Show that you understand the current state of research on your topic.
The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.
One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.
Download our research proposal template
Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.
Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:
The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.
Your introduction should:
To guide your introduction , include information about:
Discover proofreading & editing
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.
? or ? , , or research design? | |
, )? ? | |
, , , )? | |
? |
To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.
For example, your results might have implications for:
Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .
Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.
Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.
Download our research schedule template
Research phase | Objectives | Deadline |
---|---|---|
1. Background research and literature review | 20th January | |
2. Research design planning | and data analysis methods | 13th February |
3. Data collection and preparation | with selected participants and code interviews | 24th March |
4. Data analysis | of interview transcripts | 22nd April |
5. Writing | 17th June | |
6. Revision | final work | 28th July |
If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.
Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:
To determine your budget, think about:
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
Statistics
Research bias
Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .
Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.
I will compare …
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.
Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.
A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.
A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.
A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.
All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.
Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.
Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.
The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 7, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/
Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, what is your plagiarism score.
Basic components of a research budget, two models of budget development, other factors affecting your budget.
Budgets should provide the sponsor with an accurate assessment of all cost items and cost amounts that are deemed necessary and reasonable to carry out your project. They should be based upon your description or the statement of work. Budget justification provides more in-depth detail and reason for each cost and is often considered by reviewers as a good indicator of the feasibility of the research.
A research budget contains both direct costs and indirect costs (overhead), but the level of detail varies from sponsor to sponsor. The first step in developing a budget is to carefully read the guidelines of the funding opportunity being pursued.
There is no magic formula available for developing a budget but there are some basic steps to follow in order to develop an accurate budget:
The examples below developed by the University of British Columbia demonstrate two ways to include indirect costs in your budget.
Unless the sponsor specifies in writing that they require the indirect costs of research to be presented as a separate line item (Cost Model), the indirect cost should be built into each budget line item (Price Model). Indirect costs are normally included in the price of goods and services worldwide.
For example, you are developing a budget for a funding opportunity with an indirect cost rate of 25%. Your direct costs are $201,000 broken down by expense categories shown in the second column of the table below. The third and fourth colums present the two ways you can include the 25% overhead in your budget using the Price Model or the Cost Model, respectively:
Line item description | Direct Cost | Price model (indirect cost built into each line item) | Cost model (indirect cost presented as a separate line item) |
---|---|---|---|
Salary: Post-Doctoral fellow * 1 | $42,000 | $52,500 | $42,000 |
Salary: PhD student * 2 | $43,000 | $53,750 | $43,000 |
Salary: Master's student * 3 | $54,000 | $67,500 | $54,000 |
Digital devices | $26,000 | $32,500 | $26,000 |
Consumables | $15,000 | $18,750 | $15,000 |
Travel and subsistence | $21,000 | $26,250 | $21,000 |
SFU Indirect Cost (25% of Direct Costs) | N/A | N/A | $50,250 |
In-kind and cash contributions, like other costs to the sponsored project, must be eligible and must be treated in a consistent and uniform manner in proposal preparation and in financial reporting.
Cash contributions are actual cash transactions that can be documented in the accounting system. Examples of cash contributions include:
In-kind contributions are both non-monetary or cash equivalent resources that can be given a cash value, such as goods and/or services in support of a research project or proposal. It is challenging to report on in-kind contribution, please make sure the numbers you use are well supported, consistent and easy to quantitate.
Examples of an in-kind contribution may include:
Some sponsored projects require the university and/or a third party to contribute a portion of the project costs–this contribution is known as matching.
Matching requirements may be in the form of an actual cash expenditure of funds or may be an “in-kind” match. For example:
Examples of agency programs that include some form of matching from a third party are:
To be a successful candidate for a research grant, you need perfect budget formulation and justification. Here, we will help you plan the research budget for your grant proposal and give you handy tips to transform it into a convincible form.
Your budget is the skeleton of your grant proposal. It provides the estimated finance your research needs to be completed in a particular time range. It also gives the funders an exact knowledge about where their funds will be used and how will they be financed ( Asya, 2008 ). It is your responsibility to postulate clearly how you will manage the funds if granted. An excellent budget plan will compel your funders to assume that you have thought about every financial detail concerning your project.
Certain wordings are preferred to convey your research budget information better. It is important to familiarize with them before constructing the budget section of the proposals. The lexis includes:
These are the expenses that are utilized solely for executing your research. For example, expenses on your research staff members, tools, materials, and travel finance.
These are the overhead charges reserved for institutional facilities that you avail yourself while conducting your research. For example, institutional laboratory, electricity, and water usage costs.
These are the additional benefits provided to the personnel, along with their basic salaries. Every institution has its own set of fringe benefits rates.
It is a group of institutions that apply for a grant together as one. They have reached a grant agreement, and one of the institutions represents them all. The budget is divided between them.
There are two budget designs used in the NIH grant applications. Specific points will decide the type of budget design form you have to use for your application. These are:
Your budget design is considered modular when your research fulfills the following criteria:
Your budget design should be in detailed form if your research project fulfills any of the below-mentioned criteria:
For the modular design, you have to fill out the PHS 398 modular budget application form, and for the detailed design budget, you have to use the R & R detailed budget application form.
Your budget planning starts when you find the research question and decide on a suitable study design. You should also be able to guess the unpredictable charges that can arise while conducting your research ( Sudheesh, Devika & Nethra, 2016 ). There are five main points to keep in mind while planning your research budget:
Think about all the things that will affect your research budget. These are mainly the study design, testing procedures, sample collection methods, and research settings. The more complicated and unique these essentials will be, the higher will be your budget requirements. Also, observe the already present resources and will they benefit your research budget.
The next point to consider while planning your budget is to abide by the budget rules and limitations of your particular funding agency. Read each instruction carefully and remember not to deviate from it. It is expected of you to provide the exact list of items necessary for your project.
Thirdly, a breakdown of each item into its related category should be made along with its cost. A breakdown of the budget item-wise and year-wise with cost calculation should be done. Point out the recurring and nonrecurring items that are directly related to your research. All this planning is done beforehand to ensure proper budget management.
For every enlisted item, you should be able to provide a solid justification for its importance in your research. Only a well-justified budget document can win the confidence of the peer reviewers.
Reviewing is the most significant step for every document or proposal. You can ask your team members to review your budget document for you. Also, recalculate the cost of each item and the total items combined cost per annum. Keep in mind that too low or high budget will only raise suspicion in the mind of your reviewers. So, make sure you plan a research budget range, not more than the maximum limit set by your funding agency ( Michael et al., 2019 ).
Projecting your finances into your application requires skills. When writing, we primarily divide our budget into two sub-sections. These include:
As mentioned before, these are the direct expenses on which your research is largely dependent. So, firstly, give the heading of direct costs and then further give the following subheadings with explanations.
Personnel Involved
If your research project involves resource team members, here is where you have to mention them. Your resource team includes the technicians, laboratory attendants, site caretakers, data entry personnel, junior researchers, and the senior researcher involved. Specify their allowances and salaries in an organized manner.
Recurring Expenditure
These expenses occur regularly and yet cannot be avoided. These include equipment usage, laboratory-conducted diagnostic tests, telecommunication charges, chemicals, and any other essential items. Fees for human subjects involved in your research are also stated here.
Non-recurring Expenditure
These are the costs of items for which you have to pay one-time charges, and then their use is free. These include buying charges for the printer, computer, or other electronic items. Once you buy them, they are charge-free. Thus, you have to specify all the non-recurring charges in your budget form.
Traveling Expenditure
In this subheading, specify the amount spent on your traveling for research purposes. Separately mention your traveling costs for attending research-related conferences, seminars, and training. Also, mention the travel expenses for the surveys and data collection. Visiting expenses to other institutions for the sake of a research study can also be mentioned here.
The second sub-section is indirect expenditure. It includes facilities that are indirectly related to your research project. These can be library facilities, electricity, and water usage for your experiments and test conduction. These are also called overhead charges that are paid specifically to the institution for providing such facilities ( Ahmed & Abdullah, 2017 ).
In the final paragraph, write a short finalizing note relating your budget outlining the main point. This should be a 4 to 5-lined paragraph.
Most of the funding agencies separately require justification for each item that you specified in your above-mentioned budget form. This document is also known as the budget narrative page. It reasons the importance of that item for your research conduction. Each item is mentioned in the same order as in your budget form and should be justified respectively ( Al-Jundi & Salah, 2016 ). It is best to make a three-columned table with the name of the item in the first column, the quantity and cost in the second column, and a justification statement in the third column.
In the last, you have to provide a summarized form of your budget for your proposed research. It is written at the end when you have completed writing your whole application. In this, you have to specify every item with its cost per annum. The non-recurring items will only be specified under the first-year heading as they have a one-time expense. Likewise, the recurring items will be mentioned in both years, along with their costs.
The following points will enhance the esthetics of your budget section:
Writing the budget items under a categorized heading will make it easy for the reviewers to retrieve the necessary points in your budget. You can use bullet marks or checklist signs to highlight your main points. This will show the reviewers that you have the budget representation skills and that your enlisted budget finance is authentic.
Try to write your budget essentials in a tabulated form with three main columns. The first column represents the item name. The second column specifies the cost of that particular essential. The third column signifies the importance of your particular essential in performing your research. This will save both time and effort of reviewers who have to scrutinize many applications at a time.
The pattern you follow for each essential specification in the budget form should be followed in the same manner while writing the budget justification document. There should be a flow in your budget data and which will further enhance its esthetics.
Your language should be simple enough to be understood by a common person. Complicated terms and phrases will only make it difficult for reviewers to reach your point of view.
Your budget prepares you for all the financial aids you need to conduct your research. It informs you about the expenses of each research item and method. In this way, you can choose an economical procedure for your research. The budget section is considered as the key factor of success or failure for your proposal. This section requires a skillful approach and should be handled delicately. Nowadays, research writers record their budget in the form of electronic spreadsheets. It is easy to manage the budget essentials and the expenses via these excel spreadsheets. You just need to point out and categorize the direct and indirect costs in the already drawn tabulated budget spreadsheet. Hence, you will be able to plan and compose a well-scripted budget by following the instructions given in this article.
Monday – Friday 9 AM – 5 PM EST
DISCLAIMER: ConductScience and affiliate products are NOT designed for human consumption, testing, or clinical utilization. They are designed for pre-clinical utilization only. Customers purchasing apparatus for the purposes of scientific research or veterinary care affirm adherence to applicable regulatory bodies for the country in which their research or care is conducted.
The budget should list all cost details for the year or another appropriate period of time. It should include any applicable salaries & wages, fringe benefits, services, supplies, equipment, publications, travel, other direct expenses, and any facility and administrative costs. A brief outline for developing a budget is included in Michigan Tech's policies and procedures manual .
Sample budgets are available for Michigan Tech researchers in the RD Toolkit .
You can download a budget worksheet (Excel) to help you with this process. Refer to the Guidelines for Budget Development for additional calculation help and information.
Follow these cost considerations when developing your budget:
Your budget is a financial proposal that reflects the work proposed. It outlines the expected project costs in detail, and should mirror the project description. A budget is presented as a categorical list of anticipated project costs that represent the researcher's best estimate of the funds needed to support the proposed work. The term “best estimate” is important here. You will be held to using the costs detailed in your budget, so make sure you’ve correctly estimated what you will need to complete the project.
Reviewers want to know how reasonable the cost of your project is. They will ask themselves whether you are over or underestimating your expenses. A careful review of the budget lets the reviewer know that you're not asking for too much or too little, but rather, just enough funding.
A UCSB Detailed Budget should be prepared for each proposal. This will assist in the completion of any sponsor budget forms and the budget justifcation, as well as assist with sponsor requests for additional details about how you generated your overall figure, or where the money will be going. Remember, all budgets are to be prepared in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Guidance (the UG) and the UC Santa Barbara Departmental Costing Guidelines .
For proposals to State of California agencies , in addition to the information contained below, please see our State of California Proposal Guidance page for forms, instructions and indirect cost information specific to State proposals.
Direct costs.
Salaries and Wages
The budget category Salaries and Wages is designed to account for UCSB employees only. Non-UCSB employees will be listed on their appropriate subaward or MCA budget, as consultant costs, or as contracts for services. To assist in determining the appropriate role an individual or entity should have on a project, see the Who's Who on my Sponsored Project guide.
In the Salaries and Wages category , you should include the individual's name, University payroll title, annual or monthly salary, number of months or percentage of time on project, and the total salary requested for each person listed. Always note that the summer salary for faculty is "1/9 annual salary," as many sponsors question how summer salary is calculated.
If you know the specific person who will be working on a project, you should use their actual salary. When an actual salary rate is used, it must be must be indicated as such in the proposal budget. For academic appointments, if an individual's salary is above-scale or off-scale, indicate such on the budget. Remember: Off-scale means appointed at a specific on-scale level, but the salary is above that level, while above-scale means appointed at a salary that is above the highest possible level for that title.
If an individual is not yet identified, list as "TBN" (to be named) with the appropriate salary from the approved salary scales. Remember to consult the bargaining unit contract for covered academic and staff tittles.
Remember that departmental approval is required for any faculty release time included in a proposal budget.
Clerical or administrative salaries and wages should normally be treated as indirect costs. However, such costs are allowable as direct costs if the four criteria in the UG § 200.413(c) are satisfied. To be included, such costs must be specifically justified in the proposal and in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Guidance (the UG).
Note for NSF proposals only: The definition of “year” is required to be included in the budget justification when you are requesting salary for Senior Personnel. See NSF 18-1 PAPPG Section II.C.2.g.i(a) . When applicable, include the following statement, "UCSB defines 'year' as the fiscal year than spans from July 1 to June 30 each calendar year", in the section of the budget justification where you are justifying the salary request(s). (updated 2/7/18)
Escalation Rates for Salaries and Wages (updated 11/07/2017)
Projected merits/promotions should be factored in for all titles.
Fringe Benefits (updated 06/25/2024)
UCSB is implementing Composite Benefit Rates (CBR) beginning September 1, 2018. On and after this date, benefits charged to all fund sources will be based on CBR, not an employee’s actual benefit costs. CBRs are used to simplify the budgeting and standardize the accounting of employee benefits to be predictable and consistent. All proposals and revised budgets submitted should use CBRs.
The CBR contains the following costs: Benefits Administration; Medical, Dental, Disability, Life, Unemployment, Vision, and Worker’s Compensation Insurance; Employee Support Programs; FICA and Medicare Taxes; Incentive Award Programs; Retiree Health Benefits; Retirement Benefits; Senior Management Supplemental; PFCB; and Post Doc Childcare. CBR does not include Vacation Leave Assessment, UCRP Supplement Interest Assessment, Tuition remission, Graduate Student Health Insurance, and General, Automotive, and Employee Insurance (GAEL).
CBRs are fixed for an entire fiscal year and will be adjusted annually. As of June 13, 2024 the rates are approved through June 30, 2025 (FY25).
The CBRs, including projections for future years and rates to use in current proposals, are located on the budget and planning website . Budget and Planning has a CBR website with additional background information on CBR, including a CBR FAQ.
Fringe benefits are listed on the proposal budget as a set percent of salary. Fringe benefits must be budgeted to the same funding source as the corresponding salary (UC C&G Manual Ch. 7-206 , Ch, 2-520 ). The budgeted fringe benefit rate is comprised of up to three different rates, the composite benefit rate (CBR), vacation accrual, and UC Retirement Program (UCRP) interest charge*.
Please note that fringe benefit rates for some academic titles change in the summer months.
For CBR questions, contact [email protected] .
*UCRP interest charge is allowable on non-federal fund sources only. It should not be budgeted on federal or federal flow-through funds.
Graduate Student Tuition, Fees, and Health Insurance
Graduate students employed by the University in eligible classifications receive partial or full tuition and fee remission, depending on the percentage of time appointment, from the same fund that pays their salaries. In cases when an eligible graduate student is paid from more than one fund source, the cost of remission should be prorated. Graduate students employed in the title classification Graduate Student Researcher (GSR) are among those eligible for remission. Questions regarding eligibility of particular students should be directed to the UCSB Graduate Division .
Please refer to the UCSB Office of the Registrar's Summary of Quarterly Fees and Expenses for the current tuition, fee, and health insurance rates.
Indicate on the budget if tuition, fees and insurance are for an in-state or out-of-state Graduate Student Researcher (GSR).
GSR appointments up to 24% time are not eligible for remission. However, if a GSR has an appointment that is less than full time in your department/unit, make sure they do not have an additional appointment, as eligibility for remission is based on the total percent of all appointments combined on campus.
Partial Remission
GSRs employed between 25% and 34% time (all GSR appointments combined) qualify for partial remission. This includes payment of 100% of the university's mandatory fees: Student Services Fee; Tuition, All Students; and Non-Resident Tuition, Supplemental where approperiate. It also includes payment of Health Insurance. However, partial remission does not currently include the payment of UCSB Campus Based Fees.
Full Remission
GSRs employed at least 35% time or at least 140 hours of a three month quarter (all GSR appointments combined) qualify for full fee and tuition remission. This includes payment of 100% of the university's fees: Student Services Fee; Tuition, All Students; UCSB Campus Based Fees, and Health Insurance. It also includes payment of Non-Resident Tuition, Supplemental for international students, and non-resident domestic students during their first year only.
Non-Resident GSRs who have advanced to candidacy are eligible for a 100% reduction in supplemental tuition for a maximum of three years after the advance to candidacy.
Tuition, Fees, and Health Insurance Escalation Rates (updated 09/14/2020)
2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | 2022-2023 | 2023-2024 | 2024-2025 |
3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% |
Sponsored Projects staff use this unofficial GSR Tuition/Fees and UC SHIP Projection Chart as a tool when reviewing proposals. It may be used by departments to assist in determining the appropriate rates when preparing proposal budgets. It is not intended to replace use of the official rates found on the UCSB Office of the Registrar's Summary of Quarterly Fees and Expenses website.
The University defines equipment as articles of non-expendable tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year, and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. Sometimes an agency will have a higher or lower dollar value than UCSB. In this case, UCSB's dollar value takes precedent.
Tax, shipping, and any transit costs should be factored into the cost of the equipment. If the quote is from an out-of-state or foreign supplier California Use Tax should be factored into the cost as well. One exception: Sales tax is not paid on government owned equipment. If the guidelines of a proposal state that any equipment purchased will vest in the government, do not add in sales tax.
Fabrications are generally treated like equipment and excluded from indirect costs under MTDC calculation. However, if an item is fabricated and title title is not retained by the UCSB, all costs of its fabrication are subject to indirect costs. Fabrication costs may include associated labor. Please consult with UCSB Equipment Management to confirm that all anticipated fabrication costs are correctly categorized as equipment.
If proposing to purchase a single item or fabrication of equipment budgeted at $100,000 or more, and not submitting to a specific equipment or instrumentation proposal call (such as a DURIP), please contact BFS Procurement Services to discuss additional purchasing requirements that may apply. It’s important to note that even if a specific make/model of the equipment is included, federal purchasing procedures may not allow the campus to purchase that specific make/model.
Travel should be broken down into domestic and foreign categories, and as much detail as possible should be provided. Include travel destinations, number of people traveling, number of days traveling, ground and/or air transportation costs, lodging and substanance or per diem, etc. Remember to always check the sponsor guidelines to make sure foreign travel is allowed before including it in a proposal budget.
All travel funded directly or indirectly by the Federal Government must comply with the Fly America Act .
All state-funded travel must comply with the travel restrictions imposed by Assembly Bill No. 1887. For information, see the Business and Financial Services website or the State Attorney General's website .
See the UCSB Business & Financial Services travel webpage and the UCOP Financial Services & Controls travel policy webpage for additional travel guidance, including per diems rates and mileage expenses.
If the project involves international travel, we recommend the travelers review the UC Ethics, Compliance and Audit Services' information on international travel , hand-carrying items abroad and export control laws & regulations prior to traveling abroad. Additional export control information is available on the UCSB Research Integrity website .
Participant Support
Per the Uniform Guidance, participant support costs means direct costs for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with conferences, or training projects.
A stipend is defined as a fixed sum of money paid to a participant. Stipends are not paid in compensation of work performed.
This article from the May 2017 NSF Policy Newsletter answers some frequently asked questions about participant support.
Sponsored Projects staff use this unofficial participant support flow chart as a tool when reviewing budgets.
Subawards and Multi-Campus Awards (MCAs)
The total amount of each subaward or Multiple-Campus Award (MCA) should be listed as a seperate line item on the UCSB Detailed Budget. An authorized scope of work, budget, and budget justification must be submitted for each subaward or MCA. A Sub-recipeint Commitment Form or MCA Commitment Form, signed by an authorized official of the recipient entity, must be provided to Sponsored Projects prior to submission of the proposal. See UCSB Office of Research - Subawards page for details.
Indirect costs are assessed on the first $25,000 of each individual subaward for all New and Renewal proposals (effective July 1, 2009). If the first budget period is less than $25,000, remember to add the remaining amount to equal the $25,000 in the remaining budget period(s).
If UCSB is submitting a proposal that includes an MCA, no indirect costs are assessed on any part of the MCA amount. See Indirect Costs (IDC) or Facilities and Administration (F&A) Costs for additional guidance.
If unsure if the other entity's costs should be budgeted as a subaward or a service agreement (in Other Direct Costs), please review the Subaward Determination Tip Sheet . If still unsure after reviewing the tip sheet, contact your Sponsored Projects Team .
Other Direct Costs
Other Direct Costs include Materials and Supplies, Publication Costs, Consultant Costs and Contracts for Services, UCSB Campus Recharges, and Other.
Materials and Supplies
Material and supply costs are defined as items that cost less than $5,000. They must be reasonable and directly allocable to the supported activity, and should be listed on the budget with information detailing quantity, unit price, and a description of the item. Office supplies, postage, copy charges and local phone calls are examples of costs not normally allowed as direct costs. To be included, such costs must be significantly above what is normally covered by Indirect Costs (IDC) or Facilities and Administration (F&A) Costs, and must be specifically justified in the proposal and appropriate to the project.
Hazardous waste disposal costs are not allowable as a direct cost.
Publication Costs
You may include the costs associated with the dissemination of research findings from the proposed research. Publication costs typically include page charges for professional publications.
Consultant Costs & Contracts for Services
Consultant Costs generally may only be paid to individuals not employed by UC campuses or labs. The consultant should provide special knowledge that is needed for the project. Include the same information provided for UCSB project personnel (name, title, etc) and be specific about daily rate and amount of days for which they will be paid.
Contracts for Services should be included in the budget as a line item. The total amount of the contract is accessed the appropriate IDC rate.
If unsure if the other entity's costs should be budgeted as a consulting/service agreement or as a subaward, please review the Subaward Determination Tip Sheet . If still unsure after reviewing the tip sheet, contact your Sponsored Projects Team .
UCSB Campus Recharges
Intercampus recharges for research related goods and services such as facility or equipment usage, university automobile rentals, or specialized technical services may be included in a project budget. All recharges must be directly allocable to the project, and should be estimated and escalated based on the Estimating Project Costs guidance found below. See also the UCSB Budget & Planning Income & Recharge webpage for additional information on recharge policies and procedures at UCSB.
Indirect Costs (IDC) a.k.a. Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs represent those expenses that cannot be easily identified to any specific project but are incurred for common or joint objectives. They include operation and maintenance of facilities, including building depreciation, library expenses, space, utilities, payroll, accounting, and other services. The indirect cost rate is determined by the type of project i.e. research, instruction, or other. The rate is also determined by whether the project is performed on-campus or off-campus. Refer to UC Research Policy and Coordination's indirect cost recovery webpage and an Introduction to Indirect Costs at UC Santa Barbara for additional information.
The Council on Government Relations (COGR), an association of research universities and affiliated medical centers and independent research institutes, has prepared three documents to help explain what IDC (F&A) costs are, their importance and how the system works.
UCSB's Federally Negotiated IDC or F&A Rate Agreement (updated 04/10/2018)
UCSB has pre-determined IDC rates that have been negotiatied with the Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS). See the current negotiated rate agreement for UCSB which applies to all proposals submitted on or after 04/10/2018.
The applicable IDC rate is determined by the type of project (i.e. Research, Instruction, Other Sponsored Activities, etc.) and by whether the project is performed on-campus or off-campus. Refer to the negotiated rate agreement for UCSB and the UCOP Contract & Grant Manual Chapter 8, or contact your Sponsored Projects Team for assistance determining the correct IDC rate for your project.
UCSB's indirect cost is assessed on Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC). The MTDC base consists of salaries and wages, fringe benefits, materials, supplies, services, travel, and subcontracts (up to the first $25K of each). The costs of equipment, capital expenditures, graduate student remission (including tuition, fees, and health insurance), rental costs of off-site facilities, scholarships, fellowships, the portion of each subcontract in excess of $25K, and the total of each MCA is excluded from the MTDC base. When the new rate agreement comes into effect with proposals on or after 04/10/2018, Participant Support will also be excluded from the MTDC base.
A DHHS agreement statement should always be included at the end of the detailed budget to let agencies know which authority has negotiated our IDC rate agreement; "This is the DHHS negotiated, predetermined, on-campus rate for Research Projects covering the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2021. The rate thereafter is provisional."
IDC Policy Exceptions (updated 11/07/2017)
Proposals must include the negotiated IDC rate unless an exception to the UC's policy on IDC recovery has been approved. Using written documentation of an alternate IDC rate or IDC base, Sponsored Projects will request an IDC exception. The sponsor's IDC policy should be published and apply equally to all applicants. Contact your Sponsored Projects Team for assistance preparing and documenting an alternate IDC rate or base.
See also Calculating Indirect Costs with a Total Costs Base for assistance working with a sponsor imposed Total Costs IDC base.
IDC for Proposals to State of California Agencies
Proposals to State of California agencies should apply the appropriate IDC rate from UCSB's federally negotiated rate agreement if the funds are ultimately flowing down from a federal agency. For proposals funded with state funds (and no federal funding), please apply the appropriate indirect cost rate in accordance with the guidance on our State of California Proposal Guidance page.
The Budget Justification (aka Budget Narrative) provides the rationale for proposed expenditures. Follow sponsor guidelines to prepare the budget justification for submission to the sponsor. If sufficient detail is not provided on the UCSB detailed budget, UCSB may require additional justification.
Note for NSF proposals only: The definition of “year” is required to be included in the budget justifiation when you are requesting salary for Senior Personnel. See NSF 18-1 PAPPG Section II.C.2.g.i(a) . When applicable, include the following statement, "UCSB defines 'year' as the fiscal year than spans from July 1 to June 30 each calendar year", in the section of the budget justification where you are justifying the salary request(s). (updated 2/7/18)
Estimating and Justifying Project Costs (Updated 8/23/2018)
Once you know your direct cost budget categories, you will need to identify and project the costs for a sponsored project using generally accepted cost estimation methods. For categories other than Salaries and Wages, Fringe Benefits and Graduate Student Tuition, Fees, and Health Insurance, you will need to estimate your costs. There are multiple accepted cost estimation strategies:
You may utilize methods other than these to estimate your costs. However, you must ensure that your process is logical, you can explain it to someone else, and you are able to document how you obtained your numbers.
Escalating Costs (updated 8/23/2018)
When you estimate your costs, you should remember that costs increase over time. Because of this, we recommend that you include a modest escalation in the estimate of costs for direct charges. Escalating costs is consistent with the University's cost principles, and with the University's policy of recovering all costs of conducting sponsored projects. Escalation helps to ensure that your project receives adequate funding. You should use an escalation rate of 3 to 5% for most direct costs. There are three exceptions to this - Salaries and Wages, Fringe Benefits, and Graduate Student Tuition, Fees, and Health Insurance should be escalated in accordance with those rates indicated in these sections.
Documenting Costs
Once you've estimated your direct costs, you will also need to make sure you keep detailed documentation. Documentation supports how the costs were estimated and the reasons why costs were proposed. This is our proof that we are not just making up all of the numbers.
You can use any of the materials you used for your cost estimation as documentation. These could be things like payroll records, published merit & range increases, catalogs, on-line or other, vendor quotes, proposals, or documentation of historical costs for like projects.
If you are using web-based information as your documentation, you should save either a printed copy or PDF version of the page, not just the link. Auditors will need to see the information you used when you wrote your proposal budget, and the website will most likely update the information, or may not be available at the time of an audit.
A revised budget is a revision to the budget of a proposal that has already been submitted to the sponsor for review, but not yet awarded. Notification of a request for a revised budget may be sent to the SPO team, the administering department, and/or the PI either via email or via the sponsor’s electronic grants management system (e.g. Fastlane). The notification will come with directions (a.k.a. Guidelines) indicating what changes to the budget are needed.
Requirements for revised budgets
**Note: All revised budgets must use the originally proposed IDC rate UNLESS the sponsor requests to rebudget with our current rate.
Categories:
Proposal budgets and budget justifications are the financial road maps of sponsored projects. When thoughtfully and strategically built they both help propel proposals to award and pave the way for effective post-award management. Visit the ORA Budget and Budget Justifications webpage for the Stanford Detailed Budget and Budget Justification templates and resource links to help you build successful budgets and budget justifications.
Do you have sponsored project budgeting questions? Contact the ORA Client Advocacy & Education team . No question is too big or too small. We're here to help!
Budgets and budget justifications demonstrate feasibility, value for money and detail why you need an item for your project, as well as how you arrived at the costings.
Every research project has two budget categories: direct costs and indirect costs.
The University determines a set percentage for the indirect costs of funded research. Contact Grants Services for the correct figure to use.
Direct costs are costs integral to achieving the research objectives of a grant. The costs directly address the research objectives of the grant and relate to the research plan.
Direct cost examples:
Indirect costs are institution costs that benefit and support research activities at the institution. Although they are necessary for the conduct of research and may be incurred during the project, they are costs that do not directly address the approved research objectives of a grant.
Indirect cost examples:
All external research activities are expected to contribute to indirect costs except :
Indirect costs are calculated by determining the direct costs first and then applying the indirect costs formula:
e.g. Direct costs = $50,000 x (indirect cost % figure) = Total project cost
Your project budget needs to include all cash and in-kind items it requires.
In-kind support is any non-cash contributions that a party gives to the project. In-kind can be contributed by Western Sydney University or by an external party, and can include:
On-costs are direct costs associated with salary. These costs relate to superannuation, sick leave, payroll tax etc. and must be included your budget.
Access this link for more detail about Western on-costs
For the latest salary figures, please check with the Office of People
You are a Lead Chief Investigator (CI) on a non-Category 1 funding body project for one year. You commit 0.4 (FTE) of your time to the research = 2 days per week. You are paid at Academic Level E, Step 2, which is $188,944 per annum. You can calculate your salary inclusive of 28% on-costs as follows:
0.4 x 0.28 x 188,944 = 21,161.73
The budgeting of your salary, a direct cost of the research, should be listed as $21,161.73.
If your project covers three years, with the same or differing time commitments, you calculate this figure for each year of your project. Remember to factor in pay rises according to Step increases in multi-year grants.
You may also have a research assistant employed full-time for seven weeks at HEW Level 5, Step 3. You hire the assistant at the casual hourly rate of $48.97, which includes 25% leave loading. You add 16.5% on-costs to this figure:
48.97 x (35 x 7) = 11,997.65
11,997.65 x .165 = 1,979.50
1,979.50 + 11,997.65 = 13,977.15
The total cost to employ the research assistant is $13,977.15.
Note 1: the maximum period a person can be employed on a casual rate is 6 months.
Note 2: For some schemes, the funding provider stipulates a specific maximum rate for funding of salary on-costs, e.g. the Australian Research Council (ARC) funds on-costs at a rate of 30%, so you must use this figure.
^ Back to top
Mobile options:
Launch your career at UWS
Sponsor requirements differ, and sample budget justifications should be seen only as a starting point. Guidelines for sponsor requirements are in the annotated budget justifications. Read the solicitation and the sponsor’s proposal preparation guidelines for each proposal's requirements.
Research is not only a time-intensive exercise; it is also a capital-intensive one and as such, it needs a budget. Drafting a research budget is no walk in the park because you have to know exactly how much will be needed to see the process through, not to mention you may have to account for every penny spent. By virtue of being such a technical document, you will always need some help drafting it; and that’s where the research budget template comes in.
The template enables you to get a rough idea of some of the elements to include in the budget, so you do not run into any financial dead ends. Let us learn more of this critical template and see why you need it.
A research proposal budget sample is in many ways similar to the research budget sample, only that at this stage, it is still a proposal.
This sample is often written in a linear or tabular format and it details all the expenses that are associated with the proposal project.
A research study budget is a document that contains a breakdown of the funds needed to meet the various activities involved in conducting a research study. It is important to remember that a research study is not just intended to develop new methods or improve the existing practices; one of the ultimate goals of the study is profit making by the researchers.
Therefore, this budget should be able to convince stakeholders, more so the sponsors, that the study is a viable cause and that investing their money in it will be worthwhile.
A research budget example is basically a sample document of a research budget. As there are possibly hundreds or thousands of types of researches done daily, there is no hard and fast rule on the details that need to be in such a sample document. However, the rule of thumb demands that the names of the researchers be included, along with the identified challenges and expected financial investment for each challenge.
The document can take any form but primarily, the names of the researchers and the expected challenges come on the left-hand side with their corresponding assignments and projected budget for each problem respectively coming on the right-hand side of the document.
Whether you are an expert or a novice in writing research budget proposals, one thing that’s for sure is that you will always find yourself making purely avoidable mistakes.
As these documents are highly sensitive, mistakes are things you can’t afford; which is why you are advised to always keep a sample template for reference.
Opps what went wrong, related posts.
Thank you for your feedback.
All Formats
Proposal template bundle, 12+ research budget proposal templates in pdf | ms word, 1. research budget proposal template, 2. project research proposal and budget, 3. school research budget proposal template, 4. sample student research budget proposal, 5. science research proposal budget form worksheet, 6. free research budget grant proposal template, 7. research paper proposal budget template, 8. research thesis proposal budget example, 9. printable research budget plan proposal.
12. research budget management proposal format, 13. standard draft research budget proposal template, 14. free research project budget proposal, classification of research proposal budget, how to make a research budget proposal, budget templates, 12+ research budget proposal templates in pdf | ms word | apple pages.
A research proposal is a paper that proposes a research project, usually in the sciences or academia and generally constitutes a funding request for that study. A budget is one of the key components of a research proposal and serves as a blueprint for spending the funds from the project. An effective budget for the proposal outlines the proposed project in fiscal terms and helps reviewers determine how the project is to be carried out.
Indirect costs, 1. list your activities.
3. cost each item, 4. put it in a spreadsheet, 5. justify it, more in budget templates.
Keynote speaker poster template, quartet poster template, quality poster template, conference poster keynote template, research poster template for keynote, school cash management policy template, biography research template, creative research poster template, university research poster template.
Word templates, google docs templates, excel templates, powerpoint templates, google sheets templates, google slides templates, pdf templates, publisher templates, psd templates, indesign templates, illustrator templates, pages templates, keynote templates, numbers templates, outlook templates.
Funding News Edition: September 4, 2024 See more articles in this edition
NIH's SBIR program accepts Phase I, Phase II, Fast Track, and Direct-to-Phase II research proposals.
Each year, NIH solicits research proposals from small businesses through A Solicitation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Contract Proposals . The latest version was published on August 2, 2024. The solicitation serves as a vehicle for offerors to propose research projects on a multitude of scientific topics from across NIH.
Proposals are due by October 18, 2024, at 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
NIH’s Small Business Education and Entrepreneurial Development (SEED) program will host an HHS SBIR Contract RFP Pre-proposal Conference Webinar (PHS-2025-1) to discuss the mechanics of the contract opportunity on September 23, 2024, from 2 to 4 p.m. Eastern Time. The presentation materials will be posted on that same event page following the session.
Note : This SBIR contract solicitation is distinct from the 2024 SBIR and STTR Omnibus/Parent Grant Solicitations for the NIH, CDC, and FDA released in July, which are notices of funding opportunities for grant awards (despite the word “solicitation” appearing in their titles). Learn about those grant opportunities in our August 7, 2024 article “ Small Business Research: Priority Funding Topics for 2025 .”
To differentiate among the proposal types:
The table below summarizes NIAID’s research topics of interest for contract proposals. Refer to the attachment posted within the solicitation linked above for full details, including the number of anticipated awards and descriptions of required activities and deliverables.
137. New Drug Classes with Novel Mechanisms of Action for HIV, Hepatitis B, and Tuberculosis | To develop new drug classes for HIV, HBV, or Mtb therapy with a different mode of action than FDA-approved drugs currently in use. HBV and Mtb drugs must be compatible with current antiretroviral regimens. | Phase I, Fast Track | Phase I: $300,000 each year for up to 2 years Phase II: $2 million for up to 3 years |
138. Devices and Materials-Based Platforms for the Delivery of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies (bNAbs) | To develop devices and materials for administering HIV-1 bNAb(s) and bNAb derivatives that increase protection from infection. Devices or materials should demonstrate 1) sustained release and stability, 2) increased bioavailability, 3) increased protective durability, 4) increased concentration or dose, 5) reduced burden of administration, or 6) increased user acceptability of the bNAb(s) relative to standard intravenous or subcutaneous administration methods. | Phase I, Fast Track | Phase I: $300,000 each year for up to 2 years Phase II: $2 million for up to 3 years |
139. Rapid Diagnostic Assays for Self-Monitoring of Acute or Rebound HIV-1 Infection | To support early-stage diagnostic technologies as platforms for developing simple, low-cost, rapid diagnostic assays that enable individuals to directly detect HIV-1 during the earliest stages of initial infection or to monitor viral suppression in chronic treated infection, i.e., when antibody responses are not an accurate surrogate for viral load. | Phase I, Fast Track | Phase I: $300,000 each year for up to 2 years Phase II: $2 million for up to 3 years |
140. Adjuvant Discovery and Down-Selection for Vaccines Against Infectious and Immune-Mediated Diseases | To support screening for new adjuvant candidates for vaccines against infectious diseases, autoimmune and allergic diseases, or transplantation; candidate characterization; and early-stage optimization. Also, to support the down-selection of adjuvants for subsequent vaccine development in side-by-side comparisons.
| Phase I, Fast Track, Direct-to-Phase II | Phase I: $300,000 each year for up to 2 years Phase II: $1 million each year—with appropriate justification—for up to 3 years |
141. Reagents for Immunologic Analysis of Non-mammalian and Underrepresented Mammalian Models | To develop and validate reliable monoclonal antibodies or other reagents that can identify and track primary immune cells (e.g., cell surface markers and receptors) or analyze immune function/responses (e.g., cytokines, chemokines, intracellular signaling) in non-mammalian models or underrepresented mammalian models. | Phase I, Fast Track, Direct-to-Phase II | Phase I: $300,000 each year for up to 2 years Phase II: $500,000 each year for up to 3 years |
142. Adjuvant Development for Vaccines and for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases | To support preclinical development and optimization of a single lead adjuvant for use in vaccines to prevent or treat human disease caused by infectious pathogens or to treat immune-mediated diseases. The lead adjuvant may be a single entity or a combination adjuvant. Adjuvants may be chemical, biological, or genetic adjuvants. Adjuvants may be novel or may functionally replicate adjuvants used in licensed vaccines. | Phase I, Fast Track, Direct-to-Phase II | Phase I: $300,000 each year for up to 2 years Phase II: $1 million each year—with appropriate justification—for up to 3 years |
143. Development of Diagnostics for (Mg) Infection | To develop a new, more rapid, nucleic acid-based test for the diagnosis and treatment of Mg infection. The test should detect Mg and determine macrolide and quinolone sensitivity in clinical specimens to aid resistance-guided therapy. | Phase I, Fast Track
| Phase I: $300,000 for up to 1 year Phase II: $1.5 million for up to 3 years |
144. Development of Medical Interventions for Treating Non-Tuberculosis Mycobacterial (NTM) Infections | To support preclinical investigational new drug (IND) enabling development of therapeutic products that target NTM infections. This includes 1) improved strategies and regimens for treatment of NTM infections, 2) newer chemical entities with demonstrated anti-NTM inhibitory activity and , 3) optimized analogs or formulations of established antimicrobials with anti-NTM activity, and 4) selected bacteriophages for treatment of NTM infection in combination with antibiotics. | Phase I, Fast Track, Direct-to-Phase II | Phase I: $300,000 for up to 1 year Phase II: $1.5 million for up to 3 years |
145. Diagnostics to Detect Host Immunity to Coccidioidomycosis (Valley fever) or Histoplasmosis | To develop an , cytokine-release assay for the detection of coccidioidomycosis (Valley fever) or histoplasmosis. | Phase I, Fast Track, Direct-to-Phase II | Phase I: $300,000 for up to 1 year Phase II: $1.5 million for up to 3 years |
146. Discovery and Development of Oral Small-molecule Direct-acting Antivirals Targeting Viruses of Pandemic Potential | To support antiviral drug discovery, evaluation and development targeting one or more viral pathogens from the following RNA virus families with pandemic potential: coronaviruses, paramyxoviruses, bunyaviruses, togaviruses, filoviruses, picornaviruses, flaviviruses, and orthomyxoviruses. Proposals must have in hand a new chemical series with mode of action through inhibition of a viral target and confirmed antiviral activity in a cellular assay. | Phase I, Fast Track, Direct-to-Phase II | Phase I: $500,000 for up to 1 year Phase II: $2 million for up to 3 years |
147. Software or Web Services to Assess Quality and Reproducibility of Data and Information About Therapeutics and Vaccines | To develop digital tools that assess quality and reproducibility of research-based digital information for infectious disease therapeutics and vaccines. The proposed tools could be specific to a single digital platform and verify the quality and reproducibility of infectious disease data. Ultimately these approaches would enable the development of software or web services that quantify rigor and reproducibility of datasets underlying vaccines and treatments to infectious diseases. | Phase I, Fast Track | Phase I: $300,000 for up to 1 year Phase II: $1.5 million for up to 3 years |
Your contract proposal should address only one topic; if you wish to pursue multiple topics, submit a separate proposal for each topic. Submit your proposal(s) through the electronic Contract Proposal Submission . Direct any technical questions about the solicitation and NIAID’s topics to Jonathan Bryan in NIAID’s Office of Acquisitions at [email protected] or 240-669-5180.
Find general information and advice on our Small Business Programs page and contact NIAID SBIR/STTR Program Coordinator Natalia Kruchinin, Ph.D., at [email protected] for funding questions specific to small businesses.
Email us at [email protected] for help navigating NIAID’s grant and contract policies and procedures.
An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
View guidelines, important information about nsf’s implementation of the revised 2 cfr.
NSF Financial Assistance awards (grants and cooperative agreements) made on or after October 1, 2024, will be subject to the applicable set of award conditions, dated October 1, 2024, available on the NSF website . These terms and conditions are consistent with the revised guidance specified in the OMB Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance published in the Federal Register on April 22, 2024.
All proposals must be submitted in accordance with the requirements specified in this funding opportunity and in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) that is in effect for the relevant due date to which the proposal is being submitted. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that the proposal meets these requirements. Submitting a proposal prior to a specified deadline does not negate this requirement.
Supports research and development to enhance STEM learning and teaching for preK-12 students.
The goal of the Discovery Research PreK-12 program (DRK-12) is to catalyze research and development that enhances all preK-12 teachers’ and students’ opportunities to engage in high-quality learning experiences related to the sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The program’s objectives are to: (1) build knowledge about how to develop preK-12 students’ and teachers’ STEM content knowledge, practices, and skills; (2) support collaborative partnerships among STEM education researchers, STEM education practitioners and school leaders with the goals of extending relevant scientific literatures while developing more effective practice; and (3) build the field of STEM education by supporting knowledge synthesis, interdisciplinary interactions across fields and stakeholders, and the development of novel and robust ways of assessing teacher and student learning, engagement, and skills. Outcomes of DRK-12 projects can include but are not limited to promising, evidence-based products that can be used by others to support the success of all teachers and all students (e.g., curriculum, teaching and research tools, and models of collaboration).
The program solicits proposals along two strands: (1) Learning and (2) Teaching. While these strands certainly overlap and have synergy, proposals should identify one strand that is most consistent with the proposal’s objectives and research questions (e.g., are the project’s methods and outcomes focused primarily on teacher development and teaching or student development and learning?). Research project types under both Strands include exploratory, design and development, impact, implementation, measurement and assessment, and synthesis studies. The program also supports other project types including Partnership Development Grants and Workshops/Conferences.
Successful proposals demonstrate how they build on fundamental research in STEM education and on previous or current applied research and development efforts. They also explain their theoretical and empirical justification (e.g., Why is the project designed as it is?) and outline related specific aims and methods with potential to yield new understandings of STEM teaching and learning contexts, processes, and outcomes. The program welcomes proposals focused on teaching and learning in any STEM field(s) and on priorities identified in the National Science Foundation’s strategic plan . Efforts focused on facilitating the reciprocal exchange or mobilization of knowledge between the research and preK-12 formal education professional communities are strongly encouraged (see this Dear Colleague Letter https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2023/nsf23078/nsf23078.jsp ).
Cadre supports the drk-12 community, program contacts.
(703) 292-8620 |
Organization(s).
The value of investment in cancer research.
NCI Director W. Kimryn Rathmell, M.D., Ph.D., M.M.H.C., explains how the funding described in this proposal will allow NCI to achieve the full potential of cancer research and help people live longer, healthier lives.
This proposal presents NCI’s assessment of the specific funding needed in fiscal year 2026 to accelerate progress to end cancer as we know it for all people.
NCI supports cancer research to advance scientific knowledge and enhance the quality and length of life for all people diagnosed with cancer.
NCI invests in a broad portfolio of research, supports the cancer workforce, and sustains research infrastructure.
NCI highlights four areas of scientific opportunity for fiscal year 2026.
Tip of the month (september 2024): subawards checklist.
September 6, 2024
Executive summary.
Over the last several months, groups of House Republicans and the Heritage Foundation have released policy agendas that, taken together, would create a harsher country with higher poverty and less opportunity, where millions of people would face higher costs for health care, child care, and housing, and millions more would lose health coverage — all while wealthy households and corporations benefit from an unfair tax code that provides them with outsized tax breaks. These skewed priorities would exacerbate inequities in income, wealth, health, and hardship across lines of race and ethnicity, widening already glaring differences that have their roots in racism and other forms of discrimination.
Looking at three proposals — the House Republican Study Committee’s (RSC) budget plan, the Republican House Budget Committee’s (HBC) budget resolution, and the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 agenda — brings the implications of influential conservative policymakers’ and a think tank’s broader fiscal policy agenda into sharper focus. That agenda features:
Policies that raise costs and take away health coverage, food assistance, and other help affording the basics from people when they need them. These policies will create significant economic and health insecurity for millions of people while increasing poverty, hardship, and the number of people lacking health coverage. They will shortchange children’s futures, make it harder for millions of seniors to afford prescription drugs, and take away help that households need to afford food, housing, and child care.
For example, the RSC budget calls for $4.5 trillion in cuts over ten years in Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace coverage, [2] cutting these health coverage funds by more than half. The HBC budget plan, meanwhile, calls for $2.2 trillion in cuts to health coverage — all from Medicaid, the associated committee report suggests. [3] This cut would amount to 30 percent on average over ten years, and 40 percent in 2034. Nearly 74 million people receive health coverage through Medicaid, so cuts of this magnitude would result in millions losing access to comprehensive coverage.
Similarly, the RSC budget calls for cutting average Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits by about 22 percent by rescinding the updated 2021 Thrifty Food Plan, which adjusted SNAP benefits to reflect the cost of a healthy diet based on today’s dietary guidelines and food consumption patterns. [4] This cut would affect 41 million people participating in SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. (HBC and Project 2025 also sharply criticize the Thrifty Food Plan increase but are not clear about rescinding it. [5] ) And Project 2025 calls for gutting summer food assistance programs that children in families with low incomes rely on when school is out, which could include the new Summer EBT program that is expected to provide grocery benefits to more than 21 million children this summer. [6]
The HBC budget plan cuts the “income security” category of programs by almost $1 trillion over ten years; the accompanying report targets SNAP, the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (or TANF, which provides flexible funding that states use for a range of benefits and services to low-income families with children). If income security cuts are largely limited to these programs, benefits would be slashed by more than half by 2034. [7]
The RSC budget has very deep cuts in this part of the budget as well. It includes a cut that would convert Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a 50-year-old program that provided income assistance to 7.5 million low-income seniors and disabled people in 2022, to a block grant and end guaranteed cash aid through the program.
Many of the proposals in these agendas would shift large costs onto states, forcing them to either kick in far more money — a particular hardship for states with lower per capita incomes — or cut benefits and services to their residents.
Behind these eye-popping budget numbers are millions of real people who will see health coverage, food assistance, and other forms of support taken away. (See Figure 1.) This will make it even harder for them to afford the basics, leading to serious hardships such as homelessness or overcrowded living, food insecurity, hunger, and untreated health conditions.
It is also notable what is missing from these agendas. Despite rhetoric from some Republicans about the need to support families — and children in particular — these sweeping agendas do not call for new or increased investments to help families afford child care or rent, to expand the Child Tax Credit, or to bolster the EITC for workers without children. And they do nothing to ensure that all workers have access to paid family and medical leave so they can take time off to welcome a new child, attend to a health issue, or care for a family member who needs them.
These agendas, particularly Project 2025, cover multiple areas and this report does not analyze them in full. It provides key examples of fiscal, economic, and health policies within the agendas and, critically, how the plans have broad similarities. Key areas, such as the agendas’ impact on the functioning of the Justice Department, on abortion rights and reproductive freedom, on civil rights protections, and on the potential politicization of federal agencies and the civil service, are critically important but outside the scope of this analysis.
House republican agendas and project 2025 would increase poverty and hardship, drive up the uninsured rate, and disinvest from people, communities, and the economy, republican health coverage proposals would increase number of uninsured, raise people’s costs, house republican budget reflects disturbing vision for the country, more revenue is required to meet the nation’s commitments, needs, and challenges, the 2017 trump tax law was skewed to the rich, expensive, and failed to deliver on its promises, policy basics federal budget.
[1] This report’s authors: Sharon Parrott, Allison Orris, Claire Heyison, Sarah Lueck, Katie Bergh, Dorothy Rosenbaum, Joseph Llobrera, Catlin Nchako, Sonya Acosta, Will Fischer, David Reich, Richard Kogan, Samantha Jacoby, Chuck Marr, and Shelby Gonzales.
[2] See pp. 96 and 176 of Republican Study Committee, “Fiscal Sanity to Save America: Republican Study Committee FY 2025 Budget Proposal” (hereinafter RSC budget proposal), March 20, 2024, https://hern.house.gov/uploadedfiles/final_budget_including_letter_word_doc-final_as_of_march_25.pdf . For a detailed analysis of the agendas’ health proposals, see Allison Orris and Claire Heyison, “Republican Health Coverage Proposals Would Increase Number of Uninsured, Raise People’s Costs,” CBPP, September 3, 2024, https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/republican-health-coverage-proposals-would-increase-number-of-uninsured-raise .
[3] See pp. 11 and 44-45 of House of Representatives Committee on the Budget, “Concurrent Resolution on the Budget — Fiscal Year 2025, Report to Accompany H. Con. Res. 117” (hereinafter HBC report), report 118-568, June 27, 2024, https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/118th-congress/house-report/568/1?outputFormat=pdf&s=1&r=4&q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22HCR+117%22%7D . CBPP calculations relative to Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) February 2024 baseline, available at CBO, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2024-2034,” February 7, 2024, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59710 .
[4] See p. 42 of the RSC budget proposal.
[5] Heritage Foundation, “Mandate for Leadership” (hereinafter Project 2025), 2023, https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf , pp. 300-301; 118 th Congress, Second Session, “H. Con. Res. 117 [Report No. 118–568]” (hereinafter HBC budget proposal), Section 412, June 27, 2024, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hconres117/BILLS-118hconres117rh.pdf .
[6] As with SNAP, the grocery benefits are distributed through a debit-style, electronic benefit transfer (EBT) card. For the proposal see pp. 303 of Project 2025.
[7] See pp. 11 and 52-53 of the HBC report. CBPP calculations are relative to CBO’s February 2024 baseline, and take into account that some of the total savings in the income security category reflect cuts to civil service retirement, which is another program the HBC report targets.
[8] The climate provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act are primarily in the form of tax credits.
[9] See p. 29 of the RSC budget proposal and pp. 71-72 of the HBC report.
[10] CBPP estimates based on CBO estimates. See Congressional Budget Office, “Budgetary Outcomes Under Alternative Assumptions About Spending and Revenues,” May 8, 2024, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60114 . We use the ten-year period 2026-2035 because extending the Trump tax cuts would reduce tax liability starting in 2026. And in 2025, when Congress will debate how to handle the scheduled expirations, it will be looking at the 2026-2035 ten-year budget window.
[11] Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, “TCJA Extension Could Add $4 to $5 Trillion to Deficits,” June 13, 2024, https://www.crfb.org/blogs/tcja-extension-could-add-4-5-trillion-deficits#appendix .
[12] See Section 302 of the HBC budget proposal.
[13] See pp. 145 and 680 of Project 2025, pp. 84-85 of the RSC budget proposal, and pp. 52-53 of the HBC report.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
What is a Proposal Budget and why is it needed? Before we get started talking about all the pieces of a budget, let's make sure that we're on the same page about what a budget actually is. A budget is a financial proposal that reflects the work proposed. It outlines the expected project costs in detail, and should mirror the project description.
Breakdown of the budget into item-wise and year-wise with cost calculation should be done. It should be ensured that costs are reasonable, allowable and related to the research proposal, so that the budget appears realistic. Travel expenses should be calculated as per the rules of the funding agency.
Template 6 - Determine Budget for Psychology Research Proposal One-Pager Sample Example Document. ... The budget for a research project depends on the type of research and the proposed difference it could make to a field of study. For instance, the average budget for a market research project may vary between $20,000 and $50,000. ...
A good budget shows the assessors that you have thought about your research in detail and, if it is done well, it can serve as a great, convincing overview of the project. Here are five steps to create a simple budget for your research project. 1. List your activities. Make a list of everything that you plan to do in the project, and who is ...
Proposal Budget Overview A budget is a financial proposal that reflects the work proposed. It outlines the expected project costs in detail and should mirror the project description. A budget is presented as a categorical list of anticipated project costs representing the researcher's best estimate of the funds needed to support the proposed work.
A research proposal budget is a financial plan that details the costs of a research project. Including both direct and indirect costs in your budget is crucial for accuracy. Justifying each budget item helps in gaining approval from stakeholders. Avoiding common budgeting mistakes can improve the chances of funding success.
Example: Statistical Consultant - $100/hour, estimated 20 hours Budget: $100 x 20 = $2,000. d) Student Support. If you're involving students in your research, include their stipends or wages. Example: Graduate Student Assistant - $1,500/month for 9 months Budget: $1,500 x 9 = $13,500.
How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & ...
A precise estimate of the budget is really the best approach to win a grant. And importantly, once your proposal has been funded, you will find that having carefully estimated the different costs at the application stage will not only guarantee an optimal use of the funds, but also make the practical implementation of the research project ...
A research budget contains both direct costs and indirect costs (overhead), but the level of detail varies from sponsor to sponsor. The first step in developing a budget is to carefully read the guidelines of the funding opportunity being pursued. ... such as goods and/or services in support of a research project or proposal. It is challenging ...
Your budget design should be in detailed form if your research project fulfills any of the below-mentioned criteria: Your direct costs are more than $250,000 per annum. You are applying for grants other than research grant type or its equivalents. Your institution is situated outside the United States.
Research Budgeting. A research budget will help you determine all the expenses that are required to successfully execute your research project. Budget expenses are often organized into expense categories. Budget Terminology. The total budget (cost) of a research project is made up of both. cash*and in-kind*contributions; the Tri-Agencies ...
Abstract. Novice investigators may be intimidated by the task of proposal budget preparation. Often a basic understanding of the mechanics of budgeting, paired with a good working relationship with the institution's sponsored programs office, can alleviate much of the stress investigators encounter in developing budgets.
Proposal Budgets. The budget should list all cost details for the year or another appropriate period of time. It should include any applicable salaries & wages, fringe benefits, services, supplies, equipment, publications, travel, other direct expenses, and any facility and administrative costs. A brief outline for developing a budget is ...
Budget Preparation. Your budget is a financial proposal that reflects the work proposed. It outlines the expected project costs in detail, and should mirror the project description. A budget is presented as a categorical list of anticipated project costs that represent the researcher's best estimate of the funds needed to support the proposed ...
A successful grant-winning application requires two key elements: (1) innovative research prob lem with best probable idea/plan for. tackling it and (2) appropriate planning of budget. The aim of ...
Creating a Budget. In general, while your research proposal outlines the academic significance of your study, the budget and budget narrative show that you have an understanding of what it will cost for you to be able to perform this research. Your proposed budget should identify all the expenses that are necessary and reasonable for the ...
Budget Basics Tools & Resources. Proposal budgets and budget justifications are the financial road maps of sponsored projects. When thoughtfully and strategically built they both help propel proposals to award and pave the way for effective post-award management. Visit the ORA Budget and Budget Justifications webpage for the Stanford Detailed ...
The budgeting of your salary, a direct cost of the research, should be listed as $21,161.73. If your project covers three years, with the same or differing time commitments, you calculate this figure for each year of your project. Remember to factor in pay rises according to Step increases in multi-year grants.
Sample Budget Justifications. Sponsor requirements differ, and sample budget justifications should be seen only as a starting point. Guidelines for sponsor requirements are in the annotated budget justifications. Read the solicitation and the sponsor's proposal preparation guidelines for each proposal's requirements.
This is Part 2 of a four-part series on proposal writing for qualitative research. Please read Part 1 of this series, which covers crafting an overview as a starting point of conversation with the…
Medical Research Budget Template. researchamerica.org. Download. A research proposal budget sample is in many ways similar to the research budget sample, only that at this stage, it is still a proposal. This sample is often written in a linear or tabular format and it details all the expenses that are associated with the proposal project.
A research proposal is a paper that proposes a research project, usually in the sciences or academia and generally constitutes a funding request for that study. A budget is one of the key components of a research proposal and serves as a blueprint for spending the funds from the project. An effective budget for the proposal outlines the proposed project in fiscal terms and helps reviewers ...
Each year, NIH solicits research proposals from small businesses through A Solicitation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Contract Proposals.The latest version was published on August 2, 2024. The solicitation serves as a vehicle for offerors to propose research projects on a ...
Any MRI proposal may request support for either the acquisition or development of a research instrument or an upgrade of an existing research instrument. Within their submission limit, NSF strongly encourages an organization to submit proposals for innovative development projects. ... is 20% or less of the proposal's total budget request from ...
Discovery Research PreK-12 (DRK-12)
This proposal presents NCI's assessment of the specific funding needed in fiscal year 2026 to accelerate progress to end cancer as we know it for all people. Stories of Cancer Research NCI supports cancer research to advance scientific knowledge and enhance the quality and length of life for all people diagnosed with cancer.
IAAC's Research Program will base its funding decisions on the recommendations of the committee and on the overall available funding budget. In addition to ensuring conformity with the eligibility criteria, evaluation of proposals will take into consideration the following criteria: The relevancy to federal impact assessment
The Subawards Checklist from Proposal to Closeout, prepared by experts from the central offices, provides a comprehensive guide for managing subawards throughout the research project lifecycle.It includes detailed steps, guidance, and resources for proposal preparation, budget development, subaward setup, and closeout procedures, ensuring compliance and efficient management of subawards.
Looking at three proposals — the House Republican Study Committee's (RSC) budget plan, the Republican House Budget Committee's (HBC) budget resolution, and the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 agenda — brings the implications of influential conservative policymakers' and a think tank's broader fiscal policy agenda into sharper ...