• - Google Chrome

Intended for healthcare professionals

  • My email alerts
  • BMA member login
  • Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution

Home

Search form

  • Advanced search
  • Search responses
  • Search blogs
  • Using autoregressive...

Using autoregressive integrated moving average models for time series analysis of observational data

Linked research.

Retail demand for emergency contraception in United States following New Year holiday

  • Related content
  • Peer review
  • 1 Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Texas Tech University. Texas, USA
  • 2 American Society for Emergency Contraception
  • Correspondence to: B Wagner brandon.wagner{at}ttu.edu (or @BrandonGWagner on Twitter/X)

This article discusses the use of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models for time series analysis. Rather than forecasting future values, we focus here on examining change across time in outcomes of interest and how this change is related to relevant variables.

Time series data

Much of the data that we collect about the world around us—stock prices, unemployment rates, party identification—are measured repeatedly over time. By failing to account for the linked and time dependent nature of these data, common analytic techniques may misrepresent their internal structure. If we wish to describe patterns over time or forecast values beyond the observation period, we need to account for how current values may depend on previous values, trends may exist in the data, or data may vary seasonally. To visualize this, consider an electrocardiogram. The readings expected at a given moment depend not only on the preceding values but also on the position within the entire cycle. For example, following the P wave, we would expect to see the QRS complex. The assumption that each reading is unaffected by preceding values would be valid only in the most distressing circumstances (that is, during fibrillation or after death).

Description of ARIMA model

To incorporate this complex nature of time series data into models, Box and Jenkins introduced the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. 1 As the name implies, this model contains three different components: an autoregressive (AR) component, a differencing for stationarity (I) component, and a moving average (MA) component. The first component allows the outcome at a given moment to depend on previous values of the outcome. As this model requires a time series with properties that do not vary across time (that is, a stationary time series), the second model component (integrated) allows researchers to subtract previous observations to obtain a stationary time series, if needed. The third component (moving average) models the error term as a combination of both contemporaneous and previous error terms.

Box and Jenkins proposed an iterative process of modeling time series data that contains three steps. The first stage (“identification”) involves transforming the data if needed, obtaining a stationary time series though differencing, and examining the data, autocorrelations, and partial autocorrelations to determine potential model specifications (that is, order of the autoregressive, integrated, and moving average components). The second step (“estimation”) estimates the time series model with the sets of potential model parameters and then selects the best model. For example, in the linked paper (doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077437 ), 2 we used the bayesian information criterion and Akaike information criterion to select the best fitting model from among candidate models. The model that best fitted the data, an ARIMA(1,1,1) model, had order one for each term (autoregressive, integrated, and moving average). This means that we model the change in sales between week t and week t-1, a first difference. The model also includes the previous week’s value as a predictor of this change (autoregressive order 1) and an error term that is composed of the contemporary week’s and previous week’s errors (moving average order 1). Alternative specifications for the ARIMA model would correspond to the number of differences necessary to construct a stationary time series model, the number of previous values to include as predictors, or the combination of previous errors included in the error for a given observation. The third step (“diagnostic checking”) examines the model for potential deficiencies and, if any are found, restarts the process. Although not without critiques, 3 this modeling approach remains popular today. Field specific texts can provide a helpful introduction to the topic for most readers. For example, we found a text by Becketti helpful in the preparation of the linked paper. 4

The model and process described above allow researchers to explore change in an outcome over time. But what if you think some other variable is affecting your outcome of interest? In many modern computer packages, estimated from the ARIMA model described above can be adjusted with a set of exogenous X variables that also vary across time. The resulting model is often referred to as a regression with ARIMA errors, as the estimated regression includes an error term that is an ARIMA process.

When and why to use ARIMA model

ARIMA models have previously been used to explore time dependent processes in population health. For example, recent work has used ARIMA models to explore disease diagnosis or outcomes and demand for medical services. 5 6 7 8 ARIMA models or, more generally, regressions with ARIMA errors are commonly used for time series data for a few key reasons. Firstly, the model allows us to incorporate relations between observations. For example, the spread of an infectious disease through a population likely depends on previous counts of infection in the population. Consequently, hundreds, if not thousands, of papers applied ARIMA models to counts of infection or death from the covid-19 pandemic, tracing the spread of the disease over time in settings around the world. Enabling data to incorporate dependencies in terms of lags or seasonality allows researchers to better fit such data. The second key benefit of estimating regressions with ARIMA errors is that it allows us to explore changes relative to the underlying background trends in the data. In our case, sales of levonorgestrel emergency contraception have been increasing over time in the United States. 9 A basic model exploring weekly sales as a function of the dichotomous holiday indicators might not correctly differentiate the sales increase following the New Year from such a background increase.

Limitations

ARIMA modeling remains popular today, although researchers must recognize some limitations. Firstly, these models may require relatively long time series, with a common rule of thumb being at least 50, or preferably 100, observations to estimate seasonal components. Although this is not a challenge to frequently measured values or long running time series, it may limit the acceptability of ARIMA models in some cases. Secondly, the described model estimation process fits a model form, specifically the order of autoregressive and moving average terms, to the observed data. Although useful in describing the observed time trend, fitting the ARIMA model this way may limit its utility in describing trends in other contexts. Finally, as with all models, ARIMA models should be examined as one possible model. In some cases, alternative models may better fit observed data, 10 so examination of the data and model specifications is essential before selecting a modeling approach.

Regressions with ARIMA errors can be useful tools to understand time series data. By incorporating linkages between observations, and exploring change across time, these models can both describe trends and explore how these trends vary with predictors of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Circana Inc for allowing us to use its data for this project. All estimates and analyses in this paper based on Circana’s data are by the authors and not by Circana Inc.

Funding and competing interests available in the linked paper on bmj.com.

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

  • Earnest A ,
  • Sampurno F ,
  • Benvenuto D ,
  • Giovanetti M ,
  • Vassallo L ,
  • Angeletti S ,
  • Redaniel MT ,

literature review on arima model

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Medicina (Kaunas)

Logo of medicina

Testing the Accuracy of the ARIMA Models in Forecasting the Spreading of COVID-19 and the Associated Mortality Rate

Ovidiu-dumitru ilie.

1 Department of Research, Faculty of Biology, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Carol I Avenue, no 11, 700505 Iasi, Romania

Alin Ciobica

Bogdan doroftei.

2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”, University Street, no 16, 700115 Iasi, Romania; moc.liamg@ietforodnadgob

Background and objectives: The current pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 has not only changed, but also affected the lives of tens of millions of people around the world in these last nine to ten months. Although the situation is stable to some extent within the developed countries, approximately one million have already died as a consequence of the unique symptomatology that these people displayed. Thus, the need to develop an effective strategy for monitoring, restricting, but especially for predicting the evolution of COVID-19 is urgent, especially in middle-class countries such as Romania. Material and Methods: Therefore, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models have been created, aiming to predict the epidemiological course of COVID-19 in Romania by using two statistical software (STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13) and IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0)). To increase the accuracy, we collected data between the established interval (1 March, 31 August) from the official website of the Romanian Government and the World Health Organization. Results: Several ARIMA models were generated from which ARIMA (1,2,1), ARIMA (3,2,2), ARIMA (3,1,3), ARIMA (3,2,2), ARIMA (3,1,3), ARIMA (2,2,2) and ARIMA (1,2,1) were considered the best models. For this, we took into account the lowest value of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for March, April, May, June, July, and August ( MAPE March = 9.3225, MAPE April = 0.975287, MAPE May = 0.227675, MAPE June = 0.161412, MAPE July = 0.243285, MAPE August = 0.163873, MAPE March – August = 2.29175 for STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13) and MAPE March = 57.505, MAPE April = 1.152, MAPE May = 0.259, MAPE June = 0.185, MAPE July = 0.307, MAPE August = 0.194, and MAPE March – August = 6.013 for IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0) respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that ARIMA is a useful statistical model for making predictions and provides an idea of the epidemiological status of the country of interest.

1. Introduction

Towards the end of 2019, local hospitals from the Hubei region, Wuhan city begun to report by the day more and more cases of severe pneumonia with an unknown etiology. It was difficult for clinicians to establish a diagnosis on the basis of the unique symptomatology that the first patient had. Fortunately, in a relatively short interval it was revealed that the so-called patient zero was infected with a novel beta-coronavirus. Already known as severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after its successor, it was demonstrated that person-to-person transmission ultimately causes the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [ 1 , 2 , 3 ].

Intriguingly, 2019-nCoV is a zoonotic family member, and for a long time it was speculated that Rhinolophus sinicus is the natural host of SARS-CoV. Unfortunately, no clear evidence was found that incriminates the horseshoe bat, all remaining at a hypothetical stage even after almost a year since the first case was reported. Most likely, these assumptions were made based on the current knowledge that the bat is a natural reservoir for pathogens. Because of its novelty, more than fifty people were confirmed as SARS-CoV-2-infected patients by the beginning of 2020 [ 4 ].

In retrospect, humanity has never faced such a crisis since the Spanish flu between 1918 and 1919/1920, with figures indicating that it caused the death of fifty-one hundred million people [ 5 ]. Even if both clinicians and researchers are in a timed battle against this virus, the latest statistics issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) suggest that over twenty million people are positive, and approximately eight hundred thousand have died despite their best efforts ( https://covid19.who.int/ ).

Considering the uncontrolled and fulminant spreading of SARS-CoV-2, concomitantly with its identification it was demonstrated that the elderly and those who have associated chronic diseases are the most predisposed [ 6 ]. However, these figures vary, not because of the lack of data, but rather the finite capacities in the epidemiological surveillance. Based on the aforementioned, the need for a reliable and efficient strategy for planning health infrastructure is all more imperative, especially for mid-class countries. Compared with Westernized countries that have all the resources necessary, in Romania, on the other hand, the situation may reach the critical point and soon be cataloged as the second Lombardia.

There is an increasing trend in the current literature regarding the possible epidemiological course of COVID-19. Both mathematical and statistical models are crucial to determine short and long case estimates [ 6 ]. One example is represented by the AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model that has been successfully applied in the past to estimate the prevalence and incidence of numerous other highly infectious diseases ( Table 1 ) [ 7 ].

Chronological presentation of various studies in which the ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) model was used.

Year of PublicationDiseaseMethodReference
2005Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeARIMA[ ]
2009MalariaARIMA[ ]
2011Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal SyndromeARIMA[ ]
2013Hantavirus Pulmonary SyndromeARIMA[ ]
2015TuberculosisARIMA[ ]
2018InfluenzaARIMA[ ]
2020BrucellosisARIMA[ ]

Unlike the other studies conducted, the present study aims to estimate COVID-19 cases through ARIMA using two distinct statistical software (IBM SPSS and STATGRAPHICS) in order to test their reliability and accuracy. It also aims to present the evolution of the mortality rate in Romania considering the high, almost double reports between the number of positive cases/deaths in the last thirty days compared to the same intervals of the previous months.

2. Material and Methods

The daily prevalence data of COVID-19 was taken from The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Romania ( https://www.mai.gov.ro ), and compared to the figures reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) ( https://covid19.who.int/ ). An MS Excel was used to build a time-series database.

Even though the first case in Romania was reported back on 27 February, we decided the following: (1) in order to test the accuracy of the ARIMA models, the established interval was divided into small (1 month) subdivisions with fourteen days forecast of the next month and comparing the numbers reported daily by the Romanian Government and WHO; (2) to perform a forecast from the so-called point zero (27 February) until the present day, 31 August, with also a fourteen days forecast.

Descriptive statistics of the COVID-19 data for the established intervals (1 March–31 March, 1 April–30 April; 1 May–31 May; 1 June–30 June; 1 July–31 July, 1 August–31 August, and 27 February–31 August) are given in Table 2 . The current situation in Romania (31 August) is as follows: 85,833 confirmed cases and 3539 deaths. At least thirty observations are recommended for an optimum ARIMA model [ 15 ].

Descriptive statistics on the prevalence ( a ) and incidence ( b ) of COVID-19 in Romania.

1 March–31 March482.866118.415648.588322451.491.21
1 April–30 April7603.551540.3242909.737273812,240−0.03−1.23
1 May–31 May16,502.933346.8831899.95712,73219,257−0.37−0.90
1 June–30 June22,776.689427.6102302.75419,51726,9700.31−1.16
1 July–31 July36,874.31287.5827052.37927,74650,8860.61−0.94
1 August–31 August70,602.3661930.88910,575.91753,18687,540−0.03−1.19
1 March–31 August25,840.0711751.96923,700.201387,5401.040.17
1 March–31 March74.73317.05893.43403081.330.69
1 April–30 April337.24116.01686.2501905230.31−0.38
1 May–31 May22314.36978.7041244311.080.59
1 June–30 June261.10316.50788.8961194600.40−0.39
1 July–31 July786.33359.450325.62325013560.19−1.28
1 August–31 August1180.96642.478232.6647331504−0.63−0.85
1 March–31 August478.34431.352424.128015041.03−0.24

Thus, the data set was used to conduct and analyze a case estimation model starting from the assumption according to which it will be useful in the future to predict the evolution of COVID-19 in Romania. Therefore, a time-series containing at least 45 data was used to predict SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in Romania over the next two weeks with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Initially, the outbreak did not affect Romania significantly, but starting from 23 July, the number of positive cases exceeded 1000. Since then, only on 4, 11, 18, 24, 25 August were registered <1000 cases per day, the highest number being reported on 28 August with 1504 confirmed cases and 38 deaths.

2.2. The ARIMA Model

A time-series, as the name suggests, is just a succession of data points indexed in a time order [ 16 ] dedicated to generating statistical data. More precisely, are used to perform predictions of values of a series [ 17 ], ARIMA becoming a simple-to-use algorithm since it was introduced in the 1970s [ 15 ]. ARIMA is preferred to the detriment of other models due to the fact it takes into account all (in)dependent variances. Nevertheless, beyond fitting for a large sphere of data, through seasonality to cyclicity a temporal dependency can be modeled.

In summary, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) technique is used for tracking linear tendencies, the entire concept constituting a mixture or being denoted by three orderly parameters. Non-seasonal ARIMA’s parameters AR( p ) (auto regression) represents the order of autoregression, MA( q ) (moving average) the order of moving average, whereas I( d ) is the degree of difference.

Viewed or described as a time-series, Y t represents a succession of independent arguments on the basis of a time t [ 18 ]. A deterministic/stochastic time-series could be explained by the following function, Y t = f/X ( t ), where X is just a random variable. Thus, AR( p ) (Equations (1a) and (1b)) predict the future value based on previous p -time observations as inputs, θ or Φ is the multiplying coefficient, ε t or ω is the random error or white noise at a time t and µ , the mean of a series. In cases of a stationary time-series, the average of the ε t or ω t is 0, the variance being noted as σ 2 :

Here, δ or α have the same value = constant. The polynomial’s MA( q ) (Equations (2a) and (2b) time-series as a q th degree can be found such as follows:

Therefore, AR( p )MA( q )’s expression is obtained by combining p and q , mathematically being represented in Equations (3a) and (3b) [ 19 ]:

On the other hand, there are also circumstances when the time-series is not stationary. In such cases, it should be verified if this condition is satisfied or not; if not, it can be made stationary by adding another variable d . Once ∆Y “take over” Yt’s non-stationary differences, ∆Y can be explained as follows: (Equation (4)), with L representing the likelihood of the data:

For testing the accuracy of our model, we analyzed the performance of three factors known under the name of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) (Equations (5)–(7)):

For congruity, MAE, MAPE, and MRSE’s values must be low, all analyses being performed using STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13) and IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0) software with statistically significant levels of p < 0.05.

2.3. Mortality Rate

We collected data aiming to determine the mortality rate depending on the sex of each individual, the median age ranging between <10 as the minimum and >80 as the maximum limit of people who have died, who had associated comorbidities, and were hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) between the established intervals. All these parameters were calculated using Excel software. Unfortunately, there are some limitations in this context. More specifically, the figures related to the sex of patients, the median age, the associated comorbidities, and at ICU are incomplete as a consequence of lack of management from the Romanian government during this pandemic. Based on the aforementioned, we were able to collect data from the last several months; 11 June for sex, median age, and associated comorbidities, and 17 March for ICU patients.

Building an ARIMA model for any given time-series involves the checking of four steps: assessment of the model, estimation of parameters, diagnostic checking, and prediction. The first, which is otherwise imperative, is to verify if the mean, variance, and autocorrelation of the time-series are consistent throughout the established interval [ 20 ]. Therefore, two-time-series plots, autocorrelation function (ACF), and partial autocorrelation function (PACF) ( Figure 1 ) graphs were generated to test the seasonality and stationarity. ACF is a statistical metric that determines whether the prior values are related to the latest values of not, while PACF the value of the correlation coefficient between its time lag and the variable [ 13 ]. Both are imperative in detecting misspecification, the model performance being measured by Akaike information criteria expression, and the Bayesian information criterion of Schwarz (BIC) [ 21 ]. Estimated autocorrelations for Romania are presented in Figure 1 ; the straight lines indicate the limit of two standard deviations and the bars that extend beyond the lines suggest statistically meaningful autocorrelations.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is medicina-56-00566-g001a.jpg

The estimated AutoCorrelation Function (ACF) and Partial AutoCorrelation Function (PACF) graphs to predict the epidemiological trend of COVID-19 in Romania performed by using ( a ) STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13) and ( b ) IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0).

Additionally, a series of ARIMA models were created, and their performances were compared using various statistical tools. All statistical procedures were performed on the transformed COVID -19 data. ARIMA models with the lowest MAPE values were considered the most optimum model. Among the tested models, ARIMA (1,2,1), ARIMA (3,2,2), ARIMA (3,1,3), ARIMA (3,2,2), ARIMA (3,1,3), ARIMA (2,2,2), ARIMA (1,2,1) were chosen as the best models for Romania. The models where COVID-19 data fitted are presented in Figure 1 and Table 3 and Table 4 with a minimum MAPE March = 9.3225, MAPE April = 0.975287, MAPE May = 0.227675, MAPE June = 0.161412, MAPE July = 0.243285, MAPE August = 0.163873, MAPE March – August = 2.29175, MAPE March = 57.505, MAPE April = 1.152, MAPE May = 0.259, MAPE June = 0.185, MAPE July = 0.307, MAPE August = 0.194, and MAPE March – August = 6.013, respectively.

Comparison of tested ARIMA models.

March(1,2,1)40.206421.77269.3225
(2,2,0)40.134421.83329.33149
(2,1,0)37.134922.33929.42158
(3,2,0)40.713722.2529.50679
(3,0,0)36.31721.43819.58606
April(3,2,2)84.484562.48130.975287
(3,2,3)91.428364.33560.978607
(3,2,1)86.023563.54180.988232
(1,2,3)86.125466.30941.03015
(0,2,3)84.832166.8181.03804
May(3,1,3)55.121835.49720.227675
(3,2,3)51.554337.73160.233695
(3,2,2)52.260137.55650.235246
(3,2,1)52.065137.75960.235816
(3,2,0)51.933438.90650.243301
June(3,2,2)53.388336.84250.161412
(3,2,3)55.04236.88140.161561
(3,1,3)66.31945.21910.195068
(2,1,3)66.892747.86260.207124
July(3,1,3)117.98287.15120.243285
(2,1,1)113.19888.17970.24369
(2,1,2)115.67988.78630.245774
(1,1,2)115.30792.50010.256055
August(2,2,2)153.804113.3140.163873
(3,2,2)155.701114.7420.164574
(3,2,3)159.39115.1950.165348
March–August(1,2,1)121.67485.26192.29175
(3,2,3)118.41182.21942.37771
(1,2,3)118.3682.56492.37918
(3,2,1)113.77880.22052.40063
(3,2,0)121.30184.64132.41403
March(1,2,1)38.12724.65157.505
April(3,2,2)96.08968.3651.152
May(3,1,3)68.40339.9960.259
June(3,2,2)58.58841.8540.185
July(3,1,3)156.476106.5720.307
August(2,2,2)179.309129.3500.194
March–August(1,2,1)121.05485.5246.013

Parameters of ARIMA models.

-Statistic -Value
March (1,2,1)AR(1)
MA(1)
−0.865514
−0.209212
0.194131
0.291261
−4.45841
−0.718298
0.000131
0.478744
April (3,2,2)AR(3)
MA(2)
−0.329312
−0.528086
0.225307
0.247375
−1.46161
−2.13475
0.157377
0.043660
May (3,1,3)AR(3)
MA(3)
0.625887
0.570657
0.145922
0.0544548
4.28918
10.4795
0.000253
0.000000
June (3,2,2)AR(3)
MA(2)
−0.312216
−0.964198
0.209998
0.0269271
−1.48676
−35.8077
0.150660
0.000000
July (3,1,3)AR(3)
MA(3)
−0.560219
−0.0478648
0.258752
0.274587
−2.16508
−0.174315
0.040545
0.863080
August (2,2,2)AR(2)
MA(2)
−0.826566
−0.782937
0.112664
0.171731
−7.33655
−4.5591
0.000000
0.000117
March–August (1,2,1)AR(1)
MA(1)
0.479999
0.781228
0.122096
0.0765947
3.93133
10.1995
0.000120
0.000000
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model
(March)
CumulativeNo TransformationConstant8.8813.986
ARLag 1−0.7400.206
Difference2
MALag 10.0370.287
-statistic -value
Cumulative-Model
(March)
CumulativeNo TransformationConstant2.2280.035
ARLag 1−3.595−0.001
Difference
MALag 10.1300.898
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model
(April)
CumulativeNo TransformationConstant−0.9021.468
ARLag 10.2100.486
Lag 2−0.2160.203
Lag 3−0.2680.257
Difference2
MALag 11.52722.293
Lag 2−0.52811.600
-statistic -value
Cumulative-Model (April)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant−0.6150.545
ARLag 10.4320.670
Lag 2−1.0650.298
Lag 3−1.0420.309
Difference
MALag 10.0690.946
Lag 2−0.0460.964
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model (May)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant216.91746.423
ARLag 1−0.0130.498
Lag 20.2520.348
Lag 30.4800.348
Difference1
MALag 1−0.6413.924
Lag 2−0.2584.043
Lag 30.5913.576
-statistic -value
Cumulative-Model (May)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant4.6730.000
ARLag 1−0.0260.980
Lag 20.7250.476
Lag 31.3810.181
Difference
MALag 1−0.1630.872
Lag 2−0.0640.950
Lag 30.1650.870
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model (June)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant8.1941.482
ARLag 10.1610.487
Lag 2−0.1590.291
Lag 3−0.4510.234
Difference2
MALag 10.9144.922
Lag 20.0800.849
statistic -value
Cumulative-Model (June)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant5.5290.000
ARLag 10.3320.743
Lag 2−0.5490.589
Lag 3−1.9280.067
Difference
MALag 10.1860.854
Lag 20.0940.926
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model (July)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant837.899505.059
ARLag 10.27420.176
Lag 20.7533.824
Lag 3−0.08715.011
Difference1
MALag 1−0.62920.192
Lag 20.25914.442
Lag 3−0.0033.383
-statistic -value
Cumulative-Model (July)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant1.6590.111
ARLag 10.0140.989
Lag 20.1970.846
Lag 3−0.0060.995
Difference
MALag 1−0.0310.975
Lag 20.0180.986
Lag 3−0.0010.999
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model (August)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant−4.3511.253
ARLag 11.1200.139
Lag 2−0.8320.107
Difference2
MALag 11.9786.107
Lag 2−0.9956.084
-statistic -value
Cumulative-Model (August)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant−3.4740.002
ARLag 18.0770.000
Lag 2−7.8040.000
Difference
MALag 10.3240.749
Lag 2−0.1640.871
EstimateStandard Error
Cumulative-Model (March–August)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant5.8853.318
ARLag 10.5010.126
Difference2
MALag 10.8200.084
-statistic -value
Cumulative-Model (March–August)CumulativeNo TransformationConstant1.7730.078
ARLag 13.9850.000
Difference
MALag 19.7120.000

In Table 4 , the parameter estimates for the best models are presented. The fitted and predicted values are presented in Figure 2 . As seen in Table 5 for both software, the next two weeks estimate of confirmed cases may be between 2450.74–5673.29, 12,616.5–16,896.3, 19,400.9–21,280.5, 27,404.9–32,340.9, 52,247.6–75,717.2, 88,483.4–103,777, 88,427.4–101,440, respectively through STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13). For IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0), the forecast for the next two weeks is as follows: 2478.78–6715.00, 12,599.76–16,756.08, 19,412.18–21,910.55, 27,405.69–33,181.42, 52,168.29–67,467.42, 88,444.38–103,059.41, and 88,451.83–102,656.81 for March, April, May, June, July, August, and March–August.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is medicina-56-00566-g002a.jpg

Time-series plots for the best ARIMA models through ( a ) STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13) and ( b ) IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0).

Prediction of total confirmed cases of COVID−19 for the next two weeks through ( a ) STATGRAPHICS Centurion (v.18.1.13) and ( b ) IBM SPSS (v.20.0.0).

01-4-202450.742368.242533.23
02-4-202732.02593.822870.18
03-4-202947.892716.133179.66
04-4-203220.372900.323540.42
05-4-203443.873011.653876.09
06-4-203709.763166.054253.47
07-4-203938.963266.64611.32
08-4-204199.913397.235002.6
09-4-204433.393487.155379.63
10-4-204690.653597.865783.43
11-4-204927.323677.296177.34
12-4-205181.813770.816592.81
13-4-205420.883839.917001.84
14-4-205673.293918.227428.36
01-5-2012,616.512,440.412,792.5
02-5-2012,959.912,738.513,181.4
03-5-2013,302.913,061.413,544.4
04-5-2013,615.513,368.813,862.3
05-5-2013,932.313,674.714,189.9
06-5-2014,257.013,975.514,538.5
07-5-2014,592.614,276.614,908.7
08-5-2014,927.514,579.715,275.3
09-5-2015,257.214,883.315,631.0
10-5-2015,582.215,184.315,980.1
11-5-2015,907.615,482.816,332.4
12-5-2016,235.915,779.816,692.0
13-5-2016,566.216,076.417,056.0
14-5-2016,896.316,372.817,419.8
01-6-2019,400.919,280.219,521.5
02-6-2019,533.019,286.319,779.8
03-6-2019,689.219,296.520,081.9
04-6-2019,831.819,307.720,355.9
05-6-2019,971.419,290.820,651.9
06-6-2020,122.219,270.720,973.7
07-6-2020,265.219,240.921,289.5
08-6-2020,408.119,194.821,621.5
09-6-2020,556.219,143.421,968.9
10-6-2020,699.919,081.822,318.0
11-6-2020,844.319,009.022,679.7
12-6-2020,991.018,929.923,052.1
13-6-2021,135.418,841.323,429.4
14-6-2021,280.518,744.123,816.9
01-7-2027,404.927,291.527,518.3
02-7-2027,860.427,673.028,047.7
03-7-2028,267.628,019.428,515.8
04-7-2028,608.428,307.928,908.9
05-7-2028,916.828,551.929,281.8
06-7-2029,253.328,792.029,714.6
07-7-2029,652.829,060.930,244.7
08-7-2030,097.529,360.430,834.6
09-7-2030,533.129,658.331,407.9
10-7-2030,914.629,916.331,912.9
11-7-2031,243.030,126.432,359.6
12-7-2031,562.830,317.032,808.5
13-7-2031,924.030,526.833,321.1
14-7-2032,340.930,772.333,909.5
01-8-2052,247.651,999.252,496.1
02-8-2053,668.753,169.654,167.9
03-8-2055,147.354,390.955,903.6
04-8-2056,685.255,656.557,714.0
05-8-2058,282.656,976.859,588.5
06-8-2059,942.358,346.761,537.9
07-8-2061,665.359,772.163,558.4
08-8-2063,454.661,250.065,659.3
09-8-2065,311.962,784.767,839.2
10-8-2067,240.464,374.970,106.0
11-8-2069,242.166,024.572,459.8
12-8-2071,320.467,733.274,907.6
13-8-2073,477.669,504.977,450.3
14-8-2075,717.271,340.080,094.4
01-9-2088,483.488,163.388,803.4
02-9-2089,735.889,186.290,285.4
03-9-2091,171.690,521.191,822.0
04-9-2092,553.191,883.193,223.0
05-9-2093,723.493,050.494,396.4
06-9-2094,707.094,020.195,393.9
07-9-2095,660.394,899.896,420.7
08-9-2096,734.695,825.997,643.3
09-9-2097,966.896,901.499,032.2
10-9-2099,272.298,093.1100,451.
11-9-20100,527.99,273.2101,781.
12-9-20101,667.100,347.102,986.
13-9-20102,721.101,316.104,126.
14-9-20103,777.102,249.105,305.
01-9-2088,427.488,187.388,667.5
02-9-2089,378.488,905.189,851.7
03-9-2090,359.989,641.291,078.7
04-9-2091,356.190,382.192,330.1
05-9-2092,359.391,120.493,598.2
06-9-2093,365.891,851.894,879.9
07-9-2094,374.092,574.396,173.7
08-9-2095,383.093,286.897,479.2
09-9-2096,392.393,988.798,796.0
10-9-2097,401.894,679.8100,124.
11-9-2098,411.495,360.3101,463.
12-9-2099,421.196,030.1102,812.
13-9-20100,431.96,689.5104,172.
14-9-20101,440.97,338.6105,542.
Model
Cumulative-Model (March)Forecast2478.782771.813036.463337.563627.143940.69
UCL2557.112895.563237.393612.373992.874399.42
LCL2400.442648.062835.533062.743261.423481.96
Model
Cumulative-Model (March)Forecast4251.964580.374911.555256.135606.255967.72
UCL4814.735251.205698.586164.036641.617135.33
LCL3689.203909.554124.534348.244570.894800.11
Model
Cumulative-Model (March)Forecast6336.246715.00
UCL7641.788163.17
LCL5030.715266.84
Forecast
Model
Cumulative-Model (April)Forecast12,599.7612,935.8713,271.5513,584.8713,898.8014,216.66
UCL12,774.4413,150.9313,500.9813,816.9614,136.6914,467.65
LCL12,425.0812,720.8113,042.1213,352.7813,660.9113,965.67
Model
Cumulative-Model (April)Forecast14,540.0514,862.4515,181.2315,496.8415,811.6816,126.86
UCL14,808.7115,145.8415,475.5515,800.6416,125.7416,452.34
LCL14,271.3914,579.0514,886.9215,193.0315,497.6115,801.38
Model
Cumulative-Model (April)Forecast16,441.9916,756.08
UCL16,779.1017,104.18
LCL16,104.8816,407.98
Forecast
Model
Cumulative-Model (May)Forecast19,412.1819,569.6819,763.1719,935.7820,118.8320,313.78
UCL19,543.3019,816.8220,130.3820,397.3220,688.0520,989.84
LCL19,281.0519,322.5419,395.9619,474.2319,549.6219,637.71
Model
Cumulative-Model (May)Forecast20,501.1720,696.6720,895.8821,093.4521,295.8821,499.60
UCL21,277.1721,576.4721,877.3022,173.2822,473.4722,773.08
LCL19,725.1719,816.8819,914.4520,013.6320,118.2820,226.12
Model
Cumulative-Model (May)Forecast21,703.7521,910.55
UCL23,071.2723,369.65
LCL20,336.2320,451.44
Forecast
Model
Cumulative-Model (June)Forecast27,405.6927,851.2528,248.9728,627.7529,018.5229,447.71
UCL27,520.9528,038.2328,481.5028,874.6029,273.5629,714.32
LCL27,290.4227,664.2828,016.4428,380.9028,763.4829,181.10
Model
Cumulative-Model (June)Forecast29,901.6330,359.8730,809.4031,257.5531,716.7932,193.86
UCL30,190.4830,674.7431,145.8431,609.1432,081.2432,572.50
LCL29,612.7830,045.0030,472.9530,905.9631,352.3531,815.21
Model
Cumulative-Model (June)Forecast32,684.5333,181.42
UCL33,079.9833,594.43
LCL32,289.0832,768.41
Forecast
Model
Cumulative-Model (July)Forecast52,168.2953,426.6754,674.3055,902.1157,118.4958,317.76
UCL52,449.7354,031.5155,633.0757,264.8558,911.1560,573.52
LCL51,886.8452,821.8253,715.5454,539.3755,325.8456,061.99
Model
Cumulative-Model (July)Forecast59,505.4660,678.1161,839.4362,987.3364,124.3465,249.25
UCL62,244.3663,923.3465,606.4067,292.6868,979.8470,666.96
LCL56,766.5657,432.8858,072.4658,681.9859,268.8459,831.54
Model
Cumulative-Model (July)Forecast66,363.8367,467.42
UCL72,352.6074,035.96
LCL60,375.0560,898.88
Forecast
Model
Cumulative-Model (August)Forecast88,444.3889,634.0191,015.6792,372.0493,537.2994,506.51
UCL88,730.4390,079.7591,493.0092,852.8594,048.3895,027.52
LCL88,158.3289,188.2790,538.3591,891.2393,026.1993,985.50
Model
Cumulative-Model (August)Forecast95,412.1096,406.3797,549.7198,783.1399,990.33101,090.16
UCL95,938.8096,978.6498,171.4599,421.94100,629.11101,728.19
LCL94,885.4195,834.0996,927.9798,144.3299,351.54100,452.13
Model
Cumulative-Model (August)Forecast102,088.51103,059.41
UCL102,726.16103,708.74
LCL101,450.85102,410.08
Forecast
Model
Cumulative-Model (March–August)Forecast88,451.8389,445.1290,482.1291,543.9692,621.1593,708.98
UCL88,690.7189,912.3091,185.5792,489.1093,813.5495,154.94
LCL88,212.9688,977.9489,778.6790,598.8191,428.7792,263.03
Model
Cumulative-Model (March–August)Forecast94,805.0895,908.2497,017.8998,133.7299,255.59100,383.41
UCL96,511.6897,883.1499,269.09100,669.45102,084.15103,513.14
LCL93,098.4793,933.3494,766.6995,598.0096,427.0297,253.68
Model
Cumulative-Model (March–August)Forecast101,517.16102,656.81
UCL104,956.35106,413.66
LCL98,077.9798,899.95

Regarding the mortality rate, since 11 June until 31 August a total of 2261 patients were identified, from which 1356 (59.97%) were male and 905 (40.02%) were female. The most affected age group were people aged between 70 and 79 years, where SARS-CoV-2 caused the death of 709 people, followed by people between 60 and 69 years with 621 deaths and >80 with 526 deaths ( Figure 3 ). On the other hand, a total of 405 people died, from which 260 had between 50 and 59 years, 104 between 40 and 49 years, 30 between 30 and 39 years, 10 between 20 and 29 years, 1 between 10 and 19 years, and 0 with less than 10 years old. From the total number of 2261 people, 2184 had comorbidities (96.6823%), and 77 not. As well, since 17 March when the first 4 people were confirmed, the total number registered until 31 August was 506 ( Figure 4 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is medicina-56-00566-g003.jpg

The number of deaths depending on the age group.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is medicina-56-00566-g004.jpg

The total number of patients hospitalized in ICU.

4. Discussion

Based on our results, it can be concluded that Romania will face an even higher number of infections which can exceed one hundred thousand. In terms of the number of deaths, these figures are not comparable with other countries such as Italy, Spain, or France. The probability of exceeding 1000 is very small, especially due to the high longevity rate of people from other states compared to Romania.

According to the current literature, this is the first study of such a manner. Thus, the idea of testing the accuracy of the ARIMA model using two distinct statistical software is novel, all the more so as middle-class countries do not have the resources necessary or a reliable strategy in restraining the rate of contagion or transmissibility in such conditions. For an unknown reason, most studies have focused on Westernized or China’s neighboring countries.

Recently, a team of authors proposed three new methods for studying the epidemiological course of COVID-19. The first one is a universal physics-based model designed to assess the COVID-19 dynamics in Europe. The model folds within the existing curve due to the fact that the results obtained following simulation indicate an evolution curve related to that describing the current status. This “overlap” can be explained by the fact that this approach is based on a universal mechanism, having as a structural concept, the “diffusion over a lattice”. In this context, it has been successfully applied for seven European countries, and further offers the chance to study the memory effects through autocorrelation within the epidemiological dynamical systems [ 22 ]. Furthermore, Demertzis et al. [ 23 ] applied an exploratory time-series analysis built on a recent conceptualization. More specific, is dedicated in detecting connective communities by developing a novel spline regression in which the knot vector is represented by the community detection in a complex network. Through this approach, the authors demonstrated the reliability of this exploratory time-series analysis in decision-making in Greece, mainly because diagnostic testing, services, and resources strategies vary between countries. Finally, Tsiotas et al. [ 24 ] used the modularity optimization algorithm in which the visibility graphs generated describe a sequence of different typologies that this disease has. According to their results, the current pandemic in Greece is about to reach the second half in a decreasing manner, whereas the chances for a “maximum infection” are low due to the saturation point reached.

Quarantine is the first alternative, Chintalapudi et al. [ 25 ] demonstrated that in Italy this approach promoted a reduction up to 35% of the total registered cases, in parallel with a significant percentage (66%) of recovered cases.

Considering the emphatic nature of humankind, self-isolation or quarantine could have branched and serious repercussions upon humans’ psychological profile. The psycho-social impact is exponential, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression representing just two examples [ 26 ]. The gut–brain axis (GBA) component should not be neglected, since it is already known that a long-term loss of host eubiosis can promote psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorders [ 27 ].

Based on the above discussed, from our point of view, a two-sided approach is social confinement. López et al. [ 28 ] considered that social confinement should remain valid for at least 8 weeks because 99% of the current wave was attributed to humans intervention and recommended a resumption of daily activities up to 50%. Chakraborty et al. [ 29 ] sustained the arguments of López taking into consideration that people >65 years are more prone, and consider the necessity of an adequate medical center arrangement.

A study conducted by Williamson et al. [ 30 ] in which reunited a cohort consisting of over 17 million UK people demonstrated an increased risk among Black and South Asian people, predisposition attributed to age, sex, and related medical conditions. Miller et al. [ 31 ] assumed a case scenario in which around 20% of the US population will be infected, especially counties compared to the rest of the country. The authors created this pattern based on a series of assumptions such as transmission, contact patterns, basic reproductive rate, and how efficient quarantine really is.

Despite that travel restriction and social distancing significantly reduce the risk of transmissibility, evidence regarding the use of face masks are inconsistent. Regardless of the status of the individual, even for an asymptomatic carrier, face masks can mitigate the risk [ 32 ]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Chu et al., [ 33 ] reunited 172 observations studies across 16 countries with a cohort consisting of 25,697 patients. As expected, the greater the physical distance than 1 m, the risk is inversely proportional and vice versa. Intriguingly, even eye protection was positively associated with less infection.

However, a question arises. Why is there such a significant difference in the total number of deaths between countries? A cross-sectional dataset comprising 169 countries aiming to investigate factors associated with cross-country variation revealed that mortality rate is influenced by a series of variables; government effectiveness, the number of hospital beds, transport infrastructure, and the most important is the number of tests performed [ 34 ].

If all these amendments will not be taken seriously, we could face a second wave much more severe [ 35 ], reflected by the number of deaths reported each day. A similar event has been recorded as a consequence of the violation of these prevention measures in Romania.

An investigation of 12,343 SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences coming from the individual from 6 distinct geographical regions revealed that ORF1ab 4715L and S protein 614G variants is in direct correlation with fatality rates. The authors also showed that the bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine and the frequency of several HLA alleles are associated with fatality rates and the number of infected cases [ 36 ].

From our point of view, researchers and clinicians should change the direction of this topic. Where does the next question come from? “If it is still known that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors [ 37 , 38 ] are also found in different niches along the digestive tract, why is the number of studies that aim to identify SARS-CoV-2 using rectal swabs or stool samples limited?” In several previous occasions, it has been demonstrated the presence of viral signatures in stool samples starting from day seven, and ranging up to almost two weeks after infection [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. This hypothesis is also supported by additional evidence that the incidence of gastrointestinal deficiencies varies from mild [ 40 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] to moderate [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ].

The temperature could play an important role in the spreading of this virus. Demongeot et al. [ 50 ] concluded that high temperatures restrict the range of action of SARS-CoV-2, but this does not mean that in the cold season there will not be big question marks as to whether or not a person is infected with SARS-CoV-2, especially when it will overlap with influenza infections.

In conclusion, Eastern European countries such as Romania are at particular risk because of the vulnerabilities in the health system, corruption, and emigration of doctors. All these delays and the poor organization represent the consequences of the communist regime that still makes its mark even after more than three decades. It should be noted that Romania has also faced several economic crises, the critical point being reached on February 5 this year, at which point it collapsed [ 51 ].

Identical to Western models, and consistent with WHO guidelines (distance between people of about 1.5 m, wearing a mask, isolation, and massive testing), all these measures have been implemented also in Romania. Despite the efforts made, the sums allocated for carrying out such tests are insignificant, the equipment is missing, the staff is not qualified, and the hospitals are at full capacity.

Cumulatively, all these negative aspects are certified by an increasing number of infected people in contrast to the rest of Europe where the situation has reached the upper limit and is now stabilizing. What is certain is that Romania does not yet have an effective strategy to reduce the number of patients.

5. Conclusions

Forecasting the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 is imperative to date, especially for health departments. As has been described and demonstrated throughout this study, time-series models play a crucial role in disease prediction. In this study, ARIMA time-series models were applied with success with the aim of estimating the overall prevalence of COVID-19 in Romania. However, based on our expertise and although both software have proven effective, Statgraphics has a much wider spectrum of possibilities in terms of speed, analysis, and utility. To these arguments is added the current pandemic, where providing a clear perspective in a short interval is vital for every individual.

Author Contributions

O.-D.I. (Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Software); A.C. (Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Project Administration, Writing—Review and Editing); B.D. (Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Project Administration). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

  • Statistical Techniques
  • Mathematics

A Comparative Analysis of the ARIMA and LSTM Predictive Models and Their Effectiveness for Predicting Wind Speed

  • October 2021
  • Energies 14(20):6782
  • 14(20):6782

Meftah Elsaraiti at Saint Mary's University

  • Saint Mary's University

Adel Merabet at Saint Mary's University

Abstract and Figures

Wind speed time series.

Discover the world's research

  • 25+ million members
  • 160+ million publication pages
  • 2.3+ billion citations

Amiri Ahmed Faris

  • Aissa Chouder

Houcine Oudira

  • Ege Kandemir

Agus Hasan

  • Saleh Abdel-Afou Alaliyat
  • PURE APPL GEOPHYS

Décio Alves

  • Yongyong Jia
  • Dajiang Wang
  • Adem Demirtop

Onur Sevli

  • Shaurya Goyal

Rishabh Gupta

  • Ebru Şeyma Karakoyun
  • K.S. Sandhu

Anil Nair

  • Zhongda Tian
  • J Comput Sci
  • Afan Galih Salman

Yaya Heryadi

  • Edi Abdurahman

Wayan Suparta

  • Recruit researchers
  • Join for free
  • Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Benefits, challenges, and limitations of inventory control using machine learning algorithms: literature review

  • Theoretical Article
  • Published: 15 August 2024

Cite this article

literature review on arima model

  • Juan Camilo Gutierrez   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0386-1706 1 ,
  • Sonia Isabel Polo Triana 1 &
  • Juan Sebastian León Becerra 1  

Explore all metrics

This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature on the benefits, challenges, and limitations of using machine learning (ML) algorithms in inventory control, focusing on how these algorithms can transform inventory management and improve operational efficiency in supply chains. The originality of the study lies in its integrative approach, combining a detailed review with a critical analysis of current and future applications of ML in inventory control. The main aspects covered in the review include the types of ML algorithms most utilised in inventory control, key benefits such as replenishment optimisation and improved prediction accuracy, and the technical, ethical, and practical limitations in their implementation. The review also addresses challenges in managing high-dimensional data and adapting these algorithms to different operational contexts. The research method adopts a systematic approach to identify and analyse relevant sources, with a thorough bibliographic search resulting in a final corpus of 81 articles. The principal contribution of this research is a compendium of strategies for the implementation of ML in inventory control that leverages potential benefits while mitigating the technical and practical challenges that may arise, contributing to both theory and practice and providing valuable insights for academics and professionals in the industry, underscoring the potential and challenges of using ML in modern inventory control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

literature review on arima model

Similar content being viewed by others

literature review on arima model

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Inventory Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature

literature review on arima model

Demonstrating the interplay of machine learning and optimization methods for operational planning decision

literature review on arima model

Machine Learning Applications for Demand Driven in Supply Chain: Literature Review

Explore related subjects.

  • Artificial Intelligence

Availability of data and materials

The sources used for doing this study is given in Sect. 2. Research method.

Albayrak Ünal, Ö., Erkayman, B., Usanmaz, B.: Applications of artificial intelligence in inventory management: a systematic review of the literature. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 30 (4), 2605–2625 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09879-5

Article   Google Scholar  

Svoboda, J., Minner, S., Yao, M.: Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 293 (1), 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.023

Rolf, B., Jackson, I., Müller, M., Lang, S., Reggelin, T., Ivanov, D.: A review on reinforcement learning algorithms and applications in supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2140221

Esteso, A., Peidro, D., Mula, J., Díaz-Madroñero, M.: Reinforcement learning applied to production planning and control. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (16), 5772–5789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2104180

Jha, K., Doshi, A., Patel, P., Shah, M.: A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2 , 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2019.05.004

Tirkolaee, E.B., Sadeghi, S., Mooseloo, F.M., Vandchali, H.R., Aeini, S.: Application of machine learning in supply chain management: a comprehensive overview of the main areas. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021 , e1476043 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1476043

Boute, R.N., Gijsbrechts, J., van Jaarsveld, W., Vanvuchelen, N.: Deep reinforcement learning for inventory control: a roadmap. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 298 (2), 401–412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.016

Kamal, E., Abdel-Gawad, A.F., Zaki, S.: Neutrosophic-based machine learning techniques in the context of supply chain management: a survey. Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci. 21 (2), 142–160 (2023). https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.210213

Panda, S.K., Mohanty, S.N.: Time series forecasting and modeling of food demand supply chain based on regressors analysis. IEEE Access 11 , 42679–42700 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3266275

Ji, S., Wang, X., Zhao, W., Guo, D.: An application of a three-stage XGboost-based model to sales forecasting of a cross-border e-commerce enterprise. Math. Probl. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8503252

Shokouhifar, M., Ranjbarimesan, M.: Multivariate time-series blood donation/demand forecasting for resilient supply chain management during COVID-19 pandemic. Clean. Log. Supply Chain (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100078

Wu, G., de Carvalho Servia, M.Á., Mowbray, M.: Distributional reinforcement learning for inventory management in multi-echelon supply chains. Dig. Chem. Eng. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dche.2022.100073

Wu, J., Lu, C., Wu, C.: Learning-aided framework for storage control facing renewable energy. IEEE Syst. J. 17 (1), 652–663 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2022.3154389

Chong, J.W., Kim, W., Hong, J.S.: Optimisation of apparel supply chain using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Access 10 , 100367–100375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3205720

Maathavan, K.S.K., Venkatraman, S.: A secure encrypted classified electronic healthcare data for public cloud environment. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 32 (2), 765–779 (2022). https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2022.022276

Ntakolia, C., Kokkotis, C., Karlsson, P., Moustakidis, S.: An explainable machine learning model for material backorder prediction in inventory management. Sensors (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21237926

Kegenbekov, Z., Jackson, I.: Adaptive supply chain: demand-supply synchronisation using deep reinforcement learning. Algorithms (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/a14080240

Wang, K., Long, C., Ong, D.J., Zhang, J., Yuan, X.: Single-site perishable inventory management under uncertainties: a deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2023.3250249

Desloires, J., Ienco, D., Botrel, A.: Out-of-year corn yield prediction at field-scale using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and machine learning methods. Comput. Electron. Agric. 209 , 107807 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107807

Benhamida, F.Z., Kaddouri, O., Ouhrouche, T., Benaichouche, M., Casado-Mansilla, D., López-De-Ipiña, D.: Demand forecasting tool for inventory control smart systems. J. Commun. Softw. Syst. 17 (2), 185–196 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24138/jcomss-2021-0068

García-Barrios, D., Palomino, K., García-Solano, E., Cuello-Quiroz, A.: A machine learning based method for managing multiple impulse purchase products: an inventory management approach. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 14 (1), 25–37 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.141.02

Qi, M., Mak, H.-Y., Shen, Z.-J.M.: Data-driven research in retail operations—a review. NRL 67 (8), 595–616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21949

Do, H.-T., Pham, V.-C.: Deep learning based goods management in supermarkets. J. Adv. Inf. Technol. 12 (2), 164–168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12720/jait.12.2.164-168

De Moor, B.J., Gijsbrechts, J., Boute, R.N.: Reward shaping to improve the performance of deep reinforcement learning in perishable inventory management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 301 (2), 535–545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.045

Oroojlooyjadid, A., Snyder, L.V., Takáč, M.: Applying deep learning to the newsvendor problem. IISE Trans. 52 (4), 444–463 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2019.1632502

Theodorou, E., Spiliotis, E., Assimakopoulos, V.: Optimising inventory control through a data-driven and model-independent framework. EURO J. Transp. Log. 12 , 100103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtl.2022.100103

Gružauskas, V., Gimžauskienė, E., Navickas, V.: Forecasting accuracy influence on logistics clusters activities: the case of the food industry. J. Clean. Prod. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118225

Wang, S., Yang, Y.: M-GAN-XGBOOST model for sales prediction and precision marketing strategy making of each product in online stores. Data Technol. Appl. 55 (5), 749–770 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-11-2020-0286

Ren, X., Gong, Y., Rekik, Y., Xu, X.: Anticipatory shipping versus emergency shipment: data-driven optimal inventory models for online retailers. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2219343

Shih, H., Rajendran, S.: Comparison of time series methods and machine learning algorithms for forecasting Taiwan blood services foundation’s blood supply. J. Healthc. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6123745

Vicente, Ó.F., Fernández, F., García, J.: Automated market maker inventory management with deep reinforcement learning. Appl. Intell. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04647-9

Demizu, T., Fukazawa, Y., Morita, H.: Inventory management of new products in retailers using model-based deep reinforcement learning. Expert Syst. Appl. 229 , 120256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120256

Guo, M., Kong, X.T.R., Chan, H.K., Thadani, D.R.: Integrated inventory control and scheduling decision framework for packaging and products on a reusable transport item sharing platform. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (13), 4575–4591 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2187243

Hajek, P., Abedin, M.Z.: A profit function-maximizing inventory backorder prediction system using big data analytics. IEEE Access 8 , 58982–58994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983118

Behnamfar, R., Sajadi, S.M., Tootoonchy, M.: Developing environmental hedging point policy with variable demand: a machine learning approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 254 , 108640 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108640

Zhang, P., Liu, X., Li, W., Yu, X.: Pharmaceutical cold chain management based on blockchain and deep learning. J. Int. Technol. 22 (7), 1531–1542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.53106/160792642021122207007

Priore, P., Ponte, B., Rosillo, R., de la Fuente, D.: Applying machine learning to the dynamic selection of replenishment policies in fast-changing supply chain environments. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (11), 3663–3677 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1552369

Huerta-Soto, R., Ramirez-Asis, E., Tarazona-Jiménez, J., Nivin-Vargas, L., Norabuena-Figueroa, R., Guzman-Avalos, M., Reyes-Reyes, C.: Predictable inventory management within dairy supply chain operations. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2023-0051

Galli, L., Levato, T., Schoen, F., Tigli, L.: Prescriptive analytics for inventory management in health care. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 72 (10), 2211–2224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1776167

Wu, W.-S., Lu, Z.-M.: A real-time cup-detection method based on YOLOv3 for inventory management. Sensors (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186956

Dittrich, M.-A., Fohlmeister, S.: A deep q-learning-based optimisation of the inventory control in a linear process chain. Prod. Eng. 15 (1), 35–43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-01000-8

Meisheri, H., Sultana, N.N., Baranwal, M., Baniwal, V., Nath, S., Verma, S., Ravindran, B., Khadilkar, H.: Scalable multi-product inventory control with lead time constraints using reinforcement learning. Neural Comput. Appl. 34 (3), 1735–1757 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06129-w

Priya, R., Ramesh, D.: ML based sustainable precision agriculture: a future generation perspective. Sustain. Comput. Inf. Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100439

Chandriah, K.K., Naraganahalli, R.V.: RNN/LSTM with modified Adam optimiser in deep learning approach for automobile spare parts demand forecasting. Multimedia Tools Appl. 80 (17), 26145–26159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-10913-0

Koc, I., Arslan, E.: Dynamic ticket pricing of airlines using variant batch size interpretable multi-variable long short-term memory. Expert Syst. Appl. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114794

Fu, W., Chien, C.-F.: UNISON data-driven intermittent demand forecast framework to empower supply chain resilience and an empirical study in electronics distribution. Comput. Ind. Eng. 135 , 940–949 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.002

Hamandawana, P., Khan, A., Kim, J., Chung, T.-S.: Accelerating ML/DL applications with hierarchical caching on deduplication storage clusters. IEEE Trans. Big Data 8 (6), 1622–1636 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2021.3106345

Huang, B., Gan, W., Li, Z.: Application of medical material inventory model under deep learning in supply planning of public emergency. IEEE Access 9 , 44128–44138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057869

Zhou, Q., Yang, Y., Fu, S.: Deep reinforcement learning approach for solving joint pricing and inventory problem with reference price effects. Expert Syst. Appl. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116564

Zhou, S., Sun, T., Xia, X., Zhang, N., Huang, B., Xian, G., Chai, X.: Library on-shelf book segmentation and recognition based on deep visual features. Inf. Process. Manag. 59 (6), 103101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103101

de Paula Vidal, G.H., Caiado, R.G.G., Scavarda, L.F., Ivson, P., Garza-Reyes, J.A.: Decision support framework for inventory management combining fuzzy multicriteria methods, genetic algorithm, and artificial neural network. Comput. Ind. Eng. 174 , 108777 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108777

Singh, R., Mishra, V.K.: Inventory model using Machine Learning for demand forecast with imperfect deteriorating products and partial backlogging under carbon emissions. Ann. Oper. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05518-9

Svoboda, J., Minner, S.: Tailoring inventory classification to industry applications: the benefits of understandable machine learning. Int. J. Prod. Res. 60 (1), 388–401 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1959078

Aguilar, J., Guillén, R.J.D.S., García, R., Gómez, C., Jerez, M., Narváez, M.L.J., Puerto, E.: A smart DDMRP model using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Value Chain Manag. 14 (2), 107–142 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVCM.2023.130973

Badakhshan, E., Ball, P.: Applying digital twins for inventory and cash management in supply chains under physical and financial disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (15), 5094–5116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2093682

Punia, S., Singh, S.P., Madaan, J.K.: From predictive to prescriptive analytics: a data-driven multi-item newsvendor model. Decision Support Syst (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113340

Kumar, N., Singh, B.J., Khope, P.: Unleashing an ML-based selection criteria for economic lot sizing in a smart batch-type production system. TQM J (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2022-0166

Ben Elmir, W., Hemmak, A., Senouci, B.: Smart platform for data blood bank management: forecasting demand in blood supply chain using machine learning. Information (Switzerland) (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/info14010031

Tripathi, M.A., Madhavi, K., Kandi, V.S.P., Nassa, V.K., Mallik, B., Chakravarthi, M.K.: Machine learning models for evaluating the benefits of business intelligence systems. J. High Technol. Managem. Res. 34 (2), 100470 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2023.100470

Van Belle, J., Guns, T., Verbeke, W.: Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 288 (2), 466–479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.059

Clausen, J.B.B., Li, H.: Big data driven order-up-to level model: application of machine learning. Comput. Oper. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105641

Bertsimas, D., McCord, C., Sturt, B.: Dynamic optimisation with side information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 304 (2), 634–651 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.030

Kim, M., Lee, J., Lee, C., Jeong, J.: Framework of 2D KDE and LSTM-based forecasting for cost-effective inventory management in smart manufacturing. Appl Sci (Switzerland) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052380

van Steenbergen, R.M., Mes, M.R.K.: Forecasting demand profiles of new products. Decis. Support. Syst. 139 , 113401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113401

Alzahrani, A., Asghar, M.Z.: Intelligent risk prediction system in iot-based supply chain management in logistics sector. Electronics (Switzerland) (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132760

Chen, Z.-Y., Fan, Z.-P., Sun, M.: Inventory management with multisource heterogeneous information: roles of representation learning and information fusion. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2023.3267858

Juneja, A., Juneja, S., Soneja, A., Jain, S.: Real time object detection using CNN based single shot detector model. J. Inf. Technol. Manag. 13 (1), 62–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2021.80025

Yang, K., Wang, Y., Fan, S., Mosleh, A.: Multi-criteria spare parts classification using the deep convolutional neural network method. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157088

Gijsbrechts, J., Boute, R.N., Van Mieghem, J.A., Zhang, D.J.: Can deep reinforcement learning improve inventory management? Performance on lost sales, dual-sourcing, and multi-echelon problems. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 24 (3), 1349–1368 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1064

Wang, Q., Peng, Y., Yang, Y.: Solving inventory management problems through deep reinforcement learning. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 31 (6), 677–689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-022-5544-6

Zhou, Q., Fu, S., Yang, Y., Dong, C.: Joint pricing and inventory control with reference price effects and price thresholds: a deep reinforcement learning approach. Expert Syst. Appl. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120993

Bi, X., Adomavicius, G., Li, W., Qu, A.: Improving sales forecasting accuracy: a tensor factorization approach with demand awareness. INFORMS J. Comput. 34 (3), 1644–1660 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1147

Kmiecik, M.: Logistics coordination based on inventory management and transportation planning by third-party logistics (3PL). Sustainability (Switzerland) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138134

Ahmadi, E., Mosadegh, H., Maihami, R., Ghalehkhondabi, I., Sun, M., Süer, G.A.: Intelligent inventory management approaches for perishable pharmaceutical products in a healthcare supply chain. Comput. Oper. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.105968

Wang, R., Gan, X., Li, Q., Yan, X.: Solving a joint pricing and inventory control problem for perishables via deep reinforcement learning. Complexity (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6643131

Deng, C., Liu, Y.: A deep learning-based inventory management and demand prediction optimisation method for anomaly detection. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021 , e9969357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9969357

Liu, L., Zhu, G., Zhao, X.: Application of medical supply inventory model based on deep learning and big data. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 13 , 1216–1227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-022-01669-3

Zhang, S., Qin, X., Hu, S., Zhang, Q., Dong, B., Zhao, J.: Importance degree evaluation of spare parts based on clustering algorithm and back-propagation neural network. Math. Probl. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6161825

Lolli, F., Balugani, E., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., Rimini, B., Regattieri, A.: Machine learning for multi-criteria inventory classification applied to intermittent demand. Prod. Plan. Control 30 (1), 76–89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1525506

van Hezewijk, L., Dellaert, N., Van Woensel, T., Gademann, N.: Using the proximal policy optimisation algorithm for solving the stochastic capacitated lot sizing problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (6), 1955–1978 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2056540

Li, Z.: Consumer behavior analysis model based on machine learning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 40 (4), 6433–6443 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189483

Lu, S.: Enterprise supply chain risk assessment based on improved neural network algorithm and machine learning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 40 (4), 7013–7024 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189532

Li, N., Chiang, F., Down, D.G., Heddle, N.M.: A decision integration strategy for short-term demand forecasting and ordering for red blood cell components. Oper. Res. Health Care (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orhc.2021.100290

Merrad, Y., Habaebi, M.H., Islam, M.R., Gunawan, T.S.: A real-time mobile notification system for inventory stock out detection using SIFT and RANSAC. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol. 14 (5), 32–46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I05.13315

Yang, B., Xu, X., Gong, Y., Rekik, Y.: Data-driven optimisation models for inventory and financing decisions in online retailing platforms. Ann. Oper. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05234-4

Qi, M., Shi, Y., Qi, Y., Ma, C., Yuan, R., Wu, D., Shen (Max), Z.-J.: A practical end-to-end inventory management model with deep learning. Manag. Sci. 69 (2), 759–773 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4564

Iraola, E., Sedano, L., Nougués, J.M., Feliu, J.A., Coya, B., Batet, L.: SMART_TC: an R&D Programme on uses of artificial intelligence techniques for tritium monitoring in complex ITER-like tritium plant systems. Fusion Eng. Design (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112409

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

The authors declare that there is no funding agency involved in this project.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Universidad de Investigación y Desarrollo UDI, Bucaramanga, Colombia

Juan Camilo Gutierrez, Sonia Isabel Polo Triana & Juan Sebastian León Becerra

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this paper, in content and in form.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Camilo Gutierrez .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The authors assure that the paper is the output of their own original work, which has not been previously published or sent anywhere to the best of their knowledge. All sources used are properly disclosed, and all authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to this paper.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Gutierrez, J.C., Polo Triana, S.I. & León Becerra, J.S. Benefits, challenges, and limitations of inventory control using machine learning algorithms: literature review. OPSEARCH (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-024-00839-0

Download citation

Accepted : 05 August 2024

Published : 15 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-024-00839-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Inventory control
  • Machine learning
  • Deep learning
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sustainability-logo

Article Menu

literature review on arima model

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Strengthening akis for sustainable agricultural features: insights and innovations from the european unio: a literature review.

literature review on arima model

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. data collection procedure, 2.2. identification criteria, 2.3. screening and selection criteria, 2.4. eligibility and inclusion criteria.

  • The studies that were carried out or considered the 28 countries in the European Union (including the United Kingdom until 2019 and excluding Romania).
  • Studies published in the English Language.
  • Studies that were published within the past 11 years (the review covers the period from 2014 to 2024, a period in which the two previous Programming Periods of the Common Agricultural Policy were implemented).
  • Studies covering the inclusion of a transparent description of the process of data acquisition and interpretation.
  • Studies covering a primary or secondary class investigation on the subject matter.
  • Studies showcasing the effects of AKISs and FASs on agricultural knowledge advancement.
  • Studies published in a non-English language.
  • Studies carried out outside the EU.
  • Studies with unclear methodology of data collection and analysis.
  • Studies lacking author names and affiliation.
  • Studies not covering both the main issues of this review (i.e., AKIS and FAS).

4. Discussion

4.1. akis and fas in the foreground through the new cap, 4.2. improving the effectiveness of an akis, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

  • Kuiper, D.; Roling, N.G. Proceedings of the European Seminar on Knowledge Management and Information Technology ; Wageningen Agricultural University: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 8–20. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hermans, F.; Geerling-Eiff, F.; Potters, J.; Klerkx, L. Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments—Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2019 , 88 , 76–95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • European Union Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (EU SCAR). Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition—A Reflection Paper ; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Labarthe, P.; Beck, M. CAP and Advisory Services: From Farm Advisory Systems to Innovation Support. EuroChoices 2022 , 21 , 5–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kiraly, G.; Vago, S.; Bull, E.; Van der Cruyssen, L.; Arbour, T.; Spanoghe, P.; Van Dijk, L. Information behaviour of farmers, foresters, and advisors in the context of digitalisation in the EU. Stud. Agric. Econ. 2023 , 125 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ingram, J.; Mills, J. Are advisory services “fit for purpose” to support sustainable soil management? An assessment of advice in Europe. Soil Use Manag. 2019 , 35 , 21–31. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Laurent, C.; Nguyen, G.; Triboulet, P.; Ansaloni, M.; Bechtet, N.; Labarthe, P. Institutional continuity and hidden changes in farm advisory services provision: Evidence from farmers’ microAKIS observations in France. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2021 , 28 , 601–624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Madureira, L.; Labarthe, P.; Marues, C.S.; Santos, G. Exploring micro AKIS: Farmer-centric evidence on the role of advice in agricultural innovation in Europe. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2022 , 28 , 549–575. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Amerani, E.; Michailidis, A. The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) in a Changing Environment in Greece. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Hellenic Association of Agricultural Economists, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2–3 November 2023. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kiljunen, J.; Jaakkola, D. AKIS and Advisory Services in Finland. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
  • Charatsari, C.; Michailidis, A.; Francescone, M.; De Rosa, M.; Aidonis, D.; Bartoli, L.; La Rocca, G.; Camanzi, L.; Lioutas, E.D. Do Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems Have the Dynamic Capabilities to Guide the Digital Transition of Short Food Supply Chains? Information 2024 , 15 , 22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Masi, M.; De Rosa, M.; Vecchio, Y.; Adinolfi, F. The long way to innovation adoption: Insights from precision agriculture. Agric. Food Econ. 2022 , 10 , 27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Nordlund, I.; Norrby, T. AKIS and advisory services in Sweden. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 5 February 2024).
  • Sturel, S. AKIS and Advisory Services in France. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  • Enfedaque Diaz, L.; Jimenez Gonzalez, A.; Pures Pato, M.A. AKIS and advisory services in Spain. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 5 February 2024).
  • Almeida, R.; Viveiros, F. AKIS and Advisory Services in Portugal. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 3 February 2024).
  • Birke, F.; Bae, S.; Schober Gerster-Bentaya, M.; Knierim, A.; Asensio, P.; Kolbeck, M.; Ketelhodt, C. AKIS and Advisory Services in Germany. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  • Jelakovic, K. AKIS and Advisory Services in Croatia. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  • Stankovic, S. AKIS and Advisory Services in Serbia. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 4 February 2024).
  • Hrovatic, I. AKIS and Advisory Services in Slovenia. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 4 February 2024).
  • Bachev, H. Governance of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) in Bulgaria. SSRN Electron. J. 2022 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Koutsouris, A.; Zarokosta, E.; Kanaki, V. AKIS and Advisory Services in Cyprus. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  • Knierim, A.; Kernecker, M.; Erdle, K.; Kraus, T.; Borges, F.; Wurbs, A. Smart farming technology innovations—Insights and reflections from the German Smart-AKIS hub. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2019 , 90–91 , 1–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Koutsouris, A.; Zarokosta, E.; Pappa, E.; Kanaki, V. AKIS and Advisory Services in Greece. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  • Coquil, X.; Cerf, M.; Auricoste, C.; Joannon, A.; Barcellini, F.; Cayre, P.; Chizallet, M.; Dedieu, B.; Hostiou, N.; Hellec, F.; et al. Questioning the work of farmers, advisors, teachers and researchers in agro-ecological transition. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018 , 38 , 47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Lybaert, C.; Debruyne, L. AKIS and Advisory Services in Belgium. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 27 January 2024).
  • Dortmans, E.; Van Geel, D.; Van der Velde, S. AKIS and Advisory Services in Netherlands. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  • Gaborne, J.A.; Varga, Z.; Ver, A. AKIS and Advisory Services in Hungary. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 31 January 2024).
  • de Foliveira, M.; Gomes da Silva, F.; Ferreira, S.; Teixeira, M.; Damαsio, H.; Ferreira, A.D.; Gonηalves, J.M. Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture: Case Study of Lis Valley Irrigation District, Portugal. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 331. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Mirra, L.; Caputo, N.; Gandolfi, F.; Menna, C. The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) in Campania Region: The challenges facing the first implementation of experimental model. J. Agric. Policy 2020 , 3 , 35–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Cristiano, S.; Carta, V.; Sturla, V.; D’Oronzio, M.A.; Proietti, P. AKIS and Advisory Services in Italy. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 31 January 2024).
  • Todorova, I. AKIS and Advisory Services in Bulgaria. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 27 January 2024).
  • Dzelme, A.; Zurins, K. AKIS and Advisory Services in Latvia. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  • Matuseviciute, E.; Petraitis, R.; Sakickiene, A.; Titiskyte, L.; Urbanaviciene, S. AKIS and Advisory Services in Lithuania. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  • Zimmer, S.; Stoll, E.; Leimbrock-Rosch, L. AKIS and Advisory Services in Luxembourg. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  • Giagnocavo, C.; de Cara-Garcνa, M.; Gonzαlez, M.; Juan, M.; Marνn-Guirao, J.I.; Mehrabi, S.; Rodrνguez, E.; van der Blom, J.; Crisol-Martνnez, E. Reconnecting Farmers with Nature through Agroecological Transitions: Interacting Niches and Experimentation and the Role of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems. Agriculture 2022 , 12 , 137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Klitgaard, K. AKIS and Advisory Services in Denmark. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2019. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
  • Cristiano, S.; Carta, V.; D’Oronzio MA Proietti, P.; Sturla, V. AKIS and Advisory Services in Malta. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  • Knierim, A.; Boenning, K.; Caggiano, M.; Cristσvγo, A.; Dirimanova, V.; Koehnen, T.; Labarthe, P.; Prager, K. The AKIS Concept and its Relevance in Selected EU Member States. Outlook Agric. 2015 , 44 , 29–36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Terziev, V.; Arabska, E. Enhancing Competitiveness and Sustainability of Agri-Food Sector through Market-Oriented Technology Development in Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in Bulgaria. In Proceedings of the III International Scientific Congress Agricultural Machinery, Varna, Bulgaria, 22–25 June 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Konecna, M.M. AKIS and Advisory Services in Czech Republic. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  • Kasdorferova, Z.; Palus, H.; Kadlecikova MSvikruhova, P. AKIS and Advisory Services in Slovak Republic. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 4 February 2024).
  • Boczek, K.; Ambryszewska, K.; Dabrowski, J.; Ulicka, A. AKIS and Advisory Services in Poland. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 3 February 2024).
  • Ingram, J.; Mills, J.; Black, J.E.; Chivers, C.-A.; Aznar-Sαnchez, J.A.; Elsen, A.; Frac, M.; Lσpez-Felices, B.; Mayer-Gruner, P.; Skaalsveen, K.; et al. Do Agricultural Advisory Services in Europe Have the Capacity to Support the Transition to Healthy Soils? Land 2022 , 11 , 599. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Herzog, F.; Neubauer, E. AKIS and Advisory Services in Austria. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 27 January 2024).
  • Banninger, A. AKIS and Advisory Services in Switzerland. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 5 February 2024).
  • Maher, P. AKIS and Advisory Services in Ireland. Report for the AKIS inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2020. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 31 January 2024).
  • Dunne, A.; Markey, A.; Kinsella, J. Examining the reach of public and private agricultural advisory services and farmers’ perceptions of their quality: The case of county Laois in Ireland. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2019 , 25 , 401–414. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Knuth, U.; Knierim, A. How to strengthen the link between advisors and research in a privatized advisory system?—The case of Brandenburg, Germany. In Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium, Berlin, Germany, 1–4 April 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Konecna, M.M. The role of the Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information in the Czech Agricultural Knowledge Information System. Rural Areas Dev. 2018 , 15 , 49–56. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Klerkx, L.; Straete, E.P.; Kvam, G.T.; Ystad, E.; Harstad RM, B. Achieving best-fit configurations through advisory subsystems in AKIS: Case studies of advisory service provisioning for diverse types of farmers in Norway. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2017 , 23 , 213–229. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Tamsalu, H. AKIS and Advisory Services in Estonia. Report for the AKIS Inventory (Task 1.2) of the i2connect Project. i2connect INTERACTIVE INNOVATION 2021. Available online: https://i2connect-h2020.eu/resources/akis-country-reports/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
  • Kania, J.; Zmija, J. Changes in Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems: Case Study of Poland. Visegrad J. Bioeconomy 2016 , 5 , 10–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Xieyang, C.; Tongsheng, l. Diffusion of Agricultural Technology Innovation: Research Progress of Innovation Diffusion in Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Praks. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 15008. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Article IDCountryFactor(s) InvestigatedKey Results ObtainedSuggested Improvements
[ ] Kiraly et al. (2023).European Union countriesAssessing the behavior of European farmers, foresters and advisors regarding the frequency of searching for information on digital transformation using the EU Farmbook application.
[ ] Ingram and Mills (2019).European countriesAdvisory services regarding sustainable soil management.
[ ] Laurent et al. (2021).Southwestern FranceEvaluation of the processes by which farmers combine different sources of agricultural advice (micro-AKIS) for three types of innovation.
[ ] Madureira et al. (2022).EuropeThe role of farm consultancy in agricultural innovation in relation to the microAKIS.
[ ] Amerani et Michailidis (2023).GreeceEvaluation of the contribution of the Greek AKIS and its adaptation to modern requirements of Greek agriculture
[ ] Kiljunen et Jaakkola (2020).FinlandAKIS and the Farm Advisory System in Finland.
[ ] Charatsari et al. (2023).Greece, ItalyInvestigation of the possibility of AKIS actors to develop dynamic capacities during the supply process of the food chain.
[ ] Masi et al. (2022).ItalyEvaluation of precision agriculture tools as an innovation and the variables that facilitate or hinder their implementation in agricultural practice.
[ ] Nordlund and Norrby (2021).SwedenDetailed description of the Swedish agricultural advisory services.
[ ] Sturel (2021).FranceFrench AKIS and Farm Advisory System combined with the promotion of interactive innovation to support the transition in agriculture and forestry.
[ ] Enfedaque Diaz et al. (2020).SpainAKIS and Advisory Services in Spain.
[ ] Almeida et Viveiros (2020).PortugalReport of the AKIS in Portugal, with an emphasis on agricultural advisory services.
[ ] Birke et al. (2021).GermanyOverview of the AKIS and the Forestry Knowledge and Innovation System (FKIS) in Germany.
[ ] Jelakovic (2021).CroatiaOverview of the Croatian AKIS.
[ ] Stankovic (2020).SerbiaReport of the Serbian AKIS and FAS.
[ ] Hrovatic (2020).SloveniaDescription of the Slovenian AKIS and FAS.
[ ] Bachev (2022).BulgariaAnalyzing Governance, Efficiency and Development of the AKIS.
[ ] Koutsouris et al. (2020).CyprusComprehensive overview of the Cyprus AKIS and the Agricultural Advisory System.
[ ] Knierim et al. (2019).GermanySmart Farming Technologies (SFT) and their degree of perception by farmers.
[ ] Koutsouris et al. (2020)GreeceAKIS and agricultural advisory services in Greece.
[ ] Coquil et al. (2018).FranceThe transformations of farmers and AKIS actors’ work during agroecological transitions.
[ ] Lybaert et Debruyne (2020).BelgiumOverview of the Belgian AKIS, focusing on agricultural advisory services.
[ ] Dortmans et al. (2020).NetherlandsInsight into the Dutch AKIS actors and factors that play
a role in the system.
[ ] Gaborne et al. (2020).HungaryThe general characteristics of the Hungarian agricultural and
forestry sector and AKIS, as well as the historical development of the advisory
system.
[ ] Oliveira et al. (2019).PortugalThe Portuguese irrigation system of the Lis Valley, within the framework of the EIP AGRI Program of the European Union.
[ ] Mirra et al. (2020).Campania region, ItalyAnalysis of the implementation of an experimental AKIS model through the RDP.
[ ] Cristiano et al. (2020).ItalyAn overview of the Italian AKIS and the local Farm
Advisory Services (FASs).
[ ] Todorova (2021).BulgariaA comprehensive description of the Bulgarian AKIS and FAS.
[ ] Dzelme et Zurins (2021).LatviaA description of the AKIS in Latvia and brief outlook of the Forestry AKIS (FKIS).
[ ] Matuseviciute et al. (2021).LithuaniaAKIS and FAS in Lithuania. A detailed report.
[ ] Zimmer et al. (2020).LuxembourgDescription of the AKIS in Luxembourg.
[ ] Giagnocavo et al. (2022).SpainThe reconnection of the farm production system with nature, especially where the production procedure is embedded in less sustainable conventional or dominant regimes and landscapes.
[ ] Klitgaard (2019).DenmarkA comprehensive description of the AKIS and FAS in Denmark.
[ ] Cristiano et al. (2020).MaltaDescription of the AKIS with a focus in the FAS in the Republic of Malta.
[ ] Knierim et al. (2015)Belgium, France, Ireland, Germany, Portugal and the UKThe AKIS concept in selected EU member states.
[ ] Terziev and Arabska (2015).BulgariaQuality assurance and sustainable development in the agri-food sector.
[ ] Konecna (2020).Czech RepublicA comprehensive description of theAKIS in the Czech Republic, with
a particular focus on farm and forestry advisory services.
[ ] Kasdorferova et al. (2020).Slovak RepublicDescription of the AKIS and FAS in Slovak Republic.
[ ] Boczek et al. (2020).PolandAn overview of the AKIS and FKIS, as well as the FAS in Poland.
[ ] Ingram et al. (2022).Europe countriesEvaluation of the advisory services of European countries in the context of sustainable soil management.
[ ] Herzog et Neubauer (2020).AustriaEvaluation of the Austrian AKIS.
[ ] Banninger (2021).SwitzerlandDescription of the Swiss AKIS and advisory services.
[ ] Maher (2020).Republic of IrelandDescription of the Irish AKIS, with an emphasis on methods of knowledge dissemination and innovation.
[ ] Dunne et al. (2019).Laois county, Republic of IrelandEvaluating the interaction characteristics of public and private Farm Advisory Services in County Laois, Ireland.
[ ] Knuth and Knierim (2014).GermanyScientific bodies and providers of agricultural advisory services: finding ways to strengthen their relationship.
[ ] Konecna (2018).Czach RepublicEvaluation of the Institute of Agricultural Economy and Information (IAEI) regarding its innovation potential.
[ ] Hermans et al. (2019). England, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, SwitzerlandEffect of AKIS structural factors of eight European countries on cooperative schemes or social learning in innovation networks.
[ ] Klerkx et al. (2017).NorwayChallenges for advisory services in serving various types of farmers seeking and acquiring farm business advice.
[ ] Tamsalu (2021).EstoniaPresentation of the AKIS in Estonia.
[ ] Kania and Zmija (2016).PolandHow cooperation between AKIS stakeholders is assessed from the standpoint of the 16 provincial Agricultural Advisory Centers (ODRs).
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Kountios, G.; Kanakaris, S.; Moulogianni, C.; Bournaris, T. Strengthening AKIS for Sustainable Agricultural Features: Insights and Innovations from the European Unio: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167068

Kountios G, Kanakaris S, Moulogianni C, Bournaris T. Strengthening AKIS for Sustainable Agricultural Features: Insights and Innovations from the European Unio: A Literature Review. Sustainability . 2024; 16(16):7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167068

Kountios, Georgios, Spyridon Kanakaris, Christina Moulogianni, and Thomas Bournaris. 2024. "Strengthening AKIS for Sustainable Agricultural Features: Insights and Innovations from the European Unio: A Literature Review" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167068

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

  1. Literature review matrix and research position Using ARIMA and LSTM

    literature review on arima model

  2. PPT

    literature review on arima model

  3. Conceptual model for ARIMA model

    literature review on arima model

  4. (PDF) Using ARIMA model to analyse and predict bitcoin price

    literature review on arima model

  5. (PDF) ARIMA models for bus travel time prediction

    literature review on arima model

  6. Different iterative steps of ARIMA model

    literature review on arima model

COMMENTS

  1. (PDF) Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model

    ARIMA model. Jamal Fattah. 1, Latifa Ezzine. 1, Zineb Aman. 2, Haj El Moussami. 2 ... section presents a literature review about demand forecast-ing studies. The third section is consecrated to ...

  2. Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model

    This brief review of the literature shows that ANN is a strength tool aiming at the modeling of any time series. Nevertheless, in our article, we will test the ARIMA model at first to prove its ability to make accurate forecasts in the food company as a priori study. ... It is clear from Table 2 that the ARIMA model (1, 0, 1) is selected ...

  3. Future Internet

    In that scope, the first model category to be presented in detail is ARIMA, which is the center of our review, and then we organize the machine learning approaches by model category. For each of the categories, we present the theoretical background, and then we demonstrate the relevant scientific literature organized by application category.

  4. A Review of ARIMA vs. Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series

    The ARIMA model is a generalization of the ARMA model (AutoRegressive Moving A verage model), suitable for handling non-stationary time series. As the classical ARMA

  5. Using autoregressive integrated moving average models for time series

    This article discusses the use of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models for time series analysis. Rather than forecasting future values, we focus here on examining change across time in outcomes of interest and how this change is related to relevant variables. Much of the data that we collect about the world around us—stock prices, unemployment rates, party identification ...

  6. PDF Lecture 6: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Models

    • Inotherwords,thereissomenon-uniqueness ofredundancy intheparametrization—differentchoices ofparameterswillactuallyleadtothesamebehaviorinthemodelattheend

  7. Applications of time series analysis in epidemiology: Literature review

    The ARIMA model relies on the number of positive cases, the number of performed tests per day and the average positive percentage. In the United Kingdom, weighted interval scoring was used for the prediction model, which used the data from the linear progression of 7-day cases[ 42 ].

  8. An Introductory Study on Time Series Modeling and Forecasting

    important time series forecasting models have been evolved in literature. One of the most popular and frequently used stochastic time series models is the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) [6, 8, 21, 23] model. The basic assumption made to implement this model is that the considered time series is linear and

  9. Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model

    model. The two methods are used to forecast the failure of the system.8 Aburto and Weber9 combined the two forecasting meth-ods which are ARIMA and neural networks. The efficiency of the hybrid model is compared with traditional forecast-ing methods.10 This brief review of the literature shows that ANN is a

  10. A bibliometric literature review of stock price forecasting: From

    ARIMA approaches. The well-known traditional statistics time series forecasting methods, such as ARIMA and its variants 17,21 -29 are still used a lot because of their efficiency level. Table 1 presents a summary of ARIMA-based approaches for SPF. For the articles reviewed, we summarize the methods used, comparison methods, datasets, target outputs, input features, metrics evaluations, and ...

  11. A LITERATURE REVIEW ON TIME SERIES FORECASTING METHODS

    ARIMA models are mathematically written as ARIMA(p,d,q), where p and q are same as ARMA model but d = number of first differences (Yu, G. and Zhang, C., 2004, May). I. Seasonal Autoregressive ...

  12. Forecasting Using ARIMA, SARIMA, and the Additive Model

    Although the ARIMA model is a powerful model for analyzing patterns in univariate time-series data, it commits errors when handling seasonal data. Adding seasonal order to the model enhances its performance. SARIMA extends the ARIMA model. It considers the seasonal component when modeling time-series data.

  13. PDF Forecasting Using ARIMA, SARIMA, and the Additive Model

    ARIMA, SARIMA, and the Additive Model Time-series analysis is a method for explaining sequential problems. It is convenient when a continuous variable is time-dependent. In finance, we frequently use it to discover consistent patterns in the market data and forecast future prices. This chapter offers a comprehensive introduction

  14. PDF Literature review of modern time series forecasting methods

    suggested that ARIMA models might well make suitable forecasting models since it turned out that many of the previous ad hoc methods were represented as special cases: for example the ARIMA(0,1,1) model leads to forecasts produced by an EWMA, while the ARIMA(0,2,2) corresponds to Holts method (1957).7

  15. Improving Accuracy of Time Series Forecasting by Applying an ARIMA-ANN

    Literature review. Full size table. The core analysis of this paper is the outtake of well-known forecasting frameworks such as Exponential smoothing, ARIMA, LSTM, and ANN. A hybridization of ARIMA and ANN methods consisting of linear and nonlinear components is implemented. ... Using the ARIMA model for forecasting, it is presumed that the ...

  16. An Overview of Forecast Analysis with ARIMA Models during the ...

    The performance of the chosen ARIMA model is confirmed when comparing its forecasts with real data reported after the forecast period. The study successfully forecasts both confirmed and recovered COVID-19 cases across the preventive plan phases in Recife. ... The introduction in Section 1 includes a literature review of existing research on ...

  17. An Application of ARIMA Model to Forecast the Dynamics of COVID-19

    Hence, the superiority of forecasting ability of the ARIMA model over the other machine learning methods and AI models has been established by expanding amount of literature on ARIMA modelling (Ceylan, 2020; Fong et al., 2020; Kyungjoo et al., 2007; Merh et al., 2010; Singh et al., 2020).The ARIMA modelling has been successfully applied in the past literature to predict the prevalence of ...

  18. PDF Gdp Modelling and Forecasting Using Arima: an Empirical Study

    literature given mostly all previous studies focus on yearly data. Following the introduction, review of literature2 is presented. In next section I give an overview of the data sources used. In next section thereafter, ARIMA model and assumptions are detailed and then detailed modelling, analysis and results are presented.

  19. ARIMA model building and the time series analysis approach to

    Abstract This paper reviews the approach to forecasting based on the construction of ARIMA time series models. Recent developments in this area are surveyed, and the approach is related to other fo...

  20. An ARIMA-LSTM model for predicting volatile ...

    Driven strongly by a review of the literature, we selected traditional time series models ARIMA and GARCH and the deep learning model (LSTM) for the present investigation. First, the ARIMA model has been applied to check the mean behaviour of the series. ... B2, B3). ARIMA model squared residuals were used to estimate input lag through ACF and ...

  21. ARIMA Feature-Based Approach to Time Series Classification

    Abstract. Time series classification is a supervised learning problem that aims at labelling time series according to their class belongingness. Time series can be of variable length. Many algorithms have been proposed, among which feature-based approaches play a key role, but not all of them are able to deal with time series of unequal lengths.

  22. Testing the Accuracy of the ARIMA Models in Forecasting the Spreading

    Building an ARIMA model for any given time-series involves the checking of four steps: assessment of the model, estimation of parameters, diagnostic checking, and prediction. The first, which is otherwise imperative, is to verify if the mean, variance, and autocorrelation of the time-series are consistent throughout the established interval [ 20 ].

  23. (PDF) A Comparative Analysis of the ARIMA and LSTM ...

    Many authors have conducted a comparison between the traditional methods, such as the ARIMA model, and ML methods, such as SVR and LSTM models, in forecasting financial time series (Sheta et al ...

  24. Energies

    The construction industry plays a pivotal role in China's achievement of its "dual carbon" goals. This study conducts a decomposition analysis of the carbon emissions from the construction industry (CECI) at both national and provincial levels for the period 2010-2020 and employs the ARIMA model to predict the short-term peak trends at the provincial level. The findings are as follows ...

  25. Advancing Trauma Studies: A Narrative Literature Review Embracing a

    A narrative literature review was conducted, synthesizing data from 96 peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and authoritative reports from databases such as PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. The review focused on studies related to trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex trauma, and related disorders, emphasizing both ...

  26. Benefits, challenges, and limitations of inventory control using

    This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature on the benefits, challenges, and limitations of using machine learning (ML) algorithms in inventory control, focusing on how these algorithms can transform inventory management and improve operational efficiency in supply chains. ... The configured ARIMA model is then used to ...

  27. Sustainability

    The Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) and the Farm Advisory Service (FAS) are important elements of the current Programming Period of the Common Agricultural Policy (2023-2027), as it is now deemed necessary to transition the European agricultural model to more sustainable forms, through the dissemination of agricultural knowledge, while simultaneously promoting innovative ...