IFRS Accounting Standards do not include a specific standard that addresses digital assets. A company assesses whether a digital asset meets the definition of cash or cash equivalents, financial instruments, inventory or intangible assets by applying the scope requirements in the relevant standards and applying the 2019 IFRS IC Agenda Decision.
The Agenda Decision notes that IAS 2 (inventory) applies to cryptocurrencies when they are held for sale in the ordinary course of business. If IAS 2 is not applicable, then IAS 38 (intangible assets) applies to holdings of cryptocurrencies. For purposes of the Agenda Decision, cryptocurrencies refers to a subset of digital assets with all of the following characteristics:
Further, crypto-assets do not meet the definition of cash or cash equivalents because they are generally, among others, not convertible to known amounts of cash, nor are they subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. In addition, a crypto-asset is only an equity instrument under IFRS Accounting Standards if it embodies a contractual right to a residual interest in the net assets of a particular entity.
Subtopic 350-60 (created by ASU 2023-08) applies to all assets that satisfy the following criteria:
These criteria appear to have been designed principally to capture crypto assets like bitcoin and ether. However, we believe these criteria will also capture many other crypto assets (e.g. cardano, polkadot, solana and litecoin).
Many digital assets will not be in scope of Subtopic 350-60, for example NFTs because they are not fungible and, frequently , also fail the other goods or services criterion (see KPMG Issues In-Depth, ). Digital assets that are intangible assets but not in scope of Subtopic 350-60 will continue to be accounted for like other intangible assets (i.e. under Subtopic 350-30).
IFRS Accounting Standards do not include a specific standard that addresses digital assets; therefore, the usual scoping requirements of the relevant standards apply (e.g. IAS 38 and IAS 2). Under these requirements, differences in accounting may arise. For example, unlike IFRS Accounting Standards, which permit intangible assets to be classified as inventory under certain circumstances, US GAAP never permits their classification as inventory (i.e. inventory can only comprise tangible goods). In the next section, we outline key differences between IFRS Accounting Standards and US GAAP with respect to the subsequent measurement of those digital assets.
Neither the Agenda Decision nor ASU 2023-08 addresses the accounting for all digital assets. For example, neither addresses the accounting for (1) digital assets that meet the definition of a financial asset or financial instrument nor (2) NFTs. Therefore, differences in the accounting for these digital assets may arise because of existing differences between IFRS Accounting Standards and US GAAP (e.g. with respect to financial instruments or licenses of intellectual property).
Subsequent measurement | Under IFRS Accounting Standards: Otherwise, IFRS Accounting Standards offer two possible routes to fair value subsequent measurement of digital assets classified as intangible assets or inventory: can be applied as an accounting policy option to intangible assets if an active market exists; however, determining whether an active market exists can be challenging. . | Digital assets in scope of Subtopic 350-60 are measured at fair value under Topic 820 after their acquisition, with fair value changes recorded in current period earnings (i.e. FVTPL). No exceptions (e.g. for such assets not actively traded) apply. Digital intangible assets that do not meet all the scoping criteria in Subtopic 350-60 are typically indefinite-lived and, therefore, will continue to be measured after their acquisition at their cost less impairment losses, like other indefinite-lived intangible assets. |
The primary difference is that under US GAAP, digital assets in scope of Subtopic 350-60 will be measured at FVTPL while under IFRS Accounting Standards such assets are often measured at cost by either applying IAS 38 or IAS 2. Other differences include |
Digital assets received as consideration for the sale of goods or services to customers | IFRS Accounting Standards require that noncash consideration received in a revenue transaction generally be measured at the fair value of that consideration. An exception arises only when that fair value cannot be reasonably estimated, in which case the fair value of the goods or services transferred is used . IFRS Accounting Standards do not specify the date at which to measure the fair value of the noncash consideration. Facts and circumstances are considered to determine whether to measure fair value as of the contract inception date, the date the noncash consideration is received or the date the performance obligation to transfer the good or service is satisfied. | Under US GAAP, noncash consideration received in a revenue transaction is measured at fair value, unless that fair value cannot be reasonably estimated, in which case the fair value of the goods or services transferred is used. Unlike IFRS Accounting Standards, US GAAP specifies the date noncash consideration is to be measured - at the contract inception date.
|
Companies may receive crypto assets as noncash consideration for goods or services transferred. In addition, companies may receive such assets for participating in a blockchain’s consensus protocol (i.e. engaging in mining or staking activities). The initial accounting for crypto assets received as consideration for goods or services is similar between IFRS Accounting Standards and US GAAP. However, because crypto asset prices can be volatile (even in short periods of time), meaningful measurement differences may arise between: |
Besides the above-mentioned differences, another key difference is regarding the disclosure requirements. Subtopic 350-60 for in-scope crypto intangible assets require specific disclosures in both interim and annual reporting period. While under IFRS Accounting Standards, the disclosures are less prescriptive and driven by the requirements of the relevant IFRS Accounting standards that are applied in accounting for them which may result in substantial differences between both GAAPs.
Since the IASB’s 2021 agenda consultation, many stakeholders have suggested adding accounting for cryptocurrencies to the IASB’s workplan. However, the Board has not yet done so because of concerns about the prevalence and impact of such transactions, the complexity of accounting for different types of crypto assets and liabilities and the existing guidance provided via the 2019 IFRS IC Agenda Decision on ‘holdings of cryptocurrencies’. That said, the IASB’s project on intangible assets more broadly may review the scope of IAS 38, including the treatment of cryptocurrencies, but we do not expect that project to produce any IFRS Accounting Standards changes in the near-term.
There is presently no indication that the FASB will pursue additional standard setting around crypto or other digital assets anytime soon. Therefore, differences outlined earlier between IFRS Accounting Standards and US GAAP post ASU 2023-08 are not likely to significantly change in the near-term.
Further, the SEC staff have expressed views on other aspects of accounting for digital assets through staff accounting bulletins, statements and speeches. Dual reporters should keep an eye on such views to understand and evaluate potential accounting differences.
Given the recent issuance of authoritative guidance under US GAAP on accounting for and reporting of certain crypto assets, companies reporting under both IFRS Accounting Standards and US GAAP must carefully assess potential divergences. It is imperative for dual reporters to thoroughly evaluate the contrasting requirements between IFRS Accounting Standards and US GAAP to ensure accurate and compliant financial reporting. Read KPMG publications below for further insights:
Start the conversation now with your KPMG representatives.
Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.
By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement .
Job seekers
Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.
Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.
Office locations
International hotline
You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline
Press contacts
Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Approval by the Board of Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current—Deferral of Effective Date issued in July 2020. Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current—Deferral of Effective Date, which amended IAS 1, was approved for issue by all 14 members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Hans Hoogervorst.
IAS 1 sets out overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum requirements for their content. It requires an entity to present a complete set of financial statements at least annually, with comparative amounts for the preceding year (including comparative amounts in the notes).
Overview. IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements sets out the overall requirements for financial statements, including how they should be structured, the minimum requirements for their content and overriding concepts such as going concern, the accrual basis of accounting and the current/non-current distinction. The standard requires a complete set of financial statements to comprise a ...
IFRS 18 includes requirements for all entities applying IFRS for the presentation and disclosure of information in financial statements. IFRS 18 was issued in April 2024 and applies to an annual reporting period beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements. On 9 April 2024, the IASB issued IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, which replaces IAS 1 and amends IAS 7. This new standard will be effective from 2027 with early application permitted. Here are the key changes under IFRS 18:
International Accounting Standard 1 Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) is set out in paragraphs 1-140 and the Appendix.All the paragraphs have equal authority. IAS 1 should be read in the context of its objective and the Basis for Conclusions, the Preface to IFRS Standards and the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting ...
For instance, a balance sheet may now be referred to as a statement of financial position. Furthermore, the revised IAS 1 has also introduced a new statement, the statement of comprehensive income. IAS 1 offers the choice of presenting all items of income and expense recognized in the period: Either in a single statement or in two statements.
IAS 1 prescribes the components of the financial statements that together would be considered a complete set of financial statements. Under IAS 1, entities are required to make an explicit statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in their notes if their financial statements comply with IFRS.
One shows the presentation while IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement remains effective and is applied; the other shows presentation when IFRS 9 Financial Instruments is applied. The examples are not intended to illustrate all aspects of IFRSs, nor do they constitute a complete set of financial statements, which would also ...
The course consists of two parts. First part, after the introduction to the IFRS, explains the most important concepts of the Conceptual Framework. In the second part IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements standard's requirements are presented including practical examples and interim tests to enhance understanding.
The complete set of financial statements compliant with IFRS comprises 5 elements: a statement of financial position as at the end of the period. a statement of comprehensive income for the period. a statement of changes in equity for the period. a statement of cash flows for the period. notes containing a summary of significant accounting ...
Article. 14 Nov 2022. Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements have been issued to clarify that the classification of liabilities as current or non-current should be based on rights that exist at the end of the reporting period. Exclusive General Presentation and Disclosures. Article.
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. 1h 39m. Learn the key accounting principles to be applied to financial statements, including fair presentation and compliance with IFRS Standards. Last Updated: April 2024. Back.
In this Essentials, we highlight two of the principles in IAS 1: 1. Financial statements should fairly present the company's performance; and. 2. Disclosure of immaterial items can obscure material information. We explain how investors can use their knowledge of these fundamental principles of IFRS to have an efective dialogue with management ...
Opening statement is only required if impact is material. Opening statement is presented as at the beginning of the immediately preceding comparative period required by IAS 1 (e.g. if an entity has a reporting date of 31 December X2 statement of financial position, this will be as at 1 January X1)
IAS 1 will be superseded by IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements, which becomes effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2027. Published by the IASB: September 2007. Included in Part I of CPA Canada Handbook: ... IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements has been revised to remove the amendments ...
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements. Start.
This course provides answers to these questions using practical examples. The course consists of two parts. First part, after the introduction to the IFRS, explains the most important concepts of the Conceptual Framework. In the second part IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements standard's requirements are presented including practical ...
The IFRS presentation guidelines for annual financial statements are generally less prescriptive than SEC regulation, but may still surprise US private companies. IFRS preparers have some flexibility in selecting their income statement format and which line items, headings and subtotals are to be presented on the face of the statement.
The new standard replaces the oldest standard "IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements" which will no longer applicable. ... Overall, the majority of changes made in IFRS 18 impact the statement of profit or loss and notes to the financial statements, but there are also limited changes to specific requirements that are set out in IAS 7 ...
IAASA publishes paper on IFRS 18 "Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements" 3 September 2024 IFRS… Revocation of the recognition of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Ireland (CPA) Pursuant to its powers… Foláireamh Comhairliúcháin: Athbhreithniú ar an gCaighdeán Eiticiúil d'Iniúchóirí (Éire)
Presentation of Financial Statements. IFRS 18 includes presentation and disclosure requirements that are new and requirements that have been carried forward from IAS 1. IFRS 18 is intended to improve how information is communicated in financial statements by: (a) requiring an entity to present defined totals and subtotals and to classify income ...
The IASB published IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements with an effective date of annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027. As part of the UKEB's endorsement and adoption work, it is now seeking UK stakeholder views on the IASB's standard.
IFRS preparers apply a 2019 IFRS Interpretations Committee (IC) Agenda Decision 2, which addresses some accounting considerations when holding cryptocurrencies.The accounting generally depends on the company's business model (e.g. investors, miners or broker-traders of digital assets) and the characteristics of the digital asset in question (i.e. contractual terms, rights and obligations).
01 Jul 2012. Presentation of payments on non-income taxes (IAS 1 and IAS 12) 01 Jan 2015. Presentation of income and expenses arising on financial instruments with a negative yield (IAS 39 and IAS 1) 13 Mar 2018. Presentation of interest revenue for particular financial instruments (IFRS 9 and IAS 1) 13 Mar 2018.
The Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario (FSRA) is responsible for prudential supervision of Ontario Incorporated insurance companies and reciprocals. IFRS 17 was issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in May 2017 and sets out requirements for a company reporting information about insurance contracts it issues and reinsurance contracts it holds.
• Extend the disclosure requirements in IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements for management -defined performance measures to the Statement of Cash Flows. These requirements should add transparency to the computation of other cash flow measures and increase discipline in their use.