types of errors in hypothesis testing slideshare

• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Statistics By Jim

Making statistics intuitive

Types I & Type II Errors in Hypothesis Testing

By Jim Frost 8 Comments

In hypothesis testing, a Type I error is a false positive while a Type II error is a false negative. In this blog post, you will learn about these two types of errors, their causes, and how to manage them.

Hypothesis tests use sample data to make inferences about the properties of a population . You gain tremendous benefits by working with random samples because it is usually impossible to measure the entire population.

However, there are tradeoffs when you use samples. The samples we use are typically a minuscule percentage of the entire population. Consequently, they occasionally misrepresent the population severely enough to cause hypothesis tests to make Type I and Type II errors.

Potential Outcomes in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing  is a procedure in inferential statistics that assesses two mutually exclusive theories about the properties of a population. For a generic hypothesis test, the two hypotheses are as follows:

• Null hypothesis : There is no effect
• Alternative hypothesis : There is an effect.

The sample data must provide sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the effect exists in the population. Ideally, a hypothesis test fails to reject the null hypothesis when the effect is not present in the population, and it rejects the null hypothesis when the effect exists.

Statisticians define two types of errors in hypothesis testing. Creatively, they call these errors Type I and Type II errors. Both types of error relate to incorrect conclusions about the null hypothesis.

The table summarizes the four possible outcomes for a hypothesis test.

Related post : How Hypothesis Tests Work: P-values and the Significance Level

Fire alarm analogy for the types of errors

Using hypothesis tests correctly improves your chances of drawing trustworthy conclusions. However, errors are bound to occur.

Unlike the fire alarm analogy, there is no sure way to determine whether an error occurred after you perform a hypothesis test. Typically, a clearer picture develops over time as other researchers conduct similar studies and an overall pattern of results appears. Seeing how your results fit in with similar studies is a crucial step in assessing your study’s findings.

Now, let’s take a look at each type of error in more depth.

Type I Error: False Positives

When you see a p-value that is less than your significance level , you get excited because your results are statistically significant. However, it could be a type I error . The supposed effect might not exist in the population. Again, there is usually no warning when this occurs.

Why do these errors occur? It comes down to sample error. Your random sample has overestimated the effect by chance. It was the luck of the draw. This type of error doesn’t indicate that the researchers did anything wrong. The experimental design, data collection, data validity , and statistical analysis can all be correct, and yet this type of error still occurs.

Even though we don’t know for sure which studies have false positive results, we do know their rate of occurrence. The rate of occurrence for Type I errors equals the significance level of the hypothesis test, which is also known as alpha (α).

The significance level is an evidentiary standard that you set to determine whether your sample data are strong enough to reject the null hypothesis. Hypothesis tests define that standard using the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis that is actually true. You set this value based on your willingness to risk a false positive.

Related post : How to Interpret P-values Correctly

Using the significance level to set the Type I error rate

When the significance level is 0.05 and the null hypothesis is true, there is a 5% chance that the test will reject the null hypothesis incorrectly. If you set alpha to 0.01, there is a 1% of a false positive. If 5% is good, then 1% seems even better, right? As you’ll see, there is a tradeoff between Type I and Type II errors. If you hold everything else constant, as you reduce the chance for a false positive, you increase the opportunity for a false negative.

Type I errors are relatively straightforward. The math is beyond the scope of this article, but statisticians designed hypothesis tests to incorporate everything that affects this error rate so that you can specify it for your studies. As long as your experimental design is sound, you collect valid data, and the data satisfy the assumptions of the hypothesis test, the Type I error rate equals the significance level that you specify. However, if there is a problem in one of those areas, it can affect the false positive rate.

Warning about a potential misinterpretation of Type I errors and the Significance Level

When the null hypothesis is correct for the population, the probability that a test produces a false positive equals the significance level. However, when you look at a statistically significant test result, you cannot state that there is a 5% chance that it represents a false positive.

Why is that the case? Imagine that we perform 100 studies on a population where the null hypothesis is true. If we use a significance level of 0.05, we’d expect that five of the studies will produce statistically significant results—false positives. Afterward, when we go to look at those significant studies, what is the probability that each one is a false positive? Not 5 percent but 100%!

That scenario also illustrates a point that I made earlier. The true picture becomes more evident after repeated experimentation. Given the pattern of results that are predominantly not significant, it is unlikely that an effect exists in the population.

Type II Error: False Negatives

When you perform a hypothesis test and your p-value is greater than your significance level, your results are not statistically significant. That’s disappointing because your sample provides insufficient evidence for concluding that the effect you’re studying exists in the population. However, there is a chance that the effect is present in the population even though the test results don’t support it. If that’s the case, you’ve just experienced a Type II error . The probability of making a Type II error is known as beta (β).

What causes Type II errors? Whereas Type I errors are caused by one thing, sample error, there are a host of possible reasons for Type II errors—small effect sizes, small sample sizes, and high data variability. Furthermore, unlike Type I errors, you can’t set the Type II error rate for your analysis. Instead, the best that you can do is estimate it before you begin your study by approximating properties of the alternative hypothesis that you’re studying. When you do this type of estimation, it’s called power analysis.

To estimate the Type II error rate, you create a hypothetical probability distribution that represents the properties of a true alternative hypothesis. However, when you’re performing a hypothesis test, you typically don’t know which hypothesis is true, much less the specific properties of the distribution for the alternative hypothesis. Consequently, the true Type II error rate is usually unknown!

Type II errors and the power of the analysis

The Type II error rate (beta) is the probability of a false negative. Therefore, the inverse of Type II errors is the probability of correctly detecting an effect. Statisticians refer to this concept as the power of a hypothesis test. Consequently, 1 – β = the statistical power. Analysts typically estimate power rather than beta directly.

If you read my post about power and sample size analysis , you know that the three factors that affect power are sample size, variability in the population, and the effect size. As you design your experiment, you can enter estimates of these three factors into statistical software and it calculates the estimated power for your test.

Suppose you perform a power analysis for an upcoming study and calculate an estimated power of 90%. For this study, the estimated Type II error rate is 10% (1 – 0.9). Keep in mind that variability and effect size are based on estimates and guesses. Consequently, power and the Type II error rate are just estimates rather than something you set directly. These estimates are only as good as the inputs into your power analysis.

Low variability and larger effect sizes decrease the Type II error rate, which increases the statistical power. However, researchers usually have less control over those aspects of a hypothesis test. Typically, researchers have the most control over sample size, making it the critical way to manage your Type II error rate. Holding everything else constant, increasing the sample size reduces the Type II error rate and increases power.

Learn more about Power in Statistics .

Graphing Type I and Type II Errors

The graph below illustrates the two types of errors using two sampling distributions. The critical region line represents the point at which you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. Of course, when you perform the hypothesis test, you don’t know which hypothesis is correct. And, the properties of the distribution for the alternative hypothesis are usually unknown. However, use this graph to understand the general nature of these errors and how they are related.

The distribution on the left represents the null hypothesis. If the null hypothesis is true, you only need to worry about Type I errors, which is the shaded portion of the null hypothesis distribution. The rest of the null distribution represents the correct decision of failing to reject the null.

On the other hand, if the alternative hypothesis is true, you need to worry about Type II errors. The shaded region on the alternative hypothesis distribution represents the Type II error rate. The rest of the alternative distribution represents the probability of correctly detecting an effect—power.

Moving the critical value line is equivalent to changing the significance level. If you move the line to the left, you’re increasing the significance level (e.g., α 0.05 to 0.10). Holding everything else constant, this adjustment increases the Type I error rate while reducing the Type II error rate. Moving the line to the right reduces the significance level (e.g., α 0.05 to 0.01), which decreases the Type I error rate but increases the type II error rate.

Is One Error Worse Than the Other?

As you’ve seen, the nature of the two types of error, their causes, and the certainty of their rates of occurrence are all very different.

A common question is whether one type of error is worse than the other? Statisticians designed hypothesis tests to control Type I errors while Type II errors are much less defined. Consequently, many statisticians state that it is better to fail to detect an effect when it exists than it is to conclude an effect exists when it doesn’t. That is to say, there is a tendency to assume that Type I errors are worse.

However, reality is more complex than that. You should carefully consider the consequences of each type of error for your specific test.

Suppose you are assessing the strength of a new jet engine part that is under consideration. Peoples lives are riding on the part’s strength. A false negative in this scenario merely means that the part is strong enough but the test fails to detect it. This situation does not put anyone’s life at risk. On the other hand, Type I errors are worse in this situation because they indicate the part is strong enough when it is not.

Now suppose that the jet engine part is already in use but there are concerns about it failing. In this case, you want the test to be more sensitive to detecting problems even at the risk of false positives. Type II errors are worse in this scenario because the test fails to recognize the problem and leaves these problematic parts in use for longer.

Using hypothesis tests effectively requires that you understand their error rates. By setting the significance level and estimating your test’s power, you can manage both error rates so they meet your requirements.

The error rates in this post are all for individual tests. If you need to perform multiple comparisons, such as comparing group means in ANOVA, you’ll need to use post hoc tests to control the experiment-wise error rate  or use the Bonferroni correction .

Share this:

Reader Interactions

June 4, 2024 at 2:04 pm

Very informative.

June 9, 2023 at 9:54 am

Hi Jim- I just signed up for your newsletter and this is my first question to you. I am not a statistician but work with them in my professional life as a QC consultant in biopharmaceutical development. I have a question about Type I and Type II errors in the realm of equivalence testing using two one sided difference testing (TOST). In a recent 2020 publication that I co-authored with a statistician, we stated that the probability of concluding non-equivalence when that is the truth, (which is the opposite of power, the probability of concluding equivalence when it is correct) is 1-2*alpha. This made sense to me because one uses a 90% confidence interval on a mean to evaluate whether the result is within established equivalence bounds with an alpha set to 0.05. However, it appears that specificity (1-alpha) is always the case as is power always being 1-beta. For equivalence testing the latter is 1-2*beta/2 but for specificity it stays as 1-alpha because only one of the null hypotheses in a two-sided test can fail at one time. I still see 1-2*alpha as making more sense as we show in Figure 3 of our paper which shows the white space under the distribution of the alternative hypothesis as 1-2 alpha. The paper can be downloaded as open access here if that would make my question more clear. https://bioprocessingjournal.com/index.php/article-downloads/890-vol-19-open-access-2020-defining-therapeutic-window-for-viral-vectors-a-statistical-framework-to-improve-consistency-in-assigning-product-dose-values I have consulted with other statistical colleagues and cannot get consensus so I would love your opinion and explanation! Thanks in advance!

June 10, 2023 at 1:00 am

Let me preface my response by saying that I’m not an expert in equivalence testing. But here’s my best guess about your question.

The alpha is for each of the hypothesis tests. Each one has a type I error rate of 0.05. Or, as you say, a specificity of 1-alpha. However, there are two tests so we need to consider the family-wise error rate. The formula is the following:

FWER = 1 – (1 – α)^N

Where N is the number of hypothesis tests.

For two tests, there’s a family-wise error rate of 0.0975. Or a family-wise specificity of 0.9025.

However, I believe they use 90% CI for a different reason (although it’s a very close match to the family-wise error rate). The 90% CI provides consistent results with the two one-side 95% tests. In other words, if the 90% CI is within the equivalency bounds, then the two tests will be significant. If the CI extends above the upper bound, the corresponding test won’t be significant. Etc.

However, using either rational, I’d say the overall type I error rate is about 0.1.

I hope that answers your question. And, again, I’m not an expert in this particular test.

July 18, 2022 at 5:15 am

Thank you for your valuable content. I have a question regarding correcting for multiple tests. My question is: for exactly how many tests should I correct in the scenario below?

Background: I’m testing for differences between groups A (patient group) and B (control group) in variable X. Variable X is a biological variable present in the body’s left and right side. Variable Y is a questionnaire for group A.

Step 1. Is there a significant difference within groups in the weight of left and right variable X? (I will conduct two paired sample t-tests)


If I find a significant difference in step 1, then I will conduct steps 2A and 2B. However, if I don’t find a significant difference in step 1, then I will only conduct step 2C.

Step 2A. Is there a significant difference between groups in left variable X? (I will conduct one independent sample t-test) Step 2B. Is there a significant difference between groups in right variable X? (I will conduct one independent sample t-test)

Step 2C. Is there a significant difference between groups in total variable X (left + right variable X)? (I will conduct one independent sample t-test)

If I find a significant difference in step 1, then I will conduct with steps 3A and 3B. However, if I don’t find a significant difference in step 1, then I will only conduct step 3C.

Step 3A. Is there a significant correlation between left variable X in group A and variable Y? (I will conduct Pearson correlation) Step 3B. Is there a significant correlation between right variable X in group A and variable Y? (I will conduct Pearson correlation)

Step 3C. Is there a significant correlation between total variable X in group A and variable Y? (I will conduct a Pearson correlation)

Regards, De

January 2, 2021 at 1:57 pm

I should say that being a budding statistician, this site seems to be pretty reliable. I have few doubts in here. It would be great if you can clarify it:

“A significance level of 0.05 indicates a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference. ”

My understanding : When we say that the significance level is 0.05 then it means we are taking 5% risk to support alternate hypothesis even though there is no difference ?( I think i am not allowed to say Null is true, because null is assumed to be true/ Right)

January 2, 2021 at 6:48 pm

The sentence as I write it is correct. Here’s a simple way to understand it. Imagine you’re conducting a computer simulation where you control the population parameters and have the computer draw random samples from the populations that you define. Now, imagine you draw samples from two populations where the means and standard deviations are equal. You know this for a fact because you set the parameters yourself. Then you conduct a series of 2-sample t-tests.

In this example, you know the null hypothesis is correct. However, thanks to random sampling error, some proportion of the t-tests will have statistically significant results (i.e., false positives or Type I errors). The proportion of false positives will equal your significance level over the long run.

Of course, in real-world experiments, you never know for sure whether the null is true or not. However, given the properties of the hypothesis, you do know what proportion of tests will give you a false positive IF the null is true–and that’s the significance level.

I’m thinking through the wording of how you wrote it and I believe it is equivalent to what I wrote. If there is no difference (the null is true), then you have a 5% chance of incorrectly supporting the alternative. And, again, you’re correct that in the real world you don’t know for sure whether the null is true. But, you can still know the false positive (Type I) error rate. For more information about that property, read my post about how hypothesis tests work .

July 9, 2018 at 11:43 am

I like to use the analogy of a trial. The null hypothesis is that the defendant is innocent. A type I error would be convicting an innocent person and a type II error would be acquitting a guilty one. I like to think that our system makes a type I error very unlikely with the trade off being that a type II error is greater.

July 9, 2018 at 12:03 pm

Hi Doug, I think that is an excellent analogy on multiple levels. As you mention, a trial would set a high bar for the significance level by choosing a very low value for alpha. This helps prevent innocent people from being convicted (Type I error) but does increase the probability of allowing the guilty to go free (Type II error). I often refer to the significant level as a evidentiary standard with this legalistic analogy in mind.

Additionally, in the justice system in the U.S., there is a presumption of innocence and the prosecutor must present sufficient evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty. That’s just like in a hypothesis test where the assumption is that the null hypothesis is true and your sample must contain sufficient evidence to be able to reject the null hypothesis and suggest that the effect exists in the population.

This analogy even works for the similarities behind the phrases “Not guilty” and “Fail to reject the null hypothesis.” In both cases, you aren’t proving innocence or that the null hypothesis is true. When a defendant is “not guilty” it might be that the evidence was insufficient to convince the jury. In a hypothesis test, when you fail to reject the null hypothesis, it’s possible that an effect exists in the population but you have insufficient evidence to detect it. Perhaps the effect exists but the sample size or effect size is too small, or the variability might be too high.

Comments and Questions Cancel reply

Type I and Type II Errors in Statistics (with PPT)

“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it…” Mahatma Gandhi

For the better understanding of statistical errors, it is essential to understand the concept of ‘ Level of significance ’, ‘ Null hypothesis and ‘ Alternate hypothesis ’.

What is ‘Level of Significance?

Ø   Definition :  The Level of significance is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis in a statistical test when it is true. Ø   The ‘Level of Significance’ in statistics is conventionally set to 0.05 to 0.01 . Ø   The level of significance in statistics denotes the confidence level of an investigator to accept or reject a null hypothesis in the statistical testing. Ø   A level of significance 0.05 denotes 95% confidence in the decision whereas; the level of significance 0.01 denotes 99% confidence. Ø   Such a low level of significance is selected to reduce the erroneous rejection of a null hypothesis (H 0 ) after the statistical testing.

What is Null hypothesis?

Ø   Definition :  The Null hypothesis is a statement that one seeks to nullify with evidence to the contrary.

Ø   The ‘Null hypothesis’ is denoted as H 0 .

Ø  Most commonly, the null hypothesis is a statement that the phenomenon being studied produces NO effect or makes NO difference.

Ø   Example: (a study to investigate the effect of urea on the size of leaf in rice plants)

      Null hypothesis : H 0 – Urea does NOT have any effect on the leaf size of rice plants.

Ø   The null hypothesis is always constructed in a negative sense.

Ø   The statistical tests only test the possible acceptance or rejection of the null hypothesis.

What is an Alternate hypothesis?

Ø   Definition : The Alternate hypothesis is a statement created in the negation of the null hypothesis.

Ø   Alternate hypothesis is denoted as H 1 .

Ø   Usually, the alternate hypothesis is a statement that the phenomenon being studied produces some effect or makes some differences.

      Alternate hypothesis: H1 – Urea have some effects on the leaf size of rice plants.

Ø   The alternate hypothesis is always constructed in a positive sense. (negation of the negative null hypothesis)

Ø   If a statistical test rejects the null hypothesis, the investigator has to accept the alternate hypothesis.

What are ‘statistical errors’?

Ø   There are two situations in which the decision made on data in the statistics become wrong.

Ø   They are called as the Errors in Statistics or Statistical Errors .

Ø   There are Two types of statistical errors, they are:

(1).  Type I Error

(2).  Type II Error

What is Type I error?

Ø   If an H 0 is true, it should NOT be rejected by the statistical test.

Ø   Suppose an investigator made a decision to reject a true H0, then he/she has committed an error, called the Type I error .

Ø   Type I error is the wrong rejection of a true null hypothesis.

Ø   The Type I error is also referred to as the ‘ False Positive ’.

Ø   Because the type I error is detecting an effect that is not present.

How to avoid or reduce the type I error?

Ø   The probability of committing type I error is specified by the level of significance .

Ø   If a high level of significance is selected (0.1 or 0.2) in the statistical test, the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis increases.

Ø   This means that, at high significance level, the chance of committing the type I error is high.

Ø   Thus in order to avoid or reduce the type I error, a fairly low level of significance is selected (0.05 or 0.01).

What is Type II error?

Ø   If the H 0 is false, it should be rejected by the test of hypothesis.

Ø   If an investigator selects a significance level (0.005 or 0.001) much lower than the conventional level, then the probability of rejecting a wrong null hypothesis reduces.

Ø   Thus the investigator is said to be committed the type II error .

Ø   Type II error is the wrong acceptance of a false (wrong) null hypothesis.

Ø   The type II error is also referred as ‘ false negative ’.

Ø   Because the type II error is the failure to detect an effect that is actually present.

How to avoid or reduce the type II error?

Ø   If the null hypothesis in hypothesis testing is failed to be rejected when it should have been rejected, the type II error is said to have been committed.

Ø   Lower levels of significance increase the chance of type II error in statistical test.

Ø   Thus in order to avoid the type II error, very low level of significance should not be selected in the statistical test.

Key questions

1.  What is level of significance? 2.  What is null hypothesis? Give an example 3.  What is alternate hypothesis? Give an example 4. What are statistical errors? 5.  What is type I error? 6.  How to reduce the chance of committing type I error? 7.  What is type II error 8.  How to reduce the chance of committing type II error?

<< Back to BIOSTATISTICS Notes

Download the PPT of this topic…

Errors in Statistics PPT (Type I and Type II Errors)

You may also like…

@. Statistical Errors PPT

@. Biostatistics Lecture Notes

@. Biostatistics PPT

Related posts:

• MCQ on Errors in Statistics
• Graphical Representation of Data 1: Tables and Tabulation with PPT
• Types of Experimental Designs in Statistics (RBD, CRD, LSD, Factorial Designs)
• Difference between Primary and Secondary Data
• Chi Square Test: Definition, Chi Square Distribution, Types and Applications (Notes)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Overview

• My presentations

Auth with social network:

Download presentation

We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hypothesis Testing – Introduction

Published by Torje Engebretsen Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Hypothesis Testing – Introduction"— Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing Another judgment method of sampling data.

Anthony Greene1 Simple Hypothesis Testing Detecting Statistical Differences In The Simplest Case:  and  are both known I The Logic of Hypothesis Testing:

Lecture XXIII.  In general there are two kinds of hypotheses: one concerns the form of the probability distribution (i.e. is the random variable normally.

Hypothesis Testing making decisions using sample data.

Decision Errors and Power

1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.

Likelihood ratio tests

Statistical Significance What is Statistical Significance? What is Statistical Significance? How Do We Know Whether a Result is Statistically Significant?

HYPOTHESIS TESTING Four Steps Statistical Significance Outcomes Sampling Distributions.

Statistical Significance What is Statistical Significance? How Do We Know Whether a Result is Statistically Significant? How Do We Know Whether a Result.

Hypothesis Testing: Type II Error and Power.

1 Statistical Inference Note: Only worry about pages 295 through 299 of Chapter 12.

Fall 2006 – Fundamentals of Business Statistics 1 Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.

Chapter 3 Hypothesis Testing. Curriculum Object Specified the problem based the form of hypothesis Student can arrange for hypothesis step Analyze a problem.

PY 427 Statistics 1Fall 2006 Kin Ching Kong, Ph.D Lecture 6 Chicago School of Professional Psychology.

Introduction to Testing a Hypothesis Testing a treatment Descriptive statistics cannot determine if differences are due to chance. A sampling error occurs.

The Neymann-Pearson Lemma Suppose that the data x 1, …, x n has joint density function f(x 1, …, x n ;  ) where  is either  1 or  2. Let g(x 1, …,

Business Statistics - QBM117 Introduction to hypothesis testing.

About project

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.

Hypothesis Testing: Understanding Steps and Definitions

Dec 23, 2023

330 likes | 348 Views

Learn the steps and definitions used in hypothesis testing, including the null and alternative hypotheses, finding critical values, and determining the level of significance. Practice problems and solutions provided.

Share Presentation

• hypothesis testing
• definitions
• null hypothesis
• alternative hypothesis
• critical values
• level of significance
• practice problems
• solutionstext

Presentation Transcript

Chapter 8 Hypothesis Testing

Section 8-1: Steps in Hypothesis Testing – Traditional Method • Learning targets • IWBAT understand the definitions used in hypothesis testing. • IWBAT state the null and alternative hypotheses. • IWBAT find critical values for the z-test

Vocabulary • Statistical hypothesis – a conjecture about a population parameter. This conjecture may or may not be true. • Null hypothesis – symbolized as H0, is a statistical hypothesis that states that there is no difference between a parameter and a specific value, or that there is no difference between two parameters. • Alternative hypothesis – symbolized as H1, is a statistical hypothesis that states the existence of a difference between a parameter and a specific value, or states that there is a difference between two parameters.

Practice Problems

A statistical test uses the data obtained from a sample to make a decision about whether the null hypothesis should be rejected. • The numerical value obtained from a statistical test is called the test value.

Errors In hypothesis testing there are 2 types of errors: • Type I Error – you reject the null hypothesis when it is true • Type II Error – you do not reject the null hypothesis when it is false Example: jury trial outcomes

Level of Significance • represented by alpha (α) • the value used to determine the critical value that helps determine whether or not to reject the null hypothesis • Also referred to as the P-value which is the area under the curve

Critical Value and Region Critical value – the z-value that separates the critical region from the noncritical region (symbol C.V.) Critical/rejection region – range of values of the test value that indicates that there is a significant difference and that the null hypothesis should be rejected Noncritical/nonrejection region – range of values of the test value that indicates that the difference was probably due to chance and the null hypothesis should not be rejected

One-Tailed Test

Two-Tailed Test

This chart contains the z-scores for the most used α The z-scores are found the same way they were in Section 6-1.

Section 8-2 Z Test for a Mean

Steps • State null and alternative hypotheses. • Find the critical values • Compute the test value • Make decision to reject or accept • Summarize the results

Formula X = value = mean = Standard deviation n = sample size

Summarize Results • To summarize the results you need to state whether there is or is not sufficient evidence to support the claim (the alternative hypothesis) - If we reject the null there is sufficient evidence to support the claim - If we fail to reject the null there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim. Example: There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that students will have an average score of 19 on the ACT.

Therefore, our decision is to reject the null hypothesis. Test Statistic Thus, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the valve does not perform to specifications. Two-tailed with α=.05, therefore critical region starts at 1.96. Since the situation is two tailed, we have a tail to the right and a tail to the left. If we compare the two z-scores, we notice that the test statistic is greater than the critical value.

Since we have rejected the null, we can conclude there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the state employees earn on average less than the federal employees. Test Statistic Since the claim is “less than” the situation is one-tailed. The z-score critical value for α=.01 is -2.33 When we compare the two z-scores, we notice that the test statistic is less than the critical value and falls in the rejection region. Therefore, we will reject the null hypothesis.

• More by User

Diamond Chapter 8 1 CHAPTER 8

The Allowance for Bad Debts account is reported on the balance sheet as a subtraction from Accounts Receivable ... account is determined to be uncollectible, both the Accounts ...

956 views • 50 slides

FINANCIAL REPORTING &amp; ANALYSIS BY REVSINE – COLLINS – JOHNSON 2 nd Edition CHAPTER 8 RECEIVABLES Slides Authored by Brian Leventhal University of Illinois at Chicago I. Assessing the Net Realizable Value of Accounts Receivable

1.47k views • 103 slides

Chapter 8 Web Server Hardware and Software Learning Objectives In this chapter, you will learn about: Web server basics Software for Web servers Internet utility programs Web server hardware Web site hosting alternatives Web Server Basics

1.21k views • 39 slides

CHAPTER 8 Global Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) and Treatments By: Ping Hu Johnson CAM Defined: Complementary and Alternative or Traditional?

731 views • 23 slides

Chapter 8 Administering TCP/IP Objectives Understand basic concepts about TCP/IP Configure TCP/IP on Windows Server 2003 Troubleshoot TCP/IP and network connectivity using various utilities Administer Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) in Windows Server 2003 Understanding TCP/IP

916 views • 51 slides

Chapter 8. Strategies for Marketing, Sales, and Promotion. Electronic Commerce. Objectives. Establishing an effective business presence on the Web Web promotion techniques Meeting the needs of web site visitors Web site design usability testing Identifying and reaching customers on the web.

527 views • 31 slides

Chapter 8. Political Parties, Candidates, and Campaigns: Defining the Voter’s Choice. Political Parties. “Political parties created democracy and … modern democracy is unthinkable save in terms of the parties.” -E.E. Schattschneider -

716 views • 23 slides

Chapter 8. Risk and Return. Learning Objectives. Calculate profits and returns on an investment and convert holding period returns to annual returns. Define risk and explain how uncertainty relates to risk. Appreciate the historical returns of various investment choices.

1.07k views • 80 slides

Chapter 8. Chemical Composition. Students will learn…. Mole as a counting unit amu = atomic mass unit molar mass % composition of compounds Formulas of compounds empirical formulas molecular formulas. Mole (mol). A) Is a counting unit B) 1 mole = 6.02 x 10 23 particles

481 views • 30 slides

Chapter 8. Russia. Russia. Critical Junctures.

414 views • 32 slides

Chapter 8:. Distribution. Overview. Income Distribution &amp; Wages and Salaries Income Inequality Interest Income, Savings, Rental Income &amp; profit Circular Flow &amp; Gross Domestic Product Causes of Income Inequality Government Programs to Reduce Poverty Who Is Poor?

425 views • 20 slides

Chapter 8. Time Value of Money Part I: Future and Present Value of Lump Sums. Learning Objectives. Explain the relationship between the time value of money and inflation. Distinguish between effective rate and stated rate.

1.13k views • 29 slides

Chapter 8. Develop a Tentative Thesis Statement and Outline. 山东滨州学院外语系. Chapter 8. 1. Evaluating Sources and Reading for Ideas 2. Writing a Tentative Thesis Statement 3. Writing a preliminary outline. 1. Evaluating Sources and Reading for Ideas. (1) How to read a book.

338 views • 14 slides

Chapter 8. GIS software. Introduction. Chapter 1 : four technical parts of GIS(network , hardware , software , database ) . This chapter 8 : concerned with GIS software , the geoprocessing engine of a complete , working GIS .

404 views • 19 slides

Chapter 8. The Mole Part 2. What is Avogadro’s Favorite Music. What is Avogadro’s Favorite Music. a. Aluminum is often used for the structure of light-weight bicycle frames. How many grams of Al are in 3.62 moles of Al?. Converting Moles and Grams. a. 1 mole Al = 27.0 g Al .

350 views • 23 slides

Chapter 8. Sections 4 &amp; 5 Ions. Atomic Size. Size goes UP on going down a group.

376 views • 24 slides

Chapter 8. Intermediate Code Generation. Intermediate languages: Syntax trees, three-address code, quadruples. Types of Three – Address Statements: x := y op z where op is a binary operator x := op y where op is a unary operator. x := y

227 views • 13 slides

Chapter 8. Exception Handling. Basic Exception Handling the mechanics of exceptions Defining and Using Exceptions some &quot;simple&quot; cases Reality Check guidelines for more realistic situations. Exception Handling Overview.

489 views • 24 slides

Chapter 8. Campaigns and Elections. Enduring questions about elections. Basic purposes in democracies? How do U.S. election laws compare? Consequences of our election laws? Major factors influencing the public’s vote choices? “Normal” elections versus “critical” elections?

315 views • 12 slides

Chapter 8. Cell Reproduction. R. LeBlanc, MS MPHS Modified: 10/’11. Chromosome Structure. Chromosomes are rod-shaped structures made of DNA and protein. Chromatin uncoils to make RNA and replicate itself.

429 views • 26 slides

Chapter 8. State Boards of Pharmacy Jahangir Moini, MD, MPH, CPhT. Overview. Regulation of pharmacy practice is primarily a state function, not federal Legal responsibilities of pharmacies vary by state

722 views • 49 slides

Chapter 8. SQL-99: Schema Definition, Constraints, &amp; Queries and Views. Chapter Outline. Data Definition, Constraints, and Schema Changes CREATE, DROP, and ALTER the descriptions of the tables (relations) of a database Referential Integrity Options Retrieval Queries in SQL

1.2k views • 85 slides

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Type I & Type II Errors | Differences, Examples, Visualizations

Type I & Type II Errors | Differences, Examples, Visualizations

Published on January 18, 2021 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.

In statistics , a Type I error is a false positive conclusion, while a Type II error is a false negative conclusion.

Making a statistical decision always involves uncertainties, so the risks of making these errors are unavoidable in hypothesis testing .

The probability of making a Type I error is the significance level , or alpha (α), while the probability of making a Type II error is beta (β). These risks can be minimized through careful planning in your study design.

• Type I error (false positive) : the test result says you have coronavirus, but you actually don’t.
• Type II error (false negative) : the test result says you don’t have coronavirus, but you actually do.

Table of contents

Error in statistical decision-making, type i error, type ii error, trade-off between type i and type ii errors, is a type i or type ii error worse, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about type i and ii errors.

Using hypothesis testing, you can make decisions about whether your data support or refute your research predictions with null and alternative hypotheses .

Hypothesis testing starts with the assumption of no difference between groups or no relationship between variables in the population—this is the null hypothesis . It’s always paired with an alternative hypothesis , which is your research prediction of an actual difference between groups or a true relationship between variables .

In this case:

• The null hypothesis (H 0 ) is that the new drug has no effect on symptoms of the disease.
• The alternative hypothesis (H 1 ) is that the drug is effective for alleviating symptoms of the disease.

Then , you decide whether the null hypothesis can be rejected based on your data and the results of a statistical test . Since these decisions are based on probabilities, there is always a risk of making the wrong conclusion.

• If your results show statistical significance , that means they are very unlikely to occur if the null hypothesis is true. In this case, you would reject your null hypothesis. But sometimes, this may actually be a Type I error.
• If your findings do not show statistical significance, they have a high chance of occurring if the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, you fail to reject your null hypothesis. But sometimes, this may be a Type II error.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

A Type I error means rejecting the null hypothesis when it’s actually true. It means concluding that results are statistically significant when, in reality, they came about purely by chance or because of unrelated factors.

The risk of committing this error is the significance level (alpha or α) you choose. That’s a value that you set at the beginning of your study to assess the statistical probability of obtaining your results ( p value).

The significance level is usually set at 0.05 or 5%. This means that your results only have a 5% chance of occurring, or less, if the null hypothesis is actually true.

If the p value of your test is lower than the significance level, it means your results are statistically significant and consistent with the alternative hypothesis. If your p value is higher than the significance level, then your results are considered statistically non-significant.

To reduce the Type I error probability, you can simply set a lower significance level.

Type I error rate

The null hypothesis distribution curve below shows the probabilities of obtaining all possible results if the study were repeated with new samples and the null hypothesis were true in the population .

At the tail end, the shaded area represents alpha. It’s also called a critical region in statistics.

If your results fall in the critical region of this curve, they are considered statistically significant and the null hypothesis is rejected. However, this is a false positive conclusion, because the null hypothesis is actually true in this case!

A Type II error means not rejecting the null hypothesis when it’s actually false. This is not quite the same as “accepting” the null hypothesis, because hypothesis testing can only tell you whether to reject the null hypothesis.

Instead, a Type II error means failing to conclude there was an effect when there actually was. In reality, your study may not have had enough statistical power to detect an effect of a certain size.

Power is the extent to which a test can correctly detect a real effect when there is one. A power level of 80% or higher is usually considered acceptable.

The risk of a Type II error is inversely related to the statistical power of a study. The higher the statistical power, the lower the probability of making a Type II error.

Statistical power is determined by:

• Size of the effect : Larger effects are more easily detected.
• Measurement error : Systematic and random errors in recorded data reduce power.
• Sample size : Larger samples reduce sampling error and increase power.
• Significance level : Increasing the significance level increases power.

To (indirectly) reduce the risk of a Type II error, you can increase the sample size or the significance level.

Type II error rate

The alternative hypothesis distribution curve below shows the probabilities of obtaining all possible results if the study were repeated with new samples and the alternative hypothesis were true in the population .

The Type II error rate is beta (β), represented by the shaded area on the left side. The remaining area under the curve represents statistical power, which is 1 – β.

Increasing the statistical power of your test directly decreases the risk of making a Type II error.

The Type I and Type II error rates influence each other. That’s because the significance level (the Type I error rate) affects statistical power, which is inversely related to the Type II error rate.

This means there’s an important tradeoff between Type I and Type II errors:

• Setting a lower significance level decreases a Type I error risk, but increases a Type II error risk.
• Increasing the power of a test decreases a Type II error risk, but increases a Type I error risk.

This trade-off is visualized in the graph below. It shows two curves:

• The null hypothesis distribution shows all possible results you’d obtain if the null hypothesis is true. The correct conclusion for any point on this distribution means not rejecting the null hypothesis.
• The alternative hypothesis distribution shows all possible results you’d obtain if the alternative hypothesis is true. The correct conclusion for any point on this distribution means rejecting the null hypothesis.

Type I and Type II errors occur where these two distributions overlap. The blue shaded area represents alpha, the Type I error rate, and the green shaded area represents beta, the Type II error rate.

By setting the Type I error rate, you indirectly influence the size of the Type II error rate as well.

It’s important to strike a balance between the risks of making Type I and Type II errors. Reducing the alpha always comes at the cost of increasing beta, and vice versa .

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

For statisticians, a Type I error is usually worse. In practical terms, however, either type of error could be worse depending on your research context.

A Type I error means mistakenly going against the main statistical assumption of a null hypothesis. This may lead to new policies, practices or treatments that are inadequate or a waste of resources.

In contrast, a Type II error means failing to reject a null hypothesis. It may only result in missed opportunities to innovate, but these can also have important practical consequences.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Descriptive statistics
• Measures of central tendency
• Correlation coefficient
• Null hypothesis

Methodology

• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Types of interviews
• Cohort study
• Thematic analysis

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Survivorship bias
• Availability heuristic
• Nonresponse bias
• Regression to the mean

In statistics, a Type I error means rejecting the null hypothesis when it’s actually true, while a Type II error means failing to reject the null hypothesis when it’s actually false.

The risk of making a Type I error is the significance level (or alpha) that you choose. That’s a value that you set at the beginning of your study to assess the statistical probability of obtaining your results ( p value ).

To reduce the Type I error probability, you can set a lower significance level.

The risk of making a Type II error is inversely related to the statistical power of a test. Power is the extent to which a test can correctly detect a real effect when there is one.

To (indirectly) reduce the risk of a Type II error, you can increase the sample size or the significance level to increase statistical power.

Statistical significance is a term used by researchers to state that it is unlikely their observations could have occurred under the null hypothesis of a statistical test . Significance is usually denoted by a p -value , or probability value.

Statistical significance is arbitrary – it depends on the threshold, or alpha value, chosen by the researcher. The most common threshold is p < 0.05, which means that the data is likely to occur less than 5% of the time under the null hypothesis .

When the p -value falls below the chosen alpha value, then we say the result of the test is statistically significant.

In statistics, power refers to the likelihood of a hypothesis test detecting a true effect if there is one. A statistically powerful test is more likely to reject a false negative (a Type II error).

If you don’t ensure enough power in your study, you may not be able to detect a statistically significant result even when it has practical significance. Your study might not have the ability to answer your research question.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). Type I & Type II Errors | Differences, Examples, Visualizations. Scribbr. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/type-i-and-type-ii-errors/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, an easy introduction to statistical significance (with examples), understanding p values | definition and examples, statistical power and why it matters | a simple introduction, what is your plagiarism score.

The Difference Between Type I and Type II Errors in Hypothesis Testing

• Inferential Statistics
• Statistics Tutorials
• Probability & Games
• Descriptive Statistics
• Applications Of Statistics
• Math Tutorials
• Pre Algebra & Algebra
• Exponential Decay
• Worksheets By Grade
• Ph.D., Mathematics, Purdue University
• M.S., Mathematics, Purdue University
• B.A., Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry, Anderson University

The statistical practice of hypothesis testing is widespread not only in statistics but also throughout the natural and social sciences. When we conduct a hypothesis test there a couple of things that could go wrong. There are two kinds of errors, which by design cannot be avoided, and we must be aware that these errors exist. The errors are given the quite pedestrian names of type I and type II errors. What are type I and type II errors, and how we distinguish between them? Briefly:

• Type I errors happen when we reject a true null hypothesis
• Type II errors happen when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis

We will explore more background behind these types of errors with the goal of understanding these statements.

Hypothesis Testing

The process of hypothesis testing can seem to be quite varied with a multitude of test statistics. But the general process is the same. Hypothesis testing involves the statement of a null hypothesis and the selection of a level of significance . The null hypothesis is either true or false and represents the default claim for a treatment or procedure. For example, when examining the effectiveness of a drug, the null hypothesis would be that the drug has no effect on a disease.

After formulating the null hypothesis and choosing a level of significance, we acquire data through observation. Statistical calculations tell us whether or not we should reject the null hypothesis.

In an ideal world, we would always reject the null hypothesis when it is false, and we would not reject the null hypothesis when it is indeed true. But there are two other scenarios that are possible, each of which will result in an error.

Type I Error

The first kind of error that is possible involves the rejection of a null hypothesis that is actually true. This kind of error is called a type I error and is sometimes called an error of the first kind.

Type I errors are equivalent to false positives. Let’s go back to the example of a drug being used to treat a disease. If we reject the null hypothesis in this situation, then our claim is that the drug does, in fact, have some effect on a disease. But if the null hypothesis is true, then, in reality, the drug does not combat the disease at all. The drug is falsely claimed to have a positive effect on a disease.

Type I errors can be controlled. The value of alpha, which is related to the level of significance that we selected has a direct bearing on type I errors. Alpha is the maximum probability that we have a type I error. For a 95% confidence level, the value of alpha is 0.05. This means that there is a 5% probability that we will reject a true null hypothesis. In the long run, one out of every twenty hypothesis tests that we perform at this level will result in a type I error.

Type II Error

The other kind of error that is possible occurs when we do not reject a null hypothesis that is false. This sort of error is called a type II error and is also referred to as an error of the second kind.

Type II errors are equivalent to false negatives. If we think back again to the scenario in which we are testing a drug, what would a type II error look like? A type II error would occur if we accepted that the drug had no effect on a disease, but in reality, it did.

The probability of a type II error is given by the Greek letter beta. This number is related to the power or sensitivity of the hypothesis test, denoted by 1 – beta.

How to Avoid Errors

Type I and type II errors are part of the process of hypothesis testing. Although the errors cannot be completely eliminated, we can minimize one type of error.

Typically when we try to decrease the probability one type of error, the probability for the other type increases. We could decrease the value of alpha from 0.05 to 0.01, corresponding to a 99% level of confidence . However, if everything else remains the same, then the probability of a type II error will nearly always increase.

Many times the real world application of our hypothesis test will determine if we are more accepting of type I or type II errors. This will then be used when we design our statistical experiment.

• Type I and Type II Errors in Statistics
• What Level of Alpha Determines Statistical Significance?
• What Is the Difference Between Alpha and P-Values?
• The Runs Test for Random Sequences
• What 'Fail to Reject' Means in a Hypothesis Test
• How to Construct a Confidence Interval for a Population Proportion
• How to Find Critical Values with a Chi-Square Table
• Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis
• An Example of a Hypothesis Test
• What Is ANOVA?
• Degrees of Freedom for Independence of Variables in Two-Way Table
• How to Find Degrees of Freedom in Statistics
• Confidence Interval for the Difference of Two Population Proportions
• An Example of Chi-Square Test for a Multinomial Experiment
• Example of a Permutation Test
• How to Calculate the Margin of Error