education project proposal for funding

Researched by Consultants from Top-Tier Management Companies

Powerpoint Templates

Icon Bundle

Kpi Dashboard

Professional

Business Plans

Swot Analysis

Gantt Chart

Business Proposal

Marketing Plan

Project Management

Business Case

Business Model

Cyber Security

Business PPT

Digital Marketing

Digital Transformation

Human Resources

Product Management

Artificial Intelligence

Company Profile

Acknowledgement PPT

PPT Presentation

Reports Brochures

One Page Pitch

Interview PPT

All Categories

Top 10 Education Grant Proposal Samples with Templates and Examples

Taranjeet Singh

Have you ever wondered how some educational institutions seem to effortlessly secure grants that pave the way for transformative programs, cutting-edge technology, or scholarships that change students' lives? What's their secret to success in acquiring funding for projects that leave a lasting impact? The answer lies in crafting a compelling education grant proposal, a skill that can make all the difference between securing those much-needed funds or facing budget constraints.

Effective Education Grant Proposal Templates are your passport to a brighter future in today's competitive educational landscape, where institutions continually strive to provide top-notch learning experiences. It attracts potential donors, foundations, and organizations eager to invest in your institution's vision. Also, these templates are 100% customizable to suit your unique needs and goals.

Write winning university proposals with our university proposal templates backed by a team of experts.

Our approach ensures you retain complete control over your proposal's content and direction. We will equip you with the PPT templates that can be tailored to fit your institution's unique mission and objectives. This way, you can authentically convey your vision to potential funders, increasing your chances of securing the needed resources.

Write a proposal that publishers will love with our book proposal templates .

So, what exactly is an Education Grant Proposal, and why is it such a game-changer? Think of it as the best-designed blueprint for your educational aspirations. It's your chance to communicate your vision, goals, and the impact you aim to achieve through a clear and compelling narrative. When done right, it can open doors to funding opportunities you never thought possible.

Empowering individuals through collective healing with our group counselling templates .

This blog is your comprehensive guide to mastering the art of creating proposals that impress and secure the financial backing you need.

Template 1: One-Pager Education Grant Proposal PPT Bundle

Showcase the potential of your education grant proposal with our proposal PPT Bundle. This robust PowerPoint deck has over 25 slides, crafted to empower your project. Dive into the project context, delivering insight into your proposal's core foundations and clarifying your project objectives, ensuring a crystal-clear vision.

Navigate the complete process, aided by a seamless and intuitive design. Stay on track with the defined time frame, ensuring your project's success. Understand your investment with detailed slides that outline the financial aspects.

Make informed decisions, and download now to harness the power of effective grant proposal communication.

Download Now!

Template 2: Project Context of Education Grant Proposal PPT Theme

This presentation layout offers a concise project context, outlining the critical need for your educational initiative. It delves into compelling reasons for grant consideration, highlighting the tangible benefits and positive impacts your project will bring to the community.

Our PPT Slide also guides you through a persuasive grant request section, equipping you with the tools to communicate your project's objectives, scope, and anticipated outcomes. With straightforward, concise content and a professional layout, it facilitates the grant application process, increasing your chances of success. Download our template today and take a significant step toward bringing your educational vision to life.

Template 3: Project Objectives of Education Grant Proposal PPT Preset

This concise PPT provides a clear insight into your project's vital components, including duration, total budget, and location.

Communicate your project's goals and aspirations with this resource.

Keep your audience engaged and informed without unnecessary fluff or jargon. Minimize your complex data and present it effectively.

Download the PPT Template to ease your project communication. Let your objectives shine, and get your proposal on the path to success.

Template 4: Process for Education Grant Utilization PPT Template

Our PPT Slide reduces complex procedures, streamlines your grant utilization process effortlessly, and provides a clear, step-by-step guide to help you navigate the intricacies of education grant management.

You can grasp the essentials of grant utilization with simple explanations. We've taken the guesswork out of the equation, ensuring you have a resource that saves time and reduces confusion.

Empower your educational institution with a resource that offers clarity and simplicity in managing grants. Download our PowerPoint theme today and take the first step toward efficient grant management.

Template 5: Timeframe for Services Rendered for Education Grant Proposal PowerPoint Layout

This timeline PPT theme is your ultimate solution for presenting the intricate details of your grant proposal with clarity and precision. This dynamic timeline offers your audience a roadmap, showcasing your project's critical milestones and deadlines. You can convey the timeframe for services rendered, ensuring your proposal is on point.

Our timeline template empowers you to present your project's schedule in a clear and organized manner, eliminating any ambiguity.

Download our timeline PPT Preset now and take a step closer to securing the support you need for your educational pursuits.

Template 6: Your Investment for Education Grant Proposal PPT Template

This PPT theme is the ultimate resource for showcasing your investment needs in education projects. It encapsulates all aspects of your financial requirements, from training costs and technology implementation to hardware needs, training materials, club expenses, and essential manpower expenses.

This PPT Slide will impress stakeholders, funders, and decision-makers with clear, concise slides and well-organized data. It uncomplicates complex financial information, making it easy for your audience to understand your educational initiative's financial demands.

It transforms your financial data into a compelling narrative, highlighting the significance of your investment in education. Download our PPT Template and take a step closer to achieving your educational goals.

Template 7: Addressing Brief Description About Our Education Institution PPT Theme

Our PPT template is a powerful tool for communicating your institution's essence. It shows your "About Us," Vision Statement, and Mission Statement succinctly and persuasively. Crafted with precision and clarity, it ensures your audience comprehends your educational values effortlessly.

Simply put, it's the key to concisely conveying your educational institution's essence. Download now to make an impactful statement and effortlessly share your vision and mission.

Template 8: Brief Details About our Extensive Experienced Team PowerPoint Layout

This PowerPoint template conveys your team's strengths with crystal clarity. Each slide features a team member's photo, job title, and a concise description, ensuring that your audience gains immediate insight into their qualifications.

There is no need for tedious explanations or lengthy introductions; let the words speak for themselves

Download our PPT, organize your communication, and impress your audience with an easy approach to presenting your team's expertise. It's time to let your team shine!

Template 9: Statement of Work and Contract for Education Grant Proposal PPT Preset

This presentation offers a concise view of services rendered, mutual cooperation, payment terms, plan cancellation, confidentiality, and termination conditions.

Navigate effortlessly through the critical aspects of your education grant proposal with this undemanding resource.

With our PPT Template, you can outline the terms, expectations, and responsibilities, fostering a transparent and professional working relationship—no more uncertainty or misunderstandings.

Download our Proposal PPT Layout and endow yourself with the means to secure your education grant proposals precisely and clearly.

Template 10: Next Steps for Education Grant Proposal PowerPoint Layout

This dynamic presentation is your ultimate tool for simplifying complex contract details.

With this slide, you can communicate contract specifics, enhancing your grant application's professionalism and effectiveness. Hence, it reduces unnecessary complexity to save you time and effort. No more sifting through endless information – just precise, concise contract details at your fingertips.

Download our PowerPoint Slide to eliminate grant proposal preparation hassle. It's your key to presenting contract information with precision and ease. Streamline your grant proposal process today.

Template 11: 30-60-90 Days Plan for Education Grant Proposal PPT Theme

We've distilled complex processes into a clear, actionable format, ensuring you stay on track. You will find an easy pathway within these slides, free from unnecessary jargon and complexities. This PPT Slide provides a straightforward approach to showcase your educational initiatives. Our PPT Layout empowers you to confidently present your proposal, making securing vital project funding more accessible.

Our plan guides you through every phase, ensuring you never miss a crucial step. Elevate your chances of success today. Download our Proposal PPT Theme and take the first step towards securing the funding you need!

Closing Words

Ultimately, crafting a winning education grant proposal is the key to realizing your institution's vision and securing the resources it needs. This series has equipped you with the tools and insights to navigate the grant-seeking process effectively. With the power of a compelling narrative and a clear mission, you can attract the support of donors, foundations, and organizations who share your commitment to education.

Related posts:

• Top 5 Business Services Proposal Examples with Templates and Samples
• Top 10 Statistical Analysis Research Proposal Templates with Samples and Examples
• Top 10 Product Design Proposal Templates with Examples and Samples
• Must-Have Proposal for Contract Work Templates with Samples and Examples

Liked this blog? Please recommend us

Top 10 Progress Dashboard Templates with Samples and Examples

Must-Have Personal Executive Summary Templates With Examples and Samples

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA - the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Digital revolution powerpoint presentation slides

Sales funnel results presentation layouts

3d men joinning circular jigsaw puzzles ppt graphics icons

Business Strategic Planning Template For Organizations Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Future plan powerpoint template slide

Project Management Team Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Brand marketing powerpoint presentation slides

Launching a new service powerpoint presentation with slides go to market

Agenda powerpoint slide show

Four key metrics donut chart with percentage

Engineering and technology ppt inspiration example introduction continuous process improvement

Meet our team representing in circular format

Educational Program Project Proposal Template

• Great for beginners
• Ready-to-use, fully customizable Subcategory
• Get started in seconds

Are you passionate about education and want to make a positive impact on students' lives? Creating an educational program requires careful planning and organization to ensure its success. That's where ClickUp's Educational Program Project Proposal Template comes in handy!

With this template, you can:

• Outline your program's objectives, curriculum, and target audience
• Break down tasks and set deadlines to keep your project on track
• Collaborate with team members and stakeholders to gather feedback and make improvements
• Track progress and measure the impact of your educational program

Whether you're launching a new course, developing a mentorship program, or organizing a workshop, ClickUp's Educational Program Project Proposal Template has everything you need to bring your vision to life. Start creating your proposal today and make a difference in education!

Benefits of Educational Program Project Proposal Template

The Educational Program Project Proposal Template offers a range of benefits for educational institutions and organizations looking to develop and implement new programs. Some of these benefits include:

• Streamlined proposal creation process, saving time and effort
• Clear structure and guidelines to ensure all necessary information is included
• Increased chances of securing funding or approval for the program
• Improved communication and alignment among stakeholders
• Enhanced project planning and management, leading to successful program implementation
• Ability to track progress and measure outcomes against established goals
• Easy customization to fit the unique needs and requirements of each educational program.

Main Elements of Educational Program Project Proposal Template

ClickUp's Educational Program Project Proposal template is the perfect tool to plan and execute your educational projects effectively. Here are the main elements of this Whiteboard template:

• Custom Statuses: Keep track of the progress of your educational program with two custom statuses - Open and Complete - to easily visualize the status of each task and ensure smooth project management.
• Custom Fields: Utilize custom fields to capture important information about your educational program. While the specific custom fields are not mentioned, you can create fields such as Program Duration, Target Audience, Budget, and Resources Required to ensure all necessary details are documented.
• Custom Views: Access two different views to manage your educational program efficiently. The Project Proposal view allows you to outline and plan your program, while the Getting Started Guide view provides a step-by-step guide to kickstart your project.
• Collaboration and Planning: Leverage ClickUp's collaborative features such as task assignments, due dates, comments, and attachments to streamline communication and ensure everyone is on the same page throughout the project.

How to Use Project Proposal for Education Program

If you're looking to create an educational program project proposal, follow these steps to ensure its success:

1. Define the purpose and goals

Start by clearly defining the purpose of your educational program project proposal. What problem does it aim to solve? What are the main goals you want to achieve? For example, your proposal might aim to improve literacy rates among elementary school students or provide vocational training for unemployed adults.

Use the Goals feature in ClickUp to outline and articulate the purpose and goals of your educational program project proposal.

2. Conduct research and gather data

To support your proposal, conduct thorough research and gather relevant data about the educational needs of your target audience, existing programs, and success stories from similar initiatives. This will help you build a strong case for your proposal and demonstrate its potential impact.

Use the Docs feature in ClickUp to compile and organize your research findings and data.

3. Develop a detailed project plan

Next, develop a detailed project plan that outlines the specific activities, timeline, and resources required to implement your educational program. Break down the project into manageable tasks and allocate responsibilities to team members or stakeholders involved in the implementation.

Utilize the Gantt chart feature in ClickUp to create a visual representation of your project plan and track progress.

4. Create a budget and funding strategy

Every educational program project proposal needs a well-defined budget and a funding strategy. Calculate the estimated costs for resources, materials, staff, training, and any other expenses. Identify potential funding sources such as grants, sponsorships, or partnerships, and develop a strategy for securing the necessary funds.

Use the Table view in ClickUp to create a budget spreadsheet, including all the necessary line items and funding sources. You can also set up Automations to track and manage budget-related tasks and notifications.

By following these steps and utilizing the features in ClickUp, you can create a comprehensive and compelling educational program project proposal that stands out and increases the chances of getting approval and support.

Get Started with ClickUp's Educational Program Project Proposal Template

Education institutions can use this Educational Program Project Proposal Template to streamline the process of initiating and managing new educational programs.

First, hit “Get Free Solution” to sign up for ClickUp and add the template to your Workspace. Make sure you designate which Space or location in your Workspace you’d like this template applied.

Next, invite relevant members or guests to your Workspace to start collaborating.

Now you can take advantage of the full potential of this template to develop successful educational programs:

• Utilize the Project Proposal view to outline the details of your proposed educational program, including goals, objectives, target audience, and resources required.
• Use the Getting Started Guide view to provide a step-by-step plan for launching the program, including pre-launch preparations, marketing strategies, and communication plans.
• Organize tasks in the Open status to keep track of ongoing tasks and action items.
• Move completed tasks to the Complete status to ensure progress is easily tracked and documented.
• Assign tasks to team members and set due dates to ensure accountability.
• Collaborate with stakeholders to gather feedback and make necessary revisions.
• Monitor and analyze tasks to optimize the efficiency and effectiveness of your educational program.

Related Templates

• Security Project Proposal Template
• Maintenance and Repair Project Proposal Template
• Organizational Structure Project Proposal Template
• Guest House Project Proposal Template
• Mangrove Planting Project Proposal Template

Template details

Free forever with 100mb storage.

Free training & 24-hours support

Serious about security & privacy

Highest levels of uptime the last 12 months

• Product Roadmap
• Affiliate & Referrals
• On-Demand Demo
• Integrations
• Consultants
• Gantt Chart
• Native Time Tracking
• Automations
• Kanban Board
• vs Airtable
• vs Basecamp
• vs MS Project
• vs Smartsheet
• Software Team Hub
• PM Software Guide

How to Write a Proposal for an Education Project

by Heather Skyler

Published on 10 Dec 2018

The purpose of an education proposal is usually to secure grant money and get approval for a specific education project. Often, an entire team is involved and will collaborate to put the proposal together. Whether it's the idea of one person or of many, a proposal for an education project generally follows a basic format.

Start With an Abstract

The abstract is a concise paragraph or a single page that explains the entire purpose and scope of the proposal. Similar to a blurb on the back of a book, the abstract gives you a short version of the whole. Abstracts help to focus readers and guide them through the proposal. While the proposal starts with an abstract, some people find it easier to write this section last so it essentially acts as a summary of the entire report.

Write the Needs Assessment or Statement of the Problem

There is a reason you are proposing this plan or idea – to fulfill a specific need or solve a problem – so the first section should clearly explain what the need is or describe the problem that will be solved. This section is very important, and the content should be clear and concise. For example, you are proposing a program to improve the math scores of eighth-grade students. Describe the current state of their grades and show why these students would benefit from your program.

The needs assessment section should also explain how you've analyzed the needs of this particular group and why the implementation of the project will be helpful. How did you identify the eighth-grade project participants? How did you determine that your project could be successful with this group? Don't describe the entire project or plan in detail here. That comes next.

Include the Program Description

Now you've come to the meat of the proposal. What exactly is your proposed idea? Describe the nature of the project and show how it will lead to improving student performance. It's a good idea to keep the focus of the project limited so it can be implemented effectively within the time and budget constraints of the project. In this section, also include the project's goals and objectives. Explain what you plan to achieve and lay out the timeline.

Let's say your idea to improve eighth-grade math involves building a specialized computer game that can match the pace of a single student's progress. You'll outline how long it will take to develop and test the game, then lay out how many students will test your project and what variables you'll use to measure success.

Describe How the Project Will Be Implemented

The implementation section provides a more detailed explanation of how exactly you will operate the project. You gave a brief outline of this in an earlier section, but here is your chance to further explain the objectives, activities, instructional methods, materials and assessments that will be essential for the implementation and evaluation of the project.

List the Key Personnel

Identify each member of the project team and describe their duties and responsibilities. Indicate the amount of time this team will devote to the project. Provide a short bio for each team member, highlighting their backgrounds and achievements and revealing why they are a good fit for this project.

Budget and Justification

In this section, create a detailed budget. State the total amount you are requesting, then break down the spending for each part of the project. For our eighth-grade math example, this could include staff salaries, computers and other related costs.

Methods and Measurement Tools

Describe exactly the methods you will use to measure the success or failure of the project. It is important to connect the ideas in this section to the rest of the plan. This section should illustrate the strategies you plan to use to determine the extent to which you are attaining the project's objectives. List the data you plan to collect and the assessment measurements you will use. Provide a timeline for collecting the data and explain your strategies for compiling and reporting evaluation results.

Education proposals are typically long and very detailed. They also involve lots of initial research and revision. This is a nutshell version of how you can put one together, but any successful proposal for a major project should be thorough and well-written.

RoadtoFunding

Home » Grants » Business Grants

21 Steps to Writing a Perfect Grant Proposal for Education

Do you want to apply for education grants but don’t know how to write a proposal? If YES, here are 21 steps to writing a grant proposal for education purposes.

When we hear these words written as the title of an article, one may confuse it to mean that a student writes a proposal to solicit for funds in order to finance their educational aspiration. But seeking a grant for education simply means that a teacher or group of teachers who have identified a need in the educational system, have put together a proposal to seek funding for that project. This is aimed at improving the student’s performance or comprehension in any field it is requested for.

For example, a teacher may notice that quite a number of students may be struggling with learning the multiplication table at their school and may decide to establish some type of miniature playground that can teach the students the multiplication table within an environment that is fun.

So, the idea is that while the children are having fun sincerely, the multiplication table is taught. Sometimes the school itself may not have the extra funds to invest in such a project, so the teacher can seek for funding from grant organizations.

Some of these grant organizations may exclusively make their funds available to only schools, or there could be grant organizations that simply make grants available to eligible candidates, once they are able to prove their worth through a well written proposal.

In today’s article we will be looking at some of the major aspects of a grant proposal for education like the introduction, project description, budget and so on. We would also be discussing some tips that will make you have more grants paid.

When most people think of soliciting for funds, they may be uncertain as to whether their proposal will be good enough to get a grant. But one thing most people fail to understand is that if you never try you will never build the necessary skills that will get you receiving grants time and time again.

These tips will give you more insight on how to make your proposals grant worthy. Just in case you have never done this before, it would be good to know that usually there are staff members within the administrative board that have to approve grants that go beyond a certain amount.

So, it would be wise to ensure that you have already spoken to these people and that both the project and the amount you are seeking have been approved by the necessary admin personnel. Another interesting tip to consider when putting together a proposal of this nature is to think like the person who would be attending to the document you are about to send.

Put yourself in their shoes or in their mindset, find out questions they may be asking, points they may be looking for and concerns they may have about your intended program. When you have this kind of mindset, then you will write in a way that presents your case to the reviewer in terms they will identify with.

Tips such as these will be very helpful in giving you a well-rounded perspective on how to go about writing a grant proposal for education.

• BE OPTIMISTIC

Usually there’s a kind of negative way of thinking when it comes to writing a grant proposal. Most people think about how much they are about to ask for, then wonder if the funds are actually going to be made available. First of all, getting people to believe in what you do for them to release their support in cash or kind could be quite tasking.

With a lot of fraudulent people out there only seeking to get money to use for their own private purposes, grant organizations and sponsors have to be careful. In spite of all these negative impressions, being optimistic about your proposal is paramount; it will give you the much-needed energy to persist when the times get hard.

When you face challenges putting together aspects of the proposal, or when you face challenges getting the administrative officer to sign off on the idea, you have to see yourself receiving the grant, see yourself executing the program successfully, just be super optimistic about the entire activity and you will see it will go a long way.

Writing needs inspirational energy, and a mind that cannot see things happening cannot access great ideas to document on paper. A negative mindset can make you take too much time in writing the proposal, because you really can’t see the idea taking off. When your mind is filled with negative thoughts, any little challenge you face could be made into a mountain of issues, you will suddenly have more reasons not to write.

However, the opposite is true when you have an optimistic mindset about the outcome of the entire process. You will be full of innovative ideas for the project, set-backs will be seen as stepping stones, and difficulty would be seen as training hoops you would have to scale through. In fact, it is this kind of enthusiastic approach to getting funds that will make your team members to give themselves entirely to the process; even they would want to see you succeed with your idea.

2. GET RELEVANT PEOPLE INVOLVED

It would be better for you if you have other people working on the proposal with you. This could be other teachers who can provide other perspectives to the project. Writing a proposal can be very tasking, you may even need the assistance of professionals.

Sometimes the person you need may not be someone who knows a lot about what is needed. It might just be someone who will read through the entire proposal for typographical error or spell checks. Sometimes this pair of fresh eyes can also comment on the way grammar is used in the proposal.

3. CROSS CHECK FOR MISTAKES

It’s just like writing an exam; you may need to cross check your entire document for simple mistakes that may cause the reviewer to see your proposal as a mediocre attempt. Most times when we write things like this, we are so busy looking at the bigger picture that we do not notice some of the little mistakes that may ruin our chances at receiving actual funds.

We can make mistakes in the way we write the document, the way we put together the budget, the way we address the grant organisation and so on. This is also one of the areas where you may definitely need someone to look through the entire proposal and give you feedback on how the entire write up is structured. They too can point out glaring mistakes that may have skipped your attention.

4. UNDERSTAND THE FUNDING ORGANISATION

You will be approaching an organisation for grants for your educational project; this organisation would be more obliged if they knew you had some type of understanding as to what they do. It’s like going for an interview with a firm and not knowing anything about what that firm.

So it would be advisable to research the grant organization of your choice, find out exactly what their interests are, what their vision is, and the kind of projects they have done before and so on. When you skillfully weave this into your write up, the reviewer will have the sense that you are not just approaching them for their money, but you actually care about what they care about. This will help tremendously in getting you the funding you need.

5. SEARCH FOR A GRANT ORGANISATION

This may as well be one of the very first few tips in writing an effective proposal for your educational project. First of all, look for organizations that are willing to make finances available for projects such as these. There are some who simply focus on making grants available for schooling projects alone, there are others who would be interested in the age group of the students who would benefit from the program and there are others that focus on the impact the program can have on the community.

Spending time to seek out the actual organizations you would be soliciting for their funds would give you a strong backbone for the proposal you are writing. It takes some type of insight to actually locate the organizations that will be willing to make this available to you.

6. ANALYZE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE PROJECT

When looking into setting up a project like this, it would be much better to look into sustainability. Is it the kind of program that may require funding every academic session? If so would your granting agency be willing to make these monies available every academic session? How about staff, will those who volunteer their time for the program always feel okay about making their time available for the project?

These are questions you need to answer so that you will also know if you have what it takes to keep the program going. Sometimes, it doesn’t pay to start something when there are no clear-cut means of sustaining it. So, for the sake of maintaining your integrity, make sure you have paid attention to sustaining the program.

7. BE SIMPLE IN YOUR WRITING

The reviewer may not know most of the technical words that has to do with your field of expertise, so ensure you keep the wordings in your proposal simple enough for the reviewer to read through the document without getting a headache.

The truth is that you are trying to convince the reviewer about the potency of your idea; you are not trying to confuse the person. Usually when one finds it difficult to understand what is being communicated, one simply switches off. Nobody is going to grant a request for something they don’t understand.

Simplicity is the way to go when putting a document like this together. When I say simplicity, I mean in the syntax of the document not its content. It should make for an easy read, and the reviewer should be able to read through it effortlessly.

8. BE THOROUGH AND DETAILED

In order to be as thorough as you need to be, you need to spend a lot of time researching the various the project you want to execute. A person should be able to look at that proposal and see every detail of the project.

This is important because the reviewer would definitely have some questions about the project as they go through the proposal. Not only must you look into all the details, the project may require you to get into the mind of the reviewer and ask the questions he will most likely be thinking in his head.

This will ensure that there are no loopholes or places where the reviewer can develop faults with your writ up. You want to be faultless in your presentation of the facts; this type of excellent approach will definitely be an advantage to you getting the funds you need.

9. FOLLOW THE AGENCY’S GUIDELINES FOR WRITING A PROPOSAL

Some agencies have specified guidelines when it comes to grant proposals. When putting together your proposal, be sure to keep to those instructions; do not exceed the parameters they have provided for you. They may have their reasons; some may go as far as pointing out the font size you should use and how many pages the proposal should be. Adhering to the agency’s guidelines will make it easier for the agency to read your write up.

10. ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE WHAT IS NEEDED TO EXECUTE THE PROJECT

Writing the proposal is one thing, executing it is another. Sometimes the person or persons who wrote the proposals are not the people who will execute it.

If this is the case with your situation, then you may want to include certain details as to how the project can be executed so that in the situation where you are not the person to execute it, the desired outcome will still be achieved if the people who execute it follow the plans you have already laid out for the effective implementation of the project.

11. TIMELINE

It will be much better if the timeline for the completion of the project is clearly stated in the proposal. The timeline for project completion is one of the major keys to getting your proposal approved by the granting agency. Everyone who sees the proposal would know the duration of the entire program with intricate details. It informs very clearly the actual events and resources the project would require.

12. USE STATISTICAL DATA

In convincing the reviewer about your idea, stating the statistics that support your idea will go a long way in strengthening the reviewer’s conviction about your idea. The very first set of statistical data should be the one that supports your stance, the one that supports the reason why you think this project or program is worth the money you are seeking. Research and look for the actual numbers and build up your case.

Look for statistics that reveal the negative conditions that are very present within your field, these negative statistics are also part of the reasons your program should be approved, so that through the effective execution of your program, the negative statistics can be reduced.

13. EDUCATE YOURSELF ON GRANT PROPOSAL WRITING

Don’t assume you know it all, educate yourself on grant proposal writing. The more you know about writing grant proposals, the more you will get better at putting it together. Your skill for writing this type of proposal would increase as you continue to get more materials.

When you broaden your awareness as to how these write ups are made, what grant agencies are looking for and the various opportunities that are out there for those looking for grants, you will be on your way to getting more finances for your projects.

14. PUT TOGETHER THE CURRICULUM

So, the curriculum of the entire program has to be put together and it has to be designed in a way that it addresses the problem you are trying to solve. If there were not problems with the traditional way things are taught, you wouldn’t have thought to develop a new program to address those weaknesses in the former approach. So you would need to put together some type of curriculum for your proposed program.

15. IDENTIFY MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES

When you include measurable objectives in your proposal, it is most likely going to get more attention. It shows that the progress of the program on the students can be measured in very clear parameters. So, it is safe to say that if such a program is not effective it will be clear after some time, then the entire project would have to be reviewed to discover why the initial approach was not effective. Adjustments can be made to ensure better results will be achieved.

16. BE REALISTIC

When it comes to projecting how much effort it would take to actually execute the project, you have to be very realistic. Do not go over the top expressing your ability to deliver certain results or influence certain outcomes. Look at your key strengths and weaknesses and identify if you would be able to deliver on the level you have projected.

Look at the strengths and weaknesses of your team as well, because you would not be executing this plan on your own, your team members have a part to play in achieving the goals of the project.

Also, be realistic about what the students stand to gain from the entire project, being overly ambitious about these things may make expectations higher than what is necessary, hence putting yourself and your entire team under pressure to perform.

17. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

It will also help your case if you are able to present to the reviewer how this project will help the professional development of other teachers and professionals within the field where the project is focused on. This will give the reviewer the impression that this project will not only impact students who participate in it, but it will also add value to the professionals who take pride in this particular educational sector.

18. WRITE FOR THE RIGHT REVIEWER

The way you style your proposal would have to appeal to the agency or organization you are writing to. This means the way you would write to a State agency would definitely be different in style from the way you would write to a Federal agency. The same goes for if you are writing to a private funding organization. Most private funding organizations have strict guidelines as to how to go about this and so do the governmental agencies.

10 ELEMENTS OF A GRANT PROPOSAL FOR EDUCATION

When it comes to writing a grant proposal below are very important things that should make up the content of your proposal;

• INTRODUCTION

This is where you introduce yourself, your school and your project to the reviewing party. The introduction is so important because it can spell the difference between whether the reviewer would continue to read or simply put the proposal away. Be sure to explain why you intend to execute such a program, give brief indications on certain points you would be citing in the entire proposal.

The first thing you want to make sure you understand before you complete this particular section is the project. What projects have you decided on running, how will this project impact those who participate in it and the field in which it will make impact in? One suggestion is that it should be a project you are particularly passionate about and have already been nursing in your heart for a while.

You also want to briefly introduce the plan in this particular segment of the proposal, you do not need to go into details about the plan but a little summary of the various methods you intend to employ in executing the program will go a long way in making your proposal interesting for the reviewer. You should have already looked into all of the aspects of the plan before making the summary of the plan available for your introduction.

One thing that will help you put together an excellent proposal is when you get to understand why you need to write this proposal to get your grant. Your reason must be strong enough to compel you to the hard work of putting together a document like this. You must be fully convinced that such a program would be the solution to whatever challenge you may have noticed in the school.

Don’t just go into writing a proposal because you think you can, spend some time planning how you are going to put together this proposal and the kind of approach you are going to take. Look into the various aspects of the entire project and even research if such an idea had been done in any other place, find out how well it went with those students.

Also make sure you have received proper permission from the authorizing personnel before beginning your proposal. It would be very frustrating if you and your team spend so much time working on your proposal only to have it turned down by the school administrative board even before it goes before the reviewers.

• DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

Finally, you have the opportunity to go into details about the nature of the project. In the introduction, you had just given the reviewer a tip of the iceberg, so now; you have to go into full details as to how this project would be implemented.

You will be describing the various strategies you intend to use in this project, it would be much better if you carry out proper research about the methods and curriculum you want to use for the project, so that your description of the project can be convincing enough to receive a grant.

• THE NEED YOU INTEND TO MEET

For this proposal to be relevant there must be a need you intend to meet. This is the part of the proposal where you identify the problem facing the students. This is where you can freely use statistics to tell the story of the state of things and why they need to change.

Here you would explain why your method or approach to solving the problem would be effective. Get statistical data of how the methods you intend to employ for this program have worked in times past. Identify the need and further explain why this project is adequate for solving that problem.

Now you expand the solutions within the project as it has to do with solving the problem. Make sure to make this section as detailed as possible so as to really convince the reviewer of the effectiveness of your methods. Of course, you should have already done your research on how these solutions would work, your statistical data would also be plus in this particular aspect of the proposal.

• THE PLAN OF THE PROJECT

You have discussed the project in itself, but you didn’t go into the specific plans you intend to put in place to ensure that the objectives of the project are successful. This plan would include the strategies you intend to employ. The reviewer should be able to see the entire project unfold activity after activity, each of which would have its description, objectives and anticipated impact it hopes to instill in the students.

This is one of the most important aspects of the entire proposal; this is where you have to be as thorough as possible. Make sure to think about every fee that is payable to every participating body in the project. Do not forget to factor in tax payments as your grantee would most likely not make any more money available for the project once a particular amount is granted. So be sure to have done your homework, your research and anticipate all expenses as much as possible.

This is also where you need to ask for assistance from an accountant friend or someone who is good with numbers, someone who can help you look at the entire project and give you a very clear view of all the finances you would need to make the project a success.

Do not fall into the temptation of asking for more money than is required, do not pad the budget for selfish gains, it is understandable to make room for miscellaneous expenses, as one cannot anticipate every single thing that may happen as the project goes on.

• EVALUATION PLAN

You must have a way to evaluate how the entire project has been done, what needs to be improved and so on.

Looking through this entire article, you would find various tips that should help you secure the grants you need for the various educational programs you may want to establish in your school. Many have been successful with securing grants to the tune of $500,000 over the years.

So it is very possible to achieve those dreams for your school. Be sure to go through the various things discussed here and ensure that you write the best possible proposal for the project that will help with educating students in your school.

More on Business Grants

Education Project Proposal

Whenever you desire to see something to happen what do you do? Of course! You make an excellent proposal to encourage people to see the need from your standpoint and help you achieve your goals. However, if you find yourself inadequate to create an exceptional and excellent Education Project Proposal , you don’t have to worry because we got you covered. We provided you with an excellent collection of Project Proposal Samples that you can pull up whenever you need one. Nonetheless, that’s not the end. We also created a concise guide so you can create one without breaking a sweat. Go on take a scroll below and see it for yourself.

10+ Education Project Proposal Examples

1. university project proposal template.

• Google Docs

Size: A4, US

2. School Project Proposal Template

3. College Project Proposal Template

4. Free Sample School Project Proposal Template

5. Child-Friendly Education Proposal

Size: 34 KB

6. Project Proposal for Girl Child Education

Size: 827 KB

7. Education Project Proposal Example

Size: 214 KB

8. Project Proposal for Poor Child Education

Size: 51 KB

9. Project Proposal Educational Support to Poverty

Size: 60 KB

10. Recycling Education Project Proposal

Size: 106 KB

11. Education Project Proposal in PDF

Size: 130 KB

What is an Education Project Proposal?

An Education Project Proposal is a document that anyone can use within the education industry. This type of proposal is something students , teachers , and other staff can use to showcase their ideas to the school board or to the PTA.

What are the characteristics of a project life cycle?

A project life cycle is a process in which people from an organization or a project management team go through to finish a project successfully. In this way, people can gauge if what they are doing is advantageous to the overall project or not, and how it affects the company in the long run. 

The Initiation stage of the project is the conception part of it. It is the part where people create the ideas and concepts of the whole project. Determining the purpose and desired outcome of the project is within this stage.

The Planning stage is all about determining the details and processes to ensure that the project will hit the desired outcome. It is also in this phase that the proposal submission should be done.

The execution stage is usually the longest stage. The whole duration of this stage is not something the other stages can eclipse. However, this is the most hectic and time-consuming of them all. This is also the stage where all the plans are executed and come to life.

At this stage of the project, the whole execution is done and people are ready to close the project. Maybe some projects opt to become a program like the Indian Poshan Project that pushed for health and nutrition or ultimately ending the project in view of another. Nonetheless, this should never be done quickly but instead by a proper and deliberate process.

How to Create an Education Project Proposal

Education is one of the most favorable works that the older generation can do for its successor. Without a proper and genuine early childhood education , even our civilizations can be endangered. That’s why to help you make the most of their education we provided steps below for you to create an excellent project proposal.

Step 1: Determine the Readers

Your first step in creating your education project proposal should be on determining the reader of the said proposal. In this way, you can be sure that what you’re writing is tailor-made to the specific person and will see its fruits. So make sure to write something that your readers would appreciate.

Step 2: Define Project Summary

After having a definite audience you should also make sure that what you’re writing should include all the details of the project. However, since it is a proposal you may only opt to provide a summary of the project plan itself.

Step 3: Establish a Work Plan

The actions your team will do has a cause and effect, in this way, you can also see that it has further effects in the long run that might affect the readers. So make sure that you determine these within your work plan. If you’re planning to tackle school health in a certain primary school make sure that you detail it.

Step 4: Tackle the Budget and Schedule

Lastly, ensure that your proposal has a budget and schedule document or section. If you check the internet for some proposal templates you may also see these embedded usually in the later pages of the document. However, this is important and you should make sure that you write these well.

What details should I put in the project proposal?

The main details that a project proposal should have are the vision and goals, key deliverables, schedule, and ownership. Other resources and details that can also be included are the success criteria, key issues and risks, and reporting.

What is the proposal format?

The major format of creating a proposal includes: 1. Introduction 2. Issue 3. Solution 4. Qualification 5. Conclusion

What are the five elements of a concept paper?

The five elements of a concept paper are: 1. Vision 2. Scope of Work 3. Goals 4. Schedule/Timetable 5. Milestones/Criteria

With the rise of the internet and the promulgation of its uses, comes the rise of higher education. The concepts that once thought impossible are now right around the corner. However, it is still necessary to put forth ideas and concepts to the test. Use PDF, Word, or other formats as you see fit, but make sure that you are creating proposals to make the world a better place.

Proposal Maker

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

Generate a proposal for a new school recycling program

Compose a proposal for a school field trip to a science museum.

British Council

• English, education and arts
• Our work in education
• Higher education and science
• How we work
• Higher education partnerships
• Going Global Partnerships

Funding calls and opportunities

Through Going Global Partnerships, you can apply for grant funding for collaborative projects with universities, colleges, education policy makers and other partners in the UK and around the world. This funding can support: 

• Partnerships focused on strengthening quality, inclusion and innovation in higher education and TVET delivery
• Seed-funding for teaching and TNE partnerships
• Research partnerships focused on climate change, public health and other subjects

British Council Worldwide

• Afghanistan
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Czech Republic
• Hong Kong, SAR of China
• Korea, Republic of
• Myanmar (Burma)
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• North Macedonia
• Northern Ireland
• Occupied Palestinian Territories
• Philippines
• Saudi Arabia
• Sierra Leone
• South Africa
• South Sudan
• Switzerland
• United Arab Emirates
• United States of America

How to apply for grants

GPE offers different types of grants to support education system transformation in partner countries. View the pathway to grant funding and access relevant documents to help prepare grant applications.

Country-led system transformation

Click on an area to learn more.

GPE supports countries in planning and prioritizing reforms that have the potential to achieve transformation across an education system. After assessing their education system and identifying a priority reform, partner countries can access GPE grants to make focused, evidence-based investments in programs that unlock system bottlenecks.

Grant financing is available for capacity building and program development that might be needed to identify a key education reform and align partner support .

Partner countries can leverage additional external financing through the GPE Multiplier . The system transformation grant delivers funding at scale in support of a country’s reform efforts and both it and the Multiplier can combine with the Girls’ Education Accelerator to spur progress in gender equality.

Beyond support to governments, GPE also allocates grants to promote civil society’s voice and to generate new knowledge on key issues and solutions for the education sector.

• GPE implementation grant policy
• Information on education sector program implementation grants

The GPE operating model is based on three stages that support countries in moving from analysis and diagnosis of education challenges to reform prioritization and resource alignment, and finally to implementation, learning and adapting

Assess & diagnose

Analysis of a country's performance, opportunities and obstacles under four enabling factors critical to support system transformation: 1) data and evidence, 2) sector coordination, 3) gender-responsive planning and 4) volume, equity and efficiency of domestic public spending on education.

Prioritize & align

The ministry of education, with its partners, prepares a partnership compact to align partners and resources behind a prioritized reform area.

Act, learn & adapt

The country and its partners implement the agreed programs and reforms, tracking agreed results and adjusting as needed.

Partnership compact

The partnership compact details the country's focus on sector bottlenecks and solutions, defines GPE's engagement and ensures that partner financing is complementary and harmonized. Partner countries perform an analysis of education system conditions based on four enabling factors that are assessed by an independent panel of experts.

Country programs

GPE grants support education programs that go beyond piecemeal initiatives, generating systemwide change to put all children on the path to realizing their full potential.

GPE can provide grant financing to partner countries that seek financing to make focused, evidence-based investments in education programs.

System capacity grant

The system capacity grant builds national capabilities to develop, implement and monitor education sector plans and policies.

Program development grant

The program development grant supports the design of an education program that will help a country implement a priority reform.

GPE Multiplier grant

The GPE Multiplier crowds in investment for education by securing new and additional funding at a ratio of US$1 from the Multiplier for every US$3 from development partners and dollar-for-dollar from businesses and foundations.

System transformation grant

Using the system transformation grant, partner countries make focused, evidence-based investments in programs that unblock system bottlenecks and drive systemwide change.

Girls’ Education Accelerator

The Girls’ Education Accelerator provides resources to support gender equality in countries and regions where girls’ education has been identified as a main challenge.

A quality education for every child

All girls and boys, especially those who are marginalized by poverty, displacement or disability, are able to access 12 years of learning.

On this page

Grant eligibility, enabling factors, grant agents and coordinating agencies, gpe multiplier, accelerated funding, advocacy and social accountability grants.

• GPE 2020 grants

See the full list of GPE partner countries and their grant ceilings under the GPE 2025 funding model.

View deadlines for grant applications

The country assesses four enabling factors critical to system transformation:

• data and evidence
• sector coordination
• gender-responsive planning
• volume, equity and efficiency of domestic public spending on education.

The Partnership Compact Guidelines include information about the enabling factors and how to complete the questionnaire and analysis.

• Enabling factors screening questionnaire and analysis
• Domestic financing matrix

Independent Technical Advisory Panel

The Independent Technical Advisory Panel (ITAP) assesses country status against the four enabling factors to inform the partnership compact and GPE financing of system reform.

• Terms of Reference for the Independent Technical Advisory Panel

The partnership compact aligns partners and resources behind a prioritized education reform area. GPE recommends using the compact as a framework for all types of GPE grants, as well as to facilitate alignment between all sources of funding that contribute to education system transformation.

• Partnership Compact Guidelines

Partner countries receive GPE funding through grant agents who are accountable for the use of the resources throughout the grant’s duration. Governments, in consultation with the local education group, are encouraged to select a grant agent who can best assist them in a particular area supported by each GPE grant.

The coordinating agency is designated by the country’s local education group to act as a liaison between it, the government, GPE and other development partners.

• Selection process for grant agents
• GPE Secretariat checklist for grant agent selection
• Terms of reference for coordinating agencies

Countries can receive up to US$5 million through a system capacity grant to strengthen gender-responsive planning and policy development, mobilize coordinated action and improve government capacity to adapt and learn to drive results at scale. The grant can also be used to develop the country’s partnership compact.

Countries can refer to the system capacity grant guidelines in completing and submitting an application and budget template.

• System capacity grant guidelines
• Application
• Budget template
• Terms of reference for grant agents
• Progress report template
• Completion report template

Countries can receive US$200,000 (or double that, in exceptional cases) for the design of an education program that will help the country implement its priority education reform.

• Program development grant guidelines

Countries can receive up to US$162.5 million to finance priority programs to remove reform obstacles and drive change across the education system. Countries need to have completed the enabling factors analysis, developed a partnership compact and selected a suitable grant agent. They can also apply for a GPE Multiplier grant and (if eligible) a Girls’ Education Accelerator grant to maximize their GPE support.

Countries can refer to the system transformation grant guidelines in completing and submitting an application and budget template.

• System transformation grant guidelines
• Annual progress report template

Multiplier grants of up to US$50 million are available to countries that can mobilize investment in education from other partners, using a ratio of least $3 in new and additional external financing for every $1 from the GPE Multiplier . The Debt2Ed feature within the Multiplier also offers the opportunity to transform sovereign borrowing into new investments in education, helping to unlock the Multiplier in the same way as cofinancing.

A country first submits an expression of interest detailing the new and additional cofinancing from third parties, establishing the grant amount to be used in its Multiplier application. Countries are expected to have completed or be close to finalizing their partnership compact at the time they apply. Countries can refer to the GPE Multiplier guidelines in completing and submitting the expression of interest and application.

• Expression of interest
• Multiplier guidelines

Some countries applying for a system transformation grant or GPE Multiplier – either singly or in combination – are also eligible for grants under the Girls’ Education Accelerator . This $250-million window ensures countries can maximize every opportunity to help all girls attend school for a full 12 years.

• Please select between the Multiplier or system transformation grant guidelines

GPE can accelerate financing at times of crisis, such as disasters driven by natural hazards, armed conflict, forced displacement, and health emergencies, which threaten the education system.

Countries confronting a crisis can ask for advanced disbursement of up to 20% of a system transformation grant or Multiplier allocation (in countries only eligible for the Multiplier), or US$10 million (whichever is lowest of the three).

• Accelerated funding guidelines
• Operational framework for effective support in fragile and conflict-affected contexts

Through Education Out Loud , GPE supports civil society’s activities and influence in shaping education policy to better meet the needs of communities, especially of vulnerable and marginalized populations.

Implemented by Oxfam Denmark and financed by GPE, Education Out Loud is allocating up to US$133 million through three funding components.

Grants are available for national and international civil society organizations and networks in eligible countries worldwide to support their advocacy and social accountability work between 2019 and 2027.

Learn more about Education Out Loud

Knowledge and innovation (KIX) grants

With a budget of US$164.5 million, the Knowledge and Innovation Exchange (KIX) is the largest fund solely dedicated to meet global public good gaps in education.

KIX activities cover six thematic areas: early childhood care and education, learning assessment systems, gender equality, strengthening data systems, equity and inclusion, and teaching and learning. Knowledge and innovation grants.

Learn more about KIX

Grants under GPE 2020 funding model

Some grant information and documents under the previous funding model are available for a limited period.

Education sector program implementation grants

• Guidelines for education sector program implementation grant
• Variable part financing
• Standardized progress reporting
• Standardized completion reporting

Education Proposal Templates

Elevate your educational ideas with our proposal templates. They're the 'class' act for your next big educational pitch!

Find all funding opportunities for education and training

How funding is given and where to find opportunities.

Funding programmes

The European Commission provides funding to projects and organisations in the form of a call for proposals. Funding is provided for a broad range of projects and programmes covering a wide range of areas including education.

Funding is carried out through decentralised and centralised actions

• decentralised actions are managed at national level by national agencies located in EU countries
• centralised actions are managed at a European level by the European Commission

National agencies are separate from the EU institutions. They are legal entities set up to perform specific technical and scientific tasks that help the European Commission carry out policies.

Find a national agency

Funding opportunities in education

Funding opportunities exist in education and training in the form of the Erasmus+ programme, which is a funding scheme to support activities in education, training, youth and sport. The European Commission is responsible for Erasmus+ policies and oversees the overall programme implementation.

Find funding opportunities in education

More about Erasmus+

Centralised actions are managed at European level by the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA).

A list of centralised actions can be found on the European Commission's Funding Tender Opportunities Portal (F&TP)

Decentralised actions can be found by checking national agency websites.

Employment, skills and training

Calls for proposals relating to skills and training are also offered through the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

Search for funding opportunities in employment, social affairs and inclusion.

The Marie Skłodowska Curie actions (MSCA) provide grants for researchers at all stages of their careers - be they doctoral candidates or highly experienced researchers.

Share this page

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Active funding opportunity

Nsf 24-529: innovations in graduate education (ige), program solicitation, document information, document history.

• Posted: January 24, 2024
• Replaces: NSF 20-595

Program Solicitation NSF 24-529

Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

     April 22, 2024

     March 25, 2025

     March 25, Annually Thereafter

Important Information And Revision Notes

With this solicitation, the IGE program will support proposals in two tracks: Track 1: Career Preparation and Student Success Pilots and Track 2: Systemic Interventions and Policies. Under Track 1, the IGE program will continue to invite proposals to pilot, test, and validate innovative approaches to graduate education with an emphasis on career preparation and student success. Track 2 is new with a primary goal to support research on how various systemic innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate education impact graduate student outcomes (such as graduation rates, retention, employment, etc.).

Leadership teams (PI/Co-PIs) for both tracks are encouraged to include experts in education research, the learning sciences, and/or evaluation, as appropriate, as well as in the principal science domain(s), as needed, to design and implement a robust and appropriate research plan.

Proposals for the IGE Innovation Acceleration Hub are not being accepted through this solicitation.

Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitted in accordance with the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) that is in effect for the relevant due date to which the proposal is being submitted. The NSF PAPPG is regularly revised and it is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that the proposal meets the requirements specified in this solicitation and the applicable version of the PAPPG. Submitting a proposal prior to a specified deadline does not negate this requirement.

Summary Of Program Requirements

General information.

Program Title:

Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) Program

The Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) Program is designed to encourage development and implementation of bold, new, and potentially transformative approaches to STEM graduate education training. The program seeks proposals that a) explore ways for graduate students in STEM master's and doctoral degree programs to develop the skills, knowledge, and competencies needed to pursue a range of STEM careers, or b) support research on the graduate education system and outcomes of systemic interventions and policies. IGE projects are intended to generate the knowledge required for the customization, implementation, and broader adoption of potentially transformative approaches to graduate education. The program supports piloting, testing, and validating novel models or activities and examining systemic innovations with high potential to enrich and extend the knowledge base on effective graduate education approaches. The program addresses both workforce development, emphasizing broad participation, and institutional capacity-building needs in graduate education. Strategic collaborations with the private sector, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), government agencies, national laboratories, field stations, teaching and learning centers, informal science organizations, and academic partners are encouraged.

Cognizant Program Officer(s):

Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.

• Daniel Denecke, telephone: (703) 292-8072, email: [email protected]
• Karen McNeal, telephone: (703) 292-2138, email: [email protected]
• Elizabeth A. Webber, telephone: (703) 292-4316, email: [email protected]
• 47.076 --- STEM Education

Award Information

Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant or Continuing Grant

Estimated Number of Awards: 16 to 20

IGE Track 1 Awards (6 to 10 anticipated in FY 2024) are expected to be up to three (3) years in duration with a total budget between $300,000 and $500,000.

IGE Track 2 Awards (6 to 12 anticipated in FY 2024) are expected to be up to five (5) years in duration with a total budget up to $1,000,000.

The estimated number of awards and the anticipated funding amounts listed above for both Track 1 and Track 2 are for FY 2024. The number of awards and funding amounts in FY 2025 and FY 2026 are subject to the availability of funds.

Anticipated Funding Amount: $14,000,000

The anticipated funding amount of $14,000,000 is for FY 2024.

Eligibility Information

Who May Submit Proposals:

Proposals may only be submitted by the following: Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) - Two- and four-year IHEs (including community colleges) accredited in, and having a campus located in the US, acting on behalf of their faculty members. Special Instructions for International Branch Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal includes funding to be provided to an international branch campus of a US institution of higher education (including through use of subawards and consultant arrangements), the proposer must explain the benefit(s) to the project of performance at the international branch campus, and justify why the project activities cannot be performed at the US campus. Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Independent museums, observatories, research laboratories, professional societies and similar organizations located in the U.S. that are directly associated with educational or research activities. Tribal Nations: An American Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges as a federally recognized tribe pursuant to the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, 25 U.S.C. §§ 5130-5131.

Who May Serve as PI:

There are no restrictions or limits.

Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: 2

An eligible organization may participate in two Innovations in Graduate Education proposals per annual competition. Participation includes serving as a lead organization on a non-collaborative proposal or as a lead organization, non-lead organization, or subawardee on a collaborative proposal. Organizations participating solely as evaluators on projects are excluded from this limitation. Proposals that exceed the organizational eligibility limit (beyond the first two submissions based on timestamp) will be returned without review regardless of the organization's role (lead, non-lead, subawardee) in the returned proposal.

Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or co-PI: 1

An individual may serve as Lead Principal Investigator (PI) or Co-PI on only one proposal submitted to the IGE program per annual competition. Proposals that exceed the PI/Co-PI eligibility limit (beyond the first submission based on timestamp) will be returned without review regardless of the individual's role (PI or Co-PI) in the returned proposal.

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

A. proposal preparation instructions.

• Letters of Intent: Not required
• Preliminary Proposal Submission: Not required
• Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) guidelines apply. The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .
• Full Proposals submitted via Grants.gov: NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov guidelines apply (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide ).

B. Budgetary Information

C. due dates, proposal review information criteria.

Merit Review Criteria:

National Science Board approved criteria apply.

Award Administration Information

Award Conditions:

Standard NSF award conditions apply.

Reporting Requirements:

Standard NSF reporting requirements apply.

I. Introduction

Innovation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate education is vital to meet the needs of science and society in the 21 st century. There are multiple drivers for change including: (i) recent major national reports on the state of STEM graduate education, (ii) the accelerating pace of science and engineering discoveries and technological innovations, (iii) national STEM workforce trends, (iv) the growing globalization of science and engineering, and (v) calls to align graduate education practices and models with the needs of students and enhanced understanding of how people learn. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9

More recent drivers for innovation in STEM graduate education include heightened attention to (vi) graduate admissions policies, (vii) student mental health and wellness, and (viii) the potential uses of emerging technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 . There is increasing recognition, also, that addressing the grand challenges in science and engineering requires interdisciplinary and broad professional training, which is atypical for most graduate programs. Additionally, there is a growing body of evidence that diversity and inclusivity accelerate scientific innovation, hence there is a national need to identify and adopt practices that are effective in broadening participation in STEM graduate programs. 14

To address this wide range of issues, innovation is needed at multiple levels and scales ranging from the interpersonal level of student-advisor and mentor-mentee relationships through the level of the graduate program to the broad systemic environment of policies and procedures. Improved understanding through research is particularly needed at this latter level about how large-scale interventions impact graduate student outcomes and that cut across programs, institutions, and disciplines. To identify effective innovations at all scales, the IGE program calls for new approaches to a) pilot, test, and validate innovative and effective STEM graduate education models and programming, and b) examine the systemic impact of new and recent innovations in graduate education policies, procedures, and interventions.

II. Program Description

The IGE program is dedicated to (a) piloting, testing, and validating innovative approaches to graduate education, and (b) supporting research on the graduate education system and rigorous examination of outcomes associated with systemic graduate education interventions and policies. The IGE program seeks to generate the knowledge required for the customization and implementation of the most successful, transformative approaches.

The goals of the IGE Program are to:

• Generate the knowledge base needed to inform the development of bold, new, and potentially transformative approaches to graduate education as well as their customization, implementation, and broader adoption.
• Catalyze rapid advances in STEM graduate education broadly as well in particular disciplinary and interdisciplinary STEM fields.

The IGE Program calls for proposals in two tracks to:

• Design, pilot, and test new, innovative and transformative approaches for inclusive STEM graduate education (Track 1);
• Examine the impact of innovative systemic policies, procedures, and interventions on graduate education outcomes (Track 2);
• Examine the potential to extend a successful approach developed in one discipline or context to other disciplines or contexts (Tracks 1 and 2);
• Develop approaches that are informed by learning science and the existing body of knowledge about STEM graduate education (Tracks 1 and 2).

The primary beneficiaries for all IGE research projects (Track 1 and Track 2) must be master's and/or doctoral students in STEM-designated degree programs. Eligible degree programs include research-based STEM master's and doctoral degree programs, Professional Science Master's programs and MEng programs with research training but do not include programs that only award certificates or professional degrees [such as Doctor of Audiology (AuD), Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS), Doctor of Education (DEd), Doctor of Naprapathy (DN), Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), Doctor of Podiatric Medicine (DPM), Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy (DScPT), Juris Doctor (JD), Master of Liberal Arts (MLA), Doctor of Medicine (MD), Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (ND), Doctor of Optometry (OD), Doctor of Occupational Therapy (OTD), Doctor of Pharmacy, (PharmD), Doctor of Psychology (PsyD), Doctor of Speech-Language Pathology (SLPD)].

IGE RESEARCH PROJECTS

With this solicitation, NSF invites proposals for two types of projects (described below):

Track 1: Career Preparation and Student Success Pilots: IGE supports projects that generate knowledge about new, potentially transformative improvements in graduate education and workforce development that prepare the next generation of scientists and engineers for the full range of possible STEM career paths to advance the nation's STEM enterprise.

Track 1 proposals focus on novel, pilot interventions in a single STEM program or at a single institution benefiting STEM students across multiple graduate programs. Track 1 will also support proposals examining the potential to extend a successful approach developed in one discipline or context to other disciplines or contexts. Examples of topics that Track 1 projects may address include, but are not limited to: student professional skill development; career preparation and vocational counseling; faculty training and faculty professional development; entrepreneurship; experiential and project-based learning; outreach and community engagement; international experiences; virtual networks; pedagogical innovations related to generative AI and large language models; personalized learning; STEM identity and belonging; and mentoring. Projects should address how the proposed approach would serve a broad population of students from diverse backgrounds.

Track 1 proposals may request a total budget (up to three years in duration) between $300,000 and $500,000.

Track 2: Systemic Interventions and Policies: IGE Track 2 awards support research projects that are expected to generate knowledge about the graduate education system and outcomes of systemic intervention and policies. IGE Track 2 projects may be implemented at different scales: within a field of study across multiple institutions and programs; across multiple fields of study within a single institution; or across multiple institutions and fields of study. Specifically encouraged are proposals that address one of the following six areas:

1. Funding models and funding mechanisms with a priority emphasis on studies on the effects of traineeships, fellowships, internships, and teaching and research assistantships on graduate student outcomes addressing differences by sex, race, ethnicity, and citizenship and student debt load.

2. Graduate student mental health and wellbeing with a priority emphasis on projects that include research, data collection, and assessment of the state of graduate student mental health and wellbeing, factors contributing to and consequences of poor graduate student mental health, and the development, adaptation, and assessment of evidence-based strategies and policies to support emotional wellbeing and mental health.

3. Mentoring policies, procedures, and models with a priority emphasis on studies of effects of graduate education and mentoring policies and procedures on degree completion, including differences by (i) sex, race and ethnicity, and citizenship; and (ii) student debt load.

4. Graduate research environments and teams with a priority emphasis on proposals to study differences in graduate research environments (e.g., academic, industry, government, hybrid; place-based; team vs. independent; formal and informal social supports) and associated outcomes or develop and assess new or adapted interventions, including approaches that improve mentoring relationships, develop conflict management skills, and promote healthy research teams;

5. Inclusive recruitment, admissions, retention, and completion strategies including, but not limited to, studies of the impact of previously implemented and/or new innovations in policies or other interventions designed to broaden participation in STEM graduate education of students who are members of groups underrepresented in the STEM workforce; and

6. Credentialing and degree milestones including, but not limited to, studies assessing the impact of systemic innovations in graduate degree milestones, micro-credentials, stackable credentials, and competency-based approaches on graduate education outcomes such as student recruitment, retention, completion, skills development, and employment readiness.

Track 2 proposals may request a total budget (up to five years in duration) up to $1,000,000.

Leadership teams (PI/Co-PIs) for both tracks are encouraged to include experts in education research, the learning sciences and/or evaluation, as appropriate, as well as in the principal science domain(s) as needed to design and implement a robust and appropriate research plan.

IGE welcomes proposals from early-career investigators and complements the Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program's mission and focus. For information about the CAREER program, please refer to the Dear Colleague Letter: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf22099 . However, researchers at all stages of their careers including mid-career faculty and investigators from non-academic organizations are welcome to apply.

IGE especially welcomes proposals that reflect collaborations between IGE proposals and existing NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson Inclusion across the Nation of Communities of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science (INCLUDES) Initiative projects, provided the collaboration will strengthen both projects. Researchers at minority serving institutions and emerging research institutions are strongly encouraged to submit proposals.

III. Award Information

Anticipated Funding Amount: The anticipated funding amount of $14,000,000 is for FY 2024.

IV. Eligibility Information

V. proposal preparation and submission instructions.

Full Proposal Preparation Instructions : Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Research.gov or Grants.gov.

• Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG). The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg . Paper copies of the PAPPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] . The Prepare New Proposal setup will prompt you for the program solicitation number.
• Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov . The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: ( https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide ). To obtain copies of the Application Guide and Application Forms Package, click on the Apply tab on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download a Grant Application Package and Application Instructions link and enter the funding opportunity number, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the Download Package button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application Guide also may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] .

In determining which method to utilize in the electronic preparation and submission of the proposal, please note the following:

Collaborative Proposals. All collaborative proposals submitted as separate submissions from multiple organizations must be submitted via Research.gov. PAPPG Chapter II.E.3 provides additional information on collaborative proposals.

See PAPPG Chapter II.D.2 for guidance on the required sections of a full research proposal submitted to NSF. Please note that the proposal preparation instructions provided in this program solicitation may deviate from the PAPPG instructions.

Title of Proposed Project: The title of the proposed project should begin with the term: "IGE: [add project Track 1 or Track 2]: [add project title]".

Cover Sheet: If international activities are proposed, whether or not they will be funded via the IGE award, the international cooperative activities box should be checked and the individual countries listed. For planning purposes, use October 1 as the award start date for proposals submitted to the FY 2024-FY 2026 competitions.

Project Summary: (1-page limit): Summarize, for Track 1 proposals: the graduate education innovation that will be piloted, the existing pilot that will be adopted or expanded, OR for Track 2 proposals: the systemic policies, procedures, or interventions and graduate student outcomes that will be examined) as part of the IGE project. Describe the disciplinary field(s) involved, the knowledge that will be generated to inform implementation and adaptability of transformative approaches to STEM graduate education, and how the project is responsive to a need and/or opportunity. Each NSF merit review criterion (Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts) must be addressed in a separate statement (see the PAPPG for additional instructions). The summary should be written in a manner that will be informative to STEM professionals working in the same or related fields, and understandable to a scientifically literate lay reader.

Project Description (15-page limit): The Project Description cannot exceed 15 pages, including tables and illustrations. The Project Description must contain only the sections described below with the suggested headings and in the order listed.

For proposals submitted to TRACK 1 - Career Preparation Pilots:

Rationale and Goals

Describe the rationale for the proposed improvements and the overarching project goals of the IGE project with a focus on piloting and testing potentially transformative improvements in graduate education. The rationale for introducing the proposed innovation(s) should address the graduate education context or setting in which it will be introduced. All innovations should be grounded in the appropriate literature. Specify the approaches or models to be piloted and tested as well as the targeted graduate student population and the justification for their inclusion. Identify the potential of the IGE project to provide added value to the current degree programs at the institution(s) or in the discipline(s). Discuss the potential for extending the approaches and activities nationally and how they could advance the modernization of graduate education across STEM disciplines.

Research Plan and Methods

IGE supports qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches to examine the impact of the proposed improvements in STEM graduate education to enhance career development and workforce development. This section should begin with a clear identification of the research questions and hypotheses and briefly describe the associated theoretical framework. Proposals should include how rigor will be ensured, including justification of the study design including why the proposed research strategies will be used to address the questions or hypotheses 15 , 16 .

Proposals should address problem formulation, data collection, data evaluation and analysis as well as statistical methods and/or qualitative analytical methods that will be used to analyze the data to ensure valid, reliable, and trustworthy results. Studies should be described in sufficient detail so that other researchers can replicate the research 17 . If the project builds upon an early-stage or exploratory study, proposals should include a clear rationale for how this project is anticipated to generate new knowledge and discuss how research methods will differ to account for differences in scope, scale and/or target population. Proposals should describe the theory of change that informs the project's approach to innovation 18 , 19 , 20 . Proposals should also state the theoretical framework that informs the research and, for qualitative studies, discuss how people involved in the research process are situated with respect to student participants (e.g., professional or potential power relationships, demographic or anticipated cultural similarities or dissimilarities). If previously validated instruments or newly developed ones will be used, proposals should describe the method of verifying validity and reliability in the proposed study.

For proposals submitted to TRACK 2 – Research on Systemic Interventions, Policies, Procedures and Outcomes:

Describe the rationale for focus on the selected aspect of the graduate education system or systemic innovation. The research focus should be grounded in the appropriate literature addressing prior studies, where relevant. Specify the interventions, policies, or procedures to be studied, the targeted graduate student population(s) and the justification for their inclusion, as well as the time-period of the innovation of focus. Identify the potential of the IGE project to provide appreciable and meaningful added value to the current degree programs at the institution(s) or in the discipline(s) as well as anticipated limitations. Discuss the potential for extending the approaches and activities nationally and how they could advance the modernization of graduate education across STEM disciplines.

IGE supports qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches to examine the impact of systemic innovations in graduate education, interventions, and policies. This section should begin with a clear identification of the research questions or hypotheses and briefly describe the associated theoretical framework. Proposals should include justification of the study design including why the proposed research strategies will be used to address the questions or hypotheses 15 , 16 .

Proposals should address problem formulation, data collection, data evaluation and analysis as well as statistical methods that will be used to analyze the data to ensure valid, reliable, and trustworthy results. Studies should be described in sufficient detail so that other researchers can replicate the research. [17] If the study proposed is a meta-analytical, this section should address how differences in methodological procedures within the studies included such as sampling, treatment parameters, and observation methods will be addressed. If a new systemic intervention is proposed, proposals should describe the theory of change that informs the project approach to innovation 18 , 19 , 20 . For qualitative studies, authors should also state the theoretical framework that guided the research and discuss how people involved in the research process are situated with respect to student participants (e.g., professional or potential power relationships, demographic or anticipated cultural similarities or dissimilarities).

Examination of impact of interventions and policies across multiple institutions of similar and dissimilar types is encouraged. Research may involve the collection of original data on near-term impact of the implementation of new policies and procedural interventions as well as secondary analyses using extant datasets or meta-analyses/meta-syntheses on previously implemented policy and procedural innovations. The duration of the intervention and the justification for the hypothesized correlation to the studies impact(s) should be clearly explained. Proposals are welcome from higher educational institutions, non-profit organizations, and consortia of institutions.

The following sections are required in the Project Description for both Track 1 and Track 2 proposals:

Organization and Management

This section should include a clear identification of members of the project team and a description of their assigned roles and responsibilities; a project management plan, including a timeline, that outlines major steps to be taken during the proposed project. If a collaborative proposal is proposed, describe the role of the non-lead institution(s) and the participating personnel roles, and the mechanisms for project communication. A collaborative proposal should be submitted only if the partner institution(s) has (have) a significant role and will substantially enhance the education model or components tested. If a graduate student is participating in the research, clearly discuss the roles of the graduate student and the research mentors who will guide their educational research. See Graduate Student Support, below.

Broader Impacts

The Project Description must contain, as a separate section within the narrative, a discussion of the broader impacts of the education model and activities. This section must be clearly labeled "Broader Impacts." For further information see the PAPPG.

Performance Assessment

Projects (Track 1 or Track 2) that include a novel intervention are strongly encouraged to include plans to assess project implementation and performance. Assessments should be both formative and summative, and the plan should describe how and when both formative and summative assessments would be shared with the project participants and institutional administration. Projects are not required to have an external evaluator. However, teams are encouraged to include evaluation expertise needed to ensure robust data collection and analysis methods appropriate to assess process and performance. Multiple iterations of data collection and analysis over the duration of the award are strongly encouraged, when appropriate. Performance assessment is not required for Track 2 Research projects that do not include implementation of novel interventions 21 .

Dissemination

The proposal should describe how successful approaches, practices, and models will be shared across the institution[s] or field[s] and nationally and include institutional plans to implement or scale innovations. Proposals should include plans for communicating project results to other stakeholders, both within the IGE community via participation in activities and resources of the IGE Innovation Acceleration Hub (IGEHub, http://www.igehub.org/ ) and more broadly through publications, professional meetings, and electronic communications platforms.

Budget and Budget Justification:

Track 1: Provide an annual budget for up to three years total duration. The system will automatically generate a cumulative budget. The total proposed budget can range between $300,000-$500,000 and should be consistent with the costs to develop, implement, and evaluate the pilot.

Track 2: Provide an annual budget for between three years and five years total duration. The system will automatically generate a cumulative budget. The total proposed budget can be up to $1,000,000 and should be consistent with the costs to implement the proposed interventions and/or conduct the proposed study.

Track 2 proposal budgets and budget justifications should align with the proposed scale of the intervention and/or research activities including: the number of participating programs, institutions, and/or STEM disciplines; participant or sample size; partnerships and collaborations; and duration of the study. Budgets should support participation across multiple institutions as appropriate in addition to reflecting the scale of the proposed research.

Budgets for both Track 1 and Track 2 should include funds for the PI and a Co-PI or evaluator to attend biennial IGE meetings in Washington, DC. For further information on allowable costs, see the PAPPG.

Graduate Student Support: IGE projects will only support stipends or cost of education, including tuition and fees for graduate students engaged in an educational research component that aligns with their thesis research (e.g., College of Education, Discipline-based Educational Research units, and similar). See Organization and Management , above.

Supplementary Documentation:

Letters of Collaboration: Letters of collaboration using the standard NSF format (see PAPPG for guidance) may be provided from partner organizations, including international organizations, that play a significant collaborative role in the project. Track 2 projects must include one Letter of Collaboration from an appropriate senior administrator from each of the participating institution(s). See PAPPG for guidance.

No other items or appendices are to be included. Full proposals containing items other than those required above or by the PAPPG will be returned without review.

1 Graduate Education for the 21 st Century , National Academies, 2018

2 STEM Education for the Future: A Visioning Report, Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee of the Education and Human Resources Directorate, 2020

3 Grand Challenges for Engineering , National Academies for Engineering, 2017

4 The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education , Commission on the Future of Graduate Education in the United States, 2010

5 Advancing Graduate Education in the Chemical Sciences , American Chemical Society, 2012

6 Biomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report , National Institutes of Health, 2012

7 Understanding PhD Career Pathways for Program Improvement , Council of Graduate Schools, 2014

8 The STEM Labor Force Today: Scientists, Engineers, and the Skilled Technical Workforce, National Science Board, 2021

9 Professional Development: Shaping Effective Programs for STEM Graduate Students , Council of Graduate Schools, 2017

10 Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions , Council of Graduate Schools, 2016

11 Supporting Graduate Student Mental Health and Well-being , Council of Graduate Schools and the Jed Foundation, 2021

12 NSF RAPID: Graduate Student Experiences of Support and Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic , University of Montana, 2020

13 CU Committee Report: Generative Artificial Intelligence for Education and Pedagogy , Cornell University, 2023

14 Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, VV., Galvez, SM-N., He, B., Jurafsky, D., & McFarland, DA. (2020, April). The Diversity – Innovation Paradox in Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 117(17), 9284-9291.

15 Tracy, SJ. (2010). "Qualitative Quality: Eight "Big-Tent" Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research," Qualitative Inquiry , 16:10, pp.837-851.

16 Creswell & Creswell. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2017

17 Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development . A Report from the Institute of Education Sciences US Department of Education, and the National Science Foundation, 2013

18 Reinholz, D.L. & Andrews, TC. (2020). "Change theory and theory of change: what's the difference anyway?" International Journal of STEM Education , 7:2

19 Reinholz, D.L., White, I. & Andrews, T. (2021). "Change Theory in STEM higher education: a systematic review," International Journal of STEM Education , 8:37

20 Connolly, MR., & Seymour, E., Why theories of change matter (WCER Working Paper No. 2015-2), 2015

21 The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation . Directorate for Education and Human Resources and the Division of Research and Learning in Formal and Informal Settings National Science Foundation, 2010.

Cost Sharing:

Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

Due by 5pm submitter's local time

D. Research.gov/Grants.gov Requirements

For Proposals Submitted Via Research.gov:

To prepare and submit a proposal via Research.gov, see detailed technical instructions available at: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html . For Research.gov user support, call the Research.gov Help Desk at 1-800-381-1532 or e-mail [email protected] . The Research.gov Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the Research.gov system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.

For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:

Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov is available on the Grants.gov Applicant Resources webpage: https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants.html . In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide (see link in Section V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: [email protected] . The Grants.gov Contact Center answers general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation. Submitting the Proposal: Once all documents have been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must then sign and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred to Research.gov for further processing. The NSF Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov informational page provides submission guidance to applicants and links to helpful resources including the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide , Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Research.gov how-to guide , and Grants.gov Submitted Proposals Frequently Asked Questions . Grants.gov proposals must pass all NSF pre-check and post-check validations in order to be accepted by Research.gov at NSF. When submitting via Grants.gov, NSF strongly recommends applicants initiate proposal submission at least five business days in advance of a deadline to allow adequate time to address NSF compliance errors and resubmissions by 5:00 p.m. submitting organization's local time on the deadline. Please note that some errors cannot be corrected in Grants.gov. Once a proposal passes pre-checks but fails any post-check, an applicant can only correct and submit the in-progress proposal in Research.gov.

Proposers that submitted via Research.gov may use Research.gov to verify the status of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, until an application has been received and validated by NSF, the Authorized Organizational Representative may check the status of an application on Grants.gov. After proposers have received an e-mail notification from NSF, Research.gov should be used to check the status of an application.

VI. NSF Proposal Processing And Review Procedures

Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program for acknowledgement and, if they meet NSF requirements, for review. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF either as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal. In addition, Program Officers may obtain comments from site visits before recommending final action on proposals. Senior NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. A flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal and award process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/ .

Proposers should also be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in Leading the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Talent Development and the Delivery of Benefits from Research - NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 - 2026 . These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.

One of the strategic objectives in support of NSF's mission is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions must recruit, train, and prepare a diverse STEM workforce to advance the frontiers of science and participate in the U.S. technology-based economy. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge research under the guidance of the Nation's most creative scientists and engineers. NSF also supports development of a strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce by investing in building the knowledge that informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning.

NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and expanding participation of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

A. Merit Review Principles and Criteria

The National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all areas of science and engineering research and education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration of both the technical aspects of a proposed project and its potential to contribute more broadly to advancing NSF's mission "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes every effort to conduct a fair, competitive, transparent merit review process for the selection of projects.

1. Merit Review Principles

These principles are to be given due diligence by PIs and organizations when preparing proposals and managing projects, by reviewers when reading and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff when determining whether or not to recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Given that NSF is the primary federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:

• All NSF projects should be of the highest quality and have the potential to advance, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
• NSF projects, in the aggregate, should contribute more broadly to achieving societal goals. These "Broader Impacts" may be accomplished through the research itself, through activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified.
• Meaningful assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should be based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between the effect of broader impacts and the resources provided to implement projects. If the size of the activity is limited, evaluation of that activity in isolation is not likely to be meaningful. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of these activities may best be done at a higher, more aggregated, level than the individual project.

With respect to the third principle, even if assessment of Broader Impacts outcomes for particular projects is done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable for carrying out the activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual projects should include clearly stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the PI intends to do, and a plan in place to document the outputs of those activities.

These three merit review principles provide the basis for the merit review criteria, as well as a context within which the users of the criteria can better understand their intent.

2. Merit Review Criteria

All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board approved merit review criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.

The two merit review criteria are listed below. Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Therefore, proposers must fully address both criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i). contains additional information for use by proposers in development of the Project Description section of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i), prior to the review of a proposal.

When evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why they want to do it, how they plan to do it, how they will know if they succeed, and what benefits could accrue if the project is successful. These issues apply both to the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which the project may make broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will be asked to evaluate all proposals against two criteria:

• Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potential to advance knowledge; and
• Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to benefit society and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal outcomes.

The following elements should be considered in the review for both criteria:

• Advance knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); and
• Benefit society or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
• To what extent do the proposed activities suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
• Is the plan for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to assess success?
• How well qualified is the individual, team, or organization to conduct the proposed activities?
• Are there adequate resources available to the PI (either at the home organization or through collaborations) to carry out the proposed activities?

Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, but are complementary to, the project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to achievement of societally relevant outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to: full participation of women, persons with disabilities, and other underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and educator development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in society; development of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased partnerships between academia, industry, and others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness of the United States; and enhanced infrastructure for research and education.

Proposers are reminded that reviewers will also be asked to review the Data Management Plan and the Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

B. Review and Selection Process

Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.

Reviewers will be asked to evaluate proposals using two National Science Board approved merit review criteria and, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will generally be completed and submitted by each reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.

After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF strives to be able to tell proposers whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. Large or particularly complex proposals or proposals from new recipients may require additional review and processing time. The time interval begins on the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.

After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements or the Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Support for review of business, financial, and policy implications. After an administrative review has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers perform the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.

Once an award or declination decision has been made, Principal Investigators are provided feedback about their proposals. In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying information, are sent to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.

VII. Award Administration Information

A. notification of the award.

Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program administering the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)

B. Award Conditions

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the award notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms and Conditions* and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.

*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF . Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected] .

More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .

Administrative and National Policy Requirements

Build America, Buy America

As expressed in Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers (86 FR 7475), it is the policy of the executive branch to use terms and conditions of Federal financial assistance awards to maximize, consistent with law, the use of goods, products, and materials produced in, and services offered in, the United States.

Consistent with the requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act (Pub. L. 117-58, Division G, Title IX, Subtitle A, November 15, 2021), no funding made available through this funding opportunity may be obligated for an award unless all iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States. For additional information, visit NSF's Build America, Buy America webpage.

C. Reporting Requirements

For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 days prior to the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards require submission of more frequent project reports). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final project report, and a project outcomes report for the general public.

Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for all identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of required data.

PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and final project reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, and other specific products and impacts of the project. Submission of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report also must be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.

More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg .

VIII. Agency Contacts

Please note that the program contact information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.

General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:

For questions related to the use of NSF systems contact:

• NSF Help Desk: 1-800-381-1532
• Research.gov Help Desk e-mail: [email protected]

For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:

• Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a confirmation message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected] .

IX. Other Information

The NSF website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences . Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time new publications are issued that match their identified interests. "NSF Update" also is available on NSF's website .

Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at https://www.grants.gov .

About The National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering."

NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic research.

NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.

Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported projects. See the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide Chapter II.F.7 for instructions regarding preparation of these types of proposals.

The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

The National Science Foundation Information Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111.

Privacy Act And Public Burden Statements

The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals; and project reports submitted by proposers will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding proposers or nominees as part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See System of Record Notices , NSF-50 , "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," and NSF-51 , "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records." Submission of the information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Suzanne H. Plimpton Reports Clearance Officer Policy Office, Division of Institution and Award Support Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management National Science Foundation Alexandria, VA 22314

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. A lock ( ) or https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Keyboard Navigation

• Agriculture and Food Security
• Anti-Corruption
• Conflict Prevention and Stabilization
• Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance
• Economic Growth and Trade
• Environment, Energy, and Infrastructure
• Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment
• Global Health
• Humanitarian Assistance
• Innovation, Technology, and Research
• Water and Sanitation
• Burkina Faso
• Central Africa Regional
• Central African Republic
• Côte d’Ivoire
• Democratic Republic of the Congo
• East Africa Regional
• Power Africa
• Republic of the Congo
• Sahel Regional
• Sierra Leone
• South Africa
• South Sudan
• Southern Africa Regional
• West Africa Regional
• Afghanistan
• Central Asia Regional
• Indo-Pacific
• Kyrgyz Republic
• Pacific Islands
• Philippines
• Regional Development Mission for Asia
• Timor-Leste
• Turkmenistan
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• North Macedonia
• Central America and Mexico Regional Program
• Dominican Republic
• Eastern and Southern Caribbean
• El Salvador
• Middle East Regional Platform
• West Bank and Gaza
• Dollars to Results
• Data Resources
• Strategy & Planning
• Budget & Spending
• Performance and Financial Reporting
• FY 2023 Agency Financial Report
• Records and Reports
• Budget Justification
• Our Commitment to Transparency
• Policy and Strategy
• How to Work with USAID
• Find a Funding Opportunity
• Organizations That Work With USAID
• Resources for Partners
• Get involved
• Business Forecast
• Safeguarding and Compliance
• Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
• Mission, Vision and Values
• News & Information
• Operational Policy (ADS)
• Organization
• Stay Connected
• USAID History
• Video Library
• Coordinators
• Nondiscrimination Notice and Civil Rights
• Collective Bargaining Agreements
• Disabilities Employment Program
• Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
• Reasonable Accommodations
• Urgent Hiring Needs
• Vacancy Announcements
• Search Search Search

Unsolicited Submissions

You never know where the next great idea will come from. That’s why USAID welcomes unsolicited contract proposals and assistance applications for consideration. We do review every submission, but can only approve only a small number, so please read this guidance carefully.

Introduction

Unsolicited proposals and applications provide a pathway for organizations to submit unique, innovative, or proprietary approaches for solutions to development and humanitarian challenges. USAID reviews unsolicited proposals and applications to determine whether funding submissions is in the best interest of the Agency and consistent with USAID’s development objectives.

Unsolicited proposals and applications can be received by USAID on a continuous basis for review; however, only in highly exceptional cases are these likely to be approved for funding. Generally, funding for USAID programs is concentrated and focused on clear objectives within program priorities and funding for unsolicited submissions is limited.

USAID encourages those considering submitting unsolicited proposals and applications to first review USAID competitive announcements published on SAM.gov and Grants.gov and review the Agency’s Business Forecast , Funding Feed , and Sub-Opportunities portal to learn more about different funding pathways. The Agency also provides its Country Development Cooperation Strategies (CDCSs) to help potential partners understand the high-level goals that each Mission will work to address during a strategy period.

How to Apply

USAID accepts unsolicited submissions on a rolling basis in the Unsolicited Submissions portal on WorkwithUSAID.gov. Before submitting information to USAID, we encourage you to review the step-by-step guide that is available here as well as our downloadable and fillable checklist of information needed for a submission. When you’re ready to submit an opportunity, log in to your account or sign up for the WorkwithUSAID.gov Partner Directory. Creating an account will allow for quicker processing. If you are already registered, please log in to your WorkwithUSAID.gov account . A list of frequently asked questions about Unsolicited Submissions is also available on WorkwithUSAID.gov.

At this time, USAID is only accepting submissions in English.

Governor Newsom Unveils Revised State Budget, Prioritizing Balanced Solutions for a Leaner, More Efficient Government

Published: May 10, 2024

The Budget Proposal — Covering Two Years — Cuts Spending, Makes Government Leaner, and Preserves Core Services Without New Taxes on Hardworking Californians

Watch Governor Newsom’s May Revise presentation here

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:  The Governor’s revised budget proposal closes both this year’s remaining $27.6 billion budget shortfall and next year’s projected $28.4 billion deficit while preserving many key services that Californians rely on — including education, housing, health care, and food assistance.

SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today released a May Revision proposal for the 2024-25 fiscal year that ensures the budget is balanced over the next two fiscal years by tightening the state’s belt and stabilizing spending following the tumultuous COVID-19 pandemic, all while preserving key ongoing investments.

Under the Governor’s proposal, the state is projected to achieve a positive operating reserve balance not only in this budget year but also in the next. This “budget year, plus one” proposal is designed to bring longer-term stability to state finances without delay and create an operating surplus in the 2025-26 budget year.

In the years leading up to this May Revision, the Newsom Administration recognized the threats of an uncertain stock market and federal tax deadline delays – setting aside $38 billion in reserves that could be utilized for shortfalls. That has put California in a strong position to maintain fiscal stability.

“Even when revenues were booming, we were preparing for possible downturns by investing in reserves and paying down debts – that’s put us in a position to close budget gaps while protecting core services that Californians depend on. Without raising taxes on Californians, we’re delivering a balanced budget over two years that continues the progress we’ve fought so hard to achieve, from getting folks off the streets to addressing the climate crisis to keeping our communities safe.” – Governor Gavin Newsom

Below are the key takeaways from Governor Newsom’s proposed budget:

A BALANCED BUDGET OVER TWO YEARS.  The Governor is solving two years of budget problems in a single budget, tightening the state’s belt to get the budget back to normal after the tumultuous years of the COVID-19 pandemic. By addressing the shortfall for this budget year — and next year — the Governor is eliminating the 2024-25 deficit and eliminating a projected deficit for the 2025-26 budget year that is $27.6 billion (after taking an early budget action) and $28.4 billion respectively.

CUTTING SPENDING, MAKING GOVERNMENT LEANER.  Governor Newsom’s revised balanced state budget cuts one-time spending by $19.1 billion and ongoing spending by $13.7 billion through 2025-26. This includes a nearly 8% cut to state operations and a targeted elimination of 10,000 unfilled state positions, improving government efficiency and reducing non-essential spending — without raising taxes on individuals or proposing state worker furloughs. The budget makes California government more efficient, leaner, and modern — saving costs by streamlining procurement, cutting bureaucratic red tape, and reducing redundancies.

PRESERVING CORE SERVICES & SAFETY NETS.  The budget maintains service levels for key housing, food, health care, and other assistance programs that Californians rely on while addressing the deficit by pausing the expansion of certain programs and decreasing numerous recent one-time and ongoing investments.

NO NEW TAXES & MORE RAINY DAY SAVINGS.  Governor Newsom is balancing the budget by getting state spending under control — cutting costs, not proposing new taxes on hardworking Californians and small businesses — and reducing the reliance on the state’s “Rainy Day” reserves this year.

HOW WE GOT HERE:  California’s budget shortfall is rooted in two separate but related developments over the past two years.

• First, the state’s revenue, heavily reliant on personal income taxes including capital gains, surged in 2021 due to a robust stock market but plummeted in 2022 following a market downturn. While the market bounced back by late 2023, the state continued to collect less tax revenue than projected in part due to something called “capital loss carryover,” which allows losses from previous years to reduce how much an individual is taxed.
• Second, the IRS extended the tax filing deadline for most California taxpayers in 2023 following severe winter storms, delaying the revelation of reduced tax receipts. When these receipts were able to eventually be processed, they were 22% below expectations. Without the filing delay, the revenue drop would have been incorporated into last year’s budget and the shortfall this year would be significantly smaller.

CALIFORNIA’S ECONOMY REMAINS STRONG:  The Governor’s revised balanced budget sets the state up for continued economic success. California’s economy remains the 5th largest economy in the world and for the first time in years, the state’s population is increasing and tourism spending recently experienced a record high. California is #1 in the nation for new business starts , #1 for access to venture capital funding , and the #1 state for manufacturing , high-tech , and agriculture .

Additional details on the May Revise proposal can be found in this fact sheet and at www.ebudget.ca.gov .

Language selection

• Français fr

Oral Health Access Fund call for proposals applicant guide: Stream 1: Oral health education and training

Published: May 2024

On this page

About this guide, about the program, how to complete the application form, after you apply, information sessions.

This guide acts as a companion piece to Oral Health Access Fund call for proposals application for funding Stream 1: Oral health education and training , here after referred to as the 'Application Form'. It:

• describes the Oral Health Access Fund
• provides instructions on how to apply
• includes supplementary instructions for key requirements of the application form

Download the application form (PDF)

The Oral Health Access Fund (the Fund) is a new grants and contributions funding program that will expand access to oral health care. The Fund will achieve this by supporting projects that reduce or remove non-financial barriers to accessing oral health care for targeted populations. It will fund projects that aim to:

• connect people to oral health care
• deliver prevention and education efforts to improve oral health
• improve training and capacity for oral health care providers

The May 2024 call for proposals will fund projects that address:

• competency gaps related to the treatment of targeted populations
• training adaptation to ensure sufficient hands-on training opportunities

Projects are anticipated to begin as early as April 1, 2025, and will vary in duration. Regardless of duration, all projects must be completed by March 31, 2028. As the Fund has on-going funding, there will also be future opportunities to submit proposals.

Who can apply

For Stream 1, accredited and non-accredited Canadian oral health training institutions can apply, including those who are:

• not-for-profit
• publicly-funded
• privately funded

This includes training institutions providing programs for all 6 oral health professions:

• dental hygiene
• dental therapy
• dental assisting
• dental technology

Training institutions located outside of Canada are not eligible to apply.

How to apply

Download and complete the application form. Ensure that it is signed and dated by a representative who has legal signing authority for your organization.

Email the completed and signed application form to [email protected] . The application form must be in PDF format. Include all required documentation as attachments (for a full list of documents, see 'Section 14 – Submission Instructions' of the Application Form). Attachments can be included as pdfs, jpegs, Excel or Word documents.

Applications are due by 11:59 PDT on July 31, 2024.

Alternatively, the application form can be mailed to the Oral Health Access Fund at:

The Oral Health Access Fund Oral Health Education and Training Stream c/o Health Canada Mail Stop 0905A 70 Columbine Driveway, Tunney's Pasture Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9

All applications submitted by mail must be post-marked no later than July 31, 2024.

If you need any accommodations, email the program as soon as possible at [email protected] .

We will not consider incomplete applications for further review.

Health Canada reserves the right to:

• reject any submission received
• accept any submission in whole or in part (in consultation with the applicant)
• cancel or re-issue this call for proposals at any time (applicants will be notified)

Health Canada is under no obligation to enter into a funding agreement as a result of this invitation to apply.

Parameters your project must follow

Funding priority.

In this 2024 Stream 1 call for proposals, funding will be prioritized for projects that relate to training and capacity building. Ensure your application clearly outlines how your project aligns with this funding priority. Specifically, funding through this stream will support projects that:

• address competency gaps in the knowledge and skills of students and/or oral health care professionals related to the treatment of targeted populations, and/or
• help oral health training institutions adapt to provide students with sufficient hands-on training opportunities

Examples of possible projects could include:

• curriculum development for oral health training programs to improve students' knowledge and skills for treating targeted populations
• professional development opportunities for oral health professionals to develop the knowledge and skills for treating targeted populations
• internships and partnerships with community-based, government or social service organizations for oral health students to gain experience providing treatment to targeted populations in underserved areas
• design adaptations to ensure students continue to have access to sufficient hands-on training opportunities that are also accessible to patients.

These examples are illustrative and do not reflect a comprehensive list of projects that Health Canada will consider.

• Health Canada is committed to funding projects that promote diversity and inclusion. Health Canada funding seeks to improve health outcomes of all people living in Canada, including minority, equity-seeking groups.

Targeted populations

Targeted populations under the Fund include those who experience barriers to accessing oral health care, such as:

• Indigenous Peoples
• newcomers to Canada
• official language minority communities
• people experiencing homelessness
• persons with disabilities
• rural and remote communities

Proposals must identify how a project will reduce barriers to accessing oral health care for targeted populations.

Funding limitations

Funding will support many projects across the country, and so will be dispersed through a highly competitive process. The total funding available from the Fund for projects under stream 1 is limited to:

• $25 million in the 2025 to 2026 fiscal year
• $50 million in the 2026 to 2027 fiscal year
• $50 million in the 2027 to 2028 fiscal year

The amount allocated to stream 1 after 2028 will be determined at a later date.

If a project is funded, recipients may be asked during the negotiation phase to adjust the budget and scope of a project, if needed.

You can submit applications for multiple projects, but you must submit them separately (1 project proposal per application form). Health Canada will determine whether to award project funding as a grant or a contribution.

Projects can receive funding for up to 3 successive fiscal years. Projects do not need to be multi-year to be considered, particularly those wishing to be considered for a grant. All projects must be completed by March 2028.

This section will help you with some of the requirements of the application form. Each section and question number corresponds with those found in the application form.

Section 1 : Applicant information, Question 8: M-30 legislation

Applicants outside of Quebec should select 'My institution is not located in Quebec'.

Quebec-based applicants

Indicate if your institution is subject to the province's Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil Exécutif (the Act). You can read the Act here:

• the Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil Exécutif

Verify if your institution corresponds to the definition of 'school body' or any other body as defined in Section 3.6.2 of the Act. You are encouraged to seek confirmation of your institution's status with the Government of Quebec before submitting your funding application.

Your institution's M-30 status will bear no impact on the eligibility or assessment of your proposed projects.

Section 5: Reach and beneficiaries, Question 8: Integration of sex and gender-based analysis

Addressing health equity is a key priority for Health Canada. As such, we have a mandate to apply Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis Plus (SGBA+) to advance health equity, diversity, and inclusion in our:

• initiatives

SGBA+ is an analytical, intersectional approach that assesses how determinants of health interact and intersect with each other and broader systems of power and discrimination.

The "plus" in SGBA+ recognizes the importance of considering multiple intersecting factors that may impact health, or in this case, oral health specifically. These factors shape a population's experiences and lived realities, and go beyond sex assigned at birth and gender, such as:

The "plus" also acknowledges that these experiences occur within different social contexts and are shaped by systems of power and discrimination, such as:

When developing your project, consider how its activities may impact different populations beyond your initial targeted population(s). One of the best ways to do this is to involve members of the targeted population(s) directly in the design, implementation, and evaluation of your project. Integrating a health determinants lens also contributes to an inclusive approach to developing, delivering and evaluating your project.

To more effectively consider different targeted populations in your project, follow these steps:

• Begin by defining the issue: what evidence currently exists related to different demographic factors and the issue you are addressing?
• Use precise language when defining your population or sub-populations. For example, instead of simply "seniors" consider other factors such as age and location: "women over 80 years of age in rural areas".
• quantitatively (such as statistics)
• qualitatively (such as focus groups and discussions)
• Plan how you can track and analyze demographic data to uncover how your project impacts different populations.
• Plan how you will share your lessons learned from this project to make recommendations for future changes to programs, policy and practices in your community or beyond that can address inequities.

Integrating SGBA+ helps you to develop responsive and inclusive projects that meet the unique needs of diverse groups of people.

Learn more at:

• Take the Gender-based Analysis Plus course
• Health Portfolio Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis Plus Policy
• Integrating Health Equity into Funding Proposals: A Guide for Applicants

Section 7: Workplan

A workplan template is available upon request. Use of the template is not a requirement.

The first step in developing your workplan is to consider project lifecycle phases. You may be seeking funding support for 1 or more of these basic phases:

• how big the issues are
• which students or professionals they affect
• what should be done about them
• Once you have identified the specific training and capacity gaps, you will be ready to plan specific activities to address them.
• Once you know the training and capacity gaps and have developed a plan with specific activities to address them, you are ready to start the project. Implementing and evaluating the activities could be the focus of this phase.

Evaluation is an ongoing and essential part of the cycle, occurring throughout the life of the project and informing all phases.

The following steps provide some guidance for what you may consider while developing your workplan:

• Identify your project goal and who you intend to serve.
• Identify the objectives that will lead to your goal.
• These are your broad strategies or service areas.
• Who and what will be required to operate your project?
• Who will do what, and when?
• Be sure to include any knowledge mobilization activities.
• How many participants do you expect?
• What and how many tools, materials or events will be produced?
• If your project involves creating knowledge products, how will they be disseminated?
• Outcomes represent the changes you hope to see result from your activities and are not the delivery of the activities themselves.
• Mention the short-term and intermediate outcomes of your activities, making sure that these in turn link to your overall goals.

A good outcome statement:

• is simply worded
• contains only 1 outcome
• includes a reference to the intended population
• indicates the type of change wanted or the desired state to be achieved
• has clear links to 1 or more outputs

Outcomes have:

• a distinct 'who', 'what', and 'what change in whom' or 'desired state'
• no reference to 'how'

When you identify your objectives and outcomes, be sure they are:

• relevant (and realistic)

Knowledge mobilization

Projects funded under this stream will have important lessons learned that can be applied in the specific context of the project, as well as more broadly for others to learn or build from across the country. For this reason, these lessons learned are important to share beyond your institution, and so a strategy for knowledge mobilization will be necessary.

Knowledge mobilization includes the synthesis, dissemination and exchange of knowledge generated during the project. It should be integrated through the entirety of your project. Consider these points:

• What knowledge products will result from your project?
• What processes do you plan to implement to share the knowledge and information that results from your project with other stakeholders, such as regulatory bodies, associations, training programs and schools?
• How will you share milestones achieved and lessons learned?

Section 8: Performance measurement and evaluation

A performance measurement and evaluation plan outlines a project's proposed approach to measuring and demonstrating:

• a project's progress
• the results against the project's objectives and proposed outcomes

If awarded funding, you will be responsible for:

• implementing your performance measurement and evaluation plan
• completing a final project evaluation report upon completion of project activities

Your plan must include both performance measurement and performance evaluation. These activities should be reflected in the proposal's workplan and budget.

Learn more:

• Splash and Ripple: Using Outcomes to Design and Guide Community Work

Performance measurement

Performance measurement is the ongoing, regular collection of information for monitoring how a project is performing. It is a systematic way of mapping the evidence of the progress you make towards your expected results. The performance measurement component of your plan will support your progress reports, and so must include:

• who your project is reaching
• how it performs against its objectives
• a logic model
• a theory of change
• tools and indicators for measuring the dissemination of knowledge products

Funded projects must collect and submit demographic data on targeted populations reached through your project's activities in project progress reports. You should therefore include plans to collect this information, where applicable, in the development of your:

• deliverables

Demographic data can include:

• other information that can be used to identify the targeted population(s) and the populations impacted by the project

We will share a reporting template with applicants selected to proceed to the funding agreement stage.

Use valid and reliable measurement tools

Valid measurement tools provide information that reflects what they are trying to measure. For example, you might be measuring the impact of new curriculum on students' capacity to treat a targeted population. If so, you might want to look at measuring more than just the number of treatments provided to that population. A more valid tool might also measure the efficacy of those treatments or a dimension of patient experience/satisfaction with how the care was received.

Reliable instruments provide information that is likely to give consistent results over time. It will not be affected by small changes in such things as:

• the mood of people who respond to a survey
• circumstances unique to the day on which people complete the survey

Performance evaluation

Performance evaluation is an in-depth analysis of performance measurement information and outcome measures to draw conclusions about the impacts of a project. The performance evaluation component of your plan will support the final report submitted to the Fund, and must:

• reflect the needs and perspectives of targeted populations
• align with the Fund's intended outcomes, as applicable to your project
• identify resources that will be dedicated to the evaluation

Quality and consistency

Quality evaluations also use consistent data collection procedures. Where possible, collect data before and after a project. When data is collected only at the end of the project, it can be difficult to discern if any change actually occurred.

Good evaluations require resources, like time and money. Some evaluation-related activities may be carried out by:

• project staff (for example, questionnaires can be administered by a project employee)
• research assistants (for example, students may compile and analyze data)
• people with special expertise (for example, an evaluation consultant might draft your questionnaire)

The evaluation plan should include a description of data collection sources and methods, and frequency.

Finally, determine how you will analyze your data and report your findings to:

• your community
• your project partners and stakeholders

Advancing the Fund's intended outcomes

Your project proposal, including its performance and evaluation plan, must indicate:

• how the project would support advancement of the Fund's intended outcomes
• how it will measure the associated indicators of those intended outcomes

These may include describing how the project:

• increased training opportunities
• developed, used or distributed knowledge products
• formed or expanded a partnership or program that will have lasting impacts
• improved knowledge and skills of students and service providers

The Fund's intended outcomes and corresponding indicators are included here as guideposts for the development of your own evaluation plan (see table below). You may have additional outcomes and indicators you wish to measure specific to your project.

In short, performance measurement and evaluation are important for building and sharing evidence on what works, for whom, and in what context.

Section 9: Budget

The budget must take into consideration all activities and project outputs outlined in section 7 of the application form.

The following information is about each expenditure category listed in the application form, including examples of eligible and ineligible expenses under each. These examples are illustrative and do not represent an exhaustive list of what expenditures can be included under each category.

We will closely assess the proposed budget. The final sum of approved funding may be less than the amount you request.

Expenditures

You may only use funding for expenditures that support the objectives of your project.

These eligible expenditures will help you understand what we can fund and will guide you in preparing your budget.

Personnel salaries and benefits

For full- or part-time employees:

• employees' gross salaries (before deductions) for time spent directly on the project
• Employment Insurance
• Canada or Quebec Pension Plan
• other payroll taxes (for example, provincial health tax)

This can also include vacation pay for employees receiving a lump sum payment instead of paid leave.

Contractual services

A contract employee is hired for a specific job at a specific rate of pay and is not considered a permanent employee. For example, a:

• knowledge mobilization specialist

Travel and accommodation

All costs for travel related to carrying out the approved project must be lower than or consistent with the National Joint Council's Travel Directive . These include:

• private vehicle mileage
• accommodations while on travel status
• mileage rates and meal allowances per Federal Government Treasury Board rates in effect at the time of travel.

Materials and supplies

• outreach materials
• clinic supplies
• costs for work done by a printing firm
• cost of postage
• messenger services

The rental of office or clinic equipment required for the project, such as:

• dental chairs
• photocopiers
• filing cabinets
• x-ray machines
• cell phones
• water filtration systems for a mobile oral health van

Purchasing these items is allowed if cost-effective. Equipment purchase should be included as a capital expenditure in the budget.

Rent and utilities

Rent includes the rent of space, if necessary, as well as the cost of any utility that is included in the monthly rental fee.

If the rented space is not used solely for the Health Canada-funded project, you must specify how the Health Canada-funded portion is calculated. For example, by square footage or other reasonable method.

Utilities include utilities that are not already covered in the monthly rental fee. In most cases, it is only telephone charges, but in other cases, heat, electricity and water are not included in the rent.

Performance measurement and evaluation

All costs related to the evaluation of the project, for example:

• contract fees for an external evaluator
• costs for staff dedicated to performance measurement and not included under 'personnel salaries and benefits'
• data collection
• printing or photocopying
• costs for dissemination of results
• survey costs

If you do not include evaluation costs in your budget, include a line item with a value of 'in-kind' or 'in-house'. For example, the evaluator may be:

• providing in-kind services

If in-kind, include this in section 10 of the application form.

Capital expenditures

Capital expenditures are eligible in circumstances where such capital is needed to carry out the project activities and rental is not available or less cost effective.

Capital expenditures for the construction of oral health provision sites are eligible, wherein construction is needed to deliver this specific project and will be used directly during the project. Capital expenditures are defined as:

• renovation and fit-up of existing buildings
• infrastructure changes, upgrades or remodeling
• standard oral health care service equipment

Capital expenditures such as purchase of vehicles are eligible only when no other vehicles could be leased or rented.

There are some exceptions, listed under ineligible expenditures.

Other costs

All costs that are directly related to the project but do not fit within any of the noted expenditure categories. These costs may include:

• registration for seminars
• bank charges
• refreshments

Ineligible expenditures can include:

• any unspecified miscellaneous costs
• ongoing operational expenses of the applicant organization that are not related to project activities

Section 12: Authorization

Official language requirements:.

The Government of Canada is committed to enhancing the vitality of English and French linguistic minority communities in Canada. This includes Francophones living outside the province of Quebec and Anglophones living in the province of Quebec. We also foster the full recognition and use of both official languages in Canadian society. Projects must be accessible in 1 or both official languages depending on the intended reach and audience.

Learn more about:

• The Official Languages Act

Acknowledgement of applications

Within 5 business days of submitting your application, you will receive an electronic notification that we have received your submission.

Assessment of applications

All applications submitted under this call for proposals will first undergo an initial screening process to ensure:

• applicant eligibility
• completeness of application

Health Canada will only consider project proposals from eligible applicants. These are listed in the "Who can apply" section at the start of this guide.

A complete application includes an application form with all sections fully completed, and all necessary documents attached.

Applications that pass the initial screening will then be assessed against certain criteria, such as:

Funding priority and project information

See sections 2, 5, 6 and 7 of the application form. Your application must meet these criteria:

• Project, including objectives and activities, aligns with the call for proposal's funding priority.
• Project objectives are clear, realistic, measurable and achievable.
• Targeted populations are well-described, and the total reach is realistic. Project ensures the expected impact on targeted populations aligns with project activities.
• Geographic locations and settings are well described and relevant.
• amount of funding requested
• geographic location
• complexity of activities
• Workplan provides an accurate representation of what the project involves and demonstrates appropriate milestones and feasibility within the requested duration.
• Identified partnerships are appropriate and sufficient to support the proposed project.

Project details

See sections 4 and 5 of the application form. Your application must meet these criteria:

• community input
• Rationale for the proposed approach is clear and supported.
• Project is tailored to the needs of the targeted populations.
• Evidence that targeted populations have or will be engaged in project design and implementation.
• Proposal demonstrates how access barriers related to determinants of health have been factored into project design.
• This may also be highlighted in the evaluation section.
• Proposal clearly describes how the project will be tailored to the targeted audience or local geographic context.
• Proposal clearly describes the knowledge products that will be created, if applicable.

Performance measurement and evaluation plans (including knowledge dissemination)

See sections 7 and 8 of the application form. Your application must meet these criteria:

• The alignment between project objectives and activities is clearly demonstrated.
• Expected project outcomes are well-described.
• Data collection and analysis methods, including the collection of demographic data, are clearly described and realistic.
• It is clear in the performance measurement and evaluation description that the project can realistically measure its outcomes.
• implementing the project will be monitored
• monitoring information will be used on an ongoing basis to make improvements to the project
• Proposal includes a clear description of how knowledge dissemination will be measured, if applicable.

Sustainability

See section 4 of the application form. The proposal must include a description of how the project will be sustained after Health Canada funding ends. If the proposal is not sustainable, it must:

• clearly outline why
• include a detailed plan for a smooth project completion

See section 9 of the application form. Your application must meet these criteria:

• Budget aligns with proposed project activities and workplan.
• Budget provides enough information to properly assess amounts requested.
• Total funding requested from Health Canada, combined with other sources of confirmed or anticipated funding, is appropriate to support the proposed project with demonstrated value for money.

The total assessment score is one consideration for final funding decisions. Other considerations will also influence the final selection of applications, and may include:

• available funding
• geographic distribution

Health Canada will communicate with applicants when assessments of proposals are complete and let them know whether their application will proceed or not. We will communicate all final decisions by email using the address you provide in the application form. Please make sure this email address is accurate and valid.

All funding decisions communicated will be final. There is no appeal process. Projects deemed strong but not funded during this process may be retained should future funding opportunities arise.

Health Canada will hold information sessions shortly after launching the call for proposals. These sessions will:

• provide additional background on the program
• outline the call for proposals parameters
• include details on the funding priority
• provide guidance for completing the application form
• provide an opportunity to ask questions you may have

Information about these sessions will be available on Oral Health Access Fund: Call for proposals .

Email us if you have questions.

Email: [email protected]

Related links

• Grants and Contributions

Page details

Funding Radar: This week’s ten most interesting calls targeted at young researchers

Here’s a list of funding opportunities for early career scientists in the EU, UK, Switzerland and the US

Photo credits: zverge / BigStock

The EU recognises the role of young researchers in shaping the future research and innovation landscape and throughout the years policymakers have pushed for better career paths and put in place specific funding programmes in support of this.

One of the cornerstone initiatives, launched by the Commission in 1996, is the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA), which supports early career researchers through fellowships, training, and opportunities to travel.

MSCA, part of Horizon Europe’s Pillar 1, includes five grant programmes, of which doctoral networks and the postdoctoral fellowships are the biggest.

In addition to financial support, the EU prioritises professional development and wellbeing.

However, gaps remain, as Manuel Heitor, director of the Technology Policy lab at the University of Lisbon's Centre for Innovation and formerly Portugal's science minister argued in a recent viewpoint published in Science|Business. The quality of research and innovation jobs and job insecurity is thwarting future development, he said.

After the European Research Council reported a fall in applications from early career researchers in recent years, last July the Commission announced measures to improve recruitment, career paths and working conditions in the European Research Area.

Currently, there is a multitude of calls specifically addressed to, and designed for young researchers in Europe and elsewhere. Science|Business has gathered them here.

The first call is the MSCA postdoctoral fellowships under Horizon Europe to help connect researchers with host institutions around the world. With an indicative budget of € 417.18 million , postdoctoral fellowships divide into European and global. Candidates can submit proposals up to 11 September. More details are available here . 

Another MSCA call is the doctoral networks 2024 , with an indicative budget of €608.6 million to set up doctoral programmes in partnership with universities, research institutions, research infrastructures and companies. The deadline for submitting proposals is 27 November. More details here .

Next, there is an open call for Early Career Grant powered by Alzheimer Nederland to fund researchers affiliated with a university or research institute who are due to be awarded a PhD by 31 December 2024. The goal is to research causes and underlying mechanisms of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia, to contribute to the development of therapies. Research projects with a duration of two years can receive up to €125,000 . The deadline to submit application is 25 June. More details here .

The European Molecular Biology Organisation helps young scientists through three grants. T he Postdoctoral Fellowships supports internationally mobile postdoctoral researchers in Europe and around the world. The next deadline is 12 July. The Scientific Exchange Grants support international collaborations by enabling transfer of expertise. The New Venture Fellowships fund young scientists who enter a new field of research to promote interdisciplinary research and improve understanding of a particular biological process. Applications for these two last calls are accepted throughout the year.

The Semper Ardens Accelerate grants from Denmark’s Carlsberg Foundation are three-year grants for newly-appointed tenured associate professors to establish an independent research group. Awards are worth DKK 5 million or around € 670,210 . The closing date for submissions is 30 June. More details here .

The Bosch Research Foundation supports young researchers working on their doctoral theses at research institutes, allocating €620,000 . Topics that are currently supported range from algorithms, big data and machine learning, to material sciences and medical technology. Submission of applications is currently closed, but more details are available here .

Through the Humboldt Research Fellowship for postdocs , the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation sponsors researchers from across the globe to conduct research in Germany. Grantees will get individual monthly support of €2,670 . Fellowships may last from 6 to 24 months. There is no closing date for submitting applications, which are processed as part of an ongoing procedure. However, selection committee meetings take place in March, July, and November, and applicants should apply at least four months ahead of the selection meeting. More details here .

UK charity Wellcome Trust offers salaries and up to £400,000 for research expenses through its Early Career Awards , a scheme that provides funding for any discipline. The grants provide additional funding for overseas allowances, overheads and adjustment support for eligible grantees that request it. The application deadline is 21 May. More details here .

Ambizione , a Swiss National Science Foundation programme, offers funding to young researchers to undertake, oversee, and spearhead an autonomous project at a Swiss higher education institution. Young researchers from both Switzerland and abroad are eligible. The grant covers salary and funds for projects for a maximum of four years. The submission deadline is 1 November. More details are available here .

The US National Science Foundation has opened nine grants and supplementary funding to US-based early career researchers on topics ranging from engineering and mathematical and physical sciences, to developing knowledge and skills needed to conduct rigorous research in STEM education. The closing date for submissions is different for each grant. More details here .

In other funding news

Last week, the European Partnership on Animal Health and Welfare (EUPAHW) released an EU co-funded call for proposals for transnational research projects to support the future of animal health and welfare. The partnership, which comprises 30 funding organisations from 24 European countries, is committed to ensuring a sustainable production system for terrestrial and aquatic animals.

There is total funding of €24.6 million , to be awarded following a two-step evaluation process. The first deadline for submission of pre-proposals is July 8. Full proposals must be submitted by February 4, 2025. Details are available here .

The call covers three research topics.

One is novel technologies for prevention, detection, assessment and management of animal health and welfare.

The second focuses on fundamental research in animal health and welfare, which aims to advance scientific knowledge and understanding of the biological, immunological, and physiological mechanisms that influence the health and welfare of terrestrial and aquatic animals.

The final topic is the relation between animal health and welfare and society, covering social, economic, or ethical studies that examine how pathogens, novel technologies or improved animal welfare might impact farmers, fishers, aquaculture producers, consumers, or the production chain.

Editor’s note: The Funding Radar is a weekly roundup of the most relevant research funding calls. You can read last week’s edition here .

Never miss an update from Science|Business:   Funding Newswire sign-up

Related News

Get the free science|business newsletters.

  Sign up for the Funding Newswire

  Sign up for the Policy Bulletin

  Sign up for The Widening

Funding Newswire subscription

  Subscribe today

  Manage my subscription

• Funding Newswire
• The Widening
• R&D Policy
• Why subscribe?
• Testimonials
• Become a member
• Network news
• Strategic advice
• Sponsorships
• EU Projects
• Enquire today

North of Tyne Combined Authority

The North of Tyne Combined Authority was a partnership of three local authorities: Newcastle, North Tyneside, and Northumberland and a directly-elected Metro Mayor.

North of Tyne Combined Authority is now part of the North East Combined Authority

The first and only term of the North of Tyne Combined Authority (NTCA), 2019 to 2024, has come to an end. In May 2024 it was absorbed into the new North East Combined Authority.

In those five years, NTCA took a collaborative approach towards solving the problems our communities face. Working in partnership, creating connections between programmes and projects, developing an inclusive approach to investing in our region. 

To read about what NTCA achieved through devolution download their final report Delivering Devolution Together.

Looking for something?

Document archive.

Meeting agendas and minutes, decision notices, forward plans and other relevant governance documents published by the North of Tyne Combined Authority are now available in the document archive.

Projects and investments

Some projects started under NTCA have transferred to the new North East Combined Authority. Details can be found in our projects collection.

Need support?

Can’t find what you’re looking for? Get in touch and we’ll point you in the right direction.