notice of assignment to debtor

• Search Search Please fill out this field.
• Corporate Finance
• Corporate Debt

Debt Assignment: How They Work, Considerations and Benefits

Daniel Liberto is a journalist with over 10 years of experience working with publications such as the Financial Times, The Independent, and Investors Chronicle.

Charlene Rhinehart is a CPA , CFE, chair of an Illinois CPA Society committee, and has a degree in accounting and finance from DePaul University.

Katrina Ávila Munichiello is an experienced editor, writer, fact-checker, and proofreader with more than fourteen years of experience working with print and online publications.

Investopedia / Ryan Oakley

What Is Debt Assignment?

The term debt assignment refers to a transfer of debt, and all the associated rights and obligations, from a creditor to a third party. The assignment is a legal transfer to the other party, who then becomes the owner of the debt . In most cases, a debt assignment is issued to a debt collector who then assumes responsibility to collect the debt.

Key Takeaways

• Debt assignment is a transfer of debt, and all the associated rights and obligations, from a creditor to a third party (often a debt collector).
• The company assigning the debt may do so to improve its liquidity and/or to reduce its risk exposure.
• The debtor must be notified when a debt is assigned so they know who to make payments to and where to send them.
• Third-party debt collectors are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), a federal law overseen by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

How Debt Assignments Work

When a creditor lends an individual or business money, it does so with the confidence that the capital it lends out—as well as the interest payments charged for the privilege—is repaid in a timely fashion. The lender , or the extender of credit , will wait to recoup all the money owed according to the conditions and timeframe laid out in the contract.

In certain circumstances, the lender may decide it no longer wants to be responsible for servicing the loan and opt to sell the debt to a third party instead. Should that happen, a Notice of Assignment (NOA) is sent out to the debtor , the recipient of the loan, informing them that somebody else is now responsible for collecting any outstanding amount. This is referred to as a debt assignment.

The debtor must be notified when a debt is assigned to a third party so that they know who to make payments to and where to send them. If the debtor sends payments to the old creditor after the debt has been assigned, it is likely that the payments will not be accepted. This could cause the debtor to unintentionally default.

When a debtor receives such a notice, it's also generally a good idea for them to verify that the new creditor has recorded the correct total balance and monthly payment for the debt owed. In some cases, the new owner of the debt might even want to propose changes to the original terms of the loan. Should this path be pursued, the creditor is obligated to immediately notify the debtor and give them adequate time to respond.

The debtor still maintains the same legal rights and protections held with the original creditor after a debt assignment.

Special Considerations

Third-party debt collectors are subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The FDCPA, a federal law overseen by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), restricts the means and methods by which third-party debt collectors can contact debtors, the time of day they can make contact, and the number of times they are allowed to call debtors.

If the FDCPA is violated, a debtor may be able to file suit against the debt collection company and the individual debt collector for damages and attorney fees within one year. The terms of the FDCPA are available for review on the FTC's website .

Benefits of Debt Assignment

There are several reasons why a creditor may decide to assign its debt to someone else. This option is often exercised to improve liquidity  and/or to reduce risk exposure. A lender may be urgently in need of a quick injection of capital. Alternatively, it might have accumulated lots of high-risk loans and be wary that many of them could default . In cases like these, creditors may be willing to get rid of them swiftly for pennies on the dollar if it means improving their financial outlook and appeasing worried investors. At other times, the creditor may decide the debt is too old to waste its resources on collections, or selling or assigning it to a third party to pick up the collection activity. In these instances, a company would not assign their debt to a third party.

Criticism of Debt Assignment

The process of assigning debt has drawn a fair bit of criticism, especially over the past few decades. Debt buyers have been accused of engaging in all kinds of unethical practices to get paid, including issuing threats and regularly harassing debtors. In some cases, they have also been charged with chasing up debts that have already been settled.

Federal Trade Commission. " Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ." Accessed June 29, 2021.

Federal Trade Commission. " Debt Collection FAQs ." Accessed June 29, 2021.

• Terms of Service
• Editorial Policy
• Privacy Policy

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

Catherine phillips.

PSL Principal Associate

It's the day of completion; security is taken, assignments are completed and funds move. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief. At this point, no-one wants to create unnecessary paperwork - not even the lawyers! Notices of assignment are, in some circumstances, optional. However, in other transactions they could be crucial to a lender's enforcement strategy. In the article below, we have given you the facts you need to consider when deciding whether or not you need to serve notice of assignment.

What issues are there with serving notice of assignment?

Assignments are useful tools for adding flexibility to banking transactions. They enable the transfer of one party's rights under a contract to a new party (for example, the right to receive an income stream or a debt) and allow security to be taken over intangible assets which might be unsuitable targets for a fixed charge. A lender's security net will often include assignments over contracts (such as insurance or material contracts), intellectual property rights, investments or receivables.

An assignment can be a legal assignment or an equitable assignment. If a legal assignment is required, the assignment must comply with a set of formalities set out in s136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which include the requirement to give notice to the contract counterparty.

The main difference between legal and equitable assignments (other than the formalities required to create them) is that with a legal assignment, the assignee can usually bring an action against the contract counterparty in its own name following assignment. However, with an equitable assignment, the assignee will usually be required to join in proceedings with the assignor (unless the assignee has been granted specific powers to circumvent that). That may be problematic if the assignor is no longer available or interested in participating.

Why should we serve a notice of assignment?

The legal status of the assignment may affect the credit scoring that can be given to a particular class of assets. It may also affect a lender's ability to effect part of its exit strategy if that strategy requires the lender to be able to deal directly with the contract counterparty.

The case of General Nutrition Investment Company (GNIC) v Holland and Barrett International Ltd and another (H&B) provides an example of an equitable assignee being unable to deal directly with a contract counterparty as a result of a failure to provide a notice of assignment.

The case concerned the assignment of a trade mark licence to GNIC . The other party to the licence agreement was H&B. H&B had not received notice of the assignment. GNIC tried to terminate the licence agreement for breach by serving a notice of termination. H&B disputed the termination. By this point in time the original licensor had been dissolved and so was unable to assist.

At a hearing of preliminary issues, the High Court held that the notices of termination served by GNIC , as an equitable assignee, were invalid, because no notice of the assignment had been given to the licensee. Although only a High Court decision, this follows a Court of Appeal decision in the Warner Bros Records Inc v Rollgreen Ltd case, which was decided in the context of the attempt to exercise an option.

In both cases, an equitable assignee attempted to exercise a contractual right that would change the contractual relationship between the parties (i.e. by terminating the contractual relationship or exercising an option to extend the term of a licence). The judge in GNIC felt that "in each case, the counterparty (the recipient of the relevant notice) is entitled to see that the potential change in his contractual position is brought about by a person who is entitled, and whom he can see to be entitled, to bring about that change".

In a security context, this could hamper the ability of a lender to maximise the value of the secured assets but yet is a constraint that, in most transactions, could be easily avoided.

Why not serve notice?

Sometimes it's just not necessary or desirable. For example:

• If security is being taken over a large number of low value receivables or contracts, the time and cost involved in giving notice may be disproportionate to the additional value gained by obtaining a legal rather than an equitable assignment.
• If enforcement action were required, the equitable assignee typically has the option to join in the assignor to any proceedings (if it could not be waived by the court) and provision could be made in the assignment deed for the assignor to assist in such situations. Powers of attorney are also typically granted so that a lender can bring an action in the assignor's name.
• Enforcement is often not considered to be a significant issue given that the vast majority of assignees will never need to bring claims against the contract counterparty.

Care should however, be taken in all circumstances where the underlying contract contains a ban on assignment, as the contract counterparty would not have to recognise an assignment that is made in contravention of that ban. Furthermore, that contravention in itself may trigger termination and/or other rights in the assigned contract, that could affect the value of any underlying security.

What about acknowledgements of notices?

A simple acknowledgement of service of notice is simply evidence of the notice having been received. However, these documents often contain commitments or assurances by the contract counterparty which increase their value to the assignee.

Best practice for serving notice of assignment

Each transaction is different and the weighting given to each element of the security package will depend upon the nature of the debt and the borrower's business. The service of a notice of assignment may be a necessity or an optional extra. In each case, the question of whether to serve notice is best considered with your advisers at the start of a transaction to allow time for the lender's priorities to be highlighted to the borrowers and captured within the documents.

For further advice on serving notice of assignment please contact Kirsty Barnes or Catherine Phillips  from our Banking & Finance team.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Related services

Factoring , Newsletters

THE NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: A REFRESHER COURSE

Allen J. Heffner Nov 20, 2023

The Notice of Assignment is probably the single most important document for a Factor. Understanding what needs to be included in the Notice of Assignment, how to send it, and who to send it to can mean the difference between getting paid and not. Despite the fact that every Factor is (or should be) familiar with legal requirements relating to Notices of Assignment, we still find that many of our factoring clients who end up in litigation make basic mistakes relating to their Notices of Assignment. The article focuses on what information needs to be included in the Notice, who the Notice should be sent to, and how the Notice should be delivered.

What needs to be included in the Notice of Assignment?

To be effective, there is certain information that must be included in the Notice of Assignment. The Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) requires that the notice must:

• Notify the Account Debtor that the amount due or to become due has been assigned;
• Notify the Account Debtor that payment is to be made to the Factor;
• Reasonably identify the rights assigned; and
• Be signed by the Factor or its client.

The Notice of Assignment should also include a remittance address so the Account Debtor is informed how and in what manner the Factor should be paid.

Additionally, while not explicitly required under the current version of the UCC, Factors should include language in their Notice of Assignment that: (i) the Client has assigned all of its present and future accounts receivable to Factor; (ii) the Factor holds a first priority security interest in all of the client’s accounts receivable; and (iii) all payments owing to the client must be paid to the Factor.

Who should the Notice of Assignment be sent to?

Notices of Assignment should not be sent directly to individuals with an Account Debtor. Sending the Notice to a specific individual may lead to issues relating to the authority of that individual to receive documents on behalf of the Account Debtor. Moreover, Factors that direct Notices of Assignment directly to individuals open themselves up to arguments that the Notices of Assignment was not properly delivered. For instance, our clients that have sent Notices of Assignment to individuals have ended up in situations where the individual to whom the Notice of Assignment was addressed no longer worked with the Account Debtor or the individual was located at a different office and the Notice of Assignment was not sent to the proper location. To be safe and to avoid unnecessary issues, Factors should send the Notice of Assignment to the Account Debtor’s accounts payable department.

Additionally, some states have specialized definitions for what constitutes “notice” on behalf of a company. If there is any question as to where a Notice of Assignment should be sent, Factors should check with their attorney to determine where these should be sent.

How should the Notice of Assignment be delivered?

The crucial issue for the enforceability of a Notice of Assignment is proof of receipt by the Account Debtor, not proof of delivery. Therefore, it is good business practice to send the Notice of Assignment either certified mail or other method that provides for proof of delivery.

Many of our clients have asked about whether it is proper to deliver the Notice of Assignment via e-mail asking the Account Debtor to confirm receipt or with “read receipts” turned on. Some Factors prefer this method because it is more cost efficient.

While sending Notices of Assignment via e-mail is enforceable, we would not recommend it as a general business practice. Sending the Notice in this manner requires delivering the Notice to a specific individual, which we have discussed above can be problematic. Sometimes officers and directors of companies have assistants or other personnel manage their e-mail accounts, raising the possibility that the individual to whom the Notice was sent, never saw the e-mail, even though the e-mail was “read.”

Last, there is no requirement that the Notice be signed by the Account Debtor and returned to the Factor. Often, we see our client’s Notice include a “confirmation of receipt” line for the Account Debtor to sign and return. Sometimes, the Factor will have proof of delivery to the Account Debtor but the Notice was not signed and returned by the Account Debtor. This adds unnecessary ambiguity as to whether the Notice was actually received by the Account Debtor. Therefore, we instruct our clients not to include such requests for proof of receipt.

Who should send the Notice of Assignment?

Some of our clients that have had bad experiences with Account Debtors after delivering a Notice of Assignment have chosen to have their Client be the one to deliver the Notice of Assignment. There is no legal requirement as to whether the Factor or the Client is the correct party to deliver the Notice of Assignment. However, we recommend the Factor be the one to deliver the Notice of Assignment. This way, the Factor is in complete control of the contents of the Notice of Assignment, how it is delivered, and receives confirmation of its delivery. We have been in situations in which the Factor allowed the Client to deliver the Notice of Assignment, but the Client did not deliver the Notice of Assignment in accordance with the law, leading to avoidable litigation.

Should a Factor respond to an Account Debtors questions regarding a Notice of Assignment?

Absolutely, yes. If requested by an Account Debtor, pursuant to the UCC, a Factor must furnish reasonable proof of the assignment for the Notice of Assignment to be valid. Too often we see situations in which requests are made or questions are posed by Account Debtors that the Factor ignores, thinking that because the Account Debtor received the Notice of Assignment, nothing else needs to be done. The Factor should respond to the Account Debtor and provide reasonable proof of the assignment. These communications can also provide invaluable insight as to the relationship between the client and the Account Debtor, how and when payments will be made, and can provide the Account Debtor a sense of trust with the Factor.

A Notice of Assignment is crucial for Factors because it provides legal protection, establishes priority of interest, prevents confusion, facilitates legal recourse, and enables effective communication with Account Debtors. Without this notice, Factors may encounter difficulties in asserting their rights and collecting payments from Account Debtors, potentially jeopardizing the financial transaction.

Bruce Loren and Allen Heffner of the Loren & Kean Law Firm are based in Palm Beach Gardens and Fort Lauderdale. For over 25 years, Mr. Loren has focused his practice on construction law and factoring law.  Mr. Loren has achieved the title of “Certified in Construction Law” by the Florida Bar. The Firm represents factoring companies in a wide range of industries, including construction, regarding all aspects of litigation and dispute resolution. Mr. Loren and Mr. Heffner can be reached at [email protected] or [email protected] or 561-615-5701

Bruce E. Loren · Michael I. Kean · Allen J. Heffner · Kyle W. Ohlenschlaeger · Frank Sardinha, III · Lucia E. DeFilippo

Newsletters & Media

Testimonials

Press Releases Privacy Policy Terms of Use

© 2022 All Rights Reserved

• Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

• In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
• In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
• Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

Necessary cookies . These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on.

Analytics and other third-party cookies . We would like to use analytics and limited other third-party cookies to improve our website and your experience using it. These cookies collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. If you are happy to allow us to use these cookies, please click “all cookies” or you can turn individual cookies on by clicking "manage cookies". You can change your preferences at any time by visiting our cookie details page.

We use cookies on our website, details of which are set out below.

Necessary cookies

These are cookies which are necessary for the operation of our website. We set these cookies so that they are always on, although you may be able to disable these cookies via your browser if you wish. Please note that if these cookies are disabled then you may not be able to use some or all of the functionality of our website.

Ideally over time we would like to be able to improve our website and your experience using it. We would like to deploy analytics cookies to enable us to do this, which would collect and report information to us about your browsing activity on our website. However, we will only use these cookies with your consent and these cookies are switched off until you opt to turn them on. Click here for a full list of analytics cookies used on our website.

Third-party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on our website.

Search our site

§ 9-406. DISCHARGE OF ACCOUNT DEBTOR; NOTIFICATION OF ASSIGNMENT; IDENTIFICATION AND PROOF OF ASSIGNMENT; RESTRICTIONS ON ASSIGNMENT OF ACCOUNTS, CHATTEL PAPER, PAYMENT INTANGIBLES, AND PROMISSORY NOTES INEFFECTIVE.

(a) [Discharge of account debtor; effect of notification.]

Subject to subsections (b) through (i), an account debtor on an account , chattel paper , or a payment intangible may discharge its obligation by paying the assignor until, but not after, the account debtor receives a notification, authenticated by the assignor or the assignee, that the amount due or to become due has been assigned and that payment is to be made to the assignee. After receipt of the notification, the account debtor may discharge its obligation by paying the assignee and may not discharge the obligation by paying the assignor.

(b) [When notification ineffective.]

Subject to subsection (h), notification is ineffective under subsection (a):

(1) if it does not reasonably identify the rights assigned;

(2) to the extent that an agreement between an account debtor and a seller of a payment intangible limits the account debtor's duty to pay a person other than the seller and the limitation is effective under law other than this article; or

(3) at the option of an account debtor, if the notification notifies the account debtor to make less than the full amount of any installment or other periodic payment to the assignee, even if:

(A) only a portion of the account , chattel paper , or payment intangible has been assigned to that assignee;

(B) a portion has been assigned to another assignee; or

(C) the account debtor knows that the assignment to that assignee is limited.

(c) [Proof of assignment.]

Subject to subsection (h), if requested by the account debtor , an assignee shall seasonably furnish reasonable proof that the assignment has been made. Unless the assignee complies, the account debtor may discharge its obligation by paying the assignor, even if the account debtor has received a notification under subsection (a).

(d) [Term restricting assignment generally ineffective.]

Except as otherwise provided in subsection (e) and Sections 2A-303 and 9-407 , and subject to subsection (h), a term in an agreement between an account debtor and an assignor or in a promissory note is ineffective to the extent that it:

(1) prohibits, restricts, or requires the consent of the account debtor or person obligated on the promissory note to the assignment or transfer of, or the creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in, the account , chattel paper , payment intangible , or promissory note; or

(2) provides that the assignment or transfer or the creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of the security interest may give rise to a default, breach, right of recoupment, claim, defense, termination, right of termination, or remedy under the account , chattel paper , payment intangible , or promissory note .

(e) [Inapplicability of subsection (d) to certain sales.]

Subsection (d) does not apply to the sale of a payment intangible or promissory note .

(f) [Legal restrictions on assignment generally ineffective.]

Except as otherwise provided in Sections 2A-303 and 9-407 and subject to subsections (h)and (i), a rule of law, statute, or regulation that prohibits, restricts, or requires the consent of a government, governmental body or official, or account debtor to the assignment or transfer of, or creation of a security interest in, an account or chattel paper is ineffective to the extent that the rule of law, statute, or regulation:

(1) prohibits, restricts, or requires the consent of the government, governmental body or official, or account debtor to the assignment or transfer of, or the creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in the account or chattel paper ; or

(2) provides that the creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of the security interest may give rise to a default, breach, right of recoupment, claim, defense, termination, right of termination, or remedy under the account or chattel paper .

(g) [Subsection (b)(3) not waivable.]

Subject to subsection (h), an account debtor may not waive or vary its option under subsection (b)(3).

(h) [Rule for individual under other law.]

This section is subject to law other than this article which establishes a different rule for an account debtor who is an individual and who incurred the obligation primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.

(i) [Inapplicability to health-care-insurance receivable.]

This section does not apply to an assignment of a health-care-insurance receivable .

(j) [Section prevails over specified inconsistent law.]

This section prevails over any inconsistent provisions of the following statutes, rules, and regulations:

[List here any statutes, rules, and regulations containing provisions inconsistent with this section.]

• More Blog Popular
• Who's Who Legal
• Instruct Counsel
• My newsfeed
• Save & file
• View original
• Follow Please login to follow content.

add to folder:

• My saved (default)

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

It's the day of completion; security is taken, assignments are completed and funds move. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief. At this point, no-one wants to create unnecessary paperwork – not even the lawyers! Notices of assignment are, in some circumstances, optional. However, in other transactions they could be crucial to a lender's enforcement strategy. In the article below, we have given you the facts you need to consider when deciding whether or not you need to serve notice.

What's the issue?

Assignments are useful tools for adding flexibility to banking transactions. They enable the transfer of one party's rights under a contract to a new party (for example, the right to receive an income stream or a debt) and allow security to be taken over intangible assets which might be unsuitable targets for a fixed charge. A lender's security net will often include assignments over contracts (such as insurance or material contracts), intellectual property rights, investments or receivables.

An assignment can be a legal assignment or an equitable assignment. If a legal assignment is required, the assignment must comply with a set of formalities set out in s136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which include the requirement to give notice to the contract counterparty.

The main difference between legal and equitable assignments (other than the formalities required to create them) is that with a legal assignment, the assignee can usually bring an action against the contract counterparty in its own name following assignment. However, with an equitable assignment, the assignee will usually be required to join in proceedings with the assignor (unless the assignee has been granted specific powers to circumvent that). That may be problematic if the assignor is no longer available or interested in participating.

Why should we serve a notice of assignment?

The legal status of the assignment may affect the credit scoring that can be given to a particular class of assets. It may also affect a lender's ability to effect part of its exit strategy if that strategy requires the lender to be able to deal directly with the contract counterparty.

The case of General Nutrition Investment Company (GNIC) v Holland and Barrett International Ltd and another (H&B) provides an example of an equitable assignee being unable to deal directly with a contract counterparty as a result of a failure to provide a notice of assignment. The case concerned the assignment of a trade mark licence to GNIC. The other party to the licence agreement was H&B. H&B had not received notice of the assignment. GNIC tried to terminate the licence agreement for breach by serving a notice of termination. H&B disputed the termination. By this point in time the original licensor had been dissolved and so was unable to assist. At a hearing of preliminary issues, the High Court held that the notices of termination served by GNIC, as an equitable assignee, were invalid, because no notice of the assignment had been given to the licensee. Although only a High Court decision, this follows a Court of Appeal decision in the Warner Bros Records Inc v Rollgreen Ltd case, which was decided in the context of the attempt to exercise an option.

In both cases, an equitable assignee attempted to exercise a contractual right that would change the contractual relationship between the parties (i.e. by terminating the contractual relationship or exercising an option to extend the term of a licence). The judge in GNIC felt that "in each case, the counterparty (the recipient of the relevant notice) is entitled to see that the potential change in his contractual position is brought about by a person who is entitled, and whom he can see to be entitled, to bring about that change".

In a security context, this could hamper the ability of a lender to maximise the value of the secured assets but yet is a constraint that, in most transactions, could be easily avoided.

Why not serve notice?

Sometimes it's just not necessary or desirable. For example:

• If security is being taken over a large number of low value receivables or contracts, the time and cost involved in giving notice may be disproportionate to the additional value gained by obtaining a legal rather than an equitable assignment.
• If enforcement action were required, the equitable assignee typically has the option to join in the assignor to any proceedings (if it could not be waived by the court) and provision could be made in the assignment deed for the assignor to assist in such situations. Powers of attorney are also typically granted so that a lender can bring an action in the assignor's name.
• Enforcement is often not considered to be a significant issue given that the vast majority of assignees will never need to bring claims against the contract counterparty.

Care should however, be taken in all circumstances where the underlying contract contains a ban on assignment, as the contract counterparty would not have to recognise an assignment that is made in contravention of that ban. Furthermore, that contravention in itself may trigger termination and/or other rights in the assigned contract, that could affect the value of any underlying security.

What about acknowledgements of notices?

A simple acknowledgement of service of notice is simply evidence of the notice having been received. However, these documents often contain commitments or assurances by the contract counterparty which increase their value to the assignee.

Each transaction is different and the weighting given to each element of the security package will depend upon the nature of the debt and the borrower's business. The service of a notice of assignment may be a necessity or an optional extra. In each case, the question of whether to serve notice is best considered with your advisers at the start of a transaction to allow time for the lender's priorities to be highlighted to the borrowers and captured within the documents.

Filed under

• United Kingdom
• Capital Markets
• Gowling WLG
• High Court of Justice (England & Wales)

Popular articles from this firm

Easements – can a right of way be diverted by the owner of the burdened land *, the king's speech and the living sector - the key updates *, the basics: what does "without prejudice" mean and when do i need to use it *, what is the terrorism (protection of premises) bill *, the basics: what is set off and when does the right to set off arise *.

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected] .

Related practical resources PRO

• Checklist Checklist: Running an effective board meeting (UK)
• How-to guide How-to guide: Corporate governance in financial services (UK)
• Checklist Checklist: Pre-appointment checks to consider when selecting an appointed representative (UK)

Related research hubs

• Case studies
• Testimonials
• Litigation & Dispute Resolution
• Commercial Law
• Employment Law
• Professional Negligence
• Data Breach & Cyber
• Private Client
• Business owners
• High-net worth individuals
• Group actions & professional negligence

Deed of Assignment and the Notice of Assignment -What is the Difference?

In this article, Richard Gray barrister takes a brief look at the differences between a Deed of Assignment and a Notice of Assignment and the effect of the assignment on the contracting party

At the end of 2020, Elysium Law were instructed to act for a significant number of clients in relation to claims made by a company known as Felicitas Solutions Ltd (an Isle of Man Company) for recovery of loans which had been assigned out of various trust companies following loan planning entered into by various employees/contractors.

Following our detailed response, as to which please see the article on our website written by my colleague Ruby Keeler-Williams , the threatened litigation by way of debt claims seem to disappear. It is important to note that the original loans had been assigned by various Trustees to Felicitas, by reason of which, Felicitas stood in the shoes of the original creditor, which allowed the threatened action to be pursued.

After a period of inertia, Our Clients, as well as others, have been served with demand letters by a new assignee known as West 28 th Street Ltd . Accompanying the demand letters is a Notice of Assignment, by reason of which the Assignee has informed the alleged debtor of the Assignees right to enforce the debt.

Following two conferences we held last week and a number of phone call enquiries which we have received, we have been asked to comment upon the purport and effect of the Notice of Assignment, which the alleged debtors have received. Questions such as what does this mean (relating to the content) but more importantly is the ‘Notice’ valid?

Here I want to look briefly at the differences between the two documents.

There is no need for payment to make the assignment valid and therefore it is normally created by Deed.

 The creation of a legal assignment is governed by Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925:

136 Legal assignments of things in action.

(1)Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice—

(a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action;

(b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and

(c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor:

Some of the basic requirements for a legal assignment are;

• The assignment must not be subject to conditions.
• The rights to be assigned must not relate to only part of a debt, or other legal chose in action.
• The assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor.
• The other party or parties to the agreement must be given notice of the assignment.

Notice of assignment

To create a legal assignment, section 136 requires that express notice in writing of the assignment must be given to the other contracting party (the debtor).

Notice must be in writing

Section 136 of the LPA 1925 requires “express notice in writing” to be given to the other original contracting party (or parties).

 Must the notice take any particular form?

The short answer is no. Other than the requirement that it is in writing, there is no prescribed form for the notice of assignment or its contents. However, common sense suggests that the notice must clearly identify the agreement concerned.

Can we  challenge the Notice?

No. You can challenge the validity of the assignment assignment by ‘attacking the Deed, which must conform with Section 136. In this specific case, the Notice sent by West 28 th Street in itself is valid. Clearly, any claims made must be effected by a compliant Deed and it is that which will require detailed consideration before any right to claim under the alleged debt is considered.

Can I demand sight of the assignment agreement

On receiving a notice of assignment, you may seek to satisfy yourself that the assignment has in fact taken place. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that this is a valid concern, but that does not give an automatic right to require sight of the assignment agreement.

In Van Lynn Developments Limited v Pelias Construction Co [1969]1QB 607  Lord  Denning said:

“After receiving the notice, the debtor will be entitled, of course, to require a sight of the assignment so as to be satisfied that it is valid…”

The Court of Appeal subsequently confirmed this  stating the contracting party is entitled to satisfy itself that a valid absolute assignment has taken place, so that it can be confident the assignee can give it a good discharge of its obligations

The important document is the Deed of Assignment, which sets out the rights assigned by the Assignor. The Notice of Assignment is simply a communication that there has been an assignment. The deed is governed by Section 136 of the LP 1925. It should be possible to obtain a copy of the Deed prior to any action taken in respect of it.

For more information on the claims by West 28 th Street or if advice is needed on the drafting of a Deed, then please call us on 0151-328-1968 or visit www.elysium-law.com .

Related news

Get in touch

Bankruptcy & Insolvency News SLF Lawyers News Is Your Notice Assignment of Debt Valid? May 25, 2020

A creditor (assignor) can transfer their rights to receive and seek payment of a debt to a third party (assignee). Once the transfer of their rights has occurred, the assignor can then seek payment of that debt from the debtor. Once assigned, the assignee has the legal right to such debt and has the power to give a good discharge of it  without the concurrence of the assignor. [1]

There are two factors that an assignee must consider before attempting to recover a debt from a debtor:

SERVICE OF THE NOTICE

The assignee must issue a notice of assignment of debt (“ Notice ”) to the debtor at the debtors last known residential address. This is where the confusion and issues around the service of the Notice can occur by the debtor. Generally, a bank will assign the debt to a collection company after years of attempting collection/locating debtor. It is at this stage that the debtor may have moved residential addresses and may not receive the Notice. The assignee is required to comply with section 347 of the  Property Law Act 1974  (Qld), whereby service of any notices must be made to the person’s last known place of abode.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

An assignee must ensure that they are within the statue of limitations to legally commence recovery of the debt. The purpose of a statute of limitations is to limit the delay for creditors to take action against a debtor for outstanding monies. The limitation period for a contract debt is six (6) years, calculated from the point of breach. Where an assignee has been assigned a debt, the point of breach will commence from the date the debt was assigned to the assignee. However, in some circumstances, where a debtor acknowledges the debt or makes a payment in respect of the debt, the point of breach starts from the date of acknowledgement or the last payment made by the debtor.

SLF Lawyers specialises in legal recoveries and various enforcement options and can assist in providing advice with respect to ensuring the Notice has been issued correctly.

If you have any questions, please contact Partner – Mark Smith of SLF Lawyers Brisbane on (07) 3839 8011.

PRACTICE AREAS

• Building & Construction
• Commercial Litigation
• Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Estate Planning & Disputes
• Commercial Law
• Franchising & Licencing
• Bankruptcy & Insolvency
• Insurance Law
• Property Law
• Workplace Relations & Safety
• Banking & Finance

© 2022 SLF LAWYERS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | LIABILITY LIMITED BY A SCHEME APPROVED UNDER PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS LEGISLATION | DESIGNED AND BUILT BY NO STANDING

• Need Help? Get Support
• Login/Register

Deeds of Assignment of a Debt – Your Top Questions Answered

Posted by david cammack on february 7, 2020.

Home / Blog / Deeds of Assignment of a Debt – Your Top Questions Answered

( Revised for 2023. )

Do you want to know more about what a deed of assignment of a debt is, if you need one, or what to include in it? If so, our blog article has all the answers. So today, we are answering the top questions from the Internet about deeds of assignment of a debt.

1. Can a debt be assigned? How do I assign a debt in the UK?

Yes. Banks regularly buy and sell debts. If you are a creditor, then you can do so too. But you need to do so in writing. A deed of assignment of a debt is the document to use for this. You would need to assign the whole of a debt, as you cannot assign only part of it. The debtor cannot assign the debt to someone else unless the creditor agrees and you would then do this via a deed of novation.

2. What is an assignment of a loan?

This means the same thing as an assignment of a debt. It is always the right to receive repayment of the debt or loan that you are assigning.

3. What is a deed of assignment of a debt?

This is a legal document that transfers the ownership of the debt to another person. By ‘ownership’ we mean the right to receive repayment of that debt from the same original debtor or borrower.

4. What does assignment of debt mean?

The assignment of a debt will mean that the original debtor or borrower now owes the debt to a different creditor. So the debtor will now need to repay that debt to a new person, because you have transferred the debt.

5. Is a deed of assignment of a debt a legal document?

If prepared correctly, yes, a deed of assignment is a legally-binding document. In order to make the assignment legally binding on the debtor, the creditor should give notice of the assignment to the debtor. Our template includes a notice of the assignment of the debt, so you can complete it and send it to the debtor.

6. What is a notice of assignment of a debt? What do I need to do to give notice of an assignment of a debt?

Once you have assigned a debt, then you need to give the debtor notice of the transfer of the debt. Otherwise, how will they know to repay the new owner of the debt? Ideally, the deed of assignment of debt will mention this and include a form for the notice. (Legalo’s template does.) Wikipedia explains why such notice is necessary here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_in_Dearle_v_Hall#Criticisms .

7. How do you draft a deed of assignment of a debt?

If you require this deed, then the quickest way to get one is with a template from Legalo. Find our great template here: just click on this link .

8. What are the contents of a deed of assignment of a debt?

If you click on this link and scroll down to the section about the Guide to the template, then you will see the contents of our template for a deed of assignment of a debt.

9. Who can prepare a deed of assignment of a debt? Can a non-lawyer prepare a deed of assignment of a debt?

A non-lawyer can use any of the documents we sell as templates. So this includes a deed of assignment of a debt.

10. Does a deed of assignment of a debt need to be signed by both parties?

The parties who do need to sign it are (a) the original creditor and (b) the one buying (or otherwise taking) the debt from the original creditor. The debtor does not sign it.

11. Does a deed of assignment of a debt need to be witnessed?

All deeds need to be signed correctly with an adult witness, preferably one who none of the persons signing are related to.

12. Does an assignment of debt need to be a deed?

If there is no price being paid for the purchase of the debt, then the document does need to be a deed, in order to ensure it is legally binding. Otherwise, technically it does not need to be prepared and signed as a deed, but generally it is better to do it as a deed in case there is any doubt. Legalo’s template is set up to be signed as a deed.

13. Does a deed of assignment of a debt need to be registered?

Not unless you have secured the debt, for example on a property in the UK at the Land Registry. In such a case, then you would need to register the transfer of the security separately at the Land Registry. You do not register the assignment of the debt itself.

14. How long does a deed of assignment of a debt take to draft?

Legalo’s template makes it easy, so you should only need a few minutes to draft your deed of assignment.

15. How much does a deed of assignment of a debt cost? How much does a notice of assignment of a debt cost? How much do lawyers charge for deed of assignment of a debt?

Our template for a deed of assignment includes a notice of assignment and costs only £24.95. Solicitors would charge an estimated £500 plus VAT for one, so ours represents a significant cost saving.

In just a few minutes yours can be ready. What’s more, Legalo’s templates each come with a guide to make it clear how to complete it. We also provide a free helpline just in case you need any extra assistance to use it. So it could not be easier.

So if you need one, you know where to find it.

Get Legal & Compliance tips straight to your inbox, free!

Assignment Involves Transfer of Rights to Collect Outstanding Debts

Can a person who is owed money transfer the right to collect to another person, debt can be bought and sold or otherwise transferred from a creditor who is owed money to another person who then becomes the assignee creditor with the right to collect the outstanding debt., understanding what constitutes as a legally binding assignment of creditor rights to collect a debt.

Right to Collect on Debts

Within the decision of Clark v. Werden , 2011 ONCA 619 the Court of Appeal confirmed the existence of the right to transfer debts as an assignment in accordance to the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. C.34 , which prescribes the various requirements when a creditor transfers ownership of rights involving monies owed, among other things. Specifically, the Court of Appeal stated:

Clark v. Werden , 2011 ONCA 619 at paragraph 13

[13]   The ability to assign a debt or legal chose in action is codified in s. 53 of the  Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , which provides that a debt is assignable subject to the equities between the original debtor and creditor and reads as follows:

53 (1) Any absolute assignment made on or after the 31st day of December, 1897, by writing under the hand of the assignor, not purporting to be by way of charge only, of any debt or other legal chose in action of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to receive or claim such debt or chose in action is effectual in law, subject to all equities that would have been entitled to priority over the right of the assignee if this section had not been enacted, to pass and transfer the legal right to such debt or chose in action from the date of such notice, and all legal and other remedies for the same, and the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor.

Partially Assigned

It is notable that the statute makes mention of " absolute assignment " without clearly addressing the rights and method of treatment for a partial assignment of a debt.  In this circumstance, where more than one assignee may obtain or assume the rights of the creditor (or earlier assignee), a partial assignee is required to join all assignees when bringing legal action against the debtor.  This view was stated by the Court of Appeal in  DiGuilo v. Boland , 1958 CanLII 92 where it was said:

DiGuilo v. Boland , 1958 CanLII 92

The main reason why an assignee of a part of a debt is required to join all parties interested in the debt in an action to recover the part assigned to him is in my opinion because the Court cannot adjudicate completely and finally without having such parties before it.  The absence of such parties might result in the debtor being subjected to future actions in respect of the same debt, and moreover might result in conflicting decisions being arrived at concerning such debt.

Failed Notice

Of potentially grave concern to creditors, and potentially with great relief to debtors, for an assignee to retain the right to pursue the debtor, express written notice of the assignment is required.  This requirement was stated in 1124980 Ontario Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Inco Ltd. , 2003 CanLII 45266  as part of the four part test to establish the right to pursue an assigned debt:

1124980 Ontario Inc.  v. Liberty Mutual , 2003 CanLII 45266 at paragraph 44

[44]   Accordingly, for there to be a valid legal assignment under  section 53(1) of the  CLPA , four requirements must be met:

a)  there must be debt or chose in action;

b)  the assignment must be absolute;

c)  the assignment must be written; and

d)  written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

Where there is a failure of notice, and therefore failure to comply with the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act , it is said that the right to assign fails in law; however, relief in equity, via an equitable assignment may be available to an assignee affected by failure of notice.  Generally, in equity, when failure of notice occurs, the assignee is unable, in law, to bring an action in the name of the assignee and may do so only in the name of the creditor; however, even in the absence of proper notice as results in failure of assignment in law, and failure ot enjoin the creditor in an action pursued as an equitable assignment, the court may remain prepared to waive such a requirement whereas such occurred in the matter of  Landmark Vehicle Leasing Corporation v. Mister Twister Inc. , 2015 ONCA 545 wherein it was stated:

Landmark v. Mister Twister , 2015 ONCA 545 at paragraphs 10 to 16

[10]    Section 53(1) requires “ express notice in writing ” to the debtor.  Although there is some ambiguity in her reasons, it would appear that the trial judge found that Mr.  Blazys had express notice of the assignment, but not notice in writing.  Ross Wemp Leasing therefore did not assign the leases to Landmark in law: see  80 Mornelle Properties Inc.  v. Malla Properties Ltd. , 2010 ONCA 850 (CanLII) , 327 D.L.R.  (4th) 361, at para.  22 .  Ross Wemp Leasing did, however, assign the leases to Landmark in equity.  An equitable assignment does not require any notice, let alone written notice:  Bercovitz Estate v. Avigdor , [1961] O.J.  No.  20 (C.A.), at paras.  16, 25.

[11]   The appellants, relying on  DiGuilo v. Boland , 1958 CanLII 92 (ON CA), [1958] O.R.  384 (C.A.), aff’d, [1961] S.C.C.A.  vii, argue that as the appellants did not have written notice of the assignment, Landmark could not sue on its own.  Instead, Landmark had to join Ross Wemp Leasing in the action.  The appellants argue that the failure to join Ross Wemp Leasing requires that the judgment below be set aside.

[12]    DiGuilo does in fact require that the assignor of a chose in action be joined in the assignee’s claim against the debtor when the debtor has not received written notice of the assignment.  The holding in DiGuilo tracks rule 5.03(3) of the  Rules of Civil Procedure , R.R.O.  1990, Reg.  194 : In a proceeding by the assignee of a debt or other chose in action, the assignor shall be joined as a party unless,

(a) the assignment is absolute and not by way of charge only; and

(b) notice in writing has been given to the person liable in respect of the debt or chose in action that it has been assigned to the assignee.  [Emphasis added.]

[13]   Yet the assignee’s failure to join the assignor does not affect the validity of the assignment or necessarily vitiate a judgment obtained by the assignee against the debtor.  Rule 5.03(6) reads:

The court may by order relieve against the requirement of joinder under this rule.

[14]   The joinder requirement is intended to guard the debtor against a possible second action by the assignor and to permit the debtor to pursue any remedies it may have against the assignor without initiating another action:  DiGuilo , at p.  395.  Where the assignee’s failure to join the assignor does not prejudice the debtor, the court may grant the relief in rule 5.03(6) : see  Gentra Canada Investments Inc.  v. Lipson , 2011 ONCA 331 (CanLII), 106 O.R.  (3d) 261, at paras.  59 - 65 , leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A.  No.  327.

[15]   In this case, the trial judge found that Mr.  Blazys, and effectively all of the appellants, gained actual notice of the lease assignments very shortly after the assignments were made and well before Landmark sued.  Armed with actual, albeit not written, notice of the assignment, the appellants could fully protect themselves against any prejudice from Landmark’s failure to join Ross Wemp Leasing.  Had the appellants seen any advantage in joining Ross Wemp Leasing, either to defend against Landmark’s claim or to advance a claim against Ross Wemp Leasing, the appellants could have moved for joinder under rule 5.03(4).  The appellants’ failure to bring a motion to add Ross Wemp Leasing speaks loudly to the absence of any prejudice caused by Landmark’s failure to join the assignor.

[16]   Ross Wemp Leasing perhaps should have been a party to the proceeding.  Landmark’s failure to join Ross Wemp Leasing, however, did not prejudice the appellants and should have had no impact on the trial judgment.  If requested, this court will make a  nunc pro tunc order relieving Landmark from the requirement of joining Ross Wemp Leasing in the action.

Summary Comment

The rights to collect on a debt can be sold and transferred from the original creditor to a substitute creditor or assignee who then takes on the rights of the original creditor.  Indeed, the selling and buying of individual debts, or debts within an entire portfolio debts is common within business.  The entire collection services industry is based on the concept of buying outstanding debt and then standing in the shoes of the original creditor and pursuing the payment of the debt.  Other forms of buying and selling debt includes mortgage swaps, among other things.

Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

Send a Message Directly to SFG Paralegal Services LLP

I definitely recommend SFG Paralegal Services. Samantha Glass was very warm and easy to talk too. She remained attentive and very supportive. She was available to me at her office and even responded to my calls at home. I recommend Samantha Glass ...

~ Carmela Sorbara

Just one word Amazing service! Dan always answered my questions promptly and I wouldn't have got what I wanted without him and his team! Thank you again for your amazing service!

~ Jonathan Ber

I spoke to Samantha in regard to a potential matter against me, and I was filled with anxiety and dread as I have never encountered such an issue before. As a law-abiding citizen, I just could not understand how this could happen to me. ...

~ Facebook

I retained Samantha on two related landlord and tenant matters. Samantha resolved the issues to my complete satisfaction. I highly recommend Samantha and SFG Paralegal Services.

~ Ira Smith

Samantha goes out of her way to support people even if they are not clients. Once you ARE a client you know you are in the best hands possible!

~ Tonie Ogilvie

Dan took time out of his busy day to come to my office and discuss matters with my partner and I as we both can't leave the office ... I'm looking forward to dealing with Dan and his team and I feel we are going to get 120% professional service.

~ Matthew Ber

A goal of SFG Paralegal Services LLP is to provide each client with noteworthy service in effort to earn client opinions that SFG Paralegal Services LLP is the best Paralegal in Richmond Hill, York Region, Guelph, Cambridge, and surrounding areas.

A goal of SFG Paralegal Services LLP is to provide each client with noteworthy service in effort to earn client opinions that SFG Paralegal Services LLP is the best Paralegal in Richmond Hill, Napanee, Aurora, Pickering, and surrounding areas.

SFG Paralegal Services LLP

10265 Yonge Street, Suite 200 Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 4Y7   P: (888) 398-0121 E: [email protected]

Business Hours:

09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM 09:00AM - 05:00PM Mon day : Tue sday : Wed nesday : Thu rsday : Fri day :

By appointment only.  Call for details. Messages may be left anytime.

Richmond Hill Windsor Stouffville Brampton Aurora Scarborough

Vaughan Hamilton Markham Toronto North York and near you.

• News and insights
• Training services

Assignment of debts, statutory demands and offsetting claims

It is not uncommon for a creditor (assignor) to transfer their right to receive payment of a debt (assignment) to a third party (assignee). The assignee will then seek payment from the debtor.

The assignee of the debt can issue to the debtor company a statutory demand for the payment of the debt if the debt exceeds the statutory minimum, which is currently $2,000.

For the assignee issuing the statutory demand, there will be threshold issues as to whether notice of the assignment has been given to the debtor and whether appropriate details of the assignment are contained in the statutory demand.

Assignee has the same rights and obligations as the assignor

The assignee of the debt takes the assignment subject to the rights and obligations of the assignor.

This was demonstrated in the recent decision of Mascarene Pty Ltd v Slater [2016] VSC 395 relating to a building dispute.

In Mascarene a judgment debt was assigned and the assignee issued a statutory demand.

The Court held that the assignee was not prevented from seeking payment of interest as it had the same rights as the assignor, as if the assignment had not taken place.

However, the assignee also took the assignment subject to the obligations that would have applied to the assignor in respect of the debt.

In seeking to set aside the statutory demand the debtor company claimed it had an offsetting claim against the assignor for reinstatement costs relating to building works.

Although the assignee was not a party to the building contract and not personally liable for the reinstatement costs, the debtor company was successful in claiming the setoff and reducing the amount of the statutory demand by the amount of the reinstatement costs.

It is clear that an offsetting claim cannot be sidestepped by assigning the debt.

The assignee of a debt receives the benefit of the debt subject to the rights of the assignor but also subject to the assignor’s obligations in respect of the debt.

A statutory demand can be issued in respect of an assigned debt however the assignment does not prevent the debtor company from disputing the existence or amount of the alleged debt or seeking to raise an offsetting claim.

If you would like more information about these issues, please contact Graham Roberts on +61 7 3231 2404.

Like this article? Share it via:

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please let us know.

Stay up to date with CGW

Subscribe to our interest lists to receive legal alerts, articles, event invitations and offers.

Key contacts

Areas of expertise

ACCC releases draft guidance for businesses engaging in sustainability collaborations

Belinda Winter named Most Influential Lawyer for 2024 by Australasian Lawyer

Podcast: TaxLand with Fletch and Sarah – Lessons from Quy – the importance of intention when assessing a person’s residency

Acknowledgment of country.

Cooper Grace Ward acknowledges and pays respect to the past, present and future Traditional Custodians and Elders of this nation and the continuation of cultural, spiritual and educational practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Quick Links

• Client hubs

Customer Service

• Global connections
• Online payments
• Security notice

Fast, accurate and flexible entities including companies, self-managed superannuation funds and trusts.

Connect with us

• Level 21/400 George Street, Brisbane, QLD Australia
• +61 7 3231 2444
• [email protected]
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Privacy collection statement
• CGW team login

Sequestration

• Debt Report

Hear how we helped June

• Scottish Based Firm
• 5 Local Offices
• Established over 25 Years
• Lower your Monthly Payments
• Write off a Proportion of your Debt

Hear how we helped Chris

Hear how we helped Jackie

Get your Free Report

• Overdraft Debts
• Store & Credit Card Debts
• Council Tax Arrears
• Mortgage & Rent Arrears
• Personal Tax Debts
• Car Payments
• County Court Judgments
• Utility Bills
• Payday Loans
• Other Common Debts
• Administration
• Company Voluntary Arrangement
• Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation
• Members’ Voluntary Liquidation
• Overdrawn Directors’ Loan Accounts
• Winding-up Petition
• Insolvency Practitioners
• Sheriff Officers
• Success Stories
• Local Offices

Home Visits

What is a Notice of Assignment?

Sharon McDougall - Updated - 22nd April 2024 - 2 minutes to read

Understanding a Notice of Assignment

A Notice of Assignment is used to inform debtors that a third party has ‘purchased’ their debt. The new company (assignee) takes over collection procedures, but can sometimes hire a debt collection agency to recover the money on their behalf.

There are two types of debt assignment:

• Legal Assignment
• Equitable Assignment

If a Legal Assignment has been made, part of the purchasing company’s obligations are to inform you of the situation via an official Notice of Assignment, and let you know that payment should be made to themselves rather than your former creditor.

Scotland Debt Calculator

Get a rough indication of what your repayments might be under each of our different debt solutions.

Your Total Debt

£0 - £5,000

£5,000 - £10,000

£10,000 - £20,000

Your Employment Status

I am employed

I am self-employed

I am unemployed

I am a student

I am retired

Your Total Monthly Income

£0 - £1,000

£1,000 - £2,000

£2,000 - £3,000

What can you pay monthly towards your debt?

£100 - £200

£200 - £300

What are Legal and Equitable Assignments?

The Law of Property Act, 1925, lays down the requirements for both types of assignment. The criteria for a Legal Assignment include:

• It must be made in writing (Deed of Assignment)
• Notification must be sent to the borrower (Notice of Assignment)
• The assignment must be absolute

Legal Assignment gives the assignee powers to enforce the debt, unlike an Equitable Assignment where the purchasing party is unable to take enforcement action in their own right.

Under an Equitable Assignment, only the amount owed is assigned, and not the original creditor’s rights and responsibilities.

What happens after a Notice of Assignment has been issued?

The Legal Assignment process ensures that all the rights and responsibilities of the original lender are adopted by the assignee. Sometimes the purchasing company has in-house collection procedures, or uses the services of a third party debt collection agency.

As far as your credit file is concerned, the company taking on the debt will notify the Credit Reference Agencies of any default once repayments have started. You’ll see a name-change on your credit record in respect to this debt. The previous company’s name should be removed, and any default will now be associated with the new creditor.

The assignee may decide to hire a debt collection agency to collect the debt in full, in which case you should respond quickly to phone calls and letters. The debt collection company may be open to negotiations for a repayment plan, rather than taking further action against you.

Are there any benefits for you if your debt is assigned?

If you were previously having difficulty in repaying your debt, you may find that the new creditor has more flexibility to freeze interest and charges, allowing you to pay off what is owed more quickly.

Agreeing a sustainable plan for repayment is in their interests as well as yours – they won’t need to take further action if you’re able to keep up the payments, and in this way receiving a Notice of Assignment can be a positive outcome.

Scotland Debt Solutions helps residents in Scotland to free themselves from debt . We offer advice and guidance on what to do if creditors are pursuing you for payment, and operate from five locations around Scotland. Call today for an initial meeting free-of-charge .

Sharon McDougall

Other Articles

9 practical tips for cutting your household expenses

We all want to save on our household bills and have more money in our pocket for the fun things in life. While bills are an unavoidable fact of life, here are some ways you can help to reduce them:

7 Advantages of using a Debt Arrangement Scheme to become debt-free

If you’re trying to deal with overwhelming amounts of debt, you may be eligible for the Debt Arrangement Scheme in Scotland.

10 steps to take now to improve your credit rating

If you are currently working on reducing the amount of debt you have, improving your credit score may not be at the top of your agenda.

Why Choose Us

Speak Direct With

A Qualified Adviser

We Don't Operate

Call Centres

5 Offices in Scotland

National Coverage

Ask us About

Fully Regulated Advisors

From a Reputable Firm

Helping Scots Get

Out of Debt Since 1989

We'll give you a call

Our Scottish based team can help advise you on your debt problems.

Useful Tools

Personalised Debt Report

Our personalised debt report will help you better understand your financial position and see where your money is going.

Instant Scheduled Call & WhatsApp

Arrange a call with an expert advisor at a time to suit you or contact our team via WhatsApp for immediate help and advice.

Find a Local Office

We have five offices located across Scotland. Find your nearest one here.

OUR SERVICES

We can help you with...

Sequestration is the Scottish version of bankruptcy and may be suitable for you if you do not have the money to pay back your debts

Trust Deeds in Scotland

A Trust Deed involves making a monthly contribution to your debts for up to four years. After this time any remaining debt included in the Trust Deed will not need to be paid.

Debt Arrangement Scheme (DAS)

A Debt Arrangement Scheme (DAS) lets you pay off your debt through a series of manageable instalments over a reasonable length of time.

Business Debts

Whether you are a sole trader or a limited company director, we can help you work through your current financial problems including money owed to HMRC

Our Insolvency Practitioners are regulated by ICAS or the IPA and our firm is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

Fees and Information: There are fees associated with our services. These will be fully explained before entering into any of the personal debt solutions referred to on this website. Full details of our fees and how these are charged are fully explained to you prior to you committing to any particular service.

This site uses cookies to monitor site performance and provide a more responsive and personalised experience. You must agree to our use of certain cookies. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please read our PRIVACY POLICY

Assignment of debts - take care with cross-referencing

• Using your device

In the recent High Court decision in Nicoll -v- Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch), the validity of an assignment of debts and the notice requirements is considered.

The High Court in this case considered whether a notice of assignment in relation to a debt, which mentioned an unverifiable date of assignment, was still valid and enforceable against the debtor. 

The debt in question originally arose between the debtor and the Co-operative Bank (Bank) and was evidenced in various facility letters between September 2010 and May 2013. A sum of over £10 million was advanced by the Bank to the debtor, and security was taken by the Bank in the form of charges over certain property. The overall balance was repayable by May 2015, but the debtor defaulted on the payment terms.

On 29 July 2016, the Bank assigned (or purported to assign) its debt and security to Promontoria. Both the Bank and Promontoria provided joint notice of the assignment in a single document to the debtor on 2 August 2016, with wording that the debt had been assigned ‘on and with effect from 29 July 2016’. There was no express reference to the date of the assignment or the assignment effective date, but rather this was defined by reference to the completion date in a related but unreferenced loan sale deed, so a more complicated analysis of a series of documents was required to reach the actual date of the assignment.

Promontoria proceeded to pursue the debtor for the debt by serving a statutory demand, dated 27 January 2017, and referred to the deed of assignment within its contents for payment of the outstanding debt.

The debtor’s attempt to have the statutory demand set aside was dismissed at the initial hearing, but the debtor received leave to appeal to the High Court on one issue. The debtor sought to challenge the effectiveness of the assignment of the debt based on an inability to work out from the notice of assignment whether the completion date for assignment had actually occurred. The debtor argued that:

• the case of WF Harrison -v- Burke [1956] 1 W.L.R. 419 is authority that a notice of assignment that gets the date of assignment wrong is invalid and, as a result, the assignment is not good against any debtor; and
• the date of assignment stated in the notice given to him was unverifiable, and therefore potentially wrong, rendering the notice invalid

The High Court agreed that the documentation disclosed by Promontoria to the debtor after the notice of assignment was insufficient to verify the date on which assignment had occurred, due to cross-referencing to other documents and there being conditions for completion. However, the High Court distinguished this case from WF Harrison -v- Burke case as the joint notice of assignment did not specify the date of the deed of assignment. It specified the date on which the assignment took effect, which is different. In WF Harrison -v- Burke , the notice of the assignment (given by the assignee only) specified the date of the assignment document (as opposed to the assignment itself) and got it wrong. In the present case, the notice of assignment was from both Promontoria and the Bank, i.e. assignor and assignee and made clear that the parties considered the assignment to be complete. In the circumstances, the debtor was not entitled to challenge Promontoria’s title to the debt.

The High Court accepted that while Promontoria had not produced evidence which in terms showed what the effective date of the assignment was, the joint notice clearly showed that both the Bank and Promontoria agreed and accepted that the assignment had taken place, and was sufficient evidence for the present purposes to be valid. The judge said: ‘The question is not whether Promontoria have provided a chain of proof through the wording of the documents. If that were the question then Promontoria would fail. The question is whether Promontoria has demonstrated that there is a completed assignment. I consider that it has. The crucial matter is the notice of assignment, against the background of the assignment document. The assignment documentation demonstrates a clear intention to assign even if the documents do not match up as they ought to. The notice of assignment provides clear evidence that the assignment has taken place.’ Accordingly, the High Court concluded that there was no arguable case that the assignment’s effective date had not occurred and considered that the assignment had been sufficiently demonstrated to be effective as against the debtor.

The High Court clearly held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the assignment effective date, referred to in the notice, could not be verified by the debtor. The judgment provides strong support for the proposition that it is not open to debtors to seek to find alleged defects in any assignment, as long as they have been properly notified of the assignment and most importantly that the assignor and assignee both agree that the assignment is valid. This is a welcome decision for all creditors.

Dispute resolution

Related insights, upholding arbitration agreements – commercial court grants final anti-suit injunctive relief in respect of russian proceedings.

23 July 2024

In the latest spate of decisions involving final anti-suit injunctions in respect of Russian proceedings, the Commercial Court has handed down another decision granting final anti-suit injunctive...

Court of Appeal considers scope of limitations on right to appeal under Arbitration Act 1996

22 July 2024

The Court of Appeal has concluded that it had jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a costs order made following a successful application under s.68 Arbitration Act 1996 (Act 1996) to set aside...

Court emphasises importance of contemporaneous records in contractual dispute

08 July 2024

In a contractual dispute, the Hong Kong District Court has ruled in favour of the Defendant, having found that the Defendant’s version of events was more credible. The Court reiterated the...

Privy Council pivots from Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal to decide winding up petition does not offend against arbitration agreement

24 June 2024

On an appeal from the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal of the British Virgin Islands, the Privy Council has decided that before a winding up application can be dismissed or set aside due to an...

Enforcing foreign judgments by winding up just got easier

13 June 2024

In a recent case High Court decision (Re a Company [2024] EWHC 1070 (Ch)), the issue of whether any limitation period applied to prevent the presentation of a winding up petition based upon a foreign

Hong Kong seated arbitrations benefit from Court-Ordered Interim Measures

12 June 2024

On 6 March 204, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) released its case statistics for 2023. These included statistics on applications under the “Arrangement Concerning Mutual...

We can help you resolve business disputes through negotiation, mediation, arbitration or litigation. Our aim is to achieve resolution quickly and efficiently and to minimise the impact of a dispute on your day-to-day operations.

Where possible, we try to settle disputes without recourse to legal proceedings. However, when this is unavoidable, our very experienced and tenacious team will vigorously pursue a strategy set to achieve a successful outcome for you.

Clients in manufacturing, service industries, retail plcs, owner-managed businesses, accountants and other professionals rely on our clear, pragmatic advice, expert technical analysis and sound understanding of their business problems and commercial objectives.