This is the Big K, the prototype kilogram. It is a block of platinum-iridium alloy that has been housed at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in France since 1889. Back then scientists agreed to define a kilogram as the mass equivalent to the mass of this object. All 1 kg weights existing in the world today are copies of copies of copies of copies of this boulder. Scientists have taken great efforts to ensure that the mass of this prototype kilogram does not change. However, despite all precautions, it changed. Since 1889 it has become approximately 50 micrograms lighter – that is the weight of an eyelash (Resnick, 2019).
This object links to the idea of bias because, since the prototype has become lighter, we are systematically overestimating how much a kilogram is. It is a case of systematic deviation (which, by my definition, is bias). The object also illustrates the idea of inevitability of bias: the Big K has lost some mass due to natural fluctuations of matter, physical laws that are beyond human control.
This object was included in the exhibition because it demonstrates the idea that even the most precise scientific measurements are done against a standard, but standards themselves may change, and when they do, our new measurements become biased. I tried to find an example of something that is believed to be unbiased, and then I found an element of bias in it.
|
What are some other examples of knowledge that are typically believed to be free of bias? Mathematical knowledge has this kind of aura around it, especially when it is aided by technology. When we use a calculator, there is no reason to believe that the result of our calculation is biased. So it may seem.
This object links to the concept of bias because it is a case of systematic deviation from the truth. It is only this particular model, and this particular problem, that produces a biased result. This object also exemplifies the idea of inevitability of bias. The reason for this error is that pi is infinite, but the calculator’s memory is not. Therefore there is some truncation involved at some point somewhere. It is inevitable because technology cannot have infinite power.
This object has been included in the exhibition because it shows that even in something as certain as mathematics there could be systematic mistakes (biases). Unless we create technology that is infinitely powerful, we cannot recreate the infinite accuracy that is intrinsic in mathematics. Once again, I found something that is widely believed to be unbiased, and then I found an element of bias in it.
|
For my third object I am using Brendan Cole’s online article “‘Little Red Riding Hood’ Banned from School over Sexism Concerns” (2019) – this is a screenshot of the article.
The context behind this is that creating this exhibition has made me think about my own biases. I might have absorbed some cultural biases at an early age.
As described in the article, a school in Spain has withdrawn from its library 200 classic children’s books including Sleeping Beauty and Little Red Riding Hood, after analyzing them and concluding that they were “toxic” in how they depicted sexist stereotypes. For example, in Sleeping Beauty the man who kisses a sleeping woman without her consent is presented as a hero. No wonder some parents have made the choice to not expose their children to tales like that (Cole, 2019).
This object exemplifies the idea of bias because it shows how gender bias manifests in units of culture. It also conveys the idea of inevitability because we absorb these units of culture at a very young age when our critical thinking abilities are limited, so the biases may gradually become part of our personality on a deep level without us being aware of it.
This object has been included in the exhibition because it highlights another reason why bias is inevitable. While my first object (the Big K) shows that bias may be created by fluctuations of physical matter that are beyond our control and my second object shows that bias may be a result of ever imperfect technology, the third object highlights the idea that bias may be a result of cultural transmission at a young age. All three factors are very difficult or even impossible to avoid, which does indeed make bias inevitable.
Word count: 936 words
References:
Cole, B. (2019, November 4). ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ Banned From School Over Sexism Concerns. Newsweek . Retrieved from: https://www.newsweek.com/little-red-riding-hood-banned-school-over-sexism-concerns-1393134
Parker, M. [Stand-Up Maths]. (2020, July 17). Why do calculators get this wrong? (We don’t know!) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LKy3lrkTRA
Resnick, B. (2019, May 20). The new kilogram just debuted. It’s a massive achievement. Vox . Retrieved from: https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2019/5/17/18627757/kilogram-redefined-world-metrology-day-explained
Alexey Popov is a teacher of IB Psychology and Theory of Knowledge. He is an IB author, examiner and workshop leader. He also authored Oxford IB Psychology books. He currently lives in Hong Kong.
Study Mumbai
ICSE, CBSE study notes & home schooling, management notes, solved assignments
February 12, 2024 by studymumbai
TOK essay is an essay that International Baccalaureate (IB) students have to write. The idea is to develop critical thinking skills and reflect on nature of knowledge in various disciplines.
TOK essays usually require students to understand how truth, evidence, bias, perception, language play a part in shaping knowledge. In the writing, students are expected to provide verification, justification, interpretation or validation of the ideas presented.
GET INSTANT HELP FROM EXPERTS!
Hire us as project guide/assistant . Contact us for more information
Here’s a typical structure that you can follow while writing a TOK essay.
Introduction : Introduce areas of knowledge (concerning the title).
1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.
2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
4. Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
5. Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.
StudyMumbai.com is an educational resource for students, parents, and teachers, with special focus on Mumbai. Our staff includes educators with several years of experience. Our mission is to simplify learning and to provide free education. Read more about us .
Useful links.
Type a search phrase to find the most relevant TOK Exhibition examples for you
Filter exemplars, what is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge, what role does imagination play in producing knowledge about the world, want to get full marks for your tok exhibition allow us to review it for you 🎯, on what grounds might we doubt a claim, how can we distinguish between knowledge, belief and opinion, fast track your coursework with mark schemes moderated by ib examiners. upgrade now 🚀, should some knowledge not be sought on ethical grounds, how can we know that current knowledge is an improvement upon past knowledge, is bias inevitable in the production of knowledge, does some knowledge belong only to particular communities of knowers, what is the relationship between personal experience and knowledge, how important are material tools in the production or acquisition of knowledge, what challenges are raised by the dissemination and/or communication of knowledge, who owns knowledge, what is the relationship between knowledge and culture, what constraints are there on the pursuit of knowledge, what counts as a good justification for a claim, prompt: to what extent is certainty attainable , how is current knowledge shaped by its historical development, can new knowledge change established values or beliefs, does our knowledge depend on our interactions with other knowers, does all knowledge impose ethical obligations of the knower, what counts as good evidence for a claim, what is the relationship between knowledge and culture, “what role does imagination play in producing knowledge about the world“, how might the context in which knowledge is presented influence whether it is accepted or rejected, what challenges are raised by the dissemination and/or communication of knowledge, what role do experts play in influencing our consumption or acquisition of knowledge, 8. to what extent is certainty attainable, are some things unknowable, are some things unknowable, are some types of knowledge more useful than others.
The Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Exhibition is the first piece of assessment students complete in their IB TOK journey. It accounts for a third (33%) of your TOK grade. It is a new assessment for the new guide beginning in 2020 so there is still some confusion around how to do well in this assessment. In this article, I will go through the basics of the TOK Exhibition and give a few tips on how to write a good exhibition.
There are a few steps to writing the TOK Exhibition:
Students choose 1 question to comment on out of the prescribed list . These are questions that prompts students to think about the nature of knowledge.
Select a TOK Theme out of the ones they have studied. Students should have studied the Knowledge and the Knower theme and two other optional themes (such as Knowledge and Language or Knowledge and Technology).
Choose three objects to comment on that can aid the discussion of the question and theme you have chosen. For example, for the theme of Knowledge and Technology, students may choose something related to that field such as a robot they constructed.
Write a 950 word commentary on the three objects. This 950 words is the total words you have for all three objects.
A few extra things to note:
More than one person in your TOK class can have the same prompt/question, but you must have completely unique examples. I.e. two students can share the prompt "How can we distinguish between knowledge, belief and opinion?", but only one student can have an atlas from Geography class as their object for example.
The IB says that " Students are encouraged to choose objects that are of personal interest and that they have come across in their academic studies and/or their lives beyond the classroom. " so clearly they prefer personal examples. In your exhibition, you should demonstrate this by explaining the context in which this object exists, be it something you have created, or come across in your studies.
You are given ONE opportunity to submit a draft to be given feedback by your TOK teacher.
You are highly recommended to write your exhibition on themes you have studied in class. Everyone will be able to write on the Knowledge and the Knower theme, but not all students can write it with the Knowledge and Language theme as you may not have been taught this in your TOK course.
As for the actual exhibition, you will present your written exhibition publicly within your school. The IB doesn't say which way this must take place. The IB simply marks your written 950 word product but publicly showing it is a mandatory (albeit unmarked) requirement. Some schools will organise a science fair-esque display, while others prefer you to complete oral presentations on your exhibition. Either way, the actual exhibition process is not marked, it is only the written work that is submitted.
The exhibition is scored out of 10 according to the below rubric.
tok2022exhibitionrubric Download
The basic requirements to getting a good mark for the exhibition is clearly stated:
Clearly identify your three objects and describe their contexts (where you found them or made them, what is their value, purpose, etc.)
Linking the object and the prompt together. Essentially, using the object to answer the prompt
Justify why your objects are helpful to answering the prompt
Make supported points that answer the prompt. By supported, it means that your object provides evidence to your points.
Your whole TOK grade will be determined by:
Your TOK exhibition scored out of 10
and Your TOK essay alsos cored out of 10 but the score will be doubled to give an aggregate score out of 30.
Hence, the TOK exhibition accounts for a third of your grade, while the essay two thirds.
Choose personal examples - as the IB strongly recommends, personal examples allow you to write about its real world context as required in the criteria.
Understand the prompt - the prompt typically contains one or two key words such as "belief", "truth", or "communities" and it is important you understand what they mean. Each theme has their own focused key words but you are likely to need to understand what "communities of knowers" are.
Use the language of the theme - If you read the TOK guide , it explains each theme in detail. You should aim to use the language of that theme to demonstrate your understanding of the theme. It isn't required that you explicitly state the theme your exhibition is based on, so using the language of that theme will aid in examiners identifying what theme you are using. E.g. for Knowledge and the Knower, identifying "communities of knowers" are crucial.
Use the concepts - the twelve TOK concepts are super important to the exhibition. You should aim to have one or two key concepts per object and use that concept throughout.
Write concisely - 950 words is not a lot. This leaves around 300 words per object which is sufficient if you are writing concisely, but easy to waffle and waste away if you do not come in with a plan in advance.
Generic examples - the IB specifically asks you to identify the real world context of your objects. If you generically say, a Maths textbook instead of the textbook I use within the Mathematics HL course, that would not be explaining the full real world context.
Lack of personalisation - if you find that most of your writing is in the third person, you are doing something wrong. The exhibition is a personal reflection and commentary on the prompt. You should be showing how you have changed your thinking based on the objects you interacted with. This is the reason why the IB recommends you choose objects you have personal connections to.
No logic to object selection - while objects do not have to be related to each other, they must each make a valuable contribution to the exhibition. Avoid choosing 3 objects that all essentially say the same thing about the prompt. Each object should allow you to deliver a unique view on the question.
Below is a 10/10 scored TOK exhibition by the IB.
tok_exhibition_a_en Download
I will deconstruct this 10/10 example in another article soon, so stay tuned. For now, what can you see that makes it fit the 9-10 band in the criteria? Feel free to comment below.
The TOK exhibition remains a bit of a mystery even to IB teachers. Thankfully, more examples have been released that gives us a bit more of a clue as to what to expect. I will write a lot more extensively about how to do the exhibition soon, after I go through the backlog of TOK Essay help guides.
This is your first foray into TOK assessments and it is always challenging to write in a "TOK" way, but it is not as hard as it first seems! Good luck!
November 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles with Examples and Detailed Explanation
How to learn TOK
Key Concept in Economics IA
The November 2024 IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay Titles are out!
Let's be honest – tackling the TOK essay can be a daunting task. With so many ideas, concepts and topics at our disposal and a myriad of ideas swirling around, it's easy to feel overwhelmed at the outset.
That's where we come in.
In this article, we'll delve into each title and offer some strategic advice on how to approach them.
General Tips to Unpacking a Title
When we first encounter a prompt, we want to think in terms of perspectives and counter-perspectives (formerly known as claims and counterclaims). This framework allows for a structured essay, exploring the title through the lens of two chosen Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) and weaving in different arguments. While the ultimate conclusion you draw may often reside somewhere between these extremes or on a conditional basis (e.g. perspective 1 is correct in certain circumstances, while perspective 2 is a better approach in other), starting with opposing arguments can facilitate the development of a more nuanced exploration and argument.
So let's get to it – here is everything you need to know about the November 2024 TOK Essay titles:
Title 1: Does our responsibility to acquire knowledge vary according to the area of knowledge? Discuss with reference to history and one other area of knowledge.
Recommended AOKs: History (Mandatory) and Natural Sciences/The Arts/Human Sciences
This title prompts an assessment of whether we have different levels of responsibility to acquire knowledge across different AOKs. While you are open to argue against the title directly, suggesting that the responsibility is the same across AOKs, this would be unwise. It would be better to reflect on each AOK and perhaps present one perspective in support of the responsibility and one perspective against it, drawing a conclusion on which argument is stronger in each AOK.
Also consider the difference between the acquisition and production of knowledge – perhaps we have a broader responsibility to produce new knowledge in some areas of knowledge but not necessarily to acquire it as individual knowers.
Some perspectives you may consider:
Perspective: We have a responsibility to acquire knowledge to ensure that we construct an accurate record of the past. It is our responsibility to know our History and learn from the past.
Counter-Perspective: Historical knowledge is limited by subjectivity and collective memory, hence it is not essential to acquire knowledge of our past to build a successful future.
Perspective: We have a responsibility to acquire artistic knowledge to understand cultures and societies.
Counter-Perspective: The acquisition of knowledge in the Arts is for aesthetic purposes and enjoyment, not the fulfilment of a responsibility.
Natural Sciences/Human Sciences
Perspective: We have a responsibility to acquire new scientific knowledge for the continual development of mankind.
Counter-Perspective: Understanding how the world/humans work is not necessary knowledge for knowers to acquire.
Title 2: In the production of knowledge, is ingenuity always needed but never enough? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
Recommended AOKs: Mathematics (Mandatory) and Natural Sciences/The Arts/Human Sciences
This is a super interesting title – ensure you define 'ingenuity' from the outset. The essay almost structures itself – your first paragraph in each AOK can consider how/whether ingenuity is 'always needed', exploring how this plays out in each AOK, while the second paragraph can explore whether or not it is 'never enough'.
Some ideas you may consider:
Paradigm Shifts – To revolutionise an AOK, often ingenuity is needed to enact a paradigm shift (a new way of thinking which changes the entire knowledge structure of an AOK) and to ensure progress.
Creativity – Creative thinking is important not only for AOKs such as the Arts, but even in Mathematics and the Sciences. Discovering innovative ways of devising experiments or utilising clever analogies to explain incredibly complex concepts is integral to these AOKs.
Structure – Ingenuity is only valuable within a framework for knowledge production, whether this be an artistic process or the scientific method.
Title 3: How might it benefit an area of knowledge to sever ties with its past? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
Recommended AOKs: History, Natural Sciences, The Arts and Human Sciences
The 'How' of this title restricts the scope to discussing different 'benefits' rather than a standard 'perspective-counter' analysis. It will also be important to define exactly what 'severing ties' involves – does this mean completely ignoring all past knowledge or simply becoming less attached to existing ways of thinking?
Some ideas for this title:
Fresh Ideas and Paradigm Shifts – By severing ties, you open up the possibility of acquiring knowledge which can overhaul an entire AOK, drastically accelerating progress.
Bias – By severing past ties, knowers can free themselves of the biases of their predecessors.
Innovation – Since existing frameworks of thinking often lead to similar conclusions, you can expand the possibilities of new knowledge by severing past ties.
However, you may interestingly conclude that these benefits are only reaped when ties to the past are severed to an extent, as it may be detrimental to an AOK to entirely negate past knowledge.
Title 4: To what extent do you agree that there is no significant difference between hypothesis and speculation? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
Recommended AOKs: Human Sciences and History/Natural Sciences
This prompt is very focused on your definitions. I would suggest defining these terms distinctly and precisely from the outset. The primary question which this title is asking is whether hypotheses are mere "speculation" or "guesses", or if there is a significant difference.
Also, if selecting the Human and Natural Sciences, please ensure that your perspectives aren't repetitious and highlight the differences between these AOKs.
Development – Speculation and hypothesis differ in the fact that the development of a hypothesis generally requires significant prior research and an understanding of existing knowledge
Experimentation – Hypotheses are developed purposefully and then empirical experimentation are conducted to provide evidence either in support or against them
Emotion – Speculation tends to come from 'feelings' or 'impressions', whereas the development of a hypothesis is far more methodical
Title 5: In the production of knowledge, are we too quick to dismiss anomalies? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
Recommended AOKs: Human Sciences/History/Natural Sciences
This title allows you to reflect on whether or not we dismiss 'anomalies' (a key term to be defined) too quickly when producing knowledge.
Paradigm Shift – Anomalies are often the prompt for a paradigm shift in the sciences, causing us to challenge existing beliefs and ideas
Exceptions – Often rather than investigating anomalies further and considering an overhaul of existing knowledge, anomalies are dismissed as 'exceptions' to the rule, rather than a justification to question the rule itself
Generalisation – There is often a focus on generating 'general' rules and theories which can lead anomalies to be dismissed (think of the Human Sciences – how often do we produce a rule about human behaviour but ignore those who behave contrary to the rule)
Title 6: In the pursuit of knowledge, what is gained by the artist adopting the lens of the scientist and the scientist adopting the lens of the artist? Discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences.
Recommended AOKs: The Arts and the Natural Sciences
This title requires you to define the 'lens' of each of these AOKs from the outset. It will be better to define them quite opposingly – the scientist is more methodical, experimental and structured, whilst the artist is more free-flowing and creative. You will then be able to take these attributes and argue which elements would be better across the two disciplines.
Creativity – Scientists can benefit from the creativity of artists when developing innovative ways of experimenting, presenting results and constructing abstract theories
Structure – Artists can often benefit from a methodical approach to constructing art, particularly when aiming to convey a specific message or purpose through their art
Flexibility – Artists are often quite flexible when constructing an artwork, always willing to change and adapt to their free-flowing thoughts, an attribute which is highly beneficial for scientists who at times may become rigid in their thinking and fixed to pre-existing scientific beliefs.
And that's it - our comprehensive guide to the 2024 November TOK Titles! If you're still racking your brain as to how to begin the writing process for your TOK essay, why not check out our post on The Complete IB TOK Essay Guide . Or check out one of our Grade A Exemplar TOK Essays ! Or better yet, if you are looking for some more personal assistance with your IB TOK Essay, click below to reach out to us and we can work with you through the entire writing process, from title selection to the best structure for success!
The Secrets to Success in the Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay
Unpacking the 2023 November TOK Titles: A Comprehensive IB Solved Guide
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
and judge TOK essays, and why I understand that the scores awarded were justified. This docu ent cannot be considered to be authoritative in terms of IB standards or judgments. m. You may distribute this document freely, but do not remove this disclaimer. If you use only . sample essay 2, include this disclaimer. Meadowbrook HS Richmond, VA 23234
Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge. TOK Essay B. High scoring IB Theory of Knowledge Essay examples. See what past students did and make your TOK Essay perfect by learning from examiner commented examples!
Example essays. Last updated: 06 June 2023. As part of theory of knowledge (TOK), each student chooses one essay title from six issued by International Baccalaureate® (IB). The titles change in each examination session. Upcoming and past questions include:
These titles prompt discussions on various topics in knowledge, ethics, science, mathematics, human sciences, and more. There is a maximum TOK essay word count of 1,600 words. This strict limit requires students to articulate their thoughts clearly and concisely. The essay is assessed using criteria that evaluate students' ability to identify ...
B. 1600 words. Labels Are A Necessity In The Organization Of Knowledge, But They Also Constrain Our Understanding. Discuss This Statement With Refer- Ence To Two Areas Of Knowledge. Explore how labels organize and limit knowledge in this insightful IB essay.
Paragraph 1. - Say one or two interesting things about the prescribed title question. This shows us, right away that you know what the question is asking. - Define one or two of the key terms in the title. Get definitions for all of the main words in your title. You don't need to include all of them in your essay, but it's useful to see how ...
The International Baccalaureate (IB) Theory of Knowledge (TOK) essay is a crucial component of the IB Diploma Programme, designed to develop students' critical thinking and analytical skills. In this article, we will explore the various aspects involved in crafting a successful TOK essay that meets the rigorous standards set by the IB.
Once you've grasped the essay rubric, and chosen your title, you can start planning and structuring your TOK essay. You base this around the 3 interactions with your teacher, which are one-on-one meetings discussing your progress, and receiving feedback. As well as the interactions, you can also ask your teacher specific questions about your ...
3. Relevant TOK Real-life scenarios: TOK Essay criteria states that your essay needs to have "arguments are clear, supported by real-life example and are effectively evaluated". Again, this statement has a few underlying assumptions: (a) You have arguments that you want to develop in relation to your knowledge questions and the prescribed ...
Before we dive into our gameplan, let's overview the rules of the game. There are two assessment tasks in the TOK: an essay and a presentation.While a presentation encourages students to explore a real-life situation through the lens of TOK, an essay is written on the basis of the various questions provided by the International Baccalaureate Organisation.
The TOK essay is a 1600 word essay written about topics usually given to students from their teachers from a list of numerous options. It is an essay that promotes arguments and counterarguments for the topic at hand. Understanding your ways of knowing (WOKs) and areas of knowledge (AOKs) is extremely crucial before you even start choosing a ...
In it's first year of publication the ToKToday e-book Write the ToK Essay in 6 Easy Steps has been used by hundreds of ToK students in many countries. Amongst the positive feedback that we received from many students includes this: " So glad I bought this book, it showed me what to do at every stage, I'd of been totally lost without it ".
Uploading your essay & PPF. Completing and uploading your Presentation Planning Form (PPF) means that you've done the hard part of writing your essay, and are nearly at the end of the process. Check out our short video explainer for the TOK essay; you can find more explainers about other aspects of the course in our TOK explainer playlist.
Arguments are carefully and clearly developed. Every assertion is effectively evaluated giving a proper place to authority, experience, the search of truth, among other relevant TOK issues. The student definitely acknowledges the implications drawn in each of the examples. It is worth pointing out that in spite of the effective and well ...
Type 3: Examples Taken from Your Daily Observations. These are examples which may require some Googling, but not to the extent as mentioned in the earlier one. These are real life situations which may ring a bell at the back of your mind when you've decided on your argument for TOK. Such situations are often deep within the recesses of your ...
This document offers an in-depth analysis of the 2025 IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) essay titles. Ideal for students aiming for a high pass grade, it breaks down each title thoroughly, providing: Detailed Unpacking of Key Concepts: Clear explanations of each title, ensuring you understand exactly what's being asked.
1 The TOK essay is an individual task. 2 It represents two thirds of the overall mark for TOK. 3 It is externally marked. 4 You choose your title from a list of six prescribed titles, which change every exam session. 5 The word count for the essay is 1600 words. 6 You'll meet your teacher for 3 interactions to discuss your essay.
TOK exhibition Sample 1 uses the following approach: Choose the IA prompt. Think about one aspect in relation to it. Find an object supporting it. Link the object to the prompt. Depending on how it was linked, choose where to look for the other two objects. The IA prompt that was selected is "Bias is inevitable in the production of knowledge".
Here's a typical structure that you can follow while writing a TOK essay. Introduction: Introduce areas of knowledge (concerning the title). Body. Para 1 (any one human science): one argument with an example Para 2 (same or any other human science): a counter-perspective with an example Para 3 (any one Natural Science): one argument with an ...
Type a search phrase to find the most relevant TOK Exhibition examples for you. Not sure what to search for? You can always look through our example Theory of Knowledge coursework below for inspiration. Personal Objects Family Memorabilia Religious Artifacts Technology Art Historical Documents Sports Equipment Musical Instruments Fashion Items ...
Theory of knowledge (TOK) is assessed through an exhibition and a 1,600 word essay. It asks students to reflect on the nature of knowledge, and on how we know what we claim to know. TOK is part of the International Baccalaureate® (IB) Diploma Programme (DP) core, and is mandatory for all students. Learn more about theory of knowledge.
The Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Exhibition is the first piece of assessment students complete in their IB TOK journey. It accounts for a third (33%) of your TOK grade. It is a new assessment for the new guide beginning in 2020 so there is still some confusion around how to do well in this assessment. In this article, I will go through the basics of the TOK Exhibition and give a few tips on how ...
Unpacking the 2024 November TOK Titles: A Comprehensive IB Solved Guide. The November 2024 IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay Titles are out! Let's be honest - tackling the TOK essay can be a daunting task. With so many ideas, concepts and topics at our disposal and a myriad of ideas swirling around, it's easy to feel overwhelmed at the outset.
Below are the Theory of Knowledge Essay prescribed titles for the May 2025 session.. The video analysis of these titles will be ready for you soon in the member's area--which you can watch using a free trial.(Just click the "subscribe" tab at the top of this page).Our updated TOK Essay Video Course (11 helpful videos) is ready for you as well.. The May 2025 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles