hypothesis in market research

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• AI Essentials for Business
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Creating Brand Value
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading Change and Organizational Renewal
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

A Beginner’s Guide to Hypothesis Testing in Business

• 30 Mar 2021

Becoming a more data-driven decision-maker can bring several benefits to your organization, enabling you to identify new opportunities to pursue and threats to abate. Rather than allowing subjective thinking to guide your business strategy, backing your decisions with data can empower your company to become more innovative and, ultimately, profitable.

If you’re new to data-driven decision-making, you might be wondering how data translates into business strategy. The answer lies in generating a hypothesis and verifying or rejecting it based on what various forms of data tell you.

Below is a look at hypothesis testing and the role it plays in helping businesses become more data-driven.

Access your free e-book today.

What Is Hypothesis Testing?

To understand what hypothesis testing is, it’s important first to understand what a hypothesis is.

A hypothesis or hypothesis statement seeks to explain why something has happened, or what might happen, under certain conditions. It can also be used to understand how different variables relate to each other. Hypotheses are often written as if-then statements; for example, “If this happens, then this will happen.”

Hypothesis testing , then, is a statistical means of testing an assumption stated in a hypothesis. While the specific methodology leveraged depends on the nature of the hypothesis and data available, hypothesis testing typically uses sample data to extrapolate insights about a larger population.

Hypothesis Testing in Business

When it comes to data-driven decision-making, there’s a certain amount of risk that can mislead a professional. This could be due to flawed thinking or observations, incomplete or inaccurate data , or the presence of unknown variables. The danger in this is that, if major strategic decisions are made based on flawed insights, it can lead to wasted resources, missed opportunities, and catastrophic outcomes.

The real value of hypothesis testing in business is that it allows professionals to test their theories and assumptions before putting them into action. This essentially allows an organization to verify its analysis is correct before committing resources to implement a broader strategy.

As one example, consider a company that wishes to launch a new marketing campaign to revitalize sales during a slow period. Doing so could be an incredibly expensive endeavor, depending on the campaign’s size and complexity. The company, therefore, may wish to test the campaign on a smaller scale to understand how it will perform.

In this example, the hypothesis that’s being tested would fall along the lines of: “If the company launches a new marketing campaign, then it will translate into an increase in sales.” It may even be possible to quantify how much of a lift in sales the company expects to see from the effort. Pending the results of the pilot campaign, the business would then know whether it makes sense to roll it out more broadly.

Related: 9 Fundamental Data Science Skills for Business Professionals

Key Considerations for Hypothesis Testing

1. alternative hypothesis and null hypothesis.

In hypothesis testing, the hypothesis that’s being tested is known as the alternative hypothesis . Often, it’s expressed as a correlation or statistical relationship between variables. The null hypothesis , on the other hand, is a statement that’s meant to show there’s no statistical relationship between the variables being tested. It’s typically the exact opposite of whatever is stated in the alternative hypothesis.

For example, consider a company’s leadership team that historically and reliably sees $12 million in monthly revenue. They want to understand if reducing the price of their services will attract more customers and, in turn, increase revenue.

In this case, the alternative hypothesis may take the form of a statement such as: “If we reduce the price of our flagship service by five percent, then we’ll see an increase in sales and realize revenues greater than $12 million in the next month.”

The null hypothesis, on the other hand, would indicate that revenues wouldn’t increase from the base of $12 million, or might even decrease.

Check out the video below about the difference between an alternative and a null hypothesis, and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more explainer content.

2. Significance Level and P-Value

Statistically speaking, if you were to run the same scenario 100 times, you’d likely receive somewhat different results each time. If you were to plot these results in a distribution plot, you’d see the most likely outcome is at the tallest point in the graph, with less likely outcomes falling to the right and left of that point.

With this in mind, imagine you’ve completed your hypothesis test and have your results, which indicate there may be a correlation between the variables you were testing. To understand your results' significance, you’ll need to identify a p-value for the test, which helps note how confident you are in the test results.

In statistics, the p-value depicts the probability that, assuming the null hypothesis is correct, you might still observe results that are at least as extreme as the results of your hypothesis test. The smaller the p-value, the more likely the alternative hypothesis is correct, and the greater the significance of your results.

3. One-Sided vs. Two-Sided Testing

When it’s time to test your hypothesis, it’s important to leverage the correct testing method. The two most common hypothesis testing methods are one-sided and two-sided tests , or one-tailed and two-tailed tests, respectively.

Typically, you’d leverage a one-sided test when you have a strong conviction about the direction of change you expect to see due to your hypothesis test. You’d leverage a two-sided test when you’re less confident in the direction of change.

4. Sampling

To perform hypothesis testing in the first place, you need to collect a sample of data to be analyzed. Depending on the question you’re seeking to answer or investigate, you might collect samples through surveys, observational studies, or experiments.

A survey involves asking a series of questions to a random population sample and recording self-reported responses.

Observational studies involve a researcher observing a sample population and collecting data as it occurs naturally, without intervention.

Finally, an experiment involves dividing a sample into multiple groups, one of which acts as the control group. For each non-control group, the variable being studied is manipulated to determine how the data collected differs from that of the control group.

Learn How to Perform Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a complex process involving different moving pieces that can allow an organization to effectively leverage its data and inform strategic decisions.

If you’re interested in better understanding hypothesis testing and the role it can play within your organization, one option is to complete a course that focuses on the process. Doing so can lay the statistical and analytical foundation you need to succeed.

Do you want to learn more about hypothesis testing? Explore Business Analytics —one of our online business essentials courses —and download our Beginner’s Guide to Data & Analytics .

About the Author

How to write a hypothesis for marketing experimentation

• Apr 11, 2021
• 5 minute read
• Creating your strongest marketing hypothesis

The potential for your marketing improvement depends on the strength of your testing hypotheses.

But where are you getting your test ideas from? Have you been scouring competitor sites, or perhaps pulling from previous designs on your site? The web is full of ideas and you’re full of ideas – there is no shortage of inspiration, that’s for sure.

Coming up with something you  want  to test isn’t hard to do. Coming up with something you  should  test can be hard to do.

Hard – yes. Impossible? No. Which is good news, because if you can’t create hypotheses for things that should be tested, your test results won’t mean mean much, and you probably shouldn’t be spending your time testing.

Taking the time to write your hypotheses correctly will help you structure your ideas, get better results, and avoid wasting traffic on poor test designs.

With this post, we’re getting advanced with marketing hypotheses, showing you how to write and structure your hypotheses to gain both business results and marketing insights!

By the time you finish reading, you’ll be able to:

• Distinguish a solid hypothesis from a time-waster, and
• Structure your solid hypothesis to get results  and  insights

To make this whole experience a bit more tangible, let’s track a sample idea from…well…idea to hypothesis.

Let’s say you identified a call-to-action (CTA)* while browsing the web, and you were inspired to test something similar on your own lead generation landing page. You think it might work for your users! Your idea is:

“My page needs a new CTA.”

*A call-to-action is the point where you, as a marketer, ask your prospect to do something on your page. It often includes a button or link to an action like “Buy”, “Sign up”, or “Request a quote”.

The basics: The correct marketing hypothesis format

Level up: moving from a good to great hypothesis, it’s based on a science, building marketing hypotheses to create insights, what makes a great hypothesis.

A well-structured hypothesis provides insights whether it is proved, disproved, or results are inconclusive.

You should never phrase a marketing hypothesis as a question. It should be written as a statement that can be rejected or confirmed.

Further, it should be a statement geared toward revealing insights – with this in mind, it helps to imagine each statement followed by a  reason :

• Changing _______ into ______ will increase [conversion goal], because:
• Changing _______ into ______ will decrease [conversion goal], because:
• Changing _______ into ______ will not affect [conversion goal], because:

Each of the above sentences ends with ‘because’ to set the expectation that there will be an explanation behind the results of whatever you’re testing.

It’s important to remember to plan ahead when you create a test, and think about explaining why the test turned out the way it did when the results come in.

Understanding what makes an idea worth testing is necessary for your optimization team.

If your tests are based on random ideas you googled or were suggested by a consultant, your testing process still has its training wheels on. Great hypotheses aren’t random. They’re based on rationale and aim for learning.

Hypotheses should be based on themes and analysis that show potential conversion barriers.

At Conversion, we call this investigation phase the “Explore Phase” where we use frameworks like the LIFT Model to understand the prospect’s unique perspective. (You can read more on the the full optimization process here).

A well-founded marketing hypothesis should also provide you with new, testable clues about your users regardless of whether or not the test wins, loses or yields inconclusive results.

These new insights should inform future testing: a solid hypothesis can help you quickly separate worthwhile ideas from the rest when planning follow-up tests.

“Ultimately, what matters most is that you have a hypothesis going into each experiment and you design each experiment to address that hypothesis.” – Nick So, VP of Delivery

Here’s a quick tip :

If you’re about to run a test that isn’t going to tell you anything new about your users and their motivations, it’s probably not worth investing your time in.

Let’s take this opportunity to refer back to your original idea:

Ok, but  what now ? To get actionable insights from ‘a new CTA’, you need to know why it behaved the way it did. You need to ask the right question.

To test the waters, maybe you changed the copy of the CTA button on your lead generation form from “Submit” to “Send demo request”. If this change leads to an increase in conversions, it could mean that your users require more clarity about what their information is being used for.

That’s a potential insight.

Based on this insight, you could follow up with another test that adds copy around the CTA about next steps: what the user should anticipate after they have submitted their information.

For example, will they be speaking to a specialist via email? Will something be waiting for them the next time they visit your site? You can test providing more information, and see if your users are interested in knowing it!

That’s the cool thing about a good hypothesis: the results of the test, while important (of course) aren’t the only component driving your future test ideas. The insights gleaned lead to further hypotheses and insights in a virtuous cycle.

The term “hypothesis” probably isn’t foreign to you. In fact, it may bring up memories of grade-school science class; it’s a critical part of the  scientific method .

The scientific method in testing follows a systematic routine that sets ideation up to predict the results of experiments via:

• Collecting data and information through observation
• Creating tentative descriptions of what is being observed
• Forming  hypotheses  that predict different outcomes based on these observations
• Testing your  hypotheses
• Analyzing the data, drawing conclusions and insights from the results

Don’t worry! Hypothesizing may seem ‘sciency’, but it doesn’t have to be complicated in practice.

Hypothesizing simply helps ensure the results from your tests are quantifiable, and is necessary if you want to understand how the results reflect the change made in your test.

A strong marketing hypothesis allows testers to use a structured approach in order to discover what works, why it works, how it works, where it works, and who it works on.

“My page needs a new CTA.” Is this idea in its current state clear enough to help you understand what works? Maybe. Why it works? No. Where it works? Maybe. Who it works on? No.

Your idea needs refining.

Let’s pull back and take a broader look at the lead generation landing page we want to test.

Imagine the situation: you’ve been diligent in your data collection and you notice several recurrences of Clarity pain points – meaning that there are many unclear instances throughout the page’s messaging.

Rather than focusing on the CTA right off the bat, it may be more beneficial to deal with the bigger clarity issue.

Now you’re starting to think about solving your prospects conversion barriers rather than just testing random ideas!

If you believe the overall page is unclear, your overarching theme of inquiry might be positioned as:

• “Improving the clarity of the page will reduce confusion and improve [conversion goal].”

By testing a hypothesis that supports this clarity theme, you can gain confidence in the validity of it as an actionable marketing insight over time.

If the test results are negative : It may not be worth investigating this motivational barrier any further on this page. In this case, you could return to the data and look at the other motivational barriers that might be affecting user behavior.

If the test results are positive : You might want to continue to refine the clarity of the page’s message with further testing.

Typically, a test will start with a broad idea — you identify the changes to make, predict how those changes will impact your conversion goal, and write it out as a broad theme as shown above. Then, repeated tests aimed at that theme will confirm or undermine the strength of the underlying insight.

You believe you’ve identified an overall problem on your landing page (there’s a problem with clarity). Now you want to understand how individual elements contribute to the problem, and the effect these individual elements have on your users.

It’s game time  – now you can start designing a hypothesis that will generate insights.

You believe your users need more clarity. You’re ready to dig deeper to find out if that’s true!

If a specific question needs answering, you should structure your test to make a single change. This isolation might ask: “What element are users most sensitive to when it comes to the lack of clarity?” and “What changes do I believe will support increasing clarity?”

At this point, you’ll want to boil down your overarching theme…

• Improving the clarity of the page will reduce confusion and improve [conversion goal].

…into a quantifiable hypothesis that isolates key sections:

• Changing the wording of this CTA to set expectations for users (from “submit” to “send demo request”) will reduce confusion about the next steps in the funnel and improve order completions.

Does this answer what works? Yes: changing the wording on your CTA.

Does this answer why it works? Yes: reducing confusion about the next steps in the funnel.

Does this answer where it works? Yes: on this page, before the user enters this theoretical funnel.

Does this answer who it works on? No, this question demands another isolation. You might structure your hypothesis more like this:

• Changing the wording of the CTA to set expectations for users (from “submit” to “send demo request”) will reduce confusion  for visitors coming from my email campaign  about the next steps in the funnel and improve order completions.

Now we’ve got a clear hypothesis. And one worth testing!

1. It’s testable.

2. It addresses conversion barriers.

3. It aims at gaining marketing insights.

Let’s compare:

The original idea : “My page needs a new CTA.”

Following the hypothesis structure : “A new CTA on my page will increase [conversion goal]”

The first test implied a problem with clarity, provides a potential theme : “Improving the clarity of the page will reduce confusion and improve [conversion goal].”

The potential clarity theme leads to a new hypothesis : “Changing the wording of the CTA to set expectations for users (from “submit” to “send demo request”) will reduce confusion about the next steps in the funnel and improve order completions.”

Final refined hypothesis : “Changing the wording of the CTA to set expectations for users (from “submit” to “send demo request”) will reduce confusion for visitors coming from my email campaign about the next steps in the funnel and improve order completions.”

Which test would you rather your team invest in?

Before you start your next test, take the time to do a proper analysis of the page you want to focus on. Do preliminary testing to define bigger issues, and use that information to refine and pinpoint your marketing hypothesis to give you forward-looking insights.

Doing this will help you avoid time-wasting tests, and enable you to start getting some insights for your team to keep testing!

Share this post

Other articles you might like

Mixed Methods Experimentation

The Conversion Methodology: an internal training case study

Why CRO should (probably) be a priority

Marketing Analytics Lab

Hypothesis Testing in Marketing Research

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing in Marketing Research

Hypothesis testing is a critical component of marketing research that allows marketers to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of their strategies. In essence, hypothesis testing involves making an educated guess about a population parameter and then using data to determine if the hypothesis is supported or rejected. In the context of marketing, hypotheses can be formulated about consumer behavior, product preferences, advertising effectiveness, and many other aspects of the marketing mix. By conducting hypothesis tests, marketers can make informed decisions based on empirical evidence rather than intuition or guesswork.

A hypothesis test in marketing research typically follows a structured process that involves defining a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (HA), collecting and analyzing data, determining the appropriate statistical test to use, setting a significance level, and interpreting the results to either accept or reject the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis represents the status quo or the assumption that there is no significant difference or relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is a significant effect or relationship. By rigorously testing hypotheses, marketers can evaluate the impact of their marketing strategies and make data-driven decisions to optimize their campaigns and initiatives.

The results of hypothesis testing in marketing research provide valuable insights that can inform strategic decision-making and help marketers achieve their business objectives. Whether testing the effectiveness of a new product launch, evaluating the impact of a promotional campaign, or analyzing consumer preferences, hypothesis testing enables marketers to quantify the impact of their actions and make evidence-based recommendations. By employing statistical techniques and hypothesis testing in marketing research, organizations can gain a deeper understanding of consumer behavior, identify market trends, and refine their marketing strategies to drive business growth and success.

Key Steps and Considerations for Hypothesis Testing in Marketing Analysis

When conducting hypothesis testing in marketing research, there are several key steps and considerations that marketers should keep in mind to ensure the validity and reliability of their findings. Firstly, it is essential to clearly define the research question and formulate testable hypotheses that are specific, measurable, and relevant to the marketing objectives. By articulating clear hypotheses, marketers can establish a framework for data collection and analysis that aligns with the research objectives.

Once the hypotheses have been formulated, the next step is to determine the appropriate research design and methodology for data collection. Depending on the nature of the research question and the variables involved, marketers may choose to conduct experiments, surveys, observational studies, or other research methods to gather data. It is crucial to ensure that the data collected is representative of the target population and is collected in a systematic and unbiased manner to generate reliable results.

After collecting the data, marketers can perform statistical analysis to test the hypotheses using techniques such as t-tests, ANOVA, regression analysis, or chi-square tests, among others. It is important to select the appropriate statistical test based on the type of data and the research question being investigated. Additionally, setting a significance level (alpha) is crucial for determining the threshold for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis. By interpreting the results in the context of the significance level, marketers can make informed decisions about the implications of the findings and their impact on marketing strategies.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Expert Advice on Developing a Hypothesis for Marketing Experimentation 

• Conversion Rate Optimization

Simbar Dube

Every marketing experimentation process has to have a solid hypothesis. 

That’s a must – unless you want to be roaming in the dark and heading towards a dead-end in your experimentation program.

Hypothesizing is the second phase of our SHIP optimization process here at Invesp.

It comes after we have completed the research phase. 

This is an indication that we don’t just pull a hypothesis out of thin air. We always make sure that it is based on research data. 

But having a research-backed hypothesis doesn’t mean that the hypothesis will always be correct. In fact, tons of hypotheses bear inconclusive results or get disproved. 

The main idea of having a hypothesis in marketing experimentation is to help you gain insights – regardless of the testing outcome. 

By the time you finish reading this article, you’ll know: 

• The essential tips on what to do when crafting a hypothesis for marketing experiments
• How a marketing experiment hypothesis works 

How experts develop a solid hypothesis

The basics: marketing experimentation hypothesis.

A hypothesis is a research-based statement that aims to explain an observed trend and create a solution that will improve the result. This statement is an educated, testable prediction about what will happen.

It has to be stated in declarative form and not as a question.

“ If we add magnification info, product video and making virtual mirror buttons, will that improve engagement? ” is not declarative, but “ Improving the experience of product pages by adding magnification info, product video and making virtual mirror buttons will increase engagement ” is.

Here’s a quick example of how a hypothesis should be phrased: 

• Replacing ___ with __ will increase [conversion goal] by [%], because:
• Removing ___ and __ will decrease [conversion goal] by [%], because:
• Changing ___ into __ will not affect [conversion goal], because:
• Improving  ___ by  ___will increase [conversion goal], because: 

As you can see from the above sentences, a good hypothesis is written in clear and simple language. Reading your hypothesis should tell your team members exactly what you thought was going to happen in an experiment.

Another important element of a good hypothesis is that it defines the variables in easy-to-measure terms, like who the participants are, what changes during the testing, and what the effect of the changes will be: 

Example : Let’s say this is our hypothesis: 

Displaying full look items on every “continue shopping & view your bag” pop-up and highlighting the value of having a full look will improve the visibility of a full look, encourage visitors to add multiple items from the same look and that will increase the average order value, quantity with cross-selling by 3% .

Who are the participants : 

Visitors. 

What changes during the testing : 

Displaying full look items on every “continue shopping & view your bag” pop-up and highlighting the value of having a full look…

What the effect of the changes will be:  

Will improve the visibility of a full look, encourage visitors to add multiple items from the same look and that will increase the average order value, quantity with cross-selling by 3% .

Don’t bite off more than you can chew! Answering some scientific questions can involve more than one experiment, each with its own hypothesis. so, you have to make sure your hypothesis is a specific statement relating to a single experiment.

How a Marketing Experimentation Hypothesis Works

Assuming that you have done conversion research and you have identified a list of issues ( UX or conversion-related problems) and potential revenue opportunities on the site. The next thing you’d want to do is to prioritize the issues and determine which issues will most impact the bottom line.

Having ranked the issues you need to test them to determine which solution works best. At this point, you don’t have a clear solution for the problems identified. So, to get better results and avoid wasting traffic on poor test designs, you need to make sure that your testing plan is guided. 

This is where a hypothesis comes into play. 

For each and every problem you’re aiming to address, you need to craft a hypothesis for it – unless the problem is a technical issue that can be solved right away without the need to hypothesize or test. 

One important thing you should note about an experimentation hypothesis is that it can be implemented in different ways.  

This means that one hypothesis can have four or five different tests as illustrated in the image above. Khalid Saleh , the Invesp CEO, explains: 

“There are several ways that can be used to support one single hypothesis. Each and every way is a possible test scenario. And that means you also have to prioritize the test design you want to start with. Ultimately the name of the game is you want to find the idea that has the biggest possible impact on the bottom line with the least amount of effort. We use almost 18 different metrics to score all of those.”

In one of the recent tests we launched after watching video recordings, viewing heatmaps, and conducting expert reviews, we noticed that:  

• Visitors were scrolling to the bottom of the page to fill out a calculator so as to get a free diet plan. 
• Brand is missing 
• Too many free diet plans – and this made it hard for visitors to choose and understand.  
• No value proposition on the page
• The copy didn’t mention the benefits of the paid program
• There was no clear CTA for the next action

To help you understand, let’s have a look at how the original page looked like before we worked on it: 

So our aim was to make the shopping experience seamless for visitors, make the page more appealing and not confusing. In order to do that, here is how we phrased the hypothesis for the page above: 

Improving the experience of optin landing pages by making the free offer accessible above the fold and highlighting the next action with a clear CTA and will increase the engagement on the offer and increase the conversion rate by 1%.

For this particular hypothesis, we had two design variations aligned to it:

The two above designs are different, but they are aligned to one hypothesis. This goes on to show how one hypothesis can be implemented in different ways. Looking at the two variations above – which one do you think won?

Yes, you’re right, V2 was the winner. 

Considering that there are many ways you can implement one hypothesis, so when you launch a test and it fails, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the hypothesis was wrong. Khalid adds:

“A single failure of a test doesn’t mean that the hypothesis is incorrect. Nine times out of ten it’s because of the way you’ve implemented the hypothesis. Look at the way you’ve coded and look at the copy you’ve used – you are more likely going to find something wrong with it. Always be open.” 

So there are three things you should keep in mind when it comes to marketing experimentation hypotheses: 

• It takes a while for this hypothesis to really fully test it.
• A single failure doesn’t necessarily mean that the hypothesis is incorrect.
• Whether a hypothesis is proved or disproved, you can still learn something about your users.

I know it’s never easy to develop a hypothesis that informs future testing – I mean it takes a lot of intense research behind the scenes, and tons of ideas to begin with. So, I reached out to six CRO experts for tips and advice to help you understand more about developing a solid hypothesis and what to include in it. 

Maurice   says that a solid hypothesis should have not more than one goal: 

Maurice Beerthuyzen – CRO/CXO Lead at ClickValue “Creating a hypothesis doesn’t begin at the hypothesis itself. It starts with research. What do you notice in your data, customer surveys, and other sources? Do you understand what happens on your website? When you notice an opportunity it is tempting to base one single A/B test on one hypothesis. Create hypothesis A and run a single test, and then move forward to the next test. With another hypothesis. But it is very rare that you solve your problem with only one hypothesis. Often a test provides several other questions. Questions which you can solve with running other tests. But based on that same hypothesis! We should not come up with a new hypothesis for every test. Another mistake that often happens is that we fill the hypothesis with multiple goals. Then we expect that the hypothesis will work on conversion rate, average order value, and/or Click Through Ratio. Of course, this is possible, but when you run your test, your hypothesis can only have one goal at once. And what if you have two goals? Just split the hypothesis then create a secondary hypothesis for your second goal. Every test has one primary goal. What if you find a winner on your secondary hypothesis? Rerun the test with the second hypothesis as the primary one.”

Jon believes that a strong hypothesis is built upon three pillars:

Jon MacDonald – President and Founder of The Good Respond to an established challenge – The challenge must have a strong background based on data, and the background should state an established challenge that the test is looking to address. Example: “Sign up form lacks proof of value, incorrectly assuming if users are on the page, they already want the product.” Propose a specific solution – What is the one, the single thing that is believed will address the stated challenge? Example: “Adding an image of the dashboard as a background to the signup form…”. State the assumed impact – The assumed impact should reference one specific, measurable optimization goal that was established prior to forming a hypothesis. Example: “…will increase signups.” So, if your hypothesis doesn’t have a specific, measurable goal like “will increase signups,” you’re not really stating a test hypothesis!”

Matt uses his own hypothesis builder to collate important data points into a single hypothesis. 

Matt Beischel – Founder of Corvus CRO Like Jon, Matt also breaks down his hypothesis writing process into three sections. Unlike Jon, Matt sections are: Comprehension Response Outcome I set it up so that the names neatly match the “CRO.” It’s a sort of “mad-libs” style fill-in-the-blank where each input is an important piece of information for building out a robust hypothesis. I consider these the minimum required data points for a good hypothesis; if you can’t completely fill out the form, then you don’t have a good hypothesis. Here’s a breakdown of each data point: Comprehension – Identifying something that can be improved upon Problem: “What is a problem we have?” Observation Method: “How did we identify the problem?” Response – Change that can cause improvement Variation: “What change do we think could solve the problem?” Location: “Where should the change occur?” Scope: “What are the conditions for the change?” Audience: “Who should the change affect?” Outcome – Measurable result of the change that determines the success Behavior Change : “What change in behavior are we trying to affect?” Primary KPI: “What is the important metric that determines business impact?” Secondary KPIs: “Other metrics that will help reinforce/refute the Primary KPI” Something else to consider is that I have a “user first” approach to formulating hypotheses. My process above is always considered within the context of how it would first benefit the user. Now, I do feel that a successful experiment should satisfy the needs of BOTH users and businesses, but always be in favor of the user. Notice that “Behavior Change” is the first thing listed in Outcome, not primary business KPI. Sure, at the end of the day you are working for the business’s best interests (both strategically and financially), but placing the user first will better inform your decision making and prioritization; there’s a reason that things like personas, user stories, surveys, session replays, reviews, etc. exist after all. A business-first ideology is how you end up with dark patterns and damaging brand credibility.”

One of the many mistakes that CROs make when writing a hypothesis is that they are focused on wins and not on insights. Shiva advises against this mindset:

Shiva Manjunath – Marketing Manager and CRO at Gartner “Test to learn, not test to win. It’s a very simple reframe of hypotheses but can have a magnitude of difference. Here’s an example: Test to Win Hypothesis: If I put a product video in the middle of the product page, I will improve add to cart rates and improve CVR. Test to Learn Hypothesis: If I put a product video on the product page, there will be high engagement with the video and it will positively influence traffic What you’re doing is framing your hypothesis, and test, in a particular way to learn as much as you can. That is where you gain marketing insights. The more you run ‘marketing insight’ tests, the more you will win. Why? The more you compound marketing insight learnings, your win velocity will start to increase as a proxy of the learnings you’ve achieved. Then, you’ll have a higher chance of winning in your tests – and the more you’ll be able to drive business results.”

Lorenzo  says it’s okay to focus on achieving a certain result as long as you are also getting an answer to: “Why is this event happening or not happening?”

Lorenzo Carreri – CRO Consultant “When I come up with a hypothesis for a new or iterative experiment, I always try to find an answer to a question. It could be something related to a problem people have or an opportunity to achieve a result or a way to learn something. The main question I want to answer is “Why is this event happening or not happening?” The question is driven by data, both qualitative and quantitative. The structure I use for stating my hypothesis is: From [data source], I noticed [this problem/opportunity] among [this audience of users] on [this page or multiple pages]. So I believe that by [offering this experiment solution], [this KPI] will [increase/decrease/stay the same].

Jakub Linowski says that hypotheses are meant to hold researchers accountable:

Jakub Linowski – Chief Editor of GoodUI “They do this by making your change and prediction more explicit. A typical hypothesis may be expressed as: If we change (X), then it will have some measurable effect (A). Unfortunately, this oversimplified format can also become a heavy burden to your experiment design with its extreme reductionism. However you decide to format your hypotheses, here are three suggestions for more flexibility to avoid limiting yourself. One Or More Changes To break out of the first limitation, we have to admit that our experiments may contain a single or multiple changes. Whereas the classic hypothesis encourages a single change or isolated variable, it’s not the only way we can run experiments. In the real world, it’s quite normal to see multiple design changes inside a single variation. One valid reason for doing this is when wishing to optimize a section of a website while aiming for a greater effect. As more positive changes compound together, there are times when teams decide to run bigger experiments. An experiment design (along with your hypotheses) therefore should allow for both single or multiple changes. One Or More Metrics A second limitation of many hypotheses is that they often ask us to only make a single prediction at a time. There are times when we might like to make multiple guesses or predictions to a set of metrics. A simple example of this might be a trade-off experiment with a guess of increased sales but decreased trial signups. Being able to express single or multiple metrics in our experimental designs should therefore be possible. Estimates, Directional Predictions, Or Unknowns Finally, traditional hypotheses also tend to force very simple directional predictions by asking us to guess whether something will increase or decrease. In reality, however, the fidelity of predictions can be higher or lower. On one hand, I’ve seen and made experiment estimations that contain specific numbers from prior data (ex: increase sales by 14%). While at other times it should also be acceptable to admit the unknown and leave the prediction blank. One example of this is when we are testing a completely novel idea without any prior data in a highly exploratory type of experiment. In such cases, it might be dishonest to make any sort of predictions and we should allow ourselves to express the unknown comfortably.”

Conclusion 

So there you have it! Before you jump on launching a test, start by making sure that your hypothesis is solid and backed by research. Ask yourself the questions below when crafting a hypothesis for marketing experimentation:

• Is the hypothesis backed by research?
• Can the hypothesis be tested?
• Does the hypothesis provide insights?
• Does the hypothesis set the expectation that there will be an explanation behind the results of whatever you’re testing?

Don’t worry! Hypothesizing may seem like a very complicated process, but it’s not complicated in practice especially when you have done proper research.

If you enjoyed reading this article and you’d love to get the best CRO content – delivered by the best experts in the industry – straight to your inbox, every week. Please subscribe here .

Share This Article

Join 25,000+ marketing professionals.

Subscribe to Invesp’s blog feed for future articles delivered to receive weekly updates by email.

Discover Similar Topics

8 Ways to Optimize Your Ecommerce Customer Journey

Brand Design: How Does It Impact Your Conversions

Our Services

• Conversion Optimization Training
• Conversion Rate Optimization Professional Services
• Landing Page Optimization
• Conversion Rate Audit
• Design for Growth
• Conversion Research & Discovery
• End to End Digital Optimization

By Industry

• E-commerce CRO Services
• Lead Generation CRO Services
• SaaS CRO Services
• Startup CRO Program
• Case Studies
• Privacy Policy
• © 2006-2020 All rights reserved. Invesp

Subscribe with us

• US office: Chicago, IL
• European office: Istanbul, Turkey
• +1.248.270.3325
• [email protected]
• Conversion Rate Optimization Services
• © 2006-2023 All rights reserved. Invesp
• Popular Topics
• A/B Testing
• Business & Growth
• Copywriting
• Infographics
• Landing Pages
• Sales & Marketing

Hypotheses in Marketing Science: Literature Review and Publication Audit

• Published: May 2001
• Volume 12 , pages 171–187, ( 2001 )

Cite this article

• J. Scott Armstrong 1 ,
• Roderick J. Brodie 2 &
• Andrew G. Parsons 2  

957 Accesses

91 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

We examined three approaches to research in marketing: exploratory hypotheses, dominant hypothesis, and competing hypotheses. Our review of empirical studies on scientific methodology suggests that the use of a single dominant hypothesis lacks objectivity relative to the use of exploratory and competing hypotheses approaches. We then conducted a publication audit of over 1,700 empirical papers in six leading marketing journals during 1984–1999. Of these, 74% used the dominant hypothesis approach, while 13% used multiple competing hypotheses, and 13% were exploratory. Competing hypotheses were more commonly used for studying methods (25%) than models (17%) and phenomena (7%). Changes in the approach to hypotheses since 1984 have been modest; there was a slight decrease in the percentage of competing hypotheses to 11%, which is explained primarily by an increasing proportion of papers on phenomena. Of the studies based on hypothesis testing, only 11% described the conditions under which the hypotheses would apply, and dominant hypotheses were below competing hypotheses in this regard. Marketing scientists differed substantially in their opinions about what types of studies should be published and what was published. On average, they did not think dominant hypotheses should be used as often as they were, and they underestimated their use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Normative Criteria for the Development and Appraisal of Marketing Theory

Research Method Topics and Issues that Reduce the Value of Reported Empirical Insights in the Marketing Literatures: An Abstract

Marketing Theory: The Present Stage Of Development

References for appendix 2.

Agarwal MK, and VR Rao. (1996). “An Empirical Comparison of Consumer-Based Measures of Brand Equity,” Marketing Letters , 7, 237–248.

Google Scholar  

Bult JR, and T Wansbeek. (1995). “Optimal Selection for Direct Mail,” Marketing Science , 14(4) 378–394.

Foekens EW, PSH Leeflang, and DR Wittink. (1997). “Hierarchical Versus Other Market Share Models for Markets with Many Items,” International Journal of Research in Marketing , 14, 359–378.

Johnson MD, EW Anderson, and C Fornell. (1995). “Rational and Adaptive Performance Expectations in a Customer Satisfaction Framework,” Journal of Consumer Research , 21, 695–707.

Krafft M. (1999). “An empirical Investigation of the Antecedents of Sales Force Control Systems,” Journal of Marketing , 63, 120–134.

Mittal V, P Kumar, and M Tsiros. (1999). “Attribute-level Performance, Satisfaction, and Behavioural Intentions over Time: A Consumption System Approach,” Journal of Marketing , 63, 88–101.

Naik PA, MK Mantrala, and AG Sawyer. (1998). “Planning Media Schedules in the Presence of Dynamic Advertising Quality,” Marketing Science , 17, 214–235.

Pechmann C, and C Shih. (1999). “Smoking Scenes in Movies and Antismoking Advertisements before Movies: Effects on Youth,” Journal of Marketing , 63, 1–13.

Szymanski DM, LC Troy, and SG Bharadwaj. (1995). “Order of Entry and Business Performance: An Empirical Synthesis and Reexamination,” Journal of Marketing , 59, 17–33.

Abramowitz SI, B Gomes, and CV Abramowitz. (1975). “Publish or Politic: Referee Bias in Manuscript Review,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 5, 187–200.

AMA Task Force on the Development of Marketing Thought. (1988). “Developing, Disseminating, and Utilizing Marketing Knowledge,” Journal of Marketing , 52, 1–25.

Anderson LM. (1994). “Marketing Science: Where's the Beef?” Business Horizons , (Jan–Feb), 8–16.

Armstrong JS. (1979). “Advocacy and Objectivity in Science,” Management Science , 25, 423–428.

Armstrong JS. (1980). “Advocacy as a Scientific Strategy: The Mitroff Myth,” Academy of Management Review , 5, 509–511.

Armstrong JS. (1988). “Research Needs in Forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting , 4, 449–465.

Armstrong JS. (1991). “Prediction of Consumer Behavior by Experts and Novices,” Journal of Consumer Research , 18, 251–256.

Armstrong JS, and R. Hubbard. (1991). “Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 14, 136–137.

Bass FM. (1993). “The Future of Research in Marketing: Marketing Science,” Journal of Marketing Research , 30, 1–6.

Begg CB, and JA Berlin. (1989). “Publication Bias and Dissemination of Clinical Research,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 81(2), 107–115.

Ben-Shakar G, M Bar-Hillel, Y Bilu, and G Shefler. (1998). “Seek and Ye Shall Find: Test Results Are What You Hypothesize They Are,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 11, 235–249.

Bettman JR, N Capon, and RJ Lutz. (1975). “Cognitive Algebra in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,” Journal of Marketing Research , 12, 151–164.

Bloom PN. (1987). Knowledge Development in Marketing . Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Burger JM, and R Petty. (1981). “The Low-Ball Compliance Technique: Task or Person Commitment?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 40, 492–500.

Broad W, and N Wade. (1982). Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science . New York: Simon and Schuster.

Bruner J, and MC Potter. (1964). “Interference in Visual Recognition,” Science , 144, 424–425.

Chamberlin TC. (1965). “The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses,” Science , 148, 754–759. (Reprint of an 1890 paper).

Chapman LJ, and JP Chapman. (1969). “Illusory Correlation as an Obstacle to the Use of Valid Psychodiagnostic Signs,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 74, 271–280.

Cialdini RB, JT Cacioppo, R Bassett, and JA Miller. (1978). “Low-Ball Procedure for Producing Compliance: Commitment Then Cost,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 36, 463–476.

Cohen J. (1994). “The Earth is Round (p < 0.05),” American Psychologist , 49, 997–1003.

Coursol A, and EE Wagner. (1986), “Effect of Positive Findings on Submission and Acceptance Rates: A Note on Meta-analysis Bias,” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 17,(No. 2), 137.

Demsetz H. (1974). “Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly”. In H J Goldschmid, H M Mann, and J F Weston (eds.), Industrial Concentration: The New Learning . Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 164–184.

Dunbar K. (1993). “Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain,” Cognitive Science , 17, 397–434.

Dunbar K. (1995). “How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-world Laboratories.” In R J Sternberg and J E Davidson (eds.), The Nature of Insight . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 365–395.

Elaad E, A Ginton, and G Ben-Shakhar. (1994). “The Effects of Prior expectations and Outcome Knowledge on Polygraph Examiners' Decisions,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 7, 279–292.

Farris H, and R Revlin. (1989). “The Discovery Process: A Counterfactual Strategy,” Social Studies of Science , 19, 497–513.

Goldfarb RS. (1995). “The Economist-as-audience Needs a Methodology of Plausible Inference,” Journal of Economic Methodology , 2, 201–222.

Goodstein LD, and KL Brazis. (1970). “Credibility of Psychologists: An Empirical Study,” Psychological Reports , 27, 835–838.

Gorman ME, and ME Gorman. (1984), “A Comparison of Disconfirmatory, Confirmatory and Control Strategies on Wason's 2–4–6 Task,” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 36A, 629–648.

Greenwald AG, AR Pratkanis, MR Leippe, and MH Baumgardner. (1986). “Under What Conditions Does Theory Obstruct Progress?” Psychological Review , 93, 216–229.

Hogarth RM. (1978). “A Note on Aggregating Opinions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 21, 40–46.

Hubbard R, and JS Armstrong. (1994). “Replications and Extensions in Marketing: Rarely Published but Quite Contrary,” International Journal of Research in Marketing , 11, 233–248.

Hubbard R, and JS Armstrong. (1992). “Are Null Results Becoming an Endangered Species?” Marketing Letters , 3, 127–136.

Jones WH, and D Russell. (1980). “The Selective Processing of Belief Disconfirming Information,” European Journal of Social Psychology , 10, 309–312.

Klayman J, and Y Ha. (1987). “Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Information in Hypothesis Testing,” Psychological Review , 94, 211–228.

Klayman J, and Y Ha. (1989). “Hypothesis Testing in Rule Discovery: Strategy, Structure, and Content,” Journal of Experimental Psychology , 15, 596–604.

Koehler JJ. (1993). “The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgements of Evidence Quality,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 56, 28–55.

Leone RP, and R Schultz. (1980). “A Study of Marketing Generalizations,” Journal of Marketing , 44, 10–18.

Libby R, and RK Blashfield. (1978). “Performance of a Composite as a Function of the Number of Judges,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 21, 121–129.

Lord CG, L Ross, and MR Lepper. (1979). “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37, 2098–2109.

Mahoney MJ. (1977). “Publication Prejudices: An Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Review System,” Cognitive Therapy and Research , 1, 161–175.

McCloskey DN, and ST Ziliak. (1996). “The Standard Error of Regressions,” Journal of Economic Literature , 34, 97–114.

McDonald J. (1992). “Is Strong Inference Really Superior to Simple Inference,” Synthese , 92, 261–282.

McKenzie CRM. (1998). “Taking into Account the Strength of an Alternative Hypothesis,” Journal of Experimental Psychology , 24, 771–792.

Mitroff I. (1972). “The Myth of Objectivity, or, Why Science Needs a New Psychology of Science,” Management Science , 18, B613–B618.

Mynatt C, ME Doherty, and RD Tweney. (1978). “Consequences of Confirmation and Disconfirmation in a Simulated Research Environment,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 30, 395–406.

Platt JR. (1964). “Strong Inference,” Science , 146, 347–353.

Pollay RW. (1984). “Lydiametrics: Applications of Econometrics to the History of Advertising,” Journal of Advertising History , 1(2), 3–15.

Rodgers R, and JE Hunter. (1994). “The Discard of Study Evidence by Literature Reviewers,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 30, 329–345.

Rust RT, DR Lehmann, and JU Farley. (1990). “Estimating the Publication Bias of Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research , 27, 220–226.

Sawyer AG, and JP Peter. (1983). “The Significance of Statistical Significance Tests in Marketing Research,” Journal of Marketing Research , 20, 122–133.

Wason PC. (1960). “On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 12, 129–140.

Wason PC. (1968). “Reasoning About a Rule,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 20, 273–281.

Wells WD. (1993). “Discovery-oriented Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research , 19, 489–504.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104

J. Scott Armstrong

Department of Marketing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Roderick J. Brodie & Andrew G. Parsons

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Armstrong, J.S., Brodie, R.J. & Parsons, A.G. Hypotheses in Marketing Science: Literature Review and Publication Audit. Marketing Letters 12 , 171–187 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011169104290

Download citation

Issue Date : May 2001

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011169104290

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• competing hypotheses
• dominant hypotheses
• exploratory studies
• marketing generalizations
• multiple hypotheses
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Tips to Create and Test a Value Hypothesis: A Step-by-Step Guide

Developing a robust value hypothesis is crucial as you bring a new product to market, guiding your startup toward answering a genuine market need. Constructing a verifiable value hypothesis anchors your product's development process in customer feedback and data-driven insight rather than assumptions.

This framework enables you to clarify the potential value your product offers and provides a foundation for testing and refining your approach, significantly reducing the risk of misalignment with your target market. To set the stage for success, employ logical structures and objective measures, such as creating a minimum viable product, to effectively validate your product's value proposition.

What Is a Verifiable Value Hypothesis?

A verifiable value hypothesis articulates your belief about how your product will deliver value to customers. It is a testable prediction aimed at demonstrating the expected outcomes for your target market.

To ensure that your value hypothesis is verifiable, it should adhere to the following conditions:

• Specific : Clearly defines the value proposition and the customer segment.
• Measurable : Includes metrics by which you can assess success or failure.
• Achievable : Realistic based on your resources and market conditions.
• Relevant : Directly addresses a significant customer need or desire.
• Time-Bound : Has a defined period for testing and validation.

When you create a value hypothesis, you're essentially forming the backbone of your business model. It goes beyond a mere assumption and relies on customer feedback data to inform its development. You also safeguard it with objective measures, such as a minimum viable product, to test the hypothesis in real life.

By articulating and examining a verifiable value hypothesis, you understand your product's potential impact and reduce the risk associated with new product development. It's about making informed decisions that increase your confidence in the product's potential success before committing significant resources.

Value Hypotheses vs. Growth Hypotheses

Value hypotheses and growth hypotheses are two distinct concepts often used in business, especially in the context of startups and product development.

Value Hypotheses : A value hypothesis is centered around the product itself. It focuses on whether the product truly delivers customer value. Key questions include whether the product meets a real need, how it compares to alternatives, and if customers are willing to pay for it. Valuing a value hypothesis is crucial before a business scales its operations.

Growth Hypotheses : A growth hypothesis, on the other hand, deals with the scalability and marketing aspects of the business. It involves strategies and channels used to acquire new customers. The focus is on how to grow the customer base, the cost-effectiveness of growth strategies, and the sustainability of growth. Validating a growth hypothesis is typically the next step after confirming that the product has value to the customers.

In practice, both hypotheses are crucial for the success of a business. A value hypothesis ensures the product is desirable and needed, while a growth hypothesis ensures that the product can reach a larger market effectively.

Tips to Create and Test a Verifiable Value Hypothesis

Creating a value hypothesis is crucial for understanding what drives customer interest in your product. It's an educated guess that requires rigor to define and clarity to test. When developing a value hypothesis, you're attempting to validate assumptions about your product's value to customers. Here are concise tips to help you with this process:

1. Understanding Your Market and Customers

Before formulating a hypothesis, you need a deep understanding of your market and potential customers. You're looking to uncover their pain points and needs which your product aims to address.

Begin with thorough market research and collect customer feedback to ensure your idea is built upon a solid foundation of real-world insights. This understanding is pivotal as it sets the tone for a relevant and testable hypothesis.

• Define Your Value Proposition Clearly: Articulate your product's value to the user. What problem does it solve? How does it improve the user's life or work?
• Identify Your Target Audience. Determine who your ideal customers are. Understand their needs, pain points, and how they currently address the problem your product intends to solve.

2. Defining Clear Assumptions

The next step is to outline clear assumptions based on your idea that you believe will bring value to your customers. Each assumption should be an assertion that directly relates to how your customers will find your product valuable.

For example, if your product is a task management app, you might assume that the ability to share task lists with team members is a pain point for your potential customers. Remember, assumptions are not facts—they are educated guesses that need verification.

3. Identify Key Metrics for Your Hypothesis Test

Once you've defined your assumptions, delineate the framework for testing your value hypothesis. This involves designing experiments that validate or invalidate your assumptions with measurable outcomes. Ensure that your hypothesis can be tested with measurable outcomes. This could be in the form of user engagement metrics, conversion rates, or customer satisfaction scores.

Determine what success looks like and define objective metrics that will prove your product's value. This could be user engagement, conversion rates, or revenue. Choosing the right metrics is essential for an accurate test. For instance, in your test, you might measure the increase in customer retention or the decrease in time spent on task organization with your app. Construct your test so that the results are unequivocal and actionable.

4. Construct a Testable Proposition

Formulate your hypothesis in a way that can be tested empirically. Use qualitative research methods such as interviews, surveys, and observation to gather data about your potential users. Formulate your value hypothesis based on insights from this research. Plan experiments that can validate or invalidate your value hypothesis. This might involve A/B testing, user testing sessions, or pilot programs.

A good example is to posit that "Introducing feature X will increase user onboarding by Y%." Avoid complexity by testing one variable simultaneously. This helps you identify which changes are actually making a difference.

5. Applying Evidence to Innovation

When your data indicates a promising avenue for product development , it's imperative that you validate your growth hypothesis through experimentation. Align your value proposition with the evidence at hand.

Develop a simplified version of your product that allows you to test the core value proposition with real users without investing in full-scale production. Start by crafting a minimum viable product ( MVP ) to begin testing in the market. This approach helps mitigate risk by not investing heavily in unproven ideas. Use analytics tools to collect data on how users interact with your MVP. Look for patterns that either support or contradict your value hypothesis.

If the data suggests that your value hypothesis is wrong, be prepared to revise your hypothesis or pivot your product strategy accordingly.

6. Gather Customer Feedback

Integrating customer feedback into your product development process can create a more tailored value proposition. This step is crucial in refining your product to meet user needs and validate your hypotheses.

Use customer feedback tools to collect data on how users interact with your MVP. Look for patterns that either support or contradict your value hypothesis. Here are some ways to collect feedback effectively :

• Feedback portals
• User testing sessions
• In-app feedback
• Website widgets
• Direct interviews
• Focus groups
• Feedback forums

Create a centralized place for product feedback to keep track of different types of customer feedback and improve SaaS products while listening to their customers. Rapidr helps companies be more customer-centric by consolidating feedback across different apps, prioritizing requests, having a discourse with customers, and closing the feedback loop.

7. Analyze and Iterate Quickly

Review the data and analyze customer feedback to see if it supports your hypothesis. If your hypothesis is not supported, iterate on your assumptions, and test again. Keep a detailed record of your hypotheses, experiments, and findings. This documentation will help you understand the evolution of your product and guide future decision-making.

Use the feedback and data from your tests to make quick iterations of your product and drive product development . This allows you to refine your value proposition and improve the fit with your target audience. Engage with your users throughout the process. Real-world feedback is invaluable and can provide insights that data alone cannot.

• Identify Patterns : What commonalities are present in the feedback?
• Implement Changes : Prioritize and make adjustments based on customer insights.

9. Align with Business Goals and Stay Customer-Focused

Ensure that your value hypothesis aligns with the broader goals of your business. The value provided should ultimately contribute to the success of the company. Remember that the ultimate goal of your value hypothesis is to deliver something that customers find valuable. Maintain a strong focus on customer needs and satisfaction throughout the process.

10. Communicate with Stakeholders and Update them

Keep all stakeholders informed about your findings and the implications for the product. Clear communication helps ensure everyone is aligned and understands the rationale behind product decisions. Communicate and close the feedback loop with the help of a product changelog through which you can ​​announce new changes and engage with customers.

Understanding and validating a value hypothesis is essential for any business, particularly startups. It involves deeply exploring whether a product or service meets customer needs and offers real value. This process ensures that resources are invested in desirable and useful products, and it's a critical step before considering scalability and growth.

By focusing on the value hypothesis, businesses can better align their offerings with market demand, leading to more sustainable success. Placing customer feedback at the center of the process of testing a value hypothesis helps you develop a product that meets your customers' needs and stands out in the market.

Rapidr helps companies be more customer-centric by consolidating feedback across different apps, prioritizing requests, having a discourse with customers, and closing the feedback loop.

Build better products with user feedback

Rapidr helps SaaS companies understand what customers need through feedback, prioritize what to build next, inform the roadmap, and notify customers on product releases

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

Published on May 6, 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 20, 2023.

A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection .

Example: Hypothesis

Daily apple consumption leads to fewer doctor’s visits.

Table of contents

What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Variables in hypotheses

Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more types of variables .

• An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls.
• A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.

If there are any control variables , extraneous variables , or confounding variables , be sure to jot those down as you go to minimize the chances that research bias  will affect your results.

In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Step 1. Ask a question

Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.

Step 2. Do some preliminary research

Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.

At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to ensure that you’re embarking on a relevant topic . This can also help you identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalize more complex constructs.

Step 3. Formulate your hypothesis

Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.

4. Refine your hypothesis

You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:

• The relevant variables
• The specific group being studied
• The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis

5. Phrase your hypothesis in three ways

To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in  if…then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.

In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.

If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.

6. Write a null hypothesis

If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis . The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .

• H 0 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has no effect on their final exam scores.
• H 1 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has a positive effect on their final exam scores.

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/hypothesis/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, construct validity | definition, types, & examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, operationalization | a guide with examples, pros & cons, what is your plagiarism score.

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is a Research Hypothesis: How to Write it, Types, and Examples

Any research begins with a research question and a research hypothesis . A research question alone may not suffice to design the experiment(s) needed to answer it. A hypothesis is central to the scientific method. But what is a hypothesis ? A hypothesis is a testable statement that proposes a possible explanation to a phenomenon, and it may include a prediction. Next, you may ask what is a research hypothesis ? Simply put, a research hypothesis is a prediction or educated guess about the relationship between the variables that you want to investigate.  

It is important to be thorough when developing your research hypothesis. Shortcomings in the framing of a hypothesis can affect the study design and the results. A better understanding of the research hypothesis definition and characteristics of a good hypothesis will make it easier for you to develop your own hypothesis for your research. Let’s dive in to know more about the types of research hypothesis , how to write a research hypothesis , and some research hypothesis examples .  

Table of Contents

What is a hypothesis ?  

A hypothesis is based on the existing body of knowledge in a study area. Framed before the data are collected, a hypothesis states the tentative relationship between independent and dependent variables, along with a prediction of the outcome.  

What is a research hypothesis ?  

Young researchers starting out their journey are usually brimming with questions like “ What is a hypothesis ?” “ What is a research hypothesis ?” “How can I write a good research hypothesis ?”   

A research hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for an observable phenomenon or pattern. It guides the direction of a study and predicts the outcome of the investigation. A research hypothesis is testable, i.e., it can be supported or disproven through experimentation or observation.     

Characteristics of a good hypothesis  

Here are the characteristics of a good hypothesis :  

• Clearly formulated and free of language errors and ambiguity  
• Concise and not unnecessarily verbose  
• Has clearly defined variables  
• Testable and stated in a way that allows for it to be disproven  
• Can be tested using a research design that is feasible, ethical, and practical   
• Specific and relevant to the research problem  
• Rooted in a thorough literature search  
• Can generate new knowledge or understanding.  

How to create an effective research hypothesis  

A study begins with the formulation of a research question. A researcher then performs background research. This background information forms the basis for building a good research hypothesis . The researcher then performs experiments, collects, and analyzes the data, interprets the findings, and ultimately, determines if the findings support or negate the original hypothesis.  

Let’s look at each step for creating an effective, testable, and good research hypothesis :  

• Identify a research problem or question: Start by identifying a specific research problem.   
• Review the literature: Conduct an in-depth review of the existing literature related to the research problem to grasp the current knowledge and gaps in the field.   
• Formulate a clear and testable hypothesis : Based on the research question, use existing knowledge to form a clear and testable hypothesis . The hypothesis should state a predicted relationship between two or more variables that can be measured and manipulated. Improve the original draft till it is clear and meaningful.  
• State the null hypothesis: The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between the variables you are studying.   
• Define the population and sample: Clearly define the population you are studying and the sample you will be using for your research.  
• Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis: Select appropriate research methods, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies, which will allow you to test your research hypothesis .  

Remember that creating a research hypothesis is an iterative process, i.e., you might have to revise it based on the data you collect. You may need to test and reject several hypotheses before answering the research problem.  

How to write a research hypothesis  

When you start writing a research hypothesis , you use an “if–then” statement format, which states the predicted relationship between two or more variables. Clearly identify the independent variables (the variables being changed) and the dependent variables (the variables being measured), as well as the population you are studying. Review and revise your hypothesis as needed.  

An example of a research hypothesis in this format is as follows:  

“ If [athletes] follow [cold water showers daily], then their [endurance] increases.”  

Population: athletes  

Independent variable: daily cold water showers  

Dependent variable: endurance  

You may have understood the characteristics of a good hypothesis . But note that a research hypothesis is not always confirmed; a researcher should be prepared to accept or reject the hypothesis based on the study findings.  

Research hypothesis checklist  

Following from above, here is a 10-point checklist for a good research hypothesis :  

• Testable: A research hypothesis should be able to be tested via experimentation or observation.  
• Specific: A research hypothesis should clearly state the relationship between the variables being studied.  
• Based on prior research: A research hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and previous research in the field.  
• Falsifiable: A research hypothesis should be able to be disproven through testing.  
• Clear and concise: A research hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner.  
• Logical: A research hypothesis should be logical and consistent with current understanding of the subject.  
• Relevant: A research hypothesis should be relevant to the research question and objectives.  
• Feasible: A research hypothesis should be feasible to test within the scope of the study.  
• Reflects the population: A research hypothesis should consider the population or sample being studied.  
• Uncomplicated: A good research hypothesis is written in a way that is easy for the target audience to understand.  

By following this research hypothesis checklist , you will be able to create a research hypothesis that is strong, well-constructed, and more likely to yield meaningful results.  

Types of research hypothesis  

Different types of research hypothesis are used in scientific research:  

1. Null hypothesis:

A null hypothesis states that there is no change in the dependent variable due to changes to the independent variable. This means that the results are due to chance and are not significant. A null hypothesis is denoted as H0 and is stated as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.   

Example: “ The newly identified virus is not zoonotic .”  

2. Alternative hypothesis:

This states that there is a significant difference or relationship between the variables being studied. It is denoted as H1 or Ha and is usually accepted or rejected in favor of the null hypothesis.  

Example: “ The newly identified virus is zoonotic .”  

3. Directional hypothesis :

This specifies the direction of the relationship or difference between variables; therefore, it tends to use terms like increase, decrease, positive, negative, more, or less.   

Example: “ The inclusion of intervention X decreases infant mortality compared to the original treatment .”   

4. Non-directional hypothesis:

While it does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables, a non-directional hypothesis states the existence of a relationship or difference between variables but not the direction, nature, or magnitude of the relationship. A non-directional hypothesis may be used when there is no underlying theory or when findings contradict previous research.  

Example, “ Cats and dogs differ in the amount of affection they express .”  

5. Simple hypothesis :

A simple hypothesis only predicts the relationship between one independent and another independent variable.  

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging .”  

6 . Complex hypothesis :

A complex hypothesis states the relationship or difference between two or more independent and dependent variables.   

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging, reduces sun burn, and reduces the chances of skin cancer .” (Here, the three dependent variables are slowing skin aging, reducing sun burn, and reducing the chances of skin cancer.)  

7. Associative hypothesis:  

An associative hypothesis states that a change in one variable results in the change of the other variable. The associative hypothesis defines interdependency between variables.  

Example: “ There is a positive association between physical activity levels and overall health .”  

8 . Causal hypothesis:

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect interaction between variables.  

Example: “ Long-term alcohol use causes liver damage .”  

Note that some of the types of research hypothesis mentioned above might overlap. The types of hypothesis chosen will depend on the research question and the objective of the study.  

Research hypothesis examples  

Here are some good research hypothesis examples :  

“The use of a specific type of therapy will lead to a reduction in symptoms of depression in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder.”  

“Providing educational interventions on healthy eating habits will result in weight loss in overweight individuals.”  

“Plants that are exposed to certain types of music will grow taller than those that are not exposed to music.”  

“The use of the plant growth regulator X will lead to an increase in the number of flowers produced by plants.”  

Characteristics that make a research hypothesis weak are unclear variables, unoriginality, being too general or too vague, and being untestable. A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and improper methods.   

Some bad research hypothesis examples (and the reasons why they are “bad”) are as follows:  

“This study will show that treatment X is better than any other treatment . ” (This statement is not testable, too broad, and does not consider other treatments that may be effective.)  

“This study will prove that this type of therapy is effective for all mental disorders . ” (This statement is too broad and not testable as mental disorders are complex and different disorders may respond differently to different types of therapy.)  

“Plants can communicate with each other through telepathy . ” (This statement is not testable and lacks a scientific basis.)  

Importance of testable hypothesis  

If a research hypothesis is not testable, the results will not prove or disprove anything meaningful. The conclusions will be vague at best. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher focus on the study outcome and understand the implication of the question and the different variables involved. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher make precise predictions based on prior research.  

To be considered testable, there must be a way to prove that the hypothesis is true or false; further, the results of the hypothesis must be reproducible.  

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on research hypothesis  

1. What is the difference between research question and research hypothesis ?  

A research question defines the problem and helps outline the study objective(s). It is an open-ended statement that is exploratory or probing in nature. Therefore, it does not make predictions or assumptions. It helps a researcher identify what information to collect. A research hypothesis , however, is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables. Accordingly, it guides the study design and data analysis approach.

2. When to reject null hypothesis ?

A null hypothesis should be rejected when the evidence from a statistical test shows that it is unlikely to be true. This happens when the test statistic (e.g., p -value) is less than the defined significance level (e.g., 0.05). Rejecting the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the alternative hypothesis is true; it simply means that the evidence found is not compatible with the null hypothesis.  

3. How can I be sure my hypothesis is testable?  

A testable hypothesis should be specific and measurable, and it should state a clear relationship between variables that can be tested with data. To ensure that your hypothesis is testable, consider the following:  

• Clearly define the key variables in your hypothesis. You should be able to measure and manipulate these variables in a way that allows you to test the hypothesis.  
• The hypothesis should predict a specific outcome or relationship between variables that can be measured or quantified.   
• You should be able to collect the necessary data within the constraints of your study.  
• It should be possible for other researchers to replicate your study, using the same methods and variables.   
• Your hypothesis should be testable by using appropriate statistical analysis techniques, so you can draw conclusions, and make inferences about the population from the sample data.  
• The hypothesis should be able to be disproven or rejected through the collection of data.  

4. How do I revise my research hypothesis if my data does not support it?  

If your data does not support your research hypothesis , you will need to revise it or develop a new one. You should examine your data carefully and identify any patterns or anomalies, re-examine your research question, and/or revisit your theory to look for any alternative explanations for your results. Based on your review of the data, literature, and theories, modify your research hypothesis to better align it with the results you obtained. Use your revised hypothesis to guide your research design and data collection. It is important to remain objective throughout the process.  

5. I am performing exploratory research. Do I need to formulate a research hypothesis?  

As opposed to “confirmatory” research, where a researcher has some idea about the relationship between the variables under investigation, exploratory research (or hypothesis-generating research) looks into a completely new topic about which limited information is available. Therefore, the researcher will not have any prior hypotheses. In such cases, a researcher will need to develop a post-hoc hypothesis. A post-hoc research hypothesis is generated after these results are known.  

6. How is a research hypothesis different from a research question?

A research question is an inquiry about a specific topic or phenomenon, typically expressed as a question. It seeks to explore and understand a particular aspect of the research subject. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a specific statement or prediction that suggests an expected relationship between variables. It is formulated based on existing knowledge or theories and guides the research design and data analysis.

7. Can a research hypothesis change during the research process?

Yes, research hypotheses can change during the research process. As researchers collect and analyze data, new insights and information may emerge that require modification or refinement of the initial hypotheses. This can be due to unexpected findings, limitations in the original hypotheses, or the need to explore additional dimensions of the research topic. Flexibility is crucial in research, allowing for adaptation and adjustment of hypotheses to align with the evolving understanding of the subject matter.

8. How many hypotheses should be included in a research study?

The number of research hypotheses in a research study varies depending on the nature and scope of the research. It is not necessary to have multiple hypotheses in every study. Some studies may have only one primary hypothesis, while others may have several related hypotheses. The number of hypotheses should be determined based on the research objectives, research questions, and the complexity of the research topic. It is important to ensure that the hypotheses are focused, testable, and directly related to the research aims.

9. Can research hypotheses be used in qualitative research?

Yes, research hypotheses can be used in qualitative research, although they are more commonly associated with quantitative research. In qualitative research, hypotheses may be formulated as tentative or exploratory statements that guide the investigation. Instead of testing hypotheses through statistical analysis, qualitative researchers may use the hypotheses to guide data collection and analysis, seeking to uncover patterns, themes, or relationships within the qualitative data. The emphasis in qualitative research is often on generating insights and understanding rather than confirming or rejecting specific research hypotheses through statistical testing.

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

What are the Best Research Funding Sources

Inductive vs. Deductive Research Approach

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

The Craft of Writing a Strong Hypothesis

Table of Contents

Writing a hypothesis is one of the essential elements of a scientific research paper. It needs to be to the point, clearly communicating what your research is trying to accomplish. A blurry, drawn-out, or complexly-structured hypothesis can confuse your readers. Or worse, the editor and peer reviewers.

A captivating hypothesis is not too intricate. This blog will take you through the process so that, by the end of it, you have a better idea of how to convey your research paper's intent in just one sentence.

What is a Hypothesis?

The first step in your scientific endeavor, a hypothesis, is a strong, concise statement that forms the basis of your research. It is not the same as a thesis statement , which is a brief summary of your research paper .

The sole purpose of a hypothesis is to predict your paper's findings, data, and conclusion. It comes from a place of curiosity and intuition . When you write a hypothesis, you're essentially making an educated guess based on scientific prejudices and evidence, which is further proven or disproven through the scientific method.

The reason for undertaking research is to observe a specific phenomenon. A hypothesis, therefore, lays out what the said phenomenon is. And it does so through two variables, an independent and dependent variable.

The independent variable is the cause behind the observation, while the dependent variable is the effect of the cause. A good example of this is “mixing red and blue forms purple.” In this hypothesis, mixing red and blue is the independent variable as you're combining the two colors at your own will. The formation of purple is the dependent variable as, in this case, it is conditional to the independent variable.

Different Types of Hypotheses‌

Types of hypotheses

Some would stand by the notion that there are only two types of hypotheses: a Null hypothesis and an Alternative hypothesis. While that may have some truth to it, it would be better to fully distinguish the most common forms as these terms come up so often, which might leave you out of context.

Apart from Null and Alternative, there are Complex, Simple, Directional, Non-Directional, Statistical, and Associative and casual hypotheses. They don't necessarily have to be exclusive, as one hypothesis can tick many boxes, but knowing the distinctions between them will make it easier for you to construct your own.

1. Null hypothesis

A null hypothesis proposes no relationship between two variables. Denoted by H 0 , it is a negative statement like “Attending physiotherapy sessions does not affect athletes' on-field performance.” Here, the author claims physiotherapy sessions have no effect on on-field performances. Even if there is, it's only a coincidence.

2. Alternative hypothesis

Considered to be the opposite of a null hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis is donated as H1 or Ha. It explicitly states that the dependent variable affects the independent variable. A good  alternative hypothesis example is “Attending physiotherapy sessions improves athletes' on-field performance.” or “Water evaporates at 100 °C. ” The alternative hypothesis further branches into directional and non-directional.

• Directional hypothesis: A hypothesis that states the result would be either positive or negative is called directional hypothesis. It accompanies H1 with either the ‘<' or ‘>' sign.
• Non-directional hypothesis: A non-directional hypothesis only claims an effect on the dependent variable. It does not clarify whether the result would be positive or negative. The sign for a non-directional hypothesis is ‘≠.'

3. Simple hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a statement made to reflect the relation between exactly two variables. One independent and one dependent. Consider the example, “Smoking is a prominent cause of lung cancer." The dependent variable, lung cancer, is dependent on the independent variable, smoking.

4. Complex hypothesis

In contrast to a simple hypothesis, a complex hypothesis implies the relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. For instance, “Individuals who eat more fruits tend to have higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.” The independent variable is eating more fruits, while the dependent variables are higher immunity, lesser cholesterol, and high metabolism.

5. Associative and casual hypothesis

Associative and casual hypotheses don't exhibit how many variables there will be. They define the relationship between the variables. In an associative hypothesis, changing any one variable, dependent or independent, affects others. In a casual hypothesis, the independent variable directly affects the dependent.

6. Empirical hypothesis

Also referred to as the working hypothesis, an empirical hypothesis claims a theory's validation via experiments and observation. This way, the statement appears justifiable and different from a wild guess.

Say, the hypothesis is “Women who take iron tablets face a lesser risk of anemia than those who take vitamin B12.” This is an example of an empirical hypothesis where the researcher  the statement after assessing a group of women who take iron tablets and charting the findings.

7. Statistical hypothesis

The point of a statistical hypothesis is to test an already existing hypothesis by studying a population sample. Hypothesis like “44% of the Indian population belong in the age group of 22-27.” leverage evidence to prove or disprove a particular statement.

Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis

Writing a hypothesis is essential as it can make or break your research for you. That includes your chances of getting published in a journal. So when you're designing one, keep an eye out for these pointers:

• A research hypothesis has to be simple yet clear to look justifiable enough.
• It has to be testable — your research would be rendered pointless if too far-fetched into reality or limited by technology.
• It has to be precise about the results —what you are trying to do and achieve through it should come out in your hypothesis.
• A research hypothesis should be self-explanatory, leaving no doubt in the reader's mind.
• If you are developing a relational hypothesis, you need to include the variables and establish an appropriate relationship among them.
• A hypothesis must keep and reflect the scope for further investigations and experiments.

Separating a Hypothesis from a Prediction

Outside of academia, hypothesis and prediction are often used interchangeably. In research writing, this is not only confusing but also incorrect. And although a hypothesis and prediction are guesses at their core, there are many differences between them.

A hypothesis is an educated guess or even a testable prediction validated through research. It aims to analyze the gathered evidence and facts to define a relationship between variables and put forth a logical explanation behind the nature of events.

Predictions are assumptions or expected outcomes made without any backing evidence. They are more fictionally inclined regardless of where they originate from.

For this reason, a hypothesis holds much more weight than a prediction. It sticks to the scientific method rather than pure guesswork. "Planets revolve around the Sun." is an example of a hypothesis as it is previous knowledge and observed trends. Additionally, we can test it through the scientific method.

Whereas "COVID-19 will be eradicated by 2030." is a prediction. Even though it results from past trends, we can't prove or disprove it. So, the only way this gets validated is to wait and watch if COVID-19 cases end by 2030.

Finally, How to Write a Hypothesis

Quick tips on writing a hypothesis

1.  Be clear about your research question

A hypothesis should instantly address the research question or the problem statement. To do so, you need to ask a question. Understand the constraints of your undertaken research topic and then formulate a simple and topic-centric problem. Only after that can you develop a hypothesis and further test for evidence.

2. Carry out a recce

Once you have your research's foundation laid out, it would be best to conduct preliminary research. Go through previous theories, academic papers, data, and experiments before you start curating your research hypothesis. It will give you an idea of your hypothesis's viability or originality.

Making use of references from relevant research papers helps draft a good research hypothesis. SciSpace Discover offers a repository of over 270 million research papers to browse through and gain a deeper understanding of related studies on a particular topic. Additionally, you can use SciSpace Copilot , your AI research assistant, for reading any lengthy research paper and getting a more summarized context of it. A hypothesis can be formed after evaluating many such summarized research papers. Copilot also offers explanations for theories and equations, explains paper in simplified version, allows you to highlight any text in the paper or clip math equations and tables and provides a deeper, clear understanding of what is being said. This can improve the hypothesis by helping you identify potential research gaps.

3. Create a 3-dimensional hypothesis

Variables are an essential part of any reasonable hypothesis. So, identify your independent and dependent variable(s) and form a correlation between them. The ideal way to do this is to write the hypothetical assumption in the ‘if-then' form. If you use this form, make sure that you state the predefined relationship between the variables.

In another way, you can choose to present your hypothesis as a comparison between two variables. Here, you must specify the difference you expect to observe in the results.

4. Write the first draft

Now that everything is in place, it's time to write your hypothesis. For starters, create the first draft. In this version, write what you expect to find from your research.

Clearly separate your independent and dependent variables and the link between them. Don't fixate on syntax at this stage. The goal is to ensure your hypothesis addresses the issue.

5. Proof your hypothesis

After preparing the first draft of your hypothesis, you need to inspect it thoroughly. It should tick all the boxes, like being concise, straightforward, relevant, and accurate. Your final hypothesis has to be well-structured as well.

Research projects are an exciting and crucial part of being a scholar. And once you have your research question, you need a great hypothesis to begin conducting research. Thus, knowing how to write a hypothesis is very important.

Now that you have a firmer grasp on what a good hypothesis constitutes, the different kinds there are, and what process to follow, you will find it much easier to write your hypothesis, which ultimately helps your research.

Now it's easier than ever to streamline your research workflow with SciSpace Discover . Its integrated, comprehensive end-to-end platform for research allows scholars to easily discover, write and publish their research and fosters collaboration.

It includes everything you need, including a repository of over 270 million research papers across disciplines, SEO-optimized summaries and public profiles to show your expertise and experience.

If you found these tips on writing a research hypothesis useful, head over to our blog on Statistical Hypothesis Testing to learn about the top researchers, papers, and institutions in this domain.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. what is the definition of hypothesis.

According to the Oxford dictionary, a hypothesis is defined as “An idea or explanation of something that is based on a few known facts, but that has not yet been proved to be true or correct”.

2. What is an example of hypothesis?

The hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship between two or more variables. An example: "If we increase the number of new users who join our platform by 25%, then we will see an increase in revenue."

3. What is an example of null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between two variables. The null hypothesis is written as H0. The null hypothesis states that there is no effect. For example, if you're studying whether or not a particular type of exercise increases strength, your null hypothesis will be "there is no difference in strength between people who exercise and people who don't."

4. What are the types of research?

• Fundamental research

• Applied research

• Qualitative research

• Quantitative research

• Mixed research

• Exploratory research

• Longitudinal research

• Cross-sectional research

• Field research

• Laboratory research

• Fixed research

• Flexible research

• Action research

• Policy research

• Classification research

• Comparative research

• Causal research

• Inductive research

• Deductive research

5. How to write a hypothesis?

• Your hypothesis should be able to predict the relationship and outcome.

• Avoid wordiness by keeping it simple and brief.

• Your hypothesis should contain observable and testable outcomes.

• Your hypothesis should be relevant to the research question.

6. What are the 2 types of hypothesis?

• Null hypotheses are used to test the claim that "there is no difference between two groups of data".

• Alternative hypotheses test the claim that "there is a difference between two data groups".

7. Difference between research question and research hypothesis?

A research question is a broad, open-ended question you will try to answer through your research. A hypothesis is a statement based on prior research or theory that you expect to be true due to your study. Example - Research question: What are the factors that influence the adoption of the new technology? Research hypothesis: There is a positive relationship between age, education and income level with the adoption of the new technology.

8. What is plural for hypothesis?

The plural of hypothesis is hypotheses. Here's an example of how it would be used in a statement, "Numerous well-considered hypotheses are presented in this part, and they are supported by tables and figures that are well-illustrated."

9. What is the red queen hypothesis?

The red queen hypothesis in evolutionary biology states that species must constantly evolve to avoid extinction because if they don't, they will be outcompeted by other species that are evolving. Leigh Van Valen first proposed it in 1973; since then, it has been tested and substantiated many times.

10. Who is known as the father of null hypothesis?

The father of the null hypothesis is Sir Ronald Fisher. He published a paper in 1925 that introduced the concept of null hypothesis testing, and he was also the first to use the term itself.

11. When to reject null hypothesis?

You need to find a significant difference between your two populations to reject the null hypothesis. You can determine that by running statistical tests such as an independent sample t-test or a dependent sample t-test. You should reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.05.

You might also like

Consensus GPT vs. SciSpace GPT: Choose the Best GPT for Research

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework: Understanding the Differences

Types of Essays in Academic Writing - Quick Guide (2024)

Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

1. introduction to hypothesis testing in market research methodology, 2. understanding the basics of hypothesis testing, 3. formulating a hypothesis in market research, 4. types of hypothesis testing in market research, 5. step-by-step guide, 6. interpreting the results of a hypothesis test, 7. common pitfalls and challenges in hypothesis testing, 8. best practices for effective hypothesis testing in market research, 9. harnessing the power of hypothesis testing in market research.

In the realm of market research, hypothesis testing is a crucial tool that enables researchers to make informed decisions based on data analysis . It allows us to evaluate the validity of assumptions or claims made about a population, providing valuable insights into consumer behavior , market trends, and business strategies. In this section, we will delve into the fundamentals of hypothesis testing and explore its application in market research methodology .

2. The Basics of Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing involves formulating two competing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis assumes that there is no significant difference or relationship between variables , while the alternative hypothesis posits the existence of a significant difference or relationship. Through statistical analysis, we aim to either accept or reject the null hypothesis based on the evidence provided by the data.

For example, a market researcher might be interested in determining whether a new advertising campaign has a significant impact on sales. The null hypothesis would state that the campaign has no effect, while the alternative hypothesis would suggest that the campaign does have an effect. By collecting data on sales before and after the campaign, the researcher can perform hypothesis testing to draw meaningful conclusions.

3. Tips for Conducting hypothesis Testing in Market research

To ensure accurate and reliable results, it is essential to follow best practices when conducting hypothesis testing in market research . Here are a few tips to keep in mind:

A. Clearly define the research question: Before formulating hypotheses, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of the research question. Clearly defining the objectives and variables under investigation will help guide the hypothesis formulation process.

B. Select appropriate statistical tests: Different research questions require different statistical tests. Understanding the nature of the data and the relationship between variables will aid in selecting the most suitable test for hypothesis testing . Common tests include t-tests, chi-square tests , and ANOVA.

C. Determine the significance level: The significance level, denoted as , determines the threshold for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis. Commonly used values for are 0.05 and 0.01, indicating a 5% and 1% chance of making a Type I error, respectively.

D. Collect sufficient sample size: adequate sample size is crucial for obtaining reliable results. A small sample size may not provide enough statistical power to detect significant differences accurately. Calculating sample size requirements prior to data collection is recommended.

4. Case Study: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research

To illustrate the practical application of hypothesis testing in market research, let's consider a case study. A company wishes to assess whether a new packaging design for their product will increase customer satisfaction . They randomly select two groups of customers, one exposed to the new packaging and the other to the old packaging. After collecting feedback from both groups, they perform a hypothesis test to compare the mean satisfaction ratings.

The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in customer satisfaction between the two packaging designs, while the alternative hypothesis suggests that the new packaging leads to higher satisfaction levels . By analyzing the collected data using a suitable statistical test (e.g., a two-sample t-test), the company can determine whether the new packaging design has a significant impact on customer satisfaction .

In conclusion, hypothesis testing plays a vital role in market research methodology by providing a systematic approach to evaluate claims and assumptions. By formulating clear hypotheses, selecting appropriate statistical tests, and following best practices, researchers can derive meaningful insights from data analysis. Through case studies and practical examples, we have seen how hypothesis testing can be applied to assess the impact of various factors on market outcomes.

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

In the world of market research , hypothesis testing plays a crucial role in drawing meaningful conclusions from data. It allows researchers to assess the validity of assumptions and make informed decisions based on statistical evidence. Whether you're new to market research or simply looking to refresh your knowledge, understanding the basics of hypothesis testing is essential. In this section, we will delve into the key concepts and steps involved in hypothesis testing, providing you with a solid foundation to conduct effective market research .

1. Formulating a Hypothesis:

The first step in hypothesis testing is to clearly define your research question and formulate a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship or difference between variables. It can be either a null hypothesis (H0) or an alternative hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis assumes that there is no significant relationship or difference, while the alternative hypothesis suggests otherwise. For example, if you're conducting a study to determine if there is a difference in customer satisfaction between two product versions, your null hypothesis could be "There is no difference in customer satisfaction between product version A and product version B," while the alternative hypothesis would state the opposite.

2. Selecting a Significance Level:

The significance level, denoted as (alpha), determines the threshold for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis. Commonly used significance levels are 0.05 and 0.01, indicating a 5% and 1% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, respectively. choosing a significance level depends on the importance of making a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis) versus a Type II error (failing to reject a false null hypothesis). It is crucial to select an appropriate significance level that aligns with the research objectives and the consequences of making errors.

3. collecting and Analyzing data :

Once you have formulated your hypothesis and determined the significance level, the next step is to collect relevant data and analyze it. This involves designing a study, collecting data through surveys, experiments, or other research methods, and applying appropriate statistical techniques. For instance, if you're comparing the average sales of two different marketing strategies , you can use a t-test to determine if there is a significant difference between them.

4. Calculating the Test Statistic and P-value:

In hypothesis testing, the test statistic is a numerical value that summarizes the data and allows us to assess the evidence against the null hypothesis. The choice of test statistic depends on the research question and the nature of the data. Once the test statistic is calculated, it is compared to a critical value or a p-value. The p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value, assuming the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

5. Interpreting the Results:

After calculating the test statistic and obtaining the p-value, it is essential to interpret the results correctly. If the p-value is less than the significance level, we can conclude that there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis . On the other hand, if the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis due to insufficient evidence. It is crucial to consider the practical implications and context of the research question when interpreting the results.

- Ensure your hypothesis is specific and testable to facilitate hypothesis testing.

- Consider the sample size and statistical power to increase the reliability of your results.

- Familiarize yourself with statistical software packages to streamline the data analysis process.

Case Study:

To illustrate the application of hypothesis testing in market research, let's consider a case study. A company wants to determine if a new advertising campaign has increased brand awareness among its target audience. The null hypothesis would state that there is no difference in brand awareness before and after the campaign , while the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is an increase. By collecting data through surveys or other measurements and conducting appropriate statistical tests, the company can assess the impact of the advertising campaign on brand awareness and make data-driven decisions.

Understanding the basics of hypothesis testing equips market researchers with a powerful tool to validate assumptions, draw meaningful conclusions, and make informed business decisions . By following the steps outlined above and considering the tips and case studies , you can enhance the rigor and reliability of your market research methodology.

Understanding the Basics of Hypothesis Testing - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

In market research , formulating a hypothesis is a critical step that sets the foundation for the entire research process. A hypothesis is an educated guess or assumption about a specific aspect of the market that you want to investigate. It helps guide your research and provides a framework for collecting and analyzing data. Here are some key points to consider when formulating a hypothesis:

1. Clearly define your research objective: Before formulating a hypothesis, it is essential to clearly define what you aim to achieve through your market research . For example, if you want to understand the impact of a new advertising campaign on consumer purchasing behavior, your research objective could be to determine whether the campaign has led to an increase in sales.

2. Identify the variables: Next, identify the variables that are relevant to your research objective. Variables are the factors that you believe may influence the outcome of your research. In the advertising campaign example, variables could include factors like the duration of the campaign, the target audience, the media channels used, and the product being promoted.

3. State the relationship between variables: Once you have identified the variables, you need to state the relationship between them in your hypothesis. This relationship can be either causal or correlational. A causal hypothesis suggests that one variable directly causes changes in another variable, while a correlational hypothesis suggests that the variables are related but do not necessarily cause each other. For example, a causal hypothesis could state that increasing the duration of the advertising campaign will result in a proportional increase in sales.

4. Make your hypothesis testable: A good hypothesis should be testable, meaning that it can be proven true or false through data analysis. To ensure testability, your hypothesis should be specific, measurable, and focused on a single aspect of the market. For instance, a testable hypothesis could be: "Increasing the duration of the advertising campaign by 20% will lead to a 10% increase in sales within the target audience ."

Tips for Formulating a Hypothesis:

- Review existing literature: Before formulating your hypothesis, conduct a thorough literature review to gather insights from previous studies or research in your field. This will help you build upon existing knowledge and ensure that your hypothesis is grounded in evidence.

- Keep it simple: A hypothesis should be concise and straightforward. Avoid using complex language or including multiple variables in a single hypothesis, as this can lead to confusion and make it difficult to test.

- Be open to revisions: Formulating a hypothesis is not a one-time task. As you progress with your research, you may need to revise or refine your hypothesis based on new insights or data. Stay open-minded and flexible throughout the research process.

Case Study: Hypothesis Formulation in Market Research

Let's consider a case study to illustrate the process of formulating a hypothesis in market research . Suppose a company wants to launch a new line of skincare products targeting millennials. Their research objective is to determine whether packaging design influences millennials' purchasing decisions.

1. Research objective: To understand the impact of packaging design on millennials' purchasing decisions.

2. Variables: Packaging design, purchasing decisions.

3. Relationship: Correlational hypothesis - packaging design is related to millennials' purchasing decisions.

4. Testable hypothesis: "Skincare products with visually appealing and eco-friendly packaging designs will have a higher purchase intent among millennials compared to products with conventional packaging."

By formulating a hypothesis like this, the company can design their market research study to collect data on packaging design and millennials' purchase intent. The hypothesis will guide their analysis and help them draw meaningful conclusions about the relationship between packaging design and purchasing decisions among millennials.

In conclusion, formulating a hypothesis is a crucial step in market research as it provides a clear direction for your study. By defining your research objective, identifying variables, stating the relationship between them, and ensuring testability, you can create a strong hypothesis that guides your research efforts effectively. Remember to review existing literature, keep it simple, and be open to revisions as you progress with your research.

Formulating a Hypothesis in Market Research - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

In market research, hypothesis testing plays a crucial role in determining the validity of assumptions and drawing meaningful conclusions. By using statistical methods, researchers can evaluate hypotheses and make informed decisions based on the results. There are several types of hypothesis testing techniques commonly employed in market research. Let's explore them in detail:

1. One-Sample T-Test:

This type of hypothesis testing is used when comparing a sample mean to a known population mean. For instance, a market researcher may conduct a one-sample t-test to determine if the average age of their target customers is significantly different from the national average. By collecting a sample of data and performing the statistical analysis, they can make conclusions about the population as a whole.

2. independent Samples T-test :

When comparing the means of two independent groups, an independent samples t-test is the go-to method. For example, a market researcher may want to compare the average satisfaction levels of customers who purchased a product before and after a recent marketing campaign. By collecting data from both groups and conducting an independent samples t-test, they can determine if the campaign had a significant impact on customer satisfaction.

3. paired Samples T-test :

This type of hypothesis testing is similar to the independent samples t-test but is used when comparing means of two related groups. For instance, a market researcher may want to assess if there is a significant difference in customer ratings before and after a product upgrade. By collecting data from the same set of customers before and after the upgrade and performing a paired samples t-test, they can evaluate the impact of the upgrade on customer satisfaction .

4. chi-Square test :

The chi-square test is used when analyzing categorical data to determine if there is a significant association between two variables. For example, a market researcher may want to investigate if there is a relationship between gender and product preferences. By collecting data and conducting a chi-square test , they can assess if there is a significant difference in product preferences based on gender.

Tips for Effective Hypothesis Testing:

- Clearly define your research question and hypothesis before conducting any analysis. This will help guide your data collection and ensure you are testing the right variables.

- Ensure your sample size is appropriate for the type of hypothesis testing you are performing. inadequate sample sizes can lead to unreliable results.

- Choose the appropriate statistical test based on the nature of your data and research question. Using the wrong test may yield inaccurate conclusions.

- Take into account any potential confounding variables that may influence your results . Controlling for these variables will improve the validity of your hypothesis testing.

A market researcher wants to determine if offering a discount on a product will lead to increased sales. They randomly divide their customers into two groups : one group receives a discount, and the other group does not. After a specified period, they compare the sales data between the two groups using an independent samples t-test. The results show a significant difference in sales, indicating that offering a discount indeed leads to increased sales.

In conclusion, hypothesis testing in market research is a valuable tool for drawing meaningful insights and making data-driven decisions . By understanding the different types of hypothesis testing techniques and following best practices, researchers can ensure their findings are reliable and actionable.

Types of Hypothesis Testing in Market Research - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

1. Define your null and alternative hypotheses : The first step in conducting a hypothesis test is to clearly define your null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis represents the status quo or the assumption that there is no significant difference or relationship between variables. On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is indeed a significant difference or relationship. For example, in a market research study , the null hypothesis could be that there is no difference in customer satisfaction between two different product packaging designs, while the alternative hypothesis would state that there is a significant difference.

2. Choose the appropriate test statistic: The next step is to determine the appropriate test statistic to use for your hypothesis test. This depends on the nature of your data and the type of hypothesis you are testing . For example, if you are comparing means between two groups , you might use a t-test, while for comparing proportions, a chi-square test could be more appropriate. It is crucial to select the right test statistic to ensure accurate results.

3. Set the significance level: The significance level, often denoted as (alpha), determines the threshold at which you will reject the null hypothesis. Commonly used significance levels are 0.05 and 0.01, indicating a 5% and 1% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis incorrectly, respectively. Choosing the significance level should be based on the importance of the decision and the potential consequences of making a Type I error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true) or a Type II error (failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false).

4. collect and analyze data : With the hypotheses defined, test statistic selected, and significance level set, it's time to collect the necessary data and analyze it using the chosen statistical test. This step involves conducting the statistical calculations and interpreting the results to determine whether the null hypothesis should be rejected or not. For instance, if the calculated p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

5. draw conclusions and make recommendations : Once the results are obtained, it is essential to draw conclusions based on the findings of the hypothesis test. If the null hypothesis is rejected, it suggests that the alternative hypothesis is supported, indicating a significant difference or relationship between variables. These conclusions can then be used to make informed decisions or recommendations in the context of the market research study.

- Ensure that your sample size is large enough to provide reliable results. A small sample size may lead to inconclusive or unreliable findings.

- Take into account any potential confounding variables or biases that may influence the results of your hypothesis test. Proper experimental design and control measures can help mitigate these issues.

- Consider conducting a power analysis to determine the required sample size for your study. This will help ensure that you have sufficient statistical power to detect meaningful effects.

Suppose a market researcher wants to investigate whether a new advertising campaign has a significant impact on brand awareness . The null hypothesis would state that there is no significant difference in brand awareness before and after the campaign, while the alternative hypothesis would suggest that the campaign does have a significant impact. By collecting data on brand awareness before and after the campaign and conducting a hypothesis test, the researcher can determine the effectiveness of the advertising campaign .

In conclusion, conducting a hypothesis test is a crucial step in market research methodology. By following a step-by-step guide , researchers can ensure that their hypothesis tests are conducted accurately and produce meaningful results. By understanding the process and considering important factors such as hypotheses, test statistics, significance levels, and sample sizes, researchers can make informed decisions and recommendations based on their findings.

Step by Step Guide - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

Once you have conducted a hypothesis test, it is crucial to interpret the results accurately. This step is essential in determining whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis and draw meaningful conclusions from your research. In this section, we will discuss some key aspects to consider when interpreting the results of a hypothesis test.

1. Statistical Significance:

One of the primary factors to consider is the statistical significance of your findings. Statistical significance refers to the likelihood that the observed results are not due to chance. Typically, researchers use a significance level (alpha level) to determine whether the p-value obtained from the test is small enough to reject the null hypothesis. For instance, if you set your significance level at 0.05 and obtain a p-value of 0.03, you can conclude that the results are statistically significant and reject the null hypothesis.

Example: Suppose you conducted a hypothesis test to determine whether a new marketing campaign increased sales. Your null hypothesis states that the campaign had no effect, while the alternative hypothesis suggests that the campaign did have an impact. If your p-value is less than your significance level, say 0.05, you can reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the campaign did indeed have an effect on sales.

2. Effect Size:

While statistical significance is essential , it is equally important to consider the effect size. Effect size measures the magnitude of the difference or relationship between variables in your study. It provides a more comprehensive understanding of the practical significance of your findings. By examining the effect size, you can determine the practical relevance of your results.

Example: Let's say you conducted a hypothesis test to compare the average satisfaction levels of two different customer service approaches. While your test may indicate a statistically significant difference, the effect size shows that the difference is minimal. In this case, the statistical significance may not be practically meaningful, and you may need to consider alternative strategies to improve customer satisfaction .

3. Confidence Intervals:

Interpreting the results of a hypothesis test can be enhanced by considering confidence intervals. A confidence interval provides a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to fall. It adds a level of precision to your results and helps assess the uncertainty associated with your findings.

Example: Suppose you conducted a hypothesis test to determine whether a new product launch increased customer loyalty . While your test may show a statistically significant increase, the confidence interval indicates that the true increase in customer loyalty could range from 5% to 15%. This broader range helps you understand the potential impact of the new product on customer loyalty more accurately.

- Always consider the context of the research question and the specific goals of your study when interpreting hypothesis test results.

- Remember that statistical significance does not always guarantee practical significance. Always consider the effect size to assess the importance of your findings.

- Confidence intervals provide valuable information about the precision and uncertainty of your results. Take them into account when drawing conclusions .

In a recent market research study, a company wanted to determine if a new packaging design for their product would lead to increased sales. After conducting a hypothesis test, the results showed a statistically significant increase in sales with the new packaging. However, when analyzing the effect size, it was found that the increase was only 1%. Although statistically significant, the effect size was deemed too small to justify the costs associated with implementing the new packaging design. Therefore, the company decided to stick with the current packaging and explore other strategies to boost sales .

Interpreting the results of a hypothesis test requires careful consideration of statistical significance, effect size, and confidence intervals. By understanding these key elements , researchers can draw meaningful conclusions and make informed decisions based on their findings.

Interpreting the Results of a Hypothesis Test - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of market research methodology that helps researchers make informed decisions based on data analysis. However, it is not without its pitfalls and challenges. In this section, we will explore some of the common mistakes that researchers often encounter during hypothesis testing and provide tips to overcome them.

1. Insufficient sample size: One of the most prevalent challenges in hypothesis testing is having an inadequate sample size. A small sample may not accurately represent the target population, leading to biased results. For example, if a market research study aims to understand consumer preferences for a new product, a sample size of only 10 participants may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the entire consumer base. To mitigate this challenge, researchers should ensure that their sample size is statistically significant and representative of the population they are studying.

2. Type I and Type II errors: Another common pitfall in hypothesis testing is the occurrence of Type I and Type II errors. Type I error, also known as a false positive, happens when a researcher rejects a true null hypothesis. On the other hand, Type II error, or false negative, occurs when a researcher fails to reject a false null hypothesis. Both types of errors can lead to incorrect conclusions and misinterpretations of data. To minimize the risk of these errors, researchers must carefully choose the significance level (alpha) and power of their statistical tests .

3. Violation of assumptions: Hypothesis tests are based on certain assumptions, and violating these assumptions can compromise the validity of the results. For instance, the t-test assumes that the data is normally distributed, while the ANOVA assumes homogeneity of variances. If these assumptions are not met, the hypothesis test results may be inaccurate. To avoid this pitfall, researchers should assess the assumptions of their chosen statistical tests and consider alternative methods if the assumptions are violated.

4. Multiple hypothesis testing: Market research often involves testing multiple hypotheses simultaneously , which can increase the likelihood of false positives. When conducting multiple tests, the probability of at least one significant result due to chance alone also increases. This is known as the problem of multiple comparisons . To address this challenge, researchers can adjust the significance level using Bonferroni correction or other methods to maintain the overall desired level of statistical significance.

5. confirmation bias : Confirmation bias occurs when researchers unconsciously favor information that confirms their preconceived notions or hypotheses. This bias can lead to cherry-picking data or interpreting results in a way that supports the desired outcome. To overcome confirmation bias, it is crucial for researchers to approach hypothesis testing with an open mind and remain objective throughout the entire research process.

Case Study: A market research team conducted a study to determine whether a new advertising campaign had a significant impact on brand awareness. They collected data from a sample of 500 participants and performed a hypothesis test. The results showed a p-value of 0.02, indicating statistical significance. However, upon further investigation, it was discovered that the sample was primarily composed of individuals already familiar with the brand. This biased sample led to an overestimation of the advertising campaign's impact on brand awareness. By acknowledging the pitfall of insufficient sample size and ensuring a more representative sample, the researchers could have obtained more accurate results.

In conclusion, hypothesis testing in market research methodology is not without its challenges. However, by being aware of common pitfalls and implementing appropriate strategies, researchers can improve the validity and reliability of their findings. It is essential to carefully consider sample size, minimize Type I and Type II errors, adhere to assumptions, address multiple hypothesis testing, and remain vigilant against confirmation bias. By doing so, researchers can make more informed decisions based on robust data analysis .

Common Pitfalls and Challenges in Hypothesis Testing - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

1. Clearly define your research objectives: Before conducting any hypothesis testing in market research, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of your research objectives. Clearly define what you aim to achieve and the specific questions you want to answer through your research. This will help you formulate relevant hypotheses and ensure that your testing is focused and meaningful.

2. Use a sample size calculator: determining the appropriate sample size is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of your hypothesis testing results. By using a sample size calculator, you can determine the sample size needed to detect a specific effect size with a desired level of statistical power. This will help you optimize your resources and avoid wasting time and effort on an inadequate sample size.

3. Develop testable hypotheses: A hypothesis should be specific, measurable, and testable. Avoid vague or general statements that cannot be empirically tested. For example, instead of stating "Customers prefer our product," a testable hypothesis could be "Customers who have used our product rate it higher than competing products on a satisfaction scale."

4. Choose the appropriate statistical test: Depending on the nature of your data and research objectives, different statistical tests may be required. It is important to select the appropriate test that matches your research design and the type of data you have collected. For example, if you want to compare the means of two independent groups, a t-test would be suitable, whereas an ANOVA would be appropriate for comparing means across multiple groups.

5. Set the significance level and interpret results accordingly: The significance level, often denoted as alpha (), determines the threshold at which you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. Commonly used levels include 0.05 and 0.01. It is crucial to set your significance level before conducting the test and interpret the results accordingly. Failing to do so may lead to biased interpretations or cherry-picking results.

6. Consider potential confounding variables: Confounding variables are factors that may affect the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, leading to inaccurate conclusions. It is important to identify and control for potential confounding variables to ensure the validity of your hypothesis testing. For instance, if you are testing the impact of a marketing campaign on sales , you should consider factors like seasonality or competitor activities that may influence sales independently of your campaign.

7. Document your methodology and assumptions: Transparency is key in market research. Documenting your methodology and assumptions allows others to replicate or critique your study. Clearly state the statistical tests used, sample size, significance level, and any assumptions made during the analysis. This documentation will enhance the credibility of your findings and facilitate future research.

8. Validate your findings with additional research: Hypothesis testing is just one step in the market research process . To ensure the reliability and generalizability of your findings, consider conducting additional research using different methods or in different contexts. This will help validate your initial hypotheses and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under study.

In conclusion, effective hypothesis testing is crucial for obtaining meaningful insights in market research . By following these best practices, you can ensure that your testing is focused, valid, and reliable. Remember to clearly define your research objectives, use a sample size calculator, develop testable hypotheses, choose the appropriate statistical test, set the significance level, consider potential confounding variables, document your methodology and assumptions, and validate your findings with additional research. By adhering to these practices, you can enhance the quality and impact of your market research endeavors.

Best Practices for Effective Hypothesis Testing in Market Research - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

In this blog, we have explored the concept of hypothesis testing in market research and its significance in informing data-driven decision-making . By formulating and testing hypotheses , researchers can gain valuable insights into consumer behavior, market trends, and the effectiveness of marketing strategies . Let's summarize the key points discussed throughout this guide:

1. Hypothesis testing provides a structured approach: By following a systematic process, researchers can ensure that their findings are based on reliable evidence rather than mere speculation. This approach involves formulating a clear research question, developing a hypothesis, collecting data, analyzing the results, and drawing conclusions.

2. Examples of hypothesis testing in market research: To illustrate the practical application of hypothesis testing, let's consider a hypothetical scenario. A company wants to determine if changing the packaging design of their product will increase sales. The null hypothesis could be that there is no significant difference in sales between the old and new packaging, while the alternative hypothesis suggests that the new packaging leads to higher sales. By conducting a controlled experiment and analyzing the data using appropriate statistical tests, the company can determine if their hypothesis is supported or rejected.

3. Tips for effective hypothesis testing: When conducting hypothesis testing in market research, it is crucial to consider the following tips:

A. Clearly define the research question and hypotheses: The research question should be specific and focused, while the hypotheses should be testable and mutually exclusive.

B. Use appropriate statistical methods: Selecting the right statistical tests ensures accurate analysis and interpretation of the data. Consult with a statistician or use software tools that can guide you in the selection process.

C. Consider sample size and representativeness : A larger sample size generally leads to more reliable results. Additionally, ensure that your sample is representative of the target population to avoid biased conclusions.

D. Beware of Type I and Type II errors: Type I error occurs when a true null hypothesis is rejected, while Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis is accepted. Understanding these errors helps researchers interpret their findings correctly.

4. case studies showcasing hypothesis testing in market research: Real-world examples can provide valuable insights into how hypothesis testing is applied in different industries. For instance, a retail company might test the hypothesis that offering personalized discounts based on customer preferences will lead to increased customer loyalty and repeat purchases . By analyzing customer data and conducting surveys, the company can evaluate the effectiveness of their personalized discount strategy and make data-driven decisions .

In conclusion, hypothesis testing is a powerful tool in market research that enables researchers to make evidence-based decisions. By following a structured approach, using appropriate statistical methods, and considering key factors such as sample size and representativeness, researchers can harness the power of hypothesis testing to gain valuable insights into consumer behavior and market trends.

Harnessing the Power of Hypothesis Testing in Market Research - Hypothesis testing: Hypothesis Testing in Market Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide

Read Other Blogs

Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) is a powerful scripting language that operates within Excel,...

Visual branding and website design are inextricably linked in the digital age. A company's online...

Venture capital represents a vital force in the economic landscape of any country, acting as a...

Embarking on the journey from debt to solvency is a transformative process that businesses of all...

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is a type of cognitive-behavioral therapy that was originally...

In the pulsating world of mobile commerce, revenue models are the engines driving profitability....

Social media monitoring is an essential practice for any brand that wants to stay ahead of the...

Understanding your customers is the cornerstone of any successful business strategy. It's the...

In the quest for productivity and work-life balance, the concept of segmenting one's day into...

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Research Hypothesis: What It Is, Types + How to Develop?

A research study starts with a question. Researchers worldwide ask questions and create research hypotheses. The effectiveness of research relies on developing a good research hypothesis. Examples of research hypotheses can guide researchers in writing effective ones.

In this blog, we’ll learn what a research hypothesis is, why it’s important in research, and the different types used in science. We’ll also guide you through creating your research hypothesis and discussing ways to test and evaluate it.

What is a Research Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is like a guess or idea that you suggest to check if it’s true. A research hypothesis is a statement that brings up a question and predicts what might happen.

It’s really important in the scientific method and is used in experiments to figure things out. Essentially, it’s an educated guess about how things are connected in the research.

A research hypothesis usually includes pointing out the independent variable (the thing they’re changing or studying) and the dependent variable (the result they’re measuring or watching). It helps plan how to gather and analyze data to see if there’s evidence to support or deny the expected connection between these variables.

Importance of Hypothesis in Research

Hypotheses are really important in research. They help design studies, allow for practical testing, and add to our scientific knowledge. Their main role is to organize research projects, making them purposeful, focused, and valuable to the scientific community. Let’s look at some key reasons why they matter:

• A research hypothesis helps test theories.

A hypothesis plays a pivotal role in the scientific method by providing a basis for testing existing theories. For example, a hypothesis might test the predictive power of a psychological theory on human behavior.

• It serves as a great platform for investigation activities.

It serves as a launching pad for investigation activities, which offers researchers a clear starting point. A research hypothesis can explore the relationship between exercise and stress reduction.

• Hypothesis guides the research work or study.

A well-formulated hypothesis guides the entire research process. It ensures that the study remains focused and purposeful. For instance, a hypothesis about the impact of social media on interpersonal relationships provides clear guidance for a study.

• Hypothesis sometimes suggests theories.

In some cases, a hypothesis can suggest new theories or modifications to existing ones. For example, a hypothesis testing the effectiveness of a new drug might prompt a reconsideration of current medical theories.

• It helps in knowing the data needs.

A hypothesis clarifies the data requirements for a study, ensuring that researchers collect the necessary information—a hypothesis guiding the collection of demographic data to analyze the influence of age on a particular phenomenon.

• The hypothesis explains social phenomena.

Hypotheses are instrumental in explaining complex social phenomena. For instance, a hypothesis might explore the relationship between economic factors and crime rates in a given community.

• Hypothesis provides a relationship between phenomena for empirical Testing.

Hypotheses establish clear relationships between phenomena, paving the way for empirical testing. An example could be a hypothesis exploring the correlation between sleep patterns and academic performance.

• It helps in knowing the most suitable analysis technique.

A hypothesis guides researchers in selecting the most appropriate analysis techniques for their data. For example, a hypothesis focusing on the effectiveness of a teaching method may lead to the choice of statistical analyses best suited for educational research.

Characteristics of a Good Research Hypothesis

A hypothesis is a specific idea that you can test in a study. It often comes from looking at past research and theories. A good hypothesis usually starts with a research question that you can explore through background research. For it to be effective, consider these key characteristics:

• Clear and Focused Language: A good hypothesis uses clear and focused language to avoid confusion and ensure everyone understands it.
• Related to the Research Topic: The hypothesis should directly relate to the research topic, acting as a bridge between the specific question and the broader study.
• Testable: An effective hypothesis can be tested, meaning its prediction can be checked with real data to support or challenge the proposed relationship.
• Potential for Exploration: A good hypothesis often comes from a research question that invites further exploration. Doing background research helps find gaps and potential areas to investigate.
• Includes Variables: The hypothesis should clearly state both the independent and dependent variables, specifying the factors being studied and the expected outcomes.
• Ethical Considerations: Check if variables can be manipulated without breaking ethical standards. It’s crucial to maintain ethical research practices.
• Predicts Outcomes: The hypothesis should predict the expected relationship and outcome, acting as a roadmap for the study and guiding data collection and analysis.
• Simple and Concise: A good hypothesis avoids unnecessary complexity and is simple and concise, expressing the essence of the proposed relationship clearly.
• Clear and Assumption-Free: The hypothesis should be clear and free from assumptions about the reader’s prior knowledge, ensuring universal understanding.
• Observable and Testable Results: A strong hypothesis implies research that produces observable and testable results, making sure the study’s outcomes can be effectively measured and analyzed.

When you use these characteristics as a checklist, it can help you create a good research hypothesis. It’ll guide improving and strengthening the hypothesis, identifying any weaknesses, and making necessary changes. Crafting a hypothesis with these features helps you conduct a thorough and insightful research study.

Types of Research Hypotheses

The research hypothesis comes in various types, each serving a specific purpose in guiding the scientific investigation. Knowing the differences will make it easier for you to create your own hypothesis. Here’s an overview of the common types:

01. Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two considered variables or that two groups are unrelated. As discussed earlier, a hypothesis is an unproven assumption lacking sufficient supporting data. It serves as the statement researchers aim to disprove. It is testable, verifiable, and can be rejected.

For example, if you’re studying the relationship between Project A and Project B, assuming both projects are of equal standard is your null hypothesis. It needs to be specific for your study.

02. Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis is basically another option to the null hypothesis. It involves looking for a significant change or alternative that could lead you to reject the null hypothesis. It’s a different idea compared to the null hypothesis.

When you create a null hypothesis, you’re making an educated guess about whether something is true or if there’s a connection between that thing and another variable. If the null view suggests something is correct, the alternative hypothesis says it’s incorrect. 

For instance, if your null hypothesis is “I’m going to be $1000 richer,” the alternative hypothesis would be “I’m not going to get $1000 or be richer.”

03. Directional Hypothesis

The directional hypothesis predicts the direction of the relationship between independent and dependent variables. They specify whether the effect will be positive or negative.

If you increase your study hours, you will experience a positive association with your exam scores. This hypothesis suggests that as you increase the independent variable (study hours), there will also be an increase in the dependent variable (exam scores).

04. Non-directional Hypothesis

The non-directional hypothesis predicts the existence of a relationship between variables but does not specify the direction of the effect. It suggests that there will be a significant difference or relationship, but it does not predict the nature of that difference.

For example, you will find no notable difference in test scores between students who receive the educational intervention and those who do not. However, once you compare the test scores of the two groups, you will notice an important difference.

05. Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis predicts a relationship between one dependent variable and one independent variable without specifying the nature of that relationship. It’s simple and usually used when we don’t know much about how the two things are connected.

For example, if you adopt effective study habits, you will achieve higher exam scores than those with poor study habits.

06. Complex Hypothesis

A complex hypothesis is an idea that specifies a relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. It is a more detailed idea than a simple hypothesis.

While a simple view suggests a straightforward cause-and-effect relationship between two things, a complex hypothesis involves many factors and how they’re connected to each other.

For example, when you increase your study time, you tend to achieve higher exam scores. The connection between your study time and exam performance is affected by various factors, including the quality of your sleep, your motivation levels, and the effectiveness of your study techniques.

If you sleep well, stay highly motivated, and use effective study strategies, you may observe a more robust positive correlation between the time you spend studying and your exam scores, unlike those who may lack these factors.

07. Associative Hypothesis

An associative hypothesis proposes a connection between two things without saying that one causes the other. Basically, it suggests that when one thing changes, the other changes too, but it doesn’t claim that one thing is causing the change in the other.

For example, you will likely notice higher exam scores when you increase your study time. You can recognize an association between your study time and exam scores in this scenario.

Your hypothesis acknowledges a relationship between the two variables—your study time and exam scores—without asserting that increased study time directly causes higher exam scores. You need to consider that other factors, like motivation or learning style, could affect the observed association.

08. Causal Hypothesis

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. It suggests that changes in one variable directly cause changes in another variable.

For example, when you increase your study time, you experience higher exam scores. This hypothesis suggests a direct cause-and-effect relationship, indicating that the more time you spend studying, the higher your exam scores. It assumes that changes in your study time directly influence changes in your exam performance.

09. Empirical Hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is a statement based on things we can see and measure. It comes from direct observation or experiments and can be tested with real-world evidence. If an experiment proves a theory, it supports the idea and shows it’s not just a guess. This makes the statement more reliable than a wild guess.

For example, if you increase the dosage of a certain medication, you might observe a quicker recovery time for patients. Imagine you’re in charge of a clinical trial. In this trial, patients are given varying dosages of the medication, and you measure and compare their recovery times. This allows you to directly see the effects of different dosages on how fast patients recover.

This way, you can create a research hypothesis: “Increasing the dosage of a certain medication will lead to a faster recovery time for patients.”

10. Statistical Hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a statement or assumption about a population parameter that is the subject of an investigation. It serves as the basis for statistical analysis and testing. It is often tested using statistical methods to draw inferences about the larger population.

In a hypothesis test, statistical evidence is collected to either reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis due to insufficient evidence.

For example, let’s say you’re testing a new medicine. Your hypothesis could be that the medicine doesn’t really help patients get better. So, you collect data and use statistics to see if your guess is right or if the medicine actually makes a difference.

If the data strongly shows that the medicine does help, you say your guess was wrong, and the medicine does make a difference. But if the proof isn’t strong enough, you can stick with your original guess because you didn’t get enough evidence to change your mind.

How to Develop a Research Hypotheses?

Step 1: identify your research problem or topic..

Define the area of interest or the problem you want to investigate. Make sure it’s clear and well-defined.

Start by asking a question about your chosen topic. Consider the limitations of your research and create a straightforward problem related to your topic. Once you’ve done that, you can develop and test a hypothesis with evidence.

Step 2: Conduct a literature review

Review existing literature related to your research problem. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge in the field, identify gaps, and build a foundation for your hypothesis. Consider the following questions:

• What existing research has been conducted on your chosen topic?
• Are there any gaps or unanswered questions in the current literature?
• How will the existing literature contribute to the foundation of your research?

Step 3: Formulate your research question

Based on your literature review, create a specific and concise research question that addresses your identified problem. Your research question should be clear, focused, and relevant to your field of study.

Step 4: Identify variables

Determine the key variables involved in your research question. Variables are the factors or phenomena that you will study and manipulate to test your hypothesis.

• Independent Variable: The variable you manipulate or control.
• Dependent Variable: The variable you measure to observe the effect of the independent variable.

Step 5: State the Null hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no significant difference or effect. It serves as a baseline for comparison with the alternative hypothesis.

Step 6: Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis

Choose research methods that align with your study objectives, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies. The selected methods enable you to test your research hypothesis effectively.

Creating a research hypothesis usually takes more than one try. Expect to make changes as you collect data. It’s normal to test and say no to a few hypotheses before you find the right answer to your research question.

Testing and Evaluating Hypotheses

Testing hypotheses is a really important part of research. It’s like the practical side of things. Here, real-world evidence will help you determine how different things are connected. Let’s explore the main steps in hypothesis testing:

• State your research hypothesis.

Before testing, clearly articulate your research hypothesis. This involves framing both a null hypothesis, suggesting no significant effect or relationship, and an alternative hypothesis, proposing the expected outcome.

• Collect data strategically.

Plan how you will gather information in a way that fits your study. Make sure your data collection method matches the things you’re studying.

Whether through surveys, observations, or experiments, this step demands precision and adherence to the established methodology. The quality of data collected directly influences the credibility of study outcomes.

• Perform an appropriate statistical test.

Choose a statistical test that aligns with the nature of your data and the hypotheses being tested. Whether it’s a t-test, chi-square test, ANOVA, or regression analysis, selecting the right statistical tool is paramount for accurate and reliable results.

• Decide if your idea was right or wrong.

Following the statistical analysis, evaluate the results in the context of your null hypothesis. You need to decide if you should reject your null hypothesis or not.

• Share what you found.

When discussing what you found in your research, be clear and organized. Say whether your idea was supported or not, and talk about what your results mean. Also, mention any limits to your study and suggest ideas for future research.

The Role of QuestionPro to Develop a Good Research Hypothesis

QuestionPro is a survey and research platform that provides tools for creating, distributing, and analyzing surveys. It plays a crucial role in the research process, especially when you’re in the initial stages of hypothesis development. Here’s how QuestionPro can help you to develop a good research hypothesis:

• Survey design and data collection: You can use the platform to create targeted questions that help you gather relevant data.
• Exploratory research: Through surveys and feedback mechanisms on QuestionPro, you can conduct exploratory research to understand the landscape of a particular subject.
• Literature review and background research: QuestionPro surveys can collect sample population opinions, experiences, and preferences. This data and a thorough literature evaluation can help you generate a well-grounded hypothesis by improving your research knowledge.
• Identifying variables: Using targeted survey questions, you can identify relevant variables related to their research topic.
• Testing assumptions: You can use surveys to informally test certain assumptions or hypotheses before formalizing a research hypothesis.
• Data analysis tools: QuestionPro provides tools for analyzing survey data. You can use these tools to identify the collected data’s patterns, correlations, or trends.
• Refining your hypotheses: As you collect data through QuestionPro, you can adjust your hypotheses based on the real-world responses you receive.

A research hypothesis is like a guide for researchers in science. It’s a well-thought-out idea that has been thoroughly tested. This idea is crucial as researchers can explore different fields, such as medicine, social sciences, and natural sciences. The research hypothesis links theories to real-world evidence and gives researchers a clear path to explore and make discoveries.

QuestionPro Research Suite is a helpful tool for researchers. It makes creating surveys, collecting data, and analyzing information easily. It supports all kinds of research, from exploring new ideas to forming hypotheses. With a focus on using data, it helps researchers do their best work.

Are you interested in learning more about QuestionPro Research Suite? Take advantage of QuestionPro’s free trial to get an initial look at its capabilities and realize the full potential of your research efforts.

LEARN MORE         FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

Age Gating: Effective Strategies for Online Content Control

Aug 23, 2024

Customer Experience Lessons from 13,000 Feet — Tuesday CX Thoughts

Aug 20, 2024

Insight: Definition & meaning, types and examples

Aug 19, 2024

Employee Loyalty: Strategies for Long-Term Business Success 

Other categories.

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
• Uncategorized
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

• Privacy Policy

Home » What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

What is a Hypothesis – Types, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Definition:

Hypothesis is an educated guess or proposed explanation for a phenomenon, based on some initial observations or data. It is a tentative statement that can be tested and potentially proven or disproven through further investigation and experimentation.

Hypothesis is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments and the collection and analysis of data. It is an essential element of the scientific method, as it allows researchers to make predictions about the outcome of their experiments and to test those predictions to determine their accuracy.

Types of Hypothesis

Types of Hypothesis are as follows:

Research Hypothesis

A research hypothesis is a statement that predicts a relationship between variables. It is usually formulated as a specific statement that can be tested through research, and it is often used in scientific research to guide the design of experiments.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is no significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as a starting point for testing the research hypothesis, and if the results of the study reject the null hypothesis, it suggests that there is a significant difference or relationship between variables.

Alternative Hypothesis

An alternative hypothesis is a statement that assumes there is a significant difference or relationship between variables. It is often used as an alternative to the null hypothesis and is tested against the null hypothesis to determine which statement is more accurate.

Directional Hypothesis

A directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the direction of the relationship between variables. For example, a researcher might predict that increasing the amount of exercise will result in a decrease in body weight.

Non-directional Hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis is a statement that predicts the relationship between variables but does not specify the direction. For example, a researcher might predict that there is a relationship between the amount of exercise and body weight, but they do not specify whether increasing or decreasing exercise will affect body weight.

Statistical Hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a statement that assumes a particular statistical model or distribution for the data. It is often used in statistical analysis to test the significance of a particular result.

Composite Hypothesis

A composite hypothesis is a statement that assumes more than one condition or outcome. It can be divided into several sub-hypotheses, each of which represents a different possible outcome.

Empirical Hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is a statement that is based on observed phenomena or data. It is often used in scientific research to develop theories or models that explain the observed phenomena.

Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a statement that assumes only one outcome or condition. It is often used in scientific research to test a single variable or factor.

Complex Hypothesis

A complex hypothesis is a statement that assumes multiple outcomes or conditions. It is often used in scientific research to test the effects of multiple variables or factors on a particular outcome.

Applications of Hypothesis

Hypotheses are used in various fields to guide research and make predictions about the outcomes of experiments or observations. Here are some examples of how hypotheses are applied in different fields:

• Science : In scientific research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain natural phenomena. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular variable on a natural system, such as the effects of climate change on an ecosystem.
• Medicine : In medical research, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of treatments and therapies for specific conditions. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new drug on a particular disease.
• Psychology : In psychology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of human behavior and cognition. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a particular stimulus on the brain or behavior.
• Sociology : In sociology, hypotheses are used to test theories and models of social phenomena, such as the effects of social structures or institutions on human behavior. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of income inequality on crime rates.
• Business : In business research, hypotheses are used to test the validity of theories and models that explain business phenomena, such as consumer behavior or market trends. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the effects of a new marketing campaign on consumer buying behavior.
• Engineering : In engineering, hypotheses are used to test the effectiveness of new technologies or designs. For example, a hypothesis might be formulated to test the efficiency of a new solar panel design.

How to write a Hypothesis

Here are the steps to follow when writing a hypothesis:

Identify the Research Question

The first step is to identify the research question that you want to answer through your study. This question should be clear, specific, and focused. It should be something that can be investigated empirically and that has some relevance or significance in the field.

Conduct a Literature Review

Before writing your hypothesis, it’s essential to conduct a thorough literature review to understand what is already known about the topic. This will help you to identify the research gap and formulate a hypothesis that builds on existing knowledge.

Determine the Variables

The next step is to identify the variables involved in the research question. A variable is any characteristic or factor that can vary or change. There are two types of variables: independent and dependent. The independent variable is the one that is manipulated or changed by the researcher, while the dependent variable is the one that is measured or observed as a result of the independent variable.

Formulate the Hypothesis

Based on the research question and the variables involved, you can now formulate your hypothesis. A hypothesis should be a clear and concise statement that predicts the relationship between the variables. It should be testable through empirical research and based on existing theory or evidence.

Write the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis is the opposite of the alternative hypothesis, which is the hypothesis that you are testing. The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference or relationship between the variables. It is important to write the null hypothesis because it allows you to compare your results with what would be expected by chance.

Refine the Hypothesis

After formulating the hypothesis, it’s important to refine it and make it more precise. This may involve clarifying the variables, specifying the direction of the relationship, or making the hypothesis more testable.

Examples of Hypothesis

Here are a few examples of hypotheses in different fields:

• Psychology : “Increased exposure to violent video games leads to increased aggressive behavior in adolescents.”
• Biology : “Higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to increased plant growth.”
• Sociology : “Individuals who grow up in households with higher socioeconomic status will have higher levels of education and income as adults.”
• Education : “Implementing a new teaching method will result in higher student achievement scores.”
• Marketing : “Customers who receive a personalized email will be more likely to make a purchase than those who receive a generic email.”
• Physics : “An increase in temperature will cause an increase in the volume of a gas, assuming all other variables remain constant.”
• Medicine : “Consuming a diet high in saturated fats will increase the risk of developing heart disease.”

Purpose of Hypothesis

The purpose of a hypothesis is to provide a testable explanation for an observed phenomenon or a prediction of a future outcome based on existing knowledge or theories. A hypothesis is an essential part of the scientific method and helps to guide the research process by providing a clear focus for investigation. It enables scientists to design experiments or studies to gather evidence and data that can support or refute the proposed explanation or prediction.

The formulation of a hypothesis is based on existing knowledge, observations, and theories, and it should be specific, testable, and falsifiable. A specific hypothesis helps to define the research question, which is important in the research process as it guides the selection of an appropriate research design and methodology. Testability of the hypothesis means that it can be proven or disproven through empirical data collection and analysis. Falsifiability means that the hypothesis should be formulated in such a way that it can be proven wrong if it is incorrect.

In addition to guiding the research process, the testing of hypotheses can lead to new discoveries and advancements in scientific knowledge. When a hypothesis is supported by the data, it can be used to develop new theories or models to explain the observed phenomenon. When a hypothesis is not supported by the data, it can help to refine existing theories or prompt the development of new hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.

When to use Hypothesis

Here are some common situations in which hypotheses are used:

• In scientific research , hypotheses are used to guide the design of experiments and to help researchers make predictions about the outcomes of those experiments.
• In social science research , hypotheses are used to test theories about human behavior, social relationships, and other phenomena.
• I n business , hypotheses can be used to guide decisions about marketing, product development, and other areas. For example, a hypothesis might be that a new product will sell well in a particular market, and this hypothesis can be tested through market research.

Characteristics of Hypothesis

Here are some common characteristics of a hypothesis:

• Testable : A hypothesis must be able to be tested through observation or experimentation. This means that it must be possible to collect data that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
• Falsifiable : A hypothesis must be able to be proven false if it is not supported by the data. If a hypothesis cannot be falsified, then it is not a scientific hypothesis.
• Clear and concise : A hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner so that it can be easily understood and tested.
• Based on existing knowledge : A hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and research in the field. It should not be based on personal beliefs or opinions.
• Specific : A hypothesis should be specific in terms of the variables being tested and the predicted outcome. This will help to ensure that the research is focused and well-designed.
• Tentative: A hypothesis is a tentative statement or assumption that requires further testing and evidence to be confirmed or refuted. It is not a final conclusion or assertion.
• Relevant : A hypothesis should be relevant to the research question or problem being studied. It should address a gap in knowledge or provide a new perspective on the issue.

Advantages of Hypothesis

Hypotheses have several advantages in scientific research and experimentation:

• Guides research: A hypothesis provides a clear and specific direction for research. It helps to focus the research question, select appropriate methods and variables, and interpret the results.
• Predictive powe r: A hypothesis makes predictions about the outcome of research, which can be tested through experimentation. This allows researchers to evaluate the validity of the hypothesis and make new discoveries.
• Facilitates communication: A hypothesis provides a common language and framework for scientists to communicate with one another about their research. This helps to facilitate the exchange of ideas and promotes collaboration.
• Efficient use of resources: A hypothesis helps researchers to use their time, resources, and funding efficiently by directing them towards specific research questions and methods that are most likely to yield results.
• Provides a basis for further research: A hypothesis that is supported by data provides a basis for further research and exploration. It can lead to new hypotheses, theories, and discoveries.
• Increases objectivity: A hypothesis can help to increase objectivity in research by providing a clear and specific framework for testing and interpreting results. This can reduce bias and increase the reliability of research findings.

Limitations of Hypothesis

Some Limitations of the Hypothesis are as follows:

• Limited to observable phenomena: Hypotheses are limited to observable phenomena and cannot account for unobservable or intangible factors. This means that some research questions may not be amenable to hypothesis testing.
• May be inaccurate or incomplete: Hypotheses are based on existing knowledge and research, which may be incomplete or inaccurate. This can lead to flawed hypotheses and erroneous conclusions.
• May be biased: Hypotheses may be biased by the researcher’s own beliefs, values, or assumptions. This can lead to selective interpretation of data and a lack of objectivity in research.
• Cannot prove causation: A hypothesis can only show a correlation between variables, but it cannot prove causation. This requires further experimentation and analysis.
• Limited to specific contexts: Hypotheses are limited to specific contexts and may not be generalizable to other situations or populations. This means that results may not be applicable in other contexts or may require further testing.
• May be affected by chance : Hypotheses may be affected by chance or random variation, which can obscure or distort the true relationship between variables.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Appendix in Research Paper – Examples and...

Figures in Research Paper – Examples and Guide

Data Analysis – Process, Methods and Types

Conceptual Framework – Types, Methodology and...

Thesis Statement – Examples, Writing Guide

Dissertation – Format, Example and Template

How to Generate and Validate Product Hypotheses

Every product owner knows that it takes effort to build something that'll cater to user needs. You'll have to make many tough calls if you wish to grow the company and evolve the product so it delivers more value. But how do you decide what to change in the product, your marketing strategy, or the overall direction to succeed? And how do you make a product that truly resonates with your target audience?

There are many unknowns in business, so many fundamental decisions start from a simple "what if?". But they can't be based on guesses, as you need some proof to fill in the blanks reasonably.

Because there's no universal recipe for successfully building a product, teams collect data, do research, study the dynamics, and generate hypotheses according to the given facts. They then take corresponding actions to find out whether they were right or wrong, make conclusions, and most likely restart the process again.

On this page, we thoroughly inspect product hypotheses. We'll go over what they are, how to create hypothesis statements and validate them, and what goes after this step.

What Is a Hypothesis in Product Management?

A hypothesis in product development and product management is a statement or assumption about the product, planned feature, market, or customer (e.g., their needs, behavior, or expectations) that you can put to the test, evaluate, and base your further decisions on . This may, for instance, regard the upcoming product changes as well as the impact they can result in.

A hypothesis implies that there is limited knowledge. Hence, the teams need to undergo testing activities to validate their ideas and confirm whether they are true or false.

Hypotheses guide the product development process and may point at important findings to help build a better product that'll serve user needs. In essence, teams create hypothesis statements in an attempt to improve the offering, boost engagement, increase revenue, find product-market fit quicker, or for other business-related reasons.

It's sort of like an experiment with trial and error, yet, it is data-driven and should be unbiased . This means that teams don't make assumptions out of the blue. Instead, they turn to the collected data, conducted market research , and factual information, which helps avoid completely missing the mark. The obtained results are then carefully analyzed and may influence decision-making.

Such experiments backed by data and analysis are an integral aspect of successful product development and allow startups or businesses to dodge costly startup mistakes .

‍ When do teams create hypothesis statements and validate them? To some extent, hypothesis testing is an ongoing process to work on constantly. It may occur during various product development life cycle stages, from early phases like initiation to late ones like scaling.

In any event, the key here is learning how to generate hypothesis statements and validate them effectively. We'll go over this in more detail later on.

Idea vs. Hypothesis Compared

You might be wondering whether ideas and hypotheses are the same thing. Well, there are a few distinctions.

An idea is simply a suggested proposal. Say, a teammate comes up with something you can bring to life during a brainstorming session or pitches in a suggestion like "How about we shorten the checkout process?". You can jot down such ideas and then consider working on them if they'll truly make a difference and improve the product, strategy, or result in other business benefits. Ideas may thus be used as the hypothesis foundation when you decide to prove a concept.

A hypothesis is the next step, when an idea gets wrapped with specifics to become an assumption that may be tested. As such, you can refine the idea by adding details to it. The previously mentioned idea can be worded into a product hypothesis statement like: "The cart abandonment rate is high, and many users flee at checkout. But if we shorten the checkout process by cutting down the number of steps to only two and get rid of four excessive fields, we'll simplify the user journey, boost satisfaction, and may get up to 15% more completed orders".

A hypothesis is something you can test in an attempt to reach a certain goal. Testing isn't obligatory in this scenario, of course, but the idea may be tested if you weigh the pros and cons and decide that the required effort is worth a try. We'll explain how to create hypothesis statements next.

How to Generate a Hypothesis for a Product

The last thing those developing a product want is to invest time and effort into something that won't bring any visible results, fall short of customer expectations, or won't live up to their needs. Therefore, to increase the chances of achieving a successful outcome and product-led growth , teams may need to revisit their product development approach by optimizing one of the starting points of the process: learning to make reasonable product hypotheses.

If the entire procedure is structured, this may assist you during such stages as the discovery phase and raise the odds of reaching your product goals and setting your business up for success. Yet, what's the entire process like?

• It all starts with identifying an existing problem . Is there a product area that's experiencing a downfall, a visible trend, or a market gap? Are users often complaining about something in their feedback? Or is there something you're willing to change (say, if you aim to get more profit, increase engagement, optimize a process, expand to a new market, or reach your OKRs and KPIs faster)?
• Teams then need to work on formulating a hypothesis . They put the statement into concise and short wording that describes what is expected to achieve. Importantly, it has to be relevant, actionable, backed by data, and without generalizations.
• Next, they have to test the hypothesis by running experiments to validate it (for instance, via A/B or multivariate testing, prototyping, feedback collection, or other ways).
• Then, the obtained results of the test must be analyzed . Did one element or page version outperform the other? Depending on what you're testing, you can look into various merits or product performance metrics (such as the click rate, bounce rate, or the number of sign-ups) to assess whether your prediction was correct.
• Finally, the teams can make conclusions that could lead to data-driven decisions. For example, they can make corresponding changes or roll back a step.

How Else Can You Generate Product Hypotheses?

Such processes imply sharing ideas when a problem is spotted by digging deep into facts and studying the possible risks, goals, benefits, and outcomes. You may apply various MVP tools like (FigJam, Notion, or Miro) that were designed to simplify brainstorming sessions, systemize pitched suggestions, and keep everyone organized without losing any ideas.

Predictive product analysis can also be integrated into this process, leveraging data and insights to anticipate market trends and consumer preferences, thus enhancing decision-making and product development strategies. This approach fosters a more proactive and informed approach to innovation, ensuring products are not only relevant but also resonate with the target audience, ultimately increasing their chances of success in the market.

Besides, you can settle on one of the many frameworks that facilitate decision-making processes , ideation phases, or feature prioritization . Such frameworks are best applicable if you need to test your assumptions and structure the validation process. These are a few common ones if you're looking toward a systematic approach:

• Business Model Canvas (used to establish the foundation of the business model and helps find answers to vitals like your value proposition, finding the right customer segment, or the ways to make revenue);
• Lean Startup framework (the lean startup framework uses a diagram-like format for capturing major processes and can be handy for testing various hypotheses like how much value a product brings or assumptions on personas, the problem, growth, etc.);
• Design Thinking Process (is all about interactive learning and involves getting an in-depth understanding of the customer needs and pain points, which can be formulated into hypotheses followed by simple prototypes and tests).

Need a hand with product development?

Upsilon's team of pros is ready to share our expertise in building tech products.

How to Make a Hypothesis Statement for a Product

Once you've indicated the addressable problem or opportunity and broken down the issue in focus, you need to work on formulating the hypotheses and associated tasks. By the way, it works the same way if you want to prove that something will be false (a.k.a null hypothesis).

If you're unsure how to write a hypothesis statement, let's explore the essential steps that'll set you on the right track.

Step 1: Allocate the Variable Components

Product hypotheses are generally different for each case, so begin by pinpointing the major variables, i.e., the cause and effect . You'll need to outline what you think is supposed to happen if a change or action gets implemented.

Put simply, the "cause" is what you're planning to change, and the "effect" is what will indicate whether the change is bringing in the expected results. Falling back on the example we brought up earlier, the ineffective checkout process can be the cause, while the increased percentage of completed orders is the metric that'll show the effect.

Make sure to also note such vital points as:

• what the problem and solution are;
• what are the benefits or the expected impact/successful outcome;
• which user group is affected;
• what are the risks;
• what kind of experiments can help test the hypothesis;
• what can measure whether you were right or wrong.

Step 2: Ensure the Connection Is Specific and Logical

Mind that generic connections that lack specifics will get you nowhere. So if you're thinking about how to word a hypothesis statement, make sure that the cause and effect include clear reasons and a logical dependency .

Think about what can be the precise and link showing why A affects B. In our checkout example, it could be: fewer steps in the checkout and the removed excessive fields will speed up the process, help avoid confusion, irritate users less, and lead to more completed orders. That's much more explicit than just stating the fact that the checkout needs to be changed to get more completed orders.

Step 3: Decide on the Data You'll Collect

Certainly, multiple things can be used to measure the effect. Therefore, you need to choose the optimal metrics and validation criteria that'll best envision if you're moving in the right direction.

If you need a tip on how to create hypothesis statements that won't result in a waste of time, try to avoid vagueness and be as specific as you can when selecting what can best measure and assess the results of your hypothesis test. The criteria must be measurable and tied to the hypotheses . This can be a realistic percentage or number (say, you expect a 15% increase in completed orders or 2x fewer cart abandonment cases during the checkout phase).

Once again, if you're not realistic, then you might end up misinterpreting the results. Remember that sometimes an increase that's even as little as 2% can make a huge difference, so why make 50% the merit if it's not achievable in the first place?

Step 4: Settle on the Sequence

It's quite common that you'll end up with multiple product hypotheses. Some are more important than others, of course, and some will require more effort and input.

Therefore, just as with the features on your product development roadmap , prioritize your hypotheses according to their impact and importance. Then, group and order them, especially if the results of some hypotheses influence others on your list.

Product Hypothesis Examples

To demonstrate how to formulate your assumptions clearly, here are several more apart from the example of a hypothesis statement given above:

• Adding a wishlist feature to the cart with the possibility to send a gift hint to friends via email will increase the likelihood of making a sale and bring in additional sign-ups.
• Placing a limited-time promo code banner stripe on the home page will increase the number of sales in March.
• Moving up the call to action element on the landing page and changing the button text will increase the click-through rate twice.
• By highlighting a new way to use the product, we'll target a niche customer segment (i.e., single parents under 30) and acquire 5% more leads. 

How to Validate Hypothesis Statements: The Process Explained

There are multiple options when it comes to validating hypothesis statements. To get appropriate results, you have to come up with the right experiment that'll help you test the hypothesis. You'll need a control group or people who represent your target audience segments or groups to participate (otherwise, your results might not be accurate).

‍ What can serve as the experiment you may run? Experiments may take tons of different forms, and you'll need to choose the one that clicks best with your hypothesis goals (and your available resources, of course). The same goes for how long you'll have to carry out the test (say, a time period of two months or as little as two weeks). Here are several to get you started.

Feedback and User Testing

Talking to users, potential customers, or members of your own online startup community can be another way to test your hypotheses. You may use surveys, questionnaires, or opt for more extensive interviews to validate hypothesis statements and find out what people think. This assumption validation approach involves your existing or potential users and might require some additional time, but can bring you many insights.

Conduct A/B or Multivariate Tests

One of the experiments you may develop involves making more than one version of an element or page to see which option resonates with the users more. As such, you can have a call to action block with different wording or play around with the colors, imagery, visuals, and other things.

To run such split experiments, you can apply tools like VWO that allows to easily construct alternative designs and split what your users see (e.g., one half of the users will see version one, while the other half will see version two). You can track various metrics and apply heatmaps, click maps, and screen recordings to learn more about user response and behavior. Mind, though, that the key to such tests is to get as many users as you can give the tests time. Don't jump to conclusions too soon or if very few people participated in your experiment.

Build Prototypes and Fake Doors

Demos and clickable prototypes can be a great way to save time and money on costly feature or product development. A prototype also allows you to refine the design. However, they can also serve as experiments for validating hypotheses, collecting data, and getting feedback.

For instance, if you have a new feature in mind and want to ensure there is interest, you can utilize such MVP types as fake doors . Make a short demo recording of the feature and place it on your landing page to track interest or test how many people sign up.

Usability Testing

Similarly, you can run experiments to observe how users interact with the feature, page, product, etc. Usually, such experiments are held on prototype testing platforms with a focus group representing your target visitors. By showing a prototype or early version of the design to users, you can view how people use the solution, where they face problems, or what they don't understand. This may be very helpful if you have hypotheses regarding redesigns and user experience improvements before you move on from prototype to MVP development.

You can even take it a few steps further and build a barebone feature version that people can really interact with, yet you'll be the one behind the curtain to make it happen. There were many MVP examples when companies applied Wizard of Oz or concierge MVPs to validate their hypotheses.

Or you can actually develop some functionality but release it for only a limited number of people to see. This is referred to as a feature flag , which can show really specific results but is effort-intensive. 

What Comes After Hypothesis Validation?

Analysis is what you move on to once you've run the experiment. This is the time to review the collected data, metrics, and feedback to validate (or invalidate) the hypothesis.

You have to evaluate the experiment's results to determine whether your product hypotheses were valid or not. For example, if you were testing two versions of an element design, color scheme, or copy, look into which one performed best.

It is crucial to be certain that you have enough data to draw conclusions, though, and that it's accurate and unbiased . Because if you don't, this may be a sign that your experiment needs to be run for some additional time, be altered, or held once again. You won't want to make a solid decision based on uncertain or misleading results, right?

• If the hypothesis was supported , proceed to making corresponding changes (such as implementing a new feature, changing the design, rephrasing your copy, etc.). Remember that your aim was to learn and iterate to improve.
• If your hypothesis was proven false , think of it as a valuable learning experience. The main goal is to learn from the results and be able to adjust your processes accordingly. Dig deep to find out what went wrong, look for patterns and things that may have skewed the results. But if all signs show that you were wrong with your hypothesis, accept this outcome as a fact, and move on. This can help you make conclusions on how to better formulate your product hypotheses next time. Don't be too judgemental, though, as a failed experiment might only mean that you need to improve the current hypothesis, revise it, or create a new one based on the results of this experiment, and run the process once more.

On another note, make sure to record your hypotheses and experiment results . Some companies use CRMs to jot down the key findings, while others use something as simple as Google Docs. Either way, this can be your single source of truth that can help you avoid running the same experiments or allow you to compare results over time.

Have doubts about how to bring your product to life?

Upsilon's team of pros can help you build a product most optimally.

Final Thoughts on Product Hypotheses

The hypothesis-driven approach in product development is a great way to avoid uncalled-for risks and pricey mistakes. You can back up your assumptions with facts, observe your target audience's reactions, and be more certain that this move will deliver value.

However, this only makes sense if the validation of hypothesis statements is backed by relevant data that'll allow you to determine whether the hypothesis is valid or not. By doing so, you can be certain that you're developing and testing hypotheses to accelerate your product management and avoiding decisions based on guesswork.

Certainly, a failed experiment may bring you just as much knowledge and findings as one that succeeds. Teams have to learn from their mistakes, boost their hypothesis generation and testing knowledge , and make improvements according to the results of their experiments. This is an ongoing process, of course, as no product can grow if it isn't iterated and improved.

If you're only planning to or are currently building a product, Upsilon can lend you a helping hand. Our team has years of experience providing product development services for growth-stage startups and building MVPs for early-stage businesses , so you can use our expertise and knowledge to dodge many mistakes. Don't be shy to contact us to discuss your needs! 

Top 30 Financial Terms for Startups

Writing a Winning SaaS Business Plan: A How-to Guide

How to Write a Software Requirements Specification (SRS)

Never miss an update.

• Join the AMA
• Find learning by topic
• Free learning resources for members
• Credentialed Learning
• Training for teams
• Why learn with the AMA?
• Marketing News
• Academic Journals
• Guides & eBooks
• Marketing Job Board
• Academic Job Board
• AMA Foundation
• Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
• Collegiate Resources
• Awards and Scholarships
• Sponsorship Opportunities
• Strategic Partnerships

We noticed that you are using Internet Explorer 11 or older that is not support any longer. Please consider using an alternative such as Microsoft Edge, Chrome, or Firefox.

Hypothesis Testing Tool

This template will help you test a hypothesis as part of a market research effort.

• Estimated time required: 2 hours
• Skills required: Market research

Get Full Access to This Resource With AMA Membership

Market Research Playbook

This tool can be used alone, but it’s also part of the comprehensive Market Research Playbook. It provides step-by-step planning guidance while also helping you utilize more than 25 downloadable tools from the popular AMA Marketer’s Toolkit library.

This tool is powered by Demand Metric .

By continuing to use this site, you accept the use of cookies, pixels and other technology that allows us to understand our users better and offer you tailored content. You can learn more about our privacy policy here

Extract insights from Customer & Employee Interviews. At Scale.

Examples of a hypothesis in market research.

Home » Examples of a hypothesis in market research

In the fast-paced world of market research, the ability to formulate a precise market hypothesis can significantly influence the success of a study. Market Hypothesis Formulation serves as a foundational element, allowing researchers to navigate complex data and generate meaningful insights. By clearly defining what you aim to prove or disprove, you set a focused path for data collection and analysis.

Understanding how to develop effective hypotheses is essential for drawing relevant conclusions that can guide business strategies. Through exploring various examples of hypotheses in market research, one can better appreciate how targeted questions lead to valuable customer insights. This knowledge not only aids in decision-making but also enhances the overall effectiveness of marketing efforts.

Significance of a Market Hypothesis Formulation

Market Hypothesis Formulation is crucial for navigating the complexities of market research. It serves as a guiding framework, helping researchers focus their efforts on specific questions and objectives. By formulating a hypothesis, researchers can articulate their expectations about market behaviors or consumer preferences. This targeted approach streamlines data collection and analysis, allowing for more effective interpretations of results.

Additionally, a well-structured hypothesis encourages systematic investigation and fosters critical thinking. This process ultimately leads to more insightful conclusions, enabling businesses to make informed decisions. By understanding the significance of a market hypothesis formulation, organizations can better identify opportunities, respond to challenges, and enhance their strategic positioning. Whether it’s refining marketing messages or assessing product-market fit, the formulation of hypotheses is an indispensable first step in successful market research.

Why Hypotheses Matter in Market Research

Formulating a market hypothesis lays the groundwork for focused research and exploration. By establishing a clear statement that predicts a relationship between variables, researchers can concentrate their efforts on specific questions. This allows them to gather relevant data, ultimately leading to more accurate insights and informed decisions.

Additionally, a well-defined hypothesis aids in identifying what data to collect and how to analyze it. For example, if a hypothesis states that increasing product visibility will boost sales, researchers know to track marketing efforts and their corresponding sales figures. Testing this hypothesis can reveal not only whether the initial assumption holds true but also deeper insights into customer behavior and preferences. Thus, understanding the importance of market hypothesis formulation creates a framework for effective market research, promoting actionable insights and strategic growth.

How Hypotheses Drive Business Decisions

Formulating a market hypothesis is essential for guiding effective business decisions. A well-structured hypothesis provides a foundation for research and analysis, driving the direction of marketing strategies. Businesses can test these hypotheses through surveys, interviews, or focus groups, refining their products or services based on the findings. This targeted approach ensures that decisions are backed by solid data rather than assumptions, leading to more accurate outcomes.

One key aspect is that hypotheses encourage exploration and innovation. When teams construct hypotheses, they set clear expectations about market trends or customer behavior. Testing these hypotheses allows companies to validate ideas or uncover new insights. Additionally, successful hypothesis testing not only helps validate current strategies but also informs future initiatives. By continuously adapting based on results, organizations can stay ahead of the competitive curve and better meet customer needs.

Examples of Market Hypothesis Formulation in Action

Formulating a market hypothesis effectively transforms theoretical ideas into actionable insights. For example, a company may hypothesize that increasing social media presence will lead to a higher customer engagement rate. This hypothesis can be tested through targeted campaigns and measured by tracking engagement metrics before and after implementation. By analyzing the data, researchers can verify or refute the initial assumption, guiding future marketing strategies.

Another scenario involves a new product launch. A business might propose that consumers will prefer an eco-friendly version of an existing product over the traditional option. Conducting surveys or focus groups helps gather consumer reactions and preferences. The insights gained from these methods can significantly influence product development and marketing techniques, demonstrating the power of market hypothesis formulation in driving effective decision-making and strategy optimization.

Customer Behavior Predictions

Understanding Customer Behavior Predictions remains crucial for refining market strategies. The formulation of effective market hypotheses can shine a light on customer preferences and buying patterns. These predictions enable businesses to proactively respond to changing market dynamics and enhance customer satisfaction.

Focusing on behavioral insights leads to a more personalized shopping experience. For example, we can explore how pricing influences customer decisions—higher perceived value often results in increased purchases. Additionally, mapping customer journeys and developing detailed personas allows for tailored marketing options. This approach not only boosts customer retention but also aids in identifying new opportunities for growth. Exploring these facets is central to formulating a robust market hypothesis that aligns closely with the evolving landscape of customer behavior and expectations.

Product Market Fit Assessment

Product Market Fit Assessment focuses on evaluating how well your product meets market needs. At the core of this assessment is the Market Hypothesis Formulation, which helps define the assumptions about product fit and target audience. Understanding customers' expectations and pain points is essential for shaping these hypotheses. This insight allows businesses to identify potential gaps in the market that their products can fill.

To effectively conduct a Product Market Fit Assessment, consider three key elements. First, customer feedback is crucial in refining product features based on real user experiences. Second, competitive analysis helps clarify how your product stands against others, revealing unique selling propositions. Lastly, iterative testing enables businesses to validate or adjust their market hypotheses based on continuous learning and adaptation. Through these steps, you can create robust assumptions that facilitate product development and positioning strategy, driving sustainable growth in your market.

Conclusion: The Vital Role of Market Hypothesis Formulation in Research

Market hypothesis formulation is essential in guiding effective market research. By articulating clear hypotheses, researchers can focus their inquiries, directing efforts toward specific questions about consumer behavior and market trends. This targeted approach enhances the reliability of insights gained, ensuring that conclusions drawn from data collection are actionable and relevant.

Furthermore, well-defined hypotheses help in identifying the right metrics for evaluation. As researchers analyze data, they can assess whether their initial assumptions hold true, allowing for refined strategies in response to market demands. Ultimately, the process of hypothesis formulation serves as a critical foundation for informed decision-making, driving successful business outcomes.

Turn interviews into actionable insights

On this Page

Random Sampling Definition in Research

You may also like, top b2b market research companies for 2024.

How to pick a top UX research agency

How consumer research agency enhances product offerings.

Unlock Insights from Interviews 10x faster

• Request demo
• Get started for free

• Subscribers
• How To Use a New AI App and AI Agents To Build Your Best Landing Page
• The MECLABS AI Guild in Action: Teamwork in Crafting Their Optimal Landing Page
• How MECLABS AI Is Being Used To Build the AI Guild
• MECLABS AI’s Problem Solver in Action
• MECLABS AI: Harness AI With the Power of Your Voice
• Harnessing MECLABS AI: Transform Your Copywriting and Landing Pages
• MECLABS AI: Overcome the ‘Almost Trap’ and Get Real Answers
• MECLABS AI: A brief glimpse into what is coming!
• Transforming Marketing with MECLABS AI: A New Paradigm
• Creative AI Marketing: Escaping the ‘Vending Machine Mentality’

A/B Testing: Example of a good hypothesis

Want to know the secret to always running successful tests?

The answer is to formulate a hypothesis .

Now when I say it’s always successful, I’m not talking about always increasing your Key Performance Indicator (KPI). You can “lose” a test, but still be successful.

That sounds like an oxymoron, but it’s not. If you set up your test strategically, even if the test decreases your KPI, you gain a learning , which is a success! And, if you win, you simultaneously achieve a lift and a learning. Double win!

The way you ensure you have a strategic test that will produce a learning is by centering it around a strong hypothesis.

So, what is a hypothesis?

By definition, a hypothesis is a proposed statement made on the basis of limited evidence that can be proved or disproved and is used as a starting point for further investigation.

Let’s break that down:

It is a proposed statement.

• A hypothesis is not fact, and should not be argued as right or wrong until it is tested and proven one way or the other.

It is made on the basis of limited (but hopefully some ) evidence.

• Your hypothesis should be informed by as much knowledge as you have. This should include data that you have gathered, any research you have done, and the analysis of the current problems you have performed.

It can be proved or disproved.

• A hypothesis pretty much says, “I think by making this change , it will cause this effect .” So, based on your results, you should be able to say “this is true” or “this is false.”

It is used as a starting point for further investigation.

• The key word here is starting point . Your hypothesis should be formed and agreed upon before you make any wireframes or designs as it is what guides the design of your test. It helps you focus on what elements to change, how to change them, and which to leave alone.

How do I write a hypothesis?

The structure of your basic hypothesis follows a CHANGE: EFFECT framework.

While this is a truly scientific and testable template, it is very open-ended. Even though this hypothesis, “Changing an English headline into a Spanish headline will increase clickthrough rate,” is perfectly valid and testable, if your visitors are English-speaking, it probably doesn’t make much sense.

So now the question is …

How do I write a GOOD hypothesis?

To quote my boss Tony Doty , “This isn’t Mad Libs.”

We can’t just start plugging in nouns and verbs and conclude that we have a good hypothesis. Your hypothesis needs to be backed by a strategy. And, your strategy needs to be rooted in a solution to a problem .

So, a more complete version of the above template would be something like this:

In order to have a good hypothesis, you don’t necessarily have to follow this exact sentence structure, as long as it is centered around three main things:

Presumed problem

Proposed solution

Anticipated result

After you’ve completed your analysis and research, identify the problem that you will address. While we need to be very clear about what we think the problem is, you should leave it out of the hypothesis since it is harder to prove or disprove. You may want to come up with both a problem statement and a hypothesis .

For example:

Problem Statement: “The lead generation form is too long, causing unnecessary friction .”

Hypothesis: “By changing the amount of form fields from 20 to 10, we will increase number of leads.”

When you are thinking about the solution you want to implement, you need to think about the psychology of the customer. What psychological impact is your proposed problem causing in the mind of the customer?

For example, if your proposed problem is “There is a lack of clarity in the sign-up process,” the psychological impact may be that the user is confused.

Now think about what solution is going to address the problem in the customer’s mind. If they are confused, we need to explain something better, or provide them with more information. For this example, we will say our proposed solution is to “Add a progress bar to the sign-up process.”  This leads straight into the anticipated result.

If we reduce the confusion in the visitor’s mind (psychological impact) by adding the progress bar, what do we foresee to be the result? We are anticipating that it would be more people completing the sign-up process. Your proposed solution and your KPI need to be directly correlated.

Note: Some people will include the psychological impact in their hypothesis. This isn’t necessarily wrong, but we do have to be careful with assumptions. If we say that the effect will be “Reduced confusion and therefore increase in conversion rate,” we are assuming the reduced confusion is what made the impact. While this may be correct, it is not measureable and it is hard to prove or disprove.

To summarize, your hypothesis should follow a structure of: “If I change this, it will have this effect,” but should always be informed by an analysis of the problems and rooted in the solution you deemed appropriate.

Related Resources:

A/B Testing 101: How to get real results from optimization

The True Value of Data

15 Years of Marketing Research in 11 Minutes

Marketing Analytics: 6 simple steps for interpreting your data

Website A/B Testing: 4 tips to beat an unbeatable landing page

Online Cart: 6 ideas to test and optimize your checkout process

B2B Gamification: Autodesk’s two approaches to in-trial marketing [Video]

How to Discover Exactly What the Customer Wants to See on the Next Click: 3 critical…

The 21 Psychological Elements that Power Effective Web Design (Part 3)

The 21 Psychological Elements that Power Effective Web Design (Part 2)

The 21 Psychological Elements that Power Effective Web Design (Part 1)

Thanks for the article. I’ve been trying to wrap my head around this type of testing because I’d like to use it to see the effectiveness on some ads. This article really helped. Thanks Again!

Hey Lauren, I am just getting to the point that I have something to perform A-B testing on. This post led me to this site which will and already has become a help in what to test and how to test .

Again, thanks for getting me here .

Good article. I have been researching different approaches to writing testing hypotheses and this has been a help. The only thing I would add is that it can be useful to capture the insight/justification within the hypothesis statement. IF i do this, THEN I expect this result BECAUSE I have this insight.

@Kaya Great!

Good article – but technically you can never prove an hypothesis, according to the principle of falsification (Popper), only fail to disprove the null hypothesis.

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Quick Win Clinics
• Research Briefs
• A/B Testing
• Conversion Marketing
• Copywriting
• Digital Advertising
• Digital Analytics
• Digital Subscriptions
• E-commerce Marketing
• Email Marketing
• Lead Generation
• Social Marketing
• Value Proposition
• Research Services
• Video – Transparent Marketing
• Video – 15 years of marketing research in 11 minutes
• Lecture – The Web as a Living Laboratory
• Featured Research

Welcome, Login to your account.

Recover your password.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Root out friction in every digital experience, super-charge conversion rates, and optimize digital self-service

Uncover insights from any interaction, deliver AI-powered agent coaching, and reduce cost to serve

Increase revenue and loyalty with real-time insights and recommendations delivered to teams on the ground

Know how your people feel and empower managers to improve employee engagement, productivity, and retention

Take action in the moments that matter most along the employee journey and drive bottom line growth

Whatever they’re are saying, wherever they’re saying it, know exactly what’s going on with your people

Get faster, richer insights with qual and quant tools that make powerful market research available to everyone

Run concept tests, pricing studies, prototyping + more with fast, powerful studies designed by UX research experts

Track your brand performance 24/7 and act quickly to respond to opportunities and challenges in your market

Explore the platform powering Experience Management

• Free Account
• Product Demos
• For Digital
• For Customer Care
• For Human Resources
• For Researchers
• Financial Services
• All Industries

Popular Use Cases

• Customer Experience
• Employee Experience
• Employee Exit Interviews
• Net Promoter Score
• Voice of Customer
• Customer Success Hub
• Product Documentation
• Training & Certification
• XM Institute
• Popular Resources
• Customer Stories
• Artificial Intelligence

Market Research

• Partnerships
• Marketplace

The annual gathering of the experience leaders at the world’s iconic brands building breakthrough business results, live in Sydney.

• English/AU & NZ
• Español/Europa
• Español/América Latina
• Português Brasileiro
• REQUEST DEMO
• Experience Management
• The Ultimate Guide to Market Research

Market research definition

Market research – in-house or outsourced, market research in the age of data, when to use market research.

• Types of market research 

Different types of primary research

How to do market research (primary data), how to do secondary market research, communicating your market research findings, choose the right platform for your market research, try qualtrics for free, the ultimate guide to market research and how to conduct it like a pro.

27 min read Wondering how to do market research? Or even where to start learning about it? Use our ultimate guide to understand the basics and discover how you can use market research to help your business.

Market research is the practice of gathering information about the needs and preferences of your target audience – potential consumers of your product.

When you understand how your target consumer feels and behaves, you can then take steps to meet their needs and mitigate the risk of an experience gap – where there is a shortfall between what a consumer expects you to deliver and what you actually deliver. Market research can also help you keep abreast of what your competitors are offering, which in turn will affect what your customers expect from you.

Market research connects with every aspect of a business – including brand , product , customer service , marketing and sales.

Market research generally focuses on understanding:

• The consumer (current customers, past customers, non-customers, influencers))
• The company (product or service design, promotion, pricing, placement, service, sales)
• The competitors (and how their market offerings interact in the market environment)
• The industry overall (whether it’s growing or moving in a certain direction)

Learn from the world’s best market research leaders at X4 2023

Why is market research important?

A successful business relies on understanding what like, what they dislike, what they need and what messaging they will respond to. Businesses also need to understand their competition to identify opportunities to differentiate their products and services from other companies.

Today’s business leaders face an endless stream of decisions around target markets, pricing, promotion, distribution channels, and product features and benefits . They must account for all the factors involved, and there are market research studies and methodologies strategically designed to capture meaningful data to inform every choice. It can be a daunting task.

Market research allows companies to make data-driven decisions to drive growth and innovation.

What happens when you don’t do market research?

Without market research, business decisions are based at best on past consumer behavior, economic indicators, or at worst, on gut feel. Decisions are made in a bubble without thought to what the competition is doing. An important aim of market research is to remove subjective opinions when making business decisions. As a brand you are there to serve your customers, not personal preferences within the company. You are far more likely to be successful if you know the difference, and market research will help make sure your decisions are insight-driven.

Traditionally there have been specialist market researchers who are very good at what they do, and businesses have been reliant on their ability to do it. Market research specialists will always be an important part of the industry, as most brands are limited by their internal capacity, expertise and budgets and need to outsource at least some aspects of the work.

However, the market research external agency model has meant that brands struggled to keep up with the pace of change. Their customers would suffer because their needs were not being wholly met with point-in-time market research.

Businesses looking to conduct market research have to tackle many questions –

• Who are my consumers, and how should I segment and prioritize them?
• What are they looking for within my category?
• How much are they buying, and what are their purchase triggers, barriers, and buying habits?
• Will my marketing and communications efforts resonate?
• Is my brand healthy ?
• What product features matter most?
• Is my product or service ready for launch?
• Are my pricing and packaging plans optimized?

They all need to be answered, but many businesses have found the process of data collection daunting, time-consuming and expensive. The hardest battle is often knowing where to begin and short-term demands have often taken priority over longer-term projects that require patience to offer return on investment.

Today however, the industry is making huge strides, driven by quickening product cycles, tighter competition and business imperatives around more data-driven decision making. With the emergence of simple, easy to use tools , some degree of in-house market research is now seen as essential, with fewer excuses not to use data to inform your decisions. With greater accessibility to such software, everyone can be an expert regardless of level or experience.

How is this possible?

The art of research hasn’t gone away. It is still a complex job and the volume of data that needs to be analyzed is huge. However with the right tools and support, sophisticated research can look very simple – allowing you to focus on taking action on what matters.

If you’re not yet using technology to augment your in-house market research, now is the time to start.

The most successful brands rely on multiple sources of data to inform their strategy and decision making, from their marketing segmentation to the product features they develop to comments on social media. In fact, there’s tools out there that use machine learning and AI to automate the tracking of what’s people are saying about your brand across all sites.

The emergence of newer and more sophisticated tools and platforms gives brands access to more data sources than ever and how the data is analyzed and used to make decisions. This also increases the speed at which they operate, with minimal lead time allowing brands to be responsive to business conditions and take an agile approach to improvements and opportunities.

Expert partners have an important role in getting the best data, particularly giving access to additional market research know-how, helping you find respondents , fielding surveys and reporting on results.

How do you measure success?

Business activities are usually measured on how well they deliver return on investment (ROI). Since market research doesn’t generate any revenue directly, its success has to be measured by looking at the positive outcomes it drives – happier customers, a healthier brand, and so on.

When changes to your products or your marketing strategy are made as a result of your market research findings, you can compare on a before-and-after basis to see if the knowledge you acted on has delivered value.

Regardless of the function you work within, understanding the consumer is the goal of any market research. To do this, we have to understand what their needs are in order to effectively meet them. If we do that, we are more likely to drive customer satisfaction , and in turn, increase customer retention .

Several metrics and KPIs are used to gauge the success of decisions made from market research results, including

• Brand awareness within the target market
• Share of wallet
• CSAT (customer satisfaction)
• NPS (Net Promoter Score)

You can use market research for almost anything related to your current customers, potential customer base or target market. If you want to find something out from your target audience, it’s likely market research is the answer.

Here are a few of the most common uses:

Buyer segmentation and profiling

Segmentation is a popular technique that separates your target market according to key characteristics, such as behavior, demographic information and social attitudes. Segmentation allows you to create relevant content for your different segments, ideally helping you to better connect with all of them.

Buyer personas are profiles of fictional customers – with real attributes. Buyer personas help you develop products and communications that are right for your different audiences, and can also guide your decision-making process. Buyer personas capture the key characteristics of your customer segments, along with meaningful insights about what they want or need from you. They provide a powerful reminder of consumer attitudes when developing a product or service, a marketing campaign or a new brand direction.

By understanding your buyers and potential customers, including their motivations, needs, and pain points, you can optimize everything from your marketing communications to your products to make sure the right people get the relevant content, at the right time, and via the right channel .

Attitudes and Usage surveys

Attitude & Usage research helps you to grow your brand by providing a detailed understanding of consumers. It helps you understand how consumers use certain products and why, what their needs are, what their preferences are, and what their pain points are. It helps you to find gaps in the market, anticipate future category needs, identify barriers to entry and build accurate go-to-market strategies and business plans.

Marketing strategy

Effective market research is a crucial tool for developing an effective marketing strategy – a company’s plan for how they will promote their products.

It helps marketers look like rock stars by helping them understand the target market to avoid mistakes, stay on message, and predict customer needs . It’s marketing’s job to leverage relevant data to reach the best possible solution  based on the research available. Then, they can implement the solution, modify the solution, and successfully deliver that solution to the market.

Product development

You can conduct market research into how a select group of consumers use and perceive your product – from how they use it through to what they like and dislike about it. Evaluating your strengths and weaknesses early on allows you to focus resources on ideas with the most potential and to gear your product or service design to a specific market.

Chobani’s yogurt pouches are a product optimized through great market research . Using product concept testing – a form of market research – Chobani identified that packaging could negatively impact consumer purchase decisions. The brand made a subtle change, ensuring the item satisfied the needs of consumers. This ability to constantly refine its products for customer needs and preferences has helped Chobani become Australia’s #1 yogurt brand and increase market share.

Pricing decisions

Market research provides businesses with insights to guide pricing decisions too. One of the most powerful tools available to market researchers is conjoint analysis, a form of market research study that uses choice modeling to help brands identify the perfect set of features and price for customers. Another useful tool is the Gabor-Granger method, which helps you identify the highest price consumers are willing to pay for a given product or service.

Brand tracking studies

A company’s brand is one of its most important assets. But unlike other metrics like product sales, it’s not a tangible measure you can simply pull from your system. Regular market research that tracks consumer perceptions of your brand allows you to monitor and optimize your brand strategy in real time, then respond to consumer feedback to help maintain or build your brand with your target customers.

Advertising and communications testing

Advertising campaigns can be expensive, and without pre-testing, they carry risk of falling flat with your target audience. By testing your campaigns, whether it’s the message or the creative, you can understand how consumers respond to your communications before you deploy them so you can make changes in response to consumer feedback before you go live.

Finder, which is one of the world’s fastest-growing online comparison websites, is an example of a brand using market research to inject some analytical rigor into the business . Fueled by great market research, the business lifted brand awareness by 23 percent, boosted NPS by 8 points, and scored record profits – all within 10 weeks.

Competitive analysis

Another key part of developing the right product and communications is understanding your main competitors and how consumers perceive them. You may have looked at their websites and tried out their product or service, but unless you know how consumers perceive them, you won’t have an accurate view of where you stack up in comparison. Understanding their position in the market allows you to identify the strengths you can exploit, as well as any weaknesses you can address to help you compete better.

Customer Story

See How Yamaha Does Product Research

Types of market research

Although there are many types market research, all methods can be sorted into one of two categories: primary and secondary.

Primary research

Primary research is market research data that you collect yourself. This is raw data collected through a range of different means – surveys , focus groups,  , observation and interviews being among the most popular.

Primary information is fresh, unused data, giving you a perspective that is current or perhaps extra confidence when confirming hypotheses you already had. It can also be very targeted to your exact needs. Primary information can be extremely valuable. Tools for collecting primary information are increasingly sophisticated and the market is growing rapidly.

Historically, conducting market research in-house has been a daunting concept for brands because they don’t quite know where to begin, or how to handle vast volumes of data. Now, the emergence of technology has meant that brands have access to simple, easy to use tools to help with exactly that problem. As a result, brands are more confident about their own projects and data with the added benefit of seeing the insights emerge in real-time.

Secondary research

Secondary research is the use of data that has already been collected, analyzed and published – typically it’s data you don’t own and that hasn’t been conducted with your business specifically in mind, although there are forms of internal secondary data like old reports or figures from past financial years that come from within your business. Secondary research can be used to support the use of primary research.

Secondary research can be beneficial to small businesses because it is sometimes easier to obtain, often through research companies. Although the rise of primary research tools are challenging this trend by allowing businesses to conduct their own market research more cheaply, secondary research is often a cheaper alternative for businesses who need to spend money carefully. Some forms of secondary research have been described as ‘lean market research’ because they are fast and pragmatic, building on what’s already there.

Because it’s not specific to your business, secondary research may be less relevant, and you’ll need to be careful to make sure it applies to your exact research question. It may also not be owned, which means your competitors and other parties also have access to it.

Primary or secondary research – which to choose?

Both primary and secondary research have their advantages, but they are often best used when paired together, giving you the confidence to act knowing that the hypothesis you have is robust.

Secondary research is sometimes preferred because there is a misunderstanding of the feasibility of primary research. Thanks to advances in technology, brands have far greater accessibility to primary research, but this isn’t always known.

If you’ve decided to gather your own primary information, there are many different data collection methods that you may consider. For example:

• Customer surveys
• Focus groups
• Observation

Think carefully about what you’re trying to accomplish before picking the data collection method(s) you’re going to use. Each one has its pros and cons. Asking someone a simple, multiple-choice survey question will generate a different type of data than you might obtain with an in-depth interview. Determine if your primary research is exploratory or specific, and if you’ll need qualitative research, quantitative research, or both.

Qualitative vs quantitative

Another way of categorising different types of market research is according to whether they are qualitative or quantitative.

Qualitative research

Qualitative research is the collection of data that is non-numerical in nature. It summarises and infers, rather than pin-points an exact truth. It is exploratory and can lead to the generation of a hypothesis.

Market research techniques that would gather qualitative data include:

• Interviews (face to face / telephone)
• Open-ended survey questions

Researchers use these types of market research technique because they can add more depth to the data. So for example, in focus groups or interviews, rather than being limited to ‘yes’ or ‘no’ for a certain question, you can start to understand why someone might feel a certain way.

Quantitative research

Quantitative research is the collection of data that is numerical in nature. It is much more black and white in comparison to qualitative data, although you need to make sure there is a representative sample if you want the results to be reflective of reality.

Quantitative researchers often start with a hypothesis and then collect data which can be used to determine whether empirical evidence to support that hypothesis exists.

Quantitative research methods include:

• Questionnaires
• Review scores

Exploratory and specific research

Exploratory research is the approach to take if you don’t know what you don’t know. It can give you broad insights about your customers, product, brand, and market. If you want to answer a specific question, then you’ll be conducting specific research.

• Exploratory . This research is general and open-ended, and typically involves lengthy interviews with an individual or small focus group.
• Specific . This research is often used to solve a problem identified in exploratory research. It involves more structured, formal interviews.

Exploratory primary research is generally conducted by collecting qualitative data. Specific research usually finds its insights through quantitative data.

Primary research can be qualitative or quantitative, large-scale or focused and specific. You’ll carry it out using methods like surveys – which can be used for both qualitative and quantitative studies – focus groups, observation of consumer behaviour, interviews, or online tools.

Step 1: Identify your research topic

Research topics could include:

• Product features
• Product or service launch
• Understanding a new target audience (or updating an existing audience)
• Brand identity
• Marketing campaign concepts
• Customer experience

Step 2: Draft a research hypothesis

A hypothesis is the assumption you’re starting out with. Since you can disprove a negative much more easily than prove a positive, a hypothesis is a negative statement such as ‘price has no effect on brand perception’.

Step 3: Determine which research methods are most effective

Your choice of methods depends on budget, time constraints, and the type of question you’re trying to answer. You could combine surveys, interviews and focus groups to get a mix of qualitative and quantitative data.

Step 4: Determine how you will collect and analyse your data.

Primary research can generate a huge amount of data, and when the goal is to uncover actionable insight, it can be difficult to know where to begin or what to pay attention to.

The rise in brands taking their market research and data analysis in-house has coincided with the rise of technology simplifying the process. These tools pull through large volumes of data and outline significant information that will help you make the most important decisions.

Step 5: Conduct your research!

This is how you can run your research using Qualtrics CoreXM

• Pre-launch – Here you want to ensure that the survey/ other research methods conform to the project specifications (what you want to achieve/research)
• Soft launch – Collect a small fraction of the total data before you fully launch. This means you can check that everything is working as it should and you can correct any data quality issues.
• Full launch – You’ve done the hard work to get to this point. If you’re using a tool, you can sit back and relax, or if you get curious you can check on the data in your account.
• Review – review your data for any issues or low-quality responses. You may need to remove this in order not to impact the analysis of the data.

A helping hand

If you are missing the skills, capacity or inclination to manage your research internally, Qualtrics Research Services can help. From design, to writing the survey based on your needs, to help with survey programming, to handling the reporting, Research Services acts as an extension of the team and can help wherever necessary.

Secondary market research can be taken from a variety of places. Some data is completely free to access – other information could end up costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. There are three broad categories of secondary research sources:

• Public sources – these sources are accessible to anyone who asks for them. They include census data, market statistics, library catalogs, university libraries and more. Other organisations may also put out free data from time to time with the goal of advancing a cause, or catching people’s attention.
• Internal sources – sometimes the most valuable sources of data already exist somewhere within your organisation. Internal sources can be preferable for secondary research on account of their price (free) and unique findings. Since internal sources are not accessible by competitors, using them can provide a distinct competitive advantage.
• Commercial sources – if you have money for it, the easiest way to acquire secondary market research is to simply buy it from private companies. Many organisations exist for the sole purpose of doing market research and can provide reliable, in-depth, industry-specific reports.

No matter where your research is coming from, it is important to ensure that the source is reputable and reliable so you can be confident in the conclusions you draw from it.

How do you know if a source is reliable?

Use established and well-known research publishers, such as the XM Institute , Forrester and McKinsey . Government websites also publish research and this is free of charge. By taking the information directly from the source (rather than a third party) you are minimising the risk of the data being misinterpreted and the message or insights being acted on out of context.

How to apply secondary research

The purpose and application of secondary research will vary depending on your circumstances. Often, secondary research is used to support primary research and therefore give you greater confidence in your conclusions. However, there may be circumstances that prevent this – such as the timeframe and budget of the project.

Keep an open mind when collecting all the relevant research so that there isn’t any collection bias. Then begin analysing the conclusions formed to see if any trends start to appear. This will help you to draw a consensus from the secondary research overall.

Market research success is defined by the impact it has on your business’s success. Make sure it’s not discarded or ignored by communicating your findings effectively. Here are some tips on how to do it.

• Less is more – Preface your market research report with executive summaries that highlight your key discoveries and their implications
• Lead with the basic information – Share the top 4-5 recommendations in bullet-point form, rather than requiring your readers to go through pages of analysis and data
• Model the impact – Provide examples and model the impact of any changes you put in place based on your findings
• Show, don’t tell – Add illustrative examples that relate directly to the research findings and emphasise specific points
• Speed is of the essence – Make data available in real-time so it can be rapidly incorporated into strategies and acted upon to maximise value
• Work with experts – Make sure you’ve access to a dedicated team of experts ready to help you design and launch successful projects

Trusted by 8,500 brands for everything from product testing to competitor analysis, DesignXM is the world’s most powerful and flexible research platform . With over 100 question types and advanced logic, you can build out your surveys and see real-time data you can share across the organisation. Plus, you’ll be able to turn data into insights with iQ, our predictive intelligence engine that runs complicated analysis at the click of a button.

Learn from the world's best market research leaders at X4 2023

Related resources

Market intelligence tools 10 min read, qualitative research questions 11 min read, primary vs secondary research 14 min read, business research methods 12 min read, ethnographic research 11 min read, business research 10 min read, qualitative research design 12 min read, request demo.

Ready to learn more about Qualtrics?

• Open access
• Published: 24 August 2024

The paradox of aging population and firm digital transformation in China

• Hao Wang 1 ,
• Tao Zhang 1 ,
• Xi Wang 1 &
• Jiansong Zheng 1  

BMC Geriatrics volume  24 , Article number:  705 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Although a number researchers have acknowledged that the aging population inhibits firm digital transformation, others find it promoting digital transformation in some firms. As the relevant literature to clarify such paradox is still scare, this paper wants to fill the gap regarding the labor cost theory, the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis, and the human capital externality theory. Based on the empirical tests of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2001 to 2022, this study detected a U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation. In terms of the institutional environment, higher marketization strengthens the U-shaped relationship by making the slopes on either side of it steeper. However, higher minimum wage levels weaken the U-shaped relationship. In terms of firm strategy, firms with stronger marketing capabilities strengthened the U-shaped relationship. However, firms with higher customer concentration weakened the U-shaped relationship. Overall, we enriched scholarly understanding of the impact of the aging population on digital transformation and demonstrated the dual potential impact of aging populations. Instead of assuming they are detrimental to the economy and society, positive contributions in the form of innovation and progress for companies can be detected.

• Aging is an unavoidable demographic problem in China, with very complex social roots behind it.

• Increased aging has thwarted China's digital economy, but aging is not the only negative impact on digitization.

• The digital transformation process of Chinese listed companies is distinctly heterogeneous in the face of aging shocks.

• By taking into account the institutional environment and strategic development, Chinese companies can seek a proactive path of development to adapt to aging, and even accelerate digital transformation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The life expectancy of the Chinese population has significantly increased over the past few decades due to improvements in medical care and living standards [ 1 , 2 ]. However, China is also entering an aging society [ 1 ]. According to China’s Fifth National Population Census (2000), individuals aged 65 and above accounted for about 7% of the total population [ 1 ]. Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics indicates that this aging trend is becoming increasingly apparent. As of February 2023, people in this age group accounted for about 15% of the country’s total population (C.-C. Lee et al., [ 3 ]. Figure  1 presents data from China’s fifth, sixth, and seventh national censuses, illustrating the aging trend of China’s urban population over the past 20 years. Some scholars predict that this percentage will reach 28% by 2050 [ 4 ].

With an aging population, the labor supply in Chinese society is gradually decreasing, posing a long-term threat to business growth [ 5 ]. However, digital transformation—defined as the full integration of business management with digital technology through the efficient transfer of information and the optimal allocation of resources, thereby significantly increasing productivity—is an important means for companies to mitigate external risks [ 6 ]. Digital transformation is driving Chinese enterprises toward comprehensive upgrades in intelligence and informatization [ 7 ]. This transformation may partially offset the negative effects of an aging labor market.

China’s fifth, sixth and seventh national censuses

Does an aging population necessarily impede digital transformation in enterprises? The answer is not necessarily; this question requires more empirical testing. Previous literature that supports the view that aging has a negative impact suggests that older people are less able to understand digital technologies [ 6 ]. Similarly, some studies indicate that firms may reduce their investment in innovative life service technologies to meet the needs of older customers [ 8 ]. Additionally, an aging population can reduce per capita consumption and return on capital, further inhibiting business innovation [ 9 ].

In contrast, some scholars argue that aging can have a positive impact due to a feedback mechanism [ 10 ]. They believe that population aging forces companies to undergo digital transformation, for example, by encouraging them to enhance employee training and hire highly educated individuals [ 11 , 12 ]. Other scholars point out that the innovation effect of population aging is greater than its cost effect, asserting that digital transformation is better driven by skilled and experienced employees, including older employees [ 13 ]. Indeed, some studies show that population aging pushes companies to invest in R&D for innovation [ 14 , 15 ]. Thus, we argue that the impact of population aging on firms’ digital transformation may be more complex and nonlinear than previously thought.

Current research primarily explores the negative or positive linear effects of population aging on digital transformation, with few studies synthesizing and considering both scenarios. Our study attempts to fill this gap by developing a nonlinear model. Specifically, we propose and validate a nonlinear relationship model to explain the relationship between population aging and digital transformation from the perspectives of labor cost theory, the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis, and human capital externalities. We analyze the boundary mechanisms by which population aging affects digital transformation, considering institutional environment and corporate strategy.

Our empirical tests involve Chinese A-share listed companies from 2001 to 2022, revealing a U-shaped relationship between population aging and digital transformation. From the perspective of the institutional environment, we find that in regions with a higher degree of marketization, the slopes on both sides of the U-shaped relationship curve are steeper, and the vertex shifts to the left. Conversely, in regions with higher minimum wage levels, the slopes on both sides of the U-shaped relationship curve are flatter, and the vertex shifts to the right.

From the perspective of corporate strategy, our study also finds that higher levels of marketing capability make the slopes on both sides of the U-shaped relationship curve steeper, with the vertex shifting to the left. Conversely, higher levels of customer concentration make the slopes on both sides of the U-shaped relationship curve flatter, with the vertex shifting to the right.

The theoretical contributions of our study are as follows. First, we challenge the assumption in previous literature that there is a linear relationship between population aging and digital transformation. Our findings extend and complement the literature by providing a more nuanced assessment of the micro impacts of population aging. Second, our model incorporates factors such as the degree of marketization, minimum wage levels, marketing capability, and customer concentration, analyzing their moderating effects on the U-curve. This extends the boundary mechanism of the impact of population aging on digital transformation and enriches the context for the application of labor cost theory, the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis, and human capital externalities. Third, our findings help policymakers better understand and assess the scope of the impact of population aging in China, informing corporate managers’ strategic decisions and digital transformation efforts in the face of population aging and labor cost shocks.

Theory and hypothesis development

The u-curve relationship between the aging chinese population and firm digital transformation.

According to the labor cost theory, in the long-term, an aging population can reduce staff availability for companies, and thus increase labor costs [ 16 ]. As the theory of finite resources postulates, rising labor costs crowd out resources for digital transformation [ 17 ]. At the same time, the aging population has also created a surge in the Government’s financial pressure [ 18 , 19 ]. This exposes companies to more significant regulatory pressure and tax burdens and impacts adversely the amount of resources for digital transformation [ 19 ]. However, under the active aging perspective and based on the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis, some scholars have suggested that the aging population actually facilitates corporate digital transformation [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].

Griliches, a Harvard-based Israeli economist, first proposed the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis in 1969. This hypothesis analyzes the substitutable relationship between factors of production from the perspective of labor factor flows and labor skill premiums [ 23 ]. In the context of an aging population, the substitution effect of capital for low-skilled labor is more pronounced, which increases the share of high-level talent and facilitates digital transformation [ 24 , 25 ]. Previous studies have shown that the development of artificially intelligent production technologies has prompted companies to replace low-level, low-skill posts with digital technology [ 26 ]. Similarly, studies have shown that the increase in the aging population has led to a relative decline in the youth labor force, which has accelerated the replacement of routine jobs with mainly repetitive tasks by digital technologies [ 27 , 28 ].

The human capital externality theory also suggests that an aging population leads to a decrease in the effective workforce and forces companies to improve the quality of their human capital and recruit well-educated, highly skilled employees, thus facilitating digital transformation, whereas social interactions facilitate the exchange of information and create learning opportunities within the organization [ 29 , 30 ]. Clustering skilled and well-educated employees within a company boosts employee interaction and can generate more active ideas, more opportunities for innovation, and more significant economies of scale [ 31 , 32 ]. Furthermore, as labor costs rise, companies tend to recruit high-level talent for additional revenue [ 33 ].

What exactly is the relationship between an aging population and enterprise digital transformation? The answer is complex and not strictly negative or positive. Scholars who argue that population aging negatively impacts enterprise digital transformation believe that as the population ages, the transformation process is hampered [ 34 , 35 ]. However, businesses are adaptable to their environment. They will continue to adjust to societal aging and higher labor costs [ 36 ]. This adaptability means that the negative impact of aging on enterprises will gradually diminish over time [ 37 ]. In other words, the relationship between population aging and the digital transformation of enterprises is not strictly linear. Instead, the negative impact of population aging on enterprise digital transformation may gradually decline as the population continues to age [ 38 ].

In addition, scholars who support the positive impact of an aging population argue that this effect is not strictly linear [ 39 ]. They suggest that companies can adapt to an aging society by training a portion of their older workforce to master digital technologies [ 40 ]. This training can reduce the workload of older employees and increase their productivity [ 41 ]. Moreover, experienced older employees who master digital technology can effectively pass on their knowledge, creating more benefits for the enterprise [ 42 ]. This transfer of expertise is conducive to the digital transformation of the enterprise.

In summary, the impact of population aging on enterprise digital transformation is not a simple, strictly linear relationship. Initially, as the population ages, the degree of digital transformation in enterprises is hindered and negatively impacted. However, this negative effect gradually decreases over time. As companies adapt to an aging society, their digital transformation efforts improve. Consequently, the positive effect of an aging population on digital transformation gradually increases.

Based on the above analysis, we propose our first hypothesis (H1): a U-shaped relationship exists between the aging population and enterprise digital transformation in China.

The moderating role of minimum wage

Previous studies have shown that increases in minimum wage can have an incentive, an over-protection, and a perceived unfairness effect on employees [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Low increases in minimum wage create an incentive effect according to the efficiency wage theory, which postulates a positive relationship between a worker’s income and their efficiency, and that higher wages boost productivity due to increased effort at work and motivation (especially for low-skilled workers) to upskill and train [ 46 , 47 ]. Therefore, an increase in the minimum wage helps mitigate the dampening effect of an aging population on digital transformation in the short term. However, minimum wages trigger negative impacts when increases exceed a specific size [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. According to the relevant provisions of Labor Contract Law, enterprises are required to pay compensation for the dismissal of employees, whose amount is directly linked to the minimum wage standard [ 48 ]. The minimum wage reduces the cost of employee advocacy, increases the cost of dismissal for companies, and increases job stability. Companies cannot easily let even poor-performing employees go, which dampens others motivations [ 51 ]. In summary, we believe that minimum wage increases will mitigate the negative impact of aging on the digital transformation of businesses in the short term. In the long run, however, the minimum wage will also mitigate the positive impact of aging on firms’ digital transformation. This dual effect will flatten the slopes on both sides of the U-curve, prolonging the negative effects of aging and delaying the onset of its positive effects.

Based on the above analysis, we propose our hypothesis (H2a): higher levels of minimum wage decrease the slopes on both sides of the U-curve and move the vertex of the curve to the right.

The moderating role of marketization

At the institutional environment, the extent of government intervention in the economy and the level of development of formal or informal institutions varies considerably across different regions of China [ 52 ]. In more market-oriented areas, government intervention is relatively low [ 53 ]. Managers’ business behavior and market activities are less regulated by the government, and a high level of trust develops in the region, alongside a relatively high level of financial development and foreign investment [ 53 ].

According to signaling theory, information spreads faster in more market-oriented areas, and the more market-oriented a region, the more sensitive firms are to an aging population. Therefore, the negative effects of the early stages of an aging population are more likely to be transmitted to the digital transformation, as firms in more market-oriented regions are more vulnerable to aging population shocks [ 54 , 55 ]. However, the greater the degree of marketization of the region in which the enterprise is located, the greater the autonomy of the enterprise to engage in business management activities [ 56 ].

When the aging population increases to a certain level, companies cannot cope with labor cost shocks by cutting digital transformation investments [ 57 , 58 ]. At this point, it is easier for firms in regions with a higher degree of marketization to adjust their corporate strategies, which motivates them to implement digital transformation [ 58 , 59 ]. In contrast, less market-oriented regions are characterized by relatively high levels of government intervention in the economy, poorer financing and market environments, weak rule of law, and non-transparent government decision-making processes [ 59 ]. Faced with the pressure of an aging population, governments often increase corporate taxes to alleviate the fiscal crisis, further hindering digital transformation [ 60 , 61 ]. In summary, we believe that higher levels of marketization will amplify the negative impact of aging on the digital transformation of enterprises in the short term. However, in the long run, higher levels of marketization will also enhance the positive impact of aging on firms’ digital transformation. This dual effect will steepen the slopes on both sides of the U-curve. Furthermore, higher levels of marketization will shorten the duration of the negative impact of aging and accelerate the onset of its positive impact.

Based on the above analysis, we propose our hypothesis (H2b): higher levels of marketization increase the slopes on both sides of the U-curve and move the vertex of the curve to the left.

The moderating role of marketing capabilities

Mishra and Modi [ 62 ], based on stakeholder theory, resource base theory, signaling theory, and agency theory, showed that the stronger the marketing capability, the more rapid the flow of information and the more significant the influence of the external environment on corporate strategy [ 62 ]. A high level of marketing capability provides a more convenient signaling channel for enterprises, which in turn improves the efficiency of information transmission [ 55 , 63 ]. While in the short term, companies are more likely to suffer the negative impacts of an aging population on their digital transformation strategies. In time firms with more substantial marketing capabilities increase their hiring of high-level human capital by delivering practical information to the labor market in a more targeted manner, which in turn increases the aggregation of high-level human capital and facilitates the digital transformation of firms [ 64 ]. Similarly, companies with strong marketing capabilities are able to respond to the impact of changes in the external environment by quickly realizing the allocation of internal resources and facilitating digital transformation [ 65 ]. In summary, we believe that higher levels of marketing capability will amplify the negative impact of aging on firms’ digital transformation in the short term. However, in the long run, higher levels of marketing capability will also enhance the positive impact of aging on firms’ digital transformation. This dual effect will steepen the slopes on both sides of the U-curve. Additionally, higher levels of marketing capability will shorten the duration of the negative impact of aging and accelerate the onset of its positive impact.

Based on the above analysis, we propose our hypothesis (H3a): higher levels of marketing capability increase the slopes on both sides of the U-curve and move the vertex of the curve to the left.

The moderating role of customer concentration

In traditional business relationships, there is often significant information asymmetry between the company and the external environment due to organizational boundaries [ 66 ]. Companies cannot accurately estimate customer loyalty, thus leading to higher trust costs and reverse shuffling problems [ 67 ]. In the formative stages of an aging population, enterprises are willing to spend more energy on maintaining extensive customer relationships to cut costs and establish a relationship-trust-based operational model with big customers, which in turn improves market resilience through information sharing [ 68 , 69 ]. Thus, to a certain extent, they can mitigate the rising costs caused by an aging population, which in turn mitigates the dampening effect of an aging population on a firm’s digital transformation. However, long-term trust in big customers by firms with high customer concentration reduces the firm’s ability and sensitivity to changes in market information [ 70 , 71 ]. Moreover, according to the transaction cost theory, enterprises with higher customer concentration have smaller bargaining power and are prone to be encroached upon by the interests of big customers or even lack of independence [ 72 , 73 ]. Losing big customers undermines operational efficiency; arguably, enterprises with high customer concentration also face a higher business risk [ 73 ]. In summary, we believe that higher customer concentration will mitigate the negative impact of aging on enterprise digital transformation in the short term. At the same time, higher customer concentration will also reduce the positive impact of aging on digital transformation in the long run. This will flatten the slopes on both sides of the U-curve. Additionally, higher customer concentration will prolong the negative impact of aging and delay the positive impact of aging.

Based on the above analysis, we propose our hypothesis (H3b): higher customer concentration decreases the slopes on both sides of the U-curve and moves the vertex of the curve to the right.

Research design

Sample selection and data source.

Chinese A-share companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2001 to 2022 were selected as the study sample. We manually collected information on the aging population in provincial administrative units in mainland China from the China Statistical Yearbook [ 74 ]. We manually collected information on aging population from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) for city-level administrative units in mainland China for robustness testing [ 4 , 75 ]. The information on the degree of digital transformation of enterprises come from the Digital Transformation Index of Chinese Listed Companies published by the National Finance Discipline Team of Guangdong Institute of Finance in conjunction with the editorial board of Research in Financial Economics [ 53 , 76 ]. Data on minimum wage standards are from the China Statistical Yearbook [ 77 ]. Data on the degree of marketization come from the China Sub-Provincial Marketization Index Report compiled by Fan et al. [ 54 , 78 ]. Marketing capabilities and customer concentration data were obtained from the CSMAR database [ 79 ]. Control variable data were obtained from the CSMAR database [ 53 , 58 ]. We then selected the sample as follows: (1) we excluded financial, insurance, and securities listed companies with special operating characteristics and accounting systems; (2) we excluded special treatment companies coded as ST (company’s loss for 2 consecutive years) and *ST (company’s loss for 3 consecutive years); (3) we excluded observations that do not disclose geographic information about donations and revenues; and (4) we excluded samples with missing data. Our final sample consisted of 44,418 observations. To reduce the influence of outliers, all of the continuous variables were winsorized at the 1% and 99% levels.

The independent variable of this paper is the degree of aging (Aging) . Referring to previous studies, this paper used the percentage of the population over 65 years old in each province from China Statistical Yearbook data to measure this variable [ 74 ]. In the robustness test, the degree of the aging population (Aging0) was measured using the share of the population aged 65 years and over as a proportion of adolescents [ 80 ]. In addition, we measure aging using city-level old-age population ratios and this data is from CFPS (Aging_city) [ 75 ].

The dependent variable of this paper is the degree of digitalization (Digitaltrans) . Concerning previous studies, this paper adopted the Digital Transformation Index of Chinese Listed Companies, jointly published by the National Finance Team of Guangdong Institute of Finance and the Editorial Board of Research in Financial Economics, to measure the degree of digital transformation (Digitaltrans) [ 7 , 76 ]. The National Research Center for Finance at the Guangdong Institute of Finance in China has launched a research report on the evaluation of the digital transformation index of Chinese listed companies. The report focuses on analyzing the digital transformation status of 2,906 listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2016 to 2020. The index is constructed using big data to identify “digital transformation” related words in the text of listed companies’ annual reports and innovatively uses dual quantitative tools—text analysis and factor analysis—to portray the intensity of digital transformation for each listed company in the corresponding year. The enterprise digital transformation rating indicators in the report are analyzed according to the criteria of “three zones and nine levels” (AAA (highest), AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C (lowest)). The database is managed by the National Finance Discipline Team of the Guangdong Institute of Finance and the Editorial Board of Research in Financial Economics. The larger the value of the Digital indicator, the higher the enterprise’s digital transformation degree. In the robustness test, referring to previous studies, this paper adopted the proportion of intangible assets to total assets to measure the degree of digital transformation (Digitaltrans0) [ 81 ].

Minimum wage is one of the moderating variables in this paper (Miwage) . Referring to previous studies, this paper searched the official government websites, such as the provincial human resources and social security departments. It manually organized the data of minimum wage standards in the local areas [ 77 ].

One of the moderating variables in this paper is the degree of marketization (marketization or MK in Table  2 ) . The degree of marketization indicates the degree of marketization in the province where the enterprise is located, and the marketization index published by Fan Gang’s team was used as a measure of this variable [ 78 , 82 ].

One of the moderating variables in this paper is customer concentration (Customer_concentration or CC in Table  2 ) . Referring to Patatoukasl and Irvine et al., this paper used the proportion of sales revenue of the top five customers to the total sales of the firm to measure customer concentration [ 73 , 83 ]. The higher the percentage of this indicator, the more the firm relies on its top five customers and the more its business is concentrated in that customer group.

The moderating variable in this paper is marketing capability (Marketing_capability or MC in Table  2 ) . In this paper, the stochastic frontier model (SFA) was used to measure the marketing capability. The stochastic frontier production function reflects the functional relationship between the input mix and the maximum output under the specific technical conditions and the given combination of production factors [ 62 ]. In this paper, sales revenue was taken as the output index, and sales expenses, intangible assets and customer relationship management were taken as the input index of marketing capability [ 62 ]. Among them, sales expense reflects marketing expenditure; Intangible assets reflect brand effect, intellectual property and goodwill, etc. The level of CRM reflects the amount of sales obtained from repeat customers [ 62 ]. Based on the above analysis, this paper build a stochastic frontier model of marketing capability: sales revenue = f (sales expenses, intangible assets, customer relationship management). Then, through the regression analysis of the above model, the non-negative inefficiency item in the model was calculated, and then the exponential operation was carried out to obtain the value of marketing capability.

Referring to previous studies, in order to control the influence of other factors, this paper started from the enterprise level, and chose enterprise Size , Growth , Leverage and Cashflow as control variables [ 57 , 70 ].

Empirical model specification

The following model was developed in this paper for Hypothesis 1 presented in the previous section, as shown in Eq. 1. We used a fixed effects model for the regression:

In this paper, the following models were developed for hypotheses 2a and 2b presented in the previous section, as shown in Eqs. 2 and 3.

In this paper, the following models were developed for hypotheses 3a and 3b presented in the previous section, as shown in Eqs. 4 and 5.

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

Table  1 showed descriptive statistics of variables.

This paper reported and observed the correlation coefficient matrix between the two variables to test whether there is a strong correlation between the variables. It was easy to find that the correlation between the explained variables and the explanatory variables in Table  2 was significant, which initially confirmed the rationality of the main regression. Moreover, the absolute values of correlation coefficients among independent variable, dependent variables, and moderating variables were all less than 0.7, so a strong correlation between variables is excluded, indicating that there is no severe correlation between variables [ 84 ].

The impact of the population aging on enterprise digital transformation

In Table  3 , Model 1 was the regression results without adding individual, industry, and annual controls. Model 2 was the regression result with individual, industry and year controls added. From the results of Model 1 and Model 2, it could be seen that the coefficient of the linear term of aging population was significant, and the coefficient of the quadratic term was significantly positive, so there is a U-shaped relationship between aging population and digital transformation of enterprises, and H1 was verified.

Further, we conducted additional research after discovering that some firms operate on a national scale, conducting nationwide recruitment and providing products and services across the country. Consequently, we replaced the independent variable with the national aging variable. We obtained a coefficient of 0.758 for the national aging primary term, which is significant at the 0.01 level. The coefficient for the quadratic term is 0.048, also significant at the 0.01 level. This suggests a U-shaped relationship between aging and the digital transformation of firms, proving that our preliminary findings are robust.

Minimum wage moderating

Further, this paper tested the moderating roles of the institutional environments. Model 1 in Table  4 demonstrated the coefficients in Eq. 3. Referring to the previous analysis [ 85 ],  \(\beta_5\)  showed to be significantly negative. This indicated that the slopes on both sides of the curve decrease, and the shape of the curve flats out, and H2a was proven. And, we found that  \(\beta_1\beta_{5-}\beta_2\beta_4\)  <0, thus, the curve’s vertex moved to the right.

Marketization moderating

Similarly, Model 2 demonstrated the coefficients in Eq. 2.  \(\beta_5\) was significantly positive. This indicated that the slopes on both sides of the curve increase, and H2b was proved. And, we found that  \(\beta_1\beta_{5-}\beta_2\beta_4\) <0, thus, the curve’s vertex moved to the left.

To test the concavity of the adjusted model, we perform the second derivative of Eqs. 3, 4 and 5. The second-order derivative is given in Eq. 6 as:

The second-order derivatives of all the moderated effects models were calculated to be consistently greater than zero, as shown in the last row of Table  4 . This indicates that the curves of the moderated effects models are concave functions.

Marketing capability moderating

Further, this paper tested the moderating effects of corporate strategies. As Model 1 in Table  5 demonstrated, the coefficients in Eq. 4.  \(\beta_5\)  was significantly positive, indicating that the slopes on both sides of the curve increase, and the shape of the curve flats out. Then,  \(\beta_1\beta_{5-}\beta_2\beta_4\)  <0, so the curve’s vertex is moved to the left, and H3a was proved.

Customer concentration moderating

Similarly, Model 2 in Table  5 demonstrated the coefficients in Eq. 5. \(\beta_5\)  was significantly positive, indicating that the slopes on both sides of the curve decrease. Then,  \(\beta_1\beta_{5-}\beta_2\beta_4\) >0, so the curve’s vertex was moved to the right, H3b was proved.

The second-order derivatives of all the moderated effects models were calculated to be consistently greater than zero, as shown in the last row of Table  5 . This indicates that the curves of the moderated effects models are concave functions.

Endogeneity - instrumental variable approach

This part of the study addresses the endogeneity issue in the empirical analysis [ 86 ]. Population aging has deep social roots and is a typical macro-demographic issue. However, the development of population aging may be slightly influenced by companies undergoing digital transformation, as they provide society with increasingly high-quality services and products. This leads to a more inclusive society with better social and medical conditions. Therefore, there may be an endogeneity problem, i.e., a slight reverse causality, between digital transformation and population aging. Additionally, certain omitted variables, such as the increase in economic development and inflation, that affect both population aging and firms’ digital transformation, may also cause another endogeneity problem, a spurious causality that is effected by additional variables that affect the independent and dependent variables, such as social, economic, etc.

This section aims to further identify the causal relationship between population aging and digital transformation by introducing an instrumental variable approach to address possible reverse causality and omitted variable bias. Drawing on previous studies, we selected the reverse-coded historical birth rate (Birth rate) [ 87 ] and life expectancy per capita (Lifetime) [ 88 ] as instrumental variables for endogeneity testing. These two instrumental variables were chosen because, on one hand, historical birth rate and life expectancy per capita do not affect firms’ digital transformation in the current period, and on the other hand, they are highly correlated with the original independent variables.

Table  6 presents the results of these tests: models (1) and (3) show that historical birth rate and life expectancy per capita are highly correlated with population aging in the first-stage regression. Models (2) and (4) demonstrate that in the second-stage regression, population aging and enterprise digital transformation still show a significant U-shaped relationship. In summary, the endogeneity problem, i.e., reverse causation and spurious relationship, is resolved, and the benchmark regression results in this paper remain robust.

Robustness tests

This part of the study attempts to robustly test the results of the benchmark regression by replacing the measures of the independent and dependent variables.

Robustness tests for replacing dependent variable

Referring to previous research, this paper replaced the dependent variable using intangible asset share for robustness testing [ 81 ]. As shown in Table  7 , in Model 1, the coefficient of the quadratic term of the aging population was significantly positive, which proves that the aging population has a U-shaped relationship with the digital transformation and demonstrates the robustness of the original H1 conclusion. The coefficients in Model 2 indicated that the degree of marketization steepens the curve’s shape. The coefficients in Model 3 suggested that the minimum wage flattens the shape of the curve. The coefficients in Model 4 indicated that marketing ability steepens the curve’s constitution. The coefficients in Model 5 suggested that customer concentration flattens the shape of the curve. All of these findings were the same as the original findings, which proves the robustness of the results H2a, H2b, H3a, and H3b, to a certain extent.

Robustness tests for replacing the independent variable

For the dependent variable, referring to previous studies, this paper used the proportion of the population aged 65 to the youth population as a replacement [ 80 ]. As shown in Table  8 , in Model 1, the coefficient of the quadratic term of the aging population were significantly positive, which proves that the aging population has a U-shaped relationship with the digital transformation of enterprises and demonstrates the robustness of the original H1 conclusion. The coefficients in Model 2 indicated that the degree of marketization steepens the curve’s shape. The coefficients in Model 3 suggested that the minimum wage flattens the shape of the curve. The coefficients in Model 4 indicated that marketing capability steepens the curve’s constitution. The coefficients in Model 5 suggested that customer concentration flattens the shape of the curve. These findings were the same as the original findings, proving the results’ robustness of H2a, H2b, H3a, and H3b, to a certain extent. Table  9 demonstrates, the results of the robustness test for replacing provincial old people by the proportion of city old people, which is consistent with the results of the initial regression, to a certain extent.

Conclusions and discussions

The main purpose of this paper is to examine the development and changes in the digital transformation process of enterprises in the context of the aging population in mainland China. That is, this paper explored the impact of the aging population on the digital transformation of enterprises. To achieve this purpose, this paper tested and proved the non-linear relationship of the aging population on the digital transformation based on the complex impact of the aging population on the economy and society. In further research, this paper incorporated four moderating variables at the levels of institutional environments (marketization and minimum wage) and corporate strategies (marketing capability and customer concentration) into the model to explore and examined the moderating effects of institutional environments and corporate strategies on the U-shaped relationship.

Main conclusions

The main findings of this paper are as follows: First, different degrees of an aging population can have differential impacts on enterprise digital transformation. This paper found that the aging population inhibits digital transformation within a specific range. However, an aging population beyond a particular scope promotes digital transformation. The differential impact of the aging population involves two processes: elevating labor costs and changing firms’ human capital structure. The aging population significantly raises labor costs, which causes firms’ hiring costs to rise. According to the theory of limited resources, hiring costs crowd out firms’ resources for digital transformation. In addition, according to the capital-skill complementarity hypothesis, the aging population promotes the substitution of high-skilled employees for low-skilled employees in firms and the recruitment of highly-educated employees. According to the theory of human capital externalities, aggregating high-level talent promotes corporate innovation and generates additional benefits and premiums. By changing the human capital structure of enterprises, the aging population promotes the digital transformation. The aging population and digital transformation are U-shaped nonlinear relationships.

Second, the institutional environments significantly moderate the U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation. The results of this paper found that the degree of marketization strengthens the U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation and moves the curve’s vertex to the left. While the degree of marketization exacerbates the negative impact of the aging population in the short term, it promotes the digital transformation process for a long time. Moreover, firms in regions with more marketization upgrade their digital transformation earlier. Minimum wage mitigates the U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation and moves the curve’s vertex to the right. While the degree of marketization mitigates the negative impact of the aging population in the short run, it hinders the digital transformation process in the long run. Firms in regions with higher minimum wages upgrade their digital transformation later.

Finally, corporate strategies significantly moderate the U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation. This paper found that marketing capabilities strengthen the U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation and move the curve’s vertex to the left. While marketing capabilities exacerbate the negative impact of the aging population in the short term, they facilitate the digital transformation process for a long time. Firms with higher marketing capabilities ramp up digital transformation earlier. Customer concentration mitigates the U-shaped relationship between the aging population and digital transformation and moves the curve’s vertex to the right. While customer concentration mitigates the negative impact of the aging population in the short term, it hinders the digital transformation process for a long time. Firms with higher customer concentration ramp up their digital transformation later.

Theoretical contributions

First, this paper breaks away from the previous literature’s hypothesis of a linear relationship between the aging population and firms’ digital transformation. Previous studies have shown that as the population ages, the decrease in labor supply raises firms’ hiring costs, which hinders high-quality growth [ 46 , 89 ]. However, some scholars have acknowledged the positive effects of the aging population [ 12 , 13 , 90 ]. Similar to previous studies, this paper likewise argues that population aging promotes firms to upgrade their human capital structure in addition to causing cost pressures [ 12 ]. Once the innovation effect of the aging population outweighs the cost effect, it facilitates digital transformation by promoting technological innovation [ 12 ]. Based on the labor cost theory, capital-skill complementarity assumption, and human capital externality theory, this paper integrates previous ideas, breaks through the linear correlation assumption, and proposes and demonstrates the nonlinear relationship between the aging population and the digital transformation of enterprises. This paper reveals the theoretical mechanism of the digital transformation process of enterprises in the social context of the aging population and, at the same time, helps to provide micro-level evidence for the labor cost theory, the capital-skills complementarity hypothesis, and the human capital externality theory from a new perspective of how aging population affects the digital transformation of enterprises.

Second, based on the social environment and economic background of China’s aging population, this paper further clarifies the controversy about the digital transformation process of Chinese enterprises from the perspective of the institutional environment. This paper incorporates the degree of marketization and minimum wage into the nonlinear relationship model between population aging and firms’ digital transformation, further revealing the boundary mechanism by which the degree of marketization affects the relationship between population aging and firms’ digital transformation. Compared with previous studies on the degree of marketization [ 53 , 54 ], this paper analyzes the moderating mechanism of the degree of marketization on the nonlinear relationship between aging population and digital transformation of firms, and finds that, at lower levels of aging population, the firms located in the in regions with higher levels of marketization reinforces the inhibition of aging population on firms’ digital transformation. This suggests that, in the short run, firms in more market-oriented regions are more sensitive to the shocks of the aging population. The paper also finds that firms located in most market-oriented areas reinforce the promotion of firms’ digital transformation by an aging population when population aging is at a high level. This suggests that, in the long run, firms located in regions with a higher degree of marketization are more likely to undergo digital transformation in the context of the aging population. Moreover, the moderation of the degree of marketization shifts the vertex of the U-curve to the left, which advances the time for firms to enhance their digital transformation.

Furthermore, in contrast to previous studies on minimum wage [ 46 , 77 ], this paper analyzes the mechanism by which the minimum wage moderates the nonlinear relationship between an aging population and firms’ digital transformation and finds that, at lower levels of the aging population, firms located in regions with higher minimum wage mitigate the inhibition of digital transformation of firms by the aging population. This suggests that in the short run, firms located in areas with higher minimum wages weaken the negative shock of the aging population. This paper also finds that firms located in regions with higher minimum wages undermine the promotion of firms’ digital transformation by aging population when the aging population is at a high level. This suggests that, in the long run, firms located in regions with higher minimum wages are less likely to undergo digital transformation in the context of the aging population. Moreover, the regulation of the minimum wage shifts the vertex of the U-curve to the right, which delays the time for firms to upgrade their digital transformation. Therefore, this study further enriches and expands the explanatory scope of the impact of the aging population on firms’ digital transformation from the institutional environment perspective.

Finally, this paper incorporates corporate strategy into the model of the impact of the aging population on corporate digital transformation, further revealing the boundary mechanisms of the effects of the aging population on corporate digital transformation. In contrast to previous studies on marketing capabilities [ 65 , 91 ], this paper analyzes the moderating mechanism of marketing capabilities on the nonlinear relationship between the aging population and firms’ digital transformation and finds that when the aging population is at a lower level, firms with higher marketing capabilities reinforce the digital transformation of firms by aging population inhibition. This suggests that firms with increased marketing capabilities are more sensitive to shocks from the aging population in the short run. This paper also finds that firms with higher marketing capabilities reinforce the facilitation of digital transformation of firms by the aging population when the aging population is at a high level. This suggests that, in the long run, firms with increased marketing capabilities are more likely to undergo digital transformation in the context of the aging population. Moreover, the moderation of marketing capabilities shifts the vertex of the U-curve to the left, which advances the time for firms to enhance their digital transformation.

Furthermore, in contrast to previous studies on customer concentration [ 73 , 79 ], this paper analyzes the moderating mechanism of customer concentration on the nonlinear relationship between aging population and firms’ digital transformation and finds that, at lower levels of aging population, higher customer concentration in the firms mitigate the inhibition of aging population on firms’ digital transformation. This suggests that in the short run, firms with higher customer concentration weaken the negative shock of the aging population. This paper also finds that firms with higher customer concentration undermine the promotion of firms’ digital transformation by the aging population when the aging population is at a high level. This suggests that, in the long run, firms with higher customer concentration are less likely to undergo digital transformation in the context of the aging population. Moreover, the moderation of customer concentration shifts the vertex of the U-curve to the right, which delays firms’ enhancement of digital transformation. Therefore, this study further enriches and expands the explanatory scope of the impact of the aging population on firms’ digital transformation from a firm strategy perspective.

Management implications

The findings of this paper are conducive for policymakers to better understand and assess the specific process of enterprise digital transformation under the impact of the aging population. In the social context of the aging population, policymakers should fully consider the role of the institutional environment and enterprise strategies and implement tax incentives and other complementary policies to assist enterprises in pursuing digital transformation strategies and moving towards high-quality development. In addition, the findings of this paper are conducive to enterprise managers facing the impact of an aging population or even other crisis scenarios to clarify the optimization direction of enterprise digital transformation and strive to proactively adapt to the aging population society to promote the process of enterprise digital transformation. Enterprise managers should be prepared for crisis in times of peace and prepare for rainy days, actively predict changes in the external environment, actively adapt to fluctuations in the labor market, continue to absorb and receive high-quality resources, and timely adjustments and planning of corporate strategies to promote digital transformation.

First, enterprises should increase the employment of highly educated employees. This is because strengthening employee training and introducing high-level human capital can effectively enhance the innovation output of enterprises and promote high-quality development and sustainable operation [ 29 , 30 ]. In business practice, enterprises should accelerate digital transformation and upgrading to improve the efficiency of scarce resource acquisition and information transmission to adapt to the social status quo of the aging population rapidly.

Second, enterprises should flexibly formulate their digital transformation strategies based on the characteristics of their institutional environment. The digital transformation process of enterprises varies significantly under different institutional environments [ 46 , 54 ]. Firms can choose institutional environments conducive to digital transformation, such as marketization processes and minimum wages, through cross-regional mergers and acquisitions and cross-regional recruitment.

Third, firms can choose different corporate strategies to optimize the digital transformation. The improvement of marketing capability can contribute to enhancing the brand image of enterprises, promoting the efficiency of resource transformation and information transmission, and improving the quality of development of enterprises [ 62 ]. In specific business management practices, special attention should be paid to the critical role of marketing capabilities. Firms facing a crisis may adopt conservative business strategies and neglect to invest in marketing strategies. However, empirical results show that marketing capabilities facilitate the process of digital transformation of enterprises. Although customer concentration can help firms reduce the cost expenditure of maintaining customer relationships, it dramatically increases the business risk of firms [ 79 ]. Moreover, in the digital transformation process in the context of the aging population, enterprises should focus on developing diversification strategies to avoid the phenomenon of over-concentration of customers.

Limitations and future researches

This study encounters some noteworthy procedural and theoretical challenges. First, our sample consists of Chinese A-share listed companies. Although this sample size is large, it may not comprehensively cover the entire population of Chinese firms. Many medium, small, and micro enterprises are not represented due to data unavailability in the database. To address this, future research could conduct on-site surveys and distribute questionnaires to other enterprises, thereby collecting raw data from these smaller firms.

Second, the development and evolution of aging as a demographic issue have extremely complex causes that are not explored in this study. Third, certain firms may engage in substantial cross-regional hiring and operations, which was not considered in our analysis.

Looking ahead, future research efforts could extend and enrich the contributions of this study in several key areas. First, in addition to relying on secondary data, future research could employ methods such as data mining or surveys to conduct more advanced research on aging and the digital transformation of companies. These methods are expected to enhance the measurement of research variables, thereby improving the objectivity and analytical rigor of the study.

Second, incorporating case studies and obtaining primary data through interviews can reveal subtle differences in the development and evolution of enterprise digital transformation in the context of population aging. Third, broadening the research horizon to include foreign samples, such as those from Japan, South Korea, and Germany, for comparative analysis can provide multidimensional insights, thus expanding the breadth and depth of the understanding of aging.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from China Statistical Yearbook , China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) , Digital Transformation Index of Chinese Listed Companies , China Provincial Marketization Index Report , China Stock Market & Accounting Research database (CSMAR) , but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of National Bureau of Statistics (China Statistical Yearbook) , National Finance Discipline Team of Guangdong Institute of Finance in conjunction with the editorial board of Research in Financial Economics (Digital Transformation Index of Chinese Listed Companies) , Economic Science Press (China Provincial Marketization Index Report) , Shenzhen CSMAR Data Technology Company Limited (CSMAR).

Bai C, Lei X. New trends in population aging and challenges for China’s sustainable development. China Economic J. 2020;13(1):3–23.

Article   Google Scholar  

Zhao Z, Jia H, Chen M. Major socioeconomic driving forces of improving population health in China: 1978–2018. Popul Dev Rev. 2020;46(4):643–76.

Lee C-C, Yan J, Wang F. Impact of population aging on food security in the context of artificial intelligence: evidence from China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2024;199:123062.

Guo A, Ding X, Zhong F, Cheng Q, Huang C. Predicting the future Chinese population using shared socioeconomic pathways, the sixth national population census, and a PDE model. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3686.

Lee R. Population aging and its economic consequences for China. China Popul Dev Stud. 2020;3(3):189–217.

Liu L, Wu F, Tong H, Hao C, Xie T. The digital divide and active aging in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12675.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Wang Y, Su X. Driving factors of digital transformation for manufacturing enterprises: a multi-case study from China. Int J Technol Manage. 2021;87(2–4):229–53.

He F, Ma Y, Zhang X. How does economic policy uncertainty affect corporate Innovation?–Evidence from China listed companies. Int Rev Econ Finance. 2020;67:225–39.

Guimaraes SD, Tiryaki GF. The impact of population aging on business cycles volatility: international evidence. J Econ Ageing. 2020;17:100285.

Shaw ND, Srouji SS, Histed SN, Hall JE. Differential effects of aging on estrogen negative and positive feedback. Am J Physiology-Endocrinology Metabolism. 2011;301(2):E351–5.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Burke RJ, Ng E. The changing nature of work and organizations: implications for human resource management. Hum Resource Manage Rev. 2006;16(2):86–94.

Zhang J, He Y. Research on the impact of population aging on the development of digital economy. Acad J Bus Manag. 2022;4(6):107–15.

Cazacu M, Titan E, Manea D, Mihai M. Offensive Strategy Approach of Aging Population in the context of a Digital Society. Romanian Stat Rev. 2021;3:37–46.

Google Scholar  

Hervás-Oliver J-L, Parrilli MD, Rodríguez-Pose A, Sempere-Ripoll F. The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Res Policy. 2021;50(9):104316.

Narvaez Rojas C, Alomia Peñafiel GA, Buitrago L, D. F., Tavera Romero CA. Society 5.0: a Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6567.

Lee R, Mason A. Cost of aging. Finance Dev. 2017;54(1):7.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Popov V, Reder LM. Frequency effects on memory: a resource-limited theory. Psychol Rev. 2020;127(1):1.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dang D, Fang H, He M. Economic policy uncertainty, tax quotas and corporate tax burden: evidence from China. China Econ Rev. 2019;56:101303.

Rouzet D, Sánchez AC, Renault T, Roehn O. (2019). Fiscal challenges and inclusive growth in ageing societies.

Ding X, Ran M. (2021). Research on the application of role theory in active aging education service system design, editor,^(Eds.). HCI International 2021-Late Breaking Papers: Cognition, Inclusion, Learning, and Culture: 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings 23.

Raeesi Dehkordi F, Eslami AA, Alavijeh Z, F., Matlabi H. Gerotranscendence and active aging: the lived experience. J Relig Spiritual Aging. 2021;33(3):271–97.

Teater B, Chonody JM. How do older adults define successful aging? A scoping review. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2020;91(4):599–625.

Griliches Z. (1969). Capital-skill complementarity. Rev Econ Stat, 465–8.

Su C-W, Yuan X, Umar M, Chang T. Dynamic price linkage of energies in transformation: evidence from quantile connectedness. Resour Policy. 2022;78:102886.

Wu W-p, Chen Z-g, Yang D-x. Do internal migrants crowd out employment opportunities for urban locals in China?—Reexamining under the skill stratification. Physica a: statistical mechanics and its applications. 2020;537:122580.

Ang JB, Madsen JB. Imitation versus innovation in an aging society: international evidence since 1870. J Popul Econ. 2015;28:299–327.

Iqbal A, Olariu S. A survey of enabling technologies for smart communities. Smart Cities. 2020;4(1):54–77.

Loebbecke C, Picot A. Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2015;24(3):149–57.

Harsono Y, Fajarianto O. The influence of Human resources Quality on improving the performance of small and Medium Enterprises in Thousand Islands, North Jakarta. IJEBD (International J Entrepreneurship Bus Development). 2020;3(4):415–25.

Hermawan E, Arifin AL. Human Resources Education and Innovation to face the demands of business in the Digital Age. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan. 2021;6(2):136–47.

Langlois RN, Robertson PL. Explaining vertical integration: lessons from the American automobile industry. J Econ Hist. 1989;49(2):361–75.

O’Donovan N. From knowledge economy to automation anxiety: a growth regime in crisis? New Polit Econ. 2020;25(2):248–66.

Jones RS, Seitani H. (2019). Labour market reform in Japan to cope with a shrinking and ageing population.

Xie X, Xu X. The impact of population aging on SME digital transformation: evidence from China. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(5):e0300660.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Zhu C, Wang Z, Sun B, Yue Y. Urban digital economy, environmental pollution, and resident’s health–empirical evidence from China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1238670.

Urbančíková N, Zgodavová K. Sustainability, resilience and population ageing along Schengen’s eastern border. Sustainability. 2019;11(10):2898.

Sheth J. Business of business is more than business: managing during the Covid crisis. Ind Mark Manage. 2020;88:261–4.

Kraus S, Jones P, Kailer N, Weinmann A, Chaparro-Banegas N, Roig-Tierno N. Digital transformation: an overview of the current state of the art of research. SAGE Open. 2021;11(3):21582440211047576.

Yang X, Li N, Mu H, Zhang M, Pang J, Ahmad M. Study on the long-term and short-term effects of globalization and population aging on ecological footprint in OECD countries. Ecol Complex. 2021;47:100946.

Van Martins G. The effects of COVID-19 among the elderly population: a case for closing the digital divide. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:577427.

Sesen H, Ertan SS. The effect of the employee perceived training on job satisfaction: the mediating role of workplace stress. Eur J Train Dev. 2022;46(9):953–73.

Gupta S, Tuunanen T, Kar AK, Modgil S. Managing digital knowledge for ensuring business efficiency and continuity. J Knowl Manage. 2023;27(2):245–63.

Bruttel O. The effects of the new statutory minimum wage in Germany: a first assessment of the evidence. J Labour Market Res. 2019;53(1):1–13.

Dube A. (2019). Impacts of minimum wages: review of the international evidence. Indep Rep UK Government Publication, 268–304.

Wilson M. (2012). The negative effects of minimum wage laws. Cato Institute Policy Analysis (701).

Clemens J. How do firms respond to minimum wage increases? Understanding the relevance of non-employment margins. J Economic Perspect. 2021;35(1):51–72.

Kong D, Wang Y, Zhang J. Efficiency wages as gift exchange: evidence from corporate innovation in China. J Corp Financ. 2020;65:101725.

Akee R, Zhao L, Zhao Z. Unintended consequences of China’s new labor contract law on unemployment and welfare loss of the workers. China Econ Rev. 2019;53:87–105.

Fieseler C, Bucher E, Hoffmann CP. Unfairness by design? The perceived fairness of digital labor on crowdworking platforms. J Bus Ethics. 2019;156:987–1005.

Pancieri L, Silva RM, Wernet M, Fonseca LM, Hameed S, Mello DF. Safe care for premature babies at home: parenting and stimulating development. J Child Health Care. 2024;28(1):8–21.

Cooper R, Gong G, Yan P. Costly labour adjustment: general equilibrium effects of China’s employment regulations and financial reforms. Econ J. 2018;128(613):1879–922.

Audretsch DB, Belitski M, Cherkas N. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: the role of institutions. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0247609.

Wang T, Li Y-T, Cui C, Liao C. (2022). The Digital Economy driving marketization in China: based on Big data, Al and IoT, editor,^(Eds.). 2022 3rd International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM).

Kong N, Bao Y, Sun Y, Wang Y. Corporations’ ESG for sustainable investment in China: the moderating role of regional marketization. Sustainability. 2023;15(4):2905.

Zhong X, Chen W, Ren G. The impact of corporate social irresponsibility on emerging-economy firms’ long-term performance: an explanation based on signal theory. J Bus Res. 2022;144:345–57.

Considine M, O’Sullivan S, McGann M, Nguyen P. Contracting personalization by results: comparing marketization reforms in the UK and Australia. Public Adm. 2020;98(4):873–90.

Feyen E, Frost J, Gambacorta L, Natarajan H, Saal M. (2021). Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: implications for market structure and public policy. BIS papers .

George G, Schillebeeckx SJ. Digital transformation, sustainability, and purpose in the multinational enterprise. J World Bus. 2022;57(3):101326.

Hermes S, Riasanow T, Clemons EK, Böhm M, Krcmar H. The digital transformation of the healthcare industry: exploring the rise of emerging platform ecosystems and their influence on the role of patients. Bus Res. 2020;13(3):1033–69.

Barbera C, Jones M, Korac S, Saliterer I, Steccolini I. Governmental financial resilience under austerity in Austria, England and Italy: how do local governments cope with financial shocks? Public Adm. 2017;95(3):670–97.

Qiang Q, Jian C. Natural resource endowment, institutional quality and China’s regional economic growth. Resour Policy. 2020;66:101644.

Mishra S, Modi SB. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: the role of marketing capability. J Mark. 2016;80(1):26–46.

Mukherjee D, Makarius EE, Stevens CE. A reputation transfer perspective on the internationalization of emerging market firms. J Bus Res. 2021;123:568–79.

Konopik J, Jahn C, Schuster T, Hoßbach N, Pflaum A. Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: a conceptual framework. Digit Bus. 2022;2(2):100019.

Moi L, Cabiddu F. Leading digital transformation through an Agile Marketing Capability: the case of Spotahome. J Manage Governance. 2021;25(4):1145–77.

Agha L, Ericson KM, Zhao X. The impact of organizational boundaries on health care coordination and utilization. Am Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2023;15(3):184–214.

Allal-Chérif O, Climent JC, Berenguer KJU. Born to be sustainable: how to combine strategic disruption, open innovation, and process digitization to create a sustainable business. J Bus Res. 2023;154:113379.

Baashar Y, Alhussian H, Patel A, Alkawsi G, Alzahrani AI, Alfarraj O, Hayder G. Customer relationship management systems (CRMS) in the healthcare environment: a systematic literature review. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2020;71:103442.

Juanamasta IG, Wati NMN, Hendrawati E, Wahyuni W, Pramudianti M, Wisnujati NS, Setiawati AP, Susetyorini S, Elan U, Rusdiyanto R. The role of customer service through customer relationship management (crm) to increase customer loyalty and good image. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2019;8(10):2004–7.

Chen Z, Xiao Y, Jiang K. The impact of tax reform on firms’ digitalization in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2023;187:122196.

Li M, Liu N, Kou A, Chen W. Customer concentration and digital transformation. Int Rev Financial Anal. 2023;89:102788.

Babar M, Habib A. Product market competition in accounting, finance, and corporate governance: a review of the literature. Int Rev Financial Anal. 2021;73:101607.

Irvine PJ, Park SS, Yıldızhan Ç. Customer-base concentration, profitability, and the relationship life cycle. Acc Rev. 2016;91(3):883–906.

Hu B, Peng D, Zhang Y, Yu J. Rural population aging and the hospital utilization in cities: the rise of medical tourism in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4790.

Guo E, Li J, Luo L, Gao Y, Wang ZJ. F. i. P. H. (2022). The effect and mechanism of Internet use on the physical health of the older people—Empirical analysis based on CFPS. 10 , 952858.

Liu H, Wang X, Liang H, Wang L. (2022). Research on Hot Topics and Development Trend of Digital Transformation from the Perspective of Bibliometrics: ——Based on the analysis of CSSCI, editor,^(Eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial Control Network and System Engineering Research.

Du P, Wang S. The effect of minimum wage on firm markup: evidence from China. Econ Model. 2020;86:241–50.

Fan G, Ma G, Wang X. Institutional reform and economic growth of China: 40-year progress toward marketization. Acta Oeconomica. 2019;69(s1):7–20.

Han Z, Yu C, Li Y, Shi J, Liu Y. Customer concentration and supplier financial performance: an inverted U-shaped relationship. Ind Mark Manage. 2023;113:138–52.

Bellino S, Punzo O, Rota MC, Manso D, Urdiales M, Andrianou AM, Fabiani X, Boros M, Vescio S, F., Riccardo F. (2020). COVID-19 disease severity risk factors for pediatric patients in Italy. Pediatrics, 146 (4).

Jiang K, Du X, Chen Z. Firms’ digitalization and stock price crash risk. Int Rev Financial Anal. 2022;82:102196.

Nie Y, Zhou Y, Zeng Wangh L, Bao W. How does the use of robots promote carbon reduction?——Spatial correlation and heterogeneity analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023. [Preprint].

Patatoukas PN. Customer-base concentration: implications for firm performance and capital markets: 2011 American accounting association competitive manuscript award winner. Acc Rev. 2012;87(2):363–92.

Ali MA, Nawab NN, Abbas A, Zulkiffal M, Sajjad M. Evaluation of selection criteria in Cicer arietinum L. using correlation coefficients and path analysis. Aust J Crop Sci. 2009;3(2):65.

Haans RF, Pieters C, He ZL. Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U-and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strateg Manag J. 2016;37(7):1177–95.

Song M, Wang S. Can employment structure promote environment-biased technical progress? Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2016;112:285–92.

Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Demographics and automation. Rev Econ Stud. 2022;89(1):1–44.

Hoyos CM, Gordon C, Terpening Z, Norrie L, Lewis SJ, Hickie IB, Naismith SL. Circadian rhythm and sleep alterations in older people with lifetime depression: a case-control study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20:1–9.

Jarzebski MP, Elmqvist T, Gasparatos A, Fukushi K, Eckersten S, Haase D, Goodness J, Khoshkar S, Saito O, Takeuchi K. Ageing and population shrinking: implications for sustainability in the urban century. Npj Urban Sustain. 2021;1(1):17.

Schulten T, Müller T. A paradigm shift towards Social Europe? The proposed directive on adequate minimum wages in the European Union. Italian Labour Law E-J. 2021;14(1):1–19.

Drummond C, O’Toole T, McGrath H. Digital engagement strategies and tactics in social media marketing. Eur J Mark. 2020;54(6):1247–80.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all research staff that contributed to the data collection required for this study.

This study is supported by the Research Project of Macao Polytechnic University (RP/ESCHS-03/2020).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao, China

Hao Wang, Tao Zhang, Xi Wang & Jiansong Zheng

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Hao Wang: conceptualization, methodology, literature analysis, theoretical analysis, data organization and analysis, writing. Tao Zhang: conceptualization, thematic guidance, literature analysis, theoretical analysis. Xi Wang: validation, data investigation, financial support, writing-review and editing. Jiansong Zheng: conceptualization, literature analysis, data analysis, theoretical analysis, editing and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Zhang .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

Not applicable, there was no ethics or institutional committee in place at a researcher’s institution at the time the study was conducted.

Clinical Trial Number

Not applicable, because there were no clinical trials in this study.

Consent for publication

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. We confirm that all authors have approved the manuscript for submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Wang, H., Zhang, T., Wang, X. et al. The paradox of aging population and firm digital transformation in China. BMC Geriatr 24 , 705 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05217-5

Download citation

Received : 09 October 2023

Accepted : 12 July 2024

Published : 24 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05217-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Aging population
• Digital transformation
• Marketization
• Minimum wage
• Marketing capability

BMC Geriatrics

ISSN: 1471-2318

• General enquiries: [email protected]