nike inc case study

Agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice for the global fashion community.

News & Analysis

• Professional Exclusives
• The News in Brief
• Sustainability
• Direct-to-Consumer
• Global Markets
• Fashion Week
• Workplace & Talent
• Entrepreneurship
• Financial Markets
• Newsletters
• Case Studies
• Masterclasses
• Special Editions
• The State of Fashion
• Read Careers Advice
• BoF Professional
• BoF Careers
• BoF Insights
• Our Journalism
• Work With Us
• Read daily fashion news
• Download special reports
• Sign up for essential email briefings
• Follow topics of interest
• Receive event invitations
• Create job alerts

Case Study | Inside Nike’s Radical Direct-to-Consumer Strategy

• Chantal Fernandez

In October 2020, in the middle of a global pandemic that had infected 188 countries, causing record sales damage across the retail sector, Nike’s share price hit an all-time high.

Like other retailers, Nike had been forced to close most of its network of more than 900 stores across the world, as had its key wholesale partners like Nordstrom and Foot Locker.

But the American sportswear giant’s performance during the pandemic, when its online sales spiked, signalled to many that Nike had the competency to prosper long term, in a future that will be increasingly defined by e-commerce and digital brand connections.

It was a validation of a strategy that Nike prioritised three years ago, dubbing it “Consumer Direct Offense,” but the seeds of the approach go back almost a decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

Above all, Nike is a marketing company. It doesn’t just sell sneakers; it sells the brand aspiration that imbues those sneakers with meaning. But to achieve the reach required to scale its business, Nike’s distribution strategy had long-relied on third-party retailers to sell its products, even if the consumer experience offered by those partners diluted its brand.

But in a future increasingly defined by e-commerce, fast-moving trends and, above all, the rising power of branding to drive consumer preference when competitors are just a click away, Nike realised that in order to thrive, it needed to take control of its distribution to better manage its brand and deepen its connection with consumers.

It was definitely architecting a new retail, and a bold, retail vision for Nike.

Such an evolution is easier said than done, especially for a business as large as Nike in a category as competitive as sportswear. But by radically cutting back on its wholesale distribution and raising the bar for brand experience with the third-party partners that remained; expanding its focus on content, community and customisation to keep customers close; investing in its data analytics and logistics capabilities; and rethinking the role of the store as a brand stage, Nike drove a veritable direct-to-consumer revolution.

When the pandemic hit, these shifts went into overdrive.

“It was definitely architecting a new retail, and a bold, retail vision for Nike,” said Heidi O’Neill, Nike’s president of consumer and marketplace, and one of the most prominent executives leading the brand’s new strategy in recent years. “But it started with our consumer, and we knew that consumers wanted a more direct relationship with us today.”

In this case study, BoF breaks down Nike’s pioneering direct-to consumer strategy and how it has worked to the brand’s advantage, propelling its share price to new heights during the global crisis of 2020.

Click below to read the case study now.

• Mark Parker
• John Donahoe
• direct to consumer
• athletic apparel

© 2024 The Business of Fashion. All rights reserved. For more information read our Terms & Conditions

This Week: Retail Earnings Get Messy

Gap, Abercrombie, Lululemon and others report results this week, amid growing concerns about a pullback in consumer spending.

H&M’s Big Bet on Fashion’s Elusive Middle

In an exclusive interview, CEO Daniel Ervér outlined his strategy to turn the Swedish fast-fashion giant’s greatest weakness – its positioning above Shein but below Zara in the category’s pricing hierarchy – into a strength. It all kicks off with a collection due out next month.

This Week: Which Retailers Win When Customers Trade Down?

Macy’s is betting on refreshed stores and better merchandise even as shoppers hunt for bargains. The company will give an update on its turnaround efforts with quarterly results this week.

The Top Priority for Victoria’s Secret’s New CEO

The surprise appointment of Savage X Fenty’s Hillary Super to the top job gives the beleaguered lingerie brand one more chance to show confused consumers what it stands for.

Subscribe to the BoF Daily Digest

The essential daily round-up of fashion news, analysis, and breaking news alerts.

Our newsletters may include 3rd-party advertising, by subscribing you agree to the Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy .

The Business of Fashion

Our products.

Nike: An Innovation Journey

• First Online: 29 November 2017

Cite this chapter

• Michelle Childs 5 &
• Byoungho Jin 6  

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Practice: Global Fashion Brand Management ((PSP:GFBM))

8804 Accesses

4 Citations

Nike is an American multinational company that has evolved to become a global leader in athletic wear with annual sales exceeding $21 billion in 2016, more than half of which is attributed to international markets. Since its inception in 1964, Nike has been an innovation leader in product development, marketing and consumer experience. Due to a dedication to continuous innovation, Nike has been able to sustain a competitive advantage within the athletic apparel and footwear marketplace. This case highlights key points in Nike’s journey of innovation and examines how Nike has successfully emerged as a global champion within the athletic wear industry. Based on these analyzed strategies, this case provides implications that are relevant for practitioners and academics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Sports Innovation

Arena Water Instinct: Process Innovation Built-in the Company DNA

The development of a performance hand wear and tools product innovation framework

In 1928 in Chicago, IL, Cole Haan was established by two founders—Trafton Cole and Eddie Haan. The company focused exclusively on men’s footwear before expanding into women’s footwear in 1979 (Shoemetro, 2016 ).

Bauer was founded out of Kitchener, Ontario, Canada in 1927 and was the first company to make hockey skates that had a permanent blade attached to the boot, an innovation that changed the industry (Ozanian, 2012 ).

The Jordan brand was launched in 1984 when basketball star Michael Jordan signed a contract with Nike. An outcome of this five-year, $2.5 million deal was a brand new line of shoes called Air Jordan (Footlocker, 2017 ).

With roots in beach culture, Hurley was established in Southern California in 1999 by Bob Hurley. Initially, it was known for surf-related products but eventually became a youth lifestyle brand (Transworld Survey, 2002 ).

Converse began in 1908 near Boston, MA as a rubber shoe company that specialized in galoshes. The brand expanded to sneakers and basketball shoes starting in 1920 (Converse, 2017 ).

Founded in New Haven, CT by David Beckerman in 1971, Starter first manufactured team uniforms for high schools and eventually entered into licensing agreements with professional sports teams (Reference for Business, 1995 ).

Originally founded in Wilmslow, Manchester, UK in 1920 as Humphrey Brothers Clothing, the company was later renamed Umbro in 1924. The company was one of the earliest to provide professional clubs with soccer gear (Hunt, 2009 ).

Apple. (2006). Nike and Apple team up to launch Nike+ ipod. Apple. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/05/23Nike-and-Apple-Team-Up-to-Launch-Nike-iPod.html

Athleisure. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster Online . Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/athleisure

Brettman, A. (2015, May 17). US made Nike footwear a slam dunk—some day—with or without trade deal. The Oregonian . Retrieved from http://www.oregonlive.com/playbooks-profits/index.ssf/2015/05/nikes_us_footwear_ambitions_ap.html

Burns, M. J. (2016, September 9). How Under Armour and Nike have tackled wearable technology. Sports Illustrated. Retrieved from https://www.si.com/tech-media/2016/09/09/how-under-armour-and-nike-have-differed-their-approach-tech

Chung, W., & Yeaple, S. (2008). International knowledge sourcing: Evidence from US firms expanding abroad. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (11), 1207–1224.

Article   Google Scholar  

Click, C. (2013, July 8). 20 Sneakers that changed performance footwear forever. Complex. Retrieved from http://www.complex.com/sneakers/2013/07/sneakers-that-changed-performance-footwear-forever

Converse. (2017). Our story. Retrieved from http://www.converse.com/uk/en/our-story/about-us.html

Diercksmeier, B. (2011). Nike Golf celebrates 20 years of NikeFIT. NGN . Retrieved from http://ngnation.com/2011/02/23/nike-golf-celebrates-20-years-nikefit/

Euromonitor. (2016, March 18). Sportswear in the US. Passport by Euromonitor. Retrieved from http://www.portal.euromonitor.com

Footlocker. (2017). The History of Air Jordan. Retrieved from http://www.footlocker.com/_-_/keyword-history+of+air+jordan

Garfield, L. (2016, June 28). Under Armour’s new innovation lab features robots that make sneakers—take an inside look. Business Insider . Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/under-armours-new-innovation-lab-features-robots-that-make-sneakers-and-we-went-inside-2016-6

Germano, S. (2014, August 20). Yoga poseurs: Athletic gear soars, outpacing sport itself. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/yoga-poseurs-athletic-apparel-moves-out-of-the-gym-to-every-day-1408561182

Gianoatasio, D. (2013). Nike’s ‘just do it’, the last great advertising slogan, turns 25. Adweek . Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/creativity/happy-25th-birthday-nikes-just-do-it-last-great-advertising-slogan-150947/

Grill-Goodman, J. (2015, October 13). Innovation at Nike goes beyond product. Retail Info Systems . Retrieved from https://risnews.com/innovation-nike-goes-beyond-product

Hennessy, K. (2012). Fashion: The definitive history of costume and style . New York: Dorling Kindersley.

Google Scholar  

Hunt, C. (2009). The Umbro story. Editorial. Retrieved from http://www.chrishunt.biz/features47.html

Interbrand. (2016). Best global brands 2016 rankings. Retrieved from http://interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2016/ranking/

Johannessen, J.-A., Olsen, B., & Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International Journal of Information Management, 19 (2), 121–139.

Jones, R. (2013, August 19). Know your tech: Nike Shox. Complex. Retrieved from http://www.complex.com/sneakers/2013/08/know-your-tech-nike-shox

Kell, J. (2014, December 25). Athletic apparel: Outperforming the competition in 2014. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2014/12/25/athletic-apparel-top-performer/

Kell, J. (2016, March 19). Why Nike, Adidas are turning to celebrities in 2016. Fortune . Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/03/19/nike-adidas-kevin-hart-kanye/

Kim, S. (2016, April 18). Nike shoes among most counterfeit goods in the world. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/Business/nike-shoes-counterfeited-goods-world/story?id=38485256

Kish, M. (2016, June 6). Nike joins Fortune 100, 2 other Oregon companies make Fortune 500. Portland Business Journal. Retrieved from http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/blog/threads_and_laces/2016/06/nike-joins-fortune-100-2-other-oregon-companies.html

Kissane, B. (2016, January 12). New apparel and footwear research category overview: Sportswear maintains momentum. Passport by Euromonitor. Retrieved from http://www.portal.euromonitor.com

Knitting Industry. (2012, July 31). Nike Flyknit: Ready, steady, go! Retrieved from http://www.knittingindustry.com/nike-flyknit-ready-steady-go/

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3 (3), 383–397.

Kunde, A. (2012, October 17). Two reasons why H&M’s designer collaborations are here to stay. Passport by Euromonitor. Retrieved from http://www.portal.euromonitor.com

Longman, J. (2017, March 8). Do Nike’s new shoes give runners an unfair advantage? The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/sports/nikes-vivid-shoes-and-the-gray-area-of-performance-enhancement.html?_r=0

Low, E. (2016, May 13). Why Nike has more patents than Lockheed, Ford, and Pfizer. Investors. Retrieved from http://www.investors.com/news/a-nike-apple-watch-an-under-armour-baseball-line-patents-hold-secrets/

MarketLine. (2016, August 18). Nike, Inc.: Company profile. Retrieved from MarketLine Advantage database.

McGill, D. C. (1989, July 11). Nike US bounding past Reebok. The New York Times . Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/11/business/nike-is-bounding-past-reebok.html

Moore, C. M., Doherty, A. M., & Doyle, S. A. (2010). Flagship stores as a market entry method: The perspective of luxury fashion retailing. European Journal of Marketing, 44 (1/2), 139–161.

Nazario, M., & Roach, D. (2015, October 4). Nike’s incredible road to becoming the world’s dominant sneaker retailer. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/nike-history-timeline-2015-10

Nike. (2007, July 26). Nikeplus.com becomes world’s largest online running destination. Nike . Retrieved from http://news.nike.com/news/nikepluscom-becomes-the-world%E2%80%99s-largest-online-running-destination

Nike. (2010, November 7). Niketown London reopens. Nike . Retrieved from http://news.nike.com/news/niketown-london-reopens-as-worlds-largest-nike-store

Nike. (2012, June 21). Nike+ basketball #gameonworld. Nike. Retrieved from http://news.nike.com/news/game-on-world

Nike. (2015, March 12). The evolution of visible air. Retrieved from http://news.nike.com/news/the-evolution-of-visible-air

Nike. (2016a). Introducing the new Nike+ app. Retrieved from http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/c/nike-plus/nike-app

Nike Inc. (2016b). Nike Inc. 2016 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://investors.nike.com/investors/news-events-and-reports/?toggle=earnings

Nike. (2017a). A revolution in motion. Retrieved from http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/c/innovation/free

Nike. (2017b). About Nike: Nike explore team sport research lab. Retrieved from http://about.nike.com/pages/nike-explore-team-sport-research-lab

Nike. (2017c). Become a member and unlock more. Retrieved from http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/c/nike-plus

Nike. (2017d). Fresh air from Oregon. Retrieved from http://news.nike.com/news/nike-air-manufacturing-innovation-facility

Nike. (2017e). What is Nike Dri-FIT? Retrieved from http://help-en-us.nike.com/app/answer/a_id/204/~/what-is-nike-dri-fit

Nike Manufacturing Map. (2017). Where Nike products are made. Retrieved from http://manufacturingmap.nikeinc.com/

Nike Retail Services, Inc. (2017). About Nike Retail Services, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.vault.com/company-profiles/retail/nike-retail-services,-inc/company-overview.aspx

Ozanian, M. (2012, May 10). Bauer investors score with top hockey equipment maker. Forbes . Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2012/05/10/bauer-investors-score-with-top-hockey-equipment-maker/#321e611d437c

Piskorski, M. J., & Johnson, R. (2014). Social strategy at Nike . Brighten: Harvard Business Publishing.

Book   Google Scholar  

Reda, S. (2017, March 15). Nike’s SoHo flagship leads transformational charge into the future of sports retail. NRF Magazine . Retrieved from http://stores.org/2017/03/15/stay-and-play-2/?utm_source=NRFStat&utm_medium=03-21&utm_content=STORES_Nike-Flagship&utm_campaign=SmartBrief

Reference for Business. (1995). Starter Corp. company profile, information, business description, history, background information. Retrieved from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/62/Starter-Corp.html

Reference for Business. (2003). Nike, Inc. company profile, information, business description, history, background information. Retrieved from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/99/NIKE-Inc.html

Rikert, D. C., & Christensen, C. R. (1984). Nike (A) . Brighten: Harvard Business Publishing.

Roberson, G. (2016, March 10). 10 Best Nike Ads. Beloved Brands. Retrieved from http://beloved-brands.com/tag/10-best-nike-ads/

Rodionova, Z. (2016, April 19). Rolex, Rayban, Nike and Louis Vuitton among brands hit by counterfeit track worth 270bn a year. Independent . Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/rolex-rayban-nike-and-louis-vuitton-among-brands-hit-by-counterfeit-tradeworth-270bn-a-year-a6991191.html

Salfino, C. (2017, January 23). Quest for speed and customization forces re-imagined supply chains. Vamp Footwear. Retrieved from http://vampfootwear.com/quest-speed-customization-forces-re-imagined-supply-chains/

Sharma, A. (2013, May 17). Swoosh and sustainability: Nike’s emergence as a global sustainable brand. Sustainable Brands. Retrieved from http://www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/supply_chain/swoosh-and-sustainability-nikes-emergence-global-sustainable-brand

Shen, B. (2014). Sustainable fashion supply chain: Lessons from H&M. Sustainability, 6 (9), 6236–6249.

Shoemetro. (2016). A history of Cole Haan. Retrieved from http://www.shoemetro.com/t-history-of-cole-haan.aspx

Strasser, J. B., & Becklund, L. (1993). Swoosh: The unauthorized story of Nike and the men who played there . New York: Harper Collins Publisher.

Supply Chain Digest. (2016, August 23). Nike partners with private equity firm to develop new age, outsourced manufacturing and supply chain in the Americas. Retrieved from http://www.scdigest.com/ontarget/16-08-23-2.php?cid=11145

Swallow, E. (2011, September 22). How Nike outruns the social media competition. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2011/09/22/nike-social-media/#sa3BGLstN5q6

Townsend, M. (2012, March 15). Is Nike’s Flyknit the swoosh of the future? Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-15/is-nikes-flyknit-the-swoosh-of-the-future

Transworld Survey. (2002, Feburary 22). Bob Hurley explains why he sold his brand to Nike. Retrieved from http://www.grindtv.com/transworld-business/products/bob-hurley-explains-why-he-sold-his-brand-to-nike/#slT2f63zLEYaPHxs.97

Venkatraman, P. (2016). Fibres of sportswear. In S. G. Hayes & P. Venkatraman (Eds.), Materials and technology for sportswear and performance apparel (pp. 23–52). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Wasserman & Anderson. (2012). Knighting the king: The founding of Nike . Brighten: Harvard Business Publishing.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Retail, Hospitality, and Tourism Management, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

Michelle Childs

Department of Consumer, Apparel, and Retail Studies, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA

Byoungho Jin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA

Department of Economics and Law, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy

Elena Cedrola

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Childs, M., Jin, B. (2018). Nike: An Innovation Journey. In: Jin, B., Cedrola, E. (eds) Product Innovation in the Global Fashion Industry. Palgrave Studies in Practice: Global Fashion Brand Management . Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52349-5_4

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52349-5_4

Published : 29 November 2017

Publisher Name : Palgrave Pivot, New York

Print ISBN : 978-1-137-52348-8

Online ISBN : 978-1-137-52349-5

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• DSpace@MIT Home
• MIT Libraries
• Graduate Theses

Sustaining Digital Transformation in the Post-COVID Era: Nike Case Study

Terms of use

Date issued, collections.

Show Statistical Information

• Harvard Business School →
• Faculty & Research →
• March 2019 (Revised June 2019)
• HBS Case Collection

Global Sourcing at Nike

• Format: Print
• | Language: English
• | Pages: 31

About The Authors

Nien-he Hsieh

Michael W. Toffel

Related work.

• June 2019 (Revised January 2023)
• Faculty Research
• Global Sourcing at Nike  By: Nien-he Hsieh, Michael W. Toffel and Olivia Hull
• Global Sourcing at Nike  By: Nien-hê Hsieh, Michael W. Toffel and Olivia Hull

Product details

Time period

Geographical setting, featured company, featured protagonist.

• Kimi Ford (female), Portfolio Manager for NorthPoint Group

• No category

Case-Analysis-No.-2 Nike-Corporation

Related documents.

Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Research Case Study Report on Nike Inc.

Related Papers

Tram Dang Ngoc

Hina Brohi , Rizwan Raheem Ahmed , Arslan Hussain Bhutto , Rabel khubchandani

This report is all about to show a Marketing plan for Nike’s products; with reference to older offerings the report shows the plan that how can Nike offer new products in the market. With respect to this the report contains comprehensive marketing plan components including company analysis (Nike’s current and future status), situation or market analysis and competitors analysis; the report shows the Nike’s objectives and marketing strategies in terms of its 4ps that is it is shown that Nike can offer and increase its product range by offering other related products as aerobic products to its customers and set value-based pricing strategy accordingly, and for new offerings it can increase its other media other than commercials that is it can focus more on social media to promote its new products and it may expand its business in other countries as China, Middle-East etc. Beside this, the financial budget of this marketing plan has been discussed which is been forecasted by reviewing Nike’s previous years revenue and marketing expenses figures. Also execution plan as well as contingency plan has been shown which is thoroughly depends upon Nike’s senior management and team work which would make its objectives possible new offerings.

Vanessa Spindig

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.

Madeeha Kanwal

Strategy is about the most crucial and key issues for the future of organizations. Strategy is also important to explore several strategic options, investigating each one carefully before making strategic choices. The study incorporates a rigorous and systematic effort to uncover the strategies and its impact on the company's performance by analysing case studies, articles and the annual report of Nike Inc. and Adidas Inc. The study attempts to find out the relevance of the strategies adopted by these companies, which are globally successful athletic apparel companies in the context of Bahrain. The findings of the study highlight Nike's strategies which focus on innovation and emphasis on its research and development department, provision of premium pricing for its customers, broad differentiation strategy, market Segmentation Strategy and Closed-Loop strategy. The Adidas strategies focus on the broad differentiation, innovation, trying to produce new products, services and processes in order to cope up with the competition. It embraces a multi-brand strategy, emphasis on expanding activities in the emerging markets, continuously improving infrastructure, processes and systems, foster a culture of challenging convention and embracing change, foster a corporate culture of performance, passion, integrity and diversity. These strategies coupled with its resources and unique capabilities form the basis of sustainable competitive advantage for both the companies. INTRODUCTION: The strategy is a path towards achieving the optimum goals of individuals, groups and organizations. In addition, it leads to a best use of companies' available resources and it also guides the company to stay in a business successfully and continuous improvements for its processes. The definition of strategy could be differ from one author to another, but the most common definition is that the strategy is long term plans and approaches towards the intended visions and objectives. It is a general framework that specified the organizations' plans, policies and approaches to meets its objectives, goals and end results. The way an organization used to shape its strategies could be differentiate from other organizations in order to make its products unique and remarkable. Globally, companies formulate their strategies based on their visions and reaching the satisfaction of customer's needs, requirements and expectations. Subsequently, they use those strategies as a baseline to compare their actual performance with planned ones, to evaluate the end results and ensuring the continuing organizational excellence. There are many kinds of strategies that are pursued by the companies; Such as cost leadership, differentiation and the focus strategies (Porter, 1985), services strategies, growth strategies. Based on the goals, the companies form those strategies and they rank them upon the priorities. It is more than important for any organization to put strategies and not any strategies; the correct strategies which are formulated after a long time of studying and after numerous number of brainstorming among the top management members. Therefore, those strategies then to be implemented by converting the organization's plans and policies into real actions through the best use of available resources such as: human resources, budgets and technological advance; in order to enhance the organization's performance, productivity and sustainability.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Marketing environment and success strategy, drivers to superior performance, strategic management tools, marketing strategy and international markets, competitive advantage and value creation.

Nike Inc. is an international company based in the United States, which deals with sportswear and other apparels. The company is ranked as the top seller of sports shoe and clothing. Nike was started in 1964 by Bill Bowerman and was originally called Blue Ribbon Sports, but was later changed to Nike in 1978. During that time, its main goal was to produce low cost, high quality shoes for Americans to break Germans control over domestic trade (Nike, Inc., 2009).

Today, Nike not only distributes its products domestically, but also all around the globe. It has market regions in continents such as Asia, Europe, and United States. Besides, Nike has produced many brands such as Nike Skateboarding and Nike Pro. This paper focuses on the Nike Company and the strategic methods and tools that have led to its superior performance.

According to Peters (2009), Nike produces a wide range of products, which are categorized according to their relevant sports. Nike’s first products were track shoes, which were meant for running: the company has managed to design and produce shoes for different games such as baseball, hockey, football, basketball and Cricket.

This is due to the ever-increasing number of customers favoring the company’s products. The latest product that has been produced is the Cricket shoe named as air zoom Yorker (Nike, Inc., 2009). Air Zoom Yorker is better because it is 30% lighter as compared to the one designed by Reebok. Another new product is air Jordan XX3, which is meant for basketball.

Additionally, as a company that relies on collaborative marketing, Nike together with Apple Inc. has designed a product that is able to check runner’s performance through a radio device, which is placed inside the shoe and is connected with the iPod nano. Nike has also produced shoes that contain flywire and lunarlite foam meant to make the shoe lighter.

The Nike+sports brand records the mileage, lost calories, and time used. According to Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, and Lampel (2005), product differentiation and market segmentation form the basis for strategic management in marketing. In this light, meeting customers’ demands has been the strategic objective in Nike’s plan.

Dess and Alan (2006) affirm that the marketing strategy used by Nike is an essential element for its success. It has enticed its customers through advertising with a slogan ‘Just Do It’. Nike has also teamed up with athlete celebrities through sponsorship agreements. It has many elements of advertising such as advertising through television.

The first advert was created by Wieden and Kennedy at New York marathons. Similarly, Nike has also won Emmy Awards for commercial advert. The advert that won the award was based on what an athlete could face if there was Y2K realization on 1 January 2000.

The second commercial advert was called ‘move’, which marked the famous athletes. In product promotions, Nike pays players to wear their products such as t-shirts, shoes and shorts in order to advertise them. Such players include Michael Jordan, and through him, the promotion has boosted Nike’s publicity and sales. It also sponsors many football clubs in Brazil, Netherlands and United States.

Golf players like Tiger Woods and Michelle Wie have also benefited from the sponsorships. Nike also sponsors high school basketball and has developed websites for various sports such as nikerunning.com (Johnson & Scholes, 2008).

However, Nike has faced a tough competition in the market with companies such as Reebok and Adidas, which sell the same products as it does. Reebok has many female consumers, but has a weakness of poor marketing as compared to Nike. It does not always advertise its products on Televisions as compared to other Companies. Nike has tried to capture a big market share of female customers by sponsoring Women’s world cup football, which was held in 1999.

Nike has used the five forces model of competition that determines the industry structure. This model has helped it to deal with external forces such as, new entrants in the market, alternative products or services, bargaining influence of suppliers and buyers and competition and enmity among other competitors (Berman & Evans, 2006).

Onkvisit and Shaw (2004) argues that the risk of new entrants has been a threat to Nike since there are other firms in the clothing and shoe industry that have a potential to produce sportswear shoes and clothes if given a choice. Entry of new entrants has affected the prices because Nike has lowered some of its product costs.

However, the threat has been minimized by government regulations and brand loyalty. Further, Nike avoids extreme rivalry among other competitors because it is a risk to profitability rates. Nike, Inc. considers the bargaining power of the buyers as a threat because strong buyers have the power to lower the products prices and hence raise costs. The buyers are capable of buying in huge quantities and therefore getting a lot of profit while the firm suffers loss (Lynch, 2006).

The company has balanced its products productions and costs to minimize the bargaining power of buyers. Nike has also been able to cope with the bargaining power of suppliers, which poses a threat because the suppliers have power to increase the prices on raw materials. Nike has reliable suppliers who inform the management first upon the increase of costs of raw materials.

Nike has common drivers that produce superior performance. These drivers include people management, which entails realization of the potential of the employees either in groups or in an individual level. The company has come up with a strategy of upholding fairness among the employees, communication and caring for employees (Nike, Inc. 2009).

Through communication, the company ensures that there is a flow of information between the top, middle and higher levels to ensure that every employee’s contribution is taken into consideration. Nike, Inc. also motivates the employees by giving them incentives and rewards to build commitment to promote the organization.

People development enables employees to utilize their potentials and fully contribute to the organization’s goal realization. Rewards and recognitions motivate employees to give their best performance and strive to excel through continuous improvement (Berman & Evans, 2006). Furthermore, Nike has authorized the customer liaison manager to replace customer’s products in case of a complaint. The manager can make decisions without consulting the management.

Johnson and Scholes (2008) assert that leadership is another driver to superior performance, and it entails transforming the organizations direction and instigating others to follow. Leadership is paramount in Nike’s strategic management. Leaders have a stake in realization of the vision, mission and objectives of an organization because they ensure that other employees follow the organizations values. Leadership is developed at top, middle and lower levels in the organization.

Continuous improvement is another driver, which is activated by both customers and employees. In this case, there is feedback from the customers and from the employees and hence customer’s needs are met. Organizations’ processes are improved because customers provide their needs and the employees act and produce products according to customer’s specifications – all the stakeholders gain improvement benefits (Joshi, 2005).

Similarly, customer focus is a driver where a relationship with customers is an important issue. This entails assessing customer’s perceptions about products and acting on their response as soon as they raise an issue of concern about a product. Close relationships with customers benefits all the stakeholders involved. Nike has also employed process focus as a driver for performance improvement. The system performance has to meet the set objectives since it is a key technique (Nike, Inc., 2009).

Another important driver to performance is collaborating with suppliers. This entails relationships between the organization and the suppliers (Lynch, 2006). Nike has recognized suppliers as key for the organization to achieve shared goals while also sharing expertise and knowledge.

Improving on processes allows working with suppliers to share resources and improve performance. Nike applies various communication strategies within all its stakeholders to encourage openness and reliance. When communication flows through all the levels in the organization, it makes it easy for the employee’s ideas to be taken into consideration.

Stimulating innovation and creativity is another driver that has supported Nike to build up competitive products and services. This has been achieved by modifying the organization structure and being involved with product improvement activities. Nike has also managed its assets and resources to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization. Protection of its properties maximizes customer’s value (Mark, 2000).

Onkvisit and Shaw (2004) concurs that measuring performance and benchmarking is another driver that Nike uses for superior performance. By utilizing a balanced score card, it has been able to measure process improvements alongside with the organizations objectives.

The company also monitors performance in other organizations and collect information from existing and future stakeholders. It uses the information to plan for the future, set targets to be achieved within a certain period, and get unique ideas on improvements from other organizations.

Furthermore, Nike employs corporate social responsibility as a driver to superior performance as well as interacting with the society representative. A good example of this is boosting children’s games in the community by sponsoring their sports and provision of uniforms that has Nike’s logo (Nike, Inc., 2009).

Strategic management is a technique that Nike, Inc. has been able to apply to determine how it is performing in its current position and how its future should be. This has greatly helped the managers to lay a plan for the organization and take it where they want it to be. The management employs strategic management components such as vision, environmental analysis, strategy creation, strategy implementation, and strategy assessment (Nike, Inc., 2009).

Nike has set business plans through strategic management in order to assess its business areas. It is a process which managers build strategies to get better results in performance. This involves studying the competitors’ techniques, both in the current and future. The Company has utilized strategic management tools which have supported it to examine itself in the present and perceive how its future will be. Strategic management acts as a road map to show managers the best direction to follow for the organization to be where it is supposed to be (Lynch, 2006). The tools employed for strategic management include mission statement, SWOT analysis, SMART goals and benchmarking.

Mission statements help to make clear how the organization is observed and how it will be perceived in the future. The organization reflects on how it will be different from other competitors like Reebok in the market place. SWOT analysis has been applied to find out the organizations strengths, weaknesses, prospects and risks.

Berman and Evans (2006) affirm that this has supported the organization to take advantage of its strengths and reduce the impact of its weaknesses. SWOT analysis has assisted the management to consider other external factors such as new openings and risks to be avoided.

SMART goals ensure that the goals and objectives laid down are specific, assessable, achievable, appropriate, and timely. SMART goals are essential for Nike’s management because they have enabled the company to get rid of frustrations due to unrealistic goals. The management has been specific to establish whether the set goals have been met.

Measuring enables the management team to gauge whether they are about to reach their goals and if not close to the goals, how much time and work is remaining in order to get there (Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, & Lampel, 2005).

Benchmarking is another tool that is employed to scrutinize and adapt to the best processes from other organizations around the globe. As explained earlier, managers have been able to improve the organizations performance to meet its goals and to be at the competitive edge over its competitors.

Other techniques that have been used in project management include program evaluations; this helps the company to evaluate a project from start to end. This has supported the management to ascertain the time left to for the completion of the projects. Nike utilizes these projects and programs to reach its goals and achieve its objectives.

The Company uses break even analysis technique to decide on the number of products to sell to break even and grow to be profitable. Lynch (2006) says that game theory is applied in the market to conclude how the customers will react and it does this either through increase in prices or introduction of new products.

Financial control techniques like budgets, audits, and financial breakdown are efficient in controlling and balancing the cost of business. Budgets are employed to manage the organizations income and expenditure as well as allocation of resources to different activities and projects.

Nike has many strategic management techniques organized in steps to achieve the laid down goals and objectives. First, environmental scanning is a process that the company employs to collect information from both internal and external environments that has power to influence the organization. This is meant for improving the processes through analyzing competitors, employees, products, and suppliers (Mark, 2000).

After analyzing the environment, strategy formulation is the next step where Nike management takes the best plan among many to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. Through this stage the managers set strategies for business and functional policies. Strategy implementation is taking the best plan and implementing it (Berman & Evans, 2006). Organization structure is devised in this step together with the allocation of resources, hiring of human resource and coming up with a clear decision making process.

Strategy evaluation is the last step where the strategy implemented is assessed to determine whether it is performing well and if it has deviated, and that the best corrective actions are taken. The purpose for the evaluation is to make sure that that the organization goals are met.

In light of this, Nike has been on the global market and has gained competitive advantage on the market. Its marketing managers keep on analyzing the global industries and how competition keeps changing. Trade is increasingly becoming global because of improvement in transport and communication. Nike’s consumers have been able to have access to a wide range of products in their countries. Nike started exporting its products in small amounts, but later increased and reached the export stage. It got more and more foreign orders until it was able to export its products all over the world (Nike, Inc., 2009).

Nike has stayed at international market for a long time and it applies many techniques such as adding new brands. Nike keeps on adding new products such as sports shoe and clothes. The information about the new product is posted on the website (nike.com) where consumers can read. Joshi (2005) asserts that through advertising of the new product, Nike gains an increase in sales because this has brought in new customers who have never bought the current products.

The existing customers have had a variety of the products to choose. Nike combines the new brand and the old ones into an exceptional package as an offer. Nike has also become a valuable resource to its customers by giving them free information about the products. They have assisted their customers to easily get services, fast deliveries, and at low costs.

The company is unique since it produces exclusive and best quality products. They have also promoted the end result of products by telling the consumers about the benefits they will get when they choose to use the products. Nike keeps on changing its marketing strategies due to other aggressive and innovative rivals like Puma, Reebok, and Adidas (Peters, 2009).

Nike’s brands have turn out to be to be very strong as compared to others such as Reebok and Puma. Their secret is brand management because despite selling their products at a higher price, consumers are still willing to pay more money for its brands which are believed to be of high quality with different styles. Due to the strong brand competitive advantage, Nike has been able to increase its market share all over the globe. Its prices are a bit high as compared to other competitors but it has made many sales than those of its competitors.

Nike, Inc. has gained a competitive advantage over its rivals. This is achieved through giving consumers a greater value and offering high quality products. The company has devised superior value over other competitors. Nike, Inc. uses Michael Porters strategies for competitive advantage such as cost leadership, focus, and differentiation (Johnson & Scholes, 2008).

The reason why Nike, Inc. has gained a competitive advantage over other companies is that it undertakes an evaluation process, which involves evaluation of resources, clarification of goals, defining customers and examining competitors.

In evaluation of resources, the company relies on the resources available and plans on how to use them through product offering and resources. In goals clarification, Nike plans on how to achieve its goals and objectives. Defining customer’s strategy entails looking at the products and services that the plans to develop, and is not provided by the other competitors.

This assists Nike, Inc. to determine and communicate to its customers in order to understand their needs and get additional suggestions from them. Examination of competitors helps to identify other ventures targeting a particular market. Through this, Nike compares its strengths and weaknesses with the other competitors (Nike, Inc., 2009).

In this regard, there are many techniques used to achieve a competitive advantage. These techniques include product differentiation, service differentiation, people differentiation, image differentiation, quality differentiation, and innovation differentiation (Lynch, 2006). Product differentiation implies that Nike has a wide range of products. Other competitors have tried to imitate its products but it remains upfront due to its quality and the products are different in styles and consistency.

Peters (2009) argues that in service differentiation, Nike, Inc. offers additional services such as delivery and product return services. This extra service is the one that consumers are after. Information and other instructions about the products are also extra services that attract customers.

People differentiation entails hiring result oriented employees who are better than those in other rival companies. Because employees are intangibles, it is difficult to imitate them as in the case of tangibles. Training employees and paying attention to their needs gives Nike Inc. a competitive advantage.

Employees such as production staff produce quality products, and it is hard for the competitor to know that the competitive advantage is due to employees’ improvement. The competitor may think that the competitive advantage is due to equipments and materials. People differentiation is essential when customers are directly served by the employees. The way employees handle a customer at first time determines whether he will return another time (Berman & Evans, 2006).

Image differentiation is another technique that has been applied by Nike to differentiate its brand image from other competitors. A negative image can destroy the company’s image within a short time. As Nike undertakes many activities, it supports its image because the “Nike” mark symbolizes good, and it is easy to identify. In quality differentiation, Nike sells high quality products to its customers. Innovation differentiation entails process innovation.

Process innovations reduce the costs of production and the competitors may take time to discover what the company is doing to gain competitive advantage (Nike, Inc., 2009). Nike strives to sustain its competitive advantage because it is not long lasting. This sustainability is achieved through giving value to customers, creation of non-imitable products, which may not be copied by its rivals, and production of products that cannot customers cannot substitute easily.

In selecting a competitive advantage, Nike, Inc. selects ways of making products that competitors cannot imitate easily because the management understands what its customers needs are.

The company has realized that variety is totally different from differentiation. Nike has strived to stay at the competitive edge because of its efforts and strategies. It has faced many challenges since other competitors have tried to copy it through successful advantages for their business in the dynamic market place. Thus, establishing the market edge is important as well as maintaining it (Mark, 2000).

There are many ways that Nike has attracted its customers for value creation. Customer incentive programs are one of the successful programs within the organisation (Nike, Inc., 2009). Nike offers give away to customers, tickets, sales, sponsorships and discounts. Nike sponsors many players in different sports.

Such players who have benefited from sponsorships include; James Blake and Roger Federer. It also sponsored Indian cricket team for a period of five years and national soccer clubs in countries like India, Netherlands and Malaysia. Top golfers like Tiger woods and Lucas Glover has also benefited from Nike’s sponsorships.

Moreover, Nike has retained both traditional and non-traditional methods of distribution in over 100 companies, but it focuses more on its primary market regions. Apart from product diversification, Nike has diversified supply chain and manufacturing due to international economic crises and other risks. It has many contracted suppliers outside the United States, including Vietnam and Thailand. There are other contractors who manufacture its products in over 35 countries.

In the year 2003, China manufactured 38%, Indonesia 27%, Vietnam 18% and Thailand 16%, while the rest was manufactured by other countries. This has enabled Nike to make large amount of sales. Supplier diversity has also increased its competitiveness in the market and it continues to contract more suppliers in many countries because it believes that supplier relationship is vital.

Nike Inc has also employed value creation as a management goal. Creating value for consumers has increased sales as well as the shareholders through the increase in stock price. Value creation is characterized by brands, people and innovation (Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, & Lampel, 2005). Nike, Inc. has prioritized value creation in its decision-making. This has helped the managers to know where and how to build the companies capability to attain profitable and lasting growth.

Mark (2000) agrees that through value creation, the company has been able to understand the basis and drivers of value creation in the business and market place. They have realized that the consumers value high quality and timely delivery of products and so the processes that lead to the delivery of high quality products are greatly valued. Some of the customers have valued innovation and so the processes involved in creation of new products are also highly valued.

Value creation also entails product and process innovation as well as knowing the consumers needs. Nike, Inc. has also realized that value for employees is essential since they feel motivated and work hard to produce better results. Therefore, proper treatment of the employees and involving them in decision-making creates value.

Nike has awarded and promoted managers who have defeated the other competitors like Puma in value creation. In this case the managers have positioned capital better than the other competitors. Nike has gained an advantage in developing the organizations ability to get more profits and future growth.

Other companies that have achieved the benefits of value creation are Coca-Cola and the Lloyds banks. These companies applied value creation as a technique and have realized growth and increase in their profitability. In acquisitions, Nike has acquired Upscale Footwear Company, surf apparel company, Hurley international and converse Inc. It has sold some of its subsidiaries such as Bauer Hockey and Starter (Nike, Inc., 2009).

Nike, Inc. has achieved its superior performance, mostly through competitive positioning and value creation. This has been achieved through advertising, brand name recognition, product innovation, and striving to be at the competitive edge despite having a stiff competition.

Nike employs many strategies and techniques such as strategic management tools and models, product differentiation, and proper distribution channels. Many consumers have realized the uniqueness of their products and recognize them through the trade name ‘Just Do it’ and Swoosh Logo. They have maintained customers because of their high quality products and unique marketing strategies.

Berman, B. and Evans, J. (2006), Retail Management, A strategic Approach , London: Prentice Hall.

Dess, G. L. and Alan, B. E. (2006), Strategic Management: Text and Cases. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Johnson, G. and Scholes, K, (2008), Exploring Corporate Strategy , (8th edn), London: Prentice Hall.

Joshi, R. M. (2005), International Marketing , New York: Oxford University Press

Lynch, R. (2006), Corporate Strategy , (4 th edn) London: Prentice Hall.

Mark, M. H. (2000), Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (2005), Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management , London: Prentice Hall 11.

Nike, Inc. (2009), Annual Report on Form 10-K , [pdf]. Available at: < http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/10/100529/AnnualReport/nike-sh09-rev2/docs/Nike_2009_10-K.pdf > .

Onkvisit, S. and Shaw, J. (2004), Process International Marketing. International Marketing: analysis and strategy , (4 th edn), OH: South-Western College Publishing.

Peters, J.W. (2009), The Birth of ‘Just Do It’ and Other Magic Words. August 19. The New York Times .

• Business Entities, Laws and Regulations
• Literature Overview on HRD Models
• Nike: Brand Equity and Promotional Strategies
• Views on Nike Brand
• Campaign Brief on Nike
• Structure of UK Business
• HRM Role Within the Strategic Direction of an Organization
• Wayco Company's Non-smoking Policy
• Strategic Management at the Rotary Engineering Ltd. And JTC Corporation
• Developing Yourself as an Effective HR Practitioner
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, December 27). Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay. https://ivypanda.com/essays/strategic-management-the-case-of-nike-inc/

"Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay." IvyPanda , 27 Dec. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/strategic-management-the-case-of-nike-inc/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay'. 27 December.

IvyPanda . 2018. "Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay." December 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/strategic-management-the-case-of-nike-inc/.

1. IvyPanda . "Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay." December 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/strategic-management-the-case-of-nike-inc/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Nike Strategic Management: The Case Study Essay." December 27, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/strategic-management-the-case-of-nike-inc/.

Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital

Darden Case No. UVA-F-1353

8 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2008 Last revised: 10 Nov 2021

Robert F. Bruner

University of Virginia - Darden School of Business

Jessica Chan

On July 5, 2001, Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual-fund management firm, pored over analyst write-ups of Nike, Inc., the athletic-shoe manufacturer. Nike's share price had declined significantly from the beginning of the year. Ford was considering buying some shares for the fund she managed, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, which was invested mostly in Fortune 500 companies, with an emphasis on value investing. Ford had read all the analyst reports that she could find about the June 28 meeting, but the reports gave her no clear guidance. She decided instead to develop her own discounted cash flow forecast to come to a clearer conclusion. Excerpt UVA-F-1353 Rev. Mar. 8, 2018 Nike, Inc.: Cost of Capital On July 5, 2001, Kimi Ford, a portfolio manager at NorthPoint Group, a mutual fund management firm, pored over analysts' write-ups of Nike, Inc., the athletic-shoe manufacturer. Nike's share price had declined significantly from the beginning of the year. Ford was considering buying some shares for the fund she managed, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund, which invested mostly in Fortune 500 companies, with an emphasis on value investing. Its top holdings included ExxonMobil, General Motors, McDonald's, 3M, and other large-cap, generally old-economy stocks. Although the stock market had declined over the last 18 months, the NorthPoint Large-Cap Fund had performed extremely well. In 2000, the fund earned a return of 20.7%, even as the S&P 500 fell 10.1%. At the end of June 2001, the fund's year-to-date returns stood at 6.4% versus −7.3% for the S&P 500. Only a week earlier, on June 28, 2001, Nike had held an analysts' meeting to disclose its fiscal-year 2001 results. The meeting, however, had another purpose: Nike management wanted to communicate a strategy for revitalizing the company. Since 1997, its revenues had plateaued at around $ 9 billion, while net income had fallen from almost $ 800 million to $ 580 million (see Exhibit 1). Nike's market share in U.S. athletic shoes had fallen from 48%, in 1997, to 42% in 2000. In addition, recent supply-chain issues and the adverse effect of a strong dollar had negatively affected revenue. At the meeting, management revealed plans to address both top-line growth and operating performance. To boost revenue, the company would develop more athletic-shoe products in the mid-priced segment—a segment that Nike had overlooked in recent years. Nike also planned to push its apparel line, which, under the recent leadership of industry veteran Mindy Grossman, had performed extremely well. On the cost side, Nike would exert more effort on expense control. Finally, company executives reiterated their long-term revenue-growth targets of 8% to 10% and earnings-growth targets of above 15%. . . .

Keywords: cost of capital, investment analysis, valuation

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Robert F. Bruner (Contact Author)

University of virginia - darden school of business ( email ).

P.O. Box 6550 Charlottesville, VA 22906-6550 United States

HOME PAGE: http://faculty.darden.edu/brunerb/

P.O. Box 6550 Charlottesville, VA 22906-6550 United States 434-924-4812 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.batteninstitute.org

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, darden case collection.

Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic

Social Sciences Education eJournal

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Finance Education eJournal

Economics educator: courses, cases & teaching ejournal.

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Case Study Nike, Inc. - Cost Of Capital

• September 2019

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA

More details

• Words: 1,838

Related Documents

Nike Inc Pdf (1)

Case Study Of Nfc

Case Study Of Youth Center

Case Study Of Vocational School

Copyright © 2024 DOKU.PUB.