new horizons in carbohydrate research

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

Affiliations.

• 1 School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
• 2 School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. [email protected].
• PMID: 36173597
• PMCID: PMC9734239
• DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01757-1

The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called train-low approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Publication types

• Athletic Performance*
• Blood Glucose
• Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring*
• Dietary Carbohydrates / metabolism
• Physical Endurance
• Dietary Carbohydrates

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

Tim podlogar.

School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Gareth A. Wallis

The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called train-low approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

Introduction

It is now generally accepted that carbohydrates are perhaps the most important energy substrate for elite performance [ 1 , 2 ]. However, this has not always been the case. At the start of the modern Olympic Games in 1896, protein was thought to be the most important energy source for athletes [ 3 ]. Research showing the importance of carbohydrates for performance began to emerge as early as the 1920s [ 4 ]. Further seminal work conducted in the 1960s [ 5 ], as reviewed elsewhere [ 3 , 6 ], clarified the importance of dietary carbohydrates for exercise and in particular the role of muscle glycogen in endurance performance. However, it was only at the Montreal Olympic Games in 1976 that an appreciation of the importance of dietary carbohydrates among athletes and coaches started to emerge [ 3 ]. Together with other advances made towards improving athletic performance, such as improved equipment and training methodology, researchers continued to study carbohydrate metabolism to better understand the mechanisms of how dietary carbohydrates improve performance, promote recovery and/or prevent fatigue, as well as researching strategies to optimize carbohydrate availability in athletes [ 7 – 10 ]. Over this period, understanding of the actions of dietary carbohydrates on exercise metabolism and performance has increased substantially and, in concert, nutritional recommendations for athletes have developed and continue to evolve to reflect contemporary knowledge and practice. Nonetheless, scientific unknowns remain that, if addressed, could provide athletes with even more detailed and tailored recommendations to support them to reach their athletic potentials.

The purpose of this narrative review is to present contemporary perspectives and discuss areas for future research and application regarding the role of dietary carbohydrates for endurance athletes. The article is structured around three main sections: (1) the importance of carbohydrates for competition and high-intensity training sessions; (2) carbohydrates and training adaptation; and (3) personalizing carbohydrate intake. The article concludes by highlighting selected areas that, with further understanding, could help to further optimize the role of carbohydrates in endurance athletes’ diet (Table ​ (Table1 1 ).

Suggested areas for investigation to enhance understanding of the role of carbohydrates in the diet of athletes

BM body mass, RED-S relative energy deficiency in sport

Importance of Carbohydrates for Competition and High-Intensity Training Sessions

Sufficient energy availability from carbohydrates is required for athletes to sustain the demands of competition and recover for subsequent competitions [ 11 ]. Undertaking intense exercise sessions (i.e., competitions and high-intensity training sessions) places large demands on carbohydrates [ 12 ]. Additionally, the capacity to perform high-intensity sessions relies heavily on activation of carbohydrate metabolic pathways [ 13 ]. While energy for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production can be derived both from fats and carbohydrates, it is carbohydrates that are primarily utilized at high exercise intensities [ 14 , 15 ]. Evidence indicates that utilization of carbohydrates and not fats is crucial to sustain the exercise intensities observed in elite athletes [ 16 , 17 ]. However, the importance of an ability to oxidize fats at high intensities should not be discounted [ 18 ], as a valid method to quantify its contribution to ATP production during exercise at high intensities is yet to be established [ 19 ]. Due to limited endogenous carbohydrate availability [ 20 , 21 ] in endurance sports such as road cycling and cross-country skiing, energy requirements for races can exceed the capacity to store carbohydrates by more than 100% [ 22 , 23 ]. Thus, strategies have been proposed to circumvent this issue, such as increasing carbohydrate storage before the start of competition [ 24 ]—also known as carbohydrate or glycogen loading, increasing exogenous carbohydrate availability by carbohydrate feeding during exercise [ 25 ] and/or reducing reliance on endogenously stored carbohydrates while increasing the utilization of fatty acids [ 26 ].

Pre-competition

It has been known for decades that pre-exercise carbohydrate stores can influence exercise capacity [ 27 ]. The ability to store muscle glycogen increases with improved training status [ 28 ]. With training and dietary manipulations, muscle glycogen concentrations can increase to as much as 793 ± 170 mmol·kg −1 dry mass in highly trained populations [ 28 ]. While storage capacity is increased in highly trained populations, it appears that at the time of exhaustion, muscle glycogen concentrations are lower in untrained (i.e., 190 ± 90 mmol·kg −1 dry mass) than in trained populations (i.e., 280 ± 90 mmol·kg −1 dry mass) [ 28 ].

Recently, understanding of the underpinning mechanisms responsible for improved exercise capacity with elevated glycogen stores has improved. It has been demonstrated that glycogen loading increases exercise capacity by sparing of the intra-myofibrillar glycogen pool and that the intra-myofibrillar pool in type I muscle fibers is the best predictor of prolonged exercise capacity [ 29 ]. During high-intensity exercise efforts (e.g., sprints), the glycogen breakdown rate in type II fibers is higher than in type I fibers and this could indicate that glycogen content in that pool is more important at these intensities [ 30 ]; further work is required to see if this is the case. Mechanistically, impaired muscle function following muscle glycogen depletion appears to be due reduced Ca 2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum [ 29 , 31 ].

As a result of the plethora of research demonstrating the importance of muscle glycogen availability, strategies have been devised on how to optimally stimulate muscle glycogen synthesis in the days leading up to competition, a strategy also known as carbohydrate or glycogen loading [ 1 , 32 ]. To achieve muscle glycogen loading, athletes are recommended to consume a very high carbohydrate diet (i.e., 10–12 g·kg −1 body mass [BM] for 36–48 h before a competition [ 1 , 2 , 21 ]. However, it is common for athletes to undertake an exercise session in this time frame, during which some of the stored glycogen will be used. In addition, some sports events (e.g., cycling grand tours) consist of races taking place daily when there is less than 24 h available for recovery, and in these scenarios, optimization of carbohydrate intake in the post-exercise recovery period is paramount. Indeed, evidence indicates that maintaining high muscle glycogen concentration could be difficult in these circumstances [ 33 ]. More research is required to understand how to better sustain glycogen loading over multiple days, but most likely optimized recovery practices and in-race feeding strategies will represent the most effective ways to maintain adequate carbohydrate availability. In addition to this, more research is required to better understand how, and if it is possible to, affect skeletal muscle glycogen storage localization by diet manipulation, especially when time for carbohydrate ingestion is limited. A greater understanding of whether different types of carbohydrate affect the storage localization within muscle is also warranted.

While muscle glycogen depletion is more commonly associated with prolonged strenuous endurance exercise, even short but intense exercise bouts can result in significant reduction of muscle glycogen content [ 30 , 34 , 35 ]. Thus, one could assume that because of this, glycogen loading would be warranted. However, the evidence is not as conclusive, as glycogen loading before shorter duration events does not always translate into performance improvements [ 30 , 36 ]. For instance, Sherman and colleagues showed that for runners undertaking a half-marathon, glycogen loading was of no benefit to performance [ 36 ]. Based on this, it is not currently recommended to perform glycogen loading for events shorter than 90 min [ 32 ]. It is important that carbohydrate availability is still sufficient, yet targeted carbohydrate loading is less warranted as compared to when strenuous exercise is to be performed for > 90 min. It must also be acknowledged that glycogen storage causes water retention and thus elevates athletes’ BM [ 37 , 38 ]. This is especially pertinent for sports where increased BM could significantly hinder performance by reducing sustainable relative exercise intensity (e.g., W·kg −1 ) and/or reduce exercise economy [ 39 , 40 ]. However, it is important to discern between functional BM (i.e., glycogen) and non-functional (i.e., excess body fat mass), as the utilization of the former during the event will cause a reduction of BM and could therefore only have a negative impact in the early parts of prolonged events.

Whether liver glycogen stores can also be super compensated remains to be established, as currently there is no clear evidence that this is possible [ 20 ]. Varying carbohydrate intake does indeed change fasting liver glycogen concentrations [ 41 ], and this shows that sufficient carbohydrate intake is required to start an exercise session with normal liver glycogen stores. However, whether glycogen stores could be increased to higher-than-normal levels remains to be established. It is often overlooked that if competition is to be performed in the morning after an overnight fast (or any period of prolonged fasting), liver glycogen stores may be compromised. Namely, in the postabsorptive phase (e.g., during the night) liver glycogen stores decrease [ 41 ]; so, in the morning they can be substantially depleted [ 42 ]. On the contrary, muscle glycogen stores are typically not affected by an overnight fasting period [ 42 ]. As numerous competitions start in the morning, it is pertinent that the meals after overnight fast are designed so that there is a focus on liver glycogen repletion. While this has not been directly assessed, it could be speculated that providing athletes with a mix of different types of monosaccharides would be beneficial. This suggestion is based on previous observations that combining glucose-based carbohydrates with either fructose or galactose offer benefits on liver glycogen synthesis over glucose-based carbohydrates only [ 43 – 45 ]. Indeed, a recent study found improved exercise capacity with a breakfast consisting of fructose-glucose-based carbohydrates as compared to glucose-based carbohydrates only [ 46 ].

It is expected with further research that the general guideline recommending 1–4 g·kg −1 of BM of carbohydrates as a pre-exercise meal [ 1 , 2 ] will be updated with more granular recommendations based on the timing and the type of carbohydrates to be ingested. This would advance practical advice not only from the perspective of optimization of liver glycogen levels, but also from the perspective of preventing consequences of rebound hypoglycemia, which can occur in some athletes when exercise bouts are initiated close to a meal [ 47 ].

During Competition

It is now well established that carbohydrate intake during exercise improves exercise performance/capacity [ 48 ]. Current nutritional guidelines for athletes advise to consume carbohydrates during exercise at different rates and in relation to the duration of exercise bouts, as will be discussed later [ 1 , 2 ]. There are currently two proposed mechanisms of carbohydrate ergogenicity. Firstly, carbohydrates can be sensed in the oral cavity, causing an activation of certain brain regions, leading to stimulation of the central nervous system, as shown by improved performance by carbohydrate mouth rinsing [ 49 – 51 ]. Secondly, and most importantly, carbohydrates provide an additional fuel source for ATP formation during exercise. Carbohydrate ingestion during exercise maintains stable blood glucose levels over long exercise sessions [ 52 ] and maintains carbohydrate oxidation rates despite declining muscle glycogen stores so that ingested carbohydrates substitute endogenous carbohydrate stores [ 53 , 54 ]. In addition to this, exogenous carbohydrates can spare or even completely suppress liver glycogen breakdown [ 55 , 56 ]. While some studies have found sparing of muscle glycogen with carbohydrate supplementation during exercise [ 57 , 58 ], most of the studies assessing whole muscle glycogen utilization did not see this effect [ 28 ] and a recently published study that evaluated different carbohydrate ingestion rates during cycling exercise did not observe sparing of muscle glycogen in a muscle fiber type-specific manner either [ 59 ]. However, more recent evidence indicating the importance of compartmentalized glycogen metabolism to muscle function opens new avenues for investigating the mechanistic basis of carbohydrate feeding during exercise [ 29 ].

It is recommended that athletes ingest up to 60 g·h −1 of rapidly oxidized carbohydrates such as glucose, glucose polymers and glucose-fructose mixes for exercise sessions that are up to 3 h long [ 1 , 2 , 60 ]. Galactose has typically not been recommended to be ingested during exercise due to a belief that it is not as readily oxidized [ 61 , 62 ]. However, recent evidence demonstrates that at moderate dosages (i.e., 48 g·h −1 ), lactose (a molecule comprising glucose and galactose) can be as readily oxidized as sucrose (a molecule comprising glucose and fructose) while sparing endogenous carbohydrates [ 63 ]. It remains to be demonstrated directly, but these data indicate that oxidation of galactose during exercise is not limited when provided as lactose at moderate ingestion rates. Thus, lactose as a source of galactose and glucose can be ingested as an alternative carbohydrate source during exercise, at least in lactose-tolerant individuals.

The 60-g·h −1 recommendation is based on studies showing that when glucose-based carbohydrates are ingested during exercise, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates peak at 1–1.1 g·min −1 , even if the ingestion rate is higher [ 25 , 64 , 65 ]. It is believed that at this ingestion rate, the sodium-glucose linked transporters (SGLT1) in the small intestine become saturated [ 25 ]. This notion is based on the observations that when fructose, whose absorption from the small intestine utilizes a different transporter (i.e., glucose transporter 5 [GLUT5]), is co-ingested with glucose, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates are elevated, and gastrointestinal issues are less prevalent [ 66 – 69 ]. As a result of this, athletes are recommended to ingest mixtures of glucose- and fructose-based carbohydrates when training or competition is longer than 2.5 h and when 60–90 g·h −1 of carbohydrates are ingested [ 1 , 2 , 60 ].

Most studies investigating combined ingestion of glucose-based carbohydrates and fructose utilized a 2:1 glucose:fructose ratio, and this has since become a standard recommendation [ 60 ]. However, a closer examination of the literature reveals that a ratio closer to unity (i.e., 1:0.8 glucose:fructose) is superior both from the perspective of oxidation efficiency (i.e., the fraction of ingested carbohydrates being oxidized) as well as gut comfort, and this occurs even at glucose ingestion rates below 60 g·h −1 when glucose absorption is thought not to be limiting [ 69 ]. Thus, it could be recommended that composite glucose- and fructose-based carbohydrates in a ratio close to unity are ingested irrespective of exercise duration. The suggestion that glucose-fructose mixtures be recommended (over single transportable carbohydrates) even when exercise duration lies within 1–2.5 h has the additional advantages of providing greater flexibility to increase carbohydrate intakes within an event if necessary.

Current recommendations do not advise athletes to ingest more than 90 g·h −1 of carbohydrates [ 1 , 2 ] as it is believed that more carbohydrates do not offer additional benefits. Most studies to date investigating exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates have been performed on moderately to highly trained athletes, but not in elite athletes whose absolute energy demands can be vastly higher. It has been reported that elite cyclists can tolerate more than 90 g·h −1 of carbohydrates mostly from glucose-based carbohydrates [ 70 ]. We have recently shown higher exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during prolonged endurance exercise in highly trained athletes with carbohydrate ingestion at 120 g·h −1 as compared to 90 g·h −1 [ 71 ]. However, endogenous carbohydrate oxidation was not further spared by the higher carbohydrate dose, and thus whether there would be an additional performance benefit requires clarification. Nonetheless, limited data support that carbohydrate intakes of up to 120 g·h −1 offer some benefits over 90 g·h −1 regarding post-exercise markers of muscle damage and recovery [ 72 , 73 ]. Thus, this indicates that in certain scenarios, higher carbohydrate intakes than the currently recommended 90 g·h −1 could be beneficial.

Current evidence indicates that glucose delivery to the active tissue (i.e., muscle) limits exogenous carbohydrates oxidation rates. Bypassing intestinal absorption by infusing glucose and maintaining glycaemia did not result in higher exogenous glucose oxidation rates [ 74 ], whereas infusing glucose to maintain hyperglycemia (i.e., 10 mmol·L −1 ) enabled muscles to utilize up to 2 g·min −1 of exogenous glucose [ 75 ]. This occurred without a reduction in muscle glycogen use, but rather with suppression of fat oxidation rates. As oral ingestion of very large amounts of glucose (i.e., ~ 2.7 g·min −1 ) during moderate-intensity exercise did not cause plasma glucose concentrations to rise substantially and the rate of glucose appearance in the systemic circulation peaked at ~ 1 g·min −1 [ 55 ], intestinal absorption and/or extraction of glucose by the liver are the most plausible factors limiting exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates. However, there is a relationship between exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates and ingestion rates, and evidence shows that ingestion rates higher than 90 g·h −1 are feasible and that this results in very high exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 66 , 76 – 79 ]. Yet, evidence for recommending such high ingestion rates (i.e., > 90 g·h −1 ) remains inconclusive, as there appears to be no further improvement in performance [ 80 ], no sparing of endogenous carbohydrate stores [ 71 ] and, in some cases, aggressive carbohydrate feeding during exercise can result in increased muscle glycogen utilization [ 81 , 82 ]. It could be that athletes whose energy turnover rates during exercise are very high and thus have a high glucose flux to muscle due to increased blood flow proportional to absolute exercise intensity [ 83 ] could benefit from carbohydrate ingestion rates that are higher than currently recommended, but this requires further evaluation. Additionally, it remains to be established what occurs at intensities in heavy and severe exercise intensity domains, as some evidence indicates that despite higher carbohydrate demands, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates do not further increase [ 84 ]. Nonetheless, at present, it cannot be recommended to alter the currently recommended maximal carbohydrate ingestion dose during endurance exercise (i.e., up to 90 g·h −1 ).

There have been many attempts to increase exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates by co-ingestion of carbohydrates with other nutrients or nutritional supplements, a topic recently reviewed by Baur and Saunders [ 85 ]. There was no effect from co-ingestion with protein [ 86 ], calcium [ 87 ] or sucralose [ 88 ], use of different glucose polymers [ 89 ] or use of drinks with different osmolality [ 90 ], whereas effects of caffeine co-ingestion yielded mixed results [ 91 , 92 ]. On the other hand, 4 weeks of probiotic supplementation [ 93 ] and carbohydrate co-ingestion with l -arginine [ 94 ] increased exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates, albeit to a degree (< 0.1 g·min −1 ), with likely limited practical relevance. More recently, use of hydrogel-forming carbohydrate drinks and gels has been popularized, and while the majority of studies found this strategy not to affect exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 95 , 96 ], a recent study found that there could be a positive effect when using solely monosaccharide-based carbohydrate solutions (i.e., free glucose, free fructose) as opposed to a combination of polysaccharides (i.e., maltodextrin) and monosaccharides (i.e., fructose) [ 97 ]. More research is required to better understand a potential utility of the hydrogel.

Environmental Factors

While a vast majority of the studies discussed in the present article are based on interventions conducted in thermoneutral conditions, athletes are commonly required to exercise in extreme environments (e.g., hypoxia and high temperatures). In recent years, advances have been made in understanding how these environmental stressors affect carbohydrate metabolism during exercise [ 98 ] and more work is expected to be undertaken in the upcoming years. Both exercise in hypoxia and in the heat reduce the workloads at which the boundaries between moderate/heavy and heavy/severe exercise intensity domains occur ([ 99 , 100 ]), making it more difficult to interpret studies due to potentially different energy turnover (i.e., when comparing responses to the same relative exercise intensity) or different physiological responses (i.e., when comparing responses to the same absolute exercise intensity).

When comparing exercise at the same relative exercise intensity between hypoxia and normoxia, there appear to be no differences in substrate oxidation rates [ 101 ], whereas if the absolute intensity is matched, there is an increase in carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 102 ]. This is met with a reduced ability to oxidize exogenous carbohydrates during exercise at both the same absolute [ 103 ] and relative intensity [ 104 ] It was hypothesized that this is largely explained by reduced peripheral insulin sensitivity because of increased oxidative stress in hypoxia [ 105 ]. Interestingly, altitude acclimation (i.e., 22 days of sojourning at altitude) alleviated the reduced ability to oxidize exogenous carbohydrates during exercise [ 103 ]. Thus, it appears that sufficient pre-exercise carbohydrate intake plays a crucial role in sustaining intense exercise in hypoxia [ 106 ].

Exercise in the heat at the same absolute intensity is accompanied with increased rates of glycogenolysis and thus glycogen utilization in non-heat acclimatized individuals [ 107 – 109 ]. This effect is somewhat alleviated with heat acclimation [ 110 ], making another argument towards the importance of undertaking heat acclimation before competing in the heat [ 111 ]. Similarly, as with hypoxia, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates in non-heat acclimated athletes are reduced under heat stress [ 112 ]. The underlying mechanisms are not yet completely understood. Among potential mechanisms are reduced carbohydrate absorption due to redistribution of the blood flow from the intestines towards the skin to support evaporative heat loss or a reduction in gastric emptying, which may be exacerbated with hypohydration [ 113 ], and/or increased rates of glycogenolysis due to elevated muscle temperature [ 109 , 114 ]. The latter could in turn result in accumulation of glucose within the cell and a reduced glucose gradient between muscle cells and blood [ 115 , 116 ]. Of note is also the fact that under heat stress, athletes are exercising at a higher relative exercise intensity, which drives increased carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 99 , 117 ]. It remains to be explored whether heat acclimation somehow alleviates reductions in exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates in the heat. From the applied perspective, currently, the most important solution to circumvent this is combining glucose- and fructose-based carbohydrates so higher exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates can be achieved than those seen with glucose alone [ 118 ].

Post-Competition

The main aim of carbohydrate nutrition in the post-competition period is recovery of liver and muscle glycogen stores. This does not necessarily imply that carbohydrate intake needs to be such that repletion of glycogen stores always needs to be rapid given that the next exercise session might not require full glycogen stores (e.g., an easy training session), but rather it must be tailored to the goals of the upcoming training/competition schedule. In this section, optimization of carbohydrate intake for scenarios when the next high-intensity training session/competition demanding high carbohydrate availability is followed in < 36 h is discussed, whereas other scenarios will be discussed in the Sect. 3 . It is believed that for a full repletion of muscle glycogen stores, 24–36 h [ 21 ] are required, whereas for the complete repletion of liver glycogen, 11–25 h are needed [ 119 ]. Current nutritional guidelines recommend athletes ingest moderate to high glycemic index carbohydrates as soon as possible at the rate of 1.0–1.2 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 to optimize repletion of glycogen stores for the first 4 h, when rapid repletion of glycogen stores is required, after which a normal diet reflecting daily fuel needs, which may be up to 12 g·kg −1 BM, is recommended [ 1 , 2 , 120 ].

However, a close examination of the literature reveals that these guidelines are perhaps too simplistic, especially for elite athletes. Scrutiny of the evidence for the optimal dosage of carbohydrates to be ingested in the early hours of post-exercise recovery reveals that there is only one study available comparing 1.2 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 (i.e., “optimal”) with a higher dosage (i.e., 1.6 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 ), and this has been performed in moderately trained individuals with a BM index of ~ 26 kg·m −2 [ 121 ]. While it is difficult to compare results between different studies given that different methodological approaches have been used, it appears that there is a good relationship between the dosage and the amount of muscle glycogen resynthesis spanning at least from 0 to 1.8 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 [ 120 ]. Thus, given that there is also a relationship between training status and the capacity to store muscle glycogen [ 28 ], it could be hypothesized that, absorption permitting, higher ingestion rates would be favorable to elite athletes whose relative proportion of muscle mass is higher. More research is required to elucidate if this is the case.

In addition to this, an emerging topic within the post-exercise recovery period, with an aim to improve functional capabilities of athletes, is the type of carbohydrates ingested in recovery. Namely, advances have been made on the type of carbohydrates (i.e., type of monosaccharides) ingested in the post-exercise recovery period that challenge current guidelines. While there appears to be no benefit of ingesting multiple types of carbohydrates (i.e., fructose and glucose) for optimization of muscle glycogen storage [ 45 , 122 ], the benefits appear to lie with the time course of liver glycogen replenishment that is quicker when composite carbohydrates are ingested (i.e., glucose-fructose and galactose-glucose mixtures) [ 43 , 45 , 123 ]. Advancing these data are studies showing that recovery of cycling exercise capacity is greater after ingestion of a combination of glucose-based carbohydrates and fructose as compared to glucose-based carbohydrates only [ 124 , 125 ], likely because of higher carbohydrate availability within both liver and muscle glycogen pools. It has been hypothesized (but not established) that combining glucose with both galactose and fructose would result in more rapid replenishment of both glycogen pools [ 126 ].

Interestingly, this strategy did not translate into improved cycling performance [ 127 ]. The results of the latter study are thus surprising. However, a close examination of the results offers a potential explanation and opens new research questions. Namely, two studies [ 125 , 127 ] quantified utilization of in-recovery ingested carbohydrates in the subsequent exercise bout and found an increase in its use, indicating an increased carbohydrate availability. However, the increase of carbohydrate oxidation rates in the study assessing subsequent cycling performance was such that by the time the cycling time trial was initiated, glycogen stores within the body were likely the same in both conditions. Thus, more work is required to define the precise scenarios when a functional benefit can be expected; however, there appears to be a uniform observation that in terms of metabolism, ingestion of composite carbohydrates is beneficial. A summary of current knowledge on the effectiveness of different monosaccharide types on repletion of different glycogen depots (i.e., liver and muscle) is presented in Fig.  1 . Based on the current evidence, it could be recommended that athletes seeking to recover glycogen stores as quickly as possible consider ingesting carbohydrates from a combination of glucose-based carbohydrates and fructose to optimally stimulate both liver and muscle glycogen resynthesis. The same recommendation cannot currently yet be given for galactose as whilst combined galactose-glucose favorably affects liver glycogen synthesis it is currently unknown how effective it is in the replenishment of muscle glycogen stores.

Short-term recovery of muscle and liver glycogen stores after exhaustive exercise using different combinations of monosaccharides. Fructose-glucose carbohydrate mixtures have been demonstrated to be very effective in replenishment of both muscle and liver glycogen stores. On the other hand, while glucose-based carbohydrates cause robust rates of muscle glycogen replenishment, liver glycogen synthesis rates are inferior as compared to a combination of fructose-glucose- and galactose-glucose-based carbohydrates. No data are currently available for muscle glycogen synthesis rates after ingesting a galactose-glucose mixture. It is hypothesized (but not established) that combining fructose-galactose-glucose-based carbohydrates would be optimal for post-exercise repletion of both glycogen pools. CHO carbohydrate

Carbohydrates for Training

Training can be described as undertaking structured workouts with an aim to improve or maintain performance over time by manipulating the structure, intensity, duration and frequency of training sessions [ 128 – 130 ]. As total energy requirements and, consequently, carbohydrate demands are high in endurance-based sports, it is fair to assume that optimization of carbohydrate intake in these sport disciplines plays an important role. Early sports nutrition guidelines [ 131 ] advised athletes to both train and compete with high carbohydrate availability, and this approach dominated until 2005, when Hansen and colleagues observed that a reduction in carbohydrate availability before certain training sessions in untrained individuals could potentially enhance training adaptations [ 132 ]. In this study, leg kicking exercise training was performed in a 10-week-long training study. Each leg was subjected to a different treatment. Half of the training sessions in one leg were performed with reduced muscle glycogen content, while the other leg’s training sessions always commenced with normal glycogen stores. After the intervention, there was a substantial improvement in time to task failure at 90% of maximal workload in the leg that trained with reduced glycogen stores (+ 294%), while the increase in the other leg was much smaller (+ 125%). Muscle biopsy analysis also showed more positive metabolic adaptations (hydroxy acyl-CoA dehydrogenase [HAD] and citrate synthase [CS] activity) in the leg training with reduced muscle glycogen stores. While very attractive, the strategy was found to be effective in untrained individuals, and more work was required to see if similar findings could be observed in already trained individuals. As a result, this study was a landmark study paving the way for further investigations into whether different approaches to nutrient availability in trained athletes are beneficial based on different goals: training adaptation or competition performance.

In addition to carbohydrate availability manipulations to influence training adaptations, the concept of training the gut also needs to be considered to become a part of the training process to potentially improve tolerance to high carbohydrate ingestion rates during exercise especially [ 133 , 134 ], as the prevalence of gastrointestinal issues during exercise is large [ 135 , 136 ]. While the concept of training with high carbohydrate intakes to improve tolerance to ingested carbohydrates seems warranted, it remains to be established whether such practice leads to improved absorption of ingested carbohydrates and by what mechanisms or leads to just improved tolerance. Recent evidence from rats indicates that a combination of a high carbohydrate diet and exercise does not result in an increased number of glucose transporters in the intestines [ 137 ], and it could be thus speculated that improved tolerance can occur independently of improved absorption capacity.

Carbohydrate Periodization

Building from the study by Hansen and colleagues, research started to focus on ways to optimize training adaptations and not necessarily optimize performance within these training sessions in trained individuals. Indeed, studies investigating molecular signaling responses after acute bouts of training with low muscle and liver glycogen stores in trained individuals provided promising results [ 10 , 138 ]. As a result, the term carbohydrate periodization emerged whereby carbohydrate intake is adjusted daily based on the demands and/or goals of a certain training session. The concept is well described elsewhere [ 138 , 139 ]. Using this approach, some studies demonstrated metabolic benefits, such as reduced reliance on carbohydrates during moderate-intensity exercise [ 140 , 141 ]. However, a recent meta-analysis of nine studies investigating long-term benefits of carbohydrate periodization on performance outcomes suggests that this approach does not always enhance performance in the long term over training with high carbohydrate availability [ 142 ]. Perhaps important to understand when interpreting these data is that large training volumes are accompanied by substantial energy turnover. Even if a training session is initiated with adequate muscle glycogen stores, they will be markedly reduced by the end of it [ 28 ], creating a suitable environment for activation of crucial molecular signaling pathways thought to be responsible for positive adaptations [ 138 ].

One of the fundamental principles of endurance training is achieving sufficient training volume [ 143 , 144 ]. For instance, elite cyclists are reported to cover more than 30,000 km on the bike in a single year [ 145 ]. Large training volumes are reported in other endurance sports as well [ 146 ]. This provides support for the notion that accumulation of sufficient training volume is of paramount importance among elite endurance athletes. Training with high carbohydrate availability (i.e., before and during) increases exercise capacity and performance, and inversely, training with low carbohydrate availability achieves the reverse effect, i.e., a reduction in exercise capacity [ 27 , 53 ] and thus a reduction in training intensity and/or duration. Thus, training with low carbohydrate availability should likely be at best viewed as a more time efficient way to train [ 138 , 147 ] rather than the optimal way. Commencing training sessions with insufficient carbohydrate availability would result in a reduction in the duration and/or intensity of the session, which are collectively the most important determinants of successful long-term endurance improvements [ 143 ]. However, as the athlete exhausts possibilities to improve performance by increasing training duration and/or intensity, reducing carbohydrate availability before training sessions could potentially be a useful strategy to increase the metabolic perturbation required to elicit training adaptations [ 148 , 149 ] in a similar way to training in hypoxia or heat stress [ 150 ]. In line with this, a recent analysis demonstrated that both the degree of muscle glycogen utilization during exercise, which is mainly influenced by intensity/duration, and muscle glycogen concentrations at the end of an exercise bout, which could be influenced by carbohydrate availability pre- and during exercise, are important predictors of post-exercise 5ʹ adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity [ 151 ]. Thus, manipulating carbohydrate availability before and during training sessions could affect molecular responses after exercise bouts. However, focusing solely on activation of pathways such as AMPK could be too reductionist, as it does not account for the recovery that is required after such a session, as, for instance, it is well known that protein breakdown is increased during such sessions [ 152 , 153 ]. In addition to this, recent evidence indicates that the time between two exercise sessions rather than carbohydrate availability is the important modulator of the training responses after the second exercise bout [ 154 , 155 ].

Collectively, the evidence indicates a limited utility of training with reduced carbohydrate availability most likely due to a decrease in training duration and/or intensity, unless one seeks the most time efficient training method. To circumvent this, attempts have been made to rescue the reduction in training capacity by utilization of ingestion of ergogenic aids. In line with this, carbohydrate and caffeine mouth rinsing have been shown to improve high-intensity exercise performance when conducted under a carbohydrate-restricted state [ 156 ]. Whether training adaptation can be enhanced with this approach has not been studied. More recently, building on previous work [ 157 ], the effects of delayed carbohydrate feeding in a glycogen depleted state (i.e., liver and muscle) on whole body metabolism and performance have been investigated [ 158 ]. While performance outcomes were unclear, delayed carbohydrate feeding enabled maintenance of stable blood glucose concentrations without suppressing fat oxidation rates and thus created a favorable metabolic response. Again, whether such an approach leads to longer-term enhancement in training adaptation remains to be seen. More broadly there is a need to further explore the potential benefits of commencing exercise with low carbohydrate availability to maximize both the metabolic and mechanical (i.e., exercise capacity) stimulus to optimize exercise adaptations.

Training to Increase Fat Oxidation

Another popular reason for undertaking training with low carbohydrate availability is the notion that such an approach would lead to increases in fat oxidation rates during competition and spare endogenous carbohydrate stores with a limited storage capacity and by doing so improve performance [ 18 , 159 ]. This view appears to be too simplistic, as numerous factors affect substrate utilization rates, including exercise intensity, training status, sex, acute and/or chronic diet [ 160 , 161 ]. A recent study indicated that the capacity to utilize fat during exercise in an overnight fasted state is best correlated with CS activity [ 162 ], a marker of mitochondrial content [ 163 ] that is itself well correlated with training volume [ 144 ]. Thus, (1) the capacity to oxidize fat should naturally come together with improved training status and (2) specific manipulations of nutrition/training to alter fat oxidation rates during exercise should only be considered once the desired training status has been achieved. In other words, increasing fat oxidation rates as such should not come in front of the goal to improve one’s aerobic capacity, especially in the light of evidence demonstrating that training with low carbohydrate availability can result in a reduced ability to exercise at high intensities [ 164 ] due to reduced ability to utilize carbohydrates, as already discussed in previous sections [ 13 ]. More research is required to better understand if training and diet can be structured so that substrate oxidation rates would be altered in favor of fat oxidation without being part of general improvements seen with training per se, and whether this could lead to improvements in endurance performance.

Low Carbohydrate Availability and RED-S

Unfortunately, the prevalence of relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S) remains high [ 165 ]. Building on the previous evidence that sufficient carbohydrate intake can ameliorate symptoms of overtraining [ 166 , 167 ], it has recently been proposed that there might be a link between relative RED-S and overtraining and that a common confounding factor is carbohydrate [ 11 ]. Recent data support an important role for dietary carbohydrate, as low carbohydrate, but not low energy availability, affects bone health markers [ 168 ], and deliberately inducing low carbohydrate availability to promote training adaptations and remaining in energy balance by increasing fat intake does not offer any benefits over a combination of energy and carbohydrate deficit—even more, it can impair glycemic regulation [ 169 ]. Whether carbohydrate availability is the crucial part in the development of RED-S remains to be properly elucidated.

A Framework for Carbohydrate Periodization

Collectively, periodizing carbohydrate intake based on the demands of training and especially an upcoming training session currently appears to be the most sensible approach as it (1) allows the execution of the prescribed training program, (2) minimizes the risk of high carbohydrate availability impeding training adaptations and (3) helps minimize the risk for occurrence of RED-S. A framework for carbohydrate periodization using this concept is depicted in Fig.  2 .

Framework for carbohydrate periodization based on the demands of the upcoming exercise session. Exercise intensity domain selection refers to the highest intensity attained during the exercise session. The exact carbohydrate requirements are to be personalized based on the expected energy demands of each exercise session. CHO carbohydrates, CP critical power, LT1 lactate threshold 1, LT2 lactate threshold 2, MLSS maximal lactate steady state

While provision of exact recommendations for carbohydrate intake before and during exercise forms part of sports nutrition recommendations provided elsewhere [ 1 , 2 ], we believe that interindividual differences in energy and thus carbohydrate requirements are such that optimization of carbohydrate intake should be personalized based on the demands and the goals of the exercise session one is preparing feeding for. For instance, aggressive provision of carbohydrate intake during exercise deemed beneficial among one population [ 73 ] in another population could lead to unwanted increase in muscle glycogen utilization [ 81 ]. In addition to this, even within sports commonly characterized as featuring extreme energy turnover rates, day-to-day differences are such that provision of exact carbohydrate guidelines would be too inaccurate [ 22 , 170 ]. Thus, personalization of carbohydrate intake during exercise is warranted, as described in the next section.

Personalizing Carbohydrate Intake

A certain level of personalization of energy and carbohydrate intake has been a standard part of nutritional guidelines for athletes for years [ 1 , 2 , 171 ]. Practitioners and athletes have a wide array of tools available that can help them personalize energy and carbohydrate intake. For instance, energy turnover for past training sessions and even energy requirements of the upcoming training sessions can relatively easily be predicted in sports where wearables exist to accurately quantify external work performed (i.e., power meters in cycling and running). Assuming fixed exercise efficiency one can then relatively accurately determine energy turnover during exercise. Knowing the relative exercise intensity of a given training session can further advance the understanding of the carbohydrate demands during exercise, as depicted in Fig.  2 . As described in Sect.  2 of this article, it appears that absolute exercise intensity during exercise is a large determinant of total energy, and consequently carbohydrate [ 14 ] and exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 172 , 173 ]. Thus, it is possible for athletes to predict energy turnover rates during exercise and adjust the carbohydrate intake accordingly.

In addition to this, the literature describing the physiological demands of a given sporting discipline can also be very insightful. For instance, energy turnover using gold-standard techniques has been assessed in many sporting contexts, including football [ 174 ], cycling [ 22 ] and tennis [ 175 ]. By knowing the energy demands, structure and goals of an upcoming training session, one can devise a suitable carbohydrate feeding strategy. Besides making predictions on total energy turnover during exercise, it is useful to establish the rate of glycogen breakdown, as very high-intensity efforts can substantially reduce muscle glycogen content without very high energy turnover rates [ 34 , 176 ], especially as low glycogen availability can negatively affect performance [ 30 ]. Attempts have been made to find ways to non-invasively and cost-effectively measure muscle glycogen concentrations (e.g., using ultrasound); however, to date no independently performed validation has been successful in showing that this method of muscle glycogen quantification provides valid results [ 177 ]. Currently, the best solution is to draw on previous studies investigating glycogen breakdown by muscle biopsy in different sports disciplines, such as weightlifting [ 178 ], athletics [ 179 ], rugby [ 180 ], men’s football [ 181 ], women’s football [ 182 ] and Australian Rules football [ 183 ]. These data can be useful for practitioners to determine the relative (i.e., high, moderate or low) carbohydrate demands of a certain exercise session. However, whilst knowledge of exercise demands can help with tailoring, an implicit assumption is that all athletes will respond in a similar manner to an intervention, which may not be the case. In this respect, despite the present limitations in the practical assessment of muscle glycogen in field settings, gaining more readily accessible information on individual athlete physiological responses could still be of value to achieve higher degrees of personalization than those that current guidelines allow.

Recently, use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has been popularized among endurance athletes, with an aim of personalizing carbohydrate intake around exercise for optimal performance. Certainly, knowledge of blood glucose profiles has the advantage that specific physiological data are generated from the individual athlete. These devices have a rich history in the field of diabetes treatment, and their utility has clearly been demonstrated [ 184 ]. For a device to be deemed of use and its use recommended to a wider audience, both of the following criteria must be met: (1) the parameter that the device is measuring should have contextual relevance (i.e., be providing useful information) and (2) the device must accurately measure what it is supposed to be measuring (i.e., be valid). While there is no doubt that CGM devices are useful in non-exercise contexts, their utility during exercise per se remains to be clearly established. Indeed, CGM devices appear to have limited validity during exercise [ 185 , 186 ], and this may be due to the complex nature of blood glucose regulation during varying types and intensities of exercise. Blood glucose concentrations are a result of glucose uptake by the tissue and glucose appearance (i.e., liver glucose output and carbohydrate ingestion). While it has been known for a long time that hypoglycemia can associate with task failure [ 187 ], its occurrence does not always precede it [ 124 ]. This is especially the case during exercise of higher intensities where blood glucose concentrations increase [ 188 ] due to increased liver glucose output [ 20 ] and/or reduced muscle glucose uptake due to a reduced concentration gradient [ 116 ]. Therefore, further investigative work is required to establish whether differential blood glucose profiles using validated technology during exercise can be identified and be used to individualize carbohydrate intake during exercise.

In addition to tracking glycaemia during exercise, tracking it throughout the day could also be proven useful. A recent study utilizing CGM devices compared daily blood glucose profiles in elite trained athletes with those in a sedentary population and discovered large discrepancies in blood glucose concentrations throughout the day between both groups [ 189 ]. Elite athletes spent more time in hyper- and hypoglycemia as compared to sedentary controls, giving an appearance that glycemic control might be impaired. While periods of hyperglycemia are expected due to post-exercise high carbohydrate intakes, observations of hypoglycemia occurring especially at night during sleep were somewhat surprising. These data can be proven insightful if (1) it is established that these kinds of fluctuations have some negative effects on athletes’ function (e.g., recovery) and (2) a mechanistic basis of what is driving these changes is determined. This knowledge can then be used to potentially individualize strategies to counter these episodes of impaired glycemic control in real time.

While utilization of CGM devices during exercise to guide carbohydrate intake during exercise cannot be presently advised, athletes could individualize carbohydrate ingestion rates during exercise by establishing their highest exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 25 ]. To do this, one requires the ability to know carbon isotope enrichments of the ingested carbohydrates and in expired carbon dioxide. This approach requires specialized testing methodology that was once the preserve of the research environment but could become a standard part of athletes’ profiling alongside other measures typically made during metabolic testing (e.g., exercise economy or fuel utilization). For example, advances have been made in methodology to easier quantify stable carbon isotope abundance in expired air [ 190 ], a methodology currently used for quantification of exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 25 ]. Thus, this approach could be spun off from research and be used in practice as well to identify carbohydrate intake rate and carbohydrate compositions that optimize exogenous carbohydrate oxidation in individual athletes.

Finally, most research to date has investigated carbohydrate intake in a healthy male population, and thus current carbohydrate guidelines are founded on this evidence. However, there are some important metabolism differences between the sexes [ 191 , 192 ] and/or relatively large populations of athletes with, e.g., diabetes type 1 [ 193 ] that would potentially benefit from more research work.

Conclusions

Despite decades of intense carbohydrate research within the field of sports nutrition, new knowledge continues to be generated with the potential to inform practice. In this article, we have highlighted recent observations that provide a more contemporary understanding of the role of carbohydrate nutrition for athletes. For example, our article suggests a stronger emphasis be placed on scaling carbohydrate intake before competition to the demands of that subsequent activity, with particular attention paid to the effects of concomitant exercise during the preparatory period. Furthermore, athletes looking to benefit from carbohydrate feeding during exercise in the up to 60 g·h −1 range may benefit from a wide range of readily oxidizable sources, including glucose, glucose polymers and combinations of glucose-galactose (including lactose) or glucose-fructose (including sucrose), with the latter blend affording the greatest potential flexibility across a range of intakes. At high ingestion rates during exercise (i.e., > 60 g·h −1 ), glucose-fructose blends in ratios approaching unity (i.e., 1:0.8) appear preferable to the previously considered optimal ratio of 2:1. Furthermore, short-term recovery may be optimized by combining glucose-fructose to target both liver and muscle glycogen synthesis simultaneously. Finally, there has been substantial investigation into the role of commencing selected exercise sessions with reduced carbohydrate availability to provide a beneficial stimulus for training adaptation. However, a contemporary view of the “train-low” approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training, but that its main benefit may lie in time efficiency.

The abovementioned suggestions are designed to build on the wealth of knowledge and recommendations already established for athletes. Nonetheless, what this review has also revealed is that gaps in our current understanding of carbohydrate nutrition and metabolism in relation to exercise performance remain. Some remaining research questions arising from the present article are presented in Table ​ Table1. 1 . Answering these research questions could allow continued advancement and refinement of carbohydrate intake guidelines and, by doing that, further increase the possibility of positively impacting athletic performance.

Acknowledgements

This supplement is supported by the Gatorade Sports Science Institute (GSSI). The supplement was guest edited by Lawrence L. Spriet, who convened a virtual meeting of the GSSI Expert Panel in October 2021 and received honoraria from the GSSI, a division of PepsiCo, Inc., for his participation in the meeting. Dr Spriet received no honoraria for guest editing the supplement. Dr Spriet suggested peer reviewers for each paper, which were sent to the Sports Medicine Editor-in-Chief for approval, prior to any reviewers being approached. Dr Spriet provided comments on each paper and made an editorial decision based on comments from the peer reviewers and the Editor-in-Chief. Where decisions were uncertain, Dr Spriet consulted with the Editor-in-Chief. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of PepsiCo, Inc.

Declarations

Both TP and GAW planned, wrote and revised the manuscript. Both authors also read and approved the final manuscript.

This article is based on a presentation by Gareth Wallis to the GSSI Expert Panel in October 2021. An honorarium for preparation of this article was provided by the GSSI. No other sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Not applicable.

Gareth Wallis has received research funding from and/or has acted as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline Ltd., Sugar Nutrition UK, Dairy Management Inc. and Volac International Ltd. Tim Podlogar has no conflicts of interest of potential relevance to the content of this review.

Sports Science Exchange

Continuing education, expert panel, new horizons in carbohydrate research and application for endurance athletes.

September 2022

Sports Nutrition, Sport Specific, Carbohydrate

The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called  train-low  approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

Recommended Reading

Continuing Education(6)

Sports science exchange(3), research(3), expert panel (3), continuing education (6), expert panel:(3), enter text to begin searching.

• Help & FAQ

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

• Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences

Research output : Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called train-low approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

Bibliographical note

Asjc scopus subject areas.

• Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
• Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Access to Document

• 10.1007/s40279-022-01757-1 Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)
• Podlogar2022_New_horizons Final published version, 1.28 MB Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

Fingerprint

• Athletes Medicine & Life Sciences 100%
• Carbohydrates Medicine & Life Sciences 95%
• Exercise Medicine & Life Sciences 44%
• Dietary Carbohydrates Medicine & Life Sciences 39%
• Inventions Medicine & Life Sciences 20%
• Athletic Performance Medicine & Life Sciences 17%
• Diet Medicine & Life Sciences 9%
• Guidelines Medicine & Life Sciences 8%

T1 - New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

AU - Podlogar, Tim

AU - Wallis, Gareth A

N1 - Funding Information: Gareth Wallis has received research funding from and/or has acted as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline Ltd., Sugar Nutrition UK, Dairy Management Inc. and Volac International Ltd. Tim Podlogar has no conflicts of interest of potential relevance to the content of this review. Funding Information: This supplement is supported by the Gatorade Sports Science Institute (GSSI). The supplement was guest edited by Lawrence L. Spriet, who convened a virtual meeting of the GSSI Expert Panel in October 2021 and received honoraria from the GSSI, a division of PepsiCo, Inc., for his participation in the meeting. Dr Spriet received no honoraria for guest editing the supplement. Dr Spriet suggested peer reviewers for each paper, which were sent to the Sports Medicine Editor-in-Chief for approval, prior to any reviewers being approached. Dr Spriet provided comments on each paper and made an editorial decision based on comments from the peer reviewers and the Editor-in-Chief. Where decisions were uncertain, Dr Spriet consulted with the Editor-in-Chief. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of PepsiCo, Inc. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022/9/29

Y1 - 2022/9/29

N2 - The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called train-low approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

AB - The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called train-low approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139095740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40279-022-01757-1

DO - 10.1007/s40279-022-01757-1

M3 - Review article

C2 - 36173597

SN - 0112-1642

JO - Sports Medicine

JF - Sports Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.

Springer Medicine

Open Access 29-09-2022 | Review Article

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

Authors: Tim Podlogar, Gareth A. Wallis

Published in: Sports Medicine | Special Issue 1/2022

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this special issue 1/2022.

Review Article

Active Women Across the Lifespan: Nutritional Ingredients to Support Health and Wellness

Mental performance and sport: caffeine and co-consumed bioactive ingredients, exogenous ketone supplements in athletic contexts: past, present, and future, the athlete gut microbiome and its relevance to health and performance: a review, diet and nutraceuticals for mental and physical performance in athletes, nad+ therapeutics and skeletal muscle adaptation to exercise in humans.

• Medical Journals
• Webcasts & Webinars
• CME & eLearning
• Newsletters
• ESMO Congress 2023
• 2023 ERS Congress
• ESC Congress 2023
• EHA2023 Hybrid Congress
• 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting Coverage
• Advances in Alzheimer’s
• About Springer Medicine
• Diabetology
• Endocrinology
• Gastroenterology
• Geriatrics and Gerontology
• Gynecology and Obstetrics
• Infectious Disease
• Internal Medicine
• Respiratory Medicine
• Rheumatology

Research Library

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

• Review Article
• Open access
• Published: 29 September 2022
• Volume 52 , pages 5–23, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Tim Podlogar 1 &
• Gareth A. Wallis   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-0859 1  

27k Accesses

17 Citations

82 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now widely recommended, a contemporary view of the so-called train-low approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training. Nonetheless, such studies have focused importance on periodizing carbohydrate intake based on, among other factors, the goal and demand of training or competition. This calls for a much more personalized approach to carbohydrate recommendations that could be further supported through future research and technological innovation (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring). Despite more than a century of investigations into carbohydrate nutrition, exercise metabolism and endurance performance, there are numerous new important discoveries, both from an applied and mechanistic perspective, on the horizon.

Similar content being viewed by others

Carbohydrate supplementation: a critical review of recent innovations

Performance effects of periodized carbohydrate restriction in endurance trained athletes – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Peak Week Carbohydrate Manipulation Practices in Physique Athletes: A Narrative Review

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

It is now generally accepted that carbohydrates are perhaps the most important energy substrate for elite performance [ 1 , 2 ]. However, this has not always been the case. At the start of the modern Olympic Games in 1896, protein was thought to be the most important energy source for athletes [ 3 ]. Research showing the importance of carbohydrates for performance began to emerge as early as the 1920s [ 4 ]. Further seminal work conducted in the 1960s [ 5 ], as reviewed elsewhere [ 3 , 6 ], clarified the importance of dietary carbohydrates for exercise and in particular the role of muscle glycogen in endurance performance. However, it was only at the Montreal Olympic Games in 1976 that an appreciation of the importance of dietary carbohydrates among athletes and coaches started to emerge [ 3 ]. Together with other advances made towards improving athletic performance, such as improved equipment and training methodology, researchers continued to study carbohydrate metabolism to better understand the mechanisms of how dietary carbohydrates improve performance, promote recovery and/or prevent fatigue, as well as researching strategies to optimize carbohydrate availability in athletes [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Over this period, understanding of the actions of dietary carbohydrates on exercise metabolism and performance has increased substantially and, in concert, nutritional recommendations for athletes have developed and continue to evolve to reflect contemporary knowledge and practice. Nonetheless, scientific unknowns remain that, if addressed, could provide athletes with even more detailed and tailored recommendations to support them to reach their athletic potentials.

The purpose of this narrative review is to present contemporary perspectives and discuss areas for future research and application regarding the role of dietary carbohydrates for endurance athletes. The article is structured around three main sections: (1) the importance of carbohydrates for competition and high-intensity training sessions; (2) carbohydrates and training adaptation; and (3) personalizing carbohydrate intake. The article concludes by highlighting selected areas that, with further understanding, could help to further optimize the role of carbohydrates in endurance athletes’ diet (Table 1 ).

2 Importance of Carbohydrates for Competition and High-Intensity Training Sessions

Sufficient energy availability from carbohydrates is required for athletes to sustain the demands of competition and recover for subsequent competitions [ 11 ]. Undertaking intense exercise sessions (i.e., competitions and high-intensity training sessions) places large demands on carbohydrates [ 12 ]. Additionally, the capacity to perform high-intensity sessions relies heavily on activation of carbohydrate metabolic pathways [ 13 ]. While energy for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production can be derived both from fats and carbohydrates, it is carbohydrates that are primarily utilized at high exercise intensities [ 14 , 15 ]. Evidence indicates that utilization of carbohydrates and not fats is crucial to sustain the exercise intensities observed in elite athletes [ 16 , 17 ]. However, the importance of an ability to oxidize fats at high intensities should not be discounted [ 18 ], as a valid method to quantify its contribution to ATP production during exercise at high intensities is yet to be established [ 19 ]. Due to limited endogenous carbohydrate availability [ 20 , 21 ] in endurance sports such as road cycling and cross-country skiing, energy requirements for races can exceed the capacity to store carbohydrates by more than 100% [ 22 , 23 ]. Thus, strategies have been proposed to circumvent this issue, such as increasing carbohydrate storage before the start of competition [ 24 ]—also known as carbohydrate or glycogen loading, increasing exogenous carbohydrate availability by carbohydrate feeding during exercise [ 25 ] and/or reducing reliance on endogenously stored carbohydrates while increasing the utilization of fatty acids [ 26 ].

2.1 Pre-competition

It has been known for decades that pre-exercise carbohydrate stores can influence exercise capacity [ 27 ]. The ability to store muscle glycogen increases with improved training status [ 28 ]. With training and dietary manipulations, muscle glycogen concentrations can increase to as much as 793 ± 170 mmol·kg −1 dry mass in highly trained populations [ 28 ]. While storage capacity is increased in highly trained populations, it appears that at the time of exhaustion, muscle glycogen concentrations are lower in untrained (i.e., 190 ± 90 mmol·kg −1 dry mass) than in trained populations (i.e., 280 ± 90 mmol·kg −1 dry mass) [ 28 ].

Recently, understanding of the underpinning mechanisms responsible for improved exercise capacity with elevated glycogen stores has improved. It has been demonstrated that glycogen loading increases exercise capacity by sparing of the intra-myofibrillar glycogen pool and that the intra-myofibrillar pool in type I muscle fibers is the best predictor of prolonged exercise capacity [ 29 ]. During high-intensity exercise efforts (e.g., sprints), the glycogen breakdown rate in type II fibers is higher than in type I fibers and this could indicate that glycogen content in that pool is more important at these intensities [ 30 ]; further work is required to see if this is the case. Mechanistically, impaired muscle function following muscle glycogen depletion appears to be due reduced Ca 2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum [ 29 , 31 ].

As a result of the plethora of research demonstrating the importance of muscle glycogen availability, strategies have been devised on how to optimally stimulate muscle glycogen synthesis in the days leading up to competition, a strategy also known as carbohydrate or glycogen loading [ 1 , 32 ]. To achieve muscle glycogen loading, athletes are recommended to consume a very high carbohydrate diet (i.e., 10–12 g·kg −1 body mass [BM] for 36–48 h before a competition [ 1 , 2 , 21 ]. However, it is common for athletes to undertake an exercise session in this time frame, during which some of the stored glycogen will be used. In addition, some sports events (e.g., cycling grand tours) consist of races taking place daily when there is less than 24 h available for recovery, and in these scenarios, optimization of carbohydrate intake in the post-exercise recovery period is paramount. Indeed, evidence indicates that maintaining high muscle glycogen concentration could be difficult in these circumstances [ 33 ]. More research is required to understand how to better sustain glycogen loading over multiple days, but most likely optimized recovery practices and in-race feeding strategies will represent the most effective ways to maintain adequate carbohydrate availability. In addition to this, more research is required to better understand how, and if it is possible to, affect skeletal muscle glycogen storage localization by diet manipulation, especially when time for carbohydrate ingestion is limited. A greater understanding of whether different types of carbohydrate affect the storage localization within muscle is also warranted.

While muscle glycogen depletion is more commonly associated with prolonged strenuous endurance exercise, even short but intense exercise bouts can result in significant reduction of muscle glycogen content [ 30 , 34 , 35 ]. Thus, one could assume that because of this, glycogen loading would be warranted. However, the evidence is not as conclusive, as glycogen loading before shorter duration events does not always translate into performance improvements [ 30 , 36 ]. For instance, Sherman and colleagues showed that for runners undertaking a half-marathon, glycogen loading was of no benefit to performance [ 36 ]. Based on this, it is not currently recommended to perform glycogen loading for events shorter than 90 min [ 32 ]. It is important that carbohydrate availability is still sufficient, yet targeted carbohydrate loading is less warranted as compared to when strenuous exercise is to be performed for > 90 min. It must also be acknowledged that glycogen storage causes water retention and thus elevates athletes’ BM [ 37 , 38 ]. This is especially pertinent for sports where increased BM could significantly hinder performance by reducing sustainable relative exercise intensity (e.g., W·kg −1 ) and/or reduce exercise economy [ 39 , 40 ]. However, it is important to discern between functional BM (i.e., glycogen) and non-functional (i.e., excess body fat mass), as the utilization of the former during the event will cause a reduction of BM and could therefore only have a negative impact in the early parts of prolonged events.

Whether liver glycogen stores can also be super compensated remains to be established, as currently there is no clear evidence that this is possible [ 20 ]. Varying carbohydrate intake does indeed change fasting liver glycogen concentrations [ 41 ], and this shows that sufficient carbohydrate intake is required to start an exercise session with normal liver glycogen stores. However, whether glycogen stores could be increased to higher-than-normal levels remains to be established. It is often overlooked that if competition is to be performed in the morning after an overnight fast (or any period of prolonged fasting), liver glycogen stores may be compromised. Namely, in the postabsorptive phase (e.g., during the night) liver glycogen stores decrease [ 41 ]; so, in the morning they can be substantially depleted [ 42 ]. On the contrary, muscle glycogen stores are typically not affected by an overnight fasting period [ 42 ]. As numerous competitions start in the morning, it is pertinent that the meals after overnight fast are designed so that there is a focus on liver glycogen repletion. While this has not been directly assessed, it could be speculated that providing athletes with a mix of different types of monosaccharides would be beneficial. This suggestion is based on previous observations that combining glucose-based carbohydrates with either fructose or galactose offer benefits on liver glycogen synthesis over glucose-based carbohydrates only [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Indeed, a recent study found improved exercise capacity with a breakfast consisting of fructose-glucose-based carbohydrates as compared to glucose-based carbohydrates only [ 46 ].

It is expected with further research that the general guideline recommending 1–4 g·kg −1 of BM of carbohydrates as a pre-exercise meal [ 1 , 2 ] will be updated with more granular recommendations based on the timing and the type of carbohydrates to be ingested. This would advance practical advice not only from the perspective of optimization of liver glycogen levels, but also from the perspective of preventing consequences of rebound hypoglycemia, which can occur in some athletes when exercise bouts are initiated close to a meal [ 47 ].

2.2 During Competition

It is now well established that carbohydrate intake during exercise improves exercise performance/capacity [ 48 ]. Current nutritional guidelines for athletes advise to consume carbohydrates during exercise at different rates and in relation to the duration of exercise bouts, as will be discussed later [ 1 , 2 ]. There are currently two proposed mechanisms of carbohydrate ergogenicity. Firstly, carbohydrates can be sensed in the oral cavity, causing an activation of certain brain regions, leading to stimulation of the central nervous system, as shown by improved performance by carbohydrate mouth rinsing [ 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Secondly, and most importantly, carbohydrates provide an additional fuel source for ATP formation during exercise. Carbohydrate ingestion during exercise maintains stable blood glucose levels over long exercise sessions [ 52 ] and maintains carbohydrate oxidation rates despite declining muscle glycogen stores so that ingested carbohydrates substitute endogenous carbohydrate stores [ 53 , 54 ]. In addition to this, exogenous carbohydrates can spare or even completely suppress liver glycogen breakdown [ 55 , 56 ]. While some studies have found sparing of muscle glycogen with carbohydrate supplementation during exercise [ 57 , 58 ], most of the studies assessing whole muscle glycogen utilization did not see this effect [ 28 ] and a recently published study that evaluated different carbohydrate ingestion rates during cycling exercise did not observe sparing of muscle glycogen in a muscle fiber type-specific manner either [ 59 ]. However, more recent evidence indicating the importance of compartmentalized glycogen metabolism to muscle function opens new avenues for investigating the mechanistic basis of carbohydrate feeding during exercise [ 29 ].

It is recommended that athletes ingest up to 60 g·h −1 of rapidly oxidized carbohydrates such as glucose, glucose polymers and glucose-fructose mixes for exercise sessions that are up to 3 h long [ 1 , 2 , 60 ]. Galactose has typically not been recommended to be ingested during exercise due to a belief that it is not as readily oxidized [ 61 , 62 ]. However, recent evidence demonstrates that at moderate dosages (i.e., 48 g·h −1 ), lactose (a molecule comprising glucose and galactose) can be as readily oxidized as sucrose (a molecule comprising glucose and fructose) while sparing endogenous carbohydrates [ 63 ]. It remains to be demonstrated directly, but these data indicate that oxidation of galactose during exercise is not limited when provided as lactose at moderate ingestion rates. Thus, lactose as a source of galactose and glucose can be ingested as an alternative carbohydrate source during exercise, at least in lactose-tolerant individuals.

The 60-g·h −1 recommendation is based on studies showing that when glucose-based carbohydrates are ingested during exercise, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates peak at 1–1.1 g·min −1 , even if the ingestion rate is higher [ 25 , 64 , 65 ]. It is believed that at this ingestion rate, the sodium-glucose linked transporters (SGLT1) in the small intestine become saturated [ 25 ]. This notion is based on the observations that when fructose, whose absorption from the small intestine utilizes a different transporter (i.e., glucose transporter 5 [GLUT5]), is co-ingested with glucose, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates are elevated, and gastrointestinal issues are less prevalent [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]. As a result of this, athletes are recommended to ingest mixtures of glucose- and fructose-based carbohydrates when training or competition is longer than 2.5 h and when 60–90 g·h −1 of carbohydrates are ingested [ 1 , 2 , 60 ].

Most studies investigating combined ingestion of glucose-based carbohydrates and fructose utilized a 2:1 glucose:fructose ratio, and this has since become a standard recommendation [ 60 ]. However, a closer examination of the literature reveals that a ratio closer to unity (i.e., 1:0.8 glucose:fructose) is superior both from the perspective of oxidation efficiency (i.e., the fraction of ingested carbohydrates being oxidized) as well as gut comfort, and this occurs even at glucose ingestion rates below 60 g·h −1 when glucose absorption is thought not to be limiting [ 69 ]. Thus, it could be recommended that composite glucose- and fructose-based carbohydrates in a ratio close to unity are ingested irrespective of exercise duration. The suggestion that glucose-fructose mixtures be recommended (over single transportable carbohydrates) even when exercise duration lies within 1–2.5 h has the additional advantages of providing greater flexibility to increase carbohydrate intakes within an event if necessary.

Current recommendations do not advise athletes to ingest more than 90 g·h −1 of carbohydrates [ 1 , 2 ] as it is believed that more carbohydrates do not offer additional benefits. Most studies to date investigating exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates have been performed on moderately to highly trained athletes, but not in elite athletes whose absolute energy demands can be vastly higher. It has been reported that elite cyclists can tolerate more than 90 g·h −1 of carbohydrates mostly from glucose-based carbohydrates [ 70 ]. We have recently shown higher exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during prolonged endurance exercise in highly trained athletes with carbohydrate ingestion at 120 g·h −1 as compared to 90 g·h −1 [ 71 ]. However, endogenous carbohydrate oxidation was not further spared by the higher carbohydrate dose, and thus whether there would be an additional performance benefit requires clarification. Nonetheless, limited data support that carbohydrate intakes of up to 120 g·h −1 offer some benefits over 90 g·h −1 regarding post-exercise markers of muscle damage and recovery [ 72 , 73 ]. Thus, this indicates that in certain scenarios, higher carbohydrate intakes than the currently recommended 90 g·h −1 could be beneficial.

Current evidence indicates that glucose delivery to the active tissue (i.e., muscle) limits exogenous carbohydrates oxidation rates. Bypassing intestinal absorption by infusing glucose and maintaining glycaemia did not result in higher exogenous glucose oxidation rates [ 74 ], whereas infusing glucose to maintain hyperglycemia (i.e., 10 mmol·L −1 ) enabled muscles to utilize up to 2 g·min −1 of exogenous glucose [ 75 ]. This occurred without a reduction in muscle glycogen use, but rather with suppression of fat oxidation rates. As oral ingestion of very large amounts of glucose (i.e., ~ 2.7 g·min −1 ) during moderate-intensity exercise did not cause plasma glucose concentrations to rise substantially and the rate of glucose appearance in the systemic circulation peaked at ~ 1 g·min −1 [ 55 ], intestinal absorption and/or extraction of glucose by the liver are the most plausible factors limiting exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates. However, there is a relationship between exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates and ingestion rates, and evidence shows that ingestion rates higher than 90 g·h −1 are feasible and that this results in very high exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 66 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]. Yet, evidence for recommending such high ingestion rates (i.e., > 90 g·h −1 ) remains inconclusive, as there appears to be no further improvement in performance [ 80 ], no sparing of endogenous carbohydrate stores [ 71 ] and, in some cases, aggressive carbohydrate feeding during exercise can result in increased muscle glycogen utilization [ 81 , 82 ]. It could be that athletes whose energy turnover rates during exercise are very high and thus have a high glucose flux to muscle due to increased blood flow proportional to absolute exercise intensity [ 83 ] could benefit from carbohydrate ingestion rates that are higher than currently recommended, but this requires further evaluation. Additionally, it remains to be established what occurs at intensities in heavy and severe exercise intensity domains, as some evidence indicates that despite higher carbohydrate demands, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates do not further increase [ 84 ]. Nonetheless, at present, it cannot be recommended to alter the currently recommended maximal carbohydrate ingestion dose during endurance exercise (i.e., up to 90 g·h −1 ).

There have been many attempts to increase exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates by co-ingestion of carbohydrates with other nutrients or nutritional supplements, a topic recently reviewed by Baur and Saunders [ 85 ]. There was no effect from co-ingestion with protein [ 86 ], calcium [ 87 ] or sucralose [ 88 ], use of different glucose polymers [ 89 ] or use of drinks with different osmolality [ 90 ], whereas effects of caffeine co-ingestion yielded mixed results [ 91 , 92 ]. On the other hand, 4 weeks of probiotic supplementation [ 93 ] and carbohydrate co-ingestion with l -arginine [ 94 ] increased exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates, albeit to a degree (< 0.1 g·min −1 ), with likely limited practical relevance. More recently, use of hydrogel-forming carbohydrate drinks and gels has been popularized, and while the majority of studies found this strategy not to affect exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 95 , 96 ], a recent study found that there could be a positive effect when using solely monosaccharide-based carbohydrate solutions (i.e., free glucose, free fructose) as opposed to a combination of polysaccharides (i.e., maltodextrin) and monosaccharides (i.e., fructose) [ 97 ]. More research is required to better understand a potential utility of the hydrogel.

2.2.1 Environmental Factors

While a vast majority of the studies discussed in the present article are based on interventions conducted in thermoneutral conditions, athletes are commonly required to exercise in extreme environments (e.g., hypoxia and high temperatures). In recent years, advances have been made in understanding how these environmental stressors affect carbohydrate metabolism during exercise [ 98 ] and more work is expected to be undertaken in the upcoming years. Both exercise in hypoxia and in the heat reduce the workloads at which the boundaries between moderate/heavy and heavy/severe exercise intensity domains occur ([ 99 , 100 ]), making it more difficult to interpret studies due to potentially different energy turnover (i.e., when comparing responses to the same relative exercise intensity) or different physiological responses (i.e., when comparing responses to the same absolute exercise intensity).

When comparing exercise at the same relative exercise intensity between hypoxia and normoxia, there appear to be no differences in substrate oxidation rates [ 101 ], whereas if the absolute intensity is matched, there is an increase in carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 102 ]. This is met with a reduced ability to oxidize exogenous carbohydrates during exercise at both the same absolute [ 103 ] and relative intensity [ 104 ] It was hypothesized that this is largely explained by reduced peripheral insulin sensitivity because of increased oxidative stress in hypoxia [ 105 ]. Interestingly, altitude acclimation (i.e., 22 days of sojourning at altitude) alleviated the reduced ability to oxidize exogenous carbohydrates during exercise [ 103 ]. Thus, it appears that sufficient pre-exercise carbohydrate intake plays a crucial role in sustaining intense exercise in hypoxia [ 106 ].

Exercise in the heat at the same absolute intensity is accompanied with increased rates of glycogenolysis and thus glycogen utilization in non-heat acclimatized individuals [ 107 , 108 , 109 ]. This effect is somewhat alleviated with heat acclimation [ 110 ], making another argument towards the importance of undertaking heat acclimation before competing in the heat [ 111 ]. Similarly, as with hypoxia, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates in non-heat acclimated athletes are reduced under heat stress [ 112 ]. The underlying mechanisms are not yet completely understood. Among potential mechanisms are reduced carbohydrate absorption due to redistribution of the blood flow from the intestines towards the skin to support evaporative heat loss or a reduction in gastric emptying, which may be exacerbated with hypohydration [ 113 ], and/or increased rates of glycogenolysis due to elevated muscle temperature [ 109 , 114 ]. The latter could in turn result in accumulation of glucose within the cell and a reduced glucose gradient between muscle cells and blood [ 115 , 116 ]. Of note is also the fact that under heat stress, athletes are exercising at a higher relative exercise intensity, which drives increased carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 99 , 117 ]. It remains to be explored whether heat acclimation somehow alleviates reductions in exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates in the heat. From the applied perspective, currently, the most important solution to circumvent this is combining glucose- and fructose-based carbohydrates so higher exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates can be achieved than those seen with glucose alone [ 118 ].

2.3 Post-Competition

The main aim of carbohydrate nutrition in the post-competition period is recovery of liver and muscle glycogen stores. This does not necessarily imply that carbohydrate intake needs to be such that repletion of glycogen stores always needs to be rapid given that the next exercise session might not require full glycogen stores (e.g., an easy training session), but rather it must be tailored to the goals of the upcoming training/competition schedule. In this section, optimization of carbohydrate intake for scenarios when the next high-intensity training session/competition demanding high carbohydrate availability is followed in < 36 h is discussed, whereas other scenarios will be discussed in the Sect. 3 . It is believed that for a full repletion of muscle glycogen stores, 24–36 h [ 21 ] are required, whereas for the complete repletion of liver glycogen, 11–25 h are needed [ 119 ]. Current nutritional guidelines recommend athletes ingest moderate to high glycemic index carbohydrates as soon as possible at the rate of 1.0–1.2 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 to optimize repletion of glycogen stores for the first 4 h, when rapid repletion of glycogen stores is required, after which a normal diet reflecting daily fuel needs, which may be up to 12 g·kg −1 BM, is recommended [ 1 , 2 , 120 ].

However, a close examination of the literature reveals that these guidelines are perhaps too simplistic, especially for elite athletes. Scrutiny of the evidence for the optimal dosage of carbohydrates to be ingested in the early hours of post-exercise recovery reveals that there is only one study available comparing 1.2 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 (i.e., “optimal”) with a higher dosage (i.e., 1.6 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 ), and this has been performed in moderately trained individuals with a BM index of ~ 26 kg·m −2 [ 121 ]. While it is difficult to compare results between different studies given that different methodological approaches have been used, it appears that there is a good relationship between the dosage and the amount of muscle glycogen resynthesis spanning at least from 0 to 1.8 g·kg −1 BM·h −1 [ 120 ]. Thus, given that there is also a relationship between training status and the capacity to store muscle glycogen [ 28 ], it could be hypothesized that, absorption permitting, higher ingestion rates would be favorable to elite athletes whose relative proportion of muscle mass is higher. More research is required to elucidate if this is the case.

In addition to this, an emerging topic within the post-exercise recovery period, with an aim to improve functional capabilities of athletes, is the type of carbohydrates ingested in recovery. Namely, advances have been made on the type of carbohydrates (i.e., type of monosaccharides) ingested in the post-exercise recovery period that challenge current guidelines. While there appears to be no benefit of ingesting multiple types of carbohydrates (i.e., fructose and glucose) for optimization of muscle glycogen storage [ 45 , 122 ], the benefits appear to lie with the time course of liver glycogen replenishment that is quicker when composite carbohydrates are ingested (i.e., glucose-fructose and galactose-glucose mixtures) [ 43 , 45 , 123 ]. Advancing these data are studies showing that recovery of cycling exercise capacity is greater after ingestion of a combination of glucose-based carbohydrates and fructose as compared to glucose-based carbohydrates only [ 124 , 125 ], likely because of higher carbohydrate availability within both liver and muscle glycogen pools. It has been hypothesized (but not established) that combining glucose with both galactose and fructose would result in more rapid replenishment of both glycogen pools [ 126 ].

Interestingly, this strategy did not translate into improved cycling performance [ 127 ]. The results of the latter study are thus surprising. However, a close examination of the results offers a potential explanation and opens new research questions. Namely, two studies [ 125 , 127 ] quantified utilization of in-recovery ingested carbohydrates in the subsequent exercise bout and found an increase in its use, indicating an increased carbohydrate availability. However, the increase of carbohydrate oxidation rates in the study assessing subsequent cycling performance was such that by the time the cycling time trial was initiated, glycogen stores within the body were likely the same in both conditions. Thus, more work is required to define the precise scenarios when a functional benefit can be expected; however, there appears to be a uniform observation that in terms of metabolism, ingestion of composite carbohydrates is beneficial. A summary of current knowledge on the effectiveness of different monosaccharide types on repletion of different glycogen depots (i.e., liver and muscle) is presented in Fig.  1 . Based on the current evidence, it could be recommended that athletes seeking to recover glycogen stores as quickly as possible consider ingesting carbohydrates from a combination of glucose-based carbohydrates and fructose to optimally stimulate both liver and muscle glycogen resynthesis. The same recommendation cannot currently yet be given for galactose as whilst combined galactose-glucose favorably affects liver glycogen synthesis it is currently unknown how effective it is in the replenishment of muscle glycogen stores.

Short-term recovery of muscle and liver glycogen stores after exhaustive exercise using different combinations of monosaccharides. Fructose-glucose carbohydrate mixtures have been demonstrated to be very effective in replenishment of both muscle and liver glycogen stores. On the other hand, while glucose-based carbohydrates cause robust rates of muscle glycogen replenishment, liver glycogen synthesis rates are inferior as compared to a combination of fructose-glucose- and galactose-glucose-based carbohydrates. No data are currently available for muscle glycogen synthesis rates after ingesting a galactose-glucose mixture. It is hypothesized (but not established) that combining fructose-galactose-glucose-based carbohydrates would be optimal for post-exercise repletion of both glycogen pools. CHO carbohydrate

3 Carbohydrates for Training

Training can be described as undertaking structured workouts with an aim to improve or maintain performance over time by manipulating the structure, intensity, duration and frequency of training sessions [ 128 , 129 , 130 ]. As total energy requirements and, consequently, carbohydrate demands are high in endurance-based sports, it is fair to assume that optimization of carbohydrate intake in these sport disciplines plays an important role. Early sports nutrition guidelines [ 131 ] advised athletes to both train and compete with high carbohydrate availability, and this approach dominated until 2005, when Hansen and colleagues observed that a reduction in carbohydrate availability before certain training sessions in untrained individuals could potentially enhance training adaptations [ 132 ]. In this study, leg kicking exercise training was performed in a 10-week-long training study. Each leg was subjected to a different treatment. Half of the training sessions in one leg were performed with reduced muscle glycogen content, while the other leg’s training sessions always commenced with normal glycogen stores. After the intervention, there was a substantial improvement in time to task failure at 90% of maximal workload in the leg that trained with reduced glycogen stores (+ 294%), while the increase in the other leg was much smaller (+ 125%). Muscle biopsy analysis also showed more positive metabolic adaptations (hydroxy acyl-CoA dehydrogenase [HAD] and citrate synthase [CS] activity) in the leg training with reduced muscle glycogen stores. While very attractive, the strategy was found to be effective in untrained individuals, and more work was required to see if similar findings could be observed in already trained individuals. As a result, this study was a landmark study paving the way for further investigations into whether different approaches to nutrient availability in trained athletes are beneficial based on different goals: training adaptation or competition performance.

In addition to carbohydrate availability manipulations to influence training adaptations, the concept of training the gut also needs to be considered to become a part of the training process to potentially improve tolerance to high carbohydrate ingestion rates during exercise especially [ 133 , 134 ], as the prevalence of gastrointestinal issues during exercise is large [ 135 , 136 ]. While the concept of training with high carbohydrate intakes to improve tolerance to ingested carbohydrates seems warranted, it remains to be established whether such practice leads to improved absorption of ingested carbohydrates and by what mechanisms or leads to just improved tolerance. Recent evidence from rats indicates that a combination of a high carbohydrate diet and exercise does not result in an increased number of glucose transporters in the intestines [ 137 ], and it could be thus speculated that improved tolerance can occur independently of improved absorption capacity.

3.1 Carbohydrate Periodization

Building from the study by Hansen and colleagues, research started to focus on ways to optimize training adaptations and not necessarily optimize performance within these training sessions in trained individuals. Indeed, studies investigating molecular signaling responses after acute bouts of training with low muscle and liver glycogen stores in trained individuals provided promising results [ 10 , 138 ]. As a result, the term carbohydrate periodization emerged whereby carbohydrate intake is adjusted daily based on the demands and/or goals of a certain training session. The concept is well described elsewhere [ 138 , 139 ]. Using this approach, some studies demonstrated metabolic benefits, such as reduced reliance on carbohydrates during moderate-intensity exercise [ 140 , 141 ]. However, a recent meta-analysis of nine studies investigating long-term benefits of carbohydrate periodization on performance outcomes suggests that this approach does not always enhance performance in the long term over training with high carbohydrate availability [ 142 ]. Perhaps important to understand when interpreting these data is that large training volumes are accompanied by substantial energy turnover. Even if a training session is initiated with adequate muscle glycogen stores, they will be markedly reduced by the end of it [ 28 ], creating a suitable environment for activation of crucial molecular signaling pathways thought to be responsible for positive adaptations [ 138 ].

One of the fundamental principles of endurance training is achieving sufficient training volume [ 143 , 144 ]. For instance, elite cyclists are reported to cover more than 30,000 km on the bike in a single year [ 145 ]. Large training volumes are reported in other endurance sports as well [ 146 ]. This provides support for the notion that accumulation of sufficient training volume is of paramount importance among elite endurance athletes. Training with high carbohydrate availability (i.e., before and during) increases exercise capacity and performance, and inversely, training with low carbohydrate availability achieves the reverse effect, i.e., a reduction in exercise capacity [ 27 , 53 ] and thus a reduction in training intensity and/or duration. Thus, training with low carbohydrate availability should likely be at best viewed as a more time efficient way to train [ 138 , 147 ] rather than the optimal way. Commencing training sessions with insufficient carbohydrate availability would result in a reduction in the duration and/or intensity of the session, which are collectively the most important determinants of successful long-term endurance improvements [ 143 ]. However, as the athlete exhausts possibilities to improve performance by increasing training duration and/or intensity, reducing carbohydrate availability before training sessions could potentially be a useful strategy to increase the metabolic perturbation required to elicit training adaptations [ 148 , 149 ] in a similar way to training in hypoxia or heat stress [ 150 ]. In line with this, a recent analysis demonstrated that both the degree of muscle glycogen utilization during exercise, which is mainly influenced by intensity/duration, and muscle glycogen concentrations at the end of an exercise bout, which could be influenced by carbohydrate availability pre- and during exercise, are important predictors of post-exercise 5ʹ adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity [ 151 ]. Thus, manipulating carbohydrate availability before and during training sessions could affect molecular responses after exercise bouts. However, focusing solely on activation of pathways such as AMPK could be too reductionist, as it does not account for the recovery that is required after such a session, as, for instance, it is well known that protein breakdown is increased during such sessions [ 152 , 153 ]. In addition to this, recent evidence indicates that the time between two exercise sessions rather than carbohydrate availability is the important modulator of the training responses after the second exercise bout [ 154 , 155 ].

Collectively, the evidence indicates a limited utility of training with reduced carbohydrate availability most likely due to a decrease in training duration and/or intensity, unless one seeks the most time efficient training method. To circumvent this, attempts have been made to rescue the reduction in training capacity by utilization of ingestion of ergogenic aids. In line with this, carbohydrate and caffeine mouth rinsing have been shown to improve high-intensity exercise performance when conducted under a carbohydrate-restricted state [ 156 ]. Whether training adaptation can be enhanced with this approach has not been studied. More recently, building on previous work [ 157 ], the effects of delayed carbohydrate feeding in a glycogen depleted state (i.e., liver and muscle) on whole body metabolism and performance have been investigated [ 158 ]. While performance outcomes were unclear, delayed carbohydrate feeding enabled maintenance of stable blood glucose concentrations without suppressing fat oxidation rates and thus created a favorable metabolic response. Again, whether such an approach leads to longer-term enhancement in training adaptation remains to be seen. More broadly there is a need to further explore the potential benefits of commencing exercise with low carbohydrate availability to maximize both the metabolic and mechanical (i.e., exercise capacity) stimulus to optimize exercise adaptations.

3.2 Training to Increase Fat Oxidation

Another popular reason for undertaking training with low carbohydrate availability is the notion that such an approach would lead to increases in fat oxidation rates during competition and spare endogenous carbohydrate stores with a limited storage capacity and by doing so improve performance [ 18 , 159 ]. This view appears to be too simplistic, as numerous factors affect substrate utilization rates, including exercise intensity, training status, sex, acute and/or chronic diet [ 160 , 161 ]. A recent study indicated that the capacity to utilize fat during exercise in an overnight fasted state is best correlated with CS activity [ 162 ], a marker of mitochondrial content [ 163 ] that is itself well correlated with training volume [ 144 ]. Thus, (1) the capacity to oxidize fat should naturally come together with improved training status and (2) specific manipulations of nutrition/training to alter fat oxidation rates during exercise should only be considered once the desired training status has been achieved. In other words, increasing fat oxidation rates as such should not come in front of the goal to improve one’s aerobic capacity, especially in the light of evidence demonstrating that training with low carbohydrate availability can result in a reduced ability to exercise at high intensities [ 164 ] due to reduced ability to utilize carbohydrates, as already discussed in previous sections [ 13 ]. More research is required to better understand if training and diet can be structured so that substrate oxidation rates would be altered in favor of fat oxidation without being part of general improvements seen with training per se, and whether this could lead to improvements in endurance performance.

3.3 Low Carbohydrate Availability and RED-S

Unfortunately, the prevalence of relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S) remains high [ 165 ]. Building on the previous evidence that sufficient carbohydrate intake can ameliorate symptoms of overtraining [ 166 , 167 ], it has recently been proposed that there might be a link between relative RED-S and overtraining and that a common confounding factor is carbohydrate [ 11 ]. Recent data support an important role for dietary carbohydrate, as low carbohydrate, but not low energy availability, affects bone health markers [ 168 ], and deliberately inducing low carbohydrate availability to promote training adaptations and remaining in energy balance by increasing fat intake does not offer any benefits over a combination of energy and carbohydrate deficit—even more, it can impair glycemic regulation [ 169 ]. Whether carbohydrate availability is the crucial part in the development of RED-S remains to be properly elucidated.

3.4 A Framework for Carbohydrate Periodization

Collectively, periodizing carbohydrate intake based on the demands of training and especially an upcoming training session currently appears to be the most sensible approach as it (1) allows the execution of the prescribed training program, (2) minimizes the risk of high carbohydrate availability impeding training adaptations and (3) helps minimize the risk for occurrence of RED-S. A framework for carbohydrate periodization using this concept is depicted in Fig.  2 .

Framework for carbohydrate periodization based on the demands of the upcoming exercise session. Exercise intensity domain selection refers to the highest intensity attained during the exercise session. The exact carbohydrate requirements are to be personalized based on the expected energy demands of each exercise session. CHO carbohydrates, CP critical power, LT1 lactate threshold 1, LT2 lactate threshold 2, MLSS maximal lactate steady state

While provision of exact recommendations for carbohydrate intake before and during exercise forms part of sports nutrition recommendations provided elsewhere [ 1 , 2 ], we believe that interindividual differences in energy and thus carbohydrate requirements are such that optimization of carbohydrate intake should be personalized based on the demands and the goals of the exercise session one is preparing feeding for. For instance, aggressive provision of carbohydrate intake during exercise deemed beneficial among one population [ 73 ] in another population could lead to unwanted increase in muscle glycogen utilization [ 81 ]. In addition to this, even within sports commonly characterized as featuring extreme energy turnover rates, day-to-day differences are such that provision of exact carbohydrate guidelines would be too inaccurate [ 22 , 170 ]. Thus, personalization of carbohydrate intake during exercise is warranted, as described in the next section.

4 Personalizing Carbohydrate Intake

A certain level of personalization of energy and carbohydrate intake has been a standard part of nutritional guidelines for athletes for years [ 1 , 2 , 171 ]. Practitioners and athletes have a wide array of tools available that can help them personalize energy and carbohydrate intake. For instance, energy turnover for past training sessions and even energy requirements of the upcoming training sessions can relatively easily be predicted in sports where wearables exist to accurately quantify external work performed (i.e., power meters in cycling and running). Assuming fixed exercise efficiency one can then relatively accurately determine energy turnover during exercise. Knowing the relative exercise intensity of a given training session can further advance the understanding of the carbohydrate demands during exercise, as depicted in Fig.  2 . As described in Sect.  2 of this article, it appears that absolute exercise intensity during exercise is a large determinant of total energy, and consequently carbohydrate [ 14 ] and exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 172 , 173 ]. Thus, it is possible for athletes to predict energy turnover rates during exercise and adjust the carbohydrate intake accordingly.

In addition to this, the literature describing the physiological demands of a given sporting discipline can also be very insightful. For instance, energy turnover using gold-standard techniques has been assessed in many sporting contexts, including football [ 174 ], cycling [ 22 ] and tennis [ 175 ]. By knowing the energy demands, structure and goals of an upcoming training session, one can devise a suitable carbohydrate feeding strategy. Besides making predictions on total energy turnover during exercise, it is useful to establish the rate of glycogen breakdown, as very high-intensity efforts can substantially reduce muscle glycogen content without very high energy turnover rates [ 34 , 176 ], especially as low glycogen availability can negatively affect performance [ 30 ]. Attempts have been made to find ways to non-invasively and cost-effectively measure muscle glycogen concentrations (e.g., using ultrasound); however, to date no independently performed validation has been successful in showing that this method of muscle glycogen quantification provides valid results [ 177 ]. Currently, the best solution is to draw on previous studies investigating glycogen breakdown by muscle biopsy in different sports disciplines, such as weightlifting [ 178 ], athletics [ 179 ], rugby [ 180 ], men’s football [ 181 ], women’s football [ 182 ] and Australian Rules football [ 183 ]. These data can be useful for practitioners to determine the relative (i.e., high, moderate or low) carbohydrate demands of a certain exercise session. However, whilst knowledge of exercise demands can help with tailoring, an implicit assumption is that all athletes will respond in a similar manner to an intervention, which may not be the case. In this respect, despite the present limitations in the practical assessment of muscle glycogen in field settings, gaining more readily accessible information on individual athlete physiological responses could still be of value to achieve higher degrees of personalization than those that current guidelines allow.

Recently, use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has been popularized among endurance athletes, with an aim of personalizing carbohydrate intake around exercise for optimal performance. Certainly, knowledge of blood glucose profiles has the advantage that specific physiological data are generated from the individual athlete. These devices have a rich history in the field of diabetes treatment, and their utility has clearly been demonstrated [ 184 ]. For a device to be deemed of use and its use recommended to a wider audience, both of the following criteria must be met: (1) the parameter that the device is measuring should have contextual relevance (i.e., be providing useful information) and (2) the device must accurately measure what it is supposed to be measuring (i.e., be valid). While there is no doubt that CGM devices are useful in non-exercise contexts, their utility during exercise per se remains to be clearly established. Indeed, CGM devices appear to have limited validity during exercise [ 185 , 186 ], and this may be due to the complex nature of blood glucose regulation during varying types and intensities of exercise. Blood glucose concentrations are a result of glucose uptake by the tissue and glucose appearance (i.e., liver glucose output and carbohydrate ingestion). While it has been known for a long time that hypoglycemia can associate with task failure [ 187 ], its occurrence does not always precede it [ 124 ]. This is especially the case during exercise of higher intensities where blood glucose concentrations increase [ 188 ] due to increased liver glucose output [ 20 ] and/or reduced muscle glucose uptake due to a reduced concentration gradient [ 116 ]. Therefore, further investigative work is required to establish whether differential blood glucose profiles using validated technology during exercise can be identified and be used to individualize carbohydrate intake during exercise.

In addition to tracking glycaemia during exercise, tracking it throughout the day could also be proven useful. A recent study utilizing CGM devices compared daily blood glucose profiles in elite trained athletes with those in a sedentary population and discovered large discrepancies in blood glucose concentrations throughout the day between both groups [ 189 ]. Elite athletes spent more time in hyper- and hypoglycemia as compared to sedentary controls, giving an appearance that glycemic control might be impaired. While periods of hyperglycemia are expected due to post-exercise high carbohydrate intakes, observations of hypoglycemia occurring especially at night during sleep were somewhat surprising. These data can be proven insightful if (1) it is established that these kinds of fluctuations have some negative effects on athletes’ function (e.g., recovery) and (2) a mechanistic basis of what is driving these changes is determined. This knowledge can then be used to potentially individualize strategies to counter these episodes of impaired glycemic control in real time.

While utilization of CGM devices during exercise to guide carbohydrate intake during exercise cannot be presently advised, athletes could individualize carbohydrate ingestion rates during exercise by establishing their highest exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 25 ]. To do this, one requires the ability to know carbon isotope enrichments of the ingested carbohydrates and in expired carbon dioxide. This approach requires specialized testing methodology that was once the preserve of the research environment but could become a standard part of athletes’ profiling alongside other measures typically made during metabolic testing (e.g., exercise economy or fuel utilization). For example, advances have been made in methodology to easier quantify stable carbon isotope abundance in expired air [ 190 ], a methodology currently used for quantification of exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates [ 25 ]. Thus, this approach could be spun off from research and be used in practice as well to identify carbohydrate intake rate and carbohydrate compositions that optimize exogenous carbohydrate oxidation in individual athletes.

Finally, most research to date has investigated carbohydrate intake in a healthy male population, and thus current carbohydrate guidelines are founded on this evidence. However, there are some important metabolism differences between the sexes [ 191 , 192 ] and/or relatively large populations of athletes with, e.g., diabetes type 1 [ 193 ] that would potentially benefit from more research work.

5 Conclusions

Despite decades of intense carbohydrate research within the field of sports nutrition, new knowledge continues to be generated with the potential to inform practice. In this article, we have highlighted recent observations that provide a more contemporary understanding of the role of carbohydrate nutrition for athletes. For example, our article suggests a stronger emphasis be placed on scaling carbohydrate intake before competition to the demands of that subsequent activity, with particular attention paid to the effects of concomitant exercise during the preparatory period. Furthermore, athletes looking to benefit from carbohydrate feeding during exercise in the up to 60 g·h −1 range may benefit from a wide range of readily oxidizable sources, including glucose, glucose polymers and combinations of glucose-galactose (including lactose) or glucose-fructose (including sucrose), with the latter blend affording the greatest potential flexibility across a range of intakes. At high ingestion rates during exercise (i.e., > 60 g·h −1 ), glucose-fructose blends in ratios approaching unity (i.e., 1:0.8) appear preferable to the previously considered optimal ratio of 2:1. Furthermore, short-term recovery may be optimized by combining glucose-fructose to target both liver and muscle glycogen synthesis simultaneously. Finally, there has been substantial investigation into the role of commencing selected exercise sessions with reduced carbohydrate availability to provide a beneficial stimulus for training adaptation. However, a contemporary view of the “train-low” approach based on the totality of the current evidence suggests limited utility for enhancing performance benefits from training, but that its main benefit may lie in time efficiency.

The abovementioned suggestions are designed to build on the wealth of knowledge and recommendations already established for athletes. Nonetheless, what this review has also revealed is that gaps in our current understanding of carbohydrate nutrition and metabolism in relation to exercise performance remain. Some remaining research questions arising from the present article are presented in Table 1 . Answering these research questions could allow continued advancement and refinement of carbohydrate intake guidelines and, by doing that, further increase the possibility of positively impacting athletic performance.

Burke LM, Hawley JA, Wong SHS, Jeukendrup AE. Carbohydrates for training and competition. J Sports Sci. 2011;29:S17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.585473 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:543–68. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005768-201603000-00025 .

Pelly FE, O’Connor HT, Denyer GS, Caterson ID. Evolution of food provision to athletes at the summer Olympic Games. Nutr Rev. 2011;69:321–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21631513 . Accessed 4 Dec 2021.

Krogh A, Lindhard J. The relative value of fat and carbohydrate as sources of muscular energy. Biochem J. 1920;14:290–363. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16742941 . Accessed 4 Dec 2021.

Bergstrom J, Hultman E. A study of glycogen metabolism in man. J Clin Lab Invest. 1967. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365516709090629 .

Katz A. A century of exercise physiology: key concepts in regulation of glycogen metabolism in skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04935-1 .

Noakes TD. What is the evidence that dietary macronutrient composition influences exercise performance? A narrative review. Nutrients. 2022;14:862.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Burke LM, Hawley JA, Jeukendrup AE, Morton JP, Stellingwerff T, Maughan RJ. Toward a common understanding of diet-exercise strategies to manipulate fuel availability for training and competition preparation in endurance sport. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0289 .

Burke LM, Hawley JA. Swifter, higher, stronger: What’s on the menu? Science. 2018;362:781–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2093 .

Bartlett JD, Hawley JA, Morton JP. Carbohydrate availability and exercise training adaptation: too much of a good thing? Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.920926 .

Stellingwerff T, Heikura IA, Meeusen R, Bermon S, Seiler S, Mountjoy ML, et al. Overtraining syndrome (OTS) and relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S): shared pathways, symptoms and complexities. Sports Med. 2021;51(11):2251–80.

Parolin ML, Chesley A, Matsos MP, Spriet LL, Jones NL, Heigenhauser GJF. Regulation of skeletal muscle glycogen phosphorylase and PDH during maximal intermittent exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1999;277:E890-900. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1999.277.5.E890 .

Stellingwerff T, Spriet LL, Watt MJ, Kimber NE, Hargreaves M, Hawley JA, et al. Decreased PDH activation and glycogenolysis during exercise following fat adaptation with carbohydrate restoration. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metab. 2006;290:E380–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00268.2005 .

Romijn JA, Coyle EF, Sidossis LS, Gastaldelli A, Horowitz JF, Endert E, et al. Regulation of endogenous fat and carbohydrate metabolism in relation to exercise intensity and duration. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metab. 1993;265:E380–91. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1993.265.3.E380 .

van Loon LJC, Greenhaff PL, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Saris WH, Wagenmakers AJM. The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilisation in humans. J Physiol. 2001;536:295–304.

Leckey JJ, Burke LM, Morton JP, Hawley JA. Altering fatty acid availability does not impair prolonged, continuous running to fatigue: evidence for carbohydrate dependence. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120:107–13. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00855.2015 .

Hawley JA, Leckey JJ. Carbohydrate dependence during prolonged, intense endurance exercise. Sports Med. 2015;45:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0400-1 .

Hetlelid KJ, Plews DJ, Herold E, Laursen PB, Seiler S. Rethinking the role of fat oxidation: substrate utilisation during high-intensity interval training in well-trained and recreationally trained runners. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2015;1:e000047. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000047 .

Jeukendrup AE, Wallis GA. Measurement of substrate oxidation during exercise by means of gas exchange measurements. Int J Sports Med Suppl. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-830512 .

Gonzalez JT, Fuchs CJ, Betts JA, van Loon LJC. Liver glycogen metabolism during and after prolonged endurance-type exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016;311:E543–53. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00232.2016 .

Burke LM, van Loon LJC, Hawley JA. Postexercise muscle glycogen resynthesis in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2017;122:1055–67. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00860.2016 .

Plasqui G, Rietjens G, Lambriks L, Wouters L, Saris WHM. Energy expenditure during extreme endurance exercise: the Giro d’Italia. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:568–74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363009 .

Sjödin AM, Andersson AB, Högberg JM, Westerterp KR. Energy balance in cross-country skiers: a study using doubly labeled water. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26:720–4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8052113 . Accessed 30 Nov 2021.

Hawley JA, Schabort EJ, Noakes TD, Dennis SC. Carbohydrate-loading and exercise performance. An update. Sports Med. 1997;24:73–81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9291549 . Accessed 2 Aug 2021.

Jeukendrup AE, Jentjens R. Oxidation of carbohydrate feedings during prolonged exercise. Sports Med. 2000;29:407–24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10870867 . Accessed 13 Oct 2018.

Burke LM. Re-examining high-fat diets for sports performance: did we call the ‘Nail in the Coffin’ too soon? Sports Med. 2015;45:33–49.

Bergström J, Hermansen L, Hultman E, Saltin B. Diet, muscle glycogen and physical performance. Acta Physiol Scand. 1967;71:140–50.

Areta JL, Hopkins WG. Skeletal muscle glycogen content at rest and during endurance exercise in humans: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48:2091–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0941-1 .

Jensen R, Ørtenblad N, Stausholm MH, Skjærbæk MC, Larsen DN, Hansen M, et al. Heterogeneity in subcellular muscle glycogen utilisation during exercise impacts endurance capacity in men. J Physiol. 2020;598:4271–92. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280247 .

Vigh-Larsen JF, Ørtenblad N, Spriet LL, Overgaard K, Mohr M. Muscle glycogen metabolism and high-intensity exercise performance: a narrative review. Sports Med. 2021;51(9):1855–74.

Nielsen J, Cheng AJ, Ørtenblad N, Westerblad H. Subcellular distribution of glycogen and decreased tetanic Ca2+ in fatigued single intact mouse muscle fibres. J Physiol. 2014;592:2003–12.

Hawley JA, Schabort E, Noakes TD, Dennis SC. Carbohydrate-loading and exercise performance an update. Sports Med. 1997;24(2):73–81.

McInerney P, Lessard SJ, Burke LM, Coffey VG, lo Giudice SL, Southgate RJ, et al. Failure to repeatedly supercompensate muscle glycogen stores in highly trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:404–11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15741838 . Accessed 2 May 2022.

Barnett C, Carey M, Proietto J, Cerin E, Febbraio MA, Jenkins D. Muscle metabolism during sprint exercise in man: Influence of sprint training. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7:314–22.

Gollnick PD, Piehl K, Saltin B. Selective glycogen depletion pattern in human muscle fibres after exercise of varying intensity and at varying pedalling rates. J Physiol. 1974;241:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010639 .

Sherman WM, Costill DL, Fink WJ, Miller JM. Effect of exercise-diet manipulation on muscle glycogen and its subsequent utilization during performance. Int J Sports Med. 1981;2:114–8.

Olsson K ‐E, Saltin B. Variation in total body water with muscle glycogen changes in man. Acta Physiol Scandi. 1970;80:11–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5475323 .

Kreitzman SN, Coxon AY, Szaz KF. Glycogen storage: illusions of easy weight loss, excessive weight regain, and distortions in estimates of body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:292S-293S. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/56/1/292S/4715743 .

Weyand PG, Davis JA. Running performance has a structural basis. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:2625–31.

Faria EW, Parker DL, Faria IE. The science of cycling factors affecting performance-part 2. Sports Med. 2005;35(4):313–37.

Nilsson LH, Hultman E. Liver glycogen in man—the effect of total starvation or a carbohydrate-poor diet followed by carbohydrate refeeding. Scand J Clin Lab Investig. 1973;32:325–30. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365517309084355 .

Iwayama K, Tanabe Y, Tanji F, Ohnishi T, Takahashi H. Diurnal variations in muscle and liver glycogen differ depending on the timing of exercise. J Physiol Sci. 2021;71:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12576-021-00821-1 .

Décombaz J, Jentjens R, Ith M, Scheurer E, Buehler T, Jeukendrup AE, et al. Fructose and galactose enhance postexercise human liver glycogen synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1964–71.

Detko E, O’Hara JP, Thelwall PE, Smith FE, Jakovljevic DG, King RFGJ, et al. Liver and muscle glycogen repletion using 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy following ingestion of maltodextrin, galactose, protein and amino acids. Br J Nutr. 2013;110:848–55.

Fuchs CJ, Gonzalez JT, Beelen M, Cermak NM, Smith FE, Thelwall PE, et al. Sucrose ingestion after exhaustive exercise accelerates liver, but not muscle glycogen repletion compared with glucose ingestion in trained athletes. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120:1328–34. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01023.2015 .

Podlogar T, Cirnski S, Bokal Š, Verdel N, Gonzalez J. Addition of fructose to a carbohydrate-rich breakfast improves cycling endurance capacity in trained cyclists. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2022; ( in press ).

Jeukendrup AE, Killer SC. The myths surrounding pre-exercise carbohydrate feeding. Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;57:18–25.

Stellingwerff T, Cox GR. Systematic review: Carbohydrate supplementation on exercise performance or capacity of varying durations. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme. 2014;39:998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2014-0027 .

Carter JM, Jeukendrup AE, Jones DA. The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on 1-h cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:2107–11.

Carter JM, Jeukendrup AE, Mann CH, Jones DA. The effect of glucose infusion on glucose kinetics during a 1-h time trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1543–50.

Chambers ES, Bridge MW, Jones DA. Carbohydrate sensing in the human mouth: effects on exercise performance and brain activity. J Physiol. 2009;587:1779–94.

Jeukendrup AE, Moseley L, Mainwaring GI, Samuels S, Perry S, Mann CH. Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during ultraendurance exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100:1134–41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16322366 . Accessed 18 Nov 2021.

Coyle EF, Hagberg JM, Hurley BF, Martin WH, Ehsani AA, Holloszy JO. Carbohydrate feeding during prolonged strenuous exercise can delay fatigue. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1983;55:230–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1983.55.1.230 .

Coyle EF, Coggan AR, Hemmert MK, Ivy JL. Muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged strenuous exercise when fed carbohydrate. J Appl Physiol. 1986;61:165–72.

Jeukendrup AE, Wagenmakers AJM, Stegen J, Gijsen AP, Brouns F, Saris WH. Carbohydrate ingestion can completely suppress endogenous glucose production during exercise. Am J Physiol-Endocrinol Metab. 1999;276:E672–83.

Gonzalez JT, Fuchs CJ, Smith FE, Thelwall PE, Taylor R, Stevenson EJ, et al. Ingestion of glucose or sucrose prevents liver but not muscle glycogen depletion during prolonged endurance-type exercise in trained cyclists. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;309:E1032–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00376.2015 .

Tsintzas OK, Williams C, Boobis L, Greenhaff P. Carbohydrate ingestion and glycogen utilization in different muscle fibre types in man. J Physiol. 1995;489:243–50. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021046 .

Tsintzas OK, Williams C, Boobis L, Greenhaff P. Carbohydrate ingestion and single muscle fiber glycogen metabolism during prolonged running in men. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81:801–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.2.801 .

Fell JM, Hearris MA, Ellis DG, Moran JEP, Jevons EFP, Owens DJ, et al. Carbohydrate improves exercise capacity but does not affect subcellular lipid droplet morphology, AMPK and p53 signalling in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 2021;599:2823–49.

Jeukendrup AE. Nutrition for endurance sports: marathon, triathlon, and road cycling. J Sports Sci. 2011;60:S91–9.

Leijssen DP, Saris WH, Jeukendrup AE, Wagenmakers AJ. Oxidation of exogenous [13C]galactose and [13C]glucose during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79:720–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1995.79.3.720 .

Burelle Y, Lamoureux M-C, Péronnet F, Massicotte D, Lavoie C. Comparison of exogenous glucose, fructose and galactose oxidation during exercise using 13C-labelling. Br J Nutr. 2006;96:56–61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16869991 . Accessed 19 Nov 2021.

Odell OJ, Podlogar T, Wallis GA. Comparable exogenous carbohydrate oxidation from lactose or sucrose during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52:2663–72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32520875 . Accessed 8 Feb 2022.

Wagenmakers AJ, Brouns F, Saris WH, Halliday D. Oxidation rates of orally ingested carbohydrates during prolonged exercise in men. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75:2774–80. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.6.2774 .

Jentjens RLPG, Achten J, Jeukdendrup AE. High Oxidation Rates from Combined Carbohydrates Ingested during Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1551–8. https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005768-200409000-00014 .

Wallis GA, Rowlands DS, Shaw C, Jentjens RLPG, Jeukendrup AE. Oxidation of combined ingestion of maltodextrins and fructose during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:426–32.

Jentjens RLPG, Venables MC, Jeukendrup AE. Oxidation of exogenous glucose, sucrose, and maltose during prolonged cycling exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:1285–91.

O’Brien WJ, Rowlands DS. Fructose-maltodextrin ratio in a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution differentially affects exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rate, gut comfort, and performance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300:G181–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21071509 . Accessed 22 Jul 2018.

Rowlands DS, Houltham S, Musa-Veloso K, Brown F, Paulionis L, Bailey D. Fructose-glucose composite carbohydrates and endurance performance: critical review and future perspectives. Sports Med. 2015;45:1561–76.

Saris W, van Erp-Baart M, Brouns F, Westerterp K, Hoor F. Study on food intake and energy expenditure during extreme sustained exercise: the Tour de France. Inte J Sports Med. 1989;10:S26-31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1024951 .

Podlogar T, Bokal Š, Cirnski S, et al. Increased exogenous but unaltered endogenous carbohydrate oxidation with combined fructose-maltodextrin ingested at 120 g h−1 versus 90 g h−1 at different ratios. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05019-w .

Urdampilleta A, Arribalzaga S, Viribay A, Castañeda-Babarro A, Seco-Calvo J, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Effects of 120 vs. 60 and 90 g/h carbohydrate intake during a trail marathon on neuromuscular function and high intensity run capacity recovery. Nutrients. 2020;12:1–17.

Viribay A, Arribalzaga S, Mielgo-Ayuso J, Castañeda-Babarro A, Seco-Calvo J, Urdampilleta A. Effects of 120 g/h of carbohydrates intake during a mountain marathon on exercise-induced muscle damage in elite runners. Nutrients. 2020;12.

Hawley JA, Bosch AN, Weltan SM, Dennis SC, Noakes TD. Effects of glucose ingestion or glucose infusion on fuel substrate kinetics during prolonged exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994;68:381–9.

Hawley JA, Bosch AN, Weltan SM, Dennis SC, Noakes TD. Glucose kinetics during prolonged exercise in euglycemic and hyperglycemic subjects. Pflugers Arch-Eur J Physiol. 1994;426:378–86.

Jentjens RLPG, Jeukendrup AE. High rates of exogenous carbohydrate oxidation from a mixture of glucose and fructose ingested during prolonged cycling exercise. Br J Nutr. 2005;93:485. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007114505000619 .

Jentjens RLPG, Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. High oxidation rates from combined carbohyrates ingested during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1551–8. http://journals.lww.com/00005768-200409000-00014 .

Hearris MA, Pugh JN, Langan-Evans C, Mann SJ, Burke L, Stellingwerff T, et al. 13C-glucose-fructose labelling reveals comparable exogenous CHO oxidation during exercise when consuming 120 g/h in fluid, gel, jelly chew or co-ingestion. J Appl Physiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00091.2022 .

Gonzalez JT, Fuchs CJ, Betts JA, van Loon LJC. Glucose plus fructose ingestion for post-exercise recovery—greater than the sum of its parts? Nutrients. 2017;9(4):344.

Smith JW, Pascoe DD, Passe DH, Ruby BC, Stewart LK, Baker LB, et al. Curvilinear dose-response relationship of carbohydrate (0–120 g·h(-1)) and performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:336–41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22968309

Wallis GA, Yeo SE, Blannin AK, Jeukendrup AE. Dose-response effects of ingested carbohydrate on exercise metabolism in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:131–8.

King AJ, O’Hara JP, Morrison DJ, Preston T, King RFGJ. Carbohydrate dose influences liver and muscle glycogen oxidation and performance during prolonged exercise. Physiol Rep. 2018;6:1–17.

Joyner MJ, Casey DP. Regulation of increased blood flow (Hyperemia) to muscles during exercise: a hierarchy of competing physiological needs. Physiol Rev. 2015;95:549–601. www.prv.org .

Pirnay F, Crielaard JM, Pallikarakis N, Lacroix M, Mosora F, Krzentowski G, et al. Fate of exogenous glucose during exercise of different intensities in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1982;53:1620–4. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1982.53.6.1620 .

Baur DA, Saunders MJ. Carbohydrate supplementation: a critical review of recent innovations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121:23–66.

Rowlands DS, Wadsworth DP. No effect of protein coingestion on exogenous glucose oxidation during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:701–8.

Narang BJ, Wallis GA, Gonzalez JT. The effect of calcium co-ingestion on exogenous glucose oxidation during endurance exercise in healthy men: a pilot study. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021;21:1156–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1813336 .

Stellingwerff T, Godin J-P, Beaumont M, Tavenard A, Grathwohl D, van Bladeren PJ, et al. Effects of pre-exercise sucralose ingestion on carbohydrate oxidation during exercise. IJSNEM-Journal.com ORIGINAL RESEARCH Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2013. www.IJSNEM-Journal.com .

Rowlands DS, Wallis GA, Shaw C, Jentjens RLPG, Jeukendrup AE. Glucose polymer molecular weight does not affect exogenous carbohydrate oxidation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1510–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16177602 . Accessed 4 Dec 2021.

Rehrer NJ, Wagenmakers AJM, Beckers EJ, Halliday D, Leiper JB, Brouns F, et al. Gastric emptying, absorption, and carbohydrate oxidation during prolonged exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1992;72:468–75.

Yeo SE, Jentjens RLPG, Wallis GA, Jeukendrup AE. Caffeine increases exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:844–50.

Hulston CJ, Jeukendrup AE. Substrate metabolism and exercise performance with caffeine and carbohydrate intake. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:2096–104. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18981939 . Accessed 4 Dec 2021.

Pugh JN, Wagenmakers AJM, Doran DA, Fleming SC, Fielding BA, Morton JP, et al. Probiotic supplementation increases carbohydrate metabolism in trained male cyclists: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Am J Physiol Endo-crinol Metab. 2020;318:504–13. http://www.ajpendo.org . Accessed 26 Nov 2021.

Rowlands DS, Clarke J, Green JG, Shi X. L-Arginine but not L-glutamine likely increases exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during endurance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:2443–53.

Mears SA, Worley J, Mason GS, Hulston CJ, James LJ. Addition of sodium alginate and pectin to a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution does not influence substrate oxidation, gastrointestinal comfort, or cycling performance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45:675–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2019-0802 .

Barber JFP, Thomas J, Narang B, Hengist A, Betts JA, Wallis GA, et al. Pectin-alginate does not further enhance exogenous carbohydrate oxidation in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc NLM (Medline). 2020;52:1376–84.

Rowe JT, King RFGJ, King AJ, Morrison DJ, Preston T, Wilson OJ, et al. Glucose and fructose hydrogel enhances running performance, exogenous carbohydrate oxidation, and gastrointestinal tolerance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54:129–40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34334720 . Accessed 24 Dec 2021.

Pasiakos SM. Annual review of nutrition nutritional requirements for sustaining health and performance during exposure to extreme environments. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-011720 -

Maunder E, Plews DJ, Merien F, Kilding AE. Stability of heart rate at physiological thresholds between temperate and heat stress environments in endurance-trained males. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16:1204–7.

Shearman S, Dwyer D, Skiba P, Townsend N. Modeling intermittent cycling performance in hypoxia using the critical power concept. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:527–35.

Griffiths A, Shannon OM, Matu J, King R, Deighton K, O’Hara JP. The effects of environmental hypoxia on substrate utilisation during exercise: a meta-analysis. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2019;16:10.

Griffiths A, Shannon O, Matu J, King R, Deighton K, O’hara JP. . Response: commentary on the effects of hypoxia on energy substrate use during exercise. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2019;16:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0330-7 .

Young AJ, Berryman CE, Kenefick RW, Derosier AN, Margolis LM, Wilson MA, et al. Altitude acclimatization alleviates the hypoxia-induced suppression of exogenous glucose oxidation during steady-state aerobic exercise. FrontPhysiol. 2018;9.

O’Hara JP, Woods DR, Mellor A, Boos C, Gallagher L, Tsakirides C, et al. A comparison of substrate oxidation during prolonged exercise in men at terrestrial altitude and normobaric normoxia following the coingestion of 13C glucose and 13C fructose. Physiol Rep. 2017;5.

Pasiakos SM, Karl JP, Margolis LM. Challenging traditional carbohydrate intake recommendations for optimizing performance at high altitude. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2021;24:483–9.

Stellingwerff T, Peeling P, Garvican-Lewis LA, Hall R, Koivisto AE, Heikura IA, et al. Nutrition and altitude: strategies to enhance adaptation, improve performance and maintain health: a narrative review. Sports Med. 2019;49:169–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01159-w .

Fink WJ, Costill DL, van Handel PJ. Leg muscle metabolism during exercise in the heat and cold. Eur J Appl Physiol Occupl Physiol. 1975;34:183–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999931 .

Kozlowski S, Brzezinska Z, Kruk B, Kaciuba-Uscilko H, Greenleaf JE, Nazar K. Exercise hyperthermia as a factor limiting physical performance: temperature effect on muscle metabolism. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59:766–73. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1985.59.3.766 .

Febbraio M, Snow R, Stathis C, Hargreaves M, Carey M. Blunting the rise in body temperature reduces muscle glycogenolysis during exercise in humans. Exp Physiol. 1996;81:685–93. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1996.sp003969 .

Febbraio MA, Snow RJ, Hargreaves M, Stathis CG, Martin IK, Carey MF. Muscle metabolism during exercise and heat stress in trained men: effect of acclimation. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:589–97.

Casadio JR, Kilding AE, Cotter JD, Laursen PB. From lab to real world: heat acclimation considerations for elite athletes. Sports Med. 2016;47(8):1467–76.

Jentjens RLPG, Wagenmakers AJM, Jeukendrup AE. Heat stress increases muscle glycogen use but reduces the oxidation of ingested carbohydrates during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92:1562–72. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00482.2001 .

Neufer PD, Young AJ, Sawka MN. Gastric emptying during exercise: effects of heat stress and hypohydration. Eur Appl J Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989.

Febbraio MA, Carey MF, Snow RJ, Stathis CG, Hargreaves M. Influence of elevated muscle temperature on metabolism during intense, dynamic exercise. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1996;271:R1251–5.

Katz A, Broberg S, Sahlin K, Wahren J. Leg glucose uptake during maximal dynamic exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:E65–70.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Richter EA, Hargreaves M. Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:993–1017. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00038.2012 .

Maunder ED, Plews DJ, Merien F, Kilding AE. Exercise intensity regulates the effect of heat stress on substrate oxidation rates during exercise. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;20:935–43.

Jentjens RLPG, Underwood K, Achten J, Currell K, Mann CH, Jeukendrup AE. Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates are elevated after combined ingestion of glucose and fructose during exercise in the heat. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:807–16. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00322.2005 .

Gonzalez JT, Betts JA. Dietary sugars, exercise and hepatic carbohydrate metabolism. Proc Nutr Soc. 2019;78:246–56. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0029665118002604/type/journal_article . Accessed 23 Aug 2019.

Betts JA, Williams C. Short-term recovery from prolonged exercise. Sports Med. 2010;40:941–59.

Howarth KR, Moreau NA, Phillips SM, Gibala MJ. Coingestion of protein with carbohydrate during recovery from endurance exercise stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:1394–402. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90333.2008 .

Wallis GA, Hulston CJ, Mann CH, Roper HP, Tipton KD, Jeukendrup AE. Postexercise muscle glycogen synthesis with combined glucose and fructose ingestion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:1789–94.

Wallis GA, Wittekind A. Is there a specific role for sucrose in sports and exercise performance? Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2013;23:571–83.

Gray EA, Green TA, Betts JA, Gonzalez JT. Postexercise glucose–fructose coingestion augments cycling capacity during short-term and overnight recovery from exhaustive exercise, compared with isocaloric glucose. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2020;30:54–61. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31715584 . Accessed 14 Feb 2020.

Maunder E, Podlogar T, Wallis GA. Postexercise fructose–maltodextrin ingestion enhances subsequent endurance capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:1039–45. https://journals.lww.com/00005768-201805000-00018 . Accessed 16 Mar 2021.

Odell OJ, Wallis GA. The application of lactose in sports nutrition. Int Dairy J. 2021;116:104970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104970 .

Podlogar T, Wallis GA. Impact of post-exercise fructose-maltodextrin ingestion on subsequent endurance performance. Front Nutr. 2020;7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00082/full .

Bishop DJ, Granata C, Eynon N. Can we optimise the exercise training prescription to maximise improvements in mitochondria function and content? Biochim Biophys Acta Gener Subj. 2014;1840:1266–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.012 .

Tønnessen E, Sylta Ø, Haugen TA, Hem E, Svendsen IS, Seiler S. The road to gold: training and peaking characteristics in the year prior to a gold medal endurance performance. PLoS One. 2014;9:e101796. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25019608 . Accessed 2 Aug 2017.

Granata C, Jamnick NA, Bishop DJ. Principles of exercise prescription, and how they influence exercise-induced changes of transcription factors and other regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis. Sports Med. 2018;48:1541–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0894-4 .

Position of The American Dietetic Association and The Canadian Dietetic Association: Nutrition for physical fitness and athletic performance for adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:691–6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/000282239391681F . Accessed 23 Dec 2021.

Hansen AK, Fischer CP, Plomgaard P, Andersen JL, Saltin B, Pedersen BK. Skeletal muscle adaptation: training twice every second day vs. training once daily. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98:93–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00163.2004 .

Jeukendrup AE. Training the gut for athletes. Sports Med. 2017;47:101–10.

Costa RJS, Miall A, Khoo A, Rauch C, Snipe R, Camões-Costa V, et al. Gut-training: the impact of two weeks repetitive gut-challenge during exercise on gastrointestinal status, glucose availability, fuel kinetics, and running performance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017;42:547–57. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201008-1267OC .

de Oliveira EP, Burini RC, Jeukendrup A. Gastrointestinal complaints during exercise: prevalence, etiology, and nutritional recommendations. Sports Med. 2014;44:79–85.

Pfeiffer B, Stellingwerff T, Hodgson AB, Randell R, Pöttgen K, Res P, et al. Nutritional intake and gastrointestinal problems during competitive endurance events. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:344–51.

Kondo S, Karasawa T, Fukazawa A, Koike A, Tsutsui M, Terada S. Effects of a Very High-carbohydrate diet and endurance exercise training on pancreatic amylase activity and intestinal glucose transporter content in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2022;68:97–103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35491210 .

Impey SG, Hearris MA, Hammond KM, Bartlett JD, Louis J, Close GL, et al. Fuel for the work required: a theoretical framework for carbohydrate periodization and the glycogen threshold hypothesis. Sports Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0867-7 .

Jeukendrup AE. Periodized nutrition for athletes. Sports Med. 2017;47:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0694-2 .

Yeo WK, Paton CD, Garnham AP, Burke LM, Carey AL, Hawley JA. Skeletal muscle adaptation and performance responses to once a day versus twice every second day endurance training regimens. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1462–70. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90882.2008 .

Hulston CJ, Venables MC, Mann CH, Martin C, Philp A, Baar K, et al. Training with low muscle glycogen enhances fat metabolism in well-trained cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:2046–55.

Gejl KD, Nybo L. Performance effects of periodized carbohydrate restriction in endurance trained athletes - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. BioMed Central Ltd; 2021;18:37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001184 .

Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5:276–91.

Bishop DJ, Botella J, Granata C. CrossTalk opposing view: Exercise training volume is more important than training intensity to promote increases in mitochondrial content. J Physiol. 2019;597:4115–8.

Jeukendrup AE, Craig NP, Hawley JA. The bioenergetics of world class cycling. J Sci Med Sport. 2000;3:414–33.

Solli GS, Tønnessen E, Sandbakk Ø. The training characteristics of the world’s most successful female cross-country skier. Front Physiol. 2017;8:1069. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326603 .

Impey SG, Hammond KM, Shepherd SO, Sharples AP, Stewart C, Limb M, et al. Fuel for the work required: a practical approach to amalgamating train-low paradigms for endurance athletes. Physiol Rep. 2016;4:1–15.

McConell GK, Wadley GD, le plastrier K, Linden KC. Skeletal muscle AMPK is not activated during 2 h of moderate intensity exercise at ∼65% in endurance trained men. J Physiol. 2020;598:3859–70. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277619 .

Cesare Granata X, Oliveira RSF, Little JP, Bishop DJ. Forty high-intensity interval training sessions blunt exercise-induced changes in the nuclear protein content of PGC-1 and p53 in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020;318:224–36. http://www.ajpendo.org . Accessed 10 Dec 2021.

Hawley JA, Lundby C, Cotter JD, Burke LM. Maximizing cellular adaptation to endurance exercise in skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.014 .

Rothschild JA, Islam H, Bishop DJ, Kilding AE, Stewart T, Plews DJ. Factors influencing ampk activation during cycling exercise: a pooled analysis and meta-regression. Sports Med. 2021;52(6):1273–94.

Gillen JB, West DWD, Williamson EP, Fung HJW, Moore DR. Low-carbohydrate training increases protein requirements of endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:2294–301.

Lemon PW, Mullin JP. Effect of initial muscle glycogen levels on protein catabolism during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1980;48:624–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1980.48.4.624 .

Ghiarone T, Andrade-Souza VA, Learsi SK, Tomazini F, Ataide-Silva T, Sansonio A, et al. Twice-a-day training improves mitochondrial efficiency, but not mitochondrial biogenesis, compared with once-daily training. J Appl Physiol. 2019;127:713–25.

Andrade-Souza VA, Ghiarone T, Sansonio A, Santos Silva KA, Tomazini F, Arcoverde L, et al. Exercise twice-a-day potentiates markers of mitochondrial biogenesis in men. FASEB J. 2020;34:1602–19.

Kasper AM, Cocking S, Cockayne M, Barnard M, Tench J, Parker L, et al. Carbohydrate mouth rinse and caffeine improves high-intensity interval running capacity when carbohydrate restricted. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16:560–8.

Coggan AR, Coyle EF. Metabolism and performance following carbohydrate ingestion late in exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989. p. 59–65. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005768-198902000-00011 . Accessed 2 Jun 2017.

Podlogar T, Free B, Wallis GA. High rates of fat oxidation are maintained after the sleep low approach despite delayed carbohydrate feeding during exercise. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;50:1–11.

Google Scholar  

Noakes TD, Windt J. Evidence that supports the prescription of low-carbohydrate high-fat diets: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:133–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096491 .

Maunder E, Plews DJ, Kilding AE. Contextualising maximal fat oxidation during exercise: Determinants and normative values. Front Physiol. 2018;9:599.

Fletcher G, Eves FF, Glover EI, Robinson SL, Vernooij CA, Thompson JL, et al. Dietary intake is independently associated with the maximal capacity for fat oxidation during exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105:864–72.

Maunder E, Plews DJ, Wallis GA, Brick MJ, Leigh WB, Chang WL, et al. Peak fat oxidation is positively associated with vastus lateralis CD36 content, fed-state exercise fat oxidation, and endurance performance in trained males. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;122(1):93–102.

Larsen S, Nielsen J, Hansen CN, Nielsen LB, Wibrand F, Stride N, et al. Biomarkers of mitochondrial content in skeletal muscle of healthy young human subjects. J Physiol. 2012;590:3349–60.

Havemann L, West SJ, Goedecke JH, Macdonald IA, St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD, et al. Fat adaptation followed by carbohydrate loading compromises high-intensity sprint performance. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00813.2005 .

Rogers MA, Appaneal RN, Hughes D, Vlahovich N, Waddington G, Burke LM, et al. Prevalence of impaired physiological function consistent with Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S): an Australian elite and pre-elite cohort. Bri J Sports Med. 2021;55:38–45.

Achten J, Halson SL, Moseley L, Rayson MP, Casey A, Jeukendrup AE. Higher dietary carbohydrate content during intensified running training results in better maintenance of performance and mood state. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:1331–40.

Kirwan JP, Costill DL, Mitchell JB, Houmard JA, Flynn MG, Fink WJ, et al. Carbohydrate balance in competitive runners during successive days of intense training. J Appl Physiol. 1988;65:2601–6. www.physiology.org/journal/jappl . Accessed 24 Dec 2021.

Hammond KM, Sale C, Fraser W, Tang J, Shepherd SO, Strauss JA, et al. Post-exercise carbohydrate and energy availability induce independent effects on skeletal muscle cell signalling and bone turnover: implications for training adaptation. J Physiol. 2019;597:4779–96.

Areta JL, Iraki J, Owens DJ, Joanisse S, Philp A, Morton JP, et al. Achieving energy balance with a high-fat meal does not enhance skeletal muscle adaptation and impairs glycaemic response in a sleep-low training model. Exp Physiol. 2020;105:1778–91.

Sanders D, Heijboer M. Physical demands and power profile of different stage types within a cycling grand tour. Eur J Sport Sci. 2019;19:736–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1554706 .

Jeukendrup A. A step towards personalized sports nutrition: Carbohydrate intake during exercise. Sports Med. 2014;Suppl 1:S25–33.

Pirnay F, Crielaard JM, Pallikarakis N, Lacroix M, Mosora F, Krzentowski G, et al. Fate of exogenous glucose during exercise of different intensities in humans. 1982. www.physiology.org/journal/jappl . Accessed 23 Apr 2022.

Massicotte D, Péronnet F, Adopo E, Brisson G, Hillaire-Marcel C. Effect of metabolic rate on the oxidation of ingested glucose and fructose during exercise. Int J Sports Med. 1994;15:177–80. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1021043 .

Anderson L, Orme P, Naughton RJ, Close GL, Milsom J, Rydings D, et al. Energy intake and expenditure of professional soccer players of the English Premier league: evidence of carbohydrate periodization. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2017;27:228–38.

Ellis DG, Speakman J, Hambly C, Morton JP, Close GL, Lewindon D, et al. Energy expenditure of a male and female tennis player during association of tennis professionals/women’s tennis association and grand slam events measured by doubly labeled Water. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53:2628–34. http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse . Accessed 26 Nov 2021.

Kasai N, Tanji F, Ishibashi A, Ohnuma H, Takahashi H, Goto K, et al. Augmented muscle glycogen utilization following a single session of sprint training in hypoxia. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121:2981–91.

Bone JL, Ross ML, Tomcik KA, Jeacocke NA, McKay AKA, Burke LM. The validity of ultrasound technology in providing an indirect estimate of muscle glycogen concentrations is equivocal. Nutrients. 2021;13:2371. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2371

Hokken R, Laugesen S, Aagaard P, Suetta C, Frandsen U, Ørtenblad N, et al. Subcellular localization- and fibre type-dependent utilization of muscle glycogen during heavy resistance exercise in elite power and Olympic weightlifters. Acta Physiol. 2021;231:e13561.

Impey SG, Jevons E, Mees G, Cocks M, Strauss J, Chester N, et al. Glycogen utilization during running: intensity, sex, and muscle-specific responses. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52:1966–75.

Bradley WJ, Morehen JC, Haigh J, Clarke J, Donovan TF, Twist C, et al. Muscle glycogen utilisation during Rugby match play: Effects of pre-game carbohydrate. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:1033–8.

Krustrup P, Mohr M, Steensberg A, Bencke J, Klær M, Bangsbo J. Muscle and blood metabolites during a soccer game: implications for sprint performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1165–74.

Krustrup P, Mohr M, Nybo L, Draganidis D, Randers MB, Ermidis G, et al. Muscle metabolism and impaired sprint performance in an elite women’s football game. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;32(Suppl 1):27–38.

Routledge HE, Leckey JJ, Lee MJ, Garnham A, Graham S, Burgess D, et al. Muscle glycogen utilization during an Australian rules football game. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14:122–4.

Olczuk D, Priefer R. A history of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in self-monitoring of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Synd Clin Res Rev. 2018;12(2):181–7.

Fabra EM, Díez JL, Bondia J, Sanz AJL. A comprehensive review of continuous glucose monitoring accuracy during exercise periods. Sensors (Switzerland). 2021;21(2):479.

Clavel P, Tiollier E, Leduc C, Fabre M, Lacome M, Buchheit M. Concurrent validity of a continuous glucose-monitoring system at rest and during and following a high-intensity interval training session. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17:627–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354506091 . Accessed 27 Mar 2022.

Christensen EH, Hansen O IV. Hypoglykämie, Arbeitsfähigkeit und Ermüdung. Skand Arch Für Physiol. 1939;81:172–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1939.tb01321.x .

Aandahl MH, Noordhof DA, Tjønna AE, Sandbakk Ø. Effect of carbohydrate content in a pre-event meal on endurance performance-determining factors: a randomized controlled crossover-trial. Front Sports Active Liv. 2021:3:664270.

Flockhart M, Nilsson LC, Tais S, Ekblom B, Apró W, Larsen FJ. Excessive exercise training causes mitochondrial functional impairment and decreases glucose tolerance in healthy volunteers. Cell Metabolism Cell Press. 2021;33:957-970.e6.

Sutehall S, Muniz-Pardos B, Smajgl D, Mandic M, Jeglinski C, Bosch A, et al. The validity and reliability of a novel isotope ratio infrared spectrometer to quantify 13C enrichment of expired breath samples in exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2021;130:1421–6.

Oosthuyse T, Bosch AN. The effect of the menstrual cycle on exercise metabolism. Sports Med. 2010;40:207–27.

Moore DR, Sygo J, Morton JP. Fuelling the female athlete: Carbohydrate and protein recommendations. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022;22:684–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2021.1922508 .

Scott S, Kempf P, Bally L, Stettler C. Carbohydrate intake in the context of exercise in people with type 1 diabetes. Nutrients. 2019;11:3017. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/12/3017 . Accessed 27 May 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This supplement is supported by the Gatorade Sports Science Institute (GSSI). The supplement was guest edited by Lawrence L. Spriet, who convened a virtual meeting of the GSSI Expert Panel in October 2021 and received honoraria from the GSSI, a division of PepsiCo, Inc., for his participation in the meeting. Dr Spriet received no honoraria for guest editing the supplement. Dr Spriet suggested peer reviewers for each paper, which were sent to the Sports Medicine Editor-in-Chief for approval, prior to any reviewers being approached. Dr Spriet provided comments on each paper and made an editorial decision based on comments from the peer reviewers and the Editor-in-Chief. Where decisions were uncertain, Dr Spriet consulted with the Editor-in-Chief. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of PepsiCo, Inc.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Tim Podlogar & Gareth A. Wallis

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gareth A. Wallis .

Ethics declarations

Author contributions.

Both TP and GAW planned, wrote and revised the manuscript. Both authors also read and approved the final manuscript.

This article is based on a presentation by Gareth Wallis to the GSSI Expert Panel in October 2021. An honorarium for preparation of this article was provided by the GSSI. No other sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Conflict of interest.

Gareth Wallis has received research funding from and/or has acted as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline Ltd., Sugar Nutrition UK, Dairy Management Inc. and Volac International Ltd. Tim Podlogar has no conflicts of interest of potential relevance to the content of this review.

Ethics approval

Consent to participate, consent to publication, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Podlogar, T., Wallis, G.A. New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes. Sports Med 52 (Suppl 1), 5–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01757-1

Download citation

Accepted : 11 August 2022

Published : 29 September 2022

Issue Date : December 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01757-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Scientists push new paradigm of animal consciousness, saying even insects may be sentient

Bees play by rolling wooden balls — apparently for fun . The cleaner wrasse fish appears to recognize its own visage in an underwater mirror . Octopuses seem to react to anesthetic drugs and will avoid settings where they likely experienced past pain. 

All three of these discoveries came in the last five years — indications that the more scientists test animals, the more they find that many species may have inner lives and be sentient. A surprising range of creatures have shown evidence of conscious thought or experience, including insects, fish and some crustaceans. 

That has prompted a group of top researchers on animal cognition to publish a new pronouncement that they hope will transform how scientists and society view — and care — for animals. 

Nearly 40 researchers signed “ The New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness ,” which was first presented at a conference at New York University on Friday morning. It marks a pivotal moment, as a flood of research on animal cognition collides with debates over how various species ought to be treated. 

The declaration says there is “strong scientific support” that birds and mammals have conscious experience, and a “realistic possibility” of consciousness for all vertebrates — including reptiles, amphibians and fish. That possibility extends to many creatures without backbones, it adds, such as insects, decapod crustaceans (including crabs and lobsters) and cephalopod mollusks, like squid, octopus and cuttlefish.

“When there is a realistic possibility of conscious experience in an animal, it is irresponsible to ignore that possibility in decisions affecting that animal,” the declaration says. “We should consider welfare risks and use the evidence to inform our responses to these risks.” 

Jonathan Birch, a professor of philosophy at the London School of Economics and a principal investigator on the Foundations of Animal Sentience project, is among the declaration’s signatories. Whereas many scientists in the past assumed that questions about animal consciousness were unanswerable, he said, the declaration shows his field is moving in a new direction. 

“This has been a very exciting 10 years for the study of animal minds,” Birch said. “People are daring to go there in a way they didn’t before and to entertain the possibility that animals like bees and octopuses and cuttlefish might have some form of conscious experience.”

From 'automata' to sentient

There is not a standard definition for animal sentience or consciousness, but generally the terms denote an ability to have subjective experiences: to sense and map the outside world, to have capacity for feelings like joy or pain. In some cases, it can mean that animals possess a level of self-awareness. 

In that sense, the new declaration bucks years of historical science orthodoxy. In the 17th century, the French philosopher René Descartes argued that animals were merely “material automata” — lacking souls or consciousness.

Descartes believed that animals “can’t feel or can’t suffer,” said Rajesh Reddy, an assistant professor and director of the animal law program at Lewis & Clark College. “To feel compassion for them, or empathy for them, was somewhat silly or anthropomorphizing.” 

In the early 20th century, prominent behavioral psychologists promoted the idea that science should only study observable behavior in animals, rather than emotions or subjective experiences . But beginning in the 1960s, scientists started to reconsider. Research began to focus on animal cognition, primarily among other primates. 

Birch said the new declaration attempts to “crystallize a new emerging consensus that rejects the view of 100 years ago that we have no way of studying these questions scientifically.” 

Indeed, a surge of recent findings underpin the new declaration. Scientists are developing new cognition tests and trying pre-existing tests on a wider range of species, with some surprises. 

Take, for example, the mirror-mark test, which scientists sometimes use to see if an animal recognizes itself. 

In a series of studies, the cleaner wrasse fish seemed to pass the test . 

The fish were placed in a tank with a covered mirror, to which they exhibited no unusual reaction. But after the cover was lifted, seven of 10 fish launched attacks toward the mirror, signaling they likely interpreted the image as a rival fish. 

After several days, the fish settled down and tried odd behaviors in front of the mirror, like swimming upside down, which had not been observed in the species before. Later, some appeared to spend an unusual amount of time in front of the mirror, examining their bodies. Researchers then marked the fish with a brown splotch under the skin, intended to resemble a parasite. Some fish tried to rub the mark off. 

“The sequence of steps that you would only ever have imagined seeing with an incredibly intelligent animal like a chimpanzee or a dolphin, they see in the cleaner wrasse,” Birch said. “No one in a million years would have expected tiny fish to pass this test.”

In other studies, researchers found that zebrafish showed signs of curiosity when new objects were introduced into their tanks and that cuttlefish could remember things they saw or smelled . One experiment created stress for crayfish by electrically shocking them , then gave them anti-anxiety drugs used in humans. The drugs appeared to restore their usual behavior.

Birch said these experiments are part of an expansion of animal consciousness research over the past 10 to 15 years. “We can have this much broader canvas where we’re studying it in a very wide range of animals and not just mammals and birds, but also invertebrates like octopuses, cuttlefish,” he said. “And even increasingly, people are talking about this idea in relation to insects.”

As more and more species show these types of signs, Reddy said, researchers might soon need to reframe their line of inquiry altogether: “Scientists are being forced to reckon with this larger question — not which animals are sentient, but which animals aren’t?” 

New legal horizons

Scientists’ changing understanding of animal sentience could have implications for U.S. law, which does not classify animals as sentient on a federal level, according to Reddy. Instead, laws pertaining to animals focus primarily on conservation, agriculture or their treatment by zoos, research laboratories and pet retailers.

“The law is a very slow moving vehicle and it really follows societal views on a lot of these issues,” Reddy said. “This declaration, and other means of getting the public to appreciate that animals are not just biological automatons, can create a groundswell of support for raising protections.” 

State laws vary widely. A decade ago, Oregon passed a law recognizing animals as sentient and capable of feeling pain, stress and fear, which Reddy said has formed the bedrock of progressive judicial opinions in the state.  

Meanwhile, Washington and California are among several states where lawmakers this year have considered bans on octopus farming, a species for which scientists have found strong evidence of sentience. 

British law was recently amended to consider octopuses sentient beings — along with crabs and lobsters .

“Once you recognize animals as sentient, the concept of humane slaughter starts to matter, and you need to make sure that the sort of methods you’re using on them are humane,” Birch said. “In the case of crabs and lobsters, there are pretty inhumane methods, like dropping them into pans of boiling water, that are very commonly used.”

Evan Bush is a science reporter for NBC News. He can be reached at [email protected].

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

Content maybe subject to  copyright     Report

Citation Count

The return from underperformance to sustainable world-class level: A case study of a male cross-country skier

Ketogenic diets, exercise performance, and training adaptations, longer-term effects of the glycaemic index on substrate metabolism and performance in endurance athletes, diet and nutraceuticals for mental and physical performance in athletes, regulation of endogenous fat and carbohydrate metabolism in relation to exercise intensity and duration., diet, muscle glycogen and physical performance, muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged strenuous exercise when fed carbohydrate, exercise, glut4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake, biomarkers of mitochondrial content in skeletal muscle of healthy young human subjects, related papers (5), dietary supplements and sports performance: introduction and vitamins., intramuscular mechanisms mediating adaptation to low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets during exercise training., recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease: a consensus document from the study group of sports cardiology of the working group of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology and the working group of myocardial and pericardial diseases of the european society of cardiology, protein and overtraining: potential applications for free-living athletes., energy availability, macronutrient intake, and nutritional supplementation for improving exercise performance in endurance athletes., trending questions (3).

Carbohydrates provide essential fuel for endurance athletes, optimizing performance. Risks include improper intake leading to gastrointestinal issues. Personalized carbohydrate strategies can enhance performance.

The paper discusses the importance of carbohydrates for competition and high-intensity training sessions, but it does not specifically mention research about the absolute need for carbs in the daily diet.

The paper does not directly answer the question about pre-workout carbohydrate intake and its impact on endurance performance.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

New Horizons in Carbohydrate Research and Application for Endurance Athletes

Sports Medicine

The importance of carbohydrate as a fuel source for exercise and athletic performance is well established. Equally well developed are dietary carbohydrate intake guidelines for endurance athletes seeking to optimize their performance. This narrative review provides a contemporary perspective on research into the role of, and application of, carbohydrate in the diet of endurance athletes. The review discusses how recommendations could become increasingly refined and what future research would further our understanding of how to optimize dietary carbohydrate intake to positively impact endurance performance. High carbohydrate availability for prolonged intense exercise and competition performance remains a priority. Recent advances have been made on the recommended type and quantity of carbohydrates to be ingested before, during and after intense exercise bouts. Whilst reducing carbohydrate availability around selected exercise bouts to augment metabolic adaptations to training is now...

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024