structure of social science research paper

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed

Abstract Students sometimes find the general process of writing an empirical research paper to be daunting. Yet, when the process is approached in a systematic way, students can become more comfortable with the writing and standard formatting used in an empirical article. Accordingly, the current paper serves as a template for the budding social scientist.

Related Papers

Students sometimes find the general process of writing an empirical research paper to be daunting. Yet, when the process is approached in a systematic way, students can become more comfortable with the writing and standard formatting used in an empirical article. Accordingly, the current paper serves as a template for the budding social scientist. In it, I describe the various sections of a research paper in order to illustrate the structure of an introduction, methods section, results section, and discussion section in a format fitting for the 6th edition of the American Psychological Association. As in most empirical research papers, the first section is an abstract, a short outline of the paper that clarifies both what the paper will be examining, what is found, and in most cases a one line explanation of why the findings are important to the field. Accordingly, this paper should help to clarify the process of producing an empirical article.

hadson sitembo

Weather you are doing a bachelor's or a higher level studies , it is important to do academic writing. This paper gives a summary of the different types of academic writing process and aspect related to academic writing. The paper is a review of works done on the subject matter.

Social Science Writing

Ricardo Stanton-Salazar

I’ve put together three documents composed of my own study notes on the process of writing in the social sciences. Notes include items taken from the internet and written by various scholars who address the “how tos” of writing social science papers, dissertations, and journal articles. Other notes are taken from various personal documents I’ve developed over my three decades of teaching sociology and education studies. I hope you find them helpful. RDSS

, I’ve put together three documents composed of my own study notes on the process of writing in the social sciences. Notes include items taken from the internet and written by various scholars who address the “how to-s” of writing social science papers, dissertations, and journal articles. Other notes are taken from various personal documents I’ve developed over my three decades of teaching sociology and education studies. I hope you find them helpful. RDSS

Professor Jason Miin-Hwa Lim

Novice writers and university students often encounter problems with regard to (i) the extent to which they should include research questions and hypotheses in their research reports, and (ii) how they can effectively present these information elements to enhance clarity. To resolve these problems, we used a genre-based analytical framework and inputs provided by specialist informants to ascertain the prevalence of these information elements and the range of linguistic resources employed by writers in the research article introductions (RAIs) in two social sciences, namely Ethnic Studies (ES) and Industrial Relations (IR). We have found that most RAIs in IR incorporate research questions and hypotheses, while less than half of those in ES include them. The difference is attributable to writers' greater tendency to employ epistemological methodologies in IR, and ontological methodologies in ES. Polar questions are rarely used in both disciplines, while factual, evaluative and circumstantial wh-questions are far more prevalent. Active anticipatory verbs and that-clauses are used to postulate hypotheses in both disciplines, whereas first-person pronouns are far more common in ES than in IR. Our findings can be flexibly adapted to design instructional materials aimed at guiding novice writers in the formulation of research questions and hypotheses.

Peter Smagorinsky

Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals

Esdras Rangel

Ibadan University Press eBooks

Emeka Emmanuel OKAFOR

Reading for Research: Social Sciences

Structure of a research article.

Structural Read

Guide Acknowledgements

How to Read a Scholarly Article from the Howard Tilton Memorial Library at Tulane University

Strategic Reading for Research from the Howard Tilton Memorial Library at Tulane University

Bridging the Gap between Faculty Expectation and the Student Experience: Teaching Students toAnnotate and Synthesize Sources

Librarian for Sociology, Environmental Sociology, MHS and Public Policy Studies

Academic writing has features that vary only slightly across the different disciplines. Knowing these elements and the purpose of each serves help you to read and understand academic texts efficiently and effectively, and then apply what you read to your paper or project.

Social Science (and Science) original research articles generally follow IMRD: Introduction- Methods-Results-Discussion

Introduction

Introduces topic of article
Presents the "Research Gap"/Statement of Problem article will address
How research presented in the article will solve the problem presented in research gap.
Literature Review. presenting and evaluating previous scholarship on a topic. Sometimes, this is separate section of the article.

Method & Results

How research was done, including analysis and measurements.
Sometimes labeled as "Research Design"
What answers were found
Interpretation of Results (What Does It Mean? Why is it important?)
Implications for the Field, how the study contributes to the existing field of knowledge
Suggestions for further research
Sometimes called Conclusion

You might also see IBC: Introduction - Body - Conclusion

Identify the subject
State the thesis
Describe why thesis is important to the field (this may be in the form of a literature review or general prose)

Body

Presents Evidence/Counter Evidence
Integrate other writings (i.e. evidence) to support argument
Discuss why others may disagree (counter-evidence) and why argument is still valid
Summary of argument
Evaluation of argument by pointing out its implications and/or limitations
Anticipate and address possible counter-claims
Suggest future directions of research
Next: Structural Read >>
Last Updated: Jan 19, 2024 10:44 AM
URL: https://researchguides.library.vanderbilt.edu/readingforresearch

Home » Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Research Paper

Definition:

Research Paper is a written document that presents the author’s original research, analysis, and interpretation of a specific topic or issue.

It is typically based on Empirical Evidence, and may involve qualitative or quantitative research methods, or a combination of both. The purpose of a research paper is to contribute new knowledge or insights to a particular field of study, and to demonstrate the author’s understanding of the existing literature and theories related to the topic.

Structure of Research Paper

The structure of a research paper typically follows a standard format, consisting of several sections that convey specific information about the research study. The following is a detailed explanation of the structure of a research paper:

The title page contains the title of the paper, the name(s) of the author(s), and the affiliation(s) of the author(s). It also includes the date of submission and possibly, the name of the journal or conference where the paper is to be published.

The abstract is a brief summary of the research paper, typically ranging from 100 to 250 words. It should include the research question, the methods used, the key findings, and the implications of the results. The abstract should be written in a concise and clear manner to allow readers to quickly grasp the essence of the research.

Introduction

The introduction section of a research paper provides background information about the research problem, the research question, and the research objectives. It also outlines the significance of the research, the research gap that it aims to fill, and the approach taken to address the research question. Finally, the introduction section ends with a clear statement of the research hypothesis or research question.

Literature Review

The literature review section of a research paper provides an overview of the existing literature on the topic of study. It includes a critical analysis and synthesis of the literature, highlighting the key concepts, themes, and debates. The literature review should also demonstrate the research gap and how the current study seeks to address it.

The methods section of a research paper describes the research design, the sample selection, the data collection and analysis procedures, and the statistical methods used to analyze the data. This section should provide sufficient detail for other researchers to replicate the study.

The results section presents the findings of the research, using tables, graphs, and figures to illustrate the data. The findings should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with reference to the research question and hypothesis.

The discussion section of a research paper interprets the findings and discusses their implications for the research question, the literature review, and the field of study. It should also address the limitations of the study and suggest future research directions.

The conclusion section summarizes the main findings of the study, restates the research question and hypothesis, and provides a final reflection on the significance of the research.

The references section provides a list of all the sources cited in the paper, following a specific citation style such as APA, MLA or Chicago.

How to Write Research Paper

You can write Research Paper by the following guide:

Choose a Topic: The first step is to select a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. Brainstorm ideas and narrow down to a research question that is specific and researchable.
Conduct a Literature Review: The literature review helps you identify the gap in the existing research and provides a basis for your research question. It also helps you to develop a theoretical framework and research hypothesis.
Develop a Thesis Statement : The thesis statement is the main argument of your research paper. It should be clear, concise and specific to your research question.
Plan your Research: Develop a research plan that outlines the methods, data sources, and data analysis procedures. This will help you to collect and analyze data effectively.
Collect and Analyze Data: Collect data using various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments. Analyze data using statistical tools or other qualitative methods.
Organize your Paper : Organize your paper into sections such as Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Ensure that each section is coherent and follows a logical flow.
Write your Paper : Start by writing the introduction, followed by the literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Ensure that your writing is clear, concise, and follows the required formatting and citation styles.
Edit and Proofread your Paper: Review your paper for grammar and spelling errors, and ensure that it is well-structured and easy to read. Ask someone else to review your paper to get feedback and suggestions for improvement.
Cite your Sources: Ensure that you properly cite all sources used in your research paper. This is essential for giving credit to the original authors and avoiding plagiarism.

Research Paper Example

Note : The below example research paper is for illustrative purposes only and is not an actual research paper. Actual research papers may have different structures, contents, and formats depending on the field of study, research question, data collection and analysis methods, and other factors. Students should always consult with their professors or supervisors for specific guidelines and expectations for their research papers.

Research Paper Example sample for Students:

Title: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health among Young Adults

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults. A literature review was conducted to examine the existing research on the topic. A survey was then administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Introduction: Social media has become an integral part of modern life, particularly among young adults. While social media has many benefits, including increased communication and social connectivity, it has also been associated with negative outcomes, such as addiction, cyberbullying, and mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults.

Literature Review: The literature review highlights the existing research on the impact of social media use on mental health. The review shows that social media use is associated with depression, anxiety, stress, and other mental health problems. The review also identifies the factors that contribute to the negative impact of social media, including social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Methods : A survey was administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The survey included questions on social media use, mental health status (measured using the DASS-21), and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis.

Results : The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Discussion : The study’s findings suggest that social media use has a negative impact on the mental health of young adults. The study highlights the need for interventions that address the factors contributing to the negative impact of social media, such as social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Conclusion : In conclusion, social media use has a significant impact on the mental health of young adults. The study’s findings underscore the need for interventions that promote healthy social media use and address the negative outcomes associated with social media use. Future research can explore the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health. Additionally, longitudinal studies can investigate the long-term effects of social media use on mental health.

Limitations : The study has some limitations, including the use of self-report measures and a cross-sectional design. The use of self-report measures may result in biased responses, and a cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causality.

Implications: The study’s findings have implications for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers. Mental health professionals can use the findings to develop interventions that address the negative impact of social media use on mental health. Educators can incorporate social media literacy into their curriculum to promote healthy social media use among young adults. Policymakers can use the findings to develop policies that protect young adults from the negative outcomes associated with social media use.

References :

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive medicine reports, 15, 100918.
Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Barrett, E. L., Sidani, J. E., Colditz, J. B., … & James, A. E. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among US young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 1-9.
Van der Meer, T. G., & Verhoeven, J. W. (2017). Social media and its impact on academic performance of students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 383-398.

Appendix : The survey used in this study is provided below.

Social Media and Mental Health Survey

How often do you use social media per day?
Less than 30 minutes
30 minutes to 1 hour
1 to 2 hours
2 to 4 hours
More than 4 hours
Which social media platforms do you use?
Others (Please specify)
How often do you experience the following on social media?
Social comparison (comparing yourself to others)
Cyberbullying
Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)
Have you ever experienced any of the following mental health problems in the past month?
Do you think social media use has a positive or negative impact on your mental health?
Very positive
Somewhat positive
Somewhat negative
Very negative
In your opinion, which factors contribute to the negative impact of social media on mental health?
Social comparison
In your opinion, what interventions could be effective in reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health?
Education on healthy social media use
Counseling for mental health problems caused by social media
Social media detox programs
Regulation of social media use

Thank you for your participation!

Applications of Research Paper

Research papers have several applications in various fields, including:

Advancing knowledge: Research papers contribute to the advancement of knowledge by generating new insights, theories, and findings that can inform future research and practice. They help to answer important questions, clarify existing knowledge, and identify areas that require further investigation.
Informing policy: Research papers can inform policy decisions by providing evidence-based recommendations for policymakers. They can help to identify gaps in current policies, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and inform the development of new policies and regulations.
Improving practice: Research papers can improve practice by providing evidence-based guidance for professionals in various fields, including medicine, education, business, and psychology. They can inform the development of best practices, guidelines, and standards of care that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
Educating students : Research papers are often used as teaching tools in universities and colleges to educate students about research methods, data analysis, and academic writing. They help students to develop critical thinking skills, research skills, and communication skills that are essential for success in many careers.
Fostering collaboration: Research papers can foster collaboration among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers by providing a platform for sharing knowledge and ideas. They can facilitate interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships that can lead to innovative solutions to complex problems.

When to Write Research Paper

Research papers are typically written when a person has completed a research project or when they have conducted a study and have obtained data or findings that they want to share with the academic or professional community. Research papers are usually written in academic settings, such as universities, but they can also be written in professional settings, such as research organizations, government agencies, or private companies.

Here are some common situations where a person might need to write a research paper:

For academic purposes: Students in universities and colleges are often required to write research papers as part of their coursework, particularly in the social sciences, natural sciences, and humanities. Writing research papers helps students to develop research skills, critical thinking skills, and academic writing skills.
For publication: Researchers often write research papers to publish their findings in academic journals or to present their work at academic conferences. Publishing research papers is an important way to disseminate research findings to the academic community and to establish oneself as an expert in a particular field.
To inform policy or practice : Researchers may write research papers to inform policy decisions or to improve practice in various fields. Research findings can be used to inform the development of policies, guidelines, and best practices that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
To share new insights or ideas: Researchers may write research papers to share new insights or ideas with the academic or professional community. They may present new theories, propose new research methods, or challenge existing paradigms in their field.

Purpose of Research Paper

The purpose of a research paper is to present the results of a study or investigation in a clear, concise, and structured manner. Research papers are written to communicate new knowledge, ideas, or findings to a specific audience, such as researchers, scholars, practitioners, or policymakers. The primary purposes of a research paper are:

To contribute to the body of knowledge : Research papers aim to add new knowledge or insights to a particular field or discipline. They do this by reporting the results of empirical studies, reviewing and synthesizing existing literature, proposing new theories, or providing new perspectives on a topic.
To inform or persuade: Research papers are written to inform or persuade the reader about a particular issue, topic, or phenomenon. They present evidence and arguments to support their claims and seek to persuade the reader of the validity of their findings or recommendations.
To advance the field: Research papers seek to advance the field or discipline by identifying gaps in knowledge, proposing new research questions or approaches, or challenging existing assumptions or paradigms. They aim to contribute to ongoing debates and discussions within a field and to stimulate further research and inquiry.
To demonstrate research skills: Research papers demonstrate the author’s research skills, including their ability to design and conduct a study, collect and analyze data, and interpret and communicate findings. They also demonstrate the author’s ability to critically evaluate existing literature, synthesize information from multiple sources, and write in a clear and structured manner.

Characteristics of Research Paper

Research papers have several characteristics that distinguish them from other forms of academic or professional writing. Here are some common characteristics of research papers:

Evidence-based: Research papers are based on empirical evidence, which is collected through rigorous research methods such as experiments, surveys, observations, or interviews. They rely on objective data and facts to support their claims and conclusions.
Structured and organized: Research papers have a clear and logical structure, with sections such as introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. They are organized in a way that helps the reader to follow the argument and understand the findings.
Formal and objective: Research papers are written in a formal and objective tone, with an emphasis on clarity, precision, and accuracy. They avoid subjective language or personal opinions and instead rely on objective data and analysis to support their arguments.
Citations and references: Research papers include citations and references to acknowledge the sources of information and ideas used in the paper. They use a specific citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, to ensure consistency and accuracy.
Peer-reviewed: Research papers are often peer-reviewed, which means they are evaluated by other experts in the field before they are published. Peer-review ensures that the research is of high quality, meets ethical standards, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
Objective and unbiased: Research papers strive to be objective and unbiased in their presentation of the findings. They avoid personal biases or preconceptions and instead rely on the data and analysis to draw conclusions.

Advantages of Research Paper

Research papers have many advantages, both for the individual researcher and for the broader academic and professional community. Here are some advantages of research papers:

Contribution to knowledge: Research papers contribute to the body of knowledge in a particular field or discipline. They add new information, insights, and perspectives to existing literature and help advance the understanding of a particular phenomenon or issue.
Opportunity for intellectual growth: Research papers provide an opportunity for intellectual growth for the researcher. They require critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which can help develop the researcher’s skills and knowledge.
Career advancement: Research papers can help advance the researcher’s career by demonstrating their expertise and contributions to the field. They can also lead to new research opportunities, collaborations, and funding.
Academic recognition: Research papers can lead to academic recognition in the form of awards, grants, or invitations to speak at conferences or events. They can also contribute to the researcher’s reputation and standing in the field.
Impact on policy and practice: Research papers can have a significant impact on policy and practice. They can inform policy decisions, guide practice, and lead to changes in laws, regulations, or procedures.
Advancement of society: Research papers can contribute to the advancement of society by addressing important issues, identifying solutions to problems, and promoting social justice and equality.

Limitations of Research Paper

Research papers also have some limitations that should be considered when interpreting their findings or implications. Here are some common limitations of research papers:

Limited generalizability: Research findings may not be generalizable to other populations, settings, or contexts. Studies often use specific samples or conditions that may not reflect the broader population or real-world situations.
Potential for bias : Research papers may be biased due to factors such as sample selection, measurement errors, or researcher biases. It is important to evaluate the quality of the research design and methods used to ensure that the findings are valid and reliable.
Ethical concerns: Research papers may raise ethical concerns, such as the use of vulnerable populations or invasive procedures. Researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines and obtain informed consent from participants to ensure that the research is conducted in a responsible and respectful manner.
Limitations of methodology: Research papers may be limited by the methodology used to collect and analyze data. For example, certain research methods may not capture the complexity or nuance of a particular phenomenon, or may not be appropriate for certain research questions.
Publication bias: Research papers may be subject to publication bias, where positive or significant findings are more likely to be published than negative or non-significant findings. This can skew the overall findings of a particular area of research.
Time and resource constraints: Research papers may be limited by time and resource constraints, which can affect the quality and scope of the research. Researchers may not have access to certain data or resources, or may be unable to conduct long-term studies due to practical limitations.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

Data Analysis – Process, Methods and Types

APA Research Paper Format – Example, Sample and...

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Appendix in Research Paper – Examples and...

Research Objectives – Types, Examples and...

What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and...

Publication, Collaboration, Citation Performance, and Triple Helix Innovation Gene of Artificial Intelligence Research in the Communication Field: Comparing Asia to the Rest of the World

Published: 28 August 2024

Cite this article

structure of social science research paper

Yu Peng Zhu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-3911 1 &
Han Woo Park ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1378-2473 2

1 Altmetric

Artificial intelligence (AI) in the communication field has become increasingly popular in recent years. This study collected data from 482 documents and cited references in the Web of Science database. It explores the knowledge structure related to AI in communication, combined with the triple helix innovation gene model. The analysis employed collaborative network analysis, two-mode network analysis, citation analysis, and quadratic assignment procedure-based correlation analysis. The results show that the most popular hotspots are human–machine communication, automatically generated publications, social media-mediated fake news, and some other AI-based applied research. Academic collaborations can be facilitated by transnational disciplinary leaders. China emerged as the core academic country with the greatest growth potential in Asia, while the core non-Asian country is the United States. In addition, the trend in collaboration among scholars in Asia is better than in non-Asian countries. However, concerning the characteristics of collaborating institutions, the triple-helix collaboration among universities, government bodies, and industries remains insufficient. Particularly, the collaboration between industry and government necessitates further development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

Get 10 units per month
Download Article/Chapter or eBook
1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Explore related subjects

Artificial Intelligence

Akbari, M., Padash, H., Shahabaldini, Parizi, Z., Rezaei, H., Shahriari, E., Khosravani, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of green innovation research: Identifying knowledge domain and network. Quality & Quantity , 56, 3993–4023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01295-4

Allen, B., Dreyer, K., Stibolt, R., Agarwal, S., Coombs, L., Treml, C., Elkholy, M., Brink, L., & Wald, C. (2021). Evaluation and real-world performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in clinical practice: Try it, buy it, check it. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 18 (11), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.022

Article Google Scholar

Bai, X. M., Xia, F., Lee, I., Zhang, J., & Ning, Z. L. (2016). Identifying anomalous citations for objective evaluation of scholarly article impact. Plose One, 11 (9), e0162364. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162364

Cai, Y. (2015). What contextual factors shape ‘innovation in innovation’? Integration of insights from the triple helix and the institutional logics perspective. Social Science Information, 54 (3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018415583527

Cai, Y. (2022). Neo-triple helix model of innovation ecosystems: Integrating triple, quadruple and quintuple helix models. triple helix , 9(1), 76–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10029

Cai, Y., & Lattu, A. (2022). Triple helix or quadruple helix: Which model of innovation to choose for empirical studies? Minerva, 60 , 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09453-6

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1 (1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2021). Democracy of climate and climate for democracy: The evolution of quadruple and quintuple helix innovation systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12 , 2050–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00778-x

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2022). Towards an emerging unified theory of helix architectures (EUTOHA): Focus on the quintuple innovation helix framework as the integrative device. Triple Helix, 9 (1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10028

Choi, J.-A., & Park, S. (2024). Examining public responses to transgressions of CEOs on YouTube: Social and semantic network analysis. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 23 (1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2024.23.1.018

Choi, J.-A., Park, S., Lim, Y. S., Nam, Y., Nam, I., Park, H. W. (2021). Network arrangements underlying strategic corporate social responsibility: Findings from globalized cyberspace and lessons for Asian regions. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia , 20(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.17477/JCEA.2021.20.2.019

Chung, C. J., Biddix, J. P., Park, H. W. (2020). Using digital technology to address confirmability and scalability in thematic analysis of participant-provided data. The Qualitative Report . https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4046 .

Du-Harpur, X., Watt, F. M., & Luscombe, N. M. (2020). What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology. British Journal of Dermatology, 183 (3), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18880

Garcia, K. R., Mishler, S., Xiao, Y., Wang, C., Hu, B., Still, J. D., & Chen, J. (2022). Drivers’ understanding of artificial intelligence in automated driving systems: A study of a malicious stop sign. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 16 (4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221117001

Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Grané, A., et al. (2023). Research patterns in communication (2009–2019): Testing female representation and productivity differences, within the most cited authors and the field. Scientometrics, 128 , 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04575-4

Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22 (1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481985

Hah, H., & Goldin, D. S. (2022). How clinicians perceive artificial intelligence-assisted technologies in diagnostic decision making: Mixed methods approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23 (12), e33540. https://doi.org/10.2196/33540

Hameed, A., Omar, M., Bilal, M., & Park, H.W. (2023). Toward the consolidation of a multi-metric-based journal ranking and categorization system for computer science subject areas. Profesional de la información, 32 (7), e320703. 190.

Iztok, F. Jr., Iztok F. & Matjaž, P. (2016). Toward the discovery of citation cartels in citation networks. Frontiers in Physics, 4 , e00049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2016.00049

Jamshed, S., & Majeed, N. (2022). Framing evolution and knowledge domain visualization of business ethics research (1975–2019): A large-scale scientometric analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56 , 4269–4294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01315-x

Jimenez, D.R., Roig-Tierno, N., Tur, A.M., & Sendra-Pons, P. (2024). Conceptual structure of innovation systems: A systematic approach through qualitative data analysis, ROSA Journal, 1 (2), 1–25, https://doi.org/10.62478/BOTC4972

Johnson, J. A., Honnold, J. A., & Stevens, F. P. (2010). Using social network analysis to enhance nonprofit organizational research capacity: A case study. Journal of Community Practice, 18 (4), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2010.519683

Jones, B., & Jones, R. (2019). Public service chatbots: Automating conversation with BBC News. Digital Journalism, 7 (8), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1609371

Lakshman, S. A., & Ebenezer, D. (2020). Application of principles of a artificial intelligence in mechanical engineering. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 912 , e032075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/912/3/032075

Lewis S. C., Guzman A. L., Schmidt T. R. (2019). Automation, journalism, and human–machine communication: Rethinking roles and relationships of humans and machines in news, Digital Journalism , 7(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1577147

Leydesdorff, L. (2022). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3 , 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4

Liu, D., & Zhu, Y. P. (2022). Evolution of knowledge structure in an emerging field based on a triple helix model: The case of smart factory. Journal of the Knowledge Economy . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01073-z

Neyazi, T. A. (2019). Digital propaganda, political bots and polarized politics in India. Asian Journal of Communication, 30 (1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1699938

Ozbay, F. A., & Alatas, B. (2020). Fake news detection within online social media using supervised artificial intelligence algorithms. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 540 , e123174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123174

Park, H.W. (2024a). When there is no knowledge, the publishers and journals stop. ROSA Journal, 1, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.62478/ORVK4600

Park, H. W. (2024b). Measuring innovation and collaboration system using big data: A case study about Ho Chi Minh City. Triple Helix, 10 (2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-12340015

Park, H. W. (2014). Transition from the triple helix to n-tuple helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell. Scientometrics , 99(1), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1124-3

Park, H. W., & Stek, P. (2022). Measuring helix interactions in the context of economic development and public policies: From triple to quadruple and N-tuple helix vs. N-tuple and quadruple helix to triads. triple helix , 9(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10026

Park, S., Park, H. W. (2021). A webometric network analysis of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) characteristics and machine learning approach to consumer comments during a crisis. Profesional de la Información , 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.16

Phillips, F. (2024). A more perilous research scene. ROSA Journal, 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.62478/WSMN9491

Simões, P. C., Moreira, A. C., & Dias, C. M. (2022). The “endless perspective” to university – industry – government relations. Triple Helix, 9 (3), 247–274.

Túñez-López, J. M., Toural-Bran, C., & Cacheiro-Requeijo, S. (2018). Automated-content generation using news-writing bots and algorithms: Perceptions and attitudes amongst Spain’s journalists. Profesional De La Información, 27 (4), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.04

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence . Mind 1950; LIX 236:433–460.

Yoon, J. W., Yang, J. S., & Park, H. W. (2017). Quintuple helix structure of Sino-Korean research collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 113 (1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2476-x

Yoon, S. W., Chung, S. W. (2020). The EU’s public diplomacy in Asia and the world through social media: Sentiment and semantic network analyses of official Facebook pages of European External Action Service and EU Delegation to the Republic of Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia , 19(2), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.17477/JCEA.2020.19.2.234

Zhu, Y. P., Park, H. W. (2022). Profiling the most highly cited scholars from China: Who they are. To what extent they are interdisciplinary. Profesional de la información , 31(4), e310408. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.jul.08

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Journalism and Communication, Chongqing Key Laboratory for Intelligent Communication & City’s International Promotion, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

Yu Peng Zhu

Department of Media and Communication, Interdisciplinary Graduate Programs of Digital Convergence Business and East Asian Cultural Studies, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsangbuk-Do, Gyeongsan-Si, South Korea

Han Woo Park

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu Peng Zhu or Han Woo Park .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Han Woo Park is the corresponding author, and Yu Peng Zhu is the co-corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zhu, Y.P., Park, H.W. Publication, Collaboration, Citation Performance, and Triple Helix Innovation Gene of Artificial Intelligence Research in the Communication Field: Comparing Asia to the Rest of the World. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02280-6

Download citation

Received : 26 December 2023

Accepted : 28 July 2024

Published : 28 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02280-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Artificial intelligence
Communication
Collaboration
Network analysis
Triple helix
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: The Introduction

Purpose of Guide
Writing a Research Proposal
Design Flaws to Avoid
Independent and Dependent Variables
Narrowing a Topic Idea
Broadening a Topic Idea
The Research Problem/Question
Academic Writing Style
Choosing a Title
Making an Outline
Paragraph Development
The C.A.R.S. Model
Background Information
Theoretical Framework
Citation Tracking
Evaluating Sources
Reading Research Effectively
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
What Is Scholarly vs. Popular?
Is it Peer-Reviewed?
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Common Grammar Mistakes
Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism [linked guide]
Annotated Bibliography
Grading Someone Else's Paper

The introduction leads the reader from a general subject area to a particular topic of inquiry. It establishes the scope, context, and significance of the research being conducted by summarizing current understanding and background information about the topic, stating the purpose of the work in the form of the research problem supported by a hypothesis or a set of questions, explaining briefly the methodological approach used to examine the research problem, highlighting the potential outcomes your study can reveal, and outlining the remaining structure and organization of the paper.

Key Elements of the Research Proposal . Prepared under the direction of the Superintendent and by the 2010 Curriculum Design and Writing Team. Baltimore County Public Schools.

Importance of a Good Introduction

Think of the introduction as a mental road map that must answer for the reader these four questions:

What was I studying?
Why was this topic important to investigate?
What did we know about this topic before I did this study?
How will this study advance new knowledge or new ways of understanding?

According to Reyes, there are three overarching goals of a good introduction: 1) ensure that you summarize prior studies about the topic in a manner that lays a foundation for understanding the research problem; 2) explain how your study specifically addresses gaps in the literature, insufficient consideration of the topic, or other deficiency in the literature; and, 3) note the broader theoretical, empirical, and/or policy contributions and implications of your research.

A well-written introduction is important because, quite simply, you never get a second chance to make a good first impression. The opening paragraphs of your paper will provide your readers with their initial impressions about the logic of your argument, your writing style, the overall quality of your research, and, ultimately, the validity of your findings and conclusions. A vague, disorganized, or error-filled introduction will create a negative impression, whereas, a concise, engaging, and well-written introduction will lead your readers to think highly of your analytical skills, your writing style, and your research approach. All introductions should conclude with a brief paragraph that describes the organization of the rest of the paper.

Hirano, Eliana. “Research Article Introductions in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian, Portuguese, and English.” English for Specific Purposes 28 (October 2009): 240-250; Samraj, B. “Introductions in Research Articles: Variations Across Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes 21 (2002): 1–17; Introductions . The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; “Writing Introductions.” In Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide. Peter Redman. 4th edition. (London: Sage, 2011), pp. 63-70; Reyes, Victoria. Demystifying the Journal Article . Inside Higher Education.

Structure and Writing Style

I. Structure and Approach

The introduction is the broad beginning of the paper that answers three important questions for the reader:

What is this?
Why should I read it?
What do you want me to think about / consider doing / react to?

Think of the structure of the introduction as an inverted triangle of information that lays a foundation for understanding the research problem. Organize the information so as to present the more general aspects of the topic early in the introduction, then narrow your analysis to more specific topical information that provides context, finally arriving at your research problem and the rationale for studying it [often written as a series of key questions to be addressed or framed as a hypothesis or set of assumptions to be tested] and, whenever possible, a description of the potential outcomes your study can reveal.

These are general phases associated with writing an introduction: 1. Establish an area to research by:

Highlighting the importance of the topic, and/or
Making general statements about the topic, and/or
Presenting an overview on current research on the subject.

2. Identify a research niche by:

Opposing an existing assumption, and/or
Revealing a gap in existing research, and/or
Formulating a research question or problem, and/or
Continuing a disciplinary tradition.

3. Place your research within the research niche by:

Stating the intent of your study,
Outlining the key characteristics of your study,
Describing important results, and
Giving a brief overview of the structure of the paper.

NOTE: It is often useful to review the introduction late in the writing process. This is appropriate because outcomes are unknown until you've completed the study. After you complete writing the body of the paper, go back and review introductory descriptions of the structure of the paper, the method of data gathering, the reporting and analysis of results, and the conclusion. Reviewing and, if necessary, rewriting the introduction ensures that it correctly matches the overall structure of your final paper.

II. Delimitations of the Study

Delimitations refer to those characteristics that limit the scope and define the conceptual boundaries of your research . This is determined by the conscious exclusionary and inclusionary decisions you make about how to investigate the research problem. In other words, not only should you tell the reader what it is you are studying and why, but you must also acknowledge why you rejected alternative approaches that could have been used to examine the topic.

Obviously, the first limiting step was the choice of research problem itself. However, implicit are other, related problems that could have been chosen but were rejected. These should be noted in the conclusion of your introduction. For example, a delimitating statement could read, "Although many factors can be understood to impact the likelihood young people will vote, this study will focus on socioeconomic factors related to the need to work full-time while in school." The point is not to document every possible delimiting factor, but to highlight why previously researched issues related to the topic were not addressed.

Examples of delimitating choices would be:

The key aims and objectives of your study,
The research questions that you address,
The variables of interest [i.e., the various factors and features of the phenomenon being studied],
The method(s) of investigation,
The time period your study covers, and
Any relevant alternative theoretical frameworks that could have been adopted.

Review each of these decisions. Not only do you clearly establish what you intend to accomplish in your research, but you should also include a declaration of what the study does not intend to cover. In the latter case, your exclusionary decisions should be based upon criteria understood as, "not interesting"; "not directly relevant"; “too problematic because..."; "not feasible," and the like. Make this reasoning explicit!

NOTE: Delimitations refer to the initial choices made about the broader, overall design of your study and should not be confused with documenting the limitations of your study discovered after the research has been completed.

ANOTHER NOTE : Do not view delimitating statements as admitting to an inherent failing or shortcoming in your research. They are an accepted element of academic writing intended to keep the reader focused on the research problem by explicitly defining the conceptual boundaries and scope of your study. It addresses any critical questions in the reader's mind of, "Why the hell didn't the author examine this?"

III. The Narrative Flow

Issues to keep in mind that will help the narrative flow in your introduction :

Your introduction should clearly identify the subject area of interest . A simple strategy to follow is to use key words from your title in the first few sentences of the introduction. This will help focus the introduction on the topic at the appropriate level and ensures that you get to the subject matter quickly without losing focus, or discussing information that is too general.
Establish context by providing a brief and balanced review of the pertinent published literature that is available on the subject. The key is to summarize for the reader what is known about the specific research problem before you did your analysis. This part of your introduction should not represent a comprehensive literature review--that comes next. It consists of a general review of the important, foundational research literature [with citations] that establishes a foundation for understanding key elements of the research problem. See the drop-down menu under this tab for " Background Information " regarding types of contexts.
Clearly state the hypothesis that you investigated . When you are first learning to write in this format it is okay, and actually preferable, to use a past statement like, "The purpose of this study was to...." or "We investigated three possible mechanisms to explain the...."
Why did you choose this kind of research study or design? Provide a clear statement of the rationale for your approach to the problem studied. This will usually follow your statement of purpose in the last paragraph of the introduction.

IV. Engaging the Reader

A research problem in the social sciences can come across as dry and uninteresting to anyone unfamiliar with the topic . Therefore, one of the goals of your introduction is to make readers want to read your paper. Here are several strategies you can use to grab the reader's attention:

Open with a compelling story . Almost all research problems in the social sciences, no matter how obscure or esoteric , are really about the lives of people. Telling a story that humanizes an issue can help illuminate the significance of the problem and help the reader empathize with those affected by the condition being studied.
Include a strong quotation or a vivid, perhaps unexpected, anecdote . During your review of the literature, make note of any quotes or anecdotes that grab your attention because they can used in your introduction to highlight the research problem in a captivating way.
Pose a provocative or thought-provoking question . Your research problem should be framed by a set of questions to be addressed or hypotheses to be tested. However, a provocative question can be presented in the beginning of your introduction that challenges an existing assumption or compels the reader to consider an alternative viewpoint that helps establish the significance of your study.
Describe a puzzling scenario or incongruity . This involves highlighting an interesting quandary concerning the research problem or describing contradictory findings from prior studies about a topic. Posing what is essentially an unresolved intellectual riddle about the problem can engage the reader's interest in the study.
Cite a stirring example or case study that illustrates why the research problem is important . Draw upon the findings of others to demonstrate the significance of the problem and to describe how your study builds upon or offers alternatives ways of investigating this prior research.

NOTE: It is important that you choose only one of the suggested strategies for engaging your readers. This avoids giving an impression that your paper is more flash than substance and does not distract from the substance of your study.

Freedman, Leora and Jerry Plotnick. Introductions and Conclusions. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Introduction . The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Introductions . The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Introductions . The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Introductions, Body Paragraphs, and Conclusions for an Argument Paper . The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; “Writing Introductions.” In Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide . Peter Redman. 4th edition. (London: Sage, 2011), pp. 63-70; Resources for Writers: Introduction Strategies . Program in Writing and Humanistic Studies. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Sharpling, Gerald. Writing an Introduction . Centre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick; Samraj, B. “Introductions in Research Articles: Variations Across Disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes 21 (2002): 1–17; Swales, John and Christine B. Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Skills and Tasks . 2nd edition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004 ; Writing Your Introduction . Department of English Writing Guide. George Mason University.

Writing Tip

Avoid the "Dictionary" Introduction

Giving the dictionary definition of words related to the research problem may appear appropriate because it is important to define specific terminology that readers may be unfamiliar with. However, anyone can look a word up in the dictionary and a general dictionary is not a particularly authoritative source because it doesn't take into account the context of your topic and doesn't offer particularly detailed information. Also, placed in the context of a particular discipline, a term or concept may have a different meaning than what is found in a general dictionary. If you feel that you must seek out an authoritative definition, use a subject specific dictionary or encyclopedia [e.g., if you are a sociology student, search for dictionaries of sociology]. A good database for obtaining definitive definitions of concepts or terms is Credo Reference .

Saba, Robert. The College Research Paper . Florida International University; Introductions . The Writing Center. University of North Carolina.

Another Writing Tip

When Do I Begin?

A common question asked at the start of any paper is, "Where should I begin?" An equally important question to ask yourself is, "When do I begin?" Research problems in the social sciences rarely rest in isolation from history. Therefore, it is important to lay a foundation for understanding the historical context underpinning the research problem. However, this information should be brief and succinct and begin at a point in time that illustrates the study's overall importance. For example, a study that investigates coffee cultivation and export in West Africa as a key stimulus for local economic growth needs to describe the beginning of exporting coffee in the region and establishing why economic growth is important. You do not need to give a long historical explanation about coffee exports in Africa. If a research problem requires a substantial exploration of the historical context, do this in the literature review section. In your introduction, make note of this as part of the "roadmap" [see below] that you use to describe the organization of your paper.

Introductions . The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; “Writing Introductions.” In Good Essay Writing: A Social Sciences Guide . Peter Redman. 4th edition. (London: Sage, 2011), pp. 63-70.

Yet Another Writing Tip

Always End with a Roadmap

The final paragraph or sentences of your introduction should forecast your main arguments and conclusions and provide a brief description of the rest of the paper [the "roadmap"] that let's the reader know where you are going and what to expect. A roadmap is important because it helps the reader place the research problem within the context of their own perspectives about the topic. In addition, concluding your introduction with an explicit roadmap tells the reader that you have a clear understanding of the structural purpose of your paper. In this way, the roadmap acts as a type of promise to yourself and to your readers that you will follow a consistent and coherent approach to addressing the topic of inquiry. Refer to it often to help keep your writing focused and organized.

Cassuto, Leonard. “ On the Dissertation: How to Write the Introduction .” The Chronicle of Higher Education , May 28, 2018; Radich, Michael. A Student's Guide to Writing in East Asian Studies . (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Writing n. d.), pp. 35-37.

<< Previous: Paragraph Development
Next: The C.A.R.S. Model >>
Last Updated: Aug 24, 2024 10:22 AM
URL: https://guides.library.txstate.edu/socialscienceresearch

Energy & Environmental Science

Thermodynamically stable low-na o3 cathode materials driven by intrinsically high ionic potential discrepancy †.

* Corresponding authors

a GRINM (Guangdong) Research Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology, Foshan, Guangdong, P.R. China E-mail: [email protected]

b University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, P.R. China

c China Automotive Battery Research Institute Co., Ltd, Beijing, P.R. China

d School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hubei University, Wuhan, P.R. China

e Eastern Institute for Advanced Study, Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo, Zhejiang, P.R. China E-mail: [email protected]

f Powder Metallurgy Research Institute, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. China

g Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P.R. China E-mail: [email protected]

h Graphene Composite Research Center, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, P.R. China E-mail: [email protected]

i General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing, P.R. China

The thermodynamically stable window for an O3-type layered sodium cathode material is largely determined by its Na stoichiometry; a spontaneous transition to the P-type structure occurs when it is relatively low. With such limitation, the capacity and stability of O3-structured materials become restricted and a potentially promising class of O3-type materials that garner the structural stability of P2-type materials is underexplored. This work discovers that a large ionic potential discrepancy within the transition metal layer acts as a driving force that pushes the Na-ions from prismatic coordination to octahedral coordination. Utilizing this strategy, we have explored a class of off-stoichiometric O3-type materials with exceptionally low Na-stoichiometry (generally forming P2-type structures with higher thermodynamic stability) yet having the structural parameter features of P-type materials. These materials demonstrate rapid O3–P3 phase transition while maintaining a stable solid solution reaction at high voltages, resulting in an impressive P-phase range of 81.4%, thus showing superior performance compared with conventional O3-type materials. This principle provides a great extension to the existing family of layered cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries.

Graphical abstract: Thermodynamically stable low-Na O3 cathode materials driven by intrinsically high ionic potential discrepancy

Supplementary files

Supplementary information PDF (4192K)

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Download citation, permissions.

Thermodynamically stable low-Na O3 cathode materials driven by intrinsically high ionic potential discrepancy

M. Li, H. Zhuo, Y. Xu, Q. Jing, Y. Wu, Y. Gu, Z. Liao, K. Wang, M. Song, X. Li, J. Liang, C. Zhao, Y. Jiang, T. Wu, D. Geng, J. Hu, X. Sun and B. Xiao, Energy Environ. Sci. , 2024, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D4EE02359E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page .

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page .

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content .

Social activity

Search articles by author.

This article has not yet been cited.

DOI: 10.26666/rmp.jssh.2023.6.4
Corpus ID: 268565759

The Effects of Mental Health Issues and Academic Performance

Arianta Rachmana , Aini Syahira Jamaluddin
Published in Journal of social sciences… 30 December 2023
Psychology, Education

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Writing a Case Study

Purpose of Guide
Design Flaws to Avoid
Independent and Dependent Variables
Glossary of Research Terms
Narrowing a Topic Idea
Broadening a Topic Idea
Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
Academic Writing Style
Choosing a Title
Making an Outline
Paragraph Development
Executive Summary
The C.A.R.S. Model
Background Information
The Research Problem/Question
Theoretical Framework
Citation Tracking
Content Alert Services
Evaluating Sources
Reading Research Effectively
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Tiertiary Sources
What Is Scholarly vs. Popular?
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Using Non-Textual Elements
Limitations of the Study
Common Grammar Mistakes
Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism
Footnotes or Endnotes?
Further Readings
Annotated Bibliography
Dealing with Nervousness
Using Visual Aids
Grading Someone Else's Paper
Types of Structured Group Activities
Group Project Survival Skills
Multiple Book Review Essay
Reviewing Collected Essays
Writing a Case Study
About Informed Consent
Writing Field Notes
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposal
Bibliography

The term case study refers to both a method of analysis and a specific research design for examining a problem, both of which are used in most circumstances to generalize across populations. This tab focuses on the latter--how to design and organize a research paper in the social sciences that analyzes a specific case.

A case study research paper examines a person, place, event, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis in order to extrapolate key themes and results that help predict future trends, illuminate previously hidden issues that can be applied to practice, and/or provide a means for understanding an important research problem with greater clarity. A case study paper usually examines a single subject of analysis, but case study papers can also be designed as a comparative investigation that shows relationships between two or among more than two subjects. The methods used to study a case can rest within a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method investigative paradigm.

Case Studies . Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010 ; “What is a Case Study?” In Swanborn, Peter G. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London: SAGE, 2010.

How to Approach Writing a Case Study Research Paper

General information about how to choose a topic to investigate can be found under the " Choosing a Research Problem " tab in this writing guide. Review this page because it may help you identify a subject of analysis that can be investigated using a single case study design.

However, identifying a case to investigate involves more than choosing the research problem . A case study encompasses a problem contextualized around the application of in-depth analysis, interpretation, and discussion, often resulting in specific recommendations for action or for improving existing conditions. As Seawright and Gerring note, practical considerations such as time and access to information can influence case selection, but these issues should not be the sole factors used in describing the methodological justification for identifying a particular case to study. Given this, selecting a case includes considering the following:

Does the case represent an unusual or atypical example of a research problem that requires more in-depth analysis? Cases often represent a topic that rests on the fringes of prior investigations because the case may provide new ways of understanding the research problem. For example, if the research problem is to identify strategies to improve policies that support girl's access to secondary education in predominantly Muslim nations, you could consider using Azerbaijan as a case study rather than selecting a more obvious nation in the Middle East. Doing so may reveal important new insights into recommending how governments in other predominantly Muslim nations can formulate policies that support improved access to education for girls.
Does the case provide important insight or illuminate a previously hidden problem? In-depth analysis of a case can be based on the hypothesis that the case study will reveal trends or issues that have not been exposed in prior research or will reveal new and important implications for practice. For example, anecdotal evidence may suggest drug use among homeless veterans is related to their patterns of travel throughout the day. Assuming prior studies have not looked at individual travel choices as a way to study access to illicit drug use, a case study that observes a homeless veteran could reveal how issues of personal mobility choices facilitate regular access to illicit drugs. Note that it is important to conduct a thorough literature review to ensure that your assumption about the need to reveal new insights or previously hidden problems is valid and evidence-based.
Does the case challenge and offer a counter-point to prevailing assumptions? Over time, research on any given topic can fall into a trap of developing assumptions based on outdated studies that are still applied to new or changing conditions or the idea that something should simply be accepted as "common sense," even though the issue has not been thoroughly tested in practice. A case may offer you an opportunity to gather evidence that challenges prevailing assumptions about a research problem and provide a new set of recommendations applied to practice that have not been tested previously. For example, perhaps there has been a long practice among scholars to apply a particular theory in explaining the relationship between two subjects of analysis. Your case could challenge this assumption by applying an innovative theoretical framework [perhaps borrowed from another discipline] to the study a case in order to explore whether this approach offers new ways of understanding the research problem. Taking a contrarian stance is one of the most important ways that new knowledge and understanding develops from existing literature.
Does the case provide an opportunity to pursue action leading to the resolution of a problem? Another way to think about choosing a case to study is to consider how the results from investigating a particular case may result in findings that reveal ways in which to resolve an existing or emerging problem. For example, studying the case of an unforeseen incident, such as a fatal accident at a railroad crossing, can reveal hidden issues that could be applied to preventative measures that contribute to reducing the chance of accidents in the future. In this example, a case study investigating the accident could lead to a better understanding of where to strategically locate additional signals at other railroad crossings in order to better warn drivers of an approaching train, particularly when visibility is hindered by heavy rain, fog, or at night.
Does the case offer a new direction in future research? A case study can be used as a tool for exploratory research that points to a need for further examination of the research problem. A case can be used when there are few studies that help predict an outcome or that establish a clear understanding about how best to proceed in addressing a problem. For example, after conducting a thorough literature review [very important!], you discover that little research exists showing the ways in which women contribute to promoting water conservation in rural communities of Uganda. A case study of how women contribute to saving water in a particular village can lay the foundation for understanding the need for more thorough research that documents how women in their roles as cooks and family caregivers think about water as a valuable resource within their community throughout rural regions of east Africa. The case could also point to the need for scholars to apply feminist theories of work and family to the issue of water conservation.

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (October 1989): 532-550; Emmel, Nick. Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2013; Gerring, John. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?” American Political Science Review 98 (May 2004): 341-354; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Seawright, Jason and John Gerring. "Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research." Political Research Quarterly 61 (June 2008): 294-308.

Structure and Writing Style

The purpose of a paper in the social sciences designed around a case study is to thoroughly investigate a subject of analysis in order to reveal a new understanding about the research problem and, in so doing, contributing new knowledge to what is already known from previous studies. In applied social sciences disciplines [e.g., education, social work, public administration, etc.], case studies may also be used to reveal best practices, highlight key programs, or investigate interesting aspects of professional work. In general, the structure of a case study research paper is not all that different from a standard college-level research paper. However, there are subtle differences you should be aware of. Here are the key elements to organizing and writing a case study research paper.

I. Introduction

As with any research paper, your introduction should serve as a roadmap for your readers to ascertain the scope and purpose of your study . The introduction to a case study research paper, however, should not only describe the research problem and its significance, but you should also succinctly describe why the case is being used and how it relates to addressing the problem. The two elements should be linked. With this in mind, a good introduction answers these four questions:

What was I studying? Describe the research problem and describe the subject of analysis you have chosen to address the problem. Explain how they are linked and what elements of the case will help to expand knowledge and understanding about the problem.
Why was this topic important to investigate? Describe the significance of the research problem and state why a case study design and the subject of analysis that the paper is designed around is appropriate in addressing the problem.
What did we know about this topic before I did this study? Provide background that helps lead the reader into the more in-depth literature review to follow. If applicable, summarize prior case study research applied to the research problem and why it fails to adequately address the research problem. Describe why your case will be useful. If no prior case studies have been used to address the research problem, explain why you have selected this subject of analysis.
How will this study advance new knowledge or new ways of understanding? Explain why your case study will be suitable in helping to expand knowledge and understanding about the research problem.

Each of these questions should be addressed in no more than a few paragraphs. Exceptions to this can be when you are addressing a complex research problem or subject of analysis that requires more in-depth background information.

II. Literature Review

The literature review for a case study research paper is generally structured the same as it is for any college-level research paper. The difference, however, is that the literature review is focused on providing background information and enabling historical interpretation of the subject of analysis in relation to the research problem the case is intended to address . This includes synthesizing studies that help to:

Place relevant works in the context of their contribution to understanding the case study being investigated . This would include summarizing studies that have used a similar subject of analysis to investigate the research problem. If there is literature using the same or a very similar case to study, you need to explain why duplicating past research is important [e.g., conditions have changed; prior studies were conducted long ago, etc.].
Describe the relationship each work has to the others under consideration that informs the reader why this case is applicable . Your literature review should include a description of any works that support using the case to study the research problem and the underlying research questions.
Identify new ways to interpret prior research using the case study . If applicable, review any research that has examined the research problem using a different research design. Explain how your case study design may reveal new knowledge or a new perspective or that can redirect research in an important new direction.
Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies . This refers to synthesizing any literature that points to unresolved issues of concern about the research problem and describing how the subject of analysis that forms the case study can help resolve these existing contradictions.
Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research . Your review should examine any literature that lays a foundation for understanding why your case study design and the subject of analysis around which you have designed your study may reveal a new way of approaching the research problem or offer a perspective that points to the need for additional research.
Expose any gaps that exist in the literature that the case study could help to fill . Summarize any literature that not only shows how your subject of analysis contributes to understanding the research problem, but how your case contributes to a new way of understanding the problem that prior research has failed to do.
Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important!] . Collectively, your literature review should always place your case study within the larger domain of prior research about the problem. The overarching purpose of reviewing pertinent literature in a case study paper is to demonstrate that you have thoroughly identified and synthesized prior studies in the context of explaining the relevance of the case in addressing the research problem.

III. Method

In this section, you explain why you selected a particular subject of analysis to study and the strategy you used to identify and ultimately decide that your case was appropriate in addressing the research problem. The way you describe the methods used varies depending on the type of subject of analysis that frames your case study.

If your subject of analysis is an incident or event . In the social and behavioral sciences, the event or incident that represents the case to be studied is usually bounded by time and place, with a clear beginning and end and with an identifiable location or position relative to its surroundings. The subject of analysis can be a rare or critical event or it can focus on a typical or regular event. The purpose of studying a rare event is to illuminate new ways of thinking about the broader research problem or to test a hypothesis. Critical incident case studies must describe the method by which you identified the event and explain the process by which you determined the validity of this case to inform broader perspectives about the research problem or to reveal new findings. However, the event does not have to be a rare or uniquely significant to support new thinking about the research problem or to challenge an existing hypothesis. For example, Walo, Bull, and Breen conducted a case study to identify and evaluate the direct and indirect economic benefits and costs of a local sports event in the City of Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. The purpose of their study was to provide new insights from measuring the impact of a typical local sports event that prior studies could not measure well because they focused on large "mega-events." Whether the event is rare or not, the methods section should include an explanation of the following characteristics of the event: a) when did it take place; b) what were the underlying circumstances leading to the event; c) what were the consequences of the event.

If your subject of analysis is a person. Explain why you selected this particular individual to be studied and describe what experience he or she has had that provides an opportunity to advance new understandings about the research problem. Mention any background about this person which might help the reader understand the significance of his/her experiences that make them worthy of study. This includes describing the relationships this person has had with other people, institutions, and/or events that support using him or her as the subject for a case study research paper. It is particularly important to differentiate the person as the subject of analysis from others and to succinctly explain how the person relates to examining the research problem.

If your subject of analysis is a place. In general, a case study that investigates a place suggests a subject of analysis that is unique or special in some way and that this uniqueness can be used to build new understanding or knowledge about the research problem. A case study of a place must not only describe its various attributes relevant to the research problem [e.g., physical, social, cultural, economic, political, etc.], but you must state the method by which you determined that this place will illuminate new understandings about the research problem. It is also important to articulate why a particular place as the case for study is being used if similar places also exist [i.e., if you are studying patterns of homeless encampments of veterans in open spaces, why study Echo Park in Los Angeles rather than Griffith Park?]. If applicable, describe what type of human activity involving this place makes it a good choice to study [e.g., prior research reveals Echo Park has more homeless veterans].

If your subject of analysis is a phenomenon. A phenomenon refers to a fact, occurrence, or circumstance that can be studied or observed but with the cause or explanation to be in question. In this sense, a phenomenon that forms your subject of analysis can encompass anything that can be observed or presumed to exist but is not fully understood. In the social and behavioral sciences, the case usually focuses on human interaction within a complex physical, social, economic, cultural, or political system. For example, the phenomenon could be the observation that many vehicles used by ISIS fighters are small trucks with English language advertisements on them. The research problem could be that ISIS fighters are difficult to combat because they are highly mobile. The research questions could be how and by what means are these vehicles used by ISIS being supplied to the militants and how might supply lines to these vehicles be cut? How might knowing the suppliers of these trucks from overseas reveal larger networks of collaborators and financial support? A case study of a phenomenon most often encompasses an in-depth analysis of a cause and effect that is grounded in an interactive relationship between people and their environment in some way.

NOTE: The choice of the case or set of cases to study cannot appear random. Evidence that supports the method by which you identified and chose your subject of analysis should be linked to the findings from the literature review. Be sure to cite any prior studies that helped you determine that the case you chose was appropriate for investigating the research problem.

IV. Discussion

The main elements of your discussion section are generally the same as any research paper, but centered around interpreting and drawing conclusions about the key findings from your case study. Note that a general social sciences research paper may contain a separate section to report findings. However, in a paper designed around a case study, it is more common to combine a description of the findings with the discussion about their implications. The objectives of your discussion section should include the following:

Reiterate the Research Problem/State the Major Findings Briefly reiterate the research problem you are investigating and explain why the subject of analysis around which you designed the case study were used. You should then describe the findings revealed from your study of the case using direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results. Highlight any findings that were unexpected or especially profound.

Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important Systematically explain the meaning of your case study findings and why you believe they are important. Begin this part of the section by repeating what you consider to be your most important or surprising finding first, then systematically review each finding. Be sure to thoroughly extrapolate what your analysis of the case can tell the reader about situations or conditions beyond the actual case that was studied while, at the same time, being careful not to misconstrue or conflate a finding that undermines the external validity of your conclusions.

Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. The discussion section should relate your case study results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for choosing your subject of analysis. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your case study design and the subject of analysis differs from prior research about the topic.

Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of social science research is to discover and not to prove. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the case study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. Be alert to what the in-depth analysis of the case may reveal about the research problem, including offering a contrarian perspective to what scholars have stated in prior research.

Acknowledge the Study's Limitations You can state the study's limitations in the conclusion section of your paper but describing the limitations of your subject of analysis in the discussion section provides an opportunity to identify the limitations and explain why they are not significant. This part of the discussion section should also note any unanswered questions or issues your case study could not address. More detailed information about how to document any limitations to your research can be found here .

Suggest Areas for Further Research Although your case study may offer important insights about the research problem, there are likely additional questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or findings that unexpectedly revealed themselves as a result of your in-depth analysis of the case. Be sure that the recommendations for further research are linked to the research problem and that you explain why your recommendations are valid in other contexts and based on the original assumptions of your study.

V. Conclusion

As with any research paper, you should summarize your conclusion in clear, simple language; emphasize how the findings from your case study differs from or supports prior research and why. Do not simply reiterate the discussion section. Provide a synthesis of key findings presented in the paper to show how these converge to address the research problem. If you haven't already done so in the discussion section, be sure to document the limitations of your case study and needs for further research.

The function of your paper's conclusion is to: 1) restate the main argument supported by the findings from the analysis of your case; 2) clearly state the context, background, and necessity of pursuing the research problem using a case study design in relation to an issue, controversy, or a gap found from reviewing the literature; and, 3) provide a place for you to persuasively and succinctly restate the significance of your research problem, given that the reader has now been presented with in-depth information about the topic.

Consider the following points to help ensure your conclusion is appropriate:

If the argument or purpose of your paper is complex, you may need to summarize these points for your reader.
If prior to your conclusion, you have not yet explained the significance of your findings or if you are proceeding inductively, use the conclusion of your paper to describe your main points and explain their significance.
Move from a detailed to a general level of consideration of the case study's findings that returns the topic to the context provided by the introduction or within a new context that emerges from your case study findings.

Note that, depending on the discipline you are writing in and your professor's preferences, the concluding paragraph may contain your final reflections on the evidence presented applied to practice or on the essay's central research problem. However, the nature of being introspective about the subject of analysis you have investigated will depend on whether you are explicitly asked to express your observations in this way.

Problems to Avoid

Overgeneralization One of the goals of a case study is to lay a foundation for understanding broader trends and issues applied to similar circumstances. However, be careful when drawing conclusions from your case study. They must be evidence-based and grounded in the results of the study; otherwise, it is merely speculation. Looking at a prior example, it would be incorrect to state that a factor in improving girls access to education in Azerbaijan and the policy implications this may have for improving access in other Muslim nations is due to girls access to social media if there is no documentary evidence from your case study to indicate this. There may be anecdotal evidence that retention rates were better for girls who were on social media, but this observation would only point to the need for further research and would not be a definitive finding if this was not a part of your original research agenda.

Failure to Document Limitations No case is going to reveal all that needs to be understood about a research problem. Therefore, just as you have to clearly state the limitations of a general research study , you must describe the specific limitations inherent in the subject of analysis. For example, the case of studying how women conceptualize the need for water conservation in a village in Uganda could have limited application in other cultural contexts or in areas where fresh water from rivers or lakes is plentiful and, therefore, conservation is understood differently than preserving access to a scarce resource.

Failure to Extrapolate All Possible Implications Just as you don't want to over-generalize from your case study findings, you also have to be thorough in the consideration of all possible outcomes or recommendations derived from your findings. If you do not, your reader may question the validity of your analysis, particularly if you failed to document an obvious outcome from your case study research. For example, in the case of studying the accident at the railroad crossing to evaluate where and what types of warning signals should be located, you failed to take into consideration speed limit signage as well as warning signals. When designing your case study, be sure you have thoroughly addressed all aspects of the problem and do not leave gaps in your analysis.

Case Studies . Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Gerring, John. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices . New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007; Merriam, Sharan B. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education . Rev. ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1998; Miller, Lisa L. “The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (2018): TBD; Mills, Albert J., Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Putney, LeAnn Grogan. "Case Study." In Encyclopedia of Research Design , Neil J. Salkind, editor. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010), pp. 116-120; Simons, Helen. Case Study Research in Practice . London: SAGE Publications, 2009; Kratochwill, Thomas R. and Joel R. Levin, editors. Single-Case Research Design and Analysis: New Development for Psychology and Education . Hilldsale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992; Swanborn, Peter G. Case Study Research: What, Why and How? London : SAGE, 2010; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Los Angeles, CA, SAGE Publications, 2014; Walo, Maree, Adrian Bull, and Helen Breen. “Achieving Economic Benefits at Local Events: A Case Study of a Local Sports Event.” Festival Management and Event Tourism 4 (1996): 95-106.

Writing Tip

At Least Five Misconceptions about Case Study Research

Social science case studies are often perceived as limited in their ability to create new knowledge because they are not randomly selected and findings cannot be generalized to larger populations. Flyvbjerg examines five misunderstandings about case study research and systematically "corrects" each one. To quote, these are:

Misunderstanding 1 : General, theoretical [context-independent knowledge is more valuable than concrete, practical (context-dependent) knowledge. Misunderstanding 2 : One cannot generalize on the basis of an individual case; therefore, the case study cannot contribute to scientific development. Misunderstanding 3 : The case study is most useful for generating hypotheses; that is, in the first stage of a total research process, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building. Misunderstanding 4 : The case study contains a bias toward verification, that is, a tendency to confirm the researcher’s preconceived notions. Misunderstanding 5 : It is often difficult to summarize and develop general propositions and theories on the basis of specific case studies [p. 221].

While writing your paper, think introspectively about how you addressed these misconceptions because to do so can help you strengthen the validity and reliability of your research by clarifying issues of case selection, the testing and challenging of existing assumptions, the interpretation of key findings, and the summation of case outcomes. Think of a case study research paper as a complete, in-depth narrative about the specific properties and key characteristics of your subject of analysis applied to the research problem.

Flyvbjerg, Bent. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (April 2006): 219-245.

<< Previous: Reviewing Collected Essays
Next: Writing a Field Report >>
Last Updated: Jan 17, 2023 10:50 AM
URL: https://libguides.pointloma.edu/ResearchPaper

USC Libraries
Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

2. Preparing to Write
Purpose of Guide
Design Flaws to Avoid
Independent and Dependent Variables
Glossary of Research Terms
Reading Research Effectively
Narrowing a Topic Idea
Broadening a Topic Idea
Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
Academic Writing Style
Applying Critical Thinking
Choosing a Title
Making an Outline
Paragraph Development
Research Process Video Series
Executive Summary
The C.A.R.S. Model
Background Information
The Research Problem/Question
Theoretical Framework
Citation Tracking
Content Alert Services
Evaluating Sources
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Tiertiary Sources
Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
Qualitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Insiderness
Using Non-Textual Elements
Limitations of the Study
Common Grammar Mistakes
Writing Concisely
Avoiding Plagiarism
Footnotes or Endnotes?
Further Readings
Generative AI and Writing
USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
Bibliography

Things to Think About Before You Begin

After you have determined the type of research design you will use, but before you sit down and begin to organize your paper, there are few things you should consider doing that will help make the process of writing go much smoother.

Make a Schedule

Drafting a schedule and noting deadlines on your personal calendar should be your first step to writing a research paper. C reate a schedule based on your own sense of how much time you think you will need to contemplate, research, organize, and write a paper based on its length and your familiarity with the general topic. A helpful strategy is to work backwards from when the final paper is due. Choose specific dates of important steps along the way, but focus on setting realistic goals, and then stick to them! Make sure to give yourself enough time to find out what resources are available to you [including meeting with a librarian , if needed!], to identify a research problem to investigate, to select and read relevant research literature, to outline your paper, to organize the information you are going to cite in your paper, and to write your first and final drafts [as well as any necessary steps in between]. Developing a personal assignment calendar will also help you manage your time in relation to work assigned in other classes.

Analyze the Assignment

Carefully analyze the assignment to determine what you are specifically being asked to do . Look for key terms, topics, subject areas, and/or issues that can help you develop a research problem that interests you. Be sure that you understand the type of paper you are being asked to write. Research papers discuss a topic in depth and cite to credible sources that contain evidence that supports your particular perspective. However, there are many different ways this can be achieved.

The way in which your professor may ask you to frame your analysis can include any of the following approaches:

Case study -- explain the implications and unique characteristics of a complex research problem using a single bounded unit of analysis that illuminates key issues about the problem [e.g., an organization, behavior of doctors in an emergency room, a supreme court ruling, an event].
Comparison -- compares and contrasts two ideas, constructs, or tangible things with one another.
Definition -- discusses in depth the cultural and associative meanings of, for example, a political theory, a policy proposal, or a controversial practice.
Descriptive -- chooses a subject that you know well and help others to understand it.
Evaluative -- examines a theoretical concept, issue, person, place, or thing with the purpose of critically assessing basic assumptions, ideas, behavior, or events.
Exploratory -- pursues a specific line of inquiry, often with the purpose of making recommendations for further research or to advocate and provide evidence for specific actions to be taken.
Interpretive -- applies the theoretical knowledge gained in your coursework to a particular research problem, such as, a business situation in a management course or a psychological case profile.
Narrative -- writes from an experiential point of view, usually your own and written in the first person, that relates to the research problem.
Persuasive -- takes a position in a scholarly debate and gives the reader reasons based on existing evidence why they should agree with your position.
Policy memorandum -- writes short factual sentences that objectively summarizes a situation to date, identifies the main issue of concern, provides a breakdown of the elements of this main issue, and then recommends how to address the issue based on research about the topic.

NOTE: If for any reason you are unclear or confused about any aspect of the assignment, request clarification from your professor as soon as possible. Faculty are required to hold office hours to meet with students. Take advantage of this. Professors will not accept the excuse that, "I didn't understand the assignment" if you end up being upset about the grade you receive.

Ballenger, Bruce P. The Curious Researcher: A Guide to Writing Research Papers . 7th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2012. Composing Processes: Planning and Organizing. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Invention: Starting the Writing Process. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Invention: Overview of the Writing Process. The Reading/Writing Center. Hunter College; Lester, James D. Writing Research Papers: A Complete Guide . 15th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2015; Rosenblatt, Paul C. Restarting Stalled Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2016; Williams, Joseph M. and Lawrence McEnerney. Writing in College 2: Preparing to Write and Drafting the Paper, Writing Program, The University of Chicago; Prewriting Strategies. Writing Center. University of Kansas; Prewriting Techniques. Hawley Academic Resource and Advising Center. Simpson College.

General Information

Below are general rules outlined in most writing assignments in social and behavioral sciences classes, however, keep in mind that t he style and format of a research paper may vary depending on the preferences of your professor.

To make a paper readable :

Use a 12 point standard font; the most common used for research papers is either New Times Roman, Calibri, Georgia, or Garamond.
Text should be double spaced on 8 1/2" x 11" white paper with one inch margins on all four sides.
Number pages consecutively but never number the title page as page 1.

General mistakes to avoid :

Start each new section on a new page -- avoid orphan headings, sentences, or words [insert a page breaks where necessary].
Dividing a table or figure -- if possible, confine non-textual elements, such as a table or chart, to a single page. If this is not possible, create a logical break to separate the data into two pages or consider creating two or more non-textual elements to show the data.
Not adhering to recommended page limits -- if the assignment asks you to write a paper between 12-15 pages, this indicates the range that your professor believes is typically needed to thoroughly examine the research problem. If your paper is well below or well above this range, this may indicate a need to flesh out your analysis or eliminate unnecessary text, respectively.

General stylistic and grammatical mistakes to avoid :

Use normal prose with appropriate articles ["a," "the," "an"].
Spell checkers and grammar checkers are helpful, but they don’t catch everything. Always proofread and, if possible, get someone to review it for you before submitting your final paper.
Indent the first line of each paragraph.
If a paragraph is nearly a page or more longer, then it is probably too long for the reader to comprehend and should be divided into smaller paragraphs.
Write in an active voice when possible but note that some professors prefer a passive voice.
Write out all abbreviations the first time they are used with parentheses around the abbreviation [i.e., International Monetary Fund (IMF)]. Do not use too many abbreviations; they shorten the text but make it more difficult to read because the reader has to repeatedly think about what each means. Never start a sentence with an abbreviation.
Do not use contractions in academic writing and do not start sentences with conjunctions (and, but, or) or numerals.
Avoid informal wording, addressing the reader directly, and using jargon, slang terms, declaratives, or superlatives unless they appear in direct quotes from other sources.

In all sections of your paper :

Stay focused on the research problem you are investigating [follow the steps in this guide].
Use paragraphs to separate each important point.
Present your points in a logical order.
Use present tense to report well accepted facts [e.g., "The Prime Minister of Bulgaria is Boyko Borissov."]
Use past tense to describe specific results from your study [e.g., "Evidence shows that the impact of the invasion was magnified by events in 1989."]
Avoid the use of superfluous non-textual elements [images/figures/charts/tables]; include only those necessary for presenting or enhancing an understanding of the results.

NOTE: These are general guidelines that apply to almost every paper you write in college. However, the specific format of your paper--how you arrange the title page, headings, subheadings, non-textual elements, citations, appendices, etc.--will be dictated by the writing style manual you are asked to use [e.g., APA, Chicago, MLA, or other]. If your professor has not stated which style to use, be sure to ask. If your professor does not state a preference, choose the writing style used within your major or that you have the most experience using.

The Guide to Grammar and Writing. Capital Community College Foundation; Grammar. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Writing Tips. Writers Workshop. University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign; Handouts. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina.

<< Previous: Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
Next: Academic Writing Style >>
Last Updated: Aug 29, 2024 11:05 AM
URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Information

Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

Active Journals
Find a Journal
Proceedings Series
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
For Librarians
For Publishers
For Societies
For Conference Organizers
Open Access Policy
Institutional Open Access Program
Special Issues Guidelines
Editorial Process
Research and Publication Ethics
Article Processing Charges
Testimonials
Preprints.org
SciProfiles
Encyclopedia

Article Menu

Subscribe SciFeed
Recommended Articles
Google Scholar
on Google Scholar
Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Adaptive attention-enhanced yolo for wall crack detection.

1. Introduction

AAEY effectively improves the accuracy of object detection. By incorporating Transformer’s self-attention, the model is able to more accurately recognize long-distance dependencies in the image, thus integrating the information of each component more comprehensively. This improvement effectively reduces the detection error rate and enhances the model’s performance and stability in crack detection tasks.
AAEY improves object detection precision through the integration of Transformer’s attention mechanism. This enhancement allows the model to better capture long-range dependencies within the image. As a result, it integrates information from each component more effectively. Its feature processing strategy in both spatial and channel dimensions leads to improved performance in crack detection.
In this experiment, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score [ 10 ] were used to evaluate the detection ability of the model, while mean average precision (mAP) [ 11 ] was referenced as an auxiliary index. The obtained results show that the AAEY method demonstrates superior performance compared to other existing techniques in the wall crack detection task and can provide an effective solution for practical applications.

2. Related Work

2.1. wall crack detection, 3. materials and methods, 3.1. yolo algorithm, 3.2. swin transformer-based csp bottleneck with three convolutions, 3.3. adaptive receptive field, 3.4. multi-head attention, 4. performance evaluation, 4.1. valuation index, 4.2. training results, 4.3. ablation study, 4.4. comparison with state of the art, 4.5. limitations, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

Basu, S.; Orr, S.A.; Aktas, Y.D. A geological perspective on climate change and building stone deterioration in London: Implications for urban stone-built heritage research and management. Atmosphere 2020 , 11 , 788. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Sitota, B.; Quezon, E.T.; Ararsa, W. Assessment on Materials Quality Control Implementation of Building Construction Projects and Workmanship: A Case Study of Ambo University. 2021. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3901438 (accessed on 7 May 2024).
Othman, N.L.; Jaafar, M.; Harun, W.M.W.; Ibrahim, F. A case study on moisture problems and building defects. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015 , 170 , 27–36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Yacob, S.; Ali, A.S.; Au-Yong, C.P.; Yacob, S.; Ali, A.S.; Au-Yong, C.P. An Overview and Understanding the Building Deterioration. In Managing Building Deterioration: Prediction Model for Public Schools in Developing Countries ; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 11–40. [ Google Scholar ]
Andi, M.; Yohanes, G.R. Experimental study of crack depth measurement of concrete with ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Bali, Indonesia, 7–8 August 2019; Volume 673, p. 012047. [ Google Scholar ]
Singla, R.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, S.K. Infrared imaging for detection of defects in concrete structures. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Stavanger, Norway, 30 November–1 December 2023; Volume 1289, p. 012064. [ Google Scholar ]
Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Ahn, E.; Cho, S.; Shin, M.; Sim, S.H. Concrete crack identification using a UAV incorporating hybrid image processing. Sensors 2017 , 17 , 2052. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Sridhar, S.; Sanagavarapu, S. Multi-head self-attention transformer for dogecoin price prediction. In Proceedings of the 2021 14th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), Gdansk, Poland, 8–10 July 2021; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
Chen, Z.; Zhang, F.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, L. Real-time detection algorithm of helmet and reflective vest based on improved YOLOv5. J. Real-Time Image Process. 2023 , 20 , 4. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Veeranampalayam Sivakumar, A.N.; Li, J.; Scott, S.; Psota, E.; J. Jhala, A.; Luck, J.D.; Shi, Y. Comparison of object detection and patch-based classification deep learning models on mid-to late-season weed detection in UAV imagery. Remote Sens. 2020 , 12 , 2136. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Yassin, W.; Abdollah, F.; Amanah, N.; Ismail, A.; Ragam, P. Seatbelt detection in traffic system using an improved YOLOV5. J. Adv. Comput. Technol. Appl. (JACTA) 2023 , 5 , 1–17. [ Google Scholar ]
Khan, M.A.M.; Kee, S.H.; Pathan, A.S.K.; Nahid, A.A. Image Processing Techniques for Concrete Crack Detection: A Scientometrics Literature Review. Remote Sens. 2023 , 15 , 2400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Chaiyasarn, K.; Khan, W. Damage detection and localization in masonry structure using faster region convolutional networks. GEOMATE J. 2019 , 17 , 98–105. [ Google Scholar ]
Bhowmick, S.; Nagarajaiah, S.; Veeraraghavan, A. Vision and deep learning-based algorithms to detect and quantify cracks on concrete surfaces from UAV videos. Sensors 2020 , 20 , 6299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Nhat-Duc, H.; Nguyen, Q.L.; Tran, V.D. Automatic recognition of asphalt pavement cracks using metaheuristic optimized edge detection algorithms and convolution neural network. Autom. Constr. 2018 , 94 , 203–213. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Kim, B.; Cho, S. Image-based concrete crack assessment using mask and region-based convolutional neural network. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2019 , 26 , e2381. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Dinh, T.H.; Ha, Q.P.; La, H.M. Computer vision-based method for concrete crack detection. In Proceedings of the 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Phuket, Thailand, 13–15 November 2016; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ]
Ying, L.; Salari, E. Beamlet transform-based technique for pavement crack detection and classification. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2010 , 25 , 572–580. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Wang, G.; Peter, W.T.; Yuan, M. Automatic internal crack detection from a sequence of infrared images with a triple-threshold Canny edge detector. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2018 , 29 , 025403. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Rabinovich, D.; Givoli, D.; Vigdergauz, S. XFEM-based crack detection scheme using a genetic algorithm. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2007 , 71 , 1051–1080. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Praticò, F.G.; Fedele, R.; Naumov, V.; Sauer, T. Detection and monitoring of bottom-up cracks in road pavement using a machine-learning approach. Algorithms 2020 , 13 , 81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Ali, L.; Alnajjar, F.; Jassmi, H.A.; Gocho, M.; Khan, W.; Serhani, M.A. Performance evaluation of deep CNN-based crack detection and localization techniques for concrete structures. Sensors 2021 , 21 , 1688. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
Chaiyasarn, K.; Sharma, M.; Ali, L.; Khan, W.; Poovarodom, N. Crack detection in historical structures based on convolutional neural network. GEOMATE J. 2018 , 15 , 240–251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Cha, Y.J.; Choi, W.; Büyüköztürk, O. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2017 , 32 , 361–378. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Liu, H.; Miao, X.; Mertz, C.; Xu, C.; Kong, H. Crackformer: Transformer network for fine-grained crack detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada, 11–17 October 2021; pp. 3783–3792. [ Google Scholar ]
Xu, Z.; Lei, X.; Guan, H. Multi-scale local feature enhanced transformer network for pavement crack detection. J. Image Graph. 2023 , 28 , 1019–1028. [ Google Scholar ]
Deng, J.; Lu, Y.; Lee, V.C.S. Imaging-based crack detection on concrete surfaces using You Only Look Once network. Struct. Health Monit. 2021 , 20 , 484–499. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Bai, T.; Lv, B.; Wang, Y.; Gao, J.; Wang, J. Crack Detection of Track Slab Based on RSG-YOLO. IEEE Access 2023 , 11 , 124004–124013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zhang, Y.; Huang, J.; Cai, F. On bridge surface crack detection based on an improved YOLO v3 algorithm. In Proceedings of the 21st IFAC World Congress, Berlin, Germany, 12–17 July 2020; Volume 53, pp. 8205–8210. [ Google Scholar ]
Wang, Z.; Jin, L.; Wang, S.; Xu, H. Apple stem/calyx real-time recognition using YOLO-v5 algorithm for fruit automatic loading system. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022 , 185 , 111808. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Ting, L.; Baijun, Z.; Yongsheng, Z.; Shun, Y. Ship detection algorithm based on improved YOLO V5. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Automation, Control and Robotics Engineering (CACRE), Dalian, China, 15–17 July 2021; pp. 483–487. [ Google Scholar ]
Sun, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Sun, D.; Zhang, C. DGAP-YOLO: A Crack Detection Method Based on UAV Images and YOLO. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Tianjin, China, 5–8 August 2024; pp. 482–492. [ Google Scholar ]
Liu, S.; Zhang, N.; Yu, G. Lightweight security wear detection method based on YOLOv5. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022 , 2022 , 1319029. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Luo, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, F. Target detection method of UAV aerial imagery based on improved YOLOv5. Remote Sens. 2022 , 14 , 5063. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Dadboud, F.; Patel, V.; Mehta, V.; Bolic, M.; Mantegh, I. Single-stage uav detection and classification with yolov5: Mosaic data augmentation and panet. In Proceedings of the 2021 17th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), Washington, DC, USA, 16–19 November 2021; pp. 1–8. [ Google Scholar ]
Rahman, R.; Bin Azad, Z.; Bakhtiar Hasan, M. Densely-populated traffic detection using yolov5 and non-maximum suppression ensembling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data, IoT, and Machine Learning: BIM 2021, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, 23–25 September 2021; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 567–578. [ Google Scholar ]
Wu, H.; Liu, Q.; Liu, X. A review on deep learning approaches to image classification and object segmentation. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2019 , 60 , 575–597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Garbin, C.; Zhu, X.; Marques, O. Dropout vs. batch normalization: An empirical study of their impact to deep learning. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020 , 79 , 12777–12815. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Pan, X.; Ge, C.; Lu, R.; Song, S.; Chen, G.; Huang, Z.; Huang, G. On the integration of self-attention and convolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–24 June 2022; pp. 815–825. [ Google Scholar ]
Shen, Z.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, H.; Yi, S.; Li, H. Efficient attention: Attention with linear complexities. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Virtual, 5–9 January 2021; pp. 3531–3539. [ Google Scholar ]
Wang, S.; Hao, X. YOLO-SK: A lightweight multiscale object detection algorithm. Heliyon 2024 , 10 , e24143. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Sharaf Al-deen, H.S.; Zeng, Z.; Al-sabri, R.; Hekmat, A. An improved model for analyzing textual sentiment based on a deep neural network using multi-head attention mechanism. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021 , 4 , 85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Gao, C.; Cai, Q.; Ming, S. YOLOv4 object detection algorithm with efficient channel attention mechanism. In Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering (ICMCCE), Harbin, China, 25–27 December 2020; pp. 1764–1770. [ Google Scholar ]
Powers, D.M. Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv 2020 , arXiv:2010.16061. [ Google Scholar ]
Chicco, D.; Jurman, G. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom. 2020 , 21 , 6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Hong, C.S.; Oh, T.G. TPR-TNR plot for confusion matrix. CSAM Commun. Stat. Appl. Methods 2021 , 28 , 161–169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
He, K.; Lu, Y.; Sclaroff, S. Local descriptors optimized for average precision. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018; pp. 596–605. [ Google Scholar ]
Chun, P.j.; Izumi, S.; Yamane, T. Automatic detection method of cracks from concrete surface imagery using two-step light gradient boosting machine. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2021 , 36 , 61–72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Zou, Q.; Cao, Y.; Li, Q.; Mao, Q.; Wang, S. CrackTree: Automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2012 , 33 , 227–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Lee, D.; Kim, J.; Lee, D. Robust concrete crack detection using deep learning-based semantic segmentation. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 2019 , 20 , 287–299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Yang, X.; Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Luo, X.; Huang, T.; Yang, X. Automatic pixel-level crack detection and measurement using fully convolutional network. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2018 , 33 , 1090–1109. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Model	Precision	Recall	Params (M)	FLOPs (G)
Yolov5	82.84%	78.21%	7.1	16.5
Yolov8	84.55%	79.78%	11.2	28.6
Yolov10	82.60%	76.89%	7.2	21.6

Model	STC3	ARF	MHA	mAP
baseline				83.6%
STC3	√			84.4%
ARF		√		84.0%
MHA			√	84.0%
STC3 + ARF	√	√		85.2%
STC3 + MHA	√		√	85.5%
ARF + MHA		√	√	84.7%
Ours AAEY	√	√	√	86.4%

Method	Precision	Recall	F1-Score
LightGBM	68.01%	75.78%	69.50%
CrackTree	73.22%	76.45%	70.80%
CSN	83.40%	68.55%	75.24%
FCN	81.73%	78.97%	79.95%
Ours AAEY	88.69%	80.18%	84.22%

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Chen, Y.; Wu, W.; Li, J. Adaptive Attention-Enhanced Yolo for Wall Crack Detection. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 7478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177478

Chen Y, Wu W, Li J. Adaptive Attention-Enhanced Yolo for Wall Crack Detection. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(17):7478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177478

Chen, Ying, Wangyu Wu, and Junxia Li. 2024. "Adaptive Attention-Enhanced Yolo for Wall Crack Detection" Applied Sciences 14, no. 17: 7478. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177478

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

Structure of a Research Paper in Social Sciences in 2023
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
writing a research proposal social sciences
Social and Basic Sciences Research Review Template
How to Write a Research Paper
What Is Included In The Abstract Of A Research Paper: Key Elements

VIDEO

SSLC SOCIAL SCIENCE 6 MARK SURE🔥🔥
What is social science? #perspectivesineducation #social science
Systems of Social Stratification: Caste
10th standard 1st mid term Social Science question paper 2024
Research Methods Workshop Feedback on Reading Research Papers
Web of Science research paper reading 6

COMMENTS

PDF Writing a Formal Research Paper in the Social Sciences
For a social science research paper, APA format is typically expected. APA format was developed for the social sciences, so it is followed fairly strictly in these types of papers in both formatting the paper and citing sources. When in doubt, follow APA guidelines. Use peer-reviewed sources for research.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
Writing papers in college requires you to come up with sophisticated, complex, and sometimes very creative ways of structuring your ideas.Taking the time to draft an outline can help you determine if your ideas connect to each other, what order of ideas works best, where gaps in your thinking may exist, or whether you have sufficient evidence to support each of your points.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
Formulating a research question or problem, and/or; Continuing a disciplinary tradition. 3. Place your research within the research niche by: Stating the intent of your study, Outlining the key characteristics of your study, Describing important results, and; Giving a brief overview of the structure of the paper.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
Before beginning your paper, you need to decide how you plan to design the study.. The research design refers to the overall strategy and analytical approach that you have chosen in order to integrate, in a coherent and logical way, the different components of the study, thus ensuring that the research problem will be thoroughly investigated. It constitutes the blueprint for the collection ...
PDF How to Write a Social Science Research Paper
What follows is a general guide to writing a research paper in the social sciences (e.g., an undergraduate honors thesis, MA thesis). In particular, we review common sections in such papers and what they generally entail. Please note that the format of a particular paper may vary by discipline and/or class, so it is important to make sure to ...
PDF University of Michigan Writing the Empirical Social
empirical social science research paper.2 It will explore the way to write each of the ... the structure for such a paper rather than running a true empirical analysis. A typical social science paper will, however, use data collected via some sort of research design. If
PDF Structuring a Conventional Empirical Social Science Article
There are an infinite number of ways of structuring an empirical social science research article. If everyone used a different structure, however, the dissemination of ideas and findings would be very inefficient. ... By adhering to this structure when writing an empirical paper, you will maximize the chances of getting published in a top ...
PDF Writing in the Social Sciences
Most papers written in the social sciences, life sciences, nursing, and education usually follow the same basic structure and use APA style. Although these areas of study may be different, the methods of writing, presenting evidence, and explaining the research process are very similar. Most quantitative (and some qualitative) papers include ...
Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the
Accordingly, the current paper serves as a template for the budding social scientist. In it, I describe the various sections of a research paper in order to illustrate the structure of an introduction, methods section, results section, and discussion section in a format fitting for the 6th edition of the American Psychological Association.
LibGuides: Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Writing a
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Writing a Research Proposal. Purpose of Guide; ... Structure and Writing Style. Beginning the Proposal Process. As with writing a regular academic paper, research proposals are generally organized the same way throughout most social science disciplines. Proposals vary between ten and twenty-five ...
Structure of a Research Article
Knowing these elements and the purpose of each serves help you to read and understand academic texts efficiently and effectively, and then apply what you read to your paper or project. Social Science (and Science) original research articles generally follow IMRD: Introduction- Methods-Results-Discussion. Introduction. Introduces topic of article
Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework is the structure that can hold or support a theory of a research study. The theoretical framework introduces and describes the theory that explains why the research problem under study exists. ... Many social science research papers fit into this rubric. For example, Peripheral Realism Theory, which categorizes ...
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
The paper includes a description of how and why particular evidence was collected and analyzed, and why specific theoretical arguments or concepts were used. The paper is made up of paragraphs, each containing only one controlling idea. You indicate how each section of the paper addresses the research problem.
How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer ...
Communicating research findings is an essential step in the research process. Often, peer-reviewed journals are the forum for such communication, yet many researchers are never taught how to write a publishable scientific paper. In this article, we explain the basic structure of a scientific paper and describe the information that should be included in each section. We also identify common ...
Research Paper
The structure of a research paper typically follows a standard format, consisting of several sections that convey specific information about the research study. ... particularly in the social sciences, natural sciences, and humanities. Writing research papers helps students to develop research skills, critical thinking skills, and academic ...
Writing for publication: Structure, form, content, and journal
Beyond this, the title should indicate the research methodology and topic of the paper. The abstract should provide a summary of the objective, methods, results, and significance of the research. Most researchers are likely to find published papers through an electronic search (either via subject databases, or search engines such as Google).
The current phase of social sciences research: A thematic overview of
Social sciences research (SSR) is an enterprise that is continuously evolving, but not without some debilitating issues that impede the realization of its full potential and usefulness. SSR, as a human initiative and activity, is discussed. The paper features the current methods and authorship issues that enhance the research outcomes' validity.
Early science and colossal stone engineering in Menga, a Neolithic
Here, we examine a great Neolithic engineering feat: the Menga dolmen, Iberia's largest megalithic monument. As listed by UNESCO, the Antequera megalithic site includes two natural formations, La Peña de los Enamorados and El Torcal karstic massif, and four major megalithic monuments: Menga, Viera, El Romeral, and the one recently discovered at Piedras Blancas, at the foot of La Peña de ...
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
I. Groups of Research Methods. There are two main groups of research methods in the social sciences: The empirical-analytical group approaches the study of social sciences in a similar manner that researchers study the natural sciences.This type of research focuses on objective knowledge, research questions that can be answered yes or no, and operational definitions of variables to be measured.
On the micro- and meso-structure and durability of 3D printed concrete
Among the process-related issues, we want to highlight the fact that the 3D printed material is extruded from a nozzle, and there is a lack of compaction during and after material deposition. This causes variations in the micro- and meso-structure depending on the extruded concrete composition, the rheological properties of the mixture, the age of the mix at deposition, and the extruder ...
The Literature Review
A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that ...
Publication, Collaboration, Citation Performance, and Triple Helix
Artificial intelligence (AI) in the communication field has become increasingly popular in recent years. This study collected data from 482 documents and cited references in the Web of Science database. It explores the knowledge structure related to AI in communication, combined with the triple helix innovation gene model. The analysis employed collaborative network analysis, two-mode network ...
The Introduction
Giving a brief overview of the structure of the paper. ... Research problems in the social sciences rarely rest in isolation from history. Therefore, it is important to lay a foundation for understanding the historical context underpinning the research problem. However, this information should be brief and succinct and begin at a point in time ...
Thermodynamically stable low-Na O3 cathode materials driven by
The thermodynamically stable window for an O3-type layered sodium cathode material is largely determined by its Na stoichiometry; a spontaneous transition to the P-type structure occurs when it is relatively low. With such limitation, the capacity and stability of O3-structured materials become restricted and a pot
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
Below are recommendations on how to read each section of a research paper effectively. Note that the sections to read are out of order from how you will find them organized in a journal article or research paper. 1. Abstract. The abstract summarizes the background, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions of a scholarly article or research ...
The Effects of Mental Health Issues and Academic Performance
The mental health of students has a significant impact on their academic performance. This study is aimed at investigating the effects of mental health issues on the academic performance of Albukhary International University students. A qualitative method and a semi-structured interview were used to answer the research questions. The results of the research study show that when students have ...
Writing a Case Study
This tab focuses on the latter--how to design and organize a research paper in the social sciences that analyzes a specific case. ... highlight key programs, or investigate interesting aspects of professional work. In general, the structure of a case study research paper is not all that different from a standard college-level research paper. ...
Experimental study of an aluminum based three ...
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Acknowledgement. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U2141218) and ZTE Industry-University-Institute Cooperation Funds under ...
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
To make a paper readable: Use a 12 point standard font; the most common used for research papers is either New Times Roman, Calibri, Georgia, or Garamond. Text should be double spaced on 8 1/2" x 11" white paper with one inch margins on all four sides. Number pages consecutively but never number the title page as page 1. General mistakes to avoid:
Applied Sciences
To address the shortcomings in the current research, this paper proposes a new Adaptive Attention-Enhanced Yolo. The method employs a Swin Transformer-based Cross-Stage Partial Bottleneck with a three-convolution structure, introduces an adaptive sensory field module in the neck network, and processes the features through a multi-head attention ...

Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed

Related Papers

RELATED PAPERS

Reading for Research: Social Sciences

Guide Acknowledgements

Librarian for Sociology, Environmental Sociology, MHS and Public Policy Studies

Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Research Paper

Structure of Research Paper

Introduction

Literature Review

How to Write Research Paper

Research Paper Example

Applications of Research Paper

When to Write Research Paper

Purpose of Research Paper

Characteristics of Research Paper

Advantages of Research Paper

Limitations of Research Paper

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

You may also like

Data Analysis – Process, Methods and Types

APA Research Paper Format – Example, Sample and...

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Appendix in Research Paper – Examples and...

Research Objectives – Types, Examples and...

What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and...

Publication, Collaboration, Citation Performance, and Triple Helix Innovation Gene of Artificial Intelligence Research in the Communication Field: Comparing Asia to the Rest of the World

Cite this article

Access this article

Explore related subjects

Author information

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: The Introduction

Importance of a Good Introduction

Structure and Writing Style

Writing Tip

Another Writing Tip

Yet Another Writing Tip

Energy & Environmental Science

Supplementary files

Transparent peer review

Article information

Thermodynamically stable low-Na O3 cathode materials driven by intrinsically high ionic potential discrepancy

Social activity

Advertisements

The Effects of Mental Health Issues and Academic Performance

Related Papers

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Writing a Case Study

How to Approach Writing a Case Study Research Paper

Structure and Writing Style

Writing Tip

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

Things to Think About Before You Begin

General Information

Information

Initiatives

Article Menu

JSmol Viewer

1. Introduction

2. Related Work

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS