narcissistic personality disorder case study pdf

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Psychotherapeutic case formulation: Plan analysis for narcissistic personality disorder

2021, Personality and mental health

BACKGROUND One of the relevant case formulation methods for personality difficulties is plan analysis. The present study aimed at delivering a prototypical plan analysis for clients presenting with a diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). The sample consisted of 14 participants diagnosed with an NPD. Based on audio clinical material, we developed 14 individual plan analyses that we then merged into a single prototypical plan analysis. For explorative purposes, we ran an ordinary least squares regression model to predict the narcissistic symptoms severity (NAR) measured on a scale of 1-7 of the 14 clients by the presence (respectively absence) of certain plans in their individual plan analysis. The synthesis revealed that clients with pathological narcissism share common basic motives. Results of the regression model reveal that the presence of the plan 'be strong' reduces the NAR scale by 1.52 points (p = 0.011). DISCUSSION In the treatment of psychological di...

Related Papers

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Stéphane Kolly

Taina Aliste

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Brian Stagner

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Franz Caspar

Current Psychiatry Reports

Aline Vater

Journal of Personality Disorders

Igor Weinberg

Advances in social science, education and humanities research

American Journal of Psychiatry

Drew Westen

Elsa Ronningstam

Ali Eryılmaz

Introduction The purpose of the current study is to elucidate the relationships between narcissistic personality traits and primary and secondary capacities of individuals within the context of positive psychotherapy. Methods In the study conducted in 2016-17 academic year, the participants were 255 university students (51.4% female, n=124 and 48.6% male, n=124) aged 18 to 25. As data collection tools, the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, Wiesbaden's Inventory of Positive Psychotherapy and Family Therapy and Demographic Information Form created by the researchers were used. The Multiple Regression Analysis method was employed to achieve the objectives of the study. Results The findings revealed that two of the primary capacities, namely time and patience, were significant predictors of narcissism. In other words, the time capacity was a positive significant predictor of narcissistic personality traits, while those traits were predicted by the patience capacity in a negative w...

RELATED PAPERS

Ciencia & Saude Coletiva - CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA

Telma Maria G Menicucci

Michal Malinowski

Jorge Foglietta

Orphanet journal of rare diseases

Mirella Filocamo

Physical Review Letters

Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria de Ciencias de la Salud. Salud y Vida

Gabriela Liseth Vaca Altamirano

Optics Communications

Manuel Rico

Artificial Organs

Eliezer Silva

International Journal of Paleopathology

Jane Buikstra

Cláudio José Luchesa

Science of The Total Environment

Tạp chí Y tế Công cộng

Huyền Nguyễn Thị

Journal of the Anatomical Society of India

Madhumita Patnaik

Professional Development in Education

Tara Barnhart

IEEE Access

BABA FAKRUDDIN ALI B H 20PHD0910

Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances

Vimukkthi Vithanage

pabrik mesin es kristal seluma

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Ömer Lütfi Ceylan

Safety Science

Antonio Simoes Re

Cómo la política empresarial puede influir en el éxito o fracaso de una empresa.

María Erika Arévalo Torres

Rosane Oliveira

Surgical Neurology International

Maher Hassounah

European Journal of Translational Myology

Danilo Bondi

Siegfried Zabransky

International Journal of Wildland Fire

OTTO MARTINEZ

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

The Narcissistic Patient - A Case Study

What are the traits of a narcissist? Read therapy session notes from man diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).

• Watch the video on Notes of a First Therapist Session  

Notes of first therapy session with Sam V., male, 43, diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)

Sam presents with anhedonia (failure to enjoy or find pleasure in anything) and dysphoria bordering on depression. He complains of inability to tolerate people's stupidity and selfishness in a variety of settings. He admits that as a result of his "intellectual superiority" he is not well placed to interact with others or even to understand them and what they are going through. He is a recluse and fears that he is being mocked and ridiculed behind his back as a misfit and a freak. Throughout the first session, he frequently compares himself to a machine, a computer, or a member of an alien and advanced race, and talks about himself in the third person singular.

Life, bemoans Sam, has dealt him a bad hand. He is consistently and repeatedly victimized by his clients, for instance. They take credit for his ideas and leverage them to promote themselves, but then fail to re-hire him as a consultant. He seems to attract hostility and animosity incommensurate with his good and generous deeds. He even describes being stalked by two or three vicious women whom he had spurned, he claims, not without pride in his own implied irresistibility. Yes, he is abrasive and contemptuous of others at times but only in the interests of "tough love." He is never obnoxious or gratuitously offensive.

Sam is convinced that people envy him and are "out to get him" (persecutory delusions). He feels that his work (he is also a writer) is not appreciated because of its elitist nature (high-brow vocabulary and such). He refuses to "dumb down". Instead, he is on a mission to educate his readers and clients and "bring them up to his level." When he describes his day, it becomes clear that he is desultory, indolent, and lacks self-discipline and regular working habits. He is fiercely independent (to the point of being counter-dependent - click on this link: The Inverted Narcissist ) and highly values his self-imputed "brutal honesty" and "original, non-herd, outside the box" thinking.

He is married but sexually inactive. Sex bores him and he regards it as a "low-level" activity practiced by "empty-headed" folk. He has better uses for his limited time. He is aware of his own mortality and conscious of his intellectual legacy. Hence his sense of entitlement. He never goes through established channels. Instead, he uses his connections to secure anything from medical care to car repair. He expects to be treated by the best but is reluctant to buy their services, holding himself to be their equal in his own field of activity. He gives little or no thought to the needs, wishes, fears, hopes, priorities, and choices of his nearest and dearest. He is startled and hurt when they become assertive and exercise their personal autonomy (for instance, by setting boundaries).

Sam is disarmingly self-aware and readily lists his weaknesses and faults - but only in order to preempt real scrutiny or to fish for compliments. He constantly brags about his achievements but feels deprived ("I deserve more, much more than that"). When any of his assertions or assumptions is challenged he condescendingly tries to prove his case. If he fails to convert his interlocutor, he sulks and even rages. He tends to idealize everyone or devalue them: people are either clever and good or stupid and malicious. But, everyone is a potential foe.

Sam is very hypervigilant and anxious. He expects the worst and feels vindicated and superior when he is punished ("martyred and victimized"). Sam rarely assumes total responsibility for his actions or accepts their consequences. He has an external locus of control and his defenses are alloplastic. In other words: he blames the world for his failures, defeats, and "bad luck". This "cosmic conspiracy" against him is why his grandiose projects keep flopping and why he is so frustrated.

This article appears in my book, "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited"

next: The Sadistic Patient ~ back t o: Case Studies: Table of Contents

APA Reference Vaknin, S. (2009, October 2). The Narcissistic Patient - A Case Study, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, May 12 from https://www.healthyplace.com/personality-disorders/malignant-self-love/narcissistic-patient-a-case-study

Medically reviewed by Harry Croft, MD

Related Articles

Psychopathy: definition, symptoms, signs and causes, intimacy and abuse, coping with the erotomaniac stalker, personality disorders list, histrionic personality disorder treatment, borderline personality disorder, what is obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

2024 HealthyPlace Inc. All Rights Reserved. Site last updated May 12, 2024

MINI REVIEW article

Personality disorders in people with epilepsy: a review.

• 1 Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
• 2 IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Epilepsy Center (full member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE), Bologna, Italy
• 3 Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy

Epileptologists and psychiatrists have long observed a correlation between epilepsy and personality disorders (PDs) in their clinical practice. We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search looking for evidence on PDs in people with epilepsy (PwE). Out of over 600 results obtained without applying any time restriction, we selected only relevant studies (both analytical and descriptive) limited to English, Italian, French and Spanish languages, with a specific focus on PDs, rather than traits or symptoms, thus narrowing our search down to 23 eligible studies. PDs have been investigated in focal epilepsy (predominantly temporal lobe epilepsy - TLE), juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), with heterogeneous methodology. Prevalence rates of PDs in focal epilepsy ranged from 18 to 42% in surgical candidates or post-surgical individuals, with Cluster C personality disorders or related traits and symptoms being most common. In JME, prevalence rates ranged from 8 to 23%, with no strong correlation with any specific PDs subtype. In PNES, prevalence rates ranged from 30 to 60%, with a notable association with Cluster B personality disorders, particularly borderline personality disorder. The presence of a PD in PwE, irrespective of subtype, complicates treatment management. However, substantial gaps of knowledge exist concerning the neurobiological substrate, effects of antiseizure medications and epilepsy surgery on concomitant PDs, all of which are indeed potential paths for future research.

Introduction

Epilepsy is a chronic disease of the brain defined as “an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures, and by the neurobiologic, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of this condition” ( 1 ). It is a common neurological disease, with a calculated incidence rate of 61.4 per 100,000 person-years and a prevalence of 7.60 per 1,000 population ( 2 ), it affects approximately 46 million people, therefore representing a significant fraction of the worldwide disease burden ( 3 ). Remarkably, nearly half of people with epilepsy (PwE) experience comorbidities, with certain conditions exhibiting a higher prevalence among PwE compared to the general population, often impacting on epilepsy prognosis itself ( 4 ). Psychiatric disorders have garnered particular attention, due to their association with poor seizure outcome, drug-resistance, heightened suicide risk ( 5 – 7 ). While extensive research has been devoted to psychotic, anxiety and mood disorders, limited attention has been directed to the relationship between epilepsy and personality disorders (PDs). This neglect is somewhat surprising given historical observations dating back to the last century, originating from studies involving institutionalized PwE. Several clinical conditions have been described, such as Geschwind syndrome ( 8 ), gliscroid personality or Blumer syndrome ( 9 ). These data were not universally supported or agreed upon ( 10 ) and were related, in particular, to the presence of temporal lobe epilepsies (TLE) with drug-resistant seizures, social isolation, and the use of certain medications, such as phenobarbital or bromine. Subsequent studies showed that other types of epilepsy, such as the Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies (IGE), showed very different personological characteristics from those described for TLE ( 11 ). Features such as superficiality, tendency to elation, poor compliance and critical traits were noted, often attributed to frontal lobe involvement ( 11 ). However the debate about the existence of personological alterations during epilepsy has waned in subsequent years, partly in connection with the use of medications with less impact on cognitive function and with the improved social integration of PwE, so much so that the Commission on Epilepsy, Risks and Insurance of the International Bureau for Epilepsy regarded the risk for psychological disorders in epilepsy to be negligible, at least when considered as such ( 12 ). Furthermore, the emergence of a revised classification system both for epilepsies and for personality disorders (DSM-5) has provided more rigorous and precise definitions, warranting a reevaluation of the association between epilepsy and PDs. In light of these developments, it is imperative to revisit the nexus between epilepsy and PDs, incorporating contemporary scientific evidence and examining diverse populations.

Our review focuses specifically on PDs in PwE, with the aim to collect and synthesize existing evidence, identify gaps of knowledge and propose potential avenues for future research.

Material and methods

In November 2023 we performed a search on PubMed database using the following terms: “Epilepsy”[Mesh] AND [“personality disorder”(All Fields) OR “paranoid personality disorder” (MeSH) OR “schizoid personality disorder” (Mesh) OR “schizotypal personality disorder” (MeSH) OR “antisocial personality disorder” [MeSH] OR “borderline personality disorder “(MeSH) OR “histrionic personality disorder” (MeSH) OR “narcissistic personality disorder” (All Fields) OR “avoidant personality disorder” (All Fields) OR “dependent personality disorder” (Mesh) OR “obsessive compulsive disorder” (MeSH)].

We selected studies (both descriptive and analytical) written in English, Italian, French and Spanish investigating the prevalence of personality disorders in PwE. Exclusion criteria were reviews, case reports, case series with small populations (i.e. less than 10 patients) and editorial comments. Additionally, studies emphasizing personality traits or symptoms without a formal diagnosis of personality disorder were excluded. Studies focusing on personality traits or symptoms without a diagnosis of personality disorder were excluded. No time restrictions were applied, and the entire selection process was carried out manually without the use of any automated tool.

The identified references were screened and provisionally selected for inclusion on the basis of title and abstract, when available. The full texts of articles meeting the inclusion criteria were then assessed.

The initial PubMed search yielded a total of 638 articles. Following a multi-step selection process, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria and were considered eligible for analysis (see Figure 1 for further details). The findings of these studies are presented in distinct subchapters, according to the main themes investigated (see Table 1 ).

Figure 1 Detailed multi-step process for source identification.

Table 1 Results.

Personality disorders and focal epilepsy

Among the included studies, eleven investigated the relationship between PDs and focal epilepsy. These studies showed a significant prevalence of PDs within the studied population, with the strongest association observed between TLE and Cluster C PDs ( 13 – 15 ) and, to a lesser extent, between TLE and schizotypal personality ( 21 ).

Several studies investigated PDs in people with focal epilepsy who underwent epilepsy surgery, investigating its impact on both medical conditions. Notably, one study reported a statistically significant improvement in pre-surgical PD symptoms, although details on seizure outcomes were not provided ( 15 ). In another work, surgical resection of the epileptogenic zone led to remarkable improvements in all five patients diagnosed with concomitant PD, with two even being able to discontinue antipsychotic medications. Post-surgical seizure outcomes, assessed using the Engel Surgical Outcome Scale, were also highly favorable, with patients either becoming completely seizure-free or experiencing only rare seizures ( 12 ). Interestingly, a large population- based study in people with TLE revealed that PDs were predictive of surgery failure, defined as significantly lower rates of Engel class I and IA ( 16 ). The authors speculated that complex brain microstructural abnormalities in people with TLE and psychiatric comorbidities might underlie this association, emphasizing the need for further research.

In a separate comparative study, PDs were more commonly associated with extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ExTLE) rather than TLE, leading to lower rates of surgical intervention for individuals with this comorbidity. Nevertheless, those who did undergo surgery exhibited similarly successful outcomes ( 20 ). Moreover, people with epilepsy and PDs seem to suffer from an even bleaker stigma, as shown by lower employment rates two years after surgery ( 18 ).

Conversely, three studies did not detect significant differences in PD prevalence among PwE. One uncontrolled study focused only on people with intellectual disability and epilepsy, thus this finding could be attributed to a population selection bias ( 23 ). In the other two studies, discrepancies in results might be attributed to the specific assessment scales utilized – as questioned by the Authors themselves ( 17 ) - or the comparison of PD prevalence across different subtypes of focal epilepsy ( 19 ) that did not yield statistically significant differences.

Personality disorders and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Three studies on PDs and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) were identified. Two recent comparative studies showed that PDs were significantly more prevalent in JME compared to healthy controls. While one study did not identify specific correlation between PD subtypes and JME ( 24 ), the other reported strong associations between narcissistic, borderline, paranoid and histrionic PDs and JME ( 25 ). These discrepancies may stem from variations in assessment scales used, as the populations examined exhibited otherwise similar characteristics. A third older and purely descriptive study focused on assessing the prevalence of PDs in a medium-size sample of patients with JME, without providing statistical analyses ( 23 ).

Personality disorders and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Among the 9 studies investing the association between PDs and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), seven were comparative studies comparing people with PNES to various control groups, including those with epilepsy/epileptic seizures alone ( 27 – 31 , 35 ), PwE and PNES ( 33 ), or healthy controls ( 30 ). The remaining two studies were observational uncontrolled studies that gathered data on people with PNES through medical history and hospital charts ( 32 , 34 ). While the evidence from these latter two studies was undoubtedly of lower quality due to the lack of proper statistical analysis and, in one case, insufficient details on the methods used to diagnose PD ( 34 ), we deemed it important to include them as seminal works that highlighted a higher prevalence of Cluster B PDs in people with PNES, a finding largely confirmed by subsequent literature and deemed statistically significant in the majority of our results ( 28 – 31 ). However, three studies presented discordant findings in this regard, potentially influenced by factors such as the assessments tools used. For instance, one study ( 27 ) reported statistically significant high scores in the “extraversion” section of the NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised among patients with PNES. The other two studies assessed PDs by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), despite criticisms regarding its limitations and inconsistency of results obtained using this tool ( 36 , 37 ).

Regarding gender differences, two studies show a statistically significant higher prevalence of PDs in women with PNES ( 28 , 29 ).

Despite the known higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in PwE, the relationship between epilepsy and PDs has been inadequately investigated in the most recent scientific literature ( 38 ).

Our review demonstrates that the literature available on this topic is extremely heterogeneous in terms of methodology, population size, type of epilepsy investigated and assessment tools used for evaluating the disorder, with many works even failing to differentiate between psychiatric disorders in general and PDs ( 38 – 43 ). This last issue seems particularly relevant as the vast majority of the examined studies tend to combine and investigate various psychiatric conditions together ( 44 ). Conversely, when studies do focus on personality comorbidities, they often center on traits or symptoms rather than formally diagnosed PDs ( 39 – 41 ). Such methodological inconsistencies present a significant barrier to the comprehensive inclusion of pertinent evidence in our analysis, consequently constraining our capacity to derive meaningful insights regarding the relationship between PDs and epilepsy.

Another issue encountered in reviewing the existing literature on this subject is the lack of strong evidence due to the limited scope of studies carried out thus far, as, in spite of the higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities in PwE and the impact they seem to have on epilepsy prognosis itself, the number of well-designed case-control studies investigating their correlation remains insufficient ( 24 ). Ideally, to ensure statistical validity and clinical relevance, systematic comparisons should be made among different types of epilepsy and between PWE and healthy controls. Moreover, it seems very interesting to observe that there is relatively little standardized work on the issue of diagnostic tools used to identify PDs in epilepsy. Many studies relied on the MMPI, despite concerns raised by some researchers ( 36 , 37 ). The consequence of it, however, is the vast array of diagnostic tools used subsequently, such as the Bear-Fedio Inventory (BFI), the DSM-IV axis I and axis II, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R PDs (SCID-II), the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS) and many others, making the different results obtained arduous to analyse in a comprehensive fashion ( 38 ). Moreover, as reiterated by Trimble ( 36 ), the diagnosis made by scales cannot be considered valid tout court for a clinical diagnosis.

On the other hand, the change in the classification of the same disorders in relation to different editions of the DSM, the same different classification of epilepsies, the change in the treatment of them in recent years and, in particular, the increased social integration of individuals with epilepsy do not allow the historically acquired data to be considered valid.

Furthermore, the literature revision is complicated by its heterogeneity, as specific different types of epilepsy were investigated in individual studies, while, on the contrary, some neglected to differentiate between epilepsy and isolated seizures. There is a long-standing and established interest in exploring the relationship between PDs and PNES ( 35 ) and, more recently, a rapidly growing body of evidence on PDs in people with focal epilepsy has emerged ( 19 – 21 ), even applying the recently proposed dimensional approach to personality profile ( 45 ). However, there are only scattered studies on other subtypes of epilepsy, such as JME ( 24 ), and, to our best knowledge, very few works on the correlation between PDs and epilepsy as a whole, most of which also happen to be quite dated ( 36 , 46 – 48 ).

Given these limitations, our study aimed to aggregate and summarize available findings to offer a current perspective on the state of research in this area. By highlighting these constraints, we hope to identify potential research directions for future exploration. The relationship between PDs and focal epilepsy, particularly TLE, is well-established, with prevalence rates ranging from 18 to 42% in surgical candidates or post-surgical individuals ( 49 ). While there is no clear agreement as to what type of PD is the most prevalent, cluster C personality disorders or related traits and symptoms seem to be the most frequent ( 13 – 15 , 31 , 40 , 50 ). However, the correlation between TLE, PDs and surgical treatment remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for future works to delve in this complex relationship, due to its profound impact on patients’ outcome.

In the context of JME, the prevalence and specific types of PDs remain contentious among the limited available studies ( 51 ). Nevertheless, the significance of exploring this relationship is undeniable, given the prevalence of JME. Analysing the correlation between JME and PDs within the broader framework of the idiopathic generalized epilepsies, ideally comparing JME with the other subtypes, could yield robust evidence on their psychiatric and personality profiles.

Our research underscores a strong connection PDs and PNES, particularly in females, with a strong association with cluster B personality disorders, notably borderline personality disorder ( 52 ). Delayed diagnosis of PNES, averaging 7-9 years from the initial clinical episode, leads to unnecessary hospitalizations and inappropriate treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) ( 53 ). Regarding the association with PNES, it must, in any case, be considered, that since PNES is a psychiatric disorder, many authors wonder whether we are really facing an association of different pathologies or a single one ( 11 ).

Regarding ASMs in general, our review highlights that the presence of a PD in PwE, regardless of the subtype, complicates treatment management. Clinicians face challenges in maintaining a delicate balance due to the potential for ASMs to worsen or exacerbate underlying PDs, as observed with drugs like perampanel and levetiracetam ( 7 , 54 – 57 ).

This review has methodological limitations. We conducted our research through only one database, potentially excluding relevant evidence available from other online sources. Moreover, few studies were not included for language reasons ( 58 – 61 ). Lastly, we did not offer an analysis of the evidence strength provided by each work as the grand variety of statistical methodology used, population size, type of epilepsy and parameters considered made us opt for a purely descriptive presentation of our findings. However, we do not think that these limits significantly reduce the strength of our results, which allowed us to identify research paths worthy of further investigation.

Conclusions and directions for future research

While the relationship between psychiatric comorbidities and epilepsy has been discussed since time immemorial ( 47 ), our study reveals a notable lack of definitive data on various aspects concerning PDs in PwE. The literature in this domain is limited and methodologically diverse, yet our findings suggest that PDs are a prevalent comorbidity in PwE.

Future research should prioritize the identification of significant correlations between PDs and specific types of epilepsy, as well as elucidate how their co-occurrence influence patients’ prognosis. Additionally, it is crucial to investigate the effects of current ASMs on concomitant PDs.

Given the increasing number of patients being considered for epilepsy surgery, it is of the utmost importance to deepen our understanding of the neurological basis and pathological mechanisms that intertwine PDs and epilepsy, given the current scarcity of evidence that may inadvertently hinder optimal treatment decisions for some patients.

Based on our findings and with the aim of enhancing patient care and wellbeing, we advocate for a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach involving neurologists and psychiatrists, which should begin from the early stages of diagnosis and extend to the selection of personalized therapeutic strategies for each patient.

Author contributions

VV: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology. FB: Writing – review & editing. CC: Writing – review & editing. LF: Writing – review & editing. LL: Writing – review & editing. LM: Writing – review & editing. BM: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology.

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The publication of this article was supported by the “Ricerca Corrente” funding from the Italian Ministry of Health.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Loretta Giuliano for her help in creating our search string for PubMed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

1. Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross JH, Elger CE, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia . (2014) 55:475–82. doi: 10.1111/epi.12550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Beghi E. The epidemiology of epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology . (2020) 54:185–91. doi: 10.1159/000503831

3. Feigin VL, Nichols E, Alam T, Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol . (2019) 18:459–80. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X

4. Keezer MR, Sisodiya SM, Sander JW. Comorbidities of epilepsy: current concepts and future perspectives. Lancet Neurol . (2016) 15:106–15. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00225-2

5. Taylor RS, Sander JW, Taylor RJ, Baker GA. Predictors of health-related quality of life and costs in adults with epilepsy: a systematic review. Epilepsia . (2011) 52:2168–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03213.x

6. Ioannou P, Foster DL, Sander JW, Dupont S, Gil-Nagel A, Drogon O’Flaherty E, et al. The burden of epilepsy and unmet need in people with focal seizures. Brain Behav . (2022) 12:e2589. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2589

7. Memon AM, Katwala J, Douille C, Kelley C, Monga V. Exploring the complex relationship between antiepileptic drugs and suicidality: A systematic literature review. Innov Clin Neurosci . (2023) 20:47–51.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

8. Benson DF. The geschwind syndrome. Adv Neurol . (1991) 55:411–21.

9. Blumer D. Evidence supporting the temporal lobe epilepsy personality syndrome. Neurology . (1999) 53:S9–12.

10. Devinsky O, Najjar S. Evidence against the existence of a temporal lobe epilepsy personality syndrome. Neurology . (1999) 53:S13–25.

11. Beghi M, Beghi E, Cornaggia CM, Gobbi G. Idiopathic generalized epilepsies of adolescence. Epilepsia . (2006) 47 Suppl 2:107–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00706.x

12. Cornaggia CM. Epilepsy and risks: a first-step evaluation . Milano: Ghedini editore (1993).

Google Scholar

13. Sair A, Şair YB, Saracoğlu İ, Sevincok L, Akyol A. The relation of major depression, OCD, personality disorders and affective temperaments with Temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res . (2021) 171:106565. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106565

14. Baishya J, Ravish Rajiv K, Chandran A, Unnithan G, Menon RN, Thomas SV, et al. Personality disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy: What do they signify? Acta Neurol Scand . (2020) 142:210–5. doi: 10.1111/ane.13259

15. Novais F, Franco A, Loureiro S, Andrea M, Figueira ML, Pimentel J, et al. Personality patterns of people with medically refractory epilepsy - Does the epileptogenic zone matter? Epilepsy Behav EB . (2019) 97:130–4. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Koch-Stoecker SC, Bien CG, Schulz R, May TW. Psychiatric lifetime diagnoses are associated with a reduced chance of seizure freedom after temporal lobe surgery. Epilepsia . (2017) 58:983–93. doi: 10.1111/epi.13736

17. Landais A, Crespel A, Moulis JL, Coubes P, Gelisse P. Psychiatric comorbidity in temporal DNET and improvement after surgery. Neurochirurgie . (2016) 62:165–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2016.02.002

18. Thorbecke R, May TW, Koch-Stoecker S, Ebner A, Bien CG, Specht U. Effects of an inpatient rehabilitation program after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery and other factors on employment 2 years after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia . (2014) 55:725–33. doi: 10.1111/epi.12573

19. Dalmagro CL, Velasco TR, Bianchin MM, Martins APP, Guarnieri R, Cescato MP, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity in refractory focal epilepsy: a study of 490 patients. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2012) 25:593–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.09.026

20. Sperli F, Rentsch D, Despland PA, Foletti G, Jallon P, Picard F, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity in patients evaluated for chronic epilepsy: a differential role of the right hemisphere? Eur Neurol . (2009) 61:350–7. doi: 10.1159/000210547

21. Mula M, Cavanna A, Collimedaglia L, Viana M, Barbagli D, Tota G, et al. Clinical correlates of schizotypy in patients with epilepsy. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci . (2008) 20:441–6. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20.4.441

22. Manchanda R, Schaefer B, McLachlan RS, Blume WT, Wiebe S, Girvin JP, et al. Psychiatric disorders in candidates for surgery for epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . (1996) 61:82–9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.1.82

23. Deb S, Hunter D. Psychopathology of people with mental handicap and epilepsy. III: Personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci . (1991) 159:830–4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.159.6.830

24. Panda PK, Ramachandran A, Tomar A, Elwadhi A, Kumar V, Sharawat IK. Prevalence, nature, and severity of the psychiatric comorbidities and their impact on quality of life in adolescents with Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2023) 142:109216. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109216

25. Taura M, Gama AP, Sousa AVM, Noffs MHS, Alonso NB, Yacubian EM, et al. Dysfunctional personality beliefs and executive performance in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2020) 105:106958. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106958

26. Trinka E, Kienpointner G, Unterberger I, Luef G, Bauer G, Doering LB, et al. Psychiatric comorbidity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia . (2006) 47:2086–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00828.x

27. Sobregrau P, Baillès E, Carreño M, Donaire A, Boget T, Setoain X, et al. Psychiatric and psychological assessment of Spanish patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) with no response to previous treatments. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2023) 145:109329. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109329

28. Sullivan-Baca E, Weitzner DS, Choudhury TK, Fadipe M, Miller BI, Haneef Z. Characterizing differences in psychiatric profiles between male and female veterans with epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Epilepsy Res . (2022) 186:106995. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106995

29. Rady A, Elfatatry A, Molokhia T, Radwan A. Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2021) 118:107918. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107918

30. Direk N, Kulaksizoglu IB, Alpay K, Gurses C. Using personality disorders to distinguish between patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and those with epileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2012) 23:138–41. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.11.013

31. Harden CL, Jovine L, Burgut FT, Carey BT, Nikolov BG, Ferrando SJ. A comparison of personality disorder characteristics of patients with nonepileptic psychogenic pseudoseizures with those of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2009) 14:481–3. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.12.012

32. Baillés E, Pintor L, Fernandez-Egea E, Torres X, Matrai S, De Pablo J, et al. Psychiatric disorders, trauma, and MMPI profile in a Spanish sample of nonepileptic seizure patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry . (2004) 26:310–5. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.04.003

33. Kalogjera-Sackellares D, Sackellares JC. Personality profiles of patients with pseudoseizures. Seizure . (1997) 6:1–7. doi: 10.1016/S1059-1311(97)80045-3

34. Drake MEJ, Pakalnis A, Phillips BB. Neuropsychological and psychiatric correlates of intractable pseudoseizures. Seizure . (1992) 1:11–3. doi: 10.1016/1059-1311(92)90048-6

35. Vanderzant CW, Giordani B, Berent S, Dreifuss FE, Sackellares JC. Personality of patients with pseudoseizures. Neurology . (1986) 36:664–8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.36.5.664

36. Trimble MR. Personality disturbances in epilepsy. Neurology . (1983) 33:1332–4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.33.10.1332-a

37. Perini GI, Tosin C, Carraro C, Bernasconi G, Canevini MP, Canger R, et al. Interictal mood and personality disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . (1996) 61:601–5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.6.601

38. Swinkels WAM, Duijsens IJ, Spinhoven P. Personality disorder traits in patients with epilepsy. Seizure . (2003) 12:587–94. doi: 10.1016/S1059-1311(03)00098-0

39. Guo X, Lin W, Zhong R, Han Y, Yu J, Yan K, et al. Factors related to the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and their impact on suicide risk in epileptic patients. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2023), 146:109362. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109362

40. Kilicaslan EE, Türe HS, Kasal Mİ, Çavuş NN, Akyüz DA, Akhan G, et al. Differences in obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions between patients with epilepsy with obsessive-compulsive symptoms and patients with OCD. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2020) 102:106640. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106640

41. Kim SJ, Lee SA, Ryu HU, Han SH, Lee GH, Jo KD, et al. Factors associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms in people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2020) 102:106723. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106723

42. Ertekin BA, Kulaksizoğlu IB, Ertekin E, Gürses C, Bebek N, Gökyiğit A, et al. A comparative study of obsessive-compulsive disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2009) 14:634–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.01.016

43. Isaacs KL, Philbeck JW, Barr WB, Devinsky O, Alper K. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2004) 5:569–74. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.04.009

44. de Oliveira GNM, Kummer A, Salgado JV, Portela EJ, Sousa-Pereira SR, David AS, et al. Psychiatric disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy: an overview from a tertiary service in Brazil. Seizure . (2010) 19:479–84. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.07.004

45. Kustov G, Zhuravlev D, Zinchuk M, Popova S, Tikhonova O, Yakovlev A, et al. Maladaptive personality traits in patients with epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Seizure . (2024) 117:77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.02.005

46. Jeżowska-Jurczyk K, Kotas R, Jurczyk P, Nowakowska-Kotas M, Budrewicz S, Pokryszko-Dragan A. Mental disorders in patients with epilepsy. Psychiatr Pol . (2020) 54:51–68. doi: 10.12740/PP/93886

47. Trimble MR. Personality disorders and epilepsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) . (1988) 44:98–101. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9005-0_20

48. Trimble MR. Psychiatric aspects of epilepsy. Psychiatr Dev . (1987) 5:285–300.

49. Gaitatzis A, Trimble MR, Sander JW. The psychiatric comorbidity of epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand . (2004) 110:207–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00324.x

50. Hamed SA, Elserogy YM, Abd-Elhafeez HA. Psychopathological and peripheral levels of neurobiological correlates of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients with epilepsy: a hospital-based study. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2013) 27:409–15. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.01.022

51. Gélisse P, Thomas P, Samuelian JC, Gentin P. Psychiatric disorders in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia . (2007) 48:1032–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01009_4.x

52. Lacey C, Cook M, Salzberg M. The neurologist, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, and borderline personality disorder. Epilepsy Behav EB . (2007) 11:492–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.09.010

53. Oto MM. The misdiagnosis of epilepsy: Appraising risks and managing uncertainty. Seizure . (2017) 44:143–6. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.029

54. Villanueva V, Garcés M, López-González FJ, Rodriguez-Osorio X, Toledo M, Salas-Puig J, et al. Safety, efficacy and outcome-related factors of perampanel over 12 months in a real-world setting: The FYDATA study. Epilepsy Res . (2016) 126:201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.08.001

55. Yumnam S, Bhagwat C, Saini L, Sharma A, Shah R. Levetiracetam-associated obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a preschooler. J Clin Psychopharmacol . (2021) 41:495–6. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001402

56. Fujikawa M, Kishimoto Y, Kakisaka Y, Jin K, Kato K, Iwasaki M, et al. Obsessive-compulsive behavior induced by levetiracetam. J Child Neurol . (2015) 30:942–4. doi: 10.1177/0883073814541471

57. Mbizvo GK, Dixon P, Hutton JL, Marson AG. The adverse effects profile of levetiracetam in epilepsy: a more detailed look. Int J Neurosci . (2014) 124:627–34. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2013.866951

58. Usykina MV, Kornilova SV, Lavrushchik MV. [Cognitive impairment and social functioning in organic personality disorder due to epilepsy]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S Korsakova . (2021) 121:21–6. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112106121

59. Dvirskiĭ AE, Shevtsov AG. [Clinical manifestations of epilepsy in hereditary schizophrenia]. Zhurnal Nevropatol Psikhiatrii Im SS Korsakova Mosc Russ 1952 . (1991) 91:28–30.

60. Ekiert H, Jarzebowska E, Nurowska K, Welbel L. [Personality of epileptic patients and their relatives with special regard to traits and symptoms not included in the epileptic character]. Psychiatr Pol . (1967) 1:15–21.

61. Bilikiewicz A, Gromska J. Mental symptoms and character disorders in epilepsy with the “Temporal Syndrome”. Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr Pol . (1964) 14:879–82.

Keywords: epilepsy, personality disorders (PDs), PNES, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), temporal lobe epilepsy, epilepsy surgery

Citation: Viola V, Bisulli F, Cornaggia CM, Ferri L, Licchetta L, Muccioli L and Mostacci B (2024) Personality disorders in people with epilepsy: a review. Front. Psychiatry 15:1404856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1404856

Received: 21 March 2024; Accepted: 24 April 2024; Published: 10 May 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Viola, Bisulli, Cornaggia, Ferri, Licchetta, Muccioli and Mostacci. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Barbara Mostacci, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.