rush my essay

• Best of 2022
• How to Spot a Trustworthy Website
• Dating Apps
• Shopping Discount Fashion
• Discount Clothing
• Discount Designer Clothing
• Affordable Wedding Dresses
• Affordable Activewear for Women
• Plus-Size Swimwear
• COVID-19 Resources
• Beauty Home
• Consumer Advocates
• Consumer Tips
• Write a Review
• For Business
• Request a Review
• Discussions
• Backed by the National Science Foundation
• Essay Writing

Unsolicited

Rush Essay has a rating of 3.86 stars from 274 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally satisfied with their purchases. Reviewers satisfied with Rush Essay most frequently mention research paper, good quality, and assignment help. Rush Essay ranks 79th among Essay Writing sites.

What reviewers want you to know

Positive highlights.

• This company truly deserves its name of Rush Essay , as they can handle orders even on the shortest deadlines
• It is a good a research paper .The team of writers from Rushessay submitted a good research paper .

Critical highlights

No critical highlights yet

“Solved my Economics assignment on time”

In particular, if you haven't regularly attended most of the lectures and don't carry all of the materials with you, Economic expansion may be rather challenging to grasp. That put me in a difficult position when it came to completing my assignment. I just lacked the knowledge. I was able to relax knowing that this company will take care of my deadlines and score. After a couple of hours of receiving the request, they found the solution. Nice.

“If I could give 0, I would”

I ordered a coursework paper 4 pages long, double spaced to be done in four days. They assigned a writer who was working on my order and on the due date they sent me a request for extension. I gave them 5 more hours. After that they cancelled my order without any notice or email. Very unreliable service, low quality writing. I will not order ever again from them. Definitely do not recommend using them.

Reviews (274)

Reviews that mention popular keywords

From the business

Hire the best essay writing service and get $20 off your first order. We offer high-quality papers written according to your instructions. Timely delivery!

• Visit Website
• Edit business info

Company Representative

How do I know I can trust these reviews about Rush Essay?

• Sitejabber’s sole mission is to increase online transparency for buyers and businesses
• Sitejabber has helped over 200M buyers make better purchasing decisions online
• Suspicious reviews are flagged by our algorithms, moderators, and community members

Best Essay Writing Services

Rush-my-essay.com

Rush-my-essay.com review.

• High quality papers
• 100% Confidentiality guarantee
• 100% secure payment
• 24/7 Support

Rush-my-essay.com is one of the best essay writing services . Anyway, the navigation through the pages is simple and all needed information about the writing services is transparent, so I placed the order without any delays.

Services provided

They did my research project. The only part I provided was the essay questions, the marking guide and my first-hand results. I also sent a bit of the introduction I had written, but the writer didn’t use it. The writer did it all, from the start, thesis and such, all the way to the evaluation, conclusion and bibliography.

It was a very big piece of work, but apparently because I gave them a week to do the work I got a better rate. It was still a lot of money for me on a student budget, but the day after I looked on the Internet for other essay writing services and realized that the competition would have charged me a whole lot more, so I was lucky to find Rush My Essay.

Discounts and free features

I got the 5% discount and asked the customer support staff if I could use the 15% starter discount too. They also did a bunch of stuff free too, such as the formatting and such. They also added in an outline and title page without charging me.

Use RUSH15 discount code to get 15% off your first order

Ordering process

I placed the order online, but I contacted the customer support first to ask about how I apply the discounts. Turns out it was easy and I wouldn’t have had to call them if I had just read it properly.

Communication with writer

I was a bit of a pain with the people on the customer support line. I kept calling to ask if it was definitely going to be done. I was worried because I felt weird just waiting for the essay to arrive. The man at the end of the phone line kept saying that it was being done, and put me in touch with the writer to be sure. It was all coming along fine and I had been worrying for nothing.

Rush My Essay rocked my clock! My sister was the first person to ever tell me about them and she said that they could get my work done within a week. I was very skeptical because it was a research project that was supposed to take over a month, but they did it within a week so I was thrilled.

The work I got

It was a research project based on the first-hand data I had collected. It was a big piece of work and I was surprised that my writer was able to get it done on time, but somehow it was completed and sent back. I didn’t score as highly as I normally score, but it was my own fault for choosing the lowest quality band.

1 thought on “Rush-my-essay.com”

I loved the fact that when time is of the essence, rush-my-essay.com will make your time count. My essay was done in time and the quality was great!

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Privacy Overview

Francis Collins: Why I’m going public with my prostate cancer diagnosis

I served medical research. now it’s serving me. and i don’t want to waste time..

Over my 40 years as a physician-scientist, I’ve had the privilege of advising many patients facing serious medical diagnoses. I’ve seen them go through the excruciating experience of waiting for the results of a critical blood test, biopsy or scan that could dramatically affect their future hopes and dreams.

But this time, I was the one lying in the PET scanner as it searched for possible evidence of spread of my aggressive prostate cancer . I spent those 30 minutes in quiet prayer. If that cancer had already spread to my lymph nodes, bones, lungs or brain, it could still be treated — but it would no longer be curable.

Why am I going public about this cancer that many men are uncomfortable talking about? Because I want to lift the veil and share lifesaving information, and I want all men to benefit from the medical research to which I’ve devoted my career and that is now guiding my care.

Five years before that fateful PET scan, my doctor had noted a slow rise in my PSA, the blood test for prostate-specific antigen. To contribute to knowledge and receive expert care, I enrolled in a clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health, the agency I led from 2009 through late 2021.

At first, there wasn’t much to worry about — targeted biopsies identified a slow-growing grade of prostate cancer that doesn’t require treatment and can be tracked via regular checkups, referred to as “active surveillance.” This initial diagnosis was not particularly surprising. Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States, and about 40 percent of men over age 65 — I’m 73 — have low-grade prostate cancer . Many of them never know it, and very few of them develop advanced disease.

Why am I going public about this cancer that many men are uncomfortable talking about? Because I want to lift the veil and share lifesaving information.

But in my case, things took a turn about a month ago when my PSA rose sharply to 22 — normal at my age is less than 5. An MRI scan showed that the tumor had significantly enlarged and might have even breached the capsule that surrounds the prostate, posing a significant risk that the cancer cells might have spread to other parts of the body.

New biopsies taken from the mass showed transformation into a much more aggressive cancer. When I heard the diagnosis was now a 9 on a cancer-grading scale that goes only to 10, I knew that everything had changed.

Thus, that PET scan, which was ordered to determine if the cancer had spread beyond the prostate, carried high significance. Would a cure still be possible, or would it be time to get my affairs in order? A few hours later, when my doctors showed me the scan results, I felt a rush of profound relief and gratitude. There was no detectable evidence of cancer outside of the primary tumor.

Later this month, I will undergo a radical prostatectomy — a procedure that will remove my entire prostate gland. This will be part of the same NIH research protocol — I want as much information as possible to be learned from my case, to help others in the future.

While there are no guarantees, my doctors believe I have a high likelihood of being cured by the surgery.

My situation is far better than my father’s when he was diagnosed with prostate cancer four decades ago. He was about the same age that I am now, but it wasn’t possible back then to assess how advanced the cancer might be. He was treated with a hormonal therapy that might not have been necessary and had a significant negative impact on his quality of life.

Because of research supported by NIH, along with highly effective collaborations with the private sector, prostate cancer can now be treated with individualized precision and improved outcomes.

As in my case, high-resolution MRI scans can now be used to delineate the precise location of a tumor. When combined with real-time ultrasound, this allows pinpoint targeting of the prostate biopsies. My surgeon will be assisted by a sophisticated robot named for Leonardo da Vinci that employs a less invasive surgical approach than previous techniques, requiring just a few small incisions.

Advances in clinical treatments have been informed by large-scale, rigorously designed trials that have assessed the risks and benefits and were possible because of the willingness of cancer patients to enroll in such trials.

I feel compelled to tell this story openly. I hope it helps someone. I don’t want to waste time.

If my cancer recurs, the DNA analysis that has been carried out on my tumor will guide the precise choice of therapies. As a researcher who had the privilege of leading the Human Genome Project , it is truly gratifying to see how these advances in genomics have transformed the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

I want all men to have the same opportunity that I did. Prostate cancer is still the No. 2 cancer killer among men. I want the goals of the Cancer Moonshot to be met — to end cancer as we know it. Early detection really matters, and when combined with active surveillance can identify the risky cancers like mine, and leave the rest alone. The five-year relative survival rate for prostate cancer is 97 percent, according to the American Cancer Society , but it’s only 34 percent if the cancer has spread to distant areas of the body.

But lack of information and confusion about the best approach to prostate cancer screening have impeded progress. Currently, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all men age 55 to 69 discuss PSA screening with their primary-care physician, but it recommends against starting PSA screening after age 70.

Other groups, like the American Urological Association , suggest that screening should start earlier, especially for men with a family history — like me — and for African American men, who have a higher risk of prostate cancer. But these recommendations are not consistently being followed.

Our health-care system is afflicted with health inequities. For example, the image-guided biopsies are not available everywhere and to everyone. Finally, many men are fearful of the surgical approach to prostate cancer because of the risk of incontinence and impotence, but advances in surgical techniques have made those outcomes considerably less troublesome than in the past. Similarly, the alternative therapeutic approaches of radiation and hormonal therapy have seen significant advances.

A little over a year ago, while I was praying for a dying friend, I had the experience of receiving a clear and unmistakable message. This has almost never happened to me. It was just this: “Don’t waste your time, you may not have much left.” Gulp.

Having now received a diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer and feeling grateful for all the ways I have benefited from research advances, I feel compelled to tell this story openly. I hope it helps someone. I don’t want to waste time.

Francis S. Collins served as director of the National Institutes of Health from 2009 to 2021 and as director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at NIH from 1993 to 2008. He is a physician-geneticist and leads a White House initiative to eliminate hepatitis C in the United States, while also continuing to pursue his research interests as a distinguished NIH investigator.

An earlier version of this article said prostate cancer is the No. 2 killer of men. It is the No. 2 cause of cancer death among men. The article has been updated.

• How to revive hair that thins, grays or gets out of control as you age April 15, 2024 How to revive hair that thins, grays or gets out of control as you age April 15, 2024
• Anxious about your first mammogram? Here’s what I learned. April 13, 2024 Anxious about your first mammogram? Here’s what I learned. April 13, 2024
• Medical Mysteries: Years of hives and fevers traced to a startling cause April 13, 2024 Medical Mysteries: Years of hives and fevers traced to a startling cause April 13, 2024

NPR editor quit after telling the truth about liberal bias in media. It's time to defund them.

Editor's note: Uri Berliner, the senior business editor at NPR who blew the whistle on his employer's liberal bias, announced his resignation on Wednesday .

Twenty years ago, conservative journalist and humorist P.J. O’Rourke started an essay in The Atlantic with this anecdote : “Last year, on a long car trip, I was listening to Rush Limbaugh shout. I usually agree with Rush Limbaugh; therefore I usually don’t listen to him. I listen to NPR: ‘World to end − poor and minorities hardest hit.’ I like to argue with the radio.”

It still makes me laugh. 

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

His dig at NPR is funny because it’s true. And it’s only become more true in the decades since O’Rourke penned those words. 

I’ll admit it. I’ve listened to NPR for a long time. There’s nothing like waking up to its stories and sounds from around the world. And, like O’Rourke did, I seek out points of view that are different from mine. 

In recent years, however, it’s gone from being something I enjoy to something that more often than not leaves me shaking my head. NPR’s obsession with identity, gender and race is ingrained in almost every story.

I’m far from the only one who’s noticed. Criticism also is coming from within. 

NPR is in the hot seat after senior business editor Uri Berliner last week wrote a thoughtful yet damning piece in The Free Press, detailing what’s been going on behind the scenes at a place Berliner has long loved and respected. 

Berliner offers numerous examples of how NPR has moved from objective reporting to activism, and choosing which stories to cover – or ignore – based on which political side could benefit. 

(I’ll give you a hint: It’s usually the Democrats who win.) 

At the heart of Berliner’s criticism is how NPR stopped telling its listeners the news and started telling them “what to think.” And a lot of that boils down to a startling lack of viewpoint diversity among staff. 

As Berliner writes: “Concerned by the lack of viewpoint diversity, I looked at voter registration for our newsroom. In D.C., where NPR is headquartered and many of us live, I found 87 registered Democrats working in editorial positions and zero Republicans. None.”

For a company that boasts about how diversity is a “core value” and central to its “content, hiring, audience and workplace,” this seems to be a huge oversight. 

It’s also one that Berliner says he couldn’t get any of the higher ups at NPR to give a second thought. Thus, Berliner’s decision to write the essay, which earned him a five-day suspension without pay. 

I just paid my taxes. Biden's pandering on student loans will end up costing us all more.

No wonder so many Americans don't trust the media

It’s not surprising that NPR is disciplining Berliner. After all, he publicly criticized his employer and called out its liberal bias.

What’s more troublesome is that NPR seems set on changing nothing . It has gone on the defensive and appears unable or unwilling to address the problems Berliner laid out. 

This gets to the heart of why trust in the media has declined so rapidly in recent decades. 

A Gallup poll from last year found that only a third (32%) of Americans trust the mass media – including radio, TV and newspapers – a “great deal” or a “fair amount.” This is a precipitous fall from a peak of 72% in 1976. 

And Democrats at 58% are far more willing to say they trust the media to be fair and accurate than Republicans (just 11%). 

Progressives' bad ideas: High wages, 32-hour workweeks sound great, but there's a steep price

That should be a wake-up call to these news institutions. While they become more progressive and insulated from other viewpoints and experiences, the American public is much more politically diverse.

They notice what’s happening.

Here's a solution: Defund NPR

NPR – National Public Radio – isn’t just another media outlet. It’s funded in part by taxpayers, which places it in a different position than say The New York Times, The Washington Post or even my news organization .

Private publications are free to do what they want, although I think more are waking up to the need for more viewpoint diversity. It’s simply a smart business decision to reach a broader audience.

While Berliner argues that NPR still deserves public funding, I disagree. 

He writes : “As the country becomes more fractured, there’s still a need for a public institution where stories are told and viewpoints exchanged in good faith.”

Yet, NPR is offering no confidence that it will embrace anything close to the viewpoint diversity that it now lacks. Its new CEO, Katherine Maher, is getting attention because of social media posts she made before she was hired, including calling former President Donald Trump a “ racist sociopath ” and boasting of wearing a Joe Biden campaign hat in public.

That doesn’t bode well. 

If NPR wants to double down on its woke mission, fine. But it shouldn’t do it on my dime – or that of other taxpayers. 

NPR claims that “federal funding is essential to public radio’s service to the American public and its continuation is critical for both stations and program producers, including NPR.”

It’s not easy to get a set figure of how much taxpayer money actually flows to NPR, but it’s a sizable sum . While NPR likes to say that just a fraction of its funding comes directly from the federal government, that belies how much it gets indirectly from local stations who pay in part with federal grants for NPR’s flagship content. 

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides the grants, gets about $500 million a year from Congress.

That should end. 

I hope NPR takes this moment to consider how “public radio” could better reflect a politically diverse country. But its support should no longer come from American taxpayers. 

Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at [email protected] or on X, formerly Twitter: @ Ingrid_Jacques .

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: NPR editor quit after telling the truth about liberal bias in media. It's time to defund them.