what is subculture of violence thesis

• Subscriber Services
• For Authors
• Publications
• Archaeology
• Art & Architecture
• Bilingual dictionaries
• Classical studies
• Encyclopedias
• English Dictionaries and Thesauri
• Language reference
• Linguistics
• Media studies
• Medicine and health
• Names studies
• Performing arts
• Science and technology
• Social sciences
• Society and culture
• Overview Pages
• Subject Reference
• English Dictionaries
• Bilingual Dictionaries

Recently viewed (0)

• Save Search

Bill Sanders

• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

In This Entry

Related content, in this work.

• code of the streets theory
• Publishing Information
• List of Entries by Subject

subculture of violence theory  

A theory that explains that violence is concentrated within working-class communities due to norms and values that allow for violence. Developed by Marvin Wolfgang and Franco Ferracuti, the subculture of violence argues that violence is not expressed in every situation but rather that individuals are constantly prepared for violence. The subculture is defined by its willingness to engage in violence and has a broad base of support within the community. Violence is a learned behaviour and is reinforced through interaction with others who value violence. Violence is not viewed as illicit or illegal, and individuals do not feel guilty about committing violence. Later, Elijah Anderson would advance this theory in the development of his ... ...

Access to the complete content on Oxford Reference requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs , and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us .

• Oxford University Press

PRINTED FROM OXFORD REFERENCE (www.oxfordreference.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single entry from a reference work in OR for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice ).

date: 01 May 2024

• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility
• [66.249.64.20|193.7.198.129]
• 193.7.198.129

Character limit 500 /500

4.5 Subculture Theories

The dominant culture is the majority group that has its certain norms, values, and preferences that are imposed on everyone else. This culture is forced on everyone as the accepted way to live, behave, and believe whether or not groups who are not represented in this dominant majority agree and even when they contradict what is preferred for smaller, less powerful groups. These other groups have their own subculture, which may not align with the dominant culture.

A subculture is an identifiable subgroup within the larger culture whose values may differ from those present in the dominant group. This could include specific standards of behavior that are learned and passed down from generation to generation, for example. Crime, gangs, violence, and inner-city neighborhoods have been studied in a manner that ties the concept of subculture to criminal and even violent behavior.

4.5.1 Gangs

Figure 4.6  Photograph of the Navy Street gang in Brooklyn, New York used as a prosecution exhibit at trial in 1918.

Frederic Thrasher, another sociologist from the famed Chicago School, conducted a classic study in 1927 in which he described gangs as coming together spontaneously at first, then becoming integrated through conflict with other gangs and the surrounding community. The gangs had similar features to formal organizations, such as an identity as a group, stability, commitment, exclusivity, and an internal structure with distinct statuses and roles (figure 4.6).

Thrasher’s study included 1,313 gangs that each occupied a part of Chicago. He believed that the social conditions in the United States at the end of the nineteenth century encouraged the development of street gangs. An influx of immigrants filled the inner-city neighborhoods and they created a more culturally diverse population that was subjected to deteriorating housing, poor employment prospects, and a rapid turnover in the population. The conditions created socially disorganized neighborhoods (remember social disorganization theory) with weak and ineffective social institutions and social control mechanisms. It was this lack of social control that Thrasher believed encouraged youth to discover alternative ways to establish social order which was accomplished by forming gangs.

4.5.2 Violence

American criminologist Marvin Wolfgang and Italian criminologist Franco Ferracuti (1982) developed the subculture of violence theory  in which they used norms and values as explanatory variables for the origin of violent crime. They implied that norms of behavior are created in social conditions, social classes, and ethnic and racial groups. Wolfgang (1958) conducted a study on homicide in Philadelphia and discovered evidence consistent with his and Ferracuti’s theory. Forty-three percent of the homicide offenders had been arrested previously for crimes against persons with about one-fourth of homicide victims having been previously arrested for violent crimes. The conclusion is that there are certain groups in certain areas where there exists a norm that favors the use of violence to deal with conflict and it is seen as normal in these communities.

For some, violence is more common during their youth, but as they become older, they distance themselves from the violence that once may have been common. Reacting to situations with  violence is a learned behavior that can be unlearned.

4.5.3 Code of the Streets

In 1990, Elijah Anderson published his findings of a study that looked at Black neighborhoods along Philadelphia’s Germantown Avenue in his book The Code of the Street . In his study, Anderson detailed the aspects of the code of the street, or street culture,   that stressed a hyperinflated notion of manhood that centers on the idea of respect. According to Anderson, respect was defined as being treated right or being granted one’s props or the deference an individual deserves. Learn directly from Anderson about his book here .

In the code, a man’s sense of worth is determined by the respect he can command in public. How is this respect gained? Anderson found that since they lived in a subculture that was violent, an individual could not back down from any threat no matter how serious. Also, since economic and social circumstances limited opportunities for legitimate success, many tried to find alternative ways of making money to provide for their families.

One major distinction that Anderson made was between both families and people in the inner-city neighborhoods by dividing them into two different groups: decent families and street families. “Decent families” upheld positive values. Conversely, “street families” were oriented to the values of the streets which involved displays of physical strength and intellectual prowess that demonstrated their ability to take care of themselves and their families.

The code was helpful to achieve success on the streets but was very detrimental when it came to socially accepted (and legal) success. Violence in society does not generally increase opportunities, rather it actually limits opportunities. This makes for a difficult transition for individuals who wish to leave “the life” but do not have the skills to achieve success in a society where one doesn’t benefit from being street-smart.

4.5.4 Licenses and Attributions for Subculture Theories

“Subculture Theories” by Curt Sobolewski is licensed under CC BY 4.0 .

Figure 4.6 Photo by unknown photographer is in the Public domain , via Wikimedia Commons.

 Introduction to Criminology Copyright © by Taryn VanderPyl. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book

Subcultures of Violence and Beyond

Theory Integration in Criminology

Cite this chapter

• Charles F. Wellford 5 &
• David A. Soulé 5  

216 Accesses

At the core of every discipline are issues addressing conceptualization, measurement, description, and theory. Developing precise concepts, organizing ways to operationalize those concepts, and describing the critical variables related to those concepts are essential to the development of any scientific discipline. In at least one tradition of theory development, these are necessary precursors to the development of scientific theories. In any review of scientific disciplines, those individuals who contributed significantly to these topics are given special prominence. It is for that reason that Marvin Wolfgang has achieved such a special place of recognition in the field of Criminology. Throughout this book and in other reviews of Marvin Wolfgang’s work, one can clearly see his contributions in many of these areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Akers, Ronald L., Marvin D. Krohn, Lonn Lanza-Kaduce, and Marcia Radosevich. (1979). “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: a Specific Test of a General Theory.” American Sociological Review , 44: 635–55.

Article   Google Scholar  

Brennan, Patricia A. and Sarnoff A. Mednick. (1997). “Medical Histories of Antisocial Individuals.” In D.M. Stoff, J. Breiling, and J.D. Maser (eds.), Handbook of Antisocial Behavior . New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar  

Caspi, Avshalom, Terrie E. Moffitt, Phil A. Silva, Magda Stouthhamer-Loeber, Robert Krueger, and Pamela Schmutte. (1994). “Are Some People Crime Prone? Replications of the Personality-Crime Relationships across Countries, Genders, Races and Methods.” Criminology , 32: 163–196.

Cloward, Richard A. and Lloyd Ohlin. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity . New York: Free Press.

Cohen, Albert. (1955). Delinquent Boys . New York: Free Press.

Cohen, Lawrence E. and Richard Machalek. (1988). “A General Theory of Expropriative Crime.” American Journal of Sociology , 94: 465–501.

Edel, Abraham. (1959). “The Concept of Levels in Social Theory.” In Llewllyn Gross (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory . Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, and Co.

Elliott, Delbert S., Suzanne S. Ageton, and Rachelle J. Canger. (1979). “An Integrated Theoretical Perspective on Delinquent Behavior.” Criminology , 16: 3–27.

Elliott, Delbert S., David Huizinga, and Suzanne S. Ageton. (1985). Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use . Beverly Hills: Sage.

Elliott, Delbert S., David Huizinga, and Scott Menard. (1989). Multiple Problem Youth . New York: Springer-Verlag.

Book   Google Scholar  

Gibbs, Jack P.. (1985). “Review Essay.” Criminology , 23 (2): 381–388.

Glueck, Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck. (1950). Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency . New York: Commonwealth Fund.

Hirschi, Travis. (1989). “Exploring Alternatives to Integrated Theory.” In S. F. Messner, M.D. Krohn and A.E. Liska (eds.), Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects . Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hirschi, Travis. (1969). Causes of Delinquency . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Hirschi, Travis. (1979). “Separate and Unequal is Better.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 16: 34–38.

Jang, Sung Joon. (1999). “Age-Varying Effects of Family, School, and Peers on Delinquency: A Multilevel Modeling Test of Interactional Theory.” Criminology , 37 (3): 643–686.

Messner, Steven F., Marvin D. Krohn, and Allen E. Liska, eds. (1989). Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects . Albany: State University of New York Press.

Moffitt, Terrie E. (1993). “Adolescent-limited and Life-Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior: A Developmental Taxonomy.” Psychological Review , 100: 674–701.

Nagin, Daniel S., David P. Farrington, and Terrie E. Moffitt. (1995). “Life-Course Trajectories of Different Types of Offenders.” Criminology , 33: 111–139.

Nagin, Daniel S. and Kenneth C. Land. (1993). Age, Criminal Careers, and Population Heterogeneity: Specification and Estimation of a Nonparametric, Mixed Poisson Model. Criminology , 31: 327–362.

Parsons, Talcott. (1961). “Outline of the Social System.” In T. Parsons, E. Shils, K.D. Naegele, J.R. Pitts (eds.), Theories of Society . New York: Free Press.

Paternoster, Raymond and Brame, Robert. (1997). “Multiple routes to delinquency? A Test of Developmental and General Theories of Crime.” Criminology , 35 (1): 49–84.

Raine, Adrian. (1993). The Psychopathology of Crime: Criminal Behavior as a Clinical Disorder . San Diego: Academic Press.

Rieff, Philip. (1961). Freud: The Mind of the Moralist . New York: Doubleday and Co.

Sellin, Thorsten and Marvin E. Wolfgang. (1964). The Measurement of Delinquency . New York: Riley.

Simons, Ronald L, C. Wu, Rand D. Conger, and F.O. Lorenz. (1994). “Two Routes to Delinquency: Differences Between Early and Late Starters in the Impact of Parenting and Deviant Peers.” Criminology , 32: 247–276.

Swigert, Victoria L. (1989). “The Discipline as Data: Resolving the Theoretical Crisis in Criminology.” In S. F. Messner, M.D. Krohn and A.E. Liska (eds.), Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects . Albany: State University of New York Press.

Thornberry, Terence P. (1987). “Toward an Interactional Theory of Delinquency.” Criminology , 25 (4): 863–891.

Thornberry, Terence P. (1996). “Empirical Support for Interactional Theory: A Review of the Literature.” In J. David Hawkins (ed.), Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thornberry, Terence P. and Marvin D. Krohn (forthcoming). The Development ofDeelinquency: An Interactional Perspective .

Thornberry, Terence P., Alan J. Lizotte, Marvin D. Krohn, Margaret Farnworth, and Sung Joon Jang (1991). “Testing Interactional Theory: An Examination of Reciprocal Causal Relationships among Family, School, and Delinquency.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 82 (1): 3–35.

Tibbetts, Stephen G. and Alex R. Piquero. (1999). “The Influence of Gender, Low Birth Weight, and Disadvantaged Environment in Predicting Early Onset of Offending: A Test of Moffitt’s Interactional Hypothesis.” Criminology , 37 (4): 843–878.

Tittle, Charles R. (1995). Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance . Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Toby, Jackson. (1957). “Social Disorganization and Stake in Conformity: Complementary Factors in the Predatory Behavior of Hoodlums. ” Journal of Criminal Law , Criminology , and Police Science , 48: 12–17.

Vila, Bryan. (1997). “Human Nature and Crime Control: Improving the Feasibility of Nurturant Strategies.” Politics and the Life Sciences , 16: 3–21.

Vila, Bryan. (1994). “A General Paradigm for Understanding Criminal Behavior: Extending Evolutionary Ecological Theory.” Criminology , 32 (3): 311–360.

Wellford, Charles. (1989). “Towards an Integrated Theory of Criminal Behavior.” In S. F. Messner, M.D. Krohn and A.E. Liska (eds.), Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects . Albany: State University of New York Press.

Wilson, James Q. and Richard J. Herrnstein. (1985). Crime and Human Nature . New York: Simon and Schuster.

Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1958). Patterns in Criminal Homicide . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Wolfgang, Marvin E., Terence P. Thornberry, and Robert M. Figlio. (1987). From Boy to Man: From Delinquency to Crime . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wolfgang, Marvin E., Robert M. Figlio, and Thorsten Sellin. (1972). Delinquency in a Birth Cohort . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wolfgang, Marvin E. and Franco Ferracuti. (1967). The Subculture of Violence: Towards an Integrated Theory in Criminology . London: Tavistock

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Maryland, USA

Charles F. Wellford & David A. Soulé

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Queen’s University, Canada

Robert A. Silverman

University at Albany, USA

Terence P. Thornberry

Queens College, USA

Bernard Cohen

San Francisco, USA

Barry Krisberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Wellford, C.F., Soulé, D.A. (2002). Subcultures of Violence and Beyond. In: Silverman, R.A., Thornberry, T.P., Cohen, B., Krisberg, B. (eds) Crime and Justice at the Millennium. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4883-3_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4883-3_2

Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA

Print ISBN : 978-1-4419-4930-1

Online ISBN : 978-1-4757-4883-3

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NCJRS Virtual Library

Subculture of violence - towards an integrated theory in criminology, additional details.

2455 Teller Road , Thousand Oaks , CA 91320 , United States

No download available

Availability, related topics.

GHOSTS AT THE THRESHOLD: DISEMBODIED MEMORY AND MOURNING IN POST-WAR VIOLENT DEATH IN CONTEMPORARY MIDDLE EASTERN AND SOUTH ASIAN LITERATURES

Violent death that violates the ontological dignity of the body and the disappeared corpse often results in a crisis of mourning for those left behind, with the matter made all the more complicated when it comes to instances of politically motivated violence in the context of war. What follows such death/disappearance are issues of identification, collection of remains and, ultimately, an inability to enact necessary death rituals such as washing, shrouding and burial, leading to a separation between the dislocated soul and the corporeal form on part of the dead and the issue of incomplete mourning on part of the bereaved. Both the living and the dead, thus, come to occupy a liminal space ( barzakh ) where the boundaries between past/present, human/non-human, and dead/alive fall away. This paper argues that this in-between state helps the mourner gain access to a radical state of bearing witness outside of the oppressive binaries of the modern world. This work makes use of Middle Eastern (Iraq, Palestine, Egypt) and South Asian (Kashmir) literatures dealing with dehumanization and violent death in the context of what Achille Mbembe refers to as “death-worlds,” inhabitants of which are deemed “living-dead.”

Degree Type

• Master of Arts
• Languages and Cultures

Campus location

• West Lafayette

Advisor/Supervisor/Committee Chair

Additional committee member 2, additional committee member 3, additional committee member 4, usage metrics.

• Comparative and transnational literature