how to write a manuscript for speech

Mastering Manuscript Speech Tips and Techniques for Effective Delivery

Delivering a manuscript style speech can be a daunting task. It’s not just about reciting written words. It’s about making them come alive. Understanding what a speech manuscript involves is the first step. How you present it makes all the difference. Your audience must feel engaged, not bored. This requires finesse and a deep connection with your material.

So, what is a manuscript speech, exactly? In simple terms, it’s a speech read word-for-word from a written text. But it goes beyond mere reading. It’s about conveying emotion and intention through each sentence. Effective manuscript speech delivery requires practice and attention to detail. A strong command over the material is crucial. Only then can you inject life into it.

The format of a speech manuscript is another critical aspect. It should be easy to follow, with clear cues for emphasis. A manuscript speech should serve as a guide, not a crutch. Speaking naturally while referring to your script can be challenging. However, with the right techniques, you can ensure your presentation feels organic and dynamic. Define manuscript speech parameters clearly in your mind. This will aid in delivering it with confidence.

Avoid monotony. Break the rhythm with varied speech patterns. What is manuscript speech delivery if not a performance? It’s a fine balance between sticking to your script and engaging your audience. Think of it as a conversation, albeit a structured one. Each word has a purpose. Each pause, a significance. This is the essence of a well-delivered speech manuscript.

In conclusion, mastering the art of presenting a manuscript speech can transform your communication skills. It’s about more than definitions and formats. It’s about connecting with your audience. It’s about delivering your message with clarity and passion. With practice, anyone can excel at this. Your journey starts here.

What is a speech manuscript?

Understanding what a speech manuscript entails is crucial. It refers to the practice of delivering a speech while reading from a written document. This approach is common in situations requiring precision and accuracy. However, it’s more than just reading words off a page. The process involves a strategic blend of preparation, performance, and engagement.

A speech manuscript should be clear and concise.
It must capture the essence of your message.
Use a format that enhances readability.
Ensure the content flows naturally.

A well-crafted manuscript can be your best ally. It provides structure and keeps you on track. You can focus on delivery without worrying about memory lapses. However, it’s important to maintain a conversational tone. You must avoid sounding monotonous or robotic. This balance is achieved through practice and familiarity with the content.

Start by understanding the manuscript speech meaning.
Define your key points clearly.
Practice reading aloud to gauge pacing.
Incorporate pauses effectively to enhance impact.
Engage with your audience through eye contact and expressions.

With a speech manuscript, your goal is to bring the words to life. Infuse emotion and emphasis where necessary. Your voice should rise and fall naturally, reflecting the nuances of your message. This level of delivery ensures your audience remains captivated and engaged. Remember, a speech manuscript is a tool, not a crutch. Use it wisely to elevate your presentation skills to new heights.

Understanding the Fundamentals

Grasping the essentials of a speech manuscript is crucial for aspiring speakers. It’s not just about reading words from a page. It’s about translating those words into a captivating verbal experience. A manuscript style speech demands precision and clarity. When delivering such speeches, you must ensure each word hits its mark. They require skill in maintaining a natural flow while sticking to the written script.

So, what is manuscript speech ? Essentially, it involves reading a pre-written text to an audience. This approach is common in formal settings, such as political addresses or academic presentations. A manuscript speech should be meticulously prepared, leaving little room for improvisation. The speaker’s task is to present the material as though they are speaking effortlessly, despite the reliance on written text.

Understanding manuscript speech meaning also includes knowing its advantages. This method ensures consistency and accuracy. Messages are delivered precisely as intended by the author. However, it’s not without challenges. Engaging an audience while reading requires practice and a deep familiarity with your content. You might find it difficult to establish a natural connection with your listeners.

Consider the manuscript speech format . It should be organized and easy to follow. Break it into clear sections. Include transitions and cues. Your document should guide your speech delivery seamlessly. It’s also beneficial to practice proper enunciation and vocal variety. This keeps your audience interested and attentive.

Finally, let’s define manuscript speech in practical terms. It’s a strategic approach to delivering formal presentations. Whether you’re addressing a large group or a small meeting, your delivery should appear confident and spontaneous. This balance between preparation and presentation is achieved through repetition and rehearsal. Remember, your ultimate goal is to communicate your message effectively while engaging your audience fully.

Identifying Target Audience

Recognizing the audience you are addressing is crucial. Without this understanding, even the most meticulously crafted script can miss its mark. Every group is unique. They have different interests, knowledge levels, and expectations. Tailoring the speech to these specifics can significantly enhance receptivity.

When you define manuscript speech for a specific audience, consider their background. Are they experts in the topic, or are they laypeople? This affects how in-depth you should go. For instance, a manuscript speech meaning for industry professionals would differ greatly from one aimed at high school students. Customization is key.

Understanding what is a manuscript speech involves more than just writing. It’s about delivering content that resonates. Think about the demographic details. Age, education, cultural background – all these factors influence how a speech is received. A younger audience might appreciate humor, while a more senior crowd may favor formal tones.

A manuscript speech should engage its listeners. If the audience finds the content relatable, they’re more likely to stay attentive. Utilize anecdotes and relevant examples. Ask rhetorical questions to keep them thinking. Interactive elements can work wonders in a manuscript style speech.

Remember, the process of crafting a speech includes considering how it will be delivered. Visualize the listeners. Their facial expressions, their reactions. Adjustments based on this visualization can make your speech more impactful. Aligning with the audience’s expectations ensures your message hits home.

Ultimately, what is manuscript speech without an audience? It’s half the equation, the other half being those who listen, understand, and react. Balancing content with the audience’s characteristics makes the speech not just heard, but felt and remembered.

Crafting a Compelling Script

Creating a compelling script is crucial for an impactful speech. Many ask, “What is a manuscript speech?” In essence, it involves reading a pre-written text to ensure accuracy and eloquence. Your script forms the backbone of the address, guiding both structure and content. To engage your audience, every word must count. Crafting it demands precision, creativity, and purpose. You must aim for clarity without sacrificing depth.

A well-crafted script begins with understanding what you want to convey. Consider the “manuscript definition speech” and the context in which you’re presenting. Are you explaining a complex concept, arguing a point, or simply narrating a story? Each goal will shape the “manuscript speech format” and influence its tone.

When you define manuscript speech, it becomes clear that it serves specific needs: accuracy, coherence, and polished delivery. A “speech manuscript” isn’t just about writing; it’s about foreseeing how it will be perceived. A strong introduction sets the stage. It should grab attention and hint at what’s to come. Use anecdotes or startling facts. Ensure your main points are clearly outlined.

“Manuscript speech meaning” revolves around delivering a message with precision. Every section should resonate with the audience. Break your script into digestible parts to maintain focus and interest. Your transitions should be smooth but noticeable, keeping listeners on track. Diversify your sentence length. This technique adds rhythm and keeps your audience engaged.

“A manuscript speech should” be practiced aloud. This helps in identifying potential stumbling blocks. Reading your script multiple times can improve fluency and confidence. Vary your tone and pace to emphasize key points, making the “manuscript style speech” dynamic and lively. Pauses can be powerful, giving your audience time to absorb information.

Finally, remember that a “manuscript speech definition” includes the written document and its oral delivery. Practice blending the two seamlessly. Your goal is not merely to read but to communicate genuinely. Understand your script deeply. This enables you to deliver it naturally and convincingly.

Let’s break down key elements in a table for better comprehension:

Engagement Techniques

In delivering a manuscript speech, keeping the audience engaged is crucial. It goes beyond merely reading word-for-word. Instead, it demands fully capturing your listeners’ attention.

Eye contact is key. Even with a speech manuscript, look up regularly. Connect visually. This makes the audience feel acknowledged. They are more likely to stay interested.

Next is vocal variety. A manuscript speech should not sound monotonous. Use changes in pitch, tone, and volume. It makes the speech lively. An animated voice maintains attention.

Body language also speaks volumes. Gestures can enhance your message. Don’t remain static. Move around, but purposefully. This keeps the energy high.

Interactivity is another powerful tool. Ask rhetorical questions or include actual pauses for reflection. Sometimes, a well-placed question keeps the audience curious. It’s a tactic that keeps them thinking about what is coming next in your speech manuscript.

Personal anecdotes and stories work wonders. They make your content relatable. When people see themselves in your stories, they become emotionally invested. This engagement is priceless.

Use visuals if possible. Visual aids can complement a manuscript style speech beautifully. They provide visual stimulation and serve as another layer of engagement. A picture says a thousand words, after all.

Lastly, practice is paramount. The more familiar you are with your manuscript speech format, the more naturally you can deliver it. This familiarity allows you to focus on engaging your audience rather than just reading. Remember, an engaged audience is an attentive audience. They take away more from your presentation, making your message more impactful.

Using Vocal Variety

Delivering a speech from a manuscript can feel restrictive. However, incorporating vocal variety can transform your delivery. A manuscript speech should not mean a monotonous recital. Think of it as a tool to enhance communication. Use your voice as an expressive instrument.

Vocal variety involves changes in pitch, pace, and volume. These elements can make your message more engaging. They breathe life into your words. Even with a prepared text, you can captivate your audience. Change your tone to reflect your message’s emotions.

Imagine a scene while reading aloud. This practice makes the speech manuscript more dynamic. Emphasize key points with a higher pitch or softer volume. Slow down to give weight to critical information. Speed up during lighter, less critical sections. This oscillation keeps the audience attentive.

Remember, a speech delivery isn’t just about words. It’s also about how those words are presented. The manuscript speech format provides structure. Yet, the vocal variety adds the necessary flair. Combine these elements for a compelling narrative.

Each part of your speech should have its own character. Define each section with a unique vocal style. This technique ensures clarity and maintains interest. A well-delivered manuscript, rich with vocal variety, becomes memorable. It moves beyond the manuscript definition speech to a broader communication experience.

Your voice is your most powerful tool. Even in a speech manuscript format, it holds immense potential. Use it to its fullest. Create contrasts, invoke emotions, and engage your listeners. With practice, your manuscript speech delivery will shine.

Public Speaking Without Notes | Training by Jim Kwik

Previous post.

Effective Strategies for Citing Sources in Your Speech

Top 10 Best Man Speech Examples to Inspire Your Perfect Toast

Unforgettable Father of the Bride Speech That Wow the Crowd

How to Craft the Perfect Bar Mitzvah Speech

First Time Authors-Here's The Key To Getting Published

Free tips and resources for first time authors looking for publishing deals.

Subscribe via Email

How To Write A Manuscript For A Speech

Public speaking can fill one with a sense of dread, but knowing how to write a manuscript for a speech can make the difference between a successful speaking engagement and one that is not. Many factors should be considered when preparing a speech.

Preparing an outline is always helpful; make headings that clearly make key points and fill in the facts that are to be presented under each heading. Consider the phrasing of the headlines as they can be directly used as the introductory sentences to your points.

Knowing the key target audience is the most important factor in writing the manuscript. Avoid speaking over them; a group of highschool kids will need to be addressed in a different way than a roomful of adults. Keep the tone of the speech inline with the target audience. Lightheartedness may not be an appropriate tone for all occassions, but this approach is perfect for a younger audience.

Knowing how to write a manuscript for a speech sounds like an overwhelming task, but backing up the outline with well researched information keeps the manuscript interesting. When doing fact based research, try to find a new angle for the information. A speech on the deadly effects of carbon monoxide in and of itself, for instance, could be boring to listeners who already know that this is a deadly exposure. Liven the speech up with unusual facts as well, such as that in the 1800’s through the 1900’s carbon monoxide released through gas lamps accounted for sightings of ghosts and other hallucinations, and that Edgar Allen Poe is thought to have been suffering the effects of chronic carbon monoxide poisoning while writing his works. These facts would be a pertinent, entertaining and unusual way to grab audience attention. Be sure any facts offered are well researched and accurate, but do not drag the audience attention down with citing continued fact references. Terms such as “research shows” or “it has been found that” are often a better lead up to your facts and continue to keep audience attention.

Remember when writing the speech that the amount of time taken to prepare it is often far short of the amount of time it will take to deliver it. It is better to prepare the manuscript to be longer and pare it down than to consider it finished and have to add material. Using the method of paring down rather than adding on allows the ideas to flow freely, whereas adding material can often result in a speech that sounds choppy.

Once the manuscript is written, preparing to deliver it can be done at first in front of a mirror and then in front of family and friends. These practice sessions do more than boost confidence, they allow the speaker to practice inflection and emphasis. Some ideas can be changed at this point since some things sound better in writing than they do spoken aloud.

my tribute speech on barack obama? so for my english class we have to do a tribute speech on someone we look up to and first i chose my mom then i changed it to my dad then i changed it to obama can anyone help me write my tribute speech? or help me with some ideas this is what it has to have…

Step 1 (Investigate/Decide) – 250 words; due Thursday, January 8 Yes, you have to do this step, so stop whining. Reflect on a significant personality who has had an impact on our world, or who has personally influenced you. oWhy do you look up to this person? What do you consider worthy of tribute about him/her? oList his/her admirable traits oCreate a list of 5 to 10 interview questions that you would ask this person if given the opportunity to interview him or her. Consider using words and phrases such as: justify, explain, evaluate, “to what extent”, classify, describe, determine, implement, defend, etc. (See list of possible words to use in formulating a question) oIf you had an opportunity to thank this person, what would you thank him/her for?

Step Two: (Investigate/Research continues) – due with step 3 Now that you’ve chosen your subject, investigate and record on paper the answers to the following bulleted questions/statements

oBiography –origins (background, family life, education, etc) oTimeline – highlight accomplishments oRelevancy- just what is it that makes your subject worthy of this tribute speech? oUse library and Internet as needed (you must have at least 6 sources for this speech. If your speech is about a famous person, you must make sure they are accurate…keep track of them on work-cited page. If your speech is about a person who is not famous, then you must use interviews, old local newspaper articles, old family albums, etc.)

Step Three: Plan and Decide (Create Outline of Speech) – due Thursday, January 15 Decide which information you will use from your research. Plan the best way to organize your information into an effective speech.

Create an outline of your speech (please put details on the outline) Example of how you might organize speech: oQuote or eye-opening fact; statistic; etc…hook oBiography of Individual oAccomplishments oWhy tribute to this individual?

**Step Four: Create Full Written Draft of Speech – Due Tuesday, January 20 Create your manuscript with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Include the stylistic devices listed for objective #5. Cite sources within your manuscript as appropriate using MLA format. You will need a Work Cited page as well. Peer Edit and Revision

Step Five •Rehearse—create note cards and time yourself. •Did you remember to cite sources and create your work cited page?

Step Six: Presentation of Speeches with Peer Evaluation/Turn in Manuscript. All Speeches due Tuesday, January 20 whether it is your day to present or not! Keep a copy for yourself! Present and Evaluate Speeches (4 to 6 minutes)

and this is what i have so far:

January 21, 2009 English 10

Barack Obama was born August 4, 1961. Honolulu , Hawaii , USA . His full name is Barack Hussein Obama Jr.; which means “Blessed by God”, in Arabic He was born to a white American mother, Ann Dunham. And a black father, Barack Obama, Sr. they both were students at the University of Hawaii . His father left to Harvard while his wife and son stayed behind. His father went back to Kenya where he worked as an economist. Barack’s mother remarried an Indonesian. He worked as an oil manager. His father would write to him, but due to his business, he visited his son only once, and that was when Barack was ten. Barack managed to go to one of Hawaii ’s top prep academy, which is Punahou School . Then later on Barack attended Columbia University . He became a community organizer for a small Chicago church for three years. He helped poor south side people deal with a wave of plant closing. Then he attended Harvard Law School . In 1990 he became the first African-American editor of the Harvard Law Review. Then in Chicago he practiced civil-rights law. In 2004 Barack Obama was elected to the U.S senate as a Demarcate representing Illinois . Then in November, 2008 he ran for president as a democrat and won! And now he is the 44th president of the United States and the first African- American running for president. Barack Obama’s greatest accomplishment is his family, His two daughters and wife. He is worthy of my tribute speech because he is the very brave and he is the first African- American president. And because he is Step One- investigate/design I look up to this person because he has done many good things.

It’s good. Maybe find a way to replace pathos a couple times (them) towards the beginning of your essay. On the part where you say “if the paper were to be written on…” you should take out “than” after the comma. When you list the reasons why Golding might be better, I would say “he” instead of just Golding. Change “It is understandable that some people may think that Golding is more effective in his paper than Clark. Golding is older, Golding has more education, and Golding more experience in college, than Clark does. Many people may argue that Golding has the better paper, due to the previously listed reasons, and those reasons are understandable” to “Understandably, people will argue that Golding is superior to Clark when it comes to writing effectively. They will stress that Golding has experience on his side due to age and more college education.” Change “Something that may be agreeable though, is that Golding may have the better paper when it comes to following the rules of writing, and his organization style; but that Clark’s paper is actually better because he is in college, and that this paper is directed mainly towards current college students.” To “Something that may be agreeable, though, is that Golding has the better paper when it comes to the formalities of writing and organization, yet Clark’s paper is actually more meaningful due to the fact that he can relate to his target audience – he is in college, too.”

Sorry, but I’m too tired to continue. I didn’t study your essay much, so I’m not sure how well my edits would flow, but I tried. Also, there a couple of words that you should use a thesaurus on – I advise if it appears 3 or more times to do it.

It was a great essay and you can always go back to your original if you don’t like mine (but there were a few comma, etc. problems).

GOOD LUCK!!!

ENGLISH PAPER PART 2 PLEASE PROVIDE INPUT AND HELP? How many people want to be deprived of freedoms? One could assume that the majority of the United States citizens support freedom, so one could see how this idea may anger people. Pathos is a very effective way to get people to understand a view, and Clark does a great job of using it. In Golding’s article, he still uses Pathos, but to a much lesser extent. He uses pathos in some of his examples, and it is effective when it is used. Although he uses pathos a little bit in his article, for the most part he seems to simply argue and discuss the topics. By doing this he makes the reader less willing to read on, thus making his article less effective overall. Clark also is at an advantage because he is a college student, and these writings are more directed at college students than anyone else. Golding cannot control the fact that he is a professor, but it does put him at a disadvantage. Clark was a college student when he wrote this, so he knew how students his age interpreted things, Golding was from a different generation than the intended audience, and the ways of thinking among college student changed since Golding was in college. When Clark wrote this essay, one may assume that he talked to his college aged friends about this topic, and asked them what they think; Assuming that Clark did this, it helped him to be more successful in his paper than Golding. If the paper were to be written solely on free speech among college professors, than Golding would probably have the advantage of better understanding the intended audience better. It is understandable that some people may think that Golding is more effective in his paper than Clark. Golding is older, Golding has more education, and Golding more experience in college, than Clark does. Many people may argue that Golding has the better paper, due to the previously listed reasons, and those reasons are understandable. Something that may be agreeable though, is that Golding may have the better paper when it comes to following the rules of writing, and his organization style; but that Clark’s paper is actually better because he is in college, and that this paper is directed mainly towards current college students. It is also understandable that the ways of teaching how to write papers has changed, and how students are educated has changed, so due to these reasons Clark’s paper may actually be more current and apply more to it’s intended audience than Golding’s. Clark’s paper is a well written paper, and due to his use of straightforwardness, pathos, simplicity in his writing, and his advantage due to his age, he may still have the better piece of writing, even if Golding is more educated and more intelligent.

Sources Golding, M. P. (2000). Campus Speech Issues. Manuscript in preparation. Clark, Q. Speech Codes: An Insult to Education and a Threat to Our Future.

First of all, “Sir” Isaac Newton never served in Parliament. He served in 1698 and in 1701-02, but he wasn’t knighted until 1705. If the knighthood gave him the wherewithal to hire an assistant, that helper could not have written a Parliamentary speech with him. Second, Newton never argued before the House of Lords: he represented his university, Cambridge, in the House of Commons. Third, Newton’s only recorded words in Parliament were a point of order, a request to close a drafty window. He never made a “maiden speech”, nor argued for any bill. To top it all off, his service and knighthood had nothing to do with his scientific work. James II tried to turn the universities into Catholic institutions; Newton (and Cambridge itself) staunchly opposed the idea. Newton simply voted that way at every opportunity. The Queen so appreciated his efforts in support of this and other of her political causes that she knighted him.

After explaining the problems to the embarrassed vendor, Nora bought the document for £13, just as a reminder that she doesn’t know it all. She eventually got it identified: a portion of an unfinished play by a minor author, circa 1870.

She Turned Me Into a Newton!? After identifying a suspicious fellow Yankee at the local pub, Nora Shekrie decided to take a holiday at the market in Blyth. She was escorted by her not-too-distant relatives, Sir Loine of Boef and Lady Rose Boef. Nora wanted to take home some memento of her visit, something more than the prepaid travel vouchers Sir Harold had supplied. After a morning of making nice with the locals, receiving thanks, admiration, and not a few jibes about being from “the Colonies”, Nora was quite enjoying herself. The morning tea and late lunch were taking up a serene position in her abdomen, the sun was shining, and the studied quaintness of the market enchanted her more with each passing hour. She politely examined each stall of wares, commented astutely on some aspect of almost every shop, and generally impressed the vendors as something rather better than the stereotypical American tourist. Finally, at half-past two o’clock, she found the item to take home. An youngish gentleman selling out-of-print books had an item that intrigued her.

“It’s the manuscript of an early draft of the speech,” he explained as she bent over to examine the fine penmanship. “One of my ancestors was an assistant to Sir Isaac Newton. He served in Parliament, you know.” Nora nodded. “Dodgy times, what with the Glorious Revolution and all, but my many-greats grandfather found a stable position with Sir Isaac, right after the knighthood gave him enough money to hire someone permanent-like. Sir Isaac asked G-g-g-grandfather, Thomas Hanscomb was his name, to write some for his first speech in the House of Lords. Oh, Newton supplied the ideas sure enough, but Hanscomb did the first bit of writing, not what many could write back then. “Newton took Hanscomb’s draft, did it up his own way, no surprise to either of them I warrant, and gave back the first. That’s it, there in the frame and protective glass and all, and I keep it out of the sun like you see here.” The three of them noted the shade over the one item, giving it further protection from the light. “Sir Isaac made his grand speech, both houses passed whatever bill, and Thomas Hanscomb stuffed this copy into his things. It come down to me after all this time.” Nora nodded, seeming to have reached some decision. “And it’s certainly dear enough,” she held up a hand to stop him, “but fairly, given its history. Across the pond, a representative’s first speech in Congress is considered a great event.” She considered her bank balance, held a mental argument with herself, and pulled out her billfold. “I take traveler’s cheques, VISA, and cash,” he smiled. Nora smiled in return, pulling out a small plastic card. She felt a polite tug at her sleeve: Rose. ” For a purchase this significant, I usually like to get my mind well settled before I sign the papers, just to be sure. Shall we have a cuppa, and you talk to me about this?” There was a note in Rose’s voice; Nora had learned to respect that tone over her ten days with the family. She turned to the stall-keeper. “Would a fiver hold it for an hour?” “M’lady, at this price, a scone would hold it for the day.” Nora grinned. “A scone, it is. With jam?” He nodded. They had a deal.

They chose their table and allowed Harold to seat them with their food. He trundled back to the stalls with the extra scone, leaving his wife and guest to discuss the matter. “Rose, it sounds like I got off cheaply. You certainly know your business. Care to let me in on the secret? I’m usually the one who spots these things.”

How did Rose know that Nora shouldn’t buy the manuscript?

Is this paper good? What could I do to improve it? Part 2? How many people want to be deprived of freedoms? One could assume that the majority of the United States citizens support freedom, so one could see how this idea may anger people. Pathos is a very effective way to get people to understand a view, and Clark does a great job of using it. In Golding’s article, he still uses Pathos, but to a much lesser extent. He uses pathos in some of his examples, and it is effective when it is used. Although he uses pathos a little bit in his article, for the most part he seems to simply argue and discuss the topics. By doing this he makes the reader less willing to read on, thus making his article less effective overall. Clark also is at an advantage because he is a college student, and these writings are more directed at college students than anyone else. Golding cannot control the fact that he is a professor, but it does put him at a disadvantage. Clark was a college student when he wrote this, so he knew how students his age interpreted things, Golding was from a different generation than the intended audience, and the ways of thinking among college student changed since Golding was in college. When Clark wrote this essay, one may assume that he talked to his college aged friends about this topic, and asked them what they think; Assuming that Clark did this, it helped him to be more successful in his paper than Golding. If the paper were to be written solely on free speech among college professors, than Golding would probably have the advantage of better understanding the intended audience better. It is understandable that some people may think that Golding is more effective in his paper than Clark. Golding is older, Golding has more education, and Golding more experience in college, than Clark does. Many people may argue that Golding has the better paper, due to the previously listed reasons, and those reasons are understandable. Something that may be agreeable though, is that Golding may have the better paper when it comes to following the rules of writing, and his organization style; but that Clark’s paper is actually better because he is in college, and that this paper is directed mainly towards current college students. It is also understandable that the ways of teaching how to write papers has changed, and how students are educated has changed, so due to these reasons Clark’s paper may actually be more current and apply more to it’s intended audience than Golding’s. Clark’s paper is a well written paper, and due to his use of straightforwardness, pathos, simplicity in his writing, and his advantage due to his age, he may still have the better piece of writing, even if Golding is more educated and more intelligent.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>