If you have questions regarding the admissions requirements or process, contact [email protected] to avoid errors that could delay the processing of your application.
View the List of PhD Dissertations.
Most full-time Johns Hopkins Nursing PhD students are 100% funded with a stipend for the first three years of study. Additional financial support is made available in following years. For full eligibility of scholarship opportunities, apply by December 1 .
Qualified students interested in the PhD program may be eligible to receive tuition and stipend support through the School of Nursing. The following types of funding are available:
Graduate assistantships provide an opportunity for acquiring valuable research and/or teaching experience for qualifying students. Selection is competition-based with priorities given to those who have a good academic standing in the doctoral program. PhD students hired as graduate assistants receive a full-tuition waiver (base tuition payment for up to 6 credits for those in their 3rd year of doctoral study or after) and a stipend of $22,920 for the academic year 2015-2016. The full-tuition benefit is based on the number of hours worked at 20 hours per week . It is highly encouraged that the responsibilities of the graduate assistant position be consistent with the academic goals of the student.
Award: $22,920 for 12 months, plus tuition Graduate assistantships are made possible by generous support from donors and SON general funds, including:
A. T. AND MARY BLADES FELLOWSHIP Established by A.T. Blades in loving memory of his wife Mary H. Blades who was a nurse.
CAYLOR FELLOWSHIP Established by Mrs. Caylor, a 1947 graduate of the School of Nursing, to support graduate students.
ELLEN LEVI ZAMOISKI DOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP Established in honor of Ellen Levi Zamoiski who was instrumental in forming the Consortium of Nursing Education, Inc. Zamoiski fellowships support future leaders of nursing.
SON FELLOWSHIP Given to current doctoral students with an excellent academic standing in the program and those who have excellent research and/or teaching skills.
TARGETED FELLOWSHIPS The following fellowships are part of the School’s strategic efforts to enhance the educational experience for all students.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARD Established by Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing Professor Maryann F. Fralic, DrPH, RN, FAAN to provide financial support for students in the PhD nursing program. The Professional Development Award is designed to support selected full-time doctoral students in honing their professional skills. These students will receive financial support to invest in themselves through professional development opportunities that best fit their needs and personal interests.
Award : $2,500
Additional Information for Professional Development Award
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CLINICAL RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP The Johns Hopkins Hospital Fellowship in Clinical Research provides a qualifying PhD student with the opportunity for direct practice in a rich and diverse clinical practice environment.
Applicants for this Fellowship will be students who:
Award : $22,032, plus tuition
JONAS SCHOLARS PROGRAM Established by The Jonas Foundation, funds are made available to students who are committed to teach future generations of nurses.
Award: $5,000 per year matched with $5,000 from the School for two years Learn more about the Jonas Scholars Program
As a research intensive university, Johns Hopkins is committed to having faculty and students engage in discovery of knowledge, inventing new technologies, and applying knowledge in the community and abroad. The School of Nursing offers a variety of post-doctoral opportunities to students eager to engage in this process. Opportunities include:
JOHN A. HARTFORD FOUNDATION, “BUILDING ACADEMIC GERIATRIC NURSING CAPACITY” The American Academy of Nursing seeks applicants for its Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity (BAGNC) Predoctoral Scholarship Program. This 2-year scholarship program supports full time doctoral education for nurses committed to careers in academic geriatric nursing. Through generous funding from The John A. Hartford Foundation , the BAGNC Program awards a total of $100,000 ($50,000 per annum) to each selected Predoctoral Scholar candidate. The Mayday Fund provides an additional $5,000 award to selected candidates whose research focuses on pain in older persons.
Award: $50,000/year for 2 years (additional $5,000 for research focusing on pain) Deadline : January
NURSE FACULTY LOAN PROGRAM Funding is used to provide loans to students enrolled in advanced education nursing programs that prepare graduates to serve as faculty in a school of nursing. Loans can be provided to students in the MSN, DNP and PhD programs who pursue the Nurse Educator certificate option. All Nurse Educator courses must be completed prior to the completion of the student’s degree program.
Apply to the Nurse Faculty Loan Program
ONCOLOGY NURSING SOCIETY The Oncology Nursing Society offers several one time, unrestricted awards. Additional small research grants that can be used for nursing research conduct (not stipends).
Award: $3,000-$5,000 doctoral scholarships; $10,000 small research grants (one-time awards) Deadline: February 1 for doctoral scholarships; November 1 for small research grants (letter of intent due October 1)
Apply for Oncology Nursing Society Awards
SIGMA THETA TAU INTERNATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY Sigma Theta Tau International (STTI) offers several small research grants which are open to doctoral students who are members. Grants are usually smaller and can be used to cover costs related to dissertation research. There are several different types with different focuses. Local STTI chapters often provide their own small research grants as well. The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing is home to the STTI Nu Beta chapter .
Award: Approximately $5,000 small research grant awards Deadline: Varies depending on award (see website)
Apply for STTI awards
SOUTHERN NURSING RESEARCH SOCIETY The Southern Nursing Research Society (SNRS) offers two dissertation awards to support doctoral students in the Southern region (includes Maryland) enrolled in research-focused programs as they initiate a program of nursing research to advance nursing science and practice.
Award: Up to $3,000 one time dissertation award Deadlines: March and September (dates can vary)
Apply for Southern Nursing Research Society Award
STATE OF MARYLAND GRADUATE FACULTY SCHOLARSHIPS Funding for the Graduate Nursing Faculty Scholarship and Living Expenses Grant is provided by the Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) through the Nurse Support Program II (NSP II) to address the issues of recruiting and retaining nurses in Maryland hospitals.
Award: $13,000 per academic year ($6,500 per fall and spring semesters) up to $26,000 Deadline: August 1 for fall entry
Apply for State of Maryland Graduate Faculty Scholarships
TRISERVICE NURSING RESEARCH PROGRAM The Department of Defense provides research awards through the TriService Nursing Research Program to nurses in the armed services, including a predoctoral award. Active duty and Reserve students pursuing a master’s or doctoral degree in nursing are eligible. Dissertation topics must focus on one of the TriService priority areas:
The topic of “military deployment health” is broad and includes the management of diseases such as asthma, diabetes, hypertension as well as issues in mental health. Award recipients must attend TriService Grant Camp for guidance on applying for and managing this award prior to being selected for the award.
Award: Up to $30,000 in direct costs Deadline: January 4
Apply for the TriService Nursing Research Program
We recognize that it can be financially burdensome to relocate to a new city to attend a PhD program. Students who are admitted to PhD programs at JHU can apply to receive a $1500 need-based grant to offset the costs of relocating to JHU.
These grants provide funding to a portion of incoming students who, without this money, may otherwise not be able to afford to relocate to JHU for their PhD program.
This is not a merit-based grant. Applications will be evaluated solely based on financial need.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN One of the world’s largest sources of funding exclusively for graduate women, the AAUW Educational Foundation supports aspiring scholars around the globe, teachers, and activists in local communities, women at critical stages of their careers, and those pursuing professions where women are underrepresented. Scholarships are not nursing-specific.
Award: $20,000 dissertation fellowships (final year of dissertation work); $30,000 post-doctoral research leave fellowships; $6,000 short-term research publication grants Deadline: Mid-November
Apply for the American Association of University Women’s award
FAHS-BECK FUND FOR RESEARCH AND EXPERIMENTATION Grants are to help support doctoral dissertation expense of students in the United States or Canada. Proposals must have clear relevance to major social problems affecting families or individuals, including education and literacy issues, or to interventions designed to assist individuals, couples, or families in their functioning and well-being.
Award : Up to $15,000 dissertation awards Deadline : May 1 and November 1
Apply for the Fahs-Beck Fund for Research and Experimentation
GRADUATE WOMEN IN SCIENCE Award: From $5,000 to $10,000 Deadline : January 15
Apply for Graduate Women in Science award
GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION Ten or more fellowships are awarded to fund final-year dissertation projects in the natural and social sciences and the humanities that promise to increase understanding of the causes, manifestations, and control of violence, aggression, and dominance. Highest priority is given to research that can increase understanding and amelioration of these issues. Students become eligible at the writing stage of their dissertation.
Award: $15,000 one-time dissertation award Deadline: February 1
Apply for Guggenheim Foundation Fellowship
THE MELISSA INSTITUTE FOR VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT Established in the memory of Melissa Aptman, a Miami native who was murdered in May 1995, The Melissa Institute for Violence Prevention and Treatment is a non-profit educational, training and consultative organization that awards scholarships to graduate students from any discipline who address issues of violence prevention and/or treatment. The award must be used to support expenses that are directly related to the dissertation research. It may not be used for tuition, books, fees, personal travel, or personal expenses.
Award: $2,000 one-time award Deadline: April 1
“Johns Hopkins is strategically situated in the inner city of Baltimore. There are many disparities that minorities face within the community; I wanted to situate myself in a place where I could be most effective.” Morgan Dupree
Go to programs search
The Ph.D. program prepares graduates who will provide leadership in the generation, integration, and implementation of knowledge aimed at improving health and health care. Our graduates have expanded spheres of influence in academic institutions, practice settings, and policy arenas. Students join a community of scholars where supervisors are committed to supporting educational programs that meet students’ interests and growth in scholarly engagement with the nursing discipline. All doctoral students must successfully complete a comprehensive examination, an oral candidacy examine, and a research dissertation meeting the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies requirements. Program applicants are admitted based on outstanding achievement in their master's program; evidence of leadership potential for research and scholarship; self-direction; and goals that fit with program resources. Canadian students must hold practicing nurse registration in BC or another province. International students must meet general eligibility criteria for nurse registration in BC. Transfer from the M.S.N. to the Ph.D. program occurs based on Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies regulations.
For specific program requirements, please refer to the departmental program website
This exciting program prepares researchers and leaders to advance research knowledge, and the dissemination and application of findings to nursing and health care. Students join research supervisors in a community of scholars (other students and faculty members) to develop a program that takes them to new levels of knowledge and skill with career relevant competencies. In addition to core courses, students are encouraged to gain advanced expertise in research methods and other skills through rich course offerings, seminars, colloquia, conferences and independent studies available at UBC. Interdisciplinary collaboration is promoted.
The UBC School of Nursing is a world-renowned centre for research and training. Its reputation in producing and training highly successful nurse scholars with a strong foundation of course work ranks it as one of the top universities worldwide.
Manpreet Thandi
Program enquiries, admission information & requirements, 1) check eligibility, minimum academic requirements.
The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies establishes the minimum admission requirements common to all applicants, usually a minimum overall average in the B+ range (76% at UBC). The graduate program that you are applying to may have additional requirements. Please review the specific requirements for applicants with credentials from institutions in:
Each program may set higher academic minimum requirements. Please review the program website carefully to understand the program requirements. Meeting the minimum requirements does not guarantee admission as it is a competitive process.
Applicants from a university outside Canada in which English is not the primary language of instruction must provide results of an English language proficiency examination as part of their application. Tests must have been taken within the last 24 months at the time of submission of your application.
Minimum requirements for the two most common English language proficiency tests to apply to this program are listed below:
Overall score requirement : 100
Overall score requirement : 7.0
Some programs require additional test scores such as the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) or the Graduate Management Test (GMAT). The requirements for this program are:
The GRE is required by some applicants. Please check the program website.
September 2025 intake, application open date, canadian applicants, international applicants, deadline explanations.
Deadline to submit online application. No changes can be made to the application after submission.
Deadline to upload scans of official transcripts through the applicant portal in support of a submitted application. Information for accessing the applicant portal will be provided after submitting an online application for admission.
Deadline for the referees identified in the application for admission to submit references. See Letters of Reference for more information.
Transcripts.
All applicants have to submit transcripts from all past post-secondary study. Document submission requirements depend on whether your institution of study is within Canada or outside of Canada.
A minimum of three references are required for application to graduate programs at UBC. References should be requested from individuals who are prepared to provide a report on your academic ability and qualifications.
Many programs require a statement of interest , sometimes called a "statement of intent", "description of research interests" or something similar.
Students in research-based programs usually require a faculty member to function as their thesis supervisor. Please follow the instructions provided by each program whether applicants should contact faculty members.
Applicants are expected to identify a faculty member who has agreed to serve as supervisor before the application will be assessed. All applicants are strongly encouraged to speak with the Graduate Programs Admission Officer and/or PhD program coordinator prior to completing the application form, and to seek assistance (as necessary) in identifying a potential supervisor. Applicants should also browse faculty profiles to identify faculty they are interested in working with.
Permanent Residents of Canada must provide a clear photocopy of both sides of the Permanent Resident card.
All applicants must complete an online application form and pay the application fee to be considered for admission to UBC.
Fees | Canadian Citizen / Permanent Resident / Refugee / Diplomat | International |
---|---|---|
$114.00 | $168.25 | |
Tuition * | ||
Installments per year | 3 | 3 |
Tuition | $1,838.57 | $3,230.06 |
Tuition (plus annual increase, usually 2%-5%) | $5,515.71 | $9,690.18 |
Int. Tuition Award (ITA) per year ( ) | $3,200.00 (-) | |
Other Fees and Costs | ||
(yearly) | $1,116.60 (approx.) | |
Estimate your with our interactive tool in order to start developing a financial plan for your graduate studies. |
Applicants to UBC have access to a variety of funding options, including merit-based (i.e. based on your academic performance) and need-based (i.e. based on your financial situation) opportunities.
All full-time students in UBC-Vancouver PhD programs will be provided with a funding package of at least $24,000 for each of the first four years of their PhD from September 2024. The funding package may consist of any combination of internal or external awards, teaching-related work, research assistantships, and graduate academic assistantships. Please note that many graduate programs provide funding packages that are substantially greater than $24,000 per year. Please check with your prospective graduate program for specific details of the funding provided to its PhD students.
All applicants are encouraged to review the awards listing to identify potential opportunities to fund their graduate education. The database lists merit-based scholarships and awards and allows for filtering by various criteria, such as domestic vs. international or degree level.
Many professors are able to provide Research Assistantships (GRA) from their research grants to support full-time graduate students studying under their supervision. The duties constitute part of the student's graduate degree requirements. A Graduate Research Assistantship is considered a form of fellowship for a period of graduate study and is therefore not covered by a collective agreement. Stipends vary widely, and are dependent on the field of study and the type of research grant from which the assistantship is being funded.
Graduate programs may have Teaching Assistantships available for registered full-time graduate students. Full teaching assistantships involve 12 hours work per week in preparation, lecturing, or laboratory instruction although many graduate programs offer partial TA appointments at less than 12 hours per week. Teaching assistantship rates are set by collective bargaining between the University and the Teaching Assistants' Union .
Academic Assistantships are employment opportunities to perform work that is relevant to the university or to an individual faculty member, but not to support the student’s graduate research and thesis. Wages are considered regular earnings and when paid monthly, include vacation pay.
Canadian and US applicants may qualify for governmental loans to finance their studies. Please review eligibility and types of loans .
All students may be able to access private sector or bank loans.
Many foreign governments provide support to their citizens in pursuing education abroad. International applicants should check the various governmental resources in their home country, such as the Department of Education, for available scholarships.
The possibility to pursue work to supplement income may depend on the demands the program has on students. It should be carefully weighed if work leads to prolonged program durations or whether work placements can be meaningfully embedded into a program.
International students enrolled as full-time students with a valid study permit can work on campus for unlimited hours and work off-campus for no more than 20 hours a week.
A good starting point to explore student jobs is the UBC Work Learn program or a Co-Op placement .
Students with taxable income in Canada may be able to claim federal or provincial tax credits.
Canadian residents with RRSP accounts may be able to use the Lifelong Learning Plan (LLP) which allows students to withdraw amounts from their registered retirement savings plan (RRSPs) to finance full-time training or education for themselves or their partner.
Please review Filing taxes in Canada on the student services website for more information.
Applicants have access to the cost estimator to develop a financial plan that takes into account various income sources and expenses.
34 students graduated between 2005 and 2013: 1 is in a non-salaried situation; for 0 we have no data (based on research conducted between Feb-May 2016). For the remaining 33 graduates:
Sample employers outside higher education, sample job titles outside higher education, phd career outcome survey, career options.
Graduates of our PhD Program have advanced competencies in nursing research and scholarship, research team participation and management, interdisciplinary collaboration, teaching, entrepreneurship, and translating results to action. They are innovative in their approaches to finding solutions to problems in nursing and healthcare delivery. Our graduates follow a long tradition of being recognized leaders in the field of nursing, who are working to advance the profession for future generations. Graduates take leadership roles within the health authorities or business and faculty positions at university and colleges worldwide.
Job Title Health Director
Employer Seabird Island Band
Job Title Clinician Scientist
Employer St. Paul's Hospital
These statistics show data for the Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing (PhD). Data are separated for each degree program combination. You may view data for other degree options in the respective program profile.
2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applications | 27 | 14 | 19 | 23 | 20 |
Offers | 14 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
New Registrations | 10 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
Total Enrolment | 54 | 45 | 44 | 42 | 38 |
Upcoming doctoral exams, tuesday, 17 september 2024 - 9:30am.
These videos contain some general advice from faculty across UBC on finding and reaching out to a supervisor. They are not program specific.
This list shows faculty members with full supervisory privileges who are affiliated with this program. It is not a comprehensive list of all potential supervisors as faculty from other programs or faculty members without full supervisory privileges can request approvals to supervise graduate students in this program.
Year | Citation |
---|---|
2023 | Dr. Moynihan tested the theoretical framework of a nursing intervention designed to reconnect sexually exploited runaway adolescents to supportive family and school relationships. Findings suggest the intervention works as theorized. Promoting supportive relationships may improve health problems, such as emotional distress and substance misuse. |
2023 | Dr. Devane examined youth peer support services in a mental health service context. Using a research community partnership model, she identified key opportunities to strengthen and scale youth peer support services across the provincial organization, Foundry. Her research positions Foundry as a strong leader for further innovation in this field. |
2023 | Dr. Ramsay explored concussions among children and youth in British Columbia. He found that most children and youth with a concussion do not receive follow-up and those with a delayed follow-up visit were more likely to experience poor health. This research provides new evidence to support the importance of timely follow-up after a concussion. |
2023 | Dr. Ojerinde investigated the cervical screening experiences of Black African immigrant women in BC. She found that the participants' social identities interact with different contexts of Canadian society and the healthcare system to create barriers to cervical screening uptake. Her findings may have implications for practice. |
2022 | Dr. Straus' research aimed to understand living well through exploring the experiences of young people who required a ventilator long-term. Her work incorporated stories and photographs and challenges assumptions about what someone with a ventilator can do. Her work also identifies ways healthcare providers can reimagine living well in practice. |
2022 | Dr. Slemon examined how nurses who work in emergency departments promote equity and justice through everyday patient care. Her findings illustrated that despite individual nurses' efforts, promoting equity was not meaningfully supported in this setting. This study can contribute to future interventions to embed equity in health care systems. |
2022 | Dr. Abdulai examined how sexual health-related stigma can be addressed in the context of digital health technologies.Using a trauma-informed care framework, he developed a set of destigmatizing design guidelines.His work provided a reference guide on how sexual health-related technologies can be designed to be trauma-informed and less stigmatizing. |
2022 | Dr. Recsky studied the unintended consequences of health information technologies in primary and community care. In partnership with a local health organization, she co-created a process to address technology-related safety concerns. This research advances our understanding of patient safety in the context of technology-supported healthcare. |
2021 | Dr. Haney studied Canadian abortion nursing from 1960-1999. Her analysis of previously untold stories of Registered Nurses revealed their key contributions to developing and providing safe abortion services amid significant legal, clinical and cultural challenges. Her study adds new insight into abortion, women's health, and nursing history. |
2021 | Dr. Ronquillo examined how Implementation Leadership Characteristics influenced nurses' use of mobile health technologies in clinical practice, and found that stronger implementation leadership among first-level leaders had a larger impact on younger nurses and nurses with diploma and bachelors degrees compared to nurses with graduate degrees. |
Same specialization.
Further information, specialization.
The program focuses on improving health care delivery, advancing and applying nursing knowledge, and evolving health policy.
Program website, faculty overview, academic unit, program identifier, classification, social media channels, supervisor search.
Departments/Programs may update graduate degree program details through the Faculty & Staff portal. To update contact details for application inquiries, please use this form .
The UBC School of Nursing is Canada's top-ranked nursing program and is internationally renowned for their contributions to nursing and health research, nursing philosophy and health system leadership.
I have a BA in Psychology and Sociology from the U of A, but that was many years ago. As I no longer live in Alberta, the communities I know now are situated in Vancouver, so it made sense to complete my BSN and MSN at UBC. This is the University I personally feel most comfortable at. I have felt...
I chose UBC because of its reputation for high quality education and proximity to harm reduction environments that allow me to stay connected to my nursing practice. Studying at UBC has made it possible for me to be a PhD student, nursing leader in public health, and mama to two little kids. I am...
I am drawn to the University of British Columbia’s Nursing program because of Faculty’s research expertise in areas of international nurse education, primary care areas, health leadership, community health, and health equity. In particular, my research interests align well with Suzanne Campbell in...
From academic excellence and modern facilities to our diverse degree program listings to being named one of the “most innovative universities” by Reuters in 2019, UBC has a lot to offer.
Alternatively, use our A–Z index
Tackle the biggest challenges in biology, medicine and health in a world leading research environment, and prepare for your future career.
Attend an open day
Year of entry: 2025
We require:
NB In exceptional circumstances, we may consider an application from a student without both an undergraduate and post-graduate degree. For example, if they have a first/distinction and research experience.
We also have a four-year programme which is strongly recommended for anyone who:
Full entry requirements
Apply online
Before applying you must:
Visit our Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Postgraduate Research page to find out more.
Full-time | Part-time | Full-time distance learning | Part-time distance learning | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PhD | Y | Y | Y | Y |
MPhil | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Visit our Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Postgraduate Research page to find out about upcoming open days and events.
Fees for entry in 2025 have not yet been set. For reference, the fees for the academic year beginning September 2024 were as follows:
Further information for EU students can be found on our dedicated EU page.
Programmes in related subject areas.
Use the links below to view lists of programmes in related subject areas.
The University of Manchester is regulated by the Office for Students (OfS). The OfS aims to help students succeed in Higher Education by ensuring they receive excellent information and guidance, get high quality education that prepares them for the future and by protecting their interests. More information can be found at the OfS website .
You can find regulations and policies relating to student life at The University of Manchester, including our Degree Regulations and Complaints Procedure, on our regulations website .
MARCH 23, 2017 | BY MISOL KWON, BS '13, RN, PHD IN NURSING STUDENT
Attending an international school in India throughout my elementary, middle and high school education and being an international student at the University at Buffalo has shaped who I am as a person, a researcher and a compassionate nurse. As a first year Post BS to PhD student in nursing, I am still growing in ways I could have not predicted when I first arrived here.
Language is a huge barrier for most international students who want to pursue a PhD. There are so many great ideas in that intricate brain of yours, yet addressing them in the form of a second language may be challenging. I know. But also know that’s ok because every day you will see yourself improving – whether in English or terminologies used in your research – as you invest more time, energy and heart.
Be mindful that writing is a critical part in any PhD program, but that does not mean you have to be perfect. The great thing about my experience in the nursing graduate program is that the coursework prepares me to be a better writer every day.
I cannot stress enough how important reading is not only for the program, but also for your future and life in general. In the past few months, by reading hundreds of academic journals and articles, I have started to recognize the joy of reading in English. This does not mean you should give up your love of reading in your language. Reading in general has a positive impact on life.
Speak up, raise your hand, voice your opinion, be the first to initiate a conversation – you will see there is no harm in doing so, especially in an American educational community.
Is a fear of language, accent or use of incorrect grammar an obstacle for speaking up? My advice is to be confident – the only way you will overcome this is by speaking aloud.
When I hear the word “statistics,” I used to frown or sigh. But I have really trained myself to change this bad habit. The best tip I can give to any incoming PhD nursing student is to try to understand the meaning of statistical representation in one of your favorite articles or journals, even if it is in your language. This will be a first step to success in statistics.
Your involvement in your nursing school, university, research society and community matters. Familiarize yourself with not only resources in your department, but also with what the university or community can offer you. You will be surprised how many great ideas you will have by getting involved.
Many people from around the world come to UB to achieve academic excellence, and in the process, they bloom in all aspects of who they are. The result is the wonderful combination of unique individuals that make up the UB community. Wherever you pursue your doctorate in nursing, you will find that there are so many opportunities related to your research and others’ research – you may even discover opportunities in other fields, like epidemiology or medicine.
I strongly recommend you pursue each appropriate opportunity and cherish it, especially if you are a first year PhD student – but be mindful of your own limits and learn to say no so that you don’t overextend yourself.
Last but not the least, have a positive outlook and attitude. When growing up, my father used to tell me, “If you can’t avoid it, you might as well try and enjoy it.” Pursuing a PhD is a path you choose, though you may encounter some unavoidable obstacles along the way. I am sure you decided to pursue a PhD in nursing because you can see the bigger picture of health care that is accessible through nursing research. Kudos to you for your passion. Now, embrace your passion and walk the path of your PhD program with strong faith and a positive attitude. This will be the greatest weapon and shield for success on your journey.
" The marvelous richness of human experience would lose something of rewarding joy if there were no limitations to overcome. The hilltop hour would not be half so wonderful if there were no dark valleys to traverse .” – Helen Keller
I am a nursing student from Rutgers. That is very encouraging and helpful. Thank you! I will start to speak up!
-Weiming Wang
NurseJournal.org is committed to delivering content that is objective and actionable. To that end, we have built a network of industry professionals across higher education to review our content and ensure we are providing the most helpful information to our readers.
Drawing on their firsthand industry expertise, our Integrity Network members serve as an additional step in our editing process, helping us confirm our content is accurate and up to date. These contributors:
Integrity Network members typically work full time in their industry profession and review content for NurseJournal.org as a side project. All Integrity Network members are paid members of the Red Ventures Education Integrity Network.
Explore our full list of Integrity Network members.
Are you ready to earn your online nursing degree?
Nursing students from around the globe come to the United States to attend world-class nursing programs in advanced clinical facilities. Many international students, nursing students included, turn to financial aid to help pay for their education.
Financial aid comes from various sources, including nursing schools and private organizations.
Explore a list of scholarships for international nursing students. We’ve included awards for both undergraduate and graduate-level training paths, including students pursuing the associate degree in nursing (ADN) , bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) , and master of science in nursing (MSN) .
Learn about start dates, transferring credits, availability of financial aid, and more by contacting the universities below.
East tennessee state university international merit scholarship.
Page last reviewed on July 15, 2024
Are you looking for financial aid for nursing school? Explore nursing minority scholarships in this guide.
BMC Nursing volume 10 , Article number: 11 ( 2011 ) Cite this article
16k Accesses
27 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details
Educating nurses to doctoral level is an important means of developing nursing capacity globally. There is an international shortage of doctoral nursing programmes, hence many nurses seek their doctorates overseas. The UK is a key provider of doctoral education for international nursing students, however, very little is known about international doctoral nursing students' learning experiences during their doctoral study. This paper reports on a national study that sought to investigate the learning expectations and experiences of overseas doctoral nursing students in the UK.
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in 2008/09 with 17 international doctoral nursing students representing 9 different countries from 6 different UK universities. Data were analysed thematically. All 17 interviewees were enrolled on 'traditional' 3 year PhD programmes and the majority (15/17) planned to work in higher education institutions back in their home country upon graduation.
Studying for a UK PhD involved a number of significant transitions, including adjusting to a new country/culture, to new pedagogical approaches and, in some cases, to learning in a second language. Many students had expected a more structured programme of study, with a stronger emphasis on professional nursing issues as well as research - akin to the professional doctorate. Students did not always feel well integrated into their department's wider research environment, and wanted more opportunities to network with their UK peers. A good supervision relationship was perceived as the most critical element of support in a doctoral programme, but good relationships were sometimes difficult to attain due to differences in student/supervisor expectations and in approaches to supervision. The PhD was perceived as a difficult and stressful journey, but those nearing the end reflected positively on it as a life changing experience in which they had developed key professional and personal skills.
Doctoral programmes need to ensure that structures are in place to support international students at different stages of their doctoral journey, and to support greater local-international student networking. Further research is needed to investigate good supervision practice and the suitability of the PhD vis a vis other doctoral models (e.g. the professional doctorate) for international nursing students.
Peer Review reports
Globally, a key strategy for the attainment of the millennium development goals and health system improvement is the development of nursing capacity. There is increasing investment by governments in nurses to attain doctoral degrees with the expectation that these graduates will then be able to lead the advancement of nursing in their respective countries [ 1 ]. There is a global shortage of doctorally qualified nurse educators and of doctoral nursing programmes however, which means that many international nurses have to go overseas to obtain their doctorates [ 2 ]. The USA, Canada, the UK and Australia currently comprise the major destination countries [ 3 , 4 ].
Study abroad involves a large personal, social and financial investment on the part of individuals, their families and employers. High hopes are being pinned on the shoulders of doctorally prepared nurses [ 5 ], yet relatively little is known about the learning experiences of these students during their studies overseas [ 6 ]. What is it like to try and achieve the highest possible academic award in an unfamiliar context? Is the PhD programme what students expected? What are the challenges? How useful and relevant is the doctorate perceived to be? How can supervisors and other doctoral educators best support this student group? This paper describes a study that set out to explore the international doctoral journey in the UK. In doing so, it adds to a slowly growing body of evidence exploring the nature, quality and appropriateness of different doctoral nursing programmes in a globalised context [ 7 – 10 ]
Currently, UK nursing doctorates consist of two main programme routes - the professional doctorate and the 'traditional' PhD. The former is offered in many universities and, although there are some local variations, it usually includes an initial structured programme of cohort-based taught courses followed by a period of autonomous research leading to a dissertation. The professional doctorate is aimed primarily at practitioners who wish to apply a more evidence based approach to their work. Hence, it is orientated towards applied clinically relevant research and its taught elements usually include research training, clinical leadership and practice development. The practice-based doctorate that is gaining popularity in the USA as the entry level for advanced nursing practice is not yet offered in the UK, but one such programme has recently started in Ireland [ 11 ].
Students undertaking a PhD are usually also required to undertake formal research training in the form of taught courses, however, the training programme can be more flexible as the PhD has traditionally been envisaged as a more individualised programme of self-directed study relating to the planning and completion of a piece of original research. The majority of UK doctoral programmes also include substantial provision of transferable skills training to enhance graduate employability [ 12 , 13 ]. These are primarily delivered through inter-disciplinary 'Graduate Schools' and cover the following areas: research skills and techniques, research environment, research management, personal effectiveness, communication skills, team-working and networking skills, and career management [ 14 ].
In the UK, both the PhD and the professional doctorate take approximately 3-4 years full-time or 6-8 years part-time. In most UK universities, students are supervised by a team of 2 supervisors who meet with their student to discuss progress at least once a month.
According to the UK Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA), in 2007/08, approximately 15% of UK doctoral nursing students were international (124 EU/non-EU students, 692 UK resident students) [ 15 ]. The majority of UK-resident doctoral nursing candidates are on part-time programmes however, so international students constitute the majority of full time doctoral students in many nursing departments [ 15 ].
A recent literature review carried out by the authors synthesised a wide body of evidence relating to overseas doctoral students [ 6 ]. The review highlighted the transitional nature of the international doctoral student experience, suggesting that students face a range of cultural, pedagogic, linguistic and social adjustments [ 16 , 17 ].
A particular issue that many studies identified was the challenge of adapting to student-centred, self-directed learning practices common to western countries (as opposed to more didactic approaches that are often found in other parts of the world) [ 18 , 19 ]. The review also points out that the nature of the student experience is strongly influenced by their disciplinary affiliations and traditions and that this is turn is related to the kind of supervisory relationships that can develop [ 20 , 21 ]. In faculties of science for example, doctorates tend to be undertaken as part of a team of researchers whereby students have opportunities to gain support from peers and supervisors on a regular basis [ 22 ] . In social science doctorates however, the study context may be much more isolated making the process of adjustment more difficult [ 23 ]. Very little is known about how the particular disciplinary context of nursing affects the international doctoral student learning experience.
To our knowledge there have only been 3 nursing-related studies published on the international doctoral student experience One (published in 1995) was a retrospective phenomenological interview study conducted amongst 23 Taiwanese nursing graduates of US educational programmes, 4 of whom had completed doctorates [ 24 ]. Although they were now proud of their academic success, the respondents described their study abroad period as one of enormous stress, hard work and loneliness, characterized by little interaction with US nursing students. Another study (published in 2007) from one institution in the UK presented data based on a survey completed by 5 international doctoral students and 11 research supervisors [ 25 ]. Both staff and students saw great value in international education. However both groups identified the need for greater support to facilitate adjustment in a number of areas, including: understanding the PhD process, studying in a second language, working within a different academic culture, managing the supervision relationship, and finding a sense of community. Recommendations included staff training and the development of additional in-puts to support students. A larger scale study published in 2002 in the USA reported on a national survey exploring the international student experience completed by 24 different Schools of Nursing [ 26 ]. Challenges for students identified by the faculty included language and communication, development of critical thinking skills, inadequate financial support, loneliness and isolation. The faculty reported enjoying working with this student group but felt unable to give sufficient time to meet their needs, suggesting that more help from the wider university systems was required. This survey was followed up with one focus group with 5 international doctoral students at one US university. The students identified a range of similar challenges: lack of familiarity with US health care system; lack of familiarity with US teaching practices; lack of opportunity to participate in faculty research; communication problems and stress from trying to cope with a heavy workload. Although rather small scale, all three studies indicate that studying overseas can be stressful, although more in-depth data on the nature of specific challenges or ways in which students might be supported through these was rather limited. These studies are now rather out of date. Doctoral programmes and infrastructure are changing rapidly, particularly in response to enhanced global student mobility. More in-depth and contemporary research is required to build up a picture of the current situation.
The study aimed to explore the international doctoral student journey; specifically, to investigate the learning experiences of international doctoral nursing students at different points in their PhD journey and to identify best practice in supporting effective learning in this student group.
The study adopted a descriptive qualitative approach. A descriptive approach is considered appropriate when the features of particular phenomenon are not yet well understood. The study employed semi-structured interviews to give primacy to students' own perspectives and to the uniqueness of their individual experience [ 27 , 28 ]. A cross-sectional design was adopted whereby each participant was interviewed once at a particular point in their doctoral journey. The research adopted a constructivist methodological approach [ 29 ], recognising that students' accounts of their learning experiences were socially constructed, reflecting their own unique lives and backgrounds and reinterpreted for a researcher during the interview process.
Data was collected in 2008/09. Information letters were sent to all Schools of Nursing in the UK that were identified as running a doctoral programme (n = 44). The letters requested permission to access their doctoral student groups. Of the initial 44 Schools, only 21 reported having any international doctoral students. Of these, 3 declined to participate and 5 did not respond to repeated follow ups. The Heads/Deans of the remaining 13 Schools were then requested to forward one initial and one follow up research information email to their doctoral students and to put up research recruitment posters in student offices. Seventeen students from 6 different universities across the UK volunteered to be interviewed. It is not clear why students from only 6 universities responded - we did not attempt to ascertain whether all 13 participating Schools had indeed followed through with the requests to advertise the study. The interviews were arranged and conducted by a research assistant at a location of the students' choice and lasted between 1-3 hours. The research assistant was an international doctoral graduate (although not a nurse), whereas the other researchers were UK academic staff who led doctoral programmes. The latter were not directly involved in interviewing since it was felt that students would feel more able to open up freely about their experiences to a researcher who was not a UK academic member of staff. In order to enhance reliability or dependability [ 30 ], all the interviews were listened to by the principal investigator and a de-briefing meeting was held after each one to monitor quality, to discuss any issues that arose and to ensure consistency within the interviewing process [ 31 ].
Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ethics Committee. All students who agreed to participate signed a consent form and were provided with a book voucher as a token of appreciation after completing the interview.
All the interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and checked for accuracy. Field notes were taken immediately following each interview to provide context and individual case summaries were developed to facilitate analysis of each individual's doctoral experience.
The interview guide asked students to explain why they had chosen the UK and their particular university and type of doctoral programme. They were then asked to talk freely about their experiences in the UK and with the doctorate so far.
Analysis was an on-going iterative process. Trustworthiness of the study was enhanced by a variety of analytical strategies, as suggested by Lincoln & Guba [ 30 ]. To maximise credibility, the data was initially analysed jointly by the research team with the aid of NVIVO. Each researcher read the transcripts a number of times and assigned a code to significant units of the text. There was significant inter-coder agreement, but inevitably, the researchers' different experiences and standpoints influenced the coding process to some extent. We engaged in numerous reflexive exercises to clarify our own positions and preconceptions [ 32 ]. Any variations in coding were extensively discussed and the transcripts repeatedly revisited until a jointly agreed coding framework was developed which continued to be revised and refined over time. The codes were then clustered into a range of emerging themes and sub-themes which were then grouped into 3 major categories - see table 1 [ 33 , 34 ]. Careful attention was paid to atypical cases and specific examples of these are noted in the findings [ 35 ].
The 17 participants represented approximately 14% of the possible international doctoral nursing student population (n = 124) [ 15 ]. Table 2 summarises the broad socio-demographic characteristics of the research participants. Some details have been kept deliberately non-specific (e.g. nationality) in order to protect the anonymity of the participants. The number of students interviewed per university ranged from 1 to 5. The students came from 9 different countries. The majority of students were mid-career, both in terms of age and position. Many students (n = 9) were already working in higher education (e.g. as clinical instructors or junior lecturers) and needed a PhD in order to progress further. The majority of these were involved in pre-registration nurse training (rather than specialist post-registration or MSc level education). Likewise, some participants (n = 7) felt that they had reached the end of their clinical career ladders and that their only way forward was a lateral move into higher education which necessitated a PhD. Three of these were senior nursing administrators in hospitals, one was a palliative care specialist, one was a diabetes specialist and two had backgrounds in critical care nursing. Most participants (n = 15) saw their future careers in higher education. The majority (n = 13) were supported via government scholarships and all of those who were married had been able to bring their families. Six participants were male. Four of these were in the UK with their families. The other two were unmarried. Out of the eleven female participants, six were in the UK with their husbands/children; five were unmarried and had come alone. All of the participants were undertaking traditional 3 year PhD programmes involving the student carrying out a piece of original empirical research, presented in a thesis written in English and examined by viva conducted in English.
For many of the study participants, undertaking a PhD in the UK involved a number of significant transitions requiring a process of adaptation, learning and adjustment.
The first of these was the need for some students to adjust their expectations of the PhD programme structure and content to the reality that they encountered. Many participants had expected a highly structured academic programme with a strong emphasis on course work as well as research (more akin to the professional doctorate). They expressed great surprise that they were expected to develop their own programme of work according to their own learning needs:
When I came and start doing my PhD I never thought it would become purely dependent on the student, and the supervisor just will give you headings, or guidelines, I thought it was like, just a total programme......... I didn't think it would be pure research, just by learning by yourself (S.16)
Likewise, many students (n = 13) noted that they had expected a greater focus on professional nursing issues within their programme and were surprised at the almost exclusive emphasis on research. Some students had expected to undertake clinically-oriented specialist courses alongside clinical practice, as was their experience from their own countries:
Clinical theory it's more important, it's like we already told our Dean of the department here - we need it because we come here and you can find nothing. There is always a gap between your theory and the practice. And why we do PhD but we don't have clinical experience? It's so tricky you know; you know it's a problem but you still not operate. In my country I do my Master's, I still need to do the placement in hospice ward, I learn it, and my supervisor had to go to the hospice ward to supervise me and discuss meeting about my case study. Yes, I think it's important (S.8).
Others were not specifically seeking further specialist courses but had expected the PhD programme to include more input on understanding the UK nursing situation. Only two mentioned having spent time visiting clinical settings during their time in the UK. A number of students commented that this lack of engagement with UK nursing had hindered their ability to reflect critically upon nursing in their own countries or to act as agents of change upon their return:
This is the problem we all have now. If we go back to our country someone will say 'what is UK healthcare system'? We don't know, because we don't have a chance to go into the field, we didn't have a chance to observe. We just do our research, in our field only, in office, face the computer. How can we know nursing here? It would be very useful because we are looking for international comparisons... especially for me as a change agent. My government to send me here to the UK, so it's expected when I go back to my home country I will make some changes and so would like to learn more about what is going on in the UK here so I can transfer that knowledge to my home country. (S.14)
When asked why they had chosen the PhD rather than the professional doctorate, the majority of participants said that they had never heard of the professional doctorate programme and did not know anything about it. Those that had heard of it thought it required a compulsory clinical practice component (which is not the case in the UK model of the professional doctorate) and therefore excluded themselves on the grounds of not having UK nurse registration. In addition, most participants felt that it would not be recognised in their own countries.
A second transition for students was the need to adapt to the self-directed autonomous nature of learning at doctoral level. Many participants found this extremely difficult, especially in the first year, when they were trying to find a focus and identify their research questions. Some students described how the need to define and take the lead on their own projects had created deep anxiety and a desire for more guidance:
I think I spent quite a lot of time trying to understand what I need to do. The project is specific just for me, so I cannot ask anything from my classmates. Then, I cannot make this plan because I want my supervisor to tell me it is right or wrong, but every time my supervisor asked me what are you going to do next? What's your plan? And I just can't think, oh I don't know, I thought you would tell me, you know, like that. (S17)
Others however noted that, although deeply challenging, independent learning had been a liberating and exciting endeavour:
There's a certain freedom in the PhD.............but you always need to motivate yourself and mobilise yourself in different ways in order to get the results. This is sometimes exciting, sometimes it's disappointing, frustrating, but in total I would say it's an enviable experience for me. (S.13)
A third transition was the need to understand and adjust to the expectation of originality and criticality in doctoral level work. Many students noted that their educational backgrounds had trained them to describe and replicate knowledge rather than to create it. They commented that their doctoral work had initially reflected this descriptive approach and that developing criticality was a long and slow process. Students frequently associated personal development in this area with particular supervisory practices (see below) such giving detailed feedback and discussing specific texts with students. Several students noted that, although challenging, they had come to enjoy 'finding their own voice', noting that their growing ability to articulate their own ideas and to contribute to academic debates was empowering:
In my country, for exams we had to memorise. In assignments, I used to prepare them by taking paragraphs from different books, this one here and that one there - a collection of paragraphs is a Masters assignment. But now, finally, I know how to create - I can find out evidence - I can create an original draft from my original ideas, - not plagiarised, it's my own. I can accept others' argument, but at the same time now I can argue my own argument, that is a skill I learnt from learning here for two year. (S3)
A fourth transition that affected 16 of the sample was the need to learn and write in a second language. These students strongly emphasised the enormous challenge of studying in English. For them, social interaction and academic study initially demanded a huge effort which created stress and anxiety because of the extra time and energy that every task required. In addition to learning to study in a different language, students also commented that they needed to adapt to different expectations of academic writing, particularly conventions of how to structure longer pieces of work and how to develop a critical academic argument. For many, this had also been a significant challenge:
I think the cultural difference, the way we express ideas - the logic - is different. I think English is very straightforward, you tell the reader what's the purpose, or what's the content, to the paper, and then like a free structure - a,b,c. But in Chinese the logical is different, we just tell you maybe the background and then the story and the end will be a circle to work out whole story and then you work with the end. (S10)
Most of the participants felt that English classes provided by their universities were not very helpful in meeting their language needs. These were considered too basic and too generic. Rather, one to one feedback or discipline-specific language training would have been preferred.
For many students, the transitions described above were most pronounced at the beginning of their doctoral programme study (the first year was often mentioned as a particularly difficult time). In spite of the challenges of adjusting to doctoral study, several students described how their sense of academic capability had grown over time:
If I compare with the first year I felt myself lost when I start, because I wasn't able to plan to exactly what I'm going to do, or to put a timetable for myself, but I think myself now more control over my study, I'm able to do what I'm planning to. I can see the difference, I feel like I have more skills now. (S.4)
Given the range of adjustments that needed to be made to UK doctoral study, many students described a strong need for support during their doctoral journey. This need for support was identified in the context of three sets of relationships: through supervisors, through interactions with the department/institution and through relationships with other students and wider social networks.
The supervision relationship revealed itself as by far the most significant element of the students' learning experiences. Expectations of the supervision relationship were strongly influenced by the participants' past educational experiences. For example, many participants described their previous student-teacher relationships as having been rather hierarchical whereby students were expected to demonstrate extreme respect and where students were not encouraged to ask questions or to voice their own opinions. This had an impact on the way in which participants engaged with their UK supervisors with many students describing an initial uncertainty in how to approach the supervisory relationship:
I don't know, it's maybe for our culture, we don't talk out, I don't know if it's good or not, because we are afraid to confront teacher, yes. And because I'm afraid that she think that I'm kind of like challenging her or something, but maybe they don't think that way, but we, I think she will kind of like feel differently with me. (S.1)
Likewise, many participants noted that in their own countries, supervisors would be expected to actively lead a project by telling students what to do. For these students, the British expectation of student-led project management was a real challenge:
In my country, if I was doing a Masters or PhD your supervisor would tell you what to do, but here it's different, so I'm kind of like waiting for my supervisor to tell me what to do, but my supervisor is waiting for me to tell them what I'm going to do. (S.8)
In other cases however, the participants favourably contrasted UK supervisors with their home experience and appreciated the time and attention given as well as the more egalitarian and collegiate ethos:
In my country supervisors really don't take time to meet with you like the way we have here. Here, they're very concerned about your welfare, about how you're getting on. (S.16)
In discussing supervision experiences, participants were very clear about what constituted good or poor quality supervision practice - as summarised in table 3 . Interestingly, although students clearly valued particular supervisory characteristics such as being knowledgeable or accessible, the most highly valued supervisory attribute was the demonstration of a personalised student-centred approach. This was seen as foundational to the development of trust in the supervisor:
They were friendly, if I want to speak to them for my research or ask a question, first they ask me about myself, about my family and everything, how I'm living, what I'm doing, if everything is OK - this make me believe in my supervisors. When it was critical for me, when I had blocks and couldn't move forward, I trusted their suggestions. The trust is the first important thing and I had that experience in fact, and it helped me to progress with them (S13)
The personalised approach was contrasted unfavourably with supervisors who adopted a task-oriented 'professional' approach or with supervisors who were inconsistent in the way they dealt with students. There was a strong sense that students wanted their supervisors to understand them as people as well as to care about their projects:
I didn't have any interest from my supervisors in terms of sort of emotional support, they were more concerned about research and research only, but not 'is she feeling ok, is she feeling settled'? There are loads and loads of issues, and I think that I wasn't given that much attention from that particular side. You know when there's not that much interest in the student or in their work, you know, how to explain it, the student cannot trust that supervisor. (S.3)
One EU student had a different point of view, expressing satisfaction with purely project focused 'professional' interactions. This student was already highly skilled in project management however and was a senior figure in his field. Unlike many other international students, he was perhaps less reliant on his supervisors to maintain his confidence and to reduce anxiety.
Several participants who were in years 3-5 noted that the supervisory relationship changed over time commenting that there was a gradual development of greater control of their own progress:
There are times when you feel you are very vulnerable with your supervisor. I think for all first year and maybe second year students, they feel they are more led by their supervisors rather than they are in control, but once you sort of gain that sort of confidence and experience and you know your topic which I think you will know your topic more than your supervisors, in that sense you will be able to lead the way. (S.15)
The student experience of finding support from their departments or from social relationships in addition to their supervisors was rather variable. For example, two students felt very isolated because they were the only international students in their departments (and part of a small group of PhD students more generally). Others noted that they had developed good links with other international doctoral students (primarily due to physical proximity when sharing an office) but all commented that it was difficult to get to know UK PhD nursing students. Many commented that UK PhD nursing students are usually part-time and are thus rarely in the department. Others mentioned that they felt shy about approaching UK students and several expressed a feeling that the UK students seemed too busy or not particularly interested in their international peers.
You know, most of the British students study part-time, so we don't see them all the time. I had in fact several attempts to be involved with them, but I think that it is like I am shy. When we meet them in some classes they are good, they are helpful but they are busy on their own or maybe I'm not friendly enough to them so that I can continue with them (S.8)
Some Schools organised regular PhD student and/or staff research seminars and students placed great value upon these as useful arenas for relationship building:
The seminars helped me meet other PhD students. When you meet and chat with other people you will feel that it's not only you in this world, you're not on your own, because sometimes you feel 'I'm the only one who's doing a PhD, no one else is doing it'. So they will tell you about their problems or their difficulties, and they're living in misery now because they couldn't do so and so. So it's also social event let's say, yes. We exchange telephone numbers and email - it becomes a network (S.11)
The ability of students to develop relationships with other staff in their School was also variable. In some cases students felt that academic staff did not always take the time to get to know them and did not recognise the skills and experience that they brought with them:
We didn't see much initiation or willingness from some of the staff to know the students. When people will ask you 'oh where are you from, you are from [country name]'. OK - fine, then they just assume that you don't know nothing. I think they need to learn about, or to know about the background of international students (S.9)
Where good relationships developed however, students had sometimes found opportunities to work as research or teaching assistants and felt that they had gained valuable transferable skills, as well as building wider social networks.
A large number of students commented that a whole-School approach to international students was needed, in which all staff, including administrative and cleaning staff displayed a positive approach and where systems were in place to meet student support needs:
I feel that helping the international students and being successful with the international students is not one person's work, it is team work and imagine that one member of the team is not professional and not helpful, the whole process will fall down, it is like a chain and part of this chain is the administrative staff, the cleaners, the technicians, it's not the academics only and that is a very, very important part (S.5)
Outside the department, some students had been able to develop enjoyable and supportive social links (although these were primarily within their own religious or ethnic communities or with other international students). A number of participants mentioned that social events organised by the university had been an important factor in developing friendships and having an occasional break.
Those students with stronger social networks (particularly those who had come with their families) seemed more positive about their overall PhD experience.
The majority of participants indicated that the PhD felt like a long, emotionally and academically challenging journey - see table 4 . The academic transitions and challenges took place in the context of adjustment to leaving home and learning to live in a new country and culture. Thus, many participants described struggling with loneliness, isolation and the cost of living in the UK:
Sometimes you feel you are an alien here. How to say? The world feels upside down. I am away from my home country, from my family. I feel very lonely because I come from an extended family with many people living with me, so I found staying alone in this country is very difficult. Here you are totally in charge of doing everything by your own, this puts a lot of stress on you (S.9)
Most participants carried the weight of high expectations from family, colleagues and sponsors on their shoulders which, in some cases, had clearly led to chronic anxiety about whether they would succeed. In some cases, this prevented students from being able to engage in social aspects of life in the UK and prevented them from being able to enjoy their PhD experience:
I can say, I am inventing a new knowledge. So that's internal satisfaction. When my supervisors say 'good' I feel a reward and a relief. But externally there is, you know, there is nothing - just worry. At home everyone is waiting for me. So then I am thinking - will I do it? can I finish this? I mean I'm not really enjoying you know the PhD life. Sometimes I try to enjoy in the UK, but I feel I have to finish, only then can I enjoy (S.14)
As noted above, students who had come with their families had wider social networks and some spoke positively of the support they had received from their spouse and children. On the other hand, both male and female married participants commented that their families required precious time, attention and financial resources, noting that it was sometimes very stressful trying to juggle conflicting demands. However, amongst the 7 unmarried participants, the 5 females in particular expressed considerable loneliness. This was especially marked amongst those from the Middle East who were used to living in extended family situations in a context where everyday activities of life were often undertaken collectively and who now found themselves having to manage everything alone:
Living on my own, and having to manage everything by my own, it was completely different from how I used to live back home. I had, you know - there are always your brothers, your sisters around you, your mum, your father supporting you, but here you have to do everything on your own (S.8)
Almost all the participants were used to being high achievers and, in some cases, had enjoyed social prestige from being in highly respected positions in society (e.g. a lecturer). The interviews showed that, for a significant number of students, this self identity was challenged as they struggled to adjust to UK academic practice but also to the social status of being a student again:
My supervisors accused me of poor work after I spend so long on the writing. You know this really hurts your self esteem, yeah. When I think - before - you know - I had my own office. People come and take my bags, bring me tea but now, you know, I'm here as a small stuff, suddenly everything change. This hurts our confidence (S.12)
On a more positive note, students at a more advanced stage in their studies talked at length about how much they had developed throughout the course of the PhD. Much of their discussion focused on the personal development that stemmed from adaptation to a new country as well as academic development as a result of their studies. Many noted that their confidence and their ability to manage their life and work independently had grown tremendously. This appeared to be particularly pronounced for the female participants, especially those from the Middle East:
Well it's been a massive experience for me, massive. I mean personally, emotionally, intellectually, mentally, I think I have grown up a lot. My confidence has increased most. Before, when I worked as a nurse I didn't want to talk to others, but now I'm more confident, I can talk with people in different way, I can express myself in a different way. I think part of it is to do with the topic and the project itself and the other part is about living in the UK. Being on my own in the UK all these years, I think that was the biggest challenge and that taught me a lot. I think I will definitely apply the skills that I have gained from living here, whether it is in building my confidence, whether it is interpersonal skills, communication skills, I think I have learnt a lot. Now I'm totally independent person. (S.15)
Interestingly, although adjusting to 'independent study' was one of the biggest challenges that students said they faced, many also described tremendous satisfaction at having developed independent research and problem solving skills. Some participants described how their whole outlook had changed as a result of their experiences in the UK, noting a general development in their intellectual maturity:
The way how we analyse things after you have completed your PhD is different than when you started. You see different way of analysing, you see different perspectives, and you learn how the others think about the same events. You just have one way of thinking and the others have others, so we can share the perspectives. I learn how to be a high professional person, and to respect others obedience, I learnt how to present myself at my study, I learnt also how to be open and accept the others opinions, accept the criticism. I learn too many things, I feel like I really become a different person than when I just came here. (S.16)
In sum, for many participants, the PhD was experienced as a stressful but transformative journey.
This study has identified five factors associated with doctoral study in the UK that affected the nature of the learning experience for overseas doctoral nursing students.
First, there was a gap between students' expectations of PhD study and the reality that they encountered. Whilst PhD programmes will inevitably vary from one institution to another, many students expected their PhD to include a stronger professional nursing focus in addition to the research emphasis - more akin to the taught professional doctorate model. Several students expressed regret that their PhD had not afforded them with greater opportunities to learn more about UK health care practice, and, therefore, to equip them with a broader vision of global healthcare. Although students clearly wanted greater engagement with professional nursing issues, they all felt that any doctorate other than a PhD would not have been recognized in their own countries. This finding relates to a wider debate on the growth, recognition and international relevance of the professional doctorate in nursing and suggests that there may be a need for greater promotion of professional doctorate programmes to the international nursing community [ 10 ]. In the short term however, this finding also indicates that existing PhD programmes may need to create a formal system by which to facilitate clinical insight visits and to provide courses or seminars that enable students to understand and critically compare UK healthcare practice from an international perspective. Likewise, research supervisors could be trained to help students to make relevant clinical connections.
Second, our findings show that many of the participants initially struggled to understand and develop key doctoral level skills within the context of UK academic practice (specifically criticality, self-directed learning and English language/writing) - although those students with previous experience of UK study seemed to have an easier transition into doctoral academic practice. As the interviews focused only on the nature of the student experience (rather than evaluating the content and structure of each institution's doctoral programme), it is not possible to draw any firm conclusions regarding which aspects of a doctoral programme can best support the development of these skills. This is an area that requires further research [ 36 , 37 ].
It is important to point out here that the move to doctoral level being and thinking is a transition that all doctoral students need to take, not just international students [ 36 , 37 ]. By focusing upon international students, we do not wish to artificially problematise this group [ 38 ]. There is still much to be learned about how institutions and supervisors can best support the development of doctoral students into confident autonomous researchers, and how the needs of specific student groups can be addressed within this process [ 36 , 37 ]. A number of authors have commented that the current model of doctoral education can create hurdles for many types of 'non-traditional ' student (e.g. older students or part-time students), and it may be that many of the challenges raised by the international students in this study are shared by other student groups [ 39 – 42 ]. Indeed, we suggest that several issues raised in this study may well apply to other groups of doctoral nursing students. For example, studies on the professional doctorate suggest that UK nursing students also face challenges in making the transition to independent research and that their adjustment is hampered by their part-time status which acts as a barrier to engagement with peer networks and an institution's wider research environment [ 43 – 45 ].
Third, many participants wanted more structure within their PhD programme (expressed as wanting more taught input and more guidance). The majority of UK Nursing PhD programmes do in fact offer extensive research methods courses and encourage students to undertake these. These courses are taken on the basis of individual need however rather than as part of pre-defined structured programme so many of the study participants still expressed a sense of uncertainty and lack of direction regarding their progress and plan of work. This uncertainty was most acute during the first year of doctoral study - a finding that has been reported in other studies [ 46 , 47 ]. Whilst this suggests a need for more support, there is also a growing recognition that going through a degree of anxiety/uncertainty is an almost inevitable part of developing a doctoral identity as research students slowly come to find their own epistemological positions, to define their own research questions and to create their own voice [ 48 ]. The participants' accounts of self-transformation suggest that they did indeed experience their doctoral study as life changing. Those in the later stages clearly valued their new research-related knowledge and skills but also appreciated more generic changes in their own personalities (e.g. becoming more confident and independent) and in the way in which they approached the world (e.g. becoming more open minded, tolerant and more able to solve problems).
Fourth, the research found that the doctorate was an emotionally laden journey and that many students experienced high levels of stress and anxiety during their studies. Whilst some of this stress was associated with the personal, academic and cultural transitions that were demanded, it was also strongly related to the perceived quality of the supervision relationship. The research found that supervisors constitute students' primary sources of support and guidance and play a key role in the development of doctoral level attributes. As in other studies [ 16 , 17 , 19 ], our findings suggest that the experience of 'good' supervision is predicated upon a personalised relationship of trust and emotional support. Doctoral supervision is still an under-researched and little understood area of pedagogical practice [ 49 , 50 ], and there is a particular need for more work to be done to identify and disseminate models of good practice in supervising international doctoral students [ 51 , 52 ]. Our study also indicates that supervisors may need more training and support to understand and work effectively with this student group [ 53 ].
Fifth, the dependence upon supervisors found in this study may also have been related to the fact that only a few students had developed strong links with other elements of a university's research environment. For example, relatively few participants had been able to forge close links with other (UK) doctoral nursing students and relatively few seemed to have become engaged in wider departmental research activities. This finding has also been reported in previous studies of international doctoral nursing students [ 24 – 26 ]. Thus, the PhD seemed to have been experienced as a journey taken in isolation rather than in the context of a supportive peer community [ 21 ]. Increasingly, the development of professional networks are considered essential for socialisation into the role of independent researcher [ 14 ]. Moreover, the development of international-home student links is important in order to build future communities of practice of nurse researchers. Given the students' initial unfamiliarity with the UK context, the onus appears to be on the School and/or the supervisors to proactively create regular opportunities for networking and relationship building [ 40 ]. The research also shows that other staff (including administrative staff) need to be made aware of international student needs and encouraged to make an effort to make them feel welcomed and supported.
Overall, the findings suggest that Schools of Nursing need to create an infra-structure and whole-systems approach to 'scaffold' the learning of international students within their doctoral programmes. Such an approach should aim to support the transition to doctoral level study, to create a sense of confidence in their direction of travel, to support the development of productive supervisory relationships and to support engagement with other social and academic/research networks. A range of possible scaffolding inputs is summarised in table 5 . A key element of this approach is supervisor training to ensure that supervisors understand the particular needs of this student group and develop effective strategies for providing feedback and guidance.
The most significant limitation of this research is its cross-sectional design which provided only a snap-shot of student views at a particular point in time, and in so doing limited the conceptualization of the PhD as a long term learning process. The fact that the sample included students at different stages of the PhD overcame this limitation to some extent, but a longitudinal design would provide opportunities to gain a more in-depth understanding of how the PhD experience unfolds. It is not clear how representative the sample was. Due to self-selection, it is possible that it included students with particularly strong views.
Respondent checking to enhance trustworthiness (particularly credibility) is a contested concept in qualitative research, and this was not undertaken in a formal manner as many of the participants had graduated and returned home by the time the final study report was completed [ 54 ]. Nonetheless, a number of seminars about the research were held with international doctoral students based at one UK University and at one national event on teaching international students. All those present strongly endorsed the analytical framework presented here, commenting that it mirrored their own experiences. In addition, the findings are highly consistent with the existing literature in this area, lending some support to their wider transferability [ 55 ].
The further development of doctoral educational practice in nursing is hindered by a very limited evidence base. Quality criteria have been defined [ 8 ], but, with some exceptions, there have been very few evaluations of doctoral programmes for nurses [ 7 , 56 – 58 ]. It is unclear to what extent the issues reported in this study are similar or different to the experience of international doctoral nursing students in other popular 'doctoral provider' countries or to the experience of 'home' doctoral nursing students. Given the strategic importance (and scarcity) of doctorally qualified nurses, more research is needed to ensure a high quality doctoral provision and a satisfactory student experience.
This particular study has provided important insights with regard to the learning experiences of international doctoral nursing students in the UK and has suggested areas where further support and programme development may be beneficial. Further research is needed to investigate the suitability of the PhD vis a vis other doctoral models for this student group.
Ketefian S: Doctoral education in the context of international development strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2008, 45: 1401-1402. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.002.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
ICN: The global nursing shortage: priority areas for intervention. 2006, Geneva: International Council of Nurses
Google Scholar
Ketefian S, Davidson P, Daly J, Chang E, Srisuphan W: Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing and Health Sciences. 2005, 7: 150-156. 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00240.x.
The Economist: The disposable academic. The Economist. 2010, [ http:///www.economist.com/node/17723223/print ]
Kim M: Clinical academic research careers in nursing: towards global nursing. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2009, 14 (2): 125-132. 10.1177/1744987108101953.
Article Google Scholar
Evans C, Stevenson K: The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010, 47: 239-250. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.025.
Kim M, Lee H, Kim H, Ahn Y, Kinm E, Yun S, Lee K: Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010, 47: 295-306. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005.
Kim M, McKenna H, Ketefian S: Global quality criteria, standards and indicators for doctoral programmes in nursing: literature review and guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006, 43 (4): 477-489. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.003.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McKenna H: Doctoral education: some treasonable thoughts. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2005, 42: 245-246. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.01.001.
Dreher H, Smith M: Global perspectives on the professional doctorate. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010
[ http://www.ucc.ie/en/study/postgrad/research/prac/dnp/ ]
Park C: Redefining the Doctorate. 2007, London: Higher Education Academy, [ http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/435/1/RedefiningTheDoctorate.pdf ]
Roberts G: Set for success: the supply of people with science, engineering and technology skills. 2002, London: Department of Trade and Industry and Department of Education and Skills
UK Council for Graduate Education and UK Research Councils: Joint Statement of the Research Councils' Skills Training Requirements for Research Students. 2001, [ http://www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/upload/RCUK-Joint-Skills-Statement-2001.pdf ]
Higher Education Statistics Agency: 2009, [ http://www.hesa.ac.uk/ ]
Ryan J: Postgraduate supervision. Teaching international students: improving learning for all. Edited by: Carroll J, Ryan J. 2005, London: Routledge, 101-107.
Aspland T, O'Donoghue T: Quality in supervising international students?. Quality in postgraduate education. Edited by: Zuber-Skerritt O, Ryan Y. 1994, London: Kogan-Page, 59-76.
Aspland T: You learn round and I learn square: Mei's story. Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds. Edited by: Ryan Y, Zuber-Skerritt O. 1999, Society for Research in Higher Education & Open University Press, 25-39.
Cadman K: 'Voices in the air': evaluations of the learning experiences of international postgraduates and their supervisors. Teaching in Higher Education. 2000, 5 (4): 475-491. 10.1080/713699170.
McClure J: Preparing a laboratory-based thesis: Chinese international research students' experiences of supervision. Teaching in Higher Education. 2005, 10 (1): 3-16. 10.1080/1356251052000291530.
Borg M, Maunder R, Jiang X, Walsh E, Fry H, Di Napoli R: International students and academic acculturation: the role of relationships in the doctoral process. Internationalisation and the student voice: higher education perspectives. Edited by: Jones E. 2010, London: Routledge, 181-193.
McClure J: International graduates' cross-cultural adjustment: experiences, coping strategies and suggested programmatic responses. Teaching in Higher Education. 2007, 12 (2): 199-217. 10.1080/13562510701191976.
Gardner S: "I heard it through the grapevine": doctoral student socialisation in chemistry and history. Higher Education. 2007, 54 (5): 723-740. 10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x.
Wang R, Lethbridge D: Becoming gold-plated: Chinese nurses studying abroad. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1995, 27 (2): 131-134. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00836.x.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Evans C: The experience of international doctoral education in nursing: An exploratory survey of staff and international nursing students in a British university. Nurse Education Today. 2007, 27: 499-505. 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.010.
Carty R, O'Grady E, Wichaikhum O, Bull J: Opportunities in preparing global leaders in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2002, 18 (2): 70-77. 10.1053/jpnu.2002.123725.
Rubin H, Rubin I: Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 1995, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Creswell J: Qualitative inquiry and research design. 1998, London: Sage
Avis M: Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?. Qualitative Health Research. 2003, 13 (7): 995-1004. 10.1177/1049732303253298.
Lincoln S, Guba E: Naturalistic Inquiry. 1985, California: Sage
Kvale S: Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. 1996, California: Sage
Cresswell J: Standards of Quality and Verification. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Edited by: Cresswell J. 1998, London: Sage, 193-218.
Silverman D: Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 1993, London: Sage
Boyatzis R: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. 1998, London: Sage
Lincoln S: Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995, 1: 275-289. 10.1177/107780049500100301.
Lovitts B: Being a good course taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education. 2005, 30 (2): 137-154. 10.1080/03075070500043093.
Lovitts B: The transition to independent research: who makes it, who doesn't and why. The Journal of Higher Education. 2008, 79 (3): 296-325. 10.1353/jhe.0.0006.
Goode J: Empowering or disempowering the international PhD student? Constructions of the dependent and independent learner. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2007, 28 (5): 589-603. 10.1080/01425690701505409.
Carroll J, Ryan J: Teaching international students: improving learning for all. 2005, London: Routledge
Deem R, Brehony K: Doctoral students' access to research cultures: are some more unequal than others?. Studies in Higher Education. 2000, 25 (2): 149-165. 10.1080/713696138.
Haggis T: Exploring the black box of process: a comparison of theoretical notions of the 'adult learner' with accounts of postgraduate learning experience. Studies in Higher Education. 2002, 27 (2): 207-220. 10.1080/03075070220119986.
Johnson L, Lee A, Green B: The PhD and the autonomous self: gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education. 2000, 25 (2): 135-147. 10.1080/713696141.
Carr S, Lhussier M, Chandler C: The supervision of professional doctorates: experiences of the process. Nurse Education Today. 2010, 30: 279-284. 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.004.
Ellis L: Doctoral education for workforce and practice development: the professional doctorate. INDEN (International Network of Doctoral Education in Nursing) Newsletter. 2008, 7 (3): 3-7. [ http://www.umich.edu/~inden/ ]
Lee N: Professional doctorate supervision: exploring student and supervisor experiences. Nurse Education Today. 2009, 29: 641-648. 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004.
Hockey J: New territory: problems of adjusting to the first year of a social science PhD. Studies in Higher Education. 1994, 19 (2): 177-190. 10.1080/03075079412331382027.
Robinson-Pant A: Internationalisation of higher education: challenges for the doctoral supervisor. The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor's Companion. Edited by: Walker M, Thomson P. 2010, London: Routledge, 147-158.
Barnacle R: Research education ontologies: exploring doctoral becoming. Higher Education Research and Development. 2005, 24 (2): 179-188. 10.1080/07294360500062995.
Petersen E: Negotiating academicity: postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education. 2007, 32 (4): 475-487. 10.1080/03075070701476167.
Goode J: Perhaps I should be more proactive in changing my own supervision? Student agency in 'doing supervision'. The Routledge Doctoral Student's Companion: Getting to Grips with Research in Education and the Social Sciences. Edited by: Thomson P, Walker M. 2010, London: Routledge
Lee A: How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision?. Studies in Higher Education. 2008, 33 (3): 267-281. 10.1080/03075070802049202.
Deuchar R: Facilitator, director or critical friend? contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education. 2008, 13 (4): 489-500. 10.1080/13562510802193905.
Halse C, Malfroy J: Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education. 2010, 35 (1): 79-92. 10.1080/03075070902906798.
Seale C: The Quality of Qualitative Research. 1999, London: Sage
Book Google Scholar
Tobin G, Begley C: Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004, 48 (4): 388-396. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x.
Kjellgren K, Welin C, Danielson E: Evaluation of doctoral nursing programmes: a review and a strategy for follow up. Nurse Education Today. 2005, 25: 316-325. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002.
Anderson C: Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: are we prepared for the future?. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2000, 16 (4): 191-200. 10.1053/jpnu.2000.7830.
Holzemer W, Chambers D: Healthy nursing doctoral programmes: relationships between perceptions of the academic environment and productivity of faculty and alumni. Research in Nursing and Health. 1986, 9 (4): 299-307. 10.1002/nur.4770090407.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/10/11/prepub
Download references
We acknowledge Dr. Mohsen Tavakol for his assistance with conducting the research interviews. We are grateful to all the students and faculty who assisted with, and participated in, the study. The study was funded by a grant from the University of Nottingham Learning and Teaching Development Fund.
Authors and affiliations.
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, B Floor, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
Catrin Evans
School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, Scotland, UK
Keith Stevenson
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Catrin Evans .
Competing interests.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
CE conceived of the study. CE and KS supervised data collection and conducted the analysis. CE drafted the initial manuscript. KS revised parts of the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Evans, C., Stevenson, K. The experience of international nursing students studying for a PhD in the U.K: A qualitative study. BMC Nurs 10 , 11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-10-11
Download citation
Received : 11 November 2010
Accepted : 13 June 2011
Published : 13 June 2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-10-11
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6955
Meet yale’s cultural and identity-based spaces for an evening of community and refreshments at the well, followed by visits to the centers, register here.
The Student Nurses’ Association (SNA) at Paradise Valley Community College (PVCC) recently had the opportunity to partner with the International Service Learning (ISL) group for a nine-day medical mission trip to Puerto Peñasco, Mexico. This transformative experience was not only educational but also deeply rewarding as the future health care workers immersed themselves in the local community and medical society.
“During our time in Puerto Peñasco, we had the privilege of visiting several healthcare facilities, including the IMSS Bienestar hospital and a local medical center,” explained Mikayla Hinton, a recent PVCC graduate and former president of SNA.
Hinton, who is a RN at Banner Thunderbird neonatal intensive care unit (NICO), described setting up pop-up clinics at churches in various neighborhoods, which allowed the group to provide medical care and assessments directly to community members, making a tangible difference in their lives.
“As the faculty advisor for SNA, I'm incredibly proud of our nursing students for their dedication and compassion in organizing this medical mission trip,” said Tina Barney, MSN-Ed RN CCRN CHSE®, PVCC Nursing faculty. “Their commitment to helping others is inspiring, and it's heartening to see them taking the initiative to make a difference in communities in need. This mission trip provided essential care to those lacking healthcare access and offered our students a deeper understanding of the impact they can have as future nurses. Their hard work and generosity are commendable, and I couldn't be more proud to be just a small part of their incredible journey.”
Hinton recalled, “One of the most unforgettable experiences was witnessing an emergent cesarean section surgery, giving us first hand insight into the challenges and practices of healthcare in different settings.”
Beyond the clinical experience, the group was fortunate to have the support of a local team leader and translator, who not only guided the group through their work but also ensured they experienced the local culture, enjoying local dishes and sweet treats; local neighborhood families welcomed the group warmly.
“Their kindness and hospitality truly made our mission unforgettable and underscored the importance of community and connection in healthcare,” said Hinton. “We hope that more students get the chance to experience such a transformative journey, as it not only enhances our nursing skills but also broadens our understanding of the world and the power of compassion in healthcare.”
To learn more about PVCC’s Nursing Program visit our website or email [email protected] . To get involved with the Student Nurses’ Association, click here or contact [email protected] .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This program will provide you with the knowledge and skills in theoretical, methodological, and analytical approaches that will enable you to conduct research to discover and apply knowledge in nursing science and health care. Most full-time Johns Hopkins Nursing PhD students receive 100% tuition funding and guaranteed compensation for the ...
Financial Aid. Beginning in Fall 2021, Columbia Nursing will fund international PhD students. Funding includes tuition and fees, Student Health Services health insurance, and a stipend. International applicants are encouraged to visit the Columbia University International Students & Scholars Office for information about housing, Visas, and ...
Earn a GW Nursing Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing to advance the theoretical foundation of healthcare delivery and nursing practice. Our PhD program is designed to equip graduates with the knowledge and skills in theoretical, methodological, and analytical approaches needed to conduct research and apply knowledge in the fields of nursing science and healthcare.
MSN-PhD in Nursing. Hold or obtain a master's degree from a college or university approved by a recognized accrediting body before the first day of classes. Have a current unencumbered license to practice professional nursing. International Students
International students do have full access to Johns Hopkins School of Nursing resources including the Career Lab and the university-wide Office of International Services (OIS). If staying in the United States after graduation is your goal, please contact the. Employment is not guaranteed for any graduate, regardless of their citizenship.
PhD in Nursing Student Handbook version 2.1, 07/30/24 15 health, physical functioning, health risks, and quality of health outcomes. The concepts of health . disparities and health equity will be addressed, which are central to examination of health outcomes . from both biological and sociological perspectives. NU 830 Nursing Research Residency
A Holistic View of Nursing Science The UW School of Nursing Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing Science (PhD) program faculty are global leaders in nursing science. Students from all over the world create a community of scholars and learn from expert researchers. Our expert nursing scientists provide mentorship tailored to student needs using technology-driven instruction. The UW PhD program is ...
International Applicants. Columbia Nursing will fund international PhD students. Funding includes tuition and fees, Student Health Services health insurance, and a stipend. International applicants are encouraged to visit the Columbia University International Students & Scholars Office for information about housing, Visas, and other topics.
Quickview. Degree: Nursing PhD Application deadline: December 6 GRE: Optional Study Options: Full-time/part-time Please Note: PhD students in the Bouvé College of Health Sciences may not request enrollment deferrals.If you are admitted for a given term but wish to be considered for a future term instead, you must re-apply to the program in order to be considered for admission and funding.
The NursingCAS TOEFL code is #B506, and more information about sending TOEFL scores is available here, and IELTS scores is available here. The following examinations are accepted by YSN: Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) Minimum Required Score: Total = 100/120. Minimum Section Scores: Reading = 22/30, Listening = 22/30, Writing = 22 ...
PhD opportunities. PhD opportunities and supervisors within the Caring Futures Institute are available in the following research areas of focus and across the disciplines of Nursing or Midwifery. However, we also welcome and encourage your own research project ideas that may not fit into the areas of focus. Areas of focus: Healthy Start to Life
Also, nursing instructors at colleges and universities can expect a median annual salary of $84,380, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, with the highest 10% earning more than $182,710. PhD Program in Nursing Description. The program requires a minimum of 52 credit hours of graduate coursework.
Graduates of our doctoral program receive top preparation as nursing researchers, academics and leaders. Our faculty was the first to offer PhD studies in nursing in Canada in 1991. It is currently ranked #1 overall in Canada and #5 globally in the 2023 global QS rankings. We are especially interested in attracting doctoral students who are ...
Nurse Faculty Loan Program. Available to MSN, Post-Master's, and PhD students who are interested in pursuing a career as a nursing educator, this loan forgiveness program is funded by HRSA - up to 85% forgivable. Awards may vary and can be awarded as high as $35,500, and require a 4-year work commitment as a full-time faculty member at any ...
Overview. You'll be part of a dynamic doctoral research environment and will study alongside students from across the world undertaking research in key healthcare areas including our three core innovative research themes, which encapsulate lifespan health research from conception to end-of-life: Maternal and Child Health; Chronic Illness and Palliative Care and Education and Practice.
11. Summer (PhD Year 1) NURS 818: Research Practicum*** P: Completion of 2 credits of NURS 819. 2. Total: 2. Fall (PhD Year 2) NURS 811: Measurement of Nursing Phenomena P: NURS 840, NURS 841, NURS 850, NURS 851, NURS 814, NURS 815 and recommend concurrent enrollment in NURS 816 or permission of the instructor. 3.
Most full-time Johns Hopkins Nursing PhD students are 100% funded with a stipend for the first three years of study.Additional financial support is made available in following years. For full eligibility of scholarship opportunities, apply by December 1. Qualified students interested in the PhD program may be eligible to receive tuition and stipend support through the School of Nursing.
Prospective Students. In-state tuition and fees are fully covered for the first three years. In addition, for PhD students entering in the fall of 2024, a stipend of $22,000 will be provided to students to assist with living expenses in the 2024-2025 academic year, $18,000 for the 2025-2026 academic year, and $18,000 for the 2026-2027 academic ...
The Ph.D. program prepares graduates who will provide leadership in the generation, integration, and implementation of knowledge aimed at improving health and health care. Our graduates have expanded spheres of influence in academic institutions, practice settings, and policy arenas. Students join a community of scholars where supervisors are committed to supporting educational programs that ...
Fees for entry in 2025 have not yet been set. For reference, the fees for the academic year beginning September 2024 were as follows: PhD (full-time) UK students (per annum): Standard £4,786, Low £11,000, Medium £17,500, High £23,000. International, including EU, students (per annum): Standard £27,000, Low £28,500, Medium £34,500, High ...
A current nursing doctoral student offers advice to international students seeking a PhD in nursing. Her advice includes language proficiency, staying organized, connecting with nurse scientists, and other tips for overcoming obstacles. ... The best tip I can give to any incoming PhD nursing student is to try to understand the meaning of ...
Who Can Apply: The University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) awards scholarships to current international UIC students pursuing a full-time undergraduate, graduate, or professional degree in any field of study, including nursing. Students must hold a minimum cumulative 3.5 GPA at UIC. Amount: $5,000.
Graduate students in the College of Nursing PhD program are expected to perform at the level of B (3.00) or above in any course that is offered for graduate credit. A grade of B- (2.67) or below is not acceptable in the PhD program core courses and any course offered through the College of Nursing master's program (800 level courses).
Background Educating nurses to doctoral level is an important means of developing nursing capacity globally. There is an international shortage of doctoral nursing programmes, hence many nurses seek their doctorates overseas. The UK is a key provider of doctoral education for international nursing students, however, very little is known about international doctoral nursing students' learning ...
Meet Yale's Cultural and Identity-Based Spaces for an Evening of Community and Refreshments at The Well, Followed by Visits to the Centers! AFRO AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER, ASIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER, LA CASA CULTURAL, LGBTO CENTER, MIDDLE EASTERN AND NORTH AFRICAN CULTURAL COMMUNITY, NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER, OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND SCHOLARS Register Here
The Student Nurses' Association (SNA) at Paradise Valley Community College (PVCC) recently had the opportunity to partner with the International Service Learning (ISL) group for a nine-day medical mission trip to Puerto Peñasco, Mexico. This transformative experience was not only educational but also deeply rewarding as the future health care workers immersed themselves in the local ...