SLO 1 Knowledge Develop a thorough identification and review of mass communication theory and proficiency in research methods surrounding a specific area of expertise in the mass communication field.
SLO 2 Knowledge Discuss and translate mass communication theory and proficiency in research methods surrounding a specific area of expertise in the mass communication field.
SLO 3 Skills Explain and report communication subject matter and methodology, successfully complete research studies through conceptualization, methodological expertise, analysis and submission to professional conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
SLO 4 Professional Behavior Display of ethical behaviors, cultural sensitivity and appreciation for diverse viewpoints, leadership, independent and creative thinking.
SLO 5 Professional Behavior Participate in professional and academic service activities that develop leadership skills.
SLO 1 Knowledge Identify, describe, explain, and apply communication theory research methods, aiding in a synthesized perspective for evaluating and addressing professional or theoretical problems
SLO 2 Skills Address communication subject matter and issues through application, analysis, or synthesis of subjects, theories and methodologies
SLO 3 Professional Behavior Display ethical behaviors, teamwork, cultural sensitivity/appreciation for diverse viewpoints, and meet professional standards for effective and ethical decision making
Print this page.
The PDF will include all information unique to this page.
This PDF includes all graduate catalog information.
tag manager container
Manship School of Mass Communication
For more information about the Ph.D. program, contact:
Dr. Meghan Sanders
Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies
The Manship School is home to the nation’s only doctoral program in media & public affairs. We have a broad view of media and public affairs, with research on political polarization, digital technology, crisis communication, wartime propaganda, gender and sexuality, media effects, health communication, native advertising and the representation of minority groups, among others.
We fund all of our doctoral students for four years ($25,000 per year) and admit only a small class to ensure personal attention and mentorship from faculty. Our acceptance rate is about 15%. Our doctoral program graduates work at a variety of institutions: research-intensive, teaching-centered, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and international institutions.
The Manship School prepares scholars to study the ever-changing world of mass media with three research laboratories and infrastructure for a wide range of quantitative and qualitative approaches to research media messages and their effects.
The Manship School uses endowed professorships to support collaborative research groups of faculty members and students. The funds allow the teams to collect original data, hire research assistants, travel to archives and host mini-conferences.
The Manship School admits a small cohort of doctoral students each year on a highly competitive basis. Our doctoral funding includes a $25,000 9-month stipend, for each of four years, provided the student remains in good standing, and a tuition exemption (students must pay some mandatory student fees). We support doctoral students to present research at two conferences per academic year, with additional funds available from the LSU Graduate Student Association. We also fund doctoral research through our distinguished Hamilton Fellowship awarded annually, funded research groups and dissertation awards.
The total number of hours required for Ph.D. in Media & Public Affairs degree is 88 hours.* A comprehensive guide to our Ph.D. program can be found in our Ph.D. in Media & Public Affairs Policies and Procedures Handbook .
*This does not replace the Graduate School catalog .
I. Core Courses (31 hours)
II. Required Externship & Dissertation (27 hours)
III. Mass Communication Electives (12 hours)
IV. Two additional advanced Statistics or Methodology courses (6 hours)
V. Four courses concentrated in a single outside program or concentration of four courses drawn from at least two supported fields (12 hours)
The Manship School doctoral program accepts applications for fall admission. Applicants submit a statement of purpose, resume, writing sample, transcripts from all prior universities or colleges attended and standardized test scores (e.g., GRE and TOEFL for international applicants) online. We also require recommendation letters from three people familiar with your academic work. For full consideration, you should submit your application by January 25 to be reviewed for admission and funding decisions for the following fall.
You must have a cumulative 3.0 GPA, undergraduate and master’s. You must have earned a completed master’s degree or a terminal graduate degree (for example, an M.F.A. or a J.D.) We prefer to see GRE scores above 156 verbal & quantitative and above 4.5 analytical writing. For TOEFL, we prefer scores above 100 on the internet-based test.
For 2024 international degree requirements, please visit https://www.lsu.edu/graduateschool/admissions/international_admissions.php .
We accept applications by January 25 for fall admission (no spring admission for Ph.D.).
After initial screening, finalists for admission to the doctoral program are invited to LSU and the Manship School for a campus visit and interview at our expense. Applicants living outside the U.S. are invited to participate in the interview process via Skype. Final offers for admission are made after the campus visit, typically the first or second week in March
For further information, contact [email protected] or [email protected].
Our doctoral program in mass communication, jointly administered with the Department of Life Sciences Communication, is internationally recognized for our faculty and areas of research. Applicants to the Joint Ph.D. in Mass Communications may apply to one or both departments, depending on your areas of research interest. Options are:
The Ph.D. degree in Mass Communications provides future academics and professionals with rigorous training in theory and research with highly individualized programs that students develop in consultation with their advisors. Our Ph.D. graduates become some of the most successful researchers and leaders in the field of mass communication. We require our students to engage in a systematic search for answers to well-formulated and substantive questions. The research process culminates in the discovery and reporting of new knowledge to others.
A doctoral dissertation in Mass Communications demonstrates a student’s ability to examine in detail an important issue in the field, using original research. Faculty members expect the dissertation to be clearly presented while conveying the student’s close familiarity with his or her research area.
The program offers several internationally recognized areas of research and teaching excellence:
-civic and political communication | -international and inter-cultural communication |
-health and environmental communication | -public opinion |
-history of media institutions | -science and risk communication |
-information technologies | -social marketing |
-social networking and digital media | -journalism studies |
-process and effects of mediated communication | -media ecologies |
-law and ethics of media | -race and media |
Working closely with their advisor and committee, students draw from courses offered in departments across campus to develop a plan of study in preparation for independent and original research in their area of specialization.
Visit the Ph.D. in Mass Communications website for more information.
The Graduate School establishes minimum admission criteria for all students who enter the University of Wisconsin–Madison. International applicants should refer to the Graduate School’s website for information on English proficiency requirements and financial resource information.
December 15
The online application is available here .
Writing samples are not required for applications to Mass Comm-Life Sciences Communication.
The UW-Madison Graduate School offers a limited number of application fee waivers for eligible students. Please visit the Graduate School website to see if you qualify and to apply. If you are from a Graduate Research Scholars-eligible group and do not already qualify for a waiver from the Graduate School, please contact our academic advising manager Lynn Bartholomew at [email protected] at least one week prior to the application deadline to inquire about a fee waiver. Unfortunately, LSC is not able to provide fee waivers to international students or other domestic students who are not GRS-eligible.
LSC Ph.D. student handbook appendix Mass Comm PhD Joint-Program Handbook LSC funding and financial aid
Deadlines for graduate students Enrollment information (deadlines, procedures, FAQs, etc.) Academic Policies and Procedures
Graduate School Home Graduate School Contacts Graduate student family and parent resources Guide to student life Professional development
Assistantship appointment rates CALS Career Services Commencement McBurney Disability Resources Center Scholarship application and information Student Privacy Rights (FERPA) Tuition UW-Madison emergency procedures University Health Services UW-Madison Grants Database
Do I need to secure an advisor prior to applying to the program?
No, in fact, students are admitted to the program without a formal advisor and will typically pick one during their first year. In order to help students get started in the program, they are assigned an orientation advisor who will help them prepare for and proceed through their first year in the program. In many cases, students work with this advisor throughout their time in the program. We also have a process for switching advisors if a student later decides that a different faculty advisor would be a more appropriate fit.
Is funding available for students in this program?
Yes. Please refer to our funding page for more information.
What can I do with this degree?
Students with a Ph.D. in Mass Communications go on to a variety of careers in academia and industry. Check out this page for a list of first jobs secured after graduation by our doctoral students.
Is the program offered in an online modality?
No, we do not offer an online Ph.D. in Mass Communications.
Plan a Visit to the Department of Life Sciences Communication We encourage all potential graduate student applicants to visit the Department of Life Sciences Communication (LSC) at Hiram Smith Hall. The best time to visit is when most faculty and students are on campus, September through May.
We encourage applicants to contact specific faculty members to explore mutual interests.
Before scheduling a visit, please contact our Academic Advising Manager, Lynn Bartholomew , or the Director of Graduate Studies, Nan Li .
While visiting LSC, sit in on a class or a SCIMEP research group meeting, or tour campus facilities and attractions, such as the student unions , or the Wisconsin Institute for Discovery .
Finding LSC LSC is located in Hiram Smith Hall, 1545 Observatory Drive. Use the campus map to find us .
Getting Around Campus The University of Wisconsin-Madison campus is located in downtown Madison. Public transportation is an easy way to travel on campus and buses frequently stop close to Hiram Smith Hall. Information about bus routes can be found on the Madison Metro website and also at the bus stops themselves.
Parking The closest public parking ramp to Hiram Smith Hall is Lot 36. There is also free after hours and weekend parking on campus. View the online campus maps with parking locations .
More Information UW Visitor & Information Programs has information about the entire campus as well as the beautiful city of Madison.
Our fully-funded, interdisciplinary doctoral program will prepare you for a rewarding career in communications research and teaching.
Our program offers a stimulating intellectual environment where you may explore and specialize in a variety of topics, including media ethics and diversity; media sociology; new media; political communication; popular television; public relations; or social effects.
The doctoral program is designed to be completed in four years, with two years of coursework followed by qualifying exams and the dissertation.
Associate dean, research and creative activity, associate professor, public relations, co-director, real chemistry emerging insights lab.
Doctoral program, media studies, communications.
Assistant director.
Administrative specialist.
The Doctor of Philosophy in Rhetoric, Media, and Publics is replacing the PhD in Communication Studies (Rhetoric and Public Culture). Rhetoric, Media, and Publics is an interschool program between the School of Communication, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, and the Medill School of Journalism, Media & Integrated Marketing Communications; and it is based in the School of Communication.
The Rhetoric, Media, and Publics PhD program, grounded in the humanistic tradition of rhetoric, asks the fundamental question of how people influence, reflect, and transform society through mediated practices. Students learn to analyze the production and circulation of meaning in a range of rhetorical and journalistic texts, practices, and institutions through varied modes of qualitative inquiry, and to engage audiences and communities directly in the production of knowledge. The stakes of this inquiry are profoundly social and political as well as formal and aesthetic. The program teaches students to approach public media as sites for political contestation, for the representation and interrogation of ethics and power, and for imagining personhood and collective life.
Become a high-impact journalist, storyteller, strategic communicator or media leader, and take your career to the next level. In as few as 12 months, get immersive, hands-on experience that prepares you to produce impactful journalism and strategic communications content.
The Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication's MMC degree program immerses students in the practices of journalism and strategic communications, preparing them for careers in news, documentary storytelling, advocacy, community engagement or corporate communications.
This 36 credit hour master's degree program begins with a multimedia boot camp, teaching students how to tell stories with text, photo, video and audio elements. In the second semester, students choose from a selection of more advanced courses, such as those focused on narrative writing, podcasting, advanced broadcast production, documentary production, health reporting, Spanish-language news, transborder coverage, public relations research, strategic communications storytelling and media entrepreneurship.
The program culminates in a professional immersion experience in one of the Cronkite School's strategic communication labs or news bureaus in Los Angeles, Phoenix or Washington, D.C. Working under the guidance of award-winning journalists and strategists, these capstone programs offer practical experience in a professional news or agency environment.
This program is offered concurrently with degrees from ASU's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law and ASU's School of Sustainability. It is also offered in a dual MD/MMC degree with the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine.
Students can choose to create their own concurrent degree combination to match their interests by working with their academic advisor during or after their first semester of study. Some concurrent combinations are not possible due to high levels of overlap in curriculum; students should speak with their academic advisor for more details.
This degree is also offered as a concurrent program with the following:
Acceptance to the graduate program requires a separate application. Students typically receive approval to pursue the accelerated master’s during the junior year of their bachelor's degree program. Interested students can learn about eligibility requirements and how to apply .
30 credit hours including the required applied project course (MCO 593)-Mid-Career, or 30 credit hours including the required capstone course (MCO 570)-Mid-Career, or 36 credit hours including the required capstone course (MCO 570)-Full Time
Required Core (9 credit hours) MCO 503 Media Law (3) MCO 510 Data Journalism (3) or MCO 536 Public Relations Research (3) MCO 525 21st-Century Media Organization and Entrepreneurship (3)
Electives (6 credit hours)
Other Requirements (12 credit hours) MCO 502 Journalism Skills (8) MCO 504 Cronkite Master's Seminar (1) MCO 530 History, Philosophy and Ethics of Journalism (3) or MCO 519 Strategic Communications Leadership and Ethics (3)
Culminating Experience (3 or 9 credit hours) MCO 570 Master of Mass Communication Capstone (3 or 9) MCO 593 Applied Project (3)
Additional Curriculum Information The master's degree program is a full-time, 36 credit hour program. Students with extensive professional journalism experience may be offered the opportunity to pursue the 30 credit hour mid-career option.
Students must complete a total of eight credit hours of MCO 502, which is offered at variable credit hours and can be taken multiple times.
Students should see the academic unit for a complete list of approved electives. Other requirement coursework may be substituted with approval of the academic unit.
Applicants must fulfill the requirements of both the Graduate College and the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication.
Applicants are eligible to apply to the program if they have earned a bachelor's or master's degree in any field from a regionally accredited institution.
Applicants must have a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.00 (scale is 4.00 = "A") in the last 60 hours of their first bachelor's degree program, or a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.00 (scale is 4.00 = "A") in an applicable master's degree program.
All applicants must submit:
Additional Application Information An applicant whose native language is not English must provide proof of English proficiency regardless of their current residency. TOEFL scores must be at least 100 for the internet-based examination taken in a testing center.
The Cronkite School's graduate committee reviews complete and on-time applications. Recommendations for admission are made to Graduate Admission Services, where the final admission decisions are made.
Session | Modality | Deadline | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Session A/C | In Person | 06/01 | Final |
Session A/C | In Person | 12/01 | Priority |
Program learning outcomes identify what a student will learn or be able to do upon completion of their program. This program has the following program outcomes:
Studying abroad is possible for graduate students. There are more than 50 program opportunities, with programs on every continent.
Students can find more information on the Global Education website .
The skills of strong reporting, research, writing and multimedia production are in high demand across industries, including in journalism, strategic communication, nonprofit leadership, international affairs, political advocacy and entrepreneurship.
Career examples include:
Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Comm | CRONK 302 [email protected] 602-496-5555 Admission deadlines
The Department of Writing Studies proudly offers an MA and PhD in Rhetoric and Scientific & Technical Communication (RSTC). As applications for Fall 2025 open this month, we chatted with Dr. Molly Kessler, Associate Professor, Director of Graduate Studies, and Associate Chair, to learn more about what sets RSTC apart from other graduate programs. We also invite prospective students to explore our research programs on our website !
The RSTC program is designed to support students in becoming experts in writing studies, rhetorical studies, and technical communication. Our program supports students in gaining the knowledge, experience, and skills to succeed as experts in RSTC fields. Specifically, our program provides training in research design and methods, academic writing, pedagogy and teaching, and skills for entering both academic and non-academic industries.
Folks interested in becoming experts in rhetoric, scientific, and technical communication! This might include folks aspiring to be teachers, researchers, or practitioners in RSTC areas.
We are extremely committed to accessible, inclusive, and student-centered practices and processes in RSTC. We take this commitment seriously across our curriculum, community, teaching, and programming. We also prioritize joy in RSTC and want our programs to be a place where folks feel like they belong, are supported, and can succeed in achieving their individual goals!
In any way we can! :) We know graduate school is about what you learn in courses and through programmatic milestones, but we also know that the graduate school experience includes professional development, teaching, building community, and engaging with various program, department, college, and university resources. RSTC works to meet students where they are and work with them individually and collectively to support their goals while creating an inclusive, rigorous, accessible, and fun program and community.
The students! I learn so much from the graduate students in this program. It is truly one of the biggest joys in my professional life to work with graduate students every day, learn from their innovative and creative ideas, and be challenged to always continue learning and growing myself.
Reach out to Allie Cooperman, our incredible Graduate Programs Coordinator, or to me directly. You can find our contact information on our Graduate Programs website . Talking with prospective students is one of the best parts of my job!
Celebrating the accomplishments of our recent and upcoming RSTC PhD graduates!
Q&A with Writing Studies MS student Matthew Bouvier
Technical Writing & Communication graduates share their experiences in Writing Studies and working in their major.
More Writing Studies News
BMC Medical Education volume 24 , Article number: 989 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
Metrics details
We aim to systematically review and evaluate the current landscape of postgraduate pharmacy education to a) identify current evidence, best practices, challenges, recommendations, and solutions; and b) develop a framework to optimize postgraduate pharmacy programs.
A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were utilized. The search covered studies published from January 2011 to September 2023. Following the principles of Arksey and O'Malley's framework, data charting and extraction were performed using a pre-designed data collection tool, followed by the synthesis and grouping of studies based on common themes.
Of the 5542 articles found, the review included 36 eligible ones focusing on pharmacy postgraduate education (PhD and MSc), grouped into three themes: 1) courses and curriculum; 2) training and skills development; 3) assessment and mentorship methods. Utilized methodologies included descriptive analyses, questionnaires, surveys, trials, and focus groups/interviews. The studies underscored the need for competency-based curricula with regular evaluations, career planning, and diverse course offerings. Identified key skills and competencies in the studies included soft skills, communication, research, desperate skills (e.g., leadership and management), and critical thinking. The studies also emphasized the value of comprehensive evaluation and peer review methods. Challenges included balancing academic and real-world requirements, training, limited resources, time constraints, and faculty workload.
Evidence-based suggestions to improve postgraduate pharmacy education include the implementation of practice-oriented courses, value of tailored/or comprehensive assessments, focus on real-world skills, effectiveness of advanced teaching methods, and mentorship role. The proposed framework can guide program enhancement and highlight the need to improve programs holistically, entailing the three themes.
Peer Review reports
Pharmacy is a dynamic discipline of science, rapidly expanding with a rising number of students pursuing postgraduate studies in the field [ 1 ]. Postgraduate education is pivotal in shaping and advancing pharmacy practice across diverse settings, effectively addressing significant challenges and bridging crucial gaps. Such a specialized knowledge would ultimately contribute to improved patient care and population health outcomes. Further, postgraduate education programs must ensure the provision of teaching across diverse specialized domains. These include, but are not limited to, professional education, drug discovery, medicinal chemistry, pharmaceutics, biotechnology, biochemistry, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, pharmacognosy, pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, and pharmacoinformatics. Additionally, these programs should aim to contribute to advancing and improving healthcare systems, pharmacy laws and ethics, and proficiency in working with advanced machines and analytical techniques [ 2 , 3 ], all of which have positive impacts for the quality and safety of patient care and the overall health of populations.
Postgraduate pharmacy education faces a range of challenges. These include the surplus of postgraduates in traditional disciplines as compared to available emerging jobs in the market, curricula that fail to align with the demands of pharmaceutical practice settings, maintaining traditional teaching methods despite the dynamic change in the pharmaceutical industry, and advanced global practice and technology [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Notably, pharmacy postgraduate education in low- and middle-income nations confronts numerous challenges and gaps related to education, systems, and practice. Further, teaching methods at different universities are diverse [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. As a result, it is unclear whether these universities are effectively optimizing and tailoring their educational strategies to meet the current needs of postgraduate students and align with the demands of pharmaceutical industries and healthcare systems [ 3 ]. Nevertheless, institutions offering postgraduate education have a fundamental responsibility to provide high-quality education, necessitating the continuous evaluation and enhancement of their curricula to align with the developing needs of future graduates and prospective employers. This holds particular significance as postgraduate students carry the expectation that their universities have designed high-quality educational programs to fulfill their diverse needs [ 4 ].
There is a noticeable absence of a definitive guide on how universities can effectively address the expanding challenges within pharmacy postgraduate education. This is primarily because accreditation bodies focus predominantly on evaluating and reviewing undergraduate curricula, neglecting the unique challenges of postgraduate education in pharmacy. Furthermore, international experiences and needs in pharmacy education vary significantly between countries. This raises the following research question: what insights, perspectives, challenges, and recommendations can inform the optimization of postgraduate (PhD and MSc) pharmacy programs at universities worldwide? To answer this question, it is essential to conduct this scoping review to systematically chart the available evidence and understand the current body of knowledge about pharmacy postgraduate education. Through this endeavor, our objectives are a) to identify current insights, perspectives, challenges, and recommendations that can assist various postgraduate pharmacy programs in addressing potential gaps within their systems and possibly refining their existing educational structures (e.g., curricula) and approaches (e.g., educational methods) to enhance the overall learning process for their students; and b) to develop a framework to optimize postgraduate pharmacy programs.
We conducted a scoping review to synthesize and map the available evidence and identify a framework for improving educational programs for postgraduate degrees in pharmacy. Scoping reviews tackle broad subjects and usually aim to recognize research gaps in the existing literature [ 11 ]. While conducting this review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, which contains 22 reporting items [ 12 ]. Our filled PRISMA-ScR checklist for this scoping review is included in Supplementary Material 1.
The study protocol was drafted and reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist [ 13 ]. While it was not previously published, it is available as supplementary material (Supplementary Material 2).
Eligibility criteria for studies included in this scoping review: i) Studies published in peer-reviewed journals; ii) The primary focus of the studies should be on curriculum and education development within MSc and PhD Pharmacy programs; iii) Studies needed to discuss related aspects such as competencies, assessment methods, and courses; iv) They need to be published in English between the period of January 2011- September 2023; v) To encompass various aspects of graduate pharmacy education, studies were included if they employed qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method study designs.
Conversely, studies were excluded if they: i) Focused on public health, PharmD, diploma, or clinical practice-based master programs that do not include research/thesis, as these programs often have distinct educational objectives compared to research-based postgraduate programs; ii) Addressed initiatives to improve research unrelated to postgraduate programs, because the focus of this review is solely on postgraduate education; iii) Were centered on dual pharmacy (PharmD)/master of public health (MPH), as these programs are mainly interdisciplinary in nature and do not specifically reflect the unique challenges of research-oriented programs; iv) Focused on genetic counseling, because this field has a distinct aim and is not directly related to postgraduate research-based pharmacy education; v) Were associated with other non-pharmacy-related programs, as our focus is on Pharmacy; vi) Focused solely on university facilities, because our target is the educational content; vii) Were categorized as commentaries or review articles, to avoid bias in reporting and prioritize original research content.
The search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published between January 2011 and September 2023. The search strategy utilized related keywords: postgraduate, higher education, graduate, PhD, MSc, masters, education, curriculum, courses, syllabus, skills, competencies, assessment, evaluation, pharmacy, and pharmaceutical sciences. Search limits were applied to the title/abstract and English language. Three investigators independently performed the initial screening of the titles and abstracts to identify eligible articles. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and agreement. Specialized journals were also specifically reached to identify relevant articles, specifically the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Pharmacy Education, European Journal of Education, Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, and Health Education Journal. The final search strategy for each database is presented in Table S1 (Supplementary Material 3). Finally, the removal of duplicates, title/abstract screening, and full-text screening were conducted using the Rayyan application [ 14 ].
Three reviewers independently screened all included citations and full-text articles and agreed on their eligibility. A standardized data extraction tool was created using Microsoft Excel and utilized to chart data from all eligible articles. In addition, the following information was collected independently by three reviewers: authors, year of publication, focus of the study, title, relevant/irrelevant, objectives, country, challenges, recommendations, and conclusion. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and agreement between the authors.
We followed the framework proposed by Arksey and 'O'Malley for data synthesis and charting [ 11 ]. Eligible studies were grouped based on common themes. Our grouping focused on the following three themes in Table 1 : i) Courses, curriculum, and syllabus; ii) Training, competencies, and skills development; and iii) Assessment, evaluation, and mentorship methods.
To develop a comprehensive conceptual model guiding the creation of collective, high-quality pharmacy postgraduate (MSc/PhD) programs, we conducted a rigorous literature review focusing on the challenges, recommendations, factors, and successful interventions. To synthesize this information, we employed the Arksey and 'O'Malley framework for data synthesis and charting. The model development process involved the following steps:
Identification of key themes: Based on the literature review, three primary themes emerged as critical for postgraduate pharmacy program development:
Courses, curriculum, and syllabus
Training, competencies, and skill development
Assessment, evaluation, and mentorship methods
Model construction: A conceptual model was constructed around these themes, incorporating essential components, including:
Curriculum design and development, including necessary and optional elements
Competency-based curriculum development
Training and skills development aligned with student, program, and job market needs
Diverse assessment and evaluation methods to measure program effectiveness, student learning, and job market impact
Successful interventions and international experiences
Model enrichment: To ensure comprehensiveness, the model was expanded to include additional factors and emerging trends deemed important to the study team. For instance, under the "courses and curriculum" theme, we incorporated elements like needs assessment, regular evaluation, and program refinement to promote the concept of program sustainability. Additionally, we explored the potential of using advanced tools like artificial intelligence for assessment, evaluation, and mentorship, based on what has been reported within the included studies.
Overall, this systematic approach, grounded in both literature and practical examples, resulted in a robust conceptual model to inform the development and evaluation of collective, high-quality pharmacy postgraduate programs.
After removing duplicates, 5542 articles were identified from the different searched databases (Fig. 1 ). After titles and abstracts screening, 5461 citations were excluded because they matched our exclusion criteria, leaving 81 full-text articles to be further assessed for eligibility. Among them, 45 were excluded and summarized with their exclusion reasons in Table S3 in Supplementary Material 3. The remaining articles ( n = 36) matched our inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review.
PRISMA flow diagram of the studies selection process
Based on their primary focus, the included studies were classified into three commonly identified themes, as defined in Table 1 . Study characteristics are summarized in Table 2 , including the study authors, publication year, focus, objectives, place of origin, design, and main findings. Among them, 14 addressed courses, curriculum, and syllabus issues; 9 discussed training, competencies, and skills development; and 13 targeted topics pertaining to assessment, evaluation, and mentorship methods (Fig. 2 ). The studies implemented various designs, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method (Fig. 2 ).
Distribution of the research methods employed in the included studies per identified theme
The included publications on various pharmacy postgraduate educational programs (MSc, PhD, or both) were segregated based on their focus on the three themes (Fig. 3 ). Notably, most research articles concentrated on master’s programs compared to PhD programs, validating that more research is conducted on this program type (Fig. 3 ). In addition, the distribution of research on Master programs across the three themes revealed a larger number of publications focusing on courses, curriculum, and syllabus (Fig. 3 ). In contrast, research on PhD programs disclosed that training, competencies, and skills development garnered the most attention, implying a distinct focus on research efforts and underlining the necessity of competencies/skills development for PhD graduates (Fig. 3 ). Details on the distribution of the articles by country are outlined in Fig. 4 a.
A radar chart comparing the three identified themes based on the postgraduate program type
Distribution of research articles: ( a ) Overall 36 articles by country; ( b ) Articles based on country and identified theme
As outlined in Fig. 2 , 14 publications were dedicated to enhancing courses and curricula for various specialized MSc and PhD programs. These originated from nine countries, and as outlined in Fig. 4 b, most of these studies were conducted in the USA ( n = 5, 35.71%), followed by Australia ( n = 2, 14.29%). Additional contributing countries encompassed Jordan, Iran, Portugal, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and China (Table 2 ). Five of the identified studies emphasized the importance of specialized courses for improving postgraduate education (Table 2 ), such as research ethics, preparation for future faculty roles, pharmacoinformatics, and laboratory experience [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In the context of curriculum development, nine studies specifically addressed the design, format, review, and restructuring of postgraduate pharmacy programs to meet students' present and future needs [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Methodologies utilized in these studies included descriptive analyses, cross-sectional questionnaires, and surveys, as well as the incorporation of focus groups and interviews (Table 2 ).
Nine published studies evaluated specific skills necessary for inclusion in postgraduate curricula (Fig. 2 ). Most of these studies originated from the USA ( n = 7, 77.7%), with the remaining two published in India and Poland (Fig. 4 a). Most studies ( n = 8, 88.9%) primarily focused on PhD students, while only two included MSc students (Fig. 3 ). The studies shed light on the need for developing competencies and skills in research, curriculum development, communication, health administration and leadership, industrial training, and critical thinking and problem-solving (Table 2 ). Study designs were varied and encompassed mixed-methods, cross-sectional surveys, retrospective studies, interviews, and descriptive studies (Table 2 ).
The third group of studies ( n = 13) embraced approaches and criteria for assessing students' performance, methods for delivering certain lectures, and mentorship (Table 2 ). Consistent with the previous themes, the majority of the studies ( n = 5, 38.46%) were based in the USA, while two articles originated from Jordan ( n = 2, 15.38%) (Fig. 4 ). The remaining studies originated in the United Kingdom, India, Denmark, China, Australia, and Ukraine. Six studies within this group focused on assessment methods, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive evaluation and peer review (Table 2 ) [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. Two studies specifically emphasized the significance of evaluating students' performance without merely focusing on testing theoretical understanding [ 41 , 42 ] (Table 2 ). Additionally, four studies advocated the added value of artificial intelligence and computer-based tools in delivering lectures and elucidating certain life sciences concepts [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] (Table 2 ). Three studies evaluated postgraduate mentorship models, highlighting the positive impact of dual mentors [ 48 , 49 , 50 ] (Table 2 ).
To visualize the relationships among the identified themes and relevant key components, we developed a conceptual model (Fig. 5 ). Figure 5 presents the final summary derived from our comprehensive literature review of the core elements proposed for a collective high-quality pharmacy postgraduate (MSc/PhD) educational program. To our knowledge, this is the first model to be developed and published on the specific topic of pharmacy postgraduate educational programs. All the identified insights, perspectives, challenges, and recommendations that can inform the optimization of postgraduate pharmacy programs at universities worldwide have been grouped together to allow for the development of this coherent model outlining the following themes:
A conceptual framework for developing a collective high-quality Pharmacy postgraduate (MSc/PhD) educational program. This illustration was developed based on the recommendations discussed in the literature from the relevant identified themes
This theme encompasses curriculum design and development. Studies investigating the key concept of curriculum design and development, particularly emphasizing the importance of aligning the curriculum to concepts of competency-based learning, job market demands, career planning, collaboration, research, specialization areas, and others. It was noted that a number of concepts are needed to develop a comprehensive postgraduate program that is essential for graduates’ success and meets the needs of the job market.
This theme included the main components a program could target to implement effective change in students’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and competencies required in real-world practice. It was noted that skills relevant to other disciplines, e.g., leadership and management, data science, as well as various non-science communication skills, are highly essential for the modern job market. Additionally, the necessity of providing students with training on additional non-academic career skills was deemed crucial and had a positive influence on students’ skills and competencies, as well as the effectiveness of programs to produce graduates who can meet the demands of employers in the modern job market.
This theme features the role of effective assessment and mentorship in program development and student success. Various assessment strategies, such as mentorship, advanced assessment tools, merged assessment, and peer assessment, were all positive experiences reported in the literature with the potential benefit of conducting successful assessments of students learning and intervention effectiveness, both of which are related to successful program implementation and development.
This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on postgraduate education in pharmacy systematically. We identified 36 primary studies addressing the curriculum, skills development, and/or assessment approaches of postgraduate (MSc and PhD) pharmacy programs on an international scale. The studies were categorized and will be discussed based on their primary focus into three distinct themes: i) courses, curriculum, and syllabus issues; ii) training, competencies, and skills development; and iii) assessment, evaluation, and mentorship methods.
A group of studies explored the importance of different universal and specific courses within diverse pharmacy postgraduate curricula.
One of the crucial topics explored in the literature for its critical value in pharmacy postgraduate education is research ethics (RE). RE education is an integral component that equips students with the necessary skills to adhere to ethical standards when designing and conducting clinical and biomedical research [ 51 , 52 ]. Unfortunately, the findings indicate that ethics training in postgraduate programs related to pharmacy and medical sciences remains insufficient, particularly in developing countries such as Jordan and Iran [ 17 , 19 , 42 ]. Ahmed et al. also reported that, on a global scale, only 10% of research-based master programs offered standalone research ethics courses, and 40% offered some discussions within their curriculum [ 19 ]. Consequently, it is recommended that postgraduate schools consider integrating comprehensive research ethics training into their curricula, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, there is a need for additional studies in developed countries to explore this aspect further.
While many students pursue higher education to enter academia, postgraduate schools often prioritize research skills over teaching skills [ 53 ]. Teaching assistantships can offer students interested in academia practical teaching experiences [ 54 ]. However, not all students can access such opportunities, necessitating a compromise. For instance, integrating embedded lectures and courses into the curriculum can provide a viable solution. Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) was a valuable course to prepare graduate students and postdoctoral fellows for academic teaching [ 15 ]. The course syllabus included practical teaching experience and lecture delivery under dual supervision [ 15 ]. By the end of the course, many PFF graduates could secure faculty positions, and the course was distinguished as sustainable and valuable for students planning to work in academia [ 15 ]. The same course was taught to doctoral public health students and it showed excellent outcomes [ 55 ]. Similar courses can be adopted in postgraduate programs, especially PhD, as optional electives for students interested in academia.
A study by Fox et al. highlighted the urgent need to include pharmacoinformatics courses in pharmacy master's programs [ 18 ]. In particular, careers in pharmacoinformatics require students to have advanced conceptual knowledge and hands-on experiential education [ 56 ]. Recommended lecture topics encompass drug formulary management, advanced pharmacy and medical informatics, supply chain management, evidence-based medicine, and health policy [ 18 ]. Notably, the study revealed higher expectations for pharmacoinformatics knowledge for MSc graduates compared to their BSc counterparts, emphasizing the necessity for developing a comprehensive postgraduate pharmacoinformatics curriculum [ 18 ].
Another important curricular element is laboratory experience, particularly in basic sciences postgraduate programs. For example, the Non-Stop Lab Week (NSLW) was formed as part of the master's program at the University of Aveiro, Portugal, to equip students with real-life lab experience [ 16 ]. Over 1 week, students independently conducted molecular assay projects in an environment mirroring a real laboratory setting [ 16 ]. Most students found the NSLW's intensity very suitable and beneficial for their careers [ 16 ]. After graduation, they found this exposure to be similar to their experience in their current workplaces [ 16 ]. Often, postgraduate students focus solely on specific skills aligned with their thesis supervisor's area of expertise, potentially missing out on essential skills for future roles in the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, experiences like the NSLW help expose students to the actual work environment. Likewise, programs may add curricular modules for students to get hands-on exposure to different research projects during their first semester, offering insights into potential future careers and a great scientific breadth while connecting with potential thesis supervisors.
Concentrating on a few specific courses is insufficient, and crafting a comprehensive curriculum poses a complex challenge [ 57 ]. There is a notable shift towards Competency-Based Education (CBE) in contemporary postgraduate and undergraduate pharmacy and medical education systems due to its demonstrated effectiveness [ 58 , 59 , 60 ]. CBE occurs when a curriculum incorporates comprehensive tasks, such as systems of instruction, didactic and experiential courses, and assessments to demonstrate proficiency in taught skills and concepts [ 60 ]. Various studies advocated incorporating CBE when developing postgraduate pharmacy curricula [ 21 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Keller et al. suggested some curricular components and building blocks to be included in postgraduate pharmacy education, encompassing the decision on core competencies, foundational concepts, lectures, syllabus, thematic training, research seminars, research integrity, supervision, student feedback, evaluation, assessment, stipends and financial support, and alumni networking [ 25 ]. They also proposed a set of competencies to be taught in PhD health sciences programs, categorized into three domains [ 25 ]:
Scientific knowledge: information literacy, research methods, scientific writing, ethics and integrity, and professional conduct.
Management and Organization: self-management, project management, and teaching.
Leadership and personal: leadership and communication.
Pharmacy education continues to adapt to the evolving needs of diverse pharmacy career paths. Initiatives for developing curriculum recommendations have been undertaken, focusing on equipping graduates with knowledge and skills for future career paths. A key initiative is the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Research and Graduate Affairs Committee report [ 20 ]. The AACP report was developed based on data from different universities within the USA [ 21 ]. It addressed universal skills applicable to all pharmacy disciplines to be incorporated into different curricula [ 21 ]. These identified skills were grouped into five domains [ 21 ]:
Foundational knowledge.
Scientific communications.
Leadership and management.
Personal and professional development.
The three key proposals endorsed by the report were the need to concentrate on career guidance, external peer review, and preparing students for roles in academia [ 21 ]. In another study by Koster et al., three distinct pharmacy-related master's programs tailored for community or hospital pharmacists were described [ 27 ]. These programs were adapted to pharmacy education based on the CanMEDS framework, which originally describes the required skills for physicians to effectively address the needs of the individuals they serve [ 27 ]. In addition, the authors highlighted the importance of experiential (workplace) education over traditional on-campus education and the need to expose the students to a mixture of both [ 27 ].
A very important curriculum component is career planning and professional skills development. This is particularly important because many postgraduates move into postdoctoral training, even if they do not plan to take a research career path [ 61 ]. Regrettably, career discussions usually happen close to graduation [ 20 ]. Indeed, early career guidance and mentoring, ideally at the program's commencement, would empower students to make more informed decisions about their future career paths. Traditionally, pursuing a PhD was synonymous with academic positions. Still, this perception has evolved in the last decade, necessitating an educational shift to prepare students for broader career options [ 20 ]. The current job market reveals a growing "supply–demand" gap, with limited academic sector vacancies and an increasing number of postgraduate students graduating annually. Therefore, there must be a shift to diversify curriculum content, gearing it towards paths beyond traditional academic careers. For example, in a study by Fuhrmann et al., biomedical PhD students indicated that they were considering various career paths (research and non-research), which underlines the necessity for a comprehensive doctoral curriculum [ 20 ]. To aid students in achieving their career goals, the development of their plans, including career planning and professional skills training, can be encouraged through discussions with program mentors. Moreover, programs may allow flexible mandatory electives where students can select their preferred courses based on their constructed career plans.
It is crucial to have regular curriculum revisions to ensure that the educational content remains current and aligns with the expanding industry requirements and needs. An example of these revisions was published by Allen et al., in which a pharmaceutical medicine curriculum was reviewed at an Australian university based on cross-sectional survey findings to identify required updates to the program [ 24 ]. They developed a two-year, part-time, fully online program with interactive assessments to support students' career goals [ 24 ]. In another study, Barrett et al. presented a qualitative description of an established Master’s program in drug discovery and development [ 22 ]. The program was initially a course that was refined and expanded based on student and market demands, covering various stages of drug development [ 22 ]. The curriculum encompasses topics delivered as courses by different colleges, including epidemiology, nanotechnology, pharmacogenomics, and project management [ 22 ]. The authors reported that most program graduates secured jobs in the pharmaceutical industry upon graduation, emphasizing the significance of regular program evaluations and refinement [ 22 ]. Similarly, Lypson et al. outlined the newly adopted program evaluation process at the University of Michigan Health System, involving dedicated faculty and formal resident members [ 23 ]. This process also benefits from standardization of meetings, content experts, a transition from paper to electronic committee materials, and a focus on continuous improvement efforts for the program [ 23 ].
To uphold the quality of pharmacy postgraduate programs, supervisors must ensure students meet program requirements and graduate efficiently. Incorporating blended learning, which combines online and on-campus classroom experiences, has been suggested as a valuable learning tool [ 62 , 63 ]. Furthermore, introducing dual postgraduate degrees alongside undergraduate education in pharmacy programs can enable students to attain advanced degrees in a shorter duration efficiently. Implementing a hybrid teaching format can also be helpful, particularly for working professionals.
Student preparation should extend beyond curricular coursework to encompass practical training and skill development, including cultivating critical thinking skills. Postgraduate pharmacy students must acquire skills and competencies to excel in their future roles. While some skills may be specific to student specialization, others are universally applicable and should be integrated into most specialized medical and pharmaceutical programs. Furthermore, the current job market demands more than traditional scientific research skills. Students may also need to demonstrate disparate skills in business, policy management, and advanced technologies. Therefore, the curriculum should incorporate relevant course content to address these multifaceted requirements. Competencies are frequently defined as meaningful job-related skills, knowledge, attitudes, and abilities essential for competent performance in distinct professions [ 60 ]. Key skills and competencies highlighted in the literature regarding pharmacy postgraduate education encompass research competencies, curriculum development training, communication skills, health administration and leadership training, industrial training, and critical thinking and problem-solving.
In a study published by Poloyac et al., core research competencies for a PhD program were developed in a clinical pharmaceutical sciences curriculum [ 29 ]. Eight major competencies were identified for students to integrate preclinical and clinical evidence into their research successfully [ 29 ]. These competencies included: i) literature review and evaluation; ii) hypothesis generation; iii) research methods and study design; iv) statistical methods and data evaluation; v) grantsmanship; vi) presentation and delivery of oral and written scientific information; vii) ethical conduct of research; viii) leadership, management, and multidisciplinary teamwork [ 29 ]. Each category features subcategories of competencies, and evaluation rubrics were created to assess students' performance [ 29 ]. These competencies provide a valuable framework that can be adapted for other research-based postgraduate programs.
As previously discussed, some students pursue higher education to enter academia, emphasizing the need to acquire essential competencies to excel in their potential roles. Given that curriculum development and revision are ongoing and dynamic processes, training postgraduate pharmacy students on curriculum development becomes invaluable for those aspiring to pursue an academic career in pharmacy. Newton et al. demonstrated the effectiveness of incorporating a faculty simulation of curriculum development seminar for MSc and PhD pharmacy students, offering a practical and successful tool to prepare them for the responsibilities associated with academic roles [ 30 ].
Research, being a multifaceted interdisciplinary field, demands excellent communication skills. Thus, students must undergo training in presentation, negotiation, and conflict management skills. Additionally, employers' appreciation of diverse soft skills highlights the importance of cultivating a broad skill set in graduates [ 64 ]. Studies have highlighted substantial benefits for doctoral pharmacy students who received training to enhance their communication skills, improve confidence in discussing findings, and enhance public speaking abilities [ 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, integrating courses and lectures focused on communication into the curriculum emerges as an invaluable component, aiding students in cultivating and strengthening their personal and interpersonal communication capabilities.
Specialized programs often require students to develop unique skills and competencies relevant to their areas of study. For instance, a master’s degree in health-system pharmacy administration and leadership training (HSPAL) was a novel program developed within the Eshelman School of Pharmacy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [ 33 ]. That program combined Master’s education with practical HSPAL residency [ 33 ]. The program was designed to provide a balanced curriculum encompassing leadership, management, clinical, administrative, and didactic courses to prepare students for pharmacy administrative positions and leadership careers [ 33 ]. The program indicated attainment of the main core competencies and outcomes by enrolled students and graduates [ 33 ]. Furthermore, supervisors noted a greater likelihood of hiring graduates for administrative positions [ 33 ].
Many pharmacy programs often encompass laboratory components involving traditional basic sciences practice labs. However, there is a recognized need to integrate elements that provide students with the necessary knowledge for pharmaceutical industry practice, particularly those aspiring to work in drug discovery and development. A study revealed that most graduate programs inadequately address industry-related skills, emphasizing the importance of incorporating experiences that better prepare graduates for non-academic careers [ 35 ]. In another study by McLaughlin et al., a qualitative analysis of employers’ expectations for pharmaceutical sciences PhD graduates was conducted to understand the skills sought by employers [ 34 ]. The authors identified themes such as depth and breadth of knowledge, collaboration, communication, adaptability, experiential training, research productivity, and motivation [ 34 ]. Thus, integrating a holistic lab experience throughout the study duration, rather than limiting exposure to technical skills, can add significant value. This could be implemented by placing students in local and international pharmaceutical industries for mandatory practical experiences.
Critical thinking and problem-solving are among the highly desired skills in pharmacy postgraduates and are key to successful research conduct and evaluation of published evidence. However, various barriers may hinder their acquisition, including students' perceptions, limited metacognitive skills, biases, and the need for effortful thinking [ 65 ]. Though challenging, developing and nurturing these skills is not impossible in a thoughtful and encouraging educational environment. Research from India and Poland explored these skills in pharmacy postgraduate education [ 36 , 37 ]. Research from India investigated the performance and perception of students and their instructors regarding utilizing critical appraisal tools [ 37 ]. Both students and instructors reported that journal club (JC) criticism activities were vital in pharmacy postgraduate education, contributing to an enhancement in critical appraisal skills among participating students [ 37 ]. Research from Poland reported that graduates had insufficient knowledge of and attitudes toward evidence-based pharmacy, especially in their critical appraisal of scientific articles and problem-solving skills [ 36 ]. The study suggested that blended learning, combining classroom and online multi-module courses, could enhance the learning experience [ 36 ]. Further research evaluating critical-thinking and problem-solving training in pharmacy postgraduate education across diverse countries is essential to draw wide-ranging conclusions and recommend improvements in relevant curricula.
Competency-based education proves beneficial when students' competence is continually assessed throughout the program [ 66 , 67 ]. A well-defined course syllabus should outline the timeline, assessment approaches, deadlines, and submissions and emphasize feedback and constructive criticism [ 66 , 67 ]. Course instructors should decide on the course objectives and identify potentially relevant embedded assessment tools to achieve these goals [ 40 ]. For instance, a program-level assessment process was developed for an MSc in Pharmaceutical Sciences program using an iterative data collection process, peer evaluation, and discussions [ 40 ]. The main assessment domains were cognitive (knowledge-based), affective (emotion-based), and psychomotor (action-based) [ 68 ]. The assessment was developed utilizing Bloom's taxonomy, which includes cognitive (knowledge-based), affective (emotion-based), and psychomotor (action-based) domains, and can guide the setting of course goals based on complexity and specificity [ 40 , 68 ]. Program success can be evaluated through student evaluations and feedback on course content, format, assessment methods, and suggestions [ 40 , 68 ].
A set of publications explored the performance assessment of pharmacy postgraduate students. In a descriptive study by Robinson et al., a comprehensive competency review assessing postgraduates' competencies was discussed [ 38 ]. Students were required to provide written evidence for each competency, and the instructor would either accept it if found satisfactory or reject it while requesting a rewritten version to ensure the development of the required competencies [ 38 ]. Based on students' performance, the faculty member may suggest elective courses during the program's second half [ 38 ]. Similarly, in a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant Application Writing Assessment for pharmacology postgraduate students, grades improved considerably upon resubmission, with survey responses indicating increased student confidence in grant writing capability [ 39 ]. The study emphasized improving writing skills through writing, revision, submission, constructive feedback, rewriting, and resubmitting [ 39 ]. Together, these findings underline the importance of midpoint evaluations for various competencies. While this process may be time-consuming for students and faculty, it is considered a worthwhile investment in time, cost, and effort.
Assessing students' understanding of theoretical concepts alone may not be sufficient; they should also be evaluated based on their actions and practical applications. For instance, a study conducted in Jordan reported a high theoretical understanding of plagiarism among pharmacy postgraduate students. However, when given practical assignments, overall performance was unsatisfactory, revealing a high prevalence of plagiarism [ 41 ]. Therefore, educational institutions should ensure students learn various paraphrasing methods and are educated on useful references for plagiarism checking. In another study conducted in the same country, the adherence rate of postgraduate students to ethical standards related to data confidentiality and informed consent when dealing with human subjects was also inadequate [ 42 ]. Hence, assessing students’ performance in applying theoretical concepts is also recommended to ensure they are highly competent in real-world settings.
The careful selection of tools and methods for delivering lectures is crucial, especially in the context of advancing technologies and artificial intelligence. In postgraduate education, 3D virtual computer simulation methods were deemed advantageous [ 44 , 46 ]. In a randomized controlled study, using 3D technology to demonstrate drug-receptor interactions significantly enhanced students’ understanding and performance compared to traditional 2D graphics [ 44 ]. Similarly, a computer-simulated method in experimental animal modeling in postgraduate pharmacology improved the experimental outcomes and confidence when conducted before an isolated live tissue-based bioassay [ 46 ]. Moreover, a pilot study assessing the value of technology (Lecture Tools) as an active learning method in teaching pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics demonstrated a positive experience [ 45 ]. Lecture Tools is a cloud-based system that permits various question designs, student participation, and in-class evaluations [ 45 ]. Students can use any smart device, like laptops, tablets, or mobile phones, and take notes within the same slide of the teaching presentation [ 45 ]. Despite the provision of real-time interactions, there are limitations, including weak faculty preparedness for using this tool, the time required for preparing the lecture slides, and limited lecture time [ 45 ]. Other tools have also proven valuable for undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy education, offering interactive and easily accessible sessions, such as Coursera and EdX platforms, Socrative, Yammer, and the Lecture Capture System [ 69 , 70 , 71 ].
Postgraduate supervision is crucial to students' success, emphasizing the need for high-quality and sufficient mentorship. Swedish PhD students indicated that poor supervision prolonged their studies and delayed the completion of their thesis projects [ 49 ]. Every student has the right to guarantee that their mentorship is provided by qualified supervisors capable of effectively mentoring postgraduate students. When interviewed, supervisors expressed a need for training regarding the required instructions, guidance, and clarification of their roles as mentors [ 49 ]. In a study by Yue et al., which investigated Master’s mentor competence, it was reported that a mentor’s development can be encouraged via supportive policy, time, and appropriate programs [ 50 ]. Secondly, the mentor’s competencies should be assessed through mentor training and evaluation [ 50 ]. Lastly, mentors should endorse all competencies voluntarily [ 50 ]. The dual-mentorship model is a promising key initiative to improve mentorship in postgraduate education. Soucy et al. advocated for the dual-mentored PhD model, where each student is supervised by two expert mentors from different organizations, leading to superior outcomes [ 48 ]. Graduates of this program demonstrated great success, graduating two years earlier than traditional Ph.D. program students without compromising the outcomes [ 48 ].
After discussing each theme in detail, we employed a visual presentation to summarize the major identified challenges (Fig. 6 ), offering educators and readers an overview of the current potential challenges. Understanding these barriers can ensure that postgraduate pharmacy programs are effective and subject to continuous improvement. Table S4 (Supplementary Material 3) provides a detailed explanation of the identified challenges.
A summary of the major recognized challenges from each of the three identified themes
Based on the insights driven from this scoping review, we have synthesized and developed a conceptual framework outlining an optimal structure for Pharmacy postgraduate programs (Fig. 5 ). This framework elucidates evidence-based recommendations for universities to improve the educational experience for students and for refining pharmacy postgraduate programs. While implementing this framework, it is noteworthy that research and improvement efforts should be tailored to each program context and capacity.
This model can be utilized by various stakeholders. The use of such a model should be tailored to the specific target audience and the overall context. Several stakeholders could benefit from the model; for example, investigators could focus their research on a theme or a subcategory to develop and examine the effectiveness of an intervention. Likewise, postgraduate students could use this model to identify the key knowledge areas, skills, and competencies they need to master in order for them to stay ahead of the continuously changing demands of the job market. Additionally, educators, management teams, and administrators at postgraduate programs could use the model for the continuous development and refinement of their postgraduate programs.
This scoping review highlights various recommendations to be explored in future research efforts. First, all included studies were observational and descriptive, with only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a limited number of mixed-method studies. Thus, we suggest the need for well-designed RCTs and mixed-method research studies evaluating postgraduate programs focusing on the three presented themes. RCTs would provide valuable high-level evidence to support future research and practice applications. At the same time, mixed-method studies can facilitate the collection and evaluation of unique quantitative and qualitative data in individual program contexts. Second, future research should investigate educational programs from the need assessment and/or program objective development stage to the final evaluation of programs and their improvements. Exploring the utilization of well-established frameworks from the literature will allow the development of research and/or program evaluation following a systematic and comprehensive approach. Third, there are few publications on the assessment and evaluation methods. Accordingly, investigating this theme can provide valuable information on the effectiveness of the implemented programs and guide the process of program improvement and development. Fourth, our findings suggest that research involving MSc programs focuses more on courses, curriculum, and syllabus topics and less on training, competencies, and skills development. Given the growing need for competent professionals, investigating training and competencies within MSc programs will assist in preparing competent graduates. On the other hand, there were limited studies exploring courses and curriculum topics in PhD programs. Therefore, studies investigating the development or evaluation of PhD-tailored curricula and courses, particularly those focusing on competency-based education, should be considered in future research efforts. Finally, we have identified a need for additional international research efforts, from both developing and developed countries, to advance postgraduate pharmacy education on a global scale.
Strengths and limitations inherent to the scoping review.
It is noteworthy that this review is, to our knowledge, the first to systematically synthesize and chart available evidence on pharmacy postgraduate (MSc and PhD) education. Such a systematic approach offered many strengths relevant to conceptual and theoretical aspects and other strengths relevant to the standard methodology utilized in this scoping review. Studies discussed educational program implementation in detail, which provided a comprehensive overview and opportunity to learn from programs at various stages of implementation (i.e., both programs at advanced stages with successful implementation practices and nascent programs with identified improvement opportunities). The details provided in this review and in individual studies could be utilized to inform the implementation and improvement of other programs at the international level. Moreover, the included studies utilized diverse research methodologies and offered valuable insights into the current literature landscape on MSc and PhD pharmacy programs. The review also resulted in the development of an evidence-based conceptual framework for enhancing pharmacy postgraduate education. Further, included herein are outcomes of the examination of the postgraduate pharmacy educational curriculum, competency development, and assessment methods. Another strength of this study is the use of these defined themes to guide the framework constriction, analysis and presentation of findings. Additionally, methodological strengths included a) utilization of standard methodology (i.e., PRISMA-ScR) to conduct this review; b) employment of the framework proposed by Arksey and 'O'Malley for data synthesis and charting; c) utilization of a comprehensive search strategy documented in the supplementary material to increase the transparency and replicability of the search strategy; and d) utilization of major databases and journals relevant to the field of pharmacy education research to ensure comprehensiveness. Despite these strengths, this review has some limitations. Firstly, due to its scoping nature, the outcomes of the studies were not assessed using formal quality assessment tools; thus, interpretation of findings and efforts to implement any intervention or recommendation would require further investigation. However, to ensure the inclusion of high-quality data and to mitigate this limitation, we included articles from peer-reviewed journals only. Secondly, the included studies were descriptive and observational, with only one RCT. Thus, well-designed RCT studies evaluating pharmacy postgraduate programs are recommended for future research efforts. Lastly, the inclusion criteria were limited to studies published in English between 2011 and 2023; this might affect the inclusion of articles published in non-English or before 2011.
Although this model can provide a valuable foundation for developing collective, high-quality pharmacy postgraduate programs, there are some limitations to take into consideration before utilizing or interpreting the information provided, which include:
First, concerning methodological rigor, there is a need for a more robust and structured methodology for developing this model, such as the Delphi method, which would ultimately enhance its robustness. Nevertheless, the development of the model relied on a comprehensive literature review and synthesis. The model utilized a rich dataset originating from primary studies and implementing various research methodologies, e.g., survey research, qualitative interviews, and mixed-methods research. The various methodologies used in the primary studies, the various types of data originated and data qualities, as well as the unique experiences of various postgraduate programs, enriched this model and improved its quality.
Second is the issue of contextual applicability. Developing countries can find it difficult and costly to implement or adapt this model into their educational programs, mainly due to the cost and availability of necessary resources. For instance, certain components of the model could require expensive resources that are not readily affordable in low-income countries. Therefore, these educational programs should customize this model in a cost-effective approach, taking into consideration their available resources.
Finally, the consideration of stakeholders’ perspectives is crucial. Various stakeholders are required to provide their perspectives and input effectively to evaluate this model before its utilization. To elaborate, educators, program administrators, and employers representing the job market may find the model or some aspects of the model not applicable to their scope of interest or resources or may identify additional factors or priorities that are not explicitly addressed in the model.
Postgraduate pharmacy education represents a vital transition from undergraduate learning to unique, practice-oriented knowledge, preparing graduates for exceptional service across diverse pharmacy areas, topics, pursuits, and settings. Therefore, tailored pharmacy programs at higher education institutions must constantly evaluate various aspects of their educational systems with ongoing updates to remain relevant. This scoping review offered a wide breadth of evidence-based suggestions, recommendations, gaps, improvement opportunities, and conclusions pertaining to key areas of a) practice-oriented courses, curricula, and modules; b) performance-based assessments; c) real-world competencies, applied skills, and training; d) diverse tools and methods for teaching and learning; e) programs emphasizing the crucial role of mentorship and support in diverse pharmacy postgraduate topics. This review resulted in developing a conceptual framework, which can serve as a reverence for improving and developing Pharmacy postgraduate educational programs. Various opportunities for further research were also recognized to address various challenges and identified gaps in pharmacy postgraduate education.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
Brazeau GA, Meyer SM, Belsey M, Bednarczyk EM, Bilic S, Bullock J, et al. Preparing pharmacy graduates for traditional and emerging career opportunities. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):157. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20221350 .
Scahill SL, Atif M, Babar ZU. Defining pharmacy and its practice: a conceptual model for an international audience. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017 May 12;6:121–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29354558 .
Poloyac SM, Block KF, Cavanaugh JE, Dwoskin LP, Melchert RB, Nemire RE, et al. Competency, Programming, and Emerging Innovation in Graduate Education within Schools of Pharmacy: The Report of the 2016–2017 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):S11–S11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29200459 .
Doran MR, Lott WB. A duty of care. Trends Biochem Sci. 2013 Jan 1;38(1):1–2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23157921/ .
Wu-Pong S, Gobburu J, O’Barr S, Shah K, Huber J, Weiner D, et al. The future of the pharmaceutical sciences and graduate education: recommendations from the AACP Graduate Education Special Interest Group. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):S2–S2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23716757 .
Hadi MA, Awaisu A. Postgraduate programs in clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice: are we heading in the right direction? Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 May 12;74(4):72b-72b. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20585434/ .
Pillai G, Chibale K, Constable EC, Keller AN, Gutierrez MM, Mirza F, et al. The Next Generation Scientist program: capacity-building for future scientific leaders in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):233. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1331-y .
Atif M, Razzaq W, Mushtaq I, Malik I, Razzaq M, Scahill S, et al. Pharmacy Services beyond the Basics: A Qualitative Study to Explore Perspectives of Pharmacists towards Basic and Enhanced Pharmacy Services in Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2379. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32244475 .
Al-Worafi YM. The challenges of pharmacy education in Yemen. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Oct 15;78(8):146. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25386011 .
Bilal AI, Tilahun Z, Gebretekle GB, Ayalneh B, Hailemeskel B, Engidawork E. Current status, challenges and the way forward for clinical pharmacy service in Ethiopian public hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 19;17(1):359. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28526021 .
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005F 1;8(1):19–32.
Article Google Scholar
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018O 2;169(7):467–73.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Rev Esp Nutr Humana y Diet. 2016;20(2):148–60.
Google Scholar
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev . 2016;5(1):210. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 .
Medina MS, Tomsek JJ, Bowers-Pippin J. The use of mentors and partnerships in a preparing future faculty program at a Health Sciences Center. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2015;7(2):145–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2014.11.008 .
Freitas MJ, Silva JV, Korrodi-Gregório L, Fardilha M. Non-stop lab week: A real laboratory experience for life sciences postgraduate courses. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2016 May 6;44(3):297–303. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20947 .
Nikravanfard N, Khorasanizadeh F, Zendehdel K. Research Ethics Education in Post-Graduate Medical Curricula in I.R. Iran. Dev World Bioeth. 2017 Aug 1;17(2):77–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12122 .
Zainal INA, Karim NAA, Soh YC, Suleiman AK, Khan TM, Hameed MA, et al. Key Elements of Pharmacoinformatics for the Degrees of Bachelor and Master of Pharmacy. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Apr 7;51(4):419–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479017701977
Ahmed WS, Nebeker C. Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs in an Arab nation relative to top programs worldwide: A qualitative content analysis. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0238755–e0238755. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33606694 .
Fuhrmann CN, Halme DG, O’Sullivan PS, Lindstaedt B. Improving graduate education to support a branching career pipeline: recommendations based on a survey of doctoral students in the basic biomedical sciences. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011;10(3):239–49. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21885820 .
Eddington (Chair) ND, Aubé J, Das SK, Ellingrod VL, Hansen R, Madhavan SS, et al. Report of the 2014–2016 AACP Research and Graduate Affairs Committee. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Nov 25;80(9):S21. Available from: http://www.ajpe.org/content/80/9/S21.abstract .
Barrett JE, McGonigle P, Clark JE. Graduate Education in Pharmacology: Addressing the need for specialized training for pharmaceutical and biotechnology careers. Pharmacol Res. 2016;113:327–31. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661816308453 .
Lypson ML, Prince MEP, Kasten SJ, Osborne NH, Cohan RH, Kowalenko T, et al. Optimizing the post-graduate institutional program evaluation process. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 17;16:65. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26887758 .
Allen GM, Chisholm O. Postgraduate Education in Pharmaceutical Medicine in Australia: Evaluation and Evolution to a Global Program Over 20 Years. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Oct 5;53(5):654–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479018793129 .
Keller F, Dhaini S, Briel M, Henrichs S, Höchsmann C, Kalbermatten D, et al. How to Conceptualize and Implement a PhD Program in Health Sciences-The Basel Approach. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018 Apr 24;5:2382120518771364–2382120518771364. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29780889 .
Chisholm O. Curriculum Transformation: From Didactic to Competency-Based Programs in Pharmaceutical Medicine. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 21;10:278. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30949056 .
Koster AS, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Woerdenbag HJ, Mulder WMC, Wilffert B, Schalekamp T, et al. Alignment of CanMEDS-based Undergraduate and Postgraduate Pharmacy Curricula in The Netherlands. Pharm (Basel, Switzerland). 2020 Jul 10;8(3):117. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664306 .
Gu J, Liu Y, Xu F, Zhang Y, Shao R, Lu T, et al. Development and challenges of professional Master of pharmacy education in China. J Chinese Pharm Sci. 2021;30(1):69–78.
Poloyac SM, Empey KM, Rohan LC, Skledar SJ, Empey PE, Nolin TD, et al. Core competencies for research training in the clinical pharmaceutical sciences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Mar 10;75(2):27. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21519417 .
Newton GD, Hagemeier NE. A curriculum development simulation in a graduate program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Nov 10;75(9):184. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22171112 .
Garces H, Black EP. Corporate communication strategies are applicable for teaching non-science communication skills to pharmaceutical sciences PhD students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2015;7(2):265–72. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129714001579 .
Ponzio NM, Alder J, Nucci M, Dannenfelser D, Hilton H, Linardopoulos N, et al. Learning Science Communication Skills Using Improvisation, Video Recordings, and Practice, Practice, Practice. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Mar 30;19(1):19.1.15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29904514 .
Colmenares EW, McLaughlin JE, Morbitzer KA, Eckel SF. Development and perceived value of a master’s degree in health-system pharmacy administration training. Am J Heal Pharm. 2021 Jan 1;78(1):74–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa338 .
McLaughlin JE, Minshew LM, Gonzalez D, Lamb K, Klus NJ, Aubé J, et al. Can they imagine the future? A qualitative study exploring the skills employers seek in pharmaceutical sciences doctoral graduates. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 9;14(9):e0222422–e0222422. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31498853 .
Lebovitz L, Swaan PW, Eddington ND. Trends in Research and Graduate Affairs in Schools and Colleges of Pharmacy, Part 2: Students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May 1;84(5):7642. Available from: http://www.ajpe.org/content/84/5/7642.abstract .
Panczyk M, Cieålak I, Zarzeka A, Jaworski M, Gotlib J. Effective training of phd students with evidence-based pharmacy ñ the use of online multi-module course. Acta Pol Pharm - Drug Res. 2019;76(1):185–94.
Gajbhiye S, Tripathi R, Parmar U, Khatri N, Potey A. Critical appraisal of published research papers - A reinforcing tool for research methodology: Questionnaire-based study. Perspect Clin Res. 2019/05/14. 2021;12(2):100–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34012907 .
Robinson GFWB, Moore CG, Mctigue KM, Rubio DM, Kapoor WN. Assessing Competencies in a Master of Science in Clinical Research Program: The Comprehensive Competency Review. Clin Transl Sci. 2015;8(6):770–5.
Leak RK, O’Donnell LA, Surratt CK. Teaching Pharmacology Graduate Students how to Write an NIH Grant Application. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Nov 25;79(9):138. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28435165 .
Bloom TJ, Hall JM, Liu Q, Stagner WC, Adams ML. Developing an Assessment Process for a Master’s of Science Degree in a Pharmaceutical Sciences Program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):125. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27756933 .
Abu Farha R, Mukattash T, Al-Delaimy W. Predictors of Plagiarism Research Misconduct: A Study of Postgraduate Pharmacy Students in Jordan. J Acad Ethics. 2020;(0123456789). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09386-x .
Swedan S, Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Aljabali AAA. Graduate students reported practices regarding the issue of informed consent and maintaining of data confidentiality in a developing country. Heliyon. 2020 Sep 19;6(9):e04940–e04940. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32995624 .
Alcorn SR, Cheesman MJ. Technology-assisted viva voce exams: A novel approach aimed at addressing student anxiety and assessor burden in oral assessment. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022M;14(5):664–70.
Richardson A, Bracegirdle L, McLachlan SIH, Chapman SR. Use of a three-dimensional virtual environment to teach drug-receptor interactions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Feb 12;77(1):11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23459131 .
Swanson HI, Piascik MT. A Pilot Study on the Use of Lecture Tools to Enhance the Teaching of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2014 Jan 1;1:JMECD.S19011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S19011 .
Jalgaonkar S V, Joshi SS, Gajbhiye S V, Singh KNM, Sayyed MP. Perception of postgraduate students in pharmacology toward animal simulation model. Indian J Pharmacol. 2019;51(6):400–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32029962 .
Volodymyrovych TY, Tetiana K, Yaroslavovych TB. Experience in Using Peer-to-Peer Platforms and Immersive Technologies in the Training of Future Masters of Pharmacy in Medical Lyceum. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur. 2022;22(2):23–8.
Soucy K, Fairhurst RM, Lynn GM, Fomalont K, Wynn TA, Siegel RM. Breaking the Mold: Partnering with the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program to Accelerate PhD Training. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(12):813–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.10.005 .
Raffing R, Jensen TB, Tønnesen H. Self-reported needs for improving the supervision competence of PhD supervisors from the medical sciences in Denmark. BMC Med Educ. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):188. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29058586 .
Yue J-J, Chen G. An exploration of the structure of pharmaceutical mentors’ competence at universities in Western China. Stud Educ Eval. 2019;63:1–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X1930001X .
Masic I, Hodzic A, Mulic S. Ethics in medical research and publication. Int J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;5(9):1073–82. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25317288 .
Stankovic B, Stankovic M. Educating about biomedical research ethics. Med Heal Care Philos. 2014;17(4):541–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9561-1 .
Brownell SE, Tanner KD. Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and..tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012;11(4):339–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23222828 .
Smith CR, Delgado C. Developing a Model of Graduate Teaching Assistant Teacher Efficacy: How Do High and Low Teacher Efficacy Teaching Assistants Compare? CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;20(1):ar2–ar2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33444107 .
Koblinsky SA, Hrapczynski KM, Clark JE. Preparing future faculty and professionals for public health careers. Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105 Suppl(Suppl 1):S125–31. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25706007 .
Fox BI, Flynn AJ, Fortier CR, Clauson KA. Knowledge, skills, and resources for pharmacy informatics education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Jun 10;75(5):93. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21829267 .
Khan RA, Spruijt A, Mahboob U, van Merrienboer JJG. Determining “curriculum viability” through standards and inhibitors of curriculum quality: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):336. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31488128 .
Ten Cate O. Competency-Based Postgraduate Medical Education: Past, Present and Future. GMS J Med Educ . 2017 Nov 15;34(5):Doc69–Doc69. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29226237 .
Kerdijk W, Snoek JW, van Hell EA, Cohen-Schotanus J. The effect of implementing undergraduate competency-based medical education on students’ knowledge acquisition, clinical performance and perceived preparedness for practice: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 27;13:76. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23711403 .
van der Vleuten CPM. Competency-based education is beneficial for professional development. Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Dec;4(6):323–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26553242 .
Council NR. Research Training in the Biomedical, Behavioral, and Clinical Research Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12983/research-training-in-the-biomedical-behavioral-and-clinical-research-sciences .
Karamizadeh Z, Zarifsanayei N, Faghihi AA, Mohammadi H, Habibi M. The study of effectiveness of blended learning approach for medical training courses. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012/01/01. 2012 Jan;14(1):41–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22737553 .
Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 4;18(1):e2–e2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26729058 .
Touloumakos AK. Expanded Yet Restricted: A Mini Review of the Soft Skills Literature. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 4;11:2207. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33013574 .
Persky AM, Medina MS, Castleberry AN. Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students. Am J Pharm Educ . 2019 Mar;83(2):7033. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30962645 .
Chimea T La, Kanji Z, Schmitz S. Assessment of clinical competence in competency-based education. Can J Dent Hyg CJDH = J Can l’hygiene Dent JCHD. 2020 Jun 1;54(2):83–91. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33240368 .
Gruppen LD, Mangrulkar RS, Kolars JC. The promise of competency-based education in the health professions for improving global health. Hum Resour Health. 2012 Nov 16;10:43. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23157696 .
Adams NE. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):152–3. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26213509 .
Subhi Y, Andresen K, Bojsen SR, Nilsson PM, Konge L. Massive open online courses are relevant for postgraduate medical training. Dan Med J. 2014;61(10):1–5.
Munusamy S, Osman A, Riaz S, Ali S, Mraiche F. The use of Socrative and Yammer online tools to promote interactive learning in pharmacy education. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11(1):76–80. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129717300709 .
Hussain FN, Al-Mannai R, Diab MI, Agouni A. Investigating the use of a lecture capture system within pharmacy education: Lessons from an undergraduate pharmacy program at Qatar University. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2020;17(1):1–14.
Download references
The College of Pharmacy, Qatar University provided the funding for the publication of this article.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Pharmacy, Aspetar Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Dana ElKhalifa
College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Ola Hussein & Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
Department of Pharmacy, Al-Maarif University College, Ramadi, Iraq
Abeer Hamid
Department of Pharmacy, Aman Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Nour Al-Ziftawi
Clinical Imaging Department, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Israa Al-Hashimi
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
DK, OH, & MI worked on developing the study protocol. DK, OH, & NA screened and identified eligible articles. DK, OH, & AH grouped the studies, extracted the required data, and summarized the results. DK drafted the initial manuscript. AH, IA, & MI revised and edited the manuscript. MI supervised all the steps and provided guidance and feedback throughout the whole process of constructing this review. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Dana ElKhalifa or Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
Not applicable.
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’ s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary material 1., supplementary material 2., supplementary material 3., rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
ElKhalifa, D., Hussein, O., Hamid, A. et al. Curriculum, competency development, and assessment methods of MSc and PhD pharmacy programs: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 24 , 989 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05820-5
Download citation
Received : 24 April 2024
Accepted : 25 July 2024
Published : 11 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05820-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6920
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The interdisciplinary PhD program in Mass Communications is offered jointly by the Department of Life Sciences Communication and the School of Journalism and Mass Communication. The PhD degree in Mass Communications provides future academics and professionals with rigorous training in theory and research with highly individualized programs that students develop in consultation with their advisors.
The PhD program in journalism and mass communication at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication is a highly individualized program that attracts seasoned media professionals transitioning to academia, as well as recent graduates of master's degree-level programs in journalism and communication, social and behavioral sciences, or the humanities.
A minimum GPA of 3.5 for graduate courses is required. Average Undergrad Tuition . In-state $14,118 Out-of-state $37,110 Average Graduate Tuition . In-state $10,600 ... A doctorate degree in mass communication and media studies prepares graduates to conduct meaningful research and to teach key topics from politics to social media.
PhD Degree Requirements. All PhD students must complete a minimum of 46 graduate credits, 24 thesis credits, and a dissertation. All course work must be taken on an A-F grading basis. The following requirements must be fulfilled to complete the Ph.D. program in mass communication: 1. Required Mass Communication Core (7 credits)
Master's students without backgrounds in journalism and mass communication may be required to take 9 or more credit hours of undergraduate-level foundation courses before registering for more than 6 hours of graduate courses. If not previously completed, a course in statistics is also required.
Associate Professor and Graduate Director, Media Arts and Studies. [email protected]. 740-593-0630. School of Media Arts & Studies. Schoonover Center 303. Jatin Srivastava. Professor; Associate Director for Graduate Studies; Director, Institute for International Journalism. [email protected]. 740.593.3136.
The Doctor of Philosophy program in Mass Communication requires a minimum of 72 s.h. of graduate credit. The program provides training in research methods, communication theory, and teaching skills. Students in this program prepare for careers as professors, teachers and industry researchers.The
Theory and Research Ph.D. The Ph.D. program prepares students to conduct original research on communication processes, their origins, and their psychological, political and cultural effects. Most of our doctoral graduates enter academic teaching and research careers, or communication-related professions that require research skills.
The graduate programs in the College of Mass Communication and Media Arts develop teaching, research, and creative work that interrogates the construction, reception, and social impact of mass media forms and texts. Our work uniquely blends methods from the arts, humanities, history, theory, and social sciences.
The interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Mass Communications is offered jointly by the Department of Life Sciences Communication and the School of Journalism and Mass Communication.. The Ph.D. degree in Mass Communications provides future academics and professionals with rigorous training in theory and research with highly individualized programs that students develop in consultation with their ...
If you're looking for a career in teaching and research at the highest levels, or research and management with mass media companies, consider our Ph.D. program. Our program is small and selective, giving students substantial flexibility to tailor their coursework and area of study to their particular career goals.
The Doctor of Philosophy degree in Communications offers a multidisciplinary approach to the study of the relationships between people and media in their cultural, social, political, historical, economic and technological contexts. With the guidance of an interdisciplinary faculty advisory committee, students craft i ndividual courses of study ...
Graduate Programs. Ph.D. Mass Communications. The Donald P. Bellisario College of Communications offers advanced study leading to the Doctor of Philosophy degree in mass communications. The purpose of the program is to prepare graduates for entry into college and university teaching and research and for a variety of communications-related ...
All course work must be taken on an A-F grading basis. MA Degree Requirements. 1. Required Mass Communication Core (7 credits) JOUR 8001: Studies and Theories of Mass Communication (3 cr) One more theory course inside the HSJMC (e.g. JOUR 8514) (3 cr) JOUR 8009: Pro-seminar in Mass Communication (1 cr) 2.
Applied mass communication programs are typically for students who do not plan to pursue a doctorate in communication. There are also research or theory-based programs designed to prepare students for further study at the doctoral level, and which have more courses in mass communication research and theory, as well as courses that encourage ...
College of Journalism and Communications Courses. SLO 1 Knowledge Develop a thorough identification and review of mass communication theory and proficiency in research methods surrounding a specific area of expertise in the mass communication field. SLO 2 Knowledge Discuss and translate mass communication theory and proficiency in research ...
Degree Requirements. The total number of hours required for Ph.D. in Media & Public Affairs degree is 88 hours.*. A comprehensive guide to our Ph.D. program can be found in our Ph.D. in Media & Public Affairs Policies and Procedures Handbook. *This does not replace the Graduate School catalog.
Mass Communications: Life Sciences Comm (code G630A) The Ph.D. degree in Mass Communications provides future academics and professionals with rigorous training in theory and research with highly individualized programs that students develop in consultation with their advisors. Our Ph.D. graduates become some of the most successful researchers ...
Mass Communications Ph.D. Our fully-funded, interdisciplinary doctoral program will prepare you for a rewarding career in communications research and teaching. ... political communication; popular television; public relations; or social effects. The doctoral program is designed to be completed in four years, with two years of coursework ...
The mass media continues to play a critical role in distilling and transmitting information to the public. Top mass communication graduate programs typically blend traditional media forms, such as journalism and public relations, with new media technologies. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects a 3% growth rate for media and communication occupations between 2022 and 2032, about as ...
Students who complete all degree plan requirements receive a Master of Arts in Mass Communication degree from the nationally renowned College of Journalism and Communications at the University of Florida. Our graduate education-founded in theory and influenced by industry-transforms lives. We offer the most comprehensive, digitally-focused ...
School of Communication Office of the Dean 70 Arts Circle Drive Evanston, IL 60208. PhD in Rhetoric, Media, and Publics Frances Searle Building 2240 Campus Drive Evanston, IL 60208 Phone: 847-467-3551 Fax: 847-467-1036 Program Questions: [email protected] General Inquiries: [email protected]
This program allows students to obtain both a bachelor's and master's degree in as little as five years. It is offered as an accelerated bachelor's plus master's degree with: Journalism and Mass Communication, BA. Sports Journalism, BA. Acceptance to the graduate program requires a separate application. Students typically receive approval to ...
The Department of Writing Studies proudly offers an MA and PhD in Rhetoric and Scientific & Technical Communication (RSTC). As applications for Fall 2025 open this month, we chatted with Dr. Molly Kessler, Associate Professor, Director of Graduate Studies, and Associate Chair, to learn more about what sets RSTC apart from other graduate programs.
Background/objectives We aim to systematically review and evaluate the current landscape of postgraduate pharmacy education to a) identify current evidence, best practices, challenges, recommendations, and solutions; and b) develop a framework to optimize postgraduate pharmacy programs. Methods A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and ...