation conducted through a systematic and scientific approach. These findings are the outcomes of the data analysis, interpretation, and evaluation carried out during the research process.
There are two main types of research findings:
Qualitative research is an exploratory research method used to understand the complexities of human behavior and experiences. Qualitative findings are non-numerical and descriptive data that describe the meaning and interpretation of the data collected. Examples of qualitative findings include quotes from participants, themes that emerge from the data, and descriptions of experiences and phenomena.
Quantitative research is a research method that uses numerical data and statistical analysis to measure and quantify a phenomenon or behavior. Quantitative findings include numerical data such as mean, median, and mode, as well as statistical analyses such as t-tests, ANOVA, and regression analysis. These findings are often presented in tables, graphs, or charts.
Both qualitative and quantitative findings are important in research and can provide different insights into a research question or problem. Combining both types of findings can provide a more comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon and improve the validity and reliability of research results.
Research findings typically consist of several parts, including:
Writing research findings requires careful planning and attention to detail. Here are some general steps to follow when writing research findings:
Following is a Research Findings Example sample for students:
Title: The Effects of Exercise on Mental Health
Sample : 500 participants, both men and women, between the ages of 18-45.
Methodology : Participants were divided into two groups. The first group engaged in 30 minutes of moderate intensity exercise five times a week for eight weeks. The second group did not exercise during the study period. Participants in both groups completed a questionnaire that assessed their mental health before and after the study period.
Findings : The group that engaged in regular exercise reported a significant improvement in mental health compared to the control group. Specifically, they reported lower levels of anxiety and depression, improved mood, and increased self-esteem.
Conclusion : Regular exercise can have a positive impact on mental health and may be an effective intervention for individuals experiencing symptoms of anxiety or depression.
Research findings can be applied in various fields to improve processes, products, services, and outcomes. Here are some examples:
Research findings can be used in a variety of situations, depending on the context and the purpose. Here are some examples of when research findings may be useful:
The purpose of research findings is to contribute to the knowledge and understanding of a particular topic or issue. Research findings are the result of a systematic and rigorous investigation of a research question or hypothesis, using appropriate research methods and techniques.
The main purposes of research findings are:
Research findings have several key characteristics that distinguish them from other types of information or knowledge. Here are some of the main characteristics of research findings:
Research findings have many advantages, which make them valuable sources of knowledge and information. Here are some of the main advantages of research findings:
While research findings have many advantages, they also have some limitations. Here are some of the main limitations of research findings:
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on August 30, 2022 by Tegan George . Revised on July 18, 2023.
A results section is where you report the main findings of the data collection and analysis you conducted for your thesis or dissertation . You should report all relevant results concisely and objectively, in a logical order. Don’t include subjective interpretations of why you found these results or what they mean—any evaluation should be saved for the discussion section .
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
How to write a results section, reporting quantitative research results, reporting qualitative research results, results vs. discussion vs. conclusion, checklist: research results, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about results sections.
When conducting research, it’s important to report the results of your study prior to discussing your interpretations of it. This gives your reader a clear idea of exactly what you found and keeps the data itself separate from your subjective analysis.
Here are a few best practices:
Discover proofreading & editing
If you conducted quantitative research , you’ll likely be working with the results of some sort of statistical analysis .
Your results section should report the results of any statistical tests you used to compare groups or assess relationships between variables . It should also state whether or not each hypothesis was supported.
The most logical way to structure quantitative results is to frame them around your research questions or hypotheses. For each question or hypothesis, share:
In quantitative research, it’s often helpful to include visual elements such as graphs, charts, and tables , but only if they are directly relevant to your results. Give these elements clear, descriptive titles and labels so that your reader can easily understand what is being shown. If you want to include any other visual elements that are more tangential in nature, consider adding a figure and table list .
As a rule of thumb:
Don’t forget to also mention any tables and figures you used within the text of your results section. Summarize or elaborate on specific aspects you think your reader should know about rather than merely restating the same numbers already shown.
A two-sample t test was used to test the hypothesis that higher social distance from environmental problems would reduce the intent to donate to environmental organizations, with donation intention (recorded as a score from 1 to 10) as the outcome variable and social distance (categorized as either a low or high level of social distance) as the predictor variable.Social distance was found to be positively correlated with donation intention, t (98) = 12.19, p < .001, with the donation intention of the high social distance group 0.28 points higher, on average, than the low social distance group (see figure 1). This contradicts the initial hypothesis that social distance would decrease donation intention, and in fact suggests a small effect in the opposite direction.
Figure 1: Intention to donate to environmental organizations based on social distance from impact of environmental damage.
In qualitative research , your results might not all be directly related to specific hypotheses. In this case, you can structure your results section around key themes or topics that emerged from your analysis of the data.
For each theme, start with general observations about what the data showed. You can mention:
Next, clarify and support these points with direct quotations. Be sure to report any relevant demographic information about participants. Further information (such as full transcripts , if appropriate) can be included in an appendix .
When asked about video games as a form of art, the respondents tended to believe that video games themselves are not an art form, but agreed that creativity is involved in their production. The criteria used to identify artistic video games included design, story, music, and creative teams.One respondent (male, 24) noted a difference in creativity between popular video game genres:
“I think that in role-playing games, there’s more attention to character design, to world design, because the whole story is important and more attention is paid to certain game elements […] so that perhaps you do need bigger teams of creative experts than in an average shooter or something.”
Responses suggest that video game consumers consider some types of games to have more artistic potential than others.
Your results section should objectively report your findings, presenting only brief observations in relation to each question, hypothesis, or theme.
It should not speculate about the meaning of the results or attempt to answer your main research question . Detailed interpretation of your results is more suitable for your discussion section , while synthesis of your results into an overall answer to your main research question is best left for your conclusion .
The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.
Try for free
I have completed my data collection and analyzed the results.
I have included all results that are relevant to my research questions.
I have concisely and objectively reported each result, including relevant descriptive statistics and inferential statistics .
I have stated whether each hypothesis was supported or refuted.
I have used tables and figures to illustrate my results where appropriate.
All tables and figures are correctly labelled and referred to in the text.
There is no subjective interpretation or speculation on the meaning of the results.
You've finished writing up your results! Use the other checklists to further improve your thesis.
If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!
Research bias
(AI) Tools
The results chapter of a thesis or dissertation presents your research results concisely and objectively.
In quantitative research , for each question or hypothesis , state:
In qualitative research , for each question or theme, describe:
Don’t interpret or speculate in the results chapter.
Results are usually written in the past tense , because they are describing the outcome of completed actions.
The results chapter or section simply and objectively reports what you found, without speculating on why you found these results. The discussion interprets the meaning of the results, puts them in context, and explains why they matter.
In qualitative research , results and discussion are sometimes combined. But in quantitative research , it’s considered important to separate the objective results from your interpretation of them.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
George, T. (2023, July 18). How to Write a Results Section | Tips & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 31, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/results/
Other students also liked, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a discussion section | tips & examples, how to write a thesis or dissertation conclusion, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
Discover the world's research
After you have designed your study, collected your data, and analyzed it, you have to figure out what it means and communicate that to potential interested audiences. This section of the chapter is about how to make sense of your study, in terms of data interpretation, data write-up, and data presentation, as seen in the above diagram.
Once you have run your statistics, you have to figure out what your findings mean or interpret your data. To do this, you need to tie back your findings to your research questions and/or hypotheses, think about how your findings relate to what you discovered beforehand about the already existing literature, and determine how your findings take the literature or current theory in the field further. Your interpretation of the data you collected will be found in the last section of your paper, what is commonly called the "discussion" section.
Your research questions and hypotheses, once developed, should guide your study throughout the research process. As you are choosing your research design, choosing how to operationalize your variables, and choosing/conducting your statistical tests, you should always keep your RQs and Hs in mind.
What were you wanting to discover by your study? What were you wanting to test? Make sure you answer these questions clearly for the reader of your study in both the results and discussion section of the paper. (Specific guidelines for these sections will be covered later in this chapter, including the common practice of placing the data as you present it with each research question in the results section.)
As you have seen in chapter 3 and the Appendix, and will see in chapter 7, the literature review is what you use to set up your quantitative study and to show why there is a need for your study. It should start out broad, with the context for your study, and lead into showing what still needs to be known and studied about your topic area, justifying your focus in the study. It will be brought in again in the last section of the paper you write, i.e., the discussion section.
Your paper is like an hourglass – starting out broad and narrowing down in the middle with your actual study and findings, and then moving to broad implications for the larger context of your study near the end.
One of the things you will write about in your discussion or last section of your paper is the implications of what you found. These implications are both practical and theoretical. Practical implications are how the research can provide practical applications to real-world people and issues. Theoretical implications are how the research takes the current academic literature further, specifically, in relationship to theory-building.
Did any of the research you reviewed for your literature review mention a theory your findings could expand upon? If so, you should think about how your findings related to this theory. If not, then think about the theories you have already studied in your communication classes. Would any of them provide a possible explanation of what you found? Would your findings help expand that theory to a different context, the context you studied? Does a theory need to be developed in the area of your research? If so, then what aspects of that theory could your findings help explain?
All quantitative studies, when written, have four parts. The first part is the introduction and literature review, the second part is the methods section, the third section is the results or findings, and the fourth section is the discussion section. This portion of this chapter will explain what elements you will need to include in each of these sections.
The beginning of your paper and first few pages sets the tone for your study. It tells the reader what the context of your study is and what other people who are also interested in your topic have studied about your topic.
There are many ways to organize a literature review, as can be seen in the following website. Literature Reviews — The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill
After you have done a thorough literature search on your topic, then you have to organize your literature into topics of some kind. Your main goal is to show what has been done and what still needs to be done, to show the need for your study, so at the end of each section of your literature review, you should identify what still needs to be known about that particular area.
For quantitative research, you should do your literature review before coming up with your research questions/hypotheses. Your questions and hypotheses should flow from the literature. This is different from the other two research methods discussed in this book, which do not rely so heavily on a literature review to situation the study before conducting it.
In the methods section, you should tell your reader how you conducted your study, from start to finish, explaining why you made the choices you did along the way. A reader should be able to replicate your study from the descriptions you provide in this section of your write-up. Common headings in the methods section include a description of the participants, procedures, and analysis.
For the participants' subheading of the methods section, you should minimally report the demographics of your sample in terms of biological sex (frequencies/percentages), age (range of ages and mean), and ethnicity (frequencies/percentages). If you collected data on other demographics, such as socioeconomic status, religious affiliation, type of occupation, etc., then you can report data for that also in the participants' sub-section.
For the procedures sub-section, you report everything you did to collect your data: how you recruited your participants, including what type of sampling you used (probability or non-probability) and informed consent procedures; how you operationalized your variables (including your survey questions, which often are explained in the methods section briefly while the whole survey can be found in an appendix of your paper); the validity and reliability of your survey instrument or methods you used; and what type of study design you had (experimental, quasi-experimental, or non-experimental). For each one of these design issues, in this sub-section of the methods part, you need to explain why you made the decisions you did in order to answer your research questions or test your hypotheses.
In this section, you explain how you converted your data for analysis and how you analyzed your data. You need to explain what statistics you chose to run for each of your research questions/hypotheses and why.
In this section of your paper, you organize the results by your research questions/hypotheses. For each research question/hypothesis, you should present any descriptive statistic results first and then your inferential statistics results. You do not make any interpretation of what your results mean or why you think you got the results you did. You merely report your results.
For each of the inferential statistics, there is a typical template you can follow when reporting significant results: reporting the test statistic value, the degrees of freedom 3 , and the probability level. Examples follow for each of the statistics we have talked about in this text.
"T-tests results show there was a significant difference found between men and women on their levels of self-esteem, t (df) = t value, p < .05, with men's self-esteem being higher (or lower) (men's mean & standard deviation) than women's self-esteem (women's mean & standard deviation)."
"ANOVA results indicate there was a significant difference found between [levels of independent variable] on [dependent variable], F (df) = F value, p < .05."
If doing a factorial ANOVA, you would report the above sentence for all of your independent variables (main effects), as well as for the interaction (interaction effect), with language something like: "ANOVA results indicate a significant main effect for [independent variable] on [dependent variable], F (df) = F value, p < .05. .... ANOVA results indicate a significant interaction effect between [independent variables] on [dependent variable], F (df) = F value, p < .05."
See example YouTube tutorial for writing up a two-way ANOVA at the following website.
Factorial Design (Part C): Writing Up Results
For goodness of fit results, your write-up would look something like: "Using a chi-square goodness of fit test, there was a significant difference found between observed and expected values of [variable], χ2 (df) = chi-square value, p < .05." For test of independence results, it would like like: "Using a chi-square test of independence, there was a significant interaction between [your two variables], χ2 (df) = chi-square value, p < .05."
"Using Pearson's [or Spearman's] correlation coefficient, there was a significant relationship found between [two variables], r (df) = r value, p < .05." If there are a lot of significant correlation results, these results are often presented in a table form.
For more information on these types of tables, see the following website: Correlation Tables .
Reporting regression results is more complicated, but generally, you want to inform the reader about how much variance is accounted by the regression model, the significance level of the model, and the significance of the predictor variable. For example:
A regression analysis, predicting GPA scores from GRE scores, was statistically significant, F (1,8) = 10.34, p < .05.
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | ||
Model | B | Std. Error | Beta | ||
1 Constant GRE | .411 .005 | .907 .002 | .751 | .453 3.216 | .662 .012 |
The regression equation is: Ŷ = .411 * .005X. For every one unit increase in GRE score, there is a corresponding increase in GPA of .005 (Walen-Frederick, n.d., p. 4).
For more write-up help on regression and other statistics, see the following website location:
Multiple Regression (pp. 217-220)
You can follow a similar template when reporting non-significant results for all of the above inferential statistics. It is the same as provided in the above examples, except the word "non-significant" replaces the word "significant," and the p values are adjusted to indicate p > .05.
Many times readers of articles do not read the whole article, especially if they are afraid of the statistical sections. When this happens, they often read the discussion section, which makes this a very important section in your writing. You should include the following elements in your discussion section: (a) a summary of your findings, (b) implications, (c) limitations, and (d) future research ideas.
You should summarize the answers to your research questions or what you found when testing your hypotheses in this sub-section of the discussion section. You should not report any statistical data here, but just put your results into narrative form. What did you find out that you did not know before doing your study? Answer that question in this sub- section.
You need to indicate why your study was important, both theoretically and practically. For the theoretical implications, you should relate what you found to the already existing literature, as discussed earlier when the "hourglass" format was mentioned as a way of conceptualizing your whole paper. If your study added anything to the existing theory on a particular topic, you talk about this here as well.
For practical implications, you need to identify for the reader how this study can help people in their real-world experiences related to your topic. You do not want your study to just be important to academic researchers, but also to other professionals and persons interested in your topic.
As you get through conducting your study, you are going to realize there are things you wish you had done differently. Rather than hide these things from the reader, it is better to forthrightly state these for the reader. Explain why your study is limited and what you wish you had done in this sub-section.
The limitations sub-section usually is tied directly to the future research sub-section, as your limitations mean that future research should be done to deal with these limitations. There may also be other things that could be studied, however, as a result of what you have found. What would other people say are the "gaps" your study left unstudied on your topic? These should be identified, with some suggestions on how they might be studied.
There are other parts of the academic paper you should include in your final write-up. We have provided useful resources for you to consider when including these aspects as part of your paper. For an example paper that uses the required APA format for a research paper write-up, see the following source: Varying Definitions of Online Communication .
Research Abstracts General Format
APA Tables and Figures 1 Reference List: Basic Rules
You will probably be called upon to present your data in other venues besides in writing. Two of the most common venues are oral presentations such as in class or at conferences, and poster presentations, such as what you might find at conferences. You might also be called upon to not write an academic write-up of your study, but rather to provide an executive summary of the results of your study to the "powers that be," who do not have time to read more than 5 pages or so of a summary. There are good resources for doing all of these online, so we have provided these here.
Oral Presentations Delivering Presentations
Poster Presentations
Executive Summaries Complete the Report Good & Poor Examples of Executive Summaries with the following link: http://unilearning.uow.edu.au/report/4bi1.html
Congratulations! You have learned a great deal about how to go about using quantitative methods for your future research projects. You have learned how to design a quantitative study, conduct a quantitative study, and write about a quantitative study. You have some good resources you can take with you when you leave this class. Now, you just have to apply what you have learned to projects that will come your way in the future.
Remember, just because you may not like one method the best does not mean you should not use it. Your research questions/hypotheses should ALWAYS drive your choice of which method you use. And remember also that you can do quantitative methods!
[NOTE: References are not provided for the websites cited in the text, even though if this was an actual research article, they would need to be cited.]
Baker, E., Baker, W., & Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Organizations respond to phishing: Exploring the public relations tackle box. Communication Research Reports, 24 (4), 327-339.
Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2004). Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice. Human Communication Research, 30 (1), 121-144.
Chatham, A. (1991). Home vs. public schooling: What about relationships in adolescence? Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Cousineau, T. M., Rancourt, D., and Green, T. C. (2006). Web chatter before and after the women's health initiative results: A content analysis of on-line menopause message boards. Journal of Health Communication, 11 (2), 133-147.
Derlega, V., Winstead, B. A., Mathews, A., and Braitman, A. L. (2008). Why does someone reveal highly personal information?: Attributions for and against self-disclosure in close relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25 , 115-130.
Fischer, J., & Corcoran, K. (2007). Measures for clinical practice and research: A sourcebook (volumes 1 & 2) . New York: Oxford University Press.
Guay, S., Boisvert, J.-M., & Freeston, M. H. (2003). Validity of three measures of communication for predicting relationship adjustment and stability among a sample of young couples. Psychological Assessment , 15(3), 392-398.
Holbert, R. L., Tschida, D. A., Dixon, M., Cherry, K., Steuber, K., & Airne, D. (2005). The West Wing and depictions of the American Presidency: Expanding the domains of framing in political communication. Communication Quarterly, 53 (4), 505-522.
Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists' and journalists' credibility. Human Communication Research, 34 , 347- 369.
Keyton, J. (2011). Communicating research: Asking questions, finding answers . New York: McGraw Hill.
Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010, Apr. 10). Teens and mobile phones . Report from the Pew Internet and American Life Project, retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx .
Maddy, T. (2008). Tests: A comprehensive reference for assessments in psychology, education, and business . Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
McCollum Jr., J. F., & Bryant, J. (2003). Pacing in children's television programming. Mass Communication and Society, 6 (2), 115-136.
Medved, C. E., Brogan, S. M., McClanahan, A. M., Morris, J. F., & Shepherd, G. J. (2006). Family and work socializing communication: Messages, gender, and ideological implications. Journal of Family Communication, 6 (3), 161-180.
Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36 , 26-52.
Nabi, R. L. (2009). Cosmetic surgery makeover programs and intentions to undergo cosmetic enhancements: A consideration of three models of media effects. Human Communication Research, 35 , 1-27.
Pearson, J. C., DeWitt, L., Child, J. T., Kahl Jr., D. H., and Dandamudi, V. (2007). Facing the fear: An analysis of speech-anxiety content in public-speaking textbooks. Communication Research Reports, 24 (2), 159-168.
Rubin. R. B., Rubin, A. M., Graham, E., Perse, E. M., & Seibold, D. (2009). Communication research measures II: A sourcebook . New York: Routledge.
Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., and Boster, F. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of reported deception. Human Communication Research, 36 , 1-24.
Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students' facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology, 20 (2), 67–75.
Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Reliability and validity. Research methods data base , retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/relandval.php .
Walen-Frederick, H. (n.d.). Help sheet for reading SPSS printouts . Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/51982223/help-sheet-for-reading-spss-printouts .
Weaver, A. J., & Wilson, B. J. (2009). The role of graphic and sanitized violence in the enjoyment of television dramas. Human Communication Research, 35 (3), 442-463.
Weber, K., Corrigan, M., Fornash, B., & Neupauer, N. C. (2003). The effect of interest on recall: An experiment. Communication Research Reports, 20 (2), 116-123.
Witt, P. L., & Schrodt, P. (2006). The influence of instructional technology use and teacher immediacy on student affect for teacher and course. Communication Reports, 19 (1), 1-15.
3 Degrees of freedom (df) relate to your sample size and to the number of groups being compared. SPSS always computes the df for your statistics. For more information on degrees of freedom, see the following web-based resources: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsvfasNpU2s and http://www.creative-wisdom.com/pub/df/index.htm .
Back to Previous Spot
Chapter: chapter 5 summary, findings, and recommendations.
Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
CHAPIER 5 SI~MARY, FINDINGS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUGARY The primary objective of this research was to identify unproved methods for draining rainwater from the surface of multi-lane pavements and to develop guidelines for their use. The guidelines, along with details on the rationale for their development, are presented in a separate document' "Proposed Design Guidelines for Improving Pavement Surface Drainage" (2J. The guidelines support an interactive computer program, PAVDRN, that can be used by practicing engineers In the process of designing new pavements or rehabilitating old pavements' is outlined In figure 39. The intended audience for the guidelines is practicing highway design engineers that work for transportation agencies or consulting firms. Improved pavement surface drainage is needed for two reasons: (~) to minimize splash and spray and (2) to control the tendency for hydroplaning. Both issues are primary safety concerns. At the request of the advisory panel for the project, the main focus of this study was on ~mprov~g surface drainage to mammae the tendency for hydroplaning. In terms of reducing the tendency for hydroplaTuT g, the needed level of drainage is defined in terms of the thickness of the film of water on the pavement. Therefore, the guidelines were developed within the context of reducing the thickness of the water film on pavement surfaces to the extent that hydroplaning is unlikely at highway design speeds. Since hydroplaning is ~7
DESIGN CRITERIA Pavement Geometry Number of lanes Section type - Tangent - Horizontal curve - Transition - Vertical crest curve - Vertical sag curve Enviromnental oramaters Rainfall intensity ~ Temperature Pavement Tvpe Dense-graded asphalt Porous asphalt Portland cement concrete ~ Grooved Portland cement concrete Desion Soeed Allowable speed for onset of hydroplaning Recommend Desion Changes Alter geometry Alter pavement surface Add appurtenances Groove (Portland cement concrete) CALCULATIONS Lenoth of flow path Calculate on basis of pavement geometry IT Hydraulic Analvses . No? Water film thickness Equation No. 10 Equation No.'s. 16-19 1 Hvdroolanino Analvsis Hydroplaning speed Equation No.'s 21-24 Rainfall Intensity Equation No. 25 -A I / Meet Design ~ \ Cntena? / \<es? Accent Desinn | Figure 39. Flow diagram representing PAVI)RN design process In "Proposed Guidelines for Improving Pavement Surface DrmT~age" (2). 118
controlled primarily by the thickness of the water film on the pavement surface, the design guidelines focus on the prediction and control of ache depth of water flowing across the pavement surface as a result of rainfall, often referred to as sheet flow. Water film thickness on highway pavements can be controlled In three fundamental ways, by: I. Minimizing the length of the longest flow path of the water over We pavement and thereby the distance over which the flow can develop; 2. Increasing the texture of the pavement surface; and 3. Removing water from the pavement's surface. In the process of using PAVDRN to implement the design guidelines, the designer is guided to (~) minimize the longest drainage path length of the section under design by altering the pavement geometry and (2) reduce the resultant water film thickness that will develop along that drainage path length by increasing the mean texture depth, choosing a surface that maximizes texture, or using permeable pavements, grooving, and appurtenances to remove water from the surface. Through the course of a typical design project, four key areas need to be considered in order to analyze and eventually reduce the potential for hydroplaning. These areas are: ~9
I. Environmental conditions: 2. Geometry of the roadway surface; 3. Pavement surface (texture) properties; and 4. Appurtenances. Each of these areas and their influence on the resulting hydroplaning speed of the designed section are discussed In detail In the guidelines (21. The environmental conditions considered are rainfall ~ntensibr and water temperature, which determines the kinematic viscosity of the water. The designer has no real control over these environmental factors but needs to select appropriate values when analyzing the effect of flow over the pavement surface and hydroplaning potential. Five section types, one for each of the basic geometric configurations used In highway design, are examined. These section are: 1. TaIlgent; 2. Superelevated curve; 3. Transition; 4. Vertical crest curve; and 5. Vertical sag curve. 120
Pavement properties that affect the water fihn thickness mclude surface characteristics, such as mean texture depth and grooving of Portland cement concrete surfaces, are considered In the process of applying PAVDRN. Porous asphalt pavement surfaces can also reduce He water film thickness and thereby contribute to the reduction of hydroplaning tendency and their presence can also be accounted for when using PAVDRN. Finally, PAVDRN also allows the design engineer to consider the effect of drainage appurtenances, such as slotted drain inlets. A complete description of the various elements that are considered In the PAVDRN program is illustrated In figure 40. A more complete description of the design process, the parameters used in the design process, and typical values for the parameters is presented In the "Proposed Design Guidelines for Improving Pavement Surface Drainage" (2) alla in Appendix A. fIN1)INGS The following findings are based on the research accomplished during the project, a survey of the literature, and a state-of-the-art survey of current practice. I. Model. The one~unensional mode} is adequate as a design tool. The simplicity and stability of the one~imensional mode} offsets any increased accuracy afforded by a two-d~mensional model. The one~mensional model as a predictor of water fiDn thickness and How path length was verified by using data from a previous study (11). 121
No. of Planes Length of Plane Grade Step Increment Wdth of Plane Cross Slope Section T,rne 1) Tangent 2) Honzontal Curare 3) Transition 4) Vertical Crest 5) Vertical Sag U=tS 1)U.S. 2) S. I. Rainfall Intenstity ~ , \ |Kinematic Viscosity |Design Speed Note: PC = Point of Curvature PI. = Point of Tangency PCC = Portland cement concrete WAC = Dense graded asphalt concrete 0GAC = 0pcn~raded asphalt concrete where OGAC includes all types of intentally draining asphalt surfaces GPCC = Grooved Ponland cement concrete Taneent Pavement Type Mean Texture Depth 1) PCC 2) DGAC 3) OGAC 4) GPCC Horizontal Cun~c Grade Cross Slope Radius of Cunran~re Wdth Pavement Type _ 2) DGAC 3) OGAC 4) GPCC Mean Texture Depth Step Increment _ Transition Length of Plane Super Elevation Tangent Cross Slope Tangent Grade width of Curve Transition Width Pavement Type_ 1) PCC 3) OGAC 4) GPCC Mean Texture Depth Step Increment Horizontal Length Cross slope width PC Grade PI' Grade Elevation: Pr-PC Vertical Crest Flow Direction Step Increment Pavement Type 1) PC Side I 2) PI. Side | 1)PCC 2) DGAC 3) OGAC 4) GPCC Mean Tex~rc Depth _ _ ~ Figure 40. Factors considered in PAVDRN program. 122 ~1 r - . , Vertical Sad | Horizontal Length | Cross slope Wldth PC Grade PI Grade Elevation: PIE Flow Direction Step Increment / Stored :_ ~ cats ~ 1) PC Side | 2) PI Side | . Pavement Typed 1) PCC 3) OGAC 14) GPCC Mean Texture Depth I I
~ Stored data V ~ 3 L IN1T For use with a second nut using data from the first run.) , 1 EPRINT (Echos input to output ) 1 CONVERT (Converts units to and from SI and English.) ~ , ADVP (Advances Page of output.) KINW (Calculates Minning's n, Water Film Thickness (WEIR), and Hydroplaning Speed UPS).) , EDGE (Determines if flow has reached the edge of the pavement.) out roar Figure 40. Factors considered in PAVDRN program (continued). 123
2. Occurrence of Hydropl~r g. In general, based on the PAVDRN mode! and the assumptions inherent in its development, hydroplaning can be expected at speeds below roadway design speeds if the length of the flow path exceeds two lane widths. 3. Water Film Thickness. Hydroplaning is initiated primarily by the depth of the water film thickness. Therefore, the primary design objective when controlling hydroplaning must be to limit the depth of the water film. 4. Reducing Water Film Thickness. There are no simple means for controlling water John thickness, but a number of methods can effectively reduce water film thickness and consequently hydroplaning potential. These include: Optimizing pavement geometry, especially cross-slope. Providing some means of additional drainage, such as use of grooved surfaces (PCC) or porous mixtures (HMA). Including slotted drains within the roadway. 5. Tests Needed for Design. The design guidelines require an estimate of the surface texture (MTD) and the coefficient of permeability Porous asphalt only). The sand patch is an acceptable test method for measuring surface texture, except for the more open (20-percent air voids) porous asphalt mixes. In these cases, an estimate of the surface texture, based on tabulated data, is sufficient. As an alternative, 124
sand patch measurements can be made on cast replicas of the surface. For the open mixes, the glass beads flow into the voids within the mixture, giving an inaccurate measure of surface texture. Based on the measurements obtained In the laboratory, the coefficient of permeability for the open-graded asphalt concrete does not exhibit a wide range of values, and values of k may be selected for design purposes from tabulated design data (k versus air voids). Given the uncertainty of this property resulting from compaction under traffic and clogging from contaminants and anti-skid material, a direct measurement (e.g., drainage lag permeameter) of k is not warranted. Based on the previous discussion, no new test procedures are needed to adopt the design guidelines developed during this project. 6. Grooving. Grooving of PCC pavements provides a reservoir for surface water and can facilitate the removal of water if the grooves are placed parallel to the flow oath. Parallel orientation is generally not practical because the flow on highway pavements is typically not transverse to the pavement. Thus, the primary contribution offered by grooving is to provide a surface reservoir unless the grooves comlect with drainage at the edge of the pavement. Once the grooves are filled with water, the tops of the grooves are the datum for the Why and do not contribute to the reduction in the hydroplaning potential. 125
7. Porous Pavements. These mixtures can enhance the water removal and Hereby reduce water film tHch~ess. They merit more consideration by highway agencies In the United States, but they are not a panacea for eliminating hydroplaning. As with grooved PCC pavements, the internal voids do not contribute to the reduction of hydroplaning; based on the field tests done In this study. hv~ronImiina can be if, , , ~ expected on these mixtures given sufficient water fiLn thickness. Other than their ability to conduct water through internal flow, the large MTD offered by porous asphalt is the main contribution offered by the mixtures to the reduction of hydroplaning potential. The high-void ~ > 20 percent), modified binder mixes used In Europe merit further evaluation in the United States. They should be used In areas where damage from freezing water and the problems of black ice are not likely. 8. Slotted Drains. These fixtures, when installed between travel lanes, offer perhaps the most effective means of controlling water film thickness from a hydraulics standpoint. They have not been used extensively In the traveled lanes and questions remain unanswered with respect to their installation (especially in rehabilitation situations) and maintenance. The ability to support traffic loads and still maintain surface smoothness has not been demonstrated and they may be susceptible to clogging from roadway debris, ice, or snow. 126
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS The following recommendations are offered based on the work accomplished during this project and on the conclusions given previously: I. Implementation. The PAVDRN program and associated guidelines need to be field tested and revised as needed. The program and the guidelines are sufficiently complete so that they can be used in a design office. Some of the parameters and algorithms will I~ely need to be modified as experience is gained with the program. 2. Database of Material Properties. A database of material properties should be gathered to supplement the information contained in PAVDRN. This information should Include typical values for the permeability of porous asphalt and topical values for the surface texture (MTD) for different pavement surfaces to include toned Portland cement concrete surfaces. A series of photographs of typical pavement sections and their associated texture depths should be considered as an addition to the design guide (21. 3. Pavement Geometry. The AASHTO design guidelines (~) should be re-evaluated In terms of current design criteria to determine if they can be modified to enhance drainage without adversely affecting vehicle handling or safety. ~27
4. Use of appurtenances. Slotted drams should be evaluated In the field to determine if they are practical when Installed In the traveled way. Manufacturers should reconsider the design of slotted drains and their Installation recommendations currently In force to maximize them for use In multi-lane pavements and to determine if slotted drains are suitable for installations In the traveled right of way. 5. Porous Asphalt Mixtures. More use should be made of these mixtures, especially the modified high a~r-void mixtures as used In France. Field trials should be conducted to monitor HPS and the long-term effectiveness of these mixtures and to validate the MPS and WDT predicted by PAVDRN. 6. Two-D~mensional Model. Further work should be done with two~mensional models to determine if they improve accuracy of PAVDRN and to determine if they are practical from a computational standpoint. ADDITIONAL STUDIES On the basis of the work done during this study, a number of additional items warrant furler study. These Include: 1. Full-scale skid resistance studies to validate PAVDRN in general and the relationship between water film thickness and hydroplaning potential in particular are needed in light of the unexpectedly low hvdronlanin~ speeds predicted during 128 , . ~. , ~
this study. The effect of water infiltration into pavement cracks and loss of water by splash and spray need to be accounted for In the prediction of water fihn Sickness. Surface Irregularities, especially rutting, need to be considered in the prediction models. 2. Field trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of alternative asphalt and Portland cement concrete surfaces. These include porous Portland cement concrete surfaces, porous asphalt concrete, and various asphalt m~cro-surfaces. 3. The permeability of porous surface mixtures needs to be confirmed with samples removed from the field, and the practicality of a simplified method for measuring in-situ permeability must be investigated and compared to alternative measurements, such as the outflow meter. 4. For measuring pavement texture, alternatives to the sand patch method should be investigated, especially for use with porous asphalt mixtures. 129
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
READ FREE ONLINE
You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.
Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?
Show this book's table of contents , where you can jump to any chapter by name.
...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.
Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.
To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter .
Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.
View our suggested citation for this chapter.
Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.
Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free ? Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released.
For qualitative studies (dissertations & theses).
By: Jenna Crossley (PhD). Expert Reviewed By: Dr. Eunice Rautenbach | August 2021
So, you’ve collected and analysed your qualitative data, and it’s time to write up your results chapter. But where do you start? In this post, we’ll guide you through the qualitative results chapter (also called the findings chapter), step by step.
The results chapter in a dissertation or thesis (or any formal academic research piece) is where you objectively and neutrally present the findings of your qualitative analysis (or analyses if you used multiple qualitative analysis methods ). This chapter can sometimes be combined with the discussion chapter (where you interpret the data and discuss its meaning), depending on your university’s preference. We’ll treat the two chapters as separate, as that’s the most common approach.
In contrast to a quantitative results chapter that presents numbers and statistics, a qualitative results chapter presents data primarily in the form of words . But this doesn’t mean that a qualitative study can’t have quantitative elements – you could, for example, present the number of times a theme or topic pops up in your data, depending on the analysis method(s) you adopt.
Adding a quantitative element to your study can add some rigour, which strengthens your results by providing more evidence for your claims. This is particularly common when using qualitative content analysis. Keep in mind though that qualitative research aims to achieve depth, richness and identify nuances , so don’t get tunnel vision by focusing on the numbers. They’re just cream on top in a qualitative analysis.
So, to recap, the results chapter is where you objectively present the findings of your analysis, without interpreting them (you’ll save that for the discussion chapter). With that out the way, let’s take a look at what you should include in your results chapter.
As we’ve mentioned, your qualitative results chapter should purely present and describe your results , not interpret them in relation to the existing literature or your research questions . Any speculations or discussion about the implications of your findings should be reserved for your discussion chapter.
In your results chapter, you’ll want to talk about your analysis findings and whether or not they support your hypotheses (if you have any). Naturally, the exact contents of your results chapter will depend on which qualitative analysis method (or methods) you use. For example, if you were to use thematic analysis, you’d detail the themes identified in your analysis, using extracts from the transcripts or text to support your claims.
While you do need to present your analysis findings in some detail, you should avoid dumping large amounts of raw data in this chapter. Instead, focus on presenting the key findings and using a handful of select quotes or text extracts to support each finding . The reams of data and analysis can be relegated to your appendices.
While it’s tempting to include every last detail you found in your qualitative analysis, it is important to make sure that you report only that which is relevant to your research aims, objectives and research questions . Always keep these three components, as well as your hypotheses (if you have any) front of mind when writing the chapter and use them as a filter to decide what’s relevant and what’s not.
Now that we’ve covered the basics, it’s time to look at how to structure your chapter. Broadly speaking, the results chapter needs to contain three core components – the introduction, the body and the concluding summary. Let’s take a look at each of these.
The first step is to craft a brief introduction to the chapter. This intro is vital as it provides some context for your findings. In your introduction, you should begin by reiterating your problem statement and research questions and highlight the purpose of your research . Make sure that you spell this out for the reader so that the rest of your chapter is well contextualised.
The next step is to briefly outline the structure of your results chapter. In other words, explain what’s included in the chapter and what the reader can expect. In the results chapter, you want to tell a story that is coherent, flows logically, and is easy to follow , so make sure that you plan your structure out well and convey that structure (at a high level), so that your reader is well oriented.
The introduction section shouldn’t be lengthy. Two or three short paragraphs should be more than adequate. It is merely an introduction and overview, not a summary of the chapter.
Pro Tip – To help you structure your chapter, it can be useful to set up an initial draft with (sub)section headings so that you’re able to easily (re)arrange parts of your chapter. This will also help your reader to follow your results and give your chapter some coherence. Be sure to use level-based heading styles (e.g. Heading 1, 2, 3 styles) to help the reader differentiate between levels visually. You can find these options in Word (example below).
Before we get started on what to include in the body of your chapter, it’s vital to remember that a results section should be completely objective and descriptive, not interpretive . So, be careful not to use words such as, “suggests” or “implies”, as these usually accompany some form of interpretation – that’s reserved for your discussion chapter.
The structure of your body section is very important , so make sure that you plan it out well. When planning out your qualitative results chapter, create sections and subsections so that you can maintain the flow of the story you’re trying to tell. Be sure to systematically and consistently describe each portion of results. Try to adopt a standardised structure for each portion so that you achieve a high level of consistency throughout the chapter.
For qualitative studies, results chapters tend to be structured according to themes , which makes it easier for readers to follow. However, keep in mind that not all results chapters have to be structured in this manner. For example, if you’re conducting a longitudinal study, you may want to structure your chapter chronologically. Similarly, you might structure this chapter based on your theoretical framework . The exact structure of your chapter will depend on the nature of your study , especially your research questions.
As you work through the body of your chapter, make sure that you use quotes to substantiate every one of your claims . You can present these quotes in italics to differentiate them from your own words. A general rule of thumb is to use at least two pieces of evidence per claim, and these should be linked directly to your data. Also, remember that you need to include all relevant results , not just the ones that support your assumptions or initial leanings.
In addition to including quotes, you can also link your claims to the data by using appendices , which you should reference throughout your text. When you reference, make sure that you include both the name/number of the appendix , as well as the line(s) from which you drew your data.
As referencing styles can vary greatly, be sure to look up the appendix referencing conventions of your university’s prescribed style (e.g. APA , Harvard, etc) and keep this consistent throughout your chapter.
The concluding summary is very important because it summarises your key findings and lays the foundation for the discussion chapter . Keep in mind that some readers may skip directly to this section (from the introduction section), so make sure that it can be read and understood well in isolation.
In this section, you need to remind the reader of the key findings. That is, the results that directly relate to your research questions and that you will build upon in your discussion chapter. Remember, your reader has digested a lot of information in this chapter, so you need to use this section to remind them of the most important takeaways.
Importantly, the concluding summary should not present any new information and should only describe what you’ve already presented in your chapter. Keep it concise – you’re not summarising the whole chapter, just the essentials.
Now that you’ve got a clear picture of what the qualitative results chapter is all about, here are some quick tips and reminders to help you craft a high-quality chapter:
If you have any questions, leave a comment below and we’ll do our best to help. If you’d like 1-on-1 help with your results chapter (or any chapter of your dissertation or thesis), check out our private dissertation coaching service here or book a free initial consultation to discuss how we can help you.
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
This was extremely helpful. Thanks a lot guys
Hi, thanks for the great research support platform created by the gradcoach team!
I wanted to ask- While “suggests” or “implies” are interpretive terms, what terms could we use for the results chapter? Could you share some examples of descriptive terms?
I think that instead of saying, ‘The data suggested, or The data implied,’ you can say, ‘The Data showed or revealed, or illustrated or outlined’…If interview data, you may say Jane Doe illuminated or elaborated, or Jane Doe described… or Jane Doe expressed or stated.
I found this article very useful. Thank you very much for the outstanding work you are doing.
What if i have 3 different interviewees answering the same interview questions? Should i then present the results in form of the table with the division on the 3 perspectives or rather give a results in form of the text and highlight who said what?
I think this tabular representation of results is a great idea. I am doing it too along with the text. Thanks
That was helpful was struggling to separate the discussion from the findings
this was very useful, Thank you.
Very helpful, I am confident to write my results chapter now.
It is so helpful! It is a good job. Thank you very much!
Very useful, well explained. Many thanks.
Hello, I appreciate the way you provided a supportive comments about qualitative results presenting tips
I loved this! It explains everything needed, and it has helped me better organize my thoughts. What words should I not use while writing my results section, other than subjective ones.
Thanks a lot, it is really helpful
Thank you so much dear, i really appropriate your nice explanations about this.
Thank you so much for this! I was wondering if anyone could help with how to prproperly integrate quotations (Excerpts) from interviews in the finding chapter in a qualitative research. Please GradCoach, address this issue and provide examples.
what if I’m not doing any interviews myself and all the information is coming from case studies that have already done the research.
Very helpful thank you.
This was very helpful as I was wondering how to structure this part of my dissertation, to include the quotes… Thanks for this explanation
This is very helpful, thanks! I am required to write up my results chapters with the discussion in each of them – any tips and tricks for this strategy?
For qualitative studies, can the findings be structured according to the Research questions? Thank you.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
BMC Health Services Research volume 24 , Article number: 880 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
Metrics details
To better target stroke awareness efforts (pre and post first stroke) and thereby decrease the time window for help-seeking, this study aims to assess quantitatively whether stroke awareness is associated with appropriate help-seeking at symptom onset, and to investigate qualitatively why this may (not) be the case.
This study conducted in a German regional stroke network comprises a convergent quantitative-dominant, hypothesis-driven mixed methods design including 462 quantitative patient questionnaires combined with qualitative interviews with 28 patients and seven relatives. Quantitative associations were identified using Pearson’s correlation analysis. Open coding was performed on interview transcripts before the quantitative results were used to further focus qualitative analysis. Joint display analysis was conducted to mix data strands. Cooperation with the Patient Council of the Department of Neurology ensured patient involvement in the study.
Our hypothesis that stroke awareness would be associated with appropriate help-seeking behaviour at stroke symptom onset was partially supported by the quantitative data, i.e. showing associations between some dimensions of stroke awareness and appropriate help-seeking, but not others. For example, knowing stroke symptoms is correlated with recognising one’s own symptoms as stroke ( r = 0.101; p = 0.030*; N = 459) but not with no hesitation before calling help ( r = 0.003; p = 0.941; N = 457). A previous stroke also makes it more likely to recognise one’s own symptoms as stroke ( r = 0.114; p = 0.015*; N = 459), but not to be transported by emergency ambulance ( r = 0.08; p = 0.872; N = 462) or to arrive at the hospital on time ( r = 0.02; p = 0.677; N = 459). Qualitative results showed concordance, discordance or provided potential explanations for quantitative findings. For example, qualitative data showed processes of denial on the part of patients and the important role of relatives in initiating appropriate help-seeking behaviour on patients’ behalf.
Our study provides insights into the complexities of the decision-making process at stroke symptom onset. As our findings suggest processes of denial and inabilities to translate abstract disease knowledge into correct actions, we recommend to address relatives as potential saviours of loved ones, increased use of specific situational examples (e.g. lying on the bathroom floor) and the involvement of patient representatives in the preparation of informational resources and campaigns. Future research should include mixed methods research from one sample and more attention to potential reporting inconsistencies.
Peer Review reports
Acute ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of death and acquired disability worldwide. Acute treatment options include stroke unit treatment, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), all with strongly time-dependent treatment effects. While institutional and regulatory efforts have addressed the time frames from emergency call to treatment initiation [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ], the time from symptom onset to first help-seeking is largely determined by decisions made by individual medical laypeople. Efforts for raising awareness of stroke are usually based on the assumption that increased stroke awareness will contribute to an increased likelihood of patients behaving correctly, and thereby an increased likelihood of timely treatment access.
However, a positive effect of these efforts has not been shown consistently [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Moreover, evaluations use a wide range of outcome measures, including knowledge of risk factors, symptoms and treatments [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], action taken [ 9 ], emergency department visits [ 8 ], thrombolysis rates [ 8 ], initiation of reperfusion therapy [ 15 ] or functional outcome at discharge [ 7 ] – all capturing different aspects of how well a person is informed about stroke, knows what to do or actually implements the recommended action. This means that it is not clear to what extent knowledge of stroke symptoms can actually predict good health outcomes, or whether timely presentation to emergency services can really be attributed to higher stroke awareness. Several qualitative studies have pointed out the complexity of the decision-making-process, which in addition to patient-specific factors, is also subject to outside influences [ 16 , 17 , 18 ].
This study aims to (1) assess quantitatively whether different aspects of stroke awareness were associated with appropriate help-seeking behaviour at stroke symptom onset, and to (2) investigate qualitatively why this may (not) have been the case. We expect our results to help inform outreach campaigns and awareness efforts to better reach its target groups and intended goals for improved stroke outcomes.
Mixed methods research design
This study used a convergent quantitative-dominant, hypothesis-driven mixed methods design including patient questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with patients and relatives (Fig. 1 ). The theoretical framework is informed by the COMIC Model, developed for the evaluation of complex care interventions, such as stroke care provision. It focuses on aspects beyond the medical (such as patient-centeredness) and specifically considers the context in which an intervention is implemented, as needed for the current study [ 19 ]. The study was conducted in a German regional stroke network (FAST; www.fast-schlaganfall.de ). Ethics approval was obtained from the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University (S-306/2016; S-682/2017). All study participants provided written informed consent. We report our findings in line with applicable standards [ 20 ].
The mixed methods integration strategy was to compare (especially regarding patient data) and to expand (especially regarding relative data) [ 21 ]. The mixed methods research data inventory [ 21 ] is shown in Table 1 . We hypothesised that stroke awareness would be associated with appropriate help-seeking behaviour at stroke symptom onset. We defined “stroke awareness” as having information about stroke before the stroke occurred using the concepts “knowing stroke symptoms”, “familiarity with information campaigns”, “having experienced one or more previous strokes” and “knowing other stroke patients” or “having discussed stroke symptoms with other stroke patients”. We defined appropriate help-seeking as responding to a suspected stroke by seeking the appropriate help immediately upon symptom onset, measured using the concepts “recognising the symptoms as stroke”, “no hesitation before calling for help”, “transportation to hospital by emergency ambulance”, and “arrival at hospital within the 4.5 h therapeutic time window”. For mixing of data strands, we conducted a joint display analysis to assess for “fit” and draw meta-inferences according to the categories of concordance, expansion, complementarity or discordance of quantitative and qualitative findings which are addressed in the Discussion [ 22 , 23 ].
Quantitative and qualitative data were collected separately. The quantitative data collection consisted of a questionnaire for patients admitted with acute stroke at an urban university hospital or a rural primary stroke center. Patients were recruited consecutively over a period of 6 months, starting in January 2017. The questionnaires were completed on the day after admission by the patients and their treating physician. Quantitative data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics. Associations were identified using Pearson’s correlation analysis. More detailed information on the quantitative questionnaire is published elsewhere [ 26 ].
For the qualitative data collection, semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke patients and their relatives. A purposive sampling strategy was used to include interviewees with different stroke pathway experiences such as different transfer modes (helicopter or ambulance), admission at more or less specialised hospitals as well as different health outcomes. Recruitment and data collection place from May to July 2018 at Heidelberg University hospital and from July to September 2019 at two primary stroke centers. Interviews were conducted in German, approximately one month after stroke. The interview guide was piloted in advance with members of a regional stroke self-help group. For qualitative intra-method analysis, interview transcripts were coded by at least two researchers using MaxQDA-software (2018, VERBI, Berlin, Germany). After coding of all transcripts was completed, the quantitative results were used to focus the qualitative analysis on the aspects of stroke awareness and help-seeking behaviour as outlined for the questionnaires.
More detailed information on the respective methods of data collection and intra-method data analysis are shown in Table 2 .
A stroke self-help group consulted on the qualitative design and helped pilot the interviews. Stakeholder validation of preliminary results was conducted with the Patient Council of the Department of Neurology on 17 November 2020, which showed agreement with findings outside the study sample and provided insights into discordance between quantitative and qualitative findings (see Discussion).
In total, 462 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Median age was 71.5 years (IQR: 60–79) and 47.4% of patients were female. Median premorbid Rankin scale (pmRS) was 0 (0–2). Other baseline characeristics including primary admission hospital, health status and risk factors are reported in Table 3 .
Summary of main findings
We conducted 35 interviews, including 28 patient interviews and seven relative interviews. In 8 of the patient interviews, a relative was also present and occasionally participated. The interviews lasted between 20 and 82 min (median: 47 min, IQR: 32–59). Eleven patients were female (39%), and median age was 66 years (IQR: 60–78). Most patients had no prestroke disabilities as indicated by a pmRS of 0 (IQR 0–1). The mean NIHSS at admission was 8.7 (SD 7.7), indicating that most patients had not experienced a severe stroke. The primary admission hospital of eleven patients was an EVT-capable hospital; whereas the others were admitted at an IVT-capable hospital. Mean NIHSS at discharge was 2.6 (SD 2.6) while median mRS at discharge was 2 (IQR 1–3), showing a relatively good outcome after stroke. Of the seven relatives, six were female, and median age was 58, ranging from 23 to 72 years.
Main findings are summarised in an integrated visual display in Fig. 2 . This includes statistical results as well as qualitative interview quotes.
Questionnaires showed a positive correlation between knowing stroke symptoms and recognising symptoms as stroke ( N = 459; r = 0.101; p = 0.030*) and arrival at hospital within 4.5 h ( N = 459; r = 0.093; p = 0.046*), but not with no hesitation before calling for help ( N = 457; r = 0.003; p = 0,941) and transportation by emergency ambulance ( N = 462; r = 0.014; p = 0.764).
Five patient interviewees reported immediately knowing or strongly suspecting that they experienced a stroke. One recognized the stroke when he felt a sudden, strong stab of pain in the head and could not hold a water bottle. The other patient recognised the stroke when she saw her drooping cheek in the mirror. Of the five patients who recognized their stroke, four patients immediately called an ambulance or told their spouse to do so. The fifth patient was alone at home and could not physically react appropriately.
In contrast, eight patients who consciously experienced their symptoms stated that they had no idea it was a stroke, e.g. specifying that “[it] was the last thing [he] would have thought of” (Patient, Interview 12). These patients reported slurred speech, not being able to speak or answer questions, not being able to sit/stand/get up or walk (properly), not being able to use their leg(s), lying on the floor, and not being able to use their arm or hand (including dropping things). Another patient specified that even though she was aware of common stroke symptoms, she did not recognise them in her own case.
I know this thing , that you hold up both arms. But for myself , it would never have crossed my mind . Patient , Interview 1
She and another patient emphasised that even though they consciously experienced one or more symptoms, they did not feel that something was wrong.
I thought I had got up to go to the bathroom. I didn’t even wonder why I was on the floor. […] I just felt so comfortably sleepy and thought: Hm , why can’t I get up? Patient , Interview 1
Sometimes patients also initially attributed their symptoms to alternative explanations, i.e. an epileptic attack or hangover. Eight patients were unconscious or too confused to notice their symptoms or did not remember the situation. In these cases, other people called for help on their behalf. Twelve relatives present at symptom onset immediately knew or strongly suspected a stroke based on the symptoms, which included slurred speech, drooping mouth, not being able to speak, paresis, not being able to get up or walk properly, a cramped-up hand, and tingling feelings in one arm.
All relatives suspecting a stroke immediately called for help without waiting for the symptoms to improve or otherwise delaying the process.
I saw that something was wrong with [her] mouth and that’s when I knew it was a stroke . Relative , Interview 6 .
Questionnaires showed a positive correlation between familiarity with stroke information campaigns and recognising symptoms as stroke ( r = 0.203; p ≤ 0.001*; N = 457) but no correlation with no hesitation before calling for help ( r = 0.009; p = 0.847; N = 456), transportation by emergency ambulance ( r = 0.046; p = 0.323; N = 460), and arrival at hospital within 4.5 h ( r = 0.014; p = 0.769; N = 457).
In the interviews, patients were asked about their prior knowledge about the disease stroke and if so, their information sources. Twelve patients indicated that they had had prior information about the disease stroke, naming information sources such as television shows, books and magazines on health topics, knowing other stroke patients, medical conditions because of which they had been told they were at risk for stroke, a previous (own) stroke, and working or volunteering in health care. Of these patients, two patients reported having recognised their stroke, both immediately asking their husbands to call help. Stroke information campaigns were not mentioned by the interviewees.
Many patients who answered “no” to the question “Did you have any prior information about the disease stroke?”, also reported knowing other stroke patients or having discussed their stroke risk or suspected stroke symptoms with a health professional in the months or years before their stroke. Two patients reported actively avoiding information on the topic
When I saw those news articles , I did not read them. […] I skipped them. […] I did not want to know about that. […] I had the feeling […] that I wanted nothing to do with it. Patient , Interview 9 When there was information on TV , I often switched channels. I can’t watch it […] , it upsets me too much. Patient , Interview 34
The latter patient is one of two patients who, despite indicating no prior information about stroke, recognized their stroke at symptom onset. The other patient reported that because of his regular check-up appointments for heart disease he was aware of his stroke risk. The patient was alone at home when the stroke happened but was found by a neighbour who immediately called an ambulance.
Only few patients who indicated having no prior information about stroke also reported not knowing any stroke patients and not having been aware that they were at risk of stroke. In these cases, it was the patient’s partner who initiated help-seeking. In one case, the patient’s wife called an ambulance because of the severity of the symptoms even though she did not realise it was a stroke at the time.
Nine relatives present at symptom onset said they had prior information about stroke, also citing television shows and books on health topics, knowing other stroke patients, the patient’s previous stroke, and volunteering in health care as their main information sources .
Speaking to patient: I saved you. Because I know […]. I do read a lot , and I watch [shows] on TV Relative , Interview 33
All of these relatives recognised the patient’s stroke based on their symptoms and sought help immediately.
Questionnaire data for having experienced one or more previous strokes showed a positive correlation with recognising symptoms as stroke ( r = 0.114; p = 0.015*; N = 459) but no correlation with no hesitation before calling for help ( r = 0.027; p = 0.565; N = 457), transportation by emergency ambulance ( r = 0.008; p = 0.872; N = 462), and arrival at hospital within 4.5 h ( r = 0.02; p = 0.677; N = 459).
In the qualitative patient sample, four patients had previously experienced a stroke. None of them recognised their second stroke, with two unconscious at symptom onset or unable to recall the situation later. In two cases, patients knew that a stroke had been discovered previously during a routine scan, but they had not been aware of it when it happened (so-called “silent infarctions”). A third patient had experienced his first stroke just a few weeks prior to his second while he was still in rehabilitation for the first. A fourth patient had experienced an acute stroke two years previously. This latter patient did not seem to (want to) realise that this would put him at risk for another stroke:
Interviewer: “Were you aware that having had a previous stroke would put you at risk for another one?” Interviewee: I thought it’s enough now. I […] suppressed it , [put it] out of my mind […]. I thought it would be over now. Patient , Interview 9
In one of the above cases, Patient 9’s wife recognized the stroke and alerted emergency services immediately. In the other cases, no relatives were present and emergency services were instead alerted by unrelated witnesses. A fifth case of a previous stroke was reported by the daughter of a stroke patient who was herself not included in this study. This patient had experienced a severe acute stroke approximately twelve years previously. The daughter reported this as the reason why she recognized her mother’s second stroke and called for help immediately:
She had major speech problems after her first stroke […]. And [this time] I noticed the exact same thing. […] I said: it’s a stroke again. Relative , Interview 24
Questionnaires showed no correlation between knowing other stroke patients and recognising symptoms as stroke ( r = 0.082; p = 0.081; N = 455), no hesitation before calling for help ( r = 0.031; p = 0.514; N = 453), transportation by emergency ambulance ( r = 0.052; p = 0.264; N = 458), and arrival at hospital within 4.5 h ( r = 0.052; p = 0.272; N = 455). For those patients who did know other stroke patients and who reported having discussed stroke symptoms with them, a positive correlation was found with recognising symptoms as stroke ( r = 0.152; p = 0.026*; N = 215), and arrival at hospital within 4.5 h ( r = 0.230; p = 0.001*; N = 217) but not with no hesitation before calling for help ( r = 0.045; p = 0.506; N = 216) and transportation by emergency ambulance ( r = 0.037; p = 0.588; N = 217).
In the interviews, thirteen patients reported knowing other stroke patients before, mostly family members and friends, but also colleagues, neighbours and acquaintances. Of these, two patients had recognised their own stroke and called for help immediately. One spoke in detail about her son-in-law’s stroke and thrombectomy treatment as well as the stroke experience of a friend, stating this as the reason “[…] why [she and her husband] had known about stroke since then and also knew about the time window” (Patient , Interview 7) . This was not the case for the other patient who first reported no prior information about stroke before mentioning that his mother had had one at a much older age:
Interviewer: Did you have general prior information about the disease stroke? Interviewee: No. […] Well , [my] mother had a stroke at [88]. Of course , I was aware of that. But , well , riding your motorcycle at [57] , you don’t think about a stroke Patient , Interview 25
A similar pattern was also visibile with other interviewees, who initially responded that they did not know other stroke patients before realising that this was not the case. Nine patients specifically stated that they did not know other stroke patients before their own stroke. Of these, three patients were able to recognise their own stroke, however citing other information sources such as check-ups for heart disease, working in health care, and TV programs.
Seven relatives present at symptom onset reported knowing other stroke patients, with several identifying this as the reason why they recognised their spouse’s stroke and responded appropriately.
We reacted immediately […] because several people in our family already had a stroke , so I know the symptoms. Relative , Interview 29
We explored patients’ and relatives’ help-seeking behaviour at stroke symptom onset using quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews. Our hypothesis that having stroke awareness would be positively associated with appropriate help-seeking behaviour was partially supported by quantitative and qualitative data, which confirmed and contradicted each other and sometimes provided potential explanations for apparent inconsistencies, as we discuss below.
Qualitative findings around the impact of knowing stroke symptoms were found to be partially in discordance with quantitative findings. Specifically, questionnaires showed patients with knowledge of stroke symptoms to be more likely to recognise their symptoms as stroke and to arrive at hospital on time. In contrast, interviews showed many patients to not have recognized their symptoms as stroke, even when they knew of common stroke symptoms. Two patients explained that they did not feel ill and even that they felt comfortable. This was confirmed by a former stroke patient in the Patient Council who reported not linking their general knowledge to their acute experience and inexplicably feeling safe and seeing everything through rose-tinted glasses. While the literature shows that lack of pain or perceived symptom severity can contribute to a diminished feeling of urgency, we were not able to find published descriptions of these feelings of comfort or safety [ 16 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].
Regarding the importance of familiarity with information campaigns , our qualitative and quantitative findings complemented each other. While questionnaires showed that patients familiar with campaigns were more likely to recognise their stroke, interviewed patients reported other information sources. Findings from the published literature show a variety of results in terms the impact of stroke information campaigns, e.g. reporting (partial) effectiveness [ 7 , 8 , 10 ] but also rather limited impact [ 6 , 9 ]. Notably, in our study, patient reporting of prior stroke information sometimes appeared inconsistent, e.g. when patients later spoke about a relative with stroke. This suggests that patients have better recall of some types of information than others [ 28 ]. It may also be suggestive of individual patient characteristics contributing to avoidance behaviour. Moloczij et al. called this the desire to “[maintain] a sense of normalcy”, describing several strategies used by patients to support their decision not to take any action, including denial, minimisation of symptoms, and compensating or adapting [ 16 ]. Wang et al. use descriptors such as “hesitating and puzzling” and “doubting – it may only be a minor problem” to describe this process experienced by stroke patients before initiating help-seeking [ 30 ].
Partial discordance was also found for previous strokes . While questionnaires showed patients with one or more previous strokes more likely to recognise their current symptoms as stroke, none of the five patients in the qualitative sample had recognised their current stroke. In their literature review of factors influence prehospital delay and stroke knowledge, Teuschl and Brainin (2010) find that only few studies report shorter time delays or better stroke knowledge in persons having suffered a previous stroke [ 27 ]. While silent (previous) infarctions may explain some of these instances, one patient who actively experienced their previous stroke reported avoidance behaviour before the second stroke. This was also reflected in Mackintosh et al.’s study of why people do (not) immediately contact emergency services, including several patients who recognised their second stroke but did not take action [ 28 ]. This observation was discussed in the Patient Council whose patient representatives showed surprise at the apparent lack of impact of previous stroke experiences. It was discussed whether stroke patients may not perceive themselves as living with a long-term condition requiring ongoing vigilance, but instead an isolated and completed incident.
Finally, qualitative and quantitative data were found to overlap and expand each other for knowing other stroke patients and having discussed the disease stroke . Interviews provided additional insights into possible reasons for when patients did not relate to others’ experiences and showed the importance of relatives knowing other stroke patients. Questionnaires showed no significant associations between knowing other stroke patients and the four dimensions of appropriate help-seeking behaviour, but patients who had discussed symptoms with other stroke patients were found to be more likely to recognise their stroke and to arrive at hospital on time. Again, there appeared to be inconsistencies in the interviews, with patients forgetting and then remembering knowing someone with stroke, and with many patients not relating others’ stroke experiences to their own situation. In contrast, several relatives identified knowing other stroke patients as the specific reason why they recognized the patient’s stroke and knew how to react. The importance of bystander involvement was explored by Mellon et al., identifying symptom recognition and help-seeking by witnesses as critical for a fast response [ 31 ]. For instance, Geffner et al. found that the decision to seek medical help was taken by patients in only 20.4% of cases [ 32 ]. Iverson et al. also found the presence of a bystander at symptom onset to be associated with appropriate help-seeking [ 15 ]. However, other qualitative findings are more nuanced, e.g. with Mc Sharry et al. reporting actions taken by others as having the potential to override patients’ own identification of symptoms and Moloczij et al. finding that sometimes the presence of another person contributed to delayed help-seeking, while at other times facilitating contact with medical services [ 16 , 29 ]. In addition to patients’ and relatives’ own behaviour and decisions, studies also show the importance of system factors, such as inefficient pre-hospital triage for treatment delay [ 33 ].
As data collection was prepared and conducted independently, it was not always perfectly matched. One example of this is the fact that the rural-urban divide was not considered in detail in the qualitative data collection. This means that potentially important qualitative explanations of quantitative findings related to rural vs. urban differences were not explored in the current study, such as potential differences in information access, transport time or time-to-access to emergency services. Moreover, as is appropriate for qualitative interviews, prompting for more detailed information depended on the specific context and was therefore not feasible for all interviewees and all sub-questions. In the questionnaires, patients were asked about prior knowledge of stroke systems after they had their stroke. However, since it was completed on the day itself or day one after treatment, there would not have been much time for extended patient education. Additionally, the quantitative questionnaire was analysed with a pre-defined analysis plan and was collected over a (pre-defined) time period of six months. However, no power or sensitivity analysis was conducted in advance. Finally, our qualitative sample showed very good recovery, which probably affected the range of experiences and reactions covered in the interviews. One might assume that this overrepresentation of good outcomes could suggest a similar overrepresentation of study participants who “acted correctly”. However, given the importance of luck, bystander help, patients’ physical incapability to react and additional factors other than informed decision-making reported in this study, our results indicate that caution is warranted when interpreting good outcomes or arrival inside the time-window as proxies for having acted quickly or correctly (and vice versa). The main strengths of this study are its two-site design covering hospitals in urban and rural areas with differences in acute stroke treatment options, ensuring good external validity for Germany and countries covering larger geographical areas, its mixed methods approach allowing for integration of findings and generation of new perspectives of inquiry, and the involvement of patient representatives in the study preparation and conclusion.
As quantitative and qualitative findings sometimes seemed contradictory, we recommend that future studies collect data from one patient sample (instead of two separate samples, as here), allowing for direct back-and-forth iterations.As qualitative interviews pointed towards relevant inconsistencies in patient reporting, e.g. of prior stroke knowledge even with regard to close family members, it might be worth re-examining the reliability of common quantitative measures of stroke awareness and help-seeking behaviour where these inconsistencies would remain hidden and potentially incorrect. Following the Patient Council discussions, future research may investigate the “comfortable lull” reported by two patients from the study sample and one patient from the Council. If found in more instances, this could contribute to patients not recognizing a situation as highly problematic and requiring urgent action. In terms of practice recommendations, a more family- or community-based approach to stroke information provision may be helpful, emphasising the opportunity to be a loved one’s saviour. This could lessen the impact of avoidance behaviour and increase the positive impact of the presence of a family member on the decision-making process. This may necessitate critical discussions of whether and how relatives should be able to override patient preferences for delayed or no help-seeking behaviour, especially when the patient’s capacity for decision-making is impaired. As many patients seemed unable to apply general knowledge of stroke symptoms in the acute situation, we suggest exploring an example-based approach to risk communication. Specific situational examples (e.g. lying on the floor in the middle of the night or falling down without knowing why) may be a more accessible source of information compared to paresis of the arms or legs. To provide this type of information in the most appropriate way to future patients and their relatives, it seems relevant to involve former stroke patients in the preparation and provision of these informational resources.
Our study provides insights into the complexity of a decision-making process that is influenced by certain factors, but not others – e.g. a previous stroke makes it more likely that a patient recognises their symptoms as stroke, but not that they call for help without hesitation or arrive at the hospital on time. Interviews with patients and relatives provided in-depth insights into these seemingly contradictory findings, e.g. suggesting processes of denial or the inability to translate abstract knowledge into correct actions. We therefore recommend to address relatives as potential saviours of loved ones, increased use of specific situational examples (e.g. lying on the bathroom floor) and the involvement of patient representatives in the preparation of informational resources and campaigns.
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. This excludes interview transcripts as ethics requirements to ensure confidentiality do not allow for data sharing outside the research team.
Schönenberger S, Weber D, Ungerer MN, Pfaff J, Schieber S, Uhlmann L, et al. The KEEP SIMPLEST Study: improving In-House delays and Periinterventional Management in Stroke Thrombectomy-A Matched Pair Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2019;31(1):46–55.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wu TY, Coleman E, Wright SL, Mason DF, Reimers J, Duncan R, et al. Helsinki Stroke Model is transferrable with Real-World resources and reduced stroke Thrombolysis Delay to 34 min in Christchurch. Front Neurol. 2018;9:290.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Meretoja A, Weir L, Ugalde M, Yassi N, Yan B, Hand P, et al. Helsinki model cut stroke thrombolysis delays to 25 minutes in Melbourne in only 4 months. Neurology. 2013;81(12):1071–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Willeit J, Geley T, Schöch J, Rinner H, Tür A, Kreuzer H, et al. Thrombolysis and clinical outcome in patients with stroke after implementation of the Tyrol Stroke pathway: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(1):48–56.
Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, Weber JE, Waldschmidt C, Rozanski M, et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1622–31.
Morrow A, Miller CB, Dombrowski SU. Can people apply ‘FAST’ when it really matters? A qualitative study guided by the common sense self-regulation model. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):643.
Rasura M, Baldereschi M, Di Carlo A, Di Lisi F, Patella R, Piccardi B, et al. Effectiveness of public stroke educational interventions: a review. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(1):11–20.
Flynn D, Ford GA, Rodgers H, Price C, Steen N, Thomson RG. A time series evaluation of the FAST National Stroke awareness campaign in England. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104289.
Wolters FJ, Li L, Gutnikov SA, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Medical attention seeking after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke before and after the UK Face, Arm, Speech, Time (FAST) Public Education campaign: results from the Oxford Vascular Study. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(10):1225–33.
Nordanstig A, Asplund K, Norrving B, Wahlgren N, Wester P, Rosengren L. Impact of the Swedish National Stroke Campaign on stroke awareness. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;136(4):345–51.
Metias MM, Eisenberg N, Clemente MD, Wooster EM, Dueck AD, Wooster DL, et al. Public health campaigns and their effect on stroke knowledge in a high-risk urban population: a five-year study. Vascular. 2017;25(5):497–503.
Bray JE, O’Connell B, Gilligan A, Livingston PM, Bladin C. Is FAST stroke smart? Do the content and language used in awareness campaigns describe the experience of stroke symptoms? Int J Stroke: Official J Int Stroke Soc. 2010;5(6):440–6.
Article Google Scholar
Hartigan I, O’Connell E, O’Brien S, Weathers E, Cornally N, Kilonzo B, et al. The Irish national stroke awareness campaign: a stroke of success? Appl Nurs Research: ANR. 2014;27(4):e13–9.
Kraywinkel K, Heidrich J, Heuschmann PU, Wagner M, Berger K. Stroke risk perception among participants of a stroke awareness campaign. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:39.
Iversen AB, Blauenfeldt RA, Johnsen SP, Sandal BF, Christensen B, Andersen G, et al. Understanding the seriousness of a stroke is essential for appropriate help-seeking and early arrival at a stroke centre: a cross-sectional study of stroke patients and their bystanders. Eur Stroke J. 2020;5(4):351–61.
Moloczij N, McPherson KM, Smith JF, Kayes NM. Help-seeking at the time of stroke: stroke survivors’ perspectives on their decisions. Health Soc Care Commun. 2008;16(5):501–10.
Zock E, Kerkhoff H, Kleyweg RP, van de Beek D. Intrinsic factors influencing help-seeking behaviour in an acute stroke situation. Acta Neurol Belgica. 2016;116(3):295–301.
Zock E, Kerkhoff H, Kleyweg RP, van Bavel-Ta TBV, Scott S, Kruyt ND, et al. Help seeking behavior and onset-to-alarm time in patients with acute stroke: sub-study of the preventive antibiotics in stroke study. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):241.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Busetto L, Luijkx K, Vrijhoef HJM. Development of the COMIC Model for the comprehensive evaluation of integrated care interventions. Int J Care Coord. 2016;19(1–2):47–58.
Google Scholar
Levitt HM, Bamberg M, Creswell JW, Frost DM, Josselson R, Suárez-Orozco C. Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. Am Psychol. 2018;73(1):26–46.
Fetters MD. The mixed methods research workbook: activities for designing. implementing, and publishing projects: SAGE; 2019.
Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2134–56.
Moseholm E, Rydahl-Hansen S, Lindhardt BØ, Fetters MD. Health-related quality of life in patients with serious non-specific symptoms undergoing evaluation for possible cancer and their experience during the process: a mixed methods study. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(4):993–1006.
Busetto L, Sert M, Herzog F, Hoffmann J, Stang C, Amiri H, et al. But it’s a nice compromise - qualitative multi-center study of barriers and facilitators to acute telestroke cooperation in a regional stroke network. Eur J Neurol. 2021;n/a(n/a):1–9.
Busetto L, Stang C, Hoffmann J, Amiri H, Seker F, Purrucker J, et al. Patient-centredness in acute stroke care – a qualitative study from the perspectives of patients, relatives and staff. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(8):1638–46.
Ungerer MN, Busetto L, Begli NH, Riehle K, Regula J, Gumbinger C. Factors affecting prehospital delay in rural and urban patients with stroke: a prospective survey-based study in Southwest Germany. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):441.
Teuschl Y, Brainin M. Stroke education: discrepancies among factors influencing prehospital delay and stroke knowledge. Int J Stroke: Official J Int Stroke Soc. 2010;5(3):187–208.
Mackintosh JE, Murtagh MJ, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Ford GA, White M. Why people do, or do not, Immediately Contact Emergency Medical Services following the onset of Acute Stroke: qualitative interview study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e46124.
Mc Sharry J, Baxter A, Wallace LM, Kenton A, Turner A, French DP. Delay in seeking medical help following transient ischemic attack (TIA) or mini-stroke: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104434.
Wang PY, Tsao LI, Chen YW, Lo YT, Sun HL. Hesitating and puzzling: the experiences and decision process of Acute ischemic stroke patients with Prehospital Delay after the onset of symptoms. Healthc (Basel). 2021;9(8):1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081061 . PMID: 34442198; PMCID: PMC8391298.
Mellon L, Doyle F, Williams D, Brewer L, Hall P, Hickey A. Patient behaviour at the time of stroke onset: a cross-sectional survey of patient response to stroke symptoms. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(6):396–402.
Geffner D, Soriano C, Pérez T, Vilar C, Rodríguez D. Delay in seeking treatment by patients with stroke: who decides, where they go, and how long it takes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(1):21–5. Epub 2011 Sep 23. PMID: 21944574.
Iversen AB, Johnsen SP, Blauenfeldt RA, Gude MF, Dalby RB, Christensen B, Andersen G, Christensen MB. Help-seeking behaviour and subsequent patient and system delays in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021;144(5):524–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13484 . Epub 2021 Jun 14. PMID: 34124770.
Download references
The authors thank all study participants for their participation and valuable contribution to this study. For the publication fee, we acknowledge financial support by Heidelberg University.
There was not external funding for this study.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Matthias Ungerer and Christoph Gumbinger contributed equally to this work.
Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
Loraine Busetto, Christina Stang, Melek Sert, Johanna Hoffmann, Jan Purrucker, Wolfgang Wick, Matthias Ungerer & Christoph Gumbinger
Institute of Medical Virology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 40, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Loraine Busetto
Department of Paraplegia, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany
Franziska Herzog
Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
Fatih Seker & Martin Bendszus
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
LB drafted the manuscript, conceptualised the overall mixed methods study design, and was responsible for the qualitative study design including qualitative data collection and analysis. CS, FH, MS and JH conducted the qualitative interviews and contributed significantly to qualitative data analysis. JP, FS, MB and WW provided medical expertise, contributed to quantitative analysis and revised the manuscript. MU conducted the quantitative analysis and contributed to the mixed methods analysis. CG had a supervisory role, contributed significantly to quantitative analysis and mixed methods design and analysis and relevantly revised different manuscript versions.
Correspondence to Loraine Busetto .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
Ethics approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University (S-306/2016; S-682/2017). All study participants provided written informed consent.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Busetto, L., Stang, C., Herzog, F. et al. “I didn’t even wonder why I was on the floor” – mixed methods exploration of stroke awareness and help-seeking behaviour at stroke symptom onset. BMC Health Serv Res 24 , 880 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11276-6
Download citation
Received : 23 February 2024
Accepted : 03 July 2024
Published : 02 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11276-6
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6963
Internationally, there has been a push for the prioritisation of research impact beyond its scholarly contribution. Traditionally, research impact assessments have focused on academic impact and quantitative measures, at the expense of researchers for whom research impact cannot be quantified. Bibliometric indicators and other quantitative measures are still the most widely used method for evaluating research impact because these measures are easy to use and provide a quick solution for evaluators. Conversely, metric indicators fail to capture important dimensions of high-quality research. Hence, in this study, we explored challenges with metric indicators. We adopted a case study of the University of Cape Town and used document analysis, a questionnaire survey to collect data from academics and researchers, as well as semi-structured interviews with a sample of academic and research staff. The findings highlight common challenges with quantitative measures, such as bias and discipline coverage, and the ability of measures to drive researchers’ behaviour in another direction. We propose the adoption of responsible research metrics and assessment in South African higher education institutions for more inclusive and equitable research impact assessments.
Significance:
Copyright is retained by the authors. Readers are welcome to reproduce, share and adapt the content without permission provided the source is attributed.
Disclaimer: The publisher and editors accept no responsibility for statements made by the authors
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Stress, coping, and adjustment of international students during covid-19: a quantitative study.
1.1. university adjustment, 1.2. stress, 1.3. ways of coping, 1.4. purpose of this study, 2.1. participants, 2.2. measures, 2.2.1. socio-demographic questionnaire, 2.2.2. student adaptation to college questionnaire (sacq), 2.2.3. perceived stress scale (pss), 2.2.4. ways of coping questionnaire (ways), 2.2.5. covid-19-adjustment questionnaire (covid-19 aq), 2.3. procedures, 3.1. descriptive analyses of variables, 3.2. data analysis, 4. discussion, 5. limitations and future direction, 6. conclusions and implications, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.
Race | n | % |
---|---|---|
Student Status | ||
International Students | 112 | 50.0 |
White | 12 | 10.7 |
Black or African American | 0 | 0.0 |
Hispanic or Latino | 2 | 1.8 |
Asian | 94 | 83.9 |
American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0.0 |
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 1 | 0.9 |
Other | 3 | 2.7 |
American Students | 112 | 50.0 |
White | 63 | 56.3 |
Black or African American | 12 | 10.7 |
Hispanic or Latino | 22 | 19.6 |
Asian | 11 | 9.8 |
American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 | 0.9 |
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 1 | 0.9 |
Other (e.g., Biracial) | 2 | 1.8 |
American | International | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Gender | ||||||
Male | 26 | 23.20 | 29 | 25.90 | 55 | 24.55 |
Female | 86 | 76.80 | 83 | 74.10 | 169 | 75.45 |
Age (Years) | ||||||
18–25 | 73 | 65.20 | 65 | 58.00 | 138 | 61.60 |
26–51 | 39 | 34.80 | 47 | 42.00 | 86 | 38.40 |
Household Income | ||||||
Less than USD 20,000 | 6 | 5.40 | 21 | 18.80 | 27 | 12.10 |
USD 20,000 to 49,999 | 33 | 29.50 | 40 | 35.70 | 73 | 32.60 |
USD 50,000 to 99,999 | 33 | 29.50 | 22 | 19.60 | 55 | 24.60 |
USD 100,000 and more | 40 | 35.70 | 29 | 25.90 | 69 | 30.80 |
University Level | ||||||
Undergraduate | 44 | 39.30 | 37 | 33.00 | 81 | 36.20 |
Graduate/Professional | 68 | 60.70 | 75 | 67.00 | 143 | 63.80 |
University Location | ||||||
Metropolitan NYC area | 50 | 44.60 | 39 | 34.80 | 89 | 39.70 |
Outside of Metropolitan NYC area | 62 | 55.40 | 73 | 65.20 | 135 | 60.30 |
Year in School | ||||||
1–2 | 58 | 51.80 | 59 | 52.70 | 117 | 52.20 |
3–4 | 41 | 36.60 | 42 | 37.50 | 83 | 37.10 |
5–6 or higher | 13 | 11.60 | 11 | 9.80 | 24 | 10.70 |
School Major | ||||||
STEM | 16 | 14.30 | 35 | 31.30 | 51 | 22.80 |
Humanities | 1 | 0.90 | 2 | 1.80 | 3 | 1.30 |
Social science | 71 | 63.40 | 62 | 55.40 | 133 | 59.40 |
Medical or related field | 14 | 12.50 | / | / | 14 | 6.30 |
Law | 1 | 0.90 | / | / | 1 | 0.40 |
Business | 2 | 1.80 | 7 | 6.30 | 9 | 4.00 |
Other | 7 | 6.30 | 6 | 5.40 | 13 | 5.80 |
American (n = 112) | International (n = 112) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Min | Max | M | SD | Min | Max | M | SD |
SACQ | ||||||||
Academic Adjustment | 30 | 67 | 50.05 | 9.20 | 29 | 70 | 47.22 | 8.58 |
Social Adjustment | 29 | 65 | 45.96 | 8.77 | 27 | 64 | 43.44 | 7.77 |
Personal-Emotional Adjustment | 25 | 67 | 41.10 | 10.44 | 25 | 73 | 42.76 | 9.42 |
Attachment | 32 | 73 | 48.96 | 8.47 | 32 | 60 | 45.81 | 7.22 |
WAYS | ||||||||
Confrontive Coping | 0 | 13 | 4.59 | 2.85 | 1 | 18 | 6.64 | 3.22 |
Distancing | 1 | 16 | 6.71 | 3.22 | 1 | 18 | 7.37 | 3.22 |
Self-controlling | 0 | 17 | 8.06 | 3.54 | 0 | 21 | 9.62 | 3.56 |
Seeking Social Support | 0 | 17 | 7.43 | 3.22 | 0 | 18 | 8.85 | 3.51 |
Accepting Responsibility | 0 | 10 | 3.40 | 2.55 | 0 | 12 | 4.90 | 2.71 |
Emotional Avoidance | 2 | 20 | 10.34 | 3.98 | 1 | 24 | 9.89 | 4.37 |
Planful Problem Solving | 0 | 15 | 7.03 | 3.31 | 0 | 18 | 8.71 | 3.30 |
Positive Reappraisal | 0 | 16 | 6.26 | 3.87 | 1 | 21 | 8.26 | 3.82 |
Perceived Stress | 5 | 33 | 20.52 | 6.51 | 6 | 33 | 19.22 | 5.51 |
COVID-19 | ||||||||
Adaptive Adjustment | 6 | 28 | 12.86 | 0.45 | 6 | 30 | 14.32 | 4.29 |
Social Support | 6 | 20 | 16.05 | 2.85 | 6 | 20 | 15.81 | 0.26 |
Academic Adjustment | 7 | 35 | 16.80 | 6.23 | 7 | 34 | 17.95 | 5.73 |
Discriminatory Impact Adjustment | 3 | 14 | 5.51 | 2.55 | 3 | 12 | 5.27 | 2.30 |
df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | Partial Eta Squared | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SACQ | |||||
Academic Adjustment | 1 | 448.61 | 5.67 | 0.02 * | 0.025 |
Social Adjustment | 1 | 385.88 | 5.62 | 0.02 * | 0.025 |
Personal-Emotional Adjustment | 1 | 154.45 | 1.56 | 0.21 | 0.007 |
Attachment | 1 | 556.29 | 8.98 | 0.00 ** | 0.039 |
WAYS | |||||
Confrontive Coping | 1 | 236.16 | 25.51 | <0.001 *** | 0.103 |
Distancing | 1 | 24.45 | 2.36 | 0.13 | 0.011 |
Self-Controlling | 1 | 136.72 | 10.84 | 0.00 *** | 0.047 |
Seeking Social Support | 1 | 112.86 | 9.96 | 0.00 ** | 0.043 |
Accepting Responsibility | 1 | 126.00 | 18.18 | <0.001 *** | 0.076 |
Escape Avoidance | 1 | 11.16 | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.003 |
Planful Problem Solving | 1 | 159.47 | 14.61 | <0.001 *** | 0.062 |
Positive Reappraisal | 1 | 224.00 | 15.13 | <0.001 *** | 0.064 |
Perceived Stress | 1 | 93.86 | 2.58 | 0.11 | 0.011 |
Independent Variable | Unstandardized | Standardized | Structure Matrix (Rank) | Univariate F Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
SACQ | ||||
Academic Adjustment | −0.071 | −0.636 | −0.258 (8) | 5.671 * |
Social Adjustment | −0.009 | −0.073 | −0.257 (9) | 5.623 * |
Personal-Emotional Adjustment | 0.043 | 0.0432 | 0.135 (12) | 1.562 |
Attachment | −0.032 | −0.250 | −0.325 (7) | 8.984 * |
WAYS | ||||
Confrontive Coping | 0.087 | 0.265 | 0.547 (1) | 25.514 *** |
Distancing | −0.047 | −0.150 | 0.167 (11) | 2.362 |
Self-Controlling | 0.022 | 0.080 | 0.357 (5) | 10.844 ** |
Seeking Social Support | 0.087 | 0.292 | 0.342 (6) | 9.959 ** |
Accepting Responsibility | 0.140 | 0.368 | 0.462 (2) | 18.177 *** |
Escape Avoidance | −0.075 | −0.312 | −0.087 (13) | 0.639 |
Planful Problem Solving | 0.036 | 0.118 | 0.414 (4) | 14.606 *** |
Positive Reappraisal | 0.026 | 0.100 | 0.421 (3) | 15.129 *** |
Perceived Stress | −0.012 | −0.074 | −0.174 (10) | 2.582 |
Group Centroid International | 0.579 | |||
Group Centroid American | −0.579 | |||
Wilks’ Lambda | 0.747 *** | |||
(Canonical correlation) | 0.253 |
International (N = 112) | American (N = 112) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | β | t | Sig. | r | β | t | Sig. | |
SACQ | ||||||||
Academic Adjustment | −0.53 *** | −0.23 | −2.75 | 0.01 ** | −0.43 *** | 0.04 | 0.57 | 0.57 |
Social Adjustment | −0.28 *** | −0.04 | −0.52 | 0.61 | −0.22 ** | −0.02 | −0.23 | 0.82 |
Personal-Emotional Adjustment | −0.57 *** | −0.14 | −2.34 | 0.02 * | −0.60 *** | −0.18 | −3.31 | 0.00 *** |
Attachment | −0.28 *** | 0.17 | 1.59 | 0.12 | −0.29 *** | −0.08 | −0.76 | 0.45 |
WAYS | ||||||||
Confrontive Coping | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.17 * | −0.02 | −0.08 | 0.93 |
Distancing | 0.01 | −0.14 | −0.81 | 0.42 | −0.18 * | −0.14 | −0.90 | 0.37 |
Self-Controlling | 0.00 | −0.19 | −1.18 | 0.24 | −0.08 | −0.29 | −1.87 | 0.06 |
Seeking Social Support | 0.05 | 0.22 | 1.48 | 0.14 | 0.20 * | 0.34 | 2.03 | 0.05 |
Accepting Responsibility | 0.18 * | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.24 ** | 0.33 | 1.52 | 0.13 |
Escape Avoidance | 0.43 *** | 0.39 | 2.74 | 0.01 ** | 0.41 *** | 0.22 | 1.67 | 0.10 |
Planful Problem Solving | −0.29 *** | −0.14 | −0.70 | 0.49 | −0.22 ** | −0.27 | −1.47 | 0.14 |
Positive Reappraisal | −0.06 | −0.27 | −1.68 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.97 |
COVID-19 | ||||||||
Adaptive Adjustment | −0.26 *** | 0.08 | 0.66 | 0.51 | −0.53 *** | −0.33 | −3.02 | 0.00 ** |
Social Support | −0.25 ** | −0.28 | −1.56 | 0.12 | −0.16 * | 0.09 | 0.53 | 0.60 |
Academic Adjustment | −0.37 *** | −0.06 | −0.64 | 0.52 | −0.55 *** | −0.32 | −3.55 | 0.00 *** |
Discriminatory Impact Adjustment | −0.04 | −0.26 | −1.17 | 0.25 | −0.13 | 0.06 | 0.32 | 0.75 |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Wu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Ridgard, T.; Zusho, A.; Hu, X. Stress, Coping, and Adjustment of International Students during COVID-19: A Quantitative Study. Behav. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080663
Wu Y, Ding Y, Ridgard T, Zusho A, Hu X. Stress, Coping, and Adjustment of International Students during COVID-19: A Quantitative Study. Behavioral Sciences . 2024; 14(8):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080663
Wu, Ying, Yi Ding, Tamique Ridgard, Akane Zusho, and Xiaoyan Hu. 2024. "Stress, Coping, and Adjustment of International Students during COVID-19: A Quantitative Study" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 8: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080663
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
When the GitHub Copilot Technical Preview launched just over one year ago, we wanted to know one thing: Is this tool helping developers? The GitHub Next team conducted research using a combination of surveys and experiments, which led us to expected and unexpected answers.
Everyday, we use tools and form habits to achieve more with less. Software development produces such a high number of tools and technologies to make work efficient, to the point of inducing decision fatigue. When we first launched a technical preview of GitHub Copilot in 2021, our hypothesis was that it would improve developer productivity and, in fact, early users shared reports that it did. In the months following its release, we wanted to better understand and measure its effects with quantitative and qualitative research. To do that, we first had to grapple with the question: what does it mean to be productive?
When it comes to measuring developer productivity, there is little consensus and there are far more questions than answers. For example:
In a 2021 study, we found that developers’ own view of productivity has a twist–it’s more akin to having a good day . The ability to stay focused on the task at hand, make meaningful progress, and feel good at the end of a day’s work make a real difference in developers’ satisfaction and productivity.
This isn’t a one-off finding, either. Other academic research shows that these outcomes are important for developers [ 5 ] and that satisfied developers perform better [ 6 , 7 ]. Clearly, there’s more to developer productivity than inputs and outputs.
Because AI-assisted development is a relatively new field, as researchers we have little prior research to draw upon. We wanted to measure GitHub Copilot’s effects, but what are they? After early observations and interviews with users, we surveyed more than 2,000 developers to learn at scale about their experience using GitHub Copilot. We designed our research approach with three points in mind:
Let’s dig in and see what we found!
Through a large-scale survey, we wanted to see if developers using GitHub Copilot see benefits in other areas beyond speeding up tasks. Here’s what stood out:
Developers see GitHub Copilot as a productivity aid, but there’s more to it than that. One user described the overall experience:
(With Copilot) I have to think less, and when I have to think it’s the fun stuff. It sets off a little spark that makes coding more fun and more efficient.
The takeaway from our qualitative investigation was that letting GitHub Copilot shoulder the boring and repetitive work of development reduced cognitive load . This makes room for developers to enjoy the more meaningful work that requires complex, critical thinking and problem solving, leading to greater happiness and satisfaction.
In the survey, we saw that developers reported they complete tasks faster when using GitHub Copilot, especially repetitive ones. That was an expected finding (GitHub Copilot writes faster than a human, after all), but >90% agreement was still a pleasant surprise. Developers overwhelmingly perceive that GitHub Copilot is helping them complete tasks faster—can we observe and measure that effect in practice? For that we conducted a controlled experiment.
In the experiment, we measured—on average—how successful each group was in completing the task and how long each group took to finish.
There’s more to uncover! We’re conducting more experiments and a more thorough analysis of the experiment data we already collected—looking into heterogeneous effects, or potential effects on the quality of code—and we are planning further academic publications to share our findings.
We’re here to support developers while they build software—that includes working more efficiently and finding more satisfaction in their work. In our research, we saw that GitHub Copilot supports faster completion times, conserves developers’ mental energy, helps them focus on more satisfying work, and ultimately find more fun in the coding they do.
We’re also hearing that these benefits are becoming material to engineering leaders in companies that ran early trials with GitHub Copilot. When they consider how to keep their engineers healthy and productive, they are thinking through the same lens of holistic developer wellbeing and promoting the use of tools that bring delight.
The engineers’ satisfaction with doing edgy things and us giving them edgy tools is a factor for me. Copilot makes things more exciting.
With the advent of GitHub Copilot, we’re not alone in exploring the impact of AI-powered code completion tools! In the realm of productivity, we recently saw an evaluation with 24 students , and Google’s internal assessment of ML-enhanced code completion . More broadly, the research community is trying to understand GitHub Copilot’s implications in a number of contexts: education , security , labor market , as well as developer practices and behaviors . We are all currently learning by trying GitHub Copilot in a variety of settings. This is an evolving field, and we’re excited for the findings that the research community — including us — will uncover in the months to come.
We are very grateful to all the developers who participated in the survey and experiments–we would be in the dark without your input! GitHub Next conducted the experiment in partnership with the Microsoft Office of the Chief Economist, and specifically in collaboration with Sida Peng and Aadharsh Kannan .
Related posts.
We are enabling the rise of the AI engineer with GitHub Models–bringing the power of industry leading large and small language models to our more than 100 million users directly on GitHub.
An interview with economic researchers who are applying causal inference techniques to analyze the effect of generative AI tools on software development activity.
In June, we experienced two incidents that resulted in degraded performance across GitHub services.
Code with confidence. Discover tips, technical guides, and best practices in our biweekly newsletter just for devs.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Weiming chen.
1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
2 Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Fujian Medical University), Fujian Province University, Fuzhou, China
3 National Key Clinical Specialty of Thoracic Surgery, Fuzhou, China
4 Department of Thoracic Surgery Nursing, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Yizhou huang.
Weifeng Liu, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material , further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been widely studied and used as nutritional supplements because of their anti-inflammatory effects. Previous studies have shown an association between polyunsaturated fatty acids such as omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs with the development of malignant tumors. However, the relationships of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs with esophageal diseases have not been characterized.
Mendelian randomization (MR) is a statistical method for identifying instrumental variables (IVs) from genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, and is associated with little confounding by environmental or other disease-related factors. We used genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from previously published studies on circulating concentrations of omega-3, omega-6, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and linoleic acid (LA), as well as esophageal cancer and other esophageal diseases, which were downloaded from the IEU OpenGwas database ( https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/ ) and the GWAS Catalog database ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ ). The inverse variance-weighted approach was used as the principal analysis, and the MR–Egger and weighted median methods were used alongside. A series of sensitivity analyses were used to ensure the robustness of the causality estimates.
We found that the circulating omega-3 PUFAs concentration was positively associated with esophageal cancer ( p = 8 × 10 −4 ), and circulating DHA concentration (the main component of omega-3 in food), was also positively associated with esophageal cancer ( p = 2 × 10 −2 ), but no significant association was found between circulating omega-6 PUFAs and esophageal cancer ( p = 0.17), and circulating LA concentration (the main component of omega-6 in food), was also no significant associated with esophageal cancer ( p = 0.32). We found no significant relationships of circulating omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs concentration with four other esophageal diseases.
This study indicates that higher levels of circulating omega-3 PUFAs and DHA concentrations may be a risk factor for the development of esophageal cancer. Conversely, an increased omega-6/omega-3 ratio may serve as a protective factor against esophageal cancer. These findings have significant implications for the clinical application of omega-3 PUFAs and the prevention and treatment of esophageal cancer.
Esophageal cancer is a global health problem, and in a global study of cancer incidence trends, the top three 5 year survival rates for esophageal cancer were in Japan (36%), China (34%), and South Korea (31%), while all other countries had rates of <30% ( 1 ). Esophageal cancer can be associated with Barrett’s esophagus, a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption; and its incidence and mortality show substantial regional variations ( 2–4 ). Esophageal cancer is a type of gastrointestinal tumor, and the ingestion of particular foods is thought to be represent a risk factor for esophageal cancer; for example, betel quid chewing and low intake of fresh fruit and vegetables. Furthermore, the lack of certain micronutrients and long-term dietary habits may also represent risk factors ( 4 , 5 ). Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are commonly used as dietary supplements and have been demonstrated to exhibit significant prophylactic effects against coronary heart disease and asthma ( 6 , 7 ). Because of their anti-inflammatory properties, omega-3 PUFAs reduce the risk of inflammatory bowel disease ( 8 ); and omega-6 PUFAs may reduce the risks of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, and therefore may have potential for the prevention and treatment of autoimmune diseases ( 9 ). However, their effects on the risks of tumors are controversial. Previous studies have shown that PUFAs such as omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs may increase or reduce the risks of developing specific tumors. They have been shown to increase the risks of prostate and endometrial cancers ( 10 , 11 ), but to protect against the development of liver, breast, ovarian, and brain tumors ( 12 ). However, there have been no studies of the relationship of esophageal cancer with omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs. Mendelian randomization (MR) is an emerging research methodology that is used to determine whether an association exists between particular exposures and outcomes, and it permits the avoidance of the limitations of residual confounding and reverse causation. SNPs are used as instrumental variables to infer whether a relationship exists between exposures and outcomes. The genetic composition of an individual is determined before birth and is therefore not subject to confounding, and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies rely on the fact that genetic variants are randomly assigned during meiosis, such that an unbiased assessment of exposure-outcome relationships can be made ( 13 ). Here, we aimed to characterize the relationships of circulating concentrations of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFA with the development of esophageal cancer.
2.1. study design.
We conducted a two-sample MR study of GWAS data obtained from previously published studies on circulating concentrations of omega-3, omega-6, DHA, LA, as well as esophageal cancer and other esophageal diseases which were downloaded from the IEU OpenGwas database 1 and the GWAS catalog databases. 2 Therefore, the study did not require approval by the institutional ethics committee. To ensure the robustness of the MR data, we made the following three assumptions: (1) genetic variation is associated with specific exposure factors, (2) genetic variation is not associated with confounding factors, and (3) genetic variation affects the outcomes only through specific risk factors. Figure 1 shows the details of the study design.
The flow diagram of MR analysis.
Data regarding the exposures and outcomes were obtained from the IEU OpenGwas database and the GWAS catalog database. The exposure factors were omega-3 PUFAs (ebi-a-GCST90092931), omega-6 PUFAs (ebi-a-GCST90092933), the omega-3/total fatty acid ratio (ebi-a-GCST90092932), the omega-6/total fatty acid ratio (ebi-a-GCST90092935), and the omega-6/omega-3 ratio (ebi-a-GCST90092934), and the data consisted of 115,006 samples and 11,590,399 SNPs ( 14 ). The data regarding omega-3 (met-d-Omega_3) and omega-6 (met-d-Omega_6) PUFAs consisted of 114,999 samples and 12,321,875 SNPs ( 15 ). The data regarding DHA (ebi-a-GCST90092816) and linoleic acid levels (ebi-a-GCST90092880) consisted of 115,006 samples and 11,590,399 SNPs ( 14 ). The outcome factors comprised esophageal cancer (ebi-a-GCST90041891), gastroesophageal reflux disease (ebi-a-GCST90044120), ulcer of the esophagus (ebi-a-GCST90044121), reflux esophagitis (ebi-a-GCST90044122), and Barrett’s esophagus(ebi-a-GCST90044123), and the data consisted of 456,348 samples and 11,842,647 SNPs related to these ( 16 ). Further information regarding the exposure and outcome factors are presented in Tables 1 , ,2, 2 , respectively.
Characters of esophageal disease.
Disease | Study | Journal | Sample | SNPs | GWAS ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Esophageal carcinoma | Jiang et al. | Nat Genet | 456,276 | 11,842,647 | ebi-a-GCST90041891 |
GERD | Jiang et al. | Nat Genet | 456,348 | 11,842,647 | ebi-a-GCST90044120 |
Ulcer of esophagus | Jiang et al. | Nat Genet | 456,348 | 11,842,647 | ebi-a-GCST90044121 |
Reflux esophagitis | Jiang et al. | Nat Genet | 456,348 | 11,842,647 | ebi-a-GCST90044122 |
Barrett’s esophagus | Jiang et al. | Nat Genet | 456,348 | 11,842,647 | ebi-a-GCST90044123 |
Characters of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA).
PUFA | Study | Journal | Sample | SNPs | GWAS ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Omega-3 | Richardson et al. | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092931 |
Omega-3 | Borges et al. | Web | 114,999 | 12,321,875 | met-d-Omega_3 |
Omega-6 | Richardson et al. | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092933 |
Omega-6 | Borges et al. | Web | 114,999 | 12,321,875 | met-d-Omega_6 |
Docosahexaenoic | Richardson et al. | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092816 |
Linoleic | Richardson et al | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092880 |
Omega-3/Total | Richardson et al. | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092932 |
Omega-6/Total | Richardson et al. | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092935 |
Omega-6/Omega-3 | Richardson et al. | PLoS Biol | 115,006 | 11,590,399 | ebi-a-GCST90092934 |
We rigorously selected genetic variants that showed close associations with circulating concentrations of omega-3 and omega-6 (genetic correlation: p < 5 × 10 −8 ) to obtain complete and reliable results. We also further performed quality control using chain disequilibrium ( r 2 < 0.001, 10,000 kb) to ensure that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within a specific window were pruned to assess the bias caused by the residual LD of the genetic variants. The F -statistic represents the closeness of a correlation, and it is generally considered that SNPs with F > 10 are closely associated with the exposure factors. The formula for calculating the F -statistic and R 2 is as follows ( 17 ). The F -statistics for all of the SNPs included in the study were calculated and found to be >10 and part of the F values were shown in Supplementary Table S1 .
To determine whether the association of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFA concentrations with esophageal cancer, we used a number of different methods in the two-sample MR analysis. The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method was used for the primary analysis; this method involves ignoring the intercept in regression and using the inverse of the variance of the outcome for fitting. Therefore, it may be possible to identify a relationship between an exposure and an outcome despite heterogeneity of the IVs, which may yield biased results. Consequently, we used additional methods for the MR analysis (the MR–Egger and weighted median), to overcome the drawbacks of using IVW alone. The biggest difference between the MR–Egger and IVW methods is that the presence of the intercept is taken into account in the regression in the former, but it also uses the inverse of the variance of the outcome for fitting. The weighted median method is able to provide an unbiased estimate of the effects, and therefore it represents a good complementary method of analysis.
The central idea of Mendelian randomization is that IVs can only influence the outcome through exposure factors, but if IVs can influence outcomes through an alternative route, there is horizontal multiplicity of results. Therefore, we used MR-PRESSO to conduct a test of pleiotropy, which is also a means of sensitivity testing, as well as two other sensitivity testing methods: the heterogeneity test and the leave-one-out sensitivity test. The heterogeneity test, also known as Cochran’s Q test, is used to determine whether there is heterogeneity among the IVs, while the leave-one-out sensitivity test calculates the MR results of the remaining IVs after removing each IV one by one. It is thus used to investigate the effect of individual IVs on the overall effect.
We conducted a colocalization analysis to evaluate whether shared SNPs exist with omega-3 and esophageal cancer at common genomic loci. For each SNP associated with omega-3, we performed a colocalization analysis within a 500 kb range upstream and downstream of the genomic region. Our analysis results conform to the following four hypotheses: H0 (the genomic locus is not associated with either trait), H1 (associated with esophageal cancer but not with omega-3), H2 (associated with omega-3 but not with esophageal cancer), H3 (associated with both omega-3 and esophageal cancer through two different SNPs), and H4 (associated with both omega-3 and esophageal cancer through a shared SNP).
We performed two sets of MR analyses of the relationships of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs with esophageal cancer. In the first set, we chose not to use proxy SNPs, and finally 48 and 56 SNPs were entered into the MR analyses, respectively. We found a positive correlation between circulating omega-3 PUFA concentration and the risk of esophageal cancer, but no significant correlation was found between the circulating omega-6 concentration and the risk of esophageal cancer. The IVW analyses showed close correlations between omega-3 PUFA concentration and esophageal cancer (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.38–3.38, p = 8 × 10 −4 ), and between omega-6 PUFA concentration and esophageal cancer (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.84–2.72, p = 0.17). MR-PRESSO analysis did not show evidence of horizontal pleiotropy for the analysis of the relationship between omega-3 PUFAs and esophageal cancer ( p = 0.83), and the horizontal pleiotropy analysis ( p = 0.76) generated consistent results. In addition, heterogeneity testing suggested that there was no heterogeneity ( p = 0.76).
We also obtained data regarding omega-3 and omega-6 PUFA concentrations from another database and performed a second MR analysis as a validation study. For this, we also chose not to use proxy SNPs, and finally included 48 and 55 SNPs, respectively, in the MR analysis. The results of the IVW analysis also showed close relationships of the circulating omega-3 (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.46–3.75, p = 4 × 10 −4 ) and omega-6 (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.78–2.53, p = 0.26) PUFA concentrations with esophageal cancer. MR-PRESSO analysis ( p = 0.35), and horizontal pleiotropy analysis ( p = 0.28) indicated the absence of horizontal pleiotropy, and heterogeneity analysis suggesting the absence of heterogeneity. The results of the MR analysis are presented in Figure 2 and the results of the complementary analyses are presented in Table 3 .
Preliminary MR analysis of the correlation between omega-3, omega-6 and esophageal cancer, and a forest plot of the three MR analysis methods was drawn.
Supplementary MR result of omega-3, omega-6, and esophageal carcinoma.
Exposure | Outcome | MR-PRESSO | Cochran’s Q | Pleiotropy_test |
---|---|---|---|---|
Omega-3 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.840 | 0.818 | 0.759 |
Omega-3 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.355 | 0.296 | 0.278 |
Omega-6 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.636 | 0.648 | 0.040 |
Omega-6 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.711 | 0.719 | 0.020 |
Ratio of omega-3 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.186 | 0.077 | 0.100 |
Ratio of omega-6 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.086 | 0.101 | 0.182 |
Omega-3/Omega-6 | esophageal carcinoma | 0.380 | 0.274 | 0.447 |
Docosahexaenoic | esophageal carcinoma | 0.669 | 0.690 | 0.089 |
Linoleic | esophageal carcinoma | 0.435 | 0.479 | 0.590 |
We also conducted an MR analysis of the relationships of the proportions of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs of the total fatty acid concentrations with esophageal cancer, and found that the proportion of omega-3 PUFAs in the circulation positively correlated with the risk of esophageal cancer, whereas there was no significant correlation with respect to the proportion of omega-6 PUFAs. The results of the IVW analyses were as follows: omega-3/total fatty acid ratio: OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.00–2.92, p = 0.049; omega-6/total fatty acid ratio: OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.84–2.72, p = 0.17. The results of the MR analysis are presented in Figure 3 and the results of the complementary analyses are presented in Table 3 .
Preliminary MR analysis of the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3, the percentage of both in total fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid and linoleic acid were plotted as forest plots for the three MR methods in correlation with esophageal cancer.
Because DHA is the principal omega-3 PUFA, we also performed an MR analysis regarding its relationship with esophageal cancer, and found a positive correlation between its concentration and the risk of esophageal cancer. The results of the IVW analysis were as follows: OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.10–3.24, p = 0.02. The MR-PRESSO analysis did not detect horizontal pleiotropy ( p = 0.70), and neither did the horizontal pleiotropy analysis ( p = 0.08). Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis suggested the absence of heterogeneity ( p = 0.76). LA is the principal omega-6 PUFA, we also performed an MR analysis regarding its relationship with esophageal cancer, and found no association of its concentration and the risk of esophageal cancer. The results of the IVW analysis were as follows: OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.74–2.55, p = 0.32. The MR-PRESSO analysis did not detect horizontal pleiotropy ( p = 0.43), and neither did the horizontal pleiotropy analysis ( p = 0.59). Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis suggested the absence of heterogeneity ( p = 0.47). The results of this MR analysis are presented in Figure 3 and the results of the complementary analyses are presented in Table 3 .
We found no significant relationships of the circulating concentrations of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs with the risk of developing GERD, esophageal ulcer, reflux esophagitis, or Barrett’s esophagus. The result of the IVW analyses for the relationship between omega-3 PUFAs and GERD was: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.91–1.02, p = 0.18; for that between omega-3 PUFAs and esophageal ulcer was: OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.88–1.14, p = 0.988; for that between omega-3 PUFAs and reflux esophagus was: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.88–1.04, p = 0.335; for that between omega-3 PUFAs and Barrett’s esophagus was OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93–1.08, p = 0.967; for that between omega-6 and GERD was: OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.87–1.02, p = 0.14; for that between omega-6 and esophageal ulcer was: OR = 0.978, 95% CI = 0.83–1.15, p = 0.796; for that between omega-6 and reflux esophagitis was: OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89–1.09, p = 0.77; and for that between omega-6 and Barrett’s esophagus was: OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.86–1.05, p = 0.328. The results of the MR analyses are presented in Table 4 and the results of the supplementary analyses are presented in Table 5 . Therefore, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses of positive results consistently indicate that each association is not influenced by individual SNPs. The results of the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis are presented in Figure 4 .
MR result of omega-3, omega-6, and esophageal disease.
Exposure | Outcome | SNPs | Methods | SE | OR (95%CI) | value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
omega-3 | GERD | MR Egger | 0.039 | 0.9822756 (0.9108767–1.059271) | 0.644 | |
48 | Weighted median | 0.036 | 0.9633276 (0.8961703–1.035517) | 0.311 | ||
Inverse variance weighted | 0.027 | 0.9641245 (0.9139731–1.017028) | 0.180 | |||
MR Egger | 0.093 | 1.0341852 (0.8625414–1.239986) | 0.718 | |||
omega-3 | Ulcer of esophagus | 48 | Weighted median | 0.067 | 0.9800441 (0.8568837–1.120906) | 0.769 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.065 | 1.0009649 (0.8811718–1.137044) | 0.988 | |||
MR Egger | 0.060 | 0.9186796 (0.8167725–1.033302) | 0.164 | |||
omega-3 | Reflux esophagitis | 48 | Weighted median | 0.045 | 0.9185725 (0.8377571–1.007184) | 0.071 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.042 | 0.9598754 (0.8831634–1.043251) | 0.335 | |||
MR Egger | 0.056 | 1.0299400 (0.9221727–1.150301) | 0.603 | |||
omega-3 | Barrett’s esophagus | 48 | Weighted median | 0.054 | 1.0242184 (0.9241056–1.135177) | 0.648 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.040 | 1.0016081 (0.9262309–1.083119) | 0.968 | |||
MR Egger | 0.076 | 0.9784075 (0.8438039–1.134483) | 0.774 | |||
omega-6 | GERD | 56 | Weighted median | 0.054 | 0.9731946 (0.8742462–1.083342) | 0.619 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.040 | 0.9432115 (0.8720341–1.020198) | 0.144 | |||
MR Egger | 0.158 | 0.9575270 (0.7021890–1.305714) | 0.785 | |||
omega-6 | Ulcer of esophagus | 56 | Weighted median | 0.109 | 0.9510280 (0.7623761–1.186362) | 0.656 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.084 | 0.9786106 (0.8306678–1.152902) | 0.796 | |||
MR Egger | 0.100 | 1.0092409 (0.8299879–1.227207) | 0.927 | |||
omega-6 | Reflux esophagitis | 56 | Weighted median | 0.067 | 1.0723554 (0.9346917–1.230295) | 0.319 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.053 | 0.9847841 (0.8880204–1.092092) | 0.771 | |||
MR Egger | 0.098 | 1.0225614 (0.8434589–1.239695) | 0.821 | |||
omega-6 | Barrett’s esophagus | 56 | Weighted median | 0.077 | 1.0060668 (0.8734432–1.158828) | 0.933 |
Inverse variance weighted | 0.052 | 0.9500551 (0.8573582–1.052774) | 0.328 |
Supplementary MR result of omega-3, omega-6, and esophageal disease.
Exposure | Outcome | MR-PRESSO | Cochran’s Q | Pleiotropy_test |
---|---|---|---|---|
omega-3 | GERD | 0.600 | 0.550 | 0.496 |
omega-3 | Ulcer of esophagus | 0.112 | 0.008 | 0.620 |
omega-3 | Reflux esophagitis | 0.032 | 0.019 | 0.306 |
omega-3 | Barrett’s esophagus | 0.850 | 0.837 | 0.487 |
omega-6 | GERD | 0.104 | 0.097 | 0.569 |
omega-6 | Ulcer of esophagus | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.871 |
omega-6 | Reflux esophagitis | 0.052 | 0.057 | 0.772 |
omega-6 | Barrett’s esophagus | 0.639 | 0.620 | 0.380 |
Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, (A) Omega-3 (ebi-a-GCST90092931) and Esophageal Cancer, (B) Omega-3 (met-d-Omega 3) and Exophageal Cancer, (C) Docosahexaenoic acid and Esophageal Cancer, (D) omega-6/omega-3 and Esophageal Cancer, (E) omega-3/total fatty acids and Esophageal Cancer.
We performed a colocalization analysis of omega-3 PUFAs and esophageal cancer. A positive result is defined as H4 > 0.8; however, our analysis showed that H4 was consistently <0.8, indicating no evidence of colocalization. The analysis results are presented in Supplementary Table S1 .
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MR study of the relationships of omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs with esophageal cancer and esophageal diseases. Furthermore, we performed a subanalysis of the relationship between DHA, the principal omega-3 PUFA in food, and esophageal cancer. We found a positive correlation between circulating omega-3 PUFA concentration and esophageal cancer, but no association with other esophageal diseases, and there was no association of the circulating omega-6 PUFA concentration with esophageal cancer or other esophageal diseases, and there was no association of the circulating LA concentration with esophageal cancer there was a positive association between the circulating DHA concentration and esophageal cancer. However, we found a negative association of the circulating omega-6/omega-3 concentration with esophageal cancer. In summary, our study suggests that circulating omega-3 and DHA concentrations may be risk factors for the development of esophageal cancer, whereas an increased omega-6/omega-3 ratio may serve as a protective factor against the incidence of esophageal cancer.
Research to date has principally been focused on the relationships of omega-3 PUFAs with chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer, and this has primarily involved investigation of the roles of their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in disease onset and progression. It has been suggested that omega-3 PUFAs may be beneficial for patients at risk of a number of diseases and may represent means of both preventing and treating these diseases ( 18 ). A previous meta-analysis showed that supplementation with omega-3 PUFAs alone reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes, possibly because they modulate the production of a number of anti-inflammatory substances that can promote tissue repair and ameliorate inflammation during atherosclerosis ( 19 , 20 ). This finding was validated in a pooled and harmonized analysis of 29 prospective studies, which showed that supplementation with omega-3 PUFAs is associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke, probably because omega-3 PUFAs reduce platelet count, reduce arterial stiffness, and improve endothelial function ( 21 ). Although findings regarding the anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3 PUFAs have been inconsistent, a large number of studies have shown that they protect against the development of such disease. However, PUFAs exhibit a wide range of bioactivities at both the molecular and cellular levels, and therefore we should exercise caution regarding their use as nutritional supplements.
Our research findings demonstrate a positive correlation between circulating omega-3 PUFAs concentrations and the incidence of esophageal cancer, suggesting that elevated circulating omega-3 PUFAs concentrations may be a risk factor for the development of esophageal cancer. In another meta-analysis of data from 67 prospective studies involving 310,955 participants, high omega-3 PUFA concentrations were found to be associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer ( 6 ). Thus, omega-3 PUFAs may represent a risk factor for, or a means of preventing the development of, malignancy. In one prospective study, the consumption of omega-3 PUFAs in the diet or as supplements was found to increase the risk of endometrial cancer in women with overweight or obesity ( 11 ), and a recent meta-analysis generated consistent findings ( 22 ). Our findings align with similar results obtained in other studies, all of which conclude that omega-3 may act as a potential risk factor for tumor development. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of data from 47 randomized controlled trials showed that increasing long-chain omega-3 PUFA consumption may have little effect on the risk of a diagnosis of cancer or cancer-related mortality, but may slightly increase the risk of prostate cancer ( 10 ). Thus, the inconsistency of previous findings regarding the relationship between omega-3 PUFAs and malignancy are evident and may be related to their many biological activities. However, some prior studies have indicated that omega-3 PUFAs may possess anti-cancer properties or enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in tumor treatment, serving as a nutritional supplement for disease prevention ( 23 ). A review study discussed the role of omega-3 PUFAs in tumor complications, highlighting their anti-inflammatory and protective effects due to their involvement in the resolution of inflammation. The findings suggested that omega-3 PUFAs and their metabolites might regulate key pathways in cancer-related complications ( 24 ). Furthermore, another review analysis on breast cancer indicated that omega-3 PUFAs supplementation could serve as an adjunct to chemotherapy or other conventional anti-tumor treatments ( 25 ). This may represent a future research direction for polyunsaturated fatty acids such as omega-3 PUFAs. In summary, the current research on omega-3 PUFAs is insufficient, thus warranting further discussion regarding their use as nutritional supplements.
The principal omega-3 FAs in food are DHA and EPA, and these have been shown to have similar anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects to omega-3 PUFAs as a whole in previous studies. In a randomized controlled study, DHA was found to have a superior effSect to EPA on specific markers of inflammation and circulating lipid concentrations ( 26 ). Specifically, DHA caused a larger reduction in the circulating concentrations of IL-8 and triglycerides. However, the anti-inflammatory effects of DHA are not necessarily beneficial, and in a recent secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, DHA was found to be a potential risk factor for poor appetite during chemotherapy for early breast cancer ( 27 ). These contrasting findings show that future studies of omega-3 PUFAs should be more detailed, and that subgroup studies of specific PUFAs should also be performed.
There have also been contradictory findings regarding the roles of omega-6 PUFAs in disease. In a systematic evaluation of data from 19 randomized controlled trials, it was shown that omega-6 PUFAs may have no or little effect on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events, but that they may reduce the risk of myocardial infarction. However, because of the low quality of the evidence, there is much uncertainty regarding the relationships of omega-6 PUFAs with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events ( 28 ). There is also uncertainty regarding the relationship between omega-6 PUFAs and the development of malignancy. In one prospective study, they were shown to be positively associated with the development of ER + PR+ breast cancer ( 29 ), but in a meta-analysis, no significant association with cancer risk was identified ( 30 ). Thus, there is a great deal of controversy regarding the relationship between omega-6 PUFAs and the progression of disease, and more high-quality evidence is needed to better evaluate this.
It is not easy to perform studies regarding the effects of dietary components on human health; therefore researchers have conducted a large number of in vitro and animal-based studies. In one in vitro study, omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs were found to increase or inhibit the metastatic potential of gastric cancer via COX-1/PGE3 and COX-2/PGE2, respectively ( 31 ). In an animal study, it was shown that the activation of TLR4 in rats is inhibited by a high dietary omega-6/omega-3 PUFA ratio, which in turn reduces their circulating lipid concentrations, improves their glucose tolerance, and ameliorates their insulin resistance ( 32 ). Our research findings indicate a negative correlation between the ratio of circulating omega-6/omega-3 concentrations and the incidence of esophageal cancer. This suggests that an increased ratio of circulating omega-6/omega-3 concentrations is associated with a reduced risk of developing esophageal cancer. These results are consistent with the conclusions of many previous studies. In a clinical study, the omega-6/omega-3 PUFA ratio was also shown to be associated with health, and in a meta-analysis, it was shown that a high omega-6/omega-3 PUFA ratio reduces the risk of breast cancer ( 33 ). Finally, in another study, it was shown that an appropriate omega-6/omega-3 ratio may help control obesity, as well as playing a key role in disease prevention ( 34 ). Our findings are consistent with those of similar studies. Several studies on omega-6/omega-3 have elucidated that different ratios might yield opposite effects on various diseases, potentially serving a preventive or therapeutic role, but also possibly contributing to disease progression ( 35 , 36 ). Our study employed Mendelian randomization, which is a qualitative research method, and the results indicate only an association, precluding quantitative analysis. Therefore, we currently cannot determine the optimal ratio for the prevention of esophageal cancer. Future research should focus on quantitative studies of omega-6/omega-3 ratios.
There were several limitations to the present analysis. First, most of the data we used were GWAS data relating to European populations, and therefore genetic diversity analyses of other populations are needed to generalize the conclusions. Second, although we used several methods and took rigorous steps to avoid horizontal pleiotropy, genetic variation is extremely complex and we were unable to completely eliminate horizontal pleiotropy. Therefore, studies with larger sample sizes and more advanced methods are required to further validate the results. Finally, because of the limitations of the databases, we did not evaluate the individual relationships of each of the omega-3 PUFAs with esophageal disease.
We found that elevated circulating concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs might be a risk factor for the development of esophageal cancer. Conversely, a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio might serve as a protective factor against esophageal cancer. Currently, the widespread use of omega-3 PUFAs as nutritional supplements warrants further evaluation, and the underlying mechanisms require additional investigation.
Ethics statement.
Ethical approval was not required for the study involving humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.
WC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JH: Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. QX: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YH: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CC: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
We would like to thank all the researchers who have made genome-wide data publicly available. We would also like to thank all of our colleagues who gave their time and labor to this research.
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Sponsored by Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Fujian Medical University), Fujian Province University; Sponsored by National Key Clinical Specialty of Thoracic Surgery, Fuzhou, China.
1 https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/
2 https://www.ebi.ac.uk/
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1408647/full#supplementary-material
Article sidebar.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .
The use of agricultural extension information services in enhancing maize productivity among smallholder farmers in tana river county, kenya, goudian kilemba gwademba, peter wahome wamae, daniel wambiri muthee, johnson mulongo masinde, abu ahmed adam.
Food security assessment reports have demonstrated that, most food insecure people live in rural areas, with no access to information and technology geared towards enhancing agricultural productivity. This suggests that agricultural information is relevant for agricultural productivity, especially for millions of smallholder farmers, who remain the bedrock for food supply chains in developing countries. This research was carried out with a purpose of evaluating the relationship between the Use of Agricultural Extension Information and Maize Productivity among smallholder farmers in Tana River County. The main objective of the study was to ascertain whether increased use of agricultural extension information correlated with increased maize productivity. The location of the study was Tana River County where a sample of 30 maize farming households was purposely chosen for the study. Data was captured using questionnaires and both qualitative and quantitative data was captured. The research took a correlational study design and through statistical analysis using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) and the simple Linear Regression analysis the relationship between use of extension information services and maize agricultural productivity was evaluated. The research findings revealed that, there was a strong correlation (r=0.7) between use of agricultural extension information services and Maize productivity in Tana River County. The strong relationship was significant in qualifying the research hypothesis. The study also underscored the role of ICT in enhancing the effectiveness of agricultural extension information services and recommended the need to streamline agricultural extension service delivery to ensure seamless access to information. The study was significant in that, its findings are expected to enable agricultural stakeholders appreciate the role of extension information services in enhancing agricultural productivity, besides adding credibility to the agricultural extension information policy agenda for smallholder farmers all over the world.
AJOL is a Non Profit Organisation that cannot function without donations. AJOL and the millions of African and international researchers who rely on our free services are deeply grateful for your contribution. AJOL is annually audited and was also independently assessed in 2019 by E&Y.
Your donation is guaranteed to directly contribute to Africans sharing their research output with a global readership.
There is growing recognition that earliest signs of autism need not clearly manifest in the first three years of life. To what extent is this variation in developmental trajectories associated with age at autism diagnosis? Does the genetic profile of autism vary with age at autism diagnosis? Using longitudinal data from four birth cohorts, we demonstrate that two different trajectories of socio-emotional behaviours are associated with age at diagnosis. We further demonstrate that the age at autism diagnosis is partly heritable (h2SNP = 0.12, s.e.m = 0.01), and is associated with two moderately correlated (rg = 0.38, s.e.m = 0.07) autism polygenic factors. One of these factors is associated with earlier diagnosis of autism, lower social and communication abilities in early childhood. The second factor is associated with later autism diagnosis, increased socio-emotional difficulties in adolescence, and has moderate to high positive genetic correlations with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, mental health conditions, and trauma. Overall, our research identifies an axis of heterogeneity in autism, indexed by age at diagnosis, which partly explains heterogeneity in autism and the profiles of co-occurring neurodevelopmental and mental health profiles. Our findings have important implications for how we conceptualise autism and provide one model to explain some of the diversity within autism.
The authors have declared no competing interest.
This research was supported by funding from the Simons Foundation for Autism Research Initiative, the Wellcome Trust (214322\Z\18\Z),Horizon-Europe R2D2-MH (grant agreement number 101057385), and UKRI (10063472). For the purpose of open access, we have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any author-accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. S.B.-C. also received funding from the Autism Centre of Excellence at Cambridge, the Templeton World Charitable Fund, the MRC and the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East of England. Any views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funder. Some of the results leading to this publication have received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no.777394 for the project AIMS-2-TRIALS. This joint undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and the EFPIA and Autism Speaks, Autistica and the SFARI. The iPSYCH team was supported by grants from the Lundbeck Foundation (R102-A9118,R155-2014-1724 and R248-2017-2003), the NIMH (1R01MH124851-01 to A.D.B.), and EU's Horizon Europe program (R2D2-MH; grant agreement no. 101057385 to A.D.B.). The Danish National Biobank resource was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. High-performance computer capacity for handling and statistical analysis of iPSYCH data on the GenomeDK HPC facility was provided by the Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine and the Centre for Integrative Sequencing, iSEQ, Aarhus University, Denmark (grant to A.D.B.). The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and the authors will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). R2D2-MH has been funded by Horizon Europe [grant agreement no. 101057385], by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government's Horizon Europe funding guarantee [grant no.10039383] and by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) under contract number 22.00277.
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All data we used in the study were from existing datasets. The Cambridge Human Biology Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval to analyse de-identified data for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
SPARK autism GWAS: https://bitbucket.org/steinlabunc/spark_asd_sumstats/src Finngen autism GWAS: https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results iPSYCH autism GWAS (unstratified, sex-stratified and age at diagnosis stratified) can be obtained from Anders Borglum and Jakob Grove. Psychiatric GWAS summary stats: https://pgc.unc.edu/ GWAS educational attainment: https://thessgac.com/ GWAS cognitive aptitude: https://cncr.nl/research/summary_statistics/ For ALSPAC, the study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool": http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/ For MCS, data can be obtain after application through the UK Data Service: https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000031 Summary statistics for the SPARK based GWAS will be made upon publication.
https://bitbucket.org/steinlabunc/spark_asd_sumstats/src
https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results
https://pgc.unc.edu/
https://thessgac.com/
https://cncr.nl/research/summary_statistics/
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/
https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000031
View the discussion thread.
Supplementary Material
Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.
NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.
An error is preventing the page from loading. The issue is likely on our side and the page may be available if you try again later.
If this issue persists:
Please email us at [email protected] and include the following support ID, 12373773849264057936 , in the body of your email.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The conclusions are as stated below: i. Students' use of language in the oral sessions depicted their beliefs and values. based on their intentions. The oral sessions prompted the students to be ...
The results chapter (also referred to as the findings or analysis chapter) is one of the most important chapters of your dissertation or thesis because it shows the reader what you've found in terms of the quantitative data you've collected. It presents the data using a clear text narrative, supported by tables, graphs and charts.
After that comes a literature review, which ends with a summary of the research question(s) and/or hypotheses. A methods section, which explains the source of data, sample, and variables and quantitative techniques used, follows. Many analysts will include a short discussion of their descriptive statistics in the methods section.
Figure 14.1.a provides an example of a 'Summary of findings' table. Figure 15.1.b provides an alternative format that may further facilitate users' understanding and interpretation of the review's findings. Evidence evaluating different formats suggests that the 'Summary of findings' table should include a risk difference as a ...
Research Summary. Definition: A research summary is a brief and concise overview of a research project or study that highlights its key findings, main points, and conclusions. It typically includes a description of the research problem, the research methods used, the results obtained, and the implications or significance of the findings.
Qualitative Findings. Qualitative research is an exploratory research method used to understand the complexities of human behavior and experiences. Qualitative findings are non-numerical and descriptive data that describe the meaning and interpretation of the data collected. Examples of qualitative findings include quotes from participants ...
The most logical way to structure quantitative results is to frame them around your research questions or hypotheses. For each question or hypothesis, share: A reminder of the type of analysis you used (e.g., a two-sample t test or simple linear regression). A more detailed description of your analysis should go in your methodology section.
In an era of data-driven decision-making, a comprehensive understanding of quantitative research is indispensable. Current guides often provide fragmented insights, failing to offer a holistic view, while more comprehensive sources remain lengthy and less accessible, hindered by physical and proprietary barriers.
Definitions and examples of quantitative research questions. Quantitative research questions; ... or when findings contradict previous studies (non-directional hypothesis).4 In addition, hypotheses can 1) ... In summary, research questions are constructed after establishing the background of the study. Hypotheses are then developed based on the ...
CHAPTER FOUR. DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF RES EARCH FINDINGS 4.1 Introduction. The chapter contains presentation, analysis and dis cussion of the data collected by the researcher. during the ...
Chapter 4. antitative Summary of Research FindingsHans LuytenThis chapter presents a quantitative summary of research with regard to the effects of school size on student achievement and noncognitive outcomes (such as involvement, partic. pation, social cohesion, safety, attendance, etc.). The non-cognitive outcomes are widely considered as ...
Chapter Two: Understanding the distinctions among research methods. Chapter Three: Ethical research, writing, and creative work. Chapter Four: Quantitative Methods. Chapter Four: Quantitative Methods (Part 1) Chapter Five: Qualitative Methods. Chapter Six: Critical / Rhetorical Methods. Chapter Seven: Presenting Your Results.
Chapter 6. - 211 -. 'established as a result of recommendation of a commission of university education; initially to publish academic journals; senate and council decisions to publish research works and scholarly journals; lack of commercial publishers' interest in scholarly publications'.
This chapter presents the summary of the findings, conclusions and recommendations based on the data analysed in the previous chapter. Some limitations have been identified. The effectiveness of the DOTS strategy for control of pulmonary TB was researched by determining to what extent some of the objectives of the DOTS strategy have been attained.
6.2.1 Findings based on the questionnaires completed by teachers (quantitative data) In the sampled schools most of the variables that could have been expected, according to the literature, to have an effect on Grade 12 results, in fact had had no effect, at least among the sampled schools. The most significant variables which emerged from the ...
A more complete description of the design process, the parameters used in the design process, and typical values for the parameters is presented In the "Proposed Design Guidelines for Improving Pavement Surface Drainage" (2) alla in Appendix A. fIN1)INGS The following findings are based on the research accomplished during the project, a survey ...
The results chapter in a dissertation or thesis (or any formal academic research piece) is where you objectively and neutrally present the findings of your qualitative analysis (or analyses if you used multiple qualitative analysis methods ). This chapter can sometimes be combined with the discussion chapter (where you interpret the data and ...
Future research should include mixed methods research from one sample and more attention to potential reporting inconsistencies. ... discordance or provided potential explanations for quantitative findings. For example, qualitative data showed processes of denial on the part of patients and the important role of relatives in initiating ...
We adopted a case study of the University of Cape Town and used document analysis, a questionnaire survey to collect data from academics and researchers, as well as semi-structured interviews with a sample of academic and research staff. The findings highlight common challenges with quantitative measures, such as bias and discipline coverage ...
The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 caused unexpected and unprecedented disruptions worldwide. University students, especially international students, underwent unique challenges during this volatile era. This secondary quantitative data analysis study aimed to investigate the experiences, stress, adjustment, and ways of coping of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from 112 ...
When we first launched a technical preview of GitHub Copilot in 2021, our hypothesis was that it would improve developer productivity and, in fact, early users shared reports that it did. In the months following its release, we wanted to better understand and measure its effects with quantitative and qualitative research.
Our study employed Mendelian randomization, which is a qualitative research method, and the results indicate only an association, precluding quantitative analysis. Therefore, we currently cannot determine the optimal ratio for the prevention of esophageal cancer. Future research should focus on quantitative studies of omega-6/omega-3 ratios.
The location of the study was Tana River County where a sample of 30 maize farming households was purposely chosen for the study. Data was captured using questionnaires and both qualitative and quantitative data was captured. The research took a correlational study design and through statistical analysis using the Pearson Correlation ...
There is growing recognition that earliest signs of autism need not clearly manifest in the first three years of life. To what extent is this variation in developmental trajectories associated with age at autism diagnosis? Does the genetic profile of autism vary with age at autism diagnosis? Using longitudinal data from four birth cohorts, we demonstrate that two different trajectories of ...
We have a series of questions to guide our conversation. We will use findings from these interviews and research to write a report and then a public brief on the implementation and impact of the FEPP Levy. If you agree to be interviewed, I'd like to let you know that: • Participation in this discussion is voluntary. So, as we move through ...