essay on corona pandemic in pakistan for class 12

SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND ITS IMPACT ON PAKISTAN: A NEED FOR PROSPECTIVE PLANNING

• Manzoor Ahmed Abbasi
• Muhammad Arshad
• Raja Nadir Mahmood Khan

COVID-19, a global pandemic, has spread in about 215 countries of the world. It has caused enormous damage to the lives, economies, and socio-political fabric of the societies. More than 14 million people stand affected world-wide, with death toll crossing 0.75 million. The expert virologists apprehend that the worst situation is yet not over. The IMF, World Bank, and WTO have issued warnings about the impending global recession. It has also been reported that low-income countries and weak segments of the societies have been the major victims of this malady. Keeping in view the fragile economy and unsound healthcare system of Pakistan, WHO and experts of various fields have predicted multiple effects on various aspects of our national life. The paper in hand attempts to analyze the magnitude of the spread of COVID-19 in Pakistan and its implications for our national security, with a view to offering policy recommendations.

Bibliography Entry

Abbasi, Manzoor Ahmed, Muhammad Arshad, and Raja Nadir Mahmood Khan. 2020. "Spread of Covid-19 and Its Impact on Pakistan: A Need for Prospective Planning." Margalla Papers 24 (1): 16-30.

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Copyright (c) 2020 Manzoor Ahmed Abbasi, Muhammad Arshad , Raja Nadir Mahmood Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .

License Terms

Make a Submission

e-ISSN: 2789-7028

ISSN-L: 1999-2297

HEC Recognition

------------------------------

SCAN QR CODE

Information.

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Current Issue

Social Media

Important Links

• NDU Journal
• ISSRA Papers
• Journal of Contemporary Studies
• Strategic Thought

Quick Links

• Publication Policy
• Publication Ethics
• Guidelines for Authors
• Article Processing Chart
• Subscription

Institute for Strategic Studies, Research and Analysis, National Defence University, Islamabad 

Copyright © 2023 National Defence University, Islamabad, Pakistan

• Skip to content
• Skip to main menu
• Skip to more DW sites

How has COVID impacted Pakistan's education system?

Pakistan's schools have been heavily hit by the pandemic. Students have experienced several school closures, and experts speculate that such a loss could have impacts for years to come.

Last week, Pakistan opened both public and private schools in various districts of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, with Sindh province opening its schools in August. 

Schools are now operating with a 50% attendance policy on alternating days due to the COVID regulations set forth by the National Command and Operation Center (NCOC). Vaccinations were also made mandatory for all staff and students over the age of 15.  

Schools in Pakistan were closed for around seven months during the first COVID wave . However, they reopened in September 2020 and were closed again in November. 

The government announced another phased opening of educational institutions in January of this year. However, this reopening was also short-lived, as schools closed again in April 2021 due to the third wave. 

"The school year for 2021-22 has been extended to June 2022. Final examinations will be conducted in June 2022" Murad Raas, Punjab's Education Minister, tweeted last week.  

Officials have introduced digital learning to compensate for the repeated closures. Recently, the minister of education also decided to promote some students who had failed by awarding them 33% concessional marks.  

However, the effectiveness of these measures remains in doubt. 

Pakistan's education crisis worsens

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Millions of students lose out

In a country already scarred by stark differences in the quality of education between public and private schools, as well as low literacy rates, the pandemic has affected the learning of approximately 40 million students across Pakistan. The World Bank has claimed that "even the most optimistic scenario suggests an overall loss of learning for every child enrolled." 

According to a study by UNICEF, students learned significantly less from home, compared with classroom learning before the pandemic. Their learning was harmed by a lack of access to technology, network connectivity issues and low levels of motivation. 

"Keeping the children interested and motivated in online classes is the biggest challenge, as children do not have any interest in them and their screen time is increased," Alia Malik, a mother of three, told DW. Arranging separate places and gadgets for all the children in the house presented a further challenge. g

While talking to DW about the contrast between online and face-to-face learning, Shahram Ahmad, a private university student, said: "It's the same difference as between a call and meeting someone in person. It's a lot easier to understand difficult concepts when an instructor can use all tools at their disposal." 

Muhammad Qadeer, a secondary school teacher, told DW that since students are passing through a critical stage of their mental and biological development, the lack of regular coaching and extracurricular activities will have a huge impact on their learning. "This generation will always be remembered as the COVID generation," he said. 

'A matter of privilege' 

As reported by UNICEF, remote learning was not possible for 23% of young children due to a lack of access to digital devices. The pandemic has hit poor and disadvantaged families the hardest, as they are unable to purchase even a single device. 

Geographical barriers have also had an impact. Around 26% of urban youth had no access to technology whereas, in the countryside, that figure rose to 36%. 

Remote learning is also challenging for children with disabilities and girls.  

"I did really well in my in-person classes but during lockdown , I had some domestic duties that couldn't be ignored. This severely affected my performance in university and my GPA hit rock-bottom," said Wyena Qureshi, a private university student. 

Students also had to drop out due to financial losses during the pandemic. Pakistan's economy was hit hard by the pandemic. 

Back in 2020, the World Bank predicted 930,000 children would drop out of primary and secondary education. "Pakistan is globally the country where we expect the highest [number of] dropouts due to the COVID crisis," the bank said. 

Pakistan struggles to contain third COVID wave

Two sides of the same coin.

"It's been a challenging experience for all of us but we have also learned to function and stay connected from a distance," Yasmeen Hameed, an educator, told DW. 

"New learning techniques were adapted and gradually children have become familiar with them,” she said. 

Pakistan’s teleschool program for students in Punjab initially had a high number of viewers due to the support of stakeholders and a phase-by-phase rollout. However, the market research firm, IPSOS, found that usage decreased after six months. 

Zulfiqar Samin, deputy secretary for policy at the Ministry of Federal Education, told DW that the ministry has tried to overcome challenges with education through the digital programs.  

"We tried to reach all radio and TV channels that we possibly could and kept the language of communication as Urdu at the federal level to overcome any linguistic barriers. Parents have also cooperated very well with us," he said. 

He also stressed that developed countries like China, the United States, and Germany have also been affected similarly. He added that, while the government of Pakistan is pushing its vaccination campaign until the majority of people get vaccinated, they remain at risk. 

Related topics

IMPACT OF CORONAVIRUS ON EDUCATION SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

• Dr. Niaz Muhammad A/P, Drptt: of Education, Islamia College University, Peshawar- Pakistan
• Dr. Nasrullah Khan University of Poonch, Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir
• Dr. Khisro Kaleem Raza PhD, University of Peshawar, Peshawar

Background of the study: The sudden rise of COVID pandemic and its speedy spread around the globe affected almost all walks of life particularly the education system in Pakistan. The lockdown in the entire country and closure of all education institutes put a gape in teaching learning process. It made the teachers and students away from each other, thus physical interaction of students and teacher in classrooms became a dream for both the students as well for the teachers at secondary level. The parents of the students were very worried for the study loss of their children but they were helpless. Therefore, the purpose and focus of this research paper was on the evaluation of literature available internationally to see what the status of covid pandemic in the world is and what type of strategy they have adopted to cope with the problem. Method: The nature of this research is evaluative, as it has been mentioned in the above lines that focus was on the available literature, Online overview was also driven for data collection to evaluate it, analyze it and to see the result of the closure of educational institutes due to Covid pandemic and its impact on secondary education system of Pakistan. Results: Key results extracted from literature were: It affected all walks of life particularly the education system at large. It wasted the precious time of the students by halting physical interactive classrooms. ICT stepped in to replace physical classrooms with online classrooms but this new approach had many other problems like, lack of experience, many of the teaching staff as well as the students in ICT, availability of the electronic gadgets to all the teachers and students. Thus availability of the net facility to all the teachers and students in the country was also a problem. Conclusion: It was concluded that online classes were not as useful as physical interactive classes. It does not facilitate the entire stakeholder equally. Online classes have many flaws for instance, availability of the devices, experience of its usage, and net accessibility. In online class it is difficult for the teachers to have hold on the class like in physical classes.

Author Biographies

Dr. niaz muhammad, a/p, drptt: of education, islamia college university, peshawar- pakistan, dr. nasrullah khan, university of poonch, rawalakot, azad kashmir, dr. khisro kaleem raza, phd, university of peshawar, peshawar.

Abodunrin, Oyinlola, Gbolahan Oloye, and Adesola Bola. 2020. “Coronavirus Pandemic and its Implication on Global Economy.†International Journal of Arts, Language and Business Studies (IJALBS) 4. www.ijalbs.com/index.php (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Ahmad I (2020) COVID-19 and Labour Law: Pakistan. Italian Labour Law e-Journal 13(1S). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/10930 (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Bouey, Jennifer. 2020. “Assessment of COVID-19’s Impact on Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises: Implications from China.†Testimony presented before the House Small Business Committee, RAND Corporation, March 10, 2020.www.rand.org. (Retrieved on 23-11-2020)

Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 8(III).

Banuri, Tariq (Chairman, HEC) Why Online Education? (14-04-2020)

Chairman Higher Education Commission. 2020. “Online HEC Announcementsâ€. https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/Online-Education.aspx . (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Espinel, Z., & Shultz, J. M. (2020). Using guidance from disaster psychiatry to frame psychiatric support for cancer patients during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psycho-oncology, 29(9), 1412-1415.

Evans, Olaniyi. (2020). “Socio-Economic Impacts of Novel Coronavirus: The Policy Solutions.†Bizecons Quarterly 7: 3-12. https://www.researchgate.net

Fetzer, Thiemo, Lukas Hensel, Johannes Hermle, and Christopher Roth. (2020). Coronavirus Perceptions and Economic Anxiety. arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03848.pdf/.

Faculty Online Teaching and Learning Initiative,†Online Learning, vol. 24, no. 1. The Online Learning Consortium, 2020. (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Igwe, Paul Agu. 2020. “Coronavirus with Looming Global Heath and Economic Doom.†African Development Institute of Research Methodology (ADIRM) 1,

: 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339933568/ (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Iqbal MM, Abid I, Hussain S, Shahzad N, Waqas MS, Iqbal MJ (2020) The effects of regional climatic condition on the spread of COVID- 19 at global scale. Sci Total Environ 739:140101

Jahangir, Ramsha (09 Mar 2020) Virus closures make classes go digital in Pakistan https://www.dawn.com/news/1539441 (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

J. W. Richardson, E. Hollis, M. Pritchard, and J. E. M. Novosel-Lingat, “Shifting Teaching and Learning in Online Learning Spaces: An Investigation of a Faculty Online Teaching and Learning Initiative,†Online Learning, vol. 24, no. 1. The Online Learning Consortium, 2020.

Karabag, Somlaz Filiz. (2020). “An Unprecedented Global Crisis! The Global, Regional, National, Political, Economic and Commercial Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic.†Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research (JAEBR) 10, 1:1-6.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340337249/ (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Khan, Naushad, and Mahnoor Naushad.(2020). “Effects of Coronavirus on the World Community.†https://ssrn.com/abstract=3532001

Khan, Naushad, Absar ul Hasan, Shah Fahad, and Mahnoor Naushad. 2020. “Factors Affecting Tourism Industry and its Impact on Global Economy of the World.â€

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3559353 (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Mahmud, Sakib. (2020). “Impact of Coronavirus on the Global Economy.†Research

Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339435164/ . (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Muhammad A, Owais M, Ali N, Khan H (2020) COVID-19 pandemic and precautionary measures in Pakistan. Anaesthesia, Pain Intens Care 24(1):94–100.

McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 1–17.

Rieley, J. B. (2020). Corona Virus and its impact on higher education. Research Gate

Shaikh, S., Sultan, M. F., Mushtaque, T. M., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on GDP: A serial mediation effect on international tourism and hospitality industry. International Journal of Management (IJM), 12(4), 422-430.

Sahu, Pradeep. 2020. “Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff.†Cureus 12, 4: 1-6. https://doi.10.7759/cureus.7541 (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Yildirim, Z. (2005). Effect of technology competencies and online readiness on pre-service teachers' use of online learning management system [sic].

Ying, Tianyu, Kiayun Wang, Xinyi Liu, Jun Wen and Edmund Goh. (2020). “Rethinking Game Consumption in Tourism: A Case of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Outbreak in China.†Tourism Recreation Research Routledge, Taylor & Francis. https:// doi.10.1080/02508281.2020.1743048 (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

WHO. (2020). “Coronavirus Disease (COVID-2019).†Situation Reports. https://www.who.int/docs/sitrep-54-covid-19.pdf . (Retrieved on 23-03-2020)

Zia K, Farooq U (2020) Covid-19 outbreak in Pakistan: model-driven impact analysis and guidelines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00056

Submission of an original manuscript to the Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. And if accepted for publication, it will be published in print and online and it will not be published elsewhere.

The journal main policy reflects in its stance that the publication of scholarly research is exclusively meant to disseminate knowledge and not-for-purposes.

Developed By

Information.

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

• Get Involved

COVID-19 pandemic

Covid-19 pandemic response.

Humanity needs leadership and solidarity to defeat the coronavirus

The coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic is the defining global health crisis of our time and the greatest challenge we have faced since World War Two. Since its emergence in Asia late last year, the virus has spread to  every continent  except Antarctica. Cases are rising daily in Africa the Americas, and Europe.

Countries are racing to slow the spread of the disease by testing and treating patients, carrying out contact tracing, limiting travel, quarantining citizens, and cancelling large gatherings such as sporting events, concerts, and schools.

The pandemic is moving like a wave—one that may yet crash on those least able to cope.

But COVID-19 is much more than a health crisis. By stressing every one of the countries it touches, it has the potential to create devastating social, economic and political crises that will leave deep scars.

We are in uncharted territory. Many of our communities are unrecognizable from even a week ago. Dozens of the world’s greatest cities are deserted as people stay indoors, either by choice or by government order. Across the world, shops, theatres, restaurants and bars are closing.

Every day, people are losing jobs and income, with no way of knowing when normality will return. Small island nations, heavily dependent on tourism, have empty hotels and deserted beaches. The International Labour Organization estimates that 25 million jobs could be lost.

UNDP response

Every country needs to act immediately to prepare, respond, and recover. The UN system will support countries through each stage, with a focus on the most vulnerable.

Drawing on our experience with other outbreaks such as Ebola, HIV, SARS, TB and malaria, as well as our long history of working with the private and public sector , UNDP will help countries to urgently and effectively respond to COVID-19 as part of its mission to eradicate poverty, reduce inequalities and build resilience to crises and shocks.

“We are already hard at work, together with our UN family and other partners, on three immediate priorities : supporting the health response including the procurement and supply of essential health products, under WHO’s leadership, strengthening crisis management and response, and addressing critical social and economic impacts.” UNDP Administrator, Achim Steiner

Responding with people at the centre

Pakistan has witnessed a massive increase in its confirmed cases from the initial two confirmed on 26th February 2020. As a country whose economy is highly reliant on manufacturing and service industries, shutdown measures and disruptions in supply chains will negatively impact on the economy and society, particularly the poor. 

As in other countries, the pandemic is likely to stress the capacity of the public health system and result in loss of human lives.  Severe repercussions on livelihoods, especially of the most vulnerable, dependent on government support, are expected.  The shutdown measures have already impacted small businesses, small and medium enterprises and daily wagers associated with various sectors of the economy. Considering that the informal sector in the country accounts for a major share of the national economy[1] and employs 27.3 million individuals, an increase in un(der)employment and poverty coupled with implications on food production and overall food security are anticipated.

The Government of Pakistan is concerned with the social and economic implications of COVID-19 and has established, with the help of UNDP, a COVID-19 Secretariat in the Planning Commission to prepare a coordinated economic and social response and design evidence-informed interventions. The Secretariat is required to ensure adequate coordination between Federal and Provincial Governments, with UN and Development Partners.  

In this regard, the federal government as well as provincial government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have requested UNDP’s support on a range of areas including coordination, strategic communications, crisis management, business continuity and digital solutions to manage government response to the pandemic. Assistance with procurement of medical supplies and equipment is also being discussed.

Against this background, UNDP is currently in the following activities in response to COVID-19 in Pakistan.  (This page will be updated regularly.)

Supporting the Federal Government in coordination and strategic communications:

• Supporting the Planning Commission in establishing a Secretariat for coordinating socio-economic impact of COVID-19;
• Supporting the Federal Government and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government with Strategic Communications and Awareness;
• Supporting Economic Affairs Division to design ODA coordination system (aid effectiveness).

Supporting Ministry of Health and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government in health system response:

• Capacity support in crisis management and provision of digital solutions to enable business continuity;
• Supporting Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government to enhance supply chain management (including procurement of health supplies and equipment).

Coordination of UN socio-economic impact needs assessment to identify mitigation responses:

• Impact assessment on the most vulnerable, policy recommendations & proposed programme interventions, to feed into the national action plan for COVID-19.

[1] The figure ranges from 18.2% to 71% based on different analysis 

While we do this, we must also consider ways to prevent a similar pandemic recurring. In the longer term, UNDP will look at ways to help countries to better prevent and manage such crises and ensure that the world makes full use of what we will learn from this one.

A global response now is an investment in our future.

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Impact of school closures and reopening on COVID-19 caseload in 6 cities of Pakistan: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Akhter Hameed Khan Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan

Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

Roles Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan

Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan, Research and Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan

• Abdul Mueed, 
• Taimoor Ahmad, 
• Mujahid Abdullah, 
• Faisal Sultan, 
• Adnan Ahmad Khan

• Published: September 19, 2022
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648
• Peer Review
• Reader Comments

Schools were closed all over Pakistan on November 26, 2020 to reduce community transmission of COVID-19 and reopened between January 18 and February 1, 2021. However, these closures were associated with significant economic and social costs, prompting a review of effectiveness of school closures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 infections in a developing country like Pakistan. A single-group interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to measure the impact of school closures, as well as reopening schools, on daily new COVID-19 cases in 6 major cities across Pakistan: Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Quetta, Peshawar, and Muzaffarabad. However, any benefits were contingent on continued closure of schools, as cases bounced back once schools reopened. School closures are associated with a clear and statistically significant reduction in COVID-19 cases by 0.07 to 0.63 cases per 100,000 population, while reopening schools is associated with a statistically significant increase. Lahore is an exception to the effect of school closures, but it too saw an increase in COVID-19 cases after schools reopened in early 2021. We show that closing schools was a viable policy option, especially before vaccines became available. However, its social and economic costs must also be considered.

Citation: Mueed A, Ahmad T, Abdullah M, Sultan F, Khan AA (2022) Impact of school closures and reopening on COVID-19 caseload in 6 cities of Pakistan: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health 2(9): e0000648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648

Editor: Xerxes Tesoro Seposo, Nagasaki University: Nagasaki Daigaku, JAPAN

Received: May 24, 2022; Accepted: August 24, 2022; Published: September 19, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Mueed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The data was provided to the Akhter Hameed Khan Foundation team for this study as part of its work with Pakistan's Federal Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination (MoNHSR&C) and the National Command & Operation Centre (NCOC) in Islamabad, which lead Pakistan's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The AHKRC team has provided analytical support to the above entities, and such created knowledge that has directly informed pandemic policy-making in Pakistan. COVID-19 data is compiled and shared in daily National Situation Reports, or Sitreps, by the National Emergency Operation Centre (NEOC). Each day's Sitrep is compiled as a PDF file. The data used for this study was manually compiled from these PDF files and then used in STATA. The parentage of this data is with the NCOC and the MoNHSR&C. The AHKRC team received this data with the express understanding that it would be kept confidential. However, the data can be obtained independently from the NEOC, through a data request procedure, which is subject to approval from the MoNHSR&C. The data request form as well as the standard operating procedures for a data request are provided as individual documents in the attachments for this submission. The data request itself is to be addressed to: Dr. Shahzad Baig, National Coordinator, National Emergency & Operation Center, D Block, EPI Building, Chak Shahzad, Park Road, Islamabad. Email: [email protected] Phone: +92-51-8730879.

Funding: This work was supported, in whole or in part, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [grant number: INV-025171]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Since the beginning of the global spread of COVID-19 and before effective vaccines became available, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), either barriers or means to limit contact between individuals, were the mainstay to control the spread of COVID-19. Perhaps the most widely debated among these NPIs was the closure of schools, which drew criticism for the significant social, learning, economic [ 1 , 2 ], and physical and mental health costs [ 3 – 6 ] associated with them. Notably, these costs are disproportionately borne by already disadvantaged families [ 1 , 7 ], thereby exacerbating social and economic inequalities [ 8 ].

Prior studies suggest that children infected with COVID-19 are often asymptomatic or have mild symptoms identical to other common respiratory infections [ 9 , 10 ], and yet they can transmit the infection even when they feel well. Children have also been key spreaders in other respiratory infections such as influenza, because of prolonged contact in close proximities with other children at schools [ 11 ].

Early evidence on the effect of school closures on epidemic transmission of COVID-19 seemed mixed. Initial, and often modeling-based studies, suggested that closing schools may not help reduce COVID-19 transmission in communities [ 12 – 15 ]. However, more recent, and more empirically based studies have tended to show a role for school closure in reducing cases in the community [ 16 – 23 ]. In low- and middle-income countries such as Pakistan where learning is already inadequate and remote learning solutions are all too often unavailable for most students [ 24 ], it is paramount that such a social policy be used only if absolutely supported by evidence of a benefit in limiting COVID-19 transmission and then too, only as a means of last resort. We explore the changes in daily cases on COVID-19 pre and post school closures in Pakistan using a single-group Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA).

This paper is a continuation of our earlier work, which examined the effects of school closures on the daily cases of COVID-19 in Islamabad vs. Peshawar, during the same period as in this study [ 25 ]. However, this study attempts to examine the effect of school closures with a different methodology, and also with a larger sample of cities.

In this paper we conduct a pre- and post-school closures and reopening analysis of changes in the daily incidence of COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) in 6 cities of Pakistan: Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Quetta, Peshawar, and Muzaffarabad using a single-group ITSA. These cities are provincial capitals except Islamabad which is the federal capital of Pakistan. We choose these cities for the analysis as these are the largest cities of relevant provinces in Pakistan and much of the COVID-19 caseload was concentrated in these cities during the analysis period. To estimate treatment effects of school closures and reopening, we use a single-group ITSA because it is a quasi-experimental tool that is particularly useful when data cannot be fully randomized, there is no comparison group, and there is a need to consider the effect of only one intervention.

This suits our study as, in Pakistan, all non-school NPIs were enacted in groups–except for the closure of schools. For example, marriage hall restrictions and ban on large scale gatherings were notified at the same time, as were mask-wearing, broader “smart” lockdowns (lockdowns in parts of cities), and reduced market timings. Mask-wearing and social distancing were constant across time with similar compliance across the country. Two major non-school NPIs that were implemented in these cities during our period of study were marriage hall restrictions and smart lockdowns (see S1 Table ). These NPIs targeted only a small proportion of the population and hence their impact was assumed to be limited. School closures, on the other hand, were universally enforced and applied to all schools–public or private, day or boarding–and to students of all grades across Pakistan [ 26 ].

Data for this analysis was sourced from the daily National Situation Reports (Sitreps) published by the National Emergency Operations Centre (NEOC) in Islamabad, Pakistan. It is the only Ministry of Health’s official COVID-19 data that was being analyzed and used for Pakistan’s pandemic response, nationally and internationally. This data is anonymized and aggregated by city, with no disaggregation by age, gender, ethnicity, or any other potentially identifying characteristic. We use this data for an inferential analysis of the change in daily COVID-19 incidence in the overall populations of the 6 aforementioned cities, regardless of demographic characteristics, due to the change in one particular NPI. It is because this NPI is the only policy intervention that could be isolated in our chosen time period of observation. Populations of cities were derived from Population Census 2017 of Pakistan, which is publicly available [ 27 ].

We estimated 2 sets of ordinary least square (OLS) regressions for each city using a 10- or 20-day delay since COVID-19 incidence changes from school-related NPIs take effect 10 [ 28 ] or more days [ 17 , 29 , 30 ] after closures or reopening. Daily new COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) were taken for equally spaced time frames with 10- and 20-days delay after the actual school closures and reopening dates. In order to analyze the effect of school closures and reopening, we took a total of 60 days for pre- and post-intervention periods. Table 1 shows the dates of school closures and reopening. For 10-days delay models of school closures and reopening, we took the following dates from November 06, 2020 to January 04, 2021 and January 12, 2021 to March 12, 2021, respectively. For 20-days delay models of school closures and reopening, we took the time periods from November 16, 2020 to January 14, 2021 and January 22, 2021 to March 22, 2021 respectively. We chose a 60-days period because a sample size of at least 50 time points is recommended by Box and Jenkens [ 31 ], as larger sample size increases power in the case of segmented time series [ 32 ]. We did not take a much longer time period since schools had started to reopen after one-month post-closures period in our 20-days delay model [ 33 ].

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.t001

Model specification

• Y ti , our outcome variable, is the daily number of new COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) in city i ;
• β 0 , the constant term, is the starting level of the daily new COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) in city i ;
• T ti is the time period since the beginning of this study, and the coefficient β 1 shows the slope of daily new COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) until the start of the intervention for city i ;
• X ti is a dummy variable indicating the intervention period (post intervention = 1, and 0 otherwise) for city i ;
• β 2 explains the change in daily COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) that occurs in the time period immediately followed by the school closure/reopening (our interventions) in city i ;
• X ti T ti is the interaction term between the intervention period and the time since the start of the study; and,
• β 3 represents the difference between the pre- and post-intervention slopes for daily new COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) in city i .

We run the model specified above for each city i separately. Since we want to estimate city-level effects as compared to a national or combined effect, we do not opt for a panel data model. To get a singular, direct estimate of the effect of closing/reopening schools, we used the lincom estimate which is the sum of β 1 and β 3 [ 35 ].

This generates a separate variable that sums the values of β 1 and β 3 .

To adjust for autocorrelation and possible heteroskedasticity, we used Newey-West standard errors in our regression models [ 36 ]. Cumby-Huizinga test for autocorrelation was performed on each regression model to identify correct lag structure. Linktest was applied to check if the models were correctly specified. Stata 16 software package was used for the analysis.

Our descriptive results showing means and standard deviations of daily COVID-19 cases (per 100,000 population) are presented in Table 2 . These were calculated for school closures and reopening periods of each city, separately for pre- and post-intervention periods. For 10-day delay, Islamabad showed highest cases (per 100,000 population) (18.80, SD: 4.411), while Quetta showed the lowest (0.722, SD: 0.294) in the pre-intervention period of school closures; same trend followed in school reopening pre-intervention period. Islamabad and Quetta also had the highest and the lowest cases (per 100,000 population) in pre-intervention periods of 20-day delay school closures and reopening.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.t002

After adding a 10-day delay after the actual date of school closures ( Table 3 ), the rate of change in daily COVID-19 cases declined following closure of schools in Karachi, Islamabad, Quetta, and Peshawar; the reductions per 100,000 population were by -0.16 cases (95% CI: -0.23, -0.13) in Karachi, -0.41 cases (95% CI: -0.53, -0.30) in Islamabad, -0.01 cases (95% CI: -0.01, -0.00) in Quetta, and -0.06 cases (95% CI: -0.08, -0.03) in Peshawar. In Lahore, daily COVID-19 cases continued to rise at a rate of 0.03 cases (95% CI: 0.01, 0.05) per 100,000 population after the closure of schools. For Muzaffarabad, the rate of change of COVID-19 cases was declining both before and after the school closure, at -0.11 cases (95% CI: -0.16, -0.06) and -0.05 cases (95% CI: -0.06, -0.03) per 100,000 population, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.t003

The opposite trend was seen following schools reopening in early 2021. Before schools reopened, accounting for a 10-day delay from the actual date of reopening, the rate of change of daily COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population was declining in every city by: -0.03 cases (95% CI: -0.05, -0.02) in Lahore, -0.20 cases (95% CI: -0.24, -0.16) in Karachi, -0.08 cases (95% CI: 0.12, -0.04) in Islamabad, -0.01 cases (95% CI: -0.01, -0.00) in Quetta, and by -0.04 cases (95% CI: -0.06, -0.04) in Peshawar. Muzaffarabad’s pre-reopening trend is not statistically significant at 95% confidence level.

After schools reopened, the rate of change of daily COVID-19 cases became positive in every city–except in Karachi, where the rate remained negative at -0.03 cases (95% CI: -0.04, -0.02) per 100,000 population. For the remaining cities, daily new COVID-19 cases began to increase at a rate of 0.09 cases (95% CI: 0.06, 0.11) per 100,000 population in Lahore, 0.34 cases (95% CI: 0.18, 0.50) in Islamabad, 0.01 cases (95% CI: 0.00, 0.01) in Quetta, 0.02 cases (95% CI: 0.01, 0.04) in Peshawar, and 0.09 cases (95% CI: 0.04, 0.16) in Muzaffarabad.

These effects were similar but more modest when allowing for a 20-day delay after the actual date of school closures. The post-closure trend remained statistically significant in Lahore, where the rate of change in cases continued to rise at 0.01 cases (95% CI: 0.00, 0.02) per 100,000 population, while Islamabad’s post-closure trend showed a decline at a rate of -0.12 (95% CI: -0.21, -0.03). Post-reopening, in Islamabad, the rate of daily new COVID-19 cases changed from 0.05 cases (95% CI: 0.00, 0.09) per 100,000 to 0.98 cases (95% CI: 0.69, 1.26) per 100,000 population while in Muzaffarabad, rate of change went from 0.01 cases (95% CI: 0.00, 0.01) before schools were reopened to 0.09 cases (95% CI: 0.04, 0.16) once schools opened. These results are presented graphically in Figs 1 – 4 below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.g001

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.g002

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.g003

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.g004

We show that school closures are associated with fewer daily new COVID-19 cases compared to pre-closures by 5 to 62 actual daily cases in individual cities. Correspondingly, reopening schools appear to increase them by 1 to 35 daily cases. The association is the strongest in Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, and Islamabad [ 37 ], which are larger, denser cities, and had the most cases; while the association was modest for sparse and smaller cities of Quetta and Muzaffarabad, that also had fewer overall cases.

Pakistan saw a much lower reduction in COVID-19 cases with school closures than was seen in many other countries. For example, our reduction of 5 to 62 daily cases is considerably smaller than the reduction of 424 cases per 100,000 population seen in the USA [ 17 ]. However, this is consistent with the fact that cities with fewer cases had the least reductions in cases when schools were closed. Pakistan has also seen much fewer cases, hospitalizations, and deaths from COVID-19 than in Europe or North America, perhaps relating to its sparser social networks leading to fewer contacts among individuals within the community [ 38 ], or perhaps higher levels of nonspecific immunity from prior infections with disparate viruses [ 39 ]. However, both of these possible explanations are speculative at the moment.

Reductions in cases with school closure is better understood in the context of the education set up in Pakistan. Most school-going children in cities go to low-cost-private schools where they sit in small classrooms with little space for social distancing [ 40 ]. Additionally, most children commute to and from schools in small vehicles–up to 15–17 children in the back of a minivan. Children then come into contact with adults at school (teachers and custodian staff), then at home (parents and elder family members), and in so doing become a conduit for COVID-19 spread outside of schools. As 31% of total population of Pakistan falls in the school going age [ 41 ], schools in Pakistan then essentially function as “super spreader” locations for COVID-19.

Our findings are consistent with the global evidence, as well as the results of our own previous work [ 25 ], that school closures are associated with reduction in COVID-19 transmission in communities [ 17 , 30 ]. In the US, school closures were associated with reduced COVID-19 caseloads [ 15 ], deaths [ 19 , 42 , 43 ], and hospitalizations by as much as half [ 19 ]. Similarly, the timely closure of schools and high education institutes were found to lower COVID-19 transmission rates in the European Union and other developed countries [ 44 – 47 ]. Earlier in the epidemic, a number of modeling studies had predicted more modest effects of such closures [ 19 , 21 , 24 , 44 – 46 ]. However, more recent studies using empirical community transmission data have generally shown a more robust association between school closures and reductions in community cases of COVID-19 [ 21 ].

Limitations

There are limitations of this analysis. The daily COVID-19 data are aggregated nationally, regionally, and by certain major cities, with no disaggregation by age or gender. Additionally, we acknowledge that a pre- and post-intervention analysis itself has limitations. For example, it may not effectively discern the effects of an intervention from that of a long-term trend on an outcome variable. This is referred to as the “maturation” threat to the internal validity of a pre- and post-intervention analysis. However, this has negligible impact on our analysis, as we consider a total of 60 days for each ITSA regression, in each of the 6 cities, when examining the effects of the intervention after accounting for sufficient delays–at 10 and 20 days–to be sure of the effects of the interventions.

It is difficult to explain why Lahore did not show any reduction in cases after school closures. It is possible that the epidemic affected cities at different points in time and that it was at a relatively lower level in Lahore during the study period. We also acknowledge that there could be potential cross-contamination of COVID-19 cases between Islamabad and Peshawar, which are separated by a 2-hours commute by road, and between Islamabad and Lahore, which are 4-hours apart by road. However, there are no data on the magnitude of any potential contamination due to bilateral intra-city travel. Nevertheless, were there significant contamination between the cities, one would have expected to see convergence in COVID-19 caseloads between them, and there is no evidence that this occurred. Finally, measurement of the serious social, economic, and educational attainment costs from school closures was beyond the scope of our study.

Conclusions

School closures may be associated with lower transmission of COVID-19 in communities and such closures are an important policy tool to stop the spread of COVID-19. However, their social and economic costs are high, perhaps more so in a developing country. The balance of these costs and benefits must inform this effective NPI specially when other measures, including vaccines, are being planned.

Supporting information

S1 table. non-school closures non-pharmaceutical interventions (npis) during study period (november 6, 2020 to march 22, 2021)..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.s001

S1 Text. Methodology steps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.s002

S1 Data. Dataset for 10-days delay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.s003

S2 Data. Dataset for 20-days delay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000648.s004

Acknowledgments

We thank Testing, Tracing and Quarantining (TTQ) team at the National Command and Operation Centre (NCOC) and the National Emergency Operations Centre (NEOC) for facilitating our work.

• View Article
• Google Scholar
• PubMed/NCBI
• 26. All education institutions to close down from Nov 26 as Covid-19 positivity rises. Dawn. 2020.
• 27. PBS. Final Results of Census-2017: PBS; [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/final-results-census-2017-0 .
• 31. Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 4 ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008.
• 33. Dawn. Classes 9–12 to reopen from Jan 18 as planned, says Shafqat Mahmood [Internet]. Dawn; 2021 [cited 2022 July 15]. Available from: https://www.dawn.com/news/1601645 .
• 37. Statistics PBo. 2017 Census—Area, Population by sex, sex ratio, population density, urban proportion, household size and annual growth rate (Sindh). Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, 2021.
• 38. North DC, Wallis JJ, Wieingast BR. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 346 p.
• 40. Shah D, Amin N, Kakli MB, Piracha ZF, Zia MA. Pakistan Education Statistics 2016–17. National Education Management Information System (NEMIS). Academy of Educational Planning and Management (AEPAM), 2018.
• 41. Table 4—Population by single year age, sex and rural/urban. Islamabad, Pakistan: PBS; 2018.

• High contrast
• Work with us
• Press Centre

Search UNICEF

Brief on learning continuity amidst covid-19 school closures in pakistan, country profile and covid-19 impacts on schools.

The four key messages in this data brief are informed by a UNICEF-led rapid assessment about learning continuity in Pakistan conducted in August 2020, through Interactive Voice Response (IVR) calls conducted by Viamo. This assessment examined learners’ access to and engagement with remote learning and draws on data from parents, students, and teachers, and includes teachers and learners in public and private schools. The data was weighted to ensure the representativeness of the population regarding gender and geographic location (rural-urban, and province level). Where possible and appropriate, data have been disaggregated by gender, school-type and geography.

Files available for download

Related topics, more to explore, a brighter future for children of refugee & host communities.

With funding from the Netherlands, UNICEF helps children overcome the odds

Bridging the learning gap in Punjab

Global Partnership for Education and UNICEF provide out-of-school children in Punjab, a second chance to learn.

“We want education, and we need it the most.”

Accelerated Learning Programme rekindles hope for out-of-school girls to continue learning in flood affected districts of Punjab

Transitional School Structures provide conducive learning

UNICEF and GPE help School Education Department enroll and retain students in the aftermath of floods

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Mol Med Rep

The COVID-19 pandemic as a scientific and social challenge in the 21st century

Vassilios zoumpourlis.

1 Biomedical Applications Unit, Institute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation (NHRF), 11635 Athens, Greece

Maria Goulielmaki

Emmanouil rizos.

2 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Department of Psychiatry, University ‘ATTIKON’ General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece

Stella Baliou

Demetrios a. spandidos.

3 Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece

Associated Data

Not applicable.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has spread around the globe with unprecedented consequences for the health of millions of people. While the pandemic is still in progress, with new incidents being reported every day, the resilience of the global society is constantly being challenged. Under these circumstances, the future seems uncertain. SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has spread panic among civilians and insecurity at all socio-political and economic levels, dramatically disrupting everyday life, global economy, international travel and trade. The disease has also been linked to the onset of depression in many individuals due to the extreme restriction measures that have been taken for the prevention of the rapid spreading of COVID-19. First, the socio-economic, political and psychological implications of the COVID-19 pandemic were explored. Substantial evidence is provided for the consequences of the pandemic on all aspects of everyday life, while at the same time we unravel the role and the pursuits of national regimes during this unforeseen situation. The second goal of this review is related to the scientific aspect of the pandemic. Hence, we explain why SARS-CoV-2 is not a so-called ‘invisible enemy’, and also attempt to give insight regarding the origin of the virus, in an effort to reject the conspiracy theories that have arisen during the pandemic. Finally, rational strategies were investigated for successful vaccine development. We are optimistic that this review will complement the knowledge of specialized scientists and inform non-specialized readers on basic scientific questions, and also on the social and economic implications of the COVID-19 pandemic.

1. Introduction

What we have experienced during the current pandemic is an unprecedented situation with World War characteristics. For younger generations who have heard about the World War II only through the stories of our parents and grandparents, books, movies and documentaries, the current situation will be recorded in our memories as a modern form of a new World War.

2. Death and the solitude of the dead

For many people, this period of the pandemic will be recorded in their memory as a tragedy, as they have lost either loved ones or their jobs and look forward to the future with great uncertainty. ‘ Everyone dies like dogs, like pigs, I'm not ashamed to admit that. It's not fair that dad died like that. People say they were old, they were sick. But he was my father, he was not old and he was not sick […]. Here in Val Seriana you can only hear the sirens of ambulances and the bells of mourning ’ ( 1 ). This was the testimony of a young lady from the tormented Italian city of Bergamo. Italy is one the seven largest International Monetary Fund (IMF)-advanced economies in the world, which comprise the Group of 7 (G7). Such a ‘major advanced economy’ could not provide its doctors with safe masks, such a ‘great industrial power’ ran out of gloves and consumables, like most other affluent countries in the world, resulting in the infection and death of doctors and nurses, the frontline fighters who had been discredited and insulted before the pandemic and praised and applauded during its progression. Tragedies were the suicides of nurses due to their inability to cope with the insurmountable pressure and the burden of many patient deaths. Furthermore, lamentable news of unclaimed dead people in USA and Italy reminded the inhumanity of the society. The sense of unbearable solitude has been overwhelming as if their death did not matter to anyone. No one cared, at least not enough to pay their last respects to the dead.

3. Many questions arise from the words ‘cost-profit’

There are many questions concerning the frequency of zoonotic virus-related epidemics and pandemics in the last twenty years, the strengths and weaknesses of various health systems around the world and the weakness of the ‘developed’ world to cope with the ‘invisible viral invaders - enemies’ of public health, in the 21st century and during the so-called 4th industrial revolution. However, if one was to take into account all of these questions together, one basic question would emerge; how much is the life or death of a fellow human worth in the 21st century? In the era of the current pandemic, the answer to such a question, and all types of questions related to it, is defined by a ‘cost-benefit’ assessment, entangled with the existing social system. The current prevailing approach of minimising expenditure and maximising profit, limits the potential of the public health sector, with consequences that have become evident during the current pandemic.

The Latin-American revolutionary Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara, physician by training, stated that ‘ the life of a single human being is worth a million time more than all the property of the richest man on earth ’ and he continued: ‘ medicine will have to convert itself into a science that serves to prevent disease and orients the public toward carrying out its medical duties. Medicine should only intervene in cases of extreme urgency, to perform surgery or something else which lies outside the skills of the people ’ ( 2 ).

In the antipodes of these views, lie the statements made by the Bundestag president and former finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble. While Germany was mourning the deaths of more than 5,600 people from the new coronavirus, and was yet to calculate the damage caused by the quarantine to the state's economy, Schäuble warned that the state cannot solve all the problems and argued that he did not consider politics obliged to plan everything out in order to protect human life. Referring to the relaxation of restrictive measures, Schäuble stated that ‘ we cannot trust the decision exclusively to epidemiologists, but we must also weigh the significant economic, social, psychological or other consequences. If we close everything for two years, the consequences will be terrible ’. And he concluded: ‘ When I hear that everything is receding in front of the protection of human life, I must say that this is not absolute. The basic human rights have to be restricted on both sides. If there is one absolute value in our Constitution, it is human dignity. This is inviolable. But that doesn't rule out that one day we will die ’ ( 3 ).

4. The ‘invisible enemy’ from a scientific perspective

The two-month confinement due to the restrictive measures, formed the basis for us to reflect on ourselves our friends and family and society, and appreciate the concepts of solidarity, volunteering and sacrifice. Member of the scientific community were also concerned about news reports describing the new coronavirus as an ‘invisible enemy’.

The phrase ‘invisible enemy’ sounds almost metaphysical to scientists. In a way it takes us back to the dark ages, when mankind lacked scientific knowledge and technological tools. Such expressions deconstruct rational thinking when one tries to identify the causality of a phenomenon, reinforcing conspiracy theories about new biological weapons or secret and uncontrollable forces. They support the idea that the world is falling apart and that we are unable to reverse this process and, most importantly, to envision a new world that has mankind in its focal point. They give us the impression that invisible enemy forces are conspiring against us, while the confinement measures which isolate us from the community, reinforce these existential crises. Terrifying television news reports are enhancing these effects: In Russia, civilians have been monitored by cameras in every building block and the offenders have been tracked down in real time by the nearby police ( 4 ). Dozens of robots have been released in the centre of Tunis, patrolling and checking whether civilians comply with the COVID-19 restrictive measures ( 5 ): pedestrians are no longer inspected by police officers, but by robots, the so-called P-Guards, which behave exactly like officers, stopping pedestrians and asking for personal documents. Robots, of course, function through an intercom system. The officers at the Ministry of Interior are the ones giving the orders that are executed by the robots. In the streets of Israel, armed soldiers have been inspecting whether the measures against the coronavirus are being followed by the residents ( 6 ). To many, the coronavirus pandemic serves as an excuse for a global-scale exercise, aiming to control social consciousness. A variety of weapons from the quiver are used: conspiracy theories regarding the construction of SARS-CoV-2 in a secret laboratory in Wuhan, China, a special phraseology regarding an ‘invisible enemy’, which is unfortunately adopted by some science spokesmen, the constant display of images that reinforce fear and panic by the media, the presentation of the state as consistent with its duties, and most importantly, the notion that the course of the pandemic is being defined by the responsibility of the individuals instead of the establishment of a robust public health system. The results of this exercise will be manifested in the post-epidemic era and in the context of a new global economic recession that is already taking place.

The dynamics and connotations of words and images, can influence or even transform the consciousness of each individual to a certain extent and, consequently, affect social consciousness. Rarely is a word neutral. It carries our energy and our aim with it. Modern science (neurology, biology, anthropology, linguistics, etc.) can confirm this notion, as every single word is a process of thoughts that are the result of hormonal, biochemical and metabolic alterations, and electrical charges or discharges of our neurons ( 7 ). We should not forget that the main goal of the targeter is to look indeterminable, incomprehensible, inaccessible, powerful, invincible, and invisible if possible (here we are not referring to SARS-CoV-2, but to the economic elite that define global social policies). When the root of the problem is traced within the DNA of the targeter, in our attempt to defend ourselves to survive the attack and to confront the enemy, we must come up with a plan for its total elimination. It is important to first record and then analyze the targeter's plan. We must study its purpose, what it seeks from its target, which in this case is us. Marx has already answered these questions as early as mid-19th century, with the phrase ‘ The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it ’ ( 8 ). For such a change it is necessary for the targeter to become the target and for the target to become the targeter, in the context of a scientific plan for social transformation that will move us, excite us and, as a shining star, guide us into the future. And in these imprinted thoughts we must search where they come from and where they may lead us to. Only then will we be able to understand whether they are good or bad. As Hölderlin wrote in ‘Patmos’: ‘ But where there is danger, Salvation also grows’ . It is a nice expression of the Heraclitean struggle of the opposites ( 9 ), which at the socio-political level may be translated as the struggle of the social classes.

5. Is SARS-CoV-2 indeed invisible?

The total number of publications on the new coronavirus (nCoV-2019) since the first reported case in China, is impressive. Notably, until the 16th June 2020, 22,792 articles related to COVID-19 had been published in PubMed-indexed journals ( Fig. 1 ), as well as 5,244 pre-prints in medRxiv and bioRxiv. These numbers give a very important message: The scientific community is alert, and most importantly, that SARS-CοV-2 is not ‘invisible’ and, hopefully, not invincible for too long.

Graphic presentation of the total number of publications per month regarding SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. Presentation is of the monthly number of publications that were recorded in PubMed, from the 1st of December 2019, i.e., the first recorded case, until the 16th of June 2020.

Surely, when it first emerged, the virus was unknown, and so was its relation to the human immune system, and its general pathophysiology. Today, however, following the identification of more than 11 million cases through the use of specific molecular tests and the recovery of millions of patients, we know that the immune system reacts adequately in the vast majority of the cases. The clinical manifestations of the virus and its unique behaviour towards various vulnerable groups have been recorded in detail. There are asymptomatic and slightly symptomatic people who do not get sick, but act as carriers and reservoirs for the disease. A large number of data already exists on the genetic identity of the various strains of the virus. The genomes of many thousand different viral strains have been sequenced. SARS-CoV-2 is the 7th coronavirus to be historically recorded and using bioinformatic tools, it has been classified as a member of the Coronaviridae β family ( 10 ). The coronaviruses responsible for the SARS and MERS epidemics ( 10 – 12 ), that were discovered in 2002 and 2012, respectively, also belong to the group of β-coronaviruses; SARS-CoV-2 genome is composed of 30,000 bases, harbouring approximately 10 genes, with functions that are implicated in viral structure and function ( 10 ). Viral spike proteins interact with their receptors on the surface of epithelial cells ( 10 – 12 ). A study including SARS-CoV-2 genomes from 7,666 patients with COVID-19 from around the world, identified 198 recurrent genetic mutations of the virus, which appear to have occurred independently, more than once ( 13 ). The main conclusions from this study highlight the following: i) A large portion of the global gene diversity of the new coronavirus has been recorded in all countries affected by the pandemic. This finding indicates that there has been an extensive transmission of the virus on a global scale since the very early stages of the epidemic, which also means that in most countries there has not been a single ‘patient zero’, but more likely, the virus has intruded independently several times and via different routes. ii) New phylogenetic findings confirm that the virus emerged towards the end of 2019, before it began its rapid global transmission. iii) All coronavirus genomes from patients around the world appear to have originated from a common ancestor that seemed to emerge between 6th October and 11th December 2019. At that point, the new coronavirus must have been transmitted from an animal to the first human and to have caused an infection in that human. iv) Researchers believe it is highly unlikely that the coronavirus had been circulating among humans for a long time before it was detected in Wuhan, China, last December. v) Although the number of the detected mutations is large, this cannot thus far be correlated to the virulence and the severity of the virus. Several research teams around the world, including Greece, are conducting similar studies ( 14 ). The collection of a large number of genomic data and its correlation with the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 will lead to more accurate conclusions regarding the possibility of increased virulence due to frequent mutations, to the design of safe vaccines and therapeutics, as well as to our preparation for the possibility of an impending second wave of the pandemic. vi) A large number of mutations (15 in total) have been identified in the gene that encodes for the spike protein S (the protein that comes into contact with the target cell, e.g., lung epithelial cells), while other sites are far less frequently mutated and could, according to researchers, be much better targets for the development of effective therapeutics and vaccines ( 15 ).

6. The right strategy for vaccine development

Genomic analyses and the identification of highly conserved sequences will determine the right strategy for the design of vaccines and drugs with long lasting effects, which will not be easily evaded by the virus. For this purpose, Academic professionals of various scientific expertise (Molecular Biologists, Doctors, Epidemiologists, Statisticians, Pharmacists, Immunologists, Structural Biologists, Bioinformaticians, etc.) must work together in harmony in order to achieve the best possible result, i.e., an effective treatment against the new coronavirus. It is important to determine whether the already known viral mutations are beneficial or neutral or whether they contribute to the aggressiveness of the disease. This information can be reliably deduced from collaborative studies that combine clinical and demographic data with the type of mutations, the dynamics of mutations in the structure of the S protein, and the correlation of the altered S protein structure with the receptor protein of the host cell ( 15 ). Of particular interest are the 15 already known mutations in the gene that encode for the viral spike protein S which is essentially regarded as the tip of the viral spear, the first to come in contact with the receptor of the host cell. In this battle for viral replication, i.e., in the battle of ‘opposite pursuits’, some will be victorious and some will be defeated. For the patient, this is phenotypically translated into being asymptomatic, slightly symptomatic and symptomatic (diseased). Evolutionary Biology has taught us that mutations can be either beneficial, neutral, or harmful to the organism. This depends on how the mutation affects the survival and reproduction of each organism, including the new coronavirus. A more aggressive type of the new coronavirus has been found to account for approximately 70% of the 30 analysed strains, while only 30% of the analysed strains were associated with a less aggressive viral subtype. The most aggressive and deadly strain was identified in the early stages of the Wuhan epidemic, the Chinese city that the coronavirus first appeared in, and now scientists are trying to decode all possible mutations and to determine which strains have emerged in each geographic area ( 16 ).

Based on these data, the statement that the virus is ‘unknown’ or, even worse, an ‘invisible enemy’, is at the very best a statement made out of habit or, in the worst case scenario, a statement which could become offensive to the research scientists that are working on it.

Interestingly, more than 1,000,000 scientists are currently estimated to be involved in basic and clinical-epidemiological research on the new coronavirus worldwide. Plenty of information regarding the biology and the pathophysiology of the virus has already become available and this is perhaps the most optimistic message for a rational and effective design of therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19. At least 40 putative drugs are currently under evaluation in 500 clinical trials worldwide. Remdesivir and two immunomodulatory antibodies used in other diseases are already being tested against the coronavirus, and ongoing clinical trials will undoubtedly shed more light on the effectiveness of these drugs. The clinical trials on monoclonal antibodies that target the viral proteins (mainly the S protein) and inactivate the virus are also of significant interest, as they have been proven to be effective in many pre-clinical studies.

Based on the existing experience, it seems that one cannot apply the same anti-COVID-19 treatment to all patients; the type of treatment is highly dependent on the stage of the disease. In the early stages, antiviral factors that inhibit the viral reproduction enzymes, such as remdesivir, favipiravir, EIDD-2801, as well as antibodies against the viral proteins or the viral cellular receptor, ACE2, play a major role in effectively clearing the disease before it can progress to more advanced stages. In the advanced stages of the disease, however, immunomodulatory drugs, such as antibodies against IL-6, CCR5, and C5a receptors, as well as anti-coagulation drugs and drugs used in microvascular inflammatory disease, appear to be more effective ( 17 ).

In addition to the above therapeutic approaches, immunotherapy may also constitute another effective means against COVID-19, with significant research experience already gained in this field. People who have recovered from a coronavirus infection are being encouraged to donate their plasma for the treatment of other patients. Such studies are being conducted all over the world ( 17 ).

The high degree of initiative of a significant number of companies around the globe for the development of an effective vaccine against the new coronavirus is impressive. The very form of this pandemic, with its especially devastating consequences for global economy, the uncertainty of a new disease outbreak, and the small percentage of recorded immunity in the world's population ( 18 ), have put several companies of the most developed countries in a race of relentless competition. In such cases, there can only be one winner to receive the gold medal, although the rest may actually not lose too much, as the majority of these ‘losers’ will have received state funding; in this case the tax payers' money will have been used to ‘cushion’ the imminent recession they themselves will have caused with their laws of economy. The demand for the vaccine will be huge, the profit will exceed every expectation, and will therefore provide a secure investment ‘for the sake of humanity’.

Today, on 28th June 2020, there are as many as 40 programs on vaccine development, out of which 7 vaccines are already being tested in humans all over the world. Among the leading companies are CanSino Biologics (Beijing), which uses an adenoviral vector, and Sinovac (Beijing), which uses an inactivated virus (PiCoVacc). In the United Kingdom, researchers at the University of Oxford are testing the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine which includes an adenoviral vector and the spike protein S. In the United States, Inovio Pharmaceuticals is testing a DNA type vaccine. The American company Moderna has also developed an RNA vaccine in collaboration with NIH. There is also BNT162, a four-vaccine program developed by the German biotechnological company BioNTech and Pfizer pharmaceutics; the four vaccines represent different viral mRNA antigens that are used as targets ( 17 ). In addition, in early April, Veronika Skvortsova, the head of Russia's Federal Biomedical Agency (FMBA), announced that Russia had created seven novel anti-coronavirus vaccines ready to enter clinical trials ( 19 ). Experience with influenza virus has shown that vaccines are usually effective for 40–60% of the people who get vaccinated, but this rate is sufficient to control the infection fully within the community. In addition, anti-flu vaccines are modified yearly, in an effort to effectively protect against new strains.

7. The ‘competitive nature’ of man and reality

Those who dream of another, humanistic world, know very well that if all scattered scientific forces that are currently dealing with the vaccine against the coronavirus were united for a common purpose, i.e., to serve the supreme good of human health, in a continuous exchange and sharing of scientific knowledge, the goal of the vaccine would be realised much sooner, spending much less effort and funds. Others believe that competition acts as a catalyst for the realisation of the ultimate goal, which in this case is the production of the vaccine. Many also believe that competition is a basic characteristic of human nature. But there is another apprehension. Competition is not a characteristic of human nature as projected by certain socio-biologists who like to compare, and even equate, human societies with animal communities. Competition is not something that man carries since birth as a biological evolutionary trait. It appears only when the necessary social structures and relationships are formed, when a person or a group of people may possess materials of nature and means of production and the rest of the people act as their employees. Therefore, competition should be looked for within the social structures and in the relationships between people and the means of production. In other words, competition among people is a relationship that, if it were to be ablated, the ‘original’ non-competitive intellectual man, the Nietzschean superhuman, would emerge in a course of civilisation that would allow the realisation of one Utopia after another.

The hominization process of Homo sapiens was a huge leap forward in evolution. The conquest of nature by man began with the development of manual workmanship. The development of labour helped to strengthen the bonds of mutual assistance and joint activity. Mutual working activity has contributed to the need to communicate with articulated speech and language, which has been recorded in human history as culture. Therefore, because of work, humans were able to conquer the forces of nature, obliging them to serve their purpose. On the contrary, the animals adapt to the forces of nature and are not able to consciously influence them, to tame them. This is the most essential feature that distinguishes humans from animals.

To be in the position that he is today, Man has fought against the immense forces of nature, he has managed to subdue them and emerge victorious, because he had to respond to something deeper. He responded to the necessity to improve his life, to create culture. It is not by coincidence that many inventors who defined the course of humanity through their discoveries, apart from possessing scientific knowledge, they were inspired people, devoted to the common good. After all, the great meaning of life is for all humanity to enjoy the discoveries and inventions of the inspired creators. This is now known to require another social organisation plan that people will understand, believe in and fight for its realisation.

9. The extreme rivalries among the powerful of the world may have an economic basis

In the context of the ‘invisible enemy’, extreme rivalries have emerged among the powerful of the world. Some politicians, led by the US president, have insisted that the virus is a fabrication of China's secret laboratories ( 20 , 21 ). Such statements can be taken as seriously as those made by the President of the United States… solarium and disinfectant injections to treat the coronavirus infection. Respectively, China insists on denying allegations by the US government that it has been negligent in dealing with the epidemic and in not notifying the global community early enough ( 22 ). More specifically, through the newspaper ‘People's Daily’, China poses a series of questions to the US government, substantiated as follows: they accuse the US government that after ‘inadequately dealing with the outbreak’, they are now ‘shifting the responsibilities’ to China. In particular, they provoke the US government to provide answers regarding the sudden closure of the US Army's biological weapons laboratory in Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA, following a pneumonia outbreak and a simultaneous H1N1 virus epidemic last July. The Chinese also point out that two months after the exercise event 201 for a global pandemic, held by various US organizations in October 2019, the first case of COVID-19 was identified in Wuhan, wondering as to a possible relevance between these events ( 22 ). They report that Robert Redfield, head of the CDC (US Infectious Diseases Center), also acknowledged that some of the COVID-19 victims had been diagnosed with the seasonal flu, which has killed more than 20,000 people since last September ( 23 ). The majority know from personal experience that ‘when the buffaloes fight, the frogs pay for it’, the frogs being the humble people around the world. It is certain that in the near future the economic rivalries among the most powerful will intensify, as can be understood from the information presented in Table I .

Estimated global ranking by GDP in PPP terms (2 billion US dollars at fixed 2016 prices) ( 24 ).

GDP, gross domestic product; PPP, purchasing power parity.

John Hawksworth, chief economist at PwC and one of the authors of the relevant report, states the following: ‘ We will continue to see a shift in the global economic power from the advanced economies to the emerging economies in Asia and elsewhere. By 2050, the E7 countries (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia and Turkey) will produce approximately 50% of the world GDP, while the share of the G7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK and USA) will marginally exceed 20% ’ ( Table I ) ( 24 ).

10. There is irrefutable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not only contagious but also highly related to social class

While the pandemic was still in its infancy in the United States, with a reported 400,000 cases and 13,000 deaths from the new coronavirus, statistical analyses revealed the following: In Chicago, African Americans make up 30% of the population, but they seem to account for 70% of the total number of people who have died from COVID-19 in this large city. In Illinois, the African-American population is 14%, yet the death toll in this sub-group is 41%. Similarly, in Milwaukee, African-Americans make up 26% of the population but the victims exceed 80%. Surely this picture is not unrelated to the social inequalities that reflect the material basis of racism in a country where the financially less-privileged cannot have access to either (private) insurance or healthy living conditions. According to the UN's International Labor Organization, 1.25 billion workers out of the world's 3.3 billion are at high risk of suffering ‘drastic and catastrophic’ consequences, such as layoffs and pay cuts, as a result of the economic measures taken during the pandemic ( 25 ).

According to a report published in Lancet which includes tens of thousands COVID-19 cases from China, depicting mortality rates per region of the country, it appears that in areas where the population had substantial access to satisfactory health care services, the mortality rate (deaths in % of patients) was 0–0.3%, while in areas where for various reasons there was no such possibility, the mortality rate was more than tenfold higher (3–5%) ( 26 ). In an ideal situation, however, if 10% of the 7 trillion (!) monetary funds held by the 500 Croesuses who make up 0.0000066% of the world's population were committed to helping those who are less-privileged financially, we would all feel that the pandemic was just an annoying nightmare that would go away the moment we opened our eyes. The virus is therefore contagious and social class-related as the effects of the various economic measures undertaken globally have been unequally distributed on existing social class territory ( 27 ).

A recent report from the National Records of Scotland (NRS) includes statistics on the number of coronavirus-related deaths (COVID-19) and the total number of deaths recorded in Scotland in the weeks 1 to 19 of 2020. Regarding COVID-19 deaths recorded in March and April 2020, it was observed that people in the most deprived areas were 2.3 times more likely to die of COVID than those living in the least deprived areas. If an area is recognized as deprived, this may be related to low-income, but it may also mean fewer resources or opportunities, such as employment, education, health, access to services, crime and housing. In week 19 (4 to 10 May), the Health Board area with the highest number of deaths involving COVID-19 was Greater Glasgow and Clyde with 126 deaths (also the highest number of COVID-19 deaths to date: 1,038). The Health Board area with the highest rate of COVID-19 deaths to date has also been Greater Glasgow and Clyde with 8.8 deaths per population of 10,000 ( Fig. 2 ) ( 28 ).

Deaths involving COVID-19 in Scotland. Registered between weeks 1 and 19 (beginning of year to 10th of May 2020), by the Health Board of residence, Scotland ( 28 ).

11. The conspiracy theories as an antidote to the scientific truth

The struggle for the ‘paternity’ of the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus between US and Chinese officials is indicative of the contradictions that exist between these two very powerful economic forces in the world ( 23 ).

Regardless of such statements made by political officials with powerful economic status, scientists must first and foremost use strict scientific criteria and, based on published scientific data, form an opinion as to the possibility, or not, of a laboratory construction of the virus with biological warfare purposes. Having acquired enough information on the new coronavirus, we dispel such myths and conspiracy theories.

Scenarios for a laboratory construction of the virus are based on the work entitled ‘A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence’ ( 26 ). In this report, the authors point out that the 2002–2003 emergence of SARS-CoV introduced the possibility of epidemics in human populations by viruses of animal origin and opened up a new topic for discussion in the scientific community. They also refer to influenza viruses (H5N1, H1N1, H7N9) and the MERS-CoV coronavirus, and point out that previous studies have demonstrated the existence of closely related SARS-like viral genes in Chinese bat populations. However, the authors conclude that the presence of SARS-like genes in bats alone does not mean that these are indeed SARS viruses, nor does it mean that they can infect humans. Based on these concerns, they introduced the question of whether these potentially SARS horseshoe bat viruses (mainly found in China) are capable of infecting humans and thereby of causing a new SARS epidemic ( 26 ).

The first approach, which included electronic simulation experiments, showed that no spike of the bat virus is predicted to attach to the human cell receptor. They then performed pseudotyping experiments; that is, they stripped a murine SARS virus of its genetic material, and re-coated it with the nucleocapsid of a horseshoe bat virus. In all cases, the pseudotyped viruses failed to infect both mouse and human cells. The latest experimental approach involved the use of chimeric viruses consisting of a SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone and a novel spike protein isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats, that is both the genetic material of a murine SARS virus with a bat spike protein encoding gene and a complete murine SARS virus capsid-enclosure (minus the bat spike protein). The recombinant viruses successfully managed to infect both mouse and human cells in vitro . In this case, the in vitro approaches served as an indication of what can happen in vivo . Following this, the researchers infected mice with the recombinant viruses and managed to cause SARS disease in these animals, with profound related symptoms. Young infected mice showed 10% weight loss with no reported deaths, whereas older mice presented with greater weight loss and low mortality rates. This way the research team managed to create an in vivo model to use as a platform for testing various therapeutic protocols. Antibodies to SARS-CoV (2002–2003 virus) had little or no effect on alleviating the disease in mice infected with the recombinant virus. In addition, the vaccine, developed against SARS-CoV (DIV), did not seem to offer any protection, but it produced significant side effects in these animals ( 26 ).

In their Nature Medicine report, the researchers also describe the experiments performed on the horseshoe bat virus. This virus infects both mouse and human cells but with a profound delay in viral replication. Infection of mice with the horseshoe bat virus did not seem to induce weight loss and viral replication was slow as compared to SARS-CoV. If we were to take into account all of the above experiments, i.e., the experiments with recombinant viruses and the experiments with the horseshoe bat virus, we could reach the following conclusion: in order for the horseshoe bat virus to become more infectious and to be able to infect humans, it would need to undergo additional adaptations or adjustments. Viruses can acquire these adaptations selectively, as for example when a bat virus crosses the species barrier and is passed on to an intermediate host. In the new host, the spike protein acquires the necessary adaptive mutations to facilitate improved infection and eventually the ability to infect humans. Another possibility is that humans are directly infected by the horseshoe bat virus and human contact with other animals that also carry the virus eventually leads to continuous human re-infections until, due to random mutational events, the deadly variant emerges ( 26 ).

Most likely, however, horseshoe bat viruses have the potential to infect humans. And since coronaviruses are well-known for their ability to easily recombine in nature, this recombination is suggested to take place in an intermediate host and to pass on to humans thereafter. In all cases, the best and perhaps most ideal place for this to happen is in the markets of the Far East, as indicated by the metagenomics data analysis of this review. In these places thousands of people gather in front of stalls selling all kinds of wild and domestic animals every day, from bats to pangolins, palm civets, hens, pigs, and whatever else comes to mind. These so-called wet markets, due to the animals being slaughtered on the spot, are characterized by high species interaction, which is regarded as the necessary prerequisite for continuous viral exchange (zoonoses) among these animals.

Notably, the 2015 report in Nature Medicine constituted a warning to the global scientific community, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the political powers of the world, before the emergence of the pandemic. Let it be clear to the scientific community as well as to the general public that the recombinant virus, built to fulfil the needs of the particular study, has nothing to do with COVID-19. The virus is therefore not ‘man-made’.

The genomic and bioinformatic analyses of the aforementioned studies, as well as the results of previous studies, confirm that the virus originated in bats and this way put an end to all conspiracy theories regarding this issue. In addition, despite the high sequence identity of SARS-CoV-2 to SARS-CoV and a bat coronavirus named RaTG13, it remains to be confirmed whether SARS-CoV-2 has other hosts in addition to bats ( 29 ). Of particular interest is that a Malayan pangolin-isolated coronavirus was shown to exhibit 100, 98.6, 97.8 and 90.7% amino acid identity with SARS-CoV-2 in the E, M, N and S genes, respectively, with the receptor-binding domain within the S protein of the Pangolin-CoV, in particular, being almost virtually identical to that of SARS-CoV-2 (one noncritical amino acid difference) ( 29 ). In addition, apart from the high percentage of Pangolin-CoV-infected animals (17 of 25 Malayan pangolins), circulating antibodies against Pangolin-CoV in these animals also appeared to react with the S protein of SARS-CoV-2. These results highly suggest that: i) recombination of a Pangolin-CoV-like virus with a Bat-CoV-RaTG13-like virus might have occurred as an initiating event for the formation of SARS-CoV-2; and ii) Malayan pangolins have the potential to act as the intermediate host of SARS-CoV-2, thereby representing a future threat to public health if wildlife trade is not appropriately controlled ( 29 ).

In addition, Stylianos Antonarakis, the Greek professor of genetics at the University of Geneva and former president of the International Organization of the Human Genome (HUGO), has used bioinformatics tools to prove that the virus is not laboratory-made. His study was translated into a letter to Professor and Nobel-prize Laureate winner Luc Montagnier, who has repeatedly stated that the virus was man-made ( 30 ).

In his letter to Luc Montagnier, Professor Antonarakis stressed the following ( 31 ):

‘ You know very well that science is based on facts, not opinions, and therefore please forgive me for being sceptical about the accuracy of your statement. Using publicly available bioinformatics tools and virus genomes in international databases, I compared the coronavirus genome with the genome of HIV. I would like to remind the reader that the coronavirus has a genome that consists of an RNA chain and the total length of its genetic material is 29,903 ribonucleotides, which I will refer to as ‘letters’ from now on ’.

‘ To be precise, I compared the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 virus isolated from the city of Wuhan in China and submitted it to the public database Genbank on January 5th, 2020, with the accession number {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"MN908947.3","term_id":"1798172431","term_text":"MN908947.3"}} MN908947.3 . Please bear in mind that this is the first sequence of the new coronavirus submitted to the public database by the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and the School of Public Health, Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and published in the Nature journal. Comparison with the genome of the virus causing AIDS (taxid 11676) revealed a partial homology of 38 letters between the SARS-CoV-2 virus and HIV, as shown in the relevant graph ( Fig. 3 ) ’.

Partial homology between SARS-CoV-2 virus and HIV. On the top line are the letters of the coronavirus genome (from the letters 14,366 to 14,403) and below are the homologous part of the virus causing AIDS. The vertical lines show the identical letters between the two genomes.

‘ A-ha, you will say here with emphasis, Professor Montagnier, that your conclusion is correct. However, if you analyze the data a little more extensively and carefully, I strongly argue that your conclusion is completely wrong, for the following reasons: First: This homology of genomic letters has been found in all the members of the human coronavirus family that have been studied since 2004. Therefore, this precludes a recently performed laboratory manipulation on the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. In addition, the same homology has also been found in many bat-coronaviruses that have also been identified several years ago ( 31 ). Second: this homology of genomic letters is also present in thousands of other viruses (distant cousins of coronaviruses) such as the infectious virus of bronchitis, chicken and turkey viruses of infectious bronchitis, and even rabies viruses. It is therefore obvious that this homology of the very small portion of the virus genome is a remnant of the evolutionary process of viral genomes in nature and not the result of laboratory manipulation ’.

‘ My intention, Professor Montagnier, is not to diminish the importance of your previous contribution to science and humanity, but to make it clear in a public forum that a careful examination of the data definitively rules out the possibility that this new virus may be a laboratory product ’.

Notably, new evidence suggests that a significant proportion of the population, mostly people who tend to be more dependent on social media for information, are more likely to believe in conspiracy theories and less likely to follow official health advice and restriction measures ( 32 ). While the majority of extreme conspiracies have been banned from a significant number of electronic platforms, a wealth of conspiratorial material still exists on the big social media sites and continues to misinform and mislead the general public. In this context, unregulated social media misinformation may pose as a significant health risk to the general public by creating a negative association between health-protective behaviours and the spreading of COVID-19 ( 33 ).

In addition to the conspiracy theories on the nature and origins of the pandemic, two major study retractions have recently left scientists skeptical not only as to the quality of scientific research, but also regarding the efficacy of the peer review process and the credibility of respected medical journals ( 34 ). The first article, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, promised that commonly prescribed blood-pressure medication was safe to use by people infected by the new coronavirus, whereas the second article, published in the Lancet, issued a warning that the anti-malarial drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine endangered the lives of coronavirus patients. Notably, the second retracted paper claimed to rely on detailed medical records from 96,000 COVID-19 patients at nearly 700 hospitals on six continents ( 35 ), yet the scientific community had not heard of this enormous international registry. Despite claims that these admissions, which in the space of one month turned into hasty retractions, were due to an eagerness to publish helpful information during the pandemic, the editor in chief of The Lancet, Dr Richard Horton, called the paper retracted by his journal a ‘ fabrication ’ and a ‘ monumental fraud ’ ( 34 ).

It appears that research during the pandemic is taking place at an unprecedented pace, with both journal editors and research scientists who donate time in the peer reviewing process being overwhelmed with new information, trying to understand the pathophysiology of the coronavirus, or to elucidate effective treatments and vaccines. And it is during this time, when the academic system has stretched its capacity thin, that political motivation seizes the opportunity to step in. Indeed, the politicization of the pandemic is suspected to have played a role in the article published in The Lancet, if only to rebuke the US President, Mr Donald Trump, who vigorously endorsed hydroxychloroquine as both preventive and curative treatment for COVID-19 ( 34 ). This study resulted in the WHO and other health organizations halting clinical trials before substantial reviews could be conducted on the safety of these anti-malarial drugs, with immediate repercussions for many thousand patients worldwide.

12. Thoughts regarding international research on the viral origins

Ahead of the General Assembly of the WHO on May 20–28, 2020, it seems that several proposals are being reviewed as part of an international research conduct on the origins of SARS-COV-2. On the 30th of April 2020, the Swedish Health Minister Lena Hallengren said that Sweden is planning to ask the European Union to push for the probe, stating ‘ When the global situation of COVID-19 is under control, it is both reasonable and important that an international, independent investigation be conducted to gain knowledge about the origin and spread of the coronavirus ’ ( 36 ). Accordingly, the UN envoy to China Chen Xu expressed backing for the WHO but said an invitation for the agency's experts to visit Wuhan to look into the origins of the coronavirus must wait until after the pandemic is beaten ( 37 ). Specifically, he said: ‘ First things first: The top priority for the time being is to focus on the fight against the pandemic. We need the right focus and allocation of our resources ’. All of the above can be seen as positive messages in a coordinated global effort to tackle COVID-19. In the end, it seems that of the few things that can unite the world, even if only temporarily, are the issues relating to the consequences of the current pandemic or the pandemics that will follow with ‘mathematical precision’

13. The lack of prevention strategies against the SARS- COV-2 pandemic

The reactions of the economically powerful countries of Europe and the United States to the upcoming pandemic have seemed rather surprising, and rather disappointing, to many of us Biomedical Scientists. After the first case in Wuhan, China, Chinese scientists isolated the virus and, with the help of high-tech RNA sequencing technology, classified it as a beta-coronavirus. Therefore, both the Global Scientific Community and the political powers of this world had in their hands two important elements: i) the sequence identity of the coronavirus; and ii) previous experience in dealing with epidemics caused by similar coronaviruses of the beta-coronavirus group (SARS-COV-1 and MERS-CoV). In addition, we have all been witnesses to the strict and vertical isolation measures taken in China, in the city of Wuhan with its population of 11 million people, since January 23, 2020 ( 38 ). There was detailed daily media coverage of how an entire city was quarantined and how the Chinese government managed to build an entire hospital within 2 weeks as well as a mask manufacturing facility. Apparently, the country that was first hit by the pandemic was faced with the most difficulties. However, the Chinese government seems to have reacted with incredible speed, possibly owing to its past communist experience and centralized powers. In the Western world we have watched with admiration how well the Chinese have reacted to prevent the spreading of SARS-CoV-2, which is reflected on the relatively small number of victims. It is also worth mentioning that China's National Health Committee had acknowledged from the start that the virus can be transmitted from one person to another, as well as that the new coronavirus is similar to the virus causing SARS, but that it does not seem to be as deadly, also stressing what is already known for viruses, that they sometimes mutate and become more dangerous to human health.

The WHO, via Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, declared the coronavirus pandemic on March 11, 2020, when the number of infected cases already exceeded 118,000 in 114 countries and 4,291 people had already lost their lives worldwide ( 39 ). It was also noted that the pandemic was expected to cause additional problems in a larger number of countries. From that moment on, the whole planet was and still remains alert and anxious as to the emergence of a second wave of the pandemic.

14. Critical remarks

The WHO's decision to name the disease caused by the new coronavirus COVID-19 may have been unfortunate: this description (coronavirus disease 19) is indicative of previous coronaviruses and it therefore does not represent the dangerousness of SARS-CoV-2. They may have had the noblest of intentions not to cause panic, for example, but it seems now that we are in the 6th month of the pandemic since its outbreak in China that it did not help in the preparation of the states against it.

The delay by WHO in announcing the pandemic somehow acted reassuringly for all the countries of the world. With the announcement of the pandemic, panic spread across Europe and America ( 40 ). The feeling at that point was that the virus had entered many homes and would enter many more without as much as a warning or a ‘knock on the door’.

The worst scenario in such a situation (pandemic) is to be unprepared and disorganized, and the whole developed world was blatantly unprepared for such a serious problem. This is mainly due to the tremendous downgrading of the public health system worldwide. In our country this translates to i) a shortage of 30,000 doctors and auxiliary nursing staff; ii) Greece being the third country in the EU with the worst ratio of ICUs in relation to its population ( 41 ). According to EU data, Greece has only 6 ICU beds per 100,000 residents! iii) the downgrading and closure of Primary Health Care units and hospitals during the memorandum period; iv) the lack of protective material for nursing staff (e.g., appropriate masks) and respiratory equipment for patients; and v) the lack of staff and technological equipment for molecular tests.

Asian countries have reacted more efficiently in the face of the pandemic than the rest of the world. Hong Kong, for example, has slowed down the spreading of SARS-CoV-2 through a combination of intensive monitoring, quarantine and social distancing, and not by relying solely on the strict measures employed elsewhere. In January, authorities in Wuhan, where the coronavirus epidemic began, prohibited traveling outside the city in an effort to control the spreading of COVID-19. However, Hong Kong was based on a program that included extensive testing, isolation of those who had come in contact with infected people, and distancing measures such as closing schools. When Peng Wu at Hong Kong University and her colleagues conducted a residential survey in early March, 99% said that they wore a mask in public and 85% said that they avoided crowds. Public compliance with government measures kept viral spreading relatively low in Hong Kong until the end of March 2020.

Despite the fact that the WHO insisted on extensive molecular testing for the detection of the virus, much to the surprise of us Molecular Biologists, the whole of Europe and America seemed unable to respond. Indeed, it has been extremely difficult to perform these tests on a larger scale. Nonetheless, people working in the sectors of Biological Research and Biomedical Sciences know that it may not have been as hard to perform large scale molecular testing on the virus, if the following had been put to good use: i) In January and February 2020, the existing accredited laboratories could have been employed and organized in such a way as to be fully competent in performing the tests, with the addition of more such facilities in all the major reporting hospitals and wherever else it was deemed necessary; ii) the personnel capable of performing these tests should be selected; in this respect, PhD students, postdoctoral fellows and researchers in permanent employment positions could be selected even on a voluntary basis; iii) from the moment that the coronavirus RNA sequence was submitted to a public database there was enough time to organize these in-house tests. Postgraduate and PhD students in research laboratories throughout the country could have prepared these tests reliably. iv) PCR machines do not come at a high cost, which means that additional purchases could have been made. In Greece, for example, the 30 million euros that were given to private diagnostic companies to perform these tests, and who were unable to do so, and the samples were eventually sent to the Pasteur Institute and the Medical School of Athens, could have been used to purchase 1,000 state-of-the-art PCR machines, translating to a minimum dynamic testing of 1,000 samples by each machine daily. v) Primary health services and reference hospitals could aid in the development of a network of human resources that would ensure the efficient collection of samples and their rapid transport and testing in accredited laboratories.

Seventeen years have passed since the SARS epidemic and we still do not know what makes these coronaviruses so dangerous. It is unfortunate that there have been no funding policies for the coronaviruses, both at the European level and globally. We would be much better prepared to deal with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic if, with dedication and consistency, and provided that the appropriate funds were available, there was sufficient research on this type of virus after the SARS epidemic in 2003. Significant experience has been obtained on a global scale by the research community from research conducted against the virus that causes AIDS. Characteristically, in the context of the sustainable development set by the WHO, the European Union has set a goal to eliminate AIDS and tuberculosis by the year 2030 and to continue research on hepatitis ( 42 ). Let's not forget that AIDS has left 35 million dead in its path since its appearance in 1981. Due to lack of investment in research and vaccine production for SARS, we should not overlook a defining aspect set out by the strict laws of capitalist economy. Pharmaceutical companies are often a major part of this system and often show no interest in investing in vaccines. Many of the vaccines in circulation cost between $600 million and $1 billion. The major profits in pharmaceutical companies come from drugs that cure long-term illness. For example, the sales of a single drug for hepatitis C have exceeded $10 billion in one year ( 43 ). One must also bear in mind that the vaccine market ($24 billion today) appears to be extensive, but it represents only 2.4% of the global pharmaceutical industry, which is worth $1 trillion per year ( 44 ). Vaccines, in particular, are therefore not major sources of profit for the pharmaceutical companies that specialize in them. Based on this logic one should also not overlook the lack of large investments in the production of a SARS vaccine. With the confinement of the SARS epidemic in 2003 and 2004 in some Asian countries, companies estimated that a vaccine investment would not translate to a corresponding profit margin due to the small customer market. The consequences of such a decision to public health have become more realistic during the current SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. If there had been research on SARS in the last 17 years since its original outbreak, we would certainly be better prepared and equipped against SARS-CoV-2.

The genetic material of both SARS and SARS-CoV-2 encodes approximately 20 proteins. Apart from the protein that looks like a crown under the microscope and which is responsible for binding to the host cell, three other proteins that structure the viral shell (nucleocapsid) and cover its genetic material, as well as a multi-protein that is responsible for the transcription and reproduction the virus, we have very little information on what the rest of the viral proteins do. Therefore, research on SARS for the appropriate characterization of these proteins should help to obtain a better understanding of SARS-CoV-2 and to determine the appropriate treatment strategy.

Therefore, the inaction of the global community and the lack of funding to conduct biomedical research on the first SARS virus have provided the ideal environment for the new coronavirus to reach pandemic status. The field of Molecular Virology has produced prominent scientific personalities who have been and still are dedicated to the study of RNA viruses. Columbia University professor David Ho, who has saved countless lives with the antiviral therapy for AIDS, applied for $20 million funding in order to test antivirals against SARS in his laboratory, but his request has never been met ( 45 ). It seems that various government officials and pharmaceutical companies, as we have explained above, regarded the previous epidemics as cases only pertaining to the East. Thus, in an attempt to justify the unjustified, the majority of institutional officials, with the help of several scientists, often refer to the new coronavirus as an invisible enemy and to the battle against it as an unequal war. These words sound like a cover-up of our inability to effectively deal with the pandemic and of the fact that we are ill-equipped in terms of vaccines, drugs and scientific equipment to deal with a virus that, despite being called new, is highly related to the previous SARS disease. We probably have no excuse as there have been many warnings from the scientific community in the first two decades of the 21st century about the increased incidence of epidemics and the need to fund coronavirus research. Unfortunately, the institutions chose inaction and now it appears that we must make up for the lost ground in a very short time, and suffer all the consequences that this pandemic will leave behind. Despite the delays, however, the devaluation of research on SARS since 2003 shows that the Biomedical Science Community, as we speak and as the pandemic is still ongoing, are doing their best to turn the tables in favor of humanity in the battle against COVID-19.

15. Conclusions and thoughts for a better relationship between man and the environment

Many noTable Scientists such as Professor Michael Greger, former director of Public Health and Animal Husbandry at the Humane Society of the United States, and Professor Rob Wallace, evolutionary biologist and Public Health Phylogeographer, collaborator of the Institute of International Studies at the University of Minnesota, author of Big Farms Make Big Flu and former adviser to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, have touched the basis of the root cause of the latest epidemics and the current pandemic of SARS-CoV-2. The message from this pandemic is that unequal access to natural resources must be brought to an end, so as to prevent the next pandemic that is expected to occur with mathematical accuracy ( 46 , 47 ).

The protection of public health requires a review of the relationship between man and all biological ecosystems, especially animals, and the environment in general. Available genomic data now make it clear that behind the global COVID-19 pandemic lies a virus that has most likely entered the human population via human interaction with bats or another intermediate host ( 48 ).

It seems that dealing with such pandemics requires a holistic approach that focuses on causality, i.e., the generator cause, and not solely relying on the restriction/distancing measures that should be undertaken anyway in order to prevent loss of human life. In order to achieve this, we need to redefine our relationship with the environment and the inequalities that lead to its destruction. It is estimated that 75% of all new infectious diseases are the result of contact between humans and animals ( 49 ). We have all heard of at least some of them in the last twenty years, such as Zika, Ebola, SARS, bird flu, MERS and, more recently of course, COVID-19.

The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) emphasizes on the main factors that are implicated in the transmission of viruses to humans: i) deforestation; ii) intensive cultivation; and iii) climate change ( 49 ). A number of studies have ascertained that the universal approach to food production, including basic agricultural and livestock products such as beef, palm oil, coffee and cocoa, makes it easier to deplete resources in poorer countries than in countries with affluent economies. The production of such goods leads to i) deforestation and ii) loss of biodiversity. These are the main factors for the transmission of diseases among species. In the majority of nations producing coffee and cocoa (sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America), 95% of production is exported to the North, mainly to North America and Europe.

In terms of climate change, the economically developed world bears the highest responsibility for the global emissions causing the greenhouse effect and for the production of other harmful pollutants. Under developed countries, being far less responsible for the greenhouse effect, suffer to a much greater extent the consequences of climate change-related diseases that are transmitted by mosquitoes. Even very small increases in temperature seem to currently make it easier for mosquitoes to spread to new areas where people are not immune to the diseases they carry ( 50 ).

In the oppressed ecosystems of less developed countries, large predators are becoming extinct. This creates biosystem imbalances that favor the reproduction of certain species, such as bats, rats and mosquitoes, i.e., those species that usually transmit zoonoses to humans. The lack of food for these animal species in ecosystems where they lived in harmony before the violent human interventions strengthens the competition for food among them, in an attempt to meet their nutritional needs. The increased competition for food for these animals leads to their migration to more densely populated areas and to closer contact with humans ( 51 ).

COVID-19 should ring like a very loud bell to the ears of the global financial elite and of every single consumer. If global environmental, health and development issues are not addressed holistically, new pandemics will continue to emerge. Priority should be given to reducing consumption levels, eliminating trade and economic inequalities, and creating sustainable production systems for both the people and the environment, and all of this in a different socio-political system.

The current crisis brought on by the coronavirus pandemic has provided us with a unique opportunity to very seriously reconsider our relationship with the environment. This practically means that large agri-food companies and global policies should be immediately concerned about the current industrial environment producing our food products. The current food production process is often modified by the introduction of new technologies that essentially lead to significant violations of the balance in natural ecosystems. This approach undoubtedly increases the rate of production and the size of the total product, but at the same time it greatly promotes and strengthens the necessary conditions for viral replication, so that new mutations are produced at a higher rate and with greater infectious power. Many warnings can be deduced from the pandemics that have occurred so far, yet the course of our future lies in the hands of humanity.

Despite the numerous warnings that can be derived from pandemics, as Professor Rob Wallace points out ‘ agribusiness is so focused on profits that selecting for a virus that might kill a billion people is treated as a worthy risk ’ ( 52 ). If we were to use molecular biology terminology to describe this phenomenon, it would translate as follows: the world's financial elite owning the agri-food companies are self-designated by the dominant gene of profit that determines their phenotype and their aggressive behavior both to the environment and to other people. This gene is so powerful, ‘dominant’ in the language of Biology, that no effort to convince them otherwise has had any result so far. Therefore, as is the case with the numerous work-related problems being faced on a global scale, in the emergence of every pandemic we will be faced with the same clear-cut question: is there an alternative? Of course there is, this can be easily deduced by reading Brecht's poem (53,Brecht B: In Praise of dialectics).

In Praise of Dialectics

Today injustice goes with a certain stride,

The oppressors move in for ten thousand years.

Force sounds certain: it will stay the way it is.

No voice resounds except the voice of the rulers.

And on the markets, exploitation says it out loud:

I am only just beginning.

But of the oppressed, many now say:

What we want will never happen.

Whoever is alive must never say ‘never’!

Certainty is never certain.

It will not stay the way it is.

When the rulers have already spoken

Then the ruled will start to speak.

Who dares say ‘never’?

Who's to blame if repression remains? We are.

Who can break its thrall? We can.

Whoever has been beaten down must rise to his feet!

Whoever is lost must fight back!

Whoever has recognized his condition -

how can anyone stop him?

Because the vanquished of today will be tomorrow's victors

And ‘never’ will become: ‘already today’!

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Maria Adamaki for performing the language editing of the manuscript. We thank Dr Ioannis Michalopoulos for extensively reviewing the manuscript and for selecting the appropriate bibliographic references. We also thank Professor Philip Clegg for his critical thinking and for making sure that the manuscript does not lose its meaning in translation.

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Authors' contributions.

All of the authors were involved in writing, formatting and reviewing the manuscript. VZ was involved in the conception and design of the manuscript. MG designed the graphs. ER and SB performed the literature search. DAS critically analyzed the existing knowledge and contributed to editing the manuscript. All authors approved of the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patient consent for publication, competing interests.

DAS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

THE EFFECTS OF COVID-19 ON EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN

• Babar Ali Department of Physical Therapy, Abasyn University Peshawar
• Haider Ali Department of Neurosurgery, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar
• Sayed Zulfiqar Ali Shah Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong university of Science and Technology China

On December 31st, 2019, some cases of unknown pneumonia were reported by Chinese health authorities to world health organization (WHO) regional office China which were later on diagnosed as cases of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The novel coronavirus was isolated from samples taken from lower respiratory tracts of affectees, gene sequencing and comparison to the existing coronaviruses revealed that the novel coronavirus named “(2019-nCoV)” is a beta coronavirus. Coronaviruses have caused epidemics in 2012 in the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and in China in 2002-2003 (SARS-Cov). WHO in January 2020 declared Covid-19 as viral global emergency after spread of virus to many countries. This outbreak of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was officially announced as global pandemic on March 11, 2020, by WHO. So far it is assumed that COVID-19 strain emerged from wild animals in Wuhan, a city in Hubei province of China. Animals namely Pangolins, snakes and Bats have been referred as potential carriers found on the sequence homology of CoV isolated from these animals. Studies suggest that youngsters under the age of 18 years show that about 8.5% of reported cases, with relatively small number deaths as compared to other age groups and generally mild disease. However, patients with severe illness have been reported. Adults having pre-existing comorbidity have been proposed as a risk factor for developing severe disease and intensive care hospitalization.

 The recent COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 persist a significant issue for worldwide health, education, society, economics, transportation and society. Due to lack of unclear and effective treatment of COVID-19 in early stages of pandemic, emphasis has been given on early recognition and diagnosis, treatment and isolation of infected people and quarantining their close contacts. Government agencies of all Countries enforced quarantine, social distancing and hand washing to control the spread of infection. Educational institutes comprising universities, colleges and schools were closed in majority of countries including Pakistan. Pakistan is a developing country and the economic condition is not good as compared to developed countries like America, China, United Kingdom and Russia to tackle with COVID- 19 Pandemic. During pandemic majority of institutes in developed countries have moved to online education to facilitate academics and save waste of time.  Developed countries have well established technology, nonstop internet facility and online learning programs but imposition of online of online learning in developing nation including Pakistan faces many barriers. Government of Pakistan announced 1 st lockdown on March 2020, and closed all educational institutes nationwide. During this period ministry of education started teleschool ambition in partnership with leading EdTech supplier such as Knowledge Platform, Teleemabad Sabaq.pk to transmit free learning materials to class 1-12 students. Medical Colleges, degree awarding institutions and universities offering bachelor, master and doctorate programs shifted their learning process on online web based application learning management system (LMS) which offers an teacher with a way to create and deliver learning content, monitor pupil involvement and assess scholar performance. Universities and medical colleges also adopted another software-based application zoom, a video conferencing application that assents teachers and students in the educational and other institutions to carry out online classes and meetings. All these applications required a good working internet connection but remote cities of Pakistan including tribal districts do not have internet coverage due to which students learning process suffered. Further, students of life sciences, biological sciences, health and medical sciences and research scholars involved in lab-based activities were deprived from practical sessions during closure periods.

It is noteworthy that this pandemic is not distinctive to Pakistan alone. Government sector should ensure strong broadcasting of internet facility in all localities of Pakistan. Policy makers of education sector should give obvious directions at the start of the learning sessions, interacting with the students rather of just talking. Organizations should establish IT divisions and software to upgrade learning standard. Moreover, vaccinated process should be accelerated and awareness sessions should be conducted to tackle myths about Covid-19 vaccination among public. In Pakistan cases of Indian delta variant are raising and according to National Command and Operation Centre (NCOC) positivity percentage are 6.30 as of July 22, 2021 leading to fourth wave

of COVID-19 in Pakistan . If the positivity ratio of COVID-19 increases the Government may announce closure of educational institutions in cities with high positivity but educationists, should make efforts to adapt the nemesis of COVID-19 into an opportunity.

How to Cite

• Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

Most read articles by the same author(s)

• Muhammad Zahoor, Babar Ali, Abdullah Khan, Gul Sanga Zeb, Eiman Sumayyah, Ghazala Qamar, EFFECTIVENESS OF MAITLAND MANUAL THERAPY TECHNIQUE IN MANAGEMENT OF IDIOPATHIC ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS , Annals of Allied Health Sciences: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Annals of Allied Health Sciences
• Sayed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, Mohammad Bin Afsar Jan, Mujeeb Ur Rahman, Danish Ali Khan, PREVALENCE OF WORK RELATED LOW BACK PAIN AMONG CLINICAL PHYSICAL THERAPISTS IN PAKISTAN , Annals of Allied Health Sciences: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016): Annals of Allied Health Sciences
• abdullah abdullah, Haider Darain, Ayaz uddin, Shahid Ali, Babar Ali, AWARENESS OF PHYSIOTHERAPY IN ELECTRONIC MEDIA PESHAWAR , Annals of Allied Health Sciences: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Annals of Allied Health Sciences
• Babar Ali, Aqeel Ahmed, Haider Ali, Sonia Wali, Shoukat Hayat, Taher Masood, QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG DOCTOR OF PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS USING SF-36 SCALE , Annals of Allied Health Sciences: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Annals of Allied Health Sciences

Similar Articles

• Muhammad Razaq Khan, Suhail Ahmad, Asma Mehmood, PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS 2 VARIANT COVID-19 ON HEALTH CARE WORKERS IN PESHAWAR , Annals of Allied Health Sciences: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Annals of Allied Health Sciences

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Current Issue

Information.

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Make a Submission

Developed by.

• CBSE Class 10th
• CBSE Class 12th
• UP Board 10th
• UP Board 12th
• Bihar Board 10th
• Bihar Board 12th
• Top Schools in India
• Top Schools in Delhi
• Top Schools in Mumbai
• Top Schools in Chennai
• Top Schools in Hyderabad
• Top Schools in Kolkata
• Top Schools in Pune
• Top Schools in Bangalore

Products & Resources

• JEE Main Knockout April
• Free Sample Papers
• Free Ebooks
• NCERT Notes
• NCERT Syllabus
• NCERT Books
• RD Sharma Solutions
• Navodaya Vidyalaya Admission 2024-25
• NCERT Solutions
• NCERT Solutions for Class 12
• NCERT Solutions for Class 11
• NCERT solutions for Class 10
• NCERT solutions for Class 9
• NCERT solutions for Class 8
• NCERT Solutions for Class 7
• JEE Main 2024
• MHT CET 2024
• JEE Advanced 2024
• BITSAT 2024
• View All Engineering Exams
• Colleges Accepting B.Tech Applications
• Top Engineering Colleges in India
• Engineering Colleges in India
• Engineering Colleges in Tamil Nadu
• Engineering Colleges Accepting JEE Main
• Top IITs in India
• Top NITs in India
• Top IIITs in India
• JEE Main College Predictor
• JEE Main Rank Predictor
• MHT CET College Predictor
• AP EAMCET College Predictor
• GATE College Predictor
• KCET College Predictor
• JEE Advanced College Predictor
• View All College Predictors
• JEE Main Question Paper
• JEE Main Cutoff
• JEE Main Advanced Admit Card
• AP EAPCET Hall Ticket
• Download E-Books and Sample Papers
• Compare Colleges
• B.Tech College Applications
• KCET Result
• MAH MBA CET Exam
• View All Management Exams

Colleges & Courses

• MBA College Admissions
• MBA Colleges in India
• Top IIMs Colleges in India
• Top Online MBA Colleges in India
• MBA Colleges Accepting XAT Score
• BBA Colleges in India
• XAT College Predictor 2024
• SNAP College Predictor
• NMAT College Predictor
• MAT College Predictor 2024
• CMAT College Predictor 2024
• CAT Percentile Predictor 2023
• CAT 2023 College Predictor
• CMAT 2024 Admit Card
• TS ICET 2024 Hall Ticket
• CMAT Result 2024
• MAH MBA CET Cutoff 2024
• Download Helpful Ebooks
• List of Popular Branches
• QnA - Get answers to your doubts
• IIM Fees Structure
• AIIMS Nursing
• Top Medical Colleges in India
• Top Medical Colleges in India accepting NEET Score
• Medical Colleges accepting NEET
• List of Medical Colleges in India
• List of AIIMS Colleges In India
• Medical Colleges in Maharashtra
• Medical Colleges in India Accepting NEET PG
• NEET College Predictor
• NEET PG College Predictor
• NEET MDS College Predictor
• NEET Rank Predictor
• DNB PDCET College Predictor
• NEET Admit Card 2024
• NEET PG Application Form 2024
• NEET Cut off
• NEET Online Preparation
• Download Helpful E-books
• Colleges Accepting Admissions
• Top Law Colleges in India
• Law College Accepting CLAT Score
• List of Law Colleges in India
• Top Law Colleges in Delhi
• Top NLUs Colleges in India
• Top Law Colleges in Chandigarh
• Top Law Collages in Lucknow

Predictors & E-Books

• CLAT College Predictor
• MHCET Law ( 5 Year L.L.B) College Predictor
• AILET College Predictor
• Sample Papers
• Compare Law Collages
• Careers360 Youtube Channel
• CLAT Syllabus 2025
• CLAT Previous Year Question Paper
• NID DAT Exam
• Pearl Academy Exam

Predictors & Articles

• NIFT College Predictor
• UCEED College Predictor
• NID DAT College Predictor
• NID DAT Syllabus 2025
• NID DAT 2025
• Design Colleges in India
• Top NIFT Colleges in India
• Fashion Design Colleges in India
• Top Interior Design Colleges in India
• Top Graphic Designing Colleges in India
• Fashion Design Colleges in Delhi
• Fashion Design Colleges in Mumbai
• Top Interior Design Colleges in Bangalore
• NIFT Result 2024
• NIFT Fees Structure
• NIFT Syllabus 2025
• Free Design E-books
• List of Branches
• Careers360 Youtube channel
• IPU CET BJMC
• JMI Mass Communication Entrance Exam
• IIMC Entrance Exam
• Media & Journalism colleges in Delhi
• Media & Journalism colleges in Bangalore
• Media & Journalism colleges in Mumbai
• List of Media & Journalism Colleges in India
• CA Intermediate
• CA Foundation
• CS Executive
• CS Professional
• Difference between CA and CS
• Difference between CA and CMA
• CA Full form
• CMA Full form
• CS Full form
• CA Salary In India

Top Courses & Careers

• Bachelor of Commerce (B.Com)
• Master of Commerce (M.Com)
• Company Secretary
• Cost Accountant
• Charted Accountant
• Credit Manager
• Financial Advisor
• Top Commerce Colleges in India
• Top Government Commerce Colleges in India
• Top Private Commerce Colleges in India
• Top M.Com Colleges in Mumbai
• Top B.Com Colleges in India
• IT Colleges in Tamil Nadu
• IT Colleges in Uttar Pradesh
• MCA Colleges in India
• BCA Colleges in India

Quick Links

• Information Technology Courses
• Programming Courses
• Web Development Courses
• Data Analytics Courses
• Big Data Analytics Courses
• RUHS Pharmacy Admission Test
• Top Pharmacy Colleges in India
• Pharmacy Colleges in Pune
• Pharmacy Colleges in Mumbai
• Colleges Accepting GPAT Score
• Pharmacy Colleges in Lucknow
• List of Pharmacy Colleges in Nagpur
• GPAT Result
• GPAT 2024 Admit Card
• GPAT Question Papers
• NCHMCT JEE 2024
• Mah BHMCT CET
• Top Hotel Management Colleges in Delhi
• Top Hotel Management Colleges in Hyderabad
• Top Hotel Management Colleges in Mumbai
• Top Hotel Management Colleges in Tamil Nadu
• Top Hotel Management Colleges in Maharashtra
• B.Sc Hotel Management
• Hotel Management
• Diploma in Hotel Management and Catering Technology

Diploma Colleges

• Top Diploma Colleges in Maharashtra
• UPSC IAS 2024
• SSC CGL 2024
• IBPS RRB 2024
• Previous Year Sample Papers
• Free Competition E-books
• Sarkari Result
• QnA- Get your doubts answered
• UPSC Previous Year Sample Papers
• CTET Previous Year Sample Papers
• SBI Clerk Previous Year Sample Papers
• NDA Previous Year Sample Papers

Upcoming Events

• NDA Application Form 2024
• UPSC IAS Application Form 2024
• CDS Application Form 2024
• CTET Admit card 2024
• HP TET Result 2023
• SSC GD Constable Admit Card 2024
• UPTET Notification 2024
• SBI Clerk Result 2024

Other Exams

• SSC CHSL 2024
• UP PCS 2024
• UGC NET 2024
• RRB NTPC 2024
• IBPS PO 2024
• IBPS Clerk 2024
• IBPS SO 2024
• Top University in USA
• Top University in Canada
• Top University in Ireland
• Top Universities in UK
• Top Universities in Australia
• Best MBA Colleges in Abroad
• Business Management Studies Colleges

Top Countries

• Study in USA
• Study in UK
• Study in Canada
• Study in Australia
• Study in Ireland
• Study in Germany
• Study in China
• Study in Europe

Student Visas

• Student Visa Canada
• Student Visa UK
• Student Visa USA
• Student Visa Australia
• Student Visa Germany
• Student Visa New Zealand
• Student Visa Ireland
• CUET PG 2024
• IGNOU B.Ed Admission 2024
• DU Admission 2024
• UP B.Ed JEE 2024
• LPU NEST 2024
• IIT JAM 2024
• IGNOU Online Admission 2024
• Universities in India
• Top Universities in India 2024
• Top Colleges in India
• Top Universities in Uttar Pradesh 2024
• Top Universities in Bihar
• Top Universities in Madhya Pradesh 2024
• Top Universities in Tamil Nadu 2024
• Central Universities in India
• CUET Exam City Intimation Slip 2024
• IGNOU Date Sheet
• CUET Mock Test 2024
• CUET Admit card 2024
• CUET PG Syllabus 2024
• CUET Participating Universities 2024
• CUET Previous Year Question Paper
• CUET Syllabus 2024 for Science Students
• E-Books and Sample Papers
• CUET Exam Pattern 2024
• CUET Exam Date 2024
• CUET Syllabus 2024
• IGNOU Exam Form 2024
• CUET UG Admit Card 2024 (Out) Live
• CUET 2024 Admit Card

Engineering Preparation

• Knockout JEE Main 2024
• Test Series JEE Main 2024
• JEE Main 2024 Rank Booster

Medical Preparation

• Knockout NEET 2024
• Test Series NEET 2024
• Rank Booster NEET 2024

Online Courses

• JEE Main One Month Course
• NEET One Month Course
• IBSAT Free Mock Tests
• IIT JEE Foundation Course
• Knockout BITSAT 2024
• Career Guidance Tool

Top Streams

• IT & Software Certification Courses
• Engineering and Architecture Certification Courses
• Programming And Development Certification Courses
• Business and Management Certification Courses
• Marketing Certification Courses
• Health and Fitness Certification Courses
• Design Certification Courses

Specializations

• Digital Marketing Certification Courses
• Cyber Security Certification Courses
• Artificial Intelligence Certification Courses
• Business Analytics Certification Courses
• Data Science Certification Courses
• Cloud Computing Certification Courses
• Machine Learning Certification Courses
• View All Certification Courses
• UG Degree Courses
• PG Degree Courses
• Short Term Courses
• Free Courses
• Online Degrees and Diplomas
• Compare Courses

Top Providers

• Coursera Courses
• Udemy Courses
• Edx Courses
• Swayam Courses
• upGrad Courses
• Simplilearn Courses
• Great Learning Courses

Covid 19 Essay in English

Essay on Covid -19: In a very short amount of time, coronavirus has spread globally. It has had an enormous impact on people's lives, economy, and societies all around the world, affecting every country. Governments have had to take severe measures to try and contain the pandemic. The virus has altered our way of life in many ways, including its effects on our health and our economy. Here are a few sample essays on ‘CoronaVirus’.

100 Words Essay on Covid 19

200 words essay on covid 19, 500 words essay on covid 19.

COVID-19 or Corona Virus is a novel coronavirus that was first identified in 2019. It is similar to other coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, but it is more contagious and has caused more severe respiratory illness in people who have been infected. The novel coronavirus became a global pandemic in a very short period of time. It has affected lives, economies and societies across the world, leaving no country untouched. The virus has caused governments to take drastic measures to try and contain it. From health implications to economic and social ramifications, COVID-19 impacted every part of our lives. It has been more than 2 years since the pandemic hit and the world is still recovering from its effects.

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the world has been impacted in a number of ways. For one, the global economy has taken a hit as businesses have been forced to close their doors. This has led to widespread job losses and an increase in poverty levels around the world. Additionally, countries have had to impose strict travel restrictions in an attempt to contain the virus, which has resulted in a decrease in tourism and international trade. Furthermore, the pandemic has put immense pressure on healthcare systems globally, as hospitals have been overwhelmed with patients suffering from the virus. Lastly, the outbreak has led to a general feeling of anxiety and uncertainty, as people are fearful of contracting the disease.

My Experience of COVID-19

I still remember how abruptly colleges and schools shut down in March 2020. I was a college student at that time and I was under the impression that everything would go back to normal in a few weeks. I could not have been more wrong. The situation only got worse every week and the government had to impose a lockdown. There were so many restrictions in place. For example, we had to wear face masks whenever we left the house, and we could only go out for essential errands. Restaurants and shops were only allowed to operate at take-out capacity, and many businesses were shut down.

In the current scenario, coronavirus is dominating all aspects of our lives. The coronavirus pandemic has wreaked havoc upon people’s lives, altering the way we live and work in a very short amount of time. It has revolutionised how we think about health care, education, and even social interaction. This virus has had long-term implications on our society, including its impact on mental health, economic stability, and global politics. But we as individuals can help to mitigate these effects by taking personal responsibility to protect themselves and those around them from infection.

Effects of CoronaVirus on Education

The outbreak of coronavirus has had a significant impact on education systems around the world. In China, where the virus originated, all schools and universities were closed for several weeks in an effort to contain the spread of the disease. Many other countries have followed suit, either closing schools altogether or suspending classes for a period of time.

This has resulted in a major disruption to the education of millions of students. Some have been able to continue their studies online, but many have not had access to the internet or have not been able to afford the costs associated with it. This has led to a widening of the digital divide between those who can afford to continue their education online and those who cannot.

The closure of schools has also had a negative impact on the mental health of many students. With no face-to-face contact with friends and teachers, some students have felt isolated and anxious. This has been compounded by the worry and uncertainty surrounding the virus itself.

The situation with coronavirus has improved and schools have been reopened but students are still catching up with the gap of 2 years that the pandemic created. In the meantime, governments and educational institutions are working together to find ways to support students and ensure that they are able to continue their education despite these difficult circumstances.

Effects of CoronaVirus on Economy

The outbreak of the coronavirus has had a significant impact on the global economy. The virus, which originated in China, has spread to over two hundred countries, resulting in widespread panic and a decrease in global trade. As a result of the outbreak, many businesses have been forced to close their doors, leading to a rise in unemployment. In addition, the stock market has taken a severe hit.

Effects of CoronaVirus on Health

The effects that coronavirus has on one's health are still being studied and researched as the virus continues to spread throughout the world. However, some of the potential effects on health that have been observed thus far include respiratory problems, fever, and coughing. In severe cases, pneumonia, kidney failure, and death can occur. It is important for people who think they may have been exposed to the virus to seek medical attention immediately so that they can be treated properly and avoid any serious complications. There is no specific cure or treatment for coronavirus at this time, but there are ways to help ease symptoms and prevent the virus from spreading.

Applications for Admissions are open.

Aakash iACST Scholarship Test 2024

Get up to 90% scholarship on NEET, JEE & Foundation courses

ALLEN Digital Scholarship Admission Test (ADSAT)

Register FREE for ALLEN Digital Scholarship Admission Test (ADSAT)

JEE Main Important Physics formulas

As per latest 2024 syllabus. Physics formulas, equations, & laws of class 11 & 12th chapters

PW JEE Coaching

Enrol in PW Vidyapeeth center for JEE coaching

PW NEET Coaching

Enrol in PW Vidyapeeth center for NEET coaching

JEE Main Important Chemistry formulas

As per latest 2024 syllabus. Chemistry formulas, equations, & laws of class 11 & 12th chapters

Download Careers360 App's

Regular exam updates, QnA, Predictors, College Applications & E-books now on your Mobile

Certifications

We Appeared in

Pakistan’s Primary School-Aged Children’s Learning Experiences During COVID-19

May 27, 2021 | Announcements , COVID-19 , News , Pakistan , Research Affiliates

Cultural anthropologist Abdul Razaque Channa , Ph.D. shares his research on the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on learning among Pakistan’s school-aged children. Professor Channa is a Research Affiliate at the Mittal Institute and an Assistant Professor at the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Sindh – Jamshoro. What follows is a summary of his findings.

While COVID-19 has impacted each demographic group differently, experts agree that primary school-aged children—particularly those 5-10 years old—have been impacted in unprecedented ways. Since I had already been conducting research with primary school-aged children for a decade, the lack of ethnographic research on children’s life experiences during the coronavirus pandemic motivated me to undertake further research with them, specifically on this topic.

Since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, numerous publications have been publishes, including research articles, op-eds, blogs, and reports. However, the majority of them rely heavily on quantitative data. These studies quantify individual lives and experiences—largely traumatic and inexplicable—and communicate little from the field about quotidian discourse and the discursive practices of humans, particularly children. Of course, this is understandable, given how drastically COVID-19 altered the way we conduct research, especially ethnographic fieldwork.

My current research project is motivated by a question: What impact has COVID-19 had on children in Pakistan’s Sindh Province? To gain insight into this question, I undertook ethnographic research, using mixed methods, including participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and case studies, to explore the loss of learning children have experienced during the pandemic. I conducted the research in four government primary schools located in District Hyderabad and Tando Allahyar of Sindh province, Pakistan, which were selected using convenient sampling. During the research, I participated in classroom activities and interacted with teachers and students in informal setting to get emic perspective. A total of 24 interviews were conducted with female and male students and 10 interviews with female and male teachers from these four schools. I employed a random sample of 10 students from each grade to administer basic reading and writing tests from children’s school textbooks in order to ascertain the learning gap/crisis.

Preliminary findings from my study suggested that COVID-19 has gravely de-contextualized the school experience of children and further strengthened existing class and gender norms. Previously, teachers and students viewed schools as a multifaceted space that provided children with opportunities for learning, playing, networking, entertainment, sociability, and out-of-home experience. This all changed overnight when the Pakistani Government declared a lockdown, closing all public schools. Teachers told me during interviews that the majority of research participants of my study belong to lower-income backgrounds. Parents hold such occupations as daily wage workers, farmers, or small business owners (electric shops or tailors), and parents would often ask children to assist them at work. During informal discussions with the teachers in the schools, they said that the children often complained, as many parents lost jobs and faced financial hardship, and their parents often reprimanded them and assigned them domestic chores. Mothers asked girls to assist with household tasks, while boys were either asked to assist their fathers in their work or were sent for apprenticeship to learn job skills. Some of the girls enjoyed the domestic work; they also told that they viewed their future as a housewife rather than as a professional.

During November 2020, the government started online education, tele-school (TV) opportunities, and android learning apps were freely downloadable. Unfortunately, these initiatives were not widely advertised, and hence teachers and students were unaware of these offerings. Numerous teachers said that children lacked devices due to their humble backgrounds. If a family owns one smartphone, sharing it with three to five children is impractical. When schools reopened, many children did not return due to economic issues, and those who did were stressed and their reading comprehension, writing skills and basic mathematical abilities lapsed. COVID-19 has had a major effect on the children’s learning and mental health.

Additionally, COVID-19 has changed the view of childhood from a ‘child going to school’ to a ‘family member going to work’. For example, Rehan, a fifth-grader male student, shared that the pandemic altered his schedule, and he worked grueling hours from sun up to sun down. He “woke up early and went to work without breakfast to open our hotel (tea shop). I worked the whole day. I carried loads of cups and saucers to clean. I missed my school the most. At least there I had time to learn, relax, play games with my friends and make new friends.”

The data collection process has come to an end. I’m collating data for analysis and writing a research paper. One of our papers, co-authored with Maham Ali, research associate at the department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, is under publication, though this article focuses on only one school.

Recent Posts

• The Mittal Institute’s 2024 Seed for Change Winners
• Bridging Social Justice and Climate Action: A Q&A with Biraj Patnaik
• A Look Back on Mittal Institute’s Spring Flagship Events: May 2-3, 2024
• Aisha Kokan ’26 Studied Mental Health in India through LMSAI Grant
• Storykit Program Inspires Academic Excellence in Pakistan Schools

Yearly Archive

• Afghanistan
• Announcements
• Arts at LMSAI
• India Seminar Series
• Arts at SAI
• Graduate Student Associates
• South Asia in the News
• Research Affiliates
• Social Enterprise
• Name * First Last
• Affiliation Please List your Professional Affiliation
• Current Harvard Student
• Harvard Alumni

• Paragraph Writing
• Paragraph Writing On Covid 19

Paragraph Writing on Covid 19 - Check Samples for Various Word Limits

The Covid-19 pandemic has been a deadly pandemic that has affected the whole world. It was a viral infection that affected almost everyone in some way or the other. However, the effects have been felt differently depending on various factors. As it is a virus, it will change with time, and different variants might keep coming. The virus has affected the lifestyle of human beings. The pandemic has affected the education system and the economy of the world as well. Many people have lost their lives, jobs, near and dear, etc.

Table of Contents

Paragraph writing on covid-19 in 100 words, paragraph writing on covid-19 in 150 words, paragraph writing on covid-19 in 200 words, paragraph writing on covid-19 in 250 words, frequently asked questions on covid-19.

Check the samples provided below before you write a paragraph on Covid-19.

Coronavirus is an infectious disease and is commonly called Covid-19. It affects the human respiratory system causing difficulty in breathing. It is a contagious disease and has been spreading across the world like wildfire. The virus was first identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China. In March, WHO declared Covid-19 as a pandemic that has been affecting the world. The virus was spreading from an infected person through coughing, sneezing, etc. Therefore, the affected people were isolated from everyone. The affected people were even isolated from their own family members and their dear ones. Other symptoms noticed in Covid – 19 patients include weariness, sore throat, muscle soreness, and loss of taste and smell.

Coronavirus, often known as Covid-19, is an infectious disease. It affects the human respiratory system, making breathing difficult. It’s a contagious disease that has been spreading like wildfire over the world. The virus was initially discovered in Wuhan, China, in 2019. Covid-19 was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March. The virus was transferred by coughing, sneezing, and other means from an infected person. As a result, the people who were affected were isolated from the rest of society. The folks who were afflicted were even separated from their own family members and loved ones. Weariness, sore throat, muscle stiffness, and loss of taste and smell are among the other complaints reported by Covid-19 individuals. Almost every individual has been affected by the virus. A lot of people have lost their lives due to the severity of the infections. The dropping of oxygen levels and the unavailability of oxygen cylinders were the primary concerns during the pandemic.

The Covid-19 pandemic was caused due to a man-made virus called coronavirus. It is an infectious disease that has affected millions of people’s lives. The pandemic has affected the entire world differently. It was initially diagnosed in 2019 in Wuhan, China but later, in March 2020, WHO declared that it was a pandemic that was affecting the whole world like wildfire. Covid-19 is a contagious disease. Since it is a viral disease, the virus spreads rapidly in various forms. The main symptoms of this disease were loss of smell and taste, loss of energy, pale skin, sneezing, coughing, reduction of oxygen level, etc. Therefore, all the affected people were asked to isolate themselves from the unaffected ones. The affected people were isolated from their family members in a separate room. The government has taken significant steps to ensure the safety of the people. The frontline workers were like superheroes who worked selflessly for the safety of the people. A lot of doctors had to stay away from their families and their babies for the safety of their patients and their close ones. The government has taken significant steps, and various protocols were imposed for the safety of the people. The government imposed a lockdown and shut down throughout the country.

The coronavirus was responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic. It is an infectious disease that has affected millions of people’s lives. The pandemic has impacted people all across the world in diverse ways. It was first discovered in Wuhan, China, in 2019. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) proclaimed it a pandemic in March 2020, claiming that it has spread throughout the globe like wildfire. The pandemic has claimed the lives of millions of people. The virus had negative consequences for those who were infected, including the development of a variety of chronic disorders. The main symptoms of this disease were loss of smell and taste, fatigue, pale skin, sneezing, coughing, oxygen deficiency, etc. Because Covid-19 was an infectious disease, all those who were infected were instructed to segregate themselves from those who were not. The folks who were affected were separated from their families and locked in a room. The government has prioritised people’s safety. The frontline personnel were like superheroes, working tirelessly to ensure the public’s safety. For the sake of their patients’ and close relatives’ safety, many doctors had to stay away from their families and babies. The government had also taken significant steps and implemented different protocols for the protection of people.

What is meant by the Covid-19 pandemic?

The Covid-19 pandemic was a deadly pandemic that affected the lives of millions of people. A lot of people lost their lives, and some people lost their jobs and lost their entire families due to the pandemic. Many covid warriors, like doctors, nurses, frontline workers, etc., lost their lives due to the pandemic.

From where did the Covid-19 pandemic start?

The Covid-19 pandemic was initially found in Wuhan, China and later in the whole world.

What are the symptoms of Covid-19?

The symptoms of Covid-19 have been identified as sore throat, loss of smell and taste, cough, sneezing, reduction of oxygen level, etc.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Request OTP on Voice Call

Post My Comment

• Share Share

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

Register with byju's & watch live videos.