apple inc global supply chain management case study

Brought to you by:

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management

By: P. Fraser Johnson

This case focuses on the supply chain strategy of Apple Inc. (Apple). Set in early 2020, it provides a detailed description of the company's supply chain network and capabilities. Data in the case…

• Length: 20 page(s)
• Publication Date: Jun 1, 2020
• Discipline: Operations Management
• Product #: W20472-PDF-ENG

What's included:

• Teaching Note
• Educator Copy

$4.95 per student

degree granting course

$8.95 per student

non-degree granting course

Get access to this material, plus much more with a free Educator Account:

• Access to world-famous HBS cases
• Up to 60% off materials for your students
• Resources for teaching online
• Tips and reviews from other Educators

Already registered? Sign in

• Student Registration
• Non-Academic Registration
• Included Materials

This case focuses on the supply chain strategy of Apple Inc. (Apple). Set in early 2020, it provides a detailed description of the company's supply chain network and capabilities. Data in the case allows students to develop an understanding of Apple's source of competitiveness and to gain insights into the management of a large, complex global supply chain network that focused on the intersection of services, hardware and software. Students will obtain an understanding of the supply chain challenges faced by Apple, in the context of supporting its corporate strategy and growth objectives.

Learning Objectives

This case can be used in an undergraduate- and graduate-level courses on operations management, supply chain management, logistics, business strategy, or marketing. It provides an opportunity to appreciate the complexities of managing a complex global supply chain. After completing the case, students will be able to do the following: Assess Apple's supply chain, and identify its key competitive advantages. Quantify Apple's ability to generate value from its supply chain. Identify potential opportunities and challenges for Apple in improving its supply chain. Analyze the effects of the opportunities and challenges Apple faces in its growth and evolution.

Jun 1, 2020 (Revised: Nov 13, 2023)

Discipline:

Operations Management

Geographies:

United States

Industries:

Ivey Publishing

W20472-PDF-ENG

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience, including personalizing content. Learn More . By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .

• Programs Overview
• MSc in Management
• Full-Time MBA
• Accelerated MBA
• Executive MBA
• MBA Direct for HBAs
• Master of Management in Analytics
• The Ivey Academy
• Pre-Ivey Experiences
• Ivey Asia - Executive Education
• Faculty & Research Overview
• Faculty Directory
• Area Groups
• Centres & Institutes
• Ivey Impact
• Purpose, Mission and Values
• Strategic Planning
• Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
• Careers at Ivey
• Ivey Idea Forum
• Media Centre
• Contact Communications
• Alumni Overview
• Get Involved
• Benefits & Services

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management

Nov 12, 2020

• Apple Podcasts

Fraser Johnson , professor of operations management at the Ivey Business School, joins host Matt Quin to take another look at his  award-winning  case,  Apple Inc.: Managing a Global Supply Chain  (2014), as well as the recently published update,  Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management  (2020).  In this episode, Johnson and Quin discuss Apple's business model, how he has brought the company into the classroom over the years, and why junior faculty ought to consider writing cases. Professor Johnson is the Leenders Supply Chain Management Association Chair at the Ivey Business School, Western University, where he teaches courses in supply chain management and operations. Johnson is also the Director of the  Ivey Purchasing Managers Index , one of the most widely watched and utilized indicators of future economic activity in Canada.

Hi, I'm at Quinn. Thanks for joining us for decision point from Ivy Publishing at the Ivy Business School. Today we returned to another award winning and best selling case. Apple INC managing a global supply chain, originally published in two thousand and fourteen. Authoring Professor Frasier Johnson from the Ivy Business School, presents a snapshot of Apple up against competitors such as blackberry and Samsu. Unlike other companies with leading supply chains, such as Walmart, apple's approach to supply chain strategy and supplier management padded, investing far less in assets to support distribution. Instead, the company is now famous for its focus on innovation, new product development and brand management. In this episode we ask Professor Johnson about how apple was able to use its business model and supply chain strategy to help it continue capturing significant value from hardware sales. We also take a look at the updated two thousand and twenty case in the increased complexity for apple as it continues to add services in products to compete in the mature smartphone market. I hope you enjoyed today's episode. So, Frasier, thanks very much for joining us today. Apple was a really different company in two thousand and fourteen. What prompted you to write the case then, and how have you audit what's changed as you've taught it throughout the years? Well, apples a fascinating company. A lot of the cases that are done in the supply chain area tend to be with traditional manufacturing companies like Toyota or large retailers like Walmart, and one of the things that really interested me about apple was or business model with the IPHONE, with these annual product introductions, with big spikes in demand, and exactly how were they able to get their supply chain organized to be able to meet these big peaks in demand that they were facing. So the great thing about cases is it puts the student in the seat of a protagonist. This particular case Examines Apple from the perspective of Jessica Grant. She's an analyst with a Toronto based Money Management Firm. You, as an author, did a great job of giving students a primer of how apple was able to reach the margins with the iphones through supplier relationships and really tight coordination of the supply chain. Can you remind listeners what's at stake in the case for apple when it was set in two thousand and fourteen. Well, apple was one of the early innovators in the smartphone business and if you take a look at what's happened to the company over the last decade or so, the iphone is a way that apple connects with their consumers. Those they do things like sell services to individuals. Really, you know, the analogy that I use in the teaching note is that the iphone represents the the the razor that they used to be able to sell the blades to the consumers. So as apple looks to expand as market in the smartphone business, really what it does is give them a platform to be able to connect with their consumers. And from the students perspective, you're putting them in the role of the analyst in the case allows them to take a look at the entire business operation as opposed to taking the role of a functional executive with a specific functional related problem. So let's talk teaching notes for a second, because you've written a lot of case as many of them are best sellers. Let's dive into the teaching note part of this. In the teaching note you mentioned flexibility as a key part of the apple supplier management strategy. With recently apple moving away from mentell process. There's in away from Samsung as a screen supplier. It seems that the company is really continuing to embrace this approach of flexibility. What do you see in the company? Back in two thousand and seven when apple launched the iphone, they basically outsourced everything. HMM. So to bring a iphone to market they had to work closely with their suppliers. And the other interesting part of this is a short product life cycle of the IPHONE. They bring a new product ote every year and that was one of the it's one of the other important parts of the case. How do you work with suppliers where you're constantly launching and relaunching a new product every year, in selling product in the in the millions? So if you take a look at a company like Walmart, for example, they practice every day low pricing, so they try to minimize the bull whip effect and provide stable demand so they can work with their suppliers to reduce their total costs. Apples a complete opposite. They embrace variability. They have, as I said earlier, these annual releases with huge product introductions, with high volumes and then volumes taper off slowly until they bring out a new product and repeat the process all over again. And so you've built this in these comparators, in in the narratives. So one of the things that we know is important about the uptake of a case, in the sales of a case, is also the teaching note, and you write great teaching notes. You've mentioned apple versus Walmart. What are some other things that you try to include in a teaching note to help a faculty member use it in the classroom? What are your keys to success? Well, you know, what you want is, as somebody writing a case, to have a teaching note that resonates with other instructors. So when I say resonates, it's got to be something that they can relate to. It doesn't want to be so complicated that when they read the case and then take a look at the teaching note, become intimidated with the material that they see. They have to be able to understand it. They'd be had to be able to translate the material that you provided the teaching note into a classroom setting, so being able to talk about the issues at instructors face, including a teaching strategy appropriate questions to ask as part of delivery of the material are all very important. The other thing that I think is important to recognize is it before the case is completed, you've also got to write the teaching note. So don't publish the case and then come back to the teaching note a month later or two months later. Rate both documents simultaneously, because you have to use your teaching note as a quality control check to make sure that there's enough information in the case for the students and the instructors to be able to complete the analysis properly. And I know something you've done and our other colleagues have done is way to finalize that teaching note, if you will, until you've taught it a couple times and see how certain questions go or there might be some new information that comes out that you can include. So I know you've done that a few times as well. Right. Yeah, for many of the cases that I've written I will go back to the great staff at I've publishing and make revisions to the teaching note and perhaps to the case I'm talking about, minor at it to make in case issues have come up in the class discussion and I can help clarify the case by making qualifying statements. Sometimes when you're right a case, even with the editing process that you go through, sometimes students don't always interpret the information properly. So gives me a chance to be able to go back in and, you know, just a couple of sentences put not tend to clarify what certain peoples of data mean. For example, one of the tips that you gave is to try to not make things overly complicated. At the time of the case there's a lot happening at at apple with the five c being released. Profit margins were down slightly from, you know, two thousand and nine to two thousand and eleven. What do you think of and consider as you're writing a case to maintain that focus without, you know, there's a lot that you can put in a case. How do you remain so focused as an author? Well, I think that you're right a case in a particular point of time and as you as you say, you know, a lot has happened at apple in the last decade, or I guess thirteen years, since they brought out the first iphone, and you know the way that I view a lot of cases. You like my one an apple my other cases on Walmart and Amazon, is that they're almost live cases in the sense that, you know, I keep crack of what's going on in these organizations throughout the year before I teach the case so that we can use the information in the case is kind of a launching board, but we can also I can also incorporate through the introduction of power point slides, for example, and other information in terms of more recent developments. In the case of Apple, you see them, for example, insourcing more product buying the chip division from Intel and moving more to insourcing mode as opposed to an outsourcing mode, and that's the kind of stuff that you can incorporate into the class discussion. You've mentioned that you've released an updated case, which is great. We encourage faculty to do that and authors to do that. We welcome that and it's a smart thing to do because the cases evolve, the companies evolved in the situations, in the environment that the business is working evolved as well. Could you talk a little bit about the new case and the new complexities for Apple? Is As we sit here, in two thousand and twenty I wrote the first apple case, as you stated earlier, in two thousand and fourteen and if you take a look at what was happening to apple at that point, the sales for iphones were on the upsway and you know, if apple had a problem at that point, it was simply keeping up with demand. Now, if you take a look at what's happening in two thousand and twenty, the situation that the company faces and the challenges for its supply chain or are a lot different. As we talked about earlier, it's more moved to more of an insourcing model. On the other side of it, sales of the IPHONE are now starting to flatten out and the smartphone market is starting to mature. So we've see in back in two thousand and fourteen, apple competing in an environment where the markets growing margins are pretty healthy and it's having trouble keeping up with the man to in two thousand and twenty, where you're facing consecutive years of sales declines of the IPHONE and a maturing market with a lot of price pressure on margins. The other thing that you see with apple in two thousand and twenty compared to two thousand and fourteen is an increased emphasis on services. So one of the things that we can talk about in the new case is how does apple manage its services supply chain? So it really gives you a double edge. On one side we can talk about changes to the iphone and what apple does to manage its iphone successfully, but also how do they use the iphone in terms of its relationships and connectivity with its customers as part of its services supply chain? I've mentioned before how popular this case is. It's been climbing up the best seller list for years. Why do you think that is it? Is it the brand? Is it because the student can hold this thing in their hands and have a relation with with the company? What do you think is made us so popular? You know, I like to say cases like this teach themselves, and you know it's an overused line maybe in some areas, but students are familiar with the company, instructors are familiar with the company. The brand is strong. Even students that don't necessarily get excited about coming to class and talking in a case discussion do like the technology companies and I think there's something in the case for people that most people, particularly students, can relate to in terms of the technology and how they use their iphones and even the debate among the students in the class, among the iphone users versus the non iphone users. So every time I teach the case I ask you know, who's using apple products, and iphones included, and who's not using them, and why is that? You know, why do you like apple? Why do you use your products? On the other end of the spectrum, who are the Anti Apple people and why have they made a conscious decision not to participate in what I call in my new case apple ecosystem? And that kind of allows us to talk about the company strategy, which then evolves into a further more detailed discussion about how they're able to support Tho strategy with their supply chain capabilities. Yeah, it's a very accessible for for students of many Undergrad students, Grad students, high school students, can they can all take a different approach with it, but apple is a company is pretty accessible. Have there been any challenges or surprises when you've taught this where you go, oh, that's a different perspective or I have to remember to the include that in my next version of the case. Anything that comes to mind. The major event for me was in two thousand and nineteen as I was teaching the case and my supply chain management elective. And you know, as I'm standing up in front of the class talking about what's happening with a company in two thousand and nineteen, about exactly how much it changed at at Apple, and you know that point. You know after I, as I do after every class, I make notes to myself in terms of things that I want to remember for the following year, I made the decision that I commit the time to updating the case and writing and ended up doing that writing the case this year. So to me, you know, when you deal with cases like apple, you know a lot of the changes and things that happen, both in the classroom as a result of what happens at the company and as part of your preparation in terms of teaching the case. Is kind of evolutionary. Is of most revolutionary. Yeah, but eventually, you know, with companies like this, you do reach a point where you've got to think about revising the product, and that's one thing I want to give as a really good tip, and I don't want to overlook this, I'm just looking at some notes I've got here, is that the importance of immediately after the class, taking down notes as an instructor H who's either taught this case a number of times or just new to it. All the great case teachers that I've seen makeup point immediately, even at the breaks, of writing down some notes about ways it could be done differently or different things to approach or something that didn't go so well. So I want to make sure that if we hit that point for those that are listening, because that's such a great tip that I don't want to overlook. So anything else that you make a point of doing right before class or during a break or right after the class as a process for case teaching? Yeah, yeah, I think that this is maybe a minor point, but I think a relevant one. I think regardless of how many times you've taught a case and regardless of whether or not you're the one that wrote the case, and sometimes I think people that write cases can be too overconfident in terms of their level of understanding with the material to invest the time before class to get ready, regret, regardless of how many times you've taught the case. So don't just pick the file up and walk into class. US remind yourself about the essential details of the case and the case facts and think about how you're going to manage the conversation with the student. And, as I said earlier the debrief after class, every time I teach a case, I sit in my office after class and make note to my teach on the front of my teaching plan in terms of things that I would adjuster do differently or things that I want to remind myself worked well and to do. And that regular pays off, because I've seen you teach. You've welcome to a lot of our team members from I be publishing to watch a teach. So I've seen it at work. As we wrap up today on the discussion, I want to come back to the writing of cases. Do you have anything that stands out to you that you wish somebody had told you when you were just starting to write cases? Any any tips for new case writers as they ventured down this road? I think that you, as a new faculty member, writing cases is a is a great way to first of all learn about management practice and if you're writing feel cases working with companies in terms of material or case development, it gives you a chance to be able to talk to managers about some of the issues that they're facing and it keeps you current and, you know, being able to and you can do that through your research, certainly, but writing cases is another way to be able to stay in touch with what's going on in terms of management practice. The second point is a writing cases helps you establish credibility with your students. Students pay attention to the material that's being used in terms of the case studies, and if your name's on the author list of the case study that they're using, it tells the students that you know you're doing work in this area. These chances are they're probably not reading your research and helps establish some credibility in terms of your familiarity with the subject matter and the material that you're using in class. Well, that's fantastic. Thank you so much, Frasier, for taking the time to speak with us and, moreover, working with our team on publishing cases and bringing cases to the class. I know when we get a submission from you, our team always enjoys the process, so thank you for that as well. It's my pleasure. Thanks for the great job that everybody to I be publishing, does and supporting the word that the faculty does in terms of writing and publishing cases. If you enjoyed today's episode, subscribe to Decision Point on spotify or wherever you listen. Be sure to check out the show notes for links to cases, resources and more. have any feedback, send us an email at cases at IV DOC A.

• Ivey Publishing

• Business Case Studies

Technology & Operations

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management

Apple Inc.: Global Supply Chain Management ^ W20472

Want to buy more than 1 copy? Contact: [email protected]

Product Description

Publication Date: June 01, 2020

Source: Ivey Publishing

Industry: Telecom

This case focuses on the supply chain strategy of Apple Inc. (Apple). Set in early 2020, it provides a detailed description of the company's supply chain network and capabilities. Data in the case allows students to develop an understanding of Apple's source of competitiveness and to gain insights into the management of a large, complex global supply chain network that focused on the intersection of services, hardware and software. Students will obtain an understanding of the supply chain challenges faced by Apple, in the context of supporting its corporate strategy and growth objectives.

This Product Also Appears In

Buy together, related products.

Apple Inc.: Managing a Global Supply Chain

Lucent Technologies: Global Supply Chain Management

Coats: Supply Chain Challenges

Copyright permissions.

If you'd like to share this PDF, you can purchase copyright permissions by increasing the quantity.

Order for your team and save!

• Subscribe to RSS

Teaching Case – Apple Inc: Global Supply Chain Management

Once again this year, an SCM-related teaching case received an award at the Case Center Awards and Competitions : It is entitled Apple Inc: Global Supply Chain Management and written by P. Fraser Johnson. In this case, students are placed in the role of Apple’s CEO Tim Cook, who has to make a strategic decision about the company’s complex supply chain. “Set in early 2020, it provides a detailed description of the company’s supply chain network and capabilities. Data in the case allows students to develop an understanding of Apple’s source of competitiveness and to gain insights into the management of a large, complex global supply chain network that focused on the intersection of services, hardware and software. Students will obtain an understanding of the supply chain challenges faced by Apple, in the context of supporting its corporate strategy and growth objectives.” I am sure that this case can be integrated very well into many undergraduate and postgraduate courses. This case nicely complements the 2020 award winner Apple and Conflict Materials: Ethical Sourcing for Sustainability . See also the 2017 and 2018 SCM-related winners.

Tags: Award , Teaching

About Andreas Wieland

Trackbacks / pingbacks.

• Teaching Cases – “Global Sourcing at Nike” and “IKEA Goes Online” | Supply Chain Management Research - 2023-03-02

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Recent Posts

• Theory as a Camera or Theory as an Engine
• Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)
• Global Supply Chains Amplify Costs of Extreme Heat Risk
• A Guided Tour Through the Qualitative Research City
• Personal Predictions for Supply Chain Management in 2024
• Methodology
• January 2024
• November 2023
• October 2023
• September 2023
• August 2023
• February 2023
• January 2023
• December 2022
• November 2022
• October 2022
• September 2022
• August 2022
• February 2022
• December 2021
• October 2021
• September 2021
• August 2021
• February 2021
• January 2021
• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• November 2019
• October 2019
• September 2019
• August 2019
• February 2019
• January 2019
• December 2018
• November 2018
• October 2018
• September 2018
• August 2018
• February 2018
• January 2018
• December 2017
• November 2017
• October 2017
• September 2017
• August 2017
• February 2017
• January 2017
• December 2016
• November 2016
• October 2016
• September 2016
• August 2016
• February 2016
• January 2016
• December 2015
• November 2015
• October 2015
• September 2015
• August 2015
• February 2015
• January 2015
• December 2014
• November 2014
• October 2014
• September 2014
• August 2014
• February 2014
• January 2014
• December 2013
• November 2013
• October 2013
• September 2013
• August 2013
• February 2013
• January 2013
• December 2012
• November 2012
• October 2012
• September 2012
• August 2012
• February 2012
• January 2012
• December 2011
• November 2011
• October 2011
• September 2011
• August 2011
• Better Operations
• BVL's SCM Blog
• Cottrill Research
• Global Supply Chain Blog
• Inventory & Supply Chain Optimization
• Jay, Barry, & Chuck's OM Blog
• O.R. by the Beach
• Punk Rock Operations Research
• Purchasing Insight
• SCM-blog.de (de)
• Supply Chain @ MIT
• Supply Chain and Logistics Blog
• Supply Chain Matters
• Supply Chain View from the Field
• Supply Chains Rock
• SupplyChainMusings.com
• SupplyChainNetwork.com
• SupplyChainOpz
• The Freightos Blog
• The Logistics Blog by Alan McKinnon
• The Operations Room
• WFP Logistics Blog

Supply Chain Management Research

Powered by WordPress.com .

Discover more from Supply Chain Management Research

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading

Product details

Teaching and learning

• This case has been featured on our website, click to view the article .

({{ items.length }}) products in your cart

A case study of Apple's supply chain

Friday, 11 September 2015

One key aspect of Apple’s supply chain is its use of multiple suppliers for the same component. Reviews on this aspect of Apple’s supply chain strategy to examine the role that boards and directors can play in enhancing supply chain management and organisational performance.

Managing Risk in the Global Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Review, August 2015

2015 Supply Chain Top 25 Gartner, May 2015

A pple has received multiple awards for its supply chain strategy. Recently, for example, Gartner, a US-based research and advisory company, awarded Apple its inaugural “Masters” award after previously ranking Apple No. 1 on its “Top 25 Supply Chains” list for the past 5 years.

One key aspect of Apple’s supply chain is its use of multiple suppliers for the same component. The Governance Leadership Centre reviews this aspect of Apple’s supply chain strategy to examine the role that boards and directors can play in enhancing supply chain management and organisational performance.

Apple’s use of multiple suppliers for the same component in its supply chain strategy

Apple has an extensive network of third party suppliers in its supply chain. According to recent  research , Apple has 785 suppliers in 31 countries worldwide, 349 of which are based in China.

According to Apple’s “ 2015 Supplier List ”, 97% of its supply chain (including procurement, manufacture and assembly) is accounted for by its top 200 suppliers. This would imply that 585 of Apple’s suppliers account for the remaining 3% of its supply chain, providing it with a significant degree of latent capacity.

Apple has a number of exclusive long-term agreements with its key suppliers and uses prepayments to negotiate favourable pricing terms, secure strategic raw materials and guarantee high volumes of production.

Apple has also diversified its supply chain to include new manufacturing partners in China and Taiwan. It has also secured multiple suppliers for key components relating to new products (such as the  Apple Watch ).

In addition to diversification, Apple  invests  in customised manufacturing equipment and automated assembly and milling technology. It has also recently  announced  environmental programs with its Chinese manufacturing partners to offset carbon emissions and utilise more clean energy.

Apple’s strategy of using multiple suppliers for the same component provides it with key advantages over its competitors. Commentators note that this strategy allows it to:

• mitigate supply chain disruptions and delays, allowing it to maintain gross-margins;
• adjust ordering ratios with existing suppliers, therefore minimising the risk of third party issues associated with volume dependency;
• quickly increase production capacity to respond to changes in consumer demand;
• encourage lower supply costs as multiple suppliers compete for its business;
• process large volumes of pre-orders, which it then analyses to create demand forecasts; and
• prevent competitors from utilising the same production capacity through exclusive relationships with suppliers.

Apple’s Chief Executive Officer, Tim Cook, has been described as a “supply chain specialist”. He is credited for streamlining inefficient areas of Apple’s supply chain and using inventory tracking mechanisms to reduce its number of suppliers and warehouses.

What can Australian boards and directors learn from Apple’s supply chain strategy?

According to a recent  report  from Deloitte, organisations with effectively governed third party relationships can outperform their peers with an additional 4-5% Return on Equity (ROE).

There are a number of ways in which boards can learn from Apple’s supply chain model to enhance their supply chain management and organisational performance:

• Consider the benefits of multiple suppliers for the same component:   Boards should encourage management to consider the use of alternative suppliers and whether this may reduce single supplier risks or provide an avenue for improving performance. For example, a recent survey of 150 supply chain executives by  Haslam College of Business’ Global Supply Chain Institute  found that more than a third of individuals surveyed (38%) stated that their organisations’ supply chains sourced from a single supplier and only half (53%) considered their organisations had a ‘back-up’ plan due to natural disasters or major equipment failure.
• Measure and evaluate performance:   Boards should closely monitor supply chain performance by analysing financial metrics such as  inventory turnover  and the  cash conversion cycle  (CCC). These metrics can be used by boards to evaluate whether management is using the company’s financial resources efficiently.
• Encourage a compliance culture and the use of regular audits:   Boards should encourage compliance cultures within their organisations and the use of regular audits. For example, Apple has a strict code of conduct and standards that all its subsidiaries, affiliates and subcontractors are required to abide by. It also produces an annual “ Supplier Responsibility Progress Report ”, which outlines the number of audits it has undertaken and provides details on its labour and human rights initiatives, such as repayments to workers for unpaid overtime or due to excessive recruitment fees charged by brokers.

“More progressive global organisations are now starting to demonstrate bimodal thinking around how to maximise the opportunities out of the third party extended ecosystem while managing the related risks at the same time” , suggests Deloitte.

The GLC has previously interviewed  Dr Richard Welford , chair of consulting firm CSR Asia, about the role of directors in managing supply chain risks.

Latest news

Already a member?

Login to view this content

This is exclusive content.

You have reached your limit for guest contents. The content you are trying to access is exclusive for AICD members. Please become a member for unlimited access.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

APPLE INC.: MANAGING A GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN 1

Related Papers

Hemerson M Ramos

In December 1980, Apple Inc. went public presenting an initial price share of $22. Within minutes, the company’s market price was worth $1.78bn, marking a financial trend that culminated in Apple’s actual worth value of $1 trillion (Neate, 2015). The company’s core values, base for the formulation of Apple’s strategies, are undoubtedly responsible for its current success in the high-tech market, being perceived by stakeholders worldwide as a disruptive company in terms of innovation, technology and design (Gustin, 2015). Gendron (2012) notes that in order to evaluate the success of a company, it becomes imperative the utilisation of business analysis tools. Therefore, this report will discuss how Apple’s strategies have been used to build and sustain competitive advantage, allowing the company to become a benchmark to all players in the technological market. Moreover, while not offering recommendations, this paper intends not only to highlight Apple’s strategies for success, but also to present some of the issues faced by the company in the adoption of certain strategic decisions. Finally, the methodology employed in this investigation consists in the utilisation of theoretical tools such as SWOT, Porter’s Five Forces, Value Chain and Three Horizons. An evaluation of the usefulness of these strategic tools is presented, proposing a discussion in relation to the effectiveness of frameworks created in an ‘analogic’ world in the current ever-changing reality we live in.

The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation

Martijn Boersma

Many of the great international corporations of the past have now largely been disembodied into global value chains. This chapter considers the implications of the continued advance of global value chains as the mode of production for an increasing number of goods and services, and how this has impacted considerably on the economies and societies both of the developed world and the emerging economies. In turn, this has transformed corporations themselves into largely finance, design, and marketing agencies which are often distant from the production and operations which they ultimately control. While the globalization of production has brought employment and economic growth to many developing countries, it is also associated with exploitative employment relations, environmental irresponsibility, and recurrent ethical dilemmas. While corporations may disaggregate production in distant networks of contractors, they cannot as readily disaggregate the moral responsibility for the social and environmental impact of their mode of production.

Scot King , Bruce Holman , Marilyn Gates

Peter Deibert

Revista Medica De Chile

Carlos Almendares

Sciences Eaux & Territoires

SAMI BOUARFA

Journal of Orthopaedics

Marzieh Nojomi

We report the discovery of a transient equivalent hydrogen column density with an absorption edge at ∼3.8 kiloelectron volts in the spectrum of the prompt x-ray emission of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 990705. This feature can be satisfactorily modeled with a photoelectric absorption by a medium located at a redshift of ∼0.86 and with an iron abundance of ∼75 times the solar one. The transient behavior is attributed to the strong ionization produced in the circumburst medium by the GRB photons. The high iron abundance points to the existence of a burst environment enriched by a supernova along the line of sight. The supernova explosion is estimated to have occurred about 10 years before the burst. Our results agree with models in which GRBs originate from the collapse of very massive stars and are preceded by a supernova event.

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Enca Martin Rendon

Individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analysis (ACCRUE, meta-analysis of cell-based cardiac studies, NCT01098591) revealed an insufficient effect of intracoronary cell-based therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Patients with ischemic heart failure (iHF) have been treated with reparative cells using percutaneous endocardial, surgical, transvenous or intracoronary cell delivery methods, with variable effects in small randomized or cohort studies. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transendocardial cell therapy in patients with iHF. Two investigators extracted the data. Individual patient data (IPD) (n = 8 studies) and publication-based (n = 10 studies) aggregate data were combined for the meta-analysis, including patients (n = 1715) with chronic iHF. The data are reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality and changes in global ejection fraction. The ...

RELATED PAPERS

Geologische Rundschau

Bill McGuire

Microscopy and Microanalysis

Chaitanya Avinash Gadre

Revista Chilena de Terapia Ocupacional

Veronica Veliz

Benjamin Ngatunga

Resumos do Congresso de Iniciação Científica Unicamp

Marcel Assis

shujat khan

Physical Review B

Jesus Gonzalez

Sustainability

Behzad Habibpour

US Patent 7555395

SSRN Electronic Journal

Acta Astronautica

Martin Elvis

Comparative medicine

Diego Recinos

Anil Prabhakar

Erziehungswissenschaft

Markus Rieger-Ladich

Archives de Pédiatrie

Franck Thollot

Acta Iguazu

Luis Criollo

Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal

DADDY FAHMANADIE

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Rebuilding Trust: Apple Crisis Management Case Study

Crisis management is an essential skill for any business, as even the most successful companies can find themselves in challenging situations that threaten their reputation and bottom line. 

One such case that garnered significant attention and scrutiny is the Apple crisis. 

Apple, the tech giant known for its innovation and loyal customer base, faced a crisis that put its brand and reputation at risk. 

In this blog post, we will delve into the Apple crisis management case study, exploring the challenges faced by the company, the strategies implemented to navigate the crisis, and the lessons learned from their experience. 

By examining Apple’s crisis management approach, we can gain valuable insights into the importance of proactive crisis management and its impact on businesses in today’s hyper-connected world.

Let’s dive in and learn more 

Overview of Apple’s history and brand image

Apple, founded in 1976 by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne, has emerged as one of the most influential and valuable companies in the world. The company’s journey began with the creation of the Apple I, a personal computer that laid the foundation for their future success.

Over the years, Apple revolutionized various industries, introducing groundbreaking products such as the Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch.

One of the key factors contributing to Apple’s success is its unwavering commitment to innovation. The company’s ability to anticipate and meet consumer needs with cutting-edge technology has consistently set it apart from its competitors. Apple’s products are renowned for their sleek designs, user-friendly interfaces, and seamless integration across its ecosystem.

Beyond its products, Apple has cultivated a distinctive brand image that resonates with consumers worldwide. The company’s brand is synonymous with excellence, creativity, and a forward-thinking mindset. Apple’s marketing campaigns, such as the famous “Think Different” slogan, have fostered a sense of aspiration and uniqueness among its customers.

Furthermore, Apple has successfully built a loyal and passionate community around its products. The Apple ecosystem encourages users to remain within the brand’s ecosystem, promoting customer retention and brand loyalty. This devotion is evident in the enthusiastic anticipation and high demand for new Apple product launches.

Explanation of the crisis situation faced by Apple

Apple, a company known for its strong brand image and customer loyalty, faced a significant crisis that posed a considerable challenge to its reputation. The crisis situation arose when reports and allegations surfaced regarding unethical labor practices in Apple’s supply chain.

These reports highlighted issues such as poor working conditions, excessive overtime, child labor, and inadequate safety measures in some of the factories producing Apple products.

The crisis was exacerbated by extensive media coverage and the viral spread of information through social media platforms. News outlets, consumer advocacy groups, and concerned individuals amplified the allegations, putting pressure on Apple to address the situation swiftly and transparently.

The crisis not only raised ethical concerns but also posed a threat to Apple’s brand image. The company’s reputation for innovation, quality, and customer satisfaction was at risk of being tarnished by association with these labor controversies.

Apple was faced with the challenge of not only addressing the immediate issues within its supply chain but also effectively managing the perception of its commitment to social responsibility and ethical business practices.

Factors that led to the crisis

The crisis faced by Apple regarding unethical labor practices in its supply chain was influenced by several factors that contributed to the emergence and escalation of the issue.

• Globalized Supply Chain: Apple’s success as a global technology leader relies on a vast and complex supply chain spread across various countries. The company sources components and assembles its products through a network of suppliers and subcontractors worldwide. The extensive reach of this supply chain increases the difficulty of monitoring and ensuring ethical practices at every stage.
• Outsourcing and Cost Pressures: To remain competitive, companies like Apple often outsource production to regions with lower labor costs. This outsourcing, while driving efficiency and cost savings, can sometimes lead to compromised labor standards. Suppliers under cost pressures may resort to exploitative practices such as excessive working hours, low wages, and poor working conditions to meet demand and maintain profitability.
• Lack of Supply Chain Transparency: Managing a complex supply chain poses challenges in terms of visibility and transparency. Apple, like many other companies, faced difficulties in monitoring and enforcing labor standards across its entire supply chain. The lack of transparency made it challenging to identify and address ethical issues promptly, allowing problems to persist and potentially escalate.
• Limited Supplier Oversight: Despite Apple’s efforts to implement supplier codes of conduct and auditing processes, the sheer number of suppliers and subcontractors involved made it challenging to maintain stringent oversight. This resulted in instances where unethical labor practices went undetected or were inadequately addressed.
• Social Media and Activism: The rise of social media platforms and increased activism empowered consumers, workers, and advocacy groups to expose and publicize the labor issues within Apple’s supply chain. The widespread dissemination of information and the ability for individuals to amplify their concerns quickly led to significant reputational risks for the company.

Impact of the crisis on Apple’s brand and reputation

The following are key impacts of the crisis on Apple’s brand and reputation:

• Brand Perception : The crisis undermined Apple’s carefully cultivated brand image. The allegations of unethical labor practices tarnished the perception of Apple as a company that prioritizes the well-being of its workers and upholds high ethical standards. The negative media coverage and public scrutiny eroded trust and raised doubts about the authenticity of Apple’s commitment to responsible business practices.
• Consumer Trust: Apple’s loyal customer base, which had been drawn to the company for its innovative products and perceived values, was confronted with allegations of worker exploitation. This eroded the trust and loyalty that customers had placed in Apple. Concerned consumers started questioning the ethics behind their purchasing decisions and may have become hesitant to support the brand.
• Investor Confidence: The crisis had implications for investor confidence in Apple. The negative publicity and potential ethical implications affected the perception of Apple’s risk management practices and corporate governance. Investors may have raised concerns about the company’s ability to effectively manage supply chain risks and protect its brand value, leading to potential impacts on the company’s stock price and shareholder sentiment.
• Reputational Damage: The crisis resulted in significant reputational damage for Apple. The labor controversies received widespread media attention, leading to negative headlines and public discourse about the company’s ethical standards. This damage extended beyond Apple’s core customer base, reaching a broader audience and potentially influencing perceptions of the brand among potential customers and stakeholders.
• Competitive Disadvantage: The crisis also created a potential competitive disadvantage for Apple. Competitors in the technology industry could capitalize on the negative publicity and position themselves as more socially responsible alternatives. Apple’s reputation for innovation and quality alone might not be sufficient to counterbalance the ethical concerns raised by the crisis.

Apple’s Crisis Management Strategy 

Following are key aspects of Apple crisis management strategy:

Immediate response to the crisis

When faced with the crisis of unethical labor practices in its supply chain, Apple swiftly initiated an immediate response to address the situation. The company recognized the gravity of the allegations and understood the importance of proactive crisis management.

The following are key aspects of Apple’s immediate response strategy:

• Acknowledgment and Investigation: Apple promptly acknowledged the allegations and expressed its commitment to investigating the issues thoroughly. The company recognized the need for transparency and took responsibility for addressing the labor concerns within its supply chain.
• Supplier Audits: Apple conducted comprehensive audits of its suppliers to assess the working conditions, labor practices, and adherence to ethical standards. These audits aimed to identify non-compliant suppliers and gather detailed information to formulate appropriate corrective actions.
• Collaboration with Suppliers: Apple worked closely with its suppliers to address the identified issues and enforce compliance with ethical labor standards. The company engaged in open dialogue, sharing its expectations and implementing measures to improve working conditions and protect workers’ rights.
• Supplier Code of Conduct: Apple reinforced its supplier code of conduct, which outlines the expectations and requirements for ethical labor practices. The company communicated the code clearly to all suppliers and emphasized the importance of compliance. Non-compliant suppliers were urged to make necessary improvements or face consequences.

Initial actions taken by Apple to address the crisis

During the initial stages of the crisis, Apple took several immediate actions to address the labor concerns and mitigate the negative impact. These actions demonstrated the company’s commitment to resolving the issues and improving working conditions within its supply chain.

The following are some of the key initial actions taken by Apple:

• Supplier Engagement and Remediation: Apple actively engaged with its suppliers to address the identified labor issues. The company worked collaboratively with suppliers to develop and implement remediation plans that focused on improving working conditions, ensuring fair wages, and eliminating unethical labor practices. This approach emphasized corrective actions rather than simply severing ties with non-compliant suppliers.
• Worker Empowerment Programs: Apple recognized the importance of empowering workers and ensuring their well-being. The company implemented programs to educate workers about their rights, provide channels for reporting grievances, and establish mechanisms for feedback and improvement. These initiatives aimed to empower workers and create an environment where their voices were heard.
• Enhanced Supply Chain Transparency: Apple took steps to improve supply chain transparency, making information about its suppliers more readily available. The company published annual reports that detailed its supplier responsibility initiatives, audits, and progress made in addressing labor concerns. This transparency aimed to build trust among stakeholders and hold Apple accountable for its actions.
• Collaboration with Industry Peers: Apple actively collaborated with other industry leaders and stakeholders to address the systemic challenges within the technology supply chain. By partnering with organizations and sharing best practices, Apple sought to drive industry-wide improvements in labor practices and create a more sustainable and ethical supply chain.

Crisis containment and damage control

In addition to the immediate response, Apple implemented crisis containment and damage control measures to limit the negative repercussions of the labor crisis. The company recognized the importance of effectively managing the situation to protect its brand and reputation.

The following are key actions taken by Apple for crisis containment and damage control:

• Clear Communication: Apple developed a comprehensive communication strategy to address the crisis. The company proactively communicated with stakeholders, including customers, employees, investors, and the public, to provide updates on the progress made in resolving the labor issues. Transparent and timely communication aimed to rebuild trust and maintain transparency throughout the crisis.
• Public Statements and Apologies: Apple’s top executives issued public statements acknowledging the gravity of the situation and expressing apologies for any harm caused. The company took responsibility for the issues within its supply chain and emphasized its commitment to remediation and preventing similar incidents in the future. Public apologies were crucial in demonstrating accountability and a willingness to learn from the crisis.
• Continuous Improvement and Reporting: Apple emphasized continuous improvement by regularly reporting on its progress in addressing the labor crisis. The company shared annual reports, sustainability updates, and supplier responsibility progress reports to showcase the strides made in improving working conditions and upholding ethical practices. Transparent reporting aimed to rebuild trust and demonstrate Apple’s ongoing commitment to accountability.

05 lessons learned from Apple Crisis Management Case Study

These lessons learned from Apple crisis management case study can serve as valuable takeaways for other organizations facing similar challenges. 

Let’s discuss each of these:

Proactive auditing and monitoring

Apple learned the importance of proactive auditing and monitoring of its supply chain to identify and address potential issues. Regular audits and inspections help ensure compliance with ethical standards and allow for early intervention and remediation.

Transparent communication

The crisis highlighted the significance of transparent communication with stakeholders. Apple realized that timely and honest communication about the crisis, its causes, and the steps taken to address it was essential for rebuilding trust and maintaining transparency.

Supplier collaboration and support

Apple recognized the need for collaboration and support with its suppliers. The company learned that working closely with suppliers, providing resources, guidance, and training, helps improve ethical practices and strengthens the overall supply chain.

Long-term commitment

Apple understood the importance of a long-term commitment to addressing the crisis and preventing future incidents. The company recognized that sustainable change requires ongoing efforts, continuous improvement, and a steadfast commitment to ethical practices and responsible business conduct.

External validation and partnerships

The crisis highlighted the value of external validation and partnerships. Apple sought certifications and accreditations from recognized third-party organizations to provide independent verification of its efforts. Collaborating with industry peers, NGOs, and advocacy groups allowed Apple to gain insights, share best practices, and drive collective change.

Final Words 

Apple crisis management case study provides valuable insights into how a company can navigate and recover from a crisis while minimizing the negative impact on its brand and reputation. The labor crisis presented Apple with significant challenges, but the company responded with a comprehensive and strategic approach.

Ultimately, Apple crisis management case study highlights the significance of a holistic approach that goes beyond immediate crisis response. By taking responsibility, implementing meaningful actions, and fostering a culture of responsible business conduct, a company can rebuild trust, enhance its reputation, and position itself as a leader in ethical practices and sustainability

About The Author

Tahir Abbas

Related posts.

Unlocking Success with the 4 Ps of Change Management

What is the Purpose of Change Management?

08 Mistakes to Avoid while Communicating Change

• Order Status
• Testimonials
• What Makes Us Different

Apple Inc managing a global supply chain Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Home >> Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions >> Apple Inc managing a global supply chain

 Apple Inc managing a global supply chain Case Study Solution

Apple managed a global supply chain with innovative products in the United States, outsourced mechanized in Asia and mechanism sourced from suppliers around the world. The Company was well capitalized; in spite of the economic achievement Apple's stock was at $524.47 on February 28, 2014, almost 24-25 percent below the $700 reached in 2012. The Company launched a series of Macintosh computers such as Quadra, Centris, and Performa but it failed to gain the competitive position in the market. Apple Company also suffered from a view that its machines were more luxurious than equivalent Windows PCs. The company has weakened the operating system and also inventory management.

Apple Company faced some of the challenges and problems with related to supply chain process. The company has the significant amount of stockpiles with respective to its supply. Apple Company was mostly dependent on its partners rather than its suppliers. For resolving the supply chain, Problem Company developed new technologies and invested heavily in Research and Development (Centralized R&D). Total R&D spending was about $4.5 billion in 2013 which is higher from $3.4 in 2012 and $2.4 billion in 2011 so for Apple captured 60 per cent as gross margin and suppliers.

The company uses Just-in-time method to ensure that products could be made more quickly and more cost efficiently. Apple's supply chain was ranked at number according to Gartner Group. Apple's design was unique because of a single manufacturing process. Apple was situated to ensure a high-quality buying knowledge and also attract new customers.

Introduction

Apple's suffered a lot and didn't beat IBM's growth in the USA. Apple's retail partners such as CompUSA and Sears didn't have many resources to displaying its product correctly. Apple suffered mainly because of the managing cost problem because machines cost was for greater than the Window PCs. The company had inadequate operating and inventory managing control, and Apple Company failed to estimate the original demand of the consumers and due to this company leading to both stock-out and overload list.

Apple launched iMac computers as a line of revamped PCs that focus on design that was easy to carry. By May 2001, Apple announced to open its retail stores to educate customers and also gain the competitive position in the market by growing market share. By 2004, Apple established its competitive position and also gain better control over its supply chain by working with new suppliers for which Apple would present upfront capital in return for volume commitments and also lower price per unit. Due to high growth in Apple, allowed it to work with its suppliers to launch a variety of new products containing significant technological development, like iPod Video, iPod Touch and also iPhone by the end of 2007.

Apple's Supply Chain for its iPhone product

Apple's iPhone supply chain was global. Research and development stand in the United States, having 156 suppliers, assemblage operations in China and retail stores, some of which retail stores were its Apple-branded stores.

Apple's management team kept a short new product development cycle. The new product expansion subdivision coordinated with a variety of stakeholders, including internal groups such as hardware, software, and production. Contrasting other electronics manufacturers subcontract the complete production and management of supply chain to a third party service provider such as Solectron, Apple spends months to be close to suppliers and manufacturers because Apple designers worked close nearness with vendors.

Creative design and engineering were handled in California, where Apple produced new technologies and also acquired licenses for intellectual property. Apple was highly incorporated with centralized research and development and accounting for the whole company. Apple products controlled key mechanisms that were often sourced from a single producer.

The supplier at Apple was frequently out of supply because of overwhelming demand to counter the supply issue; a piece of Apple's procurement strategy was to purchase suppliers' production capacity to make sure the stable supply of essential parts. The last assembly of the iPhone 5 occurred in China. Foxconn (Apple subcontractor) founded in 1974, unique manufacturer design for clients like Apple, Sony, Nintendo, and BlackBerry. Apple was facing a $1 billion backlog of orders that frustrated the management team.

Apple Inc managing a global supply chain Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

The firm principal focus was to improve supply chain even by using high inventory or software. Moreover, Company uses reverse logistics system. Management revised logistics that contributed to Apple's success in term of cost and also customer service experience. Apple's management of its logistics system extended to packaging devices in open boxes to avoid detection and monitor every hand off point to check that every unit was accounted..............

  This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Related Case Solutions & Analyses:

Hire us for Originally Written Case Solution/ Analysis

Like us and get updates:.

Harvard Case Solutions

Search Case Solutions

• Accounting Case Solutions
• Auditing Case Studies
• Business Case Studies
• Economics Case Solutions
• Finance Case Studies Analysis
• Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions
• Human Resource Cases
• Ivey Case Solutions
• Management Case Studies
• Marketing HBS Case Solutions
• Operations Management Case Studies
• Supply Chain Management Cases
• Taxation Case Studies

More From Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions

• Kirin Brewery Co. Ltd. (B)
• Magdi Batato At Nestlé Malaysia
• Merck-Medco: Vertical Integration in the Pharmaceutical Industry
• Deal for a Dozer
• Stretton Case
• INFUSION’S GREENFIELD SUBSIDIARY IN POLAND

Contact us:

Check Order Status

How Does it Work?

Why TheCaseSolutions.com?